Welcome back, everyone, to False Flags and Conspiracies Conference 2025.
And our next guest this evening is Roger Stone.
And he really doesn't need an introduction, but I'm going to say a few quick words about besides being Donald Trump's best friend and helping with all of his election and campaign and everything else that Roger's done for our country.
As a matter of fact, he is also the author of an amazing JFK book.
It's Roger, can you give us the title?
I don't have it right in front of me.
It is The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ.
Yes.
I appreciate your mentioning that, Lauren.
First of all, it's great to be with my good friend Jim Fetzer and back with you again.
And I literally just got off a plane from the Bahamas.
I was worried about being here on time, but thank God I have made it.
Now, my book on the Kennedy assassination does not allege, of course, that Lyndon Baines Johnson acted alone, but rather that he was at the helm of a plot that involved the Central Intelligence Agency, organized crime, big Texas oil, certain major financial interests.
And I think I make an extraordinarily compelling case.
I use eyewitness evidence, fingerprint evidence, and deep Texas politics.
Now, if you're interested in this book, I want to tell you, get the paperback version, The Man Who Killed Kennedy, The Case Against LBJ, because it has three extra chapters that I wrote after the hardcover was first published.
I found that when you write a book like this, that people contact you with new information, new information that you have the obligation to very carefully vet before you publish.
But I ultimately did, in the paperback version, create three additional chapters.
Fastest and easiest way to get this is at themanwokilledkennedy.com, themanwhokilledkennedy.com.
There you can get an autographed copy of it, or you can go to a multinational corporation like Amazon that hates your guts and you can buy it there if you wish.
But it's interesting because it was my first book.
I took it to six or seven different publishers.
All of them told me that it had no commercial appeal, that it would not do well, that it wasn't worth publishing.
Yet within weeks of my publishing it, I did an interview on Coast to Coast Radio, and the book almost overnight became a New York Times bestseller.
So I'm very proud of that.
It was my very first book.
And to the today, it still continues to sell extraordinarily well.
I actually had a debate sponsored by Books and Books, a bookstore here in Miami with Gerald Posner several years ago.
He, of course, wrote Case Closed, his definitive defense of the Warren Commission.
You can find that book in the fiction section of any good bookstore.
But he's a very smart guy and he's a very able lawyer.
He's a very able debater.
You can still find this.
I believe I put it up on Rumble.
It's at Rumble Stone Classics.
It was an epic, epic debate.
Tried to get him to come out this anniversary of the Kennedy assassination and debate me again.
And he declined because I think he has a new book and he was concerned that his publisher might back away.
I can understand that.
It's not easy to find publishers who will publish this kind of controversial material, which is why in 2015, when I wrote The Clintons' War on Women, I went to the same publisher, Skyhorse, that has successfully published my book on Lyndon Johnson's involvement in the Kennedy assassination.
And I just wanted to quickly interrupt and say, Roger, that's what you're here for today, because besides the JFK book, you wrote my other most favorite book about the Clintons.
And I'm telling you, folks, this is, you know, it's a showstopper as far as I'm concerned, because it tells the truth about everything they've done.
You've done the research with the women that they attacked.
And I'm just going to let you take it from here.
And as you and I discussed, I'd appreciate if you can make any comparisons to what's going on with the Epstein girls right now.
That would be great.
Thanks, Roger.
I'm going to bow out, let you take over, and I'll let you know how much time you got left here pretty soon.
Okay, we'll get into all of that.
Before we leave the topic of my book on the Kennedy assassination, I was gratified to get an email after I'd published the book from Oliver Stone, who just said that he wished he had read my book prior to making his epic documentary, which I re-watched the other night.
And the summation by Jim Garrison, played by Kevin Costner, really is the single best compendium of the flaws in the Warren Commission and lead one to the obvious conclusion that John F. Kennedy was murdered on the basis of a conspiracy of a number of deep state players.
The original intent of my book, The Clinton's War on Women, if you think about it, was published in 2015.
And Hillary Clinton was running for president based on the false premise that she would be an advocate for women.
But as I dug into the facts, what I learned was that Bill Clinton was a serial sexual assaulter of women, a serial rapist, a serial criminal.
But it was actually Hillary who had hired the heavy-handed private detectives and the nasty lawyers in many cases to threaten and silence Bill's many victims.
The most famous victims, of course, were Juanita Broderick, who's a very valiant woman who's come forward and written her own book, which confirms everything that was in my book, Bill Clinton's technique, which he used on multiple women.
And as reported even in the mainstream media, was to bite through the upper lip of his sexual assault victims because a woman who's trying to staunch the bleeding from the deep bite in her upper lip obviously has to uncover her genitals, making raping her easy.
And then, of course, Kathy Willey, who wrote the foreword for my book.
So I documented either directly in interviews or based on an enormous amount that was credible in the public realm that Bill Clinton was a serial sexual assaulter and that Hillary ran the cover-up of those assaults.
And that was the initial premise of the book.
But I went on to expose a number of other dark secrets because the Clintons really are the they are the, I would say, the penicillin-resistant syphilis of the American body politic.
This is a crime spree that is quite extraordinary.
We get to Jeffrey Epstein, who turned out to be one of the major topics of the book, Chapter 7, Orgy Island, I think is the longest chapter in the book, and I'll get to that in just a moment.
But two of the other, I think, most explosive things that I learned was about Danny Williams.
Danny Williams is without any question whatsoever, Bill Clinton's illegitimate African-American son.
He is the product of the union of his mother, who was quite sadly a cocaine-addicted prostitute, and Bill Clinton.
And the Clintons had a very clever cover story.
A local African-American pastor in Little Rock first determined that Danny Williams was Bill's son.
He ultimately got his own son a pardon for crimes in return for stopping to talk about this.
His name was Say Williams.
But the Clintons did a very clever cover story.
What they did was David Kendall, who was an attorney for the Clintons, was also the general counsel to the star tabloid.
So the star tabloid, and there was a lot of tabloid coverage about Danny Williams and whether he was or was not Bill Clinton's illegitimate son.
But what they did at the star was quite clever.
They went to the final report of Ken Starr's investigation into Bill Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky matter.
And if you read the actual text of the final report, it makes reference to two different DNA tests that were conducted on the famous blue dress, on which it is alleged that Bill had ejaculated.
But the truth of it is, when you go to the attachments in the final report, there's only one of the two necessary DNA tests that would be required to determine to a high degree of certainty the parentage of Danny Williams.
So they took one of these two tests and then they basically went to Danny Williams, got him to, I think they paid him some nominal amount to provide a DNA sample.
Then they compared the two samples and they got the Associated Press to write that they were not a match.
And therefore, even if you go on chat GBT or any of the AI platforms today, it will tell you that a DNA test proved that Danny Williams was not Bill Clinton's son.
In fact, the DNA test in question proved nothing whatsoever.
It didn't prove that Danny was Bill Clinton's son, but it also did not prove that he was not because the information was not complete.
In other words, you needed two different DNA tests in order to determine whether Danny was Bill's son.
Howie Kurtz, the Washington Post, then wrote this the way the Clintons wanted it.
And even today, you will find this information.
Now, when I first learned of Danny Williams, I traveled to Arkansas to meet him personally to hear his story, to interview his mother, Bobby Ann Williams, also to interview his aunt, Lucille, who had, I think, quite courageously taken the infant Danny to the governor's mansion in Little Rock, slipped in through the gates, knocked on the front door, and demanded to see Hillary.
Of course, she was turned away.
But meeting Danny, listening to him, watching him talk, looking at the way he moved, listening to his story, I became absolutely convinced, and I'm convinced to this day, that he is Bill Clinton's son.
Now, he has now written his own book just out two weeks ago, which I strongly urge you to check out.
Danny Williams is spelled D-A-N-N-E-Y, D-A-N-N-E-Y.
The other, I think, shocking thing in my book was my conclusion that Chelsea Clinton is most likely not Bill Clinton's daughter, but more likely the daughter of Webster Hubble and Hillary Clinton.
Now, Hillary Clinton has written a number of things that hint at this.
Bill told a number of his both consensual and non-consensual sex partners that he was sterile, that he could not impregnate anyone.
It's unclear whether that's true.
That would, of course, cut against the idea that he is the father of Danny Williams.
So I think that was essentially a lie.
But Chelsea Clinton's very early plastic surgery, the pictures you can look at online of her as a child and the pictures you can see of her today, the startling likeness to Webster Hubble, the fact that Bill and Hillary have clearly what was a marriage of convenience, where she was the one who had the drive to make him president.
And she, of course, was supposed to succeed him.
That was, I think, the devil's bargain they had made.
Now, I believe that the same time that Hillary was running for president, Bill was probably in the bedroom talking to Barack Obama on the phone, coaching him about how to beat Hillary, because I don't believe he ever wanted her to be on that same level.
One of my favorite memes is from President's Day, where Bill says, happy President's Day, Hillary, and Hillary says, fuck you, Bill.
I think that kind of sums it up.
Now, let's get to the question of Jeffrey Epstein.
Jeffrey Epstein very, very definitely has interaction with Bill Clinton.
At the time that I wrote this book, I had a number of tools.
One of them, of course, was the Epstein's little black book.
Now, that is not to say that everyone in his phone book, this has been published, was involved in misdeeds or sexual child sex trafficking or any other crime.
But his butler, whose name was Rodriguez, I believe, was dying of cancer, sold the phone book to a tabloid journalist in Britain, made its way to Nick Bryant, who's one of the most brilliant investigative journalists in the country, who did some of the earliest reporting for Gawker on the Epstein scandal.
And the butler went through the phone book and circled the names of those that he believed were either involved in or had witnessed child sex trafficking or other abuse of underage children.
And of course, Bill Clinton's among those whose names are circled.
That is not, of course, foolproof.
But the other thing I had, which I got from Nick Bryant, who published it first, was the FAA manifests that tell you who visited Epstein's island.
I also was fortunate enough to connect with Brad Edwards, who was the attorney for Virginia Roberts Geffray.
She was one of the Epstein victims who refused a multi-million dollar settlement.
She forged ahead with her lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein.
I interviewed her for six hours and two three-hour sessions.
She clearly identifies Bill Clinton as being on the island.
She does not claim that she saw him involved in sexual misdeeds because she was removed from the room to have sex with Prince Andrew.
But she does say that two twin 17-year-olds had been flown into Epstein's Island from New York for Bill Clinton's amusement.
It's very clear that Clinton is on the island multiple times, but so are other prominent political figures, such as Larry Summers, the Treasury Secretary under Clinton, later the president of Harvard, the U.S. Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell, of course, Bill Gates, a major Democrat donor.
Comes to the question, of course, of Donald Trump.
There is no question that Trump and Epstein knew each other, that there was some socializing, but largely in public events, but that Trump cuts Epstein off in late 2004, bars him from all of his properties.
Brad Edwards, the attorney for Virginia Roberts Duffray, who were later told committed suicide a couple months ago.
I must tell you, having interviewed her and having followed her on social media, I don't believe that story.
But he very definitely cooperates with Brad Edwards in the efforts to pursue Epstein legally.
What's very strange is that Epstein's first initial case grew out of an investigation by the Palm Beach City Police, not the Palm Beach County Police,
but not the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, the Palm Beach City Police, who conducted a six-month undercover investigation of Epstein after some parents contacted him when their daughter came home with $500 in her lunchbox and told them that she had gotten it from Epstein in return for touching his genitals.
So that investigation resulted, went to the state's attorney.
It's an elected position.
He's the county prosecutor.
And Michael Ryder, who was the Palm Beach County police chief, said that he turned over a case to the state's attorney where there were 33 individual cases of abuse of a minor and statutory rape in at least 22 cases.
And he was shocked when the state's attorney turned around and charged Epstein solely with one count of solicitation.
When the police chief complained, they bumped that up to one count of solicitation of a minor, which still is a substantially less serious crime than what Epstein should have been charged with.
Anyway, Michael Ryder, the Palm Beach County police chief, went to the U.S. attorney for South Florida, Alexander Acosta, told him that he believed that the county prosecutor had either been threatened or that he had been compromised.
Interestingly enough, the prosecutor went to into private practice where he subsequently was involved in the criminal defense of a number of Epstein's associates.
So it appears that he was compromised.
But Acosta, rather than charging Epstein with broader crimes, did the exact opposite.
rubber stamped the state charge.
Epstein hired Leon Black, Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, and at least one other very famous criminal defense attorney.
And ultimately, he got an 18-month sentence for which he only served 15 months.
But unlike every other person convicted of a sex crime in Florida, he was allowed to serve that sentence in the air-conditioned Palm Beach County jail rather than a very rough state penitentiary.
And even the strangest thing about his sentence is that he was only required to be in jail from 10 o'clock at night until 6 o'clock in the morning.
But in the other hours, he was essentially free to go wherever he wanted.
The Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office essentially provided what was almost like a motorcade, like a security detail for him during those years.
Now, when Acosta was subsequently appointed Secretary of Labor, two things I can tell you definitively.
No one told Donald Trump that Acosta had been the prosecutor who had given Epstein a pass, but they'd sold his candidacy on the basis that he was Hispanic and that the cabinet for political reasons needed a Hispanic Republican.
But I do know a very prominent lawyer who's told me on a background basis, a name everyone here would recognize, who was involved in the preparations for the confirmation hearings of Acosta, that when they asked him in preparation for those hearings, what he would say if he was asked about his disposition of the Epstein case, he said, well, I'm going to tell the truth because I'm under oath.
I will say that the CIA came to me and told me to seal the case because he was one of theirs, which I believe is true.
Also, interestingly enough, one of my major sources for the book, who's now deceased, had told me this in the very beginning, remains extraordinarily consistent.
So if there's still a story here that is to be revealed, I believe that Epstein was working not just for the Central Intelligence Agency, but my guess is he was working for multiple intelligence agencies and nations.
I think he was a gun for hire, as it were, a blackmailer for hire.
So I don't think it is unreasonable based on what sources told me that he had worked for the Mossad, had probably also worked for the Saudis, had worked for Khashoggi.
I think that is why we still have not gotten to the bottom of everything and why Epstein is still a thing in the media.
Let me say, first of all, I'm for full and complete disclosure.
I would like to see all of the public records, all of the private government records uncovered.
There is a very mean-spirited theme that goes around social media that says that Roger Stone was seen on Epstein's island and we know it was him because of the Nixon tattoo on his back.
This is defamatory and it is nonsensical.
I'm actually the first author after Nick Bryant to expose Jeffrey Epstein and expose his connections to a number of the global elite.
I am not shocked, as we have learned in recent weeks, about Jeffrey Epstein's connection to Steve Bannon.
It was noted in the New York Post shortly after Bannon was fired in 2016, 2017 from Donald Trump's White House staff.
He was seen by a New York Post reporter entering Epstein's home in New York.
The subsequent emails that have been released demonstrate that Epstein was being coached by Steve Bannon between his conviction in Florida and the charges against him that were filed by the Trump Justice Department in 2019.
One count of child sex trafficking, one count of conspiracy to engage in child sex trafficking.
There are 10 hours of video that were allegedly shot for the purposes of creating a documentary, but I believe they were really shot for the purposes of practicing for a 60-minutes interview, which got canceled, never actually happened, was interrupted by Epstein's being charged in 2019.
We've now seen the emails in which Epstein says to Steve Bannon, you can use my house or my island anytime.
And Bannon replies, Thank you, brother.
I find this deeply disturbing.
This is all now on the public record.
Then just yesterday, the Epstein family, I believe the Epstein family estate, through the House Democrats, released 95,000 images, including a number of images with Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, that I think were taken prior to 2004, a number of other famous luminaries, but among them, of course, the shocking pictures of Steve Bannon.
This is not surprising to me.
Bannon went to the House Intelligence Committee at the same time I did, testified under oath the same time I did, was specifically asked, did you ever speak to Roger Stone about Wikileaks, Julian Assange, or these allegedly stolen emails?
He said no, on no occasion, never.
When he showed up as a government witness at my trial in Washington, D.C., a surprise witness, I might add, asked the exact same question.
He said yes.
Stone brought it up in every phone conversation we had in 2016.
I actually passed three polygraph tests on that narrow question.
It is, of course, false.
So I'm not among those who is surprised.
And again, I favor full disclosure.
I do think that to the extent that there's a cover-up here, I think we are covering up for Epstein's various services to multiple intelligence agencies.
I do not believe that Trump himself has any vulnerability based on my own research and based also on the timeline.
And I don't believe that there is any other material that we haven't already seen.
Now, I do think it's interesting that the House Democrats produced a number of emails presenting them as new, but heavily redacting them when, in fact, this material was already produced and made public several years ago.
I would like to see all of the grand jury information that was used to charge Epstein in 2019 made public because he is now deceased.
I think it's in the public interest.
I would like everything to be released.
But I am proud of the fact that I'm one of the first authors in the country and researchers to expose Epstein.
And I still don't think we have all of the answers.
At that point, Lauren, I've outlined my book.
By the way, you can get that book also by going to stonezone.com in the store there.
If you want the Clinton book, it's called The Clintons, and that's S apostrophe, not apostrophe, S. Clintons, war on women.
The paperback edition can also be had at stonezone.com and I will personalize it for you.
I will sign it for you.
If you're into politics and you want to hear the extraordinary truth of the Clintons, whether it is selling unscreened blood from prisoners in the Arkansas penitentiary system on the open market,
or whether it is how the Clintons and the Bushes worked together after the Congress cut off aid to the Nicaraguan rebels to import millions of dollars worth of cocaine into MENA, Arkansas, where it was then liquidated and sold to illegally support the Contras.
By the way, Bill Barr was the CIA lawyer who oversaw that operation.
All of it is in my book, The Clintons' War on Women.
If there is a companion book, it would be The Bush Crime Family.
Also in paperback, these books kind of fit together because the Clinton crime family and the Bush crime family worked very closely together.
Also proves that I'm a bipartisan researcher.
I don't try to whitewash the sins of Republicans and just heap invective on Democrats.
I go where the facts take me.
Exactly.
Thank you, Roger, for that.
Do you mind taking about five or 10 minutes worth of questions?
No, I'd be happy to.
Oh, we'd love to do that.
Okay.
Does anybody have any great questions for Roger that pertain to our topic today?
And several people said, thank you, Roger, for that.
That was really informative.
I'm sure there were a lot of people that didn't realize that you had interviewed Virginia Dufrey before her.
You know, sadly, she's not with us anymore.
And I think it's very important people read your book because of that.
Just for that alone, it's amazing.
Well, and I've also read, I mean, I read all of the trial transcripts, all of her sworn testimony.
She talks extensively about meeting both Bill Clinton and meeting Donald Trump.
She says that the only time she saw Trump in an Epstein property, it was in Epstein's home in Palm Beach.
It was a formal fundraiser for a nonprofit.
She said Trump was a perfect gentleman, but he also stayed for 15 minutes and he left.
This is also well covered in my book.
So there's no evidence that Trump went to Epstein's Island, that he went to his ranch in New Mexico, that he went to his apartment in Paris.
There's no evidence of that whatsoever.
Now, we do know that Steve Bannon visited him in New York and in Paris.
And I'm waiting for the rest of that story.
I'd really like to see those 10 hours of video to see what they reveal.
That is fascinating.
Yeah, I'm not going to say much about it, but I had heard that there was some hanky-panky with Bannon.
So I'm really glad that you're talking about it.
I think that's important.
Okay, here's one question I think is good.
Do you think Virginia was taken out or was in, or she witnessed protection?
What do you think?
I think she's actually dead, but I point out that on social media, she actually said, if you are told, I'm paraphrasing here, but if you are told I committed suicide, I'm not suicidal.
I would never kill myself.
Her own father has given multiple interviews in which he says he greatly dates, doubts that she killed herself.
She was in a very bizarre traffic accident weeks before she was ultimately killed.
I think that may have been a first attempt on her life.
No, I choose to believe she had a fighting spirit.
She turned down millions of dollars in return for her silence.
She refused that and she forged ahead with this lawsuit, which, of course, no one in the mainstream media gave any coverage to.
Absolutely.
I think she was a very, very brave lady.
And I think I sadly believe she was murdered.
God rest her soul.
Yes, I agree with you, Roger.
Yes.
Yeah, there are no coincidences.
That's for sure.
Thanks, everybody.
Roger, did you ever pay any attention to Barry and the Boys, the book by Bush, his name, Hopsinger?
Did you ever get involved in any of that?
It's a great book.
I used it as a source with attribution in my book, The Bush Crime Family.
It's very hard to find.
It's out of print.
If you can find it, it's extraordinarily expensive.
One of the most interesting things about it is there's a photo in the book of Barry Seale, the famous CIA drug smuggling pilot.
There have been several movies that have been made about this, although they clean the story up.
It's interesting that Barry Seale was murdered after essentially confronting Vice President George H.W. Bush regarding the drug trafficking activities of his two sons, Neil and George W.
And shortly thereafter, he was shot and killed in the streets of New Orleans.
This is all well covered in my book.
It's also covered by Hopsicker.
I interviewed Hopsicker once for my radio show.
He was not, he was not easy.
It was not an easy interview.
It was not easy to get him to open up and talk about the book, but I still do recommend the book to you if you can find it.
But the highlights of it are reprised again with full accreditation in my book, The Bush Crime Family.
Excellent.
Excellent.
Thank you.
Do you cover the skulls in your book about the Bushes?
And I'm assuming they're talking about the skulls, probably skull and bones.
Yeah, I mean, it's very important to recognize that the Bush family fortune comes from Prescott Bush, who was George H.W. Bush's father.
He was a partner at Brown Brothers Harriman.
He was also the U.S. Senator from my native state of Connecticut.
I actually saw him speak at the 1966 Republican State Convention shortly before his death.
He died of throat cancer.
He was a hard-drinking, I think, relatively cruel man who ran for the Senate the first time in 1950, was favored to win.
And then Jack Anderson, who was the most famous and powerful syndicated columnist of the day, published a story revealing that Prescott Bush and his wife had been major donors to Planned Parenthood.
And of course, in overwhelmingly Catholic Connecticut, that caused a downdraft and he lost by a few hundred votes.
Then in 1952, the U.S. Senator Brian McMahon died, Democrat passed away.
There was a regularly scheduled Senate seat on the ballot.
So both of Connecticut's Senate seats were on ballot in the same year.
It was 1952.
Dwight Eisenhower was the head of the ticket.
He swept Connecticut and swept Prescott Bush into the Senate.
Now, Prescott Bush made his money essentially by providing the financing to arm Hitler's Third Reich.
And I document that extensively in my book.
I found the documents that showed that the government seized his Union Bank.
Those documents were, were in the National Archive.
Fortunately, I saved them.
Russ Baker also wrote a great book on this, covers some of the same material, certainly covered this particular issue very well.
When we went back to the National Archive to look at the documents again, they had been removed.
So the cover-up continues.
The Bushes were heavily financers of eugenics, without any question.
The book I have just finished writing, I don't think it'll be out before Christmas, but it'll be out early next year, is about the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan.
I concluded based on substantial interviews with doctors, Secret Service agents.
If you go and ask for the federal records, you'll find that almost everything is redacted.
You learn almost nothing in a federal, you know, a Freedom of Information Act filing.
But here's a, let's cut to the chase.
John Hinckley Jr. is in front of Reagan, crouching, shooting from an upward trajectory.
Now, he is shooting relatively wildly, but Reagan is hit from above and behind.
That is not disputable.
And when the doctors get him to George, they don't even know he's hit initially.
They determine in the presidential limousine that he has been hit.
They rush him to George Washington University.
The doctors there initially cannot find a bullet, but through a manual examination, they remove from Reagan a projectile known as a flashette.
They tell us in the mainstream media is a flattened bullet.
That makes no sense.
The flashette, which is often dipped in poison, is shot from a very specific weapon developed by the CIA for the purposes of assassinations.
Judy Woodruff from NBC, Leslie Saul from CBS, both of them say on air that they see a man on a balcony above the entrance of the Hilton Hotel.
But go on YouTube now and try to find those interviews.
You will find them.
I did save them.
Judy Woodruff believes the man she sees, who she identifies as holding a weapon, is part of the security for Reagan.
I think, in retrospect, that he was the second shooter.
I also reveal in the book that John Hinckley Sr., John Hinckley Jr.'s father, whose oil company had been bailed out by George H.W. Bush in Texas in the 1960s, had a very lucrative contract with the Defense Department for these camps that are allegedly refugee resettlement camps.
But I can prove and will prove in the book that John Hinckley Jr. and Mark David Chapman, the man charged with shooting and killing John Lennon, were both at the camp in Laos prior to both the killings of the attempted assassination of Reagan and the sadly successful assassination of John Lennon.
So that book, by the way, is called Bushwhacked, the Real Story of the Attempted Assassination of President Ronald Reagan.
Unless somebody bushwhacks me, it'll be out early next year.
Oh, Roger, that's amazing.
Well, we're going to let you go a little early.
If it sounds like you just got home and you're probably exhausted.
And I want to thank you so much for joining us again this year.
I really appreciate it.
And I was hoping Jim would pop in and say hello to you because he says he hasn't seen you for a while.
And, you know, Jim has been, there he is.
Jim, do you have anything to say to Roger?
Great to have him here.
Always a joy.
I think you're doing such good work, Roger, across the board.
Thank you, my friend.
I appreciate that.
Jim Fetzer is one of the great researchers of all time, a truth teller who's been vilified because, well, he goes where the evidence leads him.
So I appreciate being invited.
I am running low on voice, as you can hear, but I look forward to joining you again next year.