All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 15, 2017 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
41:42
Is the Dream Over?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
And as usual, we have our indispensable guest in the studio, Paul Kersey.
Paul Carsey, as you all know, has unparalleled insights into what's happening, and that's why we have him back every week, week after week, to share his wisdom and his observations and his wit.
So, welcome back, and we have, as usual, a great deal to talk about in 2017, and I suspect it'll be the same in 2018 and 19, and as far as the eye can see, there will be much to talk about as far as subjects that are of interest to American Renaissance readers and racial dissonance.
So, welcome. What shall we talk about today?
Regrettably, I think we need to continue our conversation we had last week about DACA and President Trump because things have progressed in a...
And a path that we both were worried was going to transpire, and much to our chagrin, it's actually gone down a darker, darker path that we weren't even considering.
That's right. It looks as though he has, sure enough, worked out a deal with the Democrats, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, according to which he's going to give them everything they want on DACA in exchange for ill-defined, quote, massive border security, but no wall, no wall.
DACA, amnesty for these young, whatever you want to call them, was the one bargaining chip he could have held in reserve for that wall.
And he failed. It looks like he failed.
Now, of course, Congress is going to have to vote something.
He'll have to sign it. But this looks to me like a genuine betrayal.
Can you put any different characterization on it?
No, Buchanan's column was succinct to the point and saying this is his read my lips moment.
I went on DonaldJTrump.com last night to see if the shirt, build the wall, hashtag build the wall, was still available to purchase.
It is still available, but it's all...
It's all just a sad reminder of a campaign filled with the promise of making America great again and running headfirst into the reality of his presidency, which has been...
Globalism really might be our credo.
Mr. Kersey, he did not run into the reality of his presidency.
He ran into the reality of Donald Trump, who is a guy with no ideological moorings.
That is the problem.
We made that point clear time and time again on this program.
He had the power to get rid of DACA his first day in office, which he promised to do.
And now, no one, as far as I can tell, except for a few lonely voices in the dissident right, is pointing out, remember 1986.
You, of course, remember 1986.
And Ronald Reagan signed the first amnesty.
I wasn't even born before 1986.
But you remember what happened. I remember what happened.
But, you know, it's fascinating you say that because think about Think about what could have happened with Trump and DACA. You had a number of so-called red states, Republican-lenient states, that had sued the federal government to end DACA, that it was unconstitutional.
All Trump had to do was to not defend DACA in court.
It's gone! It's gone!
Nine states then, when Jeff Sessions gave a speech last week, they pulled the suits.
That's right.
He could have just sat tight and not even have to do it with DACA himself.
But now he is actively encouraging Congress to pass in a legitimate constitutional way
an act which, when passed by Barack Obama, was unconstitutional.
We're going to have these at least 800,000 Democratic voters, and they will of course
have the right to bring in their friends and family.
So all of their parents, all of their parents, and there was an executive amnesty for them that was immediately shot down by the courts.
But that's going to happen, too.
That's going to happen, too. But the reason I bring up 1986, and that was the very first amnesty signed by Ronald Reagan, with, I think, the best of intentions, because at that time the idea was there's never going to be another amnesty, first of all.
And second of all, there's going to be internal controls so that any illegals who slip in are not going to be able to get a job.
There was going to be employer sanctions.
Anybody who hired an illegal immigrant was going to suffer all kinds of penalties to make it absolutely impossible or at least super unattractive for any new ones to come.
But that part went by the wayside, didn't it?
Now, when we get this next amnesty that Donald Trump is promoting, what's going to go by the wayside?
America. Yes, that's exactly right.
America is going to go by the wayside.
Any idea, this idea of massive border security, come on.
And you know what's going to happen?
We still have this crazy law according to which an unaccompanied or even an accompanied minor, if they come from any nation illegally other than Canada or Mexico, we can't send them right back.
If they come from Honduras, they come from Guatemala, they come from any other of these crazy failed states, we have to let them into the country, and I see no change so far in the procedure for a buy.
They get a hearing, then they're released to whatever person claims to be their relative.
Now, I predict with 100% confidence that we're going to get a whole swarm of those people coming in because once they're here, what's the president say?
They were bought here illegally by some coyote, and they're going to say, We didn't have anything to do with it.
We know this is true, what you just stated, because we saw the surge after DACA was announced in 2012.
We saw continual surges over and over and over again to the point where we started having the sympathetic federal government start to fly all these unaccompanied minors and put them into school systems.
And stressing the local budgets for having to then have teachers brought in and hired for people who don't speak English as a first language.
We have no idea who these kids are, no idea their ages.
In a lot of ways it was the precursor to what happened in Germany when Merkel threw open the borders and you had 1.2, 1.5, who knows how many millions of Arabs, Third world people flock into Germany.
This same thing, as you just noted, is going to happen when this is announced.
America is basically a failed state at this point anyways, considering what's happened in Maryland, where they passed, I believe it was College Park, where they just announced four to three in a city council vote that non-citizens can vote.
Oh, of course. Well, they're not the first.
There are five other cities in Maryland that have passed that bill, that have passed that announcement.
So again, what is the point of citizenship in 21st century United States of America?
And what is the point in coming legally?
After all, the first amnesty back in 1986, I keep harking back to this because I was suspicious of it at the time.
I was alive, and I was conscious, and I was watching these things.
I had an eye on these things. And the idea was, the estimate of the government accounting office was that it would be 1.3 million.
Do you remember how many ended up being amnestied under that thing?
I believe it was well over 2 million.
Well over 3 million. Well over 3.
That's right, that's right.
And it's going to be the same here.
All of these people are going to come crawling out of the woodwork saying, oh no, me too, me too, me too.
And the Congress and Donald Trump are not going to have the heart to say, no, you
signed up too late.
What's interesting is I believe that in 1992, California went.
For Bill Clinton. I think I'm correct in saying this because Steve Saylor made a wonderful blog post where the whole Prop 187 has been retconned as being the reason why California started to go Democrat.
And he noted, well, that was in 95.
Guess what happened in 1992?
too, the state went for Bill Clinton.
So if you want to create this false narrative, this false, this fake history of what transpired in
California, really what happened was Republicans,
it was a last ditch effort.
They passed a very sane bill, just like a number of the bills that were passed when Arizona,
Georgia, Alabama, and I believe it was South Carolina, Tennessee passed great immigration bills
during the Obama era.
And they were all shot down by various courts.
Right. Or gutted, as we saw with Arizona's fantastic bill.
Yes, that's right. And I think that with what Donald Trump has just done, he has...
The betrayal is...
Tragic. I mean, I'm trying to think of some reference from a Greek tragedy that I may have read, but I can't think of one because this was...
He deserved to be pursued to the ends of the earth by the furies for his betrayal of his people and his country.
I was thinking that maybe he doesn't want to be a tutor.
Maybe he doesn't want to run again. And he's realizing that the hatred is going to be so great that his companies are going to come to her so much...
Fire. If the Democrats take power in 2020, they'll do all sorts of audits.
But they're not going to build. We're seeing monuments, Mr.
Taylor, torn down to or desecrated.
Francis Scott Key, as I've always joked about, Francis Scott Key's memorial in Baltimore was just defaced with a racist anthem.
There's not going to be any monuments built to Donald Trump.
There's not going to be any airports named for Donald Trump for doing this, for helping with the rising tide of color, overwhelming and capsizing what's left of the American Republic.
See, I think you're wrong.
I think he does want a second term.
And he's beginning to treat us the way the Republicans have always treated us.
That he figures he can take us for granted.
Whoever the Democrats are going to put up against him is going to be worse than he is.
And so he figures we'll vote for him, even if he turns out to be an utterly broken reed.
But while we are on the subject of betrayal...
I can't help but think about this joint resolution of Congress, the one deploring and condemning white supremacy that he just signed, was it last night?
And it goes back in August, you know.
The Democrats urged the House to censure Donald Trump because of his comments about Charlottesville.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, she quotes, and I'm quoting, The President's repulsive defense of white supremacists demands that Congress act to defend our American values.
Again, I just can't get over my amazement at a guy who is accused of defending white supremacy when he just points out that there was violence on both sides.
But that's defending white supremacy.
One of the things that we have to mention real quick is that Senator Tim Scott apparently went into Trump's office and gave a...
Racial history lesson, as if it was straight from Tynese Coates himself, blaming the history of white supremacy throughout America's history.
You know, failing to note, of course, that America was 90% white, founded by whites.
It was explicit in one of the first acts of the Congress in 1790 that the Naturalization Act of 1790, only white citizens of good character could be citizens.
Tim Scott apparently had a major role in convincing Trump, of course he's the black senator from South Carolina, to sign this declaration, Mr.
Taylor. Oh, is that part of it?
Well, anyway, well, hold on. Let's get to the declaration now.
We haven't quite got there yet.
We're talking about this vote to censure Donald Trump.
Well, and, you know, Representative Joe Crowley, Democrat of New York, he's talking about the president has chosen to stand with white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and domestic terrorists.
Perfect. This is just fantastic, just fantastic, crazy stuff.
But apparently at that time, Ryan, Speaker Ryan, pointed out that Trump had, quote, messed up.
But an actual censure vote would be too divisive.
And so instead they got together with this joint resolution.
Now, I think the key passage in this joint resolution is really quite astonishing.
It says, and this is the one that Trump ended up signing, he says,"...hundreds of torch-bearing white nationalists, white supremacists, Klansmen, and neo-Nazis chanted racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-immigrant slogans and violently engaged with counter-demonstrators." I mean, the blame is clearly on them alone.
Originally, as part of the draft, there'd been the idea that it criticized the violent counter-protesters.
Oh, can't have that.
Can't have anything being even-handed.
So that does not appear in the resolution that he signed.
And it urges the president to, quote, use all of his available resources to address the growing prevalence of those hate groups in the United States.
Now, all of the powers of the president, of course, American Renaissance, will be designated as a hate group.
Anybody who is not entirely on board is going to be designated as a hate group.
They are urging the president to use all his powers to come after us and everybody they don't like.
Going back real quick to that censure.
Remember, they wanted to also have Trump fire Steve Bannon and Sebastian Gorka.
Of course, both of those individuals left the White House on their own volition.
But what you just said is so terrifying and so true because basically we're seeing...
Well, it's not law.
It's not into law.
I agree. But it is the first steps toward European-style hate crime laws and speech codes.
That's right. And that's what I mean.
Again, we're seeing the early enshrining of the legal maneuvering for really leftist,
evil organizations to start going to court and saying, see this resolution?
This is why we have to get American Renaissance, VDARE.
This is why we have to get Breitbart.com even off of the internet because they cannot be
allowed to spread hate.
Remember when Steve Bannon said, Breitbart.com is the home of the alt-right?
Platform. The platform.
Guess what? They go back and they say, look at what all has transpired since the initiation of the irredeemables and the deplorables.
You know, the other night, there was the debut 21st season of South Park, the cartoon on Comedy Central.
The entire episode was dedicated to the events of Charlottesville.
And I read a lot of entertainment blogs, and I wanted to see what people thought about The episode and see their reactions to it and comment section.
And one of the commenters said, we have to do everything possible to stop white people who are holding views like those in Charlottesville who carried tiki torches and marched.
They should not have any platform.
They should not have any voice because the country that we now live in is no place for them.
And I think that we underestimate how How strong that viewpoint is on the left and unfortunately in the center right even.
It's quite ferocious.
It's frightening. It's frightening.
And I agree with you. Once this resolution is signed, Donald Trump, President of the United States, has agreed...
To use all of his available resources to address the growing prevalence of groups like American Renaissance, VDR, and as you say, even Breitbart.
Now, if you take that seriously, they should be auditing us at every opportunity.
They should be looking into every possible mistake we might have made in terms of applying for non-profit status.
Eventually, he should be appointing people of the Supreme Court who will say that just like in Europe, what we are saying is against the law.
That's, in effect, that is the subtext of a resolution like this signed by the President of the United States.
Howard Zinn's version of American history has won, folks.
And this is the unfortunate truth of where we are now.
The people's history of the United States of America, that is the blueprint for the America that we live under.
Republicans overwhelmingly passed this.
I don't think there was one dissenting voice, actually.
I think this was... No, this is unanimous, I think, on both houses.
Exactly. And in this...
I'm thinking back to since Donald Trump has been president, I can think of two high-profile incidents of just shocking black-on-white crime hatred.
In Fresno, California, there was the black guy who I believe opened fire on three random white people.
One of the white people he killed was actually a member of the Antifa.
I'm not making this up.
This is true. On his website, he had, on his personal Facebook page, a lot of information about being a member of the Antifa.
And that didn't protect him from this black spree killer.
And then, of course, what just happened in Kansas City, which we haven't had the chance to talk about.
No one wants to talk about the black serial killer who targeted white males.
Again, these are two just, you know, there's that great website, Narrative Collapse.
It's so worth reading.
They do such a great job.
And it's depressing looking at the never-ending parade of black-on-white crime and homicides that exist.
And yet, here we have, Mr.
Taylor, Improved reporting of hate crimes as if the only people...
This is one of the things that this asks for.
It also calls for improved reporting of quote-unquote hate crimes since there are locales that don't report at all.
Again, the only people who are capable of committing a hate crime are white.
See, if that were actually taken seriously, if all crimes motivated at least in whole or in part by racial bias were recorded by the police and given to some central database, I would applaud because we would really learn the truth about this stuff, but it's not going to turn out that way.
We, American Renaissance, ran an article about that Kansas City serial killer guy.
And we actually dug up a report by a university that looked into the prevalence of serial killings.
In the last several years, blacks are actually nine times more likely than whites to be arrested for serial murders.
And this is completely unknown.
We still have it on our minds that it's white people who are the typical and most prototypical serial killers.
That's not the case at all. But once again, this is a hate fact that must be suppressed.
The study you're referring to, I believe, was done by the Radford University.
That's right. Is that in 1990 is when this massive flip begins to take place.
And then in 2000, 2010, it's like, oh my gosh, this is, you know, like you said, nine times, this is stunning.
Because this completely flies in the face of...
the pop cultural references we see.
Going back and thinking about some of those movies that are so part of our shared culture.
Because all we have in America now that unites us is Hollywood films and reruns on television
to friends to talk about.
People think about movies like Silence of the Lambs and they think about these disaffected white males
who are...
Well, and the real guys who were doing Son of Sam and John Wayne Gacy and who are these other,
Every famous...
Jeffrey Dahmer. Yes, Jeffrey Dahmer.
Every famous serial killer in the United States is a white guy.
And certainly all the serial killers on television and movies are white guys.
But the reality, as you say, this is a stunning fact.
It's so stunning that everybody who sees it on the other side is so stunned he can't remember it.
Anyway, so, yes, Trump has now signed this joint resolution in which he's going to promise to mobilize all the forces at his disposal to make sure that our growth is thwarted.
Now, there was something else you wanted to talk about.
I find this profoundly unimportant, but because you are my favorite guest, and I defer to your opinion on some things, you brought to my attention this video by the rapper XXXTentation.
Describe that video, if you would.
I actually dragged myself through it start to finish.
I hate watching rapper videos, but you convinced me that you thought it was important, and so I watched it.
So tell us about it. Well, he's a little bit better of a rapper than Michael Brown.
No, I'm joking. It is a video where The reason why I think it's important, let me just preface.
The reason why I think it's important is because we saw a lot of the right of center sites run with this.
And I always think it's important when you showcase the double standards.
Because there is no double standard.
There's only one standard. White people are not allowed to have any identity.
They're not allowed to advocate on behalf of their interests.
But what were the center sites saying about this?
The center rights...
We'll get there in one second.
Why I think this is important is because, again, it's a video of a black guy with two children, a black child and a white child, and there's a noose, and he puts the noose around the white child's neck.
Killing. Well, and strings him up.
Exactly. Slowly, slowly lifts him up, so there's no...
It's not a proper hanging in which you break the neck.
No, this is slow strangulation.
This is torture. This is how the...
And it's a little... It's a cute little white boy, maybe he's five, seven years old, yes.
You know, whoever his parents are, they need to have the, you know, services needs to get him out of his parents' hands because no parent should ever have allowed their child to be put in a situation, especially a low-rent rap video where their child was going to be symbolically and...
Just killed and tortured in such a terrifying example of the violence we saw in the Birth of a Nation film about the Nat Turner rebellion last year.
That bombed the box office.
But again, it was a glorification.
It was racial revenge porn.
And why I think it's important.
Going back to these sites, Matt Drudge showcasing it and all of these right-of-center sites that have massive traffic.
We're at a time right now where White people are once again, especially since Charlottesville, being lectured to non-stop.
There is no opportunity for a two-way conversation.
There never has been. There's never been a true racial conversation or country.
Whenever people say that, it means one thing.
A monologue must take place.
White people must be blamed 24-7, 365 that every problem that exists in this country is because of us.
Now this video, it's still monetized on YouTube.
Now this is why I think it's so important.
InfoWars ran with this heavily because all of the InfoWars videos Have been demonetized, basically.
They've gone from making a shocking amount of revenue from their prolific videos, just dynamic stuff that they've done, that on some cases, it's monotonous topics.
It has nothing to do with anything controversial, but they've been demonetized.
And Mr. Taylor, this video by XXX Tentation, or whatever you want to call this guy, it's still monetized.
Now, I think you have mischaracterized this video.
Yes, it is true that a young white boy is strung up by a black man, slowly and cruelly.
But there are depictions of many hangings of black people.
And what he is saying, ultimately, he's talking about some kind of mutual understanding that white people and black people, we've done these lynchings, that was a bad thing, and we need to get over it.
Look at some of his...
What are some of his...
Let's see. He goes on to say, and I got the script of this thing because I couldn't understand a word he was saying, but he says, And he goes on to say, And he goes on to talk about all of these terrible, you know, Emmett Till, that's one of his favorite subjects.
He talks about that. He talks about Philando Castile, but he also talks about a black-on-white atrocity, and he condemns that, too.
Believe it or not, I think in his mind, in his mind, despite all of the vulgarity and all of the insulting imagery here, I believe this is his effort to come up with something that talks about racial accommodation.
There's another line in here.
Niggers ask for peace and then riot and bring violence.
He's saying, look, don't do that.
We're all going to have to work it out together.
So he's got strung up blacks and strung up whites.
What the center-right did was concentrate on this one image of this cute little seven-year-old white boy kicking from the end of a noose and say, oh, this is horrible, this is horrible.
They didn't look at the whole context.
Now, what this says to me...
The center-right concentrates on this kind of spectacular imagery and does not talk about what really matters.
Like the actual ratio of black to white serial killers.
Like the real facts about black on white rape, for example.
They just want to talk about a rap video Rather than the truth about the real patterns that matter.
That's what the significance of this is.
And these people are all saying, hey, they're beating their chest saying, oh, we have really put down this horrible black business.
No, they've missed the boat.
They've got the wrong target.
That's an incredible interpretation because what you just said is a perfect segue into what happened in Portland recently, where the Portland Police Department...
I believe Portland is close to 72 to 75, between there, percent white.
It is a 6% black city where almost all of the homicides and non-fatal shootings are perpetrated by...
Individuals who are part of that 6% black population.
They've got some Hispanics up there.
They do, but to give Ron Enns his due, there isn't as much Hispanic violent crime as you would think there would be.
It is almost exclusively black.
There was a great story I saw about a bunch of black people, and this also happened in Seattle this year.
There was a vigil to try and stop the black-on-black homicides in both Seattle and Portland.
You're thinking to yourself, my gosh.
The black population in these cities is like 6% and 7%.
And yet, even in a city that is proportionally that...
The black population is so demographically...
I don't want to say insignificant, but it's so small compared to these other cities.
Even that small amount of people...
Necessitates a vigil to try and stop the violence because it's so pervasive.
Because they dominate the statistics.
Exactly. So speaking of dominating the statistics, the Portland gang unit has decided to stop showcasing, I believe, the race of the gang members because...
No, they've gone further than that.
They have actually lifted the designation of gang member.
They're not even going to call people gang members anymore.
Because there are no white gang members.
That's not true. That's not true.
81% of the criminal gang affiliates, as they were officially designated, were either black or Hispanic.
So they were apparently 9%.
I guess these are bikers or something, you know.
Well, maybe Antifa. We'd like to think so.
Would that qualify? We'd like to think so.
But the idea...
What did they say?
Something like...
The idea was...
Okay, it says, we're not going to pretend gang violence doesn't exist.
We're just taking away this designation because the designation comes with too much racial baggage is what it boils down to.
They are guilty of pattern recognition.
This is, you know, what this reminds me of.
In Southern California, there are zoning regulations according to which you can't live in a garage.
You can't live more than X numbers to a bedroom in a house.
And they just stopped enforcing these zoning regulations because the population changed.
They had so many Hispanics, so many Hispanics just sleeping, you know, 15 guys on mattresses in a bedroom.
They just stopped enforcing the law.
Well here, what they've done is this was a designation that was used for tracking purposes, but because of the patterns that it fit.
Yep, this is one tool we're going to just throw away.
Not going to do it anymore. There are two other examples that we can bring up that have just happened the past three months.
The famous BART example.
Where the Bay Area Rapid Transit in Oakland and San Francisco, they've decided to stop reporting on the crimes because it would create a negative connotation of the non-white tour riding.
What that was, it was surveillance camera of the crimes.
Correct. They won't release it.
And lo and behold, there was a certain monochromatic character to these disturbances.
And that was just so upsetting to the people in the Bay Area that, nope, they're just not going to release it.
We don't want to perpetuate negative stereotypes that, unfortunately, closed-circuit television is recording and capturing for your lying eyes to see.
And then, of course, in Madison, Wisconsin, a city that is maybe 5% black, a couple weeks ago, this was actually...
Right before the end of the original incarnation of SBPDO, I was following the story, and this was about a month ago.
This was probably August 9th or 10th.
There was a fascinating story out of Madison, Wisconsin that the new police chief wanted
to go after the worst of the worst.
And guess what?
Once again, everyone went crazy because the worst of the worst were all black criminals
who had outstanding warrants.
Forty to sixty of these people were not in jail and the new police chief wanted to go
after them and lock them up because they were the ones who were committing the violence
that otherwise doesn't exist in a place as placid, even though it's intellectually bankrupt
and insidious.
The fact is that these white people, these white leftists who, lo and behold, have a death wish and are fine with...
Fine with becoming a minority in their own country.
And they still believe that they're going to hold some power, which is just insane.
But my point is, even in a place like that, the guy got in trouble.
Because he just wanted to make the city...
He wanted to make...
The Madison police chief wanted to make the city streets safer.
Primarily for blacks who are the ones who are so impacted by this black violence.
But that was the crime in itself.
Going back to the pattern recognition.
That is the ultimate crime in 21st century America.
Yes, yes. Pattern recognition.
But you know, this goes back a long way.
I remember when I first started American Renaissance, and it was only a few years into it, probably 20 years ago, I looked up this study of gun violence in some Minnesota, it might have been Minneapolis, some Minnesota state, some city in Minnesota.
And they had gotten all the statistics on who was the shooter, what was the relationship between the shooter and the victim, how old they were, this, that, and the other, and they released all this, but they did not release one piece of data, the race of perpetrator and the race of victim.
And they did this because they announced, they said, you know, we're withholding this information because we thought it might be misused.
And this, as I say, this is maybe 20, 25 years ago.
But that pattern has been just a systematic part of American life for a long time.
And of course, as we saw, that very same pattern is now hard at work in Europe.
When you have all of these so-called refugees committing mass gropings and rapes, you just don't want to let that information out because it might be misused.
The facts could be misused.
Because it's justification for social policy that would actually benefit the indigenous Europeans, or in this case, you know, the color of crime has been one of the staples of...
America Renaissance over the years.
And I know the last edition that came out, I noted that there are still a few cities, a few municipalities that do break down data, which is a public service that these police departments and I'm thinking of St.
Louis, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh...
New York City does one of the most fascinating jobs imaginable.
Chicago used to do it, but then when Rahm Emanuel took power in 2012, mysteriously, these annual reports, they kind of stopped appearing.
Another city that does it, and before Charlottesville, I started to look into Madison, Wisconsin because I was fascinated by this backlash.
Again, a police chief.
The crime of trying to make your city safer is greater than actual crimes of murder and non-fatal shootings and robbery and property crimes.
Well, it goes back to Michael Bloomberg, you know.
His stop and frisk, that really took a lot of weapons off the street.
It did. But, of course, the people that he targeted were the ones most likely to be carrying weapons and most likely to commit crimes.
That was his big mistake.
He should have been targeting old Asian grandmothers, making sure they got frisked in sufficient numbers.
But the idea, of course, is to cut down crime for everybody.
And as you know, those who are most disproportionately suffer from this are these minority communities themselves.
Well, the Madison Report is incredible.
It's the most comprehensive racial data I've ever seen from the police department because it breaks down juvenile crime by race and And then those over 25 and older by race.
So you're able to see who actually, by age breakdown, are committing the crime in Madison, Wisconsin.
Again, this is a city that is...
Probably farther to the left than any city in America.
I would actually argue that in a lot of ways.
Madison is...
We saw over the years where they've had this silly right-to-white work stuff.
Right-to-work stuff and the left that comes in and occupying the state capitol.
They had Black Lives Matter craziness, actually.
I think they actually did occupy...
At the height of the Baltimore stuff in 2015, I think they occupied the state capitol.
But their police department puts out this incredible report.
At some point, I will go back and break down the data.
Again, this is a 6% black city that is seen just like Milwaukee.
Milwaukee puts out something called the Milwaukee Homicide Review.
It is incredible.
They break down every non-fatal shooting and homicide, Mr.
Taylor, and they try and determine what was the cause of it.
And you always hear police chiefs go to that tried and true canard of, oh, it was gang violence.
Well, they found that it was basically just...
The violence is largely because of beefs and people getting upset with one another.
You stepped on my shoe, man.
I had to shoot him. The guy wouldn't share a coke or something.
It was just little disputes.
Milwaukee has seen a lot of the influx of blacks from Chicago.
Milwaukee now is about a 40% black city, 37% white.
Other police departments throughout the country And city councils are using this model.
They want to figure out ways to drop crime because guess what?
Every city in American Hill is competing for international conglomerates to move in, to build big campuses in their city because they need that tax revenue because there are a finite amount of white children being born.
And seemingly an infinite amount of people of color coming into the country.
And these tax bases are dying out.
The pensions that these cities have, or states like we know Illinois, and the pension crisis that's rising in all sorts of these leftist states, it's only going to get worse.
So a city like New Orleans wanted to implement this Milwaukee Homicide Review, Mr.
Taylor. And for months, I searched for the actual report online.
I couldn't find it. And then right before Charlottesville, I found it.
The data was...
It even blew my mind.
There were almost no non-white fatal shooting suspects for 2015 or 2016.
No. And this is a city that's about 37% white.
Not one non-white, not one white non-fatal shooting suspect.
Almost all the homicides were committed by black.
That sounds about right.
It does sound about right, but you actually, when you see the data that's officially compiled by the city, and that not one newspaper, the New Orleans Time, Picayune, or any of the ABC, CBS, NBC affiliates, that this data wasn't sent out as a press release.
Oh, well. Definitely it wouldn't be, but it's just, you look at this and you see there.
Again, Social policy should be based on the reality of criminality.
And that's always why I've looked at what our evil white ancestors did to try and create a country for their posterity to inherit and why they did and passed the laws that they did.
And based on the quality of life in 2017 America throughout the country, We owe them a great debt of service for what they tried to do to protect their...
What they tried to do and what we undid.
We gave it away. We gave it away.
We gave it away. The South Africans gave away their country.
That's right. We already gave it away.
That's right. Well, you know, this whole business of trying to track potential killers, there's a lot to it.
People are using these big data concepts to come up with algorithms.
That's sort of the idea you had in mind, I imagine, because you can use this not just retrospectively, but prospectively to see, okay, this person fits this profile.
This is the kind of person who's going to commit a murder.
And actually, it's a fairly small number.
They're out there shooting away, blazing away.
They've got these high-capacity magazines.
It's a fairly small number.
And so many police departments have gotten the idea, okay, if we can fit a profile, we can figure out who it's like.
We'll sort of keep an eye on them and be nice to them.
Well, this big data stuff, as you know, it can just come up with astonishing things.
The internet sometimes knows whether an internet user is pregnant before she does, just because of the way she's clicking around.
It's just spooky, the stuff they can figure out.
But anyway, they come up with these ideas, and of course, the profiles of the likely killers are young black guys.
Correct. And so then, I was listening to an interview on BBC. BBC is just...
Just so relentlessly, relentlessly liberal.
They're interviewing this lady who says, you see, the algorithms are racist.
The algorithms are put together by racist white people, and that's why they come up with these profiles.
Oh my God.
Naturally. Naturally. But this could be a potentially useful technique.
I mean, if you really do know that, okay, this handful of guys, this handful of 13-year-olds, they're the ones most likely to be shooting each other.
I mean, I can easily imagine some progressive city saying, okay, these are the guys we need to look at.
But as you pointed out, in Portland, they had this designation, which was probably used for that kind of attention and sort of guidance.
Nope, nope, nope, nope. Can't do that because it fits a racial pattern.
It perpetuates negative stereotypes that will only serve to bolster systemic racism and implicit bias.
I think those are the jargon, implicit bias and systemic racism.
I'm trying to think of other buzzwords that are hot right now.
Unfortunately, it's all about trannies and stuff.
White privilege. I always fall back on white privilege.
I need to cultivate my white privilege.
Of course, when I think about white privilege, I always think about the fact that doesn't white privilege depend on the fact of having nonwhites around?
If we were just all by ourselves, wouldn't we have no white privilege?
I mean, isn't the presence of non-whites, isn't that the only thing that makes white privilege possible?
I mean, I'd be happy to give up my white privilege, you know?
If it were just us, there'd be no white privilege.
I guess in an all-white society, just by osmosis or something, it rubs off on one another, so you're a privileged society that the entire world wants to risk their lives to try and...
To try and move to, even though it is, like you said, a civilization that is replete with white privilege and systemic racism and implicit bias.
It seems that every race wants to live around us.
You know, ultimately, I think the fundamental white privilege is that we are the biological heirs to Western civilization.
That is our fundamental privilege.
Anyway, we're getting near the end of our time, and by the time this podcast goes up, I assume we will have some information about the London subway attack that took place this morning.
Were you aware of that? Yeah, there were 22 injured.
It was a bucket bomb, I believe.
And yeah, it went off in the tunnel.
And you know, everyone in London was already warning Don't assume it's Muslims.
Don't assume. Don't assume.
Yeah, it's probably Danish tourists who set that bucket bomb off.
Wouldn't you reckon that? I had a couple.
Maybe that. Maybe some French getting revenge for a minor battle.
For Waterloo. Yeah, exactly.
No, it'll probably be our Saracen friends.
But we will suspend judgment.
Anyway, as always, it's a pleasure having you in the studio, and I look forward to having you back next week.
▲
Export Selection