Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 27, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor

59:10

‘Sexual Ostracism’

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to today's edition of Radio Renaissance.
	I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
	And with me is my indispensable partner in this undertaking, Paul Kersey.
	Often imitated, never equaled, except no substitutes, Paul Kersey.
	The fact is, for the last podcast, I did accept a substitute in the form of Sam Dixon.
	He almost measured up.
	It was an excellent podcast, but I'm delighted to have Mr. Kersey back on the line here.
	Well, he almost measured up, but you might recall we also did a special Christmas recording as well.
	I hope everyone enjoyed that.
	I hope everyone also out there in podcast land, listening wherever you are in the country or internationally, had a wonderful Christmas.
	And this is, of course, our last podcast Of 2018.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	So, by the time we speak to you again, it will be the new year.
	And one of the things that we would like to point out is that those of you who have not yet signed up as subscribers to our YouTube podcast channel, please do so.
	All you need to go is to go to YouTube and look for Amran Podcast.
	And you will stumble right onto the channel.
	And please join the growing number who are getting notifications every week of these podcasts.
	And we encourage you to subscribe.
	Once again, all you have to do is go to YouTube and in the search area, type in Amren Podcast, all one word.
	You'll be there.
	You can... Nope.
	Two words.
	Two words.
	Okay.
	Yes.
	So go.
	We encourage you to do that.
	And then we also encourage you to share on Twitter, on social media, as you see fit, to help spread the message.
	Now, today's lead story is a somewhat disturbing one.
	It has to do with a person by the name of Taylor Dumpson.
	This is a 22-year-old black woman who, in May of 2017, became the first black woman to serve as American University's student body president.
	When the news got out, Andrew Anglin, who runs the Daily Stormer, posted Mrs. Dumpson's picture and personal information online and urged his followers to harass and bully her.
	This is behavior that we absolutely condemn, but this is what happened.
	Now, one of the people who heeded the call was a fellow by the name of Evan McCarty.
	He is also now 22 years old.
	At the time, he was a student and a relatively well-known actor in Eugene, Oregon's community theater scene.
	Well, he was tweeting and harassing under a fake name, and in April of 2017, Rose City Antifa revealed Mr. McCarty's identity.
	And it was on that occasion that, now that Ms.
	Dumpson, the black student body president, found out who he was, she sued him in federal court, along with Andrew Anglin and the Daily Stormer.
	Now, the disturbing consequence of this is that Mr. McCarty has now agreed to a settlement, and this is disturbing for a number of reasons.
	First of all, I'm not quite sure.
	I hunted all over the internet to find out just what law it is.
	What's the federal law that this McCarty fellow broke?
	Well, if we could go back real quick, the lawsuit stated that Ms.
	Dumpson constantly feared for her safety amid the so-called relentless harassment, and she was eventually diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.
	She was able to graduate, though.
	And now she's enrolled in law school, despite the so-called PTSD that she's claiming in this lawsuit filed in federal court.
	Yes.
	Well, the PTSD must not have been all that bad for her to have done well enough in school to now enroll in law school.
	But my point is, the fact that she suffered alleged PTSD, that shouldn't make any difference.
	If I say, you're fat.
	Get out of my house.
	And you claim to have suffered PTSD, that doesn't make the fact that I called you fat Illegal!
	In any case, he has now agreed to a settlement, but there's no monetary settlement involved here.
	What Mr. McCarty has agreed to do, once he was unmasked by Rose City Antifa, he's agreed to apologize, renounce white supremacy, and help civil rights groups fight hate and bigotry.
	He's going to undergo anti-hate training, have at least a year of counseling, complete four academic courses on race and gender issues, and do 200 hours of community service related to racial justice.
	Which, I should point out, probably is going around His community and scribbling inverted swastikas on there to create this perception that there is hate in the community.
	No, he's not going to do that.
	This is one of the most absurd and shocking settlements I've ever read.
	As you pointed this out to me, I almost thought this was from the Onion.
	It reads like something from the website Bumblebeer the Onion.
	It's comedic in nature, but this is the totalitarian consequences of egalitarianism.
	This is not comedy.
	This is not comedy at all.
	No, exactly.
	And Ms.
	Dumpson's legal team will monitor his compliance.
	And if he fails to do as he has said, or if he appears to be insincere in his efforts to fight racism, bigotry, and white supremacy, they can inflict monetary penalties.
	Now, a couple of things about this.
	Well, first of all, also in Eugene, Oregon, he had been acting regularly for something called the Institute for the Arts.
	He'd performed in a lot of their productions.
	He's apparently a talented guy, did a lot of musical theater, In April, when the Rose City Antifa revealed his real name, they of course fired him.
	So he was cut off from there, he gets sued, and now he's settling.
	Now, Ms.
	Dumpson was represented not by paid counsel.
	No, no, no.
	I don't think she has spent one red cent of her own money on this.
	She filed her federal case with the help of something called the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
	Kristen Clark, probably a well-meaning white woman, is the President and Executive Director, and she said that she explained this suit by saying, and I quote, we can't just stand back and wait for prosecutors to develop the political will to go after these folks, meaning trollers and white supremacists, etc.
	So this is my guess.
	Now, I looked around on the Internet to try to find out what happened here.
	And nowhere did I see any evidence of what law, what federal law, these guys are alleged to have broken.
	My guess is what happened is that Kristen Clark and her Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law filed suit, and it cost this guy a lot of money to just defend.
	The suit was filed back in 2017, and his parents were very apologetic.
	They're quoted as saying, oh, he was a bad guy, but he's not a bad guy anymore.
	My guess is this guy who was doing musical theater probably was being paid nothing.
	His parents might have been footing the bill.
	And they've said, look, they probably worked out some kind of settlement.
	Just stop bleeding us dry.
	We can't afford these lawyers.
	We know how that is.
	We can't afford these lawyers.
	And so they have gotten this guy to crawl on his belly.
	And also, he is supposed to help with the legal efforts against Andrew Anglin and the other people who might have joined in this harassment online.
	You have to wonder, my question to you, Mr. Taylor, is reading this and reading the quote from Kirsten Clark, the president of the, as you put, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
	Couldn't this be a playbook to go after anyone who sends a so-called harassing message?
	Exactly.
	It seems that way to me.
	What's the law here?
	I have not, as I say, I looked all over.
	I couldn't find a single example of one of his harassing messages that would justify a legal case.
	I mean, we know that there are plenty of non-white people who tell us as white people in general.
	They hate us.
	They wish we'd go extinct, die, etc.
	That doesn't seem to be a problem.
	I'd be curious to see some of Mr. McCarty's tweets or whatever they were that she sent the way of Ms.
	Dumpson.
	But now he is doing community service.
	He's going to undergo anti-hate training.
	You know, I'd love to see what anti-hate training is like.
	I would like to see it, but I'd also like, it's a shame there isn't a, it's a shame there isn't a legal organization dedicated to white advocates who could go out there and could sue on behalf of a recent college graduate who has experienced harassment in his or her undergraduate studies in the course of these race and gender classes where they're basically taught that everything wrong with the country And all of the problems people of color face are because of white supremacists, structural inequality, implicit bias, these white privilege courses.
	That'd be enough to give you PTSD.
	Exactly!
	Now see, that's another moral of this story.
	Here you've got this organization, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, under law, which takes these civil cases And beat somebody to death to the point where they can get somebody to do this.
	Correct.
	I think that if the law were absolutely uniform, well, even without the law, this never went before a judge.
	If you had some of these people who do all these harassing things against whites, individually and collectively, if you had an organization like this, it would sue those folks.
	You could probably get similar outcomes.
	We just don't have that infrastructure.
	But I consider this to be a very disturbing outcome.
	Now, there are people who can look on it on the bright side, and they would say, all right, this is what happens when you misbehave.
	You should not be trolling and harassing people.
	100% correct.
	Yes.
	100% correct.
	It's not productive.
	No.
	And it's a waste of... Not only is it not productive, it's a waste of your energies and talents.
	Yeah.
	If you're going to be doing something of that nature.
	Absolutely right.
	So, you could argue that this is, in effect, a good message for us.
	It holds us to higher standards because this is the kind of damage that can happen to you if you misbehave.
	So, anybody out there, if you're thinking of trolling, if you're thinking of harassing, don't Well it also shows that we really are heading into a type of society that we can look at what's going on with China where the actual state is dictating a social credit score whereas in our country it's basically this combination of big tech
	NGOs and the surveillance and censorship and the unpersoning, the deplatforming that can happen when this type of stuff is exposed.
	This kid had a bright future, was probably into this because he probably faced discrimination in college.
	Not knowing much about his background, what would force someone to want, what would compel someone to start looking at a website like the Daily Stormer and then to engage in this type of behavior when he probably had never even A lot of people on the internet, Mr. Taylor, have never met another, whatever you want to call it, white advocate, somebody who thinks about this type of stuff.
	They only spend their time entertaining these ideas through the internet.
	And that's how they engage with people.
	That's the unfortunate reality of where we are right now.
	There's too much of a liability to meet one another in person.
	We don't need the state to come in and say, hey, this is your social credit score when you have NGOs and you have these non-profit legal institutions saying, hey, we'll do this for you.
	Right, right.
	No, this is a sobering development, but let us put this message to good use.
	Our next story is the border wall, the border wall that was going to be funded privately by Brian Colfage.
	He is a deeply patriotic Air Force veteran, a triple amputee.
	He got these wounds as a serviceman serving his country, and he started a campaign on GoFundMe to raise private money to build the border wall on the Mexico border.
	Because he's frustrated with the government inactivity.
	Well, so far, so good.
	He raised $17 million, contributed about 289,000 people.
	Well, so far, so good.
	And those of you who wish to contribute, I would urge you to do so.
	Now, Jimmy Kimmel used his program to make fun of the 289,000 people,
	calling them dopey people, and saying that they are dipping into their meth money
	to pay for this.
	And this stimulated an enormous wave of astonishing hatred for this guy.
	Some of the messages that he's been getting are just shocking.
	We like to think that we're a family-friendly program, but the following comments are not
	family-friendly.
	One of the messages to him is, eat dick, pussy-ass white trash.
	Go fuck yourself and die, is another one.
	Kill yourself, you worthless piece of shit.
	And then another, who, commenting on the fact that he is a triple amputee, says, I'm happy to see you in that wheelchair.
	I'm happy to know you get no pussy.
	And then another one says, was one of the limbs you had amputated your brain?
	And then he's married to a very attractive wife.
	And here's another one.
	Message says, I don't know how that blonde cunt you are married to stays with you.
	A hot piece of ass like that should be screwing a real man.
	This is just extraordinary to me.
	I guess I'm naive.
	Who would be sending messages like that?
	This is a guy who's representing an idea, defending an idea, that was supported by 60 million people who voted for Donald Trump.
	You can have a political disagreement, but then this kind of just obscene, horrible abuse on this Air Force veteran?
	It seems like targeted harassment on the part of Jimmy Kimmel.
	What he said, basically, he sicked.
	I don't know if he sure enough said.
	He didn't say it, but again, when you highlight the story and you poke fun at it and then it goes up on all these on your BuzzFeed and all of your left-wing sites and Twitter and all these already Rapidly anti-Trump left to see this video and then be like, well I want to go learn about this guy and then you see he has a Twitter.
	This guy also had a big Facebook page at one point.
	I think it was called Right Wing News and it was de-platformed by Facebook because of quote, inauthentic, let me see the right word here.
	So, he actually is someone who, like you, is embattling Big Tech.
	He's threatened to take the CEO of Facebook to court, and I hope he does.
	This guy has shown, once again, by the time this podcast goes up, I think that he might be close to raising $20 million.
	Let's hope so.
	A lot of people are donating to this.
	I think this is a good thing.
	I actually hope that GoFundMe takes this down.
	And they say we don't want to give our platform to allow this to happen because we want big tech to be delegitimized in the eyes of patriotic Americans.
	This is the type of American who can lead an actual American renaissance.
	A lot of people listen that will probably laugh and say, oh no, this guy is probably someone who believes MLK is a great conservative.
	His website probably posts all this stuff about colorblind nonsense.
	I disagree.
	This is the type of story that shows that there is a pulse still in white America.
	There still is, by all means.
	No, I support this guy.
	I support his wall.
	And again, if there were any reciprocity in the way people react to these different stories, the kind of messages he and his wife have been getting, if that's not online harassment, I don't know what is.
	It's a great juxtaposition.
	It's great to juxtapose these two stories together.
	It just shows the leftist totalitarian society we live in, the anti-white society, where a God-fearing triple amputee who's got two young children All he wants to do is build a wall, and as we know, the left, that's the last thing that can happen, because again, it is a symbol that white America still has a pulse.
	Well, and this one of the messages, the first one I read, eat a dick.
	Pussy ass white trash.
	White.
	White.
	It's his race that's part of his crime.
	Exactly.
	But I think there's also another interesting juxtaposition here.
	There is a competing campaign that's gone up.
	There's another GoFundMe program that has raised $154,000.
	That's a far cry from $17 million.
	It's been up three days less for just seven days.
	But the effort of this campaign is to buy ladders for illegal immigrants to scale the border wall.
	Good grief.
	Now, this is being run by someone named Charlotte Clymer.
	I bet yet another earnest, earnest, well-meaning white lady.
	She works for an LGBT advocacy organization called Human Rights Campaign, and she's in Washington, D.C., and she explained it this way.
	She says, we saw some folks are raising money for a border wall to keep out our migrant siblings and fellow human beings.
	I don't see how underpaid labor can be essential to the U.S.
	economy.
	So she's got all the politics figured out here.
	I don't see how underpaid labor can be essential to the U.S.
	economy.
	Anyways, that's just me.
	No, no, she's got novel economic theories here.
	And she aims to raise $100 million.
	If they don't raise $100 million, then they're going to donate whatever they've raised to the Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services.
	And see, I thought this was very interesting.
	She says their program is all about, and I quote, it's about lifting people up.
	I guess it's up and over the border.
	Over the wall, I mean to say.
	It's how she wants to lift people.
	Now, you know, I wonder about this.
	It is against a federal law to enter the border, or cross the border, illegally.
	Is there not any kind of law against aiding and abetting this?
	I mean, this is mysterious to me.
	It should, again, somebody should flag this campaign and they should say that exact same thing.
	If you're going to be advocate Helping those who are breaking federal law.
	How are you not aiding and abetting felons?
	Yes, yes.
	If GoFundMe, I mean GoFundMe is certainly not going to kick off this campaign.
	And we'll see what they do about Brian Colfage.
	But this is an interesting story.
	Dueling GoFundMes.
	Well, see, I'm the type of person that would want GoFundMe to give all of the information of those who donated to the campaign for the ladders for our... what was the word you used?
	Refugee siblings?
	That's right.
	Okay, that's a new one for me.
	I would want to know who was all donated because I would, if we actually had a true Department of Justice, we would pass information to the DOJ and say these individuals are funding ladders to aid and abet those who would violate federal law.
	Seems that way to me.
	It seems pretty cut and dry how you'd handle that situation.
	There you go.
	Now, our next story is one that you sent along to me.
	The current Democratic frontrunners.
	Now, we're still, well, I guess not quite two years away from the next presidential campaign.
	And the three people leading the polls in this early stage of the presidential race are, oh my gosh, they're all white men.
	At least in the minds of the voters.
	Now, of course, the last two nominees have been Barack Obama, black, Hillary Clinton, female.
	And now, drumroll, please.
	The person leading the polls at the present time is none other than Joe Biden, former vice president.
	Number two is Senator Bernie Sanders.
	And then number three is Representative Beto O'Rourke.
	And this is a poll just taken in Des Moines.
	Now, Des Moines, maybe that's not representative.
	I'm sure that is not representative of the current rainbow coalition that is increasingly going to be running the Democrat Party.
	But 32% like Biden, 19% Sanders, and 11% liked O'Rourke.
	This is going to be a big problem for the Democrats if that keeps on.
	No, it's a huge problem because, again, I think that, and I've said this going on almost two years now, that Ms.
	Harris, the senator from California, will be the Democratic Party nominee for president.
	I could actually see, I don't know if Gavin Newsom is going to want to leave California.
	There's a crazy story, and this isn't really deviating too much because this is why it's so important to start paying attention to the demographic changes that are happening.
	In California, the state legislature now is at such a point where it's so democratic controlled that there's really no point in putting bills up to have them debated, because the Democrats are able to just vote it in, whatever they want to.
	And they're actually considering going after Prop 13, which is one of the property tax bills on individual property taxes there, which would allow the state to get a lot more revenue.
	I wasn't aware of that.
	Yes, this is something.
	Yes, Prop 13, that was voted back in the 70s.
	Yes!
	And yes, the people of California said, I think it capped property taxes at, was it 1%?
	The state has incredibly low property taxes.
	Yeah, and so, yeah, that would definitely be something that the want-to-be-haves, who are currently have-nots, Would love to sink their claws in.
	This is why it's a concept I don't know if you care about it that much but I like the idea of accelerationism right now because there are still too many white people in the country who will not go quietly in the night.
	We saw that with the election of Donald Trump.
	We see that now with what Brian Colfage is doing.
	I guarantee you 98% With a margin of error of 2% of those who have donated to this campaign for the Build the Wall are white people.
	Oh, have to be.
	You can look at their names.
	You can look at their names.
	It's almost an exhaustive on-roll of WASP-y names.
	Are you surprised that a BuzzFeed or a Vox or an Atlantic, one of these websites, hasn't tried to go in and And find out who all these people are who are donating to this campaign to do it.
	They may yet.
	But I understand from people who have donated, you can put in any name you like.
	Oh, of course.
	You can call yourself Nelson Rockefeller if you like.
	Call yourself Nelson Mandela.
	That too.
	That too.
	Even more fun.
	No, but as you say, going back to this poll real quick, this is Des Moines.
	Iowa, of course, is still about 92-93% white.
	Obviously, this is not a great representation of where the The actual people of color coalition that is ascendant within the Democratic Party.
	There's no way that Joe Biden has a shot.
	There's no way that Bernie Sanders, I don't think, has a shot because you already have people of color to the left of Bernie who are advocating much more progressive economic ideas that would make Bernie Sanders look like a You know, a free market capitalist.
	Well, it will be a very interesting process, and I suspect there will be a lot of blood on the floor by the time the Democrats are finished with this.
	It will be most edifying.
	But something else that our listeners should be aware of.
	On Friday, the U.S.
	Departments of Education and Justice officially rescinded One of the Obama administration's Dear Colleague letters.
	This was issued in 2014, and it pointed out that persons of color, students of color, were being disciplined in schools at a higher rate than persons of non-color, at least whites, were being disciplined.
	They were silent on the question of Asians, who were disciplined less frequently than whites.
	But in this Dear Colleague letter, they said, this is clearly Prejudice.
	Discrimination.
	They dismissed the very idea that the behavior could be different.
	And so, and they said, unless you get these differentials down, unless you start suspending and expelling white people at the same rate as blacks, we could cut off federal funding.
	And all around the country, people started, you know, they panicked and they started completely changing their discipline procedures.
	They basically ignored Anti-social behavior by black and brown kids.
	It's that simple.
	Because they couldn't find white kids to basically say, hey, look, please misbehave.
	Please do something to get out-of-school suspension or in-school suspension.
	Please!
	Ann Coulter wrote a column about this herself.
	She said something like, you're going to have to stop suspending black kids from slugging their teachers and start suspending black kids for dropping an eraser.
	That's the only way you're going to get these rates to even out.
	And that's what people started doing.
	There was just increased chaos throughout school systems.
	And some people went back to differential rates because they said, the heck with it.
	We're going to risk being sued.
	Our school system is going to completely collapse.
	I read a story about Baltimore City schools and the violence that's going on there.
	It's the kind of thing that you couldn't even imagine happening in anything but a dystopian society.
	Yes.
	And yet Baltimore, of course, gets massive amounts of money from the taxpayers it goes to subsidize that school system and the teachers there are terrified.
	Of course.
	I encourage our listeners to go out there and look at the videos Colin Flaherty, the guy who wrote White Girl Bleed A Lot and Don't Make The Black Kids Angry.
	Two fantastic books that have red-pilled a lot of people, trust me.
	He's compiled a lot of these videos of the school discipline problems because, as you said, The Obama administration made it a mission to criminalize public schools criminalizing or punishing anti-social behavior by black and brown people.
	Well, they've got this school-to-prison pipeline idea, you see, and the idea is we've got this completely biased and prejudiced criminal justice system And the people who work in the public schools, that's where it begins.
	We have this bias system.
	Of course, the teaching professions are some of the most relentlessly liberal SJW people around.
	And the idea that they are all ganging up on black kids who are not behaving any differently from white kids or Asian kids and sending them off to the police, this stuff is nuts.
	But this threat, this is another way that the federal government sticks its fingers
	in every conceivable pie is by means of money here.
	They can't pass a law that says, oh, well, they might very well one of these days,
	that says your suspension rates have got to be absolutely equal by race.
	What they're saying is, if you get too far on the line, we're just going to pull the plug.
	No more money for you.
	And so they start letting these absolute thugs stay in class.
	Discipline goes out the window.
	Teachers are terrified.
	Teachers are attacked.
	Learning stops.
	And finally, and this is something that Donald Trump could have done on his first day.
	Once again, one of those things that he could have done, but finally he's gotten around to getting his Education Justice Department to rescind the Obama administration's letter.
	And so, this should return to differential discipline rates and considerably more peaceable schools and more learning.
	It's about time.
	Well, unfortunately, America is running out of white kids to actually be in public schools.
	So, what's going to happen when you have school districts like the one in Nebraska?
	Nebraska of all places!
	We're talking about Lincoln, Nebraska.
	The Lincoln public school system 33% of the kids in the Lincoln public school system are students of color but they represent 70% Mr. Taylor of those referred to police and this of course is prompting the Nebraska ACLU to whine and moan and
	Basically, make it their mission to end school discipline because of its disproportionate effect and impact on people of color.
	I find it ironic that this report comes out in the same week that the Trump administration has rescinded this letter threatening to withhold funds if there are differences of this kind.
	I guess they had this thing in the works for some time, and the fact that the rug's been pulled out from under them is a bit of a shock to them.
	But I find it quite interesting that one of the co-authors of the report, Rose Godinez, another well-meaning woman, no doubt, she says, as a result of having a police presence in schools, Children are far more likely to be subject to school-based arrests for disciplinary matters than they were a generation ago.
	Well, wait a minute.
	Is it because there are police in schools?
	Or is it because the schools have changed?
	The generations have changed?
	It's been a generation.
	There are more arrests.
	Is it because there are police in schools?
	Or are there more police in schools because there ought to be?
	Because they're misbehaving?
	Good.
	Miss Godinez doesn't seem to have any awareness of this possibility here.
	Well, having an officer of the law in a school by osmosis creates...
	A tendency for these people, these students of color, to break the law.
	That's how the pipeline is created.
	Exactly.
	Just the fact that they're there.
	The tube is there, sucking away.
	And the pipeline is sucking and sucking.
	And only black students and only Hispanic students get sucked in.
	But, you know, it would seem to me that if there are uniformed police officers with handcuffs on their hips walking the halls, wouldn't you expect crime to go down?
	That's taking the whole concept of broken windows policing to what I would like to see, and that is cops on every street corner.
	That's what the city of New York did.
	We're at the end of the year, basically, when we're going to have a lot of the murder, homicide, non-fatal shooting stats coming out.
	And I was reading about how New York's rate is... It's shocking how New York has gotten their homicide rate down, what it is now, because they basically have an army of police officers trying to Bring some semblance of civilization to the 33% white city of New York.
	But apparently it doesn't work in schools.
	You put the police in there and they just automatically provoke all kinds of criminal behavior.
	Anyway, another quotation from Rose Gardines of the ACLU.
	She says, a school-based arrest is the quickest route from the classroom to the courthouse.
	Fine by me.
	Fine by me.
	What's wrong with that?
	If they have committed a crime, I want them out of the classroom and in the courthouse.
	Antisocial behavior should not be tolerated, especially in a public school.
	No, you shouldn't.
	You know, I've got a friend who's a...
	He does a lot with surveys and public schools and he's basically said you can identify students in the fourth and fifth grade who are going to be troublemakers and you need to separate them immediately and that's why there are alternative schools.
	The world is harsh guys and if we're going to actually have a country, if we're going to perpetuate our civilization, we cannot See our society deviate down to the lowest common denominator of the behavior of, let's face it, black and brown kids who we're told are being discriminated against as opposed to the opposite.
	We're doing everything we can to bend over backwards to accommodate and lower our standards for them.
	I just shake my head.
	It is a perpetual motion machine.
	You get more and more data about behavioral differences that are reflected by suspension rates, arrest rates, poverty rates, whatever it is.
	And inevitably somebody steps in and says, no, no, no, there are no behavioral differences.
	There is discrimination.
	This is all the result of discrimination.
	And so if you have a youth murder rate among blacks that is ten times higher than that among whites, this is not testimony to differences in behavior, racial differences in behavior.
	This is something that we have to correct.
	It's the environment that is at fault.
	No matter how much data you have that proves racial differences in behavior, the explanation always has to go the other way around.
	It's our fault.
	We have done something to make them do this.
	Which brings us to our next story.
	What a segue!
	Yes, indeed.
	In London, they have the same problem.
	You know, remember the 2011 riots they had?
	Once again, history repeats itself in strange ways.
	You had a black person who was arrested by white police officers.
	There was some kind of mix-up.
	I don't believe the guy was actually killed, but the fact that he was arrested prompted really very serious race riots in London.
	Correct.
	2011.
	You see these images of London just going up in flames, at least certain buildings, certain parts of it.
	Blacks running riot and thuggish whites getting involved too.
	In any case, after those 2011 riots, City Hall or Scotland Yard put together something called the Gangs Matrix.
	And what it did was try to identify people who were likely to get involved in gang activity.
	Well...
	The mayor of London, the first Muslim mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has discovered that there are 3,200 names listed in this database and four out of five are...
	Black.
	They're black!
	And it's in a city that is, I think, less than 12% black at this point.
	You know, London, of course, has a white minority.
	Yes.
	But this gang metrics, just like so many of these gang databases in America, in our urban cities that are declared racist.
	Once again, you have this amazing database.
	Its sole object Objective is to make the city safer for not just white people, but for the black and brown communities where the violence is going to be happening.
	Yes.
	And they concede that there's evidence the list has helped to reduce offending rates.
	That's not good enough.
	We must restore trust, says City Hall.
	And we must ensure that this list is used, quote, lawfully and proportionately.
	What is this insanity?
	Well, I'm just repeating myself here.
	You're beating yourself up because this, the more, the further and further we remove ourselves from the era of Jim Crow, sundown laws, and the actual government working to protect property rights for property holders, Hey, they were actually on to something.
	These architects of everything that's denounced.
	You know, again, when you have data that's Collected and it shows that the violence is largely committed by one group of people.
	It makes sense then to put in place structures to stop it.
	Let's take that into consideration.
	It's like when someone says, well, you know, I've got this friend and he's black and he voted for Donald Trump.
	Well, you don't base social policy on individuals, guys.
	You just don't.
	That's a really bad way to run a city, a community, a school, or a country.
	You have to recognize patterns.
	They're having this knifing plague in London, of which I'm sure you're aware.
	But all of this is shockingly concentrated in certain communities, too.
	London actually is going to surpass New York City for the first time that they've been collecting data and homicides for the year.
	Hard to imagine.
	Back in the 60s and 70s when New York City was considered this horrible den of violence and lawlessness,
	it was impossible to imagine then that London or Paris, you know, Paris had gotten just as bad too,
	that they could ever equal New York City in lawlessness.
	But moving on to our next story is the caravan that never died.
	We have a caravan of caravans, it seems.
	A new caravan of 15,000 people has just left Honduras, says Irma Garrido.
	A member of the migrant advocacy group called Reactiva Tijuana Foundation.
	Now, we'll talk about Tijuana a little bit later.
	But, you know, it's quite an extraordinary thing to organize 15,000 people in a caravan.
	You've got to transport them, feed them, medicate them if they fall sick.
	You're a big fan of the Civil War and you think about the supply chains and the logistics of trying to feed the Army of Northern Virginia or any of the And it's going to grow!
	north and south and how difficult that was. Well how do you coordinate for
	15,000 people? And that's women and children. Exactly and it's gonna grow.
	This lady, Irma, another well-meaning woman no doubt, she says we assume that
	this caravan will pick up more people in El Salvador and Guatemala.
	But their aim is to arrive in Chiapas province.
	That's a southern province in Mexico that's relatively poor.
	And they think they're going to request work in Chiapas.
	There is a Mayan train project.
	And President López Obrador, the new president, has announced a reforestation project.
	Now, and I find this very interesting.
	Obrador has pledged that Central Americans who want to work in Mexico will get a visa.
	And the governments of Mexico and the United States last week agreed to work on some kind of development plan in southern Mexico and Central America so as to make people happy so that they will not be jumping across borders.
	But we'll see how this works out.
	Now the reason that this is called the Reactiva Tijuana Foundation, I suspect, is because of the of what happened in Tijuana when the original caravan showed up.
	I think what they're now six, seven thousand people still there and the people of Tijuana Yes, they are.
	Yes, they are.
	I mean, look at it this way.
	We did get a chance to talk about, unfortunately, the boycott of Tucker Carlson's advertisers.
	And this is something that you and I privately were worried about.
	We've been discussing this off and on throughout this whole year as Tucker got increasingly more Risky when it came to his noticing more truthful.
	Yeah, obviously truth, but you have to do that judiciously and in a position like Tucker has you can't You know, what's the old Mary Poppins quote?
	A spoonful of sugar lets the hate facts go down easier.
	Unfortunately, Tucker decided that he wasn't going to do any sugar.
	He was just going to throw them out there.
	And he interviewed someone from Tijuana.
	I can't remember if it was a journalist, but they talked about the littering.
	They talked about how uncomfortable a presence of this massive amount of individuals who comprised the caravan and what they were doing to the quality of life there in Tijuana.
	And, you know, this is...
	It's amazing that you can lose your advertisers through a successful boycott just by pointing out that, hey, they do bring litter.
	Well, but has he in fact lost advertisers?
	He's lost almost 20.
	He's lost a lot of major advertisers.
	Well, let's hope he gets 20 more.
	We'll have to see about that.
	But this new caravan, our dear friend Irma Garrido has said that she suspects some of them really will want to keep heading north and end up in the United States.
	Seek asylum, of course.
	And this is a very significant thing, and I hope that it is in fact true.
	But just last week, U.S.
	authorities announced that any of these asylum seekers that come in from Mexico are going to be returned to Mexico.
	They're going to be booted back and they will have to live and stay in Mexico while their claims are processed.
	Now, this is an unusual kind of cooperation from this new Mexican regime.
	I hope it keeps up.
	Mexico's Secretariat of Foreign Affairs said that it's going to cooperate with the U.S.
	on this policy change.
	It's going to take back these non-Mexicans.
	It used to be they'd say, hey, this guy's from Honduras.
	This guy's from Ethiopia.
	These non-Mexicans are not our problem.
	And of course, to some degree, they are responsible for them because they've let them move along.
	Correct.
	But I find it very encouraging and very interesting that they are saying, yes, we will take them back.
	And that is certainly going to discourage some of these so-called asylum seekers.
	We don't have it on here, but I do want to ask you.
	We are in the midst of a government shutdown.
	What are your thoughts on what Donald Trump is doing?
	Basically reversing course.
	He unfollowed Ann Coulter, who was criticizing him, voraciously, for his failures to do anything on the border.
	And then he comes out and says, hey, you know what?
	If we're not going to have a wall in the budget, I'm standing firm.
	What are your thoughts on that, Mr. Taylor?
	Well, I will share a little secret with you.
	This is something that we don't often talk about.
	Stories that we are going to prepare for American Renaissance and then do not prepare.
	But every year, at the end of the year, we have selected a Renegade of the Year.
	And up until this government shutdown that we were very seriously going to make, we're considering making Donald Trump the renegade of the year.
	For all the high potential he had, and the fact that he has fluffed so many opportunities to do useful things for his people and for his country, but the fact that he dug in his heels and said, all right, no wall, no government.
	That meant that we had to divert our efforts in the direction of someone else whose identity at this point still remains a secret to you and to all of our many listeners.
	But no, he's finally showing a willingness to keep a promise.
	That's what he campaigned on.
	Whenever his happy admirers spontaneously broke into a chant, the first one out of their mouths was always, build the wall.
	This is what they voted for him to do.
	Yes, it was.
	And so I'm delighted that he's going to do that.
	Who knows what the outcome will be.
	But I say, hats off to Donald.
	I'm a very skeptical guy when it comes to Donald Trump.
	He has failed us many times, and I think he's a man of bad character.
	I will go on the record to say that.
	But, he's showing some backbone, and I approve.
	So, we'll hope that he holds firm, we'll hope that we get a wall, but there are so many people who so absolutely hate him that maybe they would prefer the government glimmered away.
	You know, speaking of the government and its funding, the fact that there was so much funding on this project to build a wall, raised privately, I thought to myself, you know, I wish All governments were crowdfunded.
	That meant you could support whatever it is you thought was worth supporting.
	So you would have your taxes and you would basically eliminate taxes?
	Eliminate taxes and the government would have to make a pitch to the private citizens.
	Look, we think we need a State Department.
	Yeah, really?
	We think we need foreign aid.
	Really?
	Or if they said that we think we need the Department of Education.
	I ain't gonna fund that.
	Wait, wait.
	So backtrack here.
	You're saying there's no federal income tax.
	Right.
	Okay, so whatever you make at your job, you get a W-2 job.
	You get all of it.
	You get all back.
	You get all of it.
	And then the government comes to you and they petition you.
	Yes, every year the government says, you know, we'd like to have this cut.
	We'd like to do this.
	And you could say, nope, we ain't gonna support that.
	Make it all voluntary.
	What do you think?
	GoFundMe.
	The main government GoFundMe.
	It makes a lot more sense than what we're paying for right now.
	I'll say.
	I'll say.
	And I think they'd suddenly become a little bit more efficient.
	Just an idea.
	Just an idea.
	It floated into my head when this guy was raising so much money for this wall that the public tax the public should pay for.
	But that shows you the public is prepared to make certain public expenditures.
	It's a shame that Brian The Brian Colfage doesn't go ahead and say, well, hey, why not go ahead and crowdfund for the Trump...
	Deportation force.
	Yes, yes.
	And this would show you what the people really want to pay for.
	Correct.
	Not what these so-called leaders want to pay for.
	Anyway, moving to the rest of the world.
	I thought there was a very interesting little story from Australia.
	Apparently, there are blacks, Africans, who have immigrated to Australia.
	And just as they seem to do all around the world, they are misbehaving.
	And apparently, some blacks went into a Vietnamese restaurant, and somebody asked for a cigarette, the Vietnamese, probably asked for many cigarettes, and the Vietnamese owner of the restaurant said no cigarette, and the blacks started attacking them.
	And so apparently there's this viral video, which I have not myself seen, but the Vietnamese are defending themselves, swinging chairs at these blacks, attacking away.
	Well, the Vietnamese community is really up in arms about this.
	And what I find most interesting is a quote from a Vietnamese that I'll get to in a moment.
	But somebody says, after the fight, they all came back and while the Vietnamese were recovering, they stole people's handbags and phones that were left on tables.
	There's another woman who said, and this is really, to me, the really interesting quote here.
	This is a Vietnamese woman saying, Blacks do not deserve to be in Australia.
	And she says her immigrant community, the Vietnamese, has done a better job of assimilating than Africans.
	Now, this is really quite interesting.
	You have these different groups who are surveying each other and judging each other in terms of how well they have assimilated.
	And the Vietnamese says, we're doing a much better job becoming Australians.
	What's terrifying and what is a glimpse of America's future as the People of Color Coalition is ascendant and it's this coalition of fringes, people who literally have nothing in common, Mr. Taylor, except their hatred of white America, past, present, and future.
	You know, these Vietnamese, I think, well, of course, I do not want Vietnamese here any more than I want anybody else here.
	I mean, we should have our own homelands.
	Well, they're just visiting.
	They're just visiting.
	They can go back very quickly.
	But my point is...
	It's only white liberals who create this dictum, this idea that you cannot criticize blacks.
	Black bad behavior is all the fault of white people, and this history of oppression, persecution, slavery, blah blah blah blah blah.
	Whatever you want to do.
	And yet, as you noted correctly, The Vietnamese, they see through it.
	And in Australia.
	The Koreans in Los Angeles, they see through it.
	They're like, hey, wait a second, you white liberals living in your gated communities.
	Why don't we go ahead and crowdfund for some ladders to have people climb over into your neighborhoods?
	The kind of people you keep out.
	We have to deal with these people on a daily basis.
	Right.
	And then this final observation from this Vietnamese woman, I think this is priceless.
	She says, why we let them in?
	Feed them and give them money for making trouble to us.
	What is the Australia law?
	She says, it's not fair.
	We are working hard, paying tax, and support these motherfuckers.
	Well, she's clearly assimilated.
	Well, I love your enunciation there in the form of an elderly Vietnamese shopkeeper.
	But no, the point is, The whole world, the whole Western civilization, our leaders have constructed a moral system where it is imperative if you want to climb up the ladder of respectability that you ignore and deny, and then deny that bad
	Black behavior is because blacks are incapable of assimilating to Western civilization and our standards.
	It could be Australia, it could be the United States, it could be France, it could be England, it could be Austria, it could be China, but the Chinese are smart enough not to let You know, a large contingent of Africans moved there.
	That's right.
	Everybody sees it but us.
	Although, our next story suggests that in their own quiet way, white people do see something that they're not supposed to see.
	And this is a story about what has been called sexual ostracism.
	And it is from a Moroccan website, interestingly enough.
	It has to do with a survey of 2,000 people aged 18 and above who were involved in online dating and it was a question about their preferences for both short and long-term romantic relationships.
	As it turns out, women are choosier than men.
	Not too surprising.
	Men, well, we know about men.
	Men are sometimes not very choosy.
	And as it turns out, when it comes to people from the Maghreb, or from the broader Orient, 57% of Parisian women said they are reluctant to form a relationship with such a person.
	57%.
	That's a pretty good majority.
	And the figure for men was 44%.
	Now, I might point out that these are Parisians.
	I would imagine that if you're asking in Lyon or in Brest or in the countryside, the figures would be even higher.
	It'd be closer to 90% if not higher than 90.
	Yes, yes.
	So this is interesting.
	57% of white Parisian women will not date or it says they're reluctant to form a relationship.
	They don't want to date Arabs or Middle Easterners.
	And 44% of men don't want to either.
	Ah, this is such vicious xenophobia and hatred.
	When it comes to black men, sub-Saharan African men, 62% of lady Parisians do not want to date them, and 54% of Parisian men won't date them either.
	So, this does suggest that although we keep our eyes very firmly shut to certain aspects of pattern recognition, these people, and these are the people who are prepared to teleposter these horrifying preferences of theirs.
	Well, you see the same patterns in the United States with online dating sites like Match.com, OkCupid, I'm sure if Christian Mingle had it, or if eHarmony.
	I'm not even sure what websites there are anymore for online dating, but when I used to read about The way that women and men would look for one another, it was all broken down by race.
	And the least desirable were black women.
	Well, back in the days of print personal ads, it was S-W-M, single white male looking for S-W-F.
	I mean, it was just right up front.
	Those were the first initials of practically every message.
	Those are good acronyms.
	I'm like SJW, you know.
	Right, right.
	Well, we're coming down the home stretch here.
	We should move on to yet another interesting, interesting case.
	I will just briefly go over the background of this on December 17th.
	There was a double murder in Morocco of two Scandinavian backpackers, Louisa Jesperson, 24 year old from Denmark, and Marin Ueland, 28, from Norway, and they were stabbed, throat slit, and beheaded by Islamists in the Atlas Mountains in Morocco.
	Now, apparently, this group of Islamists had spent two days hunting for victims, and they went to a place that was popular with tourists because, as good Islamists, they wanted to sacrifice some infidels.
	Apparently, they have no formal ties with the Islamic State, but now the Moroccan police have captured a total of 19 of these.
	That's pretty much the whole cell, it looks like.
	They took really quite horrible and graphic videos of themselves committing these crimes and also they had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State, uploaded this stuff on social media.
	Somebody sent me a link to one of these.
	I watched just the first few seconds.
	I don't encourage you to watch them.
	No, I don't encourage.
	These two girls are beautiful.
	They were beautiful Nordic women and the videos do showcase Yes, just quite horrible.
	I just turned it off after really just a few seconds.
	And now, Morocco is heavily dependent on tourism.
	They do not want this kind of news at all.
	And I have to salute the Moroccan authorities.
	They apparently rounded up everybody involved, not just the two Who committed the crimes.
	And they've done pretty well, generally.
	They did, though, have an incident in 2011, when a bunch of jihadis attacked Marrakesh's famous Jama El Fana Square and killed 17 people, most of whom were European backpackers.
	In 2003, there was a chain of suicide bombings in Casablanca.
	Killed 33 people in just one day.
	But that's really the second largest employer After agriculture, the whole country, they really need this.
	So they are going to try to run a very tight ship.
	Now, an interesting footnote to this is the way the Swedish broadcaster known as SVT handled all this.
	And I thank you, Mr. Kersey, for bringing this to my attention.
	But they were very, very squeamish about reporting what actually happened.
	One of these Scandinavians... I mean, this is Swedish television.
	It wasn't really a Swede, but we're talking about Norway and Denmark, and Scandinavians aren't interested in what happens in the other countries.
	They didn't mention the beheading at all.
	They reported neck wounds.
	One of the girls suffered neck wounds.
	And then they went on to run a report from a memorial service in Marrakesh condemning the murders.
	And in this clip, they have some woman claiming the victims could have been absolutely anybody because it had nothing to do with Islam.
	Islam had absolutely nothing to do with this.
	Everybody knows this is not true.
	Utterly, utterly, utterly crazy.
	And then, to top it off, They made more of a to-do about a law, apparently in Sweden, that says you are not supposed to circulate horrifying videos of this kind.
	You run the risk of going to jail for four years if you get caught doing something like this.
	And boy, somebody tweeted, you know that you are in Sweden, When Daesh murderers, Daesh is another name for the Islamic State, of course, when Daesh murderers receive benefits, housing, and protected identity in Sweden, which they sometimes do, but people who post movies of what they have done can get four years in prison.
	No, you're right.
	I mean, this is the type of story that again shows how far we are removed from Really positive things happening when these liberal ideas that these girls, and we have no idea why these two females decided they wanted a backpack to Morocco.
	Again, I don't think either of them were married.
	They're both single.
	They have these delusions of what the world is like.
	This idea that only vicious right-wingers who should be purged from polite society would believe that Islam is a violent religion.
	We're going to go show you otherwise.
	I have seen the stills.
	Like you, I don't want to watch the video because again, I just, I hate seeing white-knit naivete on camera, captured.
	It's again, because this is, you know, I was, you've been around for a while.
	I was born into a society where our We were basically conquered is the best way I like to put it.
	It's sad to say and it's so it's so horrifying to look at these videos.
	It's just like when who was that member of the German the European Union whose daughter was murdered and he said that and they created a fund for I don't remember the exact story but that's when I saw this like that's the type of mentality.
	Yes.
	And hopefully, as we see the end of 2018, hopefully it's these type of stories, Mr. Taylor, that will compel our people worldwide to understand that... But the point is, the point is, the Swedish official news media are utterly, utterly downplaying what actually happened.
	And if they succeed in this, in a world in which people like you and me are shut up and de-platformed, they may get away with it.
	But I think it's too late.
	The horse is out of the barn.
	There are too many sources of media, and we hope that the truth will always get out.
	And again, this is our last program for this year, and we will not see our beloved listeners again until next year.
	And I wish every one of you a Happy New Year.
	So for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
	It's been a wonderful 2018.

▲