It was a great pleasure to introduce John Hankey once again.
I love his style.
He's got a unique way of putting these things together.
I think some of his videos are utterly fascinating, which doesn't imply that I therefore disagree with all of his conclusions, but I do think he has a gift.
He has a knack for presenting arguments and points of view.
Now, today, For his second contribution to our conference, he's going to address the thought that the founders of Israel were responsible for the whole cost.
John, the floor is yours.
I need a screen share.
Go ahead and do it.
You go ahead.
I don't see a button for screen share.
Well, it must be there, John.
You don't see down at the bottom.
You don't have the green button for screen share.
And I pushed it already.
Okay.
And also hit optimize for video and sound.
Open system settings.
Okay.
System screen audio recording.
Okay.
I'm turning on Zoom audio recording.
One, two, three.
Zoom US may not be able to record the contents of your screen.
You do not need to record it.
That's correct.
I agree.
I'm just trying to be able to share.
And just your mouse to the bottom of the screen and it should have a green right.
I did that.
You got it.
Oh, okay.
I'm going to allow you our screen sharing.
Okay.
So I want to get rid of Zoom.
So do you see Zoom?
Yeah, go ahead and X that out.
Just click the right.
Just click the right.
Yeah.
Yeah, just go to the top left and X all that out.
Okay.
All right.
So you're seeing that then, Curry.
And you can go to go to go to slideshow.
Right.
Go to slideshow and you get full screen.
I'm going to hit view.
No, I went to slide.
Oh, slideshow.
Play.
Play slideshow.
All right.
There you go.
Okay.
So go, yes.
Yeah, go ahead.
You're on.
We're there.
We're there.
Go right ahead, John.
Okay.
Well, so that's me.
For the recording, that's my YouTube channel and my email.
And I'm going to say a lot of stuff.
You know, I could do a three, four-hour presentation if I was presenting all of the material that there is to present.
So there will be open questions and that's an email and people are welcome to contact me.
I enjoy engaging.
It's very stimulating and helps me develop the sophistication of my approach.
Who is the deep state?
If I'd had the vision to tell Jim that this is really the topic I want to be covering, this is the reason that the Holocaust is important.
The reason anything is important, says me, is because it reveals the answer to the question of who is the deep state.
And I think that today, this morning, we're going to see, show how the investigating the Holocaust and the origins of the Holocaust and the details of the Holocaust helps to reveal the answer to the question, to the vital question of who is the deep state.
One of my favorite analysts is Jeffrey Sachs, and he had an interview with Tucker Carlson.
Used the word deep state eight times, and he never told us who he thought that they were.
He rather implied that certainly Israel is a huge part of that because the deep state supports the U.S.
The Deep State supports allowing Israel.
This, he says, that Israel has set U.S. policy in the Middle East for the last 30 years.
All right.
So I want to introduce also by saying that religious Jewish people who are anti-Zionist, I think are some of the most important heroes on the world stage today.
And secular Jewish people who are anti-Zionist are some of my favorite people in the world.
That's, you know, my best friends in any way.
Many, many, many good friends.
Secular Jewish people have a very, very warm spot in my heart.
If the words, and by the way, Jim, I have done this in 40 minutes, so we should have plenty of time.
Is Jim there?
Oh, all right.
I don't blame him.
Yeah, no, no, no.
John, I am here.
Oh, okay.
Okay.
I marvel at your energy to be able to have done all of this.
But we're good.
Okay.
So this is time to be 40 minutes long.
So we should have time to discuss questions even as they come up.
But so I wanted to start off saying that if the words deep state mean anything, the Kennedy assassination was an act of the deep state.
9-11 was an act of the deep state.
And that, to me, I think that's a very, very solid definition of who's the deep state.
They're the guys who did, who murdered JFK, and they're the guys who did 9-11.
So looking first then at 9-11, just really quickly, the FBI says it wasn't Saddam.
And Cheney, Dick Cheney says it wasn't Saddam.
And the FBI says it wasn't Osama.
That is to say, if you go to the FBI website today, you will not find any allegation.
They list his crimes and none of them include 9-11.
And as anybody who knows, pays any attention knows, there's zero evidence connecting Saddam Hussein to the 9-11 attack.
So who did the 9-11 attacks?
And Jim has presented presenters on the topic showing that Israel was behind the 9-11 attacks.
The evidence for that is just overwhelming.
It's stunning.
It's sloppy that they would have left such a wide and clear trail leading back to them.
I'm going to touch on JFK for a moment, which is to George Bush.
I have my first video that I ever made was connecting, assembling the evidence to connect Bush to the Kennedy assassination.
And there's a memo written five days after the assassination about a meeting at the FBI headquarters where George Bush was in attendance.
He's down at the very bottom in yellow.
The name is a little bit smudged, which is why this document hasn't been destroyed.
I think Hoover was just brilliant in concocting this.
The first two paragraphs are disinformation that he knew was disinformation, but by putting it in there and saying, oh, the anti-Castro Cubans, we investigated them and they were just all heartbroken at Kennedy's murder.
So that survived.
And then down in the bottom, he tucks in this gem about how George Herbert Walker, George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency, second line, I believe.
Anyhow, the Dallas Morning News had an advertisement advertising that Bush was speaking the night before at the Sheraton.
So the future head of the CIA was in Dallas giving a speech.
And then the day of the assassination, he called FBI agent Kitchell, and there's this fabulous memo that Kitchell wrote identifying him as on the job, right?
If he's a CIA agent, which he very, very clearly was, he is assigned it was the Kennedy assassination, and he's in Dallas.
So, Ed Lansdale.
So, Bush was part of Operation 40.
Zapata Offshore Oil, which was Bush's CIA cover, was part of, it was under the umbrella of the mongoose stuff.
And Ed Lansdale was the head of Mongoose.
He probably shared an office, or certainly his Florida office had a desk for George Bush.
Lansdale's Florida office had a desk at which George Bush sat.
And Ed Lansdale has been identified by Proudy and General Krulakis having been in Dallas that day.
So Bush's supervisor was there.
And Bush's father, this is the main point, I think, because it answers the question of who is the deep state.
Bush's father worked for Averill Harriman, and Averill Harriman was a minion.
He was a junior partner in Brown Brothers Harriman, which the Rothschilds acquired in 1839, the founders of Israel.
So the connection between Israel and the Kennedy assassination is the Rothschilds who founded Israel and who I think dictate U.S. policy and European policy.
I believe those are the people.
They're the, as you'll see in a few minutes, they invented the military-industrial complex.
Anyhow, E. Howard Hunt, famous Watergate burglar, also connected with the Kennedy assassination.
Dick Gregory was running around putting up posters showing one of the three tramps with parallel pictures of E. Howard Hunt saying, yes, that's E. Howard Hunt.
He was arrested behind the grassy knoll.
He was one of the three tramps.
And Hunt's son tells the story of how he was in San Francisco in a phone booth and he looks up and sees one of these posters and he nearly fell over.
His eyes bugged out of his head.
He says, Oh my goodness, that's my dad.
So to me, that's very, very when your son says, yeah, that's you in that picture.
I don't have a lot of confidence in photographic evidence generally, right?
There's all these people who point to somebody and say, oh, yeah, that's him.
And the pictures of Bush in front of the school book depository, I don't think, look like Bush.
Lots and lots and lots and lots of people do, but that's the weakness.
If your son says that's you in the picture, your son knows what you look like from 395 different angles and in the light and the dark and with your hair combed and so on.
Hunt, in his first autobiography, identified while he was famous as a Watergate shooter and before Dick Gregory had, and Mark Lane, I should include, adds a lot of substance to the charge.
This is from Hunt's first autobiography.
He has subsequently gotten rid of it.
And in addition to which, he never really explains very much about it.
He makes no mention of it in the book.
And let's just roll on so that I don't run out of time.
And there was a very famous trial, Plausible Denial.
Mark Lane wrote a really, really, really important book called Plausible Denial.
And in that book, he describes how Hunt testified at that trial that, and thinking that it would grant him all sorts of prestige and credibility, that he worked directly for Averill Harriman at the end of World War II.
Europe was flooded with CIA people and they were busy rescuing Nazis.
But so that's his connection to Avery Harriman, which is if he's the Noel shooter, and I believe that the preponderance of the evidence, certainly, certainly it's, I think, rather beyond question that he is that tramp and he is connected to the Harriman's, which connects the Rothschilds to the Kennedy assassination.
And so this is a series of questions that I think should get asked in any case, which is that the Secret Service stopped the limo.
Well, who had the power to tell the Secret Service to stop the limo?
The Secret Service also took possession of the Zapruder film and made sure that it got altered.
And by the way, kudos to Jim.
I say this to anybody who ever tries to say a bad word about Dr. Fetzer, which is that that's the first guy who identified the fact that the Zapruder film had been altered.
He's also the guy who founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth, which is arguably the most important organization in the history of the world.
But never mind, let's go on.
The military took over the autopsy, right?
And several of the doctors there have testified to the Warren Commission that all these military people come walking in and start telling, giving orders to the doctors, like, don't probe the throat wound and don't probe the back wound.
The CIA, now, Bush and Hunt were CIA at the time that Kennedy was assassinated, as were Morales, who said he was there and was involved.
David Morales also shared a desk in that same CIA Florida Operation 40 building with Hunt and Bush.
They were teammates.
And the CIA, but they weren't, I don't believe they were working for the CIA at the time that they did it.
I don't believe that any of the CIA higher-ups were involved, but that's not the point.
The point is that this is, I think, their main thing that you can point to and say, yes, the CIA did this, which is that they walked into the director walked into Johnson's office the morning after the assassination and said, we have photographs and audio of Oswald in Mexico City talking to a Russian assassination expert.
So therefore, we are willing to suggest that the Russians are behind this thing.
I believe he was at the Cuban embassy at the time that he was doing this.
The point is that Hoover called, Hoover calls Johnson 20 minutes later, and this is in the record, right?
They've destroyed the tape, but Hoover, the guy that he is, preserved the transcript and it's in the record of phone calls in any case.
Hoover calls Johnson and says, the CIA is lying to you.
I've seen the pictures.
That is not Oswald in the pictures.
My boys who interviewed Oswald have been interviewing Oswald since he was arrested have listened to the tape and they say that is definitely not Oswald's voice on the tape.
The guy on the tape, Hoover mentions that the guy on the tape did not speak Russian well and Oswald spoke Russian like a native.
On the flight home, Bundy, who was Kennedy's national security advisor and continued to be Johnson's national security advisor, said that the lone gunman was in custody.
Well, in Dallas, the police were not saying that.
The Dallas police were saying Oswald had associates and we're going to catch them and hanging is too good for them.
And all of the media went along for 60 years and no president can release the files.
And who has the power to dictate?
Well, that's the deep state, right?
Wanted definitions with the deep state, it's the people who have the power to do that.
And my answer is the Rothschilds, and you'll see why my answer is the Rothschilds as we go through this.
But so, as an introduction, it occurs to me to say that if the deep state did the Kennedy assassination and if the deep state did 9-11, shouldn't we also, given that the perpetrators of the Holocaust were in the remote, for the most part, rescued?
What's his name?
Who was in charge?
Starts with an E, Eichmann.
Eichmann was rescued out of Europe, right?
When, when, and all of the stuff that I'm going to show you about the participation, the participation of Zionists in the Holocaust, it all came out in the 50s in Israel.
And there was a big deal, and there were trials involved, and lots and lots and lots of scandal.
And it was at that point that they said, oh man, we got to go get Eichmann and arrest him and hang him so that we can, we, the government that everybody is pointing to and saying all you suckers were involved in the Holocaust.
They hung Eichmann in order to cover for themselves.
Goering, people have heard that name or not.
Anyway, he was the head of Nazi Germany.
As we'll see, a really, really high-ranking source says that Hitler was a stooge, he was a puppet, he was an idiot, that he was good at giving angry speeches.
And that's why German army intelligence recruited him to the Nazi Party.
And it's why they sent him.
But all of his speeches were written.
The Captain Mayer is the guy.
We'll see him in a minute.
He and Mayer points to Goering and says Goering was in charge.
Everything that was going on in Germany was done by Goering.
And Goering was arrested and jailed by the Allies.
And while he was in jail, he pulled a cyanide capsule out of his ass and stuck it in his mouth and died.
And the autopsy doctor doing the autopsy says, well, wait a minute, Goering had a Heidelberg dueling scar.
This guy doesn't have a Heidelberg dueling scar.
And the guy and the guy, as he was dying, is saying, I'm Goering, I'm Goering, I'm Going.
Well, that was, you know, those are funny last words.
That wasn't Goering.
Goering was rescued.
And given that, shouldn't we suspect that the Deep State did the Holocaust?
And if the Rothschilds killed JFK and if they did 9-11, we should at least address the question of whether the deep state was behind the Holocaust.
I would think that, you know, the most heartfelt, energetic Holocaust, Holocaust, everybody should remember constantly and do homage and pay their respects to the victims of the Holocaust.
I would think that they would agree with that question.
And in fact, as a teacher, I would take my kids to the Holocaust Museum and I've talked to probably 30 Holocaust survivors and they're familiar with this approach and none of them have ever told me anything other than that's really interesting.
Anyhow, so for us today, the really huge question is how is it?
How does Israel have so much power on the world stage, right?
They have no resources.
They have 9 million people.
What is it?
What is their power over these two giant dogs that they can force these guys to sit back and condone a genocide that makes them look horrible, right?
I mean, the leaders of Britain and of the United States rightfully receive all sorts of genuine hatred from people of the United States and from people of Britain and from people of the world for their failure to take action.
How is it that Israel is able to wag the dogs of their tail?
And I don't see anybody even asking that question of how it is that they do it.
Maybe I'm just missing it.
And that's more than plausible.
Anyhow, so we're going to, this is the thing that we're going to focus on for the next few minutes.
What are the origins of the Holocaust?
And I thought I had it.
It's mine.
I mean, I thought it's in here, but I'm going to say it now.
I want to make the point that I know that Jim and lots of other people say that, oh, 6 million people weren't killed.
And the most reliable sources say that 6 million is the far upper end and that it's very much likely closer to 4 million.
I mean, these are hardcore Holocaust-believing Zionists.
Say the honest ones will admit that 4 million is a reasonable estimate.
But one of the things that I learned, and I thought that that was going to come up, and we're not going to.
Well, hang on.
I don't see it, and I'm going to say it, that one of the things I learned from Gaza is that 30,000 people is a Holocaust.
As far as I'm concerned, watching the destruction of the Palestinian people in Gaza is a Holocaust.
And very recently, the International Association for deciding what's a Holocaust and what isn't, has said that that's a genocide, that what's going on in Gaza is a genocide.
And as far as I'm concerned, if there were 60,000 Jews murdered, that was a Holocaust.
And I'm not interested, seriously, I'm not interested in quibbling about the numbers because I'm interested in demonstrating that the Rothschilds made the Holocaust happen.
So where does our story start?
Well, you could say that it starts in 1829 when the first word on the page, Baron Rothschild, second line, tried to get the Sultan of Turkey to send him, to sell him Palestine and Jerusalem.
And so we'll go through it later on.
But 1829 is a place that you can begin, I think, the story of the Rothschilds' efforts to fulfill their dream to rule the world from Jerusalem.
Oh, well, all right.
So there's everything highlighted.
Sultan, you wanted the Turkish Sultan to yield to the baron sovereignty over Jerusalem, the territory of Palestine, third arrow to grant to rich Israelites to establish a feudal fiefdom, feudal fiefdoms for his billionaire friends or millionaire friends, whatever.
In those days, they would have been millionaires.
But the Rothschilds wanted to be the rulers of a kingdom and they wanted to establish fiefdoms.
Now, this is from the Asiatic Monthly Journal, which is a very, very, it's like the Wall Street Journal of its time, right?
It's seriously, that's not, that's a very accurate characterization.
And they're trying to provide information to people who are trying to make investments.
And so they're doing their best to tell the truth.
And this story, I think, unquestionably comes from the Rothschilds themselves.
The Asiatic Journal would not have made it up, and they couldn't have got such detailed information anywhere but from the Rothschilds themselves or perhaps from the people involved in delivering this request to the Sultan of Turkey, 1829.
But the Rothschilds didn't, where did they come from?
1829 is not the first appearance of the Rothschilds on the international stage.
So we're going to look at that.
If you study it, one of the things you'll find out is the Rothschilds are very, very deceptive.
They're very, very underhanded.
And the leading defenders, I'm going to bring one of them up, I'm quite sure, in one of the slides, says that, oh, no, this is in a different slideshow.
Anyhow, among their supporters, they are recognized as being just incredibly deceptive, underhanded in the background, and slippery.
But so they say they came in the late 1600s to Frankfurt, Germany, and moved to the Judengasse.
This is the street in Frankfurt where Jews tended primarily to reside.
And they changed their name.
So they're coming from someplace.
And we'll see that they're coming from someplace with an incredible amount of money.
They change their name.
And almost immediately, within a couple of generations at the most, they became the bankers to the Prince of Hess.
I need you to pay attention to Hess.
You don't need to pay attention to bankers or anything or Prince.
The main point that you're going to need to remember in a minute is Hess, which is so they would handle his money for him, which is a huge deal.
But you have to be fabulously wealthy, one to have the influence to attract the attention of the prince of this, of probably the oldest kingdom in Germany.
Certainly one of the oldest kingdoms in Germany.
Anyhow, Hess are the Hessians.
They perfected the military industrial complex.
All of the inhabitants who were under the dictatorship of the Prince of Hess were his slaves, and they made rifles and they made uniforms and they made boots.
And then the soldiers went off to fight for fees that were paid to them.
For example, and most famously by George III, right?
People in, if you're my age and you got A's in history and in junior high, you may have remembered that there was a battle that the Hessians played a prominent role.
And the money that King George III paid for the Hessians went to the Rothschilds.
The Rothschilds handled it for the Prince of Hess well.
And Washington was their boy.
What?
I'll tell you what.
Where's Washington going in this picture?
He's taking his troops to fight the Hessians.
And when Washington succeeded in surprising the Hessians and slaughtering a good number of them, they attacked on Christmas Eve and then capturing, I think, 5,000 of them.
Man, King George III had to pay these guys a fortune.
And so maybe that's just a coincidence.
Yeah, maybe it's just a coincidence.
Maybe it's too much, except that when Washington became president, Jefferson and Franklin, especially, and any number of people, Monroe, I'm rather sure that that's the correct name wanted the U.S. to have their own banking system.
And Washington said, no, no, no, no, we're handing this over to the Rothschilds.
Uh-huh.
Oh, okay.
And this is from the New York Times.
During all the years that George Washington was first in war and first in peace, much of the time that he was first in peace, the Bank of England continued to pay dividends on his 1,650 pounds, which is, you know, probably $20,000, maybe more, in bank stock.
This guy had shares from the Bank of England, which was a Rothschild product.
So the Rothschilds, he had invested in the Rothschilds.
He was getting paid dividends by the Rothschilds while he was leading his troops through the snow.
Good gravy, which was really, really, really hard on the snow.
And Washington cared so much for his troops, he didn't provide them with boots.
And the stories about that, the Battle of Princeton, I believe.
One of the details is that the American soldiers left bloody footprints in the snow because they didn't have good boots.
But meanwhile, this guy's getting paid by the Bank of England.
Which, as I say, this is Wikipedia telling you that the Bank of England was a Rothschild asset.
I can't remember whether I went into all this detail.
I think I cut it out in order to save time.
But people may remember the Silicon Valley Bank.
And you have to pay really, really close attention to get that story, but just crazy that every bank is liable to run short, right?
If somebody comes in and says, give me all your cash, and then somebody else comes in and says, I want to cash a check for 25 cents.
We can't do it.
We just gave homeboy all this cash.
So the federal government has a window where banks can go and make short-term withdrawals.
And Silicon Valley, the weak part of Silicon Valley's investments was U.S. Treasury bonds, which are regarded globally as the most solid investment.
I'm telling you, that's the official story.
My point is that these guys, the Rothschilds, specialize in banking in, I'm sorry, in pushing their rivals into a corner and putting them in a spot where they have to declare bankruptcy.
And they succeeded in doing that to the Bank of England.
And they bailed them out, which is to say they took them over.
And they ended up that, and that was in England.
The guy in this picture is up in the upper left-hand corner.
That's Nathan Rothschild.
But Nathan had four brothers.
And their father, who's up in the far upper left-hand corner, the father is just a head looming in space, Amshell.
He sent his four sons and he gave them a pile of gold to do it with.
He sent them a pile of gold that he got by having George Washington kill Hessian so that George III had to deliver them this huge pile of remuneration for the losses, so losses that they suffered.
Anyhow, the Rothschilds dominated.
This is what the Rothschild biographers say that, oh, don't say that Nathan Rothschild was the biggest banker in the world.
His brothers were just as big as he was.
Well, you know, that's, I don't, what are they trying to say?
Never mind.
It doesn't matter what they're trying to say.
They said it.
The Rothschilds dominated every important banking center in Europe.
And Napoleon, you may have noticed, if you were paying attention in the history class, that Napoleon never lost a battle for 20 years.
And one of the reasons that he never lost a battle for 20 years is because in his army, promotions were merit-based.
And he was fighting against a bunch of guys where the armies were led by the moronics sons of the aristocracy.
Well, so-and-so is a moron.
One, we want to get him out of here.
Two, we don't want him screwing up the family business, business affairs.
So put him in the army.
And those are the people that Napoleon is facing.
And he, for 20 years, he defeated them right and left, no matter how much he was outnumbered.
One, two, his soldiers were fighting for democracy and the freedom of their families, whereas they're fighting against people who are slaves.
So that is also a huge advantage.
And the third one, and the one I want you to pay attention to, is that he fought them one at a time.
And the Rothschilds in 1815, probably slightly earlier, went to every country, every king in Europe and said, look, we're going to loan you the money at low interest rates.
You're going to put together an army.
And when we tell you, you're going to march to France and we're going to defeat this guy, which is what they did.
And for years and years and years, I was able to, in a vacuum, observe that the reason that Napoleon lost was because suddenly Europe was able to unite against them.
And I'm teaching history and I think, well, who united these bankers?
I'm sorry, who united these kingdoms?
And how come I don't know?
Why is that name not in the history book?
Well, it turns out that it was the Rothschilds and the emperor of the end and there's a couple of things to know about that.
Nathan, the guy on with Standing Up, is famous for having walked into the London Stock Exchange and started selling his British assets and buying his French assets.
And everybody watching him said, oh my God, oh my God, the French have won the Battle of Waterloo, as we would expect since they had never lost a battle before.
And because they didn't know all this inside dope about how all of these other armies had been simultaneously mobilized.
So the Rothschilds had the inside dope and they sold their French assets at premium prices because people thought the French had won and had anticipated that that would have been the result anyhow.
And they bought up the British assets for nothing.
And when the smoke cleared and Napoleon had been defeated, they dominated.
They bought the Bank of England 12 years later.
They bought outright the Bank of England 12 years later.
And they dominated every financial center in Europe as a result.
And the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire made every one of them a baron.
Well, gee, and nobody asks, why did he do that for?
You won't find that question asked anywhere, but I can tell you they did it because that he did it.
The emperor made them barons because they told him to and because they had defeated Napoleon and destroyed.
There was no democracy in Europe until Woodrow Wilson imposed it upon them at the end of World War I. If the U.S. hadn't entered World War I and everybody says, oh, Wilson's a terrible guy.
He's a terrible guy.
He's a terrible guy.
He entered the U.S. into World War I because they promised him, if the U.S. gets into World War I, we will let you set the terms of peace.
And the terms of peace for Wilson was to force a democracy upon Germany, the Weimar Republic, and to force a democracy upon France and Spain and Italy.
And that was the first time there was a democracy in Europe since the French Revolution, which these guys defeated.
And they dominated, because they dominated Britain, they dominated the British Empire.
Because they dominated France, they dominated the French Empire.
Because they dominated Belgium and Holland, they dominated Africa, right?
The Dutch were very, very big.
Leopold.
Well, Leopold was a stooge of the Rothschilds.
Leopold takes all of the, he takes all of the blame.
And he died.
He didn't die a wealthy man.
Well, where'd all that money that he looted from Africa go?
I can tell you, you're looking at him.
So they die.
Anybody who's played Monopoly knows that if you start playing, you walk in and there's five guys who own the entire board, they're going to eat your lunch every day, and there's nothing you're going to be able to do about it.
I believe that these guys have thousands and thousands of trillions.
They are quadrillionaires.
I believe they are multiple quadrillionaires, that their Swiss vaults go a mile deep and they're full of gold because they've been looting every ounce of gold on the planet for the last 250 years.
So I'm having trouble looking, seeing the right side of my screen, so I had to remember what this says.
They, oh my goodness, you can find the documentation.
They dictated the terms to every economy in Europe.
The Austrians, the guys who made them barons, just humiliated them.
They demanded that the emperor get down and kiss their feet before they would grant him the loans to cover the debts that he had to them.
Anyhow, so it's, I draw the conclusion that in 1829, or perhaps shortly before that, they said, well, wait a minute, we control the kingdom of England and the kingdoms in Germany and France and Italy and Russia.
And how come we don't have a kingdom?
And so I believe that that was their motivation in going to the Sultan, is that they wanted to have a genuine home base because the Rothschilds are not popular in England or anywhere else.
And they wanted to have a place where they could be the heroes, I guess, and be in public, I guess.
Anyhow, they went to the Sultan and the Sultan said, the Palestinian people are my children, and I don't sell my children.
You may sell your children, and I have a feeling that you do, right?
You sell the girls, especially to guys who have money, but not me.
So now what?
The Rothschilds have been turned down.
This guy says, you can't buy me.
I know you're not used to that, but you can't and you won't and you aren't.
So now what are they going to do?
And you have to be, if you ask that question, now you can answer other questions, which, for example, is the stupid Crimean War in 1853.
Crimea, the right arrow shows you where Crimea is, and the left arrow shows you where England is.
Well, what the hell are the English doing fighting in Crimea?
Well, you know, that's a fair question if you just look at the map.
But it turns out, Jeffrey Sachs, this guy I mentioned earlier, he's my favorite mainstream Jewish analyst.
And, you know, he's secular Jewish anyhow, and very, very, very, very anti-Israel and anti-war in Ukraine.
And he's a hero in many people's eyes, including mine, for standing up and speaking out against the war in Ukraine as loudly as he could, screaming about the genocide in Gaza.
And he points out, he's talking to Judge Napolitano in this thing, where I saw him.
And he talks about how in 1815, the Russians and the English were allies in fighting against Napoleon.
Well, what happened that in 1853, they're going to war against each other.
And he says he read this book, and I don't know the name of it.
I could have told you so you could be bored and dismiss it from your mind.
And I didn't do that.
But so he read this 400-page book about some guy who spent, you know, 10 years trying to answer the question, what happened to sour relations between the Russians and the British?
And, you know, they're not very close to each other's feet.
And the Russians weren't big imperialists anyway.
Russians weren't invading Africa and trying to establish colonies in Africa or in India.
And so, where's the conflict going to come from?
And the conclusion was there was no source for the conflict.
The conflict came out of thin air.
I'm looking at the time and I'm going to step on the gas.
Karl Marx says the war in Crimea was fought over Palestine.
He said it.
And I invited you to conclude that.
So he says the deep state, Marx says deep state wanted to grab.
He didn't say deep state, wanted to grab Palestine.
Well, who's the deep state?
Well, who is it that's trying to grab Palestine?
And it didn't work.
So now what are they going to do?
Well, so now what is they come up with World War I?
And I'm stepping on the gas.
This is a quote from Max Nadu, who is the leading Zionist voice in 1903.
And he's saying, sooner or later, this question of the Turks is going to be settled and who gets Palestine.
He said that he raised that England, he says, England will have the deciding voice.
It's England who's going to hand us Palestine.
And there's a war, the tremendous upheaval is coming.
He's predicting World War I in 1903, and he's predicting that World War I is going to end with the British handing the Zionist Palestine.
That's really, curious, don't you think?
And then he says England's going to hand it to us.
So World War I, which, if you know how this thing ends, it ends with the British stealing Palestine and handing it to the Rothschilds.
Margaret McMillan is probably certainly one of the most renowned historians in the Western world.
And if I can make this happen, she's explaining that these people didn't want war.
The Europeans did not want war.
I'm going to cut her off.
Anyhow, so.
So she's saying that there wasn't a reason for World War I. We're all surprised by World War I because these people had been, they had had two major wars that lasted six weeks, and they had figured out that you lose much more by winning a war than you do by not having a war and just negotiating.
And I used to teach when I was teaching history to high school kids that, oh, what caused World War I?
Well, she didn't know.
And I'm telling you that the mainstream scholars, when they meet in roundtables, don't know what caused World War I.
And I used to teach that it was over Africa.
But in 1884, these guys had figured out that war is bad business.
And so they had begun learning to negotiate in 1884.
So they start World War I and they kill 22 to 40 million people.
How is that not?
And there are white people.
How is that not a genocide?
It seems to me that that's a genocide and it's a genocide that I'm insisting was orchestrated by the Rothschilds.
And if you deep dive deep into that, I think you will find that the evidence suggests that just exactly what I said.
Just a terrible slaughter.
Then this is the cream of European youth you see lying on the ground in front of you.
These are all very, very, very healthy young men who had girlfriends and wives back home.
And so World War I was fought for no reason.
So 40 million people were killed for no reason.
That's your answer, Professor.
And just by coincidence, just as the Zionists predicted at the end of World War, Britain invaded Palestine and handed it immediately to immediately, five minutes later, handed it to Lord Rothschild.
Now, the British didn't have a right to it.
They had no legal right to Palestine whatsoever, and they gave it to the Rothschilds.
Now, I want to point out at the start that it's a fraud.
The notion that they said in the Balfour Declaration that this was for the establishment of a national homeland for the Jewish people, that's a fraud.
They wanted to grant it to power to rich people.
They wanted to give rich Jews a place that they could be the lords, and then they wanted to be the lords over all of it.
The Rothschilds have no interest in common with the ordinary Jews.
It didn't work.
World War I and killing 20 million people didn't work.
Jewish people liked living in Europe.
Einstein and Freud and Chagall and Sarah Bernhardt were the toast of Europe.
They didn't want to go live in Palestine.
So how are we going to get them to go?
Well, World War II, 70 million dead.
How is that not a Holocaust?
Right?
We had 40 million.
So 110 million people dead.
20 million of those are Chinese, but most of the rest of them are white people.
This is an article I mentioned earlier: Captain Mayer.
This guy, no dispute.
He's cited by every mainstream biography of Hitler, every single mainstream biographer, because he's the only source of information for what happened to Hitler during this period of time.
And he says that he was getting orders from General Ludendorff to recruit Hitler and to train him to be anti-Semitic and to send him to organize the Nazi Party and to send five other guys with him to organize the Nazi Party.
And Ludendorff says Mayer met every week with the biggest capitalists in Germany, which is the Rothschilds.
The reason Mayer says that Hitler was recruited was because he could give an angry speech if someone else wrote it for them.
And on that basis, he recruited him.
He says Hitler was an idiot.
He says Hitler didn't write his speeches or any of his books.
He says Hitler didn't hate Jews.
And in fact, the Jewish Encyclopedia says there's nothing in Hitler's background to suggest that he hated Jewish people until he got recruited by German army intelligence and they started teaching him anti-Semitism.
Now, the Wannsee conference is where the Holocaust was planned.
The orders to the engineering firms to develop the plans for the death camps, for the ovens, for the showers that would emit poison gas came out of this conference January 20, 1942.
Well, that should be a huge red flag because in January 20, 1942, the Germans were losing the war with Russia.
That photograph on the right is from the Russian front.
And the U.S. entered the war the month before.
So they were losing the one-front war they were fighting.
They were now going to be fighting a two-front war against the United States, which outmanned and out-manufactured the Germans by many times.
And so now they're going to start committing war crimes that they're going to have to be, that they should know they're going to get prosecuted for when they lose this war that they are certain to lose.
We should start diverting resources, trains, and soldiers to carry out the extermination of these Jewish people who are working in defense factories, right?
Schindler's list.
How does this make from whose point of view?
Down in the right-hand corner, from whose point of view does that make any sense?
Well, from the Rothschild point of view, right?
That they're going to put Hitler in power and they're going to drive Jewish people to go to Palestine.
The Holocaust conspiracy delineates, it enumerates, it details the international conspiracy to prevent Jews from leaving Europe because the Rothschilds wanted to kill them.
And the Germans couldn't have organized that.
The Germans were not popular.
The way Israel is not popular, Germany was not popular at that time.
But somebody organized the governments of the world to refuse to accept massive numbers of Jewish exiles.
And Ben Hecht says that he spent his life trying to make this happen, trying to organize and fund the rescue of Jews.
And he says that every time he found himself blocked, it was from rich Zionists in this country.
He says in this book, which I really highly recommend, that the Zionists wanted the Holocaust to happen.
They made it happen and they told, well, as you're going to see, the Zionist leaders in Europe told the Jews to go quietly, which is what Hannah Arendt says.
And I'm going to blow past this because I've got five minutes.
Major voice.
I like him better.
Heim Weizmann, president of Israel, says in 1937, I was asked, can you bring 6 million Jews?
And I replied, no, the old one, they're going to have to die.
I can't bring them to Palestine.
They're going to have to die.
Selectivity says the executive vice president of the United Jewish Appeal.
If Palestine were to be flooded with undesirable people, that would be terrible.
We can't let these people into Palestine.
When they asked me, another leading Zionist speaker, when they asked me, couldn't we take money from the United Jewish Appeal to help rescue these people?
And this is in 43.
This is as it's going on.
And his answer was no.
The leading Zionists opposed the rescue of Jews from Europe.
And that's why Ben Hecht, oh, he's furious.
He hates these people.
These guys, four guys escaped from Auschwitz and they published a document that you see behind them detailing the horrors that were going on in Auschwitz and begging the Allies to bomb the death camps.
This guy, Israeli professor, one of the leading professors in Israel, says that the Zionists, the Jewish agencies opposed the publicizing, they did not publicize that document.
They prevented the American press from learning about it.
The late arrivals, the Jewish leaders got confronted by the victims.
And they said to the victims that the opinion of the executive board was that it was inadvisable because of our diplomatic ties with these governments, with the Nazi government.
We, the Zionists, had diplomatic ties, and it would be bad for our diplomatic ties if we were to expose the war crimes being committed at Auschwitz.
This is the transfer agreement.
This is the formal agreement between the Nazis and the Zionists in Israel, agreeing that you, the Nazis, will gather money from rich Jews and you will then send them to Israel.
And these are pictures of rich Jewish children on the left and rich Jewish adults landing, arriving.
This is at the height of the Holocaust, arriving in Switzerland.
They were rescued from Hungary.
These are the people who were not rescued.
These are from what I understand, you know, if you can believe what they tell you.
Those are at the top are the Hungarians going to the death camps, and at the bottom are the rich going to Switzerland on vacation.
It's always been Zionist tradition to select a few out of the many.
Again, so Hitler was Hitler was recruited by these guys.
The Rothschilds ran Auschwitz.
That is not in dispute.
You will find that if you look it up on Wikipedia, the Zyklon B was produced in Rothschild factories at Auschwitz.
This is the Rothschild factory.
IG Farben is a Rothschild factory.
The Nazis complained about how the IG Farben supervisors, the Zionist supervisors, treated the workers.
They were the richest company in the world.
Who owned it?
Well, it had to be the Rothschild, don't you think?
This is the IG Farben headquarters.
It's the most palatial, expensive business headquarters on the planet.
And it was when it was built and it still is.
And it's built on the Rothschild estate.
IG Farben was a Rothschild product.
Their factory was a Rothschild product.
The Zyklon B was a Rothschild product.
Auschwitz was a Rothschild product.
The Holocaust Hitler was a Rothschild product.
The directors of IG Farben were put on trial.
All but two got set free.
Two were sentenced to jail.
And in two years, they were out being directors of company of countries.
The Warsaw Ghetto uprising occupied 2,000 Nazis for two months.
And when the Nazis set out to deport 400,000 Jews from Hungary, Eichmann was terrified.
The Nazis were terrified.
How are we going to do it?
We only have 120 soldiers.
And, you know, if we have, and these guys have a border with Romania, they can smuggle weapons at will.
The head of the Zionists in Hungary is a guy named Kastner.
And he ended up on trial.
And it came out at the trial that he and his minions had postcards that they said, oh, these are from people who have gone on, gotten on the trains and allowed the gone with the Nazis on the trains.
And, oh, listen to this.
Oh, everything's wonderful here.
And you should hurry up and come.
They read these to the Jewish people and they told them not to resist.
They told them to get on the trains.
I can't read what's on the right.
Anyhow, you read it.
John, it's excellent to have you here once again, my friend.
Thank you.
For those who, of course, want to review the differences between John's take on JFK and mine, just review my presentation of Friday evening, which, of course, will be readily available.
We have other differences about the Holocaust, which I shall not elaborate here, but are relatively easy to track down.