All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 25, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
58:07
Trump Says He’s a ‘Nationalist’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to today's edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is my indispensable guest, always faithful, always reliable, always insightful, Paul Kersey.
Glad to have you with me today.
It's an honor, as usual, to be here.
And, as usual, there is a great deal to talk about.
Never a dull week when you pay attention to what people should all be paying attention to.
And I think we're going to start off with this story about the Proud Boys.
You're, of course, familiar with who they are.
They're the group that was started by Gavin McInnes.
Who is known as an alt-light sort of guy.
In fact, his group is sort of explicitly non-racial and they even condemn the idea of white racial consciousness.
But that does not stop you, of course, from being criticized as being a white supremacist and hate monger and all of those things simply because they consider themselves Western chauvinists.
Having non-white members will not shield you from the accusation of racism because at this point in the narrative, at this point in the chronology of the post-Trump election, anyone who supports Donald Trump, increasingly any Republican, is automatically a white supremacist.
Yes, that's right.
And you can be non-white.
You can be any color at all and be a white supremacist so long as you disagree with just about anything that the Democrats insist on.
So yes, we have this multiracial group of so-called white supremacists.
In any case, Gavin McInnes was invited to speak at the New York Metropolitan Republican Club.
Have you ever been invited?
Have you ever been invited to speak there?
I'm afraid not.
I'm afraid not.
But bravo for Gavin McInnes.
In any case, even before he was to speak, the door of the place was vandalized.
They painted those A in a circle, the anarchist symbol.
They pitched bricks through the windows.
They filled the locks with epoxy glue.
And then, of course, after Gavin McInnes spoke, there were Antifa waiting for them.
And he had a few of his proud boys with him.
There was a dust-up with Antifa.
And interestingly enough, there were three arrests of Antifa.
But since then, there has been just a mountain of criticism against the proud boys.
Now, so far, five have been arrested, and there are more likely to be arrested.
Whereas, it does not appear that there's any kind of manhunt on for the Antifa, who If they hadn't been there, of course, there'd be no violence, no problems at all.
But what strikes me...
Is the just unanimous condemnation of the Proud Boys without one word of condemnation of the Antifa?
Well, the condemnation, of course, is important, but we'd be remiss if we didn't note that there is video evidence that shows that the Antifa, Mr. Taylor, were the ones who instigated this brouhaha, this battle.
And that, of course, is not shown Or even considered by all of these elected officials who we're about to talk about when it comes to their comments.
It's indefensible that there's actually evidence that shows the Proud Boys are the good guys in their eyes, in their estimation.
That's the world that we live in.
We've talked about before, Mr. Taylor, the organization from California, RAM?
It's the Rise Above Movement.
The Rise Above Movement, yeah.
We are at a point now where the late, great Sam Francis's anarcho-tyranny is not only rearing its ugly head, but it is basically the policy of these municipalities like Charlottesville and like New York City.
Maybe even the whole state of New York, actually, if you think about it.
Where any group that could plausibly be white, identitarian in nature automatically has a bullseye on them.
Well, I did watch that video, and while we're talking about that, it does appear to be the case that the Antifa types threw something at the Proud Boys, and it's reported they stole a hat and they stole somebody's backpack, but then the Proud Boys sure piled on.
They apparently were.
It looks to me as though they might have been itching for a fight.
Who knows?
In any case, they were provoked, but provocation resulted in severe punishment.
Let's put it that way.
But the outrage is all one way.
Governor Cuomo of New York, he tweeted directly at the Proud Boys.
Quote, New York has zero tolerance for your bullshit.
And Mayor Bill de Blasio, he tweeted about, quote, an attack involving the Proud Boys, adding, and I quote again, hate is never welcome in New York City.
The New York Attorney General, Barbara Underwood, said this, and I quote, I'm disturbed and disgusted by last night's attacks involving the so-called Proud Boys.
Hate has no place in New York, end quote.
And none of these people seem to care about Antifa at all.
And New York City Comptroller, Scott Stringer, condemned, quote, this weekend's abhorrent and hateful Proud Boys attack in the Upper East Side.
Is it their attack?
Wait a minute, wait a minute.
They were defending themselves.
Some might argue, somewhat excessively, perhaps.
Who knows?
But the Proud Boys attack.
And now, my favorite, of course, is New York City public advocate, Letitia James, who is black.
And she used all the fashionable lefty buzzwords.
She was, quote, disgusted by the videos I've seen of members of the neo-fascist, white supremacist Proud Boy group engaging in hate-fueled mob violence on the streets of New York City.
And you know, just the other day, I was listening to a national public radio discussion of political extremism.
And the guest, whose name I cannot remember, talked about these white supremacists, white boy, proud boys, just attacking people on the streets of New York, as if they were just running through, running through Broadway, attacking anybody that came by.
No, they were clearly provoked, and they responded in kind.
You know, the quote you just gave, we've not talked about it before, but we'd be remiss if we didn't note the NPC meme that has kind of taken over Twitter.
Of course, you guys are banned, so you probably haven't seen it since you are unable to spend some of your free time on Twitter, but the NPC meme, non-player character from the gaming universe, where You have a character that is pre-programmed with thoughts, has no ability of discernment on their own.
They've already got these pre-programmed thoughts.
When you read all of these responses, that's the only takeaway is that, wow, those in power, those who have been elected to represent the interests of all law-abiding citizens, already have received the directive, proud boys bad, those who oppose proud boys.
That's right.
And it doesn't make any difference if those who oppose them are black-masked, violent people who attack the police, as well as anybody else.
You'd think people in government would at least have some sort of skepticism about groups that call for anarchism, overthrow of all government, and make a point of attacking the police.
But no, no, they think this is just fine.
And by the way, even a square geezer like me is aware of NPC.
I hope you'll be glad to know.
Well, it's an amazing meme, and hopefully someone out there will create a meme of Mr. Taylor surrounded by those gray characters that you see so often.
If you haven't seen it, look at the NPC meme.
And it'll be, of course, Jared radiating the positive energy that keeps them at bay.
Because Orange Man isn't bad.
Hmm.
There are some people who are still good.
But yeah, the message is very, very clear.
Some violence is good.
Some violence is bad.
And it's strictly on the basis of where your politics lie.
Now, what is, to me, much more disturbing than selective outrage is selective prosecution.
And as you mentioned earlier, just a week or two ago, there was this arrest of four members of the Rise Above movement.
Now, maybe they were a little free with their fists, too.
I don't know.
If these people are guilty of violence, then they got to pay the cost.
But it is this selective prosecution, as if Antifa were all angels, all Boy Scouts, all just, you know, they go to these rallies in the hope of leading little old ladies across the street.
It is just absurd.
Nobody seems to be looking into these people.
Well, Antifa, they represent the shock troops of the establishment.
When you go into these cities, these municipalities that are controlled by radically rabid zealots, anti-white zealots, New York City, Charlottesville, large parts of California, you think about Berkeley, you think about San Francisco, where a lot of this stuff has happened.
There is a clear pattern emerging here that, hey, these are no longer areas where Not just white identitarians, Mr. Taylor, but Trump supporters can expect to be viewed as innocent until proven guilty.
So I'm going to put you on the spot here and ask you a question.
What advice would you give to anyone who might be who might be a Proud Boy listening.
I guarantee that there are Proud Boy listeners to this fantastic podcast.
But to those who would put themselves out there and go to an area, or go to an event where Antifa is going to be present, and you do not have elected officials who care about law and order, but instead are looking to get positive press by virtue signaling to their masters in New York and in LA and Washington.
Well, I will say something that will make me very unpopular.
When you think about the Civil Rights era, the images that captured the imagination of not just the United States, but the world, were of black people with dogs sicced on them, black people doing nothing while the police pounded on them, black people who are being sprayed with hoses and not resisting.
Now, To me, it is practically impossible to imagine the Proud Boys and any other group of young people standing with their arms folded while somebody beats on them.
But if someone were capable of that, and if those images were captured, I think that that would send a very, very clear picture of who is bad and who is good.
Again, that may be too much to ask of anyone, but that would be the kind of response that at least some remotely fair-minded people would file away in their memory files someplace.
At the very least, if you are thinking of going to one of these demonstrations with the hope, with the desire of breaking somebody's chops, Don't do it.
Don't do it.
The way the law is being enforced today, you and only you are likely to go to jail.
And if you're talking about riot, if you're talking about felony assault, that can be jail for 10 years, 12 years, 15 years.
Not to mention the court costs that are going to be associated with defending yourself.
It will bankrupt you.
But to play devil's advocate here in what you just said, don't you think that we're increasingly with the Polarization in the country that the left views any Trump supporter as being worthy of someone who should be beaten I'm talking about some of these polls that we're beginning to see that showcase that hey, you know the left They're starting to side more and more with the radical elements of Antifa
Yes, they are.
But when you see these images of, in this case, the prom boy, you knock a guy down, maybe you're allowed to kick him once.
But if you kick him three times and then jump on him and start pounding him with your fists, there is legitimate self-defense and there is excessive violence.
If you are going to go to one of those demonstrations, no matter how young you are, no matter how much testosterone is cruising through your system, Think twice, three times, four times before you start swinging fists.
We live in a dangerous environment and as they say, you don't do the crime if you're not prepared to do the time.
And this is considered a serious crime in our current mentality and you are the guys who are going to pay the price.
I won't entirely echo what you just said, but I will say this.
There are areas of America that are occupied by latter-day Bolsheviks.
New York City is one of those places where those elected officials do not believe that anyone who is tangentially related to what they describe as, quote, white supremacy, individuals who have been designated by certain groups down in Montgomery, Alabama, or the ACLU, or the ADL, as being so frightening with their ideology that they shouldn't even
have the protection of the First Amendment, let alone the freedom of
association.
That's right.
And they are... Well, who was it?
Was it... I can't remember who it was that said that there are so many federal laws that if you wanted to, you could indict a ham sandwich.
And with all of these federal laws, and state laws, and county laws, and city laws... Sounds like Joe Shumpert.
Yes.
You have to be very careful if the zeitgeist is against you.
And as you say, once the SPLC says you're a hate group, And it makes no difference if you're multiracial.
It makes no difference if you explicitly condemn white racial consciousness.
If the SPLC says you're a hate group, then boy oh boy, anything goes.
Anything goes in these cities that you talk about.
Now, I wouldn't call them run by latter-day Bolsheviks, but it's just a matter of degree.
I just love that term, and I'm hoping it catches on, so... Yeah, all right.
Well, I'll keep it suppressed.
You work on it.
But, no, this is very serious stuff.
And, as you point out, this is a reflection of the incredibly divided country we now live in.
And, bless his heart, Trump added to this divide in a speech, I think just on Monday, when he was giving one of his campaign rallies.
And I'll quote from him.
He says, Trump says, I'm a nationalist, okay?
I'm a nationalist.
Nationalist.
Nothing wrong.
Use that word.
Use that word.
He says he recognizes that there's some people who don't like the word, but he says, now I'm a nationalist.
Wow, boy.
All the antennae on the left are quivering, quivering.
If I could be so bold to read the Washington Post reaction to this speech.
Yes, yes.
They would write or they would publish, quote, the term is clearly a fraught one.
A racially overt version of it, white nationalism, has been publicly ascendant since Trump launched his 2016 campaign.
Over the years, nationalism has inextricably been tied to race and ethnicity, the very idea of a defined national identity in which certain people don't qualify.
Imagine that!
A national identity.
Yes, if you are a Japanese, you don't qualify as an American.
You're not one of us.
If you're an Argentine, if you're a Swede, you're not a U.S.
citizen.
What a radical!
What a terrifying idea!
The idea they say, this idea that the racially overt version of nationalism, white nationalism, has been publicly ascendant since Trump launched his campaign.
As if Donald Trump had anything to do with it.
The media have this completely cuckoo idea that Donald Trump somehow lifted up the flat rock and people like me and people like you came slithering out from under.
Nay, we've been at it for a long time.
Washington Post.
Gosh, the idea that he started.
What a silly idea.
But then, I'll read what the Huffington Post said about it.
He says, but the word nationalism has been prominently used by white supremacists in recent years to emphasize that some countries or regions should be defined by a white racial identity.
A trend Trump is well aware of, given the rise of news about the ideology during his presidency.
Oh boy, oh boy.
Because there are some people who use the word white nationalism, Donald Trump is forbidden to use the word nationalism.
It's as simple as that.
You know, the first time I ever even encountered the term White nationalism, those two words put together, you know, in a lot of ways, it's a redundancy.
It's unnecessary.
Nationalism, in my opinion, if you're an American nationalist, you would think that, hey, well that, you know, you look back to the founding fathers.
Again, my favorite, just simple anecdote, the Naturalization Act of 1790.
It's quite clear of the country that they had fought to free England and what they were creating when you look at that.
Now, the first time I think I even encountered the term white national together was Carol Swain's book.
The New White Nationalist.
I think so, yeah.
It's a term I never encountered before.
If you would go back and even look at that great program on Google where you can put in a word and see where it started to show up, I think it was probably in the early 2000s because I don't even remember it and I read this book long after it was published.
I think Peter Brimlow's book Alien Nation came out in 1995, the same year as the Oklahoma City bombing.
Roughly the same time, April of 1995.
I'm not even sure if he mentions the term white nationals that much.
When do you remember encountering this term the first time?
That's a good question.
I don't have a vivid sense of hearing it for the first time.
I do remember years ago getting into a debate with a Catholic online, and he started referring to white gnats.
The white gnats.
And at first I didn't know what he was talking about.
Oh, okay, white nationalists.
All right, the white gnats.
But the fact is, you know, Donald Trump has been using this term, nationalist, for quite some time.
Back in February of 2017.
He agreed that the label described him, in his words, in a true sense.
He is a nationalist.
In his view, this is nothing different from making America great and putting America first.
Nothing strange about it.
But no, it is so hilarious.
The libs just jump on the slightest phraseology.
And oh, they're just so excited and weird, upset, horrified.
But let them be horrified.
I think it's great.
The next thing we're going to talk about is something that you had called my attention to.
That is the remarkable shift in liberal opinion.
And it's pretty quick.
There was a time, oh, I'd say, you know, when Mitt Romney was running, certainly when John McCain was running, when the word liberal had kind of a malodorous sense to it.
Even liberals kind of didn't want the word liberal.
They talked about being progressive.
But from 2001 to 2018, the share of Democratic voters who describe themselves as liberal has grown from 30% to 50%, whereas the percentage of Democrats who say they're moderate has dropped from 44% to 35%.
And now, the share of white Democrats who call themselves liberal on social issues has gone from 39% to 61% since 2001, whereas The number of blacks who say that they are liberal on social issues has hardly budged at all.
35% to 37%.
Now here, I think they're talking about things like same-sex marriage.
They're talking about, well, and also socially, as we'll find out early, it's views on race as well.
That's very much part of it too.
I suspect it also has to do with their attitudes on immigration.
Blacks are not all that keen on Mexicans swarming across the border.
But here, according to Pew survey data collected in 2017, this is very, very interesting.
Among white liberals, 79% agree that racial discrimination is the main reason why many black people can't get ahead these days.
79%!
In other words, it's not their fault.
It's us.
White people are the problem.
79% of white liberals say this.
Whereas, Among blacks, 60%, 10% fewer, say that the main deterrent is racism.
I think that's quite a fascinating... Not even blacks are as crazy on this subject as white liberals.
No, not at all, but I would like to say one thing to something you said about blacks Upset about what's happening with illegal swarming.
I completely disagree with that and I gotta say I really don't care Black's views toward illegal immigration because we're seeing in Georgia and in Florida the respective candidates for governor there embracing illegal aliens and embracing this racial change because it's enabling and we're going to talk about this in length in a few minutes but it's enabling Stacey Abrams and Andrew Gillum To be on the cusp, to be poised to be the next governors of these two deep south states.
And it's so depressing because it's only because of this great racial transformation that has happened, that has dropped the white electorate.
And of course the black electorate has only grown a little bit.
It's because so much of the white vote has been nibbled away year after year after year to a point where the Atlanta General Constitution is bragging about what has happened to the white vote in a new article that just got published.
You know, we won't be able to talk about today, but it's it is I disagree because again this coalition of the fringes at the end of the day, it is about redistributing white wealth to enrich this this strange misfit toys.
That is the Democratic Party.
Well, I know that all so-called black leaders, they really seem to think that there's going to be this wonderful rainbow coalition against the white man.
I, you know, when you talk occasionally to the ordinary black person, like a taxi driver or somebody that you meet, and you ask about this, They don't like it.
They don't want people coming in and speaking Spanish.
They don't want people coming in and taking their jobs as sheetrock hangers and things like that.
But it is true.
It is true.
It seems that the black so-called leadership has both feet planted so firmly in this weird coalition, as you call it, That they don't dare turn their backs on any of their pet issues, whether it is marriage for homosexuals, whether it's for opening up the borders, even if ordinary black people don't think that way at all.
But who knows?
Maybe more and more blacks actually are, because as you point out, if you look at the way they're likely to vote, they are certainly voting for the people who can open up the borders.
But in a recent article in the New York Times, Thomas Edsel, who is very much a liberal, but who, to his credit, he is interested in data.
He's interested in trends.
And he wrote quite an interesting article in which he explained the extent to which Well-educated and relatively upscale white Democrats.
They are the ones who are moving the party away from its traditional interest in the white working class towards all of these multi-culti, fringy ideas.
And he points out that in 2014, women voted for Democratic congressional candidates, according to exit polls, by a four-point margin.
But this month, 2018, October, a Quinnipiac poll shows that women are supporting Democratic candidates by an 18-point margin.
Four points goes to 18 points.
And then, now as far as these progressive activists, and they're almost all white, how they differ from average Americans, I thought this was very, very interesting.
They're more than twice as likely to say that they never pray.
That's 50% of these progressive, as opposed to 19% of ordinary Americans.
And they're almost three times more likely to be ashamed to be an American.
That's 69% of them.
69% of them are ashamed to be an American.
Apparently 24% of the average Americans say they're ashamed to be American.
That seems like a very sad state of affairs.
And they are 11 percentage points more likely to be white.
This is very much a white thing.
And they are twice as likely to have completed college.
59% as opposed to 29%.
So, this is very much a weird group.
They're these educated, America-hating, atheists, Americans, who are the they are the real activist backbone, the intellectual backbone of the party.
Yeah.
Well, but atheists, you say that's true, but their God actually is This anti-white messiah that they've built up in their minds.
When you look at this, and by anti-white, it's all of the things that come with being a white male.
This toxic masculinity you constantly see railed against in colleges.
Here's a great stat for you.
Among white liberal women, the share identifying themselves as feminist rose from 45% in 1992 to 83% in 2016.
percent in 1992 to 83 percent in 2016.
I mean when you start to think about what represents the leadership, those who are putting
forth the ideas that are...
At the foundation of what this new Democratic Party looks like.
That has all, as we've talked about, all these disparate races uniting together to get whitey.
And, you know, white liberal racial sympathy was, you know, strongest among most affluent white liberals.
That's right.
The richer they are, the richer they are, white liberals are more likely to think that it is the environment, it is white people that are holding black people back.
Isn't that interesting?
The poorer ones, I guess they're the ones who realize, they're the ones who actually probably have to work with blacks.
They know what it's like, they know what the obstacles they face, and they realize that it's, you know, it's up to you to get ahead.
Think about where a lot of these white liberals who are probably in this poll, where they live.
You're talking about New York City, you're talking about Chicago, you're talking about San Francisco, you're talking about Atlanta, you're talking about Los Angeles.
You're talking about areas that the, where the black population and Washington DC, I might add, you're talking about the areas of the country, these cities where the black population is decreasing, where black political power is ebbing.
Right, right.
So blacks, the black middle class and places like Chicago.
The stories are out there where it shows that the black percentage of the population is dropping considerably.
This is something that the Chicago Sun-Times, the Chicago Tribune is worried about because the cost of living in these areas is so great.
Same thing's happening in San Francisco.
Yeah, they've got a black female mayor for the first time, but the percentage of blacks in the city is dropping so significantly.
So you go back and you think about what This party is being built.
And before we got started today, I pointed out to you a lot of these Silicon Valley companies and how they're donating in 2018.
And you thought this was fascinating because take a company like Netflix.
Now, these are the companies that are supplying a lot of the capital, the fiscal capital, to help these Democratic candidates in office.
Netflix employees have given 141 to 1 When it comes to the ratio of donating to Democrats versus Republicans, I'm talking about $190,000 to Democrats this cycle to $1,350 to Republicans.
At Apple, the ratio is 27 to 1.
this cycle to $1,350 to Republicans.
At Apple, the ratio is 27 to 1.
$737,000 versus $27,000 to Republicans.
Mr. Taylor, you think about these high IQ companies.
We've talked about this before on this podcast.
You can go back and listen to when we've talked about the paucity of blacks and non-Asian minorities who work at Apple, Google, Facebook, all these tech companies that require intelligence for their employees.
And yet, all of these whites who work there, they give so graciously and so generously To the Democrat.
To this anti-white coalition.
That's all the Democrats are at this point.
They certainly are not, as we now know.
Well, as we've known for years.
They don't give two hoots about the working class.
They don't.
The new proletariat is all of their pets now.
Their racial pets, their sexual orientation pets.
And they certainly don't care about ordinary white people who are trying to scrape by and make a living.
And this also goes to show you the kinds of effect that going to college has.
In universities, people get their minds filled with all of this silly baloney about white privilege.
Then, after having gotten a college education, and as Joe Sobern used to say, the purpose of a college education is to give you the right attitude towards minorities and the means to live as far away from them as possible.
And now that they don't live around any of them, they can take this view that they are all long-suffering people who are all being just shot at random by the police.
All these people being exploited in these poor blue-collar jobs.
I bet most of them have no contact data with blacks at all, or minorities of any kind, unless it's the housekeeper.
But you have this rarefied group of people who are increasingly the intellectual backbone of the Democratic Party.
Now, another thing that was mentioned in this Thomas Edsel story that we were talking about, in 2016 was the first year on record in which white liberals rated ethnic and racial minorities more favorably than they did whites.
I've got an anecdote for you.
One of my good friends, he's married into a family that is just rabidly, they're white, rabidly anti-white though, and his sister-in-law lives in one of the nicest cities in the country.
I won't name which one that is, but She constantly complains about how it's too white and she's got a PhD and it's, you know, the reason why this is such a great place to live obviously correlates to its abundance of whiteness.
And yet all she can do is every time she sees my friend complain about the whiteness of the city where they live.
And I don't understand that mindset.
When you read this, what you just said, let that sink in for a second.
White liberals rated ethnic and racial minorities more positively These are the people who like to tweet, I hate white people.
even... what do you extrapolate from that? I mean, what type of racial, suicidal
mindset is at play among these white liberals? These are the people who like
to tweet, I hate white people. They think that... they really do believe this
nonsense about how white people have so miserably and so selfishly kicked
around every other group. How our wealth has been...
been sucked from their bloodstream. They must believe this stuff. And so they think that
the country would be probably better off if we all disappeared. It's a...
How do you make peace with that mindset? I'm asking you tough questions because this is,
as we can tell by what we've just talked about from these, from this polling data and from
the liberal opinion, seeing how obviously, you know, white liberals view racial discrimination
against blacks is the primary reason they can't get ahead?
80%.
How are you going to be able to coexist as the Republican Party, regrettably in the eyes of the Republican elite, becomes more and more obviously the white party?
Something's got to give here.
Well, fortunately, Not all whites have to agree with us.
We could make a lot of progress.
There's still 200 million of us here.
I think there is enough of a healthy rump left for us to make something of this country, after all.
Save a few scraps of Western civilization somewhere.
But I'm the undying optimist.
But we will see whether scraps of civilization will be saved in Florida and Georgia.
You brought this up earlier.
In the Florida governor's race, the white voters are backing Ron DeSantis, the white Republican, 54%, 44%.
And the Democrats are backing Andrew Gillum, the black candidate.
99 to 1% among blacks.
99 to 1.
I mean, that must be some sort of a record.
I thought this might be a misprint.
When I saw this stat, I thought to myself, wow, did none of these black voters down in Florida, those living in Gainesville, Orlando, Jacksonville, Tallahassee, Miami, did they not see Kanye West hugging Donald Trump in the White House?
Couldn't that have bumped up to at least 5%?
95 to 5?
That's probably what changes it from 95% support to 99% support for the black man.
Well, and among Hispanics voting, looking for the black candidate, 59 to 36, 59%.
Yes, they're all part of the Rainbow Coalition.
And then going back to that data that we just talked about, Mr. Taylor, from that Edsel piece, women back the black candidate, Andrew Gillum, 59 to 38 percent as men back Ron DeSantis 55 to 44 so it not only comes down to racial lines
Ethnic lines, but it also comes down to gender lines.
Yes, this is to me one of the saddest and most dispiriting aspects of this, is the male-female difference, even among whites.
This is not good for household peace.
This is not good for domestic tranquility.
When you have men and women Probably in the same household, going such separate ways.
Although, it is my understanding that married women tend to vote much like their husbands.
They're much more conservative than single women.
But you have single men and single women, you know, who are disagreeing on this sort of thing.
Not good.
These numbers come from a recent Quinnipiac poll, and that article that accompanied the press release noted that Andrew Gillum is ahead because of this non-white coalition.
It's precisely because of this non-white coalition that, you know, increasingly Florida is one of those states that's going the way of Arizona, that's going the way of Colorado, that's going the way of Virginia, all drifting to the Californication of American politics and that is the I hate to even say that I can't believe that word those
words came out of my mouth but in elections.
We're not superfluous.
We're good for keeping the electricity going keeping the airplanes from falling out of
the sky you know keeping a few automobiles running that's what we're good for.
Electorally, as democracy becomes more and more obviously a racial headcount, as we see in Florida, what are Well, what are white conservatives in the electorate as nothing more than you just said?
Taxpayers without, you know, disenfranchised taxpayers.
And this black Democrat, Andrew Gillum, he is certainly making a racial race out of this.
Oh, he is?
They had a debate just yesterday, I believe it was, and this is direct quotation from what he says about his opponent, the white Ron DeSantis.
First of all, he's got neo-Nazis helping him out in the state.
He has spoken at racist conferences.
He's accepted a contribution and would not return it for someone who referred to the former president of the United States as a Muslim, N-I-G-G-E-R.
And then he goes on to say, now, I'm not calling Mr. DeSantis a racist.
I'm simply saying that the racists believe he's a racist.
And you know why he was able to say that he's appeared at, quote, racist conferences?
I do know.
It wasn't because he appeared at, you know, American Renaissance or... No, no.
You know, any other conference put on by... Who was the lady that we spoke about last two weeks ago who was just barred from the Marriott in Washington, D.C.?
Oh, the Act for America.
Yeah.
Barbara... Her name is irrelevant, but Act for America obviously is far more, far more You know likely to have quote whatever you would say is a racist in America as a member then the very esteemed David Horowitz and DeSantis spoke at the 2013 and 27 day David Horowitz Freedom Center conferences that were held respectively in Florida and South Carolina.
Yeah, he apparently has appeared four times at his conferences, but the article that I was reading about this, the people that they trotted out as the toxic and unfrequentable types with which he rubbed shoulders, James Damore, the guy who, Google, the guy at Google who wrote that there might be, there might be sex differences, and also Steve Bannon.
He's another example of these horrifying people that Mr. DeSantis has actually rubbed shoulders with.
And this idea about, he says, this idea that he's got neo-nazis helping him out in the state.
Apparently there were some robocalls from a group in Idaho.
And I don't know who those people are, but Ron DeSantis has completely repudiated them.
He says, I don't want them.
But no, this guy has really been deliberately injecting race into the equation.
And I wonder if he thinks that he's going to appeal to non-whites, but I bet he's really going after these white college-educated suburbanite women.
They're probably just as horrified at the idea of race as any of his non-white supporters.
You know, it's funny, didn't you a long time ago appear along with Peter Brimelow on an internet debate on David Horowitz's website?
Yes, that's right, that's right.
A very, very long time ago.
But they have not trotted me or Peter Brimelow out as the sinners.
And also, you know, these journalists have looked, they have scanned through every word that Ron DeSantis said at these David Horowitz conferences, and they couldn't find a single word about race.
They had to confess that.
No, nothing he said was wrong, nothing he said was bad, but just the fact that he was there.
So it looks as though we're going to have a probably a more favorable outcome in the Georgia governor's race.
We have the GOP nominee, and again a white man, Brian Kemp.
He seems to be ahead of the black Democrat, Stacey Abrams, By about two points.
And as usual, Brian Kemp, the white GOP guy, is ahead among male voters, 55 to 41.
A decisive lead.
Whereas, when it comes to women, Stacey Abrams, the black woman, wins at 41%, 42%.
Another decisive lead.
But again, and again, the older the voter, the more likely to vote for the Republican.
Because they're white.
I mean, we talked about the demographics shift in Georgia before.
In 1990, Georgia is 72% white.
In 2018, Georgia is 52% white, roughly.
And that changes every day as more whites die and more non-whites pour into Georgia.
Before we've got it.
Oh, well, here we actually do have it in the notes.
Yes.
One of the things that we saw, I believe, which backfired tremendously because the Georgia electorate is no longer the electorate of the years of TBS when Ted Turner owned that great organization.
There's an image of her burning the Georgia State flag in 1992, Mr. Taylor.
That was when, gosh, if memory serves correct, the Olympics were awarded to Atlanta in 1990, the Coca-Cola Olympics.
Great story for another day.
But there was this big debate to try and get the flag changed.
That wasn't until... That was because it had the battle flag still as part of it.
It did.
It did.
And that was up until, I want to say, 19... early 2000s, I want to say.
I think that sounds right.
Early 2000s that it was actually changed.
And that was a very contentious Battle to have it changed, but Miss Abrams was depicted burning this flag of white supremacy as she saw it.
And again, this coalition that exists, all of these white liberals who live in Buckhead and the white liberals who are gentrifying Atlanta, they're going to look at that as a wonderful Trumping Georgia's disgusting white supremacist heritage and past.
The Washington Post wrote just a breathlessly celebratory article about her having done that.
And they love the fact that she wants to blast Stonewall Jackson, Robert E. Lee, and Jeff Davis off the side of Stone Mountain.
They think that's just great too.
I wonder, but no, as you say, the electorate is changing and ideas like this that would have sent the voters into a frenzy are probably not going to hold her back that much.
That Georgia is about to be buried.
It's dead.
It's, dare I say it, gone with the wind.
And I hate to even say that, but it actually gives me a motivation to finish this piece finally, because that's the way to look at it.
You know, one of the saddest One of the saddest facts about Metro Atlanta is that one of the great counties, Clayton County, which in 1980, gosh, it was about 85% white.
Today, it's 16% white.
This was the county, Mr. Taylor, that in 2005 elected its first black sheriff.
It's 16% white.
This was the county, Mr. Taylor, that in 2005 elected its first black sheriff.
His first act, once he took the oath, was to fire all the white officers,
put snipers on the roof, and he led them out of the police station.
He was in a huge controversy.
He broke the law.
He had to resign.
But guess what?
Victor Hill?
He's back as the sheriff of Clayton County again.
And Clayton County It has a great history as being a lot of Confederate relics, a lot of Confederate history.
That is where Gone with the Wind actually took place.
One of the main streets in Clayton County in a city called Jonesboro is Terra Boulevard, which is named after?
The plantation.
Correct.
It's so sad what's happening in Georgia.
Perhaps it's a great metaphor that the AMC show The Walking Dead is set there because, sadly, the great white southern heritage of that state that seems to be The Walking Dead at this point.
I hate to say it, but it's... Well, we must not overlook a few relevant statistics to this contest between Brian Kemp and Stacey Abrams.
Now, apparently, Stacey Abrams is winning the black vote 87 to 8.
Now, that sounds like a substantial number, but you wonder now, compared to Andrew Gillum who's getting 99 to 1, what's she doing wrong?
What's she doing wrong?
Gosh, she's really stumbling.
Whereas Kemp is getting the white vote 70 to 25.
Pretty substantial.
That's a pretty substantial difference.
I will go on record and I'll say that Kemp is going to get close to 75, maybe even a little higher of the white vote.
I have heard from Friends who tell me that Kemp signs are all over rural Georgia and metro Atlanta.
The question is, will white suburbanite females be compelled to go out and vote?
Because you don't know how they're going to vote.
They could vote for Abrams.
I'm afraid I do know how they'll vote.
I'm afraid I do.
That's the problem.
And then there's also the interesting story about Stacey Abrams' $227,000 in debt.
Of which, $54,000 is IRS debt.
She just refused to pay for a while.
In the debate, she tried to claim that it was because, well, you can defer that debt, but I had a father who was sick with cancer.
That's right.
And, you know, they were displaced by Hurricane Katrina.
It's like, hey, you know what?
Stacey Abrams?
There was just a massive hurricane that destroyed almost all white areas of Panama City, these places called Mexico Beach.
And we aren't even shown images of the atrocity that Mother Nature did to these areas.
It destroyed home after home after home.
And guess what?
There was no looting, there was no rioting, there was no displays of blackness because That type of mentality isn't the type of mentality you see in the Gulf.
Well, she says the IRS is perfectly happy for her dribbling repayments of all of this.
That yes, she didn't pay, but she's paying slowly now.
And that she says the IRS is very happy with something they've worked.
She sounds like she's happy.
But let's move on to a continuation of a story we were covering last week.
And that is this merry band of people who are working their way through Mexico trying to come to the United States and claim asylum.
Now, last week when we talked about this, it sounded as if Mexico was talking tough.
They said they were sending all these riot police down to the border and they were going to do their... They just stood aside.
They stood aside.
I was really thinking, gosh, these Mexicans, you know, maybe they can do something that's useful after all.
Not a bit of it.
People swam the river.
They marched across the bridge.
They said, please, don't come in.
And then when they came in, they just stood there with their hands behind their backs.
And also, the numbers seem to be rising all the time.
Nobody knows exactly how many now, but some people say there's as many as 7,000.
It just seems to gather more and more and more people all the time.
Well, the Daily Mail, Mr. Taylor, estimates it's 14,000, and you see the images.
It looks far more than even that, just from meets the eye.
When you look at it, you're like, that is a mass of third-world humanity.
Again, we've spoken about this before, and this book is very hard to find on Amazon right now, but when you see these images, these caravans, A seemingly endless line of people.
It evokes the horror that I felt when I first read Camp of the Saints.
I first read that back in 2002, and for a month I was numb.
And I still think about, you know, it was obviously about Indians from India, but when you think about what's happening now, what happened with Europe, with Merkel, and now what's happening, I mean this is...
Yes, yes.
That book was so... It was written back in the 70s if I'm not mistaken?
Jean Raspail?
I should look that up.
Early 70s, I believe.
Yes, it's remarkable.
That guy would have seen it coming that long ago.
But you know, they've finally gotten to the bottom of a little bit about how this happened.
Apparently there was this guy named Bartolo Fuentes.
He's an ex-lawmaker, an ex-parliamentarian of Honduras, and he had said that he wanted to get together about 200 people to get themselves a little caravan and head north.
But what changed everything is that there was a television report on Honduran television in which it said That this guy, Fuentes, was going to pay the food and transportation costs.
Well, that meant that thousands decided to do that.
And the idea was, and this is quite fascinating to me, ordinarily it costs about $7,000 now to pay a coyote to take you from Honduras to the United States.
So these guys said, wait a minute, this isn't going to cost a thing.
And it was like the Pied Piper.
They just started gathering and gathering and gathering.
And so part of the idea is also if they go in a group, then they would be protected from the bandits and the rapists and the robbers that make life miserable for you if you don't pay the $7,000 and pay your way off.
And now it seems that the further they go along, they're just attracting more and more and more people.
And apparently they are getting handouts from city governments.
For example, the local mayor of a town in Mexico.
Now, I don't really know how to pronounce the name of this town.
It's spelled H-U-I-X-T-L-A.
Huyxtla.
Apparently, the mayor says that they've chipped in a food and drink, and they provided toppling shelters, and apparently just ordinary folks are giving them water, giving them food, giving them extra clothes as they march by because everybody in Mexico, everybody in Guatemala, everybody in Honduras is in favor of people marching to America.
This captures the local imagination.
The red chloros is there, treating marchers for blisters and for dehydration.
And this to me, this to me, is the worst possible news of all.
A second caravan has set off from Guatemala.
And it's heading towards the southern Mexican border.
This is about 2,000 people.
And they have seen that the Mexicans just stood aside when the first batch went forward.
So they said, me too.
Another me too movement.
How many caravans are going to set off?
But another aspect of this that I think is quite interesting is that, you know, the more Donald Trump talks about cutting off aid and doesn't, the more he says we cannot stand this and then does nothing, the less credible he becomes.
They've interviewed the people in these caravans and they say, what do you think about the fact that Donald Trump says they're going to cut off aid?
He hasn't yet.
They say, what do you think about the fact he's going to militarize the border?
Didn't work last time.
Nobody cares.
Nobody cares.
They think they're going to make it.
And who knows?
Maybe they will.
Now, I think it's interesting, though, that there are people... There's a fellow who was a former Department of Justice prosecutor.
His name is James Trustee.
He says that if there are people helping these folks, they can be prosecuted for alien smuggling and racketeering.
Aiding and abetting false statements for immigration purposes.
I hope that some of the uplift artists who are down there are going to be caught for exactly that.
You were talking about Donald Trump's tweets, and they get more and more embarrassing and ridiculous.
This show, this podcast, obviously we have Spoken highly of the President when he stumbled onto positions that mirror what we would do, but when you talk about what's happening now and the failure of the last crisis on the border with the separations that happened back in June of 2018, here's President Trump's latest tweet regarding the caravan crisis, and I quote,
To those in the caravan, turn around!
We are not letting people into the United States illegally.
Go back to your country and if you want, apply for citizenship like millions of others are doing.
End quote, end tweet.
Mr. President, there are 30 million plus illegal aliens already in the country.
There are cities across the country that are sanctuary cities that protect illegal aliens.
These same cities are also likely to Legally entrap and ensnare your supporters, like the Proud Boys, in places like New York, and prosecute them.
We are talking about a crisis of the legitimacy of government in the eyes of millions of white Americans who are looking at why are we paying taxes to have our soldiers in Afghanistan dying for no reason in this war that's gone on for what, 16 years?
17.
When our country is being invaded and there are white liberals who view more favorably Non-whites.
Then they do their fellow whites.
This is why, Mr. Taylor, I ask you the question.
This is not going to end well, is it?
Oh, I am afraid it will not.
We are in a state of such mutual incomprehension.
We can see the same things and view them at 180 degree opposite perspective.
No, there is no way that this level of mutual incomprehension and in many cases mutual hostility can possibly end well.
These same white liberals who rail against Russia collusion, this is the reason why Donald Trump is the president, look at this caravan of these, this horde of non-white, non-whites from the third world as demographic, And demographic allies, and they're bearing electorally white conservatives in places like Georgia, Virginia, North Carolina, Arizona, and inevitably places like Tennessee and Kentucky.
These areas that, you know, even West Virginia.
These are places that are going to be racially enriched.
And white liberals, like you said, I mean that quote still stuns me.
That in 2016 marked the first year on record Quote, white liberals rated ethnic and racial minorities more positively than they did other whites.
I mean, so they're looking at this caravan saying, come on.
That's right.
How do we get them here faster?
This is going to improve America.
We will sprinkle them into every American neighborhood and we will be so much better off than we were before.
Yes, this is the mentality.
This is the disease that is poisoning liberal minds.
But let's end with Cory Booker, a Democrat from New Jersey.
And this congressman has the idea of what he calls baby bonds.
And he's introducing a bill that's supposed to close the wealth gap.
And the idea is that every child who is born gets a United States savings account that starts off with $1,000.
And until the child turns 18, the government would deposit as much as $2,000 a year into that account.
The size of the annual deposit would depend on the child's family income, with lower-income families getting the most.
And a child who is in the lowest income bracket, meaning that this child gets $2,000 every year, by the 18th birthday, this child would probably have $46,215.
The idea is this could be spent only on, say, certain legitimate expenditures.
They could pay Stacey Abrams IRS debt.
No, no, no.
No rap concerts.
No bling.
But they could spend it on a college education, perhaps a down payment on a house.
And this is expressly designed to give black children more money than white children.
They have looked into how it would work.
The average black child would accrue $29,000.
The average Latino would get $27,000.
The average white child would end up with about half that, $15,790.
And you take these numbers and also you could go ahead and say the average Asian child is going to get $12,000.
When you look at the numbers, the average Indian American would probably get about $10,000.
Yes.
I actually believe, I've seen studies that show that Indian Americans' income, my god, why am I using hyphenated?
That Indians in America, their income is even higher than Asians.
Oh, they are right up there.
I believe after Jews as a group, Indians, some continental Indians, they have the highest income of any group.
Yes, certainly higher than East Asians.
But anyway, yes, I think this is quite interesting.
You know, and this is what we can look forward to.
Government schemes that are cooked up with the explicit idea of closing the racial gap.
And they're going to do it by taking money from white people and giving it to non-whites.
White taxpayers who have been disenfranchised electorally, their votes no longer count.
There's a story today about the unbelievable income inequality in California and how there virtually is no middle class anymore.
No middle class.
And it's funny, this comes 25 years after the release of a movie called Falling Down.
It's a movie you've never seen, which is about just that happening.
The white middle class becoming extinct and it shows what a white male can look forward to encountering in the urban jungle of Los Angeles.
It's a movie I challenge you to watch and next time I see you I'll have to make sure I have a copy of it on me.
So you can actually watch it finally.
I'd love to hear your take on it.
I will do as I'm told.
I've heard about it many times.
But yes, this is really the fate that we look forward to.
And the kind of selective outrage in New York City, which leads to selective prosecution.
White people, more and more of them, thinking that, well, it'd be great if we're replaced by people unlike ourselves, because they are better than we are.
And this non-white coalition that is gathering together to vote the white man out of politics, these are all part of the America that we live in, and these things become more and more extreme.
At the same time, there are still 200 million of us, and there are enough of us left to save something.
So for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our time is up.
▲
Export Selection