Adam Curry, dubbed "patient zero" of podcasting, clashes with Joe Rogan over systemic failures—from Cargill’s fake meat dominance and $11.7T interbank lending pre-COVID to mass formation theory’s role in vaccine compliance and the Uranium One scandal under Obama. They critique opioid fines, renewable energy’s battery bottlenecks, and Texas’ abortion politics as partisan spectacle, comparing modern overmedication to 2,000+ frontal lobotomies at Pilgrim State Psychiatric Center. Curry defends decentralized media like podcasting against corporate capture, while Rogan laments institutions collapsing under debt and misaligned incentives, leaving society vulnerable to engineered narratives and unproven fringe theories. [Automatically generated summary]
You know, there's a lot of things happening with food, and you'll appreciate this, the meat processors, they have no intention of really continuing actual beef and other real meat.
They are all moving towards processing soy, et cetera, creating, I can't believe it's not burger, the fake meat, the fake pork.
Okay, but let's just read this, just for the heck of it, and then we'll figure it out.
It just says, under the settlement proposal, the three largest U.S. drug distributors, McKesson Corp., Cardinal Health, and America Source Bergen, that's all one word for some strange reason, America Source Bergen, one word, Corp., are expected to pay a combined $21 billion, while drug maker Johnson& Johnson, which manufactures opioids, would pay $5 billion.
You have to go back towards when modern medicine got funding.
So this is when we had the homeopaths and then we had the allopaths.
And the allopaths got all the money mainly from Rockefellers and a couple of the big rich families of the day.
And that all kind of came to a head very quickly.
There's a couple of great documentaries about the cure for cancer and how many entrepreneurial doctors, even one rancher in Texas, had really figured it out.
I think his clinic still operates in Mexico.
People go there.
And it's exactly the opposite treatment of what the allopath medicine is, which is basically try and kill all the cells and hope you survive it, or radiation or chemotherapy.
So once we went down that route, it was very easy for the big families to say, "Okay, we're going to establish universities where we teach this," which is not necessarily the look at the whole person, what is the person eating, etc.
It's like, diagnose the problem, prescribe the medication.
No education is a big one and don't you think it also is a function of doctors having these ridiculous student loan bills and they get out of school and they're in debt hundreds of thousands of dollars sometimes.
I mean, the French had to make up a word for us, you know?
It's like, we're so entrepreneurial.
And we're in, I think, a big decentralization moment where people are leaving big tech platforms and that's going off towards more decentralized, smaller things that interconnect in some way.
Travel is actually starting to unravel.
We're getting new technology.
New aircraft will be much cheaper for smaller groups and more effective to fly in, but also medicine.
We're seeing a lot of healthcare workers, nurses, doctors, leaving the systems, and off-the-shelf technology, doing their own telemedicine, concierge healthcare, where they only take 500 patients from the community, charge them $100 a month, and as much time as you need, or as often as you need, and really they build up a profile, like doctors should do.
Functional medicine is a part of this, so this is happening across the schooling.
Parents are taking their kids out of school.
They're creating their own school.
They're doing homeschooling.
That's been going on for a while with charter schools, but I think we'll see even more smaller community schooling.
Everything is decentralizing.
We're moving away—the smart people, I think—we're moving away from the big box stores, you know?
It's like people are literally getting sick from the shit in there.
If you think about the size of like a New York City, it's enormous, right?
There's so many people.
It's a perfect place because the buildings are stacked on top of each other and everything is like, when you're there, you're like, There's so much fucking energy in this place.
But very little is getting grown in terms of food.
Very little.
Definitely not enough to sustain it.
So you've got to keep shipping things in.
So you've got to keep the roads good because you're always just bringing things in on boats and bringing things in on trucks.
Everything has to come in.
One of the cool things about watching a video about a really good restaurant is seeing them going to meet the fish as the fish are coming in off the boats.
Yes, well, and he kind of came out of semi-retirement.
He's a little bit young.
He's about...
Our age, a little younger, to start the Beef Initiative.
And so he's setting it up so people are getting connected with, you know, just basically directly with farmers and food and, you know, using Bitcoin as kind of the common network.
But more importantly, he's writing and educating people about food.
And one of the most compelling arguments for me, he said, look at pictures of my—because he's a 12th generation Texan or something.
He said, look at pictures of my great-great-grandparents.
How do they look?
They got some shitty-ass clothes on, but they look pretty good.
The idea is, you know, you're putting more load on your system, and so walking is really good for you, but walking with a weight vest on is really good for you.
If I start eating pasta, I get bloated, and my stomach sticks out, and I grow love handles.
Like, if I get on a steady pasta diet of like four or five weeks in a row where I'm just fucking up, it goes straight Italian on me.
It's all those Dago genes of mine.
They fuck it, it'll go right to you.
It's always like the gut and the love handles first.
It's like, oh boy.
And it's also just feeling like shit.
I just never feel good when I eat a lot of pasta.
I always feel good when I'm eating like lean meat, you know, with some fat, some healthy fat, like grass-fed fat, like grass-fed ribeyes are probably the best example of that.
And they're really going so far with the technology of this shit, where they're putting sensors on the cattle and monitoring direct input of grain into their system, but it's also based upon supply and demand.
Where we're going, I truly think, is that people are so obsessed with their watches, their smart watches, their caloric intake, their heart rate, all these things, all these sensor type.
And we're also happy to give it up.
We give up a lot of information.
Just your phone itself tells a lot about how you walk.
Your gait can be determined from your phone.
All kinds of stuff, data about us.
It's very possible that in a future, which could be closer than you think, food is produced at the processors, which literally will be making processed food, that'll be tailored to you just to kind of keep you functional enough and keep you going with the nutrients that you need.
And kind of keep you in a matrix-like world, just kind of a state of, mm-hmm, I'm just existing, I'm just kind of doing my thing, whatever I'm told to do.
I think that would be, you know, I think there's some actual thought about that.
If I get misgendered, the way I correct them, and they're like, usually, like a lot of them, like libs of TikTok has a whole series of them.
Some of them are just insane people that are now teaching your kids.
And not saying it's insane to be non-binary.
I'm saying it's insane to have this level of narcissism where you're declaring to the internet how you deal with a seven-year-old that's misgendering you.
What Dr. Shanna Swan said was that this is observable in mammals, that when they introduce phthalates into these mammals' bodies, the children, the offspring of these animals that were contaminated with these plastics, have these weird anomalies in the children, in that they start to have less sperm count, they start to have smaller taints.
She said that in mammals the size of the taint is a great indicator of whether it's a male or a female and that when they look at like a little puppy like a puppy you know when you get them it's hard to tell is it a boy or girl you gotta look or something like that well when the taints of the males are between 50 and 100% larger than the taints of the females so if you see an animal with a long taint you go oh that's a boy but because of the introduction of phthalates into the mother the taints on the baby boys are smaller And they're seeing
the exact same thing with humans, they believe.
And this is in a lot of plastics that leach into our system.
Men whose AGD, that's the taint, is shorter than the median length, around 2 inches, 52 millimeters, have seven times the chance of being subfertile as those with a longer AGD, according to a study published on Friday in the Journal of Environmental Health Perspectives.
The distance measured from the anus to the underside of the scrotum is linked to male fertility, including semen volume and sperm count, the study found.
The shorter the AGD, the more likely a man was to have low sperm count.
And the sperm count is being lowered by plastics in the water.
And now, because I've observed it, I've been back and forth, I've lived there, I've come back to the States, and people are so much unhealthier, so much.
And of course, now they're getting processed food.
They're getting that from the Albertain, which is the, you know, from the supermarket.
They're getting...
You know, ready-made meals.
And because there's no incentive to educate people anymore, from the same people who own the processing companies and who own, you know, or endow the universities.
I think for most people, they're like, if most people, if you got to look at the whole food system and looked at what people are eating, what kind of results we're getting, where, what was it?
Especially in the idea that, for a lot of people, they see windows and then they have a bag of rocks that's handed to them, and they want to throw these rocks through the windows.
I think there's always going to be a way that they...
There's always going to be...
Like, the tech people are too fucking smart.
The people like yourself and the people that are deeply involved in, like, all the sneaky web shit, they're too smart to just let...
Someone have full, complete control over everyone's ability to podcast.
Even though Twitter and a lot of these places have done a pretty fucking good job of silencing a lot of people, you're starting to see these new platforms emerge.
Being the biggest audience, having the biggest outside of what you're doing really doesn't matter anymore.
Because you have an audience that you built this organically.
This is not some algo fucking view and you're doing, you know, four-minute clips or some shit like that.
And, you know, your cover art is...
One of those things.
You could look at all the YouTube videos to get attention to make you click on it.
You know, a shocking thing happened.
So, what is important now is people are able to assemble themselves in their own platforms, kind of back to what the internet was when it was completely decentralized.
This is a part of the same movement.
Hey, we're going to talk about Healthy living, and we don't need to be the loudest voice on Twitter.
People who are interested, they can come over here and they can hang out with us.
And everyone's welcome to come in, and if we decide you're a piece of shit, we're going to kick you out.
And then those tribes, they start to intersect, and now the technology exists for them to share between each other.
You can have your own Twitter for your own community, and it will be able to federate, so interact with other communities, but you have control over what community comes in and can communicate with you.
This is going to be a controversial thing to say, but I'm going to say it.
I think you cannot ask for a better guy.
If you could keep him, and people say, well, that's crazy, look what they did at Twitter.
I'm telling you, that guy wants it to be a free speech platform.
But those things are insanely complicated, and when you're dealing with a corporation, He wanted to have too many people that are telling you what to do.
There's too many minds that are coming together on these things.
When something's as big as Twitter, I don't know how much say he had, but I guarantee you there was a lot of other people who had a say as well.
Whereas if he can start something and do what he initially wanted to do, what he initially wanted to do with Twitter is to literally create a separate wing, like to create a Wild West wing, or there would be like regular Twitter that's like, you know, you get this sort of curated Corporate controlled message because anything that gets out of line they're ban your account right or Wild West Twitter and say you could do everything but dox people and threaten violence so I Like Jack Dorsey.
And then they pivoted, and they took, I think, the basic RSS concept.
You know, Twitter had a whole...
There was a technical progression, if you remember the fail whale.
So they had to really re-architect the whole platform to manage the growth they had, because they kind of went off of...
It was just no way to do it in the RSS fashion, to make it fast enough.
And that's what exploded.
So Odeo just pivoted into Twitter, and it was phenomenal to watch.
But when he came back to run Twitter, that was really 10% of his time.
And you think that people in America are bitching about kicking off Marjorie Taylor Greene?
How about the president of fucking Zimbabwe who's on the phone screaming at you because he won't censor this asshole or that?
There's no winning to that job.
No winning at all.
And I think he also knows that it's over, that the social media, that people are going to start moving away from it.
He sees the decentralization, so he was ready to jettison out.
I mean, I've had like one DM with him, that's it, and I've just observed from a distance.
I think he'll be a very important player in the true decentralized world that we're moving into, which we've been moving into for probably 15, 20 years.
It seems like for social media apps, that's the only way you're ever going to achieve any kind of balance.
But my concern is that they never get a chance.
Like when a new social media app starts, one of the things that first happens is immediately people start labeling it a right-wing alternative.
That's like the immediate...
That's the slam that it gets hit with as quickly as possible.
And then when you observe some of those places, I don't want to name names, but some of these new ones that start up and you see that there's like all this...
Right-wing activity.
You get a bunch of stuff.
You get, like, your basic patriot stuff, the people that have the American flag.
They don't say anything too outrageous.
Sometimes they're shocked by certain political decisions.
But then you see, like, outrageous people.
Over-the-top people.
People that are just, they sound like they're fucking insane.
They're saying all these different people are criminals and they should be court-martialed and they get real aggressive.
It's important to understand because it's a real factor.
And this is how I'm looking at it.
When I'm looking at these people arguing on these new social media platforms about which of the congressmen that are sitting in this video is the bigger traitor and which one should spend the most time in jail.
Looking at just the way they talk about stuff.
I just always go, okay, it might be a real hardcore person who's a right winger or it might be a Russian troll.
And that's what's fascinating, because I know that there's hundreds of thousands of them out there.
They have troll farms.
They set these things up, and they just purposely try to fuck with our perceptions and our arguments about things.
They purposely try, and I'm not saying that this is responsible for all of it, but I'm saying that they recognize how goofy we are, and they attack, and they're doing this all the time, and they're getting us to fight, and they're getting us to be argumentative.
There was a revolution overnight, and the government resigned, and the people took over, and the reason was, well, we're not really sure.
We think it's because the price of gas doubled overnight, maybe because people are tired of QR codes and mandates, but this was really a color revolution.
When did this happen?
A week ago, maybe.
This has been building.
But here's what's important.
I think we both can agree that President Biden ain't running shit.
Someone in probably more State Department level has done...
For months now, Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine.
Putin, come on into Ukraine.
And you know what the deal is there is that we want to put our...
Anti-aircraft missiles in Ukraine, and the Russians want to put their S-400 anti-aircraft missiles in Ukraine.
They don't want NATO or the U.S. or anybody fucking with it.
And this administration in particular, they're a bunch of Russiaphobes, and it may go back from the 60s.
There's a lot of people with a big hard-on towards Putin and Russia, and it has to be war with this guy come hell or high water, even if by proxy.
So this attention has been on Ukraine and then unbelievably, all of a sudden we have almost to the T the playbook that they did in Ukraine, Victoria Nuland, fuck the EU, I don't know if you know any of this stuff.
That was basically, we led that whole change.
That's pretty well documented.
John McCain was a big part of it.
John Kerry, it's just, it was crazy.
Biden as well, big part of that.
So this now happened in Kazakhstan, which is on the exact opposite side of Russia.
So now Putin, who has 100,000 troops, he has to haul ass because now he's got a real hot situation on his hand.
And why is this important?
Jamie, can you bring up a map of Kazakhstan?
And this is, someone is playing really brilliant but very dangerous moves in the Biden administration.
Okay, so if you look at Kazakhstan, it is in between Russia and China.
And there's a, down below, there's above Kyrgyzstan, there's on the right, on the border, somewhere around there, Jamie, there's a town, it's called, I forget what it's called, and this is not helping these...
Anyway, the point is, this is where China is connecting their railroad system to Russia to go further into Europe.
This is the Belt and Road.
This is China's whole thing.
This is also where pipelines are going to be for Russia to send their natural resources to China.
And the Biden administration or someone running the show just stopped that shit.
And that there was multiple plays on both Cuba and there was ideas about going to nuclear war with Russia, losing possibly 30 to 40 million people.
And we were talking about Dr. Strangelove.
That's what it was.
So in Dr. Strangelove, there's a general that sounds completely absurd.
He's out of his fucking mind.
He's a lunatic.
Get him out of here.
He's talking about surviving a first-strike nuclear attack, like that we could do a first-strike and we would probably survive, might lose Chicago, that kind of shit.
That was a real person.
There were real people that were actually considering us going to war with China and Russia and just getting it over with.
Because we're eventually going to have to do it later.
And so they wanted to do that and they wanted to do it with Cuba as well.
And when you think about what's happening in this country right now where, you know, there was Kennedy back then.
And Kennedy was the guy who was vetoing things and saying, no, we're not going to do that.
We're going to send envoys to Vietnam.
We're not sending any more troops.
Like he had some ideas that a lot of the people in the military industrial complex weren't happy with.
There's no one like that now.
What kind of relationship do you think Biden has with control as the president?
2019, just before the outbreak of the Wuhan flu at the time, as we jokingly called it.
There was a huge problem with interbank lending, and how that works is irrelevant, but as we now know, because that information just came out two weeks ago, JPMorgan, Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citibank, and Goldman Sachs collectively borrowed $11.7 trillion just before the pandemic started.
When the Wall Street shit happened in 2008, 2009, it was about $8 trillion.
And something was fucked up in the system.
Then it melted down.
Here, they melted down the economy by shutting everybody down.
Shut that shit down.
And now...
We've got all this money coming into the system.
CARES Act, two trillion.
Just trillions and trillions of dollars that are just being created.
The whole thing, the shutdown of the economy, that it wasn't done to protect people, that it was done In my opinion, that part was done, that was needed one way or the other.
I mean, maybe it was just a virus and it was made worse.
I mean, they had drilled, they had practiced for this, so they could trigger muscle memory with the people who were in the Vent 201 drills and everything.
That's not that hard to do.
You know, and then, well, interestingly, I feel Dr. Malone didn't do a good job of explaining mass formation.
So I've had personal contact with him, but I have studied his pitch, so I understand what it is.
If you have four elements in society, which is dissatisfaction with your meaning, just in general, what piece of shit job do I have?
If there's depression, a lot of people depressed, a lot of people on SSRIs.
If there's a free-floating anxiety, which is, oh my god, we've got this virus, what the fuck is it?
And then you add isolation to it, which even though we're online and everything, someone not going to the office, sitting at home with two kids in a two-bedroom apartment, trying to work remotely can feel very isolated.
At that moment, mass formation can occur when a solution is delivered.
And then everyone goes into a hypnotic state, and the solution was social distancing.
The solution was masking.
The solution was wash your hands.
The solution is vaccine.
And this hypnotic state, this is where it gets important, is as powerful, Dr. Malone said that correctly, as what they do in operating rooms when someone is allergic to anesthesia.
They can hypnotize you with the same mechanism so you can get cut while you're not anesthetized.
Really?
But most importantly, the leaders, the politicians, they are also in the same hypnotic state.
And they get myopic.
And like Australia, they get completely irrational and nuts.
So it doesn't lead to a dictatorship like Hitler.
It leads to totalitarianism.
And it's fucking lawless.
And it's just going to be...
And look at what's happening.
We've got people doing smashing grabs in Gucci.
We've got a lot of stuff going on.
So...
What I'm loving right now is that there's a mechanism in place that is waking people up from this.
And many people may have heard this.
People who have been double vaccinated, boosted, have followed all the rules, wear the mask, you know, whatever.
They get Omicron.
They feel shame.
Have you heard of Innis?
No.
People feel ashamed.
And like, oh my god, I can't believe it.
I did everything I was told to do.
Everything and I still got it.
I'm so ashamed.
And some people wake up and go, hey, wait a minute.
What the fuck am I ashamed for?
I did everything right.
And by the way, here I am.
They're waking up from it, and they're now looking around, and now they're seeing all the other stuff that's happening collectively.
We're in a very bad state right now, and that's mass formation, and we're in it.
And we can be in it for all kinds of reasons, but when the lockdown happened, that...
But do you think that that's possibly just setting up the narrative that we're getting in new science, and we're starting to understand, to try to realize that people are not going to take masks forever, so that you're going to try to detox us slowly from masks.
Slowly but surely, get the message out there that they're not necessary, they don't really do anything anymore.
This is very important, and this is a good place to do it.
And it's great because it's a podcast, it's independent.
When someone needs to go do this shit on mainstream television, you always have to be introduced as former FBI, former CIA, intelligence work, you know, whatever the shit, and you do your spiel in a minute and 30 seconds, and you hope that that sticks.
This is what's scary to me about the way things are going.
Every decision seems to compound the problem further as if it's on purpose.
When you hear that people that are in government And even some folks that have at least some control over law enforcement don't think that crime is a problem.
There's a fucking letter.
There's a letter that a friend of mine, I won't say where, lives in.
One of his friends is a cop.
And they sent him a letter of all the new guidelines, and these guys are passing around because they can't fucking believe it.
Like what you're allowed to arrest people for, what you're not allowed to arrest people for, what you have to let people go for.
And they've eliminated a lot of fucking crime.
And this whole idea of having at $1,000, anything more than $1,000 you can get prosecuted for.
Well, here's the problem, and my buddy Mo predicted this, and I think, unfortunately, he's right.
So, this recent trial of ex-officer Potter, who killed a guy, she thought she was reaching for her taser, yelled taser, shot him.
So, in Hill Country, there's a lot of, you know, service people up there.
And my buddy Mike...
He was considering going back into the police department, because he was there for a long time, and he quit for a little bit, and he was like, I want to go back, I want to serve again.
And after that trial happened, he said, I'm not going to do it, because No one's got your back.
And there's no way for you to police effectively because if you have to have in the back of your mind, that's what training is.
We always had kind of this secret agreement like, hey, if it happens, like with military accidentally killing civilians, you know...
I'm not trying to make it right, but I'm just saying the thinking is no one wants to be a cop anymore.
No one wants to serve the community.
And you know what's going to happen?
He's going to go into a wealthy neighborhood who have a private police force.
And the people in poor neighborhoods, you're going to get drones and robots and shit like that.
And you're never going to go to jail because we have the mechanism to lock you down now.
We know where you are.
You should be quarantining.
You're quarantining for 15 years now in your house.
This is not just about women, because there's a lot of women who can do it and handle themselves, but you should be able to fucking handle yourself if you're going to be a cop, period.
When you see a lot of these cops that are small people with no physical ability to restrain someone and no martial arts background, whether it's a small man or a small woman, that's crazy.
But this is a common conspiracy theory, air quotes, right?
But I've had it told to me by very credible people.
And the idea is that what one would do is one would, we don't want to accuse anybody, but if one wanted to do that, what one would do is they would fund a very, very progressive politician, district attorney, what have you.
Get him into office.
Then once they get him into office, then fund someone who's way to the left of him.
Fund him.
Push him.
Get him and push him out.
Fund the next one.
Make him even crazier.
Keep going.
And then get in people's heads that you have to defund the police.
You've got to say that.
Say, defund the police.
Make it a narrative.
We've got to defund the police.
Instead of retrain the police, instead of pay the money.
Imagine if we looked at our country's education system and said, we've got to defund the teachers.
That would be crazy.
You would never say that.
You'd be like, no, no, no.
They don't get paid enough.
This is crazy.
They're understaffed.
These rooms are too big.
What we need is more money that goes into education.
That's a general thing that, like, if you talk to rational people.
But if you talk to rational people, it was, like, A bunch of people that are paying attention and really care about kids' futures, that's what you'd say.
We need more money to educate these children.
The same thing you would say about cops.
If you have problems with cops, you should say, listen, we've got to rework this.
The idea of having no cops is so crazy.
And then the idea of defunding them is almost just as crazy because you take the cops that are still there and you neutralize them.
And this isn't exonerating anybody for any horrendous things that police brutality cases that we've all witnessed and we've all been terrified of and shocked by and infuriated by.
Vice President Kamala Harris caused outrage Thursday by comparing the January 6th Capitol Hill to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 and the September 11th attacks on New York and Washington by al-Qaeda terrorists.
Certain dates echo throughout history, including dates that instantly remind all we have lived through our...
Certain dates echo throughout history, including dates that instantly remind all who have lived through them where they were and what they were doing when our democracy came under assault.
She said, dates that occupy not only a place in our calendars, but a place in our collective memory.
December 7th, 1941, September 11th, 2001, and January 6th, 2021. That's insane.
Well, I think it is working with a certain amount of people.
But listen, there's a lot of people, particularly people on the left, that want to discuss why Fox News is not talking about the January 6th anniversary, as if when that date repeats itself a year later, you have to bring this up.
So, they're trying to, if they could, convict everybody who had anything to do with January 6th in any fashion whatsoever.
Now, this outfit called the Lawfare Group, they're the ones that, I think, wrote the whole strategy for Trump impeachment, maybe even for, you know, the Russia stuff, all of that.
It's a group of very, you know, Democratic fund, it's a huge law collective, really, really smart fucking people.
They are now trying to mount a case against these insurrectionists using Sarbanes-Oxley.
And Sarbanes-Oxley was a law that was put into place really to make sure that Enron never happened again.
And what is it they're trying to use?
It's some section there, 1519, I looked at it, I don't remember what it was.
It says, if you in any way are trying to hamper or kill or stop someone from official testimony, Then you can be arrested and go to jail for 20 years under Sarbanes-Oxley.
It was never intended for this situation, but that's what they're trying to do.
So that's why they want Sean Hannity's text message and all these people, because if you are any part of that, any part, I don't know if it'll fly, but if any part of that, you can fall under the statutes of this law They want to lock everybody up.
If someone didn't know that that happened, and that was going to happen, I don't think you can blame them for the actions of others that you say they influenced.
Unless they say that, you know, I want you to do that, like that guy did, the agent provocateur.
I want you to do that.
I want you to go into that building.
I want you to go after those people.
I want you to take what's yours, that kind of talk.
But there is an influence.
So like, what responsibility does someone have if they do push an influence?
And not just that, not just talk about the Capitol Hill thing, But what about like the fake Russia story?
What about Russiagate?
What about the people that were pushing a narrative that changed the way people thought about corruption in government?
What about that?
How come that's not a big deal?
How come that all happened?
We know it's all bullshit and no one apologized.
How come we know that the version of it that we were told versus what actually was going on and that communications are kind of like common and on both sides and the Clinton campaign Communicated with them, too.
Like, who knows what the fuck they talked about?
But the idea that, like, this was this terrible thing that Russia had subverted our government and they had taken over through Donald Trump and he's some sort of a fucking, you know, undercover agent.
I have a video of his face when President Trump got elected.
It was on election night, we were at the Comedy Store, and I was in the comics bar, and Jake Tapper was doing a rundown of how President Trump had won the election.
And the look on his face was like, motherfucker.
You know he wanted to say something, but he couldn't say anything.
And they said, just in passing, they never told me not to talk about it, said it was really weird, like mostly CNN people were there, including Jake Tapper.
But here's the thing we have to think of as humans.
Capitalism's not bad.
What's bad is this shit.
There's versions of capitalism that are great.
You want to buy something, you know it's a good company that makes it, the people get paid well, you buy it, you feel good, everybody's good.
Those things still exist.
The idea that they can exist, the idea that the only way to buy something is that it has to be made overseas in some fucking horrible conditions in a sweatshop.
That's the only way you could get it at a reasonable price here in America.
That's bananas.
It's not like it's impossible, it's not like they're using fairy dust over there.
Like, what the fuck are they doing?
Well, I'll tell you what they're doing.
They're getting people to work cheap.
So, it should cost a little more, and people should get paid better, and like, duh.
Like, it's such a simple formula, and we all would have clear consciences.
We all would know that if you're...
Like, if you used to buy a car in Detroit, you wanted to buy, like, a Corvette when they first started making them.
The fucking people made them.
Like, as soon as they had unions.
Those people were making good money.
They had houses.
They had a fucking boat by the lake.
It was a well-paid job.
And it felt good to buy something that was made there because you knew whether or not it's because you're patriotic, which is fine, or it's because if you know that you're giving another human being a good wage because you're buying something from a company that takes care of people.
That should be, like, one of our most important things we think of when we spend money.
It's not fun when I think about deep dives on, you know, air quotes, evil.
Because I don't know if it's real.
I don't know how much of it's real.
But I know that throughout history, there have been enormous entities, whether they're armies or governments or religions, that have wrecked havoc on the human race.
What I was going to say is, and if you don't think that can happen right now, you're crazy.
It's always happening, and we always have to fight against it.
When people think that, like, the idea of saying that freedom is important is a frivolous notion, you have to understand what you get when you don't have freedom.
If you look at the places that have the most control over people, and Australia's one of them, because everyone's unarmed, because they took the guns away in the 90s when they had one mass shooting, they took everybody's guns away.
They're ignoring science when it comes to whether or not you've recovered from it naturally because you got COVID. Should you be exempt from taking a vaccine?
It gets to this point where you're going, okay, would that be possible in a place where everybody was armed?
And I'm not saying people just rise up against government.
This is not what I'm saying.
What I'm saying is like the psychology of people where they have ultimate power over you because they have also, they have all the weapons.
Just from the, not even this, let's not even look at this scenario.
Let's look at just the psychological state of people that have absolute control over you and then they want to tell you what to do.
You know, there's some people that are bad parents.
They're like, go to your room!
Just shut up and go to your room.
They want the kid to just shut up and go to the room because they don't want to deal with it anymore.
Because they have the ultimate power over the kid.
And then the kid feels like this is a terrible relationship.
Like they don't want to listen to me.
I'm crying.
I didn't really mean to do it that way.
And you can't even talk to them.
Go to your room.
Shut the fuck up.
Go to your room.
That's some parents, right?
It's also some governments.
There's some governments that when they have the same kind of ultimate power that a parent has over a child, they're shitty government.
And they're mean, and they treat people as if they have to listen, and they treat people as if they're second-class citizens, and they know better than you, even though they're just human beings, they know better than you, and you're just gonna have to do this.
You're just gonna have to get used to doing this, because this is how we do things.
Like, hey no, fuck you!
You're just a person.
You shouldn't be telling all these other people who disagree how they have to and don't have to live their life.
How can you do that?
The only way.
You have to have ultimate power.
Ultimate power.
You have to be the only one who's armed.
You have to be the only one who gets to say.
You have to be stuck in this weird situation where you can change laws and change rules because there's an emergency.
Get away all sorts of protections that people have had in the past and then you never get them back.
Well, so here's my only – this is all I'm working on because there's a whole slew of young people who are just opting out and they're moving to building parallel systems, parallel networks, which is pretty much the only thing you can do.
We have all the technology, everything we need.
My two projects, I bring them together, brought them together, is podcasting that is protected and Bitcoin.
And I'm just on the Bitcoin train because I believe that my money is safer there.
I'm not talking about versus the US dollar.
Just in general, and I think that we will see that in our future as very protective for everything.
As they say, Bitcoin fixes this.
If you can fix the money, that's the broken part.
The money system is broken.
It causes the inflation.
It causes the misery.
It causes wars because it's linked to oil, so we have to go protect all that shit.
It's fucked up.
The dollar, I love America.
We used to have our own, the banks would create dollars.
They were promissory notes until this Federal Reserve Act came into play.
Yeah, and I have a lot of hope for cryptocurrencies.
I really do.
I don't know too much about them, but Bitcoin seems to be the one in the Ethereum, the ones that the people who are in the know talk about the most.
And my point is that what we're seeing right now, it's either going to go one way or the other.
It's either going to fall apart completely, or we're going to use this as an opportunity to right the ship and come up with a better way to live our lives.
The fundamental difference, just so I say it, because otherwise people beat me up, the difference between Bitcoin and Ethereum is Bitcoin, there will only be 21 million.
Well, now, in the dream of the metaverse, the Silicon Valley-controlled metaverse, NFTs are going to be very, very important.
They'll all be with their own shit coin.
They'll be like whatever the meta coin will be.
And then you have really more the Ethereum crowd who are building their own decentralized metaverse.
But there when you have a cool outfit that is one of a kind, you can trade it with someone and you do that through an NFT. That's a very valid reason if you're into that.
You let people invest in being a part of the company.
So you buy coins, and through those coins, you can buy products, and you can invest a certain amount, and the coins go up, you actually make money, the coins go down, you lose money.
And as the company keeps doing better, it's almost like another version of stocks or something.
Yeah, Facebook had the Libra, and it was all set up, and then the US government intervened and said, fuck no, because that could easily become the default currency overnight.
Facebook does all this local commerce.
They own the classified market.
They own the real economy.
The small mom and pops, they own that shit, which is why everyone hates them, especially the news people.
Because they're taking their salaries.
They're taking their fucking money away.
Newspapers, oh my god.
Anyway, that's not the plan.
The plan is the central bank digital currency.
You will have crypto.
You will have a digital wallet.
It will be directly from the Federal Reserve to you.
And there will be no little retail banking that just won't happen anymore.
Could you imagine if that was a thing where you got a job in the metaverse and through the metaverse you were making things at a factory in a real place?
That is the hardest part because it's too overwhelming, especially if you have a job.
If you have a job doing something and then you have a family and you have hobbies and you have friends, you don't have time to be thinking about this shit.
Most people don't have the hobbies and the friends.
We've been divided amongst vax and unvax and safe and unsafe and stay safe and go with Jesus and I hate this and I hate that and I hate you and left, right, blue, red.
All this stuff is not healthy and it's probably not coincidental.
Flying car and or personal VTOL. I don't think you're going to get flying cars because I think they'll sabotage them with accidents.
I think the best way to control people is to keep them on the ground in grids so you can cut off the grid, stop the maze right there, and then you can capture them.
If people could just fly around, why are they going to pay taxes?
I'm a licensed fixed-wing and helicopter pilot, so whatever is on the market, I can fly, and I can fly legally, and there's not going to be a lot of people doing what I'm doing for a long, long, long time.
It's a lot of moving parts unless it's completely autonomous.
You get a piece of paper when you pass that.
It's for a reason.
It's not easy to get.
You've got to learn it and you've got to do it.
And so that's not just how do I operate the aircraft.
But for me personally, CES, the Consumer Electronics Show, is on right now in, I think, Vegas.
They're debuting the coolest fucking shit, and it's almost there.
Look at this Jetson 1. So it's like a one-person, basically a drone, and you can take it right out of my garage, go pop up and fly to see my buddy Joe.
They're not quite there yet.
It only does 50 mile radius.
But I think in three years, if they figure out the battery technology, which is still questionable, this is the kind of shit, man.
So you have, like, 10-person, you know, pop in so people can live outside of the urban core, land on the rooftop.
That's coming.
But the regulations and the lawsuits, we can't even figure out 5G now with these regulatory, the FAA is fighting the FCC. Well, if people decide to fly drones, you know, they can fly drones over places, but there's restricted airspace.
Like, if we get rid of that whole idea of restricted, if people can just fly across borders, everyone from Mexico that wants to live in America is going to move.
But I'm just trying to look out from here to the eventual changing of all the things we do, whether it's transportation— Yeah, I don't know if I like any of it.
Oh, yeah, you could probably see way better with that.
Like imagine if you were playing sports and you had a way better vision on like where a ball is or something.
The making of Mojo AR contact lenses that give your eyes superpowers.
Using a display the size of a grain of sand to project images into the retina, this startup could help everyone from firefighters to people with poor vision to the government tracking everything you see.
We're still 15. Well, that's a real thing, though.
I mean, it's a silly thing to make fun of, but it's a real thing.
It seems like there's so many compounding issues.
There's that, there's our insistence of being deeper and deeper integrated into technology.
And our need for innovation where we always want the newest, best technology.
We're never satisfied until we get better and better stuff.
And then this integration with that technology through some sort of a system of communication that can be controlled, whether it's social media, whatever it is, whether it's the news, whatever it is, where you can control whatever people hear and what becomes normalized.
And this was kind of interesting how this happened.
So we've been hearing, you know, for years and years and years, we've been hearing about solar, wind, solar, wind.
This is all going to be great.
And slowly everyone starts to dismantle.
Throughout Europe, Natural gas, even here in Texas now, you can no longer get a home that has gas heating or a gas stove.
It all has to be electricity.
They're removing all gas.
Gas is evil.
Gas is greenhouse gas.
We can't have any of this.
Nuclear has to shut down.
Everybody shut the fuck up.
Get rid of your nuke plants.
Germany, they're the ones that went all in.
They closed down their gas plants, most of them.
They just recently closed down their last nuclear reactor, and then all of a sudden, To the weak, the European Union says, yeah, we think we're going to classify natural gas and nuclear as green investments.
So there's the reveal.
Bill Gates has investments in nuclear.
And they're fucking the Germans because the Germans literally shut down their last nuclear plant.
So they realized—maybe it was a plant from the beginning, but they realized that the solar and wind, you can't do it without supplemental energy, natural gas.
Nuclear is the ultimate solution.
It's not as dangerous as it used to be.
And I think they gaslit the whole fucking world and now in context I kind of also understand the Uranium One deal that happened during the Obama administration that Hillary Clinton signed off on which gave away a lot of our The U.S. is nuclear fuel.
Maybe this has been a long time coming.
Like, get all the shit out, then we're gonna control the energy with nuclear and gas.
When they first started innovating with solar and with wind, the people that were involved in those businesses Those were entrepreneurs and engineers and scientists that were trying to figure out how to extract the most amount of energy from the wind, the most amount of energy from solar.
And then over time, I think they found that there's some serious restrictions.
Like, you have to have wind.
If you don't have any wind, you don't have no electricity.
Like, I flew by in California once, and I looked down at this wind farm, and I'll never forget, none of them bitches are spinning.
I think that there was a promise that battery technology would advance along with the solar and wind technology, and a lot of promise, including, I would say, arguably from Elon.
If the wind is blowing too hard, you can't overload the grid, so they have to turn them off.
There's that problem, too.
Now, the real issue, and this is what happened, in my opinion, in Texas when we lost power for four or five days.
The energy that we consume has been traded and commoditized 20 times over up to five years ago by energy suppliers.
This is what ERCOT is.
It's basically a real-time auction every five minutes On this side is Austin saying, hey, I need some energy, and on that side are the suppliers.
And they say, okay, I'll buy yours for $75 a megawatt hour.
And then after five minutes, they're looking at these prices, and I'll grab yours.
Those prices ran up to $9,000 per megawatt hour just before this all happened.
Basically, Enron never went away.
These are just people who are trading energy like it's stocks and bonds, and because of that, no one thought that, hey, you know, maybe we should at least fire up one plant at a possible loss, because it takes several days to do, just in case this storm is bad.
They took the risk of the money, losing money, over everybody else, and that's been completely...
Covered up, not talked about.
It's a fucking mess.
It's just Wall Street bets going on right there.
Not Wall Street bets, but like betting on Wall Street going on with our energy supply.
And no one knows.
Well, Abbott knows.
The people know.
You know, now climate change activists are using this as Texas can't manage their grid.
We got a great grid.
We got assholes who are trading our futures.
And then German companies, not even American or Texan.
I thought it was going to turn me into a total loser because I thought I wasn't going to be able to keep a job where I had to do things that I did not want to do, which is what I thought most people had to do all day long, which really is the case for most people.
They wouldn't say something crazy if they thought it was funny.
It's too risky.
Why take a risk when you're managing all this?
It'd be better if you were less controversial.
Then you'd get more sponsors.
And then you'd have more people paying for things.
I don't think that's true anymore.
I don't think that's real anymore.
I think we're at this point where we realize that whatever our views of our society are, whatever our views of culture and civilization are, they're shaped by other people.
And they're shaped by other people who may or may not have thought this through.
There's examples of people who absolutely have thought this through and they're fascinating examples.
Fascinating accounts of people who wrote things down that still inspire us to this day.
Even people who You know, wrote the Declaration of Independence and what a bunch of crafty fucks sitting around thinking, how do we write down some rules to keep this thing on the rails as long as possible?
Fascinating, right?
But not most people.
Most people aren't thinking like that.
Most people don't have the time to think like that.
If you wait until you're like 35, 36 years old, and you have a deep investment in a company that you've been working for for 10 years plus, and you also have a family, and you have a mortgage, it's very difficult for anybody to rock the boat.
They're fascinating because everybody wants to think they're cute.
They're the meanest motherfuckers.
I remember one time I was flying home, or driving home rather, and this owl flew above my car and dropped a rabbit on the road in front of me.
Because sometimes when you startle them, if you drive by and they have their prey, they try to fly with it, but then they realize like, hey, this rabbit's fucking heavy, I gotta let this bitch go.
I want to say it was early 1900s, which kind of makes sense, because if you have a loyal dog, especially if you use them in a rural area, chasing off wolves and- I have one now.
Hunting and stuff.
Back then, a dog was super important, especially in the 1700s and the 1800s.
If you had dogs to let you know that wolves were nearby, that was real.
They're just doing that because they're going to corner the bison market and stop us from hunting bisons.
And what they're trying to do is bison is better than beef, and they're trying to get rid of beef, and they're moving beef out, and they're going to start with this plant-based meat.
But really what they're trying to do is get the bison back.
And once they get the bison in place, they're going to say, well, this is the national animal.
You can't shoot a bison.
Only we can shoot a bison.
So we know how many bison can get shot, and we'll control all the bison.
If you're on public land, there's a lot of places in this country where you can get a general over-the-counter tag, and you have a pretty good chance of encountering a deer.
Decent.
But on these ranches, you've got a fucking 100% chance of encountering deer.
They're all over the place.
So it's a weird form of hunting to a lot of people.
A lot of people don't like the feeders, the whole situation.
But if you want to get meat, it's the best way to do it.
If that's what your concern is, let them roam around, and then every now and then when they're eating, I'm going to whack one.
But if you did that, then you would establish that there was always food there, so you would get a steady amount of deer there, and then every now and then you whack one.
But if you whack one with a bow and arrow, it'll be way quieter and probably not freak them out as much.
So, like, they probably won't even know what's going on.
One of them just hit, whack, there's a noise, they run off, and then they fall down, and then they're gone.
I just thought that at the time I was sold on the, it comes from this guy, he's the druid, and he got it from the tree bark, so I kind of believe that.
That was kind of from Bush to Obama, and that became really unpopular overnight.
Like, everybody was handing out Atlas Shrug to their employees, and this is the way to go, objectivism, and, you know, like, freedom.
It was kind of still the information, much more conservative-leaning, which a lot of Silicon Valley really is, because, of course, just the amount of money, you know, So they're socially liberal because it's a good posture?
I think most of them now are in total capture.
There's no other...
I mean, how can you be an investor in Google and be a Republican?
Right, but when it comes to money, they're very conservative in terms of like using offshore accounts and the way they, you know, structure their taxes.
Football players, a lot of fighters, and that's where this all comes from, is that the brain's super delicate.
There's real good therapies that they've devised, like magnetics and some other stuff with hormone replacement and stuff, but make no mistake about it, getting hit in the head is fucking terrible.
A judge on like people's disputes and I had to like like with humor and it was a comedian that was my sidekick who was the The cop so there's a bunch of wild pitches like that.
But there's also mistakes not just in facts, but there's mistakes in philosophy.
Like, you could have a bad idea of how things should be, and you've committed to that bad idea, and you defend that bad idea.
And you haven't really had time to just sit down and think it through in its entirety, objectively divorced from your own adopted opinions.
The opinions that you took on, that you're defending, divorce it from those and just look at it.
And that's hard for people to do because we're so fucking tribal.
And these ideas, whatever they are, get locked up into a group.
You're on this group, you believe this.
You're on that group.
I had a long argument with a friend of mine once about abortion.
It wasn't an argument.
It was like a weird conversation where they were like, it's always a woman's right to choose.
And I said, okay, but what about when the baby's like eight and a half months?
Isn't that a different thing?
Is it a different thing when it's five cells than it is when it's eight and a half months?
I mean, I'm not saying what- Depending on where you're coming from, sure.
He didn't want to admit that.
It was a thing where he didn't want to discuss it.
I said, okay, listen, I'm not a pro-life person.
I believe a woman should be the one who makes the decision if she wants an abortion.
100%.
But at a certain point in time, it becomes kind of crazy.
Right?
Like, admitted that when the baby's about to be born, the day it's about to be born, if you decide to kill the baby hours before it's born while it's in the womb, that's a different thing than an abortion when a baby is like six hours old, right?
I'm not making a judgment about what people should or shouldn't be able to do or what law is.
I'm just saying, don't you admit there's a difference between those things.
And the resistance of even discussing this was fascinating because it was like someone who had like a spell around them and they couldn't, there's no, I can't discuss, cannot discuss.
Like, do not talk.
Do not talk about this one thing.
It didn't want to acknowledge that they're different because if you do, then you set up the narrative that abortion is murder and that abortion should be evil and that now you're a pro-life person.
And you don't want to be a pro-life person because they're the crazies that attack capital.
That's the January 6th people, right?
So there's these ideologies that are attached to these things in this way that's almost inescapable if you're on team blue or if you're on team red.
Well, unfortunately, both Team Blue and Team Red in Texas created this controversy specifically for this election.
This law that was passed is, I don't think there's any reasonable person that can think that, you know, you're 12 weeks in or whatever it was, six weeks.
I mean, no reasonable person can think that that's reasonable for detection.
Leave that as it is.
Then the whole, which was not true, you can rat on your neighbor and the Uber driver can report you.
That turned out to be not true.
You can sue a clerk who issues a license.
The whole point is, it's not about the actual choice of a woman or the life of the child.
Let it be said now that I recognize right now that Adam Curry is a spokesperson for big mind reading.
This is what's going on, because once big mind reading comes along, you don't have to worry about being honest, because everyone's going to read minds.
You're going to promote this technology.
It's going to be decentralized mind reading technology.
I thought that what was also, that they might be able to reprogram some things if there's been some kind of neural pathway break, so not necessarily that you are hooked up to a machine, but they can actually do some reprogramming and fix certain things.
Where they literally would drill a hole, they'd go in, they'd pull out your frontal lobe, whatever that little thing is, and people were happy because they'd heard, this is the thing I want.
2,000 Pilgrim patients were lobotomized in the 40s and 50s, according to the later reports from the New York Times and elsewhere.
Though lobotomies were probably performed at mental hospitals in Central Islip and Creedmoor, among other places, one out of every 25 lobotomies performed in the United States took place at Pilgrim, making it undoubtedly the scariest place in Long Island.
So that's the fucked up part about it, which I looked, when I was looking this up recently, because there was some stuff, it was still going on in the 70s and 80s.
We all know those alcoholics that they have one drink and then fucking shark eyes.
They're gone.
Whatever the fuck goes on in that alcoholic, it's a different thing.
They have a couple of drinks and they're gone.
They're not even there anymore.
You're like, hello?
They can't communicate with you.
They're whacked out.
They're gone.
Well, I think that is...
We've got to take that into consideration when it comes to heroin.
But for Carl, when he was a, and I hope I'm not fucking this up, but he was a very straight-laced guy.
He wasn't into drugs, then he became a clinical researcher.
And during that time period, when he started really understanding the mechanisms around these drugs and what they actually do, and then all the unjust laws, like the difference between the sentencing for crack versus cocaine, which is crazy.
Because he's like, they're exactly the same thing in terms of the effect on the body.
And he was explaining all this stuff to me.
He's like, he loves heroin.
He says, heroin's wonderful.
He goes, if you get pure heroin, he goes, it's beautiful.
It makes you appreciate things, makes you appreciate your relationships.
It's like, the heroin's not the problem.
The problem is that it's illegal, that you're buying stuff that's laced with fentanyl, the public perceptions of it, the way we look at drugs.
And his idea is you don't want a world that's drug free.
You want responsible, educated drug use.
And when it comes to a guy who's a professor at Columbia, a brilliant guy, By the way, it looks like he does a lot of drugs.
I mean, not that I tried heroin, but he influenced me to change my thoughts of what, you know, we have these ideas about how hard it is to get off these drugs.
Well, for some people, it is, right?
Like for some people, you can get drunk and you don't want to get drunk again.
It's an amazing story, especially when you realize how smart he is, and that he didn't know, and he got roped into it, and then he couldn't get off of him.
Well, I don't know anything about that, but what I do know is that I used to have a family that lived fairly close to my house, and their kid, they put him on something real early on, and I don't think he needed anything.
He seemed like a normal kid.
He just had a lot of energy, and they were deciding he had too much energy.
And so we were all like, you know, the people that knew the kid were like, what the fuck?
Like, you can't say anything, and you don't know what to do, and you don't know if they're right.
Like, maybe they're right.
Maybe we only see the best version of him.
I don't know.
But it's scary to think that he could have been just a normal kid with too much fucking energy and bouncing off the walls, and the parents didn't want to deal with it.
Well, growing up a kid today with all the fucking influences and all the craziness and, you know, all the bizarre aspects of our culture and the interconnectedness of it, and these kids are going to look like fucking pioneers.
They're going to look like the people who settled west to get gold in comparison to kids that are coming along 100 years from now.
If they take control of their own experiences, yes.
If they continuously allow and most unwittingly, if they just don't know, if they allow other entities, artificial intelligence, whatever it is, control their experiences without human experience.
Do you think the fear is, and this is like a real long-term concept, The fear is that one day we'll decide that whatever does make us human, whether it's our emotions, our hormones, our desires and greed and jealousy and all those different things, are all a problem.
And they're not helping us achieve our goal.
And all those things can be slowly edited out.
Because think about all the damage that emotions have done.
Think about all the crimes of passion and all the fighting and all the hatefulness.
If we could just tamper those emotions and get them into a far more controllable vibration, And we can do that through CRISPR or whatever the fuck they decide to use or whatever Neuralink or whatever the new jazz is that comes along.
If they can figure out a way to say that what makes us human, our ability to emote, our ability to scream and to play crazy songs and to tell funny jokes and to write meaningful poems and all that stuff is a complex.
Like, mess of shit that we can't control and it's led to the demise of our civilization.
What do we love?
We love being together and love and camaraderie and we don't need them.
We just need love.
So we're going to engineer out the bad parts and keep only the good parts.
And his ideas, I mean, if you looked at just the amount of innovation that one guy's been a part of, and some of them are crazy, like, not crazy, like, dumb, but I mean, like, insane, the idea of a tunnel that goes under L.A., like, and they're shooting people through these fucking tunnels with cars.
Now the new NASA scientists who don't remember the original moon landings, I guess, like, well, it's going to be hard to get through the Van Allen belt.
You know, humans, a lot of radiation.
Well, how the fuck they do that in that tin can with no computer or nothing?
They just went up there and it landed and it worked and I went deep into this for many years.
Before you even do it with people, they've definitely done it with objects, they've definitely done it with satellites, so they have the technology to get something there.
The question is whether or not they have the technology to get the, in today's day, get a biological entity there and back, right?
What I like the most about these videos, this is about the energy.
So there's this one video.
This is so fucking cool.
And you've seen the pictures.
You've seen the pictures of Manhattan around 1900. And there's these beautiful big buildings, fantastic shit.
And then the streets are just squalor and people with horse-driven crap.
And the video says, how did this get built?
What happened?
Why are the streets just mud and all these beautiful buildings?
When did that occur?
What did it look like then?
Where are those pictures?
And I'm just telling you how this video is put together.
It's pretty slick.
And they show all these pictures of completely empty streets.
So the theory is that there was a water event, but really a very severe one, but that electricity used to flow through canals everywhere.
Wait for it.
From the churches.
And the church steeple, which now has a bell tower, that's where a ball of mercury used to be.
And listen to me, because Elon's going to fucking patent this and he's going to sell it to us.
And then that energy, they pull the energy from the ionosphere, that somehow it interacts with mercury, then they would distribute the electricity through Tesla's principles, through the earth and through water.
Well, we know that Tesla had this idea of broadcasting electricity through the air, but people that look at today's electronics think that that would be horrendous, because then if he had done that and implemented that, we would never be able to use all these electronic devices and all the things that we have today, because they'd be constantly interfered by this electricity flying through the air.
Or would they develop new technology that interacted with that electricity and it would just be different than what we're accustomed to?
You know I have a ham radio license, so I know a lot about high frequency and radio waves.
And there is the ultra-low frequencies, which is like a 700...
Foot antenna or some shit like that these ultra low subsonic frequencies a lot of experimentation going on and That actually transmits through the earth So you transmit your signal and it goes through the earth's core to the other side and that's where it's received So that's more my understanding of the technology Tesla was using But you don't think the earth is living in a crater, right?
We don't think we really have no evidence to prove it.
unidentified
No, of course But it's one of the weird ones to entertain There's a lot of people out there.
What I get interested in is a lot of the biblical parallels and references.
I have a lot of believers in my life, and I question them on all kinds of stuff.
Certainly what we're seeing now compared to revelations, and there's always been this kind of doomsday, which is maybe why I have never connected with God is because I'm such a fucking optimist.
I'm not quite sure what it is.
But I recognize the connection people have.
And there's so many parallels with a lot of these quote-unquote conspiracy theories.
You've got to wonder, you know, what's the conspiracy?
So this guy came up with these theories of time travel that apparently if you have enough power, you have to have some massive...
I think the first guy to come up with...
No, no, no.
Kurt Goodell, I think, was the first guy to come up with the idea of...
Of a functional mechanism that could actually change time, that you could actually go back in time or go forward in time.
But the amount of energy that you would need is just impossible to imagine.
And then what this guy seems to have concluded is that even if you go back in time, this professor, even if you, is it Ronald Mallet, is that his name?
Even if you go back in time, you can't go back if there's no road.
So from the moment a time machine is invented, from that moment, the moment it's switched on, that moment till forever, time ceases to become linear.
I mean, you want to talk about a thing that would completely change the way human beings interface with the universe itself?
It's time travel.
Because everything that people can figure out from now until as long as there are people will then be ported back To where we are now and the understanding of it will be brought back to it and then who knows if you'll ever even be able to achieve innovation because you're going to be constantly dealing with people traveling to and from different time zones to and from different time periods like all simultaneously I think it's impossible for us to imagine how wild a time machine could be if
it did get invented.
Because it's not like, oh, I'm going to go back and steal all the gold.
No, it's like everybody's going to do that, stupid.
Everybody's going to do that at every second of every day, ever.
Or are they in a whole different plane of consciousness, which is perhaps a lot cooler, and we're just seeing the external interpretation that we make.
Do you think we'll get to a point in our lifetime where the power of these decentralized entities will eclipse these corporate-controlled medias?
Because if you think about the amount of influence that a decentralized entity could have, like people just living life and that- You're already decentralized from the mainstream media, you yourself.