Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 7, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor

01:07:13

Managing the Multicult

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
	This is Henry Wolfe here with the incisive, the intrepid, Paul Kersey.
	Our usual co-host, I am standing in for Jared Taylor today.
	Mr. Kersey.
	I'm sure some would call this podcast insidious.
	Those who would not be listening for our insightful commentary, they would be saying that what we're about to say is nefarious.
	That's true.
	I did like that one of our listeners referred to you as perspicacious, and I thought that that was just a spot on term.
	Well, I just want to take a quick moment to thank all of our listeners.
	You guys are sending in tremendous questions, which we're going to get to at the end.
	of this wonderful podcast.
	I'm excited to be here with Henry Wolfe.
	What I'm really excited about though is this is a tease.
	We've got a project that we need your help on and we're going to get to that in about 20 minutes.
	So be listening because we've got a challenge to every listener out there to help us put together a database that I believe has the potential to be one of those really cool stories based on We can start a conversation, but first we begin with trouble in paradise.
	got from just normal conservatives, normal, normal, you know, slightly red-pilled people.
	We can start a conversation, but first we begin with trouble in paradise. Mr. Kersey,
	in New York City there are these public schools that are considered elite schools, schools like
	Stuyvesant, Brooklyn Technical Schools, probably a lot of our listeners have heard of them.
	They're these really impressive schools.
	I mean, impressive academic achievements.
	Many of their students just get funneled directly into Ivy League and so on.
	But these schools have really provided an opportunity over the years for Asian students, in particular, who come from poor immigrant families, it's provided them an opportunity to get a really top-notch education when they can't afford the private school.
	So a lot of, you know, the older families in America, of course, can afford to get the elite boarding schools and so on and use that as a springboard to the Ivies.
	But in New York City, the Asians, in many cases, rely on these schools.
	But Mayor de Blasio has other ideas, because these schools, despite the fact that blacks and Hispanics in New York City make up 70% of the public schools, they comprise only 10% of the students at these specialized schools.
	On the other hand, Asians, who are 16% of the public school students, are 62% of the specialized school students.
	And, you know, whites are slightly overrepresented.
	They're 5% of the system overall, but 24% of those at specialized schools.
	Stop real quick.
	Think about that.
	In New York City, think about the future of New York when you have, like you just said, 94% of the public school enrollment is non-white.
	That number is the same for the Dallas public school system, Chicago public schools.
	95% of the public school enrollment is non-white.
	That number is the same for the Dallas public school system, Chicago public schools.
	This is one of those stories that a lot of people don't realize how, for lack of a better
	term, how dark the future is in these cities.
	Well, it's kind of bright in terms of the Asian attendance, but at least at these technical schools.
	But yeah, whites, of course, are all going to the fancy public schools and so they don't.
	The prep schools.
	The prep schools and so on.
	That's why the numbers are so low for the system at large.
	But de Blasio wants to boost the numbers of blacks and Hispanics at these schools.
	And he's got a couple ideas for doing so.
	One proposal, one part of his proposal is to set aside 20% of the seats at the schools
	for students from high poverty schools, feeder schools.
	Oh, yeah.
	And these schools are, of course, just overwhelmingly Black and Hispanic.
	And so, you know, there would still be some kind of academic requirements for them.
	They would score slightly below the cutoff on the standardized test, which has been previously used as the sole criterion for admittance to these schools.
	So the Blacks and Hispanics from these poor schools Who score below, they'll get a crack at 20% of the seats.
	But eventually he wants to do away with the test entirely.
	He wants to take the top students from every school and then also, you know, consider also statewide tests and so on.
	But this is kind of like what Texas does in terms of affirmative action to the university system there.
	That was their way of getting past Affirmative Action.
	Yeah, the great Governor George Bush, George W. Bush, was the head of pushing that through, that Affirmative Action program.
	Well, that's not the only brilliant education initiative Bush Jr.
	did.
	He's truly a reformer.
	It's funny, I would argue that George W. Bush tried to do more for minorities than even Barack Obama did.
	Obviously this is not the time for the conversation, but you look at what de Blasio is trying to do, who is a, who is a, Mark, he was a Bolshevik, who is a committed anti-white politician, and you think of what He's trying to do here to set aside these 20% of seats for students from 99% Hispanic or Black public schools.
	George Bush did the exact same thing 25 years ago when he was governor of Texas and it has in some ways crippled some of the colleges within the University of Texas system because of Students who were unprepared to come in to these college programs, and they had to take remedial classes, they failed out.
	This is what's going to happen to these wonderful technical schools.
	Of course.
	I mean, they're going to have to have remedial classes, or at the very least, you know, dumb down the standards.
	Which, you know, we see it happens everywhere.
	So the schools are going to lose their raison d'etre.
	Is what's going to happen.
	Bingo.
	But yeah, so you've got de Blasio proposing this.
	Well, of course, the Asians aren't going to take it lying down, just like out in California, where they're protesting the forced integration of this public housing into their communities.
	The Asians in New York City are up in arms.
	One activist in this New York Times story compares it to the Chinese Exclusion Act.
	He says that the mayor is pitting minority against minority with these efforts.
	And then the school's chancellor, a Hispanic guy named Richard Carranza, he fired back and said, I just don't buy into the narrative that any one ethnic group owns admission to these schools.
	So Carranza, of course, is looking out for his people.
	He wants Hispanics in the spots, and he's willing to do what it takes to get there.
	Last week I watched Bonfire of the Vanities, the movie.
	A much derided movie by Tom Hanks and Bruce Willis.
	There's a great scene where Bruce Willis, who plays the news reporter, is going to interview the teacher of the black kid who was hurt and hospitalized because he wants to find out if he was an honorable student.
	And this is a scene, if you can track down on YouTube, it's very much worth watching because the teacher's like, hey, I just tried not to get spat on, kicked, or called, you know, cracker during class.
	And he's like, well, what would you consider an honor student?
	And the teacher said, if they just showed up.
	Right.
	That's what an honor student is.
	That's what equates someone to get that classification, that designation in the New York public school system.
	Thinking back, Tom Wolfe wrote this book in, what, 87, and the movie was made in 1990, and I was thinking about this as I was reading the story, that just powerful scene where you think about what it's like to teach in these schools, and then there is this oasis of academic liberation.
	For, as we know, largely Asians, because the whites, because let's face it, there is no white middle class left in New York City.
	The white people who live in New York City and Manhattan or Brooklyn, they don't have kids.
	They're just a bunch of hipster gentrifiers.
	Right, they're leaving their kids and going to the prep schools.
	Exactly, exactly.
	So this is almost a situation where we get to see America's non-white future played out.
	Where whites have such little to gain from any of this, except to sit back and laugh and realize this whole concept of diversity being a strength, No, it's artificial.
	It's manufactured.
	Now, minority is being pitted against minority.
	Some of the stats about these schools are pretty shocking.
	Carranza, he mentioned that at Stuyvesant, of 900 incoming freshmen, only 10 are African Americans.
	Is that 1%?
	And that's, look, let's be frank, that's what most Elite colleges would look like as well if we got rid of affirmative action.
	I've got a quick anecdote for you.
	So when I was a freshman in college, one of my friends went to one of the major universities of this state and he called me because he said he heard the funniest joke in an elevator and it had been the first week of school.
	They're going to the elevator and one of his friends said, Hey, you know, I don't see any, I don't see many black people here.
	And one of the people in the elevator riding with him just deadpanned it, because this
	is college.
	And what you just said is right.
	I mean, this is, because you're at a big boy college, you're at a university.
	What do you expect?
	I mean, this is a school that has standards and has qualifications, and absent of state
	mandated quotas, the cream rises to the top.
	And it's, you know, in some ways people like de Blasio, these ideologues, they've got to get rid of little pockets of meritocracy like this because it shows the reality.
	That, you know, the fact is most blacks cannot qualify for, cannot reach these standards.
	And so you've got to eliminate the standard.
	That's a great term you just invented right there.
	Pockets of meritocrity and the sea of the future.
	We think about a couple weeks ago, Jared and I were talking about the Democrat, the black female Democrat who is up for the governorship in Georgia.
	And she was saying, we represent the future.
	And her coalition of course, she's no longer even actively trying to get the white vote in Georgia.
	And you think about what that future, what the left, what the Bolsheviks like de Blasio, what they really see.
	They already envision a future where whites are marginalized and have no voice and don't And are not an active participant in the ongoing managing of this decaying state.
	And I think that pockets of meritocracy is such a fascinating word when you think of these These oases that whites and Asians are trying to carve out of what is increasingly a terrifying wilderness that the United States and these major cities is beginning to sink back to.
	That's right.
	And even in many schools, public schools, you know, where they do set up things like
	honors classes and stuff so that the cream can still rise to the top and still get educated,
	you know, you have movements to get those classes either integrated or eliminated, you
	know, eliminate AP classes if we can't get blacks and Hispanics in.
	And it's just, you know, part of the general egalitarian impulse to try to cut off the
	wheat that grows too high and level everything down to the same height.
	But yeah, you talked about managing diversity and managing these situations.
	And our next story is very demonstrative of that.
	I mean, it's about these universities, these public universities, using tax dollars to manage diversity, which diversity, as we all know, is America's greatest strength.
	It's the best thing we have going for us.
	Somehow, though, it's got to be really nurtured and taken care of in order to be this benefit.
	If you're not careful enough, it could explode and you might end up with riots or something, or you might end up with mass numbers of non-whites flunking out of schools.
	We got to carefully take care of this stuff.
	It's a beautiful thing, but it's fragile.
	It's fragile.
	So at the University of Florida, there's a story this week that a fellow named Antonio Ferris is getting a sweet, sweet job as the first ever Chief Diversity Officer of the school, making a cool $280,000 per year.
	This is such a stunning amount of money for this ensconced diversity.
	13 deep who manage diversity at the University of Florida.
	This is such a stunning amount of money for a for this this ensconced diversity.
	You basically talking about this pockets of meritocracy on campuses all across the country.
	Now you have taxpayer supported really it's state enforced state mandated and state dictated diversity and
	multicultural centers where you now have a you have a forward operating base.
	For the people of future so that they can have their well connected well healed.
	Bye.
	Administrators or professors at other universities basically have a talking circuit to go to, and they can pay them $10,000, $15,000, $20,000 to come in and give a lecture, and then, hey, guess what?
	I'm going down the interstate to the next university.
	That's a lot of what most of these guys do, is they administer programs like this, which are essentially massive redistribution programs to fully fund left-wing activists, but we can get into that a little more.
	But Mr. Kersey, you have to admit that 280k is modest compensation really for this kind of
	job description. It says that Mr. Ferris is going to be quote, overseeing university-wide efforts to
	advance equity, diversity, and inclusion and establish a new standard of inclusive
	excellence. Of course, that doesn't have anything to do with the University of Florida football team or the
	basketball team, which shockingly has a lack of racial diversity when you look at the over-representation
	of blacks.
	I'm not worried about that.
	There was a story that's so important to point out here.
	Texas Christian University in Texas, something like I don't remember the exact numbers, but 90% of the black male student body either played in the football team or the basketball team, and they were saying, gosh, this is so bad.
	We're so underrepresented.
	But if you actually read it, you're like, wait a second.
	Why is it compared to the actual student body of the school?
	Is it that Texas Christian University You know, white or Hispanic or Asian.
	Why are they so underrepresented on the football and basketball team?
	Of course, you're not supposed to ask that.
	No.
	That's diversity of thought.
	That's not tolerated.
	But this position Mr. Farris has, I mean, this is an opportunity for Mr. Farris, the CDO at the University of Florida.
	If he's able to, whatever metrics, to accrue that great bonus at the end of the year, he can then take that, put it on his resume, and he can go to the major corporations all across the country Fortune 500 companies, and he can then try and climb that diversity ladder to that next great job where he's probably making double with great stock options, getting paid dividends for, you know, your Exxon or your Chevron.
	Because all companies, I mean, this is the future.
	All companies are going to have that chief diversity officer and that strict mandate.
	Well, they already do.
	Well, they do, but this is that pipeline.
	Where do you think this talent is coming from?
	You've got to cultivate the talent.
	You've got to cultivate the talent.
	And, you know, really these are just glorified positions to a expound upon leftist ideology.
	Yes, basically anti-white ideology.
	To put on anti-white programs, to jam as many non-whites as they can into open roles at the school.
	It's to cultivate a sense of resentment, negative group identity in the various non-white groups as well as like homosexuals and so on.
	And get them all militant and agitated against the white heteronormative power structure.
	And being prepared to advocate on behalf of those poor black bodies whenever there's a hate hoax that can then be the catalyst for change, as we saw at the University of Missouri, where this type of forward operating base for diversity, the Diversity Center, They sprung into action, they coordinated, they mobilized their rabidly anti-white army of these disparate groups, the Umbrella Coalition.
	Again, as we saw with that prior story in New York, at the end of the day, the main thing uniting all these groups is their hatred of the white majority.
	But when the white majority becomes a pitiful, voiceless minority, They look around each other and they have to find someone else to channel their energy forward.
	And they will.
	But for now, they're trying their best to dismantle the white legacy.
	And that's exactly what the UF president, Kevin Fuchs, said when he announced the position.
	He said, we created this position at UF because UF, like many southern universities, has a legacy that includes not always welcoming people of diverse backgrounds.
	This is a significant step in addressing the cultural changes that must continue to take place at the University of Florida.
	Gainesville is a really cool southern city.
	Obviously, Tom Petty was from there.
	Tom Petty used to proudly fly the Confederate flag at all of his concerts.
	Then he apologized and backtracked when that became unfashionable.
	It sounds like the cultural changes we need to make.
	Exactly!
	And then of course he dies of a drug overdose a couple years ago.
	I guess it was last year.
	But no, Gainesville is a cosmopolitan place.
	I visited there in the early 2000s and I was shocked by the United Nations has a huge presence on that campus.
	It's a lot like the University of Georgia and some other schools where you've got just this Rabidly, but bluntly, just an insane ideological mentality that is pervasive and dominates the campus.
	And now we're seeing with this position, this is a logical conclusion.
	Any statue to a white person.
	I wouldn't be surprised if in 20 years they don't consider taking down Tim Tebow's statue that's in front of Bill Hill Griffin Stadium there because Tim Tebow has yet to distance himself from some of his comments he made about homosexuals, homosexuality, gay marriage.
	Or Steve Spurrier's statue coming down because he played on an all-white team.
	When you won the Heisman Trophy back in 1967.
	There you go.
	One thing is certain though that University of Florida has a lot of work to do because there are shining examples of diversity administrations at schools like the University of Michigan.
	We got another story this week that the University of Michigan has 93 full-time diversity staff, 26 of whom make salaries over $100,000.
	Now compare that to the University of Florida's Full-time diversity staff, but they only have 13.
	14 now, but they really have to step up their game.
	One thing that people don't point out about this is, you know, our listeners are probably familiar with this, but the American public at large isn't, that university systems, the cost of tuition has just skyrocketed over the years.
	And it's not because the faculty are being paid more or sorry, the professors are being paid more.
	It's not because there are more of them.
	It's because of these bloated administrations.
	The number of administrators has gone up just Many hundreds of percent.
	They're a phenomenal chart.
	You can actually look at the professors versus the administrators, and the administrator is just astronomical in terms of the rise and the percentage increase.
	And what I'd love to see is numbers on what percent of the rise in administrators is attributable to these diversicrats.
	This University of Michigan story, Mr. Wolf, I saw it on a lot of places.
	Obviously, the conservative media.
	This is a story That's safe for them to promote because it allows them to be like well this is you know this is uh what's that website campus reform or some of these silly uh right of center somewhat nominally right yeah college fix this is a story again it's it's obscene it it is it is shocking when you think about that extreme amount of money that
	Well, it's one of the implicitly pro-white stories that they're allowed to promote without, you know, while maintaining plausible deniability.
	So they can, all their white readers, which, you know, probably comprises 95% of their readership, can get, you know, all worked up.
	So you're saying that it would be Koch brother approved because it's an appropriation of state funds?
	That's right, 100%.
	But the thing that people won't point out is that All these non-whites who are, you know, supposedly benefiting from being coddled and having their, you know, resentment stoked and so on by these administrators, they're also footing the bill.
	I mean, of course, many of them are there on scholarships, but the ones who do manage to graduate or even drop out, many of them are saddled with student debt. Yeah. And it just it's crippling. I mean you
	can't default on student debt except under extreme circumstances and you
	know it's ruining a lot of these people's lives. First of all they're underqualified
	to be at the schools anyways so they end up either flunking out or just
	being hopelessly stressed. What do you say about an African-American I'm
	sorry what do you say about a bachelors in African-American history?
	Are you saying that that doesn't have much value on the free market?
	No.
	Except for when you're the next Antonio Farris.
	I mean, that's actually the thing.
	I think a lot of these positions are created because it gives them something to work toward.
	Like if you're majoring, I think Antonio Farris majored in something like inter-ethnic studies.
	Well, last week, Mr. Taylor and I spoke about the mayor of Stockton, who his undergrad was in, I think it was black
	studies or, or, or ethnic studies at Stanford.
	And his wife is majoring in the same things.
	And now they're both getting grants and scholarships to go to elite colleges that have these.
	So peripheral degree tracks or or or PhD tracks in African-American studies is a client. What what are you going to do with
	that? Except go to another school and start another department or like you just said, this burgeoning, this
	growing, this, you know, obviously it's got an incredible growth market.
	If you're looking at, you know, a staff of 14 at the University of Florida and like you, like we've been joking
	about here, a staff of 93 full time diversity staff at the University of Michigan.
	And again, we've got to point out 26 of them are.
	Just back of that, that's what 2.6 million right there?
	Yeah.
	It's an incredible amount of money.
	So what we want to find out, tell them, Mr. Chris.
	Yeah, well, here's an idea I have.
	Our listeners send such great questions in.
	Well, what I want to do is I want to challenge everyone listening to this right now.
	Think about your alma mater.
	And what we here at American Renaissance, what we want to do is we want to put together a study.
	We want to put together a white paper.
	We want to put together a graph.
	That breaks down the diversity departments on college campuses all across the country.
	We'd like to do, you know, the Southeastern Conference, the Atlantic Coast Conference, the Big Ten.
	So wherever you went to school, was it Northwestern?
	Is it Purdue?
	Is it University of Tennessee?
	Ideally public colleges because then we can talk about, in universities, we could talk about The taxpayer money going into it, also the salaries are public records.
	And because, yeah, exactly what you just said.
	At state-funded colleges, universities, that is a public record.
	So what I'd like to ask all of our listeners to do, think about the college that you went to, log on, and what we'd like to see is if you guys can send us the webpage that breaks down The database that breaks down the number of employees at the Diversity Center, the staff, the salary, and the budget.
	And I'd love to see this as well.
	This is something I just thought of.
	A lot of these campuses are building these huge citadels, these huge massive buildings, student centers devoted entirely to diversity.
	We'd love to know the budget for those buildings.
	We'd love to actually see the building and see these For an operating basis for the dissemination of anti-white ideology on campuses nationwide, I think this could be a very powerful report based on what we saw with the reaction to the University of Michigan story.
	I had friends that I never would have thought would be motivated to send me this story.
	They just said, hey, did you see this story?
	Right.
	And can you believe 93 full-time staff?
	What is this?
	The Manhattan Project?
	I know.
	And what we'd love to do is we'd like to put together this database to put together a report and break it down.
	So send when you find out that information, send the link over to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
	Once again, that Email address is sbpdl1 at gmail.com and myself, Henry, I'll compile all the data.
	We'll get into a spreadsheet.
	We'll have some fun putting this together and, you know, we can do what, I can't remember what the guy's name down at University of Central Florida does, but they've got a whole institute there at that campus where they break down the racial demographics of the, you know, the front offices of all the sports All the professional sports to try and denigrate the fact that too many white people are still employed or stuff like that.
	We'd like to turn it around.
	We'd like to actually show, well, let's quantify the cost of this diversity initiative that's taking place nationwide and is being almost entirely subsidized with our taxpayer dollars.
	So we need your help.
	We need help from the community.
	And we like the community.
	We love community around here.
	It brings us to our next story which is a big piece that the New York Times published, not too big, but on trad wives.
	All the media, they love getting their latest angle on the alt-right.
	You know, what they can talk about, what music do they listen to, what memes are they sharing, whatever.
	I guess they get clicks out of it or whatever, but one story that's been recurring... Well, the alt-right is the last boogeyman that really has left.
	Yeah, of course.
	And so they like to analyze their little...
	They're a little demon.
	But, yeah, one of the angles that they keep going after is analyzing, like, women in the alt-right.
	And why does the movement have so few women?
	Why weren't there women at Charlottesville as though, like, women would go to a rally where, like, violence is being threatened against them?
	No one should have been at Charlottesville.
	I'll say it again.
	No one should have been at Charlottesville.
	I mean, come on, let's... Yeah, well, I mean... Anyways.
	In any case, they, you know, are...
	perpetually trying to do this kind of thing where they say, they basically pathologize anyone who's involved in white identity politics.
	You know, if you're concerned that white people are being dispossessed from the country, from the institutions, if you're concerned that your neighborhood, your state is turning majority non-white, if you're concerned that Western culture and identity is being denigrated or disappearing altogether, You must be motivated by economic anxiety or probably some kind of like sexual problem.
	Maybe you're involuntarily celibate.
	You know, you need to get laid, bro.
	You need to get a job and that'll solve everything.
	Is that the whole incel movement?
	That's the whole incel movement.
	That's why they love talking about that.
	But so, this piece was about, focused on women specifically, and it does the same kind of thing.
	It's this typical left-wing method of analysis where everything gets reduced to the most base motives.
	You know, Marxism did it with class.
	You know, everything is, all of your problems are a result of, you know, false consciousness or oppression by the bourgeoisie and so on.
	Or Freudianism, where all of your problems are because you secretly want to have sex with your mother, or you have penis envy or something.
	Tell me about your mother, Mr. Wolf.
	Exactly.
	So they did the same kind of thing in this article, and they say that women become tradwives because they are of a frustrated yearning for a mythic past of material abundance.
	Yeah, the idea is that women start supporting this trad wife idea because they're stuck in cubicle jobs and, you know, they yearn for a time when a household could get by on a single income.
	And it's like, first of all, What's wrong with that?
	Why wouldn't a woman want to prefer having a family and being a homemaker as opposed to doing grunt work in a cubicle?
	There's a reason why people love Little House on the Prairie so much.
	There's a reason why that young adult series of books about the Amish is so popular with females.
	And there's a reason why one of the most popular movies of all time is still Sound of Music, which is a glorification of large families.
	No, this can only come from a sense of economic anxiety.
	There's nothing about women that yearns for children, that yearns for a nice home, and so on.
	Well, it's funny, because this line you just quoted, Mr. Wolf, a, quote, frustrated yearning for a mythic past of material abundance, end quote.
	That's nonsense.
	Most people growing up Even going back to just maybe a generation ago, they didn't have material abundance.
	Think about what we have now.
	You just talked about that soulless, culturalist, cubicle life.
	What was that great tweet that was so popular that some photographer put out the other day where she goes, imagine yourself in 20 years as the cool aunt who comes back from exotic vacations.
	With wine and so on?
	on That is the reality.
	It's not a mythic past.
	She already is living in a world of material abundance.
	A plethora of options that can keep her away from this purported mythic past.
	I was astounded when I saw that tweet and the number of retweets it got.
	It was one of these Ladies who have reached the end of their childbearing years and have nothing to show for it in terms of a family, they have to justify their lifestyles.
	And so it's going to catch a lot of traction because they've got to coddle each other and they've got to try and convince themselves as they're crying into their pillows at night that everything's okay and that somehow they're still cool.
	And really, it's just sad.
	But yeah, this article, it also says that, you know, that these tradwives, this subgroup of women who are racially conscious, they advocate dressing modestly.
	And that the reason that they advocate dressing modestly, it's not for any of the reasons of the past, you know, that since time immemorial, societies have advocated modest dress for women.
	It's not because of any of those reasons.
	It's because, quote, they are, well, let's see, the deliberately hyper feminine aesthetics are constructed precisely to match the authoritarianism of the ideology.
	Yeah.
	Masculine authoritarianism of their ideology.
	It's fascinating when you think that, dressing modestly to hide authoritarianism, this is the same newspaper, the New York Times, that is constantly blasting any European nation that wants to ban the burqa, which of course is a true sign of Saracen authoritarianism and misogyny.
	But in this case, when women are just doing it because it's a rejection of the hedonistic, for lack of a better term, thought.
	Lifestyle thought of course is a is an acronym for it's a lewd acronym for that hoe over there that is very popular
	Online, and it's actually it's a hilarious word to say it rolls off the tongue nicely
	It's not one that I use that often, but reading this piece I mean the the women that were profiled in this article are
	just lovely women are beautiful beautiful individuals who are trying to raise
	great families and to be to be to be forced to
	Have their entire life under a microscope and and magnified to this to this to this evil
	The New York Times audience really are the same people who are trying to keep their children away from the colored masses in New York City that are the public school students.
	That's right.
	They're sending their kids, I'm sure, that New York Times writers, their kids comprise the 5% in public schools.
	And yet here they are, blasting the backwards white Americans who realize that something is rotten in Denmark, that something is wrong with 2018 America.
	And they're rejecting the state-mandated norms of, you know, whether it's from the... I mean, you know, this month is Pride Month, and I'm sure there are many fantastic homosexual listeners to this podcast, but this corporate-mandated celebration of this is just getting Over the top in a lot of ways.
	And it's just, you know, largely, once again, it's about pitting people against people, creating that umbrella of resentment.
	Exactly.
	That's the driving force.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	They go on to say that, you know, the trad wife offers some kind of false solution to female fears of objectification and sexual violence.
	And so on and so once again, you know, getting married and having children and not, you know, going out and getting drunk, you know, every weekend getting wasted and then getting assaulted like this is somehow, you know.
	Preferring the first to the latter is somehow a result of fear and not just genuine desire.
	You know, this is the thing.
	They're like, oh, you know, guys who are racially conscious, like they support, um, all this, all this manliness stuff.
	They support going to the gym and all this stuff.
	It's like, yeah, look, we want to become the best versions of, uh, of what we can be.
	We want to embrace our identity.
	And that's not just a racial identity.
	It's also, A sexual identity.
	It's, you know, in terms of place, we want to have a real robust identity.
	And these women who are supporting this, they're embracing their feminine identities.
	And of course, this is a great danger to the New York Times, to the managerial elites who prefer that women be slaving away in a corporate setting as opposed to raising the next generation.
	Yeah, I mean, you look at the marketing.
	I love, you know, one of the reasons to still be on Twitter is to be able to look at all the ads that you see people taking snapshots of and comparing them of, you know, they always have white women with a couple children and the white woman looks distressed and why you shouldn't have kids.
	Of course, the famous Time, or was it Time or Newsweek?
	Where it was, you know, the childless future, there's a white guy and a white woman on a beach, they're laying there having a wonderful time, and then you compare that to the National Geographic article, the New Europeans, and it's a bunch of Saracens, a bunch of Muslims, and you just think of just the incredible amount of propaganda that is spewed out.
	It's amazing, Mr. Wolf, that white people are still even having children at this point.
	Because you're from a very young age.
	Millennials, Generation Z.
	I can only imagine what it's like for children in kindergarten, where now they're getting white privilege lectures in kindergarten, and how bad it's going to be.
	But the fact remains, white people are still having children.
	Well, nature reasserts itself.
	Nature finds a way.
	Nature finds a way.
	And, you know, having children is the most natural thing that anyone can do.
	And certainly, you know, women, that's where I think they probably end up finding their greatest sense of fulfillment.
	And that's not a misogynistic statement, what you just said.
	That is a simple statement of evolutionary fact based upon all known record of what constitutes Western civilization up until about, what, 60, 70, 80 years ago with, you know, when the feminist mystique came out and then the battle of the sexes began.
	I mean, I don't want to get an artiste-style rant here, but Mr. Wolf, I know that I can think of a lot of my friends who wasted their 20s and then they started to have children in their early 30s and they think to themselves, why did we put this off?
	Why did we allow this hedonistic lifestyle to cloud a world that We should have embraced a while before, and that is of course having children.
	And that is, having a white child is the most seditious thing you can do in this society.
	There is no doubt about that.
	I mean, remember a couple years ago, I don't recall, was it a German government piece where they said that, they had that picture of the blonde family and they said that, you know, having Blonde children that are happy is like authoritarianism or something.
	I don't remember the exact... That sounds about right.
	Yeah, and you just think about the state, you know, going back to what we were talking about, these diversity centers being, you know, diversity of state, enforced state, mandated state, dictated.
	There is a concerted effort to try and keep And guess what?
	It doesn't come from a place of resentment.
	I know it's hard for them to understand because, you know, this lady, I'm sure that she's a feminist.
	more seditious and yet at the same time delicious than being a father or a
	mother and and and guess what it doesn't come from a place of resentment I know
	it's hard for them to understand because you know this lady I'm sure that she's
	she's a feminist I looked up her bio and you know so her she's motivated really
	by resentment and really a lot of people on the left are it's It's hatred of either white people, hatred of men, hatred of normalcy, of bourgeois normalcy, of people who have families and so on.
	There's a lot of hatred and a lot of resentment and it's not coming from us.
	You know, my fiancée is probably an aspiring trad wife and she's never at any point said that she's like that because of, you know, economic anxiety, because of fear of sexual assault or something like this.
	It's, it's simply a pure desire to have a family.
	The people who attacked this, this movement of trad wives are the same people who will go to Haiti because they want to help out these poor, impoverished, uh, blacks and they'll get raped.
	And then they won't want to report it because there'll be a shame that there'll be afraid that it will.
	No, they've channeled their maternal instincts to the entire third world.
	I mean, that's effectively what it is.
	They've passed the age where they could have their own families.
	And, you know, so now they channel those instincts toward the third world.
	It's really just quite sad.
	You know, this has been a fun conversation because this is a story, hopefully we can talk to our good friend Gregory Hood to really go into this.
	Because this seems up his alley of a necessary piece.
	Because again, we are seeing so many wonderful signs in Europe where the Polish birth rate is rising, the Hungarian birth rate is rising, even the Russian birth rate is rising.
	Some of the moves that Putin is doing, where the state as In opposition to Western Europe and the United States, where the state seems dedicated to trying to keep the white birthrate down and doing everything they can to convince whites not to have children, guess what happens when the state comes in and says, we want large, robust families?
	There was a great story the other day where the Hungarian president... Orban.
	Orban.
	He said, you know, there's nothing more important to us than children.
	And it's, you know, Voice of Europe.
	My favorite website, Voice of Europe.
	It is such a great website to go to, to see what's going on in there.
	And that story was one of the more shared pieces.
	And it is an uplifting story because, again, who is going to keep this society going once we're gone?
	Our children.
	That's my favorite line from the movie The Village.
	Where they try and create, that's one of M. Night Shyamalan's best films, they try and create this... You could even call The Village a Trad Wife style movie.
	Where people reject the violence, the cynicism, and the dystopia of modernity.
	And they create this world set in, I guess you would say, 19th century America.
	And there's this great line where they're trying to keep the myth of these monsters
	that are keeping the people within the city alive.
	And they're like, why did you send her to go get medicine?
	And William Hurt's character says, who do you think is going to keep all of this alive
	when we're gone?
	And to the American Renaissance listeners of this podcast, dusty books don't procreate.
	A book by Madison Grant, or a book by Lothar Stoddard, or a book by Jared Taylor, or a book by Gregory Hood, you can name them.
	They're not going to have children.
	They're going to motivate people, but what is truly going to be a motivating factor for everyone Is when you wake up every morning and you go to your child's room and they hug you.
	And they say, good morning mom, good morning dad.
	I want you all to understand that that is such a powerful thing that will motivate you more than any other story or idea you ever encounter.
	Because you know that everything you do is for the world that they are going to have to one day face on their own.
	That's a very good and uplifting message.
	Let's move on to some questions.
	Questions from our listeners.
	We love our listeners.
	They've sent us in some good ones, and our first contributor here is Franz.
	And Franz asked what has got to be the best possible question for Paul Kersey, which is, what is Paul's favorite superhero movie?
	It's funny you would ask that, Mr. Wolf.
	It's almost as good as asking, what's your favorite astronaut?
	Well, I'll tell you what.
	Favorite actress, Patrick Swayze, of course.
	But no, I'm getting ready to go see Han Solo, which you can't constitute as a superhero movie, but people are attacking that Mr. Wolf for failing at the box office, as it has.
	for its hyper-masculinity and having too many white people as heroes.
	And in our Black Panther-centric world, people are saying maybe we need to do away
	with the white action star.
	So let me answer this in two parts.
	One, my favorite superhero movie of all time is a 1996 film, The Phantom, with Billy Zane as the Phantom.
	The one reason why I love that movie is because the whole concept of The Phantom
	is that it's passed down from father to son, from generation to generation,
	and it's about honoring your ancestors, protecting your legacy, and it's a beautiful, fun film.
	And I just love that character, because again, the concept is The Phantom
	is the ghost who walks, he never dies, but really, in reality,
	he can date back the mantle of The Phantom to his ancestors starting, I think, in the 17th century,
	and it's passed down, and obviously The Phantom's always Caucasian,
	and so there's that implicit notion of racial lineage But my favorite film, this is one that I had the opportunity to see in theaters back in 2012 with actually Gregory Hood.
	We went and saw it, and I would say that it is The Dark Knight Rises, the culmination of the three-part Christopher Nolan Batman trilogy, sort of the reinvention, inserting Batman into a world where Bruce Wayne doesn't have to contend with superheroes like Kal-El that you saw in the Justice League.
	It just doesn't work.
	Batman does not work.
	Live action wise in a world where you have people who can fly around he works best when it's just a man his intelligence and whatever armaments he can have competing to bring down criminals and of course in this series you have the introduction of Bane as the new leader of the League of Shadows taking Taking over the leadership of that quasi-criminal organization from Ra's al Ghul who was featured in Batman Begins.
	I know you're a big fan of this film.
	You could call it criminal organization.
	I said quasi!
	Or you could call it an esoteric order dedicated to accelerationism and pushing that which is falling.
	But that's part of the duality of this movie is that there's redeeming elements to the bad guys.
	And that's one thing about Nolan is that he doesn't create this manichaean world where Batman is universally good and whoever the villain is is universally bad.
	There's mixed elements.
	I mean, the world that Bane is trying to end, Gotham City at the time, is hopelessly corrupt.
	People of your status deserve to see the next era of Western civilization.
	That's right.
	It's being propped up by lies, but underneath, and the mass arrest of mass incarceration and so on.
	And Bane said, you know, he's part of this esoteric order that believes that at a certain time, A society has reached its end and it just needs to be pushed over the edge.
	But Batman is the kind of conservative who wants to stick around and continue propping it up and continue nipping around the edges of something which Bane would argue is just hopelessly corrupt.
	And it's funny because at the end of the movie he does leave Gotham City.
	He tries, you know, spoiler alert, Batman foils the League of Shadows plans.
	And so doing, the idea is that he sacrificed his life, there's this big celebration, they build a statue to Batman, but Bruce Wayne, he survives and he's off in Europe, gallivanting with Catwoman, and I love the film.
	It's the centerpiece of an upcoming book, actually, that American Renaissance's own Gregory Hood edited, and it's coming out by counter-occurrence with the venerable Dr. Greg Johnson, and it's a look at Batman.
	from a right-wing, racial perspective.
	And it's a fantastic collection.
	I read it and, you know, people can joke and they can say, oh, you know, why do you guys even engage culture?
	Well, if we're not engaging culture, we're, we're basically cutting off our nose to spite our face.
	We're not putting out articles that, from a search engine perspective, people can read and they can find and be like, wow, I never thought about this movie.
	I never thought about The Dark Knight.
	You know, it's funny, when I watch Batman Begins, I like some of the concepts of what The League of Shadows, where they were talking about when a society grows too decadent, or when a forest grows too wild, a purging fire is natural and inevitable, which is one of my favorite lines of the Batman Begins film, spoken by Ra's al Ghul.
	And so it's so great that It's fantastic that people like Gregory Hood and Greg Johnson are putting out these articles, reviews of movies, reviews of television shows, and compilations where you actually get a proper perspective.
	I mean, in my opinion, one of the more right-wing pieces of fiction I've ever read was Frank Miller's The Dark Knight.
	From 1986 I think that came out.
	I remember I read it in early 2000s and it's just this powerful story where basically Batman comes out and he's, you know, I'm not endorsing fascism or anything here, but he's, you know, what is a superhero?
	Somebody who goes beyond The legal system, you know, because the state has a monopoly on violence.
	And the movie actually touches on this again, too.
	And the Dark Knight movie, where Batman goes beyond what the state is allowing normal citizens to do.
	He's a vigilante.
	That's right.
	I mean, you could say, I referred to him as a conservative earlier, but in a sense you could say that he's fascistic because he does go above the rule of law.
	You know, conservatism has a No, I mean, we don't have enough time to talk about the trilogy, but it is something that I am very encouraged that Hood and Johnson are co-editing this collection.
	It's going to be fantastic.
	It's going to be available next month, and it's something that I encourage all American Renaissance podcast listeners to check out.
	Let me ask you the next question here from our boy Franz, I believe.
	He asks, Can all tech ever really be a viable alternative?
	And I guess we should preface this by explaining what all tech means.
	Yeah.
	So all tech is basically, you know, social media platforms, but not just social media, you know, eventually even up to, you know, ISPs or domain service providers.
	People basically providing alternate infrastructure on which, you know, people who are of dissident views cannot be censored or or it's run by dissidents themselves.
	And so you've got platforms that already exist like BitChute, which is a kind of YouTube equivalent.
	You've got Gab, which is a Twitter equivalent.
	You know, there were rumblings for a while of people creating a domain service, a domain provider.
	Yeah.
	You have Vote, which is a, which is a Kind of facsimile of Reddit.
	Yeah.
	So there, these social media sites are already popping up and we see that they're going to become increasingly necessary for, you know, dissonant views to be on the internet at all.
	Are they a viable alternative?
	Yes and no.
	What I would say is that Right now, people should still take advantage of the dominant platforms.
	They should go on YouTube.
	They should go on Twitter and Facebook.
	And some people say you shouldn't.
	Some people say these are evil corporations.
	Why are you supporting them by being on there?
	Look, we're in the business of educating people, of winning people over to our ideas.
	Hearts and minds.
	Hearts and minds.
	That's what we're in the business of.
	And that's where the people are.
	You know, the point is you've got to use the system to your advantage.
	And certainly, if you want to talk about the people on the other side, they're using the system to their advantage.
	Well, they are the system.
	They are the system, of course.
	But they used it to their advantage.
	Let me just jump on exactly what you're saying.
	you should be using everything that you can until you're removed, until you lose access to it.
	And then get back on under a different name, under a different IP address, whatever you've got to do.
	But I would say at the same time, you should also be cultivating a presence
	on the alt text sites, because there could come a time
	when the sensors are just so good.
	And it looks like they're headed in this direction.
	I mean, you read stories about YouTube and Facebook hiring tens of thousands of employees who are just going to be sitting there censoring content all day.
	They know what a threat that we are, and they do not want to contend with our ideas, which is one of the reasons why videos that come out from American Renaissance on YouTube are quickly quarantined on YouTube, so they're not searchable.
	In some cases, yeah.
	I know that on Twitter, you can no longer...
	This is a true story, and I've never actually told this.
	In late 2015, there were two websites that you could no longer link to, whether you were trying to do a tiny URL, you couldn't do that, or just do it directly.
	But Vox Day's website and SBPDL, Twitter, Stopped allowing those to be shared on on their platform.
	Yeah, it said that this was malicious and it would give you I've got the screenshot it's incredible and so that was in 20 that was in late 2015 and that's Twitter at that point it exploded the amount of traffic that Regrettably was lost from that It's hard to it's hard to fathom how much was actually lost because the the PK Twitter the the Paul Kersey account I won't say the exact number because I don't want to get kicked off like AR, but it's got a lot of followers and it's a good voice.
	I don't want to step on anyone's shoes here.
	I'm going to come out and I'm going to say that it's not viable unless we have significant funding.
	Without significant funding, without a way to have credit card processing, and to be able to collect payments anonymously.
	I mean, how many times have... How many stories have you read of people getting kicked off of Bitcoin?
	Well, the question is, can it ever be a viable alternative?
	You're going to have to have a lot of funding.
	You're going to have to have forward-thinking people.
	And look, websites like Gab already have gotten multi-million dollar funding.
	Yeah, ICOs.
	Support.
	And I commend those guys, because those guys are the people who are picking up a flag that has been discarded, where all the people who have been booted off of these various platforms, You booted off of these various software, whether it's Twitter, whether it's Facebook, whether it's Reddit.
	I mean, my God, the best Reddit sub-account got kicked off.
	It was called Uncensored, Mr. Wolf, and it had about 120,000 people subscribed to this thread.
	It was an amazing way to drive traffic.
	I would post a story on there on Sundays, and it would be upvoted 1,000 times, and I'd be able to go to analytics and be like, holy cow, that just drove 3,000 people in one day.
	That's gone.
	That was removed by the Reddit and there hasn't been anything that has risen in place.
	But you've gotta keep...
	Sprouting up on these platforms.
	Innovation.
	While it's still possible.
	Eventually, you know, the algorithms may be good enough and the number of sensors they have employed may be good enough that it's just impossible to do anything.
	But until that time happens, people should be on those platforms.
	People should also be supporting the nascent upstarts.
	Yes.
	Because that's our redoubt once we do get fully censored.
	And what I would say, what I envisage for the future is a time when we basically fuse old forms of activism with new forms of activism.
	What I imagine is, and you already see some of this, Local areas of local networks of activists getting together and going out and handing out, you know, let's say business cards that have on them certain URLs and maybe that URL is to like a bit shoot channel where you can find all of, you know, Ramsey Paul's archive videos or something.
	Of course, I foresee a future where we have to all learn Morse code to communicate because the sensors are so, uh, You know, you can you can do stuff, you know, you think back in the day, if you wanted to spread a dissident political message, you had to stand on a street corner and pass out pamphlets.
	But now you can send people to certain URLs where you know that things will remain up and they can go there and receive a full education.
	They're not just getting a couple of talking points.
	They're getting a full education.
	And so I foresee some kind of fusion of old activism, new activism, or old activism and new tech.
	And at that point, I do think it'll be a viable option, certainly better than going all the way back to just like, you know, pamphlets and books.
	The days of menstruation and American Renaissance.
	Exactly.
	Yeah, that's just too costly.
	Main thing to say in closing for this question is, Support those who are taking chances and who have a track record of success when and and growing and attracting quality people yeah, because you know That's the most important thing when you're when you're gonna put your time money in your effort I mean your time is finite when the day is gone.
	It's expired and you only have a you know, X amount of hours and minutes and hours per day
	to invest in doing stuff. So make sure that you're doing it with a platform that has
	responsible gatekeepers. And there are some very good alternatives. Like you said, I would say
	that Gab has built something that can be replicated along with BetShoot. So great work there.
	Our next question comes from Philip.
	Philip says, as a recently racially awakened American man and a weekly listener to the
	American Renaissance podcast, how can I increase my representation in public in the face of such
	double standards?
	That is, a Black or Hispanic individual can speak openly about advocating for his people, even in the corporate workspace.
	With my generation, 35 and under, entirely brainwashed into a reactionary response to anything positive espoused regarding whites as racist, I want to red pill If I may be so bold to answer this real quick, and I'll let you go in, because I love, we've spoken before we did this, we kind of storyboarded out how we wanted to answer this, but I just want to say that if you're in a corporate environment where there's an HR department that you could be directed to, or you could be tattled on, and forced to go and question your ideas, keep your mouth shut.
	Be quiet.
	You need to protect yourself.
	If you have a family, protect yourself and them.
	Get your paycheck.
	Get your bonus.
	Get your 401k maxed out.
	Get your Roth IRA.
	Hopefully you're making more so you'll qualify for a Roth IRA.
	Do everything you can in the corporate environment to protect yourself so you can grow, you can be nurtured, and you can climb that ladder and you can get into a position where Yeah, you might be able to hire some people underneath you and then you can dictate to them once you've gotten to a place.
	But you, in a corporate environment, you are living and you are a target already.
	You're an occupied territory.
	Just as a white heterosexual male, you are an occupied territory to a degree that would leave, you know, Soldiers in war not feeling the vulnerabilities.
	They would want to be prisoners of war as opposed to being where you are as a prisoner of diversity and the anti-white ideology.
	But Mr. Wolf has a wonderful answer here.
	Well, what I would say is that if you are in that corporate environment, you're better off focusing your efforts on social media than trying to convert your colleagues and so on.
	You know, you can have anonymous accounts on social media, you can push a message there and reach many more people than probably even exist in your corporate environment if you put out quality content.
	So focus on social media if you're in that kind of environment.
	But if you're absolutely dead set on, you know, converting your colleagues to our way of thinking, you know, there's there's this book, Dedication and Leadership, which if anyone is serious about our cause, you should read it.
	And it's by a former communist, British communist, Douglas Hyde, who was involved in the Communist Party.
	And, you know, he converted to Christianity and got away from communism.
	He talks a lot about how the communists got their recruits, and one of the things they heavily emphasized was that you have got to be the absolute best at whatever it is that you're doing.
	If that's welding, you've got to be the best welder.
	If it's, you know, masonry, you've got to be the best mason.
	You've got to rise to leadership positions, managerial positions.
	You've got to, well they would probably not like that, but you've got to be At the top of your game, both in terms of your competence at your job, also in terms of your character, in terms of your family life, you've got to be an upstanding individual.
	And I would say the same is true for our people.
	You have got to be, wherever you are, whatever you're doing, you've got to be an example of excellence.
	And if you do that, and if people see that fire in you, that passion, They'll come to you and they'll say, what is it about you?
	What is it that inspires you?
	What is it that gets you to, to be the first one at the job site?
	What is it that gets you to be, uh, you know, the, the person who's making the top ranks and so on.
	And then you can tell them, look, I'm just very, I'm very passionate about, uh, about, My job, I'm very passionate about my people, about my culture, about my civilization.
	You can slowly bring them into seeing what drives you.
	And you're in a much better position as a messenger at that point if people respect you in other ways.
	When the pupil is ready, the master will appear.
	So first master yourself, then you can be prepared to be a pedagogue to those who are ready and willing.
	So I think that Mr. Wolf's answer is beautiful, wonderfully stated.
	Go back and listen to that a second time, Philip, the gentleman who sent this in, because he just gave you some wonderful pearls of wisdom.
	And I would encourage all of our listeners to go back and listen to that one more time, especially if you're in a similar situation where you feel like you can do more And you have all this knowledge and it's ready to come out of every pore and you're looking at what's going on in the world and you're thinking to yourself, I've got to do something.
	I've got to tell all these people.
	Sit back, step back, master yourself.
	The more and more people, as the days go on, are going to have to confront the lies of this state, of this dystopia that we live in, this racial dystopia.
	And when the pupil is ready, the master will appear.
	Master yourself before you dare take that next step to mentoring other people.
	And I would say beyond that, you're probably better off trying to get out of the corporate environment.
	Try to start your own business.
	Try to become autonomous.
	Try to become self-sustaining to the extent that you can.
	And that's advice I would give to anyone who sees themselves as, you know, a white advocate, race realist.
	You want to be in a position where you're not, you don't have this sword of Damocles hanging over your head.
	You know, you want to be where you're in control of your fate and you can speak your mind a little more.
	A lot of people don't like him.
	I do.
	Mike Cernovich has always said that what is money?
	Nothing more than freedom.
	Yeah.
	So I think that, I think that people on our, a lot of people on our side, you know, don't understand what that truly represents and everything Mr. Wolf just said about that sword of Damocles.
	If you can, if you can say, Hey, I'm going to go stand somewhere else because that sword It doesn't really affect me anymore or impact my present and future.
	Then you truly are a warrior being prepared to become that spokesperson, that avatar that we need.
	Great question!
	Start your own business if you can.
	Get rental properties.
	Start trying to own things that will give you returns.
	Passive income.
	Revenue channels.
	Get revenue channels, get that stuff in place so that you are in a position that you can be an advocate.
	Yeah, and I'll go one step further.
	It's something so simple, but I believe it's vital.
	Everybody listen to this, especially if you're a millennial, save your money.
	Save as much as you can.
	Think about ways that you can save 10 to 20% of your paycheck and you'd be surprised where you're like, well, you know, I really don't need to go out to eat today.
	I'm okay with eating a can of tuna and I just saved eight bucks.
	I'm going to put that into my brokerage account and then that's going to add up over time and then you are truly liberated in a way that Tyler Durden never could imagine.
	It's a good note to end on but again we put the challenge out so listeners one more time to summarize what we want you guys to do is look at your go to your alma mater's website find out how much they're how much they're spending on their diversity center the staff how many staff members the salaries And the budget, and if there's a picture of the building, you know, all the information you can for your alma mater.
	I believe that with the number of listeners we have, the people listening to this, the motivation that you're going to have, I think we can probably get 30 to 40 universities very quickly.
	Email that information over to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
	Once again, that's sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
	We'll cobble together a pretty comprehensive and awesome report.
	We can create a spreadsheet and really have some fun exposing the cost of mandated diversity.
	All taxpayer-funded.
	And of course, also, Mr. Wolf, I'd be remiss if I didn't say we'd love to get your questions.
	Mr. Taylor, myself, and Mr. Wolf, we can discuss.
	Send those to sbpdl1 at gmail.com or Wolf at Ameren.com.
	And Henry, this hour flew by.
	This was a phenomenal podcast.
	I hope you all enjoyed it as much as we enjoyed bringing it to you.
	Bring us home.
	Hey, for Henry Wolf, this is Paul Kersey.
	Our time is up.

▲