All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 31, 2026 - Jim Fetzer
01:03:40
Gold Rush, White Pride, Wailing Wall Club, Greenland, 2nd And,kids Phones, Gaza, Whitney Webb
|

Time Text
Militia Debt and Political Manipulation 00:14:40
Welcome to episode 163, 163 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents video clips, stories I don't know are coming for my spontaneous and unrehearsed response, Gary.
What do you got for me today, my friend?
First of all, you're probably going to laugh at me, but it's 29 degrees.
And as Southern boys, I was talking to Michael, Mike Ivey, he said, being from Texas, we're just not built for this stuff.
So everyone's dying of it being cold, but I'm sure it's nothing compared to where you live.
Well, you know, I was at Duluth for 19 years and it's famous for cold temperatures.
We got down to 35 below zero, but right here in Wisconsin, to my astonishment, we've been as low as 41 below zero with a wind chill, Gary.
It's rather shocking.
You don't want to spend a lot of time outside in those conditions, I'll tell you.
Yeah, I rarely ever hear you complain about the cold.
I guess you're just built for it, you know, but as Southern boys, you get used to it after a couple of decades.
Yeah, a couple of decades, I got that.
And so we did have snow last year, so it's a little odd.
Now, I'd like to ask a question before we get on to our first video.
I understand your blog was taken down, and I wonder if you could tell us about that.
Oh, that was just a, that may have been merely a maintenance thing or a brief interruption.
It's back up, Gary.
Everything's good.
JamesAncer.org is hanging in there.
Okay, I feel better now.
Okay, we're going to start out with Kim Iverson and talking about billionaires and what they do with their money.
Well, this is shocking.
At the Israeli American Council, billionaires were asked how they buy and influence American politics.
They don't deny that this is exactly what they're doing.
You have Haim Sabin.
He's an Israeli-American billionaire media executive, extremely influential political donor, specifically to Democratic politics, whereas Miriam Adelson, they're on the stage with him, donates to Republicans.
So both sides there happily getting along, gleefully chatting about how they buy U.S. politicians.
This is what Haim Sabin had to say.
We had many sessions here about how important it is to get involved, to build a relationship with politicians and to have access.
You both mastered that.
So can you share with us, I want everyone to learn today, how do you build a relationship with the politicians?
You both mastered that, by the way.
He says, you both mastered that, like the buying of American politicians.
So how do you do it?
I understand what you're asking, um, I want to be cautious how I...
Well, you just get a guy named Epstein and you blackmail them.
That's what you do.
It's a system that we did not create.
It's a system that's in place.
And we just play within the system.
The contribution and the financial support grants you the access.
Oh my God!
He admitted!
He's not wrong.
It's not really their fault that they're able to do what they do.
It's our fault.
It's our system.
The system's in place and our politicians are up for sale.
Now, Miriam Adelson was asked the same question.
This is what she says.
Miri, you and Sheldon created a lot of relationship over the years with politicians.
I want you to share with everyone why is it so important and how do you do it?
Again, writing checks is part of it, but there is more than writing just checks.
So how do you do it?
Can you allow me not to answer?
You choose.
I want to be truthful, and there are so many things that I don't want to talk about.
I mean, first of all, what is she talking about that she can't talk about?
That's suspicious.
I'm just going to say Epstein.
Again, there's just a lot of money behind it and a lot of influence behind it and a lot of brainwashing and blackmailing.
And that is what's behind our politicians waving the Israeli flag, gleefully censoring Americans.
They're advocating for the benefit of a foreign country.
We have to somehow change the rules, somehow change the rules of the game in order to prevent this from happening now and from happening again.
Okay.
Well, I'm a big fan of Kim Iverson.
She does a lot of good work.
I only really discovered her, I don't know, six months ago, but I really like her stuff.
Yeah, and here you have Zionist Jewish billionaires not wanting to talk about how they do it because it's a combination of bribery on the one hand and blackmail on the other, the carrot and the stick.
So they manipulate our political figures.
I think it could be solved if there were laws against any dual citizen occupying any policy shaping or decision-making position within the American government, because you cannot know that their loyalty to the other state does not outweigh their loyalty to the United States, which was the point of the very first political speech I ever gave, Gary, at a Ron Paul Freedom Rally in 2008 on the grass outside the Capitol.
That would subsequently be published under the title 9-11 in the neocon agenda.
Also, we should require AIPAC to register as a foreign agent.
All the other representatives of foreign nations satisfy that requirement, but AIPAC has been allowed to be exempt.
JFK wanted them to register as foreign agents.
We know what happened to him.
Israel was only a part of the scheme.
There turned out to have been eight different shooters in D. Lee Plaza, only one of whom was Israeli.
But the Jewish influence here on our government is simply overwhelming, which is why, of course, so many refer to Congress as Israeli-occupied territory.
If we want to regain control of our own nation, its future, and its destiny, it must end, Gary.
And Kim has made a very nice contribution toward understanding the problem, which is a necessity if we're going to solve it.
Yeah, good cash there, just to blackmail she didn't want to talk about.
All right.
Okay.
Big question today in politics is: will Trump be able to keep his coalition together for the next election?
In the last election, Trump benefited by a weak economy and problems at the borders.
And that has continued to be an issue.
Matter of fact, affordability, which a name and an issue the Democrats initiated, is something that Trump has benefited by because of the weak economy.
But they're arguing, fussing over this, and deciding who's the worst and who's the best on these particular issues.
But the whole thing that bothers me most is they do not talk about the real issue in this economic argument.
The real issue is why don't they talk about the Fed?
Because they can talk about political excuses, but the real question is: it's the Fed stupid.
And as long as they don't look at the Fed, they can't solve this ongoing argument about affordability business.
So I argue that they better talk about the important issue, and that is what's going to happen to the Fed and what's going to happen to our money.
Of course, this is Ron Paul, who has been a wise man on this issue forever.
He's probably been talking about it for 50 years.
JFK had thoughts about circumventing or abolishing the Fed.
He printed United States notes, which is a young Marine Corps officer.
I held one in my hand.
It had a red embossed imprint instead of green.
It said United States notes rather than Federal Reserve.
Most Americans have no idea.
that the Fed is a consortium of private banks.
It's not a governmental institution.
It's semi-independent.
And that our national debt is an accumulation of interest on interest paid to the Fed for publishing the currency of the United States.
I mean, it's in the trillions now.
Interest on interest.
Some have observed that compound interest may be the greatest evil ever designed by the hand of man.
Well, that's what's got us to where we are today, where the interest on our debt is going to exceed our GDP at some point in time, Gary.
It's actually outrageous.
And what has to happen is its abolition.
Jack thought it was ridiculous because the Department of the Treasury could print the currency of the United States at no cost, no interest to the American people.
Let that sink in.
The Fed is not just an adequate institution.
It never had a place in American society.
It should not have been allowed to exist.
The vote that created it occurred at midnight on Christmas Eve when the Senate was virtually empty bereft, but nobody called for a quorum so you can go ahead and proceed.
It's outrageous.
It must be abolished.
It must be taken out of the American system.
The whole debt thing is preposterous.
There ought to be a debt jubilee, or as some have suggested, have Trump print a single coin with this vast amount of the debt, make it that value and give it to the Fed to get rid of it.
This is all outrageous, Gary.
Ron Paul was right then.
He was right now.
We must follow his advice, emancipate ourselves from this form of slavery to an entity that has no concern about the best interests of the United States, but simply enriches itself at the taxpayer's expense.
It's bad.
It's antiquated.
It should never have existed.
Let's get rid of the Fed.
Absolutely.
All right.
Yeah, I have one of those bills, and you're right, it says United States note right across the top.
Who goes to a protest and brings a gun?
I mean, was he not asking for some kind of trouble in that situation?
But as Secretary Noam said, no one who wants to be peaceful shows up at a protest with a firearm that is loaded with two full magazines.
That is not a peaceful protest.
And I don't know of any peaceful protester that shows up with a gun and ammunition rather than a sign.
I'm sorry that this gentleman is dead, but he did bring a nine millimeter semi-automatic weapon with two cartridges to what was supposed to be a peaceful protest.
Peaceful protesters don't have nine millimeter weapons.
He wasn't there to peacefully protest.
He was there to perpetuate violence.
I mean, as you know, he was an ICU nurse, worked for the Veterans Administration, and there's no evidence that he brandished the gun whatsoever.
The fact that he brought it to the USA.
He brought a disarm before.
He brought a gun.
I've been to a protest.
Guess what?
I didn't bring a gun.
I brought a billboard.
You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want.
It's that simple.
You don't have that right.
All right, little buddy.
Let's sit down and have a little chat about the Second Amendment because I see some people out here struggling with it like it's some kind of ancient treasure map written in pirate code.
It's not.
It's actually really simple once you stop overcomplicating it.
So let's break it down in a way that even a kid could understand.
What is the Second Amendment?
Think of the Second Amendment like a rule in the giant rulebook of America, also known as the Constitution.
It's a special rule written a long time ago that says people, yes, regular people like you and me, have the right to own and carry guns.
Now, here's exactly what it says.
A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Wow, that's a lot of old school wording.
But don't worry, I'm going to make it super simple.
This sentence has two parts, kind of like a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.
The first part, the peanut butter, a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state.
This part is just context.
It's explaining why the right to own guns is important.
Back in the 1700s, a militia was just a bunch of regular people who could grab their guns and defend their town if something bad happened.
They weren't full-time soldiers, just normal folks who knew that if bad guys ever come, they couldn't wait for the government to come save them.
Or the government was the bad guy.
The second part, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Boom.
That's the part that actually matters.
Let's break it down.
The right of the people, that means you and me, regular everyday people, not just soldiers, not just the government, but the people to keep and bear arms.
Keep means own, and bear means carry.
So regular people have the right to own and carry guns, shall not be infringed.
That's just a fancy way of saying the government can't mess with this.
It's not a suggestion.
It's literally a command.
It's not up for debate.
It's a straight-up rule.
So let's put it all together, shall we?
Regular people have the right to own and carry guns, and the government isn't allowed to take that right away.
That's it.
That's the whole point of the Second Amendment.
Now, what about that word militia?
See, some people get stuck on the word militia like it's some kind of cheat code that cancels out the rest of the amendment.
If the Second Amendment only applied to militias, then why does it say the right of the people and not the right of the militia?
And before you try to say, well, the militia today is the National Guard.
The Militia Misconception 00:04:42
No, it's not.
It's not what the militia meant back then.
A militia in the 1700s was just regular civilians who could defend themselves.
And how did they defend themselves?
With their own guns.
The founders didn't say, hey, only the government should have weapons and you should just hope they show up in time.
The right belongs to the people, not the government.
That's the whole point.
The Second Amendment isn't complicated.
People just pretend it is so that they can justify taking away gun rights.
It protects the rights of individual people.
It guarantees you can own and carry a gun.
And it says the government can't mess with that right.
That is it.
That's the whole thing.
So, no more pretending like it's some big mystery.
The right to own and carry guns belong to the people, and the government isn't allowed to take it away.
Simple.
That was very good, Gary, and I'm glad you combined the controversy over what happened to Alex Pretty in Minneapolis, where he was shot, and the right to keep and bear arms.
Very, very good combination.
I think the government is desperate to try to make out that this was a justifiable shoot.
But it's pretty obvious on the face that it was not, or at least it's open to serious doubt.
Though there is a brilliant attorney who says that once you got the guy, you know, contesting, fighting with the federal agents, that he's compromised himself, that he's going to be highly vulnerable, that no jury is going to hold the ICE agents responsible for having shot him because he was resisting and because the shout out, gun,
gun, gun, was made, even though his sidearm, and yeah, he was carrying a Sig Saur, had already been removed from its holster by another agent and taken away.
We have videos showing his hands were free of any weapon.
He never held his weapon.
He never pulled his weapon.
And I'll just say that this is focusing a lot of attention on the behavior of ICE agents.
It's created a huge controversy in Minnesota mass protests, trying to assume the character of the George Floyd protest, where Floyd actually died from fentanyl poisoning.
He had overdosed himself.
He was complaining about I can't breathe when he was still sitting in the police car before he was reportedly on the ground.
The officer, Chauvin, who was kneeling, was actually on his shoulder, not on his neck.
The whole thing appears, by the way, to have been a stage event using a mannequin.
You got George Floyd with hair before he's put in the car.
He's cuffed behind his back.
What we have lying on the ground has no hair and his hands are in front of its chest.
And when it's lifted up, it appears to have no legs.
In other words, it appears to have been a Sigma 7 African-American torso training dummy.
I've exposed this in Deception Galore, a presentation I made back in my 2021st False Wagon Conspiracy Conference, which you can find online, Deception Galore, and there's a whole lot more exposing the Jesse Smollett fakery and the Bubba Wallace, you know, necktie.
I mean, it was just a pull rope in a garage there.
The Democrats get really carried away here.
Let me say, if you want more about this, I do have a piece on the Second Amendment and the politics of gun control.
You can find it probably by a Google search.
But also, if you go to my blog and search for the 65 shows or Jim the Conspiracy Guy, scroll down, you'll find it.
I think it's among the most important presentations I ever put together.
So this is an excellent clip.
His explanation was flawless.
I like it a lot.
The government is just scrambling, trying to find an excuse because the political impact, even though a brilliant lawyer critiqued and said that they were legally acting in a manner that was not going to hold them at fault, the politics have been explosive.
Divide Growing in Canada 00:05:27
They want to, you know, disarm the problem and literally by talking about him having brought a weapon, but he was entirely entitled to do that.
And I don't like the response we got from all those figures.
This was a very appropriate expose, Gary, of what happened here.
And I like it.
Thank you for that.
All right.
Okay.
Now, this girl is really not happy about the way things are going in Canada.
And it's happening here.
Nice to hear this.
What you are seeing right now is not your imagination.
There is a divide growing in this country, and it is not coming from the people.
It is coming from the federal government.
Refugee claimants are considered residents of Canada for the purpose of federal benefits the moment that they receive their temporary documents.
That status unlocks multiple federal programs as long as they meet the income criteria.
Even if they've never worked here, they've never paid into our system and they have only been in Canada for days or weeks.
In Canada, the Resettlement Assistance Program, or RAP, covers almost every living expenses for newcomers.
Furniture, linens, household needs, transportation support, dietary allowances, clothing allowances, newborn allowances, maternity clothing and benefits, school allowances, the maximum child tax benefit, monthly income supports, housing top-ups, and even startup payments in the thousands.
Over $8,000.
They also receive interim federal health coverage, which includes health care, vision, and dental.
And today, I learned that they also qualify for the Canadian Dental Care Plan as well.
So they're getting double coverage for dental.
I will link this website for you so that you can look yourself.
My mind is honestly blown.
Meanwhile, Canadian families are paying higher taxes, higher rent, higher bills, and being told to tighten their belt.
Programs for our own veterans continue to be cut.
I want to be very clear.
I am not blaming the families that have arrived here.
Any one of us would take the help if we were in their situation.
This is about our government.
They continue stretching Canadians thinner while expanding programs that Canadians themselves cannot even access.
They created the rules, they've created this gap, and they are responsible for this resentment.
And now they turn around and say that the public is the problem, that raising concerns is somehow hatred or phobia, and now they're going to censor our speech left, right, and center.
So no, the problem is a system that gives full support to one group while telling the people that built this country that they should be grateful for scraps.
The divide is not natural.
It is not accidental.
It is engineered.
They continue draining working Canadians while sending hundreds of millions overseas.
Over 250 million more were announced today alone.
The moment that more Canadians start looking at the numbers for themselves, my hope is that the conversation changes fast.
The government is supposed to work for us, not the other way around, but they're not listening to us.
When will our leaders finally pause, look at the strain happening here at home, and put Canadians first so that they can stabilize this country?
Well, I think her critique is spot on.
There's so many developments in Canada that rather parallel the developments right here in the United States.
She's articulate.
She's knowledgeable.
She's nailing it.
I'd like to add a further thought, if I might, about the Second Amendment, Gary.
It turns out that Democrats basically make it an issue based upon the presumption that the more guns, the more crime, the more homicide, which turns out to be contrary to the facts.
As John Lott, among others, where Lott may be our leading expert on the statistics about guns and crime, the situation is precisely the opposite.
It turns out worldwide.
The more gun ownership, the lower the homicide rate.
I mean, just think about it this way.
Suppose you had a community where everyone is required to carry a gun in another community where there are no civilian, no law-abiding citizen is allowed to carry a gun.
That's basically what we have in communities like Chicago.
By having strict gun control laws, which criminals are not going to obey, remember that's what makes it criminals.
They violate the law.
They disregard the law.
They act contrary to the law.
They're going to carry their guns.
So what you're doing is taking guns away from law-abiding citizens who might in a position intervene and reduce crimes.
In fact, worldwide, Gary, the higher the gun ownership, the lower the homicide rate.
We had a nice illustration of Brazil of late.
A strong gun control guy was replaced by a weak gun control guy.
Sales skyrocketed.
Crime went down.
And he was replaced by a strong gun control guy.
And the homicide rate went right up.
I mean, the empirical facts contradict the Democrat slogan in politics here.
And the American people need to understand.
They need to have the right to keep and own guns.
Plans For New Gaza Revealed 00:16:18
It now has the opportunity.
It provides for self-defense for individuals who are targeted.
It allows citizens to intervene when criminals are performing criminal acts and they just happen to be in the vicinity.
But perhaps first and foremost, it allows the people to rise up against a tyrannical government, which is why it was enshrined as the Second Amendment, right after freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, because the Founding Fathers recognize its enormous importance.
So don't let yourself be played.
The Democrats are selling baloney that you don't want to buy.
Reject it and stand up for your rights.
Okay, you got it.
All right, next up.
Here's Gaza.
Listen up.
And y'all, please listen up because this is end time prophecy in our face.
So the plans for new Gaza were revealed at Davos.
And this is what they plan for it to look like.
A giant smart city.
And they're calling it Project Sunrise.
Of course, they didn't go over the plans of it being an actual smart city or that it will be a digital tokenized society.
But we can get all that information in this, the Great Trust.
It says Gaza is a regional trade hub at the crossroads of the ancient sea route, Egypt to Gaza to Babylon, and the incense trade route from India to Yemen to Arabia to Europe.
There will be 10 mega projects.
The Gaza Rebuild, the Abraham Gateway, the Central Highway, the Abrahamic Infrastructure Corridor, Gaza Port and Airport, Regional Water Hub, and get this, the Elon Musk Smart Manufacturing Zone.
You got to have that false prophet over there.
And get this, the American Data Safe Heaven, which are regional data centers with special U.S. AI regulation protected by the Great Trust and serving Israel.
We got to have something named after Trump.
So the Gaza Trump Riviera and Islands and Gaza Planned Cities.
The new design envisioned six to eight pie slice shaped smart cities with mixed-use residences, commerce, light industry, and other facilities.
All services and economy in these cities will be done through ID-based AI-powered digital systems.
Also, to develop a blockchain registry for land and tokenization.
And they will enable Gazans to redeem their tokens for ownership of rebuilt residences.
They will record all of token transactions and blockchain register.
Y'all, pretty much everything that we've been saying is coming to America, they are building over there in Gaza right now.
This is going to make it easy to control these people.
They are literally building the B system.
And it's almost like they're trying it out over there first.
While Gaza is being rebuilt, they will be staying in this area that looks like a microchip.
Now, looking at the map, Gaza is right here, this strip.
Jerusalem, right there.
And that is where the temple will be.
Daniel chapter 11, verse 45.
And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas and the glorious holy mountain.
Yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.
The seas and the glorious mountain.
We know that the tribulation is going to be Jacob's trouble, which is Israel's trouble.
So it makes sense that these plans that we've been saying is the B system for years now would start over there.
Okay.
Well, Stephen Witcoff and Jared Kushner, during a recent interview, inadvertently let it cat out of the peg that the plans for this elaborate reconstruction in Gaza were complete before October 7th.
So we get the story that October 7th was supposed to have initiated that, you know, Hamas conducted this breakthrough.
IDF former members were saying there's something completely wrong with this story because the security is so great.
They know if a pigeon crap's on the fence, that this couldn't happen, that there was a deliberate order coming down, apparently from Netanyahu himself, to not interview for seven or eight hours to allow them to make progress.
And they used American-made Apache helicopters to slaughter Jews and others who were at this rave, this, you know, this Jubilee, this music concert to run up the numbers.
And then, of course, claimed that they were acting in retaliation.
No such thing.
What's been going on in Gaza is an urban renewal project.
In order to build the new Gaza for which they had the plans already in existence, before October 7th, they got to get rid of all the buildings there, which has been going on systematically, killing as many Palestinians as they can.
They're hoping to use Somaliland, a newly created or designed part of Somalia, which Israel, I think, alone today has recognized because that's where they want to ship all the remaining Palestinians to a complete leveling, build this new magnificent city.
Remember, Donald Trump's a real estate guy.
He looks at Gaza as a real estate project.
He's talked about it as the Riviera of the Mediterranean.
He's salivating over having a Trump tower, maybe a Trump casino, all those kinds of things.
But what's going on, and others have acknowledged as much.
They have to destroy all the property and level it before the new construction can take place.
And that's what's been taking place before our very eyes for more than two years now, Gary.
It's outrageous.
It's disgusting.
It's a gross violation of human rights, international law, the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions.
They don't care.
They're moving ahead anyway.
They could care less as long as they're able to seize this wonderful property that historically belongs to the Palestinians and convert it to their own commercial and financial benefit.
It is that gross.
It is that corrupt.
And it's taking place before our very eyes today.
All right.
Great response.
Nobody can do it like Dr. Fetzer.
All right, TikTok.
No, but the government is saying the quiet part out loud.
Truth is, with 100 million Americans daily on TikTok on an average of 90 minutes a day, this is an issue.
I imagine most of you would like your networks to get 90 minutes a day from 100 million Americans.
We've got to make sure that we take care of that national security base concern.
Okay.
What is the truth, a national security base concern, unless the government is operating on the basis of lies?
And that's what we got today.
We got nothing but propaganda coming from the White House, the Department of War, the Department of Justice.
We do have some stunning new revelations, by the way.
They released 3 million more Epstein piles, and there are some pretty bad stuff in there, Gary, I'm given to understand.
But that's like a token.
I think Trump thought in the midst of all the war on Iran, and it now appears it's going to happen.
I've long observed that if you're going to have an international war, the first thing that'll happen is satellites will be destroyed.
A Russian spy satellite was taken out like last night, Gary.
And I guarantee that was itself an act of war.
And the shit is about to hit a fan over Iran.
Yeah, I'm very afraid of that myself.
Okay, here's Winnie Webb.
Alex Acosta, who was Secretary of Labor under Trump, arranged that when he was U.S. Attorney in Miami.
He signed off on that because he was told to back off of Epstein because Epstein belonged to intelligence.
So somehow Chomsky is completely ignorant of that.
And I don't really know how that's possible.
Herald reporting and Julie Brown and all of that was all about the sweetheart deal and how Epstein didn't really have time to serve.
So what we're having are two parallel things going on.
There's this push to digitalize everything, to get all of the money, no more cash.
It's all online.
The whole economy has to go online.
Everyone has to go online for work and this and that.
There's this push to make everything exist in the digital realm as part of the 4IR, the fourth industrial revolution and all this stuff, right?
And at the same time, we are having, on the flip side, a concerted push by governments around the world to completely control the digital realm.
So the censorship stuff we were talking about earlier is part of that.
But there's also these big efforts to end financial anonymity, to end just privacy online, have your internet activity or your social media accounts tied to a government-issued ID, right?
So everything's online, and you're not allowed to participate in the economy unless you're online.
And that entire online environment is completely surveilled, including all your financial transactions.
This is about an insane new surveillance paradigm.
And I would say, too, keep in mind this isn't just about surveilling what you do in the present moment or what you've done in the past.
This is using all of that data from past and present, feeding it into AI and using it to predict if you'll engage in naughty behavior.
Pre-crime minority report.
It's here.
Totally.
So you don't even have to actually engage in anything the state says is bad anymore.
They'll be like, this person might engage in something the state thinks is bad.
The reason Epstein wanted to talk to Chomsky, by the way, was all about artificial intelligence.
And Epstein had openly talked about this in an interview he gave in 2017, which the Wall Street Journal did not include.
So just more indications that they left out a lot of information that could have given important context, including about like Ehud Barak example, another name that comes up in this Wall Street Journal stuff.
Yeah, they declined to mention that he spent the night at the apartments owned by Epstein's brother, where all these traffic girls were housed and was seen there super frequently all of the time when he was visiting New York.
That's not Epstein's residence.
That's where the traffic girls were housed.
Yeah, and this is the former minister of Israel for Israel.
Well, he's not just a former prime minister of Israel.
He's also former head of Israeli military intelligence and a former defense minister of Israel as well.
So, and he was head of Israeli military intelligence during the Iran-Contra affair.
And when Robert Maxwell was doing the promise software stuff for Israeli military intelligence, Ehud Barak probably met him before 2003, as he claims.
Just like, you know, Bill Gates claimed that he met Epstein in 2011 as bunk.
It's hard to believe what these people say about their relationship with Epstein when there's indicators that seem to point to an earlier meeting.
Well, Whitney Webb is just brilliant, articulate.
She's got it all there right at the tip of her tongue.
She's impressed me tremendously, Gary.
I really like what she has to say.
And right here, of course, this is all rather devastating, but true.
So I think she's one of the few sources you can go to that you can count on.
I put her right up there with Jimmy Dore, who has a knack for cutting through the smoke and mirrors.
Like I've never seen it.
In fact, I'd say rather than watching any of the mainstream networks, which are nothing but Zionist propaganda these days, if all you did was watch Jimmy Dore on a regular basis, you'd be pretty well informed about what's actually going on in the real world.
So that's a nice clip.
The new revelations coming out appear to be very, very damning.
Not only about sex abuse, but about torturing children and murdering them, are in these millions of new files.
And I believe the American people, once they absorb what they're learning, are going to be more than disgusted and outraged.
But they're going to want to find those parties responsible to hold them accountable.
And I just say it's about time.
I agree.
All right.
Now, this next clip here, I want you to read all of the people and for how long they've been going to the wailing wall.
We are more than friends.
We are great allies.
We have so many opportunities in front of us.
You are mine now.
You belong to me.
Earlier, President Trump visited some of Jerusalem's most sacred sites.
He placed his hand on the western wall and put a prayer note in a crevice.
He is the first sitting U.S. president to visit what is considered the holiest site in Judaism that Iran must never be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon, never, ever.
My recommendation to the leaders to go to Israel.
And I think to support people, George.
There's a lot of names, boy, even Putin.
It was this sold show on television.
What was it like with Riley?
He'd say, what a revolting development this is.
You look at all that, and I got to say, what a revolting development that is.
How bad is that?
A succession of presidents, even a pope, you know, really demeaning themselves, debasing themselves by deferring to a mythical story.
You know, that whaling wall isn't even a part of the old temple.
That's actually a part of a Russian Roman fortress that was mistaken, where the historian of science, Nicholas Kohlerstrom, and I did presentations about it.
You can find it online.
Go to my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, and look at for Nick Kohlerstrom or Nicholas Kohlerstrom in his presentations, and you'll find it.
Nick is a very meticulous scholar.
The whole thing's fraudulent.
It's a historical myth.
And not to mention, you know, the theology that goes along with it, which is completely actually obscene if you get into the Talmudic whole storyline where Jews are so superior to the other races as they claim humans are to cattle,
and they're entitled to abuse them, use them, lie to them, even kill them with impunity.
Anti-Dollar Narratives Rising 00:06:00
The world is divided into the Jews and the Goyim, the Goyim, the non-Jews.
And the non-Jews only exist to serve the Jews.
Gary, this whole business is just horrific.
And yet you have Christians buying into this story in part because of the influence of what's known as the Schofield Bible that was done as an alternative to the King James Version in order to accent and idolize the role of Jews in history as God's chosen people,
where I've come to conclude that the merger of the Old Testament with the new was one of the greatest catastrophes of world history, because the Christian God is a God of compassion, mercy, love, forgiveness.
But the Jewish God is God of vengeance, of violence, even of genocide, of punishment, retaliation.
They're irreconcilable.
And the fact is that the Christian Zionists are displaying a form of theological schizophrenia that's unworthy of Americans.
And they need to disimbuse themselves of the false belief in which they've been brainwashed.
And today, of course, we have the Israelis paying lots of ministers, especially of evangelical churches, to promote Israel once again.
They're trying to regain their status in the eyes of the world post-a-genocide.
It ain't going to happen, Gary, but it won't be for lack of trying.
I agree.
Okay, now a little bit about gold and silver from the Corbett Report.
Unusual Fed rate check triggered free fall in the U.S. dollar.
Investors fleeing into gold.
The U.S. dollar has been in relative free fall since late Friday.
After it emerged, the New York Federal Reserve had conducted a rare rate check with currency traders on the dollar Japanese yuan exchange rate.
Fortune understands that the check was conducted per request from the U.S. Treasury.
The purpose of the move implies that the U.S. government may be considering coordinated action with the Bank of Japan to support the latter's currency.
As a result, traders began selling the dollar, which is now down more than 2.26 over the past five days against a standard basket of international currencies on an unusually steep decline given the gargantuan scale of the U.S. dollar in the global economy.
Even as they were riding in fortune over the last day alone, it lost 0.46%.
The yen was up more than 3% against the dollar over the same time period.
And then the Nikkei 225 stock fell 1.79%.
That is a sign that traders feared equities exposed to Japan's export trade would be hurt by a rising yen.
The price of gold, by the way, surged to a new record over $5,000 per troy ounce.
I think it maybe broke its record again today as I come to you January 28th.
That has added to the anti-dollar narrative on Wall Street.
The dollar, as we have talked about for 17 years on New World Next Week, used to be a safe haven asset.
But as the U.S. becomes more politically volatile, investors are going elsewhere.
It used to be the case that any eruption of geopolitical tension tended to rally the world around the U.S. dollar.
That's because the U.S., despite its role as guarantor of the old order and its obligation to join the fights, was seen as the safest and most accessible readout for haven for global flight capital.
And because it had a history of being relatively unscathed territorially from the conflicts, as there, of course, would be a gun behind every blade of grass from the conflicts it participated in or enjoined.
But what is happening now is different.
Instead of flocking to the U.S. dollar, traders flock to gold and its neighbor on the periodic table, e.g., silver and platinum doing well as well.
And defense stocks.
And the U.S. dollar has little to show for its erstwhile vauntedness.
We think this is because the implicit arrangements that have prevailed since World War II are unraveling, however slowly, he told clients seen in a note seen by Fortune at UBS.
Paul Donovan was similarly downbeat.
The deterioration in the international standing of the U.S. and recent domestic events may be corroding some of the perceived supports of the dollar's reserve status.
Well, the U.S. abused, you know, international commerce by politicizing the role of the dollar, that if you did actions politically the United States didn't like, it's going to sanction you.
You're not going to be able to participate in SWIFT or the International Bank of Commerce settlements, what have you.
BRICS has risen as a consequence.
The rubble is strong.
The dollar is weak.
That isn't going to change anytime soon.
And there's scandals emerging about sales of gold where those who are offering gold and send you a certificate may have sold the same amount of gold 10 or more times.
In other words, there's a lot of fraud out there.
I've always thought, you know, how can you invest in gold and what you get is a piece of paper that you may be unable to cash in?
A friend of mine who's been keen on gold actually acquires the physical gold, which, of course, is a whole other matter.
Why Greenland Holds Precious Metals 00:06:22
I can endorse that.
But getting a certificate, that's nothing more than a promissory note is a fool's error, and that's something you do not want to do.
Silver, of course, has become of great interest given the skyrocketing value of gold.
What, 5,000 an ounce for gold?
But it appears that silver is being manipulated to keep it from climbing.
I'm not completely clear on the politics there, but I can tell you, while, you know, metals, these precious metals have in the past represented very sound investment.
Today the situation is a whole lot more complicated and the risk enormously greater.
Just take into account.
This guy, very smart, very articulate.
He was nailing it.
I think you could believe everything he had to say.
I do.
I agree.
All right.
Next up.
Got to talk about Greenland.
Top of the agenda for Sakis Starmer, who's expected to meet with the Coalition of the Willing in Paris shortly.
It's going to be hosted by the French President Emmanuel Macron.
It's going to bring together 30 allies whose talks originally planned to center around peace in Ukraine.
Though they're likely, of course, to be distracted by Trump's threat to take over Greenland.
Our international affairs editor, Dominic Waghorn, has more.
Meta Fredriksen, the Danish Prime Minister here in Copenhagen earlier, said that she thinks that Donald Trump is serious about wanting to acquire Greenland and she warned him against it in no uncertain terms.
She said if America makes a move on Greenland, which is an autonomous part of Denmark, therefore, you know, part of the European Union, if you like, part of a NATO member country, she said if America makes a move in anyway on Greenland in a way that's not welcome, then that is the end of everything.
I think she said it could be the end of NATO.
She said, if a NATO member country attacks another NATO member country, then all bets are off.
And despite saying that, Donald Trump then went back to double down on what he was saying about Greenland, saying he absolutely must have it.
America must have it for national security reasons, for means of America's defense.
Look, Greenland doesn't make fentanyl.
It doesn't produce cocaine.
It's not run by a crazy right-wing or left-wing dictator.
It has no weapons of mass destruction.
There is no historic reason that stands up to scrutiny for America to have any claim on Greenland whatsoever.
It's just that Donald Trump would like to have it because he has this new kind of imperialistic view of what American foreign policy should be.
And the Danes point out that, you know, if he's concerned about national security and defense, well, it's already got one military base on Greenland America.
It's entitled to ask for another one if it wants to.
And if it wants to have some of the crack at some of the rare earth metals and some of the mineral wealth of Greenland, then it's entitled to apply for it, as many other countries have through their own corporations and try and get it out of very difficult icy Arctic conditions.
And American companies have been trying to do that for some time alongside many others.
So the Danes and the Greenlanders as well, apart from a very small minority of Greenlanders, say it makes absolutely no sense for Donald Trump to try and acquire Greenland.
They also say it's disrespectful and they're really offended by it.
Despite all of that, Donald Trump is still, it seems, very serious about trying to acquire it.
And I think it's fair to say, based on what he's saying and people around him are saying as well, that it's a fair bet that he's going to have a go.
Well, the public generally doesn't realize that the United States has the ability to track and map every precious metal anywhere on earth by airborne devices, possibly even satellite today.
They know what Greenland possesses in terms of precious metals.
I think that's what this is all about.
Many of us have had doubts about why in the world we were in Vietnam.
The only time I ever heard a reasonable explanation was Walter Cronkite, a 30-minute presentation 1968, explained that the offshore continental shelf of Vietnam was believed to be vastly oil-rich.
And the international oil companies had already subdivided.
They'd already mapped out which tracts of the continental shelf they wanted to possess.
It's the only time I ever saw that broadcast or that explanation advanced.
And I'd pay attention every time, every now and then there'd be a little article about, say, ExxonMobil has just leased this tract of the continental shelf off of Vietnam.
So it's going on a pace.
I believe here we have a similar situation with Greenland.
And it's all about precious metals.
I would surmise, given the to-do, that there were trillions.
There were trillions.
So Trump is offering, what, $704 billion plus $100,000 to each of the 57,000 residents of Greenland to buy the property?
There's some reports that it might actually happen.
It would be, of course, far preferable to have a commercial transaction to purchase Greenland from Denmark than it would be to try to take it by force, which would be unacceptable and would certainly shatter NATO forever by one NATO nation attacking another, just as was very appropriately reported.
That was a good sketch overall.
And I say the real motives were buried there, but it appears to be exploiting Greenland for vast mineral and other resources.
Who knows?
Maybe they have one of the world's great lithium deposits where lithium is used in computers, triggers for nuclear weapons, and for electric car batteries.
There are all kinds of potential motives for wanting to take Greenland that are based upon the resources it would provide.
And I tell you, that's the bottom line.
Okay.
Just a couple of clips left.
I Am Proud of My Ancestors 00:03:52
I'm proud to be white.
So before I begin, I want to acknowledge Australia's historic Anglo-Covid nation.
Not other people acknowledge us.
Just standing up and saying, I identify as an Anglo-Australian is considered somehow strange and weird and extreme.
Is it right that our children are being taught to hate their ancestors, to hate their own people?
People should be able to say, I'm Anglo.
I am proud of who I am and of my ancestors.
Well, that was very interesting and appropriate because discrimination is wrong in any form.
And we've got emerging discrimination against whites that's been taking place in the Western world.
And it's frankly absurd.
Even the Democrats have climbed on, many of which are white.
They want to protect blacks and minorities, especially the illegals, where things have gone haywire, absolutely bananas across the nation, Minnesota being the most striking example.
I actually see here a fission point that could separate two elements of the nation that strongly believe those who believe in law and order, the enforcement of federal law, that illegals ought to be deported.
Those who, on the other hand, want to protect the demographics, that the illegals have enabled them to gain many new houses in the seats in the House of Representatives.
Honestly, I think the Democrat going all out for the illegals is protecting their turf politically.
And then it turns out there are all these financial scams, including the daycare scams that turn out not to be just in Minnesota, but nationwide.
Well, a whole lot of that money has flowed into Act B, the Democrat political coffers.
I think the Democrats are worried that if they lose this source of funding via these scams and illegals, they'll never win another election in America.
That might be the case, but it's an appeal to pity.
It's the unfortunate consequences that would follow if you actually adhere to the law.
So I think there's actually here a potential for an American civil war.
I never thought black and white was going to do it.
After we elected a black man president, not once but twice.
Seemed to me that racial antagonism wasn't going to ever rise to the occasion of precipitating violence between states or groups.
But this, I think, illegal immigration has that potential, Gary.
So I say you got to pay attention.
There's no reason to apologize for your ethnic heritage.
Cell Phone Dilemma 00:06:13
Whites have made enormous contribution to history, intellectual, scientific, technological, and others.
I think it's very, very appropriate that he should be standing up for the integrity of the Austrian population, the whites there, even though my understanding historically is Australia was a penal colony for the British Empire.
They took all the scalliways and criminals and sent them down to Australia.
So it has a rather fascinating history.
But I can't argue with a basic premise that whites have nothing to apologize for.
We ought to be proud of our heritage, the contributions we've made to the world, which have been outstanding, and oppose any form of discrimination, much less efforts to depopulate whites from planet Earth, which is going on apace.
Don't be fooled.
The white population is a primary target of the depopulation agenda.
Let that sink in.
Okay, last clip.
No extra here, last clip of the day.
Well, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he is working with each state to ban cell phones in school.
He cited concerns about depression, low academic performance, suicidal ideation, substance abuse, and radiation exposure.
Watch.
Cell phones also produce electric magnetic radiation, which has been shown to damage, to do neurological damage to kids when it's around them all day and And to cause cellular damage and even cancer.
So cell phone use and social media use on the cell phone has been directly connected with depression, with poor performance in schools, with suicidal ideation, with substance abuse.
And, you know, it's the other countries that have done this.
The states that are doing this have found that it is a much healthier environment when kids are not using cell phones at schools.
Mr. Secretary, you've talked about the school.
And the teachers loved it.
I bet.
Yeah, the parents do too.
Well, immediately, this clip on X was hit with this community note saying, oh, no, cell phones do not cause cancer and we know it.
Do we have that community note?
It's okay if we don't.
So this is what they're doing is collapsing a scientific debate into an absolute claim, which is far stronger suggests that there is a negative effect of cell phone radiation than we care to admit.
And in fact, the U.S. government's own National Toxicology Program conducted a $30 million study decades long exposing rats to cell phone type radio frequency radiation.
And the results did show evidence of tumors in these rats and DNA damage.
The World Health Organization classifies radio frequency as a possible human carcinogen on the same category as lead and DDT.
So to say that there is absolutely no evidence is reckless and frankly, ignorant.
This is not settled, not by a long shot.
All right, let's close it up.
I'm not prepared to dispute the facts.
As RFK Jr. is elaborating, I don't have any doubt that cell phones do induce tumors.
I don't have any doubt we're going to have a proliferation with new generations that are raised on cell phones of different kinds of adverse health effects.
I don't dispute that.
What I assert is there's a dilemma here because notwithstanding the health effects that Secretary Kennedy was describing, cell phones are addictive.
I couldn't be without my cell phone.
I got a little flip phone.
It's antique, but it works for me.
And I'll tell you, cell phones have been as revolutionary in America as television has in the past.
This is one of those technological developments that has had enormous cultural impact.
And frankly, today, kids would rather give up their parents than they would their cell phones, Gary.
So there's a, I think it's an impossible task.
What you want to do is moderate.
It's like the difference between revolution and reform.
You want to moderate the use.
They should not be able to use their cell phones in school.
That's all.
They should shut off their cell phones, put them in their locker or whatever, so it doesn't interrupt with the educational experience.
But the idea of taking away cell phones from kids preposterous ain't going to happen.
You'd have a real revolution on your hands if you tried it.
So we got to get serious.
There are ways to moderate the use of cell phones, especially in educational institutions, as I've suggested.
But don't even think about taking them away from young people today.
It would generate opposition of the kind you've never seen before.
Children would disown their parents.
Gary, it's unreal, but that's where things stand right here in the USA today.
All right, let me just say this.
I took a trip to Italy.
I took a trip to Paris, and I wanted to observe, you know, their culture.
And their culture is on the phone doing this.
Everywhere I went, everyone was just on their phone no matter what.
That ship has already sailed and there's no coming back.
All right, this is Inconvenient Truth number 163, and we'll see you next week.
Thanks again, Jim.
My pleasure.
Export Selection