All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 7, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:51
Score One for the Caravan
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to our edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me on the line is Paul Kersey, my faithful and indispensable partner in this weekly undertaking.
And as usual, we have a very, very full week of developments in all the matters that are of interest to us and to our audience.
And I'd like to give our readers an update yet again on this wonderful caravan of optimistic fortune seekers who are coming to our country and who hope to make it great, make it big, strike it big in the great Norte, El Norte.
And I'd like to concentrate on some of what we've learned about this group called Pueblos Sin Fronteras, or People Without Borders.
Which is an activist group based in the U.S.
and Mexico.
They're actually the ones who invented the caravan phenomenon.
That's correct.
And they've helped guide this group from a thousand miles away, all the way to the border.
That's right.
Have you seen some of the images of the individuals as they're sitting around, of the caravan participants?
They've all got smartphones.
Oh yeah.
They all look well-fed, and when I say well-fed, they're quite corpulent.
They're quite turgid, quite overweight.
They're regular to their meals, and we have this sense of them wearing out shoe leather, tramping thousands of miles.
No, for the most part, they've been hitchhiking on 18 wheelers.
Correct.
And in some cases, the Mexican government actually rented buses for them and shoved them up smack up to the border next to where they can leap the fence if need be.
But in any case, but you know, the people without borders, the first couple of caravans, they in fact organized.
And they claim that they did not organize this latest one because they decided that caravans weren't necessarily such a good idea because President Trump was so opposed to them.
They attracted a lot of attention.
But they say the principle of a caravan is to get a lot of people together in one group so that they will not fall prey to the rapists and the robbers and the other hazards that accompany the trip to El Norte.
But in any case, on this occasion they have attracted so much attention and in some cases so much negative attention that not only are conservative groups accusing them of being people traffickers, which in some respects they are.
They tell them, you know, go this way, and they tell them what to tell the border patrol, how to apply for their trafficking in people.
But even some lefties are a little bit tired of them.
One in particular is a fellow named Alejandro Solalinde.
He is a Catholic priest in Mexico, and he is one of Mexico's most prominent migrant activists.
He says, and I'm quoting him now, they are helping Donald Trump say that there is an invasion.
And this priest, Solaninde, thinks that the caravan strategy has backfired because you have these images of these troops of people marching north and hopping over border walls.
And to quote him again, he says, Pueblo Sin Fronteras cheated the migrants.
They told them lies that once they arrived at the border, everything would be very easy.
Of course, People Without Borders is denying this.
They tell them the truth.
But no, clearly they're being encouraged to head north and they think they're going to get in.
We've talked about this before on this fantastic podcast.
This has been the finest moment of the Trump presidency, in my opinion, Mr. Taylor, that he has stood firm.
Again, the Border Patrol, before we started this podcast we were talking about what's going on in France right now and of course nobody seems to be at arms with the French government shooting tear gas at the French individuals rioting over a minor gas tax on petrol there in France.
But of course if a white nation is perceived as being mean-spirited toward non-whites as we saw the border and the howls of protest that accompanied such acts to defend our borders.
I thought that was a fascinating... You mean the tear gas?
The tear gas, yes, when they were trying to rush the border.
Well, you know, now that it has been revealed that the Obama administration, they used tear gas on the border dozens of times.
They did?
Yes, some of the complaints have quieted down.
If Obama said it was okay, well, then it must be okay.
But yes, it's been very good that he has held firm, although I do not like it when the President of the United States issues threats that turn out to be just complete baloney.
He was going to cut off foreign aid to the countries who let these caravanners come through.
That was all nonsense.
He didn't do that at all.
And he says he's not going to let any of them in.
Well, we're letting in about 100 of them every day.
And they go through this process of getting queried as to whether or not they are genuine refugees.
Well, on that same thought real quick, I know we've got this coming up.
I'd like to bring this up now because Donald Trump notoriously uses his Twitter to tweet something fantastic.
Take, for instance, right before the election when he said, hey, we're going to use an executive order to end birthright citizenship.
Nothing has happened in the intervening month and a half since he did that tweet.
And guess what?
One of the members of the caravan was a Honduran woman who was pregnant, and she is believed to be the first member of this migrant caravan.
To have had a child in the United States, meaning that that child is now an American citizen.
That's right, that's right.
But then once again, are we praising Donald Trump or are we criticizing Donald Trump?
Donald Trump in a tweet says, we've got to stop this.
And then nothing happens.
He doesn't do anything.
And we hope that the antics of Mari Uri, Elizabeth Serrano Hernandez, 19 years old by the way, She left home in Honduras when she was seven months pregnant and she marched up here.
Apparently she's got a husband.
I'm impressed by that.
A fellow by the name of Miguel Ortiz and their three-year-old son.
This happy family unit traveled for 2,000 miles and then this pregnant woman hops the fence.
What kind of fence is this?
If pregnant women can get over the fence, I tell you, this fence is pretty worthless in my view.
But they showed up at the border and were taken to the Imperial Beach Station in San Diego for processing.
And she began to complain of abdominal pains.
Well, of course, they took her to a hospital, and on your and my dime, and giving birth in the United States costs thousands of dollars.
Yes, it does.
Even in a completely uncomplicated delivery, which this apparently was, she gave birth to a baby boy.
A baby boy anchor baby.
And, of course, he's got his passport now, and the family has been placed into immigration proceedings and released on their own recognizance.
Happy ending for them, or happy beginning.
So, yes, this is, again, Donald Trump talks big, but what does he do?
Nothing.
As I recall, when he made that famous tweet, who was it in the Congress who said he was introducing legislation right away to get rid of birthright citizenship?
I've forgotten who that was.
It was actually the senior senator from South Carolina.
Lindsey Graham.
That's exactly right.
It was Lindsey Graham.
Well, what happened to that, Lindsey?
Come on, get to work.
These things just don't go anywhere.
And I think if Donald Trump had any kind of discipline, if he could really focus on things that matter, he could promote this to the point where it would have to be either voted out of committee or not, or put to the House floor and voted or not.
And I believe when it comes to something like illegal immigrants sneaking into the country and giving birth to automatic U.S.
citizens, even many Democrats think that's wrong.
Yes.
And that is something he could make progress on, bipartisan progress.
And it would be nice if he tried that while we still had a Republican majority.
But anyway, this is not a dump-on-Trump session, although I can't help thinking there are so many things he could have done.
In any case, back to our lovely caravan.
There are now some roughly 6,000 of them, and they're stuck in Tijuana.
And most of them are living on handouts from volunteer groups in government-run shelters.
But the government, of course, has been, I think they're paying $20,000 a day to serve them meals, while we take 100 asylum applications every day.
And I wonder how they decide, you know?
Is it a lottery or something?
Are they all lined up?
It almost, you know, it's funny.
A couple years ago there was a, I don't want to say hilarious because I don't want to downplay the human element involved, but in Atlanta, Metro Atlanta, there was a lottery for Section 8 housing vouchers.
Now it wasn't even to get on the list to get Section 8 vouchers, it was to get Part of the lottery to then be considered for Section 8 vouchers.
And something like 30,000 to 40,000 individuals showed up, almost all black.
It was I think either in College Park or East Point, Atlanta, which is just outside of the city, a heavily, heavily black area in South Atlanta.
And when you read what's going on here, you kind of think about that exact same story. And these happen
a lot Mr. Taylor, these Section 8 voucher lotteries, which is why HUD has gone to doing all
the Section 8 lotteries online. They no longer do them in person because there have been so many
instances of fisticuffs erupting.
That's right.
You have these people sleeping out the night ahead so that they're on the sidewalk.
They get first in line and then, yes, somebody leaves his line and comes back and there's a fistfight and a riot.
Yes, yes, a very nasty business.
Now, interestingly enough, you can do it online, but that's not considered discrimination against anybody because, of course, they all have smartphones.
They can all do it online.
Correct.
Yes, yes, your local wino.
He's, you know, he's got his smartphone.
He could sign up for Section 8 housing just like everybody else.
But, yes, this Pueblo Sin Fronteras bunch, they have been egging these folks on.
They claim that they were trying to control the march up to the border when, was it Sunday a week ago, they They brushed the border.
They did.
And they got a whiff of the gas, which outraged everybody.
But also, they have been urging these caravanners to have demonstrations against the Mexicans, too, that they're not being treated properly.
They're really stirring things up.
So, who are these people, these Pueblos Sin Fronteras?
They were founded in Dallas.
In 2009, not all that old, by a fellow named Roberto Corona, a Mexican-American immigrant.
Now, I love it when these people show up and then they start these organizations to tell us how to operate.
Just the bloody cheek of it, you know?
I can't get over it.
Well, you say that, but there's absolutely no pushback.
No.
The only people who notice are individuals like you, me, our fantastic listening audience, those who read VDARE, perhaps some upset readers of Breitbart.
Breitbart might do a story on this and then forget about it the next day just to get some clicks.
But, yeah.
Now, they are not an official registered non-profit, but they get money from a non-profit called a group Freedom for Immigrants.
This is an Oakland-based 501c3 that says it is, quote, devoted to abolishing immigration detention.
Well, that means not even catch and release, just release.
Exactly.
And this organization, Mr. Taylor, Freedom for Immigrants, collected $588,933 in revenue between July 1, 2016
and June 30, 2017.
That's a lot of money to help out the cause of eradicating immigration detention.
I'll say.
I'll say.
I wish we had a budget like that.
I've never heard of these groups.
Where do they get this kind of dough?
I bet some of the dough comes from the United States government or local funding.
Who knows?
They claim that none of their money has come from any Soros group.
But we'll see about that.
Everyone accuses Soros of having his fingers in every single pie.
It's entirely possible they don't have them in every pie.
In any case, this Pueblo Sin Fronteras is at the forefront of trying to get as many people into the United States as possible.
And again, a Mexican-American trying to show up and tell us how to run our country.
I've just had enough of this stuff, but what we can do about it remains to be seen.
And let's assume that at least some of these caravaners, and you know, it's not just the 6,000 who are in Tijuana, there's that other caravan.
I think there's another 2,000 who are still working their way north.
And of course, if we're nice to this bunch, then more and more will come.
And it is very good that at least Donald Trump is not making it easy for them.
And not making it easy, as we'll see later in a very interesting Danish story.
That's an important aspect of this.
If they come wafting in, swanning across the border, all it's going to do is encourage more of the same.
But, assuming that some of these people get in, there's something we can say with great confidence about them.
Thanks to research from the Center for Immigration Studies.
Now, you and I have praised the CIS many times because their data is so wonderful.
I suspect maybe we should tamp down our praise because it's a group that perhaps would not necessarily benefit.
I could just see the SPLCs right up at the Center for Immigration Studies.
Those wicked people at American Renaissance think that their data are wonderful.
I just, you know, that's one of those links.
Well, I believe they're already considered a hate group.
Again, they've already been, they've already been, they're already in the crosshairs of the ADL and the SPLC and other, you know, other, other entities on the left to monitor and patrol this type of data collection.
Yes, but the Center for Immigration Studies, they have come out with what is now appearing to be a pretty regular study based on the best available statistics about welfare use in which they compare non-citizen households to native households.
And they also have naturalized citizens, all immigrants, etc.
But what is most interesting to me is the non-citizens households compared to native households.
So these are immigrants.
Non-citizens are immigrants.
And if you're talking about absolutely any welfare program, no fewer than 63% of non-citizen households are using some kind of welfare compared to 35%.
63% to 35% for natives.
That's something else I want to point out, too.
When the CIS talks about natives, that's every single native of all races.
Correct.
Now, the CIS, in a number of very illuminating footnotes, makes the racial breakouts.
We have not yet had the time to analyze this, but we plan to do a thorough study of this and do a write-up of it, and we'll make graphs, too, and show you just what the comparison is between non-citizens and then citizens who are white, Asian, Hispanic, all that information is there.
And if you were to compare non-citizens to, say, whites, the contrast would be even more startling than the 63% to 35%.
Correct.
And tell us about actual cash welfare.
Cash welfare use.
Yeah, actual cash welfare use in non-citizen households, 31%.
Yes.
Compared to native households, which is 19%.
Again, the data that you're talking about that is hidden within the appendices of this study will be quite interesting and illuminating, as you stated, as to the racial breakdown of Native households, be it, you know, African American, Asian, Hispanic, and White, because they do break that out.
I remember this study last year, and it was quite...
Let's just say it wasn't something that even the CIS wanted to bring too much attention to because it really shows, wow, wait a second, so non-citizen households, not exactly sitting in their best are these countries.
But wait a second, look at the breakdown of blacks compared to whites.
Right, right.
Now, to me, The fact that any non-citizen household is on any kind of welfare.
What's going on here?
And I think, again, this is something that you could call attention even to well-meaning liberals and democrats and say, is this really how we should be spending our tax money?
We let people waltz into this country and they put their foot in the public trough.
How can this possibly make sense?
A third of them, 31%, nearly a third, are getting cash benefits.
Who pays for that?
You and me.
And 45% of non-citizen households?
Hey, they're getting food.
That's right.
45%!
I mean, this is the same type of study that when people, when reasonable people who are too busy with their lives to really get into the minutia of racial differences, racial studies, talk about crime, talk about, you know, all the type of stories that American Renaissance concentrates on, they just don't have time to really deal with that.
But you see a story like this, or one that we talked about two weeks ago, the fair evasion, in Washington D.C.
which the city council has now voted to implement the policy of doing away with fare evasion arrests entirely.
Entirely!
When a normal person is confronted with this type of just shocking data Again, it shows you, like you just said, there could be some sort of bipartisan effort to do something if, of course, the Democrats weren't so wedded upon this coalition of the fringes that make up a lot of what we're talking about, you know, non-citizen households and, of course,
Blacks, Hispanics, etc, etc.
But this, too, is something that Donald Trump should be pounding his desk and yelling about.
He should be tweeting.
Yes, he should be shouting from the rooftops.
Half of non-citizen households are on Medicaid.
And compare that to 23% of native households.
Again, that's all native, that's all Americans.
Right.
You know, all American citizens.
And if we're not breaking it down by racial classification, 50% of non-citizen households.
Think about how much money this is we're talking about on a yearly basis for the budget.
You talk about, you know, Donald Trump recently said, hey, he's not going to be around when the really nasty Budget deficit hits in and you know, it looks like America could default on interest payments He's not gonna be around But you know what a lot of us who see this data we're gonna be around as these numbers continue to increase And you know the CIS points out that of all the non-citizen households they're talking about here roughly half in the country illegally
So we're talking about people who broke the law to get here, and then they're eating our lunch.
And furthermore, a lot of these non-citizen populations, they get benefits to their household because, of course, they've got U.S.-born children.
Back again to this absolutely crazy anchor baby phenomenon.
Then, another thing that is quite shocking.
Of the households that are headed by non-citizens, those who have been here for fewer than 10 years, 50% use one or more welfare programs.
If they've been here more than 10 years, 70% use welfare.
The longer they're here, the more they mooch.
The longer they linger, the more they binge on American tax dollars.
Sam Francis put it best.
You've got the evil party and the stupid party.
The Republicans could jump all over this and they could be screaming this from the high heavens.
I haven't had a chance to watch Tucker Carlson in the past few days.
I don't know if he's gone over this data yet.
You guys did a fantastic review of his book on American Renaissance.
I don't remember the author's name.
But this is the type of stuff that Americans who believe in fair play, regardless of political party, it's hard to look at this study and think that American citizenship is even meaningful anymore.
Well, when you talk about what it is that Americans think, there have been some somewhat disturbing polls on that subject.
And as a matter of fact, when you get to ages 14 to 37, in that age group, 53% believe the United States is a sexist
country and 54% believe it is a racist country.
Now, it may be that people who think that really do think that, well, we should be welcoming all these people in from all around the world and feeding them, housing them, clothing them, paying for their medicine.
And another quite astonishing thing is when asked whether America's future, quote, should be driven by capitalism or socialism, 48% of people in this age bracket, 14 to 37, choose socialism.
How deeply ignorant must one be not to have some sense of what went wrong in the Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, North Korea, Albania, all of these places that just went around the bend.
Well Venezuela, again, as long as a country doesn't run out of gullible white taxpayers who can continue to fit the bill for this, the parade is going to continue and American citizenship basically becomes, we're going to give you a Costco card membership in the form of Welfare, cash, food, and Medicaid.
You don't have to pay anything.
Just here.
Go and have this if you're not a citizen.
This is on us.
This is on the aging white taxpayer.
And you know what?
At some point, we'll just have to raid 401ks and we'll have to figure out another way to pay for all this.
That's what I think they will without hesitation do.
If you're a white guy and you're in your 60s or 70s, then you are by definition a beneficiary of vastly unfair white privilege.
Correct.
You are the child and grandchild of exploiters.
Why not raid your 401k?
I can see all of this coming.
But then similar polls are telling us that 68% of Democrats say employers should grant a request for a prayer space by Muslims.
Remember, 68%.
But only 45% say that employers should grant a similar request by Christian employees.
And that's a Democrat.
These are Democrats.
We're talking about Democrats.
Now, 30% of Republicans, as opposed to 68% of Democrats, say that employers should provide a prayer space for Muslims, but a larger percentage, 40% as opposed to 30%, say that they should support a similar service for Christians.
This is really quite an eye-opening comparison between these two different parties and the two different views of the world.
And again, it's these Democrats who are happy, who think that Muslims have a greater claim on employee for expressing their religious convictions than Christians do.
I assume they're the kind who would be more inclined to let non-citizens, illegal immigrants, get welfare payments, get Medicare, Medicaid, But this is a state of mind that has to be called to the public's attention.
And again, I think that if this were made an issue of, I think even somebody like Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer would have a hard time going back to their constituents and saying, yes, we believe that these illegal immigrants and non-citizens should be getting handouts of this kind.
Respectfully, I disagree at this point.
I think we're past the point of no return for the Democrats, who, as I've been saying for almost two years now, their nominee in 2020 is going to be Kamala Harris.
Well, it's quite obvious that we're headed that way.
And they're never going to turn the spigots off.
They know the only way to win is by democratically disenfranchising white conservatives through the biological weapons that are illegal immigrants and granting them either amnesty or some form of citizenship or the right to vote.
And we're witnessing that the Democrats are not going to They're going to be relentless in this onslaught of granting citizenship, and they're never going to come to the bargaining table.
And that's why it's so disappointing and disheartening that the Republicans who have controlled Congress and the executive branch have done absolutely nothing to stop illegal immigration, to get the wall built.
I know today that Senator Jim Inhofe just introduced a $25 billion package to actually start the wall.
Again, it's getting kind of late.
We're almost at the end of 2018.
It's getting late, and wasn't it?
Didn't the Democrats say there's absolutely nothing that they would take in return for supporting the wall?
The question was, OK, what if you get the Dreamers legalized?
Then will you fund the wall?
Their position is, no, absolutely nothing will make us support the wall.
You can't give us the sun, the moon, or the stars, and we still will not support the wall.
So we'll see what happens.
And just one last little statistic about the foolishness of our fellow citizens, and that is that 55% of Americans age 18 to 21 think that Barack Obama has had a bigger impact on the country than George Washington.
Yes.
If you actually think about where the country is today, that is entirely true.
No.
Barack Obama was riding a wave of folly, foolishness, and suicide that started long before he did.
Barack Obama could be replaced by Hillary Clinton.
And our country would be not much different.
But George Washington, who actually fought a revolution to establish the country, who established, who denied any kind of push to make him a king rather than a president, who established the foundations of our country, who set up this idea of two terms and no more.
I mean, you could go on and on about the influence of George Washington, but Barack Obama?
Oh, I like what I'm saying is that think about the people that are 18 to 21 in this country, maybe 52% of those are white, maybe at this point.
So the way that they perceive things, George Washington is this old dead white dude who's on the dollar bill and he's on the quarter.
Most people don't even see quarters anymore.
They don't care about that country.
That is, that's the most important thing that we have to understand is that the past to the new America that's being built, that we are about to see, oh gosh, I can't remember all of the non-white females who are about to take their oath of office as part of the new house.
Our cool new congresswomen, as the New York Magazine put it.
Our cool new congresswomen.
The black woman who was just elected from the district in Boston in Massachusetts, the first, I can't remember her name, but she put out a tweet.
Ayana something.
Yes, yes, yes.
She put out a tweet that said, hey, our album's dropping as if they're coming in and they're going to be pop stars.
She put out a tweet that says our album drops on X date.
And we need to start realizing that in a lot of ways.
They are a revolutionary force just as George Washington was.
I mean, they see themselves as supplanting pale, male, white America.
That's certainly true.
With their glorious, what was it?
The wise Latina side.
I mean, yeah, they look at themselves as wise Latinas, as wise blacks, as those who have a right to rule because of the melanin in their skin or the brownness of their skin.
Oh yes, they are saving us from ourselves.
Correct.
They're convinced of this.
And so, yes, they are having an effect.
They are certainly having an effect.
And you're correct to say that this is a perhaps slow-motion revolution, but a revolution that is just as profound as anything George Washington did.
And if I can make one more point about why I do also think that Barack Obama's had a bigger impact on the country than George Washington.
And one of Sam Francis's last columns, he noted that if...
Because Barack Obama spoke in July of the 2004 DNC convention, and a lot of people at that point said, this is going to be our nominee in 2008.
And Sam Francis, in one of his last columns, he noted, if they nominate this guy, that's the death of the old America.
And think about what Barack Obama's election did.
It forced a lot of whites to realize, hey, Things are changing here and guess what happened?
A guy named Donald Trump got elected who in a lot of ways you know you think about what if someone like a Jeb Bush had been elected what would have happened with the migrant caravan.
Well, I've got to disagree with you.
I think Barack Obama need never have existed.
We could have had Hillary Clinton for eight years instead of Barack Obama, and our country would be in exactly the same situation.
That is my conviction.
Now, the fact that a non-white person was elected to the highest office in the land, that certainly has inspired a lot of people.
They think, well, we can do that, we can do anything.
But this wave of wise Latinas And angry young black men and everything that's coming our way.
All that was set in motion years and years and years before Barack Obama took office.
But we will just have to agree to disagree on that.
What I'm saying is, this is all happening so soon and there are still so many white people in the country who are having a reaction to it.
And that's a positive thing.
Barack Obama came 20 years before his time, when they could have implemented and never relinquished control to Republicans.
And now, of course, with what's just happened in the midterms, where all these old white Democrats are being pushed out of the way for, what was it the New York Senator just said about the intersection, the future is female?
I mean, again, you're seeing, you're not going to see many more Male Democrats.
Certainly not white ones.
But I think you're going to see less and less non-white male Democrats elected.
I think that we are seeing this strange realignment happening.
And so, don't get me wrong, I love George Washington.
But what I'm saying is, Barack Obama has impacted a lot of white people to realize, hey, wait a second.
And the wave that, and that culminated in Donald Trump's election.
It was pushback.
And I think we're going to, I just say we live in very interesting times.
And you know what?
They are revolutionary from, from the perspective of what's happening with the rising tide of color, Mr. Taylor, and what is going to be happening with the white population.
As you've always noted, well, 200 million white people just walk off from history.
I don't think so.
I don't think so either.
I don't think so either.
We're waking up.
Well, the question is, will enough of us wake up soon enough?
I like to quote the great Guillaume Fay, who used to say that, Unless the generation that is in their 20s acts, then it's too late.
But we'll see.
We'll see what the 20s, but you know, we can wake up people in their 30s, people in their 40s.
It's never too late to wake up.
All of you out there listening, it's never too late.
But as we march forward into this revolutionary state of affairs, I'd like to mention Goucher College In Towson, Maryland, we had an amusing incident there in which a person by the name of Finn Adjani Arthur, a 20-year-old black student, he was actually arrested because he had written graffiti on the dormitory attacking blacks and Latinos.
And he had mentioned himself, of course, as a target, a racial target.
Well, interestingly enough, the minority students say that this graffiti incident is merely a symptom of Goucher's larger issue of racism on campus.
Again, this is a symptom of our times.
You don't have enough actual so-called racism.
So that the alleged victims of this have to gin up fake cases of it themselves and when the fakeness of it is revealed that doesn't matter.
The demand outpaces the supply so like you said create fake hate and then and double down on a negative turn it into a positive.
That's right.
And black students, as a result of this, have started a buddy system for walking in pairs around the campus at night, as if fake graffiti is going to come out and strangle them or knock them over the head.
What in heaven's name?
And the goucher black student union group, Umoja, has designated a common area on campus for students to gather, debrief, and vent.
And all these non-white students have been flocking to this lovely space to sign a list of seven demands.
Now, of course, the seven demands include hiring more staff, security cameras in the residence halls.
Well, you know, if there's security cameras in the residence halls, I think we're gonna get fewer of these phony incidents.
I actually think it's great that there's security cameras in the residence halls.
In fact, I'm actually beginning to think that white people should Walk around with body cameras like police do because then you can capture everything that you encounter on a daily basis.
Once a day goes by when nothing happened, just erase the prior day's memory and then the next day start over.
So yes, we should be putting security cameras everywhere to catch these individuals in the act of trying to Perform a hate crime to blame it on whites.
And that's what this is.
And I'm glad this guy's been arrested.
Yes, yes.
It is unusual, actually, that they be arrested.
Yes, it is.
Ordinarily, the college administration will say, oh, he was a disturbed student, and we just don't understand how this could possibly have happened.
But, now this list of seven demands, and of course they want all students to take cultural competency classes, which means white guilt classes, but this list has been recycled from 2014, the same list, and a senior by the name of Cindy Jones, Cindy spelled C-Y-N, I'm sorry, Sydney Jones, C-Y-D-N-I-I, And yes, she's black.
She says the fact that this list has to be recycled and dredged up from four years ago is just proof that racial tensions have persisted.
Never mind that the racial tensions were deliberately manufactured by a black guy.
A very light-skinned black guy.
And his name is Finn.
Isn't Finn an Irish name?
I think it has Lorne in Ireland.
This is almost comical, as the story turns out.
But this is how, invariably, 98% of them turn out.
Because the demand for white supremacists across the country, unfortunately, far exceeds the supply.
That's right.
So what are we going to do about this?
You know, ordinarily, ordinarily, the free market evens these things out.
But nope, nope, nope.
The supply's just dwindled to practically nothing.
So you have to manufacture fool's gold because the real stuff is in such short supply.
But moving down the academic ladder to high schools.
There's a Northern Virginia high school.
It's in Arlington, right here, just a few miles from where I am sitting at any rate.
It's called Washington Lee High School, named for George and Robert.
But, of course, Robert E. Lee's name must be removed They've definitely decided to do that.
And I wouldn't have to actually ask you to guess, but the person that they're going to add the name to is Loving.
Now, who would Loving be?
That would be Mildred and Rachel Loving.
That was the first interracial couple that gave rise to the 1967 Supreme Court decision, Loving v. Virginia, that banned laws that forbid interracial marriage.
So, once again, they are not content with removing the name of a confederate.
They want to rub our noses in it.
Oh yeah.
And instead of the most respected man on both sides of the confederacy, certainly at that time and for years later, we're going to have the Lovings who struck down the laws against interracial marriage.
A couple years ago they made a movie about this incident.
That is true.
And it was one of those, you know, Another entry into the white guilt porn catalog that continues to grow on a yearly basis.
Didn't do that well at the box office but I have a Seeking suspicion that that movie is going to be in public schools as a required documentary to watch moving forward, especially in the soon-to-be renamed Washington Loving High School.
Well, it doesn't have that name yet.
The school board is going to vote for sure on December 20th.
That's going to be their final decision, but I think we can tell which way the wind is blowing.
It'll be a unanimous decision.
I think you're right.
But moving on to a different high school, this is called T.M.
Landry College Prep School.
This was one of the small charter schools that was run by a black guy by the name of Landry, Tracy Landry.
And interestingly enough, he was one of these miracle producers.
All of his students were just performing in the most amazing way.
He was on the Today Show.
He was on CBS This Morning.
And his students were getting into Yale, Brown, Princeton, Stanford, Columbia, Dartmouth, Cornell.
Well, lo and behold, All of these records of the students, it was just completely fake.
Yes.
Completely fake.
They would say things that this guy has took four years of honors English.
He was the baseball MVP.
He earned a high honors in the mathematics Olympiad.
In his spare time, he'd started a community service for alcoholics called Dry House.
All, all completely invented.
And as you stated, the students that attended this preparatory school, they were all black.
So that was one of the reasons why all these mass media institutions like the Today Show and Ellen, they just wanted to offer this guy fawning praise over the top and saying, this is going on everywhere, this type of charter school.
This is so great.
We're closing the racial gap in achievement.
Wow, let's throw more money at you.
And as you noted, womp womp womp.
Turns out it was all a lie, a massive fabrication.
Completely phony.
Now, apparently the journalists who broke the story and looked into it, they called up Harvard.
And they said, well, how are these fellas doing?
Harvard did not reply.
Harvard ain't telling.
As Paul Harvey would have said, and now you know the rest of the story.
Well there's still more to the story.
I really want to know how they're doing, how they're doing.
You know these guys with completely fake transcripts and fake records.
Oh well, but I guess we can imagine.
Their resume was all padded by the White guilt, this soft bigotry of low expectations.
What was it that George W. Bush famously said?
Yes, yes.
And of course, all of these Ivy League schools just snapped him up because they're so hungry for blacks who... Anyway.
But let's move on to one of our favorite black people.
That's Al Sharpton.
Now, the latest news on him, which is really just another mouth-watering little morsel.
His organization, the National Action Network, is going to pay him $531,000 to the rights
of his life story.
Now, theoretically how this is going to work is National Action Network can then sell these
rights to Hollywood or to publishers, biographers.
And all of this would then profit the nonprofit.
Now, of course, it's completely and utterly crazy for them to just take this arbitrary number and give this to Al Sharpton.
Who knows whether the rights to his life are worth a dime?
But they've decided it's worth more than a half a million, and they're just going to give him the money.
Now, this is on top of the $244,000 that he's already gotten for running National Action Network.
And even anybody who looks at nonprofits realizes just how crazy and utterly corner-cutting this kind of behavior is.
It's just a half a million dollar bonus for him.
And they say, OK, now we're going to peddle the rights to his life story.
Now, Sharpton himself, who, when he was contacted by journalists, was in South Africa, where he was hosting an MSNBC broadcast on the 100th anniversary of Nelson Mandela's birth.
He says, hey, I know this perfectly, gentlemen.
He says he's got two contracts for movies.
On his life, the life of Reverend Al.
And another one in the works.
And he says a movie's already in production.
But he declined to mention who the production people were, when it's coming out, any of that stuff.
And he says a play about his life is being shopped around.
I know you're not a subscriber to Netflix or Hulu or any of these streaming services, but Netflix is the same streaming service that greenlit and produced, I believe now, two seasons of a very anti-white show.
The name of it escapes me.
It was a movie that they then made into a TV show and it's very derisive toward whites.
I'll think of the title in a second.
But Netflix is one of those streaming services that's got a lot of money flowing around.
Their stock price is high so they can throw some money at production.
I wouldn't be surprised if an HBO or a Netflix looking for some cheap programming
did a deal with the National Action Network, where they said, hey, we'll pay you $100,000
and we'll give you residuals based on how this does during in distribution.
I mean, again, the entertainment industry is 100% wedded to promoting the anti-white mindset.
the anti-white mindset and But Al Sharpton?
This creep?
This king of sleaze?
I guess you're right.
Look what you just said.
He was one of the hosts of this massive pageantry that surrounded the 100th anniversary of Nelson Mandela's birth.
That was a literal who's who of the pop culture black figures down there.
Trevor Noah, the guy who now hosts The Daily Show and Comedy Central, they're all down there.
And again, hey, if South Africa is such a great place now that white rule's been supplanted, guys, why aren't you down there?
Why aren't you leaving this evil, racist country called the United States for this blissful paradise known as South Africa?
Come on, guys.
Well, you're asking them a difficult question.
The fact is, Al Sharpton's got even more reason to leave because he owes $736,000 in personal income taxes and taxes for three of his companies.
That's just state income tax.
And then when it comes to the feds, the feds have two and a half million dollars on liens on him personally and on one of his companies.
I mean, yes, South Africa would be a perfect bolthole for this tax cheat.
And now, his nonprofit took in no less than $6.3 million last year.
Still can't pay its taxes, apparently.
And that's up from $5.8 million the year before.
This guy's rolling in dough, but he still can't pay taxes.
I remember after—just one of these things that sticks in my mind about Reverend Al.
After the 2001 attacks, the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center,
I had a hot, hot...
This jet comes into the World Trade Center, the tallest building in Manhattan.
Well, at that time, Reverend Isle had offices in the Empire State Building.
And he got into a panic.
And he thought, what if they go after the next highest building?
So he cleared out with tens of thousands of dollars in back rent that he never paid.
That is Reverend Al for you.
That's the way he operates.
But his life story, I doubt if it's made into a Netflix movie.
I suspect that little incident will be one that will not be included.
Well, with Christmas coming up, I would like to throw out an idea.
If you've never seen the movie adaptation of Tom Wolfe's Bonfire of the Vanities, it's actually a good movie.
Tom Hanks plays the Sherman McCoy character.
Bruce Willis plays a reporter.
And, of course, Reverend Bacon has a likeness, to put it mildly, to the 1980s iteration of Al Sharpton when he was about 200 pounds heavier than he is now.
Well, as I recall, there were some modifications to the movie.
There were some strategic race changes.
There's a judge in the novel who is a white man who has to be turned into a black woman just to keep things from being too obvious.
It's actually a black man, played by Morgan Freeman, who gives a good speech at the end of the movie.
This is one of his more non-objectionable roles.
I don't mind the race change, actually.
A lot of people did.
You actually one time made fun of me, because you asked me, hey, what are you reading these days, Kersey?
And I said, hey, you know, I'm actually reading a book about The attempt to make Bonfire of the Vanities into a movie and how difficult it was.
It's pretty fascinating because they did take a lot of other shortcuts to the racially contentious aspects of the novel to sanitize it for the audience.
I need to at some point write just a little thing about that for the AR site because it's a great little story that shows Even in the late 80s, Hollywood was sensitive to the correct racial norms.
Gosh, yes.
Gosh, yes.
When Gone with the Wind was made in 1939, there was huge pressure on them from the NAACP and everybody else never to use the N-word to depict slavery in particular ways.
I read quite an interesting article on all the pressure that was made on the production company back in 1939.
This is nothing new.
But to move overseas at this point, forsaking my favorite black man, Al Sharpton, there was a very interesting political development.
There's a party in Spain called the Vox Party, the voice of the people, I assume.
And they took 12 parliamentary seats in the Andalusian Parliament.
Beating expectations that they would win only five.
Now the Socialist Party has been ruling Andalusia for 36 years.
The Vox Party is an immigration control party.
That's their main thing.
And it turns out the conservative Popular Party came in second.
And then the center-right Citizens Party, the three of them are a majority.
These three parties.
Now, what is interesting about this is, unlike in so many countries where you have an immigration control party that breaks into Parliament, the Spaniards are not giving them the cold shoulder.
Correct.
They're going to form a government, and Andalusia, at least at the regional level, is going to be very firm about keeping immigrants out to the extent that it can do that.
Not coincidentally, Andalusia is the region that has received the vast majority of the 53,000 or so immigrants who have crossed the Mediterranean to Spain so far this year.
So this is, you know, Spain has been one of the few countries that has not had a kind of populist outpouring of Opposition to this transformation, the Great Replacement.
And, you know, people have been tutting about how, oh, well, it was under a fascist dictatorship for so long, and this means they are immune to this kind of thing.
Ha, ha, ha.
What a bunch of baloney.
No, the Spaniards are aware of their country slipping through their fingers just like everybody else.
And so this is, I think, a very important first step.
One of the things I like about what's happening is that the leaders of this party, they reject this idea that they're far right and they instead insist that they're a party of extreme necessity.
I think that, rather than extremism, I think that moving forward we're going to see more and more people in the United States begin to reject also that label of right.
It's one of the reasons why I don't like the label alternative right because As I continue to age and the way that I look at things, my political lenience, kind of like Tucker Carlson, and again, going back to that great book review that America Is Not Published, Tucker Carlson has drifted dramatically to the left when it comes to the economic issues.
And I think that that is the fascinating aspect of populism and racial populism, and it's why I don't think we've yet Determine the word that's going to define us.
I agree.
This extreme necessity.
They're called extremists, far-right.
Yeah, baloney.
Extreme necessity.
I love it.
That's good.
That's very good.
We're fighting for our lives, ultimately.
That's what he's saying.
I think this is great.
Also, they propose to make Spain great again.
I wonder where they got that idea.
But continuing on the continent of Europe, there's an interesting development in Europe.
I'm sorry, in Denmark.
And Denmark has a tiny, hard-to-reach island called Lindholm Island.
And it is now the home of laboratories, stables, and a crematory for a center that researches contagious diseases in animals.
That's what Lindholm Island has been known for.
It's two miles off the coast, reached by ferries, which are very infrequent in number, and one of the ferries is called The Virus.
Anyway, this is going to be the new home for failed asylum applicants and for foreign criminals who cannot be deported to their home countries, often because those countries will not take them back.
Now this is, to me, just the greatest outrage.
Some immigrant goes to Denmark, commits some sort of horrible crime, And does time, but then can't be deported, because whether it's Vietnam, or what are some of the other... I think Burma is another big... They just won't take them back.
They say, we don't care, we don't want them.
They're yours now.
Yeah, I don't blame them for that, but they ought to just send them home in parachutes, as far as I'm concerned, or just drop them off on the beach.
In any case, they don't take them back.
So, they are going to put them on this island.
And this is part of the government's policy of deliberately making their lives so unpleasant that these people will voluntarily go elsewhere.
I think there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
And apparently the way they're doing it now Rejected asylum seekers and these people who cannot be booted, they are given accommodations.
They cannot prepare their own meal.
They've got to eat the food that is prepared for them.
And if they're halal types, too bad.
This is what we make for you.
Not on the menu today.
Not on the menu today.
And then they get an allowance of about $1.20 a day.
That's their walking around money.
And if they misbehave, they don't get their money.
So again, the idea is to make life unpleasant and so that they will clear out.
But still, hundreds, hundreds are hanging on, even under these circumstances.
But apparently, the Danes have decided that this is so pleasant that they're going to ship them to this island instead.
Maybe they'll just get island fever and just have to go elsewhere.
But as Prime Minister Lars-Lukas Rasmussen says, he says the government's aim in receiving refugees would be no longer to try to integrate them.
We're not even going to try.
The point is, we will hold them until they can go back home.
It's a step in the right direction.
It's actually a violent step in the right direction.
It's almost as if the Danes are beginning to realize there is an alternative to losing our country, and that is making our country so inhospitable to these asylum seekers, these immigrants, whatever they are, that they're going to want to go home so we can have a home of our own.
Yes.
But the last story was one that you called to my attention.
Tell us what's on your mind here.
What's going on in Bristol?
Well, let me just preface real quick with the story.
About 20 years ago, I spent about a month in Bristol, England.
It was a phenomenal time.
There were some friends and I was underage at the time.
I was actually underage at the time.
But drank a lot anyway.
Even the English drinking age I was underage.
But we were able to drink and we played rugby.
We had a lot of fun.
But I remember walking around downtown Bristol and just being shocked because my perception of these English cities was there were actually going to be English in these cities.
And even at that point I was...
I'll be blunt.
I was in high school at the time, freshman I believe, and I remember thinking, why is there this weird siren being blared?
And that was because there were a number of mosques all throughout the city.
At that point, There really wasn't that large of a Muslim presence outside of major cities in the United States.
So from where I grew up there were absolutely no Muslims and that was just such a cultural shock.
This is before I knew about what had happened after the war with Enoch Powell and with all that had happened.
The fact that Winston Churchill was forced out of politics because he was campaigning to keep England white.
This is stuff that you just don't know about and then you see The consequences of this.
So here you were, a naive American, dropped down in multicultural England, and it took you completely by surprise.
And this was Bristol!
Yeah, this is Bristol, which was, I think it's, if memory serves correct, it's about an hour, hour and a half away from London.
So it's, again, this is this picturesque, quaint little city.
At that point, even in the late 1990s, it had already been inundated.
And now, well, things have changed even more forcibly.
So do tell.
I guess, is it Lord Mayor?
Is that what they're called there in Bristol?
Her name is Cleo Lake.
She had previously banished a painting of the slave trader Edward Colston.
And now she's decided that the paintings are hanging in her office.
of the 18th century portrait of Robert Craggs Nugent, an Irish politician.
This painting was done by Thomas Gainsborough.
Yeah, by Gainsborough no less.
Mr. Taylor, it was dull and dated in the words of this mulatto Cleolac.
She's a black woman, obviously she has one white parent, but she sides, as almost always happens, with her black racial heritage.
That's right.
Out with the white, in with the black.
And that's the way things are going to go all around the world, unless we do something about it.
But I do have a couple of announcements to make.
It may be that Mr. Kersey will get a vacation next week.
We're not sure.
But the week after that, you should look forward to a special broadcast of a most unusual kind, in which he and I will cooperate in a way that is unprecedented so far.
But in the meantime, we wish you a lovely week.
And for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection