Welcome back, everyone, to our False Flags and Conspiracies Conference 2025.
Our next speaker is Gary King, who has been the sidekick to Mr. Jim Fetzer all these years.
Gary, how long have you been working with Dr. Fetzer?
Let's just say we've got 350 hour-long JFK shows.
We've done lots on Sandy Hook, you know, the Boston Marathon.
We go way, way back even before Zoom and videos.
We were doing audio shows on the old Revere network.
So we've been at it quite a while.
And we did make a video of a presentation that he made.
The very first thing we did, and it was the most popular thing, it was talking about JFK, who, how, and why.
And from then on, we've been hitting it off.
Thanks to John Hankey.
I was trying to get a hold of Fetzer.
I thought, oh, maybe he's too big of a dog to talk to me.
And then Hankey actually said, look, he's got a little radio show.
So he came on my AM radio show.
And wonderful.
That's great.
And I remember you helped me with several conferences in New Orleans and Dallas.
And yeah, we've known each other for quite some time now, too, as well.
Yeah, we go way back, you guys.
So Gary's been on the ground doing the yeoman's work for all of us in the background.
And we really appreciate you.
So what is your topic today?
It's going to be the Tartarian Empire.
Oh, excellent.
Excellent.
So you take it away, and I'm going to bow out for a while.
Okay, real quickly, Jim and I have a show called Inconvenient Truths.
It's once a week on BitChute.
You might like it.
I play clips and he reacts.
So it's a reaction video series.
All right, here we go.
We're going to start out with my screen share.
Okay, I'm going to tell a little story.
Well, let me take this off first.
All right.
When I was in Italy, we went to the Vatican and I was aware of Tartaria and we were inside the Vatican and there were these columns and the spokesperson or the person, you know, the tour guy said that that column right there weighs 60 tons.
And I'm going, 60 tons.
It's like, oh my God.
You know, then when we had a little break, I went to the side and I asked her, I said, are you aware of the Tartarian Empire?
You mean the Tartars?
I said, yeah, I mean, just the idea that, you know, with the primitive tools that they had, that they could, you know, pick up one column and it was so smooth.
It was just perfectly done.
So come to find out, according to the lore, that these people were master masons.
And not only were their stuff almost impossible to make today, their stuff actually gets stronger.
So if you look at their buildings, they're a thousand years old and they almost look brand new.
They seem like they don't even get dirty.
And then you look at our buildings, you know, within, you know, 10 years or so, the bricks are starting to crack and, you know, that kind of stuff.
So that's where it all kind of started with me.
So I'm going to go ahead and start.
Okay.
All right.
So there's my presentation.
Sorry about my PowerPoint crashing on me.
So we'll have to do it the old-fashioned way.
Okay.
Now let's first talk about the tools available in the 1200s.
All right.
And then I'm going to show you this real quick.
This is, let me see if I can find it.
Oh, yeah.
The, if you've ever been in Germany, for gosh sakes, go and see the Cologne Cathedral.
Now, let's take a look at that now.
This building is a thousand years old.
I mean, just look at it.
There's not hardly one square foot that is not just complete, absolute, beautiful, you know, high-end architecture.
There's just not one of it.
And if you'll notice, there's a lot of these points up here.
And the theory goes is that, I mean, if you can build a building like that, or you think that you can't see inside of it during the daytime or nighttime, well, I think they had, you know, they used Tesla tight energy and, you know, were able to generate electricity from the air as Tesla came along.
And of course, they put the squash on that.
So, like I said, take a look at that building here.
All right.
So now we're going to take a look at thousand-year-old tools.
All right.
So we had stone working tools.
We had chisels, point, tooth, and flat for roughing and fine carving, mallets and hammers, iron saws with softer stones, pickaxes for quarrying, rasps for filing and finishing, measuring and laying out instruments.
We had a plum, okay, a string with a weight on the end.
All right, looks like a pretty big cathedral for that plum bob to do it all.
Set squares and measuring tools, compasses or geometric design.
Now, lifting, all right.
Cranes didn't really come around until the 1850s, the ones that could really begin to pick things up.
Before that, it was pulleys and men and ropes.
So that is a little suspect to me.
All right, so there you go.
All right.
And then we're going to also move into the 1800s.
All right.
So what kind of tools do we have in the 1800s?
All right.
Broad axe for heavy, wide axe for one side.
Adiz, a tool with a blade perpendicular to the handle used for smoothing logs, saws, rip saws, but all no power, you know, all hand, you know, handcrafted.
So here's what I'd like to show you on that.
I have a picture.
Now, let's be honest with yourselves.
In 1839, in the middle of Mississippi, now don't be careful there.
You can end up being racist.
But what do you think was going on in the middle of Mississippi?
Well, here's what they built in 1839.
All right.
Not bad with a couple of wooden mallets and chisels and things like that.
So now the trick is, pretty much every state has this.
Washington, D.C. has one of those.
And the story goes that that big dome right there is for making and generating electricity.
Okay.
And you can go around the world.
And if you can look right here, this sort of looks like the front of the Federal Reserve building.
This is found all over the world in the most, well, in the poorest parts.
You can see people, you know, in China with their little, you know, one man carrying someone with two wheels.
And you go by and there it is.
And also in San Francisco, There's these people in basically mud and horse and buggies and in the middle of San Francisco before the gold rush there's these big huge cathedral type things.
So what we're gonna do we're gonna play a quick video here and this is gonna explain an awful lot, all right?
So let me get it up here.
All right.
Gotta optimize the share and sound.
So here is going to explain an awful lot.
And this is something that I think you could, you know, why not?
It's so interesting.
And like I said, the idea of building this kind of stuff a thousand years ago with the tools available just doesn't seem possible.
What if everything we've been told about human history is wrong?
Across forgotten maps and buried beneath our cities lies a chilling possibility.
The Tartarian Empire, an ancient civilization more advanced than anything we can imagine.
I think it was a civilization that emerged from shamanism, but did not stay at the hunter-gatherer stage.
Strange architecture, mysterious world fairs, and entire stories erased from history point to something we were never meant to know.
Even Graham Hancock, who has long argued that vital chapters of our past are missing.
We are dealing with the fingerprints of a lost civilization that mapped the world and that left evidence of that mapping.
Warns that history is not as simple as we're taught.
Could this be the greatest cover-up of all time?
The truth may shock you, and it changes everything.
Forgotten maps and vanished names.
For centuries, the word Tartary appeared across European maps like an enigma sprawled over half the world.
It stretched from the edges of Eastern Europe through the endless Siberian plains and down into parts of Central Asia.
To those who lived at the time, Tartary was not a small, obscure place, but an immense landmass whose borders blurred with mystery.
Travelers returning from the east spoke of nomadic peoples, endless forests, cities of stone, and cultures unlike anything in Europe.
Yet, despite its prominence on maps and in records, the word faded almost overnight.
By the 19th century, Tartary had all but disappeared from schoolbooks, replaced with the neat divisions of Russia, Mongolia, China, and Central Asia.
What was once a vast unified space in the European imagination had been quietly redefined, fragmented, and forgotten.
When historians are asked why Tartary vanished from maps, the explanation sounds simple.
It was never an empire, they say.
Only a vague geographic label for lands Europeans didn't yet understand.
But this explanation leaves behind a trail of unease.
Why would an entire term so widely used for centuries collapse into nothing?
Why would maps once proudly showing Great Tartary or independent Tartary later be reissued with those names scrubbed away?
It is as though the cartographers of the past had sketched a reality we are no longer meant to see.
Some argue it was nothing more than a linguistic update, a byproduct of better exploration and clearer national borders.
Others, however, whisper about erasure, deliberate acts of rewriting that conceal a deeper story.
Consider the context.
Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries was obsessed with cataloging the world.
Explorers returned with maps, manuscripts, and artifacts, and libraries filled with information.
The lands labeled Tartary were described with awe, even fear.
Stories told of sprawling fortified cities, rulers of immense wealth, and cultures with their own advanced sciences.
This was no blank space.
Yet, by the Enlightenment, descriptions of Tartary had grown sparse, treated as if the entire region had little worth beyond its geography.
What happened to those earlier accounts?
Why are so many of them hard to find today?
Adding to the mystery are maps that depict features contradicting the accepted historical timeline.
Some show architectural icons placed deep in Siberia.
Others mark vast networks of rivers and canals that have since vanished or been dismissed as errors.
Were early cartographers mistaken, or were they capturing pieces of a civilization whose traces were later buried?
To dismiss it all as bad geography seems almost too easy, especially when we consider how quickly the narrative changed once new powers dominated the region.
and history books began to align with their political interests.
The disappearance of Tartary from records also echoes something we see again and again in history.
Names erased, cultures absorbed, and legacies rewritten.
Empires fall, and victors reshape the past to suit their own stories.
Yet, Tartary's case feels different.
It was not an isolated kingdom or tribe.
It was, at least on the maps, a massive entity, as large and imposing as Russia or China.
And still, it slipped away without the kind of closure we find in the fall of Rome, or the collapse of the Aztec Empire.
No dramatic war, no clear conquest, just silence.
That silence has fueled modern theories suggesting Tartary was more than a forgotten word.
Could it have been the shadow of a civilization far more advanced than we realize?
Could maps and old accounts have been intentionally altered?
The memory of an empire systematically removed?
These are unsettling questions, but they emerge naturally when we trace how a vast and prominent name in our collective geography was allowed to vanish so completely.
If Tartary was nothing at all, why does its erasure feel so deliberate?
This is where the story of the so-called Tartarian Empire begins.
Not with definitive proof of its existence, but with the mystery of its absence.
A vast region once charted on every major map now reduced to a historical footnote, a forgotten name, a ghostly echo of something larger.
Whether it was a phantom born of cartographers' ignorance or the first clue to a suppressed history, Tartary continues to haunt those who dig into the cracks of the past, demanding we ask the question no one in authority seems eager to answer.
What exactly was erased from history?
Architecture that shouldn't exist.
Walk through almost any major city built during the 18th or 19th century, and you will notice something peculiar if you look closely enough.
Towering domes, intricately carved facades, enormous archways, and entire blocks of stonework that seem to rival the great monuments of Rome or Greece appear in places you wouldn't expect.
Chicago, San Francisco, Melbourne, Moscow, St. Petersburg, and even smaller towns boast structures so ornate and colossal that one can't help but ask how such wonders were constructed in the supposed age of horse-drawn carriages and hand tools.
The official story attributes these marvels to architects of the Industrial Age, a period of rising wealth and rapid urban development.
We are told they were the product of hard work, imported materials, and emerging technologies like cast iron and steel.
But critics of this narrative point to the sheer scale and uniformity of the style across continents as reason for suspicion.
How could nations thousands of miles apart, with different cultures and resources, all produce architecture of such similar grandeur in such a narrow window of time?
Consider the domed state capitals of the United States, nearly identical in style to grand cathedrals in Eastern Europe, or the monumental courthouses and train stations scattered across the Midwest, echoing the scale of palaces in Paris and St. Petersburg.
Why do these buildings constructed in supposedly different contexts appear as though they were cut from the same blueprint?
Mainstream historians chalk this up to global architectural trends, the influence of neoclassicism, and the exchange of ideas through books and education.
Yet for those who peer deeper, it raises the possibility that these are surviving fragments of a much older tradition, one that has been written out of history.
Then there are the anomalies at ground level.
Look at old photographs or examine the lower floors of some of these buildings, and you'll find half-buried windows, doors that open into sidewalks, and basements with ornate stonework clearly never intended to remain hidden underground.
Urban development, city planners say, is to blame.
Streets are raised, landfills level uneven terrain, and over time ground levels naturally shift.
But the pattern repeats too often across too many cities for skeptics to dismiss so easily.
The mud flood theory, which we'll explore further, suggests these sunken levels might be scars of a catastrophe that literally buried parts of a forgotten civilization.
World fairs provide another curious case.
In the late 1800s and early 1900s, massive expos were built in record time, showcasing breathtaking domes, towers, and palaces.
Official accounts insist these temporary white city structures were made of plaster and meant to be demolished.
And yet, photographic evidence shows detailing and craftsmanship that rivals permanent stone architecture.
How could temporary structures achieve such precision?
Were they really temporary at all, or were some of them older buildings repurposed, misattributed, and then conveniently destroyed to erase their true origins?
Take the example of the St. Louis World's Fair of 1904 or the Chicago Columbian Exposition of 1893.
These fairs were said to be built in less than two years, using primitive technology compared to modern standards, and dismantled soon after.
But their scale was immense, rivaling the largest cities of the time.
How do you construct entire cities of grandeur, only to erase them almost without a trace?
For many, this feels less like temporary spectacle and more like a cover story.
Perhaps these expos were staged to explain the sudden appearance of majestic architecture that already existed, too advanced to fit comfortably into the official narrative.
The mainstream story remains unshaken.
Talented architects, visionary planners, and industrial wealth explain it all.
But questions linger.
Why are so many of these buildings attributed to relatively unknown architects who seemingly appeared, created masterpieces and vanished into obscurity?
Why do some records of construction appear incomplete or contradictory?
And why do cities continue to bury and demolish these structures rather than preserve them?
These are not idle curiosities.
They strike at the heart of how history is told and what might have been hidden.
The uniformity, the grandeur, the buried levels.
Each detail builds toward a larger suspicion that we are not looking at the proud achievements of the industrial age, but the remnants of something much older, much more advanced, and much more deliberately erased.
If Tartary was real, its fingerprints may not lie in old texts alone, but in the very streets and skylines we walk past every day.
And once you start noticing, it becomes impossible not to ask.
Were these cities truly built in a handful of years, or were they inherited from a civilization erased from history?
The Mud Flood Mystery If there is one element of the Tartarian narrative that stops people in their tracks, it is the so-called mud flood.
At first glance, the idea sounds absurd, even impossible, that within the last few centuries, some kind of global or near-global event blanketed cities in layers of mud, burying entire lower floors of buildings and erasing traces of a forgotten civilization.
And yet, once you begin looking at the evidence presented by believers, the anomalies pile up in ways that demand attention.
Start with the simplest clue, half-buried windows.
All across the world, from European capitals to small American towns, you can find buildings with ornate window frames peeking out at sidewalk level, sometimes several feet below the current street surface.
Doors appear to open directly into walls of dirt.
Basements are finished with the same fine stonework as the visible facades, as though they were never meant to be underground.
The official explanation is straightforward.
Cities grow, roads are raised, and time slowly changes the ground level.
But when the same architectural oddity repeats across continents, skeptics wonder if something larger is being ignored.
Photographs from the 19th century provide even more fuel for suspicion.
Images of workers digging out city streets reveal buried arches, windows, and doorways that appear to belong to structures much older than the roads being constructed above them.
These are often brushed off as ordinary urban excavation, the natural byproduct of rebuilding modern infrastructure atop old foundations.
But those who argue for a mud flood point out that entire blocks seem to have been unearthed, as if they were once functioning ground floors suddenly suffocated under several feet of earth.
The theory claims that a massive catastrophe, whether geological, environmental, or even engineered, covered much of the world in mud.
Some imagine an enormous flood of liquefied soil unleashed by earthquakes or melting glaciers.
Others suggest volcanic ash, atmospheric anomalies, or even weaponized energy.
Whatever the cause, the result would have been catastrophic.
Cities swallowed, populations scattered, and histories rewritten to hide what had been lost.
The survivors, they argue, inherited buildings they could not explain and rewrote the story of their origins to fit within a neat, controlled timeline.
Of course, mainstream historians reject this idea outright.
To them, buried levels are simply the result of centuries of rebuilding.
Cities like Rome, Paris, or Istanbul have always been layered upon themselves, streets rising higher as debris and fill accumulate.
But believers counter with examples from newer cities that supposedly should not have such dramatic layering.
Why, they ask, do places less than 200 years old show the same sunken doors and windows as ancient capitals?
Why do photographs reveal excavations not of a few scattered ruins, but of seemingly intact urban levels hidden below?
The mud flood mystery grows more tangled when tied to sudden historical events.
The Great Fire of Chicago in 1871, the San Francisco earthquake of 1906, and countless other disasters are sometimes reinterpreted as convenient cover stories.
Were these truly accidents of nature and chance, or were they engineered opportunities to demolish and rebuild, erasing inconvenient evidence of a deeper past?
The fact that many temporary world fair structures, built with impossible grandeur, were swiftly destroyed after exhibitions only adds to the suspicion that we are being shown staged histories.
Critics ask a fair question.
If a mud flood really occurred, where is the geological evidence?
Where are the massive layers of displaced sediment, the catastrophic records in soil cores and climate data?
Thus far, no scientific consensus supports such a global event in recent centuries.
But here lies the tension.
Absence of accepted evidence, believers argue, does not equal absence of truth.
If entire civilizations could be erased from maps, what is stopping geological anomalies from being ignored, mislabeled, or suppressed?
We are dealing with the fingerprints of the lost civilization that mapped the world and that left evidence of that mapping.
The mud flood theory may not offer clear answers, but it raises questions that gnaw at our sense of certainty.
Why are so many buildings designed with ornate underground levels that serve no practical purpose today?
Why does buried architecture often look too refined to be treated as mere basements?
And why do official records so often gloss over or contradict what old photographs appear to show?
If nothing else, the mud flood is a story of silence.
Silence in textbooks, silence in museums, silence in the explanations handed down by authority.
And in that silence, suspicion thrives.
Whether it was a true global cataclysm or simply a misunderstood pattern of urban development, the mud flood theory forces us to ask whether parts of our history have been covered up, quite literally, beneath layers of earth.
If Tartaria existed, the mud flood may have been its tomb, sealing away its greatest cities and leaving us only fragments to puzzle over centuries later.
Erase technology and suppressed evidence.
If the mystery of Tartaria ended with maps and buried architecture, it might be easy to dismiss.
But the narrative grows darker when you start looking at what some call the deliberate destruction of evidence.
Fires, wars, demolitions, and conveniently timed renovations have wiped out countless structures that could have served as proof of something greater.
One begins to notice a pattern.
When questions arise about buildings too advanced for their supposed era, those buildings often don't survive long enough to be studied.
Skeptics call it coincidence.
Others believe it is the mark of a systematic cover-up.
Take the Great World Fairs once more.
The Chicago-Columbian Exposition of 1893 produced an entire city of breathtaking domes, vast plazas, and seemingly permanent monuments.
Officially, most of it was constructed with plaster and wood, never intended to last.
Within two years, fires swept through and destroyed almost all of it.
Similar stories are told about fairs in St. Louis, Paris, and San Francisco.
Each time, enormous structures, built with suspicious speed and precision, were demolished or lost to disasters almost immediately.
Were these truly temporary facades, or were they the inherited remnants of a civilization we weren't supposed to recognize?
Then there is the curious absence of construction records.
For many iconic buildings attributed to the 18th and 19th centuries, archives contain little more than vague mentions of builders, incomplete blueprints, or after-the-fact documentation.
It is as though the process of design and construction left almost no trace, despite being projects of massive scale and cost.
Why do we lack detailed records for structures that should have been considered national treasures?
Why do so many names of architects vanish into obscurity after a single grand work?
It is these gaps that feed the suspicion that what we are told about their origins may not be the whole truth.
Believers in the Tartarian theory argue that these buildings were not simply impressive feats of human labor, but relics of advanced technology that has since been erased.
They point to features like massive domes crowned with strange metallic structures, spires bristling with antenna-like designs, and intricate detailing that seems engineered for more than beauty.
According to the theory, these were not just decorations.
They were components of an energy system, tapping into natural forces to produce free and limitless power.
The idea may sound outrageous, but once raised, it is difficult to ignore the uncanny repetition of these features across continents.
Mainstream historians explain these elements as stylistic flourishes, symbols of religious or civic pride, or simple expressions of neoclassical design.
But critics counter that beauty alone cannot explain their apparent uniformity.
Why would city halls in America, cathedrals in Europe and palaces in Asia all share the same domes, spires and layouts, built with eerie precision, often in a matter of years?
If these were simply trends, why do they resemble a kind of technological blueprint repeated across the world?
Fires play an especially suspicious role in this story.
The 1871 Great Chicago Fire, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire, the destruction of Moscow's architectural gems, and countless others seem to follow the same pattern.
Ancient-looking structures obliterated in disasters that left conveniently little behind.
Even when some buildings survived, they were often gutted, rebuilt, or renovated beyond recognition.
The result is a world in which vast amounts of monumental architecture supposedly existed for only a brief moment, leaving us to wonder if they were erased intentionally.
This is where the phrase they lied to us resonates most.
If Tartaria did exist, if it left behind evidence of technologies far beyond what we are told was possible, then rewriting history would not just be about names on a map, it would be about stripping humanity of a legacy of knowledge.
Energy systems, architectural methods, even ways of living in harmony with natural forces, could have been lost in the process.
What if we are not living at the height of civilization, but in the ruins of one far greater?
It is a haunting thought, and one that grows stronger as you look at the ruins, the fires, the missing archives, and the suspicious uniformity.
Whether you accept the theory or not, the fact remains that history is littered with gaps, sudden shifts, and unexplained destructions.
Was it all chance, or was there a deliberate effort to erase what came before?
If Tartaria's technology was real, then its absence today is not just a mystery.
It is a silence that has been imposed on us, and that silence may be the clearest evidence of all.
The civilization they don't want you to remember.
At this point, the pieces of the puzzle form a disturbing picture.
Maps that vanish from circulation, architecture that defies explanation, entire districts swallowed by mud, and technology hinted at in the very shapes of the buildings themselves.
All of it suggests we may not be standing at the pinnacle of human achievement as we are told.
Instead, we may be living among the faint ruins of something greater, something erased from history.
This is where the theory of the Tartarian Empire makes its most staggering claim, that there once existed an advanced global civilization more sophisticated than anything we can imagine today.
Supporters argue that this empire was not bound by the limits we assigned to 18th or 19th century builders.
It possessed technologies and methods that allowed for the effortless construction of colossal domes, intricate stonework, and vast networks of energy distribution.
The ornate facades and strange metallic ornaments found on government buildings and cathedrals are reinterpreted as remnants of a lost science.
If this civilization truly existed, then the narrative of human progress is built on a lie.
And perhaps that is why, as some believe, they lied to us.
The name Tartaria itself, once sprawled across maps, now lingers only as a ghost.
To mainstream historians, it was never more than a vague label for unknown lands.
But the sheer scale of its presence on cartography, combined with the architectural anomalies that stretch from Moscow to San Francisco, hint at something much more.
Could the so-called Tartarian Empire have been a civilization so advanced that it unsettled the carefully constructed timeline of history?
Could it have been deliberately dismantled, its legacy absorbed, its monuments rebranded as the achievements of far smaller nations?
Even thinkers like Graham Hancock become part of this conversation.
He has long argued that human history is missing entire chapters, that civilizations far older than we admit may have risen and fallen before us.
His work focuses on deep prehistory, on Ice Age cultures wiped out by cataclysm 12,000 years ago.
Yet his central question applies here as well.
How much has truly been forgotten?
Tartaria, for its believers, echoes his warning that the past we are taught is a selective story, trimmed to fit an acceptable narrative.
If Tartaria was real, then the truth about it would shake the foundations of everything we know.
Imagine a world where free energy was harnessed from the environment, where architecture was both beautiful and functional in ways we can barely comprehend, where cultures across the globe were connected under a single banner of knowledge.
Then imagine all of that deliberately destroyed, buried beneath mud and fire, and rewritten so that we might never know it existed.
That is why the idea is so powerful and so dangerous to conventional history.
The more you follow the traces, the harder it becomes to dismiss the suspicion that something extraordinary has been hidden.
Whether Tartaria was a vast empire or a patchwork of civilizations bound by shared technology, its story raises the possibility that humanity has already reached heights we are told we are only now approaching.
And if that is true, then the phrase, the Tartarian Empire, ancient civilization, more advanced than anything we can imagine, may not be a wild conspiracy, but a glimpse of a reality that was stolen from us.
Aftermath and unanswered questions.
If the story of Tartaria teaches us anything, it is that history is not always as straightforward as the textbooks claim.
Whether you see it as a grand conspiracy, a misunderstood series of architectural quirks, or a suppressed legacy, the questions it raises refuse to go away.
Why did the name vanish so suddenly from maps?
Why do so many cities show evidence of buried levels and structures far more advanced than their time?
And why do disasters, fires, and demolitions always seem to arrive just when uncomfortable questions begin to surface?
For believers, the answer is clear.
The Tartarian Empire was real, a global civilization more advanced than anything we can imagine today, and its memory was deliberately erased from history.
For critics, it is nothing more than the human tendency to find patterns where none exist, to weave mystery from coincidence.
Yet, in that divide, lies the heart of the fascination.
The possibility that an entire chapter of humanity's story has been hidden forces us to rethink what progress truly means.
Even voices like Graham Hancock remind us that the past is full of gaps, silences, and mysteries we have yet to solve.
Perhaps the real lesson of Tartaria is not whether it existed exactly as described, but that we should never stop questioning who writes history and why.
The monuments still stand, the maps still whisper, and the silence still lingers.
What was lost may never be fully recovered, but the mystery ensures that Tartaria will continue to haunt us, daring us to look deeper and ask what else have they kept hidden from us.
What do you think?
Let us know in the comments.
What if everything we've been told about human...
All right.
Pretty comprehensive there.
Now, in New Orleans, you can find these buildings and pretty much anywhere around the country, you can find evidence of these things.
And there are, a friend of mine, Jared, has been obsessed with this subject.
And there are places in New Orleans where the windows are beneath the ground.
And why would you have it like that?
And another thing, when I was at the Vatican, some of these doors were 14 feet tall.
I mean, who builds a 14 foot tall?
So there's also evidence that there were giants.
So if you want to talk about who built the pyramids and how do they do it?
Well, the same way we build everything with big, strong men.
And that really makes it sound right to me.
All right, just to close up my presentation, I'm going to read something to you and I'll leave the rest to your imagination.
All right.
Once upon a time, there was a highly advanced civilization today known as Great Tartaria.
She was disappeared from our history books less than a century ago.
The vestiges are still everywhere.
The civilization dominated technologies more advanced than the present ones we have.
The geopolymer concrete was eternal and grew stronger over time.
Its gigantic iron and glass structures surmounted by domes and metal needles were present on every continent.
Associated with Mercury, they distributed free atmospheric energy to everyone.
The towers and the railway stations are still in operation today.
Unfortunately, the technology of free energy from the ether was destroyed or imprisoned and now give way to handsome profits.
All right, the story goes that Nicholas Tesla was discovered, had discovered the technology to connect the ether and provide unlimited power to everyone anywhere, anytime.
You could travel by boat, car, or plane for free by simply accessing nature's magnetic energy and was omnipresent.
And we have just not been allowed to have this free energy, and all due to our capitalist society, systems of greed and dominations by those in power even to this day.
So, for hundreds of years, we have been denied the benevolent systems of our free energy.
And Mr. Tesley, if he existed, was a front man to hide the Tartarian free energy devices.
And you will see details extensively in the book.
All right, that's my presentation, and just a lot of food for thought.
And if you want to get into it a little bit, this is the book you want to get.
It's called The One World Order, The Tartarians, and it's written by James W. Lee, the One World Tartarians.
There you go.
All right, that'll conclude it.
Well, Gary, do you want to take some questions?
Yeah, if anybody has some questions, I'm ready.
Okay, so if anybody has questions for Gary, can you kind of make them in capital letters so I can read them?
What ocean is Tartaria in in the middle, in the bottom of?
So do you think it's underwater now, Gary, or does the book describe that?
Well, there are theories that Atlantis is part of the Tartarian Empire.
And even when you go in regular cities, when they dig down, they keep finding these columns and same, you know, like the Federal Reserve has that triangle on the top.
You find it everywhere.
And if you go to Paris or Italy or any place in Europe, basically, you'll see these unimaginable, even in Venice.
There's these big, huge domes just everywhere you go.
And I just can't believe that they would want to build a copper dome, you know, the size of my house to put on top of a building just because it looked good.
And to have that in every continent, everywhere around the world.
So that's fascinating.
So Monique says, did Gary just call Tesla a front man?
That was in the book here, you know.
But no, Tesla's one of my heroes.
And but I do believe that, you know, the idea that we could have free energy is just, in fact, Hope Girl and her husband was talking about that.
They've devoted their life in one of the earlier presentations about finding, you know, free energy and different energy sources.
But we all know that if you start getting close to free energy, they'll shut you down really quick or buy you out, whichever one works.
Call you a terrorist, right?
Yeah, or most of them end up in like psychiatric hospitals or places like that.
You know about the group that meets in Tucson every year, correct?
Steve's group.
It's an energy group that they get together.
And there were several guys that came up with free energy devices that ended up being tortured by the government, basically.
Oh, boy, that makes you want to build your own free energy stuff, right?
Yeah, yeah.
So big deterrent, I'll tell you what.
Okay.
So Tesla was likely killed for his invention.
So uncertain how he was the front man.
Oh, okay, you guys.
I think Gary meant that.
Go ahead, explain what you meant by Tesla being the frontman of this.
Yeah.
I really can't really say to that one way or another.
I mean, it seemed like he used some of the technology and he was, I guess, the frontman because they shut him down.
Really, I mean, he died penniless in a hotel with nothing, you know.
So, you know, that's what happens to you when you start messing with the oil industry, electricity, you know, capitalism.
Gotta have it.
You gotta have a meter connected or else you're in trouble.
It's free energy from the atmosphere.
Not gonna have it.
Yeah, absolutely.
So, oh, yeah, the guest yesterday, Hope, yes, that he just mentioned that.
Danny, no, I doubt, I don't, well, there's a discussion going on about Admiral Byrd and the South Pole, and they shut down the whole thing.
But Gary, I'm wondering if the South Pole stuff was around the Nazi, the Germans and the, you know, that whole bit and their development of UFO technology.
I think it's probably more in that direction.
Yeah, that's true.
Was it the South Pole only, or what about the North Pole?
You know, I don't know.
I think it was the South Pole where they had that flyover and the battle.
But the North Pole, apparently, he flew up there and found a hole going into the earth that was like a tropical area, correct?
Yeah.
That's the rumor.
Yeah.
Well, that's that's your thing, right?
UFOs.
Who knows?
We'll see.
New Schwabenland.
Yes, thank you.
And there's maps about Antarctica, correct?
Those old maps that show the continent.
Right.
There's someone that has just written a new book and has new theories about it.
And I think he was a relative to Admiral Byrd.
But I'm going to look into that a little bit more too.
But because, you know, there's a reason has to be a reason you're not allowed to go, you know, to the top of the earth and examine things unless you're with the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marines.
Yes, there's definitely something going on.
Right after they shut down Antarctica, you have Operation Fishbowl.
Do you know about Operation Fishbowl, Gary?
I do not.
I don't know either.
And I may be getting that confused with the UFO event and the Nazi event, but we'll see.
I mean, because they're connected.
It's all one thing.
But if you can explain that a little better for us, Abia 731, that'd be awesome.
Okay.
Yeah.
Monique is at the are you looking at Monique's question?
No, Monique.
Let's see.
A Thai doctor says Charlie is up in Antarctica.
Any comment on that?
Charlie Kirk's up there.
I mean, I think Fetcher's got it right.
He's sipping my ties in Tahiti or Tel Aviv, one of the two.
But yeah, that's definitely the new JFK.
They even had a palm print on the rifle.
You know, all the angles and where did the bullet come from.
And pretty much every JFK research that I've known over the years are all in.
Just like Hankey, he just did a couple of presentations, if I'm not on this conspiracy conference 2025.
Yeah, exactly.
Respect for Hankey.
No doubt about it.
So, a naval veteran I know participated in Operation Fishbowl.
They were shooting atomic weapons at the sky.
Oh, yes.
I didn't know the name of it, but yes, thanks for reminding us, Dan.
Thank you.
Yeah, they're trying to detonate a nuclear weapon to see if they could crack the firmament at the top.
Sorry, guys.
I have somebody calling, and I just told them to go bye-bye and leave a message.
All right.
Yeah, they were trying to crack the firmament.
I don't know what you believe about the firmament that's in the Bible.
And the rocket scientist Van Draun said it's up there too.
So a lot of people say we just can't leave the atmosphere because of the firmament.
You know, basically like a glass dome over the earth.
So that's another rabbit hole to go down.
And, you know, I always wondered if maybe the firmament meant that we have a layer of poison, radiation, or gases around the planet that make it impossible for us to get beyond it without dying.
And maybe they're talking about the Kuiper belt and the radiation and everything that's out there.
That could be what they mean by that.
And we took it more literally, you know.
Who knows?
All I know is when they send a rocket up, it always seems to go sideways.
Yeah, that's interesting, isn't it?
Yeah.
So maybe there is a firmament.
Wow, that's crazy.
Okay, guys, I think we're going to call it.
We're going to give everybody like a 10 minutes off, get 10-minute break to get a little food, to do whatever you like.
And then Donald Jeffries will be with us shortly.
So everybody, take a quick break and have some fun.