All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 2, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
56:46
‘We Can Replace Them’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is my always reliable, indefatigable comrade at the microphone and over the airwaves, Paul Kersey.
Thanks for being on again.
Hey, it's an exciting Thursday.
We're only a few days away from a pretty historic midterm election.
And I think that's a nice little segue into our first topic of conversation this week.
Yes, indeed.
We have something that has evoked the ghost of Willie Horton.
This time, the fellow's name is Luis Bracamontes.
And Luis Bracamontes is a Mexican man who had been deported twice, but returned to the United States, managed to sneak in again, and he killed two California deputies.
He wounded somebody else in a crossfire and also wounded another deputy.
And when he was convicted of this murder, he says, I'm going to get out and I'm going to kill more cops.
He was laughing and carrying on.
He had learned clearly lots of American obscenities.
He was saying things in the courtroom that you and I would never say, not even in private life.
But he also called the person that he had wounded, the passerby, the civilian who was black, he called him the N-word.
But the most amusing aspect of this is that he said he had enjoyed killing those two.
His great regret that he hadn't killed more, and as soon as he was out, he was going to get back on the street and start killing policemen.
Now, of course, the ad that Donald Trump has released It features some of this courtroom outburst.
Oh, it's incredible.
If you haven't seen this yet, you need to watch this ad.
You can go to Donald J. Trump's Twitter account.
He tweeted it out on October 31st, 2018.
You can see it, and it is quite clear, uses the word Democrats over and over again about this is the reason why this gentleman was even allowed back in the United States after being deported twice.
Right, right.
And then he switches to footage of the caravan that's on our way here.
And the question is, who else will the Democrats let in?
You may be underplaying the footage of the caravan, Mr. Taylor, because it's a caravan.
It's members of the caravan pushing down borders, knocking down fences in a violent manner.
It is a thing of beauty to watch this.
What, 45, 50 second ad.
It is a brilliant ad.
Yes, it's very well put together.
And of course, they interview, they have footage of somebody interviewing one of the people in the caravan, and they're asking him, he's seeking amnesty?
Yes, he's seeking amnesty.
Well, what sort of crimes has he committed?
Well, murder.
But there are no criminals in the bunch.
No, not at all.
But this, of course, because Luis Bracamontes is Mexican, that means that we have evoked the ghost of Willie Horton and Robert Reich, President Clinton's Secretary of Commerce, as I recall.
He said, this may be the most desperate and vile ad since Willie Horton.
Now, there may be listeners who are unaware of who Willie Horton was.
So let me go into a bit of a background on Willie Horton.
He was a black man who was born in 1951, the same year as myself.
So he's my age mate.
And while he was sentenced, he was serving a life sentence for murder without possibility of parole, he was a beneficiary of a Massachusetts weekend furlough program.
Criminals got the weekend off, unsupervised.
Makes perfect sense in St.
Lake, Massachusetts.
Yes, yes, this is Massachusetts.
The idea was, you know, go have a good time and then just make sure you come back.
And as it turned out, this had been, this is a program that had been signed into law in 1972.
And in the next year, the Massachusetts Supreme Court, and this is the Massachusetts Supreme Court for you, at its best, it ruled that this right to furlough had to be extended even to first-degree murderers, the worst of the worst, because the law had not specifically excluded them.
So there you go.
All criminals.
Well, the Massachusetts legislature very quickly passed a bill saying not first-degree murderers.
Even we liberal Massachusetts type would think twice about letting first-degree killers out for a weekend lark.
But, and this is the relevant point, the governor of Massachusetts at that time in 1976, Michael Dukakis, he vetoed this bill.
He said that if you made distinctions between first-degree killers and everybody else, that would, quote, cut the heart out of the efforts at inmate rehabilitation.
Well, what do you know?
As it turns out, of course, this fellow, William R. Horton, better known these days as Willie, on June 6th, 1986, he was released as part of the furlough program.
Off you go, Willie.
Be sure to come back.
Check in Sunday night.
But on April 3rd of 1987, and this is interesting, from June 6th, 1986 to April 3rd, 1987, he was on the loose.
Nobody knew where he was.
The Massachusetts program wasn't very good at reeling them back in, it seems.
No ankle bracelets or anything like that.
You know, bye-bye, see you later.
So, about eight months later, he raped a woman after pistol-whipping, knifing, and tying up and gagging her fiancé.
And then he stole their car and went on a nice goose chase.
But then he was finally captured.
And now, this is also very interesting too.
This happened in Maryland and the judge in the case, Vincent J. Femia, he gave him two consecutive life terms plus 85 years.
Now, and he also said that he would not send Horton back to Massachusetts saying, I'm not prepared to take the chance that Mr. Horton might again be furloughed or otherwise released.
He knew what these Massachusetts loonies were all about, and so he is still in Maryland.
He is my neighbor, just across the state line in Maryland.
Now, what's the significance of all this?
In 1988, George H.W.
Bush Sr.
was running for the president against Michael Dukakis.
And there was a group that was supporting Bush that was not part of the official Bush campaign.
It was something called the National Security Political Action Committee, NSPAC.
They started running an ad campaign called Weekend Passes.
That pictured a mugshot of good ol' William R. Horton.
Now, William R. Horton, of course, is black, and so that was a terrible thing to have done.
This was dog whistling.
This is the usual, oh, scaremongering, fearmongering.
Yes, and for those who might not know, as you alluded, this happened 30 years ago.
Dukakis was the candidate the Democrats had nominated against George H.W.
Bush in 1988.
At that point, from what I understand, it was a pretty close election.
It was a close election, but Dukakis really suffered badly on account of this.
This ad really hurt him.
Well, there were a couple of other things that really hurt him.
One, he was trying to look tough, and he went for a video photo shoot in a tank.
And he had a helmet on, and he's sticking his head out of the hatch at the top of the tank, but he looks so terrified and miserable.
The idea of him being Commander-in-Chief was a joke.
And the other was, there was a debate in which, you know, this question about Willie Horton, this really dogged him.
He says, what if somebody got on furlough and raped and murdered your wife?
And he gave some sort of namby-pamby answer about how, well, we have to think about the criminals and rehabilitate them.
He couldn't come right out and say, I don't want to kill the son of a bitch.
He couldn't say that.
This, too, hurt him.
But anyway, this ad was not initially criticized as being ferociously racist.
That sort of came up later.
But as time goes by, all of these things get worse in retrospect, as we all know.
And it got to the point where Bush, the father, was asked about it.
He finally did repudiate it, but it was put out by something other than the campaign.
And this is a point that people are making now, that that was put out by this PAC that wasn't part of the campaign, whereas this wicked ad put out by Donald Trump is officially part of the campaign.
And Lee Atwater, who was the Republican strategist who was helping George H.W.
Bush on his deathbed.
He apologized for this. He regretted this.
I've read a few articles that are calling this one of the most racist ads,
not only in the history, but also the final bit of data needed to showcase that President Trump is indeed a racist.
And they point out that the dignified George H.W.
Bush had nothing to do with the ad.
Right.
So he's a dignified elder statesman, is the way that he's been described by the Washington Post, of all places, who, hey, it wasn't his ad.
Donald Trump is, this is an ad that he allowed to go out, that he tweeted.
Right.
And you have to ask yourself, again, this is My view of this is, well, wait a second.
Again, here is a twice-deported illegal alien.
Are the mainstream media who are attacking this ad, are the Democrats like Robert Reich who are piling on, are they now siding with criminal illegal aliens?
It sure makes it sound that way and I think that's what many voters are going to think.
Are you not allowed to say that here is a guy who was deported twice and who has gone on to kill Americans, American sworn officers who in defense of the law and who brags about wanting to kill more and regretting they hadn't killed as many and joking and laughing and swearing in court And are you not allowed to let this be known?
Are you not allowed to point out that Democrats are very, very weak on border security?
And that Democrats are all in favor of this caravan?
Let them in, let them in, let them in.
And who knows who's there?
Is that, why is that racist?
We're going to be talking about Paul Ryan momentarily, but the Heritage Foundation continues
to tweet out nonsense about, oh, tax cuts, you have more money in your pocket, courtesy
That message is going nowhere in 2018.
The message that is resonating with Americans And it's obvious because it's spooking the national media that they're having to spend so much time in fits regarding this fantastic ad that I would love to shake the hand of whoever it was that decided, hey, I got an idea for an ad, let's compare, let's juxtapose this video with
the caravan and just say Democrats, Democrats, Democrats over and over again. Because again,
as you noted, a lot of Americans out there and a lot of these tight races, whether it's for
Senate, whether it's for the House of Representatives or whether it's for governor,
they're going to look at this ad and they're going to ask themselves, well, wait a second,
why are they so upset about Americans being harmed, especially police?
Are these people on the side of illegal aliens?
And that's all you have to ask.
That's the question to ask.
Yes, and let's hope that this gets, you know, and the people who wouldn't even have seen the ad, they're certainly going to see the ad because their noses are being rubbed into that ad very vigorously by all these upset liberals that run the media for us.
But to stick with Donald Trump, he's finally gotten around to something that he promised he would do right away, and that is attack birthright citizenship.
And on the subject of birthright citizenship, of course, as we know, that means anybody who's born in the United States, It doesn't make any difference where you're from, whether you're here legally.
Citizen.
Instant citizen.
Presumably, you could be in an airplane traveling through American airspace and be born on that airplane, and you'd be a U.S.
citizen.
I'm not sure if there's ever been a test case to that effect so far, but the folks at NumbersUSA, they have pointed out that Over the past 16 years, an average of 300,000 illegal aliens have given birth in the United States.
That is 300,000 a year.
So over the past 16 years, that's 4.5 million U.S.
citizens in stanter on the spot.
And who knows how many mothers and uncles and aunts and sisters and brothers and who all else that they will eventually be able to bring in.
To put that into perspective, I think that the population of Wyoming is just under 1 million.
So you're talking about in 16 years, we're talking about Four Wyoming's.
Yeah, well, maybe even five Wyoming's.
It's almost five Wyoming's.
Yes, yes.
And Donald Trump is saying that he's just going to issue an executive order and make sure that we stop doing this.
Of course, House Speaker Paul Ryan, he says that Trump can't make a change without Congress or a new constitutional amendment.
He's always the naysayer on these things, but I'm pleased to say that Lindsey Graham is behind him.
Lindsey Graham has grown a little bit of a backbone.
Not only has Lindsey Graham grown a backbone in saying that he will introduce legislation on this topic, Donald Trump also then put out another... Whatever he was drinking yesterday on Wednesday, October 31st, was fantastic because you know what?
He had a few treats up his sleeve for his base when he tweeted out at Paul Ryan, hey, you have work to do to try and maintain the Republican majority.
You know, quit, stop this.
And of course, Paul Ryan's about to ride off into the sunset to probably get a job as a fellow at The Heritage or Cato, where he's probably going to be handing out pocket constitutions for Halloween in a few years.
But the main thing, like you said, people are being forced.
Donald Trump is his own planet and he's by force of will, with his gravity and his gravitas, he's pulling people like a Lindsey Graham in his direction.
Yes, it's wonderful.
Now, I don't consider him a man of great gravitas, frankly, but we needn't quibble on the personality of Donald Trump.
Interestingly enough, you know, Senator Harry Reid, back in his frisky youth, back in 1993, he himself had introduced legislation to clarify the 14th Amendment so that illegals would not become U.S.
citizens.
And he called it the Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993.
Now, he says that was one of the worst mistakes of his Senate career.
He actually said that that was not only one of the worst mistakes, he then, his wife scolded him apparently.
He tried to come out and say that his wife scolded him yesterday, right after this happened, and he was apologetic.
But that's not true, because he would write a number of op-eds on the same topic for the next year.
It blows my mind to think about how close we were in the early 1990s to shutting the door.
And then, of course, my theory is Oklahoma City derailed a lot in the 1995 attack because it focused everything on the militias.
Obviously, you know, these things don't have any logical connection, but then liberals aren't rational anyway.
No, they're not.
No, they're not.
Because it derailed, you know, Peter Brimel and I've talked about that a lot because he lost a lot of opportunities to speak because of that.
His book came out exactly at the same time.
Well, the 1990s was a very strange time.
You had people like Michael Levin publishing their books in mainstream publishers on race and IQ.
You had Phil Rushton.
You had Daniel Seligman.
You had, of course, the bell curve.
My first book, Pay With Good Intentions, was published and became a conservative book club number one choice.
Isn't that an astonishing thing to consider?
The 1990s were a very interesting time.
And then, all of a sudden, the curtain came down with a slam.
An iron curtain has descended, as Winston Churchill once said.
But back to the 14th Amendment here.
I don't know if our listeners want a history lesson, but they're going to get one anyway.
And it has to do with citizenship in the United States.
This is an interesting thing.
The U.S.
Constitution does not define citizenship.
Instead, each of the 13 states had its own rules for citizenship, and once you became a state citizen, then you could, of course, become a federal citizen.
And it wasn't until the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision of 1857 did a definition of national citizenship emerge, and blacks were excluded from federal citizenship.
It said, we don't care if you're a citizen of the state of Massachusetts, you ain't a federal citizen.
Slave or free, too bad.
Now, the 14th Amendment, which was ratified after the war in 1868, it was intended to overturn the Dred Scott decision and protect former slaves, to establish federal citizenship automatically, whatever the southern states did.
Many of the southern states did not recognize emancipated slaves as citizens, and so technically speaking, they weren't federal citizens either.
They're sort of stateless, waifs.
But, what the relevant phrase in the 14th Amendment is, all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are U.S.
citizens.
Now, in the Slaughterhouse Supreme Court cases in 1873, that was the first time that the Supreme Court interpreted the Citizenship Clause.
And remember, the 14th Amendment had been ratified just five years previously.
And it said, the phrase, subject to its jurisdiction, was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, that means ambassadors, consuls, citizens, and citizens or subjects of foreign states born in the United States.
All foreigners were excluded from that.
And when you think about it, if it weren't that case, why would that phrase, subject to the jurisdiction, be in there?
I mean, the way the libs want to interpret it now is, all persons born or naturalized in the United States are U.S.
citizens.
Correct.
That's the way they want it to work.
But there is an ambiguity here.
Because there was a Supreme Court decision called United States versus Wong Kim Ark.
And in this case, the Supreme Court applied what is considered to be British common law to interpret the citizenship.
In other words, customary law.
Now, this was a Chinese person, Wong Kim Ark, that Mr. Ark's parents were still subjects of the Chinese emperor, and that they were excluded from citizenship because of the Chinese Exclusion Act, but that Ark had been born in the United States, and his parents had established a permanent domicile and legal residence in San Francisco, where he was born, and so he was a citizen.
Now, of course, he was a legally admitted citizen because his parents had showed up before the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act.
And so, the question is, what is the real intent of the law and what would the Supreme Court decide today?
Now, a number of states have considered unilaterally saying, OK, if you're born in Arizona, say, you are not a citizen.
And that would go to the Supreme Court right away.
Of course, a declaration, an executive action by the United States would go to the Supreme Court.
In one way or another, it's going to end up at the Supreme Court.
Correct.
And these happen sooner than later.
Yes, yes.
There are plenty of commentators today who say, oh, it's common all around the world.
It's common only in places where nobody wants to become a citizen.
The only developed country in the world that has birthright citizenship for anybody who happens to pop out on the territory, besides the United States, is Canada.
And there are plenty of other countries that have abolished it recently.
I've got a list of them here.
Portugal in 1981.
Britain in 1983.
India, interestingly enough, in 1987.
France in 1993.
Ireland in 2005.
India, interestingly enough, in 1987.
France in 1993.
Ireland in 2005.
New Zealand, 2006.
Australia in 2007.
They got sick and tired of this idea, and so they have done the sensible thing.
Of course, now we have birth tourism, and especially the Asians seem to be doing it,
they do it first class.
You know, they pay $40,000 to $80,000, some sort of package deal where they show up
in New York, California, stay in some swank hotel, and they pay for first class delivery wards.
And then, of course, there's the other way of doing it.
You know, the way the Mexicans do it.
They trot across the border, eight months pregnant, hang around, and then show up as charity cases, and lo and behold, they produce a U.S.
citizen.
You know, it's fascinating when you actually think that is happening.
This sort of colonization is happening with Asians using Weaponizing the womb and this manner around citizenship, I mean, because it gets the heart of.
You and I and our listeners who have listened to us for a long time, they know that we talk about the Naturalization Act of 1790 quite often.
We bring it up and we lament that the founders Didn't put this into the Constitution or make this one of the amendments.
That to me is one of the saddest facts because the first Congress in the United States actually ratified the Naturalization Act of 1790 before they even did the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights wasn't done until 1791.
So those 10 amendments that we all cherish, the Bill of Rights, that takes a back seat to the Naturalization Act of 1790.
But when you think about it, this is something out of a script for a movie.
There's this action film series called John Wick where in New York City there's supposed
to be this exclusive hotel for hitmen where they can go and they can seek refuge.
But in our world, in our crazy world, something like that script idea, John Wick, it sounds
cool and unique but in our world it's something more terrifying where citizenship is basically...
I mean what is American citizenship worth at this point, Mr.
Taylor?
Well, you certainly wonder.
And those who want to keep the current state of affairs whereby any illegal immigrant who has a child produces a U.S.
citizen, why do they want that?
Why can they possibly want that?
Why should that be the way the country works?
I'd really like to hear some kind of earnest explanation on the part of the Democrats who think that's a good idea.
Well, who thinks it's a good idea and why?
We're going to get to that in a few minutes, courtesy of a columnist of the New York Times, so that's called a tease.
Well, but I'd like to hear some politician come right out and say so, but anyway.
Well, but while we are on the subject of immigrants, why don't we talk about Congressman Steve King.
Of course, he has been one of the most outspoken in standing behind the preservation of Western civilization in the United States.
He is a Republican of Ohio.
I'm sorry, he's a Republican of Iowa.
And he has... No, I beg your pardon.
Stephen King is a Republican from Ohio.
And he has been in trouble for doing such things as endorsing Faith Goldie for mayor of Toronto.
And for a number of things he said.
Now, I looked up a list of all the horrible things that Stephen King has said.
You know, when you string them all back to back, you don't get... It's not all that horrifying at all.
No, it's not.
No.
He said that he wanted to build a border fence with an electric wire at the top.
He says, not to kill, but to discourage.
And then he says, we do that with livestock all the time.
You create a Pavlovian response.
Yes, yes.
It's obvious.
But this is, oh!
And then also he said, we can't restore our civilization with somebody else's babies.
Seems pretty obvious to me.
Could the Japanese restore their civilization with somebody else's babies?
Or the Saudis?
But no, no, we're not supposed to talk about that.
Then he also said, cultural suicide by demographic transformation must end.
Obviously, another first-degree crime.
And then, remember, he got in a little bit of trouble for saying that for every young immigrant who becomes a school valedictorian, there are, quote, 100 out there, and they weigh 130 pounds, and they've got calves the size of cantaloupes because they're hauling 75 pounds of marijuana across the desert.
Well, that was an amusing observation, and may not even be, technically speaking, biologically speaking, correct.
I've never seen an illegal immigrant with calves the size of cantaloupes.
I just want to point that out.
Maybe there are a few working out at a gym in Mesa, Arizona that I haven't seen, Steve King.
But, you know, Steve King is also a guy, he is He's probably the best that the Republicans offer right now,
Mr. Taylor.
And for our listeners out there, I strongly suggest that you send him a message of respect
and state that keep doing what you're doing because don't let these corporations that
are pulling out Land of Lakes and Intel, those are both corporations that have offices in
Iowa that were giving donations.
They've pulled back You're gonna start seeing a lot more of this as the Republican Party.
Mr. Taylor and our great listening audience as the GOP becomes more and more obviously Well, some of those messages might begin with the letter S with two vertical lines through it.
But just to finish off with my list of the horrible offenses that Stephen King has committed, When there were complaints about all the white people at the 2016 Republican National Convention, he asked, well, what's wrong with that?
And his words were, where did any other subgroup of people, subgroup of people, contribute more to civilization?
So you see, this is the Des Moines Register that compiled this list of unforgivable crimes on the part of Stephen King.
But this is scaring away, as you said, these corporate donors and, and I think this is quite significant, Congressman Steve Stivers.
A Republican of Ohio who chairs the National Republican Congressional Committee.
He is the guy who's in charge of making sure that Republicans get elected and re-elected.
He condemned Steve King with a tweet on Tuesday this week saying, we must stand up against white supremacy
and hate in all forms, and I strongly condemn this behavior.
Now, isn't that a great message from a brother Republican?
Well, when the number two person in the Democratic Party is someone who's written extensively
about not only black nationalism, but a black state within the United States,
and I can only be referring to Keith Ellison, who is running for Attorney General in Minnesota,
You can only imagine.
The type of criminal justice reform he'll enact that would make Michael Dukakis blush if he's elected in Minnesota.
I mean, Mr. Taylor, everything is setting up for our conversation next Thursday to be historic.
It really is going to be historic.
Yes, it's going to be very, very interesting.
We might end up devoting the entire program to what happens, but who knows?
We'll see.
But there are always other exciting developments for those who pay attention to these things.
You know, you may be interested to know that on election eve, I've been asked to do live commentary on the midterm elections on Japanese television.
Really?
Yes.
Where will you have to go to be able to do this?
Oh, we'll be doing it by Skype.
Okay.
We'll be doing it by Skype.
So yes, the Japanese public will be there all agog as I let fall one pearl of wisdom after another into the Japanese airwaves.
I'm quite looking forward to that.
But, you know, just to stick with Congressman King here, some of these attacks may be affecting some of his voter base because the Cook Political Report, which is in the business of elections forecasting, it has shifted its rating of the race between King and his Democratic challenger from likely Republican to leaning Republican.
So there is a possibility that he might be out of there, but we certainly hope not.
There's a 1% chance that he's going to be out of there.
Steve Keating is a beloved congressman.
He's been elected time and time again.
The attacks are getting more and more vicious.
Yesterday, CNN aired a huge hit piece on Chris Kobach because it's obvious he's going to become governor and they're starting to do everything.
The corporate media is doing everything they can to try and stymie what's transpiring, to try and impede the implicit white identity that has overtaken the Republican Party from becoming explicit.
And I think there is no more obvious example of that.
Gregory Hood wrote, I believe, one of the best pieces he's done in his life for American Renaissance just the other day on the very topic, Mr. Taylor, of Michelle Goldberg's eye-opening, jaw-dropping piece with its honesty.
I mean, finally, after all these years, After decades and decades of what we know is happening, we get a voracious piece that is dripping with honesty as it is invective toward the white population of Georgia.
Yes, this is getting clearer and clearer all the time.
And the piece by Michelle Goldberg, she's a frequent op-ed contributor to that wonderful old newspaper, was titled, We Can Replace Them.
And yes, the people that she has in mind to replace are the very ones you think she might very well have in mind.
Let me read just a few of the sentences.
She says, right now, America is tearing itself apart as an embittered white conservative minority clings to power, terrified at being swamped by a new multiracial polyglot majority.
This divide feels especially stark in Georgia, where the midterm election is a battle between Trumpist reaction, that's of course Republican Brian Kemp, and the multicultural America, and of course by that she means the black Democrat Stacey Abrams, whose emergence the right is trying at all costs to forestall.
As if we've been really trying hard to keep America white.
You know, that's what the Republicans have been doing.
Good grief.
I mean, they're just as guilty of this crazy... They are probably more guilty, and in fact, the people of Georgia, a state I know a little bit about, I've said it many times, and I'll say it again because it's important to point out, the suburbs of Atlanta are on the verge of going to South Carolina, Tennessee, and Alabama because white people abandon one city that they build after another once the black undertow from Atlanta moves in and they numerically displace the white so white seeking quote-unquote good schools move further and further down 85 South further and further up 85 North further and further up 75 North toward Tennessee and further and further down 75 South toward Macon, Georgia
You've got a situation, Mr. Taylor, just to put it quite bluntly, because this article didn't point this out, Georgia was 72% white in 1990.
And now you've got a situation where Gwinnett County, I just found out that some of the top high schools, say 20 years ago, that were 95% white in Gwinnett County, one is called Brookwood High School, it's now less than 15% white.
And less than a score, it went from being almost entirely white to, hey, We were replaced.
Well, that certainly happens when there is integration in schools.
And when it begins to happen, it begins to go rapidly.
But let me continue quoting from Michelle Goldberg's piece.
She says Stacey Abrams' goal is to put together a coalition of African American and other minority voters and white
liberals.
The potential is there, says Michelle Goldberg.
Georgia is less than 53% non-Hispanic white.
She's looking at those numbers and she's clearly happy.
Then she goes on to say, while she was in Georgia preparing to write this piece, she said, reports of the killings at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh were coming in.
The social media posts of the man arrested in the shootings echoed a lie being peddled by Donald Trump, Fox News, and some Republican politicians which paints a group of bedraggled migrants about a thousand miles away as a dangerous invading horde.
Now, got that?
That is a lie.
A lie.
And then she says, in a week, American voters can do to white nationalists what they fear most, show them they're being replaced.
And she goes on to say, Brian Kemp is the candidate of aggrieved whiteness.
And as you just pointed out, he's probably going to get the votes of about 80% of the whites, but I guess all whites are aggrieved.
And the point of Gregory Hood's article that you praised, and rightly so, was to point out just how it is that she defines conservative whites.
Basically, she wants everybody with whom she disagrees politically to be replaced.
I suppose she'll let Hillary Clinton stay around as some sort of exotic bit of fauna in this new America in which we're being replaced.
But I thought it was quite interesting here.
She says, first of all, that, and this is part of the logic that a lot of people put together to blame Donald Trump for this shooting, this terrible massacre at the synagogue.
She says that he was motivated by this opposition to the idea of American whites being reduced to a minority, and because the Tree of Life synagogue supports the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, which likes to bring in all sorts of non-white immigrants from all around the world, He, this fellow Robert Bowers who did the shooting, was hopped up and crazed by Donald Trump portraying these poor bedraggled migrants as a dangerous invading horde.
Now, of course, if they make it across the border, and let's not forget, this first caravan has already spawned two more caravans.
There are three.
And if they make it into the United States, the whole thing will, of course, become a very dangerous invading horde.
That's precisely what they are.
Not only is it dangerous, but Brandon Darby of Breitbart continues to point out on Twitter that The Border Patrol is arresting numbers of 1,300 illegals every day.
That many people are crossing.
So every day that we've been focused on this caravan, which it is a good thing to focus on because it gives you wonderful images that are powerful and that are illustrative of this massive third world humanity that wants to come to our shores and take advantage of the Gracious welfare state that exists here.
But as Brandon Derby of Breitbart points out, this is happening every day.
That's right.
It's happening every day.
And this is one of the reasons why a state like Georgia, which was 72% white in 1990 and about 25% black and what's the rest of that?
25% black and what's what's what's the rest of that 3% other in 1990 is now 52%
white 30 30% black and 18% other because you've had white people
people abandoning cities in places like Clayton and Fulton and DeKalb and Rockdale, all the counties in metro Atlanta
for cheap homes built by illegal aliens.
And guess what?
Eventually those illegal aliens settle down and a little amnesty comes around
and the numbers start to look pretty bad.
Yes they do.
They start to look pretty bad.
Yes they do.
And Michelle Goldberg of course, when she talks about we can replace them,
She knows exactly what she's talking about.
She is evoking Charlottesville.
And in an earlier column about Charlottesville, She said, and this is just a few days before this recent column, she says, last year, polo-shirted racists marched around Charlottesville, Virginia, chanting, you will not replace us.
This year, it began to seem that in Georgia, their worst fears might be thrillingly realized.
She is just thrilled at the prospect of replacing white people.
And again, it's already happened.
If Brian Kemp wins on November 5th or November 6th, if he wins, The numbers in Georgia, the trend is going to put Georgia as a majority-minority state by 2022.
Now, the white electorate is still much larger than the 53% of the actual population.
That's something that she doesn't take into account in her piece.
But the immigrant population of Georgia is approaching 11% in 2018.
11% in 2018. I've been I've got this piece. It's Big it's it'll be in it'll be in Jarrett's hands by
tomorrow my My friend Gregor will look at it first.
But this is such a fascinating state because this is more interesting than the election, I think, in Florida.
I actually believe DeSantis is going to win, and I believe Kemp is going to win.
But there's an interesting fact to point out about Georgia, we do this real quick.
Georgia is basically, Atlanta, Georgia is the new Hollywood.
Most of the major motion pictures you watch are filmed down in Atlanta, Georgia for tax incentives.
A lot of people don't know that.
Now, Mike Pence is out there, down in Georgia right now.
He's been going all across the state saying, hey guys, this ain't Hollywood, thinking that Georgia is still
this aw shucks, good old boy state that spawned the Dukes of Hazzard.
It's not.
That Georgia has been replaced.
It has been replaced.
We know that Stacey Abrams has her sights set on the most visible example of white supremacy
in their eyes in the country.
And I can only be referring to Stone Mountain.
Of course.
I mean, again, this is the type of stuff that Brian Kemp, he should be doing ads about Stone Mountain being airbrushed, not airbrushed.
Sandblasted.
Sandblasted is the word she used.
Sandblasted.
And again, maybe we'll see that, but you've got Oprah Winfrey is down in Atlanta right now, and she continues to evoke lynching and poll taxes and everything that blacks had to overcome.
I mean this will be, mark my word, if somehow Stacey Abrams wins this election, the racial triumphalism, the triumphant feelings of racial pride by blacks will be far greater than it was for Obama.
Oh, I suspect so.
Barack Obama's going to be down there campaigning for her, too.
So will Michelle.
And if she wins, here's something I'm going to throw out at you.
If she wins this election, Mr. Taylor, I personally will bet A lot of money that she is instantly the frontrunner in 2020.
If she can beat the Trump candidate and Brian Kemp in Georgia, a state that a lot of people erroneously have this view that it's this good old boy, when if you just read what Michelle Goldberg wrote, you know that, hey, Georgia was targeted for destruction a long time ago by refugee resettlement.
There's a, I can't remember the city, but there's one city in Georgia that has a massive Somali population all around the airport.
I mean, it is the black Mecca.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution pointed out that blacks are moving back from Chicago, Detroit, Newark, and Camden.
These places that have, well, back to Atlanta.
But Mr. Kersey, after having been government of Georgia for two years, she's going to abandon Georgia and put her hat in the ring for president?
Yes!
I don't think that'll happen.
She is going to get a book deal.
She's already being lauded by the so-called objective media as the face of the Democratic Party.
She was profiled on Time Magazine, the face of the New South, back in August of 2018.
If she wins, she becomes the frontrunner because she will have the moral authority, having conquered Georgia.
And then just imagine the battles for Stone Mountain.
I mean, I'm telling you, Georgia is the most important state to be watching right now.
Far more than Florida.
Because DeSantis, he's going to win.
But in Georgia, there's a Libertarian candidate who will probably get 2% of the vote.
And so, say Brian Kemp wins, but he doesn't get 50%.
That forces a runoff.
That's what I understand.
You've got to get 50%.
There's a few candidates in there.
So if we have listeners down in Georgia, Get to the get to the voting booth and go vote and get your friends.
They need to understand this is the most important election in their lives if they are a resident of Georgia.
Well, back to this Michelle Goldberg op-ed piece in the Times.
She's talking about, again, trying to pin this Tree of Life synagogue massacre on Donald Trump.
Now, another aspect of this is that because Robert Bowers, just before he decided to go shoot people up, he posted on Gab Saying that, you know, this Hebrew Aid Society is bringing in killers in our country.
I can't sit around anymore.
I'm going in.
Screw your optics.
And so that was a very clear suggestion that he was going to do something illegal and probably murderous.
But, of course, GAAB would have taken that down had they seen it in time.
In any case, GAAB is now starting to de-platform themselves.
They were down for a few days, you know?
They're still down.
They're cooperating with the FBI and the DOJ.
They are doing everything they can.
And let's point this out.
There was a great article It was on Drudge, and it noted that the Filipino immigrant who sent all those bombs to Democrats and the media, he was posting threatening stuff on Twitter.
And it was never taken down.
That's right.
But they started taking it down after he got arrested, yes.
But somehow, the idea that Gab, because it permitted what the rest of the world considers hate speech, you get one Gab user who goes out and commits multiple murders, then Gab itself has got to be taken down?
This is just extraordinary.
Now, I have argued over and over that one of the reasons these people kill, the way Dylan Roof went on his murderous rampage, It's because the country does not talk about what these people care about.
The replacement of whites.
The demonization of whites.
This Robert Bowers, I don't know anything about this guy other than what I've read, but he was very concerned about whites being reduced to minority.
How come we never talk about this?
How come we never talk about the enthusiastic promotion of immigration by Jewish groups?
He's all upset.
And if this sort of thing were taken seriously, if Gab were not sort of this ghetto of people who've been forced out of any kind of respectable discourse, if these things were discussed in a straightforward, honest way, I think we would be much less likely to have these attacks.
Remember back in 2011 when Pat Buchanan didn't get his contract renewed at MSNBC?
And what did the president of MSNBC say?
The conversations that Pat Buchanan wants to have are no longer permissible in the United States.
One of the books that he had on immigration was coming out and the president said, we no longer have these conversations.
They've already been decided.
And once people realize that they are being shut forcibly out of any kind of respectable discourse, some of them are going to lose their marbles and some of them are going to go in guns blazing.
This kind of shutting up gab, this kind of suppressing the facts about race and crime, which so infuriated Dylann Roof, the more these people react by censoring, by demonizing, by driving us out of any kind of respectable society, It makes it more likely that this kind of thing is going to happen.
Mark my words.
This is just the beginning.
If the reaction is to clamp down on people, demonize them and their symbols, the Confederate flag, only Southern white people, or all white people, but especially Southern white people, are not allowed to have any kind of pride in their heritage, it's going to make people angry.
But other things are going to make people angry.
Don Lemon, he was on TV just the other day and he's worth quoting too.
He was saying that, I keep trying to point out to people not to demonize any one group or any one ethnicity.
But we keep thinking that the biggest terror threat is something else.
Some people who are marching towards the border.
Like it's imminent, he says.
Now he's talking about the caravans.
Correct.
We mustn't demonize these people.
Absolutely must not demonize these people.
You know, we keep hearing, they're 800 miles away.
They're 1,000 miles away.
As if that makes any difference.
They're headed our way and some of them are going to show up.
That's right.
Good grief.
Then, after having said we mustn't demonize people, he goes on to say, We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men!
Most of them radicalized to the right.
And we have to start doing something about them.
There's no travel ban on them.
You know, we had the Muslim ban.
There's no white guy ban.
So what do we do about that, he said.
He's not being facetious.
You've got to watch this video.
He's being interviewed by Chris Cuomo on CNN.
Chris Cuomo is, of course, the brother of Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, who has taken it upon himself to launch an investigation on the Proud Boys.
A lot of people out there, and I'm not referring to our audience, but there still might be some who don't understand where things are headed.
The left is out for blood.
And Don Lemon and Michelle Goberg have let slip what they believe needs to happen.
Obviously they're not in power, but Michelle Goldberg is excited at the thought of this demographic replacement of whites in Georgia and what that represents.
She's thrilled!
Political power.
Because when you vote, you're exercising violence.
When you have the franchise, you have the opportunity.
It's political force.
You're voting to get the state the monopoly, the executive.
And again, this is why I argue To my face is blue.
To understand where the world is headed, you need to read the book Starship Troopers to understand the concept of citizenship.
There's so many great things happening, except in America where we still believe that universal suffrage is the greatest idea since sliced bread, when in fact universal suffrage is nothing more than universal suffering.
And, you know, the franchise should be taken very seriously.
But we have a guy like Don Lemon here who's a black homosexual who's married to a white guy.
And he's using this study from the Government Accountability Office report that shows since 9-11 attacks in 2001.
Now, it's interesting that they start there.
That far-right violent extremists have killed 106 people in 62 attacks in the USA, while radical Islamist violent extremists have killed 119 people in 23 attacks.
That's right.
The death rate from the Islamic extremists is greater than from these so-called far-right extremists.
I'd like to know who some of these attacks, who these attackers were.
62 attacks since after the 9-11 attacks.
In any case, let's assume that they're all correct.
Let's assume that they're all far-right white people.
The fact is, Muslims have killed more.
And Muslims, as a percentage of the population, are tiny compared to Well, per capita is a concept alien to a journalist with the integrity of a guy like Don Lemon, so I'm sure he'd have no idea what you're pointing out when all they look at are apples to oranges.
But he wants a white guy ban?
What sort of nonsense is that?
They're already here, Mr. Lemon.
We were talking about Gab.
Howard Dean himself said that Gab needed to be prosecuted.
Because they were somehow complicit in this attack on the synagogue in Pittsburgh.
This is just such insanity.
They're going to prosecute... You see, that is precisely what the Communications Decency Act is all about.
If you are a platform... Now, this is one thing that Facebook and Twitter and all the rest of them are claiming all the time.
Look, some crazy says something crazy.
Not our problem.
But all of a sudden we're going to exclude Gabb from the protection of this?
Again, we've talked about selective outrage and selective prosecution before, but just because the people on Gabb say things that upset the liberals, they're going to de-platform it?
Prosecute them?
This is just outrageous.
Now, to his credit, the guy who founded Gabb, I think his name is Tabor?
Andrew Torba.
Torba, yes, very good.
He has said, no, we're not going to change our rules at all.
Once we get back in business, we believe in free speech, we don't believe in inciting violence, and that we curb.
But absolutely not are we going to change.
Well, and why this is so important, and why the lawsuit that you're doing, and why American Renaissance existing throughout all of the Battles that you have to wage over the past 30 years is that as long as we have the opportunity to speak and have the opportunity to have our ideas, our articles, our videos out there in the market where all these ideas are allowed to percolate and be digested.
And consumed without being denied that ability.
If we have that, we're going to win.
That's right.
Because we are winning right now.
Exactly.
All we ask is a chance to be heard.
A chance to be heard just like everybody else.
And our ideas are so compelling, we are so clearly right to those who have taken the time to think about it, that no matter how much power they have, they will crumble in the face of truth, goodness, beauty, and morality.
And as you notice, and as you noted, when you silence people you, regrettably, you radicalize them into violence because they see no other alternative.
The left has made it quite clear that they are not for free speech anymore.
Quite clear.
No.
And there are going to be more killings.
I predict that with great confidence.
And this is a terrible tragedy that these Alleged believers in diversity and tolerance have brought upon us.
They've brought upon themselves.
They've brought upon all of us.
I just don't know how this can possibly end without yet more massacres of this kind.
Well, this is why it's important that we actually have a national conversation on race.
We all step back and instead of Like Barack Obama did back in 2015 where he pointed the finger at police and the left and the media all said, hey the police are the greatest threat to black lives and black bodies out there.
And what happened?
We had the Dallas massacre where five white cops were shot by a Black Lives Matter protester and the cops that were killed in Baton Rouge by a Black Lives Matter protester which has of course been Brushed under the rug, that never happened.
So again, let's all take a breath and let's have the conversation.
Because you know what?
Trying to say that this video that Donald Trump just pointed out, he cares about all Americans.
And if we're at a point now where the left has consumed the message of Michelle Goldberg that, hey, we're going to replace you.
It doesn't matter.
We don't have to have a conversation.
It's a monologue.
We've replaced you with new, better Americans, and they're going to vote for our ideas, and you don't have access to the marketplace.
And there are going to be some people who get angry by hearing that talk.
And naturally so.
What they do is their affair, but they're naturally going to be angry.
Well, let's end with something of a good news story.
And this is Austria's decision to join the United States, by the way, and Hungary and Australia in withdrawing from this Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration.
This is something that was passed by the UN.
It's a non-binding pact.
But the point is, it's to make migration safe and orderly.
And of course, Mr. Taylor, migration is largely an outflow of non-whites from their failed states to white nations.
That's right.
That's right.
I wonder why.
I just can't imagine why that's the case.
White people are so vicious and racist and exploitative.
Why could they possibly want to come our way?
Well, as Gregor here has pointed out, it seems that what non-white people hate even more than being around racist white people in Europe and North America is being around their own people.
Which is why they're constantly leaving.
Where are those racist white people to be around?
It just must be so gruesome to come to America, which is why they all want to come.
But this pact, which as the Austrians have decided not to sign, the Hungarians, Poland is considering backing out on this thing.
The U.S.
was never involved at all.
Donald Trump said from the beginning, this is baloney, because it in effect creates a right to migrate.
Correct.
And Croatia also just decided to pull out.
I think you're going to see Italy.
I think you're going to see a lot more countries pull out.
As soon as there are a few brave people who do that, then that opens the floodgates, let us hope.
This was originally approved in 2016 by every single member of the U.N.
All 193 of them.
But apparently this is something that has resulted in a little bit of buyer's remorse.
And so Austria is joining the camp of the saints in deciding to stay away from this thing.
So that's our good news story.
You know, I got an email from someone who said, I absolutely love the podcast.
You guys are two of, if not the most reasonable and responsible voices on the right.
And it's a shame that you guys aren't dictating Republican policy in Washington.
Why not national policy?
Well, anyway, we'll start first.
We've got to start first.
And they said, you know, the way that you end it, it doesn't sound that positive because our time is not up.
Our time is just beginning.
And I got to thinking, wow, we're just talking about our on-air time.
So I think we need to decide on a new sign-off.
Well at least we can say, our airtime is up.
And we thank you for yours.
But for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Never ever apologize.
Because we're right.
And we will win.
▲
Export Selection