Virology, Super Bowl, Bill Gates & Epstein, Ring cameras, Billy Graham, Israel & Nixon + Much More
Super Bowl 60’s commercials and Bad Bunny’s halftime show are framed as "anti-white propaganda" tied to ESG schemes, while Ring’s surveillance tech sparks fears of social credit systems. Epstein’s redacted files allegedly expose elite corruption, including cannibalism claims, yet Garland ignores them. Vaccine skepticism links autism rates to the Amish, with accusations that Sandy Hook and Las Vegas were false flag events. Michael Ivey and Jim Fetzer argue virology is pseudoscience, failing proper experimental rigor. Bill Gates’ Epstein ties and "pandemic" narrative fuel conspiracy theories, while Billy Graham’s 1970s warnings about "Zionist Jews" align with claims of U.S. foreign policy prioritizing Israel over domestic interests—including denying Holocaust gas chamber deaths via disputed Red Cross data. Marjorie Taylor Greene calls Trump’s MAGA a "big lie," accusing it of benefiting corporate donors and Israel, not American families. [Automatically generated summary]
Welcome, Tab Keynes Inconvenient Truth where Gary presents stories and video clips I don't know are coming for my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
Gary, there's so much going on in the world today.
What do you got for me now?
Oh my goodness.
We're going to have a couple of clips that are maybe even three in a row as I get everything lined up about the same subject, so I think y'all still enjoy it.
This is what I'm going to cut off a little short.
And then there's two more about the same subject.
So here we go.
Super Bowl 60, pitting the Seattle Seahawks against the New England Patriots at Levi Stadium, drew viewers who had long avoided the NFL, only to confirm their decision to abandon the league entirely.
This championship game, once a cornerstone of American culture, now exemplifies the infiltration of subversive agendas that have rendered professional sports unwatchable for traditional football fans, former players, and everyday citizens.
The broadcast served as a stark illustration of how the NFL has been commandeered to promote anti-American, anti-white, and anti-Western propaganda, driving away its core audience in favor of globalist ideologies.
The event unfolded as a relentless barrage of multicultural messaging, beginning with commercials that bombarded audiences with non-white faces in every ad.
Black, Latino, and African individuals dominated the screen, often paired with white characters in interracial relationships that reinforced a narrative of demographic replacement.
These advertisements, sponsored by corporations controlled by massive global investment firms, advanced environmental, social, and governance schemes designed to undermine white Western dominance.
The same firms dictate NFL content, ensuring that football, a sport invented by white Europeans in the late 19th century, becomes a vehicle for their economic opportunism and political power grabs.
Former NFL and professional sports fans, many of whom grew up idolizing the game as a symbol of hard work, discipline, and achievement, expressed disbelief and outrage.
They cited the Super Bowl as the epitome of why they stopped watching the league's embrace of Black Lives Matter activism, LGBTQ promotions, transgender advocacy, and other social engineering efforts that began escalating around 2020.
The COVID-19 era accelerated this shift with mandatory protocols and virtue signaling gestures transforming stadiums into platforms for societal control agendas.
College sports followed suit, turning athletic events into indoctrination sessions where political posturing overshadowed competition.
At the heart of the night's spectacle was the halftime show, headlined by Puerto Rican artist Bad Bunny.
Performing in Spanish amid reggaeton beats and trap rhythms, the set featured dancers in wild attire executing gyrations, twerking, and provocative hip-hop moves.
Cross-dressing elements and fluid sexual orientations were evident, with performers climbing on each other in exaggerated displays of sensuality.
The staging incorporated fruit-picking themes and sugar cane fields, symbolizing Puerto Rican heritage while ignoring football's roots.
Bad Bunny spiked a football at the conclusion, a defiant act signaling the takeover of American institutions by non-white cultures.
This performance, the first mostly in Spanish at a Super Bowl, amplified Puerto Rican and Latino dominance, enabled by historical policies like the 1898 Treaty of Paris and the 1917 Joan Shaffroth Act, which granted territorial citizenship and facilitated mass migration.
Viewers witnessed the culmination of decades of open borders, mass migration, and fraudulent immigration systems.
Legal and illegal inflows, riddled with deceit, have flooded urban centers like New York with non-white populations, allowing their cultures to infiltrate media and entertainment.
The halftime show embodied this invasion, excluding white performers and prioritizing deviant lifestyles over the sports heritage.
It declared that Latinos, blacks, and other minorities are spiking American football, literally and figuratively.
Okay, Dr. Tetzer, it's half a one.
Well, Gary, my son-in-law and I went to a local sports bar and we had draft beer and nachos while we watched the Super Bowl.
And I was particularly concerned with the halftime because I had independent reason to believe that the attack on Iran might take place, that it could be the sinking of the Abraham Lincoln, time to coincide with the halftime show carried out by Mossad but attributed to Iran to justify an American strike on that great nation,
which is dedicated to peace, having not launched a war of aggression against any other state since 1775.
Remember, the Declaration of Independence was 1776.
So I ran for longer than the United States has existed as a constitutional republic, has not launched a war of aggression against another state.
Would that could be said of us?
Meanwhile, I watched it.
I wasn't that close to the screen, but I didn't see anything that was particularly disturbing.
It seemed to me after, you know, 60 Super Bowls to have one Super Bowl that was dedicated to Puerto Rico, that that was okay with me.
In any case, we left the sports bar after the halftime.
I came home, watched the wrestling game with my wife.
The second half was better than the first.
When I went on my shows, then, you know, on the following day, I had both on Revolution Radio the Raw Deal, but I don't have callers.
When I did my Republic, my RBN show, however, the second hour, there were callers complaining all over the place.
And I explained why I hadn't found it particularly disturbing, but I also, of course, did not know Spanish.
But there were a lot of the themes you've just seen here in these newspapers of, you know, being all Hispanic, no whites, denigrating whites, Bah-ba.
I didn't have that sense about it.
But then I began to get complaints about the lyrics.
Yeah, I got that.
That's the next clip.
Next clip, we're going to show about that.
Okay.
And it turned out that Randy Fine, who's, in my judgment, a bit of a scumbag, had sent to the Gateway Pundit what he claimed to be the lyrics of one of the songs and that even InfoWars had published about it, which kind of threw me for a loop because the lyrics that were being published didn't coincide with any impression I had of what had actually been sung at the Super Bowl.
So let's take a look at the next clip, Gary, and I'll continue my critique.
All right.
We'll do that right now.
It's amazing what they were saying.
Well, I don't see how people can dance like this.
I don't see it either.
They're just hating.
Yep.
I mean, sure, listening to it without the backing track doesn't really sound pleasing, but the lyrics make up for it.
True, it is the artist's self-expression and message that actually matters.
Right, so what is the lyric?
I don't know.
I thought you knew it.
How the hell should I know?
I don't speak Spanish.
Translate.
Yep.
Translate.
Translate.
Okay, so this is the lyric of one of the songs he performed.
If your boyfriend doesn't eat your ass, then what the f is he for?
Let him lick it.
tell him to f**k off, mommy, because I do it all.
So what if the lyric doesn't live up to white christianity standards?
Yeah, the artist is just being creative.
Right, like the artist is being profoundly layered when he says, get home, mommy, so I can make you twerk.
I stick my finger in your ass while I eat your pussy.
Okay, that's the point is criticizing the halftime show, whether it's because of the whole performance being in Spanish or that the music was bad, is just racist.
Right.
Racism is the problem.
Right.
And I remember these same racists laughing when Megan DeStalion performed at Kamala Harris's rally.
Obviously, because she's black.
Obviously, there could be no other reason.
She was just twerking and rapping about her vagina at a presidential campaign.
As I said, they're just racist.
Exactly.
By the way, did you see Kid Rock's performance?
White?
Trash.
All right.
That should be a parody.
But Gary, Gary, Gary, those lyrics apparently were true of the original version of the songs, but not of what he sang at the Super Bowl.
So that I called.
I figured, well, who?
I mean, this is a Puerto Rican performer.
Who do I know that I can count on to give me a reliable translation of what he actually sang?
So I called Larry Rivera.
Yeah.
And I asked Larry if he'd watched.
He said, of course he'd watched and how he felt about it.
And he said he'd been so proud.
Tears had actually come to his eyes.
And I said, well, I'm encountering a controversy on the air.
People who are saying the lyrics were very nasty.
I had some claiming they were satanic or Luciferian and encouraging.
This was even in advance of the performance, watching Kid Rock as an alternative.
So I said, Larry, listen, was there anything wrong with Royce?
He said, absolutely not.
That he'd followed the whole thing very closely.
And I said, well, look, could you come on my show and talk about it?
And he agreed he would be able to do that.
So when I had the next show Tuesday, I had Larry on for the first 20 minutes of the second hour during which I take callers and the way the clock is organized.
There's a break at 20, I break at 30, I break at 50, and then top of the hour.
So I gave Larry the whole first 20 minutes.
He'd actually gone through every line that Bad Bunny had sung at the Super Bowl.
And they were all okay.
They were all in the bounds of reasonableness, certainly compared to certain past performances at the Super Bowl.
I thought it was tame, mild by comparison.
And yeah, you did have one sequence where they're shaking their booties.
You know, they're bending over and shaking their backs.
I didn't find that particularly disturbing.
Or I said that was kind of a Puerto Rican thing.
But in any case, I compared what Randy Fine had sent out and what InfoWars had published.
And they were talking about apparently the lyrics to the original songs when he released them.
Which I got to admit, Gary, they were dirty.
I mean, they were filthy.
But I was talking about what happened at the Super Bowl, and he did not sing those lyrics at the Super Bowl.
Missing Calls, Missing People00:06:22
Lyrics of the kind you were portraying there.
And what I think was a bit of a parody, but it got point across.
I mean, those appear to be, you know, authentic lyrics for the original songs, which would have just dumbfounded me had that been sung at the Super Bowl.
So we had an extended discussion.
It's still going on here a week later.
Yeah.
I'm still getting discussions about Mad Bunny on my show.
Now you have one more clip.
Go ahead, lay it on.
Okay.
Yeah, this isn't about the profanity.
This is about the commercials and the ringtone.
This commercial is important because I want you to see.
This is how they're going to manipulate people into normalizing this ring technology.
Remember, I've talked about this in the past.
All of these devices that we're allowing, bringing in on our own, hooking up to our home, thinking it's for our safety to prevent porch pirates, to prevent burglaries and all this other stuff.
It's all being used by the government.
They're the ones who are accessing the ring cameras.
They're the ones who are accessing your Alexa, all of it.
This is a spy world that we're living in.
Instead of putting us all in a big prison, we can't fit into one.
All the citizens of the world can't fit into a large prison.
So there's not a big enough one yet.
So they've used our homes and built them into virtual prisons.
Look at this commercial and then start thinking to yourself when they show you images like introducing Search Party, how, oh, that's so nice.
Amazon's going to work with their ring device with local police.
And if my dog goes missing, well, it'll connect to everybody else's phone.
I won't be able to bring the puppy home.
And then start thinking to yourself, who this really is for when you start thinking about social credit systems and a world that looks exactly like China looks.
This is airing during the Super Bowl because this is the type of propaganda that they use to normalize this tech.
And of course, the sheeple out there will think that we're all crazy and that the government, or excuse me, Amazon just came up with this idea because they want to help and they care so much about us.
This is Milo.
Petser family.
But every year, 10 million go missing.
And the way we look for them hasn't changed in years.
Until now.
One post of a dog's photo in the Ring app starts outdoor cameras looking for a match.
Search Party from Ring uses AI to help families find lost dogs.
Since launch, more than a dog a day has been reunited with their family.
Be a hero in your neighborhood with Search Party.
Available to everyone for free right now.
Join the neighborhood at ring.com.
So that's the frightening reality that they're building out.
Ring Super Bowl ad and listen thoroughly.
Have a dog or your cat.
And eventually when they tell you it's to find your child, it won't be for that either.
It'll be to find people like you and me who disagree online with what the government's doing when the government suddenly tells you that you have to wear a mask every day and you can no longer leave your house.
People who aren't vaccinated are no longer good citizens and need to be targeted by psychopathic citizens who want to take away everybody's freedom.
So Super Bowl 2026 will contain Ring's first Super Bowl commercial.
And the look at the spot I just showed you, the ad is dedicated to raising awareness about Ring's search party feature, which recently expanded to be available to non-Ring camera owners as well.
Missing every year.
You couldn't go missing if you wanted to go missing in this world.
That's how many cameras are already out there.
But children go missing everywhere.
Let's start with dogs.
Let's play on people's heartstrings from there.
And then, of course, we'll move to children.
And then from there, we'll just move to regular citizens.
Okay.
Well, Gary, you know, I'm not averse to conspiracy theories, right?
I mean, I'm called a conspiracy guy for crying out loud.
I haven't had a show on, you know, out of New York City.
Gary Null's network, PRN, called a conspiracy guy for, I don't know, I think maybe it was less than a year, but I did 65 shows.
You can find them online on my blog at jameshfencer.org.
Just put in the blog with the 65 shows.
You'll find really astonishing stuff where I got the boot where I was more or less in real time taking apart the Parkland fraud at the Marjorie Stoneman Green School down there, which was an alleged massacre on Valentine's Day, ironically, today being Valentine's Day once again.
And as it complained out, they had 3,500 kids there, that they let them go at one o'clock because it was Valentine's Day, that only a handful would stay behind to be the crisis actors.
I was taking the whole thing apart.
And between the first and the second segment, I was fired.
I think there was too much concern that I was doing too good a job in blowing these things apart.
So, you know, I'm obviously not averse to swear seat theories.
However, when it comes to this ring thing, I think he's got a little over the top.
Okay, honestly, I think there's a little excess of paranoia there.
I think these ring cameras are a good thing.
They record all kinds of events.
Yeah, they could, in the extreme, be adapted for bad purposes such as are being denounced here.
But honestly, helping to find your pet, missing kids, all that.
It's happening now with Samantha Guthrie's mother's kidnapping, which is very bizarre.
And because she had a pacemaker, but it was controlled by her Apple phone and her Apple phone was left home, I'm apprehensive that she could possibly even still be alive.
False Flag Victims Exposed00:13:58
But they do get a ransom demand.
Now, there you got a ring phone that's helping to identify the culprit, the perb who kidnapped her.
Pretty big guy wearing a mask.
He goes and picks up some flowers to put over the camera.
Kind of peculiar.
You would have thought he was anticipating to have just spray paint or something to, you know, take it out.
But in any case, I think this is going to prove to be one of the contributions that these ring phones can make to solving crimes.
So I'm not opposed to ring phones.
I don't think this attack on the commercial was appropriate or warranted.
And I'll just say I think, you know, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Very good.
Okay.
Next up, something completely different.
They are talking about Epstein today.
This has been around since the Obama administration.
This administration released over 3 million pages of documents, over 3 million.
And Donald Trump signed that law to release all of those documents.
He is the most transparent president in the nation's history.
And none of them, none of them ask Merrick Garland over the last four years one word about Jeffrey Epstein.
How ironic is that?
Well, today the Department of Justice released 3 million documents in the latest Epstein drop.
And some of the information in this drop was pretty darn damning against the president.
These just don't sound made up.
They just don't really sound made up.
Very, very disturbing files.
They were so damning that the DOJ actually removed the pages after the fact.
But we have them.
This is what we saw later on.
Was this page not found when trying to access the documents?
Previously, the documents were there.
They're claiming, though, the DOJ is saying, no, we've released everything.
We're done.
What will be done about this?
Probably nothing.
In fact, this is what Todd Blanche with the Department of Justice, this is what he had to say.
I don't think that the public or you all are going to uncover men within the Epstein files that abuse women.
Yeah, because we redacted it all, right?
Because these women apparently abused themselves.
RoConna has this to say.
He says, no, all the files are not released and you do have the names of the men.
You're just not releasing them.
If Blanche believes that there is no cover-up, then he should release the 302 files.
The 302 files are where the survivors name who these rich and powerful men are.
But if Blanche continues to not release the 302 statements, to not release the prosecution memos, then it's a cover-up.
That's it.
Just release the files.
But instead, they're playing games with us and covering things up and then deleting things and then saying, we gave you everything and there's nothing else to see here.
They just think we're so unbelievably stupid.
It's all just very bizarre.
And this is one of the biggest scandals with all these powerful people doing these very awful things that were clearly being done as a mode for blackmail so that everything in this country's foreign policy, all of our tax dollars, all of that being done, because these sickos couldn't contain themselves.
It's not just about the abuse of the girls.
It's the abuse of a country.
All right.
Well, like Kim Iverson, I've only discovered her, I don't know, last six months or so.
She's not quite up there with Candace and Tucker, but I like her.
I think she does a very good job.
She gets to the heart of the matter.
She's very clear.
And I think this is a good example and illustration.
Pam Bondi is being breaked over the coals by Congress.
She's adopted a host of inconsistent positions.
At one point, we had a report.
She told Trump his name was all over the Epstein files, which apparently is true.
I gathered some 38,000 mentions of Donald Trump in the files that have been released so far.
Then she would say she was about to release the Epstein files and they were sitting on her desk.
And she would say there were no Epstein files.
And she would say, there are no indications that men, other men, were abusing other than Epstein.
I mean, it's absurd, just absurd.
We all have plenty out there, redacted, unredacted.
It turns out some of the redacted can be unredacted.
You put them on a, I don't know if it's a Xerox, some kind of scanner, and it removes because it's a layer.
See, it's a layer on top, the redaction.
And you can remove the layer.
So we're getting a whole lot out there.
It's really grotesque.
And in fact, it's getting more and more serious, Gary.
And we got 3 million more pages to go.
The horrors of the Epstein extravaganza are going to have a permanent impact on the consciousness of this nation.
The grotesque immorality of the political elite in America is going to be indelible.
No one is going to be able to ever forget it if you've taken a serious look.
And frankly, the administration of justice in this country, the Attorney General Bondi, and this FBI Director Patel is little more than a clown show.
I'm really distressed to say that law and order in America is an antiquated thought.
It's not being pursued today, which means that the moral ethical foundation of the country is being allowed to collapse out of a desire to protect men guilty of evil acts, some of which are turning out to be virtually unspeakable.
And now it appears they're pointing in the direction even of cannibalism, Gary.
Not just sex abuse, not just ritual murder, but even cannibalism.
I mean, it is grotesque beyond imagination.
I hate to be the bearer of this message, but we have to confront the truth if we're going to deal with the reality that surrounds us, which turns out to encompass far more evil than the American, the average American could even conceive in his wildest dreams,
which are turning into nightmares before our very eyes.
Okay.
Excellent.
All right.
We're going to have a clip that I got from your site.
It's called Brian Davidson Takes a Victory Lap.
You're muted.
Yeah.
Okay.
So I guess I'm going to try to run an analysis on the new information related to vaccines.
I never trusted them.
The Amish don't have any, and they don't have any autism either.
Jimmy Doerr recently run a pretty extensive clip dealing with the CDC knew all along, but there was so much money in it.
The previous stories that we dealt with have to do with these mainstream media or semi-mainstream media guys that are now beginning to realize that all the people that they thought died in false flag events aren't really dead.
Duh.
But those of us who have been around for a long time that actually understand the game have been saying these people weren't dead for a long, long time.
Nobody believed us because everybody wanted to synchronize some form of the mainstream media story with the evidence and the facts.
And so they came up with some sort of weird hybrid solution where you've got some sort of blend of something's off.
I can't really tell what it is because the cognitive dissonance just won't go away that you've been lied to and you've believed a lie and you've allowed the fallacy of mass belief to change your mind and drive you a particular direction instead of following the evidence.
And that's the problem that we have.
We've been dealing with this for years.
Oh yeah, well, yeah, Sandy Hook wasn't right and it was fake, but the kids still died.
People still died.
Oh, Las Vegas, that wasn't right.
But, you know, people still died.
We have to admit that if we want to have any sort of credibility out there.
This has been happening for so long.
And we've been exposing it for how many years now, Jim?
30, 40 years.
These people don't, when they run these media propaganda operations, these people aren't killed.
They're just simply redeployed.
And it's the fake identity that gets killed.
Ask me.
I'm a private investigator.
I know who's real and who's not.
I know which names are real and which aren't.
I don't expose it on because it creates too much liability, but I certainly understand it and I know it.
And I can even track the characters that are inside these false flags.
But I don't want to go there because I just find that it's more trouble than it's worth as you get deeper and deeper and deeper down the rabbit hole.
Besides, everybody says, oh, you're crazy.
Well, we know exactly what's taking place and we have known it for years.
You should have been listening to us a long time ago.
I told you Charlie Kirk wasn't dead.
I told you Jeffrey Epstein wasn't dead.
I told you that the day after he died because I found the earliest and most reliable post related to being extracted from the cell.
I told you that these people aren't dead, but that's okay.
We take it one step at a time and we try to win one mind at a time.
Now, the fact that these mainstream media guys are still trying to come up with some hybrid strategy where it's sort of a synchronized blend of what they used to believe and what they're now coming to believe.
And so they come up with these weird dinosaurs of ideas like people are really dead, but the event was fake or staged.
You know, we've been seeing this for years.
It's worthless to even argue with these people.
O'Brien is so good at internet research.
No one can hold a candle to him, Gary.
He is absolutely sensational.
When he reached out to me years and years ago and wanted to do a show with me about mastering these techniques, which included photographic identification, I just sent him one photograph of the crime investigative unit in a parking lot in front of a school without any identification.
And he was able to nail it.
I mean, you know, I think it may have been even later that day got back to me and said, I've been taken in the Sandy Hook parking lot on the 14th, whereas I had inferred and actually said in the book that it was the evening of the 13th before they'd completed staging the scene,
because you got this row of four windows in classroom 10 that are undamaged in the photograph, and yet after the event, they would be damaged.
So it's fascinating to learn that it was even actually taken on the 14th after the event allegedly had taken place around 9.35 in the morning.
And they had police tape up and you had Wayne Carver, the medical examiner, leaning against the wall with his arm folded awaiting the arrival of his portable mortuary tent.
But this photograph all by itself proves conclusively this was fraudulent.
And that's true whether it was taken the evening of the 13th or the 14th.
Brian was able to use shadow analysis to identify exactly.
The guy is brilliant.
And I just want to say, you know, I couldn't have exposed one of these fraudulent stage events after another without the benefit of collaborators.
So with Sandy Hook, I had 13 contributors, including six PhDs, where we established that the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students or teachers there.
There had been a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control, where we even had the FEMA manual, which I published as Appendix A.
And of course, it blew the whole case apart, which is why Amazon banned the book less than a month after it gone on sale, even though it sold 500 copies.
500 copies in less than a month, it was going to be a runaway bestseller, Gary.
They had to nib it in the bot.
Demanding Real Science00:14:54
So I released it for free as a PDF, downloaded millions of times, I've been told.
In any case, Brian wasn't available then, but has made a big difference.
And of course, so much else has developed where participants in the drill have reached out to me, those who were cast as Emily Parker on the one hand and Victoria Soto on the other, by their mothers, because of which they hadn't signed non-disclosure agreements.
So when they saw me being beat up in the courts, they thought it was wrong and reached out to me through a mutable friend, Steve Lucia, whom I regard as one of my closest friends now to this day.
So Brian's, of course, absolutely right.
I extol his virtues.
He has assisted in cracking one case after another, including the Buffalo Tops grocery store, the Nashville, Las Vegas, a host of others.
Really does exceptional work and deserves the highest praise.
Awesome.
Okay, next up.
I can get it to work.
Here we go.
We need to vote schizos into office.
This is the secret war that's been going on since the dawn of time.
Now, most of the world is made up of normies.
Now, these people are taken advantage of very easily by psychos.
They prey on these people, they manipulate these people, they trick these people.
Normies, unfortunately, cannot see psychos, but you know who can?
Schizos, the heroes of our story.
Schizos are the natural predator of psychos.
We have pattern recognition abilities that are inexplicable.
Now, schizos were once upon a time revered as the kind of wise people of their collective groups.
Unfortunately, since psychos run the world, they've convinced all the normies to be afraid of the schizos.
I make videos sometimes online.
My wife tells me, look at my aura ring.
My heart rate increased to a very stressful state watching your video and then went back down.
Sorry, babe.
Psychos benefit from their lack of empathy and their attraction to cruelty, it seems.
And that allows them to crew out of power.
That power allows them to manipulate the normies to fear the schizo, to ostracize the schizo, to deny the schizo.
It never feels very good to say, I told you so when you're a schizo, and the I told you so's you're seeing are about like pedo elites running the world and stuff like that.
That feels bad.
And you go, well, I told you so, but schizos wish we'd listen to you sooner.
But that's my point.
We need to stop fearing and ostracizing the schizo and start opening our ears and hearts to hear the truth that they're telling us.
Because the conspiracy theorist schizo is almost always right.
Now, yes, they'll get some of the details around the edges a little wrong.
It sounds a little literal.
You need to understand it as poetry and metaphor.
I'll give you an example.
Birds aren't real.
That's a fun conspiracy theory that they're just little listening device robots that exist.
Now, there are real birds.
We know that to be true.
But are there also listening devices and surveillance devices everywhere hidden in the natural world, it seems?
We don't even know what the natural world is anymore.
We can't even trust if the world is natural or not anymore.
They're doing things without telling us.
They're observing us constantly.
Yes, yes.
There are things in the sky that are alien to us flying around that could just be drones.
That's all true.
One thing I've noticed, there aren't any schizo politicians I can think of.
Lots of normies, plenty of psychos.
They seem to make up our entire government.
What we need to do, start supporting the schizos.
We need to vote schizos into office as soon as we can.
Let's use voting.
That's a weapon.
And let's start looking for more schizo candidates.
Let's get some real weirdos in there.
Because at this point, what they're doing, that seems pretty weird to me.
They think it's too big to fail.
I think we need to blow it up.
All right.
What do you think about that one?
Well, that was extremely interesting.
I did a recent interview with Catherine Horton, who's a PhD particle physicist from Oxford and has led the legal fight against targeted individuals who have been hit with directed energy when she's married to Bill Binney of NSA fame.
They're both still under attack by directed energy weaponry.
We had a wonderful conversation about two weeks ago, Catherine and I, where she was talking about how the sociopaths and the psychopaths gravitate to political leadership and tend to control what here is being described as the normies.
And if you think of the normal bell-shaped curve, you know, the vast majority of people are in the middle and have rather normal emotional cognitive moral capabilities.
You know, they tend to respect other people.
They don't want to exploit them.
They want to treat other person with respect, which is actually the fundamental principle of morality, as I've elaborated in several places, including on oons.com in a piece entitled The Nature of Immorality and on my own blog in a piece called Evaluating Moral Theories,
which I encourage everyone to review because it's a good idea to know the difference between right and wrong and what makes an action right and what makes an action wrong.
I mean, we use these notions pretty much by habit, intuitively, just by virtue of cultural assimilation in an appropriate way.
But here's the theory that explains why right is right and wrong is wrong when it comes to morality and immorality.
So Catherine did a brilliant job.
What you have here is kind of the cliff notes version.
I think this is very good.
You notice it was on TikTok.
And the Zionists have declared TikTok to be their greatest enemy because it has short clips.
They're very well done.
They attract a very large audience.
They have an impact.
This is a perfect example.
This is a wonderful little piece, Gary.
And I'm very glad you included it.
And I encourage others, go to my Mitchu Channel, Jim Fetzer, and check out my more recent interview with Catherine Horton if you want to get into a deeper dive.
Okay.
All right.
This next clip is our friend Michael Ivey.
And this seems to be one of his subjects.
This is a six-minute clip, almost seven.
So y'all, everybody just kind of kicked back.
And it seems to be right up your alley, Dr. Fetzer.
Virology is pseudoscience, and the proof is hiding in plain sight in every middle school science textbook.
For the last few years, people like me have been in the trenches, debating with everyone from random people on the internet to actual real-life virologists.
And the most shocking thing we've discovered is that they have no idea what the scientific method is.
Or worse, they pretend it doesn't exist.
When you challenge their evidence using the basic logical steps of science that have been around for centuries, you get scrambled reactions.
Some virologists will agree the method exists, claim they follow it, and then show you a diagram of their experiment that gets everything wrong.
Others will straight up tell you there's no single scientific method, that the steps we outline are just something we made up.
But when you press them, they either go silent or hilariously end up describing the exact same steps they just said we invented.
It's gotten so weird that even some people on our side, the no virus side, have started saying the scientific method itself is a scam.
So what is the truth?
Does this method exist?
And if it does, why are so many scientists terrified of it?
Let's get back to basics.
What is science?
The word comes from the Latin scientia, meaning knowledge.
But not just any knowledge.
Knowing all the Pokemon doesn't make you a scientist.
Scientific knowledge has to be earned through a specific process.
Every major dictionary, from Merriam-Webster to Black's Law Dictionary, and every major science council agrees.
Science is the pursuit of knowledge following a systematic methodology based on evidence.
That methodology is the scientific method.
Without it, you don't have science.
You have, by definition, pseudoscience.
So what are these magical steps that virologists seem to hate?
It's not complicated.
First, you observe a natural phenomenon.
Something that happens in the real world, not in a lab.
Like, you see sick people.
Second, you form a hypothesis.
This is your educated guess about what's causing it.
This is where it gets critical.
You have to identify your independent variable.
The thing you think is the cause, like a virus, and your dependent variable.
The effect you observed.
The sickness.
Your independent variable must be something you can find, purify, and control.
Third, you must have a null hypothesis.
This is the opposite of your guess.
X does not cause Y.
A core principle of real science is falsifiability.
You have to be able to prove your own idea wrong.
If you can't, it's not science.
It's a belief system.
Fourth, you experiment.
You take your purified independent variable, the supposed cause, and introduce it to a healthy group.
You also have a control group that gets everything the same, just without that one variable.
You need to see if the cause actually produces the effect, and if the effect is absent in the control group.
Then you analyze the data and see if your hypothesis was validated or not.
This isn't new.
This logical process has roots going back to Aristotle, but it was really solidified by an Arab scientist named Ibn al-Haytham around 1000 AD.
He's called the first scientist because he insisted on experiments as the standard of proof.
He was so rigorous that his methods, used by Roger Bacon 200 years later, were able to prove many of Aristotle's long-held beliefs wrong.
This is what real science does.
It challenges old ideas.
So, why does virology fail this test?
Because they can never perform the most crucial step.
They have never, not once, properly isolated a virus from a sick person, purified it, and shown that it alone causes sickness in a healthy person, while a control group remains healthy.
They can't.
Their independent variable is a computer-generated sequence from a toxic soup of chemicals, monkey kidney cells, and antibiotics.
It's not isolated from nature.
The experiment is invalid before it even begins.
When you don't follow the scientific method, what you're doing is called pseudoscience.
Oxford defines it as, beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.
It looks like science.
It uses big words like science, but it lacks the rigor.
This is the secret.
This is why they get so angry and confused when you bring it up.
They know deep down that their entire field is built on a foundation that ignores the very definition of science.
Had they followed the method, the germ hypothesis would have been thrown out decades ago, along with the entire field of virology.
Instead, we live in a world where pseudoscience is king, where most published research is false, and where the people we're told to trust as scientists can't even pass a seventh grade science quiz.
It's not about being anti-science.
It's about demanding real science.
Okay, Dr. Fezer, that was from Mike Ivey.
Well, to the best of my knowledge, everything that was reported there is completely accurate, and it's extremely controversial, of course, because it throws into doubt the entire scientific discipline of virology.
I'm not an expert on virology, so I cannot offer definitive statements.
But I will say, Michael Ivey has spent a vast amount of time on this, and there is kind of a distilled exposition of what he discovered.
And so far as I can tell, they and he have got it right.
It's extremely interesting to have a whole field that may in fact be pseudo-scientific.
But as I follow the arguments, it looks as though that may be the case in this instance.
Without claiming to be authoritative on this issue, therefore, I will say what was presented there looks to me to be accurate.
And if that is correct, then the authenticity of the field of virology is very much in doubt to this day.
All right.
Okay, this is Bill Gates talking on regular news TV.
Dinners With Jeffrey00:02:18
Every minute I spent with him, I regret and I apologize that I did that.
Part of that issue of trust brings me to Jeffrey Epstein.
I want to know what your relationship with him was.
Yeah, I met Jeffrey in 2011.
So over a period of three years, I had a number of dinners with him.
The focus was always he knew a lot of very rich people and he was saying he could get them to give money to global health.
You know, in retrospect, that was a dead end.
And I've said many times, but I'll say again, I was foolish to spend time with him.
I was one of many people who regret ever knowing him.
You've no doubt seen the allegations, including some of them in the last 24 to 48 hours.
Are they true?
No, apparently Jeffrey wrote an email to himself.
That email was never sent.
The email is false.
So I don't know what his thinking was there.
Was he trying to attack me in some way?
But it just reminds me, every minute I spent with him, I regret and I apologize that I did that.
The problem is some of the things that he has sent and some of the information about other people that has come up in those files has been true.
Why would he do this and say this about you, do you think?
You know, it's factually true that I was only at dinners.
You know, I never went to the island.
I never met any women.
And so, you know, the more that comes out, the more clear it'll be that although the time was a mistake, it had nothing to do with that kind of behavior.
Is it frustrating to you, given what you've said, that this is now happening?
Not really.
I mean, people should, you know, hold people who are successful to a very high bar.
And so, you know, as these documents come out, they're going to be closely scrutinized.
Well, I don't think Bill Gates has any kind of case to make for excusing himself.
There's going to be no vindication for him or Alan Dershowitz or Bill Clinton or Hillary for that matter and a host of others.
Pandemic Fears00:02:48
It's monstrous.
It's bizarre.
It boggles the mind.
The degree of depravity.
Gates was already impaled on his own efforts to promote a pandemic.
He's been the foremost articulator of the risk, not of nuclear war, but of a worldwide pandemic.
He's been instrumental in fomenting anxiety about it and making it happen.
Talk about your pseudoscience.
There was no bona fide pandemic.
There were, in 2019, 300 million cases of the flu.
The following year, 3,000.
So how do you go from 30 million to 3,000?
You convert 297,000, you know, into the COVID.
I mean, they just renamed it.
John Rabaport, very good on this, and others as well.
Edward Hendry, very good on this.
He had 300 million to 297 million.
You know, I mean, it was a conversion.
It was a sleight of hand.
It was very artfully done.
You simply require paying a lot of attention to see what happens.
Scott Jensen was very good about this.
He was a doctor who is also a state senator from Minnesota.
Follow-up also, I have, you know, I mentioned this conspiracy guy stuff on my blog.
I've got two about that pandemic and the COVID shot, which turns out to be all too real.
So you got a fake pandemic, but you got a real shot that's actually toxic and is bringing about millions.
We even have the president of Pfizer saying their objective was to destroy, to terminate 50% of the world's population, Gary.
Well, the world pop was 8 billion.
They had a plan to terminate 4 billion souls from Earth.
I mean, the monstrosity, the gargantuan evil here, it even exceeds the horrors of the Epstein fiasco.
I mean, Gary, the inhumanity, man's inhumanity, a man in pursuit of global power is just unfathomable to the decent, normal, moral human mind.
Billy Graham's Implication00:04:08
There it is.
Okay.
All right.
We're coming very close to the end of the show.
This is an unusual clip.
It's Billy Graham talking with Richard Nixon.
It's unfortunate, but this has happened to Jews.
It happened in Spain.
It's happened in Germany.
It's happening.
And now it's going to happen in America if these people don't start behaving.
Maybe they have it that way.
You know, that's been the problem with our Jewish friends for centuries.
Well, they've always been through the Bible, at least.
God's a time piece, and he has judged them from generation to generation and yet used them, and they've kept their identity.
You see, the Bible makes a distinction, Mr. President, between two groups of Jews.
One is called the synagogue of Satan.
There's two different kinds.
And those people in the latter days are called the remnant of God's people, which will be Jewish people.
And then there's the synagogue of Satan.
And nearly all of your religious deceptions in the latter days, what the Bible speaks, latter days will be a thousand years, what they call the synagogue of Satan.
In other words, they are energized by a supernatural power called the devil.
This is what the Bible teaches, whether you believe it or don't believe it.
This is the biblical teaching.
And this is what I believe.
And I believe that you have, they have a strange brilliance about them.
They have a smart.
And they are energized, in my judgment, by supernatural powers.
But also, they do something else because they're not conspiring.
And you see, and of course, Hitler didn't, they had a stranglehold on Germany, on the banking of Germany, on everything in Germany.
And the media, they had the whole thing, you see.
And he went about it wrong.
But this stranglehold has got to be broken, or this country is going to go down the drink.
Yes, sir.
I can't ever say it, but I believe it.
Nobody said, but I like it the second time.
We might be able to do something.
Whether we like it or not, everybody thinks of you as conservative.
And then when you lean a little bit in that direction toward the sociological thing is the big thing, Nick Sorry.
What's that?
You have to, or you, the whole thing will be close to you.
You know, I mean, I don't care how conservative.
I'm sure I'm more conservative than you are.
At least you told me that one time.
And I think that's true.
But I have to lean a little bit.
You know, I go and I see friends with Mr. Rosenthal at the New York Times and people of that sort.
You know, and all the, I mean, not all the Jews, but a lot of the Jews are great friends of mine.
They swarm around me.
They're friendly to me because they know that I'm friendly with Israel, but they don't know how I really feel about what they're doing for this country.
And I have no power, no way to handle them.
But I would stand up if it, if, you know, under proper circumstances.
Okay.
That was odd.
Wow, is that a fascinating exchange, Gary?
Billy Graham's really implying that if Nixon had a second term, they might be able to do something about the influence of Israel on the American government.
That's really what he's saying is the bottom line.
What you've uncovered here might actually be the real reason for Watergate for getting Nixon out.
Gerald Ford was an abish as sad he couldn't walk and chew gum at the same time.
He'd be Hoover's man on the Warren Commission, keeping him informed about where they were headed so Hoover could cut him off, manipulate the evidence, get rid of witnesses, the whole shebang.
Alleged Holocaust Debunked00:06:50
This is really fascinating.
And I think, as an agnostic, I don't believe in the existence of God or of the devil, but I sure do believe in the difference between good and evil.
And I would suggest what Billy Graham is identifying there when he talks about the synagogue of Satan, a phrase I've never really embraced.
He's talking about the Talmudic Jewish supremacist Jews, the Zionists, as opposed to the Torah conventional Jews who don't have the megalomania that drives the Zionist Jews to want to rule the world.
And we're, you know, we're going through an extraordinary expose of the role of Israel in our government today because of the genocide on the one hand and the use of American force to bomb Iran,
which may be the most peace-dedicated nation the world has ever known, as I previously observed, not having launched a war of aggression since 1775.
Now, I have been to Iran in 2014.
I was invited to participate in an international conference, and I was flown by the Iranian government to Tehran.
It was an exhilarating experience.
There were intellectuals from all around the world there gathered together to address issues of common concern.
I made a presentation on 9-11, and as I recall, perhaps also on JFK, and they played the one, but not the other.
I think for some reason, 9-11 was too touchy a topic.
But my respect for Iran as a nation, its people, its heritage, which goes back thousands of years.
You got to understand, Iranian civilization is deep.
Thousands of years compared to America, 250.
We're just little kids on the block compared to the Iranians.
So when it comes to this conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran, actually, I wind up 100% on the side of Iran.
When your country is wrong, it's wrong.
And we need to speak out against it to get it back on the right track.
So I'm not your country, my country, right or wrong guy at all.
I believe if we are off the rails doing actions that are wrong, violating, in this case, international law, the UN Charter, the Geneva Convention, the Haitian Convention, we need to get back on track.
And I'm hopeful that Net Yahoo will not be able to convince Trump to undertake a massive bombing on Iran because it's going to have catastrophic consequences.
Iran is well prepared.
I predict if this goes forward, we're going to lose one or more carriers.
They have like 5,000 sailors, 3,500 sailors, 1,500 Marines on those carriers.
We're going to lose 10,000 American bases scattered throughout the Middle East.
And as Colonel McGregor recently observed, the whole U.S. presence in the Middle East at vast expense is to protect this little state the size of New Jersey.
We're all there to protect Israel.
And the expense is staggering.
Oh, you add it up.
It's into the trillions, in excess of a trillion expended on Israel through all these efforts.
We're fighting wars for Israel.
9-11 was an Israeli op to provide a pretext for the U.S. to take out the governments of seven countries in the next five years, which were deemed enemies of Israel.
They weren't enemies of the United States.
We had no bones to pick.
Not even with Iraq, for example, much less Syria or Lebanon.
I mean, the whole thing is outrageous, Gary.
Our foreign policy is a mishmash.
It's completely misconceived.
When he mentioned Hitler there, he said Hitler didn't do the right thing.
Well, he's talking about the alleged Holocaust.
Six million allegedly put to death in gas chambers.
But, Gary, there were no gas chambers.
There weren't six million put to death.
What Hitler did was to get them out of government because they were in banking.
And by doing that and securing the borders of Germany, he had performed an economic miracle for Germany to recover from the devastating economic events of the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I. Hitler performed an economic miracle.
There were Jews incarcerated in these camps.
They were sprayed with Zyklon B to kill body lice because it was spreading typhus and dysentery in the camps in order to preserve the health of the inmates for the simple reason you cannot yet work out of a corpse.
These were labor camps.
They were contributing to the war effort.
They were located near major industrial facilities like ammunition dumps.
So, you know, we've been plagued, we've been bamboozled.
International Committee of the Red Cross was keeping copious, detailed notes of every inmate in every camp, their age, their sex, their ethnicity, their religion, their cause of death.
And in 1993, they recalibrated the total.
296,081 from all causes combined, none of whom were put to death in gas chambers.
Done Research On MAGA00:04:48
I reviewed the bidding.
I've done the research.
And I say, if you've done the research, you're either a Holocaust denier or a big fat liar.
And Gary, once again, I compliment, this has been a superb series of video clips for us to address today.
Real quickly, do you have time for one more bonus clip?
It's about three minutes long.
Sure.
Okay, let's go ahead and do that.
And we'll call it a day.
Here we go.
You want to know what I really think about the MAGA movement I spent years defending?
I think people are realizing it was all a lie.
It was a big lie for the people.
And before you click away thinking this is some hit piece or that I've lost my mind, let me tell you exactly what happened when I sat down with Kim Iverson and said those words that are now exploding across the internet.
Because what I'm about to tell you isn't just about Trump or MAGA.
It's about the biggest political con job of our lifetime and how I went from being Trump's biggest defender in Congress to calling out the whole damn system.
I spent five years in Congress, five years fighting for what I thought was America first, five years defending a man I believed would drain the swamp, bring our troops home, and put American families before foreign countries and corporate donors.
And you know what I discovered?
The swamp never got drained.
It just put on a red hat.
When Kim Iverson asked me what happened to MAGA, why Trump gets in office, and all he talks about is other countries, Canada, Greenland, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Mexico, I had to be honest.
This isn't what we voted for.
This isn't what millions of Americans thought they were getting when they put that ballot in the box.
What MAGA is really serving in this administration, who they're serving, is their big donors, the big, big donors that donated all the money and continue to donate to the president's PACs and donate to that quarter billion dollar ballroom he's building.
Let me break this down for you because the media won't.
Those donors, those are the people that get the special favors.
They get the government contracts.
They get the pardons, or somebody they love or one of their friends gets a pardon.
It's not about you.
It's not about your family struggling to pay rent.
It's not about your kids who will never be able to afford a house.
It's not about Americans drowning in medical debt or watching their jobs disappear to AI and automation.
And people always want to make excuses.
Oh, it's his staff.
They want to blame everyone around him.
But there comes a point where people have to come to grips with this.
This is Donald Trump.
He's pretty hard to tell what to do.
Anybody that knows President Trump knows you can't push him around.
You can't tell him what to do.
So when I see him prioritizing Israel's wars over Minnesota's civil unrest, when I see American tax dollars flowing to foreign countries while American families can't afford groceries, when I see government contracts going to the same corporate cronies who write the biggest checks, that's a choice.
That's his choice.
I remember when Trump called me, this was back when the Epstein files were becoming an issue.
He told me straight up, my friends will get hurt, not let's get justice for the victims, not let's expose the truth.
My friends will get hurt.
And when JD Vance was asked about it, his response was, we'll look into it.
Look into it.
We had legislation ready to go.
We had the power to release every single document, every single photo, every single piece of evidence about the most powerful pedophile ring in modern history.
And the response was, we'll look into it.
That's when I started realizing what this really was.
MAGA became MIGA, Make Israel Great Again, or MVGA, Make Venezuela Great Again, or whatever other country Donald Trump decided was the priority that week.
But it sure as hell wasn't make America great again.
Not when American families are drowning and we're spending billions on foreign military operations that benefit oil companies and defense contractors.
The media keeps asking me why I turned on Trump.
I didn't turn on Trump.
Trump turned on the movement that elected him.
Okay, Dr. Fetcher, let's close it up.
Marjorie Taylor Greene is a magnificent human being, and I agree with every single word she had to say there, Gary.
I voted for the guy three times.
He's more persuasive than Barnaban and Bailey.
I mean, this guy turns out to be the supreme con man.
He's a marvelous marketeer.
Media Queries On Trump00:01:04
He has a genius for television.
But he's been a colossal disappointment in terms of fulfilling the promises of the MA movement.
If I choose between Marjorie Taylor Greene and Donald J. Trump, it's Marjorie Taylor Greene every day of the week.
Now as I recognize in retrospect how we have been played, and I'm only hoping that Trump's commitment to Israel, where those who regard him as a mashiac, as the God of Judaism returned to earth, doesn't send America into a tailspin by attacking Iran and the disastrous consequences that will follow therefrom.