All Episodes
Previous Next
June 22, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:47
Human Shields on the Southern Border
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to yet another edition of Radio Renaissance.
This is Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and our usual guest, Paul Kersey, is with us today in the studio.
And it seems that every week just tops the last week in grist for our mills, and this week is no exception.
We'll begin with a brief commentary on the latest big news in immigration, namely Donald Trump's executive order decision that he arrived at under tremendous pressure, not just nationally but from around the world, to keep families of illegal immigrants together while the parents are being prosecuted for illegal entry.
Up until now, the families have been separated because when an adult is charged with a crime and goes into a detention facility, oddly enough, you don't put children in jail with adults.
You put them in some other facility, but since they're being separated, and this is a national scandal, he has issued this executive order that means that the adults and their children will be kept together in Department of Homeland Security facilities.
Now, the trouble with this decision is that it will come under something called the 1997 Flores Settlement Agreement.
This requires that ordinarily unaccompanied alien minors must be released from DHS facilities within 20 days.
Well, if the case of the adults who are being prosecuted for illegal entry has not been settled by then, then either you have a choice.
Either you release the adults or you have to separate the families.
So, Donald Trump, in this executive order, has asked for an extension.
Well, who will grant the extension?
The person who will grant it is Judge Dolly M. Gee of the Federal District Court of Los Angeles.
She is a President Barack Obama appointee and the daughter of immigrants from China.
Now, I would bet you the next dozen mortgage payments that what she will do is say no Donald Trump thinks he wants to keep families together.
And if I extended the 20 days so that the families can stay together until the adult's case is adjudicated, they could stay together.
But I'm not going to grant that.
Because what she probably wants is catch and release too.
So given the choice of keeping the families together or Telling everybody, see you later.
Next court date is in a year and a half.
She will say, no, no, no.
Can't keep the children in for more than 20 days.
And that's my guess as to how she will decide.
What's incredible about this whole episode, we've been watching Mr. Taylor play out from Laura Bush publishing some emotional plea on the Texan, the border state, but this is not who we are.
We're better than this.
And this media driven insanity and hysteria I mean, this is where the Democrats are.
This is where the corporate media is in 2018.
Again, the rights and the lives of illegal immigrant children far supersede those of actually American citizens.
And if you remember last week, I mentioned this very odd story on the cover of the USA Today.
I showed it to Mr. Taylor and I said, you know, This is weird.
This is a story that is detailing this exact phenomenon that the mainstream media and every respectable pundit spent the past five days pontificating on.
About how dare we be so inhumane.
I mean, you saw the Time magazine piece where Uh, what is it?
Welcome to America of Trump looking down at some little brown child?
This is the cover of Time.
So this is, this was, this is one of those things, Mr. Taylor, where it was a top, a top-down driven story to create this, this mass hysteria.
That in a lot of ways we have to say Donald Trump stood up to it and he doubled down time and time again and he still continues to.
We don't know how this is going to play out in the end.
This is, in my opinion, this is one of those last chance Hail Mary passes by the left.
I really believe this.
Trump's popularity is fantastic right now.
This is a situation where if What you believe could happen where this Judge G is going to basically reinstate, catch release, it will create a massive crisis beyond probably what we're actually have witnessed in Germany in a lot of ways.
Well it might even cause some sort of legislation to come out of Congress.
We'll see.
But of course As I have been repeating over and over at every opportunity, no family is going to be separated if it just stays in Guatemala or Honduras or Mexico or wherever they're coming from.
All of this howling and weeping and wailing makes it sound as though it's our fault.
No, it's If they stay home, they can stay all happy and united.
And of course, as a number of people have been pointing out, a lot of these families are complete fakes anyway.
They're not really blood relations.
These are children who have been given over, handed over to smugglers, coyotes and told, take them to the United States.
And the fact is, Any American who subjected his child to this kind of dangerous cross-border, through-the-desert, in the hands of smugglers and exploiters, anybody who treated a child that way would probably have their children taken away from them by child security officers.
For six days, the mainstream media, the corporate media, all of the nightly shows, the Rachel Maddow's, the Chris Hayes, all the stuff on MSNBC, the late night comedians, this was all they talked about.
Once again, it brings up that point that I made last week.
They have to win every day.
They have to bombard us with these emotional images and these pictures.
In a lot of ways, those images were fake.
They were manipulated.
They were images of rallies that they tried to say, oh, look at what Trump is doing.
Well, actually, that's from a political rally.
So it's been fascinating.
It's been a fascinating episode in mass psychology, in my opinion, that really illustrates my point.
They have to win every day.
If we had one opportunity to say, hey, we're going to have control of the newspapers nationwide, we're going to get to decide and dictate what's on the cover.
If we had, in fact, Some control over the news that goes out.
We would be pointing out that this number of adults bringing children in has absolutely skyrocketed.
It was 15,000 in fiscal year 2013.
Now, 75,000.
15,000 is 75,000.
Extraordinary.
year 2013. Now 75,000. 15,000 is 75,000. Extraordinary. Yes.
Yes.
And unaccompanied alien children showing up all by themselves, that's been an
increase in 325% in a year. 435% increase in family units entering the
country illegally.
Why?
It's very clear why.
Because they're using children as human shields.
First of all, because they know that they're going to get all sorts of sympathy.
And second, they follow our debates on amnesty as if they were World Cup games in Central America.
They've heard all this stuff about DACA, and they're going to get in on the next good thing.
It's just extraordinary what's going on here, and of course all of it is being laid at the feet of the brutal, horrible, racist, white supremacist Donald Trump.
And to me, some of the most extraordinary things about this is the utter viciousness that this controversy has brought out.
Yeah.
I think it was you who called my attention to this Occupy Wall Street group that is putting up tweets urging folks to just kill ICE agents, showing illustrated diagrams of, you know, you stab them from the back, tear out the heart, and good grief, it's like an Inca sacrifice.
There was a New York University professor who created a database on the LinkedIn website of ICE employees, and he gave it to Antifa to go out and see if they would potentially even target those families.
And of course, you can talk about the unbelievable, really unprecedented evil in that tweet from Peter Fonda, the actor.
Yeah, yeah, the one in which he's talking about putting Barron Trump in a cage with pedophiles.
You know, apparently—well, the theory, of course, is that this is the equivalent of what we're doing to these poor, innocent immigrant children, and what if President Trump had his child stuck in a cage with pedophiles?
You know, he later withdrew that tweet.
I think he probably did so because it was considered insulting to pedophiles.
Actually, yeah!
Remember, I mean, again, remember who was that serial killer at the end of his life?
Was it Ted Bundy?
Who said, hey, look, I may have been a cannibal, I may have been a mass murderer, but I'm not a racist.
I'm not a racist.
I mean, remember, we live under that ruling mindset and that's why this whole episode is so...
It's been, in a lot of ways, I think, gratifying for someone like you and me who know how far apart civility is, how civility is becoming increasingly impossible in this country.
Well, it certainly has unmasked the left for the absolutely vicious people that they are.
Here's this journalist, Dan O'Sullivan.
He writes for Rolling Stone, Salon, Daily Beast, Vice.
And in the context of this policy at the border, he has been talking about, he's been tweeting about, quote, simpering Nazi fuck Stephen Miller.
That's what he calls Stephen Miller.
Yes, unquote.
And he's giving his private home address, urging people to go protest.
Now, here's a guy who's not banned by Twitter, of course, the way I am.
Apparently this is civil, acceptable behavior.
And then I was equally astonished by Pennsylvania Congressman Brian Sims.
Mike Pence is going to be visiting Philadelphia, and Brian Sims, he emits a tweet.
And he says, we're a city of soaring diversity.
Keep that in mind, Mr. Pence, when you're coming here raising money to attack more families, spread more lies, blaspheme with your Bible.
So get bent and then get out.
Accompanied by a photograph of him, With a very fierce middle finger pointed at the camera.
Is this the way a sitting congressman welcomes the Vice President of the United States to his city?
This is just extraordinary.
You saw the story of what happened when the DHS secretary was trying to eat at a restaurant in Washington, D.C.
and what happened?
It might have been Arlington.
I don't remember the city.
It's somewhere in Northern Virginia or Washington D.C.
and she's accosted and yelled at.
Turns out the person who did it, guess where she's employed?
The Department of Justice.
I don't think people understand that when I use that joke from Independence Day where the president is talking to the alien and he says, is there a way we can coexist?
Can there be a peace between us?
And the alien replies, peace?
No peace.
The president says, what is it you want us to do?
The alien then says, die.
Die!
And I'm not, you know, I use it a lot because I think it really does, it really does powerfully illustrate and as this whole episode for the past seven days has shown us, There really can't be a coexistence.
We don't have a part in this utopia that they're erecting.
At all.
And they clearly hate us.
Yes.
This is just this blind hatred for those with whom they disagree.
You can see their eyes just blazing red hot with an unreasoning, unhinged hatred.
Another good example of this was a woman by the name of Tanya Lavin writing in The Forward, and she wrote an article.
This is all in the context of this border business.
She says the title of her article is, No, we don't have to be friends with Trump supporters.
And here are a few quotes.
She says, anyone who willingly declares himself a Republican is aligning with an administration whose official policy is to torment minorities, to employ the public purse both for private gain and for sheer cruel parsimony, to strip away health care from the afflicted and to comfort the wealthy.
Then she goes on to say, in 2018 the question is not who goes Nazi but who goes Trump.
It is undeniable at this point that his is a regime ruled by cruelty and evil.
This is just crazy stuff.
But the forward is... I mean, it does take liberal positions on practically any question that matters to us, but this is not some complete backwater internet news site.
This is a pretty respectable publication.
Then she finally says, If you find yourself at a dinner party with someone who has gone Trump, smash your glass to shards and leave.
It's time to cease to behave with subservient politeness towards those who embrace barbarity with unfettered glee.
She's saying, if you voted for Trump, you're subhuman.
You're not part of the human race.
To quote the great Corey Lewandowski, womp womp.
I'm sure you saw that video where he was said, how dare the president break up this kid with Down syndrome, this 10-year-old illegal alien, and Corey Lewandowski just simply said, hey, womp womp.
I thought that was hilarious because, again, there really is no way to have Discourse and to try and find common ground with the people who who say hey break a glass in the shirt I'm surprised she didn't say break the To smash your glass to shards and then cut the and then cut the Trump supporter basically what she's she's almost insinuating that she doesn't write it I guess to protect herself in case you know Rush Limbaugh of all people has said the left needs to cool it They're gonna get someone killed and I've read a lot of people that I greatly respect on Twitter who have really prominent jobs within within the
Within the confines of Conservatism Inc.
and they pointed out that, hey, you know, you're going to try and, you know, the left wants to try and dox ICE employees.
It's going to come to a point where they start going after and trying to dox just Trump supporters who work within corporate media.
I'm sorry, who work within big corporations.
You know, we are in unprecedented and uncharted waters.
I agree.
I don't think there's ever been a situation in which it has been considered perfectly normal for, as I said before, a sitting congressman to welcome the President of the United States to his own city with a loud and public, fuck you.
This is just extraordinary.
But let's move from our own tormented country to perhaps more encouraging developments.
In Europe, for example, I'm delighted to find that Angela Merkel is really fighting for her political life after she refused to consider migration reforms.
And now the CDU, the Christian Democratic Unit, her Bavarian allies, who have been part of their coalition for years, they are threatening to pull the government to pieces.
They gave her a two-week ultimatum, and they said unless she modifies her stance at the Bavarian border, that's within Germany itself, at the Bavarian border, they're going to say, to hell with the Schengen Agreement, to hell with all of this free migration.
We're going to stop these people coming in.
This is remarkable.
This is really basically a mutiny within her own party.
And she could really come a cropper on account of this.
It'll be very interesting to see whether she flinches.
And of course, it was just last September when she narrowly got her fourth term as chancellor, and her party suffered their worst electoral performance since all of this got—in fact, since the end of the Second World War.
And the alternative for Germany got 13% of the vote and now they're pulling even higher.
So she could be on the rope.
She cannot.
give an inch in this which is why she is done.
I will say I think this is going to be one of those great moments because she cannot admit that her policy was a failure.
The left can never admit that what they did was ruinous toward their nation because it has to be toward the greater good and the greater good in their mind is the advocating and aggregating egalitarianism wherever It might come from whatever country, nation, creed, race, blah blah blah.
I mean, this is one of those moments where this is all because Trump won, that we see this pressure.
We see Trump released something back in 2016 with his election.
Something was going on in Europe already.
There was already a blowback coming, but Trump gave it all oxygen.
And, you know, this is one of the more encouraging developments that I think is happening.
Right now.
And it's exciting.
Well, see, don't forget.
Don't forget.
Even more important than being virtuous for politicians is survival.
This woman's been in power for a long time.
She likes being in power.
I suspect, now you could be right, but I suspect that she's going to give just enough to keep the coalition together.
That's my guess.
But we'll see.
We'll see.
I suspect she reads the polls just as well as anybody else.
And a recent European poll found that when they were asked to rank the two most important issues facing the EU, This is Europeans.
That the two most popular answers by a considerable margin were immigration and terrorism.
Those are the two most important issues on the minds of European voters.
And they go hand-in-hand together.
Exactly.
Without one, you wouldn't have the other.
Without the other, you wouldn't have, you know... That's right.
Without immigration, there'd be no terrorism.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Yes.
And what would ordinarily be the top issue, the economic picture in Europe is a distant third.
So, and this of course explains this widespread and rising support for nationalist populists like the League, the League in Italy, the Austrian Freedom Party, AFD in Germany, we hope for the Swedish elections.
You know, later this year we could see really another resurgence of sanity when the Sweden Democrats, they are apparently now polling at more than 20%.
And they got into parliament for the first time recently, and even more important, they had been held in this sort of cordon sanitaire where nobody would even talk to them.
Now, it's very clear that if they get a 20% vote, other parties in Sweden are going to have to do business with them.
Not just other parties, but you can see Orban potentially trying to reach out.
This coalition is forming and it is a beautiful thing to watch.
As depressing as what we've seen happening on the southern border with this storm, this unprecedented storm.
I don't think I've ever seen in my lifetime a media-orchestrated event as this.
Well, it reflects, as you say, a determination to use any excuse, any pretext, to let anybody in.
That's basically what it boils down to.
America is up for grabs.
And if you can get here, if you can manage to get yourself in, you belong.
And any attempt to keep you out is immoral.
That's what it boils down to.
And thank goodness so many Europeans are saying no.
We're not going to do this.
And, you know, I think the European example is such an important one, because as soon as a nationalist party starts polling maybe 15%, in the United States 15% doesn't sound like much, but that is enough to get the center-right parties changing their tune, because they know exactly where the votes are coming from for the people who are real nationalists.
Two-thirds of German voters now are saying they want a more restrictive stance on immigration.
And, you know, it used to be just the Visigoth countries, the Eastern European countries, the Czechs, the Slovaks, the Hungarians, the Poles.
Now, Italy, Austria, they are all led by people who talk to each other regularly.
And they are really putting up a kind of united front that can only grow.
Again, we can lament what's happening in this country.
of Austria, he is sort of the model of center-right nationalist parties.
He's called for an axis of the willing against illegal immigration.
I like that.
And he says he's in full agreement with Interior Minister Matteo Salvini,
of whom we will speak next.
Again, we can lament what's happening in this country.
We can see how far our enemies are ready to go to tar and feather good people
and to scare those into signing what appears to be a concession, as with Trump.
And then it turns out, like we noted at the beginning, this could be the return of catch and release.
In fact, the Washington Post basically reported this today, and the DOJ actually put out a great tweet where they were like, well that's actually not true, you didn't contact us.
But the point is, there's still so much positive news out there that I mean, again, this all happened because Trump actually stood firm.
He doubled down and he kept saying great things.
He continues to say great things.
And all he did was try to enforce the law.
That's it.
That's all.
That's all.
And that is something our country cannot tolerate.
But, again, I've said this over and over on these podcasts.
I think ordinary Americans, they see a president trying to protect our southern border, get lambasted right and left by these bleeding hearts who are trying to protect people who have broken our laws.
And I think more and more people are waking up.
Now, last podcast we talked about the MV Aquarius.
That was the boat that had rescued hundreds of sinking immigrants off the coast of Libya.
And instead of taking them back to Libya or to Tunisia, which were the closest ports, which they were obligated to do under international law, they wanted to take them to Italy.
But the Italians said, no!
Matteo Salvini.
He said, saving lives is fine, but we are not going to become a dumping ground.
We're not going to become a refugee camp.
Good for him.
Now, what eventually happened?
Well, when they went to Spain, you know, the Spaniards decided, we're going to be the good guys.
We're going to just be the top dog virtue signalers this time around.
And more than 2,300 people rallied to the port to help the exhausted arrivals.
They had spent a week on this rescue boat.
There were 1,000 Red Cross volunteers, 400 interpreters, and 450 national police and civil guards.
And isn't this touching?
Somebody created a huge welcome home banner.
in four different languages and unfurled it across the harbor.
Now most of these people are Sub-Saharan Africans and practically zero Sub-Saharan Africans ever get granted refugee status.
These are people who just want to live in a civilization created by us.
Yes.
That they could never have created.
But here you have these welcome home.
Isn't that ironic?
These people have already granted them citizenship.
Anyway, they got immediate medical attention, psychological assistance at the Red Cross, after which they'll be registered by the Spanish authorities and transferred to reception centers, and France apparently has agreed to take any who would like to go to France.
But, again, the far-right interior minister, as they're called, as he's called, Matteo Salvini, I consider him an absolutely normal guy, a patriot.
He says he has pledged, you know, there are two more NGO, these goody-goody, busybody types who send these boats out to rescue these folks who are obviously going to sink.
And there are two more of those that were involved in operations off the coast of Libya.
He says they ain't coming to Italy either.
And it's pretty clear, once these boats start arriving regularly in the Spanish harbors, I think these welcome home banners are going to come down.
They're going to come down, but when you read these stories, it just You think back to the prophecy of Gaddafi and what he said.
I mean, I'm the only one.
Do you understand what I'm here for?
And it's just, it's, again, everything happens for a reason.
You have to be flexible in life.
And that's the beautiful thing about what's happening.
This invasion has invigorated something atavistic that was missing in the European people.
And I do believe that This is going to force the Spaniards to decide, do we want to live or do we want to die?
The pity is that it takes so much to wake the Saxons, so to speak.
You know that great poem by Kipling?
Yes.
When the Saxon began to hate, it takes an awful lot to anger the sleeping white man.
But what it's taken in Italy, of course, is There are now 600,000 of these sub-Saharan Africans, blacks, in Italy's cities and villages.
They cost the Italian government, which is already dead broke, $5 to $6 billion a year just to keep them fed and sheltered.
I mean, the Italian government, the taxpayers, are basically feeding an army.
That's right.
An invading army.
Yes.
An invading army.
And now, I mean, Christopher Caldwell wrote about this, and to quote him, he says, Italy is now considerably more skeptical about European institutions than Britain was at the time it voted to exit.
He says, Now, Christopher Caldwell is a pretty astute observer of Europe.
What he writes about the United States is often pure foolishness because he doesn't seem to think that the same rules apply.
He seems to think we've suspended human nature in the United States, but he recognizes it in Europe.
But the idea that Italy is prepared to kick over, could be prepared to kick over the traces just the way the British did, all this is enormously encouraging to me.
Again, this is all at the same time.
Trump is actually using some of the language of Salvini, by the way.
He's talked about how America can't be a refugee camp.
He's talked about how they'll all come.
I guess he's listening to the points that Stephen Miller is probably making to him enough where he's listening because he really does care about this issue.
You saw that a couple nights ago.
He was in Minnesota.
Again, you and I made this point two years ago, a year ago, that Trump needs to be doing these massive rallies in states that he could win in 2020.
Minnesota is one of those states, as is Colorado, as is, you know, he needs to be going to all these states to get the energy up and to keep making these points and to force the media to cover what he says.
And when he keeps talking about the European crisis, when he puts it into the words, when he says, we can't allow what happened to Germany to happen here.
It forces Americans, it forces conservatives to research this because that's one of the things that you do have to give it to white conservatives.
They will look up stuff, they will read and they will try and find a way to No, that can't be true.
That can't be true.
Then that makes us, oh my gosh, that means that the racists might be right all along.
And you know what?
Yes, guess what?
Those called racists have been right all along.
That is the great lesson of the 21st century.
We're going to get to that point.
That's what's happening in the European Union.
That's what's happening on our continent of our forebears that's being invaded.
And as we talked about, it's an army being housed with our own people's money.
Yes, yes.
It reminds me of something else we talked about the other day.
All of these smart blacks who go on full scholarships to western institutions, Stanford, Cambridge, all studying black power or black Back to the United States, in fact.
ways of black empowerment.
We are teaching them to, we are giving them, we are paying them, we are teaching them,
raising up people who will be the enemies of our own children.
It's just incredible what white people think is virtuous.
But back to the United States, in fact, there was a fascinating article about charter schools.
And I don't know if you know about Greensboro, Georgia, but there is a charter school there called
Lake Oconee Academy.
And I'm sure our listeners are aware of this, but charter schools can be set up with considerably looser rules than general public schools.
And as a result, they can have concentration in particular interests, they can require uniforms, they may not supply public transportation, buses, they're subject to different rules.
Well, Lake Oconee Academy is 73% white, whereas just down the road in Greene County, it's in Greene County, Georgia, the other public schools are only 12% white and 68% black.
Well, Lake Oconee has some of the highest test scores in the state.
64% of Lake Oconee's 8th graders passed the math test in 2017, whereas in the other district schools, only 9%.
That is 64% to 9%.
Obviously, it's a very good school.
Well, word has leaked out that this charter school has lots of whites.
It does very well.
It has actually a kind of an endowment that people send their children there, although it is a public school in the sense that it's a charter school.
They work hard for it.
They have volunteers.
The parents volunteer, and they have an endowment.
They're spending wisely.
But now, of course, because it's overwhelmingly white, there are protesters.
Now, in a larger sense, what this means is even if they abide by the rules, even if they establish institutions that are good institutions, if they're overwhelmingly white, they're no good.
White people just cannot have anything for themselves.
And, to me, it is fascinating that this study that was put out by something called the Hechinger Report.
This is yet another one of these non-profit news organizations.
They did what is, in fact, an extraordinary thing.
They looked through all the public charter schools in the country that enroll a higher percentage of white students than any of the traditional public schools in the same districts.
I mean, that must have been quite a job.
Quite a job looking for all that.
And they found there are no fewer than 747 such charter schools.
Now, they found that Lake Oconee Academy is one of 115 charter schools in which the percentage of whites is at least 20 points higher than any of the traditional public schools in the district.
So, the idea is that anything, anything in which whites show up as a majority is obviously something that has to be fought.
Now, it's interesting how this works out.
How do they end up being so overwhelmingly white?
Well, one of the things that they can sometimes do, charter schools in some states are allowed to select the area from which people can apply to their school.
Correct.
And sometimes, perhaps strictly by accident, they end up being in areas that have more whites than the surrounding area.
Also, they might require that uniforms be... that the children wear uniforms.
Now, all the people who oppose this kind of thing say, oh, we can't afford expensive uniforms.
In fact, uniforms are almost the least expensive way to dress people for school.
You're going to be wearing the same thing every day.
You need maybe two or three outfits.
Hey, wear one a couple days, wash it, you got another one you can wear a couple days.
I mean, come on people.
Exactly, exactly.
But anything to criticize it.
But it is true that if they don't provide public bus transportation, then it means it cuts out certain people, maybe single-parent families, etc.
But also, oh, what the Hechinger Report has found is that some of these 747 largely white or disproportionately white charter schools don't offer admission materials in any language other than English.
This too, this too is a sign of serious, serious bigotry.
And it's the four states, the four states that have the most of these identifiably white charter schools, Michigan, Arizona, Texas, and California, that do not require charters to offer public transportation.
No, it's fascinating about Georgia because Georgia's population growth has largely been Hispanic.
We've talked about Georgia's shocking racial transformation from 71% white in 1990 to almost being a majority-minority state by about 2022, 2024.
It's what's projected.
And the clustering of whites, if you know anything about metro Atlanta, White people are basically fleeing further and further from downtown.
Homosexual whites are moving back.
Atlanta actually is majority white, believe it or not.
Atlanta proper is only about 500,000 people, and it is majority white now.
But metro Atlanta, I mean, you're talking about places like Johns Creek.
These are cities that the per capita income, the median income, Rivals anywhere in the country from Fairfax to you know to San Francisco stunning wealth in these areas but you have to reinvent a new city every 10 years because there are only so many white kids to go around and You know there are you know you talk about a county like Gwinnett County Gwinnett County was one of the great counties in 1980 was about 99% white I believe Gwinnett County in 2016 2018 is
I think it's 37% white because of the large influx of Asian, Hispanic, and just a lot of refugees.
Georgia is one of the states that was targeted for a lot of refugee resettlement.
Interestingly enough though, that study that just came out by the New York Times where it showed that in 26 U.S.
states there are now more white deaths than white births, Georgia actually does have far more white births than white deaths.
So there is a lot of prosperity, so there are a lot of whites who are able to afford.
Because of what Steve Saylor has written about, Atlanta doesn't have any natural boundaries.
You can keep going out further and further into the suburbs for affordable family formation.
Well, of course, what's happened here in this charter school, this Lake Oconee Academy, They've come under all sorts of pressure.
Now that the word is out that this is a wonderful school, and it's disproportionately white, the people who run the school have promised they're going to meet all sorts of outreach efforts.
They have been forced to stop exercising what was their prerogative, namely limiting applications from a particular area.
That was their right.
But because that area was largely white, then they've stopped.
They can no longer do this.
What is interesting to me is that I would like to know, to what extent was there any deliberate sense of wanting it to be majority white?
Whether that was unconscious, whether that was dimly conscious, whether that was explicitly conscious, or whether it was just an accident.
Whether they set out to make the nicest and the best school they could, and it turned out to be white, or just what the ingredients were in their thinking.
Of course, they will never, no matter what they thought, when confronted with the fact that they have a disproportionately white student body, they would never say, well, we like it that way.
They'd gladly give up 12 mortgage payments to not have to say why they like it that way.
Exactly.
I dream of the day when whites can say something like that.
But of course, then they would be hit with 25 lawsuits.
Whites are not allowed to say, we like it that way.
Now, what this story put out by this heckin' show organization failed to point out is that there are dozens and dozens of charter schools all around the country that are not only overwhelmingly Hispanic or Black, but are explicitly so.
Names with Afrocentric names, Hispanic names, and they are set up explicitly to promote the culture of Latinos or Afrocentrism.
This article never ever mentioned that.
That's okay.
It is perfectly fine for them to do that.
And if they can coax the parents to contribute money to a gymnasium fund or to extracurricular funds, nobody's going to object.
It's only when whites, and without even any kind of explicit explicit expression of Eurocentric culture, European culture, happen to have a good school that is majority white or disproportionately white, then the hammer comes down.
even if it implicitly is something that is beneficial toward a overwhelmingly white school,
that's even wrong. That's even racist. And that's the lesson of this whole attack on
this Lake Oconee Academy. I'm trying to think of what part of Georgia Greensboro is. And
I want to say that that's kind of on the South Carolina border, but I'm not sure. But again,
there are only so many white kids to go around as we know white children K through 12.
They're very precious. They're very precious. They must be distributed in the most prudent
Somehow being in our presence is a remarkable blessing.
Now, we're always being told how much diversity is a great thing, but this is diversity working the other direction, I suppose.
That's right, that's right.
Somehow being in our presence is a remarkable blessing.
Now we're always being told how much diversity is a great thing, but this is diversity
working the other direction, I suppose.
But again, the lesson here is blacks, Hispanics, Asians if they wanted to, anybody but white people
can have institutions for them, but not for us.
Well, I think that brings us to what I think is one of the more shocking examples of capitulation to this egalitarian thinking, Mr. Taylor.
And this is a story out of the Harvard Medical School where they're going to take down, unfortunately the portraits are the unbearable whiteness of the portraits of the doctors who have done so much to advance medical technology and use science to improve so many people's lives regardless of color, race, Creed, sex, sexual orientation, whatever you want to put in there.
These happen to be white individuals who collectively bring shame to Harvard Medical School in 2018.
That's right.
There is an amphitheater in the Harvard Medical School in which there were 31, let's see, I think there were 31 portraits of people who have made great contributions, not only to medicine, but to Harvard Medical School.
Alas!
Every one of them, every one of the 31, is a man.
And alas, 30 of the 31 are white people.
But there's one Chinese.
So clearly, they are recognizing and they're giving credit where credit is due.
I'm sure that if there was a woman who was affiliated with a hospital who had done great things, she would be up there.
These are known as pioneers of medicine.
And getting your portrait hung in that select group is considered a great honor to which medical people aspire.
As Harvard Medical School has decided, this sends the message that white men are in charge.
I rather like that message myself.
I think it's a beautiful message.
It suggests that things are going well, but no white men are in charge.
That's no good.
And removing the portraits will create, in the words of one of the administrators, a sense of belonging for women and minority employees and students.
Now, the hospital's president is a woman, Dr. Betsy Nabel, and she told the Boston Globe that moving these portraits is the right decision.
And I quote her, I have watched the faces of individuals as they have come in to the auditorium.
I've watched them look at the walls.
I read on their faces, hmm, interesting, but I'm not represented here.
And it got me thinking that we must start respecting our past in a different way.
I'd love to know what that look actually looks like and how she was able to read these individuals' minds to how they could see this unbearable whiteness on the walls and say, I'm not represented here.
Because it's funny, there's a reason why our borders, whether it be these boats bringing Sub-Saharan Africans to Europe, or whether it be these diminutive brown people from Guatemala, Mexico, and all throughout South America, they're trying to come to the United States.
They actually do believe that white men are in charge.
They actually do believe that they're going to get to enjoy the bountiful goodness that white men being in charge actually brings.
It betters their life.
This goes for the entire third world that's trying to relocate to Europe, that's trying to come to the United States, which we know that leftists in America, which they've made quite clear, they don't want to have borders.
They'll never shed a tear for any of the American children killed by illegal aliens, but for all of these illegal alien children that we're supposed to believe somehow have far more rights than you or I should ever have been granted.
Because we already know that they don't want us to speak.
We already know that we've seen the tweets from some of these leftists who say that, gosh, if you've ever exercised a racist thought, you should be thrown into some sort of database where it follows you around for the rest of your life.
You know, the comedian Sam Hyde is right.
They do want us dead.
They do want us bankrupt.
They do want us to have absolutely no semblance of a future, to be able to have any value on the open market.
I mean, this is why I say that we're in unprecedented territory, because this type of... And this Harvard story, it just shows.
I mean, this is an attack on our past, is done so that not only are we in the present, put in our place, but hey, we have no future.
There is no way, Mr. Taylor, to have doctors aspire to try and help everyone.
The great goal of today is to inspire people of color to be inspired for the sake of past whiteness.
It's interesting that she says we should think about respecting our past in a different way.
Well, isn't that in effect saying we're going to invent a new past?
We're going to invent a false past.
We're going to pretend that our past was created Not by these guys up on the wall.
This is a figment of somebody's imagination.
We're going to reinvent the past so as to make people happy in the present.
But I think you made an excellent point.
Why is it that all of these non-whites wish to come to Europe and wish to come to the United States?
Why is that?
It's because white men were in charge.
They're going to be disappointed when they find out that Kamala Harris is in charge, and these other reprobates have the command of the public sector.
But this brings us to a slightly different news story, and in some respects a rather encouraging one.
I'm not sure just how representative the findings reported here are, but it was a story this week on a website called The Conversation, with which I was unfamiliar, but the article was called.
Schools must equip students to navigate alt-right websites that push fake news.
Now, according to a survey by the author, who is himself a school teacher, he did an informal survey of 200 teachers.
That's a fair number.
And according to him, more than 60% of America's middle and high school students rely on alt-right internet sites as credible sources for their research papers.
I find that, well, I'm a little skeptical about that finding.
A little high.
Seems a little high.
I would be content with 45%.
But anyway, 60% seems a little surprising.
But what this guy is saying, and he actually cites some of the websites that apparently all of these poor gullible students have been drawn to, and of course American Renaissance is included among them.
But he says, now, instead of simply instructing the students, stay away from these sites.
This is bad stuff.
He says, we, what teachers should do, and this guy himself is a teacher, we should teach students how to critically examine these sites.
And in order to do that, teachers have to know what is out there and what is in them.
I tell you, I would love that.
I want them to come critically examine us.
They say that, this guy says, awareness of pseudo-scientific white identity sites.
like American Renaissance, will allow teachers to deconstruct these sites with students, encourage critical thinking, and debate the validity and value of the content."
Boy, I couldn't ask for more.
I couldn't ask for more.
Preach.
This is a wonderful conclusion that this guy's come to.
Stunning, actually.
Yeah, absolutely stunning.
Now, I think this is one of the funniest lines in the whole piece.
He says, It is not our job to indoctrinate students to think as we do.
However, it is our job to teach facts.
I couldn't agree more.
I couldn't agree more.
Teach those facts, baby!
And then he says that fewer than 10% of teachers report doing any whole-class teaching about or discussion of these alt-right websites.
Instead, they speak to students individually and ask them to find other sources.
Hey, facts and truth have a well-known racial bias once you actually remove personal bias from those trying to inculcate.
We'll just borrow all the phrases he used.
Right.
And I believe that this is a story that almost seems like it's out of the onion, because it's like, dude, I don't think that's what you want.
You should be calling for censoring.
You should be calling for doing what big tech is doing, and that's alienating and ostracizing voices like Jared Taylor.
Reasonable voices like Jared Taylor at American Renaissance.
You know what this says to me?
This says to me that this guy, there are two possibilities to what's going on here.
Either he hasn't really spent time on sites like ours, and he doesn't know how reasonable, how factual we are.
Or, or, and this is an equally possible explanation, he is so blinded by slogans and bigotry that he genuinely thinks that you can read American Renaissance and come away convinced that it's all baloney.
I mean, it's got to be one or the other.
Again, I mean, if you were to go on there right now, you would find some fantastic articles, fantastic commentary, and some stunning news aggregated in a way that All right.
Here's a paradigm that you've probably never considered that is far different than the one that is channeled and funneled your way on a 24-7, 365 basis.
Again, they have to win every day.
You have someone who comes to one of these sites, you know, we won't name all the sites that are mentioned here because I don't think some of them even exist anymore, but the point is if someone were to encounter American Renaissance, at first they might be shocked, they might be embarrassed because they're on a site that they've been told is espousing a view, Mr. Taylor, that they're not supposed to ever consider as being legitimate.
There's nothing more illegitimate than a white person exercising for their people, exercising a voice for their people, espousing ideas that further and would proliferate whiteness.
We're supposed to bring about the abatement of whiteness.
That's the goal of the 21st century, the elites.
But when you first, I can think back to when I actually first
visited American Renaissance.
It must have been back in 2002, and to be blunt, the site was dreadful then.
I'm sure you remember what it looked like.
I think it was in 2004, 2005 that the switch came to what is basically what it looks like now,
where you have news aggregated and then you have commentary available.
But the old site, it was a hodgepodge.
It was kind of like the Drudge Report in a weird way, if memory serves correct.
I remember I would be looking at the site and I would make sure that no one was behind me.
I would make sure that I was in a public place where I wasn't, at the university.
But the more and more you started to read it, the less you felt I don't want to say embarrassed, that's the wrong word, but it's an intellectual journey for someone to honestly accept that what they've been told about race is wrong and a lie and to conclude
I have to go through this door, and I have to shut this other door to this world that is a lie.
And you know, I would love to stand over Heidi Beirich's shoulder at the SPLC while she read an article like this, and I can just hear her say, No!
No!
You can't!
Send your students to these sites.
You must tell them no, no, no.
And she would say, oh, Twitter's doing the right thing.
Facebook is doing the right thing.
These people just need to be shut up.
We cannot engage in any way.
That would be her reaction.
I think it would just be hilarious to see the kind of argument that she might get into with the sort of person who says, we need to engage with this.
We need to explain to students what's going on here.
Anyway, I thought that was a very encouraging article.
60% of high school and middle school students rely on our sites for their research papers.
As I say, I think it's a little high, but you know, I'll accept that figure if it's true.
But now, tell us about the Soccer World Cup.
You know, I have to admit, I despise Football.
I despise soccer.
I've never, ever, ever liked soccer.
I've never liked it.
Just instinctively there was something about the game that I, growing up, I just did not enjoy, especially watching it.
But I became interested in the 2010 World Cup.
So I did start, because that was in South Africa, and the amount of money that that government was spending on infrastructure and on safety.
I mean it was incredible what they were doing to ensure that the games would go on.
It was amazing.
So I got into the World Cup and it was fun to look at the stereo that grips all these countries and obviously the World Cup is going on right now and before we started this podcast Mr. Taylor and I were talking about the 1998 French team that won the World Cup and it was a team that, I want to say there were only three white starters, three actual white French Yes.
I believe that there are 11 players on the field for each team at a given time.
Of the starters for that French team, three were white, I think six were black, and then I think that... The rest of them were North Africans of some kind.
Yeah.
Case in point, this year's English team.
The last time that Britain won the World Cup, Mr. Taylor, was 1966.
They look like, you know... I looked at a picture of the team and it's just so sad to think that England... It basically looks like a bunch of guys who were cast in the movie Zulu.
That's what it looks like.
On the British side.
Now it actually looks like if you... It looks like a battlefield scene where you've got the British dead and then the Zulu dead.
The British team in 2018 is 12 of 23 are actually white British.
And it's 52% white British.
And this is, of course, the consequences of what Enoch Powell warned about.
But in sports, obviously, as we know, sports are regrettably an opiate.
You were telling me that the French elite bragged about how this was such a wonderful thing in 1998 when this multiracial team won the World Cup.
Ordinary Frenchmen didn't care for it.
There were actually rumblings among local children's soccer groups and amateur soccer groups saying, you know, this just isn't France.
Let's face it.
These people, this is not a French team.
But these were very diligently suppressed.
And as you were reminding me, When this multi-culti team then failed to win in subsequent international competitions, it was blamed for feeding the lies of the Le Pen successor.
The National Front in France was said to have succeeded because this multi-culti, all-hold-hands-and-sing-kumbaya team wasn't doing as well.
There was a book published by a French journalist, don't remember the guy's name, but he was lamenting the fact that they had such a poor showing in 2002 and then they lost in 2006.
I believe 2006 was the year that there was the infamous headbutt, they lost to Italy.
But the point is that as you see these teams, even in England there's been a pushback where I believe that they're trying to institute rules on the club teams to try and get more white kids.
But interestingly enough, the Washington Post did a story, I wish they would have gone a lot further than they did, but they did bring up that before the start of the World Cup they profiled the 736 players that comprised the various teams and 82 were not born in
the country they play for.
Now, they focused on this one Iranian who was actually born and raised in Sweden.
I won't even try to pronounce his name, Saman Godis.
He wasn't chosen for the Swedish team.
The Swedish team, interestingly enough, is 20 of 23 players are actually white Swedes.
And this guy, being of Iranian descent, he was asked to come play for a country he had never even visited.
But it was his parents' birth country.
Right.
It is extraordinary, isn't it?
So now, he's playing in the World Cup for a country that He's never set foot in?
No.
Extraordinary.
Then there was another one that they described, and I didn't really quite understand how they came up with this description, but according to the Washington Post, and I'm quoting them, perhaps the most American player in the World Cup this year is Rodney Wallace, a native of Costa Rica who emigrated to the United States as a nine-year-old.
Now, he spent the rest of his life in the U.S.
playing soccer, but now he's playing for Costa Rica.
Now, I don't understand why that makes him the most American player in the World Cup, but his father is quoted as saying, we are very grateful to be here and to be American.
Of course, he's an American citizen, but his son's playing for Costa Rica.
He says, but with soccer, we are Costa Rica.
And the player himself, this Rodney Wallace, apparently Costa Ricans make fun of his Anglo-type name.
They would prefer he sounded like Jesus Gonzalez or something.
He says, I am definitely Costa Rican, the way I feel, my blood, my upbringing, my parents!
So he's playing for Costa Rica, and he's the most American guy.
He's the most American guy in the tournament.
It's funny, one of the big debates has been obviously the United States is not in the
World Cup and one of the players who's been a long time member of the team, Landon Donovan,
he did an ad for I think American Express where he was paid to show his support for
Mexico and a lot of people attacked him.
I think that in a lot of ways what we're seeing with the World Cup and this post-World War
II, whatever you want to call it, the Anglo world order, new world order, blah, blah,
whatever you want to describe it, it's this corporate driven world and that story of Landon
Donovan being paid to show support for Mexico.
I think in a lot of ways that this underscores what, or this accentuates the point this Washington
Post story is making.
Nationalities in their eyes don't matter.
The World Cup is sort of an archaic display of national pride that we can do every four years, but... Well, it's... I don't know quite what to make of all this.
We, white people, have all been very, very carefully trained to assume that we can be represented in sports competitions as people who are completely racial aliens to us.
That's okay.
A British team, an American team, a French team, they can be overwhelmingly non-white.
That's okay.
Other countries don't feel that way.
No.
And other countries almost never have people that... How many non-Nigerian are on the Nigerian team?
How many non-Moroccans are on the Moroccan team?
No, no, they don't accept that.
They understand perfectly well, this guy's an alien.
He doesn't look like me.
He's not part of my country.
He's not part of my team.
And I wonder what in the world they think when they see a Belgian team, so-called, With all of these obvious non-Belgians, I'd be very curious to know how an Algerian would feel that, how a Chinese person would feel about that.
And to me, one of the most interesting soccer stories was, oh, way back, when was it, when the women's soccer team, the women's national soccer team won the World Cup?
That must have been 20 years ago.
I want to say 1998 was the first year they won, when the girl took her top off after they beat China.
Yes, they beat China.
Well, locally in China, I'm sorry, in Los Angeles, the people from mainland China and the people from Taiwan had always been at odds.
They couldn't agree on anything.
They all agreed to rent out seats right at the midfield and all get together and root for China.
So that shows you where their real loyalties lie.
Yes.
Well, our loyalties must lie to our people, and we thank you all for listening, and we will see you next week.
Hey, for Jared Taylor, this is Paul Kersey.
Our time is up.
▲
Export Selection