All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 22, 2017 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
40:46
Will the Ephialtes of Germany Get Her Due?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
And as usual, I have Paul Kersey with me in the studio.
And it's been a relatively slow week.
In terms of race and immigration in the United States, but it's always relative.
There are always fascinating things that are happening.
And I'd like to start with what may appear to be a somewhat academic development, and it's the fact that the entire editorial board of something called the Third World Quarterly resigned over the publication of what they thought was a controversial essay.
Well, Brother Kersey, can you tell us a little bit about this essay?
Yeah, the essay is by an associate professor of political science at Portland State University, and it's entitled, The Case for Colonialism and Professor Gilley's piece argues that this idea that Western colonialism harmed colonized countries and their people is largely exaggerated.
Of course, that sounds like a fascinating essay that I can't wait to read the entirety of, but in our day and age, this is tantamount to some form of revisionism in Europe that would get you incarcerated or I mean, going on television and, I guess, using the N-word.
Just about. That's right.
That's right. Now, this Bruce Gilley guy, he sounds like one of these rare, wide-awake academics.
And as you note, he works for Portland State University, which is only in these second-tier places where people with any brains ever seem to show up.
Wasn't Portland State University where Bill Clinton gave the speech back in the late 90s about how whites were going to become a minority?
And the country and everyone wildly exploded into clapping.
And we're just excited about this prospect of dispossession being some form of...
United States government policy.
This is a wonderful thing.
I think you're right. I think you're right.
But he has written elsewhere about the looniest end of the left-wing academy.
For them, even theory is hostile to viewpoint diversity.
He's right about that. There should be no diversity.
He says they view the academy as a special zone of left-wing truth that must be protected against right-wing falsehoods of the real world.
Genuine pluralism from this vantage is a cover for privilege and oppression.
In other words, if you come up with an alternative point of view, such as to make the case for the view that colonialism was not all bad, that is simply a cover for white privilege and oppression of non-whites.
I think he's absolutely right about this.
One of the themes we've developed on this program and this podcast is the concept of pattern recognition being the greatest sin of the 21st century.
And hopefully that'll be maybe your next book.
Some form of that in the title.
Maybe we can do a collaboration with Steve Saylor.
Shout out to Steve.
His blog is one of the more interesting, on-point...
Sources of information out there, and Steve, if you're listening, keep up the awesome work, but especially, I'm surprised you haven't commented on this yet, because when you think about how terrifying it is that so few professors who have tenure are even willing to come out and say something of this nature because of the social ostracism that comes with such lucid observations about the lack of viewpoint diversity that's tolerated, allowed, or Gosh, it's just...
I'm not that long out of college.
Let me put it this way. And I can remember when I began to get interested in these ideas and I found the amazing Atlantic cover story.
Now, Atlantic obviously is not in the same realm as Third World Quarterly.
But the point is, the Atlantic ran that incredible story in the mid-90s.
About Camp of the Saints.
It was a cover story. And it wasn't hysterical.
Like, look at this crazy piece of fiction.
This is actually happening.
This is going to happen in our lifetime or our children's lifetime.
Is this a good thing?
It was sort of like a Pat Buchanan column.
It asked questions, but it didn't give any solutions.
It led the reader to come up with their own ideas of what was going to happen.
And That American Renaissance was in its infancy when that piece came out.
And now you've reached the point where the entire editorial board of Third World Quarterly, where Professor Gilley's piece was published, they resigned in mass.
That's right. The very idea of pointing out that colonization was not necessarily all bad...
This is so horrifying to these lefties that they cannot tolerate being associated with a magazine that would publish something so startlingly commonsensical.
The point I would make here is that if they were to go to Africa and ask Africans, was colonization all bad?
I would bet you that the overwhelming majority of those with any kind of education, historical understanding of their own countries, would say no, by no means.
And this is a story I've told over and over, and perhaps our podcast listeners are going to be bored with it.
But when I was vagabonding around Africa at age 19, when I was still a lefty liberal on the whole subject of race, I went from Ivory Coast, which is doing well, to Liberia, which is doing terribly.
And I went to Monrovia, went to the university, and I asked a young college student, I said, I don't mean to be offensive in my question here, but how come your country is such a mess compared to Ivory Coast?
Right next door, right next door, how come you all are a mess?
He said, oh, very easy question to answer.
We were not colonized by white people.
That's why we're doing so poorly.
The Ivorians had the advantage of being colonized by the French.
And we just published an essay on American Renaissance by a Nigerian who says many Nigerians will tell you confidentially that yes, the British were much better rulers than our current black rulers.
There are many in South Africa who will tell you whites were much better rulers.
And so the idea that this was a terrible blood sucking is something that is almost exclusively dominates the leftist white thinking.
In any case, the very idea that you can't even make the case for an alternative view.
This just goes to show you how ultimately blinkered and blinded academia is in the United States today.
Mr. Taylor, there are plenty of people in Detroit and Baltimore who would tell you that white people were better rulers.
I've always joked about the so-called Great Migration that took place in the 1910, 1920s of six million blacks to northern cities when the mechanical cotton picker basically made black labor obsolete, sharecroppers obsolete.
So you had this mass migration.
And there's a great book called The Promised Land which talks about the migration of blacks to Chicago.
And when they were in the Jim Crow states, everyone behaved in the train cars.
Then when they got to Illinois, They stopped the train, everyone got out and went crazy, kissed the ground.
It's this great passage in the book, Promised Land.
And you think about what happened 100 years later.
100 years ago, Detroit, 98% white, 1917.
Today, it's about 6% white.
It's sort of the reverse colonialism, and I've always argued that future historians are one day going to look at the Great Migration in America, and they will call it manifest destruction.
Because regardless of where the black sharecroppers settled, their descendants all helped...
Create the same conditions that are found in every city throughout the North.
You can see the consequences of this resettlement.
And it is reverse colonialism.
This program is probably one of the few out there that will point that fact out.
Yes. When the whites left Africa and turned those African countries over to local rulers, we had essentially the same process, as you describe, of Detroit turning from run by whites to run by blacks.
So you could call it very much a colonization in our case and decolonization in the case of Africa.
So long as the demographic transformation goes in one specific direction, the consequences are predictable.
But this idea of our minds being obligatorily closed to any reinterpretation or any alternative interpretation of the process of colonialism It reminds me in an obscure sort of way, or an indirect way, of something that just happened recently in the context of the looting after the hurricanes struck Miami.
The Miami Police Department sent out a little tweet, and it was a photograph of a group of blacks who were all incarcerated.
They're sitting in one of those holding pens.
All the faces were black, were blurred out, so you couldn't tell who they were.
But the tweet, I thought the tweet was a pretty good one.
It says, thinking of looting?
Ask these guys how that turned out.
Pretty good. I mean, I think police departments should creatively do that kind of thing.
Discourage folks. This is good.
Well, this didn't sit well with a woman named Sarah Jeffy.
She is a fellow with the Nation Institute.
And, well, I can imagine what the Nation Institute would be like, the Nation being this super, super uber-lefty magazine from way back.
In any case, she is a journalist who has written for Salon, Washington Post, Atlantic.
You know, good big-time stuff.
You know, I haven't written for the Atlantic.
I'd love to, but in fact, over the years I've posed a few pieces to them.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, not Jared Taylor.
In any case, she replies to this tweet saying, Good morning.
The carceral state exists.
Now, the carceral state for her, that means any state enterprise that is devoted to imprisoning people.
The carceral state exists to protect private property and is inseparable from white supremacy.
So what she's saying to us is the idea of locking up looters...
This is to protect private property.
She's right about that. But it is inseparable white supremacy.
Controlling looting is white supremacy.
Yet another example of the utterly insane view that these libs have about the most basic organizational requirements for any civilized society.
The state must have the monopoly on violence or else there is no protection of private property.
I think what's happened in St.
Louis, this is one thing we're not going to talk about today, but for seven days now there's been intense protests and violence in St.
Louis by people who are once again, just like we saw in Baltimore, rioting on behalf of a black heroin dealer who was killed by a police officer.
And one of the more Interesting developments that we saw was the Antifa, these Black Lives Matter protesters chanting, whose streets are streets?
Well, then the police came and they quickly arrested about 80 of the more vociferous protesters.
And then the police did something I'm still shocked they did to this day.
They started chanting, whose streets are streets?
A profound and Emphatic statement that the carceral state is very important to protect private property and the freedom of people who are going to go out and spend money.
Because the whole idea behind these riots and these protests, Mr.
Taylor, was to try and disrupt commerce in St.
Louis. You had a number of concerts that were canceled.
U2 canceled. A number of other concerts and other events they had to cancel because the police had to spend so much energy trying to guard private property.
Well, local businesses have to close because you've got all of these mobs of people running through the streets.
Nobody's going to come have a night out on the town when this is all going on.
Yes, economically, it's been very damaging to St.
Louis. But the idea that protecting private property is indissolubly linked to white supremacy.
Now, it's very difficult for me to think that any seriously functioned human being with an IQ more than that of maybe a fried egg would take this kind of view.
And this is a serious journalist who writes for serious publications.
This level of lunacy is very, very difficult for me to conceive of.
Is it though? And I'm going to pose this to you.
I'm going to ask you this. Think about how much ink is expended on attacking the achievement gap and the wealth gap between the races.
Now, in our egalitarian world, this is only due to white supremacy, that white home values are so much higher than black and brown people's home values, as we see.
Now, this is the next logical step to some form of redistribution of wealth because they see white people having higher property value as somehow...
Extolling the final stages of white privilege.
I understand this, but redistribution can work only if we protect private property, the private property of blacks.
Once they get there, their widow's mite or the crumbs from the white man's table, they have to have the right to protect their own private property.
But for this woman to say, protecting private property, this is inherently white supremacist.
Black people, Hispanic people, Asian people, they all have private property too.
And the police are in the business of protecting their private property too.
Well, anyway, this is just typical of this kind of utterly nonsensical thinking.
The whole idea that only whites benefit from this inveterate system of white supremacy under which we live is All non-whites are unoffending, incapable of racism, and we, by virtue of just breathing the air, are racist.
This kind of thinking, I think, was to some degree behind a very important decision in Canada.
This was a white family from South Africa that had moved or visited relatives in Canada in 2016, and they applied for refugee status.
And they made a claim that I thought, I wish I knew more about the details of the claim, but this family, William Andre and Sonia Andre, they said that they were victims of a carjacking in 1995.
They were farmers who were assaulted on their farm by four black men who came into their house, a home invasion, and robbed them in 2004.
Fortunately, they apparently left them alive.
That seems to be the reverse of the modus operandi.
First you torture them and then you kill them.
And they had their home burgled in 2013, their car stolen from outside their house in 2014, and three black men tried to steal Mrs.
Andre's cell phone.
In any case, this whole series of criminal acts against them, they describe this as a pattern of anti-white and anti-Afrikaner prejudice and discrimination.
Well, the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada denied them refugee protection, saying that there was no reliable evidence they were attacked because of their race.
Then they appealed to the Federal Court of Canada, and they used some kind of documentation to suggest that there were racial motives.
Now, this again, it'd be very interesting to know what kind of documentation they used, but...
The Federal Court of Canada said that this documentation was from white supremacist hate literature.
And therefore, could be rejected and ignored.
My suspicion is that this was some sort of statistical accumulation of the kinds of acts that are increasingly common in South Africa.
But because I suspect that the Canadian way of approaching this is similar to that of this crazy lady, Sarah Jaffe, and these crazy people who work for the Third World Quarterly, Their understanding of race is so blinkered and blinded that they simply refuse to recognize that whites can be victims of racial discrimination.
I think we're going to find in our time, as we talked about last week, with the Portland Police Department getting rid of their gang affiliations because of the...
A pattern that emerged of non-white gang faces aggregating crime statistics at an individual level to collectively show an accurate picture of who's committing the crime, be it in South Africa, where we all know that Afrikaners and white farmers are being robbed and victims of crime on a daily basis.
It's tragic what's happening.
And there's seemingly nothing we can do to stop it.
No one wants to stop it.
And to see the Canadian government step in and The federal court there in Canada described their presentation and their documentation as, quote, white supremacist hate literature, unquote.
There's a chilling correlation to what just happened last week in the United States where both sides of Congress passed unanimously, you know, Coming together and showcasing that there is a bipartisan effort capable in the United States government and that is to denounce white people who dare stand up for their right to exist.
Merely doing so is white supremacy and neo-Nazism.
Correct. But yes, this is the current mindset.
Now, it's the prevailing mindset, but it's one that I think is increasingly threatened by people like you, by people like me, by more and more wide-away quiet people who are going to point out the absurdities of all of this.
One wonders at what point, how many murders have to accumulate?
Being a South African farmer, as I understand it, is far and away the most dangerous profession in the world.
Probably being shot out of cannons is a safer way to make a living.
But to refuse to recognize these patterns, as you say, pattern recognition is a great crime in our country.
It's fascinating. One of the stories I saw someone tweet out recently was that the greatest cause of death for 18 to 25-year-old white males was a car accident in the United States.
For blacks, 1825, it was other black males.
I wonder if you actually juxtapose the data for black males in America, you know, in inner cities where their mortality rate from murders, if it's higher than white farmers.
And South Africa.
It would be an interesting data point to show that white farmers are actually at a greater risk of being murdered by, well, as we all know, almost every suspect in these.
Well, they don't even know who the suspects are in most of the cases because the police in South Africa don't care about bringing the murderers to justice.
The murders to justice. But I'd like to see that data.
That would be an interesting data point.
Well, we are often reminded that it is more dangerous to be a young black man in Chicago or Baltimore than it is to be an American soldier in Iraq at the height of the killing.
But these are parallels that we are not supposed to draw.
You know, the other aspect of the South African situation is that there is a very, very high rate of murder against these farmers, despite the fact that they have a pretty elaborate network now.
They have these alarm systems.
They can call friends from not far away, armed men who will come at a moment's notice.
They've taken every possible private-level precaution to stop this stuff, but it still happens, as you say, repeatedly.
And for the world at large to turn its face away and say, okay, first of all, this isn't happening.
Second of all, if it's happening, it's not racially motivated.
Third, if it's racially motivated, this is no more than those swine deserve.
That is the thinking, I think, of most white people, at least official white thinking all around the world.
It's absolutely, absolutely despicable.
But as we go around the world and we consider the question of the way white people think about their countries, I think we must touch on the elections that are coming up in Germany.
This is going to be just this Sunday.
And according to all the polls, and although polls have been mistaken when it came to Brexit, when it came to the election of Donald Trump, I suspect the polls are correct in assuming that Angela Merkel and her Christian Democratic Union and her allies in Bavaria will probably come in as the number one party.
The question, of course, is who will be—I mean, they won't have a majority, so they're going to have to have some kind of coalition partnership, and it might take some time to cobble together a partnership, but maybe the Social Democratic Union, which has been one of their partners so far, it's likely to be business as usual.
Now, the wild card here, of course, is the alternative for Deutschland.
Boy, do I applaud whenever those guys get any attention.
The theory is that they could get 10 or 11 percent of the vote.
Now, I'm hoping for a huge Bradley effect.
All these polls are based on asking Germans who you're going to vote for.
And my hope is that far more will vote for the alternative than are prepared to tell the pollster that they will.
We'll have to see about that.
And four years ago, that was the first time they presented candidates in German federal elections.
Because the party's just five years old.
They were just one year old at the time.
They just barely missed the 5% threshold for actual parliamentary representation.
They're going to make that for sure.
They should come in with 10 or 11%, and I think it would be great if the Bradley Effect were working hard on these polls and they came in with, oh, 15.
I mean, let's fantasize.
20%. Why not? In any case, I think the latest party platform, you see what they say there?
This is great stuff. Their latest party platform is far better than what the Front National was running on in France.
And that very disappointing, the second portion of the election that Le Pen was so heavily trounced in because she tried to frame it as being the Frexit.
Whereas our friends with the Alternative for Deutschland are doing the exact opposite of what they're doing.
They urge Germany to close its borders to asylum applicants, end sanctions on Russia, and to leave the EU if Berlin fails to retrieve national sovereignty from Brussels, as well as to amend the country's constitution to allow people born to non-German parents to have their German citizenship revoked if they commit serious crimes.
This is reaching Hungarian levels of Patriotism, real patriotism for your people that has been so absent from, let's face it, the Western Europe narrative, the Western European narrative for so long, it's seeping in. I mean, I'm not saying that salvation is coming, but the brave stance we've seen, the Hungarians, the Czechs, the Poles, even the Austrians, we've seen that them take It is inspiring a lot of patriots throughout Western Europe.
I would even argue it's inspiring people in America.
Unfortunately, I don't believe that we have the infrastructure yet to really do anything in our country, as we've seen some of the shortcomings of the past couple months that have been so...
Let's face it, disastrous.
Only way to put it. I think that's fair to say.
Not for lack of trying, but there's a lot to learn from what's going on and being pragmatic in what's going on in Europe and these countries where any form of racial solidarity or pride in your people, I mean, the indigenous people of Germany and You know, you can go to jail. I mean, think about all the stories, Mr.
Taylor, we've read of people who posted on Facebook about the crimes that these asylum seekers, these refugees, these 1.5, 1.8 million refugees are committing, and then the police come.
What do they do? They're not going after the people who are performing these rapes.
What do they do? They arrest people noticing crimes committed by Non-white refugees are Muslims.
That's the real threat. How do you say pattern recognition in German?
In any case, whenever I think of Angela Merkel, My, smoke just comes out of my ears when I think of that woman likely to be head of state, no, she's not head of state, head of government again for another four years.
To me, she is single-handedly about the worst traitor to her people and to her race of anyone that I can think of, all the way back to Ephialtes the Malian.
You remember Ephialtes.
He was the guy at the Battle of Thermopylae.
He's the guy who betrayed the Greeks, and he showed the Persians this back way around through the pass, and he was responsible for the defeat of the Greeks on that occasion.
I can't think of any single person, all by him or herself, who has been so out and out treacherous Can you think of a single act by a single, I mean, she really, I think she had the power, she had the prestige to say, okay, no or yes.
It was really up to her.
Can you think of anybody else who has been just so lamentably treacherous in the way that as a white person who has treated her own people?
Past three or four centuries, no.
And I think the Effialtes reference is fantastic because in the Zack Snyder 2007 film, 300, they show a grotesque, deformed Effialtes, which I think really showcases the heart of a traitor.
The outward grotesqueness of their inner hatred for a people that they believe rejected them.
And that was a brilliant portrayal in that film.
Although in the film, Effialtes showcases some remorse for what he did, we have no record that Effialtes and the reality showed any remorse.
I don't believe Merkel has any remorse for what she's done.
I believe that she thinks she's going to go down in history as this great curator of a one world.
Of a one-world state where Brussels dictates policy.
Tell me, Mr.
Kersey, are you drawing some sort of parallel between Mrs.
Merkel's appearance and that of Ephialtes as depicted in the movie?
I wouldn't want to denigrate Ephialtes.
We'll leave it at that.
We'll leave it at that. Of course, now, one thing that has just come out a couple of days before the election, I think this is great.
There is something called the Bundestag Scientific Office.
And this is a team of non-party political experts.
And they have looked over the decision that Angela Merkel made to let in all of these so-called refugees.
And they have concluded that it was extra legal, that this was a matter that was a matter of essential relevance to the state.
That's the way they've put it. And she had no authority to suspend the legal process of accepting refugees.
Now, I think this is really great because even the leftist parties are saying she exceeded her authority.
It was the Bundestag, the elected representatives of the people, who should have made this decision because, quote,"...the decision led to a change in the proportion of non-Germans to Germans in the country." To me, it's remarkable that this group of non-political experts have seen the question in its essential terms and have said she did not have the authority to do that.
No, you're exactly right.
Unfortunately, a little too late.
The fact is, the study came out, Frankfurt now is majority non-German, all these states.
The consequences of demographic displacement, unless there is some form of repatriation, they're devastating.
This is the reality of demography is destiny.
We know this. It is an inescapable truth.
Yet, it is a startling development, to say the least, just because of the crippling guilt that the Germans had imposed on them by the victors of World War II. As official state policy and the Germans almost have a guilt or they can't even exist as a people.
I remember a couple of years ago during the World Cup, as silly as I know you perceive athletics to be, national athletic competition I believe is healthy.
It's good when the Olympics come along and you're actually able to have some pride in your people and in your nation.
And the Germans were actually waving the German flag.
And people noticed that. It was one of the first times they've done this since the reunification of West East Germany.
That's right. And everyone was shocked.
How dare they wave German flags?
Yeah, because you go back and you think of that great video of Merkel where she's on stage and someone waves the German flag and she grabs it.
Right. And walks away with a disgusted look on her face.
That brings back that whole Efealti's image that you brought up so beautifully.
But... One of the things that you mentioned earlier, and I think it's a great point, is that you are seeing the white elite, what Sam Francis talked about as the managerial elite.
They have to continue to always double down on the anti-white nature of politics that permeates through every level of our life.
Because if they don't, they'll be replaced by someone who's even more fanatic.
Well, we'll see.
I mean, this decision by this oddly named Bundestag scientific office seems like a very odd name for something that decides what's legal and what's not.
In any case, the fact that these so-called non-political experts, these people who are taking a scientific view, they have come down on the side of sanity.
They've said she exceeded her authority.
Now, as you point out, it's all very well and good.
They're here now. Unscrambling the omelette is always difficult.
So we'll have to see about that.
I'm delighted that this report just came out two days before the election.
This cannot help but improve the chances of the alternative for Deutschland.
But in any case, I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
I hope this is going to be a real sea change, and at least it'll be the first time that the AFD gets federal representation.
They have, I believe, seven Eurodeputies, but that doesn't really affect what happens in Germany.
And they have over a hundred local deputies in these sort of local state parliaments.
This is good. They've got a foothold. Yeah, they have a foothold.
And this time, it'll be great that they will have an official voice at the federal level.
To me, it's also significant that their strength is in the East.
Or Merkel is from.
I mean, she was a good little commie when she was in...
She's just a good little whatever it is.
She just wants a pat on the head.
But once again, it is the people who were spared are Western poisons.
They're the people who still maintain some kind of a racial and national health.
You used the phrase, it's hard to unscramble an omelet.
And sometimes when an omelet goes bad, there's only one choice, to throw it out.
Get rid of it. And one of the things that's happening right now, I believe, it started last year, Mr.
Taylor. I know you scoff at this, but this is, in my opinion, one of the most powerful examples of a transformation that's happening in a collective reawakening in some sense that maybe white people do have.
Interests that would force us to unite in an increasingly non-white country.
And I can really be referring to what's happened in the National Football League.
What in some cases is considered a religion.
An opiate of the masses.
Last year we saw ratings decline.
We saw people tune out.
Largely because Colin Kaepernick, a muletto quarterback who was raised by Caucasians, took a knee during the National Anthem.
Ratings did decline significantly.
Revenue... You know, which was always growing, was actually stagnant.
We've seen the ESPN, which is a cable channel devoted to projecting this idea that blacks are superior athletes and that yet somehow blacks are still disenfranchised when it comes to athleticism.
Ownership of sports teams, even though, you know, sports are one of the main reasons we have so many black millionaires.
This is funny, Mr. Taylor. This morning, a former NFL player basically said that even though there's all this data now about CTE and concussions and the negative implications of playing sports for long-term health, it's still the most viable option for black males to become millionaires.
Obviously, I think he's actually right, but that's besides the point.
The point is, this season, the National Football League, we're still seeing this idea from the top down that Colin Kaepernick is a hero.
Remember, he was on the cover of Time Magazine last year.
They were trying to portray this as being a modern-day Cassius Clay, Muhammad Ali moment of protest.
We even saw some NFL players doing the Black Power Fist, Black Power Salute after they made a sack.
Michael Bennett is a player who's been very outspoken about black solidarity on the NFL football field.
Guess what's happening this year?
It's not an anomaly that ratings were down in 2016.
Ratings are down even more significantly in 2017.
We are seeing reports that the TV networks that have poured hundreds of millions of dollars into having the broadcast rights for NFL games They are seeing potentially 200 to 250 million dollar losses.
It's incredible. It is incredible.
Well, let us hope that it is for the reasons that you suspect it is.
I know last year the networks were making excuses because it was election season, there was all the excitement about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, and this is diverting viewers.
They don't have that excuse this time.
Also, apparently, one of the measures that they took in the hope of increasing viewership was to let people celebrate touchdowns in that flamboyant, the art of Africa kind of a way.
Now, I would like to think that that's going to drive viewers away.
Now, I just don't know. How sensible are the viewers in America when it comes to things like that?
I think that's poor sportsmanship, and I think that's gloating, doing headstands and backflips and the boogaloo and the end zone.
That is, quite frankly, disgusting to me.
You know, when you look at old...
Old clips of, oh, the Super Bowl of maybe the 1950s or cottage championships.
You know what they do after a touchdown?
They hand the ball right to the referee.
And when the guy comes back, somebody will shake his hand.
A manly gesture. A manly gesture.
That's right. Well done, comrade.
There's a guy out there, Mr.
Taylor, who is an unsung hero in all of this.
His name is Clay Travis. He's a sports writer for Outkick the Coverage, and he has been phenomenal in attacking ESPN. They're hemorrhaging subscribers, largely because they've taken on...
He hasn't gone as far as to say an anti-white.
Mindset and narrative, but he's come as close as you can to just using the dog whistle language.
And it's a beautiful thing because ESPN is losing subscribers.
Disney's been posting record profits, but because...
ESPN is part of their corporate portfolio.
They haven't been able to really see the massive financial windfalls for their investors because of how many subscribers ESPN is losing.
There's a lot of talk that Disney is going to sell ESPN and the question is, is there another company that would take the risk of ESPN, which is alienating so many of the white sports fans by constantly trying to say that this black figure is the Rosa Parks.
There are people who are saying that Colin Kaepernick taking a knee is the Rosa Parks moment.
First of all, Rosa Parks destroyed public transportation for white people nationwide.
Secondly, Well, you give her more credit than she deserves.
I guess my point is this.
I believe from where I come from, I do like sports.
I do believe that there's a lot of pride that people put in.
You know, white people have been so de...
Have been so debased and had the idea that you can't have any pride in your region as a southerner anymore.
So you invest all of that pride that would have been put into your ancestors and the lost cause.
You put in your alma mater.
The same thing goes for blue collar people in the Northeast and all throughout the country.
Blue collar people, they love their NFL franchise.
I know that you might find that silly and superfluous, but they have to have an outlet somewhere for Pride and this belief in belonging that is seemingly outlawed for people who may have once done that for their ethnic and racial solidarity, which of course, as we know from what we've talked about today, even considering white racial solidarity a viable option is tantamount to White supremacists hate literature, end quote.
Right, right. Well, it is certainly the case that when you get this, what did you say his name was, Michael Bennett, this professional football player, he makes a good tackle and he flashes the Black Power salute.
Keep doing it, guys. Yes, I agree.
Keep doing it. Keep doing it.
Do it as often as you possibly can.
It reminds me of, what is it, John Carlos and that other guy in the 1968 Mexico City Olympics.
Two of these guys, I think they were one and two in, what was it, the 400 meters, some sprint, two black Americans.
Mexico City. And they're standing up there on the podium with their faces down doing the black power salute.
This stuff, I think, wakes up white people.
These are black people who have had more handed to them than any black people in the history of the world.
And they've still got a chip on their shoulder.
They're still blaming white people for the fact that What?
That they're millionaires? The fact that they are champions?
That the fact that they are the most well-paid athletes probably in the history of the world?
It's still our fault.
Every act of black racial chauvinism in the NFL, the NBA, will startle one white I think there's a correlation there, and I encourage every NFL player that, you know, 70% of the NFL is black, and again, somehow, white privilege, systemic racism, and implicit bias apparently still exist, I guess, because there are too many white quarterbacks and punters, but...
Keep doing it, guys. Raise that fist.
Now, doesn't this Bennett guy, he sits out the national anthem, too, doesn't he?
He takes a knee during the national anthem.
Well, keep it up, Bennett baby.
Keep it up. That's what we want.
So, we have these athletic contests, which I think will be experiences of racial reawakening for whites more and more.
And we are also, as I said, looking forward to this electoral contest in Germany.
So all of you listeners, pay attention to what happens.
This could be significant.
I hope that we will have a real surprise result, and the Alternative for Deutschland will do much better than we hoped, well, much better than is projected.
But we may have some comment on that next time we meet, depending on what kind of results we've had.
And so once again, Mr.
Kersey, thank you so much for coming into the studio.
As always, it's been a pleasure.
Pleasure's all mine. Listeners, thank you for listening and keep those tweets coming.
I'm unbelievably appreciative of all the tweets and I promise next Friday you're going to have some news on something very exciting that I've been working on behind the scenes.
A little tease.
▲
Export Selection