All Episodes
Previous Next
June 13, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
58:04
‘Diversity Is Not a Virtue’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to today's edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me in the studio is our guest, our usual guest, Paul Kersey.
And as usual, the week has been full of interesting news for those of us who care about the demographic future, not only of the United States, but of Europe, and in fact, the entire world.
First of all, I'd like to talk about some crime reporting that has been really quite interesting.
Some of it from the Washington Post and some from the Wall Street Journal.
The Washington Post went to the trouble of doing a very considerable and detailed research project trying to look into those parts of the country where murder has been unsolved.
The crime of murder is unsolved.
Ordinarily, murder is the crime that has the highest clearance rate.
Now, in the United States, we used to have a clearance rate in the 80%, in good years, approaching 90%.
That figure has been declining.
Now, we're lucky to clear something over half of the murders in the United States.
But what the Washington Post did was look into those particular neighborhoods where the clearance rates are low.
And, Mr. Kersey, who is a real specialist in crime and how it relates to certain other patterns that we're not supposed to notice, can you summarize some of the findings?
Yeah, you know, The Washington Post, they dedicated a lot of resources, a lot of writers, a lot of investigative journalists were in on this report.
It's fascinating.
It's an incredibly searchable database with some great statistics.
It basically breaks down the fact that they look at 50 cities, 50 of the largest urban areas in the country over the past 10 years.
There were a combined 52,000 murders in these cities and they break down the clearance rate for these murders by race.
So we have at our disposal a look at a word that doesn't appear in the Washington Post story,
but social capital.
They lament the fact that in only three of the cities, three of the municipalities that they go over in this
report have a clearance rate higher for non-whites than for whites.
So in 47 of these cities, the clearance rate is unbelievably disproportionate, whereas white people don't tolerate homicides.
They want to get them, you know, because one of the fascinating things from a sociological perspective is that when a homicide happens with white people, normally it's within, you know, family.
It's something that it doesn't happen You know, indiscriminately it's something that it's premeditated a lot of ways.
It's an act of emotion.
It's not something as what you see in the black community all the time when you're watching the nightly news wherever you live in the country where there was a shooting over five dollars or there was a shooting at a at a birthday party because of some sort of lingering beef, which is one of the reasons why in a lot of these cities you see such low clearance rates.
And this is one aspect of the problem that the Washington Post did not dare get into, and that is the differences in behavior between blacks and whites.
With blacks, there is a great deal of purely impulsive killing of people who may be complete strangers to each other.
I step on your shoe, you're insulted, you pull out a gun and you kill me.
And that's not an exaggeration either.
What you just said there, it's not.
No.
And that is why many of those murders are so hard to solve.
First of all, there is just no clear connection between the murderer and the victim, whereas with whites, as you point out, many are family matters, or there is a clear person who had some good reason to want this person killed.
There's a motive.
There's a motive.
And one of the most important shows on television, which I encourage I'm sure a lot of our listeners watch it.
It's A&E's The First 48, where A&E has contracted out with police departments across the country, most notably Louisville, Memphis, New Orleans, areas where there are all cities that are profiled, mind you, in this Washington Post story, where the police detectives will get to the murder scene and they have 48 hours to try and establish a motive.
They talk to people who are witnesses and there's no cooperation.
It's not the fault of, as the Washington Post says, there's a fractured relationship because
of poor policing by white police.
No, they just won't talk.
There's no snitching policy.
It is the belief that the justice department, that the justice system in all these cities
is unfairly targeting blacks that's held among the black population.
They have a greater affinity toward protecting black criminals than bringing black criminals
That's exactly right.
Yet another point that the Washington Post refused to make.
They did talk about lack of trust in communities of color for the police department.
Now, they did not go into the race of the police officers themselves.
No, they didn't.
And so, the whole impression they try to give is, first of all, that white police departments, and they assume that every police department in America is overwhelmingly white, which is obviously not true.
No, it's not.
But white police departments are simply ignoring black crime.
They just don't put any effort into it.
Whereas, as I said, I think you pointed out that there's this profound lack of cooperation with the police, whether they're white or black.
This snitches, you snitchers get stitches stuff.
And at the same time, there are these crimes of passion between strangers.
They don't know who it's very, very hard to track down.
You find some dead black guy in some abandoned building.
You have no idea what the connection was.
Whereas a dead white person, chances are it was not this spur-of-the-moment thing.
There was something going on.
Someone had a motive.
And, of course, the white community is going to be cooperative with the investigation.
But this is an aspect, these are aspects of Wall Street that, I'm sorry, that the Washington Post pretty much ignored.
They want to leave us with the impression that racist white police officers just shrug it off when they find a black dead body.
And they use that term over and over and over again that we've discussed on this podcast previously that we noticed is starting to become more prominent in liberal vernacular.
Clustering of homicides.
The Washington Post story does point out, Mr. Taylor, that all across the country, regardless of what geographic area of the country you're talking in, largely happen in low-income black areas.
They're clustered there.
It gives the impression that somehow this is the fault of well-meaning white people who continue to persist in keeping segregation alive.
If only blacks lived among white people by osmosis, they'd behave.
Not well-meaning, ill-meaning.
Ill-meaning!
Otherwise, let me rephrase that.
Otherwise well-meaning white people who are Who are engaged in gentrification, which is obviously some form of warfare against...
Again, we live in a country where we are held hostage because we cannot accurately discuss the racial dimension of every problem.
And this Washington Post story, hey, you know what?
Good on the editor for saying we need to actually break this data down.
Because we can look at this and we can then look at every city, because a lot of these police departments, I've already started this, a lot of these police departments actually break down the crimes in these places by the suspect's race, which the Washington Post story conveniently leaves out.
Which is the most important data point.
The question that I actually tweeted to the Washington Post, why aren't you mentioning who's committing these crimes?
Yeah, the suspects, yeah, that's one thing, but who is committing these murders in Detroit and Milwaukee and Indianapolis?
And the other thing they failed to point out in that entire article is differences in murder rate.
The murder rate per capita, yes, is much, much, much higher for blacks.
They fail to get into that as well.
So they do mention that these unsolved murders are disproportionately among poor blacks.
They at least said that.
But they bring up the race question only to try to pin it on white people.
Correct.
White police departments are just not doing their duty.
Now, in the case of the Wall Street Journal, they likewise this week had a fascinating and detailed story on crime in which they did not mention the word race a single time.
This was really quite astonishing to me because sometimes the Wall Street Journal has been a little bit bolder than some of the mainstream press.
But they're talking about all of these, for example, the fact that Chicago had, last year they had 771 murders.
That is a 58% jump since 2015.
In other words, the largest, the third largest city, it has 2.7 million.
2015. In other words, the largest, the third largest city, it has 2.7 million.
Chicago had more murders than the two largest cities, number one and number two,
New York and Los Angeles combined.
But see, what the Wall Street Journal was concentrating on was the fact that, once again, clusters.
Where are these murders happening?
Where are they happening?
Now, instead of doing a simple census analysis and discovering that the murders happen to fit a certain demographic pattern, instead, they looked into all sorts of details.
The neighborhoods that had the greatest rise in unemployment, poverty, and vacant homes.
These are the ones that also saw a bigger decline in medium income compared to those other parts of Chicago.
That's where we had a rise in murder rate.
And here they quote someone named Danton Floyd, a community activist in West Garfield Park.
He is a black guy and West Garfield Park is one of these heavily black neighborhoods.
He says people see these empty buildings standing there over four years on and it's a reminder that the city has turned their back on them.
And that must be why they're killing each other.
Now, interestingly enough, as I said, they talked about rise in unemployment, rise in poverty, number of vacant houses.
To its credit, the Wall Street Journal put in a lot of data to show just what the differences were.
And the differences between those with high, with increasing murder rates in the neighborhoods, and those that did not have increased murder rates, They were tiny differences.
Just tiny differences.
I was shocked.
They look at that and they try to hang their hat on something like the number of vacant buildings, whereas I'm sure they could have had a much, much more impressive correlation if all they'd done was look at race.
It's funny you say that because going back to the Washington Post story, they break down the clearance rate for a city like Detroit.
I remember this one because it stuck out in my mind.
In a 10 year time span from when the data points were collected, there were 2,215 blacks murdered in Detroit.
And there were something like 200 whites.
And the clearance difference in those was, it wasn't that great, it was like 15 percentage points.
But when you break it down per capita, you think about the volume, how many more blacks are murdered.
And then you have to compare that to, there are only a couple hundred white people who were murdered in Detroit.
And again, you try and use the math, you try and use these statistics to try and get people like, wow, that's a big difference.
That's awful.
But like you just said, there are tiny differences when you actually break it down from a per capita standpoint.
Yes, but it was astonishing to me that this great long article in the Wall Street Journal trying to tease out those areas of Chicago, for example, or they also talk about Baltimore, but they say almost half of the increase of murder in Chicago, and as I said it was up 58% from the year before, came in just five neighborhoods.
Just five neighborhoods.
And then they go into this analysis of what it was about those neighborhoods, and they never mention race.
In the time we've been talking, I got on my smartphone, and I looked up on CityData the racial demographics of this neighborhood.
A reporter can simply go online, and they can look at these communities within these cities, and they can just type in the zip code, and they can be taken to CityDat, and they get an amazing pie chart that shows the racial breakdown of the community.
How hard is that?
Hey, there's other sites that do it.
Zillow.com, Neighborhood Scout.
It's out there.
It's simple.
It's right there for you to access.
And it actually puts a wonderful bow of truth around your story as opposed to forcing the reader to unwrap an incomplete package.
See, they go into things like this.
One of the things that they have discovered is a lot of indiscriminate killing attributed to small, fiercely competitive gangs that have devolved from more powerful street organizations of the 1990s but lack the earlier gangs' discipline in the use of violence.
Wow, if only they had that moral compass that those gangs of yesteryear had.
That's right.
Geez, what went wrong?
Those wonderful gangs they used to have that were controlling the violence.
But, are these the white Aryan resistance gang?
Who are these gangs?
Are these the Nazi low-riders, these gangs?
No, they're just gangs.
And they also talk about, here, this struck me as well, on a recent afternoon, a dispute between two families over their children playing too loudly in the yard, escalating into a shooting incident with someone hit.
Well, are we supposed to imagine little Norwegian children playing in the yard?
Somebody gets too loud and they start shooting?
And then here is a police commissioner.
He says, before, it was unheard of that there were female victims, children shot.
It was unheard of that there were retaliatory shootings at churches.
I guess this is, again, part of this lack of discipline in the kind of gang rule that used to prevail in Washington.
There was a story...
Two months ago in the Chicago Sun-Times about how the police are having to dedicate resources to funerals now because of the fear of retaliatory shootings.
Not just at the funerals, but actually at the funeral homes, because there have been a noticeable uptick
in these firefights.
And it's so unfathomable for you and I sitting here to even consider something like that at a solemn occasion,
where you're going to commemorate someone's life and grieve and remember what they meant
to so many people, family and friends, and to think that you'd have to have resources dedicated
to stop a rival gang that is somehow, what are the words they used?
That lacks the discipline and the use of violence.
I...
Again, it makes me think back to, as we were talking about before this podcast started, Abraham Lincoln's idea that these races cannot live together.
Well, to me, the key phrase here is retaliatory shootings at churches.
Good grief.
But that is that you know for sure.
If whoever the guy is, Big Mo, who was horned in on your turf, if it's his if it's his funeral, then chances are all of Big Mo's buddies and comrades, some of them are going to be there.
That'll be a target rich environment, as they like to say in the military.
So, yes.
But, once again, not a word about race.
Not a word about race.
These people could be Asian immigrants doing this, for all the Wall Street Journal is going to tell us.
Then, once again, they're talking about Baltimore.
And they make the same point.
In one neighborhood, homicides soared 89% during 2015 and 2016 from the two prior years,
far outpacing the 49% citywide jump. I mean, the city as a whole is up 50%,
but here's a neighborhood where it's up 89%.
percent.
And here we have the same kind of thing.
To me, it's eerie the way these things, the sentiments reflect each other.
Erica Alston Buck, who runs a youth center blocks from where Freddie Gray was arrested in 2015.
She says the violence is tied to poverty that hasn't eased since the riots.
And this is a quote from her.
You have to be here to feel the blight.
The vacant houses.
Once again, vacant houses cause people to shoot each other.
Decades ago those vacant row houses were brimming, overflowing with social capital when white people were still able to live in Baltimore before the riots basically forced white flight from the city The abandonment of these properties and these once bustling homes that
Only took on their current state because it's a reflection of the race that lives there.
Going back real quick to Chicago, I failed to point out one thing about West Garfield Park.
Because you mentioned, hey, why can't they just mention race?
I just simply went to Wikipedia and West Garfield Park, which is one of those five neighborhoods where half of the increase in Chicago came from.
Demographics for you real quick.
quick, 95.6% black, 1.7% white. How hard is that to do, Wall Street Journal?
It's beyond their capabilities.
But the Wall Street Journal continuing to talk about Baltimore, as I say, homicides are up 50% in two years.
But the police union president said in July that some officers remain hesitant on duty
because of the six officers involved in the Freddie Gray case.
Remember, they were indicted with all this fanfare.
Their lives were put through the wringer.
They were eventually, the cases were dismissed, but this is a horrible thing for a police officer.
And obviously, very few people are going to go out of their way and look what happens.
De-policing.
It has real consequences.
People genuinely die.
But that was what the mayor of Baltimore thought she had to do in order to stop the riots, indict these police officers.
Now, the Wall Street Journal threw in what I thought was a fascinating little tidbit about homicide in Baltimore.
that homicide victims of Baltimore on average have 12 arrests.
Now, they just sort of tossed this off.
Now, what does that make you think?
It makes you wonder whether or not they're doing the Lord's work, some of these people.
Yeah, I mean, I just saw a story where David Simon, the creator of The Wire and The Corner, which are basically a form of hagiography for the Baltimore black underclass, these shows that are on HBO.
He just got kicked off of Twitter because he was blasting Trump and saying all sorts of crazy things.
One time I actually got in a Twitter war with him, where I pointed out, Why do you glorify the black underclass?
They've done everything possible to destroy what once was one of the world's great cities in Baltimore.
You think about the American history that is alive and is present in Baltimore and how that should be just this great tourist city when instead it is nothing more than a mausoleum, basically.
And you read that quote, what you just said, this could probably be replicated in all of the newspapers in those 50 cities that the Washington Post dedicated their resources to show where clearance rates were low.
You would find the exact same thing in Milwaukee, in New Orleans, in Atlanta, in Memphis.
See, once again, now this would be a fascinating statistic to see, Baltimore homicide victims have 12 arrests on average.
Now, what are the racial differences?
What are the racial differences across the country?
It would be very, very interesting.
I mean, certainly there are bound to be a certain number of white low-lifes who get knocked over.
Or drug addicts who are involved in some sort of... My suspicion is that white homicide victims have, on average, far fewer arrests.
It's just a completely different pattern of behavior.
If any, they just happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Well, I'm talking about husbands killing their wives, the standard Alfred Hitchcock sort of a murder...
Or you read, regrettably, of a white person, say, in Baltimore, who's just going to, you know, have a neurological checkup at Johns Hopkins, and they get, you know, in the wrong place at the wrong time.
That too.
That too.
But, no, I would love to see statistics on that.
Now, of course, the killers, I wonder how many arrests they have.
I suspect they're pretty much the same boat.
You know, the ones who are doing the killing and ones who are being killed, pretty much the same sort of dregs.
Maybe 13 arrests on average?
Might be a little higher, yeah.
Moving on to a candidate.
I find this really quite interesting.
A candidate who has won the GOP primary for the New Jersey Congressional District that includes Atlantic City.
He is a candidate named Seth Grossman.
He's running for the second congressional district, and he is in the news for having called diversity crap and un-American.
He popped onto my news feed by saying the whole idea of diversity is a bunch of crap and un-American.
Diversity efforts, he continued, are, quote, an excuse by Democrats, Communists, and Socialists basically to say that we're not all created equal, that some people, if somebody is less qualified, they will get a job anyway, or they'll get into college anyway, because of the tribe that they're with, what box they fit into.
He's talking about the way diversity is used in order to make an excuse for affirmative action.
Yes.
I thought that was quite fascinating.
But then, he's also attacking diversity the way we ordinarily talk about diversity being the great strength.
He says, he also says, diversity is not a virtue.
America did not become great because of diversity.
This is remarkable.
This guy is, I will be very, very interested to see how he does.
Well, look at his credentials real quick, if I could read them.
Sure.
Undergraduate at Duke University, 1971.
Right.
He went to Temple Law School.
He's a respected attorney.
He first won office in 1986 in a citywide election, served as an independent on the city council.
That, of course, was when Atlantic City was seeing massive growth.
Trump was building his Taj Mahal and his properties there.
Between 2006 and today, he is maintaining a law practice.
He's hosted several popular talk radio programs.
He's been a teacher at a community college.
Hey, he's published opinion columns throughout South Jersey's major newspapers.
That's right.
That's right.
And so it's fascinated me.
Often, when you find a guy talking about diversity this way, he turns out to be some guy who's just popped up on a freak ballot.
This guy is an established citizen.
He's held public office.
And to me, it's very, very, and I think we're going to see more and more of this all the time.
And for those listening who care more about fiscal policies than racial matters, you know, hey, in 2016 he represented liberty and prosperity in a lawsuit to force Atlantic City to adopt a balanced budget.
There you go!
That's right.
He's for gun rights too.
He says one of his platforms is allow Americans to defend themselves.
He sounds like our kind of guy.
One of his quotes is, 50 years of welfare programs, public and college education, and media and Hollywood pop culture run by progressive Democrats did far more long-term damage to blacks in America than 230 years of slavery.
That's a pretty strong quotation.
He's getting there.
Yeah, he's getting there.
And then, why are we inviting thousands of Muslim immigrants to our towns and neighborhoods when we are in the middle of a war with Islam?
Now that's a very good point that I think most conservatives who watch Sean Hannity and these other shows on Fox are probably saying, hey, I agree with that.
Why don't we add this conversation?
Right.
I am delighted that this guy running for Congress is talking in these terms.
And then from his website, I looked up this guy.
I thought, now we need to kind of keep an eye on him.
From his website he says, The new 1965 immigration laws had the purpose and effect of dividing and weakening America.
If we do not act quickly, they will destroy America as the free, safe, prosperous and united country most of us grew up in.
He goes on to say, the 1965 immigration law was just the first of countless ways Ted Kennedy showed his hatred for America during his 44 years in the U.S.
Senate.
Can't argue that.
This is very very strong talk.
He says, far too many of these immigrants are not assimilating.
Many actually hate our American culture and constitutional government and want to change us.
If elected, I will forcefully defend and protect President Trump and his agenda every way I can.
Wow.
Ah, yes, ah...
And see, again, again, I am very impressed that this is not some just guy popped out of the woodwork.
He's got a career, he's got a profile, he's already served in public office, and who knows, maybe he has a chance of winning.
And he's saying very unconventional and dangerous things according to the zeitgeist, however, As you and I know, this is what a large, increasing segment of the American white population wants to hear.
They yearn to hear this.
You and I were talking about that newspaper story.
Where's that USA Today headline?
6-13 2018 main story is quote.
Why are you taking him trauma lingers from immigration?
Policy that separates parents and kids now this USA Today.
I believe has the largest circulation.
Mr. Taylor in the country This is the main the main story above, you know above the center of And it talks about how horrible it is that these illegal immigrants are seeing their families ripped apart, blah blah blah.
I could care less.
What I'm sad about is all the Americans who have been murdered by illegal immigrants and why we have politicians who continue to advocate for sanctuary city policies.
Now my question to you when we started, before we started, was If we actually were the editors at the USA Today, how long would it take for us to put stories to change Americans' perception?
overnight into understanding that all of these policies that have been positioned as virtues by our ruling elite, the managerial elite, are in fact the inverse of what they should be.
Now you said it would take about a month, right?
I think if the media were sensible, it would probably take about a month and then everything would change.
Because the media, basically what they're doing, they are really constantly, constantly beating us into an unnatural state of mind.
And I think as soon as the pressure relieved, we would revert to a more natural, healthy state of mind.
But I think it would take a while.
You think it could be done overnight?
I think in some cases it could be done overnight in terms of what that would do for, you know, not everybody reads the newspaper anymore, but for water cooler conversations.
I mean, just look at the top-down measure.
I mean, this doesn't really have much to do with what we're talking about here, but I'd like to point out that this is Pride Month for the LGBT community, and every corporation is completely on board changing the color of their brand to the rainbow flag.
And it's amazing how quickly that became the highest virtue of the land, to dictate as if they're somehow the resistance, when in fact every corporation is funding Pride parades.
Pride floats.
And, you know, my point is, our side, if we were ever... Let me elaborate on this point just real quick.
Our enemies have to win every day.
They can't let up.
They can't allow a sliver of our ideas to seep in, or else we see what happened with Trump, which is why they were so upset, and you saw tweets, and you saw pundits, and you saw people of respect, respectability, say, we can never allow this to happen again, we gotta stamp this out.
We only have to win once, and then we never have to win again.
They have to win every day, every moment of every day, they have to have the hearts and minds, when if we have the opportunity, it's only once.
Well, that is one reason why I think guys like this Seth Grossman are so important.
He is stepping forward and putting a perfectly respectable and reasonable face on the kinds of things we've been saying for many years.
One thing that the opponents have held against him, he actually circulated an article from American Renaissance.
There's a lot of good stuff on here.
Somebody has tracked this fact down.
It was the confessions of a public defender.
This was a guy, I don't know if you remember that story, a great story, a great article, by a public defender who ends up most of the time defending blacks.
And he has noticed certain patterns and he wrote them down as honestly as possible.
But then, interestingly enough, he continues by saying that he is still a liberal.
He still thinks that these people can be helped.
That it is society's responsibility to pull them out of the mud, but for the time being, this is how they behave, and we better realize it.
In any case, Seth Grossman circulated that.
Another thing Seth Grossman has got going for him, he's Jewish, so it's going to be very hard to say that here's a Nazi, here's a neo-Nazi, an ex-skinhead.
As I say, I'm going to be very curious to see how he does in the general election.
Three words.
Heroes are rising.
Understand that any quest in politics begins with a single step and that kind of brings us to our next stories.
We're going to talk about some of the really positive things happening in Europe that seemed I'll say it.
Implausible.
Two, three years ago, when you saw what Angela Merkel was doing with Germany, basically opening up the borders, surrendering, capitulating Germania to the Saracen hordes.
Guess what?
For every action, there's an equal and not-so-opposite reaction.
Well, it's an opposite reaction.
It's an opposite reaction.
I meant to say not so equal.
Let's hope it is an overwhelmingly superior reaction.
But yeah, just this latest story from Austria was great.
The Austrian government announced that it was going to expel up to 60 Turkish-funded imams and their families and shut down seven mosques.
Apparently, Austria has a law that says there cannot be foreign funding for religious office holders.
If you are on Saudi Arabia's payroll, or in this case, Turkey's payroll, and you are spreading all sorts of Islamic nonsense, apparently, all you have to do is be on the payroll.
It doesn't make any difference what you say.
Out you go!
And other European far-right leaders thought this was great, and even Austria's opposition parties were broadly supportive of this announcement.
The center-left Social Democrats calling it, quote, the first sensible thing this government has done.
Wow!
Stop the press for a second.
You're seeing people begin to understand that when saying practical policies, you know, obviously like you just said, the media beats people down saying these are This far-right rise is, you know, the return of Hitlerian, Nazi-type policies, when in fact, something like this, you know, whether these center... I'm sorry, the center-left Social Democrats, they want to protect freedom, they want to protect equality, they want to protect egalitarianism, and they realize, I believe, it might be late, late in the hour, but they realize that these ideas that they espouse
They don't, they're kind of incongruent with where the Saracen, Mohammedian, what's that group?
How do you pronounce that word that no one uses anymore?
Musliman or Mohammedan?
Mohammedan.
That might be my favorite term that you encounter a lot in Richard Burton's writings.
Mohammedans.
Yeah, I love that term to describe the Saracens.
Again, heroes are rising and it doesn't happen overnight.
It doesn't happen with some order that you have 72 hours to leave our borders, to leave our lands and go back to whence you came from.
It takes precise legalese sometimes.
Like you noted, it's this simple little lock.
That's right.
You can't have Saudi-funded places or Turkish-funded imams.
That's right.
Out!
Guru, this is great stuff.
And even the Social Democrats, as you say, they probably care about homosexual rights and equality for women.
That's all fine and good.
But if they realize that those things are going to flourish only in certain populations.
Even the lefty Social Democrats are coming around now.
What's interesting, of course, about this is that President Recep Erdogan of Turkey, he's all on his high horse.
He says, these measures of kicking out these 60 Turkish funded imams and their families.
I like that.
You don't want to break up a family, you know.
Taken by the Austrian Prime Minister, are, I fear, leading the world towards a war between the cross and the crescent.
Well, what do you know?
What do you know?
I hope he keeps talking that way.
He has threatened sanctions and it'll be very interesting to see what kind of sanctions he imposes.
Yeah, it's funny.
I've been to your house before and I believe you have a picture framed of the World Trade Center.
Aftermath.
That's right.
And it's just a picture of the big hole in the ground where World Trade Center 1 and 2 once stood that, of course, knocked down by an act of Saracen terror against their hated Christian, against Christendom.
And, you know, it's like, hey, sir, when did this war between the cross and the crescent ever end?
Exactly.
Exactly.
I know.
I think he's, I hope he keeps talking this way.
So this is very, very encouraging news.
And more encouraging news, this time from Italy.
The story started off well, but ended a little bit in a disappointing way.
But there was one of these NGO ships, Doctors Without Borders, that was out cruising the Mediterranean, and they picked up 729 of these so-called migrants, I think it's more proper to call them Islamic invaders, frankly, cruising in from Libya, who were on a sinking ship, And they said, OK, we want to take him to Italy.
And apparently the Italian Coast Guard was involved in this rescue, but with this new populist Italian government.
Matteo Salvini, the leader of the anti-immigrant League Party, used to be called the Northern League.
He was the spokesman for the government on that.
He says, no, you can't bring him to Italy.
Too bad.
And I thought this was great.
He says that while saving lives is a duty, quote, transforming Italy into an enormous refugee camp is not.
Italy is done bowing its head and obeying.
This time there's someone saying no.
The two, probably the most powerful word in the English language is the word no.
I'm sure it sounds pretty good in Italian as well, but again that sends chills down my spine to think that we're at a point where It seemed like the prophetic novel Camp of the Saints was what was going to happen and there was not going to be a politician of anywhere in Europe that was going to say no.
Maybe privately they'd fund a newspaper as the French president did, the right-wing paper in Camp of the Saints, which everybody listening needs to read that book because that was written at a time when someone like Salvini was It was incomprehensible that someone like this would ever rise to a power where, you know, the example after example after example of Italy being what he just said, we're not going to be a refugee camp anymore.
No.
Yes.
No.
I mean, and of course, our great friend in Hungary, Orban, praised this.
And you're seeing this unbelievable alliance start to form.
Austria, Italy, Czechoslovakia.
What's the country?
Slovenia.
Poland, of course.
Poland, of course, and you just wonder if, you know, and we don't have this written down
here but I've got to point out, you of course probably didn't see this because unfortunately
Jared Taylor and America Rezents are banned from Twitter.
Donald Trump tweeted out his support for the President.
Is he the Prime Minister?
He's the Deputy Prime Minister.
He's the Deputy Prime Minister.
I somehow forget how the parliamentary process works of how you create these coalition governments, but Trump tweeted out his support.
for Slovenia.
Oh, Slovenia!
It was amazing.
In my opinion, that was one of his best tweets that he's done because...
I make this point over and over again.
Had Hillary been in office and something like this was happening, you would see enormous pressure by the federal government to work with the world banks to work with, you know, because Italy's also got sort of a, they've got a crisis with their bond and their bond market and stuff right now.
And a lot of people worried what that might be.
There'd be economic pressure on Italy to force them to accept these boats.
And of course, as you said, the story didn't end all that well because unfortunately Spain has a leftist government now.
Right.
And they, of course, they did allow this migrant ship to land and dock.
In Valencia.
Yeah.
Yes, yes.
So it does not have the happy ending.
But at least this is not going to be a problem for Italy.
This batch of invaders is not going to be a problem for Italy.
Now, as you were suggesting, once Spain gets enough of these, maybe they'll get some backbone too.
But I hate to think that all these countries have to be flooded With these Islamic potential rapists, potential welfare chiselers, before they really realize what's going on.
And of course, Spain's got this problem with people crawling into their enclaves in North Africa.
Melilla in Ceuta, you've seen these videos of people just climbing over the walls trying to get in.
So they've already got their own problems.
Repatriation can happen overnight.
It just takes the Constitution and the will of a people who are fed up and just simply say no.
We could see massive changes with, again, as this new coalition is forming.
I kind of liken it to what just happened in Italy.
Forgive the reference to Tolkien, but it's that great moment where the beacons of Minas Tirith are lit and Aragorn The beacons are lit.
What are we going to do?
And Rohan will answer.
And the fact that Hungary says, we support this.
The fact that what you're seeing in Austria, the fact that what you're seeing in all these countries, and Western Europe, which is unfortunately governed by leaders who are sociopathic and have risen to their position because of their dedication to this egalitarian world order that's submerging Western Europe with third world people.
Which we'll see on display in the World Cup, where the French team has just a few actual French people, the English team has a number of third world people.
Then you see the Eastern European countries, they're all white, they're all Polish, etc.
They're all Russian.
We live in such exciting times, because this isn't supposed to be happening.
White people were supposed to go silently into the night.
I noticed the headline, I didn't even read the story, but apparently the Icelandic World Cup team has got a video that is being criticized as being white supremacist.
They do, and not only that, the Swedish team is of 23 members on their roster.
20 are actually white Swedes.
One is black and two are refugees.
And this reporter, this liberal reporter, this journalist, asked at a press conference, shouldn't there be greater diversity on the team?
And at some point, even in Sweden, you're going to see somebody say no.
You're going to see, when you hear this question, You're going to see somebody laugh, and they're just going to say, no.
And then they'll turn around and say, why should there be?
Can you give us an example of why this actually matters?
No.
Again, that word is such an important to add to your vocabulary.
Because for 60 years, you've lived it your entire life.
You've lived in a country where whites have been submissive and have just ceded and capitulated.
And cannot say no.
It's simple.
If you say no, that is putting your feet into the ground and it is no more.
Wasn't it George W. Bush's wife who started this Just Say No campaign?
Actually, I think that was Ronald Reagan's wife.
That goes back to Nancy Reagan about drugs.
Well, we need to revive that slogan.
Just say no.
White people can say no just like everybody else.
But, you know, to me it's fascinating the way the liberal press has screeched about failures of democracy when we get governments like the one in Italy and the one in Austria.
And, of course, Viktor Orban and the Poles and all of that.
They screech about how this is a failure of democracy.
And Brexit as well.
You can even point that out.
Yes.
We've got a great article by the great Gregory Hood.
It's on the website now or coming up just within the next 24 hours in which he talks about who's the threat to democracy.
This is democracy in action.
This is a reflection of the people's will.
If you ask the American people and if you ask the European people, do you want more third world immigration?
Overwhelming majorities say no.
No, no, no.
Go back 20 years.
Go back 30 years.
It's the same.
Where is democracy being fulfilled and where is it being flouted?
It's in these very countries where all the liberals are shrieking that democracy is failing.
Now, to me, the hypocrisy is so transparent that they believe in democracy if the people vote the way they like.
I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that Gregory Hood also has an edited collection of works with Dr. Greg Johnson that just came out.
I believe it's called The Dark Right.
I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that Gregory Hood also has an edited collection
of works with Dr. Greg Johnson that just came out.
I believe it's called The Dark Right and you might scoff at this but it's a collection
of essays on the fictional character Batman.
I can't recommend this enough because it's so important that we engage in pop culture
and have our arguments interpreted with movies and cinema and comics.
You might not think it's an important, valid form.
I think it's hugely important.
I just think it's very, very difficult to get there yet.
We have to, of course, infiltrate every movie studio, just like we have to infiltrate every university.
But we've got a very, very long march through those institutions.
No, I agree, it's 100% profoundly important.
Those are terrible enemies, not only of American whites, but white people all around the world.
You know, one of the great things, I will say, Greg Hood coming over and being a staff writer now of American Renaissance has probably been the coup of the century.
That might seem overstated, but I can't stress enough how important and what a courageous voice for truth, reason, and just lucid writing and coherent.
I mean, I think you've said it once before, you wish that you had written some of the pieces.
Well, when his first collection came out, Waking Up from the American Dream, the publisher asked me to blurb it.
And I said something like, in our movement, he's clearly the best writer of his generation.
Heck, he's probably the best writer in the entire movement.
No, he's great and we're delighted to have him.
He's done phenomenal work for AR.
I actually challenged him.
Hopefully he'll get around to it.
The famous CNN pundit, chef, cook, world traveler Anthony Bourdain committed suicide and he was lauded in the press as being a great voice for immigrants, Mr. Taylor.
Because he was very upset with President Trump and this idea of pushing back on illegal immigration and he said this is going to devastate restaurants nationwide.
And headlines it said, this was a good white man because he advocated for the dispossession using his platform to say Who's going to wash these dishes, as if we have to have this permanent slave class driving down wages?
So, hopefully Gregory Hood will look at the way that he was, and his suicide, was lauded, and the things that he talked about, and how he became a, quote, good white man, end quote, in the zeitgeist of today.
That's pretty much all it takes.
Just say good things about non-whites and bad things about whites, and you're officially a good white man.
But you're talking about popular culture.
And I'm not sure this is exactly an example of popular culture, but whoever appears on the currency, it's certainly part of the national zeitgeist.
And I must say I was delighted that Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Democrat of New Hampshire,
she's been pestering the Treasury Department to go through with the Barack Obama,
I guess it was pretty much a promise, to put Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill.
Oh, in the latter stage of his presidency, he bragged about this.
You know, he was saying, hey, you gonna get your tub?
He even had a euphemism for what the Tubman $20 bill going to be called and if you ever visited Washington DC
they actually had the designs in front of the Treasury Building.
They had this massive currency, expansive, on the outside facade.
Yes, I remember seeing, instead of Jackson, we have Harriet Tubman herself.
The design looked like it was pretty much, all it needed was the finishing touches.
Apparently, the assistant secretary of the Treasury Department, Drew Maloney, wrote back to Shaheen saying that, you know, the final designs aren't yet finished and we just haven't really made any progress on these new notes.
And so she says, I'm severely disappointed by the Trump administration's failure to prioritize the redesign of the $20 bill to honor Harriet Tubman.
And other trailblazing women and civil rights leaders.
And she promises to just keep poking and prodding and pestering until she gets Tubman on the $20 bill.
Of course, the Treasury Secretary himself, Steve Mnuchin, back in August 2017, when he was asked about it, he says, eh, it's something we'll consider.
Right now, we've got a lot more important issues to focus on.
Quite right.
Quite right.
So I very much hope that Andy Jackson stays on the bill.
He will.
But yeah, I think he will for now.
But again, this is yet another example of Your Vote Matters, ladies and gentlemen.
Your Vote Matters.
I think there are too many in our movement who For perfectly understandable reasons.
Think that the political system is completely corrupt.
There is nobody that's going to stand up for us.
But there are people.
And they really do need our support.
And even if they don't stand up for us in the sort of explicit way we'd like with Donald Trump, this is the kind of effect it has.
Harriet Tubman, at least for the time being, is not going to be on that bill.
Oh, the push for that in 2016 and 2017, maybe even started in 2015, was just so great.
maybe even started in 2015, was just so great.
And you saw the conservative media for what it exists and what it stands for.
They pushed back on it, and that's what people wanted.
And when President Trump came out and said, oh, this is ridiculous, what are you doing?
And what was one of the first things he did when he came to the White House?
What would be the past tense?
He hung a portrait of Andrew Jackson, which is prominent, and you see it all the time when there's a picture taken of Trump.
Who's in the background?
Old Hickory, Colonel Jackson.
That's right, that's right.
Symbols matter.
One of our great precedents.
You know, I looked into Harriet Tubman, actually, when all this talk about putting her on the $20 bill was going to come in, and I thought she might be one of these kind of fake heroes, you know, like the pilots in the Second World War, I forget what they were called.
The Tuskegee Airmen.
The Tuskegee Airmen.
You really look into their record and they were nothing like the superheroes that they were cracked up to be.
But, you know, apparently Harriet Tubman was a really pretty brave woman.
She was herself an escaped slave.
She went back into slave territory repeatedly, at considerable risk to herself, trying to get slaves out across.
But she didn't go very far, just across the Mason-Dixon line, basically.
But she was apparently quite a courageous and competent woman.
So if you really are going to choose somebody to put on a bill, she apparently really worked hard for her people.
Now, I prefer to have Andrew Jackson work hard for his people on the bill.
Yeah, you can say all you want to about Harriet Tubman, but I don't believe... Again, going back, simply, no.
Sorry.
I mean, why?
I mean, we don't need to look into her credentials as, you know, looking what... Andrew Jackson on a random Tuesday in his life.
Perspective does count, but you know what?
her entire life.
What depends on your perspective, Mr. Curtis.
Perspective counts.
Perspective does count, but you know what?
I kind of look at things in the perspective of how is this going to impact, influence,
and motivate our people versus how is this going to engender and engineer even greater
white capitulation, surrender, and guilt.
Exactly.
That's absolutely my perspective as well.
This would be just one more attempt to hammer a nail into the white man's coffin.
It would be a significant nail.
Yes, and it would be quite a precedent too.
Why stop with Andrew Jackson?
Anyway, another story back in the U.S.
This is just a slight little news item here.
I thought it was very interesting.
Apparently there is a couple in Michigan, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
The father is 44 and the mother is 43.
And they have 14 children, all of them boys.
All of them boys.
The oldest is 25 and they just have a newborn.
Now, to me, the significance of this story, and it is just mentioned casually in the reports, that they are members of a church.
I know that there are many people, probably in our audience, who think that churches and Christianity have been a very bad influence on white racial consciousness, and many of them have.
But one thing you can say for churches is that they are organizations that keep married people together, And the people who have large families like this are almost invariably Christian members of sincere Christian churches.
I just wanted to bring this up as just a little news item for those of you who have these embittered feelings about Christianity and churches.
You can seek out positive people and individuals and families that you want to surround yourself with that are going to uplift and are going to be a positive impact on your life.
It's not that hard to find a church that doesn't have ridiculous slogans out front, you know, everyone is welcome, Black Lives Matter, rainbow flags.
There are churches out there still that Advocate positive beliefs and do reinforce them so that a white family like this in Michigan... It's not just the oddity of having a large family.
Why this was such a national story is they've had 14 boys.
That's a statistical anomaly.
That's crazy when you think about the odds of that happening.
This is a healthy, happy family.
And like you noted, it is vital to point out that, yeah, they do belong to a church.
They do belong to a community.
And of course, the primary mechanism that has broken down, I think, the concept of white racial consciousness is the erosion of community, in a sense.
So, I mean, who even knows their neighbors anymore?
One of the stories you told me that had a big impact on me was when you noted how in
the days of our founding fathers, they would constantly be having dinner parties almost
every night.
You can read their journals and they'd have these large, elaborate, ornate dinner parties.
Unfortunately, in 2018 America, dinner parties for white Americans constitute sitting around
of your broken home watching Netflix.
And it's sad.
And part of it is that you have both the mother and the father working.
Who's got the energy to do anything but try to scrape something together and feed the children?
Now, George Washington, after he retired, there were careful, elaborate accounts of who came to dinner.
And the number of times when he and Mrs. Washington dined alone We're just a handful.
It was an extreme rarity for Mr. and Mrs. Washington to dine alone.
They were always immersed in their community, and I agree 100%.
This atomization that white people suffer from, I think by nature we tend to be more individualistic than people of other races, but it separates us not only from family and community, but even more important, or equally important, from our race as well.
And so people think they can go their own way and it doesn't matter.
Well, it matters profoundly.
Yeah, there's nothing more important than shared values, shared heritage, and shared memories.
And unfortunately, you can't expect a solid oak tree to grow overnight.
Friendships take a long time to nurture and to grow to their full potential so that one day they can shield multiple generations of your respective families.
So, if you're feeling down or depressed, or if you just look If you look at modernity and you're stuck in a rut, honest to God, please go out there and do try and find a positive influence.
And if it is a church, good for you.
Find yourself in a community.
Don't live all your life online, trolling message boards and Twitter, because that's not a community.
If you're down and depressed, have 14 children.
That'll prick you up.
Well, and on that note, Mr. Kersey, congratulations again to this Michigan couple that has 14 children, all boys.
Apparently the eldest is married and is expecting, and the first grandchild is going to be a girl.
So, all things even out in the end.
But, thanks so much for coming into the studio, and I look forward to seeing you next week, and have a wonderful week, as well as all of our listeners.
Have a wonderful time, until we speak again.
And real quick, I just want to thank all of our listeners who listened to the episode last week with Henry Wolfe and myself.
We asked that if you would help us out by going to your alma mater's webpage and trying to find out how large the budget is for their diversity center, how many staff, how many employees it has.
We've gotten over 25 people have sent in this information.
So we're going to be able to start to piece together a pretty awesome database, Excel chart.
We want to be able to do this for all the major universities,
all the major conferences.
So please, if you wouldn't mind, go to where you graduated from, find that data out,
and send me over the links to that.
And I can put it all together in a spreadsheet for this really comprehensive report from the New Century
Foundation that I believe will be invaluable to quantifying the true cost of what academia is
doing to dispossess the white majority in this country.
Send them to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again, thank you so much for those who participate in this so far.
More than 25 of you have sent this in.
We really need your help on this crowdsourcing project, so send your information in to sbpdl1 at gmail.com for your university or college, where you graduated from, and for Jared Taylor, I'm Paul Kersey.
Our time is up.
▲
Export Selection