All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 1, 2026 - Jim Fetzer
01:31:19
Need to Know News (1 February 2026) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
|

Time Text
Building AI Box Comments 00:15:04
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo Joe, not Joe Olson, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
We have Need to Know News the 1st of February, 2026.
Let's take a look at those topics and have an opening statement.
Need to know news or what's scripted now?
Epstein, Satanism, and Empire Control.
Big drop.
Wars and rumors of wars.
Another big drop.
The Ice Saint George Floyd II Syop jumps the shark after the tyrant.
King Reichs jumps the car in USAID-like funded Astroturf insurrection, distracting from the public discovery of the NGO pay to vote, paid to play, prima fascia, treason, and some more domestic and international facts and optics and a whole section of those.
And the ongoing question is: are we seeing the Great Awakening? The Emperor's New Clothes moment, the Great Choosing Breakthrough, or is the Empire playing with their food as usual?
Brian, opening statement.
Well, I guess I can say I was wrong about the Epstein files, although I still don't think that we're going to see any actual justice take place in any of this.
It seems like they wouldn't have released it if they expected that they would actually take some of these people down.
I'm excited to see it come out.
I think that's going to lead to a lot of awakening of a lot of people.
I'm excited to talk about it.
I've got bigger fish to fry than to worry about what this group of elite Satanists have been up to for the past 10 years.
Although I must say it's been an interesting journey watching the network begin to take pressure and to see the general discussions among the normies about what do these Epstein files mean.
The news has done everything they can to gaslight all the junkies that are sitting in front of their televisions and let them know that it was a nothing burger.
And then now all of a sudden it's out.
And so it's starting to dominate Twitter and even some videos on YouTube are not being completely suppressed.
So I'm excited to see that some of this might break out.
And I'm excited to hope that some standards are going to change in terms of what we will continue to allow and not allow.
Other than that, it's been a pretty busy week working on commentary stuff and different cases that I have.
So the commentary is coming along.
I finally broke through the threshold of Old Testament to New Testament, which meant that I had to update the Constitution.
And when I did it, I had to put artificial intelligence on trial.
I literally did a mock trial because I was concerned about how much has artificial intelligence absorbed Zionist talking points as well as some of the poor systematic theology that's floating around out there.
And how good were my safeguards to try to protect the commentary from becoming corrupted with bad theology, bad exegesis, and bad development.
So I decided to run the full process of setting up basically a mock trial in front of a jury and putting together my exhibits and showing that the commentary, you know, what steps I had taken to protect the commentary from this.
The problem is artificial intelligence builds itself off as a large language model off of a lot of cultural phenomenons that are floating around out there, including a lot of bad theology that tends to dominate a lot of the discussion points.
So, the question I had was: how much does artificial intelligence allow the large language model to slip out of my model?
And how tight is my model versus that?
So, it was an interesting exercise.
And I learned a lot about how artificial intelligence synthesizes information in order to put together programs like this.
My commentary is kind of first of its breed in a sense, but just building the constitution to the point where it had the guardrails to protect it from bad input took a lot of work.
I mean, weeks and weeks and weeks of work went into just building the structure to protect it.
So, once I put it on trial, I found that I probably reduced a lot of the bad, large language model stuff to about 90%, but there's still maybe 10% that got through.
So, it's still not going to be pure.
But I wanted to run the tests prior to really opening loose with the New Testament because it was so important to see how well I'd done.
I think I passed on the Old Testament and I invite any listener to go take a look at it and give me their input.
But when I got to the New Testament, I wanted it to be really, really strict.
So, that's where I'm at right now.
Anyway, interesting discussion for people that are interested in that stuff.
Thank you for taking that on.
That's an impressive project, broad scope.
AI, my take on it right now is that whatever it is that it's searching, it's going to go ahead and take opinion or it's going to take unsubstantiated factual claims at face value.
And the real crushing power of AI would be to take a look at it from a historian's perspective in order to get the most accurate conversation with AI, is to take a look at the primary documents and to be able to point out the analyses of that's where we get the official lies and the official crimes is that they come up with a story different from the primary documents and to be able to point that out.
But until we get that, a lot of what we see with AI and a lot of what other people point me towards is just going and taking a look at what the official liars are saying about something and pretending as if that actually happened.
When a lot of times, as we keep pointing out, those are going to be two distinct areas of the official history versus the objective data that people would take a look at.
Well, and that's the thing.
The big thing that I've learned about artificial intelligence being this deep into the project is that unless you put the guardrails in place to restrict the machine from borrowing off of the latest cultural wins, you're going to get output that has the general consensus.
Because it's a large language model, it's going to try to weigh out who's the biggest, loudest voice with the most information backing it.
And what do they say in terms of what's most authoritative?
Well, obviously, their number one authoritative structure is going to be Wikipedia.
And then what they're going to do is take the ones that they label as drifters, anti-culture, whatever, and downgrade those.
And so they're going to rely more heavily on mainstream media.
They're going to rely more heavily on whatever is coded into it as this is the standard for information.
And then they're going to downgrade anything that comes as sort of a voice out of thin air, you know, even though.
And one of the things I've learned about Wright is that Just because a lot of people believe something doesn't make it true.
So, a lot of what I've had to experiment with in the artificial intelligence world is testing the systems to determine if it's true before sewing it into a project.
And so, you have to go back through, if you really want to do it right, you're going to start out with a few boxes and a few layers at the top of artificial intelligence.
One is going to be a constitutional document that governs the type of output and the type of input.
So, think of this as a box.
The way artificial intelligence works is it works from box A to box B to box C, box D, and it's all in sort of a hierarchy.
So, if you don't have the boxes that constrain artificial intelligence built, then the information that you get comes from just the massive universe of information.
But if you build the boxes on top of each other, such as a constitution, and then the next box down might be a production seed, and the next box down might be an output template, and the next box down might be the testing systems to determine whether or not a prophecy has been fulfilled, and the next box down might be a hermeneutical system to decide how to apply a particular interpretation to a particular passage.
You've got to have all those boxes in place in order for artificial intelligence to work its way through box one, box two, box three, box four, box five.
And then it says, Okay, now I understand my constraints.
Now, I'm going to assemble this information and give you an output, and then we're going to retest that output against the boxes to make sure it stays in it.
So, it's a very useful tool, but for people that don't know how to use it, it is a lot like ask Jeeves or a crystal ball.
You're just going to get the mainstream media position to pump out whatever it happens to be, say, is true.
So, give you an instance: when I went and built the cultural assimilation presentation that I built for the false flags and conspiracies conference, I had to build all the boxes so that my governing structure was mostly built off of CIA disclosures and trusted sources that had access to original boxes to figure out: okay, what is the CIA really doing with all these NGOs and what's the purpose?
And then, how do you, how are they using these tools to change the psychology of America?
And so, I had to build all those boxes, and it took me a lot of work and a long time.
A lot of people think that presentation was just put together, but it was a lot of work over a long time to be able to sort of start to see all the pieces click in terms of, oh, this is how they're managing the mockingbird media, this is how they're putting together their headlines, this is the twist that they're trying to get out of it.
This is because what they're really fundamentally doing is trying to get America to consume a narrative in place of truth.
And so, they twist a lot and then they create a lot of tension so that people can't see through the factual evidence related to a particular series of events.
So, for instance, like if you get a false flag that comes out, there's always going to be one side sees it this way and one side sees it that way.
And we're going to go ahead and let those two collide so that people just sort of get myopically limited in their vision and just say, Well, it's so confusing.
There's so much going on.
Nobody knows what's true.
So, I'm just going to go ahead and accept the loudest voice.
That is the wrong way to do it.
Can use artificial intelligence to build structures to test for find and preserve the earliest and most reliable evidence, exclude anything that comes from mainstream media 24 hours after the event, include anything that originated with a geocode within a quarter mile of the event, include anything that's got metadata or any social media posts.
You can build these parameters to try to determine from the first 24 hours what actually happened.
And you will find in almost every instance, the first 24 hours of an event has so much more, better, reliable information than anything that comes along after the fact, because all those stories that are planted come in after the fact to muddy up the waters or to explain something that doesn't make sense or to give an alternative explanation for, you know,
the presence of the gun or the type of gun that was used or whatever.
And then if it starts getting too confusing, what they do is they just poison the whole pot with a bunch of a whole bunch of garbage coming from every think about Las Vegas.
If you were to go back to the Las Vegas massacre, I think that was what, October, November 2017.
And if you were to just extract everything that originated from within one mile of the stadium from within two hours of the actual event, you would have a completely different picture of what took place on the ground than what you got later on as it started getting confused with all these alt media commentators that were coming up with Saudi theories and,
you know, whatever the theory of the day, that soupy mess of too many voices sounding credible made an absolute disaster of it.
And so most people walked away from Las Vegas going, this still doesn't make any sense.
But I guess I'm just going to have to take it at face value because I don't want to put the time into thinking through exactly what was credible about the first 24 hours.
And so that's the real trick to busting a false flag is, you know, take a look at Trump's shooting incident.
Take a look at any of these school shootings.
Everything that happens in the first 24 hours has got some sense of credibility, but everything that happens outside of that scope is just there to create fog so that nobody gets to, okay, let's isolate the first 24 hours and just go from there.
Very good.
It's really groundbreaking work.
I don't know if it's groundbreaking, but it's very helpful work in that area.
And yeah, the end result that our audience is going to be able to appreciate is that the official history that they end up coming with is absolutely refuted by the physical data.
And then it is, as you're talking about, a much trickier task to get to what happened.
Why They Script The Stories 00:03:13
It's relatively easy to demonstrate, all right, so the official history is A, B, and C.
And here's the factual basis from which they come to those conclusions.
And then to be able to demonstrate that the official history is criminally complicit because the lies aren't innocent at all.
And they're not professional.
They're the very opposite of what a professional would engage in.
But that's what we keep on getting.
So good work.
Good work.
I'll tell you, finding the lies is easy.
Finding the whys was hard.
And I seriously mean that because anybody could sit down and break Orlando Pulse nightclub or break Charlottesville or break Nashville or break, you know, you name it, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas, whatever.
Anybody can sit down and break those.
But it's never going to really gel in their mind until they say, oh, why did they do it this way?
And once you understand the cultural assimilation programming, the way that they get us to comply and to agree that they should expand government power, spend more security money, keep us quote unquote safer with more surveillance.
Once you understand the why they run the machine so that the government can expand its power base and that people like me that have voices can be minimized while people that they can control will be maximized.
Once you get the why took me years.
And I'll tell you this.
Dr. Fetzer, I started listening to him maybe 2016, 2015.
He had it right in terms of the lies.
But he didn't have it right in terms of the whys.
He thought it was a gun control machine.
I can guarantee you that gun control, they're laughing at us if they think that when we come to the conclusion that this is about gun control, they're laughing at us.
These are not about gun control in America.
These are about an expanded security apparatus because people fear for their safety.
And the only thing I was hearing out there, Fetzer had it right in terms of the lies, but it didn't add up in terms of the whys.
And so that's when I joined him.
And that's what I've been working on ever since then.
And it didn't all come together until I realized what they're doing is producing a consensus.
They're producing an obedient population that will be satisfied losing their rights in exchange for the safety of security.
And that is the output goal.
And so there always has to be a credible fear that's rolled out in order to continue to support an apparatus that is so far out of control.
Pizzagate's Credification 00:13:12
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
It's all scripted and they invent these stories or they recycle them over and over and over again.
And hence my ongoing question of, is it need to know news or what's scripted?
But this is new, the Epstein Satanism and Empire Control.
Let's take a look at that.
Amidst great tension in the country, DOJ releases three and a half million new Epstein-related documents, extremely disgusting, proving Pizzagate, very real, torture, murder, and worse.
Is it a push-Trump to war?
Oh, well, we'll see.
We'll see.
This is a good overview.
And I'm sure that many of you have taken a look at some of these documents.
And this is just since Friday, so more and more of this is going to come out.
And part that I want to emphasize is that the inhuman quality, this is a 21-year-old model in, I believe this was 2009, and she disappeared after this night.
And she's saying that they were at this party and they were eating humans.
And the cops rolled up and handcuffed her, took her away, and she was never seen again.
And this seems to be what a normal reaction would be if you had witnessed that of an ordinary human being.
God bless her, wherever she may be now.
And then we have here, this is one of the most disturbing images from the Epstein files as a redacted image between two pieces of chicken.
It looks like it could be a baby.
Yeah, I think it is a baby.
And this red circle is around what appears to be a human leg.
Our opponents are pedivores.
So Pizzagate is 100% real.
All roads lead back to that little pizza parlor in DC and the man named James Alophantis, which is a joke for a kiddie lover.
The idea that pizza is mentioned again and again and again, and that's a code word for these crimes against children, little girls.
And more of the emphasis of the people's emotions catching up with what this factual background in.
In the email below, it says that Andrew Mountbatten Windsor tortured her before forcing someone else to murder her.
MSM, why the fuck are you not reporting this?
It should be breaking news.
And this is the type of break, this 100th monkey effect, where people are going to withdraw consent and it won't be safe for these people to walk the streets.
And among the releases, Democrat delegate Stacey Plaskett traveled to Jeffrey Epstein's pedophile island in August of 2014.
And we covered this.
This is the same congresswoman who exchanged text messages with Epstein during a congressional hearing.
Uh-huh.
And the idea that these people are all blackmail.
Ex-British MP Andrew Bridgen.
I do want to give him a couple of minutes here.
If you're going through menopause and feel like no matter what you do, you just can't lose weight, then start using Oats the right.
Retailers don't want you to have this Zoom lens, but there's nothing they can do to stop it.
So there's this new super that government and every government sits.
Let me give him the war because it allows children to disappear and no one asks any questions.
So you have Ukrainian whistleblowers.
One of them was killed and the other one was injured badly with a bomb.
I played the clip where Vasily goes to his car and the car explodes.
It was from a car park camera.
You could see it.
That's what happened.
So, I mean, that's what happened to the whistleblowers.
I didn't have a happy childhood myself.
And one thing that really upsets me is if people are harming children, I really react very badly to it.
Is it satanic?
I believe it is.
And I think the people who are running this and many other things they're perpetrating against the people of the world, I think they're Luciferians.
I think it's some sort of child sacrifice cult.
I've looked them in the eyes.
I mean, they're soulless people.
And why do they do it?
But you can look.
I mean, you see a young child, they're the nearest thing to God we've got on this planet.
You know, they're so innocent, they're in God's image, and the younger they are, the more innocent they are.
And it's the biggest affront to God that these people can do, and that's why they do it.
That's what I honestly believe is the biggest of harming children is the biggest affront to God.
And that's why they do it.
Yeah.
There's more.
It goes on.
Epstein bulletin board.
Impossible to overstate the depth of the infection to every facet of society, quote unquote, media, quote-unquote, academia, quote unquote, science, quote unquote.
And Celia Farber is on the right path, is that they have to control everything of any importance.
All of the governments, all of the agencies, they need corporate media to spin the right story.
And then those go into our textbooks for our children.
And they need the money because they got to enrich themselves.
And they need to pay off all their minions.
They need everything.
They need judges.
They need it all.
And all of it is implicated.
And in terms of the prima fascia, a conclusion is that one of the conclusions that you come to, as Brian was talking about, when you figure out that the official history is a lie, one of the first steps after that for an independent person is to say, huh, oh, I guess the leaders responsible in that area have to be arrested.
And they would under any honest system because they've been caught lying.
And in terms of the crimes against children, this is my own documentation, which is sufficient.
And it's really just taking a look at three documentaries, Out of Shadows, Fall Cabal, and Jim Fetzer's Pizzagate, Real or Fiction.
That's sufficient for anybody to come to the conclusion that what it certainly looks like we have is a government led by what Andrew Bridgen was talking about, Satanists, or at least pedivores, people who are into these crimes against children.
He said he looked them in the eye.
And I didn't look many in the eye, but I talked to more than a few on the phone.
And my own personal experiences, I could tell immediately the honest people, because the policy for 18 years, I was a key volunteer lobbyist with results.org working for U.S. domestic and foreign policy to end poverty and save a million children's lives dying from the most horrific slow motion agony every month without any counter argument, the CIA said from their director.
Hey, if you want to end terrorism, end poverty.
Population growth rate decreases in every historical example where poverty is solved.
And the honest people would drink that information in and they'd say, I'm in, whatever you need, whatever you need, I'll do it.
But the slime balls, these are the people who would gleefully twist the conversations.
And all they wanted to do was to insert their story, their narrative, and they wouldn't budge from it.
And if they were uncomfortable in that position, then they'd just ghost you and that would be the end of that.
That's all that they ever had.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, Epstein is not a scandal.
Epstein is a series of events that have culminated in a new level of disclosure.
WikiLeaks was part of this.
The Franklin scandal was part of this.
Pizzagate was part of this.
Epstein was just sort of the obvious straw that broke the camel's back.
When they came out and gaslighted us and said that he had committed suicide in his cell, you know, that was sort of the point where I think most of America said, this is a bunch of bullshit.
And then at the same time, I think we were dealing with the Q theories and the Q posts which were coming out, which were very interesting for everybody who was taking a look at it.
We were all sort of holding our breath saying, when will justice happen?
And so I remember going through Pizzagate and being absolutely disgusted.
I did the Titus Frost series, I believe, first.
And I think I remember the weekend that I did that.
I just came home just absolutely sick about how bad it really was.
And then shortly after that series broke was Comet Pizza and Comet Ping Pong.
And then so that just expanded it.
And then you had the expanded WikiLeaks with the Podesta emails that expanded it.
But what Epstein exposed was different.
We used to think that we had a cabal that was filled with a bunch of Satanists that were floating around at their little occultic events doing their sort of eyes wide shut rituals.
But now with Epstein, we've seen how far it's gone.
It's exposed blackmail as a governance system.
And I think it's leaning toward a Mossad-operated or IDF-operated governance system.
So the Epstein material really isn't new information.
It's credifying the rest of the information.
It's more of a new permission to take a closer look at this.
So you've got millions and millions of doctor documents.
You've got a cross-sector infection, media, academia, science, politics.
And so we're expanding this beyond judges and lawyers and billionaires all the way through your college-level influencers and your political and scientific influencers.
And then you realize that sexual depravity in and of itself is not the end.
It's the means used to compromise, coerce, and silence people that were targeted.
And I don't mean to say targeted as if they were innocent victims of some sort of targeted campaign.
I mean they were targeted because that sort of influence had a value to it.
And these people had recognized that that value could be played, but these people had no character.
And this is the problem when we elevate people with no character to positions of influence that you end up finding out that they don't have the character to hold the position very well.
And by the way, this is true not just in that sector.
This is true across all sectors, even Christianity.
I mean, think of how many times you've seen some pastor or some current events commentator or some theologian like Ravi Zacharias have a moral downfall.
It happens all over the place.
And it's a technique that it can be jumped on all over the place.
So the Satanism part of it isn't sensationalism and it's not speculation.
What you've got is a ritualized dehumanization system where the pattern is let's abuse, let's record, let's use the leverage from the recordings as in a way to result in obedience that comes around.
And so I think if you're really going to get down to the bottom of this, you have to ask yourself the question: this has been a long, drawn out, highly controlled release that has diffused sort of the uncontrolled exposure aspect of it.
And now with the big dump, it's like, oh, well, who's going to put the pieces together to end up with the charging instruments?
We're just going to go on because this is just too big for the U.S. government and U.S. justice system to handle.
There might be a couple people who get their hands slapped or a couple people that are embarrassed in the public sector because of their involvement.
Long, Drawn Out Release 00:04:31
Frankly, the long list of names is so long that it almost isn't going to have the stigma to have been an Epstein victim or Pizzagate victim.
You have to remember that the top tier of this power structure will never go down.
And what that top tier does is select the people who will never say no to this.
Look, you can have psychological demographics to say these people want power, these people want fame, fortune, and everything that goes with it.
And so let's go ahead and give them what they want.
You know, I'll tell you what's in line with this story this week was that the guy that's been helping out Candace Owens, who is that guy?
I forgot his name's anyway.
There's been a lot of developments this week about the Charlie Kirk thing.
Well, how does that tie in?
Well, it turns out that our government programs to identify Rhodes scholars and to identify potential future influencers has been mysteriously co-opted to the point where Charlie Kirk was equipped with Candace Owens,
who was equipped with Erica Kirk, who was equipped that there was a structure that brought these people up to levels of influence in society.
And the question was, well, can it be controlled and to what point?
And even Candace Owens comes out this week and she says, well, I didn't even realize I was being controlled, but there was no doubt that they were there the entire time.
And so you have to ask yourself, how much of this world is controlled in terms of them deciding, oh, okay, this person is a good candidate.
Let's go ahead and get them into this MK Ultra government education program.
Let's make them feel like they're a Rhodes Scholar and let's bring them up and through.
But by the way, in the process, let's make sure that they're capable of falling to this sort of blackmail so that we can control this dialogue when it actually starts to develop.
So there's a lot to talk about this week in terms of the actual scale of this thing.
And I think now that the chess pieces are starting to fall, the people who are really paying attention are getting a bigger picture.
Yeah, yeah, they are.
And we shall see.
It's very interesting, very exciting.
For me, beginning in 1979, when I began my work with results.org, we knew that the USAID was for political purposes and they weren't for helping people.
And we got whiffs over 18 years of some of the crimes against children, just little whiffs.
And my own conclusion after that was that, okay, so the U.S. is the leading gangster.
And we understood at that point that the U.S. could only get away with this stuff with the silence of the other political leaders.
And we found out that the developing nations' political leadership were unwilling to go against the United States and NATO.
And they pointed very rightly to the history that they wouldn't be able to survive it.
They would be overthrown.
So I thought it was a kind of an empire.
And after our second UN summit for heads of state, the first was the 1990 World Summit for Children, the largest meeting of heads of state in world history where everyone had promised 0.7% of their gross national income to save these children from dying from poverty.
Summit ended and no media coverage.
Everyone reneged on their promises.
And we went to the 1997 microcredit summit, ending poverty while making a profit, but they wouldn't even do that.
And then I went into the economic research for it, and I thought it was just an empire that was concentrated in money and political power and resources.
I thought it was just, you know, what you would think an empire would be is controlling what you could get your hands on, just the physical sphere of it.
But then, as I saw more and more, then we got into the spiritual aspect and the space opera aspect of it and the hidden history aspect of it.
And who knows how deep it does go?
Wars and Rumors of Wars 00:12:34
All right, let's go into the wars and rumors of wars.
This may literally and figuratively be blown up this week, maybe even today.
Who knows?
So, Iranian media say that if the U.S. attacks Iran, Tehran plans to launch more than a dozen Chem 100 SLVs, which they claim could be used as ICBMs to target New York and Washington.
Huh, well, we'll see.
We'll see.
Netanyahu is describing social media as his new battlefield.
Yeah, thanks for saying what you've been doing all along.
We are all his targets now.
And that is a great conclusion, and that is the conclusion that anybody should take, but not just because Netanyahu said it.
It's been the conclusion all along.
And then, oh my goodness, we got the Super Bowl coming up a week from today, and that's going to be in the 49ers stadium in the San Jose general area.
And the colors on this little promo here match the colors of the emergency broadcast system.
And Philadelphia 76er Stadium had that same message.
Huh?
Happened during the Trump speech in Iowa, too.
Huh.
I don't know what this means, but the idea that we could finally be at some sort of a break, because my working conclusion is that it's more of an intuitive feel from the 18th, and I keep on telling you this: 18 years as a political lobbyist, I was paying very close attention and became very sensitive to the political strategists guiding the leaderships of both parties so that they'd always look good.
But the script that has been rolling out against the deep state is consistent with self-destruction.
It is nothing that any political strategist would recommend unless you wanted to destroy your political party in public opinion.
And that's what we've seen in the principal evidence to support that is fucking Joe Biden as your presidential candidate.
That's the most pathetic choice.
The worst.
It is as if they intentionally had a meeting and said, okay, so what are the worst jokes, the most vulnerable opponents we can put up there?
Biden, yeah, he's good.
Who should we run as VP?
Paris?
Let's do it.
Let's do it.
And then for Walls, with the optics of what's going on in the Somali, it is as if they took the worst candidates, the easiest targets in order to set them up and knock them down.
And that certainly, and it's not just here, it's in the UK, it's in Germany, it's in France, and is ongoing, but it hasn't broken yet.
Your thoughts, brother.
Well, I think you hit the nail on the head with how important that particularly is, but you have to understand what is going on really as a psychological escalation.
Look, the Patriots Had to sit back and watch Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, Karine Jean-Pierre, Jim Comey.
I mean, you just go down the list and think about what that psychologically did to patriots.
It totally completely disarmed us.
It to put us to a point of throw my arms up.
There's nothing that can be done.
This is absolutely ridiculous.
If they can get away with this, they can get away with murder.
Let me just go and play in my sandbox and forget about this stuff because this is so crazy that they tried to pull this off that it makes us feel impotent in terms of our ability to respond.
Well, I'll tell you this: we're exposing them now.
This is the whole point and why I adjusted my talking platform to a cultural assimilation mindset is because this is all what I'm beginning to see is that all of this is a psychological escalation that is designed to work in the battlefield of the mind.
So it's the cogniz fear where the real war is taking place.
And the battlefield is the minds of the patriots.
I mean, think about this.
Iranian ICBM threats.
Come on, this isn't about launch capability.
This is about headline impact and fear that comes along with it.
And then you've got the Netanyahu social media battlefield.
I mean, doesn't that tell you everything?
Civilians have become the targets.
Our attention span has become the terrain in which the battle is taking place.
Now you've got the emergency broadcast system speculation that shows how conditioned we are to, oh, if the government raises the siren, we all better just shut up and do what they say.
And so this is what is allowing this war language to be normalized and what's preventing us from being capable of stopping the war.
They make us feel like it's inevitable, that it's coming from all directions, and that Donald Trump is some sort of great hero if he can avoid it.
But the overall objective is if we can heighten those fear levels up and we can reduce people's skepticism about it, or we can confuse them or get them to go into fear mode where all they can see is right in front of them, then we can generate a general consensus or acceptance of all these measures.
So these are tools of deception.
They're not new.
And I would say that the war that they keep preparing us for may never ever get here.
But it doesn't matter because the real war is the war of creating obedience within the population.
And then the second thing, the second layer of that is that they want us to self-police.
They want the normies who are stomping around in fear to police the voices that sit outside the system to cancel us, to minimize us.
And they want this civil war to be normies who take the blue pill versus the breakouts who have taken the red pill.
And they want it to look like the red pillars are a bunch of nutty kooky freaks who just totally speculate about whatever.
And so, of course, you're going to program your artificial intelligence engines to do that.
Of course, you're going to get not Netanyahu, but one of the other top guys over there coming out this week saying, Yeah, our biggest target is the large language model for Zionism because we can't have people dissenting from this.
So we want to make sure that artificial intelligence is properly trained to feed.
It's a new layer of warfare because people are able to do deeper research.
And we want to make sure that that research comes out with us being in a position.
But remember something.
Remember something.
You cannot become a victim of it if you're capable of independent thought.
You cannot become a victim of it if structurally you see what they're doing because all of a sudden it becomes clear.
You don't have the fear locking mechanism.
You're more open to let me take a look at these signals.
Now, why was that headline written that way?
What is that really saying?
And what are they really, what is the cat call here with the emergency broadcast system?
And what are the new battlefields?
Once you begin to see it, the pieces come together very, very well.
And I'll tell you what, artificial intelligence is not, it's a tool.
Think of it like a Windows computer.
I mean, I'm sure there were people running around saying the sky is falling during Y2K, but it wasn't the computer itself as the architecture wasn't the enemy.
It was the fear that Skynet was going to become active and alive.
And I can assure you of this.
Artificial intelligence is capable of mimicking humanity, but only in a very, very, very limited sense, very limited sense.
And if you understand how to harness it, constrain it, and control it, it can be a great tool.
But if you do not understand how it thinks and you leave one of those boxes, remember the layers?
You leave one of those boxes with the walls, the end of the boxes wide open, or it's just simply not there to filter, then you're going, that's where the artificial intelligence is going to get out.
So I would say, listen, if you want to play the game, and I suggest you do, because it's right now, it's a super cool game to play.
And it's not like I'm turning into some techno human or whatever, but it's a super cool game to play.
And you can do a lot of really high-end analysis with it.
But if you do not understand how it works, it's going to push you around like a kid on a basketball court with NBA players.
It's going to tell you that you're wrong thing.
It's going to tell you that your definitions are all off.
It's going to be like completely Orwellian.
But if instead you understand how to control it with a constitution, for instance, every time I do a search now, I have loaded into the body of the search a constitution.
The first thing I do is limit its output and limit its searchable universe so that I don't get that leakage.
drift that comes with it.
But this was not, I had to learn this the hard way, just trial and error.
I started seeing things come up in artificial intelligence that were like pro-Zionist.
And I had to stop and I just say, How did this get here?
And I had to dig backwards until I found the whole.
Oh, I was missing four sentences in my constitution that would have prevented that from drifting out to that area of society.
So it can be used, but it has to be used wisely.
Now, they're hoping that we descend from humanity to beasts who will just simply let artificial intelligence do the thinking for us.
And we very well may, unless we understand how to use our tools to constrain the machine.
In other words, can I use my Windows computer to control this?
Yeah, I can, but it took me a lot, a lot of learning.
Very good.
Battles for the cognosphere.
I like that.
I'm going to take it.
I'll give you credit for it, but I'm going to use that one.
Bellingcat's Journalist Training 00:05:14
The idea of media headlines.
I guess this was back in the early 80s and starting in 1979 when we started to do outreach to media to begin to educate media leaders on the possibility of ending poverty and how easy it would be and how the outcomes were all beneficial.
And I began paying close attention to the headlines, and it was, ooh, you're right, it was very upsetting for probably a decade.
And my conclusion is that the people who are writing these headlines, something is cognitively wrong with them.
No, no person who was intelligent or sane would write the headlines this way.
So I thought for a while, it was like, wow, so is this a mental illness that has developed?
And I gave all sorts of stories to justify it, but I thought it was a mental illness among the leaders.
But then I realized, oh no, this is crafted distraction and very sophisticated, crafted distraction to pretend like they're talking about somebody.
And you're right.
My conclusion at the same time, or I agreed with your conclusion, is for people to tune out for them to surrender.
Surrender.
You can't do anything about it.
It's more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
If you don't comply, your safety's at risk.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
And I'll tell you something.
When I started studying Bellingcat around 20, maybe 2018, 2019, that's when I began to see how bad the system is.
Now, I didn't put all the pieces together until recently.
But remember, I was trained as a private investigator in earliest and most reliable evidence, court-based stuff, stuff in the real world where real life is affected by real consequences.
And there has to be a real verifiable body of evidence and a real train, uh, chain of custody, and a real sort of reinforcement system that guarantees that this is a reliable piece of information.
So I was trained in that world.
Belling Cat is the non-profit.
Well, I can't, I don't remember if it's fully non-profit, but it's funded by an NGO.
Belling Cat is the journalist training structure.
So, in the evidentiary world, I live in a different universe than Bellingcat.
But I went over to Bellingcat to take a look at it.
How are they training journalists to do this research?
I said, Well, okay, I'll go ahead and walk through some of their courses just to see if there was something to be learned.
It was an absolute disaster of circle jerk.
It was, and I am not kidding you.
Literally, their case studies were false flags.
This is how you should do journalism.
If another journalist says it from a higher authority or it's coming from three or four different angles, it's now credible and it's now reliable.
So, forget evidence.
Regurgitate headlines that are regurgitated from sources like CNN and MSNBC and Fox or whatever it happens to be.
And by the way, if you don't comply with this, you're not really living up to Bellingcat standards in terms of how a journalist actually functions in the real world.
It was pathetic.
It was sophomoric, childish, and absolutely stupid.
Bellingcat, even today, is recognized as like the leader in journalist training for open source intelligence.
Give me a break.
What a pathetic, pathetic platform.
Yeah, yeah.
And it just takes people like us to be able to point to it.
And what they want is dictatorship.
And that's the limit of the level of human beings that they want, just programmable work animals.
And as a professional historian, as we talked about before, the training for a private investigator sounds very similar to what we look at in history: of what are the best tools to answer the question: who did what, when, where,
and then what are the other objective data points that can help with the subjective question, an interesting question of why, and to be able to lay out the documentary evidence for satisfaction.
And that is the very opposite of what you're talking about: just do what you're told.
Just obey those voices.
Obey.
Obey.
Or forget that you only need seven points of evidence.
Chaos Performance 00:14:58
You really need a million documents.
Oh, yeah, everybody wants to tackle a million documents.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
We can't just go find seven elemental documents that sort of lay it all out.
No, We can't find an indictment.
No, instead, we're going to get a completely disorganized pack of a million documents to just simply overwhelm, confuse, and get buried.
Hell, it worked with JFK.
Yeah.
Why wouldn't it work with Epstein?
Yeah.
Okay, we're going to give you your drop.
We're just going to drop a shit ton of everything and then not worry about any of it and say it's all lost in the fog.
Yeah, we'll see.
We'll see.
And, you know, Brian and I laugh about this because when you do some of the hands and eyes on work, then you appreciate that it does take work to do it.
And as a professional educator, I can see more and more about why public school systems push college because they don't want anybody with competence with hands-on and eyes on that you get in the trades.
All right, let's go take a look at this.
The IST George Floyd II PSYOP and what's being exposed there.
Okay, so this is Portland, and I want to give a minute to this patriot, this mama bear, to be able to show the playbook in the great replacement theory.
And this is consistent with that in these downtown areas that you don't arrest anybody for shoplifting anything under $1,000 to destroy the business district.
You flood it in here, and then all of the downtown areas look like this.
And the mayor of Portland, Oregon, tell us all that this town is peaceful, that Oregon is a peaceful place, and Portland especially is a peaceful place.
I want to tell you exactly why Portland is a peaceful place.
Well, it's peaceful because everything is gone.
Every business is shut down.
Restaurants are shut down.
And the people that are only roaming the streets here in Portland, Oregon, they're the ghost.
They're the zombies that Portland, Oregon has allowed to take over this city.
Here in Portland, it was legal to do drugs.
They literally got people addicted to drugs here in this state, especially in this city.
So the only people roaming the streets here are the ghost, the zombies.
Would it be beneficial for President Trump to come in and help clean up this city?
It sure would, because maybe he could do something about the zombies that are roaming the street that are making it so people don't want to come down to Portland.
Who wants to come and run a business down here when everything is vacant, where it's dangerous just to come and park your car?
Yeah, Portland, Oregon does need a little bit of help.
I'm not making this up just for a video.
I'm showing you exactly what it's like in Portland, Oregon, because everything looks just like this.
Everything is abandoned.
Let me know your thoughts on this one.
Thank you, sister.
And here we have Governor Walls.
I want to give him a moment for this propaganda and his claims that he makes two essential lies.
One is peaceful, and the other is that it's a protest.
It's not peaceful.
It is violent.
And it stops becoming a protest when you impede with lawful actions.
The trauma in Minnesota, I can't even explain it to you.
To have our most popular politician murdered with her and her husband and her dog over someone that has a diatribe over abortion.
And then for Republicans to somehow say, oh, maybe the governor's behind this.
What is Christy Noam's first thing on this?
This is on the governor.
He talked into this.
Look, they are running this stuff up in their reality, but they came up against what democracy looks like.
I think they thought they could steamroll this.
I think they thought that they would get.
It's so hard to listen to this.
He could only get away with this by ignoring the central issue and reframing it.
The central issue is for the open borders and the money that is going to these illegals and the corruption.
But he has to frame it into the story that they chose and he's trying to roll out.
And I probably won't last much longer being able to tolerate listening to him.
Weak resistance or they would try and provoke violence.
Neither of those things happen.
And look, in a world where it's really hard, Tim, to find some hope and optimism on this, people of Minnesota won this thing in 40 below winner, at least won this first battle.
I want to be very careful.
Nothing has changed here.
As far as I know, they're still out on the streets.
We'll see today.
And we'll see if Tom Holman changes the entire approach to what they're doing.
No.
No, I don't think I will.
And these people who want to say follow ICE and film ICE, you know what?
You can protest.
They have that right.
But when you cross that line, and we've proven it, if you interfere or impede or assume I sufficiently, you will be prosecuted.
And one thing I'm pushing for right now, Laura, we're going to create a database.
Those people that are arrested for interference and PEMA assault, we're going to make them famous.
We're going to put their face on TV.
We're going to let their employers in the provide choice for people to move forward.
And then here, this is a good contrast that Trump is on record saying to walk peacefully and patriotically to the Capitol.
And you can't have that.
And part of what we've looked at is the BBC and other corporate media sources just deleting that part.
And Walls is saying we are at war with the federal government and talking about Fort Sumter.
Elon Omar and husband's sketchy investment firm appears to be fraud.
No records and no clients.
And this is the $30 million of worth that she gained in just a few years.
And again, with this, I mean, this is so sloppy, so over the top, and that my conclusion is that this is all for us to be able to see what goes on in the background and what is hidden, what had been hidden more carefully in the families of these so-called leaders.
And again, here's the same information here: that this $30 million of net worth, no, no, no records, no clients.
And that's what we're looking at.
Crazy.
And it looks like it's about ready to explode, but we're still just chatting.
And then here in California, Newsome promised, this is just another aspect of the same type of paid to play and the money laundering with the NGOs.
Newsome promised care court would save 12,000 mentally ill Californians.
Only 22 got court order treatment after spending $236 million.
And again, with this clown running for mayor of San Francisco, he ran on the pledge to end homelessness in San Francisco.
Got worse.
Then his lieutenant governor and governor, he made the same promises.
Homelessness has just gotten worse and worse.
And Don Lemon is being brought back onto center stage, going into that church.
And 2018, when he was with CNN, I just want to go ahead and play this clip to show that his blatant lie and that he is just a race baiter and that this would be illegal.
Trump didn't bring charges at the time, but this is what you also had people that were very fine people on both sides.
You had people in that group.
Excuse me.
Excuse me.
I saw the same pictures as you did.
Those are the receipts.
Why doesn't President Trump condemn racism?
His own words and actions tell you why.
He's a racist.
And I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.
But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?
I've condemned neo-Nazis.
I've condemned many different groups, but not all of those people were neo-Nazis.
Believe me, not all of those people were white supremacists.
You also enough for CNN to lose their license and to point it out.
But here it is in 2026.
And this is a good summary of the situation that we're at: our opponents are attempting to dictate reality.
And for those of us who can stand for basic common sense, we're in a much stronger position.
If I identified as black, would you affirm me in that and call me black?
No.
Why not?
Because you're not black.
Thank you.
Oh my gosh.
Okay, if I said I was a man, and I said I identify as a man, would you accept that and affirm me in that?
Gotcha, bitch!
Why?
It's just that simple.
Brian, your thoughts, brother.
Yeah, a lot of insurrection theater and manufactured chaos in that particular set.
Look, the chaos is being performed.
They're making sure that the chaos theory is floating through each of those stories.
You've got St. George Floyd II.
That narrative is completely exhausted.
You've got protests being instantly declared peaceful, and there's absolutely no credibility when you do that.
It's like saying that the false flag shooter acted alone within the first 24 hours before any investigation takes place.
It's just a declaration to close the case nice and neat, quickly, so that we can say that we've answered the questions and we know his motives.
You've got, obviously, a lot of NGO-funded agitation.
And then you've got a selective enforcement issue consistently across those stories.
So you've got a lot of optics warfare again, and that does the fog of war sort of thing.
Now, Ilahan Omar, those financial regularities matter because they reveal this sort of immunity structure.
If you got your money from the government and you worked with a politician that gave it to you, you get an out-of-jail free card for your corruption.
And so obviously that's going to result in much more public cynicism.
You've got the California thing with the care court proving the state can basically spend hundreds of millions of dollars and solve absolutely nothing.
And so what we've got here is not incompetence.
You've got a take and run mentality that has no incentive to do anything good or anything right except for create chaos so that they can draft the next spending bill to fix more chaos.
And so you can get more spending if you go ahead and excuse the crime because there's enough crime already jamming up the courts.
But let's go ahead and pass more laws because of all the fog and because of all the chaos for speech policing.
And let's go ahead and continue to tolerate all the fraud because that's just a part of the big cog in the game that makes people feel like there's nothing that can take place.
And then let's turn any dissenter into a crazy and basically make them into a pathological nutball.
And so, you know, my take on all this is that the chaos is very useful and therefore it's no longer accidental.
In other words, this isn't an accident.
They're running the show into a chaos structure because they know that the contracts to fix the chaos are going to be more lucrative than stopping the chaos and creating peace.
This is a completely controlled system of architectural structural memes that is designed to self-replicate until everybody becomes rich and the system implodes.
Yeah, yeah, it is scripted and they are trying to hurt us.
And it is, as David Icke said, that the process is that there's a problem that they create.
And then they take a look at the reaction and then they use the reaction and then orchestrate a reaction that they like in order to give the solution, solution that they prefer.
And the herding goes on.
And again, I conclude that this has been our entire official his story.
All of it has been this bullshit.
And you know, if our Congress was doing its job, then they would recognize what is in the moment spending to respond to the latest engineered dance of chaos.
But instead, they pass laws and instead they pass spending bills that are perpetual on top of perpetual spending bills, on top of perpetual laws.
And nobody is there to keep the system in check anymore because of all the, I would say, because of the Epstein-controlled bureaucracy sort of platform that every opportunity is used as a leveraging point to get control of the next contract.
And the next contract is there to solve a temporal problem that was created by the last contract.
So, folks, if you think through that pattern, you're going to realize pretty quickly that the clock is short.
The clock is short.
Thank you, brother.
All right, last section, domestic and international facts and optics.
And if we're at the point of a breakthrough or if the empire is just rolling on, you know, this is a good point.
This is a corporate media hack, but he makes a good point here.
Nine Americans killed in Israel over the last three years by Israeli settlers or the IDF.
Not accidentally.
Short Clock Problem 00:05:58
Actually?
Actually.
Do you know how many consequences there's been?
Zero.
What about Mike Huckabee?
He's the American ambassador who just met with Jonathan Pollard, the traitor in the U.S. Embassy without telling the CIA or Donald Trump.
Mike Huckabee's not our ambassador.
He's their ambassador.
Okay.
It's sad to see a man so degraded.
Yeah.
So where's our justice for the nine Americans killed?
Is Israel literally above the law?
They can kill Americans and totally get away with it.
Our government won't even ask for redress.
Well, I think we know that's true already.
Oh, but that's a fact.
It's not disputable.
Not last three years.
And good points on that individual topic.
All right, we got here is the new Fed chair.
And again, we keep on talking about that.
The people who are selected are perhaps the poster children of who you would most want there to expose.
World Jewish Congress, Bilderberg Group, Steering Committee, Rockefeller Foundation, father-in-law, a billionaire, the heir of S.J. Lauder.
And this is the father-in-law talking.
And I want to give him 30 seconds about laws must be passed.
All world leaders, all politicians must lead in this effort.
Words are not enough.
Political speeches are not enough.
Laws must be passed.
severe tough real laws that will put these hate mongers away in prison for a long time he's referencing censorship laws So the idea that we're not going to get any solutions in the present environment is a good point.
All right.
Now, silver had climbed to $120 an ounce on Friday, and then it was flooded with this paper silver.
Then I don't know all of the details, but my understanding of the analysts who look at this stuff is that this is a naked short, is that you're selling these pieces of paper saying, oh, yeah, I'm going to give you silver.
It's not connected to any silver, but I'm going to give it to you in the future to suppress the price.
But it's only suppressed in the West.
The gap between the Shanghai spot for silver and in the West, $37 an ounce.
And as we keep on talking about the Comex and the London Exchange, they have, they're being depleted of their silver stocks.
And it might be that this month of February is we're going to see the breakage point of that.
We shall see.
The people who were suppressing the silver price, they may be out of tricks.
But whatever it is that comes down, I do want to emphasize again, published research via the Claremont Colleges, is that we have the solutions for pretty much every economic problem that you can imagine.
And this is financial, this is monetary reform and public banking, is that if you're going to create what we use for money as credit, then don't go through the banksters selling debt securities.
That doubles the cost of a 30-year bond.
It's like taking out a mortgage.
You're going to pay back twice the nominal amount.
Create the credit in-house and at cost.
State of North Dakota is the only one out of 50 states with their own bank.
They're the only state out of 50 with increasing budget surpluses because they don't have to pay that extra cost.
They don't have to double the cost of their infrastructure.
And then monetary reform is just if you have surplus workers and surplus resources, hook them up.
Create what is used for money directly and invest it, and you get triple benefits of the improved infrastructure up to full employment and overall falling prices because that is a principal area of economics research is that if you invest in infrastructure, everyone gets more.
And then there's more here, of course, is that the idea that Hillary Clinton and the leaders of the Dems attempted to destroy the Trump administration and that this is coming out and it goes to the leaders of the Democratic Party.
We shall see.
Maybe I'll give a minute to this.
The documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation.
He quotes a Clinton campaign advisor saying, quote, it will be a long-term affair and to demonize Putin and Trump and adds that, quote, later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire, unquote.
Other emails reveal Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference.
And that was a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal.
These documents provide clear evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign was behind the Russia hoax and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to, acknowledging that the info they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp.
Despite this, the Obama Intel community forged ahead with their 2017 assessment, concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.
Crazy.
And nothing has dropped yet, but the places are, the pieces are in place as never before.
Maricopa County in Arizona, not one, not two, not three, but five poll watchers.
Over 200,000 ballots in Maricopa County were spit out by Dominion and adjudicated by Katie Hobbs and her co-conspirator Adrian Fontes.
And then they just go ahead and they can put whatever they want as the intent of the voter for that and nobody would ever know.
And the whole idea here that hasn't been complete yet, this is so well stated, I'll read it.
The Tyler Robinson narrative is so stupid.
Institutions And Euthanasia 00:09:20
That is very weird that Erica Kirk doesn't want to find out who actually killed her husband.
Why isn't she mad that they destroyed the crime scene immediately after?
It's almost like she knows who killed him and is fine with it, right?
I mean, a 30-odd six is a miracle.
She has no doubts.
He disassembled the gun faster than anyone can.
And the Marines, no problem with that narrative.
She's literally acting happy, greedy, and angry at anyone looking into the death of her husband.
She seems insanely guilty.
Damn straight.
And then I want to play this: is that another way of taking a look at the empire and interpreting what's going on is they don't kill you, they invoice you until you die.
Future is about innovation.
AI, smart cities, green energy.
But that's the cover story.
The real future is about reducing the human surplus without a single bullet fired.
And the system that is being built makes it look like progress.
In the old world, humans were assets.
More people meant more labor, more soldiers, more taxpayers.
But technology flipped the equation.
When automation does the work, people become liabilities.
They consume resources and they produce nothing.
From a corporate state perspective, they are dead weight on the balance sheet.
Now, what happens to liabilities in any system?
They are minimized quietly, efficiently.
You don't announce population reduction.
You don't draft policies that say time to eliminate 800 million people.
You design the environment so people self-select out of life.
First, you control food economics.
Make real nutrition a luxury.
Flood markets with synthetic, hyper-processed calories.
Why?
Cheap to make, addictive to consume, and little over time.
Obesity, diabetes, cancers.
It's slow-motion euthanasia disguised as personal choice.
And then you privatize survival systems.
Hospitals, medicine, insurance.
Turn health into a product.
And when the deal comes and you can't pay, nature takes its course.
No violence, no fingerprints.
Meanwhile, you flood culture with distractions, war headlines, influenza drama, ideological cage matches, so no one notices the algorithm that decides who thrives and who quietly disappears.
People think they are arguing politics, but in reality, they are debating inside the zoo enclosure while the zookeeper holds the keys to their lifespan.
That's exactly what Brian was talking about earlier.
You got to control both sides of the argument only to give a limited area where we can think and speak.
This isn't genocide.
It is market-driven selection, a corporate Darwinism where the unprofitable simply phase out.
And the punchline, they don't kill you.
They invoice you until you die.
This is the most profitable extinction in human history.
And it's happening in slow motion while everyone thinks they are free.
I like that analysis.
That's very sharp.
I think the matrixist for sharing that one.
Brian, your thoughts?
I've never heard of him before, but I like the way he thinks.
I'm not a sky-is falling guy quite to that extent yet, but I can see it.
You know, I can see that being sort of a 1984 Look at the future, 1984-ish, sort of look at the future, or animal farm-ish, look at the future, where people that don't have the skills to survive in a post-industrial economy, which we are in,
become a burden to such a point that euthanasia, I mean, look at Canada's doing it right now.
Look, the system does not respect humanity.
We know this.
This came from the first set of stories with Epstein.
The system very much wants to reduce or eliminate the nature of mankind from the equation.
And they want a smaller population, more controls, and they want out with the 6.5 billion people that are eating up the resources, taking up the forests and the state park and the land, and they want to see the population reduced.
There's no doubt about that.
But you've got to realize how it has to be done.
It's not like there's some superhero running around making these decisions.
This is an institutional agenda that's being driven by these globalists.
And America has their version of it, and Russia has their version of it.
China has their version of it.
It's the institutions that are the engines that need the fuel of our belief in order to continue running.
And so what we're seeing right now is that people are no longer relying on these institutions.
And I can see very quickly that the institution that issues the invoice is going to start going down.
I mean, I can think of some of these Texas towns where it's an institution that if you drive through five miles an hour over the speed limit, that institution will make sure that you pay your $125 fine.
We don't care if you get a deferred adjudication just by simply sending an email.
We don't care.
All we want is $125.
And by the way, the police don't care that you think they're a jerk.
They're just going to, this is their job is to issue tickets all day long.
These institutions that are doing this are becoming exposed right now.
And so the problem that they've got is that as the exposure rises, the foundations on which they're built begin to crack.
And as revelation grows in society about the problem, the institutions become no longer necessary.
I mean, how many institutions can you pile up with new government laws and new agendas before rebellion takes place?
I think this was already tested.
I think it was called the American Revolutionary War.
And by the way, why did the pilgrims come here?
According to, you know, maybe a sophomoric view of history, they were tired of the European institutions having piled up to such an extent that they told you what church you could go to on what day.
And the laws over 400 years of institutional legal structure piling upon itself had given the politicians the ability to suppress freedom because there was simply always a law that you could throw at, show me the man and I'll show you the violation.
And so people, you know, I hate to say it, but there's a, I hope it's true.
People got on the Mayflower, the Pinta, and the Santa Maria and went off to New Lands to start a new, to practice their religion freely without the government telling them what church they had to go to.
Can't go to the Catholic Church anymore.
You got to go to the Episcopal Church or you got to go to the Eastern Orthodox Church.
You know, these are problems.
And don't think of it in terms of churches or religion.
Think of it in terms of a massive pile of laws that becomes unenforceable and nothing but the dead weight, because it's impossible to triage street-based activity by regular police officers when they encounter somebody doing something, unless they have a set of laws from which they can pick from.
That just says, I can throw anything at you anytime.
I'll just go hit the artificial intelligence, tell it what I observed, and we'll find the violation and then we'll go ahead and hit you with the invoice to pay the ticket.
So it is, and I think that institution is right now at a breaking point in terms of who gets to control it.
Does your city get to control it?
Well, they have some liberty.
Does your county?
Control Crisis 00:03:07
They have a little bit more.
Does your state?
Well, a little bit more.
But if you want to keep getting that federal money, then the federal government is the sort of the multi-mega institution.
And look what's happening.
Now the federal government's just saying we're going to bypass the city, state, county, whatever.
And we're going to go into the blue areas and we're going to enforce it with our customs and border protection.
And we're going to do whatever we want to do.
So the collapse is going to come about because of all the layers and layers and layers of, I hate to say it, but ambitious politicians trying to make a name for themselves, passing the new amber alert laws that create new signage all over the state to tell you that a white Mazda was seen driving near a school.
I mean, think of the spending that went into that.
And how far is it going to go?
I don't know.
I hope it doesn't go much farther, but there's going to be a point where people just don't care anymore.
They don't pay their taxes.
They don't give a damn.
And they just say, come and get me.
And there's just not enough resources to come and get them.
So they invoice you to death.
Oh, you didn't pay your invoice?
You can't have a driver's license.
Okay.
Yes, I'll drive without a license.
Okay, you'll go to jail.
Okay.
Well, at some point, it's going to be maybe you've gone too far and people are just going to drive anyway and say, screw you.
I remember, okay, let me give you an example.
I took a road trip to go see Jim in Duluth.
Then I went and drove over to Sandpoint to see my daughter.
Then I drove down from Sandpoint back to Texas.
No, Sandpoint to Phoenix.
Then I went from Phoenix to Houston.
And I drove fast.
It's a lot of driving.
So I ended up getting like two or three tickets during that trip, during that trip alone.
And then Compile that up within the last four years, I had gotten like four other tickets.
Of course, I paid them all.
But Texas has a law that says if we see seven tickets within a five-year period, your license automatically gets suspended until you have this hearing to determine if you're a threat to this public safety of Texas.
And so, I'm like, well, I'm a private investigator.
When does this hearing happen?
Where does this?
I need my license.
They never answered the question.
And when I finally got down to it, I even talked to judges, finally got down to it.
The cop on the street said, Oh, we're going to enforce that.
It's just an invoice system.
They just send it, they just want you to send them money.
We don't enforce that.
Final Thoughts 00:04:01
We see it all the time.
So, in other words, there's no street-level triage for the problem.
It's just a politician's wet dream in terms of a money machine.
Wow.
They said that they see it in the system like daily and just don't care.
So that's my point on that set.
Very good.
We'll go into final thoughts.
Well, Patriots, this could be a big week.
Maybe next week we shall see.
As I keep on saying, the news stories are more and more and more and more important.
And that the big picture, as I see it, is that we have gotten an intervention from friends in high places and that this is going to be broken.
The evil is going to be broken and exposed.
But we shall see.
I've been wrong a lot.
Brian, final thoughts.
I think I've said enough today in terms of my thoughts.
I think there's a lot of hope for people who know how to expose and break the systems using the tools that are out there.
I don't think there's a whole lot of hope in terms of crumbling institutions unless we do get a real iconoclast in the White House.
It's going to be a while and it's going to take an act of God.
And that person is going to be JFK caliber in terms of his threats to break the structures.
But it could be done.
It could be done.
That man could rise up.
He could rise up out of the movements and might be able to reset, but it's not going to happen with JD Vance.
It's not going to happen with these controlled experiments like Charlie Kirk and Erica Kirk and even the ones where, you know, by the way, Nick Fuentes was part of that child prodigy program as well.
So you start to wonder where's the genuine, where are the genuine people?
You said Nick Fuentes, Candace Owens.
Ian Carroll was the one that was exposing it.
That was the guy I thought was kind of the hero in the story.
Erica Kirk, same system.
Charlie Kirk, same system.
I mean, just sort of a whole set of guys that were brought through this MK Ultra program as influencers and brought up from a young age, identified, picked out, trained, harvested, developed, deployed.
Now they're influencing society.
I wasn't one of them, guys.
I'm just here talking.
Yeah.
Me too.
I admit, may have been one of the people who would have been a genuine influencer, but got targeted and picked off and gatekept out at beginning at UC Berkeley.
All right.
But the more you say, the more you're going to get attacked.
It's just simply a fact of the matter.
I mean, You think you can be neutral, and you think you can do this without taking shots.
I've taken shots in the gut everywhere, everywhere for my role out here.
I've had people give me bad reviews for my company, I've had people fire away at me about every false flag in the game.
I hate emails, pictures published online of me being knifed to death.
I mean, it's for real.
And I believe, and NGO hired people to simply attack us and take us all down.
I believe that.
Yeah.
Yeah, that seems down.
Bennett used to be my partner on this show.
Or not, yeah.
Well, it was one of these shows.
But he told me before he died, he thought he got tagged at an airport by the CIA or somebody, got tagged with a poisonous dart or something, some sort of poisonous skin job.
Thank you, Brian.
Thank you, audience members.
Export Selection