Bernie Sanders slams U.S. debates as "demeaning reality TV," where 45-second soundbites fail to address Medicare for All, a $15 minimum wage, or canceling $2.2T in student debt via a 0.5% Wall Street tax. He calls out corporate lobbying—Amazon and Disney dodge taxes while drug companies exploit price-fixing—blaming systemic inequality for crises like the opioid epidemic and gun violence. Sanders insists change demands grassroots pressure over billionaire-backed policies, framing climate action as a wartime effort requiring $1.5T weapons-to-renewables redirection, even with authoritarian regimes like Putin’s and Xi’s. Scientific consensus and extreme weather—July 2023’s record heat—expose fossil fuel lies, he argues, before pivoting to aliens with a playful promise: "I’d tell you if I knew." [Automatically generated summary]
I'm sure it does, but I mean, the ability to discuss things in long form, like you can do online, like you can do right here, right now, you can't get that on television.
What I'm saying about is, and what goes on in other countries, if I'm not mistaken, don't hold me to this, I think in the UK, you're a member of the Labour Party, you're a candidate.
He has 30 minutes of time, and you do with it as you want.
You want to speak 30 minutes on healthcare, whatever it may be, you can do then.
Because here's the – if you go to the knee-jerk conservative reaction, you talk to people who are not interested in anyone that wants to be a democratic socialist – They hear the name Bernie Sanders.
The negative implications are that you are somehow or another going to take their money, right?
And the truth is, we are the only major country on Earth.
Many people don't know this.
We're the only major country on Earth not to guarantee health care to all people as a human right, and yet we end up spending almost twice as much per capita on health care.
The function, and you can argue with me if you want, but the function of the current health care system is not to provide quality care to all.
It is to make tens of billions of dollars in profit for the drug companies and the insurance companies.
That's the function.
If you go to Canada, and I live 50 miles away from the Canadian border, you have major heart surgery.
It was a ballot item in one state here in California.
Do you know how much the drug companies alone spent to defeat that effort?
They spent $131 million on one ballot item in one state.
Last year, the top 10 drug companies made $69 billion A week ago, I went to Canada with a number of Americans who are dealing with diabetes.
We bought insulin in Windsor, Ontario for one-tenth the price, 10% of the price, same exact product, being charged in America.
So you've got drug companies that are engaged in collusion and in price-fixing who are incredibly greedy, and the result is many elderly people, many working people simply cannot afford the medicine they need.
It's unbelievable.
And the reason for all of that stuff is we are the only country in the world that does not negotiate with the drug companies.
They can charge you any price they want.
And that has to do with the fact that we don't have a national health care program, Medicare is not negotiating, etc.
And by the way, this idea of national health care, this has been talked about literally since Teddy Roosevelt.
It's not a new concept.
Health care is a human right.
That's what Teddy Roosevelt was talking about.
That's what FDR was talking about.
Harry Truman was talking about it.
Kennedy was talking about it.
Kennedy got killed.
Lyndon Johnson picked up the mantle.
And their idea was, according to people in their administration, we'll start with the elderly who are most impacted by healthcare costs and sickness.
We'll start, and they did.
In 1965, without the technology we have today, they implemented Medicare.
19 million people, elderly people, signed up in the first year.
So, if you could start a brand new program, And have 19 million people sign up with a technology that is way, way behind where we are today, why can't we over a four year period simply expand that program?
So when you talk about the drug companies and the lobbyists and the enormous amount of money that they spend, does this exist anywhere else other than the United States, lobbyists on that level?
And the reason, you know, in Canada what you have is you have a national healthcare program and so forth.
And they sit down and, A, they negotiate with the drug companies.
They have their own approach.
But every other major country on earth says to the drug companies, of course you can't charge us any price you want.
This is a reasonable price.
Tell me what your profits are, what your expenditures are.
This is a price.
For us, you can walk in, you know, if you have an illness, you can walk into the pharmacy tomorrow and the price has been doubled and you say to the pharmacist, what happened?
They just raised their prices.
They could do it any day they want, any price they want.
Now, lobbyists are, in general, when people talk about lobbyists, it's an unattractive term.
We think a bit in terms of a negative.
We don't think of, oh, thank God there's lobbyists.
We think, wow, there's someone with enormous amounts of money using that money to gain influence on politicians, and it shapes regular people, it shapes our lives, mostly in a negative way.
This is the way most people look at it.
I'm not saying it's correct.
Why do we have that system in place?
Like, why do we have lobbies?
Why is it legal for someone to spend exorbitant amounts of money to affect our civilization, to affect the way our culture works?
You've got the top 1% owning more wealth than the bottom 92%.
Listen to this.
This is a statistic we recently saw.
It came from the Federal Reserve.
Over the last 30 years, the top 1% has seen a $21 trillion increase in their wealth.
The bottom half of America has seen a $900 billion decline in their wealth.
So what you have in America today is a relatively small number of incredibly wealthy people.
And I deal with these guys every day.
People say, oh, we're talking about rich.
You don't know what rich is, what multi-billion dollar operations are.
Incredible power over our society.
And if you were the pharmaceutical industry, and last year 10 companies made $69 billion in profit, you're sitting around right now saying, all right, that's great.
How do we do better next year?
What strategy do we have?
We're going to put a lot of ads on.
We're going to work with other companies.
During the CNN debate that I participated in recently, in the debate, right in the middle of the debate, The drug companies and the insurance companies had an ad telling how bad so-called, how bad Medicare for all would be.
So they're smart guys.
And they use their power over politicians.
They use their power over the media.
They spend billions of dollars on advertising on media to make sure that they make as much as they can in profit.
But it's not any different with Wall Street.
It's not any different with the fossil fuel industry.
Or the prison industrial complex.
These guys have wealth.
They have power.
And they could care less about the needs of working people in this country.
And that's the dynamic of American politics right now.
And in our campaign, look, we're taking them all on.
And I know it makes a lot of people uncomfortable.
But we are taking on all of these entities and all of their wealth and all of their power.
So the real problem seems to be that they have this strategy of unlimited growth, not that they're not providing medication that people need to save their lives.
I mean, it's obviously important to have pharmaceutical companies.
When you're dealing with this, the kind of influence that you're talking about with $69 billion in a year, I mean, the resources they have, how would you stop that?
Well, that is kind of what we call the $64 question.
And I'll tell you what I think.
This is what I believe.
If you think back on American history and you think about the real changes that have taken place in society, You think about the labor movement and working class people standing up and saying to their employers, we're not going to be treated like animals anymore.
You can't hire and fire us.
You can't work us, you know, 15 hours a day.
We deserve dignity.
And you think about the growth of the labor movement of millions of people beginning to stand together and fight.
You think about the civil rights movement, you know.
And it wasn't just Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. It was, again, millions of African Americans and their white allies saying, we're going to end segregation and racism in this country.
Think about the women's movement.
A hundred years ago, women in America didn't even have the right to vote.
Think about the gay rights movement.
Think about the environmental.
The only way that change takes place is when ordinary people come together and stand up and fight and say that the status quo is not working.
And that's what I believe, and that's what we're trying to do.
So the message of our campaign is it's us, not me, because I can't do it alone.
Let me be very honest with you.
If I were elected president tomorrow, I can't do the things that I would like to do, that I'm campaigning on, unless millions of people were working with me to tell the corporate elite that they cannot get it all.
First of all, you make it clear to the American people what your agenda is.
And I appreciate the opportunity to talk about an agenda.
In more than 12 seconds.
What does that mean?
We're going to fight for Medicare for all.
We're going to raise the minimum wage to a living wage.
We are going to deal with education in a profound way because I worry about what's going on in education today.
Everybody knows that the ages of zero through four are the most important years for human intellectual and emotional development.
Right?
Every psychologist will tell you that.
And yet we have a totally dysfunctional early childhood system.
We pay our childcare workers starvation wages, yet working class families cannot find affordable quality childcare.
You've got our public school systems All around this country, and many of them really being challenged right now.
Teachers are underpaid.
Teachers are working two or three jobs.
You've got kids who can't afford to go to college.
And here's something that is just unbelievable.
Kids who have gone to college leaving school with $50,000, $100,000 in debt.
Unbelievable.
These are issues that we have to deal with, and I will deal with them.
And we are going to substantially improve the quality of education in America.
We're going to cancel student debt by imposing a tax on Wall Street speculation.
So you've got to deal with education.
You've got to deal with climate change.
The truth is that Donald Trump is dead wrong.
Climate change is not a hoax.
It is a very, very dangerous reality for our country and the rest of the world.
Scientists tell us we have less than 12 years.
To transform our energy system away from fossil fuel, or there will be irreparable damage.
All right.
So those are, and healthcare, of course, for all.
So those are some of the major issues, criminal justice, immigration reform.
You lay it on the table.
You see, these are the issues that we are going to focus on.
And you rally the American people around those issues, and you tell people like Mitch McConnell, who represents a very poor state in Kentucky, that Mitch, if you are going to oppose raising that minimum wage to at least 15 bucks an hour, I will be in Kentucky as President of the United States, and we're going to have a rally.
Because you're going to have to stop representing, and I hope, by the way, that Mitch McConnell is not the leader.
I hope the Democrats can gain control over the Senate.
But if he is, we'll put enormous pressure on him to do what the people want.
Every idea, Joe, here's the bottom line on this thing.
Every idea that I've just talked to you about is supported by a majority of the American people.
Let's take these one step at a time because you mentioned a lot of important things there.
Let's go with the minimum wage thing.
Now, the argument that I've heard about the minimum wage being raised to $15 an hour is that there are entry-level positions for high school kids, for people that are just getting their feet wet in the marketplace, they're learning how to work, they're making some money after school, that if you charge or if businesses have to pay $15 an hour to people like that, to entry-level people, that they won't be able to stay open.
Well, first of all, they will be competing against, you know, if you're a business and I'm a business, and both of us have to raise our wages at the same level, we both have the same burden, so it's spread across.
That is what my conservative colleagues will tell you.
The truth is, I don't have the numbers right in front of me, that while it certainly is true that young people do work at McDonald's in the minimum wage jobs, a significant majority of the workers are not kids.
They are often, and I've met them at McDonald's, They are workers who have children themselves.
We work very hard to raise the minimum wage at Amazon and at Disney.
We put pressure on both of those companies and they did the right thing.
And when you talk to the people at Amazon who got that raise, These are not kids.
These are people in their 30s.
These are ordinary adults who cannot make it on 12 or 13 bucks an hour.
So I think the argument that, oh, they're old kids, is not really quite accurate.
Well, not even that they're all kids, but that if they are kids, what would you think about making a minimum wage for someone who's under 18 that's different from a minimum wage for someone who's a legal adult?
One of the things that always freaks me out is when I find out that enormous corporations that make billions of dollars have tax loopholes where they literally pay no money.
How is it possible that we pay ten times more for insulin in this country and for other drugs than in Canada or countries around the world?
And the answer is, it's power.
So what is the goal of major corporations in America?
It's to be deregulated as much as possible, so in some cases they can pollute our water, our air, our environment.
It's also not to pay any taxes.
Trump campaign, as you recall, he said, my tax plan is not going to benefit the wealthy people.
It's going to benefit working people.
Well, it turns out over 10 years, 83% of the benefit at the end of 10 years goes to the top 1%.
That's what these guys – I remember – I'm called the ranking member on the budget committee in the Senate.
And some guy came forward representing, I don't know, one of the big business organizations.
And this is their agenda.
Their agenda was to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, and to do away with all corporate taxes.
So what you have right now, that's what greed is about.
They want it all.
So as you indicated, you have a company like Amazon, owned by Jeff Bezos, who happens to be the wealthiest guy in America, worth about $150 billion.
Amazon paid zero in federal income taxes.
And it's not just them.
Dozens of corporations paid nothing or very, very little.
And on top of all of that, you got these guys able to stash All over the world, trillions of dollars, trillions of dollars in the Cayman Islands, in Bermuda, in Luxembourg, and other tax havens.
You know, that is what – you're touching now on the heart and soul of the tragedy of American politics.
How does it happen that on issue after issue, the American people, the working class of this country, want something, nobody pays any attention to it, but billionaires want something, and it gets done.
And that has to do with a corrupt...
Political system.
So right now, if you are the Koch brothers or some multi-billionaire, you say to the leadership of the Republican Party, and in some cases to the Democratic Party, hey, guess what?
We're prepared to put hundreds of millions of dollars into your campaign.
Hundreds of millions of dollars coming from one or two people.
And here is my agenda.
I want tax breaks.
I want a trade system.
I want to be able to do more pollution, because I don't like all of this money I have to spend preventing pollution of the air or the water.
That's what I want you to do.
And by the way, I'm worried about the deficit, so you may as well cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
How many Americans actually believe That we should give tax breaks to billionaires and cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.
And it seems that if you just took away those tax breaks, the enormous amount of money that would come from those corporations having to pay their fair share would take care of a lot of the expenses of all these things that you're proposing.
Exactly.
Okay, let's talk about the education, because the idea of free education is a wonderful thing for people.
I mean, the idea that you get out of college and you're in debt in an insane amount, that you might have 10, 20 years where you have to pay it back.
And I know many people that are in that situation.
So you had great universities like the University of California, City University of New York, state colleges all over this country, where tuition was virtually free.
And then what happened, for a variety of political reasons, states and the federal government started cutting back on higher education and put more and more burden on the student with higher and higher tuition, which is where we are today.
So all that I'm saying is in the year 2019, 2020, If our working class kids are going to go out and get the jobs that are out there, they need a higher education, which should be tuition-free.
In terms of the cancellation of debt, which is my view, you've got 45 million people who are dealing with debt.
I'll never forget this.
This is where it really hit me.
I was in Burlington, Vermont, and I had a meeting on an issue.
And a young woman comes up and she says, she's a doctor.
She graduated medical school.
She's very happy.
She's practicing in a community health center.
Loves what she's doing.
She says, Bernie, I've got to tell you, though, I am $300,000 in debt for having gone to medical school.
I couldn't believe it.
I was in Iowa, a young woman, $400,000 in debt.
This is not unusual for medical schools and dental schools.
And, you know, ordinary people, $50,000, $100,000 for going to college or getting a master's degree.
We promised these young people, we said, go to college.
Go out and get an education.
You'll get decent paying jobs.
Well, the answer is they have not been able to do that.
So what we have proposed in one piece of legislation or two, actually, is Is to make public colleges and universities tuition-free, cancel all student debt in this country.
That will cost $2.2 trillion, a lot of money, over a 10-year period.
We do this through a tax on Wall Street speculation, which will bring in $2.4 trillion.
We bailed out Wall Street 11 years ago.
And by the way, these are crooks on Wall Street who engaged in legal behavior.
Taxpayers, against my vote, bailed them out.
If we can bail out Wall Street, you know what?
We can cancel student debt and provide public colleges and universities tuition-free.
Here's one of the darkest things about student loans, is that if you go bankrupt, it doesn't matter.
You still owe that.
And that's kind of crazy.
I mean, if you have a serious medical issue, if you're held up, whatever happens to you that's awful, you go bankrupt, most of those things are resolved, but not student loans.
I mean, again, this talks to the – and that has to do with bankruptcy law, which was passed against my vote.
And while you're on bankruptcy, and I should have mentioned this before, when you talk about the healthcare system, a half a million Americans every single year go bankrupt because of medical bills that they can't pay.
But you're right.
I talked to this guy in Nevada.
I'll never forget it.
The guy says, Bernie, you know, The guy's in his 50s.
And he said, you know, I've been paying off my student debt for years.
I'm going nowhere because the interest rates are high.
And I fear very much, which is the case, that they will start garnishing, taking away my Social Security checks, taking money away from me.
So people are carrying this burden.
The result is that they can't, in many cases, get married and have kids.
Look, I would be lying to you if I told you I had a magical answer.
I don't.
And this is such a horrific situation.
We had a town meeting.
We were in Nevada, actually, in Las Vegas, when El Paso happened.
And we did a town meeting, and I said, let's take a moment of silence to remember the victims and pray for the survivors.
Literally, the next day, in another part of Las Vegas, I had to do it again.
And I said, I can't believe that just yesterday we did this, and I have to do it again.
This is – I don't know what the words – you know, my friend Beto O'Rourke would say.
You don't know what words – what can you say?
It happens again and again.
Who can imagine some lunatic walking into a school or a mall or just on a nightclub area and taking out an assault weapon and shooting down people?
And that we almost become to accept this as a normal part of American life is incredible, is just totally demoralizing.
All right, so here's what I think.
There's no magical answer, but let me tell you what I think.
First of all, this is the reality.
The reality is that today as we speak, there are approximately 400 million guns in America today.
We have more guns than we have people.
We have between 5 to 10 million assault weapons, and an assault weapon, as you know, is a military-style weapon designed to kill human beings kind of rapidly.
And then on top of that, we have, again, nothing to be proud of, but we have a number of mentally unstable people.
People, for whatever reason, are walking the streets, they're suicidal, they're homicidal.
That's the mix that we have.
I think the answer is, and I'm not the guy to invent all these ideas, but here's some of what we have to do.
First of all, if you want to own a gun in America, We have got to know that you are a stable person, and that means that we need to expand the background checks that currently exist.
Okay, so we've got to know, did you beat up your wife?
Have you committed crimes?
Et cetera, et cetera.
What is the state of your mental health?
Number two, we've got to make that universal.
Number two, right now, There is a background check if you walk into a gun shop, but you can buy guns in various states at a gun show, and you don't have to do any of that.
You and I go to a gun show, you sell me a gun, I don't have to do that.
Third of all, I can today legally walk into a gun show, pass the background check, and buy a dozen guns, walk out and sell them to criminal elements who will use them for bad things.
So I think those are issues that most Americans believe we have got to deal with, and we can.
Fourthly, I happen to believe, and I believe this for 30 years, that we should not be selling or distributing assault weapons in this country.
They are weapons of mass destruction in a sense.
They kill people rapidly as we saw.
And thank God, by the way, when we talk about both Dayton and El Paso, thank God, cops were there very, very quickly and did an incredible job.
So if that guy had walked into the nightclub, there could have been dozens and dozens more people killed within a few minutes' time.
I happen to believe, A, that we should not be selling or distributing assault weapons in this country.
That's my view.
Period.
So I believe in a ban on assault weapons.
And I think we have got to begin thinking about when we have 5 to 10 million assault weapons, which is more than the U.S. military has, we have to think about a strong licensing procedure in terms of who owns these assault weapons.
So that's some of There are many other things, but those are some of the ideas that are out there.
Now, the legal gun owners who are law-abiding citizens, who would never in a million years think about going around shooting people, but they love guns.
They hear this kind of stuff about banning assault rifles, banning assault weapons.
They don't even like the term assault weapons, right?
They like to refer to them as their individual names for whatever they are.
These people feel like this is an inexorable part of being an American, that you should be able to own a gun.
It's written into our Bill of Rights.
It's written into the way this country was founded.
It's the Second Amendment.
What do you say to those people that don't want to give up their guns and they want to protect themselves?
They feel like these guns are viable options to protect themselves from criminals.
And Joe, as you may know, I'm a senator from the state of Vermont.
And the state of Vermont is one of the most rural states in America.
Every fall, we've got whole thousands and thousands of people out in the woods hunting.
And it's something that's part of our tradition.
I believe in it.
I believe in the Second Amendment.
But all that I ask of the gun owners, and you're absolutely right, 99.9% of gun owners would never in a million billion years think of doing these horrible things.
But in the moment that we are living in, I think that we're all going to have to make some concessions to the reality of what is going on.
And that is that there is a small number of, call them what you want, depraved people who are prepared to do that.
You know, in Australia, you remember that terrible – New Zealand, I'm sorry – the terrible shooting at the mosque.
And they moved pretty quickly in an aggressive way.
So, you know, I wish I can say in the best of all possible worlds, yeah, you know, you can own any weapon you want and so forth and so on.
We're not living in the best of all possible worlds.
We're living in a world where we're shocked every day by horror.
Well, the idea of banning assault weapons has been done.
In 1994, we banned assault weapons, I believe it was for 10 years.
That ban was undone by a Republican majority.
And it didn't, you know, I'm not suggesting, by the way, anything here that if you banned assault weapons tomorrow that it would radically change everything.
But we have got to do the best that we can do.
And again, I preface my remarks by telling you, I don't have a magical solution.
You've got hundreds of millions of guns out there.
You have people who should not be owning these guns, who get set off by God knows what, and do terrible things.
All we can do is the best that we can do.
But to say we can't do anything, I think is a real disservice to the American.
Now, I'll tell you something else that bothers me, you know, in addition to the horror of seeing people lying on the street dead, is what this is doing to the children of this country, and I think we underestimate that.
I have seven grandchildren, and for them and for kids all over this country, you're going to see the falls coming, kids coming back to school, you're going to see in schools all over America drills All right, this is what you do if somebody walks into the school.
All right, you're going to hide under here.
You go over there.
A couple of months ago, I was in Iowa.
This guy is about six foot two, big guy, probably a football player.
And he says, Senator Sanders, I got to tell you that the young people in my school are increasingly frightened, terrified about what could happen in the school.
Think about what this – the trauma, the trauma of what this gun violence is doing.
So I think we're all – as Americans, there ain't no easy answers here, but I think we're all going to have to come together and figure this one out and do the best that we can.
But if we have 400 million guns already out there, and they're building more every year, right now as we speak, gun manufacturers are making more guns.
This is happening right now.
So if those guns already exist, there's more than enough, how would you stop?
If you've got 400 million guns out there, you know...
So I think there are approaches.
No one has any magical solution, but I've given you – I'll tell you something else that I didn't mention, and that is the role of gun manufacturers, is that if you are a gun manufacturer and you are selling a hell of a lot of guns to a gun store in an area which normally you would not think – I mean,
these guys know what cities buy, what towns buy, how many guns – And if suddenly there is a tremendous demand, you've got to be thinking, why is this gun store buying so many guns?
It doesn't reflect the population in the area.
You've got to deal with that issue where the gun owners have to take some responsibility.
Besides the guns and the gun manufacturers, the other gigantic issue is mental health.
The only way any of this ever happens is someone has to be insanely mentally depraved.
That's the only way.
And many of them are medicated.
And many of them are on pharmaceutical drugs, and they have been since they were children, including amphetamines like Adderall and Prozac and all this different stuff that has varied effects on the human brain.
What could be done and what would you done to analyze this, to find out what the cause and effect are, and to try to figure out what role and how much these drugs are responsible?
Let me respond first by saying it goes without saying that we have a mental health crisis in America, before we even talk about drugs.
And for whatever reason, you know, there are a whole lot of people, and the nature of our healthcare system, getting back to healthcare, is...
I just talked to a woman, literally last night, and we had a town meeting, and she said, this is unbelievable, she said...
Bernie, I was in Las Vegas when the terrible shooting took place, okay?
And now I am, and I can understand this perfectly, I'm seeing Dayton and I'm watching television in El Paso, and I'm getting a PTSD reaction, all right?
And that's totally, if you were in a place where people were shot down, and she said, I'm trying to get counseling.
I can't find it.
I remember a guy called up, a woman called up my office in Burlington, Vermont, and she said, I'm worried about my husband, my brother, what he might do to himself or somebody else.
We're looking for mental health counseling.
We can't find something that we can afford.
So we need above and beyond gun violence.
We need, and this is why I believe in Medicare for All, mental health is healthcare.
You break your arm, that's a health issue.
That's a medical issue.
Mental health is a medical issue.
And we have got to make mental health counseling available to all people in this country when they need it, not six months from now, at a price they can afford.
And under Medicare for All, it would be free.
So that's number one.
Number two, your point about studying the impact of drugs on people's behavior and possibly resulting in violence absolutely deserves to be studied.
We should be studying the impact of drugs.
In my view, this is a layman's view, you know, I'm not a psychiatrist.
I worry very much that we are over-medicating kids in schools.
You know, we have this deficit-deficient issue.
You know, kids are running around and they're active.
You know, when I was a kid, people used to run around and they were active.
You know, they weren't drugged up.
So I worry about that whole business.
But your point is well taken.
I think we need to study this issue and make sure that these drugs, in fact, are not causing kinds of reactions that we will regret later.
Now, on the subject of drugs, marijuana is obviously a big issue in this country, and we've seen many states make it recreational, including this one.
What do you think could be done, and what should be done to have this across the board, especially federally?
You know, there's a guy that I have on the podcast coming up soon, his name's John Norris, and he wrote a book on the cartels growing marijuana illegally all over this country and selling it, especially, particularly in California now, because it's a misdemeanor, because it's legal recreationally and selling it with all sorts of horrible pesticides on it all sorts of like very in fact deadly chemicals all of this because it's not federally legal because we can't have sanctioned licensed companies doing
an ethical job of growing something that any responsible law-abiding person should be able to consume Okay.
When I ran for president for the Democratic nomination in 2016, I talked about a broken criminal justice system which ends up having, in the United States, more people in jail than any other country.
We have more people in jail than China does, which is a communist authoritarian country.
And what I called for then and I call for now is the legalization of marijuana in America.
Right now, you have a federal law.
It's called the Controlled Substance Act.
Here's heroin.
Here is marijuana.
They're at the same level.
That is insane.
Heroin is a killer drug.
You can argue the pluses and minuses of marijuana, but marijuana ain't heroin.
So we have to end that, and that's what I will do.
As president of the United States, I believe we can do that through executive order, and I will do that.
Second of all, what we have now is a number of states, and I'm very proud.
I talked about during 2016 what seemed kind of radical, the need to legalize and decriminalize marijuana, a very radical idea.
Four years ago, it is spreading all over the country.
And by the way, it blows my mind to drive through Nevada, I think here even in California.
Now you see signs, corporations buy our marijuana.
The other problem is, of course, with illegal drugs comes, you get this horrible cycle, particularly in inner cities, where you have people that are incarcerated for illegal drugs.
Illegal drugs seem to be the only way out.
The hard drugs, when we're talking about cocaine and all these other drugs, how does one stop that?
And would you ever consider legalizing all drugs or decriminalizing all drugs?
And when we talk about criminal justice in America, we have over 2 million people in jail.
They are disproportionately African-American, Latino, and Native American.
And here's what I think.
I think in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, what we have got to do, instead of building more jails and locking up more people, we really do have to invest in our young people, especially young people in distressed communities.
What does that mean?
If we can, and we can do this with the proper amount of resources, make sure the kids are not dropping out of school.
If you drop out of school today, you know, say you drop out in your second or third year of high school, you don't have an education, you don't have any job skills, What are you going to do with your life?
And the answer is you may well do drugs, you know, or you'll get in trouble, self-destructive activity or destructive activity and you're going to end up in jail.
It makes so much more sense from a humane perspective, protecting our people, as well as a financial situation.
We're spending $80 billion a year to invest in these kids.
What does it mean?
It means making sure they get the education that they need, paying attention, having good schools.
Making sure that they get the jobs that are out there, doing job training.
There was a principal in a school in southern Vermont.
I'll never forget what she said.
It was a working class school.
And she said, Bernie, I love these kids.
I am not going to let them drop out.
And she had a mentoring program, just watching the kids who are mostly at risk.
So that they would not end up going through the cracks and getting into trouble.
That's what we should be doing as a nation.
And when we do that, we invest in the kids, we get them jobs, we get them education, the likelihood of them falling into bad ways is significantly reduced.
Now you're asking, this is a very, very deep question, which we don't talk about terribly much.
Why is it that so many of our people are turning to drugs, to alcohol, by the way, and I don't mean to drink at night, but I mean serious alcohol problems, and tragically to suicide?
We now have, for the last three years, something that is ahistorical, never happened before in modern history, and that is our life expectancy is actually going down.
And this is hitting all over the country, but it's especially hitting rural areas.
And what the doctors are saying is that these are diseases of despair.
Despair.
So you're in West Virginia, you're in rural Ohio, or any place, Vermont, any place.
And the job you used to have, earning a decent living, is now in China.
Your kid can't afford to go to college.
Maybe you can't afford healthcare.
You've got nothing to look forward to.
Under that scenario, drugs become, alcohol becomes a way out, and the worst case is suicide.
So I think what we're talking about is why is this happening, often in rural areas, in urban as well.
And how can we reestablish hope and optimism in the American people?
And that gets back to a whole lot of other issues.
It means if people have health care as a right, that will certainly play a role in this thing.
They'll walk into the doctor when they need.
But it also means that people need decent jobs to pay them a living wage.
That means we have to rebuild rural America.
We have to rebuild the depressed communities In urban America, it means that we have to have a great educational system.
And people say, oh, that's great, Bernie.
That's utopian.
It is not utopian.
This is something that in the wealthiest country in the history of the world we can afford and we should be doing rather than creating a situation where Amazon pays zero in federal income taxes.
So to answer your question, this is a deep question.
And again, I'm not here to tell you I have all the answers.
But there are a lot of people out there who have basically given up hope.
And for those people, I guess drugs is the alternative.
So what you're saying essentially is that if we can do something to mitigate despair, then we'll do something to at least stop some of the demand for these illegal drugs.
Look, if I am optimistic, if I'm excited about going to work tomorrow and I'm seeing my kid doing great in school, and when I get sick, I can go to the doctor's office and have a sense of community.
My downtown is not all boarded up because businesses have left.
But we have a community.
Yeah, the strong likelihood is there will be less diseases of despair and drugs than we currently see.
Now, when we're talking about impoverished communities and chronically, when you're talking about cities like Baltimore or parts of Chicago and Detroit that have just been in a terrible state of despair for long periods of time and it doesn't seem like there's a way out, The people that are born there, the people that live there, they live in this state of despair.
What can be done to resolve all these terribly impoverished communities and bring them up to a standard where these kids that grow up there, they feel like there is an out, that they do have an opportunity?
And why is this not addressed?
When we talk about making America great, Wouldn't, like, fixing the worst parts of the country be the primary concern?
The less people that grow up in a terribly disadvantageous position from birth, wouldn't that be an important thing?
When we talk about what it means to live in a great society, a great nation, a nation that we're proud of, I'm afraid there are some people who have incredible wealth and power who say, you know what's great?
Is that we're seeing a growth in the number of billionaires in America.
Isn't that terrific?
And we got one guy who's worth $155 billion.
How great.
Oh, by the way, we're building more nuclear weapons.
And we're spending $750 billion a year on the military.
Isn't that extraordinary?
And by the way, do you see the yacht that that billionaire has?
You know, it's three miles long.
Isn't that great?
Your point is that we have to, I think as I understand what you're saying, we have to redefine what being a great nation is about.
We are not a great nation when we have 40 million people living in poverty and in despair.
We're not a great nation when we have massive levels of income and wealth inequality, when 87 million people can't afford to go to a doctor today.
So, to answer your question, I think that as a nation, we have got to focus a great deal of attention on those distressed communities.
Often they're African American, often they're Latino, often they are rural white communities.
And that means making sure that the kids there get the quality education that they deserve, making sure that we're creating good paying jobs in those communities.
I voted against NAFTA, permanent normal trade relations with China and other trade agreements because I knew that those agreements were written by corporate America with the goal of shutting down plants in this country and moving abroad.
And the result of that has been the loss of millions of good-paying jobs and the complete destruction of communities all across this country, in the South and all across this country.
So we have got to rebuild those communities.
We have got to bring high-tech jobs, not just to Silicon Valley, but to rural America again.
I don't have magical answers, but the goal is we will not, under a Sanders administration, turn our backs on distressed communities.
We will rebuild those communities.
We will build the millions of units of affordable housing.
Now think about what it means to a community now where people are living in terrible housing or housing they cannot afford.
When we put young people to work rebuilding their own communities, will that become an indication of hope and optimism?
We're talking about so many deeply important issues and all of them that will be under the control or at least the direction of the one person who winds up becoming the President of the United States.
Is it an impossible job?
I mean, it seems like being the president, you are managing so many different aspects of our economy, our culture, our safety, our environment, international communication, and it's so in-depth.
You know, what you do, and this is the way any sane president operates, is you need to be working with the smartest men and women from all walks of life who understand these issues.
Every issue we have touched on, Joe, is enormously complicated.
I can send out a 20-word tweet on it, but that doesn't solve it.
So, unlike Trump, we will bring together the best and most knowledgeable people in this country to address the housing crisis, to address the The issue of these diseases of despair.
We didn't even touch on climate change, you know, and then the future of the planet.
How do we lead the world in transforming our energy system and creating the kind of jobs that we need?
How do we revitalize American democracy so that instead of suppressing the vote, we're getting more young people involved in the political process?
So to answer your question, it is not a one-person job, and anyone who thinks it is is dead wrong.
You need the help of a very strong administration that knows the issues, that comes from the ranks of the working class.
And this is the promise I will make.
My administration, unlike Trump's, is not going to be filled with billionaires who's basically very often greedy type people.
It is going to be filled with the best people often from the working class itself, from the trade union movement, people who are going to help us create policies that work for workers and not just the billionaire class.
Well, first of all, we have to have a president who, unlike Trump, believes in science, and I do.
And what the scientists are telling us, as I mentioned earlier, is that we have fewer than 12 years to transform our energy system, or else there will be irreparable damage done, not only to our country, but to the world.
Now, climate change is not just an American issue.
So we could do tomorrow, do all the right things, but of China and Russia and India and the rest of Brazil.
And Africa does not do the right thing.
You know, we're not going to make the progress we need.
So, here is what we have to do in my view.
Number one, we have to tell the fossil fuel industry that their short-term profits, and they make a whole lot of money, their short-term profits are not more important than the future of this planet.
I don't think that's a hard sell to make.
You cannot keep producing a product which is destroying the planet in the United States and around the world.
There are a variety of ways to do that, but that is the bottom line.
And by the way, in the midst of that, we do what we call is a just transition.
The guy out on the oil rig today simply wants to feed his family.
And the coal miners today want to feed their families.
And we're not going to leave them.
I'm a pro-worker.
I have probably the strongest pro-worker record of any member of the Congress.
So it is not my intention to throw these guys out on the – and women – out on the street and ignore the pain that they will go through.
We are proposing billions of dollars to rebuild those communities and make sure that those guys and women get new jobs.
So we're not just discarding people in the fossil fuel industry.
But ultimately, the product that they are producing, which is now carbon emissions, is destroying the planet.
So we have to move away from fossil fuel in a very bold way into energy efficiency.
Right now, in my own state of Vermont and all over this country, there are buildings which are incredibly wasteful.
We don't have the windows, we don't have the insulation, we don't have the roofing, the doors that we need to keep the buildings warm in the winter and cool in the summer.
And we can create just an incredible number of jobs just retrofitting our buildings.
Second of all, we need to move very aggressively.
To sustainable energies like wind and solar in California, you're doing a good job with wind.
Iowa's doing a good job.
Texas doing a good job.
We've got to do much more.
Solar, there is incredible potential out there.
Prices of solar has dropped in recent years.
And we have got to not only transform the energy system in our own country, we've got to lead the world in working with Russia and China.
Because in this issue, we are in it together.
And here's my dream, and this may be a utopian dream.
The world right now is spending a trillion and a half dollars on weapons of destruction designed to kill each other.
And maybe, just maybe, if we had a kind of leader, and I hope to be that leader, who says to the world, instead of spending a trillion and a half dollars killing each other, maybe we'll use those resources to transform the global energy system and save the planet for our kids and our grandchildren.
Well, these ideas sound great, but in the competitive environment of global politics, how would you convince Russia or China or any of these countries to do something that would put them in some sort of a competitive disadvantage?
Well, and the answer is, Joe, if we do not do that in 50, 100 years, everybody's going to be a terrible disadvantage.
And look, I'm not telling you that tomorrow it's going to happen.
But you've got to make the case.
These people, you know, Putin is a dictator.
I dislike him intensely.
You know, Xi and China, very authoritarian, so forth and so forth.
But they're not crazy people.
And presumably they have concern about their kids and their grandchildren.
This is a planet under siege.
You know, I don't want to become a science fiction.
You've all seen the movies, the media, racing toward Earth.
We're going to blow up the Earth.
What do we do?
Well, we've got to get together.
This is, in a sense, what that is about.
You know what I think about?
In 1941, after Pearl Harbor, we were faced with a war in the East with China, a war in the West in Europe with Hitler.
Within two years, the United States had transformed its economy to address and win the war, basically in two or three years, by re-industrializing America.
Look, if you asked the Defense Department, you asked the CIA, you asked the defense people all over the world, tell us what the great national security threat is.
There's a lot of people, though, that are skeptical of this.
How would you convince them?
I mean, this is a big part of the problem, right?
There's a narrative that you hear from a lot of people that, oh, you know, climate change is not a proven science, and climate change is a hoax.
I mean, this is something that's repeated over and over again, and I'm sure some of it has to do with lobbyists and some of it has to do with merchants of doubt that go out there and seed the world with disinformation to try to increase their profits and continue the practices that they're currently enjoying.
You know, Joe, when I'm thinking back, and I don't know if all of you listeners can remember this because I'm older than most, but I can remember tobacco ads, cigarette ads on television.