All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 14, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
58:40
The Battle Lines are Forming
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to today's edition of Radio Renaissance.
It is an unusual one in that instead of my reliable and always insightful comrade, Paul Kersey, who is taking a well-deserved rest this week, I have in his place an old friend, a man whom I have known for many years and admire deeply, and that is Sam Dixon.
Sam Dixon has been racially aware and you could even call him an activist from the age of 15.
That means he has been working for our people for no fewer than 57 years.
A claim that very, very few people can make.
He has observed much and reflected much and it's a great opportunity to have him with me today to share with us some of his observations, some of his wisdom on the passing scene.
So thank you very much for making yourself available on this occasion.
Well I'm happy to do so and I'm honored and hello everybody that listens to Radio Renaissance.
And Mr. Dixon had suggested that he'd like to talk a little bit about how the left or the group that he prefers to call the system, given that the terms left and right are increasingly irrelevant these days, but I still like to think of them as the left, but how the left has changed since the days of our youth.
And one of the most obvious changes, of course, is that instead of going to bat for the economically downtrodden, the working class, that used to be really their main issue of concern, at least in economic terms, They are now the champions of non-whites, of homosexuals, of illegal immigrants.
Their focus has completely changed to what, and I suppose this is one of the reasons people talk about cultural Marxism, because Marxism used to be concentrated on economic ideas, but now it's lavishing its care and its vision of future on people who are not necessarily economically deprived.
But, Du, what are your ideas?
What happened to the liberals?
Have they changed?
What sort of principles and positions have they abandoned?
What are your views on this?
Well, as a preface, first, as you say, I prefer to call it the system.
I am liberal on more issues than I am supposedly conservative.
I recommend everybody a column, the best column I think he ever wrote, By Paul Gottfried on belief clusters and how belief clusters have caused people to adopt these artificial, arbitrary positions on sort of a litmus test list of what makes you a liberal or a conservative.
I don't buy into that.
I am a white person.
I am What I am is not defined by ideology, and I think these issues can be approached one by one.
What I believe about abortion says nothing about what I believe about the progressive income tax.
What I believe about the estate tax says nothing about what I believe about environmentalism.
What I believe about environmentalism says nothing about what I believe about the rights of homosexuals to get married.
These are all separate things.
But what we're interested in is the race.
That's what American Renaissance is interested in.
And support for American Renaissance, I imagine, and I hope, and I'm sure, is not restricted to people who are card-carrying conservatives.
Because lots of liberals, like Margaret Sanger and Jack London, would fit in in many ways better than so-called conservatives.
And so-called liberals also understand the use of power, which conservatives don't understand, and we will not solve our problem without the use of power.
So I do prefer to call them the system, and I think these divisions of left and right are simply a way for the system to divide white people and get white people not to listen to each other and not to think as a people.
So that's it.
Well, it is certainly true.
It's been my position ever since the establishment of American Renaissance that what unites us is our race.
We are a family.
And in your family, you accept members of that family, even if you disagree on a whole host of things.
And if we ever are to have nations in which our race is to be protected, that nation will be like all nations, one in which there are differences of opinion on a whole host of subjects.
But so long as we have these discussions among ourselves, we can arrive at what I believe will be amicable and fruitful solutions that will lead to our prosperity.
Yes, like we pray in church on most Sundays.
The mainstream denominations usually have a prayer in which we ask that the leaders of our country and society will be led to good and wise decisions for the benefit of mankind.
That's what we want.
That's right, that's right.
And of course, it is our hope that other races and other groups will have similarly fruitful and successful societies for themselves.
This is of course something that our opponents and critics never seem to be capable of understanding, is that we want nothing for ourselves that we're not delighted and happy to grant to others.
That is one of the few points of difference between you and me.
As you know, I believe there is far more criminality in the behavior of these people than insanity.
But you, you being the good-hearted person you are and always looking for the good in people, you believe they just don't understand.
I think many of them do understand, but they basically have a genocidal attitude toward white European civilization.
Well, I don't like to use that word.
But we'll skip over that and go directly to the issue at hand.
Yes.
How has the system changed?
What are some of your observations in that respect?
Well, the system and what I call the old believer liberals have ceased to exist.
The old believer liberals have ceased to exist.
When I was a young man, a child, You had a lot of sort of American Civil Liberties Union liberals who genuinely believed in free discussion and being rational and fair to people and this sort of thing and they believed in doing things that were right and they were sensible.
Basically, our enemies have become Bolsheviks.
They've become Marxists.
They are unwilling to concede to other people what they demand for themselves.
At the conclusion of that trial, of that fellow, James Fields, up in Charlottesville, the witnesses for the prosecution and a lot of people in the audience, and I think Heather Heyer's mother, went out on the steps of the courthouse and chanted, Whose streets?
Our streets!
Whose streets?
Our streets!
This is the kind of thing you would expect from red thugs under linen, the idea that they own the streets and nobody else is supposed to be able to have a demonstration.
Our enemies have become militant Marxists.
They may not even know it themselves.
They may yell that you're a McCarthyite if you say that.
But you can be a Marxist without knowing it.
And they are full of hate.
I read their sites.
I subscribe to Nation of Change, which is one of the sites where they talk to each other.
If you want to talk about hate, Read the comments from the readership of the followers of Nation of Change.
You will see hate in a way that you won't see it in the comments to American Renaissance.
Yes, I'm not sure it's correct to call them Marxist in any sense that is meaningful.
I don't think they know anything about the labor theory of value.
I don't think they know anything about seizing the means of production, or the dictatorship of the proletariat.
Those are the things that I associate with Marxism.
Perhaps by that you mean that they are totalitarian, that they wish to totally dominate the thought and the discourse of our society.
And would act with tremendous brutality and cruelty to those who get in their way.
They'd be very happy with the de-Kulakization.
They would have no trouble with the execution of 200,000 clergymen, which went on in the Soviet Union.
Franklin Roosevelt knew about that and was untroubled by it.
So I think that they really are on the point of rising to the level of violence that is very disturbing in the future.
I can imagine them, as we were discussing this morning, if they saw a situation in which whites were asserting themselves and there was a possibility of the establishment of a white ethnostate, If things were dissolving in America, the elections were going against them, and you had truly articulate, determined, principled people being elected to Congress, I can easily imagine someone like Bernie Sanders or Chuck Schumer or Elizabeth Warren or Hillary Clinton calling up the government of Mexico and saying, Mexican nationals are in danger, the white races, the Anglos are on the march, and we can't control them.
Send us your army.
I think they're perfectly capable of doing that.
They are very militant, but I can tell you're skeptical of my assessment, so let's move on to something we can agree on.
Well, it's true.
I don't like to impute motive to people.
I suppose because I've so often had motives imputed to me that are false.
And I don't like to anticipate what others would do in imaginary situations, but I certainly do agree with you that there is an increasingly open expression of just the most virulent and visceral hostility towards whites.
I think that's new.
It's really new.
Well, at the highest level, as everybody listening to us will know, the New York Times has hired a Korean woman who says that she'd be perfectly happy if every single white person in the world were dead.
And they had no problem with that.
They didn't fire her.
They actually endorsed her and said that it's understandable as an Asian woman growing up in a white country, it's perfectly understandable and acceptable that she would have this idea.
Yes, Sarah Jong, she is now a member of the editorial board of what was at one time the most prestigious newspaper in the United States, and still thinks it is.
And here again, we want to talk about how our enemies have changed.
The language that the so-called free press, the so-called responsible media is using now Is the kind of stuff that you would have expected to read in the Militant, or the Daily Worker, or some extreme Klan paper.
I was reading last week, one of the people in the New York Times mentioned, as if everybody just accepts it, the bottomless depravity of Donald Trump.
Now, I'm not an unqualified Donald Trump admirer.
I voted for him, but I can see a lot of things.
If I were God and could do it, I would change about Donald Trump.
But bottomless depravity?
He has nothing good about him?
And this is like your old friend and mine in childhood, John Calvin's idea of the utter depravity of man.
They have the utter depravity of Donald Trump.
As well as the utter depravity, really, of anyone that gets in their way in any way.
They would say the same thing about anyone that got in their way and they would falsify their personality and fake the news to get them, as they're doing to Donald Trump.
So the language that they are using is something that 30 years ago, 50 years ago, when Nixon and Kennedy were running against each other, If somebody prominent in the media had made such a statement, the reaction of the American people and the rest of the American establishment would have been one of shock and indignation that somebody could make such an extremist statement.
Yes, yes.
I made a video broadcast not all that long ago that I started off just by reciting the headlines of the top four trending Washington Post editorials, opinion pieces I should say, of that day.
All four were about Donald Trump.
All four were utterly contemptuous of him and one that particularly sticks in my mind is one that concluded that, don't forget, Donald Trump is still an authoritarian who could Burn it all down.
It makes them sound like the Emperor Nero setting fire and fiddling while Washington goes up in flames.
There's no limit to their language.
It's the language of extremists.
It's the language of people who are fanatics.
And they are fanatics.
When you have a board of editors that will include somebody who flat out says she'd be happy if every single man, woman, and white man, woman, and child in the world We're dead.
From the get-go, you're not dealing with a very rational person and the people who accept her, obviously they're not disturbed by that.
And then there's to some element, they share that sentiment in the back of their minds.
They would certainly never share that if someone said that he'd be happy if all the Jews in the world were dead, or all the whites, all the black people were dead.
In fact, I believe some wag took some of Sarah Jong's tweets and substituted Jews for whites, and tweeted them out, and her account was immediately suspended.
Yeah, that's hate speech.
It's hate speech.
Well, to me, in a way, I'm thankful to the New York Times.
for making this double standard so explicit.
So explicit.
When I noticed the there were the announcements that she was hired and then the word came out as to her tweets and I thought oh of course they will fire her.
They must not have known about this.
Au contraire.
They knew full well.
They knew all about this.
And they were expecting this.
They had the prepared statements.
And they said, well, they tutted about it a little bit.
They said they weren't happy with this.
But this is understandable in the circumstances.
As you say, here she was, an Asian woman, Now, she's not even 30 years old.
She's a naturalized Korean.
She came to the United States, I believe, when she was seven years old.
She went to Harvard, no doubt, because white supremacy kept her from going to some better school.
Yeah, they forced her to go to something as low-rent as Harvard.
No wonder she's outraged.
Oh gosh.
But no, the clarity of the other side's language, just the bare knuckles, open-eyed, wide-eyed, bear-toothed Animus that they hold for us.
You were mentioning earlier that the Democratic Party is almost explicit about its desire to sweep away the old white guard, certainly the old male white guard, And I keep expecting Democrats, white Democrats, all across the country to see the writing on the wall and come our way.
But alas, the last set of elections in 2018, more people voted Democrat, more whites voted Democrat than voted Democrat in the 2016 election.
That's true.
It was a very discouraging election, very discouraging figures.
There are among white liberals, though, an awakening.
There is no future for them.
I try to maintain contacts with lots of people.
I try not to get walled into a ghetto of people that agree with me.
I make a conscious effort To be pleasant and friendly.
And I've established good relations with a certain number of liberals, prominent ones, who are willing to talk to me.
And several of them are members of the state legislation.
They are not us.
Actually, I agree with them on many of their issues.
They are white liberals and a lot of their issues I agree with.
But they have told me that Stacey Abrams is a racist, that she hates white people.
And they have no future in politics, and they're getting out of politics.
Stacey Abrams, of course, is the black woman who was running for governorship of Georgia in this latest election.
And she was in the legislature, and they had to deal with her.
They said, she does not want white help.
She simply hates white people.
And I think she does.
It was even reported in the press that she was going to make scarcely any effort at all to attract white people when she was campaigning.
She figured if she could get enough of the blacks, enough of the Hispanics, then any whites who voted were welcome.
But she wasn't going to go make any particular effort to attract them.
No, she prided herself on that.
And she beat, she defeated a sort of establishment liberal woman by a vote of three to one in the Democratic primary.
And this is also something that is changing in our society.
It's not the kind of change of position that I want to talk about and hope we will move on to.
But she defeated somebody with perfect credentials as a liberal, but was not an extremist.
And she not only defeated her in the Democratic primary, she crushed her.
And she said flat out, we have made the mistaken strategy of trying to get some white votes.
And the time has come for us to just rally our forces and storm the Citadel.
And she made wild statements that she was involved in flag burning before.
That didn't matter to the media.
She said that she would blow up the statues on the faces of Lee and Davis and Jackson on Stone Mountain.
I mean, this was a real in-your-face, I-hate-you woman.
She also, this is something that among black people is that truth doesn't matter.
The myth of their suffering is just growing and growing and growing.
She described herself as growing up in poverty.
Her parents were both ordained ministers of the United Methodist Church.
The United Methodist Church Babies and Pampers, it's clergy.
They pour huge amounts of money into these people.
They have health care plans, they've got retirement plans, all this stuff.
Her parents were not poor, but she tells that story and no one dares tell her.
That's a contradiction.
She claimed that she won some kind of academic award and went to the governor's mansion When she was in high school or something.
This would be like 20 years ago.
And the guards at the gate told her, you can't possibly have won this because you're black.
And she was turned away.
This is just ridiculous.
It did not happen.
She made it up.
She's a demagogic, race-baiting liar.
But nobody in the media would ever say that.
And she came very close to winning.
She came within 1% of winning and she will win next time because the Republican Party will make no effort to register whites and the Democratic Party and the NAACP and LARASA have constant voter registration rise with the result that already in Georgia minorities are registered at 15% above their percent of the population.
And so the white working class has just left out and the Republicans don't dare register white people because the Justice Department would probably investigate them.
They did that one time in New Jersey when the Republicans were trying to register people in their base and the Justice Department sent investigators out saying, well, you're only working in white areas.
This must be some civil rights.
Your Republican registrars need to be down in the projects registering black.
Well, it's certainly true that blacks and Hispanics, they can explicitly and actively go out and register their own people.
And that's not considered any kind of violation of electoral law or any kind of civil rights law at all.
Eventually, however, this will give us some help.
Like these discouraged white democratic friends of mine who now realize that there is no market for white liberals.
They are unhappy.
This does not mean that they are eagerly going to the Christian majority and looking forward to signing up with the NRA.
And signing on to help big business pollute the rivers and that kind of thing.
The door of opportunity for the traders is closing.
The era of the Charles Weltners and all the other rank breakers who got their faces on Time Magazine, they're not needed anymore.
It's like a convention of whores, where the whores outnumber the potential customers in a hotel by 10 to 1.
The price of their services would have to drop radically because they're no longer needed.
Well, I think that we are still, after all, about, what, 65% of the electorate?
White people are.
And it seems to me that the Democrats are a little ahead of their time.
They're anticipating things.
And if they keep talking about how dispensable we are and how unimportant to their goals, and really, if they continue to treat us as essentially an obstacle to peace on Earth and goodwill towards man, I do maintain my faith that even some of these Democrats will see that they are not wanted and will realize what that means.
Well, I think you saw that in the Trump election, where you saw white working-class Democrats especially voting for Trump.
But they are right.
I mean, demographics are on their side.
No question about that.
Amazingly, they still have a significant percentage of the white population, which does not have any white identity.
They don't think of themselves as white.
They don't think of Western civilization as something they're involved in.
They don't have a proprietary feeling toward the Parthenon.
They see themselves as in other identities.
I am a woman.
I am gay.
I am young.
You know, they see themselves as their established identity is one of these subsets.
And the white women who buy into this feminism apparently do not have the discernment to realize how harmful this is and how malignant the motivations behind it are and how it is not functioning.
Never do you see a white woman feminist ask, well, what about the behavior of the black women on the O.J.
Simpson jury?
Yeah, there wasn't any feeling of sisterhood between them and the murder victim, Nicole Brown Simpson.
There was only the fact that O.J.
is black and we are black.
Only white women are so silly as to think that they have more in common with a black woman than they do with their father, their husband, their brother, their boyfriend.
White women are capable of believing amazing things, so they will continue to get a chunk of these white women because they're indoctrinating this stuff.
As you know, the schools now are virtually something.
They might as well turn them over to the Khmer Rouge.
I mean, they're just, they work from Sesame Street all the way through graduate and professional school with the indoctrination.
And it takes a long time for people to get deprogrammed, you know, from the cult.
Yes, and I'm sure you're aware of all the screeching from the non-white left about white women who did vote for Donald Trump.
There was just outrage at the fact that the majority of white women did vote for this beast, this fiend in human form, And this is again thrown in their faces as a denial of everything in the name of white supremacy.
That to vote for Donald Trump was an expression of white supremacy.
And indifference and inability to see their own interests.
There was a column I read where you said that.
What's wrong with white women?
Why can't they see Of course, the truth is the exact opposite.
It is not that way.
But the division in the Democratic Party is a very important thing.
There's been very little commentary about the primary race between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.
But had it not been for the minorities, Hillary Clinton would never have gotten the nomination The overwhelming bulk of her support came from Blacks, Hispanics, and Jews, while Bernie Sanders, ironically the more radical of the two, the wine-and-cheese, Birkenstock-wearing, Volvo-driving, Champagne Bolshevik whites in the Democratic Party, they voted for Bernie Sanders.
But the fault line fell almost exactly along racial lines.
It was like 85% of the The non-whites were voting for Clinton and 85% of the whites were voting for Sanders, but Sanders made a strong show he didn't win, but the time is coming when a black person, a black radical or a Hispanic radical will win the Democratic nomination and they will be able to dispense with white people the way the Democratic Party in Georgia now is dispensing with white people.
It would be a mistake for them, within the next, I think, 10 or 15 years, openly to just throw the white voter in the trash the way Stacey Abrams was doing.
Yeah, but we want that to happen.
Like you were saying about the New York Times, it's good for us That it's being made so explicit.
The problem, of course, though, is the Republicans will not offer any real alternative.
Well, that's exactly right.
They will try to engage in dog whistling and that kind of thing.
I don't believe they're even whistling to dogs, I think.
I talked to some of their strategists in the election in Georgia, and they were looking at the racial numbers and all that.
When the Republican candidate Kemp finally did win and Stacey Abrams couldn't get her recount in his statement, he said, we're going to have an administration that all Georgians will like.
We're going to have a diverse administration.
So clearly they still believe that they can appoint a few blacks, give blacks appointments to the courts, make them judges.
In the next election, four years from now, they'll be able to get a percentage of the black vote.
When the reality is, the Republican Party in Georgia is virtually finished.
Well, that is the big difference.
We have these groups who have a clear sense of their racial identity, their racial interests.
And then, on the other hand, you have a Republican Party which is trying to be race-blind.
Who's gonna win?
Who's gonna win?
They have no program.
The Republicans have no program.
They really have basically embraced the system program.
They offer no real opposition.
That's why I'm in favor of the idea of the ethnostate.
We have to have a program.
The Republicans won't take it up.
No.
But it is incumbent upon people to clinch the sale, to sell the life insurance policy at the end of the interview.
We have to give an alternative.
We have to have a program.
Which the Republican Party will never have, but the Republican Party is on the way out, and it won't matter much longer.
We'll be rid of the Republicans.
I fear that they could hang on for quite a lot longer.
It's so difficult in the United States to start a new party, their form party under Perot.
They don't need a new party.
We don't need a new party.
They're virtually finished.
You said the demographics are not yet ripe for them.
I think it's pretty obvious that we're going to have amnesty for the illegal aliens.
The Democrats want it.
The Republicans aren't really stopping it.
To stop it, you've got to get them out of the country.
You've got to have huge numbers of border police and national immigration employees, investigators.
You'd have to have a massive program, and you would have to use force.
Like I was saying about liberals knowing how to use government power.
The Republicans and the whites don't have the sufficient testicular and spine equipment to carry that out.
When you get the amnesty, as you know, the government has used the 11 million figure now for almost 30 years.
It's never gone up.
Everybody with a grain of sense knows it's much higher.
Ann Coulter in Adios America was clever.
She went to Western Union and she found that the number of remittances going back to these third world countries from America has gone up 300% during the period that the government has been insisting that there are only 11 million illegal aliens.
But let's take the government's figure.
They're 11 million and they get amnesty.
Most of these people are males without wives and families.
They're not going to want to live single without wives and families.
So if you get 11 million of them, they bring their wives and their two children.
You're very quickly looking at 45, 50 million.
When Reagan granted his amnesty, they turned out to have two and a half times as many aliens as we were told.
That's right.
We had legalized far, far more than anyone expected.
Right.
And then, of course, at the same time, we did not get the other end of the bargain, namely employer sanctions and a secure border.
They passed it, but it might as well have been a blue law.
It was never enforced.
Not enforced.
Yes.
And so when this happens, you say it's been a long time before the Republican Party has gone.
If you look at the figures, the Republican Party is carrying these states like South Dakota, Montana.
When they got Senators elected in these states, most of them are very small.
Their margins are like 53-47.
When you legalize these people, that margin is gone.
In Florida... But no, my point is, I agree that the Republican Party, as it stands now, has very little future.
I just don't see anything coming along to replace it that's any better.
I don't think there's any possibility of reform.
That's another difference between you and me.
It's hard to guess how this will come, but when you have people like Stacey Abrams and Senator Schumer of New York, and they have total control of the government, things are going to happen to white people.
And what I think could happen will be a nationwide breakdown along the lines of Northern Ireland or Lebanon.
It will become such that people will have to move into neighborhoods of their own ethnic group.
Regardless of what the government wants, people will not let people into their ethnic group.
The economy will tank, because it has those places, and the government will be unable to buy people off.
And we will have a just gridlock all over the country.
I don't see that coming through votes.
I see it coming through just a process of the government attacking white people in so many ways and fomenting attacks on them that this will have to happen.
The incitement to hate.
Our enemies talk about hate.
They work hate all the time.
They go back to things that in a sane society we laughed at.
Lynching.
What do they have to do?
They have to go back to Emmett Till.
Three generations ago.
But Emmett Till is very much alive.
His picture's on the walls of schools.
He's in the history books.
Children in all grades spend a lot of time with Emmett Till.
And of course, even then they go back to Emmett Till.
A lynching I think most of us, when you say lynching, we have an idea of a mob of people, maybe some of them wearing white sheets, grabbing someone and dragging him out of jail and hanging him.
the case of an outraged husband who was told that this guy had tried to sexually assault his wife,
who went with one buddy and got immatile and killed him.
It's really stretching the definition to call that a lynching, and the jury acquitted him,
probably for racial reasons.
Possibility had it not been there, given Mississippi, a lot of people said somebody tries to grab your wife
and force her into a sexual relationship, you are entitled to get your shooting iron and killing.
But that's what they're doing.
They're picking these things.
The Black Lives Matter movement.
You've done a slender job at pointing out there's no statistical evidence to support this.
That hasn't deterred George Soros and the New York Times and NPR.
One iota.
If you try to go on Facebook or something and simply point out the statistics that black cops kill more blacks per capita than white cops do, you will be taken off as a hater.
Because they don't want anything to contradict their propaganda.
They're telling white, black people that white cops are engaging in what they've called an epidemic of killing African-American youths all over America.
And when you look at the epidemic, it's stretching the language, like saying that Donald Trump has bottomless... Depravity.
Depravity.
They have to go...
over here and find some guy in North Charleston who was killed and then four or five months later they have to find one that they say was strangled in New York City.
Out of a population of 40 million African Americans, if you total up the number of these questionable killings, it comes up maybe a dozen?
Well, the Washington Post went on a witch hunt and they tracked down every single police killing of all races, of all sexes in the United States, and to their surprise and dismay, and they were explicit about this, they found only 70 black men, unarmed men, who were killed by police in a single year.
Only 70.
And in many cases, this guy, he was by unarmed, we mean without an actual arm.
And here's a fellow who might have been driving a car towards a police officer.
Or a fellow who was just beating the living heck out of some police officer.
And in many cases, the fact that he was unarmed didn't make any difference at all.
This was an obvious and clear threat.
The other fact is... They had one in Atlanta where they said that the white pup killed a black young person, a youngster.
And it turned out that the gun was a plastic toy gun.
Well, that's not surprising.
You know, you're in a desperate situation and, you know, someone's got what looks like a gun.
What are you supposed to have, x-ray vision like Superman?
You're supposed to be able to do a chemical diagnosis.
Well, that's the case of this Tamar Rice fellow.
I forget what state that was.
He was a young fellow who was in a public park.
He's waving one of these very realistic plastic guns around, and they're supposed to have a red piece of plastic stick right in the barrel.
So that if you're looking down the barrel, you know exactly that this is not the real thing.
What are you taking that off?
And the police are told, look, here's a guy waving a gun around in the park.
They show up, the guy's waving the gun around the park, and they shoot him.
Well, frankly, I don't think the fact that he was black makes a bit of difference.
And it's like Michael Brown, for heaven's sake.
If you attack a policeman, and you punch him, and you try to take his gun away from him, and the gun goes off while you're wrestling over the gun, and then you manage to break away, and you charge him, Makes a difference what race you are.
Chances are, you're going to be shot.
And even Eric Holder's Justice Department recognized that Darren Wilson acted with justifiable able prudence.
Once again.
But my point is, the facts don't matter.
Tamara Rice and Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin and Eric Garner, all the rest of these go down as heroes.
Heroes!
These are martyrs to white wickedness.
Well, it's much worse than you say, because being a good believer, as you are, you cannot see how bad it is.
But in the case of Darren Wilson, no.
The Eric Holder did not decide, oh, he's a nice guy.
He's not well, they just could they did everything they could to get him for months
They sent in dozens of FBI agents and Justice Department people and
At the end of the investigation, they couldn't come up with anything.
Furthermore, they found that the blacks retracted their statements.
A lot of them had made these statements that Brown was holding his hands up trying to surrender and don't shoot and all this stuff.
These blacks eventually, when confronted with the evidence and things they had said to other blacks and people at the time, before they found out that they could give up guilt on a lie that would be useful, they admitted that these were lies.
These lies that the blacks uttered were not really made to the news media.
They were made to police officers.
The result of these lies were violence all over the country in which police officers died and tens of millions of dollars of property were destroyed.
Not one of them was ever indicted for giving false statements to a cop, the way Martha Stewart was, and the way these people associated with Trump are being indicted.
Eric Holder in the Obama administration gave them all a pass.
They could put all this in motion and the law didn't matter to Eric Holder or Barack Obama.
They were black brothers and sisters and they were not going to be touched.
What is worse is that there were two investigations in Ferguson, Missouri.
One of the shooting of Michael Brown.
The other was of generalized police alleged misconduct in Ferguson.
And the one of the shooting of Michael Brown took apart one black witness or alleged witness after another and showed that what they were saying was wrong, critiqued one of them one after another.
The other investigation into the behavior of the Ferguson police accepted that kind of Testimony, much of it clearly unreliable, without question.
It's as if they were written by two completely different police departments.
In any case, no, I certainly agree.
See, this is another fundamental change which all of our listeners, most of them, are aware of.
We need to think about it and recognize it concretely.
And that is the denial of justice to white people.
To fail to enforce the law against Darren Wilson's accusers, who lied to the police, harms Darren Wilson and the white community.
This system is denying justice to us.
The Antifa, as we know, is able to act with impunity throughout most of the United States.
They sell masks on their websites.
They go about masked in violation of the anti-mask laws.
They commit crimes.
They assault people.
They brag about it.
They were bragging in Atlanta about vandalizing my properties, breaking into them, smashing the windows out, painting threats on the wall.
When asked about this, their response was, LOL, laughing out loud.
And the media wasn't upset about it because Sam Dixon is a thought criminal and it's kind of funny.
We get together with our journalists and have a cocktail.
It's kind of funny to find out that the Antifa is doing this to Sam Dixon.
We're amused.
Well, I must say, an example of my naivete, as you would put it, was on full display.
When we had to cancel an American Renaissance conference for the first time, and this was after we'd been kicked out of four successive hotels, we would get into a contract with a hotel, and then there would be enormous pressure brought to bear on them.
People threatening to come on the premises and distribute leaflets, in some cases they actually did that.
In some cases, they're going to say they're going to block the parking lots.
They're going to demonstrate.
And rather than hold our event, they would sign a check as a cancellation fee.
This happened four different hotels, and we finally gave up.
We discovered we could not have a meeting.
And I cleared my schedule, and I issued a press release.
And I expected to be swamped with interviews from people who wanted to know what is the true state of freedom of speech and assembly in the United States today.
Well, as soon as the American press discovered that we were wicked so-called white supremacists, the SPLC says we are haters, They lost all interest.
They're condoning it.
But one thing I would add, the interviews that I did get were from the foreign press.
Foreign press was quite interested because they still have this idea that we are a nation that cherishes our constitutional freedoms.
But the American press, once they found out who we were, if we had been the North American Man-Boy Love Association, if we'd been PETA or some other group, and we'd been kicked out of hotels, my gosh, it would have been coast-to-coast news, I'm sure.
But if all we're talking about is white people who stand up for the interests of white people, oh my gosh.
You can understand.
You can understand.
It's perfectly legitimate that we should be shut up and kept out.
You see, what you don't do is you don't connect the dots.
There's a charge that judges give jurors when they have to find criminal intent, and that is the intent can be inferred from the act.
And when you have these people condoning, covering for the people who made the threats and cancelled our event, it's because they don't believe in the First Amendment.
They want to shut people up.
Well, no, I'm fully aware of that.
I believe that when we get one democratic administration after another, and the Supreme Court is full of Elena Kagan's and Sonia Sotomayor's, they will find some creative reading of the First Amendment.
To make it illegal for broadcasts like this to go out.
I have every confidence that they have.
They have done it historically.
In World War II, Felix Frankfurter authored an opinion that Jehovah's Witness children could be compelled to say the pledge of allegiance to the flag.
That their religion did not matter and their freedom of speech did not matter.
The government had the power to force citizens Who belong to a religious sect that do not affirm allegiance to flags, make their children do this.
And so they've got precedents they can look at.
Oh, I think they will evoke them and it will become possible to not simply count on the likes of Facebook and Twitter and YouTube and Google to silence us, but government force can actively mobilize against us.
I do not see that as by any means an unthinkable outcome in the United States.
Well, nationwide, this is another change from the left.
They have abandoned law and order.
In 1954, when the Supreme Court made its decision about mixing the races in the schools, what we heard from liberals like Ralph McGill, the Pulitzer Prize-winning editor of the Atlanta Constitution, was, this is the law of the land.
When the Civil Rights Bill, the law of the land, and they were willing to send in troops to enforce that.
If Southerners didn't go along with it, well then you sent in federal troops to Mississippi and Arkansas and you forced them at bayonet point, leveled at children.
You forced the government's will.
Now liberals of this system have become secessionist.
They are, if some city in the South had decided to, that we're not going to follow civil rights,
you know, they would have, they would have put an end to it.
Now all over the country, you have the cities that are sanctuary cities
that are going to fight the federal agents.
They're going to pretend to defy the law.
You have it on drugs.
Whenever the liberals can get their way by anarchy, by allowing cities to opt out of the law of the land, it's being allowed.
And this is another change, by the way.
They are willing to allow localities to adopt even more extreme left-wing policies in defiance of the law.
And you see them.
Hillary Clinton made this clear in her campaign.
One of her campaign promises was that there would be no deportations in a Clinton administration.
Did she really say no to deportation?
That's what I understood her to say, that she would not deport anybody.
Anybody?
Anybody.
Well, deportation is a part of the law.
One of my problems with Trump is that he's incapable of meshing with these people.
Someone should have asked her, how many is enough?
At what point will there ever be an immigration law?
If 200 million Chinese come in a period of 12 months, if 50 million Mexicans and 13 million Haitians and 50 million Nigerians, if suddenly we double the national population in 12 months, which is conceivable, Would you then be willing to consider having an effective immigration thing?
No one asked these Democrats that.
But getting back to the law thing, they have withdrawn law protection from us.
Nationwide.
The system makes no pretense of enforcing law.
In Atlanta, the Antifa put up a death threat against me.
I went to the FBI and was simply laughed out of the office.
I didn't go to the police.
I knew it would be hopeless to go to the Atlanta police.
They were able to attack Trump rallies with impunity in Atlanta and around the country.
And finally, to give you an example of just how outrageous the situation in Atlanta is, they had a demonstration against police brutality.
It didn't even have the radioactive issue of race.
They weren't out fighting white racism.
They were demonstrating against police brutality at Georgia Tech.
They threw a Molotov cocktail about 14 months ago.
They threw a Molotov cocktail into a police car and destroyed the police car.
And they were arrested in the act.
Several months ago, the Antifa website had a retrospective and exalted the fact that none of the people arrested for throwing a Molotov cocktail in a police car had been prosecuted.
Our black district attorney, Paul Howard, is not about to prosecute some people who have engaged in the fight against white racism for merely throwing a bomb in a police car.
That's a pretty wild country.
When you have a country like Washington, like we have, where you can have the president inaugurated, and 300 people can be arrested for acts of violence, and attacking the inauguration of the head of state.
And not one of them goes to jail.
This is beyond the situation of the French Revolution before they overthrew the king.
This is a wild situation, and the media won't comment on it.
It is certainly extraordinary.
And I find that even under Jeff Sessions, the fact that the people who got arrested for conspiracy or for serial rioting, I suppose that's a new crime that's been invented, Are all of these white groups, there was this rise above movement.
And maybe they did.
Maybe they did go out looking for a fight.
Maybe they did.
Certainly no more so than Antifa.
And then of course there is Gavin McInnes' Proud Boys, who have been arrested for all kinds of conspiracy and this, that, and the other.
And for this to happen under a Donald Trump Justice Department is very, very disturbing to me.
And I see absolutely no signs that they are cooking up a similar kind of investigation for Antifa and these other leftist groups that openly brag about their violence.
No, they won't be touched.
I'm running out of time.
We've got a lot of territory to cover.
Yes, well, what would you like to talk about?
Well, we talked about what's going on with the Democratic Party and the opportunities that that opens for us.
We talked about the system now left in condoning violence against people based on race and what they say.
We talked about the withdrawal of police protection and we talked about the system's tolerance of secession by cities.
But there are other things, too.
The left has abandoned any interest in the rights of the accused.
When I was a kid, this was a fault line between the phony right and the phony left, which I think it was, and certainly is now.
The liberal establishment, the New York Times and the others, were all for the Warren Court, which established things like the right to a Miranda warning, things like that.
That's gone.
You see in things like the prosecution of this Fields guy in Charlottesville, the judge denied a motion for change of venue.
If he had been a black rapist who had broken into a family, let's say this happened in Georgia, in the all-day killings, you had a black rapist, criminals, who broke into a farmhouse, they raped the women, they killed the women, they killed the husband and children when they came home in the midst of this crime.
Well, the federal courts ruled that the public opinion was so outraged in Seminole County that it ought to be moved to another county.
And that makes sense.
That should have been done.
I say that as somebody, you know, there's no way you can impanel a jury in Seminole County to try these outsiders who came into the county and murdered a prominent and admired white family.
So move it somewhere else.
Another jury will be able to hear it impartially, but in this case, The liberal press, not a word about the denial of a change of venue.
The stuff with these rise above people.
Indicting people under a crime of conspiracy to incite riots.
I didn't even know such a crime existed.
I thought it was passed with one of LBJ's civil rights bills as a sop to the cop-on-every-block, brain-dead conservatives that somehow this would be used on the Black Panthers and the SDS.
Well, that never happened.
But it's a goofy Orwellian law to begin with.
So the rights of the accused mean nothing to them.
That's gone.
There's no pretense of that anymore.
The interest in the white working people, as you've said before, old Franklin Roosevelt, when he was running his lying administration, he was always chumming up with Polish Catholic workers in Detroit and Lithuanians and others, what people used to call hyphenated Americans.
Urging them to resent Anglo-Saxons and rich people, that Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt were going to take care of you and they were going to give you labor unions.
All that's gone.
Though the working class is now viewed as some sort of lumpenproletariat fascist.
And they've moved the Marxist-minded system, liberal activists, journalists, people like that.
They've moved over now that it's going to be strictly a racial revolution.
And the white workers also will be scrubbed.
That's a significant change in the left.
Yes, I agree.
I certainly do agree.
And they've moved on in other ways.
When I was in college, you could go by the literature tables of the Students of Democratic Society, which you were familiar, I think, and they had scads of leaflets and books about the horrors of the military-industrial complex and these overseas wars.
I happened to agree with them.
Because I was an isolationist, and I was not in favor of the Vietnam War, and I wasn't in favor of the military-industrial complex and the Pentagon then.
I'm not in favor of it today.
But you won't hear about that in the New York Times.
They're in favor of brinksmanship against Putin over a ridiculously contrived thing in Crimea.
They're in favor of boots on the ground in Syria.
After the total failure of what they said we were going to do in Iraq and Afghanistan, the failure in Libya, the failure in Egypt, Hillary Clinton and people like that, they want to try again.
They're still preaching this doctrine, which I think they know is untrue.
You would say they're delusional.
There's Hillary and people like that, and the campaign was like, oh, if you just go into Syria, all the silent majority Syrians, the good people who are like Danes, will come out, and there'll just be this Danish democracy, and all of these people will just be chatting in their coffee shops about all this stuff.
No, they're all for the military.
We spend more on military expenditures than almost all the nations of the world put together.
Now, I happen to be more liberal than I am conservative.
I'm liberal on more issues than I am conservative.
As the liberal schizoid side of me looks at this, Here is a huge amount of money that could be devoted to things like job training, building roads, building a nationwide speed train system, all kinds of things that we need if we are to survive economically, instead of being just flushed down the commode.
of protecting the rights of homosexuals and women in the Muslim world, making the U.S.
government a third party to Muslim marriages all over the world to reform the Muslims.
George Washington would have had somebody that came up with such a cockeyed foreign policy arrested and sent to the lunatic asylum.
But they're all for the military industrial complex.
And you take foreign policy, this is an extraordinary thing.
This vilification of Russia, this carrying on about Russia trying to influence our elections, Every country in the world, with a grain of sense, tries to influence our elections.
For Pete's sake!
I mean, you have these people who are in one breath saying they're globalists, and they want the free movement of capital and labor and ideas across national boundaries.
And then you get someone like Trump elected, and suddenly they're sounding like Stalin in 1953 or 52.
What are they going to be doing next?
Jamming foreign broadcasts?
I recommend to everybody a thing that came out in the last several days about Maria Butina, the Russian girl who our fascistic state arrested and has held in jail, and what I'm saying is solitary confinement.
for the crime of trying to influence American elections.
She's now pled guilty to one count.
And the New York Times is jubilant, if you look at it, that they forced this pathetic woman who wants to go home to admit that her supposedly is guilty.
And the headline doesn't even say she was trying to influence the election.
No.
She was trying to influence conservatives.
And they have a video to go with it.
The video is just fantastic.
You watch it.
This young lady is guilty of things like she went to a conservative meeting, something called Freedom Fest.
I've never heard of it before, but I imagine a lot of our listeners have heard of it.
She went.
Maria Putina was caught.
The government could prove she went to a meeting?
And she stood up during the question and answer period, and she asked a question of Donald Trump.
And they have a little circle around her, and then they have a circle around Trump.
So you'll know that Donald Trump is the kind of guy who lets people who are foreigners, who aren't Americans, he actually will accept a question from some anonymous questioner who turns out to be a foreigner.
Where's all the language about globalism and the free trade, the free distribution of ideas?
What is all this?
And then you look at the system itself.
How many members of Congress hold dual citizenship with Israel?
Quite a few.
I think it's 30 or 40.
Are there as many as that?
That's what I've heard.
I can't document them.
But certainly a lot of them do.
Isn't this obviously a problem that you've got a foreign government with a citizen sitting in our councils in the legislative branch of our government?
Well, I imagine you will have some who are Mexican dual citizenship.
I know that's coming.
I think you've got some now that are with Irish and Italian citizenship.
And yet the system never says we've got to stop dual citizenship where you have an Italian or Irish or Israeli national sitting in the U.S.
Senate or Congress.
How can they not influence our policy?
And then you have Barack Obama.
Barack Obama taped a message for Macron in the French elections to stop the National Front.
You can find it online.
The Guardian.
The Guardian newspaper.
You'll find it online in Britain.
That was certainly not an attempt to influence the election.
You talk about the sceptre of Putin.
Did Putin tape ads for Donald Trump?
But they feel that's perfectly all right.
The New York Times had an article condemning Oban.
And because he has banned... Victor Orban.
Orban, yeah, Hungary.
Because he has banned foreign money from coming in to fund political parties.
This is the newspaper that wants someone like Maria Butina locked up because she asked the president a question, they sent 11,000 tweets out, and joined the NRA.
But they think it's perfectly all right for them to insist That they should have a right to fund political parties in Hungary?
Well, as has often been said about them, if they didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have standards at all.
But it's so blatant!
It's so blatant!
Why can't people see the obvious?
What's wrong with white people?
And they begin to wonder why the credibility of the media is just plummeting.
They do.
This is a wonderful thing.
And they know the answer.
The answer is that people have been spreading fake news and we have to get control of the internet and stop the Facebook.
Well, that's right.
That's very much what they're trying to do because they realize that they used to have a monopoly.
The monopoly has faded away.
People no longer trust them.
And their only alternative is to snuff out people like us.
And ladies and gentlemen, we have come to about the end of our podcast to this day.
And thank you very much for listening.
Thank you very much.
And I must thank you, Sam Dixon, my friend of a long time and comrade-in-arms.
Thanks so much for being able to join us on this occasion.
Oh yeah, I will say farewell to our listeners.
Farewell is a word that comes into our English language through our Viking forebears.
It means say-o-well, far-o-well, so farewell to everyone.
I love the English language and I especially love the Viking and Anglo-Saxon contributions to it.
▲
Export Selection