All Episodes
Previous Next
April 24, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
57:43
Can a White Man Be the Democratic Nominee?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me, of course, is my usual stalwart companion, PK.
And once again, it's been a busy week.
It's always a busy week.
Mr. Kersey, please regale us with some of the most significant events of the week, at least from your perspective.
This week has been exceptionally busy because the New York Times decided to once again float that idea that we've been discussing with a headline story reading, and I quote, should a white man be the face of the Democratic Party in 2020, end quote.
And this story was filled with some incredible anecdotes.
I'd like to read from it right now.
As Peter Johnson and Emily Neal waited for Senator Kirsten Gillibrand to arrive at Barley's, a brick-lined sports bar in southwestern Iowa, They gamed out possible nominees in the Democratic presidential primary.
Mr. Johnson, a 27-year-old law student, said the large field was a great equalizer and, quote, if at the end of it we get an old white guy, someone who represents the status quo, it'll be because they've proven themselves, end quote.
Well, that's very generous.
It is.
Well, Ms.
Neal, a dental hygienist, made an agonized face at Mr. Johnson, her boyfriend.
Wouldn't something be lost, she asked, if the historically diverse slate of 2020 Democrats was passed over?
She would go on to say, personally, I'd love to see a woman, who's also 27, Miss Neal, who said this, and if people are being catty and holding gender or race against a candidate, it would break my heart.
This is how the New York Times story with the title, Should a White Man Be the Face of the Democratic Party in 2020, that's how it opened.
Wow, so it would break her heart if someone held race or sex against a candidate.
But she sounds as though she's certainly holding race or sex in favor of a candidate, and I'm not quite sure what the difference is.
Can you explain it to me?
I can't, but I'd like to continue on with the story because, again, this once again shows that war on whites, that top-down war on whites that we're seeing in academia and, most importantly, in the entertainment.
Because, hey, politics is downstream from culture, and if the New York Times decides, let's start putting these stories out constantly, it's a steady drip.
It's a drip campaign, an anti-white drip campaign.
They go on to write, quote, Is a white man the best face for an increasingly diverse Democratic party in 2020?
And what's the bigger gamble to nominate a white man and risk disappointing some of the party's base or nominate a minority candidate or a woman who might struggle to carry predominantly white swing states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania that both Barack Obama and President Trump won?
I'd like to note real quick that Ohio is not mentioned there because Ohio is no longer a swing state.
It is solidly a Red, conservative state, which I find quite interesting.
Oh, proceed, proceed.
I will, I will.
Pam Van Arsdale of Bedford, New Hampshire.
She's 64.
She said in this article she would like to see a minority or female candidate catch fire and worries that nominating a white man could cause some liberals to skip voting in November of 2020.
So the article would then go on to spotlight a number of the minorities and people of color and women who are changing the Democratic Party and it would go on to state that but as older white men they are older white men such as Bernie Sanders such as Joe Biden, who still has yet to enter the race.
And, of course, Beto O'Rourke and the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, Pete... how do you pronounce his last name?
Buttigieg?
Buttigieg?
Butt-edge?
I never actually heard his name.
I don't listen to any shows that talk about him.
We'll just call him Mayor Pete.
So, those are all boring, pale white males, but this article would go on to note that women, minorities, and young people are fueling much of the energy of the Democratic Party, and they are well represented by multiple, well-qualified, political-savvy female and non-white Democrats who are running.
So, once again, we see this top-down media campaign, Mr. Taylor, of the top newspaper in the country asking a rhetorical question.
Is it a proclamation, though?
Are they just saying, hey, who are all these white guys?
What's going on here?
I think this is great.
In effect, they're saying that if you have a Democratic Party filled with non-whites, it should produce a non-white candidate.
They're saying non-whites can only be represented in a fair-minded way by non-whites.
And presumably, they'd be forced to say, out of pure logic to say, that whites can be represented only by whites.
Doesn't this lead to separation?
Which is exactly what you and I have been talking about.
Voluntary separation.
If we can be fairly represented only by people of our own race, doesn't that suggest that the multiracial exercise is fundamentally a mistake?
Now, very few Times readers are going to see it in those terms, but that's what it means to me.
That is the logic of what they're saying.
If a Democratic Party is full of these non-whites, and that essentially rules out a white man, then they are proponents of separation.
Correct.
You're entirely right.
We're not going to talk about this at length this week, perhaps next week again, but there's a black website called News One, which is funded by an actually publicly traded company.
They get massive, massive advertisements from Fortune 100, 500 companies and the entire webzine, the entire online magazine is nothing but a screed against white people.
They actually call gentrifiers in Washington DC colonizers and they continually and constantly attack white people as Colonizers.
That, of course, is a take from the Black Panther movie, the Marvel Cinematic Universe film, where the citizens of Wakanda derisively call white people colonizers.
I bet it goes back a little bit further than that.
I bet it goes all the way back to the Belgian Congo.
I bet it goes back to the Slave Coast and the Gold Coast.
But anyway, be that as it may, white people are perfectly happy to splash out big checks and advertise on sites like that.
But have we completed your analysis of this fascinating article?
Or is there more to say?
We have!
And I don't think we've seen the end of these type of articles.
I think there will actually be... I'll make a prediction to you.
There'll be a cover story.
Is Newsweek still around?
There'll be a timed cover story at some point where that same question is asked.
Is this Democratic slate too white?
Well, Joe Biden was on the cover of Time not long ago.
He was?
And there was a very skeptical subheading.
I can't remember what it was, but basically it was, you know, is this guy acceptable to the Democratic Party?
White man, you know, gotta watch out for these guys, these superannuated things.
Now, on the subject of Joe Biden, I mean, this is really not our beat, but I saw a quite hilarious graphic.
It said, the 2020 Joe Biden t-shirt is already out.
And it was being worn by this attractive lady.
And when it said Biden 2020, there was a pair of hands right across the chest.
You're referring, of course, to his...
You know, his inclination to be handsy, I assume.
He's just a very friendly guy.
But now, weren't you going to tell us, you have a Baltimore story for us.
Well, we want to talk about Baltimore because Baltimore is one of the more fascinating cities in the country.
Gonna be roughly 70% black when the next census comes around.
It's 600,000 people, so it has one of the larger black populations per capita in the entire country versus its overall population.
And there was a stunning editorial in the Baltimore Sun by a gentleman by the name of Enerban Basu with the headline, Suburbanites, come back to Baltimore.
Now, Suburbanites is obviously a synonym usually used for white people.
Because think about it.
White people... 100 years ago, Mr. Taylor, Baltimore was one of, if not America's greatest cities.
It was 88% white in 19... in 2019.
Now it's roughly 22% white.
No, I think you're safe in assuming that Suburbanites is a dog whistle for white people.
It's a complete dog whistle.
And it's fascinating because he opens the piece saying, This plea is made to the suburbanites among us.
If you have disengaged from Baltimore City, please consider re-engaging.
My appeal is not based upon vague notions of virtuous acts.
I appeal to nothing other than your self-interest.
You know, obviously Baltimore was rebuilt in the suburbs.
Who cares about that?
Let's get back to the article.
The editorial.
So many of you tell me that you no longer go to this city.
Often I sense a hint of pride in your voice, as if you have managed to kick a bad habit.
It may seem irresponsible to ask people to frequent the city that reads Healthy Holly.
Given its deeply regrettable state of affairs.
For those who don't know Healthy Holly as that was the book purportedly written by disgraced mayor who's taken a leave of absence, Mayor Pew.
She had a deal with the city and all sorts of organizations that bought large numbers of her book and apparently they were never delivered to the tomb of six-figure deals for this Healthy Holly book.
Half a million, didn't she collect?
She collected quite a bounty for these books.
You know, I'm wondering if those books ever actually were printed and changed hands.
We've talked about it before.
I think there's some evidence that some books were printed.
Let's get back to this editorial plea, an open plea for Whitey to return to Baltimore.
With that in mind, my third rationale regarding re-engagement is based on the notion that our region's cultural heritage and greatness are inextricably linked to the city.
If it is there, you will find the Walters Alt Gallery, the Baltimore Museum of Art, the National Aquarium,
the Maryland Zoo, the Visionary Arts Museum, the Lyric, the Hippodrome, the Enoch Pratt Free Library,
the Baltimore Basilica, the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra, the Maryland Science Center, Port Discovery,
Little Italy, Fells Point, Hamden, Mount Vernon, Harbor East, Johns Hopkins, Fort McHenry,
Poe's Resting Place, Edgar Allan Poe's Resting Place, Center Stage, Reginald F. Lewis Museum,
the Ravens and the O's.
For your own sake, it's time to go back to the city.
There's more than, there's more there than violence, corruption, panhandlers, and squeegees.
See if you can peer through that and find the charm beneath.
Now, Mr. Taylor, when our friend editorializing for white people to come back to the city talks about there's more than violence, corruption, panhandlers and squeegees, the squeegees are Black youth who are armed with squeegees you'd find at a gas station who, when you are stopped at a stoplight, they'll come up and they'll try and clean your windows for a fee.
And this was actually something that Mayor Catherine Pugh, who's taken a leave of absence, she actually wanted to fund these kids because they had to have a job.
They didn't want them engaging in violence.
So she thought, hey, this is a great merger of an avocation and a vocation, and it can keep kids away from violence.
Let's have them squeegee people's cars.
And of course, there's been a lot of acts of violence that these squeegee kids have been involved in.
Well, of course, that's one of the things that was first on the list for cleaning up New York City in the old days, was the squeegee boys who would come and clean your windshield.
And they'd do a lousy job of cleaning your windshield, and then they would demand money.
You'd never ask them to do that.
But the broken window idea of anything that's going wrong just leads to more things going wrong.
That was one of the most offensive things.
As soon as you came into the Honnold Tunnel, here you're stopped at traffic and these guys jump all over you.
And really, it's almost a violent shakedown.
If you didn't give them money, they'd pound on your car.
No.
And so Mayor Pew once encouraged this.
Well, great.
You know, I noticed something about the list of cultural attractions that you're mentioning.
What did you notice?
Well, they all had sort of the whiff of white man's culture to me.
The symphony orchestra, the zoo, the museums, all that.
You know, I don't think those are very diverse places.
No, and if you recall back in 2014, it was 2015 when the Freddie Gray riots were going on. Suburban fans at the
Baltimore Orioles game, the night they broke out, there was an image put on the big screen
that said, due to riots outside, due to disturbances outside, we need you to stay in your
seats because it's unsafe to go outside. And I think I've read where the Orioles
attendance has been down significantly over the past few years because it's largely white people
from the suburbs who go to the Didn't they cancel a couple of games on account of a... I believe they did.
It was even better than that, Mr. Taylor.
The very first empty stadium game.
was played where there was not one fan in attendance because they couldn't guarantee the safety of the Baltimore Orioles fans.
That's right.
The season had to go on, but they could not assure safety.
And it was an ipsy stadium game.
There wasn't one fan in attendance.
You know, the fellow who wrote that article, he should be ashamed of himself.
Listing all of these institutions built and patronized by white people, they're not diverse.
They're not vibrant.
How can you expect people to come all the way from the suburbs to experience such a thing?
Well, again, they tried to replicate what they'd built in Baltimore by recreating in the suburbs.
And, again, if these institutions have low attendance, the question you have to ask is why do these white-created institutions not appeal to the predominant racial group in Baltimore.
That, of course, is 70% Black City.
I think we know the answer for that.
It just reminds me that Oakland used to have a major symphony orchestra.
I will say no more.
Now, let's move on a little further up the coast to Brooklyn.
There was an interesting encounter in the courtroom of Judge Ellen Edwards.
A young man of 18, the name of Ismael Abraham, appeared before her after he was arrested in Brooklyn when he was caught pitching a loaded .38 caliber revolver.
Loaded with five bullets, they say.
Well, that must have been an S&W Chief Special, I'm guessing.
Unless it was six shot with only five rounds.
You never know with these gangbangers.
In any case, he pitches his revolver and runs down the aisle and he's arrested.
Well, this guy's a member of the G-Stone Crips.
He has four priors.
They're sealed because apparently he just turned 18, and so these were juvenile offenses.
But we know that at least two, within the last year, were for firearms possession.
Now, this case has been disposed of by Judge Ellen Edwards, and even I was a little bit surprised at how she decided to handle this case.
First of all, she rejected a prosecutor's request that bail be set at $25,000.
She dispensed with bail entirely.
Yes.
She's taken care of the case now.
Due punishment has been meted out.
And punishment consists of an 8 p.m.
curfew.
I don't know for how long.
And he has to write a report on gun violence in the community.
Now, we don't know how many pages, and we don't know when it's due.
But that is apparently all that this fellow has to do.
This is at least his third gun violation.
A guy with a whole batch of priors.
Now, let me, I suppose, probably our listeners can assume that we're talking about an all-black cast here.
Judge Edwards, and I would also point out that she is an elected judge.
I don't suspect that anyone with any authority would appoint her, but in 2017 she came in fifth among candidates for six seats in the Brooklyn Civil Court.
Now, why it is that she's been assigned to sit in Brooklyn Criminal Court is a mystery to me, but she has most of the rest of her 10-year term to serve.
And I just bring this up as an interesting kind of example of the sort of justice that we can expect as the country changes demographically.
This reminds me of this little thing that you might read about in a court in Zimbabwe, a court in South Africa.
But yes, he'll have his little homework assignment, he'll have his 8 p.m.
curfew, and You know, it would be a little bit of a bother to track this guy, this Ishmael Abraham, but I would bet just about any amount of money that this is not his last time to appear in court.
It won't be, but what you just said about the judicial system being, quote-unquote, Africanized.
Think what's happening in Dallas, Texas.
It's a 29% city now.
29% white city, Dallas, Texas.
And they have a new district attorney, he's a light-skinned black guy, who came out and said that they're no longer going to prosecute criminal shoplifting under $750 because too many people of color are getting swamped, are getting Swallowed into the criminal justice system.
That's right.
Unjustly.
Yes, and so it's basically a license to steal.
That's right.
If this goes through.
You know, I believe it was, well Seattle has already been doing this, they decriminalized what they call crimes of homelessness.
That is to say public defecation, littering, loitering, because people of color were coming, were being caught up in the enforcement of these laws.
As I recall, there was one city that had done a similar sort of thing, making it essentially decriminalized to steal anything less than what was grand larceny, which is something like $900, whatever it was.
And one of the things that some of the stores were doing, carefully recording, video recording, all of these crimes until they get a repeat shoplifter to have gotten a total of more than $900.
Then they call the police because only then, and this may be over a period of days or weeks, only then will they get any satisfaction out of the police.
No, this is really quite astonishing.
The fact is, that's not Africanization.
Africanization would be if you steal from a guy, the surrounding people beat you to death.
Yeah, that's true.
You know I don't like your black-run America, but this is America run for blacks.
Correct!
Exactly!
This is a perfect example.
Anyway, we have another black lady who's in the news.
Her name is Whitney Davis.
She was apparently a mid-level executive at CBS.
And she has since left the company, and she's written a stinging letter denouncing CBS, accusing it of, as the headline of her story that appeared in Variety just the other day, says, CBS has a white problem.
He's got a white problem.
Yes, they do.
Like the whole country.
Like the whole world.
Like the Democratic Party.
Yes.
Oh, they have a white problem, too.
And the subhead for this article was Executive Blast's Toxic Culture.
Well, this all dates back to last year when, as you may recall, Leslie Moonves, if that's how you pronounce his name, the CEO of CBS, got in trouble.
He had wandering hands, too, apparently.
And so he was ousted.
And they called in these two white-shoe law firms to deal with this.
And Ms.
Whitney Davis says that she talked to six attorneys.
detailing her experience in a heart-wrenching two-hour session and she talked about how the workplace was fraught with systemic racism, discrimination, sexual harassment, and she expected something to be done.
Wow, apparently nothing was done.
And so now she is explaining what was done to her.
And she wrote this whole list of things that were done.
And some perhaps true, some perhaps not.
But I think it's interesting that what she calls systemic discrimination and a toxic culture.
Apparently one CBS Evening News senior producer used to share inappropriate sexual jokes with her and touch her hair.
Another, now, and this, this, well, you know, perhaps true, perhaps not.
Some co-worker once said to her, and she quotes him as saying, my dad has slept with black women and he loved it.
Apparently he didn't use the word slept with, he used a monosyllable that begins with F. And then apparently in 2009, a white female colleague used the N word in her presence.
Now, you know, I, I'm always surprised by these stories of people at CBS or in universities or in big companies using the n-word.
I mean, I don't know anybody who uses the n-word.
No, neither do I. The only person we know who we've heard about who has used it is someone who lost his entire And we're talking about Papa John's himself.
Remember when he tried to defend himself and he just used the word, and then they used that, and he was using it in the context.
Exactly.
Trying to make a point.
And that was enough to cause him to lose his empire.
That's my suspicion here.
In 2009, a white female colleague used the N-word.
She was probably quoting someone.
She wasn't calling anyone that, or she certainly wasn't calling the author of this piece, Whitney Davis, But, you know, all of this talk, and as I say, all you need to do is pronounce the word, no matter what the context, even if you're quoting someone.
But anyway, then she says, she noted the overwhelming majority of creators, producers, and hired writers at CBS were white and male.
And then she says an executive made an Aunt Jemima joke.
Now, once again, you'd have to know the context.
An Aunt Jemima joke.
And then, finally, she says she's struggled and struggled, but she's promoted to manager of CBS Entertainment Diversity and Inclusion.
Here she is, she's got a job that she's supposed to be whooping up the numbers, but she's finally given up in despair because it was not what she called a creative role.
She wanted to be casting, she wanted to be choosing who's on what programs, and she says, it has taken me 13 years to harness the courage to speak my truth.
I'm speaking out to encourage other black Latinx native API, disabled, or LGBTQ?
Why doesn't she say and LGBTQ?
They could be all of those things.
To know that we don't have to tolerate what is intolerable.
And so the fact is she's been promoted several times.
She was, as I say, a mid-level executive.
She's quite a light-skinned black, as far as I can tell.
But, and at least this article in Variety gave some of the people she mentioned a chance to reply, and some of them say outright, completely untrue, completely untrue.
But this is, once again, the inevitable problem when you have people who walk into a place with a chip on their shoulder.
I'm sure that it was unpleasant to be told that someone's father had sexual relations with people who looked like you and enjoyed it, but I suppose it'd be worse to be told they didn't enjoy it at all.
But whatever the case, This is inevitable in this multi-racial, on-its-edge society, and I suspect that CBS, CBS probably, bends over backwards, just like all of these Ivy League universities, all of these places that are constantly being accused of entrenched white supremacy.
You can't No, you can't.
It is simply impossible to try to establish anything that works that's in a multiracial environment.
But what most white people, I fear, will see when they read this, they will hear these things that, oh, how horrible, oh, how horrible, we white people must reform, we must do better, we must do better.
Of course, if black people, I wish their attitude would be, okay, we'll start our own company.
It's funny, CBS is the same company that commissioned and put out that ad where they said it was okay to punch a Nazi.
The good fight.
I think there was an article at AR that was published a few weeks ago regarding that piece where speech is now equated with violence in the eyes of the left, thus it follows we need to stamp it out before... I wonder how many White people at CBS have ever had to sit through any strategy sessions in which people discuss just how wicked, awful, and horrible white people are, past and present?
But no, that certainly doesn't count for anything.
Anyway, that is our second black lady who was in the news this week.
Now, I believe you were going to tell us about a city in Mexico.
A city in Mexico.
What we're going to talk about is, are we going to talk about what happened on the border?
Are we going to talk about what's going on?
Your choice.
Your choice.
Well, this was a story that a lot of people talked about because they thought it was a sign.
We spend $700 billion a year on defense.
And there was a story that broke about some of our troops.
There was an unmarked vehicle of two US soldiers stationed at the border in El Paso County, Texas.
And there was reported that a group of five or six suspected Mexican soldiers on April 13 at about 2 PM,
they ordered them out of the vehicle, according to Newsweek, Mr. Taylor, which obtained
the serious incident report.
The soldiers were, in fact, active duty members of B Battery, 1st Battalion, the 37th Field Artillery Regiment, not from a National Guard unit.
The Mexican soldiers disarmed!
Now, this is on American soil, ladies and gentlemen.
The Mexican soldiers disarmed one of the U.S.
soldiers and placed his sidearm in the U.S.
vehicle.
While the soldiers were parked south of the border fence near Clint, Texas, they were north of the Rio Grande Riverbed, which placed them appropriately in the U.S.
territory, according to Major Mark Lezane, a spokesman for NORTHCOM.
Customs and Border Protection and the Department of Defense, after inquiring of the Mexican government, were informed that the Mexican soldiers thought that the Americans were south of the border, thus on Mexican territory.
Throughout the incident, the U.S.
soldiers followed all established procedures and protocols, according to NORTHCOM.
Now, NORTHCOM confirmed there are approximately 2,800 service members assigned to the border mission.
I think President Trump sent a number of troops down there.
To try and stop this so-called invasion, which is not working.
Northcom would go on to state that quote this includes approximately 1,200 in the mobile surveillance camera mission plus roughly 1,000 service members hardening ports of entry in Texas and New Mexico.
There are roughly approximately 200 personnel as part of the crisis response force with the remainder being headquarters and logistics personnel supporting the mission.
Well, the point is, these are American active duty service personnel on the U.S.
side of the border who are being disarmed at gunpoint by Mexicans.
Now, as this story explains, this is north of Rio Grande, which is the border, although it was south of the border fence.
Now, some people think of this as some sort of extremely provocative and deliberate insult to the United States.
We just don't know what the facts are.
I didn't think this was a particularly significant story because it could have been an honest mistake.
I think if they... Who knows?
But... And it was an unmarked car, was it not?
It was.
It wasn't clearly a military vehicle.
If it had been a Humvee, an olive drab Humvee, maybe they wouldn't have done it.
I just don't know.
But it is disturbing if this is just sort of the Mexicans flexing their muscles and trying to intimidate us.
But we'll see.
Now, the fact is, I imagine this is one of those stories that will just disappear.
Even if it does turn out that the Mexicans knew perfectly well what they were doing, and they were just trying to intimidate us, this is one of those stories that will drop from view.
Oh, it is going to have...
The ability to be used by the conservative outrage machine.
It'll generate a lot of clicks.
I doubt anyone's going to remember it in a couple weeks.
No, it'll be gone.
Correct.
It'll be gone.
Now, it would have been a vastly more important story if the American servicemen had refused to be disarmed.
We would never have heard about it, probably.
It would have been declassified and the government would have done everything they could to cover up what had happened.
An interaction between The Mexican United States government.
No, I definitely would not have heard about it.
Okay, I'm afraid you're right about that.
But, yes, tell us about this Mexican city.
Well, there's a Mexican town, which, once again, this is from the New York Times.
The title is, Mexican Town Once Welcomed Migrants, Now It Blames Mexico's President for Them.
And it starts out by telling us that, like so many others in this impoverished part of southern Mexico, Joaquin Ramirez, a corn farmer, He eagerly cast his vote for the leftist presidential candidate, André Manuel López Obrador.
Obrador.
That means worker, you know.
That's right.
But five months later, Mr. Ramírez's view of the president has soured.
The reason is because he said it's evident the tens of thousands of migrants from Central America and elsewhere who have stopped in this small town in recent months en route to the United States border have taxed government resources in the patience of of residents of the small town of
Ma...Pastapak?
Is that how you pronounce it, do you think?
It's as good as it gets as mine.
Yeah, and he blames the influx on the president's quote, migrant-friendly messaging
and policies.
Quote, by trying to do good, he has done a lot of bad.
It seems like he is more worried about them than about his own people.
End quote.
Now, Mr. Ramirez's quote again, I love that because that coincides with that idea that I love to use.
Because we live here.
Mr. Ramirez, he probably has called this small town in southern Mexico, Mapastepac, home his entire life.
And yeah, he hoped, he had high aspirations for this leftist president.
Just as a lot of conservatives, a lot of right-wing people in our country had for President Trump.
And just like we have been, had our hopes dashed, Mr. Ramirez, that is as well, and he talks about, I love that line, more worried about the invaders, they don't say invaders, but this invasion force, which is basically what it is, than about his own people.
Now, the resentment is heated enough that local officials in the nearby town of Huxtla, again, H-U-I-X-T-L-A, I'm not going to even try and pronounce that correctly, they tried to block about 2,000 migrants from entering the town in the past few days.
declaring an emergency and telling residents to close their shops and remain inside their homes.
This sentiment has been particularly abundant in recent days as well, with more than 8,000 migrants
passing through the state, most of them fleeing the poverty and violence in Central America.
Many, if not most, intend to head to the northern Mexican border, where, guess what?
They're going to try and claim asylum.
And they're going to try and wait to apply for sanctuary in the United States of America.
Where can we apply from sanctuary, Mr. Taylor, from this increasingly anti-white zeitgeist
that has enraptured every aspect of polite American society?
Well, we are the sanctuary.
This podcast is a sanctuary.
Our YouTube channel is a sanctuary.
Our website is a sanctuary.
The books that we write, the conferences that we hold, these are all sanctuaries.
And I think more and more white Americans are realizing that this is part of our mental health.
To be able to speak out, to share our views with people who see things as we do.
And I'm glad to provide this opportunity for people.
It's sort of, I sometimes think of it as mental health.
And we get the communications from readers and listeners all the time, viewers who say that it is a form of mental health to realize that, yes, they have friends, they have associates, they have people who see it the same way.
Well, think about it.
In 2019, Congress, the United States Congress, what did they do?
It was early 2019.
What did they do when there was a congressman from Iowa who was attacked for a misquotation in a New York Times interview?
What did they do?
They crushed him.
They passed this resolution condemning white supremacy.
But of course he voted for it for himself.
He voted for it himself in an astonishing act.
Of self-immolation.
But to get back to this whole question of illegals coming our way, the Rand Corporation has released, they released just on Monday, I think a very, very interesting report that breaks down how much it costs to get here.
And they concluded that in 2017, and that's just the beginning because 2018 is shaping up to be a bigger year for smuggling in illegals, The human smugglers took in more than two billion dollars.
Two billion!
That's astonishing.
It's astonishing.
Just to get to the United States.
Now, they figure, on average, for a typical Honduran to get here, you know how much it costs?
How much does it cost?
$10,000.
That's a lot of money.
These are not the poorest of the poor.
$10,000.
How many people you know just could come up with $10,000 for a little vacation trip?
They'd be taking on a substantial amount of debt to be able to fund such a trip.
Some of these people do go into debt, and some have to pay the coyotes after they've presumably gotten some sort of off-the-books job in the United States.
But in any case, $10,000.
Now, if I were a coyote, I don't think I would just take anybody along.
You have to become, in effect, a judge of credit risk.
If you're going to let somebody go into debt, pay off the $10,000.
In any case, $2,000 covers the expenses to get to Reynosa in Mexico.
Say it comes from Honduras.
That includes buying off police checkpoints in Guatemala and Mexico, transport, housing, and food.
That gets you into Mexico.
$2,000.
Now, then another $300 is the cartel fee.
That's what you have to pay the Gulf Cartel just to travel through their territory.
This is just a standard part of it.
And the Gulf Cartel, every year, makes about $130,000,000.
They just pocket $130,000,000.
This is like a toll road, you know?
$130 million.
Yeah, yeah, this is like a toll road, you know?
Then, now this is the big expense, $5,000 for the coyote in charge of a U.S.
border crossing and getting as far as Houston.
Once you're in Reynosa, Mexico, it's going to cost you $5,000 to cross the border.
Now, that is a tribute to the wall.
That is a tribute to the Border Patrol.
to the border patrol, if people are prepared to pay $5,000, that means no clown can just waltz across, in any case.
Then, now, if you want to travel past Houston, further into the interior, it's maybe another $1,500.
So you might be paying these Mexicans $6,500 just to get from Mexico to the United States.
Then, a thousand bucks.
$1,000 goes to a coyote who goes through Mexico with these people who are traveling up through Mexico and then another $1,700 was the commission of the person back in Honduras who arranged the deal to begin with.
So you add all this up and it's a cool $10,000.
Incredible.
Yes.
Now this is big business because back in fiscal year 2017, this is what we're talking about, in which the $2 billion was swallowed up in this process.
At that time, there were about 300,000 migrants from Central America who crossed the border, including about 80,000 family units, they say.
The new fiscal year is only half done.
Last year, 300,000.
This year, 361,000.
300,000 this year, 361,000.
Including last year's 80,000 family units, this time we've got 200,000 family units.
That's a lot of money.
That is, I mean, this is gonna, by 2018.
2018 is going to probably be a $5 billion year.
That's big business.
Where is this money being funneled?
What banks are funneling it?
How is this done?
What an operation.
It's probably the bank of the paper bag.
That'd be my guess.
But this is big, big money.
And of course, this is all becoming such a ramped up process because, as you know, and as we complain about practically every week, once these people show up with their families, they cannot be separated.
Then they have to be released into the interior of the United States.
They give them a nice court date, say, see you next year, fellas.
And they say, yes, yes, we'll be there for sure.
Si, si, si.
Si, si, senor.
Si, si, senor, gringo, estupido.
What is it, 90% don't show up for their court dates?
That's exactly right.
Never see them again.
90% don't show up.
I hate this cliche of a broken system, but if there ever was a broken system that people are exploiting to the hilt, it's this one.
I just wonder, how many, even Democrats, think this is good?
I mean, they just show up, and how many are we supposed to take?
For how much longer is this to go on?
I think we have an almost touching story from Yuma, Arizona.
That reminds me of Johnny Yuma.
We'll take the 310 to Yuma with a story.
Yes, Yuma.
This is a city on the US-Mexico border.
It's become the first in the nation to declare a state of emergency.
Now, ordinarily cities do not because they cannot declare a state of emergency.
It's something that governors can do and governors can appeal to the federal government and the federal government can recognize a state of emergency.
But there's so much illegal immigration That this city, it's a population of 100,000.
In the past three weeks alone, they got 13,000 of these illegals dumped on them by the U.S.
Border Patrol.
The Border Patrol doesn't necessarily want to do that, but they're not allowed to hold them.
They can't separate families, etc., etc.
And the only shelter in Yuma is a former Salvation Army thrift shop that has space for 200 people.
It's been full.
Full to capacity.
For a long time.
And the mayor, Douglas Nichols, he is a Republican.
He made the declaration just Tuesday.
And he says, it ain't going to change anything legally.
I'm just trying to call attention to this crazy situation that our federal government has dumped on us.
He says that, of course, federal law requires that they do whatever they can for these people.
And he says, you've got to have all these people wandering around, and the temperature in the summer gets above 100 degrees.
It gets hot there.
It gets hot there.
He says we could have a, quote, catastrophic situation.
Now, this is another incredible thing.
Yuma does not even have enough intercity bus service to take 1,300 migrants in a few weeks out of town.
They don't even have enough Greyhounder Trailways to get them out of there.
What is this?
It's just, it's insanity.
And you would think that they'd take them to a place like El Paso.
It's got a little bit more, a little bit more capacity, but neither does El Paso have capacity.
In that area, because there was no place to put these people that have to be looked after, the border patrol was housing them under a bridge.
Did you hear about that?
I did hear about it, yes.
Now that prompted a national outcry, so they have got a tent complex about 12 miles from the border where they are housed before they can arrange to find local groups that will take them or relatives somewhere that will take them.
This is If this were not a a real emergency and a catastrophe, you could call it a comedy.
Sticking them under bridges, putting them up in tents, but judging from the figures that we saw earlier that we not just in the first six months We have got more than twice as many of these family units, hundreds of thousands of people, that have got to be put somewhere.
This is the kind of America... Well, they have to be put somewhere because of the failure to change the asylum laws, the lack of an executive order on birthright citizenship, the abject failure of the Trump administration.
Yeah, well, part of it you can blame, of course, on the Congress because there are laws involved here.
Now, one of the craziest laws is if you have unaccompanied minors or children and families that come from either Canada or Mexico, if they're from either of those countries, you can pitch them.
Correct.
Send them right back.
But if they're from any other country in the world, then they get special treatment.
This has to do with some sort of convoluted thinking in terms of they could be, if they've come from a long way, that means that they are probably victims of child traffickers and you have to take special precautions for them.
But this is insane.
But apparently, the American Congress would have to act to change that.
And I don't think Well, think about it this way.
Cortez would vote to change that law. In fact, if that law came up, she would
probably say you can't, they would change it to say you can't pitch him from
Canada over Mexico either. Well, think about it this way, Bernie Sanders, who a
lot of people believe is a front-runner for the Democratic nomination for
president, he's already come out and said, hey, illegal aliens are already Americans.
I mean, we are at a point now where, we've talked about this, white liberals' views
on illegal aliens have catastrophically changed to a point where they are
diametrically opposed to where they were 20-25 years ago in the early 90s on
their view of illegal aliens, whereas white conservatives roughly stayed the same on their disapproval of what's
happening.
Yeah.
You'd like to think that news stories like this are going to bounce some of these white liberals out of their foolish mindset as well.
But I guess we can continue to hope.
Then, of course, there was a FAIR study.
That just came out.
The Federation of American Immigration Control.
They do pretty good work.
They do great work.
Well, some people say that in terms of the amount of money they burn through in their budget, they could do greater work, but I don't like to take sides in debates of that kind.
I'm thankful for what they do accomplish.
They found that illegal immigrants are net consumers of taxpayer benefits worth more than $100 billion a year.
So, while the coyotes and their other networks get $2 billion to bring them here, that's just chump change to what you and I are stumping up for these people.
And this doesn't include any kind of border enforcement.
Now, federal benefits are supposed to be off-limits.
But in fact, they're not.
And see, this is something I don't understand.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development that hands out subsidized housing vouchers, they say there are 25,000 illegals who are getting subsidized housing.
They're not supposed to, but they know they're there.
How come they just don't give them the boot?
Be pretty easy.
Be very easy.
You'd think so.
If they know they're illegal, and it's against the law to give illegals subsidized housing, why are they there?
Inquiring minds want to know.
But we've got statistics on them anyway, and of course the children get free education, and most of them qualify for English lessons, because of course they don't speak English, and free school breakfasts, and free school lunches.
Then, now, the illegal immigrants do not qualify for Obamacare under federal law.
Correct.
But there are those famous regulations according to which all hospitals and clinics are required to provide urgent medical care to anyone, no matter how indigent, no matter how illegal.
And one of the big problems, of course, is pregnant women.
They get prenatal and postpartum care under the WIC program.
Women, infants, and children.
That's supposed to produce healthy Americans, you know?
Well, it produces healthy foreigners.
And delivery costs, of course, get paid by Medicare.
And apparently all of this, just the immigrant insurance program for medical purposes, costs about $2 billion a year in emergency treatment.
And then there's an additional $1.2 billion that it costs to deliver the infants of illegals.
There's just no end to it!
And of course, those infants are what once they pop out of the womb?
Anchor babies!
American citizens, just like you and I are.
Yes, that's right.
They are as American as you and me.
And I hate to mention AOC's name in vain so frequently, but she's the one who said all of those desperate people down on the border trying to get in, they are more American than anyone who would rather they stayed home.
Do you remember that comment?
I do remember Alexandria's remark.
Mmm, oh yes, she's a sweetheart.
Now, illegals are not entitled to food stamps, but the U.S.-born children are.
And if illegals manage to get into subsidized housing, I don't see how they would have any trouble
sneaking into the food stamp program, too.
And according to FAIR, more than 50% of Central American families living in the United States use at least one welfare program.
Probably lots of them.
Now, this is the part that astonishes me as much as anything else.
26 states explicitly and legally and deliberately offered illegals state-funded benefits.
State funded.
New York State.
$300 a month in cash.
Cash assistance.
If you qualify.
And I bet a lot of them do.
I do.
I do as well.
Then there are 11 states that offer free or subsidized medical and hospital care.
And California does give them California food stamps.
Legal services in case they get tangled up with the migra.
And also benefits for those over 65 or disabled.
What world is this?
If you are over 65 or disabled, you're an illegal immigrant, you manage to scrape together your $10,000, and you get yourself across the border and into California!
Gringo benevolence.
Gringo benevolence, legal services, benefits, and benefits for those over 65 and the disabled.
You know, at one time, if I were a humorist, I would come up with some sort of dialogue, and if I could come up with a Spanish accent.
I had this idea that there were going to be two characters on this sort of jokey dialogue.
They are the two sons of a Mexican fireman.
And one of his sons is named Jose and his other son is named Hose B. And Jose manages to sneak into the United States.
And I had this imagined series of telephone calls, you know, Jose explaining to Hosby what it's like to be in the United States and all of these remarkable benefits that just fall from the sky.
And, and, you know, and mañana it will rain beer, it will rain beer, Hosby.
I mean, what can they possibly think?
I mean, it's just as likely it's going to rain, rain beer, isn't it?
If you're 65 and disabled, go to California.
We don't care where you're from.
We don't care how legal or illegal you are.
We'll treat you like a retired American.
The streets are paved with gold, unless you're in San Francisco where they're paved with human excrement.
Yes, that's right.
According to some recent stories I've seen.
But anyway, I'm not a humorist, and I just don't have the talent for that kind of thing.
But for all of you aspiring humorists out there who do have a knack for the funny line, this whole idea of what it must be like... Oh, you know, I did have another crazy idea.
You'll have to forgive me.
You hear about these Samadhi Bantu's who have never seen a light switch.
They've never seen a flush toilet.
They come over here and they just absolutely have no idea how water faucets work.
And I can imagine the old hand Samadhi Bantu.
He's showing the newcomer Samadhi Bantu around.
They must be astonished at a supermarket, you know?
A supermarket's an extraordinary place.
And I can't do a Somali accent, but I can imagine the old hand walking down the pet food aisle, and the newcomer saying, my God, these Americans, they eat dogs?
They eat cats?
Because you've got pictures of, you know, the big bags full of stuff.
Of course, yes, yes.
What's he gonna think?
You know, they eat.
No, no, you fool!
This is food for dogs.
Food!
And they wouldn't even be able to contemplate what that means.
You give this much attention to your pets?
What?
Food!
Food for what?
You come and you buy this enormous, wonderful, beautiful food and you give it to a dog?
No, I can just imagine how astonished they are.
But, you know, once again, all these sort of humorous dialogues, But as I say, I just don't have any talent for that.
But anyway, have we come to the end of our program here, Mr. Kersey?
Well, we're running out of time.
We can briefly point out one story real quick out of Kansas City because there have been a number of these mass disturbances that we're noticing.
There was one on the Magnificent Mile in Chicago.
I want to say 300 youth, black youth teens.
Youth, youth, youth, a lot of black youth.
The corporate media did not mention the race of the group, the racial group engaged in the riot.
There's also one just outside Baltimore actually.
In Baltimore County, at East Point Mall Carnival and Dundlag, they actually had to cancel the carnival because of these disturbances.
And the Baltimore County Councilman, Todd Crandall, posted on Facebook, he actually said that the massive uproar was the responsibility of those living in the city of Baltimore.
So, once again, dog whistling to his constituents, hey, what are all these black youth coming here?
Shouldn't they be squeegeeing in Baltimore?
What's going on?
So, we now go to the Worlds of Fun, which is an amusement park in Kansas City, where officials, they're trying to quell the fallout from this past weekend.
Easter weekend, there was a brawl involving nearly 300 teens.
Now, I've seen the video.
I've seen the video of the riots, of this massive brawl that broke out, and I can safely say it was a group of 300 plus black youth.
Not much diversity.
No, no, no, no.
A monochromatic mob.
The incident and the ensuing negative publicity, this article goes on to say, could hurt the amusement park's reputation, not to mention the bottom line.
Many customers have taken to social media to air grievances.
Some have said, hey, we're just going to cancel.
Our season passes.
The World of Fun spokesman Chris Foshee said that although several physical altercations did break
out among small groups of unruly teens, the total number of people involved was overstated.
Now why I think this is important, this was a chaotic altercation that required
quite a few police officers to come in to try and bring down the
They weren't letting people leave the amusement park.
A few years ago, this wasn't an isolated incident, Mr. Taylor and our great listeners all across the globe.
There was an article from July 5th, 2017 with this title, Large Teenage Brawl Ruins Out-of-Town Family Experience at Worlds of Fun, the same venue.
A family vacation in Kansas City said their 4th of July at Worlds of Fun quickly turned into a nightmare when a huge fight broke out and they were surrounded by dozens of teenagers fighting.
This white family from South Dakota said they'll never forget it.
The mother said, it started to get really packed, a lot of people coming in, and we decided to have the shuttle bus pick us up to get out of there and beat the rush.
As they were leaving the theme park, Dozens of teenagers started making their way toward them and she would go on to say, a group of kids had come up and they were being pretty rowdy, a lot of foul language, made us pretty uncomfortable.
She explained to her kids, don't stare, just watch the fireworks.
Fireworks are going on and she tried to ignore them and move as far away as they could.
But unfortunately, the fighting continued and Mr. Taylor Gibson, her two daughters, ages six and seven from South Dakota, this white family's probably never been in a Interaction with large number of African-American youth such as this night in July 5th, 2017.
They were surrounded by a hundred teenagers in a matter of seconds.
Everybody started running.
They were behind us, in front of us, behind us, and everybody was fighting.
They recorded all this and the kids were scared.
They were screaming hysterically.
Security actually came in and And they forced the crowd to disperse.
This is just one of the candid nights at Worlds of Fun.
But this is a happy ending.
Apparently they themselves were not attacked.
They were not attacked.
That's the part that seems surprising to me.
They were offered free passes and a fast lane to go through the rides without having to wait in line for the next Wednesday.
They were apologized from the Worlds of Fun spokespeople.
But she said this.
She hopes no one else ever has to witness something like this, especially young children.
She would say something different has to go on there.
I can't believe this would happen at all at a family amusement park.
Well, our white family from South Dakota, it happened again less than two years later.
And it's going to keep happening.
In Chicago.
In Baltimore.
And at Worlds of Fun in Kansas City.
Worlds of Fun.
Worlds of Fun.
A fine time was guaranteed for all.
You know, one of my daughters was very much an amusement park fan for a while.
Loved to be on roller coasters.
And we never had a wild, rioting type experience.
But there was no question whenever, and we never went in the nighttime either.
Night is, I'm sure, far more dangerous.
But it was a very good racial education for my daughter to see how these groups behave.
They were loud.
They would cut in line.
They would insult people.
It's very, very clear.
And there is a certain pattern that even the most well-meaning could not fail to notice.
And so, as part of your education, if you have somebody who likes to go to amusement parks, take them to one in the summertime, where you know there will be a large contingent of African Americans.
Well, wise sage advice from my partner in crime, Mr. Taylor.
So, for Jared, this has been PK.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection