All Episodes
Previous Next
May 1, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
58:07
‘This is Not Going to Be the Country of White People’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another episode of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance, and with me is PK.
And we're going to start this podcast with a look at a number of Somalis.
It's a Somali-heavy podcast this time around, but sometimes that's just the way the news shakes out.
I'd like to start with a Somali ex-policeman named Mohammed Noor.
We have spoken about him a number of times on this podcast.
He was the pioneering, first Somali ever appointed to the Minneapolis Police Department, and he was rushed through, despite the fact that many people considered him unfit for duty.
There were a number of psychological evaluations, and they decided, no, no, it's more important to have a Somali on the force.
Well, as some of you know, back in 2017, an Australian-American woman named Justine Damond, she had heard a sound outside her apartment.
She said it sounded as though some woman was being raped.
And she called the police, and the police did show up.
The police in the form of Mr. Muhammad Noor, our prized Somali police officer, in the company of a fellow named Matthew Harady, his partner.
And once they showed up, they were cruising down this alley where the alleged rape was supposed to have taken place.
It was all very dark.
They turned off their lights, and they cruised up and down, and they decided there was no problem.
And at one point, both of them say that they heard a big bang.
Now, there's some doubt as to how this happened.
They say it sounded as if someone was beating on their patrol car.
There were no fingerprints of this woman on the patrol car.
But in any case, outside the window, this person appeared.
And it turned out to be Justin Damond.
Who was out in her pajamas, actually, investigating.
Seems like an unwise thing to do if she thinks somebody's being raped in an alley to go tripping out unarmed in her pajamas.
In any case, there she was.
And this Mohamed Noor, he was sitting on the passenger side.
She showed up on the driver's side.
The window was down.
And this is the aspect of it that's very interesting to me that came out in trial.
The fact that the fellow in the passenger side had reached across his partner's face and fired, that to me was a real suggestion that he had panicked.
He had done something very stupid.
And there were even people at our end of the political spectrum who thought, okay, Here was this white woman.
Here was this black Somali.
And so race had something to do with his activities.
He was obviously incompetent.
But this trial result leaves things a little bit more nuanced.
And the aspect of this that I find particularly nuanced is the fact that his partner, Matthew Harady, He said he was terrified.
That's the aspect of it that I find particularly interesting.
And he, when this person came up, and it was dark, he couldn't tell who it was, couldn't tell if it was a man or a woman, he unholstered his weapon.
And he had it up by his side.
He was so scared.
He said, this was one of those moments where you don't know.
The deadly force might be required at any time, but it was Noor who actually fired.
Furthermore, when he was asked, This Matthew Harady, his partner, he was asked, he was five hours on the stand, and he said, did he trust him?
Did he trust his partner?
He says, I loved working with Officer Noor.
And on cross-examination, he says, did you trust that he had your back?
Yes, every day, says Harady.
So this really puts a different perspective on things.
The jury, nevertheless, After 10 hours of sequestered deliberation, they decided that he was guilty of third-degree manslaughter.
And so he's going to be sentenced, not until January apparently, but he has been found guilty.
Again, it's important to get this on the record here.
It apparently was not an absolutely reprehensible and completely crazy thing.
Both officers present thought that there's a potentially dangerous situation here.
But the jury, after having examined all the evidence, said yes, he should not have shot this woman.
Now, there are a couple of other aspects about this.
And that is that Mohammed Noor's cousin, Gauth Ali, who apparently is in a position to take time off and attend the trial every day, despite the fact that it lasts for weeks.
I wonder what he does for a living.
He wept after the hearing and he said, I'm crying because of how the case was handled.
He says what happened was injustice.
This is shocking.
My cousin didn't get a fair trial.
Now, does this guy think he'd have gotten a fairer trial in Somalia, for heaven's sake?
Well, think about it this way, Mr. Taylor.
It's a story we didn't talk about, the whole Molly Tibbetts thing, but his lawyer, the lawyer of the illegal alien who killed Molly Tibbetts, allegedly, was able to get the trial moved to an area of Iowa With more non-whites.
Because they thought they wouldn't get a fair trial.
So perhaps this family member thinks that they should have had a better representation.
So it could have been jury nullification.
Well, who knows.
I don't know what the racial composition of the jury was.
I doubt that he was talking about that.
He probably, well, who knows.
He thinks it's unjust.
He thinks it's racism.
Furthermore, the Somali-American Police Association.
Did you know there was such a thing?
There's a lot of Somalis now in the country, so of course they're going to have their own identity.
But are there that many who are police officers?
Good grief.
In any case, there is a Somali-American Police Association, and they put it this way.
I mean, they've picked up all the buzzwords really quickly.
It says, while historically it has not been uncommon for minority officers to receive differential treatment, they're talking about discrimination here, It is discouraging to see this treatment persist in 2019.
SAPA, the Somali American Police Association, fears the outcome of this case will have a
devastating effect on police morale and make the recruitment of minority officers all the
more difficult. Well, yes, I suppose when you do kill unarmed civilians, it is bad for morale.
But once again, the Somali American Police Association is saying it's racism.
The Cousin says, it's racism.
So, no matter how it ended up, and again, it does not appear to have been the open and shut case that we considered it to have been when this first took place.
Of course, it's racism.
But continuing in the vein of racism, and depending on whose ox is gored, I think we have yet another Somali story, have we not?
Well, we've got three more Somali stories, so we'll try and get these quickly because they paint a picture of, I think, an interesting future for not just those in Minnesota, but for us all across the country.
We'll start with Alon Omar.
Alon Omar, yesterday, She gave a speech in DC where she said, quote, This is not going to be the country of white people.
At this moment, the occupant of the White House and his allies are doing everything they can to distance themselves and misinform the public from the monsters that they created.
That is terrorizing the Jewish community and the Muslim community, the congresswoman told this crowd gathering.
She, of course, was talking about the shooting at the synagogue over the weekend in San Diego, and apparently the guy who participated in the shooting allegedly tried to burn down a mosque as well.
He claims he did.
He did, yeah.
And so, logically, Ilhan Omar decides it's all Trump's fault.
It's all Trump's fault.
That is so typical.
You know, the guy who won the Pulitzer Prize for editorial cartooning, he had this cartoon in which he's got Donald Trump playing the fiddle, and then in the foreground you see these three horrible KKK types.
You can see a guy with a Nazi, and they've got blood in there, blood all over their hands.
He says, I may play the music, but I didn't ask him to dance.
He's playing the music of hatred, you see.
This is just so idiotic.
Again, we're at a stage now where we should all be denouncing violence.
All be denouncing violence.
That means the left as well.
You think about it, over the weekend their story broke that there was a Mexican in California Was he a marine?
Converted to Islam and he was going to blow up some rally?
A neo-nazi rally or something?
Yes.
Apparently the rally never took place.
Exactly.
But yeah, he was going to kill everybody in sight.
Yeah, it's extraordinary things.
I don't think you actually mentioned who Ilan Omar is.
I suspect all of our listeners know, but I guess she's one of those people now who needs no introduction.
She absolutely needs no introduction, but she went on to introduce herself and her background during this speech.
She said that she wanted to emphasize that she was a refugee and an immigrant from Somalia, which she said Trump would call a, quote, shithole country, unquote.
She asserted that America was, quote, founded on the history of Native American genocide and on the backs of black slaves.
And this is not going to be the country of white people, I guess, moving forward as more and more of her brethren and her countrymen Come to the country, become police officers, get elected to serve in the entrance of Somali migrant refugees, Mr. Taylor?
Yes, well, I guess that's what she thinks she's doing, representing Somalis in Congress.
She's certainly not representing white people, is she?
It's not going to be the country of white people anymore.
Oh, no, no, not at all.
And why I think we need to stay on top of the Somali situation, there was new data, Mr. Taylor, that came out that was gathered and released by the Federal Assisted School Office and the State Secretariat for Migration in Switzerland.
Showing that 4,000 or so Somalis in Switzerland are by far the most prone to be non-government benefits, with 83.7% relying on state income.
Now those numbers correlate roughly what we see in Minnesota, where we have the largest contingent of refugees and migrants who have been resettled in Minneapolis.
Of Somalis you're talking about?
Correct.
We're only talking about Somalis here.
And so with Somalis by far and wide the largest recipients of welfare in Switzerland, It's interesting that several other nationalities there in Switzerland have rates of over 50%.
Eritreans 54.7%, Angolans at 54%.
Of course, these statistics greatly contrast with the number of Swiss nationals on welfare, which is, would you care to take a guess? 5%.
2.3% of the population.
2.3% of the Swiss are on the dole.
Yes, 2.3%.
Now, which racial group do you think has the lowest in Switzerland?
Wait, which racial group?
Which racial group, if we're talking about nationals?
Some East Asian group, no doubt.
Japan, 0.6.
Japanese.
I wonder how many Japanese Swiss there are anyway.
But, you know, the thing is Japan is such a sort of shame-oriented society, too.
If you're actual Japanese living in Switzerland, you got your foot in the public trough, they'd be so embarrassed.
Well, Damian Mueller of the Swiss Liberals said that the figures show both far too many asylum seekers not qualified for asylum or living on state handouts, and that not enough was being done to integrate those with refugee status into the Swiss economy.
Or, the fact is, they have no way of integrating into the Swiss economy because they have no skills to offer.
And you said how many Somalis?
4,000? 4,000.
Living in Switzerland.
So 83% are living on the government dole.
Okay, that's Somalis for you.
Well, you know, it's interesting that Somalis and Eritreans be rather different in terms of welfare dependency because Eritrea is just a little chunk that's stuck on to Somali there.
But the Eritreans, even here in the United States, they have a reputation for being more on the ball than Somalis.
Eritrea was more heavily colonized by the Italians and more infrastructure, in any case.
I don't think they're really that much of a credit to the economy and to the society of Switzerland.
Well, speaking of on the ball, we have one more story about Somalia that to me is the most interesting of all that we've spoken of because it shows the depths and the penetration of the SJW mindset, Mr. Taylor.
I can only be referring to Sports Illustrated and They said this, quote, we're absolutely thrilled to announce that Halima Aden is the newest member of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit family, making history as the first Muslim model to wear a hijab and a burkini in the magazine, end quote.
So, she's the first Somali-American model.
The Somali-American model.
She was born in Kenya at the Kakuma refugee camp, where she lived until the age of seven before she was brought to the United States.
Of course, she lives in Minneapolis, Minnesota, just like Ilana Amar.
I'm sure that they've crossed paths within that fantastic, wonderful Somali community that's colonizing the state of Minnesota and now she's colonizing the pages of Sports Illustrated and the famed vaunted Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue.
Where do you even begin?
Where do you go from here?
Here's what she said.
I'd like to tell you what she said, Mr. Taylor.
Please do.
Our burkini wearing friend.
Quote, I keep thinking back to the six-year-old me who in this same country was in a refugee camp because the shoot was actually done.
They went to her birth country where the photoshoot of her and her kini was at.
Watamu Beach.
So she's thinking back to this and she said, so to grow up to live the American dream and then come back to Kenya and shoot for SI in the most beautiful parts of Kenya.
Gosh, I don't think that's a story that anybody could make up.
Well, Hadima, Aidan, I agree.
I don't think anybody could make it up.
It could only happen in 2019 America where the burkini is now Forced upon us as some sex symbol that we have to... You know, I did look up photographs of her in her burkini.
And she is a nice-looking Somali.
But, for heaven's sake, this burkina covers the body completely.
Except for the face.
It's just a little glimpse of her face.
And the idea of the swimsuit issue... I'm sure all the men out there who buy and read the swimsuit issue We're just dreaming, dreaming passionately of the idea of when are we going to have somebody in a bikini?
What the heck is going on?
It's as if they're just rubbing our noses in this, that somebody walking around head to toe covered up except for her face.
That is supposed to be just alluringly sexy, It boggles the mind.
And of course, the whole idea of this Muslim burkini is to conceal the body.
Of course, what is she doing?
She's draping herself out on the beach in these alluring poses.
And this is a complete contravention of what the Muslim modesty requirements are supposed to be all about.
She is abiding by the letter of the law, I suppose, not showing us her ankles, but she's refusing to show us her ankles in the most alluring and sexual way possible.
The whole thing, even from a Muslim point of view, seems revolting.
It is revolting.
I'd like to finish by just telling you a quote from the SI Swimsuit Editor, M.J.
Day.
Is this a man or a woman?
We don't know.
I won't look it up, but I'll leave it up to our listener if you want to research MJ Day, but here's what this individual said.
Quote, we believe beauty knows no boundaries.
I admire Halima and I consider her an inspirational human for what she has decided To use her platform for, and her work with UNICEF as an ambassador.
She is, in my opinion, one of the great beauties of our time.
Not only outside, but inside.
When we met, I was instantly taken by her intelligence, enthusiasm, and authenticity.
Well, I just looked her up.
It's a woman.
Why does a woman run the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue?
That seems a little strange to me.
In any case, MJ Day, she's the woman who runs the issue.
And beauty knows no boundaries.
You know, the next thing you know, they're going to give us somebody who's just markedly fat.
Well, what's interesting, though, to close out our Long train of Somali stories.
I'm sure our listeners are so fascinated now to fly to Minneapolis and go take a look at the community for themselves.
ESPN the magazine, after being published for 21 years, Mr. Taylor, is closing its doors because they can no longer make a profit.
And I think Sports Illustrated is probably on its last legs as a periodical.
But isn't this issue one of their most popular, or at least has been?
It might have been.
I mean, think about this.
From a modesty standpoint, Sports Illustrated swimsuit issues, they were at a point where they were trying to compete with free porn on the internet.
They were doing body paint.
That's all they were showing, and being as risque as possible.
And now, as a way to try and I think they actually had a model wearing a hijab.
Did they?
I want to say that was a couple years ago, but this is how they drum up positive press, trying to get people excited.
We're going to show this.
Look, but positive press is one thing.
How many people, well, presumably she's not the only model in there.
They're going to be Caucasians who are scantily clad, the usual sort of fleshy stuff that the male readers want, but they'll have sprinkled her in just as a nod to this kind of utter and total foolishness.
I'd like to think that readers are going to look at this thing and say, look, forget it.
I'm just not going to buy this magazine.
I'd like to think so as well.
But we shall see.
But if this is the kind of thing they keep up, they're not going to survive.
The whole idea is to titillate men.
Come on, let's be frank about it.
And this woman, she's got a very pleasant looking face, but it's just not the same as seeing somebody dressed in the more traditionally alluring way.
An actual bikini. That's right. An actual bikini. A bikini, not a burkini.
But anyway, yes, I believe that that is the last of our Somali story. The Somali train has left the station.
But there'll be more.
I'm sure there'll be more.
Somalis will always be with us at this rate.
But I believe you had a story about some new ordinance that a Michigan city is threatening to pass?
Mr. Taylor, we're seeing this more and more across the country as left-wing DAs take control of places like Dallas.
We spoke about this last week, two weeks ago.
The new black DAs basically said, hey, $750 or less when it comes to crime...
We're not going to prosecute.
You can do that.
In Chicago, Kim Fox, famously, when she came on board, we're not going to prosecute shoplifting under $1,000.
That's right, under $1,000.
In Boston, in Suffolk County, same thing is going on.
This is all to protect people of color.
Yes, indeed.
Because they think that the law disproportionately Discriminates against them.
Hey, you're breaking the law.
Come on.
Well, the theory also is, you know, we can't have our police officers running around arresting people who have stolen $999 worth of merchandise.
That distracts them from the really serious crimes.
Of course, Chicago continues to have the highest number of murders in any place in the country.
I think they had more than New York and L.A.
combined.
No, she's going to redirect the forces to things that are more important.
I think it was the head of the Retailers Association in Chicago said, this is just a declaration of war against the retail industry.
It is.
I think there's going to be a story at AR in the next couple of days about Kim Fox and largely about what she did when she came into office.
And you know, I didn't realize this.
Kim Fox apparently had the backing of George Soros.
That's right.
George Soros gave what, a quarter of a million dollars?
That was one of the big first coups they had back in 2016 when she came into office.
I think Robert Hampton has a big piece coming up at A.R.
which I'm Quite excited to read.
Yes, yes.
Read it here.
You read it here first.
But in any case, I'm sorry I interrupted you.
No, don't be sorry because I'm almost sorry we have to tell this story because I'm afraid that this is going to be one of many cities that introduce such legislation or introduce such a proposal.
Grand Rapids, Michigan, it's a city of 200,000 people.
It's a large city in Michigan.
They're considering an ordinance that would make it A criminal misdemeanor to racially profile people of color for participating in their lives.
The proposed ordinance comes as part of a larger proposed Human Rights Ordinance that includes further defining discriminatory practices terms such as for people with disabilities and of differing sexual orientation.
What is so important for us to consider is that there have been a series of highly publicized 9-1-1 calls on people of color across the nation.
We've talked about them on this podcast.
They've been discussed ad nauseum on the Amarin.com website.
I think it's the War on Beckies is what people call it.
So at this public hearing, They've decided to wage war on the whole concept of hashtag living while black.
Patty Cottle, the diversity inclusion manager for Grand Rapids, described an incident in 2017 in which Grand Rapids police were called on a graduation party in a park.
Graduate party of blacks.
They had the approval of and permission of the city to be in the park.
The family and most of the people attending the graduation party were African American.
Was the 9-1-1 call because of bias?
I don't know.
But this is the type of example that she's giving, that she's referencing as a need to quote pass this ordinance that would Make it a criminal misdemeanor to racially profile people of color, Mr. Taylor.
Well, but doesn't it turn out that it's someone who calls the police on someone who is black, and it turns out that a crime was not committed?
Isn't that it?
Don't they have to prove that the person's blackness contributed at least in part to the 9-1-1 call?
A racially profiling call, basically.
So here's what more the ordinance will actually do.
The city's proposal falls under the section of biased crime reporting.
No person shall knowingly or recklessly report to a city police officer, city dispatcher, or other city personnel that an individual who is an actual or perceived member of a protected class has committed or may or will commit a crime if such report is based in whole or in part on the individual's membership in a protected class and not on a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity in consideration of all available facts and the totality of the circumstances. So basically, in summation, protected
classes means anybody but white people basically. Of course. So it's not criminalizing the idea of
calling 911 on people of color, but think about it. If you pick up the phone and you see
somebody loitering around, you're going to think twice if you have the threat of a criminal misdemeanor
if you're racially profiled.
The thing is something like that's going to be very hard to prove.
It's going to be hard to prove that the race had something to do with it and given the totality of the circumstances it was unreasonable to think that a crime might be committed.
But it reflects a mentality as much as anything else.
Now I'd like to know If a black person calls the cops on another black person, because black people know very well how dangerous other black people are, I wonder if that could be done, because black people are perfectly capable of racially profiling.
They'd be idiots if they weren't.
So, what you're asking is, would a member of a protected class who's calling to report a crime of someone who's also part of a protected class, Will they have the criminal misdemeanor for profile?
It's a fascinating question.
Exactly.
If a hispanic calls the cops on a black or presumably a homosexual is a protected class too.
Homosexual calls the cops on a hispanic.
No, this would be a nightmare to try to actually get a conviction, it seems to me.
But, clearly, the intention here is to hang this law around white people's necks.
Well, Ilhan Omar is right.
As we move further and further from this being a country of white people, the founder's vision to this Polygot this, whatever you want to call America in 2019.
Social cohesion is, it's, it's gone.
But don't forget it's vibrant.
I guess it's vibrant, but it's just so sad to think how delicate of a, of a experiment this was and how just a couple of tugs of the thread, Mr. Taylor, it all, it's, it's all unwoven.
It is an interesting exercise to go back and think, just where was the point at which we went wrong?
Where did we go wrong?
And as you go further and further back, was it the Immigration Act of 1965?
Was it the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Was it the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Was it, oh, the decision to bring black slaves?
That was a terrible one.
That goes back quite a ways.
There are many points at which you can describe how the country could have been corrected.
Or was it when the Constitution was written?
Should the Constitution have reflected the Naturalization Act of 1790 and said, this is a country for white people?
That they took it for granted that it was a country for white people.
Well, they did.
They did.
Because again, they passed it quickly when it came up as we had discussed.
And there's a great piece.
That we should all celebrate in March, the day that it was actually ratified.
I would actually argue it was Shelley v. Kramer.
And it's fascinating that the author of Race and Reason also came up with that same conclusion.
Explain to our listeners what Shelley v. Kramer is.
Shelley v. Kramer was a Supreme Court case that the NAACP and a number of other of these organizations spent 30 years trying to defeat.
Basically, from the founding of the NAACP in 1909, it was finally struck down.
I want to say 1948.
It was restrictive covenants on real estate.
Basically, that's what was going to maintain the racial composition of a neighborhood, a community, of a city.
Up until then.
But you see, yes, I know, I think that's important.
It's freedom of association.
Exactly.
I remember buying a house in California that still, on the deed, had restrictive covenants that were unenforceable, of course.
Of course.
But they were still there.
Wow.
Very interesting.
Nobody bothered to remove them.
But they were unenforceable.
But I think that's less important.
That's less important than immigration.
The fact of having lost control of the borders of your country, no longer having a white immigration string.
But anyway, we got distracted a bit on this, where the country went wrong.
You could write a whole book on this.
Various steps which, if we'd gone the other way, might have kept things going in our direction.
There are so many spots in which something that seemed innocuous at the time ended up having very profound consequences.
As opposed to the direction of the Burkini and Alain Omar.
Try and explain that one to not just the Founding Fathers, but to John F. Kennedy as he's looking at pictures of Brigette Bardot in a bikini that we've reached, that we've evolved to.
That's right.
That's right.
Well, what is this?
M.J.
Day, she says, a beauty knows no boundaries.
Well, I guess beauty, beauty doesn't require even display.
Anyway, I thought this ordinance that could be passed, this is a proposed ordinance, right?
It's a proposed ordinance, yes.
The Grand Rapids, you know, Grand Rapids, I visited that city once, it's not particularly black.
I bet it still has a substantial white majority.
I think it's close to 70% white.
Yes, yes, but they're going to be leading the pack here.
That's, by the way, where the Gerald Ford Presidential Library is located.
Quite an interesting little place that I visited.
Is he the only president who was actually never elected?
Well, let's see.
I'm putting you on the spot there with a little trivia.
You sure have.
Well, let's see.
No, no.
After the assassination of... Oh gosh.
There was a guy who came in and then was not re-elected either.
Johnson?
No, no, no.
Johnson was elected on his own.
But he only served one term elected on his own.
Oh, so I'm like Andrew Johnson.
Oh, Andrew Johnson.
Well, that's yeah, that's right.
He wasn't reelected.
Yeah, but there was another there's another after that in any case Let's move on here and as I say I was particularly interested in this idea of making it illegal to think in terms of race and It reminded me of something that just came out recently about a killing that took place back in February.
This was in the Henry Pratt company that makes valves in Aurora, Illinois.
And a black fella named Gary Martin.
He had been dressed down because he had been failing to wear his safety glasses.
This is not the first time.
And he was afraid that he was going to be fired.
And this is a guy who would always apparently make outbursts of a strange sort.
But in any case, he was called in.
He was told, yes, we're going to fire you.
And at that point, he opened fire with a handgun and he fatally shot five people.
All of them white.
All of them his colleagues at the Henry Pratt Valve Company.
And he injured one more.
And then when the police came, he managed to injure five police officers.
He was apparently quite a tough nut to crack.
If I may add, Mr. Taylor, this was a mass shooting that completely Completely was censored from the mainstream media.
This happened quickly, and then once it became evident that it was a black guy who was behind the shooting, it disappeared instantaneously.
It disappeared.
Yes, that's right.
Five people killed, six people injured, and I don't know about the police officers, but all of his colleagues, I believe one of them was a Hispanic.
Jim was an elderly Hispanic.
Yes.
But here's this black guy going on a rampage.
Now, what has just recently come to light, which is why I bring this up at this point, is that an investigation found that he told one of his fellow employees, if I get fired, I'm going to kill every mother effer in here, and I'm going to blow the police up.
Which is exactly what he did.
But the employee did not report the comments.
On the one hand, he said that this fellow Gary Martin was always making off-the-wall statements.
Maybe he was.
I would have thought that this was sufficiently off-the-wall to merit a certain amount of notice.
But it's one of these situations in which this employee might have thought, I better not racial profile.
Because we're all warned over and over that we should not hold these prejudices against people of color.
Now another little footnote that came out in this recent investigation is that because he had a felony conviction back in Mississippi, where he was from, he should not have even owned a gun.
That's right.
Now, interestingly, this fellow who had heard him talking about killing everybody and blowing up the police knew that he usually kept a gun in his car.
And he still said nothing.
This almost sounds like criminal negligence to me.
But I thought this was an interesting counterpoint to what's going on in Grand Rapids, in which you are supposed to check your bias, check your privilege.
Don't think in terms of race when you may find yourself face-to-face with a dangerous situation.
So there you go.
Another piece of news that I thought was interesting and significant has to do with Charlottesville.
This is, of course, where the Unite the Right rally took place.
Heather Heyer died, and it was a terrible disaster for people who are racially oriented and who think that the demographic future matters.
But as our listeners will recall, this is originally a demonstration to defend the statue of Robert E. Lee, which the city was trying to take down.
The city was also trying to take down a statue of Stonewall Jackson.
But a judge has concluded that these are both protected monuments.
The city does not have the right to take them down.
Charlottesville Circuit Judge Richard Moore has noted that both General Lee and General Jackson are in their uniforms, riding horses, and this is associated with their service at war, and so these are war memorials.
War memorials cannot be taken down at the whim of a city.
And he went on to say, and I thought this was really quite remarkable that he would reach this conclusion, he says, the status of the monuments is so clear-cut that, and then I'm quoting him directly, if the matter went to trial on this issue and a jury were to decide that they are not monuments or memorials to veterans, Then I would have to set such verdict aside as unreasonable.
He says, even if it went to trial, and even if the city won, he would set the verdict aside.
But the fact is, though, there may be an end run around Circuit Judge Richard Moore because the Virginia House of Delegates, there was a bill proposed, which failed in fact, that would allow cities, in fact, to destroy Confederate monuments.
I mean again, think back to what happened when the Tennessee legislation passed a law to protect monuments and then what did Memphis do?
They sold the land to a non-profit and in the cover of Night they took down the Nathan Bedford Forrest statue.
You've got the former white mayor of New Orleans who took down the Robert E. Lee statue and a number of other Confederate statues who's going around now.
He has no future in the Democratic Party but he's written a book basically about how he's so right on the right side of history for having Started this conversation and had the moral courage to take down.
I think the title of his book has monuments in the title.
Yeah, I've actually got a copy and I plan on reading it at some point.
Mayor Landrieu.
That's the thing he's proudest of.
He goes around the entire country giving speeches.
Actually, I think he was just in Richmond and Charlottesville and other parts of Virginia on this book tour because he's out in paperback and he's extolling all these areas.
You've got to have the courage to take it down.
You just have to take that step.
Yeah.
What happened in Memphis was just incredible.
We talked about this on this program, but just to review some of the details that you touched on, the state had said that no public entity could remove a statue of that kind.
And so, what the city of Memphis does, take this public park and sell it for a nominal fee, I think just a few thousand dollars, to a private entity, which then immediately took down the statue.
Immediately.
At night.
So, the deal goes through.
Yes, and that very night, while nobody's watching.
And by the way, it's a glorious statue.
Have you ever seen that statue in Memphis?
I have seen it.
It's very, very impressive.
The Lee statue in Charlottesville also, he just looks like a god, practically, astride that horse.
But, yes, the ones in Charlottesville have stood for nearly 100 years, and apparently they will stand for a little bit longer, I'm glad to say.
I was wondering whether or not the Yahoos in Charlottesville will try, at this point, to come up with some other way to get those statues down.
But I think they've already had enough unpleasantness in that town trying to deal with that statue.
I think they're just going to try to forget it.
But we'll see.
Now, another judge story, interestingly enough.
This is, in some respects, this is a good news story and a bad news story.
And I'll start with the bad news.
Roll the ugliness.
Ah, the bad years.
Yes, there was a district judge in Massachusetts by the name of Shelley Joseph, a nice-looking 51-year-old white lady.
She and a court officer by the name of Wesley McGregor, no doubt another white person.
What they did, they were holding a hearing for a Dominican citizen by the name of Jose Medina Perez.
He had been detained on drug and outstanding warrants.
Now, I don't know what the other warrants are.
I'd be curious to know.
And he had previously been deported twice in 2003 and 2007.
He was back in America doing jobs that Americans won't do, no doubt.
And there was an ICE officer standing.
He wanted to be in the courtroom and make sure that he could clap the irons on this guy as soon as he left the courthouse because he's this bad guy.
He's been deported and they want him out.
Well, Judge Joseph asked the ICE fellow to step out in the hall a moment.
And while this was going on, she had a discussion with his lawyer.
She asked his lawyer, ICE is going to get him?
And the lawyer replies, Yeah.
And soon after that, Judge Joseph had the courtroom recorder turned off for 52 seconds.
And then what happened is that she had this fellow, Wesley McGregor, take Jose Medina Perez out a back door through the chambers, through judge's
chambers, downstairs and led him out the courtyard, out of the courthouse, out the back door. In
other words, this was a deliberate attempt to keep him from the clutches of ice.
And when this happened, this happened back in, let's see, when did this happen?
Last year.
And when it happened, the governor was furious, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker, who is a Republican who had actually appointed her.
He called for the removal of Joseph from the bench when the details came out.
Now, what has happened is she has since lied to a senior judge about what happened.
The senior judge had asked, well, why did you turn off the recording device?
Obviously, this was when they were discussing what they were going to do.
Correct.
In that quick span of time, as you stated.
In 52 seconds.
In a minute's time, they're going to say, OK, well, then we're just going to sneak him out the back.
It doesn't take long to say that.
And of course, the lawyers said, that's fine.
What happened is the federal authorities launched a grand jury investigation after this 2018 hearing, and they have just reached a decision that they are going to prosecute Judge Joseph.
She's charged with obstruction of justice—I think this is great—and making a false statement to other judges who inquired about this, and I hope they throw the book at her.
I agree.
I agree.
As you stated, when she came out, this blonde-haired female judge was crying.
She was crying profusely.
Yeah, let's keep her crying.
Let's keep her crying for many years back in the big house.
So that's the happy ending story.
There is another happy ending.
Mr. Medina Perez was caught about a month after having left the courthouse, and he is being processed for deportation.
Thumbs up on that one.
But you know what I just don't understand?
What is this Shelley Joseph thinking?
What is she thinking?
Here is a criminal.
A criminal who's been deported twice.
A criminal in her courtroom.
A drugs guy.
And we don't know what the other crimes he's committed that he warrants out for his arrest.
What is she thinking?
Does she actually want this guy in the United States?
And if so, why?
You've asked that question a lot.
What is it that these leftists think?
What is it that motivates them?
Are they just... Is she, at the end of the day, does she have anarchist views?
Is she a Marxist?
Who knows?
What is it that motivates them?
But, as you stated, let's hope they keep crying.
Because the image of her crying was a lot more Refreshing and enjoyable than the image of Hedina in the burkini.
Yes.
That's the future I'd like to see.
More and more leftists crying.
Yes, it is a very, very strange thing.
And I'm delighted that the federal authorities have taken it upon themselves to do this.
Now, if Obama were still in the White House, or if Hillary Clinton were in the White House, would this have happened?
I mean, you and I have been pretty doggone critical of Donald Trump, and for excellent reasons.
Depending on who's in the White House, this judge might not have been indicted at all.
I think the ACLU will probably give her an award.
Yeah, they probably will.
They probably will.
But then, moving on to a different character who is sometimes in the news, Bill Cosby.
As you all know, Bill Cosby was sentenced to 3 to 10 years for drugging and molesting up to 33 alleged victims, maybe more.
And Gloria Allred was representing some of them, by the way.
In any case, He has been tweeting away.
He's not gone to jail yet, but he's been tweeting some really remarkable things.
He says, in referring to himself as in the third person, he says, Judge Stephen T. O'Neill, That's the guy who's handling his case.
Continues to show his disgust and prejudice towards Mr. Cosby.
This has to do with Cosby is trying to appeal something and the judge doesn't want him to appeal it.
Frankly, I don't know the details.
It's probably one of these procedural matters.
He says, we are asking that this scandalous judge be removed immediately and Mr. Cosby be granted
bail throughout the appeals process because of the judge's racial hatred towards Mr. Cosby.
He's complicit in the corruption against me.
This judge is being exposed and it shows that this is bigger than me, Bill Cosby.
O'Neill, that's the judge, now has his formula tried, true, and tested to destroy any black man and or colored man in America.
I'm just so happy because this guy is proving my innocence and guess what else?
America is finally getting to witness the truth!
The truth.
Yeah, the truth.
Here's this guy who was notorious for behaving this way, and he finally, finally, he's 81 years old now, he's finally going to go to prison for this, and all he can do is rant about racism.
This is the whole Muhammad Noor story all over again.
If I could, this is an important point because a lot of our listeners might be younger and they might not understand the cultural phenomenon that was Bill Cosby.
Yes.
30 years ago, in 1989, this guy was coming off of one of the more impressive syndicated television runs with the Cosby Show.
That's right.
Where he was known as America's dad, America's conscious.
That's right.
This was one of the most watched television programs everywhere.
It made so much money that in syndication, Actors who've been, some of the black actors who were part of the Cosby family, they've been out of work for a while, but because of the residuals that they were making off of syndication, they were able to live a comfortable life because the checks kept coming in.
Wonderful passive income.
Mr. Huxtable.
Mr. Huxtable.
The Huxtable family You know, I never actually saw an episode of The Cosby Show, but I understand that they lived in this wonderful upper, upper, upper middle class house, living in an entirely conventional middle class way.
And yes, America's dad, he was the idol and hero.
He was just the sort of wonderful Negro of the civil rights era that one wanted to move right next door.
But now he is furious and he is happy.
Well, apparently he's happy because his judges overt and obvious races towards him is exposing America.
And America is finally witnessing the truth.
You know, apparently 25 colleges and universities had awarded him honorary degrees.
And they have rescinded their degrees.
Now, I don't know if that's every last one of them.
Maybe there's some.
I bet there's some black universities that have not rescinded their degrees.
It'd be interesting to look into that.
But that's the story on America's Dad.
Now, did you have any other stories that you had in mind?
Hey, I'd just like to point out to our listeners out there, there's a fantastic book that I Request everyone give a check out.
It's by a gentleman by the name of K. M. Brakey.
He's written a number of books.
His newest one is called All Thy Sons.
The theme of the book, what happens when there's nowhere left to run, nowhere left to hide, no neighborhood, no city, no country.
All Thy Sons.
It's available on Amazon.
It shows us a world through the eyes of the protagonist.
It's a fiction, but it's not that far off.
It's set in Canada.
He also wrote a good book About South Africa called, well, forgive me, the title escapes my mind right now, but K. M. Brakey's books are very much worth reading.
State that name again.
K. M. Brakey.
B-R-E-A-K-E-Y.
And the title, All Thy Sons, is a book I'd like our listeners to check out.
Available on Amazon.
I will add my dissenting voice to this.
I think fiction in the interests of racial consciousness is not usually successful, but P.K.
is a man of great discernment and judgment.
If he says it's good, it's probably very good.
Well then, we've got one more story here, and I find myself repeating myself when it comes to stories, but sometimes they're just so compelling I can't help sounding like a broken record.
This has to do with a fellow by the name of Carlos Zuniga Aviles.
A 33-year-old illegal alien from Honduras.
Well, he was shacked up with somebody by the name of Mercy Lisandro Chacon, and he discovered, and I don't know how, that this woman's child was not his own.
Well, once he discovered that the four-month-old was fathered by somebody else, he kicked the child to death.
Now, this is all in Shelby County, Tennessee, which has an importance that will be coming up before you in just a moment.
He had been deported five times, five times from Louisiana, Arizona, and Texas back to his native Honduras.
He had slipped into Shelby County, Tennessee.
Now, interestingly enough, Shelby County is one of those places that has become a sanctuary, and it refuses to turn illegal aliens over to ICE for deportation.
And so, as a consequence, you have this five-time deported guy living happily ever after in Shelby County, kicking a four-month-old baby to death.
And months ago, Shelby County attorney Marlene Clark She had explained to local media the county would not obey a state law that sought to ban sanctuary entities in the state of Tennessee.
Well, this is what you get.
And whenever I tell one of these stories, I always ask, how many is it going to take?
How many is it going to take?
It seems that there is an insatiable tolerance for this kind of thing in these sanctuary communities and cities and counties.
But I suspect I will be telling our listeners yet another story of this kind in the future.
But we have some interesting questions from our readers, and we have a little bit of time left, so let us take some of them up.
And here's one.
Do you think secession is a serious possibility in the next century within the U.S.? ?
He says, secession along racial lines.
The next century?
Well, there's quite a lot left of this century.
I think secession is entirely possible during the current century.
I agree.
And more and more whites, as they become minorities, they're going to realize that this is simply untenable.
They are becoming not only a minority, but a despised minority.
And as Ilan Omar is telling us, this is not a country for white people.
As all of these laws are being passed, are directed at white people.
If you call the police on a black person, it turns out that there wasn't any real danger of crime, but you thought so.
This too could be a crime.
All of this affirmative action, All of these Democrats who are pandering to non-whites, I think more and more whites, there'll be enough of us to say, look, this is just not the way to do it.
We need a divorce and we must separate and we shall succeed.
I think it's entirely possible.
What is your sense?
I think it's already happening.
I just don't think it's explicit yet.
I think we're seeing more and more people understanding that something is wrong.
I think that's what the whole Trump phenomenon was about.
63 million people voted for someone because they realized the things he was talking about resonated with them.
But see, secession is different.
Separation's been going on ever since integration.
The white flight, white flight, you go back to the 1950s, you go back to the 1960s.
White flight has always happened.
But the idea of conscious and literal, legal, boundary line secession.
That's a new idea.
Well, you're seeing it in places.
A couple of years ago in Baton Rouge there was an attempt to secede part of the city
to create an area that was going to be predominantly white because they wanted more tax dollars.
They thought that they were subsidizing.
We've seen this happen throughout metro Atlanta and the North Fulton suburbs, Sandy Springs,
Roswell.
They've all incorporated.
It's a form of micro-secession in a way.
Yes, yes.
And people talk about Northern California breaking away from Southern California.
But until you draw an explicit line, these are just stopgap measures.
But no, I do agree that there is a sense among whites that the kind of Living together that we're supposed to look forward to is just not working.
And so in their own private and discreet ways, whites are trying to avoid that.
But we'll see.
I think within this century, it's entirely possible.
I think it's in fact the only way that our civilization will survive in any meaningful way on the North American continent.
Otherwise, we would just be diluted and dispossessed.
This person also says, Do you envision whites moving to Europe or Australia in large numbers as demographics progress?
I think that could be possible.
I hope it doesn't happen.
I hope that white people, especially those who've been here for a while, will stand and stand their ground and ensure that there is some kind of continuation of the nation that their ancestors founded.
But here's yet another interesting question.
Do you think the demographics of Sub-Saharan Africa will actually lead to 4 billion Africans by the end of the century?
Which is what the demographers are projecting.
Or will disease, war, and famine prevent this?
Who's to say?
I think that the real question is not so much whether there will be 4 billion Africans.
There will, in any case, be more than there are now.
The real question is, where will the ones who don't want to stay go?
That is the aspect that worries us.
If you had 4 billion Africans and they stayed in Africa, It would probably be a very unpleasant experience for them, but it would not be the threat to the rest of the world that the desire of these, at least a few of these billions, will have to move in with us.
Correct.
Correct.
This is the ultimate ecological question of the 21st century, and it's one that oh so few people are even considering.
Yes, so we ran a debate on this, a discussion about this on the pages of American Renaissance, in which we had various assumptions.
And the question was, what does this mean, these projections?
I remember Steve Saylor referred to a graph that projected the population growth of Africans as the most important graph Available today.
And in many respects, that's true.
This will affect everything.
And there are still countries in which, I think Burkina Faso, I think Uganda still have an average of six children per mother.
There are countries in the, I think there are three countries still in Africa where the median age, the median age is below 16.
Half the people there are 15 or younger.
I think the median age in Europe is about 40.
This is just an extraordinary difference, an extraordinary difference.
I believe Singapore, or maybe it's Hong Kong, the median age is 45, 50, something like that.
What's the median age in Japan?
Oh, it's pretty old.
It's probably over 40.
The world is heading towards an extraordinary kind of conflict that is inevitable when you have all of these young, poor, desperate Africans doing their best to leave what they have turned into a miserable continent and come live with people who have made more successful societies.
Yeah, there's nothing else.
That's a sad way to end because that is not the optimistic answer I think that our listener was hoping for.
Well, you know some people have this perhaps this fantasy that disease and war and famine will knock them off.
That's not anything that it is particularly humane to hope for or to count on.
I don't think that will necessarily happen.
There will be an enormous amount of aid from all around the world and what we will be doing is rearing up more and more people who will want to leave their homelands and move to Europe or perhaps even to Asia at some point.
Anyplace but Africa.
We appreciate our listeners' questions and we ask that you keep them coming.
Send them to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again, that email address is sbpdl1, the numeral 1, at gmail.com.
Or to amren.com, A-M-R-E-N dot com, at our Contact Us tab.
Yes, we are always interested in hearing from our listeners, and sometimes we don't get around to questions, but that's only because we've got so many stories to cover, and we really do like hearing from you, and so please send us your questions.
So for Jared Taylor, this has been PK.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection