The Raw Deal (13 February 2026) with special featured guest, Danny Cirrus
Danny Cirrus examines Iran’s fortified Isfra nuclear complex, exposed by satellite imagery in February 2026, while questioning Netanyahu’s push for U.S. missile strikes despite Iran’s 2025 war claims and Trump’s reluctance over potential losses like the USS Abraham Lincoln. He criticizes Mike Huckabee’s alleged treasonous lobbying for spy Jonathan Pollard’s release, citing 73% Israeli approval vs. 56% U.S. disapproval of Trump. Unredacted Epstein files—linked to "jerky" and trafficking claims—spark skepticism, while Pizzagate resurfaces with deleted Teigen tweets. The episode ties healthcare costs ($1,500–$2,000/month premiums) and migrant benefits to political exploitation, warns of DHS’s $55B Navy contract repurposing for detention centers amid agent killings, and debates whether anti-Zionism censorship mirrors 9/11 conspiracy suppression. [Automatically generated summary]
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, right here on Revolution Radio Studio B this 13th day of February 2026, a day before Valentine's Day.
Keep that special someone in your life in mind for tomorrow.
Do something very special together, joined by my friend and colleague Danny Searras.
We'll have other stories to cover, but we begin with the latest in relation to Iran and the potential strikes by the United States.
Iran is strengthening its defenses near its key nuclear site.
New satellite images show the Truth Seeker reporting.
New high-resolution satellite imagery has revealed that Iran is intensifying defensive measures at one of its most sensitive nuclear facilities.
Development experts say reflects Iran's growing concern about the possibility of renewed military action against its nuclear infrastructure.
As an aside, remember, Iran has disavowed any interest in nuclear weapons.
Netya, for 30 years or more, has been insisting that was the problem, why we had to attack Iran.
He's made absolutely absurd claims about a program in which Iran is not invested even remotely.
Their sole purpose in enriching uranium is for peaceful nuclear energy, for the production of electricity, and for special medical procedures involving radioactive elements.
That is it.
Now, however, instead of insisting the problem was Iran's seeking nuclear weapons, it wasn't seeking, Net Yao is pressuring Trump about dismantling Iran's ballistic missile system, which is, of course, absurd.
Netya would prefer Iran to have no missiles with greater than 300 kilometer range, which is just as ridiculous as it could possibly be, denying Iran any ability to defend itself strategically.
And this, of course, is because Iran wreaked great havoc on Israel during the 12-day war so bad.
Bibi had to plead to Trump to sue for a ceasefire because Israel was being hit so hard.
Analysis assessing the imagery says the activity signals a concerted push to harden subterranean access point and fortify above-ground structures, moves that could complicate any potential strike planned by foreign powers amid simmering geopolitical tensions.
The site at the center of the imagery is the Isfra nuclear complex, one of Iran's major enrichment and conversion facilities.
Recent satellite photos taken earlier this month, analyzed by independent watchdog groups, show that entrances to several large underground tunnels and passageways have been buried beneath earth and debris, making them difficult to detect and access.
Additional defensive works, including the construction of new roofs over previously damaged buildings, were also visible around the site, indicating a broader effort to protect infrastructure and restrict the visibility of sensitive components.
We have more specialized U.S. air defense suppression unit redeploys F-35A staff fighters to Britain as conflict with Iran looms.
Yes, yes, yes.
This is the kind of deployment, in my judgment, would only occur if, in fact, war were imminent.
The following report, and once again, this is from the Truth Seeker, makes a critical omission.
While the buildup of the U.S. arms equipment in Europe and the Middle East is impressive enough, the following fails to take into account the fact that Russia and China have rearmed Iran since the 12-day war in June.
Of course, apart from the Su-35s, which will only be delivered later this year, much of this is still secret.
But from some reports, we can conclude that new Russian and Chinese weapons whipped to Iran include new missiles, new air defense system, radar and electronic warfare systems.
Of course, this has all been cloaked in secrecy.
So while the U.S. and Israel are preparing to deliver some heavy blows, they hope will topple the Ayatollah.
They could find some nasty surprises waiting for them.
Editor, a very savvy fellow.
Meanwhile, U.S. Air Force has redeployed a half-dozen F-35A fifth generation fighters to Royal Air Force, Lake and Heath in the UK on February 9th, according to flight tracking data, representing one of the latest developments in a more than month-long surge in U.S. military presence in Europe and the Middle East.
The fighters were deployed by the Vermont Air National Guard 158 fighter wing and departed Burlington Air National Guard base the morning of Feb 9, accompanied by three KC-135 Stratotankers, which provided refueling support.
Six other F-35s from the same squadron have also redeployed to Spain after having been temporarily based at newly restored facilities in Puerto Rico.
U.S. Marine Corps F-35 sea fighters have already been deployed to the Middle East on board the nuclear-powered supercarrier U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, which I believe if this war goes forward will wind up at the bottom of the sea.
Meanwhile, we have a second carrier group being deployed where Trump warns that the Iran talks must succeed.
There's a general consensus Trump is under tremendous pressure to attack Iran by Netanyahu and the warmongers and neocons.
He doesn't really want to do it, but with the blackmail they have available to them through the Epstein files and others, he may have no choice.
The Bingham is preparing to deploy a second U.S. Navy aircraft carrier strike group in the Middle East and President Trump.
Orange nuclear negotiation with Iran must produce results.
Trump made clear that military options remain on the table.
Wall Street Journal Report defense officials are developing plans to send another carrier to join the USS Abraham Lincoln strike group already operating in the region.
The move would significantly expand America's naval firepower amid mounting tensions.
Trump said earlier this week that talks with Tayran Falter, he would not hesitate to reinforce U.S. forces.
That, of course, is very different than actually deploying them.
But that certainly appears to be the agenda.
Meanwhile, Sonar 21, another excellent website.
Why are the U.S. and Israel obsessed with eliminating Iran's ballistic missiles, Larry Johnson?
Larry's really become very, very good.
I put him in the same class with Scott Ritter and just below Colonel McGregor.
It appears the main topic of discussion Wednesday meeting between Trump and Bibi was Iran's ballistic missile program.
It really wasn't a discussion.
Instead, it was Bibi with his advisors trying to sell Trump and his team on the necessity of ending Iran's ballistic missile capability.
Why the emphasis on those missiles went until recently the big concern was whether Iran could build a nuclear bomb?
The U.S. and Israeli narrative about Iran's missile and drone strikes in Israel during the 12-day war in June 2025 insisted Iran did little damage, that the combined might of U.S. and Israeli air defense system knocked down 90% of the Iranian ballistic missiles.
If that was true, why is NetU President Trump touting on the need for Iran to eliminate its ballistic missile force?
I have the answer.
We need only look back at the damage Iran's ballistic missile caused in Israel during the 12-day war.
Based on reporting and independent analyses of conflict, much of the detailed damage was initially censored or not fully disclosed by Israeli authorities, but independent and foreign sources have provided more data.
Iran launched more than a thousand ballistic missiles toward Israel over the 12-day war, often in large salvos that overwhelmed the Israeli and U.S. air defenses.
Israel's multi-layered missile defense systems intercepted some, but a significant number still penetrated and struck targets.
Hundreds of buildings in major cities, such as Tel Aviv, suburbs, Batram, Ramat Gon were damaged.
Some so badly hit they had to be demolished in Tel Aviv alone.
Endless damage to around 480 buildings across multiple strike sites.
Iranian missiles damaged key public facilities, such as Siroca Medical Center in Beersheba, which was hit by an Iranian missile, causing structural damage and chemical leaks.
The affected wing was evacuated.
Power and water infrastructure also were hit, contributing to service disruptions.
Iran's ballistic missile strikes hit high-value facilities as well.
The Weissman Institute of Science, a major research entity in revolt, was severely damaged.
An estimated 90% of its structures affected.
Destruction of dozens of labs.
Suspension of about 25% of its operations.
Independent radar data and reporting shows that Iranian missile directly hit around five Israeli defense force facilities, including an air base, intel center, and logistic base.
Israeli Authority did not publicly confirm these hits at the time to the military censoring.
Israeli oil refining infrastructure, especially in Haifa Bay, also suffered direct hits and damage from Iranian missiles.
Now, Colonel McGregor has estimated Israel can withstand about 700 missile strikes from Iran, but no more.
He's also explained that the American naval forces there are going to quickly consume their allotment of missiles and are going to be left defenseless.
That this is not going to be a cakewalk.
And when you consider the logistic problems of supplying a war being conducted by the United States, thousands and thousands of miles away from the continental U.S., whereas Iran has all of its resources right at hand, when you consider that these naval flotillas are antiquated, that they're sitting to targets in the era of missile technology and drone strikes,
it's not really a favorable situation for the United States.
Meanwhile, Alex Kraner, Iran vows to open the gates of hell going on offensive air defense.
This guy's pretty pleased hit like button helping us reaching more people.
And follow, you can follow Alex on his substack, trendcompass.substack.com.
And Alex, let me start with what has happened in the United States, the meeting, almost three hours of meeting between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netnia.
What is the objective?
What were the objectives of the meeting?
From what we've heard from me, from mainstream media or from the alternative media is that Benjamin Netniau wants to limit Iranian missile program.
It's not anymore about just nuclear program of Iran.
Ballistic missile together with the support of Iran for, you know, Houthis, for Hezbollah, and Hamas.
U.S. and Israel on Path to War?00:09:25
The other option would be, if not negotiations, would be a war, a war, because I would assume that Israel is not willing to, in my opinion, to start a war against Iran without the United States.
That's why they're doing everything to push the United States into a war with Iran.
Then Israel be at the margins of the conflict to be not much damaged by the war between the two parties.
Here is what there was there yesterday or the day before there was a.
There was an interview the Iranian foreign minister had with Russia today and he's described the current situation and how Iran would react to any sort of aggression on the part of the United States or Israel.
What if they attack and what if they use aggressive means?
What would you, what would your retaliatory strategy then be?
We defend ourselves.
How?
Uh, you know how you would attack the U.s bases in the Gulf countries?
We would attack us and U.s assets and facilities, everything they have in our uh, you know, neighborhood.
You seem almost uncomfortable saying that, are you?
I am.
No, i'm not uncomfortable.
The only point is I don't want to uh, you know, express something yes, which I don't like it to happen.
Of course i'm a man of diplomacy, i'm a man of dialogue, i'm a man of negotiation.
Everybody knows me, I have done it in the past and I can do it again.
Uh, i'm not the man of war.
Of course, I have a war veteran myself.
Yes uh, my country, our armed forces are fully prepared for any eventuality, but my preference is diploma.
Yeah, it's.
I really felt the same way when I was in Iran, talking with the people talking with the officials.
They are prepared for negotiations and for war.
And what is your understanding and of what has happened in Washington, and how is that going to influence the Trump's administration and the decision they're gonna?
Because it seems yesterday we've learned that they're sending a new aircraft carrier to the region.
The second one, what is happening in your opinion?
Um, my impression is that we're seeing Trump's relatively typical Uh negotiating tactics uh, where he goes with Uh, with an over-the-top aggressive gambit.
But also my very strong impression is that he wants to do everything he can to avoid the war, and I think that by now it's quite obvious that he doesn't want to go to war against Iran.
But there's tremendous pressure being put on him to do that, and the pressure is coming from the Israeli side.
But we have to remember that what is Israel?
Israel is a small nation in the eastern Mediterranean.
The problem is the, the large voting bloc in the United States, which consists on of evangelical Christians and of Zionist Jews, among which are many very wealthy donors who are very influential, and the problem with this is that they have a more complete control of the U.S. Congress than Trump DOES.
So for him, avoiding going to war is a bit of a balancing act.
And to the extent that I've paid attention to the American media, they are very much in the warmongering mode.
And you have all these foreign policy experts, military experts, who are driving the point relentlessly.
What an excellent opportunity this is, like once in a lifetime, once in a millennium opportunity to take down the Iranian regime and that Trump must do this, that he will, you know, leave great legacy and change in the Middle East and all these wonderful, wonderful things that are going to happen if he goes to war against Iran.
Of course, we can now recognize this for what it is.
It's just simply more war propaganda, no different than when they went to war against Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and so forth.
There's always a class of people there who wants war.
It's the bankers, it's the military-industrial complex.
And then, you know, in the case of Iran, there's also all these very passionate Israel supporters among Christian evangelicals and Zionist Jews.
So far, Trump has been resisting this.
And we know a little something about this because from Aragchi, from some members of Iran's parliament, we know that the negotiations between Iran and the United States are going on, that the relationship between Arakchi and Witkov are good and positive and cooperative.
They don't necessarily tell us everything that they talked about.
But what I found interesting is that about a week ago, we had the, maybe 10 days ago, we had the incident when one Iranian drone, apparently, made it to within the striking distance of USS Abraham Lincoln.
And the drone was only destroyed after they scrambled an F-35 jet to shoot down this drone.
I found the whole story very strange.
Almost like they invented the story.
And I think that the point was to convey to the public that U.S. naval athletes in the Arabian Sea are very vulnerable to Iranian military assets, that they could get sunk, which is a way of the Trump administration saying, hey, you know, we can go to war against Iran, but then, you know, we could lose an aircraft carrier.
And that's like 6,000 sailors that will go to the bottom of the sea.
So do we really want to do that?
However wonderful you think this opportunity is, we stand to lose a lot, which is true, which is why Trump doesn't want to go to war, because it would be absolute suicide.
I think he's got it right.
Danny, it seemed to me Trump would say, well, to attack Iran, we have to go to Congress for a declaration of war, which of course would be repulsed.
They're doing the attacks on the ground that Iran is supposed to be a terrorist state.
It's not a terrorist state, but they're using that as a cover because in the wake of 9-11, the government was given permission to attack terrorist entities without seeking congressional authorization.
I do believe it's going to be a catastrophe for the American forces, however much Netanyahu may want it.
It's a bad idea.
It doesn't represent any American interest.
Not only are we likely to lose the Abraham Lincoln, and as he says, 6,000, I think there are over 3,000 sailors, 1,500 Marines, but we have like 10,000 more troops distributed at bases in the Middle East that are going to be hit by Iran if we attack.
And whereas Colonel McGregor's made clear, we only have this massive U.S. presence in the Middle East to protect Israel, this little state the size of New Jersey.
We're expending vast sums of money, deploying enormous resources to protect this little state.
And it appears to be, you know, egregious abuse of American assets.
It most certainly not in the interests of America and reflects the extent to which we're really in the grip of an Israel First Administration.
Your thoughts, Danny.
Hope for Negotiation00:05:22
Hello, sir.
Good to be with you.
How's my volume today?
Can you hear me okay?
Good.
Yeah, you know, I just growing really weary and disgusted with this whole situation.
I wish we could leave Iran alone.
I'm hoping that, you know, the ambassador there for Iran seems, you know, reasonable.
I'm hoping that there can be some kind of negotiation.
I wish I understood more about what the pressure is that Netanyahu has over Trump.
I just don't quite understand why we have to be involved in this in the first place.
Any hope for that, I want you to come back and hear us.
We'll be right back after this message.
By the injustices inflicted upon the innocence of the world.
Do you have a message you'd like to share?
Any knowledge you'd like to impart to those willing to learn?
Have you ever listened to our shows and thought, hey, I could do this, but you just don't know how to kickstart your hosting ambitions?
Or are you an established professional host?
Thwarted by censorship in other areas, seeking pastures new?
Contact us here at the world's number one free speech network, Revolution Radio.
We provide the platform, the training, and the airtime to any budding host wanting the chance to take those first talk show steps.
Established hosts can find a safe and secure home here where their message can ring out loud and clear, unencumbered, free from sponsorship overreach.
Drop us a line via our email, support at revolution.radio, or head into our Discord server to say hello.
We'll take everything from there.
Revolution Radio, where hosting dreams become actualized reality.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution RadioFreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution.
Host, Zengar Siak.
The Opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
Mike Huckabee's Jonathan Pollard Moment00:09:05
Danny, I think you're absolutely right.
Most Americans, I think, are sick of all this Iran business.
What the hell does it have to do with the United States?
Here we have other reports like the Ambassador's Loyalty Program.
America versus Israel.
How could the American affordable buttoning app on base 44?
You might remember a few months back when Israel, the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, had an undisclosed meeting with Jonathan Pollard, the convicted Israeli spy that stole highly classified U.S. secrets and sent it over to Israel.
Well, I found this video of him from way back when, when he was actually lobbying to have the United States release him, to have the president grant clemency to release him, to release Jonathan Pollard, excuse me, the spy who sold U.S. secrets for Israel.
And it makes you wonder how much of a treasonous trait, how much of a traitor is Mike Huckabee.
So take a listen to this clip here.
It's really shocking.
Governor Huckabee joins the recent cause to act in benefit of Jonathan Pollard, who has spent more than 25 years in U.S. prison for spying for Israel.
He pled guilty.
He served an extraordinary length of time for the crime that he was convicted of, to which he pled guilty.
And what seems to me, I think, a matter of good will and a good faith gesture for the president to give clemency and release him.
So, I mean, there you have it.
And, you know, Mike Huckabee, of course, was continuously putting this pressure on.
Max Blumenthal said, Mike Huckabee went to Israel 14 years ago to lobby for the freedom of the Israeli spy, Jonathan Pollard, who worked, who forked over the NSA's signal intelligence manual to Tel Aviv.
Trump and the Senate GOP then chose him as their point person to represent America first brand in Israel.
And that's who Mike Huckabee is today.
And Pollard said his meeting with Huckabee was welcomed and friendly.
This is actually a tweet that I previously wrote.
This is how Mike Huckabee looks nowadays.
So that's Mike Huckabee for you.
And of course, today, he went on social media also, and he's talking about the outright falsehoods about being a Christian in Israel.
He's saying that everything that's coming out about being a Christian in Israel is a lie.
And when you start to really listen to this guy, what you notice is his entire thing is making sure to be on the defense for Israel.
It really has nothing, nothing to do with America whatsoever, because his religious ideology, his evangelical, his evangel, his evangelical beliefs are tainting his work as a U.S. ambassador.
It's pretty obvious for everybody that's watching, seeing the way he acts, seeing the way he puts the interests of Israel above America, seeing the way that he hides the fact that Israelis treat Christians badly, ignoring the fact that Israelis are treating Palestinian Christians worse in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, not addressing that publicly, allowing Israel to literally spy on the United States and then campaigning and or sorry, lobbying to push to get that spy sent back to Israel.
A spy who stated that he has no problem using the Samsung option, and he suggests that Israel uses it, which states that the United States would threaten, or sorry, Israel would threaten the United States with nuclear weapons if the United States doesn't get in line.
This is who Jonathan Pollard is, and this is the guy that Mike Huckabee was lobbying to have release.
And he's currently the U.S. ambassador to Israel.
It's full-on treason.
And every single day I see these new headlines come out about this guy.
And every single day I'm shocked more and more and more.
The good thing is, and I think this is a good thing, is that recently Tucker Carlson was making a video about how Christians are treated in Israel.
And that really upset Mike Huckabee, which is why he made this video.
And Mike Huckabee ended up quote tweeting Tucker and said, if you're so angry, why don't you go ahead and interview me?
And Tucker said that he's going to reach out and they're going to be setting up an interview.
So I hope they do.
And the reason I'm really actually excited about that is because I hope, and I think that Tucker Carlson, because he's the one who was outwardly also speaking out about the fact that Mike Huckabee released Jonathan Pollard, I hope that the number one of the first questions he asks him is, why did you meet with Jonathan Pollard in Israel?
What the hell was the point of meeting with a convicted Israeli spy who stole U.S. secrets?
Why did you meet with him in Israel?
Why was it also off your calendar and you didn't tell anybody about it and you didn't tell the White House about it either?
Why?
That's going to be, I'm pretty sure that Tucker Carlson is going to ask him this question.
And of course, Mike Huckabee is going to say something along the lines of what we heard.
So, you know, it was a good faith gesture.
We have to do it for our ally, Israel.
Yeah, good faith gesture for a guy who betrayed America grotesquely.
This guy has done enormous damage to American intelligence.
Just outrageous.
I do think Huckabee is a ridiculous person to be in the American government whatsoever.
But then Trump has so many others who are equally enthusiastic about Israel.
To everyone who values tradition, what does tradition mean to you?
And Covers, we hand out her fish.
You might remember a few months back when Israel, the U.S. name.
Sorry about that.
It's the guy did a good job.
Danny, your thoughts about Jonathan Powell, Mike Huckabee.
I mean, I find it embarrassing, but this is a Trump admin.
I voted for the guy three times.
I thought he meant it when he said he was going to be the past peace candidate and enter all these wars, but he's been just the opposite.
Danny, your thoughts.
Well, there's so much to unpack there, sir.
I mean, there's a lot of unknown as well.
But as far as Huckabee goes, I'm very disappointed that he did that.
I mean, he should know better.
I don't know what he was thinking.
I don't know where the pressure came.
I actually wonder if secretly he was told to go ahead and meet him and don't say anything kind of thing, because I just, I can't imagine what he was thinking when he did that.
I mean, he knew ahead of time that would be bad.
He knew that, you know, doing it kind of in secret like that would be not a good thing if he got caught.
I just don't really understand what the point of it is.
Somebody in his position doesn't make any sense to me.
And it's very disappointing.
There's no doubt about it.
Meanwhile, Trump's approval rating is higher in Israel than it is in the United States.
Why am I not surprised?
Here we have from Libertarian Institute.
President Donald Trump has substantially higher approval ratings among Israelis than among Americans.
Trump has taken several positions that are unpopular with Americans, but favorable to Israel.
According to a new poll conducted by the Jewish People Policy Institute, Trump's approval in Israel is 73%.
There's a wide gap between right-wing and left-wing Israelis.
Only a third of left-wing Israelis approve of Trump, while 92% of those on the right have a favorable view of the American president.
A New York Times analysis of multiple recent surveys measuring American views on Trump found a majority disapprove of the president.
56% disapprove.
Just 41% favor.
The higher bull numbers in Israel could be the result of Trump making several statements that supported Israel, but contradict what he promised to do as president.
While Trump told Americans on the campaign trail he would avoid wars in the Middle East in June, he bombed Iran to help Israel destroy nuclear sites.
The president's meeting with Israel, he did so two days ago, Wednesday, considering attacking Iran again.
Additionally, Trump promised to release files related to Jebre Epstein.
Many Americans believe the document will show Epstein was the head of an international sex trafficking ring, exploited underage girls, and the convicted sex criminal had deep ties to Tel Aviv.
Trump and his admin have refused to release the files.
Congressional effort led by Republican Thomas Massey forced the government to release the documents.
Code Words and Victims00:15:38
However, they've slow walked the process, redacted much of the valuable, meaning informative information.
Danny, we're getting terrible, terrible reports.
I mean, Pam Bondi was raked over the coals by Congress for failing to come through over what the law, the law requires.
And here, this is particularly shocking.
Representative Lauren Boebert says unredacted Epstein files far worse than imagined, even pointing to cannibalism, raising questions about alleged code words and human consumption from the Gateway Bundit.
In an interview on Newsmac, Republican Congresswoman Lauren Boebert warned that long-concealed unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files are much darker than the public has ever been led to believe,
suggesting they contain disturbing code words, references to consumption, concludes that might point to elite cannibalism and human meat trafficking.
Bobert, who joined a select group of lawmakers given access to pages of the newly opened files after the passage of the Epstein File Transparency Act, told host Rob Schmidt that what she saw went far beyond the established narrative of sex trafficking and abuse.
Bobert quoting, this seems that wasn't the only trafficking of young girls as the narrative suggests, but there are code words that suggest Jeffrey Epstein and his associates could maybe even be engaging in some consumption.
Is that human consumption or their code words?
There's a lot of talk of beef jerky.
There's a restaurant called The Cannibal where the owner is listed in some of these documents.
Now, that isn't a restaurant that's claimed to serve human meat by any means, but some of this just seems like there are a lot of conspiracies that make you wonder.
I wouldn't be surprised at all.
They call the restaurant the cannibal.
I believe they're going to live up to their name.
Boebert notes that while restaurant name alone isn't proof, the contextual clustering of terms, paired with discussions that are beer to describe torture, raises alarming questions.
Here again, I saw more email about torture.
These coded conversations still have a very clear topic: that torture was big.
It was a big driver for them.
And these were sick people doing very, very sick things.
As you mentioned, there are many women who are involved in this.
You have folks who were working directly for Epstein and Ghelane Maxwell.
A lot of these women are the ones sending emails saying, here's one 10-year-old, 11-year-old, 9-year-old.
It's just very disturbing to see the women who are involved in this.
Here's a clip.
This seems that it wasn't only the trafficking of young girls, as the narrative suggests, but there are code words that suggest Jeffrey Epstein and his associates could maybe even be engaging in some sort of consumption.
Is that human consumption?
Are there code words?
There's a lot of talk of beef jerky.
There's a restaurant called The Cannibal, where the owner is listed in some of these documents.
Now, that isn't a restaurant that is just proclaiming to serve human meat by any means.
But some of this just seems that there's a lot of conspiracies that make you wonder.
And I saw more emails about torture.
And these coded conversations still have a very clear topic: that torture was big, it was a big driver for them.
And these were sick people doing very, very sick things.
As you mentioned, there are many women who are involved in this.
You have folks that were working directly for Epstein and Glenn Maxwell.
And a lot of these women are the ones that are sending emails saying, here's one 10 years old, 11 years old, nine years old.
And it's just very disturbing to see the women who are involved in this as well.
Oh, I find the whole thing grotesque beyond words, Danny.
I don't have any doubt they were engaged in cannibalism.
Your thoughts.
Well, sir, if that's true, that's disgusting.
I don't even like thinking about that.
I mean, you know, I don't know about the code words if that's true or that's not.
I haven't been going through the files in depth, just kind of glancing over news as it breaks.
But I can only hope that she's wrong and that that's not happening.
But, you know, I can't say either way.
I could just tell you that that's disgusting beyond belief.
It's very tough to swallow that.
Florida Representative Anna Paulina Luna, she's very, very good.
Added fuel to the fire during appearance on the Benny Show.
Luna said her own examination of widely distributed Epstein emails left her with serious questions about what the documents imply.
I looked directly at the emails that have been widely circulated about the age 11, what I call the permission to kill email.
Luna told Johnson.
These were emails sent by women to Epstein, many of whom were victims who were allegedly groomed to later be traffickers themselves.
Luna said she saw the phrase jerky, whatever that is.
It's a code word and it's weird.
I'd say it's meat sticks made out of human flesh.
That would be my opinion.
Here is Luna on the Benny.
There are a lot of viral mentions about the 11-year-old, 10-year-old people sending these photos to Jeffrey Epstein.
Did you uncover who sent those photos?
I looked directly at the emails that have been widely circulated pertaining to the age 11.
The, and I have it written down on my notes, the permission to kill email, the Snow White, the littlest girl was naughty, et cetera.
And those ones were directly sent by alleged victims.
So the most disturbing and darkest and sickest emails were sent by women to Jeffrey Epstein.
Yeah.
And some of them pertaining to, you know, jerky, whatever that is.
Yeah.
And so, and, and, and so, just quick follow: what is jerky?
Like, what is that exactly?
I, that's, I think that's the question.
I don't know if it's like, and again, like going into specifically, just based on what this is, um, I don't know.
Code word.
Nobody talks about jerky like this.
Yeah, it's a code word and it's weird, but either which way, we'd be jerky in the studio.
Okay.
So, like, you know, Klein and I know that, like, I've never spoken to my team or anything.
There's no correspondence to me talking about jerky this obsessively.
There's hundreds of emails about jerky.
It's a code word, and some of those emails were sent by women and women that specifically claim to be victims.
So you're saying that these victims are being groomed in becoming traffickers themselves.
There's evidence of that.
Yes.
I'm not saying all of the victims.
So they're not actually victims.
They're not actually victims.
I think that there are some that are actual victims, but I also think that at a certain point, depending on the severity of what you're doing, I think that there's a gray area and then you become a co-conspirator.
Danny, I really don't have any doubt in the context of these circumstances.
Jerky is referring to human meatsticks.
Assuming that's correct, this is even more horrific.
I mean, it's getting worse and worse.
When they release 3 million, we have this much awful indications of evil.
What are we going to find in the 3 million they've yet to release, Danny?
It's a veritable horror show.
Well, it's terrible, sir.
I mean, it's beyond comprehension, some of this stuff.
You know, I hope that's not true.
Obviously, Benny thinks it's some sort of a code word.
You know, I don't know.
Benny's very close to Trump and his family and a lot of people on his staff.
And if he's saying that, I mean, you know, there must be something to it.
I just, I don't know, and I'm hoping not.
We'll have to see as more news develops on the subject.
Here's another report.
Pizzagate, much worse than we thought.
Epstein document just changed everything.
Maybe Pizzagate here has been used in a broader sense to encompass Epstein.
awfully good cheer but for some reason there's a fresh stirrup about it Honestly, to me, it feels like a backlash to the trans agenda that's been shoved in our faces.
And that's unfortunate because I don't think this deserves the same outrage.
There.
And or a furlough.
So, Lionel, yes or no?
Does the president have the constitutional right to do this?
Absolutely.
100%.
And they're not even claiming he doesn't.
They're asking for a temporary restraining order.
Think of it as a Hail Mary.
Pretending that that needs to be argued.
We take it as self-evident that God wants us to be free.
And governments, they're just this institution that man creates to protect our freedom.
And if they're not protecting our freedom or if they're tyrannical, then we have the right and the duty to overthrow that government and replace narratives from these like magazine influencers.
There are entire units at the CIA that do this as their 40-hour a week jobs.
Yeah, this would be a very sophisticated program taking place at the CIA.
Wow.
Here in moments, so thank you.
Get in your questions, anything you guys have here on in the chat room.
We're going to be talking with Liz in a moment.
Very excited about that.
But first, I want to tell you about our friends over at Van Man because, you know, you know that chemical cocktail that you're putting in your mouth with tools that will help you launch to the world.
Our next guest, Liz Krokin, is the first journalist to actually connect the dots in all of this, putting all of this together.
She saw patterns where Hollywood elites and politicians were openly communicating about child sacrifice, sex trafficking rituals, pedophilia, joking about it in emails.
And yes, pizza, of course.
Here's one example, Chrissy Teigen, married to John Legend.
Here's just one example.
Johnny and I are on our way to the Hollydale, and Corinna Bellinoff is serving a nice four-year-old cheese pizza with adrenochrome.
Okay, who would ever think to post something?
Why would you joke about that?
But that's not the only time she joked about that.
Here's a few more examples over the years.
I'm 1 million percent going to be a child, going to be a child from toddlers and tiaras for Halloween.
Can we fast forward time, please?
I'm beyond excited.
I'm going to jail over pizza, she says.
I woke up this morning with a pizza on my chest and ranch dressing all over me.
So if you think I'm too good for this, you are sadly mistaken.
It's actually so ridiculous that most of the plane just laughs hysterically when someone just comes on with pizza.
Then at the bottom, I accidentally went to the children's aquarium looking pretty pedo bearish, cruising the parking lot.
Are we joking about being a pedophile star?
I mean, it's so bizarre.
Then the lower, seeing little girls do the splits half naked is just, I just want to put myself in jail.
Toddlers and tiaras.
So journalist Liz Kroken took them to task, specifically Chrissy Teague and John Teigen, excuse me, and John Legend had something to say about that.
You need to take my family's name out of your mouth before you get sued, John Legend wrote to her initial tweet.
Chrissy, you run in circles with people who rape, torture, and traffic kids.
This is a fact.
I expose sex trafficking for a living.
Liz is an investigative journalist who first broke the Pizzagate story wide open from the 2016 WikiLeaks emails.
And we have to give credit where credit is due.
Liz, welcome to the show.
Great to see you.
Hi, guys.
Thank you so much for having me on.
I got to give some context, though, to the Chrissy Teigen few.
Yeah, please.
Okay, I'm going to start by saying that you posted some of her abhorrent emails where she's clearly promoting pedophilia.
But I just want your audience to understand those are just some.
She had to delete tens of thousands of tweets going back decades after we got into this Twitter feud.
So that's number one.
And then number two, the tweet where John Legend threatened to sue me in that, the tweet that I wrote.
So he was quote tweeting me.
You know, I said you run in circles with people who rape, torture, and traffic children.
Okay.
So in that tweet, you can't see it because this is, you know, years back and before X or when X was Twitter.
But I actually had posted four pictures of her with different known sexual predators and or pedophiles.
And one of them would have been Harvey Weinstein.
And another one was someone that John Legend and Chrissy Teigen did some kind of philanthropic event with who actually had been charged and convicted of sex trafficking.
So there is more context to that tweet and everything that I said about them was 100% factual.
So they did get into a huge Twitter feud with me for pointing out that Chrissy Teigen not only promotes pedophilia on her social media pages, and not just Twitter, by the way, it was Instagram too, but she was also promoting pedophile code words, including known pedophile code words or symbos that have been identified by the FBI.
So everything I wrote about Chrissy Teigen was 100% accurate.
And then she fired back, you know, days after I had tweeted about her, just kind of out of the blue.
It felt like a very coordinated attack.
And the next thing I know, I have her attacking me, millions of her followers attacking me.
The Church of Satan defended her honor.
Hooters and Chelsea Clinton.
I'm actually not kidding.
When she was this Twitter feud, like of the verified people that were defending her, it was the Church of Satan, Hooters, and Chelsea Clinton, like Satan's spa.
Church of Satan Defends Honor00:02:04
It's like, you can't make this up.
I'm like, you guys aren't really helping her case here by coming out.
And then, you know, and then, of course, John Legend threatened to sue me.
This was in 2017.
Still waiting for the lawsuit.
I've actually begged them over the years, please sue me.
Like, Discovery would be wonderful.
If you're willing to promote pedophilia on your Twitter page, then imagine, you know, what she's doing behind closed doors.
And of course, it was just an empty threat.
But then you ran.
It's worth mentioning: truth is an absolute defense.
So, what you are saying here is you are associated with known sexual predators and you have proof.
And you're saying that you are promoting pedophilia on your own social media, and that is undeniable based on just the snapshot we just showed.
So, none of this is conjecture.
We are going to get into how you decoded Pizzagate into something which at the time was conjecture and no longer is.
But what you're saying here is provable.
There's no, there's no suit here because truth is announced.com and was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting this is a drill, this is a drill on bullhoards during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities, and that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Burning Lies Revealed00:03:49
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston Either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's boomrockbooks.com.
This is what they do, and you can torture us and bomb us catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us.
Good evening.
Wake up.
I hope we've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
The time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide If you want to be a warrior or a victim, denial is not a choice anymore.
RevolutionRadio FreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
revolution angered by the injustices inflicted upon the innocence of the world Do you have a message you'd like to share?
Any knowledge you'd like to impart to those willing to learn?
Have you ever listened to our shows and thought, I could do this, but you just don't know how to kickstart your hosting ambitions?
Or are you an established professional host?
Awarded by censorship in other areas, seeking pastors new?
Contact us here at the world's number one free speech network, Revolution Radio.
We provide the platform, the training, and the airtime to any budding host wanting the chance to take those first talk show steps.
Established hosts can find a safe and secure home here where their message can ring out loud and clear, unencumbered, free from sponsorship overreach.
Drop us a line via our email, support at revolution.radio, or head into our Discord server to say hello.
We'll take everything from there.
Revolution Radio, where hosting dreams become actualized reality.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
Florida's Negative Comment Controversy00:10:00
Danny, I got to tell you, it's horrific what we're getting here and very, very disturbing.
I was uh out exposing Pizzagate back in 2020, so I don't find uh a lot here that is new, but I sure find it equally or even more disturbing because it appears it's gone deeper and become even more vile and wicked.
Your thoughts, Danny, your thoughts?
Well, this subject, sir, turns my stomach.
I don't do very well with this kind of stuff.
And, you know, I did follow the Pizzagate stuff and it's disgusting.
You know, I've heard several people say the world is ran by pedophiles.
That definitely looks like that's true in some cases around the world.
It's just disgusting.
And, you know, I'm afraid more and more of this is going to come out.
I don't know a lot about the code words.
I haven't been following it that close.
But you know what?
It wouldn't surprise me based on what I've seen about the Pizzagate stuff, you know, and it's just disgusting beyond belief, sir.
I mean, it turns my stomach.
I don't know how else to describe it.
Yeah, I do agree, Danny.
I had a Pizzagate real or fiction six years ago.
Six years ago, Danny.
I mean, when's Congress gonna actually do the job?
Least they're finally coming out with it.
Pizzagate, real or fiction um i'm, i'm upset in the extreme.
I mean, these are kids uh, some of whom are rather famous.
Miley Cyrus, for example, I think, was clearly a victim of Pizzagate and she's gone out of her way to try to expose it.
She's done performances covering herself with pizza, many of which were rather vulgar, but it was all you know, with the intention of drawing notice to what the hell was going on.
I mean, I think she was acting in an honorable way to to, to expose some of these matters.
Danny, I know you want to take a slightly lighter turn with events in San Francisco.
Uh, give us a little brief while I pull up the story.
Well there's, there's a couple things I wanted to touch upon.
Also, there's another.
There's another quick subject I want to mention i'm.
I sent you a video and i'd like to hear what you have to say about it.
Um, because it touches on the law and I saw a clip uh, yesterday.
Uh, it's a short I could just describe it if you don't have it at the handy by email and it talks about the Israel thing in Florida.
And what struck my mind about this short video?
It's a short little.
Uh, it's one of those youtube shorts is?
It shows the police okay, and I can't tell what agency by the badge is going door to door in Florida and they're visiting a woman that posted negative comments on Israel.
So she went online I think it was on facebook or you know one of the social media platforms and she put something on there that she did not like that was taking place.
You know, that's her first amendment right, participating in a conversation, and she had the police actually visit her door and in the video uh, the police reaches through the door and shows her on the cell phone on Tiktok and they're passing laws in Florida, telling you, if you criticize now, by the way, can you get up the video of the woman who said something about the mayor of Miami and they just like knocked on her door?
Take a look here.
United States America, in Florida, Republican Florida, Republican Florida.
Let's take a look at this.
There you go.
There's no video sir, just a sound.
This is not the right one.
No, this is it.
There's no video, just sound.
I think you're on the wrong screen or whatever.
There's no video on the screen, just letting you know.
Okay Danny okay, let me.
Let me see if I can fix that.
I think this is a key video though sir, to show everybody.
This is definitely makes no sense to me at Clear violation of the First Amendment.
Okay.
Let me see if I can get it there.
Go ahead and keep talking about it.
Anyway, what we're about ready to see is the police are visiting in Florida and they're talking to a lady about her negative comments on Israel.
And they're telling her, they're instructing her that she cannot do that.
And the officer yells, says out that, well, you won't be going to jail today, but, and I'm like, going to jail for what?
For First Amendment violations, the United States.
She can say anything she wants.
And I've never seen ever a police agency going to the door of somebody over negative comments about Israel or negative comments about anything.
I mean, you know, you're not allowed to threaten.
And she didn't do that.
This was about, you know, having a conversation with something that she didn't like that Israel is doing.
And for the police to go by, I don't even understand why an agency would even do that.
There is no law.
And if there were, it would be unconstitutional.
I mean, it's your First Amendment right to, you know, to criticize anybody that you want in the United States.
I don't understand that.
You know, even if you don't like something Trump's doing or somebody in the cabinet's doing or whatever, you have a right to criticize it.
Can you imagine getting visited by the police telling you that you cannot do that?
I don't understand that.
You had the right clip, sir.
We just didn't have the video.
We just had the sound.
I don't know.
I know, Danny.
I know, Danny.
I've got the right clip.
I'm just out to get it out of here for you.
Okay.
So, anyway, what I wanted to talk about, sir, is the First Amendment violation.
And my concern is First Amendment violation in Florida.
And I, I, you know what?
When I saw the clip, I go, that can't be.
I watched it a couple of times.
I couldn't make out what agency that was going to the door.
It looks like it's a city.
You can't talk about Jeffrey Xine on TikTok.
And they're passing laws in Florida.
Talk about Jeffrey Xine on TikTok.
Can you see it now?
Yeah, that's it.
We're good to go.
Go ahead and clear that.
Here we go.
And they're passing laws in Florida telling you if you criticize.
Now, by the way, can you get up the video of the woman who said something about the mayor of Miami and they just like knocked on her door?
Take a look here.
United States of America in Florida, Republican Florida.
Republican Florida.
Let's take a look at this.
There you go.
Picture can make sure it's you.
We're not sure.
Is that your account?
I refuse to answer questions without my lawyer present.
So I really don't know how to answer that question.
Like I said, by the way, stop that.
Didn't JD Vance go to Europe and start talking about free speech and how embarrassing it is that Europeans didn't have free speech?
Didn't he do that?
This is Florida.
It's Republican-controlled Florida.
By the way, they're censoring your posts on TikTok.
Anyone who's not criticizing this, anyone who's not calling this out, I cannot trust them.
You can't talk about Jeffrey Xine on TikTok and they're passing laws in Florida telling you if you criticize.
Now, by the way, can you get up the video of the woman who's Danny?
Go ahead.
Tell us about what's going on here.
Sir, I mean, you know what?
You cannot criticize anything about Israel online in Florida.
What's that all about?
Why are the police going to the door?
I mean, I don't even understand that officer.
Was he told he was going to be fired if he didn't do that?
You can't do that.
I can't even imagine being in his position and being told, I need you to go visit these people and tell them to knock it off.
No, what are you talking about?
She could say whatever she wants.
It's the United States of America.
Who cares if she's criticizing?
That's her own business.
You know what I mean?
I don't care who the mayor is.
I don't care who it is.
Are you crazy?
That's just insane, sir.
When we start having police go to people's door for criticizing anyone, you know what I mean?
That's just ridiculous.
And yet, we see it there in Florida.
And he's calling it out.
He said that's Republican Florida.
I mean, Florida has some amazing things about it.
There's no doubt about it.
But this is very, very disturbing, especially you think that maybe something like this might happen in one of the liberal cities or something like that.
But no, this is in Republican Florida.
To me, that's very, very disturbing.
I don't understand what law or what his enforcement action is for visiting.
I mean, police can go by and knock and talk to whoever they want.
You know, if you answer the door, that's fine.
And he just wanted to talk to her about her post.
And I just don't understand police resources even doing that.
What is the point to try to chill the public into not talking?
I mean, she said, I'm not going to talk to you without my lawyer present.
Well, there's no laws being broken.
I didn't hear in the clip him say you broke the law.
He said you're not going to jail.
Well, yeah, you're not going to jail.
Teachers Union Struggle00:08:00
What would be the charge?
I mean, now we're going to make it a crime to criticize anybody.
I don't know, sir.
I just thought we should mention that and show the public in Florida that there's police going to the door.
That's a First Amendment violation.
That's very concerning, sir.
I don't know what your opinion is on that, but when I saw it.
Oh, no, of course, Danny.
It's all outrageous, completely outrageous.
I mean, me and you talk about all kinds of subjects when I come on here.
And I mean, can you imagine all of a sudden the police telling us, coming to our door and telling us, oh, you can't talk about that?
You can't talk about Epstein.
You can't talk about, you know, the pictures or the evidence that came out.
You can't talk about you don't like Netanyahu.
You don't.
I mean, can you imagine that?
I mean, that's just insane.
I just, I've never even seen that in the United States.
That was a first for me, sir.
And you got another goodie here about the teachers' union in San Francisco.
Well, what I wanted to bring up about that, sir, is you can go ahead and read my paragraph if you want.
But, you know, the teachers, you know, they're always on strike.
And, you know, that's their right to be on strike.
And that's fine.
You know, they want more pay.
And God bless them.
They probably need more pay in that area because it's very expensive to live with inflation out of control.
But what I thought was very interesting that was on the chopping block is they want Newsom specifically wants them to start paying out of pocket for their medical benefits.
And that's what caught my eye about the whole strike, sir.
Not about the money, the retirement and all that sort of thing, working conditions, the medical benefits.
And as anybody knows, medical benefits are getting to be a sort of a luxury.
And if people, if you're a person that has medical benefits, you know, you need to consider yourself a luxury because there's a lot of people out there in the United States that are very well suffering over medical benefits.
And the reason is if they have a business or they have something else and they have to come out of pocket for them, they're getting extremely expensive.
Even in California, there's people paying $1,500, $2,000 a month.
I mean, that's a house payment and then some in some areas.
And they're paying that much just to have medical insurance, sir, for the privilege of going to the doctor a couple of times a year for a checkup, going to the ER if they need to, stuff like that.
And now in San Francisco, what the teachers union is saying anyway on the news is part of it is Newsome wants them to pay out of pocket for their medical benefits.
And that's crazy.
In California specifically, one of the things that is positive about California is most of the jobs, most, not all, most come with medical benefits.
And that's why a lot of people work certain kinds of jobs, especially union jobs, because their family is covered with the medical benefits.
But Newsom wants them to come out of pocket and start paying.
And it's very ironic because he insists on continuing giving the millions of illegals free health care.
So, in other words, it's okay that he's pulling resources and giving the illegals the free health care, but then he's now insisting that the teachers come out of pocket for their health care.
I just find that to be extremely, you know, over the top and ridiculous, sir.
It's one more sign that the Democrats clearly don't care if you can see what they're doing.
They clearly don't care if you can see that they're taking the illegal migrants' position and giving them taxpayer money and paying for their health care while the Americans suffer.
And that's all.
We talked about that, I think, a few couple of episodes back where it was very clear that they were using the migrants to vote, and everybody knows that they're doing that.
Well, now they're using money and they're using our taxpayer money to pay migrants health insurance and give them health insurance while trying to fight and take away from the teacher, sir.
And I just thought that is really the point of showing the strike: that particular benefit caught my attention because I know quite a bit about health insurance.
I know how expensive it is.
I know how it's breaking a lot of people.
I know how it's forcing a lot of people to leave the state, just that one issue on health insurance alone.
And for him to be arguing with the teachers, telling them to pay out of pocket for their health insurance, sir, I think that's over the top.
Let's take a look at the video clip, Danny, you have here.
Strike continuing coverage of the San Francisco teacher strike.
And while talks are continuing right now, there's no end in sight.
That means a fourth straight day of school closures.
Today in the base, Ginger Cona Haro Saab has been covering it for us.
She joins us live in San Francisco this morning.
Explain what's keeping these sides from getting a deal done.
Yeah, well, Laura Marcus, there are three remaining issues that both sides cannot agree on.
That those are wages, health care benefits, and special education.
Those have really been the three sticking points that have sustained these negotiations.
And at this point, you can hear from both sides that there's some finger pointing as to why this can't get done.
We need to keep up the struggle.
We need to go one day stronger, one day longer, until we have the agreement for the schools our students deserve.
That we all know is possible.
And that right now, the only thing standing in the way is a district management and the Board of Education that will not step up and do what's right by our families.
In a late-night post, the bargaining team from United Educators of San Francisco, the union representing around 6,000 teachers, posted that to their social media page saying at 1 a.m., they were told that the district was not ready to fully respond to their latest proposal.
Now, yesterday, Wednesday morning, we heard from District Superintendent Maria Su, who pushed for urgency during these prolonged negotiations.
We have been ready to negotiate this entire time.
We are prepared and committed to getting this agreement done today.
We all must act with urgency.
We all must get together to get this done.
So it did not get done yesterday.
We are now on the fourth day of the strike and preliminary numbers from the district estimate a loss of up to $10 million each day.
The teachers' strike continues.
So much of that comes from a loss in state funding each day that the district is not operational.
SFUSD has reiterated it is fiscally constrained in these negotiations as it tries to stay the course to get the district out of state oversight.
Now, teachers will be back out on the picket lines across SFUSD campuses today as early as eight.
There's also a noon rally at Justin Herman Plaza over by Embarcadero Center that will be accompanied with a march as well.
Now, Marcus Laura, the last time that there was a teacher's strike was almost 50 years ago, and that lasted for quite some time.
We'll have to see now that we're pushing day four if it'll amount to those almost seven weeks as it did decades ago.
We're live in San Francisco.
Ginger Conjero sob today in the bay.
We'll see.
Certainly dragging on there.
Thanks for all the details, Ginger.
Well, Danny, I think your points about the governor giving health care to illegals but not willing to give it to California teachers is very telling.
Healthcare's Expensive Weaponization00:05:41
I mean, this is grotesque.
And as you observe it, it's pure politics.
Let me reiterate the points you're making here.
One of the big is Newsom is not giving the teachers health care.
He wants them to pay out of pocket.
He's giving out care all the poor illegal migrants.
He is once again showing everyone in the open, illegal migrant vote for Democrat count more than citizen.
As Elon says, Democrats are doing their best to keep the money magnet turned on, to keep the illegals coming in and illegally voting for them.
These are their sources of power.
They no longer care if you see what they are doing or not.
Danny, I think you got it right.
They are so blatant.
They are so open about it.
Well, that's it, sir.
I mean, you know, we've talked about this before in subsequent shows, and it's very disturbing, the whole money magnet thing.
I mean, using our tax dollars to give benefits that are very expensive and becoming a luxury and it'd be carrying, they're detrimental to Americans.
I mean, there's people, there's people, sir, out there that are losing their homes and they're having to move because they're being crushed by medical debt.
And a lot of people won't say anything because they're covered with their job currently and their medical insurance.
And maybe they're healthy and it's not an issue for them.
But I'll tell you what, it's extremely important for some people to have health issues.
And for them to say that, you know, we got to start paying out of pocket for health care because it's getting so expensive.
But then for the Democrats to keep insisting that migrants that come here illegally, sir, they're breaking the law.
Okay.
ICE is, you know, flushing them out.
And you simply break into the United States and you can have free health care for you and your family, but yet an American can't afford it and they can't have free health care.
They have to pay out of pocket for it.
I don't understand, sir, what they're thinking.
I don't understand why anybody would think that's positive and want to vote for a Democrat and say to themselves, you know, I think that's a great idea.
I think all the third world ought to be able to come in here and get free health care and we should pay for it.
And we need to suffer and have these huge premiums.
Healthcare is a big problem in the United States, sir.
It's getting worse.
It's getting more and more expensive.
You know, there's some very strange things going on in healthcare.
I almost feel at times, sir, that healthcare is almost being used to being weaponized like insurance in Florida.
It looks almost like they're making it so astronomical, sir, that they're making it so people can't afford it to cause a hardship on purpose, like causing an earthquake, like causing a tornado or a hurricane.
It's really getting ridiculous.
When you start having premiums for the average family, sir, that's higher than a house payment, right?
I mean, you know, how far can it go?
And there's no sign of it stopping.
You know, if it's $1,500 to $2,000, I know one guy has to pay $1,500 a month for his insurance, and he's just one guy.
I just don't understand.
I don't even, I don't even think I'd be able to do it.
A month?
$1,500?
Yes, $1,500 a month, sir, just for himself.
You're better off just putting that money in the bank.
Well, you are.
But here's the kicker, sir.
If you go to the hospital, okay, and let's say you injure yourself working around the house or something like that, you're looking for walking into the ER.
You're lucky, and I have some family that work in healthcare.
You're looking at $3,000 just to walk into the ER for a cut or something, depending on what you need.
I mean, if you ended up needing x-ray or MRIs or whatever test that doctors need to do, I mean, you can walk in to a $10,000 bill for visiting the ER.
And they come after you for that.
So you can imagine, you know, anything could happen while you're working around your house.
You know what I mean?
You have to go to the hospital or your kid or your wife gets injured somehow, even if she gets injured in the kitchen.
Can you imagine going there and getting a five or $10,000 bill?
I mean, and that's what's happening.
I've seen some people with these astronomical hospital bills for not having insurance and going there.
And they come after you for that, sir.
They end up garnishing your wages.
There's all kinds of nasty things that they do to come after you.
But yet, illegals, sir, coming into this country, okay, and the Democrats are insisting on giving them free health care insurance.
Let's take a look at what's going on in Minnesota.
You know, we saw that shooting of those people that voted down the health care bill for migrants in Minnesota.
We saw that.
I think you covered that.
Well, yep, they want to give free health care to the Somalis and all the migrants that are in there.
Now, why the hell would we give free health care as expensive as it is?
There's hospitals, sir, that have shortfalls and are going bankrupt in Minnesota right now for unpaid debt on taking care of the Somalis.
There's hospitals that are millions of dollars short and threatening to close.
They don't have the money to stay open on unpaid medical bills.
Well, it's because of the Somali debt.
They're coming in and they're getting treated for free.
They don't have to pay.
Hospitals Draining of Resources00:04:11
And this is just over the top.
They're draining, people want to talk about draining resources.
This is a very scary subject to me.
I mean, when you think about it, sir, healthcare, you know, some people say it's a right.
Okay, it's a right, but we have to come up with a system that's affordable.
And we certainly can't have the third world coming in here by the millions voting for one.
They're voting for Democrats.
DMV has been caught several times registering them under the motor voter laws, giving them a driver's license.
In some states, they take that driver's license as almost like a passport, and they go and get all these health care benefits, welfare, and all this sort of thing.
And they're getting free health care, sir, while Americans are suffering with these huge bills.
That's very disturbing to me.
And I hope I just wanted to mention it, and I hope we can cover more on that in the future.
Much appreciated, Danny.
right back after this break.
We'll be right back after this message.
Tune into Revolution Radio, where truth breaks the spell and information never sleeps.
Never sleeps.
Never sleeps.
Into Revolution Radio, where truth breaks the spell, and information never sleeps.
The People Station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osaba had nothing to do with it.
That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
Barry Jennings was there.
Ironic Views on Dearborn, Michigan00:14:56
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read America Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
Well, Danny, here's another rather disturbing story.
Comes from Common Dreams left-wing website, but the left is good at criticizing the right.
So I even watch a lot of MS now with my wife because to see what they have, what they think they've got on Trump and his administration.
And often they've got it right.
U.S. military helping Trump to build massive network of concentration camps.
Navy contract reveals.
Get this, Danny.
The Department of Homeland Security is using a repurposed $55 billion Navy contract to convert warehouses into makeshift jails and planned sprawling tent cities in remote areas.
In the wake of immigration agent killing of three U.S. citizens within a matter of weeks, the Department of Homeland Security is quietly moving forward with a plan to expand its capacity for mass detention using a military contract to create what Pablo Mariqua's author of the immigrant news site Megrant Insider calls a nationwide ghost network of concentration camps.
On Sunday, Manrika has reported that a massive Navy contract vehicle, once valued at $10 billion, has ballooned to a staggering 55 ceiling to expedite President Trump's deportation agenda.
It is the expansion of a contract first reported in October by CNN found DHS with funly $10 billion through the Navy to help facilitate the construction of a sprawling network of migrant detention centers across the U.S. in an arrangement aimed at getting the centers built faster, according to sources and federal contracting departments.
I find this pretty disturbing, Danny.
What are your thoughts?
Well, I don't know.
I'm just hearing about this now.
It almost looks like they're bringing back the FEMA camps.
I know they do need to detain migrants, sir.
They are running into housing problems for the migrants that they're arresting and deporting.
Kind of like we saw the famous alligator Alcatraz in Florida.
They do need detainment centers while they give them their due process and go through the deportation process.
So, you know, if they need space, they need space.
I mean, they're mass deporting these migrants, the illegal migrants, especially the criminal.
People really don't understand, sir, how many criminal migrants we have in this country.
I'm not talking about the migrants that, you know, are working.
Okay, I'm not talking about that.
They broke in here, and that's not good either.
So that is against the law.
They cut in front of others that are waiting in line and trying to do it illegal, or people that have done it legally and have done it.
But I'm not trying to make light of that.
But what I'm saying is we have a lot of felons, sir.
And I'm talking about migrants that carry firearms.
They carry knives.
They're pedophiles, sex offenders, you know, rapists, you know, all kinds of these kind of thieves because the third world had emptied their jails.
It's expensive to keep people in jail.
And they flooded our country with these migrants and these caravans.
And we have them by the millions, sir.
And you'd be awfully surprised at these migrants that are walking around carrying weapons, sir, that were purely let out of jail and done that.
And I'd like to give an example.
Nobody likes to talk about this for some reason.
But, you know, we have some nasty prisons in the United States that are housing, you know, people that are never going to see the light of day.
And the problem is, right now in some of the Democrat-controlled areas, they're letting a lot of these people out of prison and dumping them on the streets.
And they have no resources to make it in society.
That's happening a lot in California.
Newsom has dumped a bunch of criminals on the street.
They go to the inner cities, they get weapons, and they start committing crimes within 24 to 40 hours of being released.
And they're already getting in police contacts.
I've seen several videos.
I seen a video the other day of a guy released from jail, and he was wearing his jail shirt under a sweatshirt, and he was heading towards a prominent neighborhood up in the hills.
And he was stopped by a sheriff deputy.
And he said, what are you doing here?
And the guy explained where he was going.
He said, well, you're going the wrong direction.
Where you want to go and the city you want to go is the opposite direction.
What are you doing up here in the hill?
And of course, he was just giving him the run around.
And he was looking obviously for something to steal.
He just had got out of jail.
So this is a very disturbing thing, sir, is this prison thing and these migrants that are walking around with warrants.
You know, I find that everybody talks about how bad ICE is, which I don't, do not agree.
They're law enforcement.
They're doing their job.
But nobody wants to talk about, sir, is the tens of thousands of warrants that are issued to ICE for ICE to go legally pick up these criminals.
There's courts, sir, all over the nation and judges, individual judges that are reviewing these cases and signing these warrants, okay?
Which is putting the court and the legality of the court behind these warrants to go out for ICE to effect these arrests.
And we see these protesters protesting the law enforcement arm.
That's the guy that's going out and actually doing the job.
But we never see any protests around the courts.
We never see anything around the judges that are actually signing the warrants and asking the ICE officials to go out and pick up these criminals.
For some reason, that seems to be an off-topic or off-limits subject.
I don't quite understand that.
We can only talk about the law enforcement that goes out and does the job.
We cannot talk about the people that are issuing the orders to go out and do the job.
I don't know if you have any thoughts on that at all, but I find that to be very strange.
Oh, Danny, I think you're on top of so many issues.
Here's another I want to discuss with you.
We have a woman on the religious liberty panel who's drawing distinctions that are highly relevant between Zionism and Judaism, asking some of those who are testifying whether to be anti-Zionist is to be anti-Semitic.
And they're claiming yes when it's clearly not the case.
She's explained why she doesn't agree.
She's been kicked off the panel.
This is like out there.
You were talking about coming to the door because you were criticizing Netanyahu.
I want to share with you a couple of stories and get your take, Danny, because I find researching dental implants.
There's a lot of demops that'll talk about doing their teeth in the day.
You might remember a few months back when Israel, the U.S. That was our we've already addressed that about Mike Hockabee and his excess, which are so extraordinary.
Sir, real quick, I'd like to point out another ironic thing: look at what some of the Muslims have been saying in the Muslim cities like Dearborn, Michigan, or like the one in Texas that they want to build.
There's a city there outside of Dallas that they want to create that was just for Muslims.
It's a whole enclave that they put together.
It's like, I don't know, a few miles outside of Dallas, but there's a neighborhood and they've renamed the streets and all this stuff, you know, to make Muslim names.
It's ridiculous that they can create an all-Muslim neighborhood like this.
And look what they're saying in Dearborn.
In Dearborn, Michigan, sir, we've all seen the videos.
I know I saw the videos, and I'm very confused about what's going on in Dearborn, Michigan.
It seems to be that there's this whole different set of rules in the United States in there for them.
I've never seen non-citizen police before in the United States.
I've never seen Muslim insignias on the police on police before like this.
I've never seen such a lack of them, a police force not acting on open crime that happens right in front of their face.
And I've never seen where a group of people can shout death to America and death to Americans and threaten Americans with weapons online and on video.
And that's what's been happening in Dearborn, Michigan.
Yet we don't see any enforcement for that.
I mean, I don't understand how that's allowed to operate.
Most of that city is collecting welfare from taxpayers.
And I don't understand how they can bash the United States like that and say death to America, right?
And even worse things, sir, when they're sitting in the United States, they were brought in here as some sort of a refugee.
I don't know why Obama started that whole enclave in Dearborn.
And they're sitting there yelling and screaming and insisting that they don't have to follow American laws in Dearborn, Michigan.
Now, you know what?
We see in Florida, they're going door to door for mentioning or saying negative things about Netanyahu, but yet in Dearborn, Michigan, it's okay if these people are shouting out death to Americans, death to America, and threatening us openly on video.
I just don't understand.
That seems to be, I don't get that, sir.
I don't know if you have a comment about that, but what is that?
Danny, I agree completely, but I want to focus on this issue here in Congress.
You got this woman, I think she's very good.
She missed that.
Thank you.
Mr. Frankl, this is for you.
You described very painful experience.
First of all, the fact that Dr. Phil is sitting on the Religious Liberty Commission says all you need to know about this administration.
Stop it.
But wait, before we go forward, I just want to answer somebody that said that that's why I was so spoiled.
Yes.
Yes.
I was an only child and I was an only grandchild.
And my parents, my grandmother, my great-grandmother would pool their resources all the time so that I could do the stuff that I did.
So, yes, that is exactly why I was so like indulged.
Yes, if I had siblings, I would have been screwed.
I have something very interesting to tell you about this that you're going to watch.
I was supposed to be at this.
I was invited by Carrie.
I actually got off the phone with her before we came on air.
Talk a lot.
Yeah.
This is a total happenstance that I happened to catch this.
I watched it live because I was supposed to go and I want to, I'll get into it.
Play it and I'll get into it.
It's breaking your name.
I take that very serious.
At the same time, many of the students who I've spoken to personally who created those encampments say that they were protesting the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians in Gaza and their university's financial ties to that war.
So I need to ask you, in a country built on religious liberty and the First Amendment, do you believe someone can stand firmly against anti-Semitism, including what you experienced, and at the same time condemn the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza or reject political Zionism or not support the political state of Israel?
Or do you believe that speaking out about what many Americans view as genocide in Gaza should be treated as anti-Semitic?
Because in my view, the United States cannot and must not make loyalty to a particular theology about Israel a litmus test for protected speech or moral legitimacy.
Charlie Kirk said that Jew hate is brain rotten.
Some people don't have brains.
I don't need, I'm not going to assist them in setting a double standard for the Israeli government.
And first of all, he never, he does, he sits in a high chair.
I mean, let's just be honest.
You know, who is this?
What's his name, Dave?
Do you happen to be able to do that?
What am I watching?
I have the list of names, but I don't remember what his name is.
But I have a, I wouldn't be able to look at the list and tell you who he is, but I did listen to this.
Can I ask you, why is there a Religious Liberty Commission?
Okay, so let me give you the backstory of what I know, and that would be helpful.
So I got a random, I got a random call from somebody I met after my first viral post.
And he was like, hey, would you mind if I give your number to somebody who works for the Trump administration?
I was like, sure.
So it happened to be Carrie.
Candace's Religious Freedom Concerns00:11:41
And Carrie and I spoke and she wanted me to be on a panel of her guest speakers.
And I'm not sure if I'm supposed to disclose who it was.
So I'm going to leave that out.
I am one of them.
And all five of her speakers were rejected.
And everybody you see was the rest of the panel.
And we were five Jewish.
One, I know there was a rabbi.
There was somebody who's pretty important.
There was a anti-Zionist rabbi.
All of us were anti-Zionist.
Yes.
I wonder if it was Rabbi Rosen, anyhow.
I don't remember the name of the rabbit.
So then they just went through with.
I have the names, but I don't remember it.
Whoever, right.
And you should, yeah.
But then they just went through with their, this religion, this ridiculous narrative that they're putting.
Yeah.
So we got this.
I mean, I can only speak on behalf of my rejection letter, which was basically like, oh, you sound wonderful.
If you would like to write a statement, we will see if the board will read it.
But ultimately, you're not invited to come.
So that's why it's so funny you brought this up.
So Carrie and I were talking about what we should do about that.
And I said, you should just go whatever, you should say whatever you feel comfortable to say.
And that's what she did.
And I am like, I think right after this clip, I texted her that you are a boss because she really, I mean, she really went at them.
And when you are in a room where you know everyone is against you and you're able to speak and not be afraid, that's like real courage.
And she was the only person in that room who believed what she believed and did not stop, even though she knows the rest of the room wanted her to stop.
Being able to stand out in a crowd, especially in a moment like this, is what true courage and conviction is all about.
And she definitely has more to say, but yeah, let this play.
I start to share.
You know, I just want to say something.
What is, especially like when I ask what are the points of these commissions, and then especially when you tell me the way they cherry-pick them, and you're not really even getting any, which makes sense.
Of course, they are.
That's what we always do.
Obviously.
So then again, brings me back to the point is that why do we need this?
So what is going to happen after this after this conference is that they're supposed to collectively come up with a solution to give to Trump to talk about religious freedom and whatever it is that they're going to play like they actually care.
And the interesting part is that she's a part of this and she has to go to Trump and have a completely different view.
And I'm very curious how that's going to transpire when they have that meeting.
And that I'm going to meet her in DC for.
Well, it'll be a really great meeting.
And by the time it's over, she will see things exactly as she's supposed to, which is my way.
That was good.
These Jewish people as they fight to defend themselves.
These were students calling for intifada within days after October 7th, before Israel had even entered Gaza.
So it's not about them and their using Palestinian civilian death, which is horrendous and horrible.
They're using it as a prop.
And it doesn't matter.
My religious beliefs are violated.
You don't get to block me because I'm Zionist and a Jew.
Yes, I do.
You want to protest Israel?
Yes, I do.
I do get to block you because you're a Zionist.
That's not your religion.
Sorry.
That's a thought process.
That's a choice.
And yes, we do get to hate you for that.
Yes, we do.
And this is the other thing that I pointed out the other day.
Carrie Bowler is drawing relevant distinctions.
You could tell that the rabbi there wasn't going to respond at all.
He wasn't going to acknowledge the difference between being anti-Semitic and being anti-Zionist because he wants to merge the two.
And because she's raised these intelligent questions, she's been booted off the commission.
Catholic activist Carrie Brisine Bowler was booted off the White House Religious Liberty Commission Wednesday after using her position to defend Christians' religious liberties and point out who is threatening them.
Carrie Brisene Boyler has been removed from President Trump's Religious Liberty Commission, said Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick on X.
No member of the commission has the right to hijack a hearing for their own personal and political agenda on any issue.
This is clearly without question what happened Monday in our hearing on anti-Semitism in America.
This was my decision.
Disgraceful.
Absolutely disgraceful.
The bowler received overwhelming public support on social media for opposing Zionist attack on free speech and Christian religious freedom through the ever-expanding IHRA definition of anti-Semitism.
That's the International Holocaust Remembrance Agency, which expands anti-Semitism to include any criticism of Israel whatsoever.
Jewish Zionist activists demand that she be kicked off the commission.
I find this unbelievably offensive.
Unbelievably offensive.
This woman is very, very good, Danny.
She's very intelligent.
She took an intellectual approach.
Here we have Candace defending Kerry.
We corrupted that within 40 minutes.
He was already acting like everybody's trying to cover up Wetzner's name within 40 minutes.
We know all about that.
Bondi melting down.
Maybe I've got two links.
If you saw the news, but Fox News is claiming President Trump is declining in the polls.
Okay, Danny, give us your thoughts so far as you can put them together in relation to what we got here.
Well, sir, you know, it goes back to a First Amendment violation.
And, you know, that is a very slippery slope.
And what I don't understand, I could guess.
I don't have proof.
But what I don't understand is why anybody would want to stifle somebody from giving their opinion if you're an American.
I mean, we have First Amendment is a fundamental right that you can criticize.
You know, you can't violently threaten.
Okay.
And most people agree on that.
But to criticize and talk about in some way whoever you want to talk about is a First Amendment right, sir.
I mean, you're talking about taking down talk radio, sir.
You're taking, what about everything that you've ever put out, all the good information, your life's work that you've been working on?
And they just say, well, you know what?
You can't talk about that.
You can't talk about that.
That's what they do in China, right?
They have that governing board, the CCP, where they just, you know, censor everything.
It's just ridiculous that I don't understand these people why they would want to fight for the sect of people to have the right to where you could talk about anything you want to talk about in the United States, but you can't criticize Israel.
I mean, that doesn't make any sense to me whatsoever, sir.
I don't even understand why they're pushing for this, why they think that they're above everybody else and nobody can criticize them.
That's just unbelievable.
This is very upsetting to me.
I would think this would be upsetting to Trump as well.
I mean, he full well knows and Pam Bondi knows and Kash Patel knows that that is just not what happens.
I mean, you take a look at Pam Bondi and Kash Patel before they got into the cabinet, things they've said in the past.
I mean, you go look at the interviews with Kash Patel online before he became FBI director and things he criticized.
And what if they labeled him and told him, hey, you can't talk about that.
You can't talk about that.
It's against the law.
You're not allowed to talk about Israel.
I mean, that's just insane, sir, to me, that they would even talk about that.
She could say whatever she wants to say.
And, you know, for them to kick her off the board because they don't like her free speech, that's just, that's over the top, sir.
It's unfathomable.
I understand that in the third world country.
I understand that, you know, in maybe in parts of Europe, but man, not in the United States.
That's, you don't go messing around with free First Amendment free speech.
It's just that's such a slippery slope, sir.
She wasn't no violence, no nothing.
Just that's insane to me, sir.
It's just unfathomable.
Turns out Carrie had defended Candace in the past.
We don't seem to have an actual video clip here, but rather a report about it.
And well, just imagine, sir, if all of a sudden they started saying, oh, you can't talk about 9-11, even though you're showing evidence.
You can't talk about that.
You can't talk about the false flag shootings.
You know, well, we're showing evidence.
Nope, nope.
That's an off-limit subject.
And you could be arrested and go to jail if you talk about that subject.
You know, I mean, pretty soon, I mean, it's insane, sir, that that would happen.
I would just think everybody in that room, whether they're uncomfortable or not, everybody on that panel, just for the First Amendment alone, if you're American, would even want to participate in silencing somebody like that and taking away their right, because that means that you would lose your rights.
So if you criticize, you can't say anything.
You know what I mean?
I mean, we could turn the tables and say that Jewish people aren't allowed to talk about Americans.
They're not allowed to, well, we could just as well say that and put that on them.
Here's more about it.
A member of the Federal Religious Liberty Commission has been ousted after a hearing this week that featured tense exchanges on the definition of anti-Semitism, which is, by the way, an absolute critical intellectual issue.
The ousted member, Carrie Brigine Boyler, had defended prominent commentator Candace Owens, who routinely shares anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.
Brigine Boiler, a model to conservative activists, denied that Owen had ever said anything anti-Semitic, quoted a biblical verse attributed to the death of Jesus to Jews, pushed back on the idea some people mask anti-Semitism in their criticism of Israel.
Spend Time Wisely00:00:38
Danny, Danny, my friend, what a pleasure to have you here once again.
I'm really grateful for your contributions.
Meanwhile, everyone, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friend, your people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left.
Use it wisely.
Support Revolution Radio.
And God willing, as I, as an agnostic, are now disposed to say, we'll be back on Monday and we'll do it all over again.