Michael Osterholm, a biodefense expert and "medical detective," warns COVID-19’s U.S. spread will peak at 48M hospitalizations and 480K deaths in 3–7 months, defying early fatality-rate optimism while citing overwhelmed Italian hospitals and younger high-risk patients due to obesity/smoking. He dismisses lab-leak theories, pinpoints animal-to-human transmission via Wuhan’s pangolin-linked virus (late Nov), and compares systemic failures—like China’s 690K renal drug dependency and lack of vaccine stockpiles—to a preventable forest fire. Osterholm also links zoonotic risks to wet markets, where exotic wildlife like civet cats and bats thrive in viral "soup" conditions, and highlights Lyme disease’s autoimmune complications, with antibiotics failing in chronic cases. Vaccine development, he notes, faces years-long hurdles due to past SARS/dengue ADE risks, stressing research and preparedness over misplaced skepticism. [Automatically generated summary]
I'm, for a lack of a better term, a medical detective.
I've spent my whole career tracking infectious diseases down, trying to stop them, trying to understand where they come from so we can make sure they don't happen in the first place, but most of all, trying to respond to situations just like this.
Well, first of all, you have to understand the timing of it in the sense that it's just beginning.
And so, in terms of what hurt, pain, suffering, death has happened so far, it's really just beginning.
This is going to unfold for months to come yet, and that's, I think, what people don't quite yet understand.
What we saw in China, I'm convinced as are many of my colleagues, as soon as they release all of these social distances, these mandated stay in homes, haven't left your home in weeks and weeks kind of thing, when they go back to work, they're on planes, trains, subways, buses, crowded spaces, manufacturing plants, even China is going to come back again.
And so this really is acting like an influenza virus, something that transmits very, very easily through the air.
We now have data to show that you're infectious before you even get sick.
And in some cases, quite highly infectious, just breathing is all that you need to do.
So from this perspective, I can understand why people would say, well, wait a minute, flu kills a lot more itself every year than this does.
And I remind people this just was beginning.
Probably the best guesstimate we have right now on what limited data we have would say this is going to be at least 10 to 15 times worse than the worst seasonal flu year we see.
And require 48 million hospitalizations, 96 million cases actually occurring, over 480,000 deaths that can occur over the next three to seven months with this situation.
So this is not one to take lightly.
And I think that's what I can understand if you say there's only been 10 deaths or 20 deaths or 50 deaths.
Just remember, two weeks ago, we were talking about almost no cases in the United States.
And now that we're testing for it and watching the spread as it's unfolding, those numbers are going up astronomically.
Three weeks ago, Italy was just living life just fine.
Now they're literally at a virtual shutdown in the northern parts of Italy.
And that's the challenge with an infectious disease like this.
It can spread very quickly, and it also can affect people.
I think maybe to put this into modern terms, because this is something we think of often when we think of, you know, pre-antibiotic days, you know, the old-time medicine.
We have an employee at our Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, and she has a dear friend who lives in Milan, Italy, and she works at a hospital there, and she texted us to this employee of ours last night.
And this was an email that came out yesterday from one of their physicians in Milan at the largest hospital there, and he said...
I just got a very disturbing message from a cardiologist at one of the Milan's largest hospitals.
They're deciding who they have to let die.
They aren't screening the staff anymore because they need all hands on deck, and they have very small areas of the hospital dedicated to non-COVID patients where they still screen doctors.
Everybody else is dedicated to COVID patients, so even if they're positive, meaning that they're sick, but they don't have a severe cough or fever, then they have to work.
He says that they're seeing an alarming number of cases in the 40-something age range, and these are horrible cases.
So we need to stop thinking that this is only an old person's disease.
This is what's going to unfold, not just in Wuhan, it's unfolding in Milan, it's unfolding here in Seattle, and this is what's going to continue to rollingly unfold throughout the world.
In fact, that's the primary risk factor for dying is being old and then having certain underlying health problems.
For example, in China, Those men over the age of 70 who also smoked, 8-10% of them died.
65% of older Chinese men smoke.
The case fatality rate or the percentage of people who die in women in that same age group was only about 2%.
In that case, very few women smoke.
Now, the challenge we have is that that's the Chinese data.
But there are a series of risk factors that we worry about that if they overlay on this disease are going to cause bad outcomes.
And we happen to be right at ground zero for one of the major ones here in this country, and that's obesity.
We know that obesity is just like smoking in terms of its ability to really cause severe life-threatening disease, and 45% of our population today over the age of 45 in this country are obese or severely obese, men and women.
So one of the concerns we have is we're going to see more of these, what I guess I would call, very serious and life-threatening cases occur in our country because of a different set of risk factors than we saw in China.
When we call something an incubation period, we're talking about from the time you and I got exposed, meaning I was in a room breathing the air that somebody else who was infected with the virus was expelling out, I breathed it in.
How long from that time period till the time period that you get sick?
And what is that?
That's what we call the incubation period.
So that's when case numbers can double or triple in every so many days.
In this case, it's about four days.
And we actually have data there from people who were exposed one time or one time only.
And we know when they were exposed, where they were exposed, and how soon do they get sick afterwards.
So the chauffeur in the car where an individual was sick or showing symptoms, then the chauffeur gets it four days later.
You know, they were there one time and one time only.
And this is what's unfolding here, and this is where I think it's such an important, and I said why the timing is so important, because, you know, Joe, we've really got to get information out to the public.
There is so much misinformation right now, and, you know, we're going to be doing this for a while.
This is not going to happen overnight, and I worry.
I keep telling people we're handling this like it's a corona blizzard, you know, two or three days, we're back to normal.
This is a coronavirus winter, and we're going to have the next three months or more, six months or more.
That are going to be like this.
And, you know, so far this thing has been unfolding exactly as we predicted it.
We and our center put out a piece on January 20th and said this is going to spread worldwide.
At the time, people said, ah, no, it's just China.
We put out a piece the first week of February and said this is going to pop probably the last week of February, first week of March.
Because what happens is it has what's called an R-naught or a doubling time.
Of these every four days, so the increase is doubling every four days.
So if you go from 2 to 4 to 8 to 16, it takes a while to build up.
But when you start going from 500 to 1,000 to 2,000 to 4,000, that's what we're seeing happen in places like Italy.
We're beginning to see it in some ways up in Seattle.
It's what happened in China.
And, you know, when people are confronted with that, suddenly this low-risk phenomena that everybody talks about isn't so low anymore.
The primary mechanism for transmission is just the respiratory route.
It's just breathing.
In studies in Germany, which just have been published literally in the last 24 hours, they actually followed a group of people who had been exposed to somebody in an automobile manufacturing plant.
And then they had nine people that, with this exposure, said, if you have any symptoms at all, contact us.
We want to follow up.
And they all agreed.
Well, they got infected.
And so in the very first hours, just feeling bad, sore throat, they went in and sampled their throats, their saliva, their nose for virus.
They did blood.
They did stool.
They did urine.
And they found that at that very moment when they first got sick, they had incredibly high levels of virus, sometimes 10,000 times that we saw with SARS in their throats, meaning they were infectious at that point already, and they hadn't even had symptoms yet of really any nature.
And that's where we're concerned because that's the kind of transmission, you know, I always have said, trying to stop influenza virus transmission likes trying to stop the wind.
You know, we've never had anything successfully do that other than vaccine, and we don't have a vaccine here.
So what's happening is that people in public spaces are getting infected.
And the way you need to address that is, unfortunately, if you're older, over 55, you have some underlying health problems, which unfortunately a lot of Americans do.
We have obesity.
Then right now, you don't want to be in large public spaces and try to potentially get infected.
So you can take care of that part.
As far as what can public health do?
We can talk about this.
We're not going to have a vaccine anytime soon.
That's happy talk.
You know, we can close schools.
One of the big challenges we have right now, if we close schools, what do we accomplish?
An influenza virus.
We close schools during outbreaks because it turns out kids get infected in school and they're like little virus reactors.
You know, they come home and they transmit it to mom and dad and brothers and sisters.
And so we close schools sometimes.
Christmas breaks are always great for kind of putting the dampening effect on flu.
In this case, kids are not getting sick very often at all, which is one of the really good news features of this disease.
In China, only 2.1% of the cases are under 19 years of age.
And I'm going to come to that in a second because they're getting infected, it turns out.
One study showed that they still get infected with the virus, but they don't get sick.
And we have that happen.
There's a disease called infectious hepatitis, hepatitis A, where we have outbreaks in daycares.
And the way we know we have an outbreak is because it's transmitted through the stool, fecal, oral.
His mom and dad and the daycare providers all get sick.
And the kids, those symptoms we go in and test the kids are all positive.
So some diseases will manifest primarily when you're an adult but not as a child.
This one appears to be the same.
So do we close schools or not if we're not really spreading the disease?
Because it turns out that if we close schools, a recent study done showed that 38% of nurses today in this country who are working in the medical care area have kids in school.
And if suddenly we're closing schools for two or three months, who's going to take care of those kids?
One-fourth of the American population has no sick leave.
If we close schools, they don't get paid if they have to stay home.
So when you ask what can we do, we have to really be thoughtful about what we do.
Are we doing more harm than good by closing schools, for example, even though everybody will say, oh, we've got to do everything we can, or do we just tell people, you know, it's going to be limiting your contact as much as you can, and that's really about what we can do.
Well, they can put them in quarantines of some kind if they want and follow up on them, but you're guaranteed they're all going to keep getting infected day after day.
And that's what, hopefully, this is a wake-up call.
The business community hopefully will wake up.
You know, one of the other things we're doing right now, Joe, this is really one of the things that has me most concerned about this whole situation is our group has been studying for the last year and a half with support from the Walton Family Foundation looking at critical drug shortages.
It turns out that we identified 153 drugs in this country.
I mean, it's on the crash card.
It's acute critical drugs.
100% of them are generic.
All of them basically are made offshore of the United States.
And a large part of them are made in China and India.
And at this point, we have shortages anyway every day, just before this crisis happened.
Now these supply chains have gone down.
Our group is actively helping the United States government try to figure out, you know, where they can get these drugs.
Now, just think of this.
If I came to you and said the Defense Department was going to outsource all this munitions production to China, you'd look at me and say, come on.
You know what?
The U.S. Defense Department has no more access to these drugs than anybody else.
They are beholden to China for these drugs.
690,000 Americans have end-stage renal disease right now.
Most of their primary drugs are coming from China.
And now with the shutdown, and what's happening with this, and this is what I talked about in the book why I was so concerned, because we are at risk.
So even this situation unfold, it's not just about what the virus does to you, it's about what the entire system is rigged up to be, and what this virus does once it gets into it.
One of the things that I read was that if you are in contact, that 20 minutes in a sauna, in a really hot sauna, is very good for killing some of the virus.
See, if that temperature of 180 degree air got really into your lungs, your lungs would be fried.
You'd be dead.
So what happens is just from the time you breathe it in and what you mix it with the air there, it's kind of like taking a cup of hot water and putting it into a bathtub of cold water.
And so what happens by the time you get done, it's not that hot.
And so in this case, your lungs couldn't stand even 110 to 20 degree heat without causing real severe damage.
When you breathe out, you don't breathe all the air out.
You'd almost be dead.
You couldn't do the tidal volume.
What are you saying?
In other words, you have so much air in your lungs already, when you breathe out, you breathe just a little bit of it out, and each time you bring more in, out, in and out.
And so when this mixes in, the hot air like that, or the very cold air, you know, in Minnesota, when you're 45 below zero, we have the same problem.
We don't freeze our lungs, okay?
You know, when we breathe in, it may feel cold.
And so it's just, there's so much in there that it mixes with the other air, and it ultimately doesn't, the temperature of your lungs don't change.
Even if you're doing some crazy deep breathing exercises where you slowly exhale all the air out until there's nothing left and then breathe it all the way in?
And let me just give a little bit of background more to my career.
Back in the early 1990s, I got very involved in the whole area of biodefense and bioterrorism, biowarfare.
It turned out I was involved with helping to interview and get information from some of the Russian bioweaponiers.
After the wall fell and Russia collapsed, we had all these experts coming out who had been spending their whole lives making bioweapons.
And it became very clear to me this was really a serious challenge.
And as part of my work, I spent a lot of time in this area, and I actually, through a series of serendipitous events, became a personal advisor to His Majesty King Hussein of Jordan before he died on this topic.
I got really into it.
I wrote a book that was published on 9-11 of 2000 called Living Terrors, What Our Country Needs to Notice 5, The Coming Bio-Terrorist Catastrophe, and I think I bought 8 of the 12 copies that were sold that year afterwards.
And then when 9-11 happened, of course, then it became really prominent.
And then I went on to serve on a group here in the United States that was basically the National Science Advisory Board on Biosecurity Safety Issues.
So I've had a lot of experience in this area.
And so I bring that to the table and I tell you there is no evidence whatsoever that this is a bioweapon or that it was accidentally released from the Wuhan lab.
Today, with the genetics we have on these viruses and how we can do testing, we can almost date them, almost like carbon testing.
You know, so radiocarbon and you want to know how old a block is or something like that.
This thing clearly jumped from an animal species probably the third week of November to humans.
And pangolins, you know, these scaly, anteater-like animals, are a very good source because we have coronaviruses just like those in these animals.
And it got into a human.
So, you know, we've surely had a lot of challenges with that, but I don't believe that there's any evidence linking those to, one, an intentional release or an accidental release, or that it's an engineered bug.
My friend Duncan and I did a show back in 2012-ish, somewhere around there, with Sci-Fi, where we went to the CDC in Galveston, and we talked to them about that very thing, and they said the real concern, the real concern is just actual diseases.
Brian Richards who explained the science behind it.
And there are so many people that are dismissing this because either they enjoy deer hunting or they want captive cervids to be something that are still something that you could be released on private property because people grow and breed deer and then sell them to ranchers who want deer in their properties, particularly large deer.
And, I mean, guys that I have talked to that are dismissing it, I can see the chain of events that they want it to be not a concern.
But if you see what it's doing to deer, it's terrifying.
It's 100% fatal.
The DNA exists on plants for years.
They leak it out of their saliva.
They leave traces of it everywhere.
And in Doug's area, somewhere near there, there's like 50% infection rate.
Listen, I think this is really a significant challenge.
I was involved back in the 1990s and into the 1980s when Mad Cow first emerged in England.
And at the time, I was asked to give an assessment of this bovine spongiform encephalopathy and other prions.
These prions are what causes disease.
And, you know, people wanted to dismiss it that people weren't going to get sick.
Well, then we realized 10 years later, all these human cases started to show up that were from those exposures 10 years before.
And it took a while before those prions obviously changed in the cattle to get to the point where they'd infect humans.
Well, the same thing is happening with deer.
If you look back on the deer population that were infected 30 years ago, and you look at it today, the prions are constantly changing.
They're mutating.
They're new strains.
And they're getting more human-like all the time.
And one of the things our center is doing is working on that very issue of trying to help people understand that the studies that were done 15 or 20 years ago looking at how infectious these might be for humans were really well done.
They were good, but they had different strains.
And over time, these strains are looking to be more and more like they could infect humans or they could even infect cattle.
which would be another huge challenge if that happened.
And so I think your point's a really good one.
And we know today that there are probably at least 17,000 deer that were consumed in the past year that were actually positive for this prion and people went ahead and ate them anyway.
One of the challenges, we don't have a test unless you die.
And then that's a heck of a way to have to get a test.
So one of the challenges, you don't know this until you actually show up with the signs and symptoms.
And so one of the things that we're looking at carefully is doing surveillance or disease detection among people that might present with this.
If it's going to happen, I suspect the naturally occurring prion-related diseases, Leitz-Kreutz-Fallt-Yakub's disease you just mentioned, occurs typically in older people, over 70. If you suddenly start seeing a 40-year-old or a 50-year-old or 60-year-old even with this disease, then you got to start thinking what else is going on.
And so that'll help us detect it in cases.
But then we've already failed.
You know, then we've had 10 years worth of transmission or more potentially before we get the first human cases like we did with Mad Cow.
And so our message has been right now, hunting is really important.
It is a very important part of our society.
Frankly, it's the way we manage deer herds, thank God.
It's a huge economic boon for running the kinds of DNRs, etc.
we have.
We balance the back, as you know, from sportsmen on these licenses.
And so we don't want to stop hunting.
But we've got to make sure that people aren't getting infected.
And one of the things that our group at the University of Minnesota is working on is tests now that are almost like point of detection tests.
So if you shoot an animal, could you know very quickly that it's positive or not?
And then you'd know not to process that animal or eat it.
When they're sanitizing medical equipment that they've used on mad cow patients, or whether it's cows or humans with these prions, They've been able to do it three times.
So try to sterilize these things.
Like the sterilization process, what is the temperature that they do it for?
Well, they do it both temperature and pressure, but it's in the hundreds of degrees and it's under high pressure.
And I've actually been involved with several cases where these very equipment you're talking about were accidentally used on somebody who had Creutzfeldt-Jakub disease.
That's why we want to make sure that if you're eating deer cervids right now, that we have to make sure they're tested.
And I think the other point you raised is a good one.
We've been very concerned about the movement of this disease by cervid farming.
We've had far too many examples, and Doug has shared that with you, just the extent to which...
We see state by state by state slowly getting picked off because somebody moved a trophy deer from state A to state B and it was infected and it got out or others got out of the pens and then it infects locals.
I mean, different kinds of deer types that are there.
Yeah, yeah.
So the one we worry about right now is getting into the caribou in northern Canada.
Right now, the range of the deer that are infected in the provinces of Canada is right budding up next to caribou.
And of course, if you're not a hunter, you wouldn't know this, but caribou, obviously, the herds are remarkable, unlike, you know, white tails, or to that matter, elk.
If you got it into caribou, it would likely spread very quickly.
And as you know, the native populations, caribou are key.
They're key to their livelihood.
So you wouldn't want to see it get in the caribou.
As our good friend Doug Duren has been doing all this work to try to alert people about it, and also they're putting up these testing places where hunters can bring in a deer and have the deer tested.
How much...
None of that is available to people around the country, though.
And that's what we need to work on is if you don't make it easy and convenient, as you know, it's not going to get done.
And so, you know, it's hard enough to convince people that there's really a problem because people don't want to believe it, even if they know that there's, you know, CWD in deer in the area and we have some like that.
But I think the tide is changing.
More and more people are sensitive to it.
They want to have access to testing quickly.
But if it's going to take you a month and a half to get the test back, you know what it is about processing it.
Because, you know, unlike laboratory testing for an entire year, where I do one 12th in January, one 12th in February, etc., etc., you know, deer season typically is very concentrated in just a couple of weeks to a month in the fall.
And so the problem is all the animals come in at that time, so your lab capacity has to handle that huge surge all at one time.
Yeah, and we hope that these prions don't ultimately infect people and jump.
But if they do, I worry what will happen to deer hunting as we know it, because probably a lot of people will not continue, and we need that desperately for herd management.
Well, what they're doing in Doug's area is they're actively trying to eliminate a lot of deer and try to drastically lower the numbers, particularly of bucks, which I guess they wander more.
Yeah, and folks, if you've never seen a deer with CWD, you should go and Google it because it's terrifying.
The idea that that could make that jump to human beings and people pouring saliva out of their mouths and their whole body just wasted away to skin and bones.
That's what we're looking at.
I mean, that's why it's called chronic wasting disease because the animals literally waste away.
So, for the average person that is sitting around reading these articles that say, don't worry, or reading these articles that say, this is the end of humanity, what could these people do?
Like, what could they do and what do they do if they get infected?
Well, first of all, neither of those kind of articles are correct.
And we have to make sure that we get that message out to people that it's there.
We need straight talk right now.
You know, and part of it is it's so hard to hear from people who suppose experts, what's this going to happen or not happen?
You know, and let me just give you an example, because we've heard a lot about, well, it's going to go away with the coronavirus with the seasons.
Okay, when it warms up, it'll go away.
Well, you know, the other coronaviruses that we have that we've had to worry about was SARS, which appeared in 2003 in China.
And when that came out of China in February 2003, it took us a little while to figure out that these people really aren't that infectious till day five or six of their illness.
And then they really crash and burn and many of them would die.
But what we did was basically, by knowing that, identify these cases in their context quickly.
So if they had symptoms, brought them in, put them in these isolation rooms so they wouldn't infect anybody else.
And it took until June to bring that under control.
That had nothing to do with the seasons.
MERS, which is another coronavirus that's in the Middle East, it's in the Arabian Peninsula, The natural reservoir for that is camels.
By the way, SARS, it was palm civets, a type of animal food that we got out of the markets there.
In the Arabian Peninsula, we're not going to euthanize 1.7 camels to try to get rid of MERS. And there, it's 110 degrees out, and this virus is transmitted fine, thank you.
Well, it wouldn't have, but we had good public health.
Had we had, you know, the same kind of transmission we're seeing with this coronavirus where you're infectious before you ever get sick, where you're highly infectious.
Remember with SARS now, you didn't really get infectious until you're in six days of illness, and you knew that you were in trouble.
And then you could isolate you.
And we didn't understand that at first, and the virus transmitted.
So that's why SARS stopped.
MERS stops because we don't get rid of the camels, so it keeps hitting humans day after day.
But then when they go to the hospital, we no longer allow those individuals to transmit to others in the hospital because we do what we call good infection control.
As soon as they get there, they're in special rooms with special masks and all this kind of thing.
And so in that regard, these coronaviruses can be stopped.
This one's not.
As I said at the top of the program, this is like trying to stop the wind.
Influenza transmission, you never hear anybody saying in a bad seasonal flu year, you know, we're going to stop this one.
If you don't have a vaccine that works, you don't.
Well, I think as I laid out to you before, you know, this could be 10 times worse than a really bad seasonal flu year.
And I'll grant you it will hit, you know, primarily the older population and those underlying health problems.
But as I mentioned also, you know, we have a lot of people who have other risk factors, obesity, high blood pressure is another risk factor where you can have a really bad outcome with this.
And so we don't quite know what it's going to do yet.
I think, you know, we've been right on the mark predicting where it's going to be to today.
I think from here on out, I can tell you it's going to stay around for months.
It's not going to go away tomorrow.
We've got to stop thinking about if we just get through tomorrow, that's it.
So if we're going to close schools, we're going to tell people not to go into public, we're going to cancel big events.
How long are we prepared to do that?
What are we going to do?
We have to ask ourselves that.
I think the big thing is that eventually enough people will get infected where it'll be like putting reactors in the rods, you know, rods in the reaction, I should say, and then that stops it by itself.
Because if two of the three of us in this room were immune right now to it because we'd had it and recovered and had protection because of natural protection, then I couldn't transmit to anybody.
So that's what's going to happen if you get enough people who get infected.
Ultimately, then it'll slow down and stop transmission that way, but that's a heck of a price to pay to get there.
Well, you know, it has to do with your immune response again, we think.
That what happened is when this virus got into you, it created what we call a cytokine storm, which is an antibody response in your body that's out of control.
Or the other group that has had a real challenge with that are pregnant women.
And pregnant women have a very unique issue.
One is, of course, they have some constriction of their lungs just by the very physical mass.
But also their immune system is really at a heightened state at that point.
There's a part of that immune system that woman says, this is not all me.
Get rid of this.
It's like a rejection of a graft.
And the other part is saying, this is the most precious cargo I'll ever carry.
You know, I've got to make sure I don't lose it.
And when that virus got in between those two, it started again that same kind of cytokine storm.
Now, the thing that concerns us about this, which we saw in 1918, I mentioned this 3 plus percent.
This one could be as high as 2%.
So it's somewhere between a really bad flu year at 0.1%, and it could be as high up here, you know, getting closer to 1918-like.
And that's the numbers I just gave you a few minutes ago from the American Hospital Association of, you know, 480,000 deaths here in this country over the next 6 to 12 months.
First of all, just being as healthy as you can be.
You know, wait, wait.
You know, I'm getting up there right now where, you know, it becomes more and more of a challenge to stay, you know, in good shape.
You know, the more you can do to do that, something you know all about, you know, is keeping in shape is really important.
The second thing is if you're on medications, like for high blood pressure, don't miss them.
Take those drugs because they're really important, even though they may not appear, you know, you don't have any symptoms of high blood pressure or something like that.
And then I think just, you know, getting sleep and eating a healthy diet.
And that's about what we can do today to help get you prepared for this.
You know, when you look at all the things that might be there, and I'm happy and willing to accept any and all that might help, but we don't really have any data that those substantially impact on your immune system to make it that much better.
No, and the issue of if you're going to kind of compete out the bad bugs, so by getting a good healthy gut flora, the bugs there, you would actually reduce the chance of picking up a bad bug and it turned out there was no difference.
The only way I think they would do a study like that accurately is infect someone that is the same person, like have the same person with no Probiotics and then have them with probiotics.
And the studies that have been done are very close to that.
But what they did is they used two different groups of people.
Those people used probiotics, this group did not.
And then they looked at all their illnesses and they got stool samples on everybody.
How large is the group?
I don't have the numbers in front of me.
They're pretty sizable because I was disappointed.
I mean, I was taking some myself.
But I think the key message here is that we're going to get through this, but right now we do have some real challenges before us.
What we can't tell people is it's all safe.
Every time I hear people say the risk is low right now, it reminds me of what would happen if there was this huge low-pressure system five days off the coast, the Gulf.
And there was 90-degree water between that system and the beach.
And there was no wind shears in the northern hemisphere that's likely going to knock it off.
But we tell the people standing on the beach that day we have low risk of anything.
Well, we know five days from now it's coming.
And so what we need to do is help this American population or the world, for that matter, understand we're going to be in some hurt for the next few months.
Do you see that viral video that's going around of that woman who was giving the address at the behest of the White House and she tells people not to touch their face and then immediately licks her finger and turns the page?
Basically the surgical mask, which just fits over.
And the reason it's called a surgical mask is because it's loose fitting, just fits, you know, kind of ties behind you.
It was worn by surgeons so that they don't cough or drip into your wound.
And it was never made to protect you from bugs coming in.
So those little spaces on the sides, that's not a problem if I'm breathing into the cloth right in front of my nose.
But in terms of the air coming in on the side, they're not effective at all.
So people wear them, they look like they're doing something, they're not.
Now, if you are sick, they may help a little bit from you transmitting because if you cough, then you cough right into that cloth and some of it will embed in there and not get out around.
The other one, though, is called an N95 respirator.
You know, right now we have hospitals that are down to just a couple days worth of these masks, the respirators, and it's because we don't stockpile anything in this country.
You know, we don't have, hospitals don't have the money to do that.
And you know, but this is really important because how healthcare workers go is how the country, I think, will see where we're going.
You know, there have been over 4,000 healthcare workers in China who were infected, many of them on their job, and a number of them died.
And if in this country we have a real challenge delivering healthcare because we're overwhelmed, and then we have healthcare workers picking up the infection, like we talked about the group in Milan, And we don't have the protection for them.
I really believe that's when the public will say, wait a minute, what's going on here?
And that's where I think the challenge.
So we really have to protect our healthcare workers.
They are the frontline people.
And the biggest problem we have is a lot of these cases need intensive care medicine, which we only have a limited number of beds for.
But this is really sophisticated medicine.
So when one of those people get infected, a doctor or nurse working in intensive care, it's not like you just took out another soldier.
You took out a special forces person.
You just can't bring somebody in from family practice or wherever and put them in there.
And so we've got to protect these workers.
And I'm really concerned that that's one of the areas we've not done.
Nobody stockpiles.
We have no capacity to make lots of them all of a sudden.
Prior to this event, the hospital purchasing agent would go online, click a button, send me 5,000 of these, and it would be there the next morning.
And so, you know, I've never had a partisan, you know, I'm just a private in the public health army.
And so I actually served as a science envoy for this administration in the State Department last year, you know, still in my full-time job at the university.
And so I've never been, I mean, I'm there to give the best advice I can.
And so I've talked to a lot of these people there at the CDC, at Health and Human Services, etc.
No, you know, this is the challenge we have is today in this environment, everything's just-in-time delivery.
I mean, look at when you go online and whatever place you're outing from, Amazon, wherever, you expect it there the next day.
People forget that we don't have that capacity today to suddenly make lots of things.
So right now, all the mass manufacturers in North America are working 110% time.
But if they were trying to fill all the orders they've gotten just in the last few weeks, it would take them years and years with the capacity they have.
And you can't go build these new machines to make masks overnight.
You know, we prepare all the time well in advance.
We don't build an aircraft carrier at the moment we think we're going to go into battle.
We look at what all do we need.
We don't do that in public health.
We've tried.
And so, you know what, stockpiling 500 million of these in 95s would have been the difference between night and day.
And when you look at the price of one of those versus one airplane, not even close.
If you look at the things like that, it's like these medications.
Think about our own Defense Department employees are at risk of running out of these critical drugs because they get them from China.
I mean, what a vulnerability.
So what we need to do is take a step back after, we can start now, but we're not going to fix it now, is to say, what are the key things that we should do?
Vaccines, you know.
If we had been serious about this, we might very well have had a coronavirus vaccine, whether it worked specifically for this strain, whether it worked for SARS or MERS. But right after SARS happened in 2003, everybody was hot on a new vaccine.
Well, I seek the advice of experts whenever possible, and what I was seeing was that there was a lot of weird misinformation and conflicting information.
A lot of people saying, don't worry, and a lot of people that were terrified.
I'm like, okay, I've got to talk to an expert, and luckily you were willing to sit down with us and help us out.
Well, you know, and the other thing I think that, you know, maybe it's a function of age, but, you know, straight talk is so important today.
You know, I'm so tired of having people say to me, oh, if you tell them this stuff, they're going to panic.
And I say, well, what's panic?
Have you seen anybody riding in the streets yet?
Have you seen cars turned over, smashed?
Have you seen people hurting themselves over this issue?
They're concerned, but they want legitimate information.
And so what you need to do is just tell them the truth.
And we have many experiences like that.
A few years ago, when I was at the State Health Department in Minnesota, we had a big outbreak of meningitis, a type of brain infection, bacterial brain infection.
And a number of high school students were very sick.
All of a sudden, in one day, they were in a hospital.
And this community of 20-some thousand people were on edge.
And so we had a big town meeting.
Several thousand people showed up.
And I addressed them and gave them everything I knew about meningitis, what we're going to do about it, etc., And then towards the end of the talk, I said, and I just need to let you know, about one out of every seven cases of this dies.
And people looked at me and said, why did you tell them that?
And I said, because they needed to know it.
Two days later, one of them died.
And you know what?
Everybody in town was terribly sad, very emotional, but they all said, we knew it.
We knew it.
You told us.
We knew it.
And then they got on with dealing with it.
We vaccinated the whole town.
20,000 people we vaccinated one weekend for this bacterial meningitis.
But it was because they had faith in us because we told them the truth.
And we said what we know and what we didn't know.
So that's what we need to do here.
We need to just have straight talk.
Don't tell them it's low risk.
That's like the hurricane, okay?
You know, I would be really bad at you if I thought you were a hurricane forecaster and you knew this was coming, but you kept telling me, oh, it's low risk.
And it's not only the vaccines themselves, but it's the prioritization of vaccines.
I mean, you know, one of the real tragic stories right now in Africa is we are just finally bringing to a close this outbreak of Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, far northeast part of the Congo.
You know, 2800 people have died from this, okay?
Bad.
It's been going on for almost two years.
And everybody talks about that, and I understand why.
Ebola is a challenge.
But do you know that during that same time period, over 7,000 kids in that same area have died from measles?
Because everybody was preoccupied trying to deal with Ebola.
And those deaths were totally preventable.
Totally preventable.
So, I mean, I think that's, you know, I have to say, and, you know, I'm already on this show, so I'm not trying to thank you for what you do say about vaccines, because people listen to you, and we need every positive voice, because we have so many crazy voices out there right now.
And when something like this can be prevented and the reason why people don't do it is because they're paranoid of vaccines and they get that information from some wacko website or some person who really has no business talking about it.
Whether it's the people out there that think it causes diseases or that it's a government plot or that it's a medical scam because it's just trying to raise...
Raise money.
It's just all of it.
All of it's very, very disturbing.
But it's a part of people.
You know, the human beings, for whatever reason, there's a percentage of us that lean towards conspiratorial thinking and they lean towards thinking that there's some sort of a plot against them or the government's against them and it's just...
Did you put that in there because you really thought that a lot of this stuff was going to come out of China or was that just because it's a great world?
Because they have this incredibly large population, 2 billion.
They've got this food supply that is largely wildlife that comes into these markets where there's this incredible contact between people and these animals.
And the crowded nature of that society, I mean, I think one of the things that surprises people when they go to China, 15 million population cities are common over there.
I mean, we think of the United States, we think of LA and New York, and that's big, okay?
Over there, I mean, in Wuhan, a city of 15 million, the entire metropolitan area is 60 million.
And so you have people crowded so closely together that if you add in the bugs coming from these animals and then the potential for this kind of contact where it spreads quickly, China has been a bacterial and viral soup vessel for a long time.
That's, again, why we have to protect ourselves here because a bug anywhere in the world today can be a bug everywhere tomorrow.
I could never have imagined the animals – you know, I've spent time in these markets.
I remember one day spending a day in the Bangkok, Thailand market, and it was about a mile by a mile and a half while big, I mean, in these tight isles.
Every animal imaginable to humans, and I swear to God, there were some out of the movies, I think, that were in there.
And they're all just right on top of each other.
And I actually have a picture that I show in some of my lectures.
There was a situation where there was all these chickens in a cage, I don't know, 15 or 20 of them, okay, in a big wire cage, and it sat on top of a wire cage full of ferrets.
And ferrets are actually an animal model from a flu standpoint that they do really well in getting infected with flu viruses.
If you wanted to create the perfect experiment that no university, you know, research group would let you do, is you'd put birds and ferrets like that together.
And so these markets, and I don't know what's going to happen here, but for the first time, we really saw the Chinese, after this outbreak in Wuhan, really start to put down some markers on what they're going to do to supervise these markets.
I mean, they still have to eat, but I think this is a dangerous practice where we see it.
You know, this could just as easily be a flu pandemic, the same thing, like 1918. So these wet markets, they just have all these animals hanging out and some of them are still alive.
It's like, how do you tell them that they've been doing this for who knows how long?
How do you tell them to stop doing it?
Or is that impossible, and is it more possible to just accelerate our vaccine program and try to preemptively create something to address coronaviruses, to address...
What other viruses are we concerned about other than coronaviruses?
Turns out that what research we have and our group was involved with some of it, the flu mist in the nose works really well in children mostly.
Because they haven't been infected yet themselves.
They don't have any protection.
And so that virus really multiplies in the nose.
Remember, this virus is adapted not to multiply in your lungs because the nose is colder than the lung.
And so it'll grow here.
If you swallow it, it won't grow in your lungs.
If you've already been infected once, then you actually have some interference in your nose.
There's a little bit of protection there.
So it works well in kids who haven't been infected before, adults not so well.
For us, the injection works best.
And, you know, I'm happy to report that although I'm not happy to report, being an old man, now I can even get the high-dose vaccine over age 60. So they are actually, you know, the best we have.
And then I think the other key piece, though, is if you do get the flu and you have really bad muscle aches, one of the things about real influenza is not just sniffles.
You feel like you got hit by a Mack truck.
If after several days you still are really feeling bad, really bad, And you haven't seen a physician by then, you should.
Because that's when you get the complications occurring, the bacterial pneumonias that occur subsequent.
And if you get those treated earlier than later, you can actually do a lot to keep somebody from dying.
So, you know, if you don't feel a lot better in two days, I mean, if you catch it really early, you can get a medication for flu.
There's actually a medication that will reduce your illness a bit.
But if you're sick for more than a couple of days, it's not better.
You absolutely should see a doctor so you don't have these other complications.
They would likely give you an antibiotic based on what you had because you are then...
The problem with flu is it's not just the flu virus but then you get secondary bacterial pneumonia from the damage in the lungs and so they can prevent that.
A lot of older people in particular will Die from actually what we call secondary pneumonia to having had influenza.
They wouldn't have gotten the pneumonia if they had not had the flu, but then they do.
Well, you know, it's again, surely I'm not going to profess to be the expert on probiotics, but I'll tell you that the data we have doesn't show that they have a big boost and that they actually help you long-term or short-term, meaning that it makes any difference.
Now, there's one exception to that where I would say, and this is a very different thing than probiotics, but...
We actually have a disease called Clostridium difficile, which is a bad bacteria that happens when you've taken way too many antibiotics and it colonizes your gut because you don't have competing organisms there.
And then you can die from this.
There are treatments for that called actually fecal transplants.
But you take that and that kind of is what you're talking about.
That does have real benefit.
And there is clear evidence that if you take those, those fecal transplants as opposed to just probiotics as such, that that can have a major positive impact on your recovery from things like clostridium difficile infection.
And so more and more institutions now actually are doing fecal transplants, which you'd never thought that that would be one thing you'd do one day.
But for those who've had this problem, they're life-saving.
Well, Lyme disease in of itself is a fascinating story.
I've actually been involved with it since its early discovery in the 1980s.
And Minnesota, Wisconsin was a big focus, the upper Midwest.
And this is a story that I think you'll find interesting is that Even though it was discovered primarily in the eastern part of the United States, named after Lyme, Connecticut, it's a disease that actually probably originated in the upper Midwest.
And I tell you that because it turns out that there is a focus in northern Wisconsin and east-central Minnesota where there's Lyme disease, there's another disease called anaplasmosis, there's another disease, babesia, etc., that all seem to have a similar kind of tick, human, deer kind of component.
And back in the CCC days of the 1930s, the white-tailed deer population had been virtually totally depopulated from the northeast.
And so they actually trapped deer in northern Wisconsin and took them out and deposited them in New York and Connecticut and so forth.
And most of those deer are actually deer that, you know, today their great-great-great-great-great-grandfather came from Wisconsin.
Wow.
And guess what?
When you move deer, you move ticks.
In fact, I was involved with a study that the Wisconsin Division of Health did and a colleague of mine, the late Jeff Davis, where up in northern Wisconsin, as deer would come into the check station, they would actually measure the number of ticks that were attached to the nape of the neck.
And they had a thing drawn.
And they asked hunters, who were driving back to Madison and Milwaukee, If they would be willing to check in at a station down there for just a second, and then they were going to count the ticks again.
And it turned out that as the vehicles come rolling down from Highway 51 from northern Wisconsin, get on the Interstate 90-94 and go to Milwaukee or Madison, the ticks just kept falling off.
By the time they got to Madison or Milwaukee, the ticks were almost all gone.
Well, yes, lo and behold, where all the Lyme disease and so forth started to show up right along the interstate corridor.
Because the ticks were coming off, and then they were getting into the local deer in that population.
And so it's exactly what you said.
The ticks are moving.
They're moving.
Okay, they've moved.
And they're now infected.
So I think that this Lyme disease issue is a key one.
Lyme disease is really an important disease.
It's real, no question about it.
The challenge we have is that there's a lot of people that assume that they have chronic Lyme infection.
And, you know, the data on that is just really, really not there to support that these people are chronically infected, but they do have An immune response, likely, that occurs where it sets up this trigger.
And so they're sick.
They actually have something.
But it's not treating it again for the bacteria infection.
It's the fact that your own body's immune system, as we've talked about several times today, it starts attacking you.
I think it's a similar picture we see with chronic fatigue syndrome.
Same kind of thing.
These people really are sick.
They really do have problems.
But it's not something you can treat.
So when people...
I have a challenge because when people take IV antibiotics at extended periods of time for Lyme disease, You know, the data, there's four different studies now that have been done where people have had what we call a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, where half got the drug, half got IV, but no drug.
And it turned out all four of these studies in Lyme disease, the people who got just the placebo did just the same as the people who got the drug.
And I worry that we're using antibiotics a lot there.
And this is where I just mentioned earlier about clostridium difficile.
We actually had a patient in Minnesota that died from the IV treatment for what was chronic Lyme disease and wouldn't have been helpful.
And so we need a lot more research in this area to figure out what are these people getting?
What is it that we can shut off so that they don't have this chronic Lyme disease picture, knowing that it's not actually just you got to treat them more.
Treatment's not going to help them with the antibiotics anymore.
And so I think that that's an area that we just need a lot more work in.
Yeah, it's like rheumatoid arthritis, a lot of things, you know...
You know, thank God for our immune system.
It's what fights off all the bad things we have, but sometimes that immune system gets turned on too much, and then it takes on us, okay?
And it goes back to the coronavirus.
That's why a lot of these people are dying right now, is this over-vigorous immune response.
And Lyme disease is kind of that same inciting event where we have evidence now that you could be infected with the bacteria, but if we treat you, It's like every other bacteria.
You can really get rid of it.
But you still have this chronic illness that's occurring.
And what I think is hard is that we see people who have this, who are desperate to have somebody understand what they have, and they end up going to people who take real advantage of them.
Clinicians who charge them an arm and a leg for things that are not going to help them.
And what we need is a lot more research on what is actually going on and what kind of drugs can we use to reverse this immune system disorder.
I mean, I'm not, you know, without knowing what's there.
But again, more often than not, if he's been adequately treated, it's not that the bacteria is still growing in him like it might be for a lot of days.
You know, this is another thing you'll find interesting.
In Minnesota, Prior to the arrival of the first Whiteman, the Native Americans burnt much of our state all the time.
The prairies through much of the territory, even in northern Wisconsin, northern Minnesota, we had the classic, you know, pine forest.
Fire would wipe through.
And with that, it would open up so much of the forest that you'd have a very different kind of mammals, population, deer, etc., etc.
And with the suppression of fire, what's happened is we now have, instead of having these old growth forests, we have all this younger, you know, non-pine or...
Any kind of—like the oak trees of the upper Midwest are all disappearing because oak trees need sunlight.
And fire is what kept—they were very resistant to fire.
And so the old oak forest and so forth would survive because of fire.
Whereas today, with no fire, you know, the elms and the maples and everything else comes in and the buckthorn and all that kind of stuff and takes over.
So what's happening is, in our state of Minnesota, is we have a really good example of this is we're losing our moose.
It's a type of parasite that's common in white-tailed deer but causes no problems.
In moose, it actually causes a brain infection and it kills them.
And guess why it's happening?
Because the deer range has moved farther and farther north in Minnesota.
I'm sorry.
It has moved farther and farther north in Minnesota because of lack of fire because the forest is changing.
So now, where there only used to be moose, we're seeing deer and moose, and where that intersection is, we're starting to see moose develop this brain worm infection because it's from the deer.
So, the tick population has changed too, and it's largely due to the fire.
Lack of fire in many places.
In the Northeast, never used to be like it was.
We had fire all the time that would clear out these areas, and it was just part of natural everything.
So one of the challenges we have with ticks is they're here.
We're not going to change how we live, suburbs and trees and all of that.
They do, because what they do is they just don't eliminate the ticks, but what they do is they eliminate, for example, the whitefield mice and all these different species that are important to the ticks.
And then they bring in different species that will be there.
So, I mean, this is a big debate in Minnesota right now.
I mean, we're losing all these moose to brainworms.
Ironically, the moose's population is expanding dramatically in Isle Royale.
Why?
Because there's no deer out there.
And so they're not getting brain worm out there.
So people have said, you know, we're going to lose our moose.
Well, it's the deer.
So fire actually has helped the moose.
In areas in northern Minnesota where there's been a lot of fire, The moose population is growing because the deer are not there because exactly those mammals, those rodents, and so forth are very different in burnt-out areas than they are in non-burnt-out areas.
I had a friend who was hunting in Washington State a couple years ago, and he said it was really weird because there's these massive fires in the distance that were actually being controlled.
And that's another issue, you know, for some of the larger mammals, as you know, tick predation can get so heavy, particularly in certain times of the year, that it really, literally takes a lot of blood out of these large animals, even though they're so big.
It's one of those things that when you talk about ticks and you talk about Lyme disease, most people, their eyes glaze over.
They don't even care.
It's not affecting me until someone in your family has it.
There's a guy that I know who was a former UFC fighter, Marcus Davis.
His wife got Lyme disease and he spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to help her and do something about it and treatments and all these different things for it.
And this is another area, again, you know, when you think of the amount of money we lose in just lost time, let alone pain and suffering, what an investment to make in this.
I mean, this is the kind of thing.
This is where infectious diseases really need a renaissance.
We pulled up a chart of the United States where they showed the areas that are affected by these ticks and what percentage of ticks carry Lyme disease they've tested.
And some places in the Northeast, it's in the 60%.
Dan Flores, who has been a guest on the podcast before, has a great book called Coyote America that sort of details how this came to be and how these coyotes have...
Well, you know, when I'm asked that question, I don't mean to sound glib again, but I can make a vaccine for it overnight.
The question is, is it safe and effective?
And that's the challenge.
We have right now questions about how do you make immunity to a coronavirus?
And what kind of vaccine do you have to have that brings in all the different parts of the immune system?
So we don't know that yet.
So some of this research is going to have to be basic to that.
The second thing we have to worry about is safety.
There's a condition in humans called antibody-dependent enhancement, ADE. And it turns out that if you have no antibody or immune response, you'll get the disease.
If you have a lot, you're protected.
But if you have this in-between level, and then you get the disease, it actually enhances the disease.
Immune response is really destructive.
And in fact, there was just a couple years ago a major recall of dengue vaccine, a type of vaccine we use for mosquito infection in the Philippines where kids who got the vaccine actually made just a little bit of antibody.
And when they got the real disease, it made them a lot sicker.
And so we found with the 2003 SARS vaccine that there was an ADE component to it when we made it in animals.
And so we're going to have to really study this to be sure it's safe.
And as you said earlier, you know, we can surely make mistakes.
We don't, you know, we need to do everything we can not to.
And so I think between getting the effectiveness and the safety data together, we're years out.
I mean, maybe two years.
Yeah, this is not going to happen soon.
You know, it's wishful thinking.
You know, every time, I mean, I go back to SARS in 2003 and look at every event, Zika.
2015, we said, oh, we'll have a vaccine for it in no time.
Here we are five years later and we have no vaccine.
And so this is one of the challenges we have.
We have to complete the job.
You know, it's like we start on something and then we forget that it's important because it kind of goes away for a while, but only to come back.
And so this is part of that picture we talked about.
And this is what Peter Hotels talks a lot about.
You know, we got to finish the job on these things.
You know, I worry that we'll get through this situation and then people say, oh, we're done.
And then we'll forget until the next one comes along.
And so this is where vaccine research and development is really important.
So anyway, the bottom line, though, is that then they gradually work their way up to larger studies where, you know, if something happens one every thousand people, you have to study a lot of people before you know the chance that you might find that.
You can't do it on 30 people.
So that's why it's going to take a while.
And, you know, they'll test it on more and more people.
And they're going as fast as they can.
It's not like there's anybody dragging their feed.
It's just that, you know, I jokingly say it's like if the Iowa farmer wanted to harvest his corn in half the time, it doesn't mean by planting twice as many acres he can do that.
You know, plant in April, you still can't harvest until October.