Truth vs. NEW$ Inc, Part 1 (12 January 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
|
Time
Text
And welcome, folks, to Truth vs. News, Incorporated.
All that news out there, we stand up for the truth, and we stand strong.
we've been doing it for about 20 years here every week and we've got the best panel to do it here i'm donald brown your host here on december the 12th in 2026 and uh we have uh well actually we have great you
We have Tim Petter, who is a workhorse extraordinaire who puts this whole show together and has quite a recipe of all kinds of things that we're talking about.
And of course, he's only done writing a couple of books like American Noobs on 9-11 and another little book on JFK and How Long to Live.
And of course, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
And we have about Boston and other things, and 40 other books that we find very interesting.
So, Jim is our host, and we also have Brian Davidson out of Texas.
He's a private investigator who seems to be able to search out the truth of all kinds of things and able to express it very well.
Plus, all the way over from Bali!
Comes in Joaquin Hagopian, a writer extraordinaire who does government rag posts that are just outstanding and really expose them.
Well I think a certain president and other people for all the corruption that's going on.
So what do we have today Jim?
I guess we're talking about new protests and about all kinds of massacres and all kinds of things that are in the air.
There's a lot going on, Don, but you've got to sort out the wheat from the chaff because of much of it is propaganda.
For example, we have the first report, new protests hit Iran as alarm grows over a crackdown massacre, so we're told by Newsmax, burnishing its In new protests against the clerical authorities overnight,
despite an internet shutdown, his rights group warned on Sunday the authorities were committing a massacre to quell the demonstrations.
That appears to be a gross exaggeration.
The protests, initially sparked by anger over the rising cost of living, we would have such protests here, have now become a movement against a theocratic government that has ruled Iran since 1979 revolution and have already lasted two weeks.
There appears to be no threat to the regime whatsoever.
The mass rallies are one of the biggest challenges of the rule of Supreme Leader Ayatollah al-Khaimani, 86, coming in the wake of Israel's 12-day war against the Islamic Republic in June. Which was backed by the United States, but where Iran walloped Israel, which planned for a ceasefire.
Meanwhile, the IRC...
So let me get this straight.
You're telling me I don't have to spend countless hours consolidating our company's financial data anymore?
Welcome back to 2C TV.
This is your global news channel, AMIR TUSI, and the situation in Iran is escalating very fast, as the Islamic Republic have now launched their military drones and personnel on against their own people in the capital and a number of other cities.
The United States military, under the leadership of President Trump, are now on standby for an attack on the IRGC bases.
They are assessing the situation as we speak.
we're going to go to the flight tracker as well to give you guys the latest on this whole saga as far as we know we currently have the live map there is a u.s navy aircraft that is around the island of gashm in iran we will be monitoring the mobilization of the troops from the american side There is a lot to cover.
Of course, subscribe to the channel if you haven't already. The Iranian people continue their uprising. This is the final battle now, literally, as millions have taken to the streets capturing the city centers, especially the capital in Tehran. Of course, Mashhad, Shiraz,
all the other cities as well. We're now in this live stream. Just unbelievable propaganda,
but Trump wants a predicate, a pretext to go into Iran and Iranian people, when we all know he's doing anything against Iran at the behest of Bibi Netanyahu. U.S. is ready to help Iranian protesters achieve freedom. Well,
we heard that before from the ruling Islamic regime, President Trump has said, as massive protests in the Middle Eastern nation enter their 14th day. The president offered a message of support and a promise of assistance. Iran is looking for freedom. Perhaps like never before,
the USA stands ready to help. Meanwhile, Iran hits back at Trump for his warning. And this, mind you, is all political theater. The ongoing protests in Iran have captured not only the attention of the world, but also a sharp response from the United States. It seems demonstrated across Iran are not backing down. In here now,
it's the sixth consecutive day, despite a regime that isn't exactly known for its taste in peaceful negotiations. These protests have erupted over a crumbling economy, runaway inflation,
and a currency taking a nosedive in value. Quite the trifecta to push a population over the edge. The response from the international community and President Trump has been robust. The president issuing a stark warning that should the Iranian regime decide to quash the protest with force,
the U.S. is not prepared but positioned to act. What utter rubbish. Meanwhile, we get a note of insanity from Larry Johnson. The CIA Mossad op to spark a color revolution in Iran has failed. The CIA Mossad plan to spark a color revolution in Iran,
which has attracted global attention and a tsunami of propaganda pieces portraying the Iranian protests as a massive, unstoppable popular movement, has failed. Protests continue in some parts of the country, but Iranian security forces have taken off the gloves and are fighting back. Casualty estimates are all over the board,
ranging from hundreds to thousands dead. Iranian officials have announced that the alleged ringleaders of violent protests will be publicly executed starting Wednesday. Yes, and we can expect to see them hanging from cranes in very public spaces, Joachim. I can't believe anyone has bought into this. Your thoughts? Yeah,
It's unbelievable how many people in the West are buying into it, and even people in the alt -news media, I've noticed, have also bought into it.
You know, I mean, Israel.
Pretty much It has infiltrated all the mainstream networks.
It's also going after TikTok and a lot of the online social platforms.
And so this is just more basic propaganda, you know, playbook.
Right out of the playbook, you make sure that the world knows that this whole population of Iran is so up in arms.
I think they have been under sanctions, obviously, since 1979 when the Islamic Revolution occurred.
They've been getting heavily sanctioned throughout that whole period.
And probably there is some inflation that's occurred and times are a little bit economically harder.
Probably for everybody in the world.
That's the trend.
And so maybe there is some rationale for discontent amongst a certain population in the country.
But That's all it takes is a little bit of movement, and then Israel jumps in.
They pay mercenaries to infiltrate Iran, and, I mean, that's one of the reasons why their decapitation strike the first day of the June 12-day war was so precise, because they had help on the ground inside Iran. They put their mercenaries in there to exaggerate,
to start burning buildings and vehicles and going after the security troops in Iran. There have been some deaths occurring on the part of the soldiers trying to quell the uprising. But I think it's so overinflated and so false. It's in our face. But,
you know, like I say, the West just feeds on this because, you know, that's what they've been going for. All the puppets and the media puppets are all going for war with Iran. And then to have Trump, big mouth Trump saying, oh, yeah, we're all standing by ready to help at any time, you know, like the people. Iran want him there. They want to see troops on the ground, you know,
from America in their country. Yeah, right. You know, I mean, come on. This is horrible. You know that the mileage that it seems to appear to be getting, you know, it's pretty bad. But the bottom line here is, yes, this is the pretext for the next move, which will be Airstrikes. They're probably going to go after another decapitation effort. This time,
though, Iran's air defense is prepared. They've been, you know, getting shipments from China and Russia on their military arms. They've already developed their own missile arsenal that,
you know, they use a thousand or something. You know, volume that they've got. So they are very well prepared for any kind of Middle East war on them the next go around. And we knew from the very start,
you know, as soon as Trump started doing his brigadaccio, I saved another war, you know, give me the Nobel Peace Prize, you know, for, quote, brokering the deal. Iran just continued that war and took out the government of Israel. That was what I wanted. But you know, Iran has,
they haven't invaded the country since the 18th century. Yeah, I know. Since 1775, where the Declaration of Independence was declared in 1776. Brian,
your thoughts? Point I guess I'm going to stick with is just because the media is telling us that unrest is breaking out doesn't necessarily mean that it actually is. We've seen so much fake video and artificial intelligence and substitution for narrative enforcement lately that it's hard for me to trust anything I see comes out of it,
especially when I see clear sides being written out. In this case, we've got one side. Framing it as an organic uprising against the government and the other side is framing it all as foreign manipulation. And of course, This is being given to us.
So I think, from our perspective, the best thing that we can do is realize that the media is going to use the structure to get us to adopt an interpretation.
As it's morally mandatory that we start this war before there's even any facts that have begun to stabilize about what the actual truth is.
So we're watching a lot of shock conditioning here, protest footage, claims of massacres, drone deployments, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
You know, What is that?
That's like a shock, conditioning response.
Very high emotion, very low verification, and, you know, very fast moral sorting.
It puts us in a position where we're kind of confused in terms of who are the good guys.
So the shock isn't there to inform us.
They're using the shock to get us to become more myopic about the issue where you frame it down to something as simple as right and wrong when simply the truth is that there's a lot more nuance to it.
So the two narratives that we already talked about.
basically CIA, Mossad, color revolutionary, you know, stuff that we're seeing, but you've got one, it's a popular uprising among oppressed people. By a brutal regime, and we have a moral obligation to intervene. And second, you've got the foreign interference narrative. Well, of course, when you see that, you're going to say CIA, Mossad,
because they've been historically the guys that did it. And they're very much the recognizable villains and heroes in this. But really, what Trump is doing is he's trying to get permission. To do this. And he's trying to manufacture it as much as possible. So, you know,
Whether the unrest is organic, manipulated, there's something in between, or if it even exists, I think all that is still contested.
But what I think is not even going to be contested is the pattern, shock, narrative control, moral obligation, pressure.
And they're trying to train us to think in terms of what are we going to do when the next crisis hits?
And this is real typical of any color revolution type change.
It's exactly what we did in Ukraine.
It's exactly what we've done all over the world when it comes to, oh, we don't like what they're doing because it offends our partners in Mossad or IDF.
So let's go ahead and chalk this up to this is a war we need to finish as quickly as possible.
And the best way to do it is to get the people to buy into it.
So that all of our current political structure don't end up with a black eye.
I think that about 70% of the American people are opposed to going to war with Iran.
So he's trying to figure out a rationale to sell it.
But it ain't happening.
Meanwhile, I'd like to add something.
I'd like to add something.
Go right ahead.
Go right ahead.
Joaquin. They're coming off the Venezuela coup. They're coming relatively fresh off the Syrian coup. So what we're seeing is there's You know,
wag the dog, misdirection, you know, he was catching a lot, Trump was catching a lot of heat, you know, and still is, on the Venezuela thing and the Greenland thing. So you switch gears and you go for the jugular because they've been going after Iran more than anybody else. And,
and so there's a degree or element of that. And, you know, but the bottom line is, if people pay attention, They're not going to get swayed by the propaganda. This is what America does. Prior to every war,
they go into this, and then they almost always do a false flag to actually enter the war and try and convince people, which, sadly, Americans go along with wars all the time. But we can't allow this to happen again,
because I'll tell you, if they go after Iran, There is no turning back from World War III on multiple war fronts, because I don't believe that Russia and China will just sit idly by while Iran is attacked by America. I don't believe that will happen. Yeah,
I think you're right about that. Meanwhile, speaking of Venezuela, drop my head. After the Venezuela op, Trump says the whole hemisphere is in play. This is pretty disturbing any way you cut it. As President Trump announced Saturday the U.S. would run Venezuela for now, he and top aides made clear the U.S. may not stop there,
demanding that the rest of the world take Gee, I thought he was actually elected. Nicolas Maduro captured in an overnight raid and exited to New York to be indicted on completely fabricated narco-conspiracy charges,
had a chance to leave on his own before becoming the latest example of a leader paying a high price for not responding to Trump pressure. I think if there's a dictator there, it ain't Maduro, it's the American guy. Meanwhile,
Russ Winter on Winter Watch. The Senate admits major oil companies aren't interested in Venezuela anyway. Big Brain Trump is pissed that oil companies don't want to take over Venezuela's oil industry because of the cost of modernization,
security concern, political instability, and current low price of oil. Which would take decades to earn a profit. Now he looks like an idiot. I think that's becoming a major role for him. Meanwhile, Security guard protecting Maduro gives a chilling account of U .S. Weaponry.
This is from Hal Turner.
This is very Disturbing.
This account of the U .S. Raid to capture Maduro, provided by a Venezuelan security guard loyal to Maduro, is absolutely Chilling.
Listen to this.
Security guard.
On the day of the operation, we didn't hear anything Coming.
We were on guard, but suddenly all our radars shut down without any explanation.
Next thing, there were drones, a lot of drones.
Flying over our position, we didn't know how to react. Interview. So what happened then? What was the main attack? Security. After those drones appeared, some helicopters arrived, but there were very few. I think maybe eight. But from those helicopters, soldiers came down, but a small number, maybe 20 men. But those men were technologically very advanced. Hey,
didn't look like anything we've fought against before. Interviewer. And then the battle began security. Yeah. But it was a massacre. We were hundreds,
but had no chance. They were shooting with such precision. I mean, it was like each soldier was firing 300 rounds a minute. We couldn't do anything. And your own weapons? Didn't they help? Guard. No help at all. Because it wasn't just the weapons. At one point,
they launched something. I don't know how to describe it. It was like a very intense sound wave. Suddenly, I felt like my head was exploding from the inside. We all started bleeding from the nose. Some were vomiting blood. We fell to the ground,
unable to move. And your comrades? Did they manage to resist? No, not at all. Those 20 men Without a single casualty killed hundreds of us. We had no way to compete with their technology with the weapons, I swear.
I've never seen anything like it.
We couldn't even stand up after that sonic weapon, or whatever it was.
Another Venezuelan guard describes the use of Very much the same.
Report.
We have no idea.
They have no idea what capable of it is.
That after I saw, I never want to be on the other side of that again.
They're not to be messed with.
So here we have a lot coming from the security guard.
Really rather fascinating in terms of the technology involved.
We've lost Joaquin temporarily.
Brian, your thoughts? Well, when the United States is busy openly discussing operations with Venezuela, it's not just foreign policy. I don't think there's any real foreign policy here at all. It's trying to set the norm. So they're getting, again, taking extraordinary actions and framing it as routine,
Justified, or necessary.
But not just for this case.
They're setting the precedent that it's good for all future cases.
So they're really telling the American people through these stories that this is about precedent.
But what we're actually watching is selective enforcement on a global scale.
What are we being told here?
We're being told that foreign leaders can be targeted, seized, or neutralized.
Due process is irrelevant as long as we sufficiently demonize their leadership and there's no meaningful institutional consequences that follow.
This isn't about Nicholas Maduro.
I don't care who he is.
This is selective law enforcement, and that's legitimately a performance, not a standard. When they say this to Americans, things like the hemisphere is in play,
You know, what that really means is that it's strategically necessary that we do this to try to get everybody to kind of fall in line with the broadcasts and get our adversaries to say, OK, you're next.
If you don't play by America's rules, then then we're going to take you down to using the same techniques.
So we're not paying attention to borders here.
We're basically just announcing permissions that we can make up on the fly.
Now, the mystery weapon.
OK, again.
fear doesn't require proof. Just repetition of a statement. So, in a way, it's like a psychological dominance game to try to get everybody to fall You know,
this is it. And then, of course, there's the oil confusion. Well, didn't we already get the confusion about the cartels and the drugs and all this? You know, they can try to tell us that this isn't about oil,
but there's no doubt that the motivations aren't lining up here. So, fundamentally, I'm going to say they're stacking precedent here. Testing for hemisphere compliance conditioning,
and basically just setting it up to make sure that they can do exactly what they want. Remember, this isn't about whether Maduro's good or bad. This is about training the world to accept raw power without process. And that makes us gangsters. The assimilation process that they're putting us through to accept this narrative is getting people to stop asking the question,
Is this lawful?
And just start asking, well, didn't they deserve it?
You know, it's pretty clear once you analyze it and say it for what it is.
So that's the way I see it.
This is obviously not about saving the people of Venezuela from the bad guy Maduro.
That's their business.
They've got resources and we need to take it.
So we need to get the American people to buy in on the idea that we're going to take it.
Well, in Joaquin's absence, I'll just add a couple of comments of my own.
He talks about the whole hemisphere.
He's also mentioned specifically Mexico, Colombia, and Cuba.
And the idea, you know, of the U.S. somehow running any of that.
much less Venezuelans, preposterous. If you stop and think about it, what does he mean? Are we going to give them the same benefits we give to American citizens just as we have to the illegal immigrants here? Because there are like 35 million Venezuelans. Are we going to add them to the American social safety,
welfare network? As far as the weapons are concerned, I take away two conclusions. Namely, first, we do have stealth helicopters. They're so quiet, you don't know they're coming. I take that to be a fact. And that we have somehow developed these acoustical weapons to be devastating. Frankly,
I believe that the security guard is giving us accurate reports of performance and it might be something that neither Joaquin nor I, at the very least,
have factored in before that the U.S. could have some new forms of weaponry of which the world is generally unaware of which they're using for the first time on this occasion. Pretty damn interesting Meanwhile,
Trump orders a plan to invade Greenland, as ludicrous as that may sound. This is from RT, Russia Today. Should the U.S. President go ahead with it,
it could lead to the destruction of NATO from the inside Daily Mail reports. U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered his senior commander to draw up a plan for a potential invasion of Greenland. A move that could potentially lead to a complete collapse of NATO. The president has long sought to take control of Greenland in autonomous territory under Danish sovereignty, Where the Vikings first landed there in like 987.
I mean, this is a rather long -standing territory under the control of essentially what would become Denmark.
Citing security concerns and the need to detour Russia and China, while not ruling out a military option to capture the island.
The stance had put him at loggerheads with European members of NATO who have rallied behind Denmark.
According to Daily MAIL, Trump asked a joint special op command to prepare invasion plans, But the Joint Chiefs are pushing back, arguing the move would be illegal, lacking congressional support. One source told the paper, senior generals have tried to distract Trump by talking about less controversial measures,
such as hitting Iran. Think about it. When hitting Iran is a less controversial measure, you know, we're in deep, deep trouble. Have you seen anything like this at the drugstore? No,
you haven't. Look, OpTic is making the most. Denmark and Greenland are absolutely furious at the Trump regime. Europe is furious at the Trump regime. We're hearing from German's foreign minister that they will absolutely invoke all rights under NATO to attack the United States in defense if the United States invades Greenland. Germany's made that very clear. We're learning behind the scenes that Germany,
France and others are actually working up what war plans could look like if the United States invades Greenland, a part of a fellow NATO member, Denmark.
Donald Trump, when he held this bizarre meeting with oil executives on Friday, started again defaming Greenland and Denmark.
And he said, no matter what, we're going to take it one way or another.
We're going to do this the easy way or the hard way, but this is Ours.
What right does Denmark have to?
They sent a ship to It.
This is going to be ours, no matter What.
Watch what Donald Trump said on Friday.
Play this, Put it On.
Thank You.
And the policy question, How much money are you thinking of giving people in Greenland to get them on board with a possible U .S?
I'm not talking about money for Greenland yet.
I might talk about that.
But right now, we are going to do something on Greenland, whether they like it or not. Because if we don't do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland. And we're not going to have Russia or China as a neighbor. Okay? I would like to make a deal,
you know, the easy way, but if we don't do it the easy way, we're going to do it the hard way. And by the way, I'm a fan of Denmark, too, I have to tell you. And, you know, they've been very nice to me. I'm a big fan. But, you know, the fact that they had a boat land there 500 years ago doesn't mean that they own the land. We had lots of boats go there also. But we need that because if you take a look outside of Greenland right now,
there are Russian destroyers, there are Chinese destroyers and bigger, there are Russian submarines all over the place. We're not going to have Russia or China occupy Greenland, and that's what they're going to do if we don't. So we're going to be doing something with Greenland either the nice way or the more difficult way. Then Thomas Danz. One of Trump's people on the Arctic Research Commission who's been representing Trump on this issue,
he says the same thing, not ruling out military invasion. Let's play it. He said the U.S. will take over Greenland and did not rule out the use of force. The key point here is that I think President Trump's been clear on is America needs this for America's national security. There is a major risk to American national security. If it doesn't,
there's also a, by extension, major risk to our European partners and really to the free people around the world. So we're at it. We're at a situation where the current status quo is untenable. So things need to change. So they will change. But I think,
as I said before, that eventuality is slight. It's not something that needs that needs or really needs a lot of discussion. So, Thomas, it sounds like you're saying that this is going to happen either the easy way or the hard way, but it's going to happen. Look,
I think if you ask President Maduro, the former, this week, he would probably agree with that statement. You know, President Trump's been clear. And so, this is the opportunity for everybody to come to the table and, I think,
find the win-win-win deal I've talked about. Win-win deal, stealing another nation's territory. Meanwhile, Mac Blumenthal has very astute observations to make here. We have a complete lack of regard for not just international law,
but any law and any value other than the law of the jungle. Naturally, this is going to blow back on us. I think a good metaphor for it is a husband who just decides to lean into beating and cheating on his wife because that's the natural nature of man. That's Donald Trump on the world stage. is stripped of any values,
Any meaning other than crude exploitation and raw capitalist Plunder.
Where is the Smedley Butler of today to rise from the ranks of the U .S. Military and realize that they are just the muscle for a banker's cartel and that they are actually not defending anything or anyone except the global militant Zionist?
One percent?
I think he's got it exactly right, Max Blumenthal. Spot on! Meanwhile, the Western world once constituted a civilization, Paul Craig Roberts. In my writings,
I often refer to the U.S. and Western civilization as lost. When I do, I'm not being provocative. I'm being truthful and realistic. There are many examples proving I am correct. For example, And the Western world education is not passed on to younger generations and understanding and appreciation of their inheritance.
Western education tears down Western achievements and demonizes them as racist, exploitative, and anti-Semitic.
Western civilization has created liberal left ideological cadres who hate their own society and are alienated from their own country.
We see this everywhere in Europe, in England, and in the United States.
Large percentages of the white ethnics that comprise the national population of these countries have been indoctrinated into accepting the right of illegal immigrant invaders to occupy their countries and to rape their women in many parts of Europe.
such as UK and Scandinavia. It's risky for a woman to report her rape if the rape was committed by an immigrant invader person of color because the report can be considered a hate crime,
an expression of white racism against people of color. It's now a scandal admitted by the British government British female children were hidden by the British government so as not to discredit the government policy of open borders. Brian,
That's about as horrific as it gets, in my opinion, your thoughts.
It's Paul Craig Roberts writing in the OONS Review.
My friends and I like Paul Craig Roberts as a standalone source and I like the OONS Review as a standalone source.
Roberts has an excellent vocabulary and an expert grasp on cultural events that are taking place and he's probably one of the top tiered next to Jeffrey Sacks or alongside Jeffrey Sacks one of my go-to guys for straightforward, truthful analysis with no holds barred.
So i'm a big fan of all of those sources, anything that's got Jeffrey Sacks.
I like anything that's got to do with McGregor. Um, you know, there's pros and cons to every different outlet, but Unz Review and Paul Craig Roberts are like number one and number two when it comes to my current event analysis. Now,
that said, obviously, we're dealing with the Greenland-Denmark absurdity. And many of you might ask, what is this craziness that we're talking about Greenland and Denmark? Greenland's important to one simple extent. There are four massive trade routes that cut right through the North Pole. Many of you think the North Pole is covered with ice year-round,
but there are four, count them, four shipping routes that go right past there, and there's a massive port there that would be an important controlling thing. Again, I'm going to go back to the cultural assimilation model when it comes to talking about this stuff. We've got headlines that are seriously discussing, as if it's serious,
invading Greenland and Denmark with world war language. We're not watching strategy. We're watching something called threshold manipulation, where they're trying to determine where the cutoff This might be morally acceptable, and this is absolutely insane. They often use unthinkable ideas to make something ridiculous discussable,
Repeatable, or at least so people begin to emotionally process it as normal.
And you know, when you hear Trump talking, I mean, think about the hypocrisy, the pure hypocrisy.
If I was Putin in Russia right now I would be livid.
We don't want Russia or China as a neighbor, yet full-on western powers go in and perform a color revolution and a coup in Ukraine, using them as a pure proxy government for us to start a war with them and bring in all of the North Atlantic trade organizations to continue to threaten them.
I mean.
It's absurdity, but that's not a bug.
Greenland sounds ridiculous.
Denmark sounds exaggerated and ridiculous.
These are civilized people who have civilized conversations.
But America doesn't necessarily act very civilized anymore.
And I got to agree with Blumenthal on that.
We're acting like a bunch of gangsters.
But the purpose of these absurd stories and headlines is to de-rationalize resistance and get people to basically lower their guard.
I mean, skeptics are going to disengage.
Defenders are going to mock the critics.
And serious analysis is all going to be replaced here by ridicule.
and that's just going to create a passive population. That doesn't even want to have the conversation. But regardless, the conversation is trying to be normal. They're trying to force it to be a normal conversation by having all their talking head panels debate it and have their officials respond to it and get the media to frame reactions. I mean,
the question shifts from, should this even be thinkable, to how likely is it? And the moment that you start arguing probability, you've already lost the boundaries here. So,
this is fear conditioning that fits perfectly into the cultural assimilation model that I've been pushing since the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference. Everything, I mean, I'm starting to see more things through that lens. I mean, just about everywhere I go, I can see this assimilation conditioning. Through that lens. For those of you who saw the presentation,
I argued that this technique is much more effective than militarizing your societies. It's getting people to mentally submit to your guidance with psychological manipulation and manufactured consent,
and thus creating a society that self-polices among those who consider themselves Good and moral citizens versus those who are standing out against the talking points. So this is an old trick. It goes back to old Babylonian culture, And it's been well -developed, but written out of the history books.
But I'm telling you, I see it more and more every single day.
So just about these two things.
Greenland isn't the story.
Denmark isn't the story.
Mentally, accommodate anything that these crazy people can come up with and normalize unthinkable things to the point where resistance feels completely pointless.
What do you think, Jim?
Well, I'm with you in having great admiration for Wounds.com and for Paul Craig Roberts.
And when he talks about the British government covering up for decades.
what turned out to be the gang rape of 300,000 young British girls by immigrant rapists. That's catastrophic. That means there is no civilization in Britain. That means the immigrants are running the country. And when Max Blumenthal talks about all these wars for bankers,
we've known that to be a theme. Mentioning Smedley Butler, who concluded that his whole career had been devoted to the profit margins of international financiers, They're telling us a message that resonates to this day.
I think you have very subtle observations, Brian, about the way the world is being conditioned, framing of issues, and so forth.
And it's quite startling and profoundly disturbing.
So I don't find any basis for disagreement with your take at all.
If you'd like to add a further thought, you're welcome.
Well, you know, I'm not going to toot my own horn here because I worked really hard to build that presentation.
And I think maybe it has 150 views.
I spent almost two...
maybe three weeks Building that thing out, thinking I was delivering something absolutely groundbreaking, because I had the opportunity to go and do the story right before Roger Stone and Dave Hodges. Obviously,
they have bigger names than me. But I felt like it was actually unique, groundbreaking research delivered at that conference. And it's just a shame that it didn't get more grip. Because I think if the alternative community could get a hold of it and understand it,
you'd have an entirely new framework. You know, for so long, we've been interpreting false flags as, you know, creating a reason for gun control or even on the next level, you know, Creating a security or a military -industrial complex, which to me are the symptoms of the disease.
But the real disease is the United States propaganda being used and deployed under the Smith -Munt Act to accomplish nefarious purposes and expansion of a globalist military -industrial complex for the purpose of careening toward a new world order.
So don't get confused with, oh, this new fake school shooting is about gun control.
That's a symptom.
The disease is, what are they training our minds to accept?
And how do we separate ourselves from that?
understanding where it's going, and then help to enlighten our neighbors and our listeners to get a feel for it? I'm telling you that we have no idea. How far our minds have been manipulated. And if you think about it,
you know, Carl and I on the show have been talking about, you know, Tartarian and, you know, this forbidden architecture and these secret societies and what happened to these great builders. And you can almost naturally conclude that these great builders were there at some point in time,
but they've been phased out of history to such an extent that they've disappeared. Well, how is that possible unless someone had mastered cultural assimilation in a way where they could erase and rewrite history? Guys, We've been assimilated.
We were assimilated into the heliocentric model.
We've been assimilated into all sorts of things that just don't add up when you really put the tape measure to them.
And we've been assimilated into Climate change.
We've been assimilated into fear, porn related to school shootings.
We've been accustomed to a military -industrial complex controlling our schools.
We've been accustomed to an academic machinery and structure that teaches absolute, pure garbage, like evolution and billions of years.
I mean, it's foolishness. But the simple fact of the matter is most of the population have massive blind spots because they can't possibly recondition their brain because once they do that, they're going to have to admit that everything they thought they knew and everything they said as fact was potentially wrong and go back to ground zero.
Well, folks, I went through that process.
I called it cognitive dissonance.
Not everybody goes as deeply as I did.
I was absolutely untuned to the rest of the world.
But I ended up on Jim Fetzer's channel after the process because Jim Fetzer was the only guy that would stick to the truth about false flags.
Blind spots or no blind spots?
Yeah, there's some other areas that I would have debate with him.
But he's the only guy, only one that stuck to it in terms of what it really was.
And that's why I have a lot of respect for this channel.
And I got to tell you.
I think we're in the right place at the right time to deal with this. Well, There are outstanding issues such as evolution and the cosmology that we could debate, but you make so many powerful points, Brian, about contemporary politics and framing issues. Let me see if we can pull in at least one more story before the break. Before I get cut off again. I know. We know this,
my friend. Yeah, we kicked you out, Joaquin. You weren't making enough sense. The U.S. to withdraw from dozens of U.N. international organizations to sweeping changes. We'll see the U.S. quit major forums for cooperation on climate change,
peace, and democracy. The United States President Trump plans to withdraw the U.S. from 66. United Nations and international organizations, including major forums for cooperation on climate change,
peace and democracy. I like to think peace and democracy are real, at least as gold, but climate change is pseudoscience and unwarranted. In a presidential memorandum shared by the White House, Trump said that The decision came after review of which organization, conventions, and treaties are contrary to the interests of the United States. The changes would see the USC's participation, but also funding,
to the affected entities. The list shared by the White House included 35 non-UN organizations, including, notably, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, The International Institute for Democracy and Electroassistance and the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Although the IPCC was included in the list of non-UN bodies,
it is actually a UN organization bringing together top scientists to assess evidence related to climate change and provide periodic scientific assessment to help inform political leaders. Joaquin, I'm fascinated to learn your thoughts about this development.
I can only assume Trump didn't actually pull us out of the UN because we're tied in by a treaty that would require Senate confirmation and that that's unlikely to happen.
your thoughts yeah i mean he hasn't done very many good things but one thing is to pull out climate change u.n agreements you know that's one good thing However, you know, how about the geoengineering? Oh, they never touched that topic, you know. Look at what that's done to the environment. Look how it's hooked up, you know,
electromagnetic conduction in human bodies and the kill shot, what effects that has on all of this. You know, all of this is very much related, you know, but climate change, yes, And, you know, it goes back to the Club of Rome in the 60s and 70s. They got this off the ground. They hijacked the environmental movement. And, you know,
here we are. That isn't to say that the industrial corporations haven't been polluting our planet. Obviously, it's a big problem. But they take them off on a tangent. Along with the green energy, zero carbon, bullshit, you know, so that they basically curtail the use of gasoline and oil and all of this. And obviously, you know,
the whole Venezuela venture by Trump is all about oil. Oil is huge right now. Electric cars aren't even selling anymore. They don't even work, at least the ones that are made in America. They're not working. The Chinese are coming up with some improvisation on the electric cars. Yeah, I mean, So that's one thing.
Pull out of all UN.
UN is a globalist.
It came from the League of Nations after World War I.
And it's the movement towards one world government.
You know, that's what they're after.
And so, you know, get out of the UN, get out of anything that it's associated with, because they use all this climate bullshit, you know, as the Trojan horse to get what they want, which is basically depopulation.
Brian, your thoughts.
You're muted.
You are muted.
Muted.
so basically withdrawing from the United Nations is being framed here as not just foreign policy housekeeping, but basically that we have our own identity separate from the world. So it's not a political loss to pull out of an international body that works together to make sure that we can all get along well with our neighbors,
but it's being framed as, well, this is what strength does, and sovereignty does, and moral clarity is brought to us as a result of this. So If the U.S. withdraws from the U.N. and all these other international organizations that have been established to be able to enforce boundaries,
we've just become the ultimate gangster, and now we answer to no one under any circumstance. Because of debate,
but because of abandonment. And those international organizations are there as constraints, safeguards, and guardrails. But we're being trained to see that this is all sort of disengagement is now empowering. So instead of fixing the institutions,
it teaches people to just simply detach from the institutions if you don't like anymore. And that sounds great and feels good to the rogue. individual that wants to go out there and shake his fist at the rest of the world, But it doesn't work really well when it comes to putting together diplomatic responses to international concerns, especially related to Israel.
So the only reason I can see to break loose from them is if we're.
Planning on breaking loose from Israel as well and just going back to Originally mandated that the United States is and should be.
Stay out of other people's business.
Avoid that.
Take care of yourselves.
Grow strong on your own.
But we've become such a corrupt, international, CIA -driven,
globalist monster that now we feel that we can be the godfather and we've taken down all of our enemies. Although I can understand why a lot of patriots think it's a good thing to break ties with these international organizations. I can tell you that there's two sides to that story. And,
you know, hopefully, it's a good time for beginning to debate whether we should just stand alone. Look, I'd say stand alone if we were small. But I don't necessarily say that stand alone is the right attitude,
given the fact that we've been the one waving a gun. At the rest of the world lately. That's going to make us look like criminals. Don, on that very interesting division of perspective, take us out. Oh, wow. You guys are taking us out. Oh, well, what a show, Jim, about wars and all kinds of things that are not good for this new year. It looks like we're going to be in for it,
and our shows truth versus news incorporated all that news out there shaking the world there and uh so you gotta get your back straight and i think this place is the place to do it so you want to tell your friends at all