All Episodes
Dec. 12, 2019 - The Joe Rogan Experience
01:45:30
Joe Rogan Experience #1399 - Pavel Tsatsouline
Participants
Main voices
j
joe rogan
15:43
p
pavel tsatsouline
01:27:19
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
joe rogan
All right.
Here we go.
What's up, man?
How are you?
pavel tsatsouline
Joe, great to be on your show.
joe rogan
It's a pleasure.
It's a pleasure to meet you and an honor.
I've been following your work for a long time, man.
I mean, I was first introduced to you and your methods by Steve Maxwell, who was a huge proponent of the kettlebell, and then I started getting into your videos.
pavel tsatsouline
A very smart coach, yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah, very good.
And I started getting into your videos, and I've read your books, and so for me, it's an honor.
pavel tsatsouline
My pleasure.
joe rogan
How long have you been teaching and practicing with kettlebells?
Since you're a little?
pavel tsatsouline
Something like that.
Medium.
It's kind of like baseball, you know.
It's a pretty common thing.
In Russia?
Yeah, it is.
joe rogan
Why didn't it catch on here until you came over here?
pavel tsatsouline
You know what?
I don't think people really tried.
I don't think people really understood that it would catch on.
And I did not think it would happen either.
So I'm sitting with my friend Marty Gallagher, having stakes years back.
Marty is a former coach for Powerlifting Team USA and coach of some top lifters.
And you were just trading old war stories, talking about stuff, and I told him about kettlebells.
He says, well, you've got to teach Americans how to do that.
And I said, Marty, you don't understand.
This stuff is too hard.
Nobody's going to want to do this.
And he said, you don't understand.
People want to do this.
And I wrote an article based on Marty's suggestion for Milo.
So Milo was a niche publication for strange guys who lift rocks and bend things and break things and so on and so forth.
So that was the start of it.
And after that, I told my publisher about it and he said, well, come on, let's just make kettlebells and teach people.
I told him the same thing.
You don't understand that people will not want to do this.
This is too hard.
But he convinced me and they convinced me and the rest is history.
joe rogan
Why did you think that it was popular in the Soviet Union but wouldn't be popular in America?
pavel tsatsouline
You know, this is something that you just see.
It's a very common thing though.
So you just see this, you don't think much about this.
Who knows?
joe rogan
Yeah, but it was popular over there.
Yeah.
pavel tsatsouline
Since at least 1700s or possibly before that.
joe rogan
But this country is so performance-oriented and so sports-oriented and so competitive.
Why wouldn't you think that that would be sort of a natural training modality?
They would immediately adopt it.
pavel tsatsouline
You got me there.
joe rogan
So you just assumed...
pavel tsatsouline
But in the U.S. some years back, decades before, some kettlebells were used by some old-time strongmen like Zig Klein, for example.
And there was a company named Milo, no relations to the magazine, Really?
joe rogan
What is this thing you're obsessed with Milo?
pavel tsatsouline
Oh, Milo's the guy who carried the calf.
So if you look...
Okay, the progressive overload is usually explained as this legend of Milo of Crotona.
So this guy started carrying a little calf on his shoulders, and he would carry the calf every day.
So the calf would grow, and eventually the guy became very strong.
So that's why that name is present in...
In the strength game.
So back then, today, it is just one of the finest publications on strength training, mostly niche things, again, like gripping.
joe rogan
I wonder if anyone's actually done that, like carry a calf.
It would not work.
Isn't it amazing that something can grow physically faster than you can keep lifting it?
pavel tsatsouline
Absolutely can.
But your typical training plan that people say, I'm going to have five pounds on my bench press today.
I'm going to do this every week.
And then by Christmas, I'll be the world champion.
And it just doesn't work.
So the rate of adaptation is such that your body just cannot do that.
And it's cyclical in nature.
So you have to...
To put it in the Milo terms, you have to, after you carry the calf for a while, it grows, you have to back off to a lighter calf and start building up again.
Why?
We do not know exactly.
So for some reason, that unidirectional adaptation, just in one, you know, we're getting stronger at the bench press or what have you, or carrying the calf.
It just cannot proceed indefinitely.
There's some fatigue of some endocrine mechanisms, some genetic mechanisms.
We do not know that.
But tactically, we do have tricks of the trade to beat that, to work around that.
And there's a number of ways of doing that.
The oldest way of doing that, and it's very smart, still very smart for a lot of people, They would call this, I think, possibly constant weight training or something like that.
But the Soviets described it as step loading.
So let's look at your typical beginner, somebody in the gym.
And so the person starts lifting whatever weight for whatever reps.
And the next week, let's say next week he has five pounds.
And he does it again and he does it again.
Well, the Soviets figured out that it's much better for him to stay at the same weight for several weeks and then make a bigger jump.
So what you're doing pretty much is you are making adaptations more stable.
And it just happens in the cellular levels.
Membranes become stronger and so on.
But old-timers just, they would say that you're solidifying the gains.
So the way that many old-timers trained...
Is they would just take the same weight, and they're staying with the same weight for a long time.
In the beginning it's challenging, and then it becomes kind of comfortable, that becomes almost easy, and they would jump up.
So that's just one way of doing it.
And today it's not unprecedented either.
If you look at Chris Sommer, he's a gymnastics coach.
He used that with gymnasts.
It's very common.
I use that tactic with my latest edition of my kettlebell, Simple and Sinister, because it's much more reliable than just progressive overload.
And also because psychologically, first of all, it weeds out the impatient people.
So you're told to stay with the same load for a while.
Some people automatically say, oh, forget it.
I cannot do that.
Well, I don't want these people following my stuff anyway.
And second, so you're staying with this weight or these reps for some time.
In the beginning, they challenge you.
And then some time goes by and suddenly they don't anymore.
So it just very much is a very clear sense of accomplishment.
So this is called step loading or using the old-timers terminology, the constant weight training.
If you look at the other ways of making progress, so another approach is called cycling.
And cycling, so the one that I just described, that would really be if we could artificially stop the growth of the calf, like, okay, stop growing for a while, which we can't.
But the cycling, this is where I mentioned earlier, this is where you go back to a lighter calf.
So the classic American powerlifting training template is cycling.
So the history of cycling is very interesting.
Again, what cycling is?
Cycling is in the simplest possible terms.
You take 12 weeks.
You start with light weights.
You build up until you go really heavy.
And that was the predominant strength training system in the 70s, in the 80s.
And that was the strength system behind the dominant American powerlifting team.
So lifters like Eddie Cohn, Kirk Kowalski, lifters like Dan Austin, who is...
Lamar Gant, whose deadlift records still stand decades after, they use this classic cycling.
So the classic cycling, you start with the moderately challenging load, then you keep proceeding, go heavier and heavier and heavier.
Then you compete, then you start over.
And to give you...
To give you a very simple tactic, that's something that your listeners can use in their training, whether they follow the cycling format or they do something else, is that Russian scientist's discovery that your endocrine system pretty much can take two weeks out of four of heavy loading.
That's just the way it is.
There are some exceptions, but forget exceptions.
Generally, just two weeks of heavy loading.
And if you look at the classic powerlifting cycles by, let's say, Marty Gallagher, so for four weeks you do sets of eight, four weeks sets of five, four weeks sets of three.
And in week one, you start out with a weight that's comfortable.
In week two, moderately challenging.
In week three, you repeat your previous PR for these reps.
And in week four, you set your new PR. And then you jump to the next rep count.
So as you see in this particular template, you have two weeks, two hard weeks of training out of the month.
And that's just one of the many ways of doing that.
Pardon me, I got distracted, so I wanted to talk about the history of cycling.
unidentified
Yeah.
pavel tsatsouline
So Bill Starr, who is a huge name in the game, he was a former top weightlifter in the United States back in the 60s.
Later on, very successful coach, strength coach, and author.
The Strongest Shall Survive, his book on strength training for football, remains one of the best strength training books.
And Bill Starr recalls that American lifters started getting a whiff of some Russian periodized programs.
So what's periodization?
Periodization, the simplest terms, is planning your training according to certain principles to end at peak performance.
So that's just the really kind of a 50,000 level, 50,000 foot definition.
And they did not have their full information about how it was done, so they just decided to do exactly that.
And that was a very successful approach to strength training.
It does not necessarily work for everybody.
There are some reasons for that.
Mostly because of your sport competition, if you're an athlete.
But it's extremely effective, as was shown on the platform.
And finally, so first we discussed step cycling, step loading, which is constant training.
Second, we discussed Wave cycling, which is just cycling, right?
Wave loading.
And the third one would be the variable loading.
And variable loading is extremely unique.
It's unlike something else.
So here's how variable loading works.
In variable loading, you have certain load parameters.
Like, for example, you will know that...
Your average training weights will be 75% of your maximum.
You will know that you will perform, for example, 300 squats per month or whatever.
So these numbers are arrived at, experimentally, over decades.
And what variable loading does As opposed to the traditional methods, traditional progressive overload, is that the jump in volume, for example, from one training unit to another, one day, one week, one month, and so on, it's at least 20%.
So the jumps are really high, really high.
The variable loading was developed by Professor Arkady Vorobyov, who was an Olympic weightlifting champion, and he was the premier sports scientist.
So he argued that in nature, most changes are discrete.
They're not gradual.
They're discrete.
So whatever adaptation takes place in your body, the same thing, whatever happens with many physical processes, chemical processes, and so on.
So He concluded that training has to be highly variable.
So you understand when I mean that it's a 20% minimal change, we call that delta 20 principle.
It doesn't mean it's constantly going up.
That's just not possible.
It goes up and down.
It just keeps whiplashing.
So if we use...
If we go back to the traditional cycling as an example, the traditional cycling, so it's a linear buildup, Back up a little.
Linear buildup.
Back up a little.
In contrast, variable overload, it's going crazy.
It's completely insane.
In fact, this is a little entertaining.
Experienced strength coaches, and especially people with some sort of a background in mathematics, They're able to dissect and analyze training plans from other coaches.
You can look at a plan.
You can take an experienced powerlifting coach, show him a program from another coach, and the coach will be able to tell whether this will work or not, who this will work for, and so on, and kind of figure out what's under the hood right there.
So there's a very clear pattern.
Variable overload.
So it's like a photograph.
It's very clear.
Variable overload, if you start analyzing the pattern, looking at the program.
So for example, Boris Sheikov, he's a former coach of Russian national powerlifting team.
So he took the Soviet Olympic weightlifting methodology and directly applied it to powerlifting.
So his plans have made their way to the west, and some lifters use them very successfully.
But whenever you try to read this plan and try to make any sense of that, it just drives you crazy.
Because you see, like, okay, here's a strain.
Here's a pattern.
It's going right here, and suddenly it's gone.
So if traditional cyclings, like clear photograph...
The variable overload makes me think of, remember in Ferris Bueller's Day Off, where the kid is looking at Seurat's painting, you know, all these dots right there.
So when you step away, you see something.
You start getting closer, just a whole bunch of dots.
It just disappears.
So what's the story behind that?
So the story is this.
This method, the Soviet Olympic weightlifting method, was developed over several decades by a number of coaches, by a number of scientists.
So it's a very much collaborative effort.
So Vorobyov was one for sure, Medvedev, Chernyak, a number of others.
And it was a very...
Before even dissecting this method, let me tell you how successful this method was.
You can look up the world weightlifting records in Olympic weightlifting.
You hear about all these different records set by this lifter, that lifter, and so on and so forth.
Few people realize that the International Weightlifting Federation has changed the weight classes two or three times since the 80s.
And the reason they did that is to erase the drug, the record set by the drug-taking athletes back then.
Of course, Joe, I'm very happy that as soon as they changed the weight classes, lifters stopped taking drugs like that.
So if you look at these records, kilo per kilo, pound per pound, And if you chart them, compare them to what they did then, to what they do today, you will find that while they did catch up in a few weight classes, in about half of these classes, the records from the 80s still stand.
So, for example, what Yurik Varbanyan did in 1980, at 82 kilos, he totaled 400 kilos in the snatch and the clean and jerk.
That's never been done before.
And Yurik Varbanyan was a wiry guy.
He wouldn't have been taken for a lifter.
Just amazing.
So, first of all, the system still remains.
If we're just taking a very large, big picture, 50,000 foot look at strength, There are a great many ways of getting strong, some of them very good, some of them mediocre, some of them very bad.
But historically in lifting sports, the two systems that have been predominant are the Soviet weightlifting system and the American classic powerlifting system from the 70s and 80s.
So that was kind of a long detour to Before I tell you why this stuff that they figured out back in the 1960s, why it matters, just to say it still is the best.
It still rules.
So what they did was very empirical.
For example, when you're studying endurance, going into the cell, studying the biochemistry of the cell and the body, taking it apart, figuring out how this works is very helpful.
Very.
On the other hand, when you're dealing with strength, that approach has been not really effective.
So if we talk about muscle training, for example, hypertrophy, we still have no idea what the hell is going on.
So we know which buttons to push, but that's just empirical knowledge.
That's not the understanding of the cell.
joe rogan
So we really don't understand hypertrophy?
Really?
pavel tsatsouline
No, we do not.
unidentified
Wow!
pavel tsatsouline
No.
And let's, I'll be happy to talk about this, but if you don't mind, let me just finish on this variable overload in the Soviet weightlifting system.
So, what they did, even though they also, you know, they cut the muscle, looked at that as well, just didn't learn as much.
But the coaches programmed particular loads for athletes, and watched what happened.
And then they watched how the athletes performed, and they watched how the top athletes performed.
And they looked for patterns.
And they were very open-minded.
So they're not thinking like, well, it's got to be just the heaviest weights will do that.
Or it's got to be the training to failure is going to do that.
It's not the case.
So just to give you an example of how enormous that undertaking was.
So typical strength training study is what?
Six weeks for some untrained college subjects.
You know, guys who are just on their phones.
Professor Medvedev, who is also world champion, he studied the training loads of top weightlifters only when they were successful in competition for four Olympic cycles.
Four.
So we're talking about 16 years, and then somebody else did it for another cycle.
And there are just some amazing patterns just emerged.
So for instance, I'm going to give you a rundown of what the patterns are.
There are certain optimal volumes, how much exercise you do.
There are certain optimal intensities.
So if you follow the variable overload method, the optimal intensity, so the average intensity would be about 75% of your max, which for most people would be probably somewhere like 8 reps or something you could do, maybe 10, maybe 8. And You will see that about half of all the lifts that you do are about 75-80%.
Now, where do all the other lifts come in?
So there's a normal distribution.
So you'll find that 75-80% are on the top.
80-85% a little bit lower.
So the lighter weights, like 60%, are on the bottom.
And the heavy weights like 90% and higher are on the bottom as well.
So to figure it out, you just have to do most of your work with these average weights.
They're not so light, so you're going to respect them, but they're not so heavy that you have any question about performing lifting them correctly.
So, and then there's another aspect of intensity is just doing some heavier lifts, a very carefully measured number of heavy lifts in addition, like 90% or whatever, occasionally.
Then they figured out the proper volumes.
Just to give you an idea, if you're looking at, let's say, you know, you might be doing 30 reps of given exercise per session, what have you, although there's variability.
But then there's also something else that's very interesting, is the optimal number of repetitions with a given weight.
And this is what hurts people's heads.
If you look at the weights from 70% to 90%, The optimal number of repetitions are one-third to two-thirds of your maximum.
So let me give an example to the reader, to the listener.
Let's say that you're lifting a 10-rep max weight.
So you go all out as hard as possible.
You can do 10 reps.
In training, you should be doing three to six reps.
That's it.
That's the window.
And why is that?
And we have no idea.
But the scientists, like in this case, I think it was Matveev who was involved in that, the father of periodization.
I think he was one of the scientists.
They experimented with all sorts of rep ranges.
And they figured out that if the reps are too low, they're given a weight, you don't get stronger.
If the reps get too high, either the athlete gets hurt, or his technique is compromised, or he's just unable to perform the optimal volume.
So, pretty much, roughly, you're looking at doing about half of the reps you're capable of.
That's it.
And people can argue with this all they want.
Like, what's the science behind this?
There's no science.
We don't know.
The science is purely empirical.
This particular method is purely empirical.
It worked for decades.
It still does.
And that's one of the ways you can get strong.
So, in summary, we have We have step loading, which is where you stay with the same weight for a while, or the same reps, whatever, and then make a sudden jump.
That's the best way to train for beginners, usually.
We have wave loading, or cycling, which is where we build up, jump back, and build up again.
And we have variable loading, which is almost chaotic.
We're just constantly surprised the body with what we're throwing at it.
But we do that within very narrow parameters.
joe rogan
So this method was purely developed by studying winners.
pavel tsatsouline
And winners is where they finally took that.
But the studies were done at every level.
So, for example, coaches in the field would conduct something called pedagogical experiments, which is a study that's not quite as...
Not quite as scientifically solid, but it's still good enough.
So the first to test things out, lower level athletes.
And then we'll finally take it to higher level athletes.
So the things that I'm telling you about, they have been universally effective for athletes above the beginner level.
And of course, there are some subtle changes as you progress.
There are some subtleties.
Like for instance...
Notice that I said that you have to use some heavy lifts, like 90%, 95%.
But it has to be very surgical about how many.
So, for instance, beginners do none.
Advanced lifters need to do just some, but not many.
Intermediate lifters can do the most.
Or heavyweight lifters can do not as many.
Lighter ones can do more.
So there are some differences at different levels, but the principles fundamentally are the same.
joe rogan
And do these principles apply whether people are taking drugs or not?
pavel tsatsouline
Yes, they do.
The difference is, in fact, Verkashansky and Medvedev made a very strong case of that.
They used the Soviet euphemism for that was restoratives.
And they said, this is universal even with restoratives or not.
The difference for the drugs would be just that the volumes will be higher.
You'll be able to train more.
That's pretty much the difference.
But the body will still work the same way.
joe rogan
Now, these principles, have they caught on in the United States?
I mean, they've caught on with strong firsts.
I know you implement these and people teach these.
But is this something that's universally sort of accepted?
Or is it still something that people are cautiously curious about?
pavel tsatsouline
It's definitely not universal, in part because people don't know about it.
In part, you have to implement this correctly.
So right now, there's several areas where you would see that is...
Well, one, obviously, the Baryshekos powerlifting programs that have been imported here, but they're used by powerlifters.
The other is we have the program called Plan Strong, which is, again, this is a very faithful representation of the Soviet weightlifting system, but applied to general strength exercises like, you know, squats, deadlifts, and so on.
And the other thing what we also do, and this is what we do with the military and so on and so forth, we have some simple programs, very simple programs that are designed using this Delta 20 principle and using this optimal loads that they could just go out and use.
The nice thing is, unlike progressive overload, cycling, if something happens, you've got a problem.
Here there is some variability.
So, in summary, just say, no, it's not widely known.
joe rogan
It's not.
Let's fix it.
Yeah, let's fix it.
It makes sense.
And one of the things that I really like what you're saying about is completing the adaptation with your tendons and your ligaments and all these different things that oftentimes are injured when you're ramping up your weightlifting.
And you're trying to increase the amount of weight you carry.
So this principle of maintaining a similar weight for a long time allowing your body to complete that adaptation, that makes a lot of sense.
pavel tsatsouline
Adaptations need to be stable and it's not true just for strength training.
If you're looking at endurance as well, the adaptations in the mitochondria as well, you can get some acute adaptations, a very short term, like, oh, you know, bigger whatever, guns in six weeks, or faster 400 meters in six weeks.
Yes, you can do that.
But these adaptations are transient.
So it takes time for things to really get solidified.
And also, if you're more patient with your progression, as well, you're going to find that Your gains are much more stable if you take some time off, which is important for anybody.
You travel, you get sick, some other thing happens.
So if you've been training in a manner where you're not forcing yourself, in fact, this is one of the very important points that Soviet coaches would make that do not force adaptation.
David Rigard is probably the greatest weightlifter of all times.
So he's over 60 world records in several weight classes and just unbelievable athlete.
So he just made a point that do not force the strength development.
Do not force mass development.
That's another problem.
It's possible to build muscle fast, but it's not going to be necessarily a very quality muscle.
So yes, take your time and And this is interesting enough, Joe.
This is what old-timers understood.
I'm a fan of books by old-time strongmen.
Not all of them, of course, but some of them are just remarkable.
Earl Liederman, he was an American strongman and educator.
He wrote a book back in 1925 called The Seekers of Strength, and it's an awesome book.
So you read this book, and if you follow the directions in this book from 1925, you will get far superior results than for most pop fitness and strength programs.
Because people who had some sense, some common sense, they were able to again observe what's going on.
They were not driven by some slogan, oh, one more rep, whatever.
joe rogan
Yeah.
The one more rep thing is very embraced here in America with meatheads, which are my people.
The thing about it is that you think that mental toughness is going to push you past your limits or what your perceived limits are and that that's where the real strength comes.
That's where the real growth takes place.
pavel tsatsouline
That's a very valid point for you mentally, not physically.
Mentally, but periodically.
This is a very important point.
You have to push the body to the limit, whether in competition or in some other manner, but for a short period of time and not too often.
That's very important.
joe rogan
You know who Ronnie Coleman is, right?
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah, Ronnie Coleman, who was Mr. Olympia, just at one point in time, one of the most impressive and spectacular physiques on earth, is now so injured from all of his incredible lifts.
He was known for lifting enormous, enormous amounts of weight.
And, I mean, I think when they asked him about if we do anything different, because I think he's had...
I hope I'm not wrong, but I think more than 11 back surgeries over the last few years.
He's essentially herniated every single disc in his back, and a series of back operations has left him walking with crutches, and it's bad.
But this is...
The result of this sort of mindset of a champion, you know, that he was...
pavel tsatsouline
Joe, pardon me.
I'm going to interrupt you for a second.
The champion has that mindset on the platform.
The champion, whenever the champion is in the gym, he or she is going to approach this as a working man, pretty much.
This is the plan and this is what I do.
So you will find that absolutely in sports you have to be extremely tough, and you have to model some of that in training as well, but in a very, very careful, timed manner.
So, for instance, top lifters, top power lifters, they max twice a year at the Nationals and at the Worlds.
Meanwhile, they train hard, they push themselves, they do everything right, but they do not try to squeeze out one extra rep.
It just simply will not work.
It does not work.
I remember having a conversation with Andy Bolden.
Andy is the first man to deadlift 1,000 pounds and just a spectacular athlete.
If you watch Andy pull in competition, it's just unbelievable.
It's a thing of beauty.
And I just, Andy was telling me how some lifters he has seen that would just simply try to hang with others, better lifters in the gym, and try to repeat exactly what they do.
And that's what happens after that.
Nothing good happens from that.
You have to be tough when it's time.
In the gym, you have to do the plan.
And like, for example, let's talk about heavy lifting, just heavy singles, let's say.
If, I'm sure everybody who listens to your program has, at what point of their life, decided to up their bench press by going to a maximum once a week.
I'm sure everybody has.
I have, you have, everybody has.
So how long did it last?
Typically six weeks for a beginner, and an advanced lifter might tolerate two or three weeks, and that's about it.
So for whatever reasons, after that, you know, your nervous system starts burning out, your endocrine system can't keep up, and that's it.
So for that reason, before the competition, you might take like a 90% single or double, or something like that.
And if you look at the longevity of powerlifters, and if you look at longevity of the weightlifters of the Soviet school, it's very impressive.
I'll give you one great example.
So, well, David Rigard himself, who was the champion around, you know, in the 70s.
So he is probably pushing 70 right now, you know, lives in a farm, works on a farm.
But his coach, doing great, very healthy.
But his coach, that's an even more interesting story.
Rudolf Pluckfelder, he was probably the oldest to win the Olympics in weightlifting.
He was 36. And he worked in the mines in daytime and then trained hard.
So Plückfielder ethnically is German.
So one of the Germans living in the Soviet Union.
And eventually when the Soviet Union fell apart, Plückfielder immigrated to Germany.
And so a journalist came to visit him.
And so here's this really spry looking guy fooling around in the garden.
And the general is asking, pardon me, sir, may I speak to your dad?
So here's this guy who is almost 90 years old, who still looks about 30 years younger, who still does jump squats with 90 kilos for sets of 10. And this is an example.
So heavy weights don't have the same longevity, but that does not have anything to do with the training system that has to do with the fact the strain you put in your system by eating so much, just not so good.
But these guys have longevity.
If you also look at the powerlifters, most successful powerlifters, American powerlifters, Eddie Cohn competed for, if I'm not mistaken, about 30 years at the highest level, from a very lightweight class to a much heavier one.
And he stayed super healthy throughout.
He maybe had one injury.
And Eddie, right now, yours after retirement is very, very healthy.
So you will find that the mentality of saving this eye of the tiger for when it matters, as opposed to treating every training day as a competition, that makes a big difference for performance and for longevity.
joe rogan
It just battles the mindset of always do more, always push harder, always give more.
You're all, leave everything in the gym.
This is the mindset that people have been sort of indoctrinated into.
They think that hard work is what really matters.
pavel tsatsouline
Hard work does matter, but hard work can come in a lot of different, it can manifest itself differently.
joe rogan
Would that approach have worked with a guy like Ronnie Coleman because he's a bodybuilder?
So bodybuilders, obviously, you're not talking about competition in the sense of being able to lift a lot of weight.
You're talking about just mass, acquiring mass.
pavel tsatsouline
Well, you know, the bodybuilders from the older era, like Franco Colombo, very sad that...
Dr. Columba passed recently, but he was an exceptionally strong man, a very healthy man.
joe rogan
He died swimming.
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah, but it was a hard issue that has nothing to do with lifting.
So he was very healthy and very strong until the end.
And if you look at the guys of that generation, they're doing great.
And if you look at other bodybuilders, let's say bodybuilders who have some kind of a power bodybuilding approach, these guys have been around longer as well.
If you look at the old-timers again, Dave Draper, these guys...
Oh, Clarence Bass.
Do you know Clarence Bass?
joe rogan
Sure.
pavel tsatsouline
Okay.
joe rogan
Super shredded.
pavel tsatsouline
Clarence is a friend of mine, and Clarence is...
Well, let's put it this way.
He's not a spring chicken.
But he's got an absolutely spectacular physique.
He's still staying very strong.
joe rogan
Are there recent pictures of him?
Yeah.
How old is he now?
He's got to be in his 70s, right?
pavel tsatsouline
Pushing 80, possibly.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
There he is.
pavel tsatsouline
Yep, that's Clarence.
He's awesome.
That guy's awesome.
joe rogan
That is crazy.
That picture of him lifting his shirt up with this complete grandpa face and just super jacked body.
pavel tsatsouline
That guy's incredible.
He knows how to push himself when you need to push himself.
joe rogan
Well, he's very, very intelligent, that guy.
pavel tsatsouline
But all top athletes and lifters are very intelligent.
There are some flukes, but they don't last long.
joe rogan
Right.
I see what you're saying.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
For longevity, you sort of have to have that sort of intelligent approach.
So do you think a guy like Ronnie Coleman would be able to achieve the mass and the size and the way he was built with a different strategy?
pavel tsatsouline
I can speculate.
I don't know, but I can speculate.
But if you look at the muscle mass that have been achieved by heavyweight powerlifters, like Kurt Kowalski.
Look up that guy.
Kurt Kowalski.
K-A-R-W-O-S-K-I. So if you see that type of development achieved by heavyweight powerlifters, then I don't see why not.
And bodybuilders have their own additional techniques.
They still have to do their stuff for their separation and whatever it is that you do.
But I think there's a very good chance that you would have.
And if you look at the successful power, like Michael Hearn, for example, that's a very strong guy.
He's a power bodybuilder.
There we go.
There's Karwaski right there.
unidentified
Jesus Christ.
joe rogan
Look at the size of that fucking guy.
unidentified
Yeah, he looks like a body, but look at the size of his legs.
joe rogan
That is ridiculous.
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah, and that guy just would not fool around with Peck whatever deck and what have you.
joe rogan
Peck deck?
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah.
joe rogan
You say that disdainfully.
Is that a bad move?
pavel tsatsouline
What do you want me to say?
joe rogan
A lot of people don't understand what's wrong with it.
pavel tsatsouline
This is an interesting point of view.
There is a belief that machines are great for beginners because you don't have to control it, it's safer, and it's isolated, so on and so forth.
Really, machines have limited use for advanced lifters when they're injured or whenever they have to just really focus on something.
So it's possible.
It's possible to use a machine if you're really messed up, you can find some angle.
But a beginner starts doing leg presses, it's going to totally mess up its coordination.
It's not going to have the back strength.
It's not going to have its ab strength.
So machines are not necessarily bad.
So the pec deck might be okay for a bodybuilder looking for more cuts or for somebody recovering from an injury knowing exactly the angle to which to push.
But your typical person going to the gym has no business doing that.
joe rogan
none one of the things that I love about kettlebells is that it promotes functional strength it promotes the entire body moving as a unit and that seems to apply very quickly to athletics it's one of the reasons Absolutely.
unidentified
Absolutely.
pavel tsatsouline
There are many reasons why, but that's one of them.
joe rogan
And non-glamorous moves, like Turkish get-up, which is one of the very best moves for jiu-jitsu.
It's just phenomenal for your stability, your core, and your ability to get out from under the bottom positions.
It's just a phenomenal workout.
But these principles of using the entire body with kettlebells, Using different parts of your body, using your legs, your core, your ab, all in one workout.
It's also so effective time-wise because you can get a spectacular workout in a very short amount of time.
pavel tsatsouline
You're correct, Joe.
Maybe this is a good time to discuss the benefits of kettlebells versus, let's say, barbells or bodyweight.
joe rogan
Sure.
pavel tsatsouline
That's a very good conversation.
That's a question people ask often.
joe rogan
Right.
pavel tsatsouline
So I would name these as three top modalities for people.
Yes, there are some other additional things, dumbbells and whatever, but usually they're secondary.
So what are the respective benefits of these different modalities?
The bodyweight is obviously accessible.
It's with you no matter where you go.
But interestingly enough, the body weight requires the most coaching.
So you have to, it's very subtle.
Like, for example, if you look at developing something, the gym is called the hollow position.
It takes a lot of coaching.
To perform correct, even pull-up or push-up, it's a lot of work.
One-legged squat, so on and so forth.
So it's great, but it just takes more time, more investment.
Also, the downside of the body weight would be you can't really train your lower back effectively.
And you have to turn your lower back to C on.
You just have to.
And whatever you do, back extensions, other stuff, neck bridges, it's not going to do for your back.
It just won't.
So bodyweight, great modality, but with these limitations.
The barbell, if you just love heavy stuff, it's awesome.
And it's just psychologically, it's extremely satisfying to have a deadlift, let's say, for some people, not for all.
Then, if you're looking forward to maximize your muscle mass, nobody has come up yet with anything other than the barbell.
So, you know, you start doing, you know, some repetition, deadlift, squats, so on.
So that's another reason.
But let's say you're playing football, right?
Yeah.
The problem with the barbell, first of all, is the learning curve.
It takes some time to learn it correctly.
It's not easy to master it, and it takes a lot of instruction.
In addition, the barbell is not forgiving.
So let's say that one of your shoulders is jacked up.
It's just not very forgiving because you just have to adjust yourself to the bar as opposed to make the implement adjust to yourself.
So this is where the kettlebell comes in.
First of all, the kettlebell, because it moves freely, it adjusts to your body, to your physiology, to your anatomy, I should say.
So it works quite well.
For example, Mark Rifkin, he's one of my top instructors.
He was...
Highly successful gymnast in the past and later on he was a coach for women's powerlifting national team and great powerlifter too.
So he cannot do bilateral exercises well because of the mileage he sustained.
He took a very bad landing as a gymnast, ruined his knee and then from there other things went bad back, whatever.
But he cannot do two arm swings.
Because it just messes him up.
But he can do one-arm swing, so the body compensates a little differently, and he can handle it.
So with the proper medical clearance, it's much easier to work around problems.
Then the offset center gravity, that's just a tremendous thing for your back.
I'm sorry, for your shoulder.
So the positions that put your shoulder in, you cannot do it with anything else.
But Obviously, you have the get-up, which is an amazing exercise.
You cannot do it as well with other implements.
But the ballistics, that's another unique benefit of the kettlebell.
Swings and snatches, exercises like that.
The benefits of these exercises are many.
First of all, ballistic loading, obviously, is part of sports, and it's a part of life.
Oftentimes, it's hard to do it safely.
Go ahead and start jumping.
Before somebody starts jumping correctly, jumping off boxes and so on and so forth, just even hopping across the floor, it requires some coaching.
It requires getting some strength.
It requires addressing some dysfunction and so on and so forth.
The kettlebell swing, for example, it's So many hard men with high mileage who are really banged up in so many different ways, their backs, their knees, their hips, they're able to do swings safely.
That's just remarkable.
And the ballistic contraction is very important.
So you have to run, you have to jump, you have to do things like that.
But it goes beyond that for your health, for your longevity.
So as we grow older, There's a loss of type 2 muscle fibers, so the strong ones, the fast twitch fibers.
And there are several problems with that.
First of all, they're metabolically needed for the body to be healthy, to process sugar, so on, so on and so forth.
Second is to deal with real life situations.
You know, like it's very unfortunate, some old person trips and breaks the hip.
It's terrible.
And oftentimes the reason is just weakness.
And we need these fast fibers because whenever you trip and you have this reflexive contraction, these fibers go online first.
So if you don't have them anymore, you've got massive problems, right?
So another reason is in type 2 fibers, there is mitochondrial degeneration takes place as you're older, much faster than others.
And if you don't take care of that, it's also aging.
So you've got to train these type 2 fibers.
And there are only two ways to train type 2 fibers.
It's heavy or fast.
So there's no third way.
So whenever people try to do some sort of a super slow this or Pilates that, whatever, it's not going to do it.
So you have to train heavy or you have to train fast if you want to stay young.
joe rogan
So are you completely against that kind of super slow training?
pavel tsatsouline
Not at all, but for totally different reasons.
There is, well obviously one reason is possibly somebody's injured, right?
Another reason is to develop your type 1 endurance fibers, hypertrophy for these fibers.
Why would you want to do that?
Well first of all, type 1 fibers, the downside of these fibers is they contract slower.
So obviously that's a downside for some sports, for some activities.
But they're also more efficient, which means it's plus for other sports, right?
So another positive here, they already come pre-equipped with mitochondria.
So mitochondria, that's where aerobic metabolism takes place.
And by building your type 1 fibers, you automatically get more endurance in addition to muscle mass and strength too.
Super slow work is good for that, but it has to be done correctly.
The proper methods were developed by Russian professor Viktor Siloyanov.
And so he developed this method.
I'm going to summarize it for you right now for your listeners.
That's something you can easily do yourself.
Well, easily is not the word.
Simply.
So the duration of a set is 30 to 60 seconds.
You have to select the range of motion where there's no stacking.
There's no support from your bones at all.
So, for example, if you were to do a squat, you go down below parallel, but not to the point where you're sitting on your calves.
And come up just a little above parallel and below again.
So just that most unpleasant, the most painful area.
If you're doing, let's say, push-ups for your chest, for example, you would almost brush the deck with your chest, come up about halfway, and come back down.
And the speed is very slow, so there's no momentum at all.
Now, it doesn't sound like anything new, but here's what's new.
Silyanov optimized the rest periods, and that's a big game changer.
Normally, when people train in this manner, bodybuilders and others, they just want to get more burn possible.
And by the way, the burn is awful.
And in this particular case, you want to train close to failure.
In this particular case, that's just a muscular training.
That's not strength training per se.
So they try to run from one set to the next.
So they'll do that, let's say, that 30-second set, then they will just, you know, rest for 30 seconds and do it again, completely hammer themselves.
The problem with that is even though we do not know the exact mechanisms of muscle growth, we do know that some lactic acid is needed, but too much lactic acid is destructive.
So what Selyanov did is he figured out is after this kind of set, you have to rest for 5 to 10 minutes.
And it sounds for people, it's a very hard mental thing to do.
So here I am going for this massive burn and I have to wait for 5 to 10 minutes.
But it's very simple.
You introduce another exercise in between.
So train twice a week.
Five to ten sets on the heavy day, eventually, once you build up to it.
And about one to three sets on the light day.
That's it.
joe rogan
Now, this is incorporating super slow techniques?
unidentified
Yeah.
pavel tsatsouline
And who would this be good for?
Wrestlers.
For wrestlers, it's spectacular.
joe rogan
Yeah.
pavel tsatsouline
Because even though there are explosive elements there as well, but it's also very much there's that static element, static endurance.
And one of my strong first certified instructors, Roger from the UK, I had him follow this protocol before he and his crew rode across the Atlantic.
And he did much better after most people and was much happier, if you can be happier, rolling across the Atlantic.
So for rowing, for wrestling, for bodybuilding, for some people who cannot do anything else.
So that's a good protocol.
joe rogan
So this is essentially a muscular endurance protocol.
unidentified
You know what?
pavel tsatsouline
It's both.
Because the muscle's getting bigger, and it will get stronger as well.
joe rogan
But it won't be faster.
It's not something you would incorporate with a boxer.
pavel tsatsouline
No, absolutely not.
No, definitely not.
Wrestler, yes.
MMA, you just have to use your judgment there.
joe rogan
Right, depending upon your style.
Now, it's so interesting hearing this big, long break in between exercises, because it makes sense.
It makes sense you would want the muscles to be fully recovered, because then they'd be able to do more work.
But that's so counterintuitive to what everybody promotes.
You go to a coach, you get a personal trainer or something like that, they just want to burn everybody out.
So come on, let's go, let's go, next exercise, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go.
pavel tsatsouline
Well, that's about feeling.
joe rogan
Yes.
pavel tsatsouline
That's about feeling and that's about time management possibly.
joe rogan
And not about results.
pavel tsatsouline
No.
And there are other ways to save time.
There are other ways of doing that.
Depending on your circumstances you can definitely find ways of doing that.
But you can fill in the time with other things.
Let's say you're doing this hypertrophy protocol.
And by the way, that's been used extensively by Russian national judo ensemble teams.
So you're doing some rows on the belt.
The guy's holding you up.
Then you walk around for a minute, you do the push-ups.
Then you walk around, you do something else.
So you're making good use of the time.
You're just not revisiting the same exercise.
joe rogan
So instead of taking 10 minutes in between any workout at all, you would take just a couple minutes in between and then do like push-ups and then do something that's non-related to that.
pavel tsatsouline
So think of it as a slow circuit.
joe rogan
Okay, slow circuit.
But then you'd go back to whatever it was that you were initially doing 10 minutes later.
pavel tsatsouline
Correct.
joe rogan
Yeah.
So those muscles are recovered, but physiologically, you're still getting this constant state of exercise, or at least fairly constant.
What's the lowest amount of break in between an exercise you recommend?
pavel tsatsouline
That would be, that's the guidelines, Selyanov's guidelines, about five minutes of the rest is active for the same exercise I'm talking about.
So active rest means you're moving.
You're not just sitting.
joe rogan
Jump rope, maybe.
pavel tsatsouline
Not necessarily.
This would be probably just walking around.
Maybe you could do some super easy shadowboxing or something or like footwork or something.
But I mean extremely, extremely easy.
So that facilitates the circulation.
Just do that.
And if it's passive, it's longer.
joe rogan
Wow.
It's, again, so counterintuitive to what most people call it.
Particularly something like CrossFit, right?
CrossFit is all about massive reps and doing the most that you possibly can and switching from one thing quickly to another thing.
How do you feel about that?
pavel tsatsouline
Joe, how about we take one minute till I get myself another tea and I'll address that.
Sound good?
joe rogan
Yeah, sure.
pavel tsatsouline
Thanks.
It's a good question, man.
Very good question.
Excellent question, Joe.
Thank you.
joe rogan
He's going to go get another tea.
Do you know how to do it?
pavel tsatsouline
No.
No idea.
joe rogan
All right.
Jamie will do it for you.
pavel tsatsouline
I have a cup here.
unidentified
I think he's going to get you another cup, whether you like it or not.
pavel tsatsouline
This is not in the shot, is it?
joe rogan
It doesn't matter.
pavel tsatsouline
Okay.
joe rogan
It can be in the shot.
That...
All this stuff is so interesting because it's so obviously, I mean, it makes sense, but it's just not the method that anyone is accustomed to.
pavel tsatsouline
You know, you would be surprised that's not necessarily true.
If you look at the top coaches, if you look at top athletes who don't necessarily advertise what they're doing, That's not the case.
joe rogan
So it's more common now.
pavel tsatsouline
It's getting there.
joe rogan
Yeah.
pavel tsatsouline
Oh, sorry.
Let me do this.
Let me dump this in there.
joe rogan
Are you a tea fanatic?
pavel tsatsouline
No, I'm just a warm liquid fanatic.
My favorite warm liquid is canarino.
Italians make it.
It's like zest from lemon when you boil it.
Stuff is good.
joe rogan
Yeah?
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Do you drink caffeine?
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah?
Occasionally?
pavel tsatsouline
No, twice a day, but just a very small amount.
Don't want to be running around buzzing.
joe rogan
Yeah, that's what I like.
pavel tsatsouline
You like buzzing?
joe rogan
Yeah.
pavel tsatsouline
That's good, man.
Keep buzzing.
joe rogan
So tell me about CrossFit.
pavel tsatsouline
So CrossFit, what is your question about CrossFit exactly?
joe rogan
The methods that they use, the sort of competition with Olympic-style lifts, doing it to maximum reps, doing it for speed.
Do you think that's a recipe for injury, or do you think it's a good modality if pursued correctly?
pavel tsatsouline
I'm going to start by saying that...
I like the fact that CrossFit gets people out, gets people training.
They have a great community.
People are very motivated.
I like the fact that they understand the concept of general physical preparation, which means you have to train multiple different qualities.
I would not go about it the way they do it, and let me explain to you why.
Let's talk about endurance.
There are different aspects to endurance.
There's cardio and there is the peripheral endurance in the muscles, muscular endurance.
First, let's discuss how we develop cardio.
Let's discuss how we develop endurance in the muscle.
The best, the healthiest way To develop your cardio is just steady state exercise.
Like running at a particular speed that's not too fast.
That's very simple.
joe rogan
That's the best way to develop cardio.
pavel tsatsouline
For most people it is.
For most people it is.
And so here's what's happening.
What's happening is the heart is stretching.
When you increase your heart rate up to a certain point, the heart starts stretching more.
And it stretches more and more.
So that increases the stroke volume.
So pretty much you get a bigger heart.
And that's good.
That works up to not quite 90% of heart rate.
When you start redlining your heart rate, when you start getting to 90% and higher, the heart does not have time to relax fully.
So it really pretty much is twitching.
So you're no longer really stretching that heart.
So you want to be training at...
The metabolic intensity, that's much lower.
Something we can pretty much sustain a conversation.
So like say you're running and talking to your body.
joe rogan
That's what you want to stay to develop endurance.
pavel tsatsouline
Well, to develop to stress your heart.
That's the basic method.
So that's one method.
So the second method is interval training.
And the interval training for the heart was developed by Germans decades ago.
And these guidelines still stand.
So here's what they figured out.
unidentified
They figured out that your...
pavel tsatsouline
Well, we know that these various systems in your body have inertia.
So, for instance, notice that when you're running hard and you stopped, your heart's still beating hard, and then maybe 10 seconds after, there's a sudden drop right there.
So there's that inertia.
So the Germans figured out if you get your heart rate up to about 85-90%, which is...
It's hard, but it's still not maximal.
And then you switch to walking or jogging, so the heart is still beating, and so this extra volume of blood is moving, and it stretches the heart.
So it works really well.
So you can use the interval method as well, but it was found it's used best after a period of steady-state training.
It's very demanding on the body, and it's just...
It's too easy to have problems with the heart if you start using it prematurely.
Then there's also such a thing as high heart rate under heavy loads.
So in this particular case, we're talking about dynamic exercises.
So what's dynamic exercise?
Running, bicycling, skiing, even light kettlebell swings.
That's dynamic exercise.
When you start doing static exercise, let's say you're trying to do squats, heavy squats, to get your cardio, so to say.
That's not the best idea.
Because that interferes with the blood flow.
It's something called afterload versus preload.
The heart gets thicker instead of the heart gets stretched and bigger.
So it's not the optimal way to train the heart.
You can, again, the simple way you can use...
Dynamic exercise, an interval type training, or repeat training in this case, to train your heart is to do an exercise that's dynamic in nature to raise your heart rate to about, let's say, 80-90%, which would be 80-90%, it would be where you can say maybe a couple words.
You're not dying yet.
You can still answer a question.
And then you just walk around.
And you do it again.
So that's a simple way of doing it.
joe rogan
How much time walking around?
pavel tsatsouline
That depends.
That totally depends on who you are.
joe rogan
Depends on how fast your heart rate drops back down?
And what do you want to, like, is there a number?
Do you want to keep it in the 140s, the 150s?
Is it dependent upon your age?
pavel tsatsouline
Okay.
In this particular case, you would drop it down.
The original guidelines were done for young people, those 120, 130 beats.
So you're talking about 60, 65%.
And pretty much if you're just looking at being able to pass the talk test, which means you can talk, you know, short sentences.
I can speak in short, something like that, right?
So for example, you do a set of tense swings, really powerful, with a kettlebell.
Walk around a little bit.
When you feel that you can speak again, you do it again, do it again.
So that's a simple way of doing that.
But...
The heart is only a very small part of endurance.
So we definitely need to do some cardio for our health, and athletes definitely need to do it for their performance.
But what we really need to focus on is we need mitochondria.
So mitochondria in the muscle cell.
So that's where energy is being converted aerobically, which means efficiently.
So if you look at The way your muscle uses energy.
So you will get this energy with food converted.
It goes down.
Eventually, the final currency, so to say, is something called ATP. But you only have it for a few seconds.
So it has to be reloaded.
So we have three main energy systems.
So we have the creatine phosphate system.
It's very powerful, but it only can go for just some seconds.
And it's clean burning.
We have aerobic system that's not powerful at all, but it's longer lasting.
And we have the glycolytic system that's kind of in between that dumps a lot of acid and other fatigue metabolites in there.
So what we want to do is we want to develop this mitochondria in our muscles.
It's easy to do in slow fibers and it's a little more involved in fast fibers.
I'll tell you how we can do that.
But it can be done.
So what we're looking for Instead of trying to trash the muscle with acid, we are trying to train in a way to produce less acid.
And then only before the competition, right before the competition, a couple of weeks out, you do a couple of smokers like that to get yourself used to that thing.
So the way we develop mitochondria, which means make your muscle oxidative, make your muscle enduring and not polluting, In slow fibers, it's simply moving right below an aerobic threshold.
So an aerobic threshold, it's that intensity at which you, you know, acid is accumulating just up to a certain point and stays in that steady state, and you can keep disposing of that for a while, for quite a while.
As soon as you go above it, very rapidly, you crash.
So Running right below the anaerobic threshold is the primary training method for endurance athletes.
And how do you know that you ran the threshold?
When you're failing the TOC test.
That's a simple way to do that.
And it's very interesting that endurance athletes, even though we're not necessarily well educated, they kind of tend to gravitate through that intensity.
And so what happens is we are producing just small amounts of acid.
And the body finally is able to, you know, produce less and less.
So that's how we train aerobic...
I'm sorry.
That's how we train mitochondria in slow fibers.
For fast fibers, it becomes something more interesting.
So the conditions...
The conditions for making the mitochondria be able to handle more traffic without producing as much acid...
Is push them just to the edge of acidosis, just to the edge, and do it over and over and over.
So, Professor Verkashansky, back in the 80s, that's the guy who invented plyometrics and so on.
So, he figured out, so here's what we do.
Imagine that you are sprinting, let's say you're sprinting for 5-7 seconds, and then you're just walking.
And you're sprinting again.
And you're just walking.
But you're doing that.
You're measuring your blood lactate.
And it still keeps below the threshold.
And you sustain that for, let's say, 40 minutes.
So think of this for a second.
So you're sprinting very intensely.
But you stop before you start burning.
You get to the point of just light muscular fatigue.
And you do it over and over and over.
So...
If we talk about the coaching terminology, it's repeat training versus interval training.
So what is interval training?
Pardon me, Joe, I have to take a step to the side.
So there are three types of rest periods between your sets, whether you're running, lifting, whatever.
So there's a stress period.
That means that you will have a harder time to do the same thing, or you will not be able to repeat it, right?
That's interval training.
There is the supercompensation period, which means if you wait extra long time, you'll perform even better.
Like, for example, if you do a set of pull-ups, wait for 15 minutes, you might be able to do more 15 minutes later.
And there is the ordinary period, which is just you'll be able to repeat it over and over.
So that's, in coaching speak, it's called repeat training.
Repeat versus interval.
So we're trying to sustain that same level of performance for 40 minutes, let's say.
So that's an example of how we develop mitochondria and fast-witch fibers.
And the same thing we can do with kettlebell swings, the same thing you can do working in a heavy bag and so on and so forth.
joe rogan
Now, CrossFit, to circle back around to that, what do they do that you feel, you said there's a lot of good things they do, they get people moving, they introduce people to all these different exercise routines.
What do you think they do wrong?
pavel tsatsouline
Joe, I don't want to pick on CrossFit.
This so-called metabolic conditioning has been around since 1975, at least, when Arthur Jones coined that term.
You know, the guy from Nautilus.
That's when people go through a circuit of machines going, you know, going one after the next.
And I'm sure it's been around even before that.
I would just do things totally different.
So there's no point in me trying to criticize a different system.
I'm just telling you this is what the science and experience says is how you should be doing it.
I think there are a lot of great people in CrossFit, and I just wish power to them.
joe rogan
You would just do it like what you're talking about, with longer rest periods, different sort of training approach?
pavel tsatsouline
Okay, let's say that you're training for the CrossFit Games.
Let's say that's your goal, right?
What you would do is name some CrossFit exercise.
Let's say wall ball, okay?
Let's say they throw the ball against the wall.
Good exercise.
You do this thing with this wall ball for 40 minutes like I told you.
And you can incorporate a second exercise in between.
Just in between.
Stick it in there.
So let's say you do a wall ball.
You throw this a few times.
Walk around.
You do a set of push-ups.
Let's say 5 to 10 reps.
And you do this for 40 minutes.
Why 40 minutes?
It doesn't always have to be 40 minutes.
But pretty much we know if you can sustain it for 40 minutes, it's not going to be overly glycolytic.
So we just kind of know that.
I'll give you another example.
Let's say burpees, right?
You can do a burpee, but time it in a way that you can keep doing burpees for 40 minutes.
So you do a rep, walk around.
Do a rep, walk around.
Or even break it up.
So you do these different CrossFit-specific, competition-specific exercises in this particular manner where you're able to sustain it again for 40 minutes.
Then, pardon me, closer to the competition, you start doing what in track is called peaking.
When you're running, let's say, 400 meters or 800 meters, athletes, when they train in the off-season, they train largely aerobically.
Even though their distances are shorter, they're still not trying to trash themselves.
But we do know that even if you develop your mitochondria, if you do it correctly, and suddenly you throw yourself in an acid bath, your body's going to be unpleasantly surprised.
So what you need to do is you need to model that.
So what's going to happen is A couple of weeks before the competition, once a week, you would pretty much do something similar to the competition, like a wad or whatever.
And this will accomplish several things.
One is it will upregulate your buffers.
So your body produces baking soda pretty much to cancel out the acid.
And it's a very rapid adaptation.
It's very easy to get.
Just two weeks, you got it.
And in addition, you also upregulate your glycolytic enzymes, which you also want for competition.
And again, they're very quick to develop, very quick to lose as well.
So finally, there is such a thing as heart and respiration rate modeling, which pretty much means that you're going to be sucking wind, and if you're not used to sucking wind, it's not going to feel good.
Your diaphragm is going to spasm and not so good.
The purpose of peaking is to get yourself in kind of a simulated competition situation where the acid is high enough to make your body adapt to it, which adapts fast, and to make yourself comfortable with high heart rates and breathing.
So that's the summary.
That's pretty much how track athletes train for middle distance.
joe rogan
What do you do now?
First of all, how old are you?
20. You look great.
unidentified
Thanks.
pavel tsatsouline
Thank you.
Great haircut too.
joe rogan
Thank you.
unidentified
Yeah.
I like it.
joe rogan
How old are you really?
pavel tsatsouline
I'm working on being 20, Joe.
Let's stick with that.
joe rogan
Working on going back?
Yeah.
I'm 52. Are you older than me?
pavel tsatsouline
I'm working.
We're both working on going back.
How about we stick with that?
I don't want to be judged by some of my age.
joe rogan
I understand.
How often do you train these days?
pavel tsatsouline
How often do I train?
Almost every day.
joe rogan
Almost every day.
Just doing something differently?
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah, doing something differently.
joe rogan
Mostly kettlebells?
pavel tsatsouline
Mostly kettlebells.
For the last several years with, I suppose, last several months, we're kind of experimental doing something else.
But for the last several years, pretty much it's been nothing but swings and dips, just one of my protocols.
It's a very particular anti-glycolytic protocol.
Anti-glycolytic means, well, the kind of thing we just discussed.
joe rogan
Just swings and dips?
unidentified
Yep.
joe rogan
Why that combination?
pavel tsatsouline
Trying to be minimalist, pretty much, and trying to cover as much base as possible.
Also trying to do things that my body likes.
But the swings are...
I would argue that the swing is the most beneficial exercise anybody can do.
Because you will, again, your training power...
You're training your fast fibers.
You're developing mitochondria in the fast fibers.
You are training your connective tissues.
And, you know, you're getting your cardio as well.
It's not, you know, it's not focused on that but you have that side effect.
The dip is, you know, kind of covers what's been missing.
I like the idea of very minimalist general strength protocols that just have pretty much a hip hinge and a press.
That's a preference.
joe rogan
What about chin-ups or things along those lines?
pavel tsatsouline
Sure, it's great.
I'll do them sometime.
But you will find, to your surprise, that if you do swings powerfully and if you do dips or push-ups powerfully, chances are you're not going to lose your chin-ups.
unidentified
Really?
pavel tsatsouline
Chances are, for most people.
So here's something to keep in mind.
What is general training versus specific training?
So in Russian sports science, there is a concept of general training versus special training.
Special means sports specific, pretty much.
So the general training can be strength, can be something else, gives you foundation for everything else.
And it's characterized by a high degree of carryover.
So for example, if you decide to do barbell squats, you know for a fact that you're gonna jump higher, you're gonna run faster, you're gonna hit harder, and so on and so forth.
If you decide to go leg extensions, you can be sure that you're going to get better at leg extensions.
That's it.
So general exercises are the ones that are fairly simple to perform and give you the greatest possible carryover.
So that's what you do.
And then after that, you start adding your more specific stuff.
So let's say that you want to increase the number of chin-ups you want to do.
Well, you've got to do chin-ups.
So that's a specific practice.
Absolutely.
joe rogan
So chin-ups are great.
One of the things that I noticed that I thought was really weird was when I started doing kettlebells, things that I wasn't doing, I got stronger at.
I wasn't doing dips for a long time.
I didn't do them for months and months, and I was just doing kettlebells.
I was just doing cleans, presses, snatches, swings, a bunch of different squat protocols, overhead squats.
My dip went through the roof.
pavel tsatsouline
Awesome, dude.
joe rogan
But it was so strange.
pavel tsatsouline
We call this the what-the-hell effect.
So that type of carryover, some of it we can't understand, some of it we can't explain, some of it we can't.
But yeah, we've had the kettlebell swing, for example, increase the performance of world champion powerlifters and top marathon runners at the same time.
It's a very bizarre thing.
And again, some of it I can decipher, some of it I can't, but hey, we'll take it, right?
joe rogan
What do you think is going on there, if you had to guess?
Because...
pavel tsatsouline
Okay, so it's a number of different things.
One is the type of breathing patterns that we use, for example, for endurance.
That helps strengthen endurance.
So we use this pressurized breathing that increases your strength on exhalation, so that pretty much increases your strength at any kind of exertion, whether it's punching or lifting.
And at the same time, we are also training our muscles, that inspiration muscles, inhalation muscles as well.
And so developing these muscles is really important for your performance.
So that's just one of the aspects.
Another aspect is the...
Well, this is kind of interesting.
Mr. Haney was a coach for Donnie Thompson.
Donnie Thompson, he broke the 3,000-pound total record in powerlifting some years back.
So I'd known Donnie for some time, so Donnie kept hurting his back and his deadlift was stuck.
So we met.
I showed him some kettlebell stuff.
He started doing that, invented a couple of cool things of his own as well.
So nine months later, he added about 70 pounds to his deadlift, 100 pounds to his bench press, set the total record.
And what his coach said, interestingly, he said, kettlebells work the muscles without killing them.
So it's kind of interesting.
So it appears to be that the particular stimulus that you have...
There's always a positive and there's always a negative when you're training, right?
So there's something good that's happening.
It's also something that's holding you back.
You have to recover.
So it seems to be that nature of whatever things that happens within the muscle is positive more than negative.
And I think part of it is very well-dosed ballistic loading.
The body adapts to it extremely, extremely well.
Part of it has to do with the particular training protocols we have because we produce the right amount of acid but not too much acid.
A lot of trainees in the kind of a pop fitness world, they're just enamored with burn.
joe rogan
Like, oh, go for the burn.
pavel tsatsouline
Fred Hadfield, Dr. Fred Hadfield had a great line.
So Hadfield was the first lifter to squat a thousand pounds in competition.
And he was just a brilliant sports scientist, brilliant coach.
He said, do you like burn?
Light a match.
And so people are just enamored with the burn.
So again, the loading protocols we have is such that you have the right amount of that stimulation, not excessive.
Because what happens, you have too much lactic acid.
Right.
Here's what happens.
Well, many, many things happen.
We don't have the time to discuss this on the show, but most of them are really rather negative.
Some positive, most of them rather negative.
But, for sure, it makes you more sore.
For sure.
People like to say, well, soreness is just caused by eccentric loading, and that's it.
It has nothing to do with lactic acid.
Well, eccentric loading does contribute to that, absolutely, but acid does as well.
It doesn't literally burn holes in your muscle, but it does stimulate lysosomes, something that kind of eats up defective components of the cell to function.
And you also have this spike of free radicals, and so that free radicals damage cell membranes as well.
So, with what we do, we try to, and plus there's other stuff happening, like body starts producing ammonia, which is toxic, and depletes your ATP. So all those things start going, they're really sideways.
So I think the nature of what you do with kettlebells, especially if you use the correct protocol, is you just optimize this metabolic environment to get exactly what you want.
But there are some other things too, like in your case for pressing and for dips, I challenge anybody to find a pressing exercise that's biomechanically more perfect for the shoulder than the kettlebell military press.
It's perfect.
Range of motion is perfect.
Great stretch, great contraction, just absolutely perfect.
So some of which we get, some we don't, but hey, what the hell effects will take it, right?
joe rogan
So what do you spend your time doing these days?
Do you spend your time teaching seminars, coaching people, writing books?
pavel tsatsouline
All of the above.
I am staying, I'm working on, I teach some special events for Strong First, which is my company, the School of Strength.
So I teach seminars like Strong Endurances, I Can Win and so on.
I write books and I do some consulting.
But what I really am trying to do is I'm trying to build Strong First, you know, the School of Strength.
My vision is that More people want to become stronger and strength will become cool.
Strength will become important.
And I'd like to see that across decades really.
joe rogan
Do you think strength is cool now?
pavel tsatsouline
Among a small portion of the population.
joe rogan
Do you think that can actually change?
pavel tsatsouline
I hope so.
I don't know.
I hope so.
joe rogan
Why would it change?
pavel tsatsouline
Well, we're working at it.
Maybe you'll do something about it.
Who knows?
But, you know, a friend of mine said something interesting, a friend John.
He said, today, you have this very small, among young people, very small fraction of the population.
These super tough guys who are just competing in MMA and so on.
These daredevils doing extreme sports and so on.
And you have the...
Huge majority are just sitting doing this or they go and do their little Pilates thing or whatever they do, their little interval session.
And I just think society at large needs more just regular tough guys, you know, like the old farmer or somebody like that.
And I think that that needs to be more broad.
And people need to understand that I hate this word fitness.
I just hate that.
Because it conjures up images of just all sorts of weird equipment and weird exercises and foam rollers and all that stuff, you know?
joe rogan
You don't like foam rollers?
pavel tsatsouline
It's not that I don't like foam rollers.
It's a tool just like everything else.
Here's a problem.
A guy comes in.
He spends 45 minutes on some fancy, he calls it movement prep.
What the hell is movement prep?
And he's sitting around rolling his butt in the foam roller and then he does some other weird voodoo and...
You know, if he's injured and if he got a prescription from his physical therapist or doctor, power to you, buddy.
But if not, and then finally he's going to spend 10 minutes doing some little nonsense, get his heart rate up, and between sets he's going to be updating his profile or whatever.
So the foam roller, it's got a place.
I'm even going to tell you, even doing any of the corrective work, something that you need to do, you should even separate it from your training.
Don't dishonor the lifting platform by throwing a foam roller on it.
Just do it somewhere else.
joe rogan
Really?
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah.
joe rogan
Don't dishonor?
pavel tsatsouline
Don't.
joe rogan
I thought it was just a natural thing to sort of work the kinks out.
pavel tsatsouline
Fine.
Go work them out.
Just do it somewhere else.
Just don't do it by the platform, man.
And don't ever step over a barbell.
That's the most disrespectful thing you can do.
joe rogan
Really?
pavel tsatsouline
Absolutely.
joe rogan
You can't step over a barbell?
unidentified
No.
pavel tsatsouline
In Russia, you'd get beaten up and thrown out of the gym.
joe rogan
They beat you up?
pavel tsatsouline
Absolutely.
joe rogan
That seems excessive.
pavel tsatsouline
You gotta respect it, Ben.
No, you do.
joe rogan
Stepping over a barbell is disrespectful?
unidentified
Disrespectful.
joe rogan
You have to go around it.
pavel tsatsouline
Of course.
joe rogan
Of course.
pavel tsatsouline
Yes.
joe rogan
How do I not know this?
Well, now you do.
I'm trying to think what I do.
I'm sure I've stepped over barbells.
pavel tsatsouline
It will get you.
joe rogan
Nobody ever taught me that a barbell will get you?
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah, it will.
joe rogan
Really?
Oh, okay.
I didn't know.
When you see gyms like mine that have all this equipment, all these different things, do you look at that as like that's excessive or unnecessary?
pavel tsatsouline
Joe, that depends.
That all depends on the circumstances.
We're talking about CrossFit.
Generally, like we talked about CrossFit early, I think CrossFit gyms, I love CrossFit gyms.
I mean, they have a few things I think are not necessary, but not so many.
But they have a lot of great stuff.
High pull-up bars and platforms and so on and so forth.
Those are essentials.
But then beyond that is just whatever you add for yourself.
And without knowing your training needs, your background, I can't evaluate you, Jim.
But I can tell you that most people have too much stuff.
And that becomes a problem of choices.
So you come in, you have this and this and that, so what are you going to do?
You're just confused.
What is it called?
The paradox of choice or something like that.
joe rogan
Yes, yes.
Now, what about injuries?
How often do you get injured from this kind of exercise?
pavel tsatsouline
I've had a number of injuries in my life, older contact injuries, like fractures and things like that.
They're not from lifting.
From lifting, things were old tweaks.
All of them were tweaks.
But, you know, tearing ligaments by falling and things like that.
joe rogan
So you've never had issues with tendinitis?
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah, I've had some of that.
Some of that.
Training pull-ups too heavy and things like that.
Things happen.
joe rogan
What do you do to combat that?
That's exactly what I got mine from.
Sure.
pavel tsatsouline
Well, first of all, provided in the absence of medical restrictions, you just work around things.
So you find things to do that work the area without aggravating it.
That's kind of the age-old prescription for what you want to do.
But I'm telling you that a lot of things we do are allowing a lot of people to get back in the game, people who have been really injured before.
And I can tell you that the techniques we use, the strong first kettlebell techniques and some other techniques, we have supporters amongst top healthcare professionals, people like Professor Stuart McGill, who is a top spine biomechanist in the world and who works with The elite of athletes and also the most broken down people.
Greg Cook, who's a top physical therapist, people like that.
So we have a very good track record of keeping people healthy.
I like this old expression from George, the Russian Lion Hackenschmidt, strength cannot be divorced from health.
I think that's a great line.
joe rogan
That's a great line.
I specifically have something with my bicep tendon.
I think I got it from two things.
I got it from training, doing a lot of chin-ups, but also from archery.
Because in archery, you're extending as you're drawing back at the same time, and this particular muscle gets overworked.
pavel tsatsouline
Well, I have Dr. Mark Chang.
I know Dr. Mark Chang.
I'll help Doc check you out.
joe rogan
Yeah, I'll talk to him.
What about your diet?
pavel tsatsouline
I'm an enemy of nutrition.
I didn't know anything about it.
joe rogan
An enemy of nutrition?
pavel tsatsouline
I hate it, man.
unidentified
What do you mean?
pavel tsatsouline
It's such a confusing thing.
I'm telling you, in training, it's really kind of funny about training.
In training, I do my thing, you do your thing, he does his thing, but it's cool.
In nutrition, it's the only way.
And there are so many different variables that it's very hard to keep track of.
So I just feel sorry for people in that field.
unidentified
I really do.
pavel tsatsouline
It's an awful thing.
joe rogan
You have to constantly be reading papers.
You have to constantly be studying.
pavel tsatsouline
And it's still hopeless.
joe rogan
Yes.
pavel tsatsouline
It's just really hopeless.
The body is a complex system, but I think this particular silo is worse than others.
It's just so nonlinear and it's just so difficult to figure this out.
joe rogan
Biological variability is so confusing too.
With one person, the diet would be optimal.
The other person, it would be terrible.
pavel tsatsouline
You know, I think what we should do is focus, whether it's in diet or in training, we should try to focus on things that are more universal.
So, for example, in terms of longevity, Dr. Nick Lane, who's a mitochondrial researcher, he made a very interesting point.
He said, right now, for longevity, so many efforts are directed at the genetic engineering, manipulation, whatever, fooling around, trying to make this really, really customized.
And he said, you know what's really interesting?
Why don't we try to focus on something that's been known to work not just for any individual, it works for pretty much every species, which is mitochondrial health.
And he says that if we find a way of extending the lifespan to 130 years old, He's pretty sure it's going to come from mitochondrial health.
And the stimuli for mitochondrial health are pretty much well known.
Well, there may be some more down the road, but now we do know.
So, for example, in terms of Nutrition, that's fasting.
In terms of exercise, it is both aerobic steady-state exercise and that type of work for fast fibers that I told you about, anti-glycolytic training.
And there's cold.
So those are the stimuli, the primary stimuli for the mitochondria.
So probably for nutrition, the same thing.
They should look for more things that work for everybody.
And then kind of on the margins, try to fool around with customization.
joe rogan
What about you personally?
What kind of diet do you follow?
pavel tsatsouline
Back some years ago, I met a very interesting gent, Ori Hoffmeckler, and he introduced me to his so-called warrior diet.
And I was not interested in any kind of a diet, any kind of a body comp changes.
I'm just not into that kind of thing.
But what attracted me is efficiency.
He said, just eat once a day.
And I thought, sure, I'll try.
And this was long before the current intermittent fasting craze has begun.
So I don't think Ori is getting quite the credit he deserves.
So I pretty much just eat a large dinner and don't worry about it.
joe rogan
Do you snack at all during the day or anything?
unidentified
Nothing.
pavel tsatsouline
It kills me, man.
joe rogan
Really?
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah.
joe rogan
And this has always been the case with you?
No.
If you snack, it kills you or as you get older?
pavel tsatsouline
No.
Since I started this way of eating.
joe rogan
So your body's acclimated to this one large meal.
unidentified
Yeah.
pavel tsatsouline
It did.
It did.
And I just feel great when I do that.
joe rogan
You've got to slam a lot of calories down in one meal though, right?
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
What do you eat?
pavel tsatsouline
Steak.
joe rogan
Mostly.
pavel tsatsouline
Of course.
No chicken.
Just say no to chicken.
joe rogan
Say no to chicken?
pavel tsatsouline
Just say no.
unidentified
Why?
joe rogan
What's wrong with chicken?
pavel tsatsouline
It's just lame.
I don't like it.
joe rogan
What don't you like about it?
The taste or what it stands for?
pavel tsatsouline
It's a weak bird.
joe rogan
It is a weak bird.
Can't even fly.
pavel tsatsouline
Just say no, Joe.
Helpless against coyotes.
Just say no to chicken.
joe rogan
Really?
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Wow.
What about fish?
pavel tsatsouline
Well, my wife makes me.
I'll eat it.
Not out of choice.
joe rogan
But mostly meat.
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah.
But you understand what I'm telling you is just personal choices, not professional recommendations.
Totally out of my wheelhouse.
joe rogan
But what about vegetables?
pavel tsatsouline
Vegetables are just kind of a necessary evil.
I do eat them.
joe rogan
What's necessary about them?
pavel tsatsouline
You know, this is an interesting point.
Same Doc, Nick Lane...
Did some research and summarized some other research.
Like, why are fruit and vegetables good for you?
And the party line is the antioxidants.
And they almost convincingly concluded that's not the case.
Because if you just try to isolate antioxidants, just give it to people, they don't have the same effect.
So the current theory, and it's very likely it's true, is the plant toxins...
Pretty much promote hormesis.
Hormesis is pretty much resistance against stuff.
So it's pretty much mild doses of poison that you take to make yourself stronger.
So that's most likely what these things are good for.
But anytime you hear about antioxidants, this, antioxidants, that, it's unless they're prescribed by a doctor to a particular patient, a patient, antioxidant supplementation might even cause cancer.
So there's studies in that.
unidentified
Yeah.
pavel tsatsouline
That's just not something to shotgun or go to the pharmacy, buy all this stuff.
No.
joe rogan
You should know exactly what you're taking them for.
pavel tsatsouline
You should gather a recommendation prescription from your doctor.
joe rogan
That is correct.
Do you know anybody that follows a carnivore diet?
pavel tsatsouline
What's a carnivore diet?
joe rogan
A carnivore diet is very recent.
Within the last few years, people are eating only animal products.
And the great benefit that some people have had is people with autoimmune issues like skin conditions, eczema, things along those lines, it seems to cure it up.
People with severe arthritis, it's...
I mean, by cutting out all plant foods...
Completely.
Some people with autoimmune issues have found great results.
Some people have found great results with depression, but it's extremely controversial.
It's also ideologically troubling for some people.
Some people don't want you to eat meat at all, so if you're eating only meat, this is terrible, you're sending a bad message.
You think that's funny?
pavel tsatsouline
Okay, it sounds like a fun diet, man.
It sounds awesome.
But I'm completely unqualified to comment on that.
joe rogan
Right.
But would you be interested in trying it?
pavel tsatsouline
Would I be interested in trying it?
When I see some more research on that, I might.
Not that I'm a fan of vegetables or anything, so I would consider it.
joe rogan
You say vegetables with disdain.
You say vegetables like cowards.
pavel tsatsouline
It's a necessary evil.
You understand certain things.
It's like your foam roller, Joe.
You just do it.
You don't enjoy it.
joe rogan
That thing next to you, the Tim Tam, that's what I use instead of a foam roller.
That jackhammer right underneath the tripod, that's...
That was invented by MMA coach Farah Sahabi.
unidentified
Okay.
joe rogan
Cool.
More effective.
pavel tsatsouline
So that's better than vegetables.
joe rogan
Oh, quick, too.
Better than vegetables?
unidentified
I don't know.
joe rogan
But better than foam rower.
I think so.
But that's what I'm saying.
For a guy like you that talks about vegetables with such disdain, I would think that...
pavel tsatsouline
But it's a necessary evil, you understand?
unidentified
But is it?
joe rogan
This is the thing.
I'm not sure it is.
pavel tsatsouline
Based on the current...
Well, the docs will tell you all this stuff about fiber and this and that.
That's supposedly good.
And again, that's not my specialty.
joe rogan
Right.
pavel tsatsouline
But this other point about hormesis, which is, again, building up your resistance.
joe rogan
Yes.
pavel tsatsouline
Resilience to things.
So it's very possible vegetables are evil, and the small doses of this evil make us stronger.
joe rogan
Small doses.
A little tiny, like a quarter of your plate.
pavel tsatsouline
Yeah, well, it should be more probably.
unidentified
Probably.
pavel tsatsouline
I don't know.
joe rogan
It's just a funny subject with you.
You have an interesting relationship.
pavel tsatsouline
I told you, I'm an enemy of nutrition.
I hate it.
I just really hate it.
I have a sympathy, deep sympathy for people who are in that line of work.
joe rogan
Now, do you supplement with multivitamins or creatine or anything along those lines?
pavel tsatsouline
No, I don't.
And, you know, creatine is definitely, supplementation is not my specialty either, but I can tell you creatine is one of those supplements that definitely has been tested extensively.
And while not for everybody, it does work well.
joe rogan
Yes, it's also been proven as a nootropic, which I think is fascinating.
pavel tsatsouline
It's very possible.
joe rogan
It enhances cognitive performance.
pavel tsatsouline
Again, I don't have cognitive performance.
joe rogan
You don't have any cognitive performance?
pavel tsatsouline
I don't have any, so not my thing.
joe rogan
What about vitamins?
Do you take any vitamins?
No.
pavel tsatsouline
There's no evidence.
And again, if you would get a prescription from your doc that you're short on this, then you should.
joe rogan
This is essentially not your wheelhouse.
pavel tsatsouline
Absolutely not.
joe rogan
What about sleep?
pavel tsatsouline
I'm a big fan.
joe rogan
How much do you get?
pavel tsatsouline
I get a lot more than most people would.
I try to get nine hours.
Oh, great.
I'm convinced, based on the research that I've seen, that that is very important.
joe rogan
Yeah, I'm convinced of that as well.
I find a big difference in my performance, both mental and physical, when I have a lot of sleep.
But what disturbs me, we have this guy on, Dr. Matthew Walker, who studies sleep extensively.
He's a sleep expert, and he There's a direct correlation between a bunch of diseases and people not getting sleep.
Heart attacks.
You know, heart attacks jump up some number worldwide, something in the neighborhood of 20-plus percent when they do daylight savings time and people lose an hour of sleep.
pavel tsatsouline
Well, that's the most idiotic idea.
I hope that goes away.
joe rogan
I hope it goes away, too.
I was just in Arizona, and one of the first things I said to them on stage, I was like, I'm so happy that you guys don't follow this stupid shit.
It's so dumb.
Like, oh, we jump forward.
We move back.
We do this.
pavel tsatsouline
Oh, it's very cute.
joe rogan
Yeah.
The time is the time.
If it's dark out early, then it's dark out early.
Why is that so troubling for people?
pavel tsatsouline
And I think I've read somewhere that messes up the cows.
If they start milking the cows at an hour later or earlier, the cows are all unhappy.
joe rogan
Everybody's fine.
pavel tsatsouline
What have you.
joe rogan
Well, it increases heart attacks, something in the neighborhood of 20 plus percent.
And then when you gain an hour sleep, there's a subsequent decrease in heart rate, heart attacks rather.
That's very similar as well.
Somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 percent.
pavel tsatsouline
Well, the point I think is this, that we're all very busy.
There's a lot of stuff going on.
Everybody has limited bandwidth.
But trying to save on sleep, that's not the right place.
joe rogan
I completely agree.
Now what about, do you do anything to recover like cryotherapy or any of those things, ice baths?
pavel tsatsouline
Right now, no, because it's just not logistically, not very convenient.
But yeah, I used to cut a hole in the ice and go dipping in there when I lived in cold places, and I've done things like that.
Russia has a long history of a practice called tempering, and that goes back, I don't know, centuries, which is pretty much cold exposure.
They figured out that does promote your non-specific resistance to a lot of things.
Colds and so on and so forth.
And more recent studies, they found out that pretty much increases your resistance also.
So free radical damage and so on.
Away.
So cold is really good.
Definitely is really good if you have a chance to do that.
Other things that are very good if they're used correctly is hypoxia, hypercapnia, pretty much breathing less but doing it in the correct manner.
But there's something that you need to keep in mind when you start getting really fancy in all these different recovery modalities, all these different supplements and massages and whatever, whatever.
That was also, I believe, Professor Vorobyov who made a point of that, that accelerating the recovery, first of all, accelerating the rate of adaptation is just not normal.
And again, it's going to be less stable.
And second, that just makes your body less able to handle it by itself.
So it's like spoiling yourself with it.
I think, so again, not my specialty, but I think it should be used judiciously.
And I also think that too many people are starting to get into the fancy cryotherapy this or fancy supplement or machine that before they've just taken care of basics.
So what are the basics if you're, let's say that you are, okay, for an athlete or for a normal person.
So what are the basics for health for a normal person?
Obviously, we discussed earlier, you want to have type 2 fibers and mitochondria in them when you're older.
So that means you've got to lift heavier fast.
There's no other way.
There's no third way.
And you just have to find exercises that your body can tolerate.
The next thing is, obviously, you have to do something for your heart.
It's not that much.
So whatever lame government guidelines are out there, usually that will suffice for that.
Then today we know about sleep, obviously.
And today we also know about other ways of promoting this overall resilience.
And again, things like cold.
Things like vegetables.
unidentified
But strength for the athlete.
pavel tsatsouline
So I guess if you get your diet you're eating, and again, what is the correct eating?
I have no clue, but I tell you what, there is probably a couple of things that most experts would agree on.
They'll probably tell you, lay off the sugar and eat some green vegetables, whatever.
Probably everybody except for those carnivore guys will agree on that.
So get your nutrition dialed in, get your sleep dialed in, then get strong.
So I named my organization Strong First because that's the primary quality.
So Professor Matveyev, he made a point that that's the mother of all qualities.
Upon the foundation of strength, you build endurance, you build speed, you build power, you build resilience, everything.
So, get strong.
Have your joint mobility in order.
Have some amounts of endurance.
The minimum, if you just do it for health.
Again, those government guidelines are enough.
More if your sport requires that.
Then, get great coaching.
And then when you're almost a contender, then you can start fooling around with all the, you know, additional stuff on the periphery.
And those things are really, first of all, they're really expensive.
Second of all, some of these modalities.
But second of all, you know, you might get some, a microscopic fraction of a percent of improvement to your performance.
And if you're training for the Olympics, it's absolutely worth it.
But if you're not, you got to consider the point of diminishing returns.
So like what are you doing with your life?
What are you spending your time on?
And the point of diminishing returns happens in everything.
So it's again, if you just want to be healthy, You don't want to hammer away in just one thing.
Like, oh, I just want to build up my deadlift to its highest level.
Or I just want to run the fastest 5k.
You train your deadlift.
You do some running.
You eat healthy.
Maybe you add some cold exposure.
Maybe you add some hypoxia.
Maybe you eat your vegetables.
So adding each successive thing, you get to the point of diminishing returns.
But if you decide to be a specialist, you still have to do the general work.
joe rogan
What about sauna?
pavel tsatsouline
Great.
joe rogan
You use it?
unidentified
Mm-hmm.
pavel tsatsouline
Sauna is great for a lot of different reasons.
Right now, normally they just talk about things like microcirculation, which is all good.
Heat shock proteins, which is all very good.
But there's also something else.
There is a very interesting phenomenon that is called RMED. What does it stand for?
Something about acute relaxation reaction to stress.
I don't recall the acronym exactly how it goes.
So hypothermia, heat is amongst the stimulus, hypoxia as well, that allows you to develop a reaction in your body that in response to stress you're going to be more relaxed.
So this is kind of an interesting thing.
So it's definitely a healthy thing, definitely.
joe rogan
Well, listen, man, we've taken up a lot of your time, and I appreciate you very much, and I appreciate all the work that you've done.
And like I said, I've been a big fan for a long time.
pavel tsatsouline
My pleasure, Jim.
unidentified
Thank you.
joe rogan
If someone wants to find a gym that follows your protocols, where's the best way?
pavel tsatsouline
Go to strongfirst.com.
First is spelled out.
And we do have a director of accredited gyms in the U.S. and elsewhere, and also our certified instructors as well.
joe rogan
And your most recent book...
pavel tsatsouline
My most recent book is The Quick and the Dead, Total Training for the Advanced Minimalists, but that is for the Advanced Minimalists.
So I presume that's not for the majority of listeners.
So I also, about the same time, came out with an updated edition of my Kettlebell Simple and Sinister, and that, I firmly believe, is the book for most people, whether it's Grandma Betty or Ranger Joe, to train on, to get started on.
joe rogan
Alright, beautiful.
Well, thank you very much.
unidentified
Thank you, Joe.
joe rogan
Appreciate it, sir.
pavel tsatsouline
Thank you.
Export Selection