Destination Moon, Weather Mod at Woodstock, Venezuela, AIPAC, Porch Pirate Revenge, MTG
|
Time
Text
Welcome to episode 156 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths.
To celebrate my birthday yesterday, Monique Lucens, a dear friend from California, sent me this shirt that took me 85 years to look this good.
I wanted to say thanks, Monique.
I had a wonderful birthday, Gary.
Yeah.
The adult part of the family went to see Quentin Tarantino's four-hour version of Kill Bill.
Then we went to the Oriental Buffet, absolutely spectacular.
All kinds of Chinese cuisine and just fabulous.
And then we topped it all off with Indiana beating Ohio State 13 to 10, where I earned my PhD in Indiana.
And we have many family ties.
It was like the perfect end to a perfect day.
I couldn't have asked for a better present on my birthday than that victory, which represents a complete reversal.
Going into Indiana had lost more games than any other team in the NCAA, and Ohio State had won more games than any other team in the NCAA.
They were favored by three and a half points, Ohio State.
But in fact, it turned out the opposite, Indiana won by three.
It was a great game, Gary.
Just a real joyful experience.
Awesome.
I just want to thank you, everyone, who's been so supportive of Gary and me over all these years.
We really truly appreciate it and are profoundly in your debt.
Gary, what do you got for me today?
I got a cool one to start out.
And as they say, that's why they play the game.
So, all right, here we go.
I've been wanting to show you this one.
We'll have a lovely afternoon.
Kiss the world goodbye and away we'll fly.
Destination moon.
We'll travel fast as light till we're out of sight.
The earth will be like a toy balloon.
What a thrill you'll get for riding on my jet.
A destination moon.
We'll go up, up, up, up.
Straight to the moon we choose.
High in the starry blue.
I'll be out of this world with you.
So away we'll steal in my spacemobile.
A supersonic, a honeymoon.
Leave your cares below.
Pull the switch.
Let's go.
A destination moon.
I'll be out of this world with you.
So away we are still in my jet mobile.
A supersonic, a honeymoon.
Leave your cares below.
Pull that switch.
Let's go.
Destination.
We're flying high, up in the sky.
All right.
Very, very nice, Gary.
Report NASA has now conceded that we never went to the moon.
And for those who want their own documentation, check out my video.
The moon landing hoax, how we know we didn't go, jameshfetzer.org.
I think you can find it online just using that title.
Otherwise, go to my blog and go to the 65 shows.
And it's like number two on the list.
Check it out.
There's so much proof we did not go.
I would like to believe NASA has finally come clean.
Wow, I wasn't aware that they finally admitted it.
Awesome.
Okay, next up, we've got Kim Iverson and Margaret Taylor.
Let me tell you what a traitor is.
A traitor is an American that serves foreign countries and themselves.
A patriot is an American that serves the United States of America.
Marjorie Taylor Greene is right when she calls Trump a traitor.
Essentially, serving a foreign government makes you a traitor.
And if that is the case, then nearly all of Congress are traitors.
Practically everybody in Washington, D.C., is in trouble because the truth is, Washington is packed with lawmakers who openly, proudly, unapologetically serve the interests of foreign nations, including Donald Trump.
And the number one beneficiary is not Russia, not China, not Ukraine, not even the American people.
It's Israel.
So let's walk through this.
We have members of Congress who take millions of dollars from APAC and affiliated PACs.
APAC alone spent record amounts this cycle, tens of millions of dollars, backing candidates who represent Israel's interests, not the interests of Americans.
You've got pro-Israel interests that spent hundreds of millions of dollars on Trump.
And what does he do?
He does Israel's bidding.
There are dozens of lawmakers whose biggest donor, including Trump, year after year, almost Trump.
Elon Musk was probably his biggest donor, but year after year.
And Israel lobbying group is the number one donor to a huge number of our lawmakers.
And those lawmakers almost always vote in lockstep with whatever Tel Aviv wants.
You can go issue by issue and see the pattern.
Israel wants more military aid?
Congress signs the check.
Israel wants unconditional support at the UN?
Congress gives it.
Israel wants the U.S. to criminalize boycotts of Israel?
Congress tries to do it.
Israel wants the U.S. to stay silent about Palestinian civilian debts.
Congress does it.
It is the most reliable foreign alignment in modern American politics.
And if you don't go along, AIPAC pours money into your opponent's campaign until you're removed.
This isn't hidden.
This isn't a secret.
This isn't a conspiracy.
They brag about it.
And then there are the anti-BDS laws, which exist in more than 35 U.S. states.
These are laws that literally punish Americans for exercising free speech if that speech criticizes Israel.
It is unbelievable that this is going on in this country, that Israel has the power to essentially get rid of American rights, rights that we as Americans hold absolutely dear.
It is unfathomable.
It is disgusting.
Imagine that.
You can boycott American companies.
You can boycott American police departments.
You can boycott the U.S. government itself, but you can boycott your own state.
You can boycott Christian organizations.
You can boycott Muslim organizations.
But you cannot boycott the state of Israel because lawmakers in both parties decided that Israel's interests matter more than the United States Constitution.
Now, federal judges have struck these laws down as unconstitutional violations of the First Amendment.
And what do states do?
They rewrite them and try again.
This is the level of influence we're talking about.
Okay.
Gary, just to underline what both Marjorie Taylor Green and Kim Arborson are saying, I got three stories, brand new this today, today.
One is a prominent Israeli politician saying anti-Israel America deserve the same treatment we're giving to the Palestinians.
The second says Israel has directed Donald Trump to attack Venezuela in order to punish Maduro for his support for the Palestinians.
The third, even more egregious, if that could be imagined, that age of consent law for sex with children are anti-Semitic and should be abolished.
If you had any doubt about the moral character of Israel, there are three strikes.
They're out, Gary.
They are out.
Just unbelievable.
And they're running our country.
Okay.
New information provides a clearer picture of the moments after this U.S. airstrike on a suspected drug smuggling boat off Venezuela in September.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the Pentagon have faced bipartisan criticism for launching a follow-up missile strike, which reportedly killed two survivors of the initial attack.
International law prohibits killing enemy combatants who no longer pose a threat.
This rises to the level of a war crime, if it's true.
When people want to surrender, you don't kill them.
And they have to pose an imminent threat.
But now, a source familiar with the incident says the two survivors climbed back onto the boat after the initial strike.
They were believed to be potentially communicating with others while trying to salvage some of the drugs.
And because of that, it was determined they were, quote, still in the fight and therefore valid targets.
A judge advocate general or JAG officer was also present, giving legal advice during the strikes.
We asked President Trump if the administration will release video of that second attack.
Whatever they have, we certainly release, no problem.
It comes as a Pentagon watchdog releases a report on a previous controversy involving Hegseth, his use of the commercial messaging app Signal.
The watchdog concluding that Hegseth risked endangering U.S. troops when he relayed sensitive details about military strikes in Yemen over the app.
Sources say the Inspector General found Hegzeth shared information classified by U.S. Central Command with colleagues, his wife, and a reporter accidentally added to a group chat.
At the time, he defended the chat.
Nobody's texting more plants.
I know exactly what I'm doing.
Sources say the watchdog determined if the information Hegseth shared had fallen into enemy hands, troops could have been in danger.
Sources say Hagseth refused to sit down for an interview, insisting that he has the power to classify and declassify information.
Last night, Hagseth tweeted, no classified information.
Total exoneration.
Case closed.
You know, I think at some point, just take the learning experience and move on.
No one can rationalize that as an exoneration.
Hagseth also reportedly denied that troops would have been at risk if his chat had been exposed.
All these destruction of these boats, and there's no good reason to believe they're actually transporting drugs at all.
That's a fantasy.
Means that they're in violation of international law.
They are war crimes or murder or both.
The story there you just heard about them climbing back on the boat, there was no boat left to climb back on.
They were survivors under international law.
You're obligated to save them.
They pose no threat.
This is all made up.
Total bullshit story.
Trying to exonerate Hegseth because this is such an egregious act.
And, you know, Gary, it's embarrassing that we have low lives like this in these positions of high authority where they're able to commit acts, atrocities of this caliber.
It's outrageous.
Hegset's pathetic.
He's unqualified.
And I'm sorry to say, I'm increasingly worried that Donald Trump himself really is unfit to hold his office.
Sad to say.
I agree with that.
100%.
Okay, Laura Logan, I'm not really sure.
So for these people, they cannot have you ask questions of substance because everything is built on a lie.
Climate, all those climate programs, all built on lies.
The whole race narrative, all built on lies.
Does that mean there's no racism?
Does that mean there's no difference?
No.
But what do they do?
They want to take race.
They want to take differences and they want to create them, turn them into problems which can never ever be solved.
So the color of your skin, you can't change it.
Therefore, you can never solve this problem.
Unbiased racism, it's unconscious.
If you're not conscious of it, you can't fix it.
And if you look in all of these places, they create issues.
Like as a man, you're going to have masculine instincts.
They now teach you that that masculine instinct is evil.
It's a problem, can never be solved.
CO2.
We create CO2 as we breathe out.
It's critical for life on earth.
You will never ever, they created a nonsense problem that can also never be solved.
Because to remove CO2 from the earth is to kill all life on earth.
So once you start to recognize the tactics, it becomes very, very simple.
It's easy.
You don't have to be a genius to see the same tactics playing out over and over again.
Transgenderism, it's the same thing.
This is an attack on us as we were created to break down communication, to isolate us so that we can be controlled.
Why do they have to kill the food supply?
Because they have to control what we eat.
We have to control our movements.
And of course, they react like this about race because at the end of the day, people don't really care.
But we do gravitate towards our own.
We do like to be with people who understand us.
When you marry someone, what is the biggest thing that tears people apart?
My wife doesn't get me.
She doesn't understand me.
Well, you know, you can, if you're overseas and you bump into somebody from, you know, the United States, you might not have talked to that person back home.
But when you're there, you have this common shared history of being American.
And so that brings you together.
Well, look all over America.
New York, the Chinese gravitated towards each other in Chinatown, in Little Italy.
I mean, we instinctively gravitate towards our own.
So it's okay to do that.
But they've made those things that are natural and instinctive in us.
They've made those war crimes.
Well, it was Henry Kissinger, it could have been 50 years ago, observed that if you want to control a government, control their finances.
And if you want to control a population, control their food.
This was an absolutely sensational presentation.
She's right on every single issue.
Go right down the list.
One, two, three, four, five.
She's hitting them right out of the park, area, talking about differences that cannot be changed, great, unsolvable problems.
This is a brilliant woman, very articulate, wonderful delivery, very, very impressive.
Five stars.
That's absolutely sensational, Gary.
I'm delighted you discovered and shared it today.
Okay.
All right.
Next up, at the Woodstock in 1969, the people were complaining that they were seeding the clouds and making it rain.
I got something to say.
I want to know how come the fascist kids have been seeding the clouds.
There's already airplanes going over twice with all the smoke coming out of them seeding the clouds.
And I want to know why that stuff is going down.
Why doesn't the media report that stuff to the people, man?
I'm telling you what happened.
The planes come over an hour and a half.
And they seed all the classes.
This is the second time.
People of unknown origin were seeding the clouds over the years.
I don't know what they hope we're proving for.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah, what do you think?
I don't know.
I never thought about it, but I haven't any doubt at all.
The clouds were seated at Woodstock to try to dampen the whole affair.
There was a lot of enthusiasm.
These are wonderful young people who actually believed in America, believing freedom.
Yeah, a lot of them were smoking grass.
Well, what the hell is wrong with that?
Just because a generation prefers to smoke inside rather than drink it doesn't make them bad Americans.
In fact, it's a superior high.
Grass doesn't cause cirrhosis of the liver, as does alcohol.
Grass doesn't cause cancer of the lungs as does cigarette smoking.
It all should be legalized and standardized.
Instead, we now have a regressive movement, apparently led by Mitch McConnell, another candidate for scum of the earth, to reverse the legalization of marijuana.
I hope it does not come to pass.
It's outrageous.
It makes ordinary citizens despise their gov herb.
And there's going to come a point where that despite for the government leads to action.
And believe me, the officials that are going to be the target of American wrath aren't going to be happy with the outcome.
Mitch McConnell included.
Thanks for that.
Fascinating.
I have no doubt that was what happened.
They did.
They seeded the clouds.
Too much enthusiasm.
Too many young people.
Too much joy.
Too much happiness.
How despicable.
But that's how it's done.
Yeah, that was a wild clip there.
Okay, when you go to the supermarket, beware.
He says he was forced to make old food look fresh.
That's why he secretly recorded his supervisor admitting tampering with best before dates is industry standard.
Every store does the same thing.
All the other stores do the same at his home.
Safari demonstrates what he says is done at work.
He takes cheesecakes weeks past their best before dates, adds new toppings, and sells as fresh.
I decorate it.
And I'm selling expire this stuff for in a national online call-out marketplace hears from grocery workers at smaller stores and big chains sharing stories of food tampering.
He used to work in a Toronto area supermarket.
He shows us how he was told to give old meat new life.
If it's like this, we would dabble in a little bit of blood, throw it into the meat minster with some redder meats, and then all together it would make it look red.
And then we put it back up on the shelf.
At the University of Guelph, a microbiologist simulated what grocery insiders told us they do.
He discovered toxins and bacteria.
No doubt it discovered toxins and bacteria in the food that oughtn't to have been there had it been sold by its prior to its exploration date.
Gary, that's absolutely SOP.
Standard operating procedure, I have no doubt whatsoever.
Americans simply need to become aware of it and be very particular what you buy, where you buy it, what you eat.
Take pains to circumvent the ill effects that could come from being played for a soccer and a sap.
Absolutely.
Okay.
As we march on.
Recently, I've been going over material that I was familiar with in the past, and this is one of the things because I remember really being moved by M. Scott Peck's sort of scientific analysis of the nature of evil.
That's what this book is.
He's a psychologist, a psychiatrist, and he was trying at the time when he wrote this book to get evil classified as a form of mental illness.
Obviously, he did not succeed in doing so.
And in my personal opinion, I believe that he was unsuccessful for two reasons.
One is if you mention the word evil to secular people, they reject it because it's too religious.
It's too woo-woo for them.
It's too old-fashioned.
You know, it's anti-progressive.
It's anti-technical.
If you mention evil, it conjures God and faith and virtue, and they hate that.
The second reason I think Scott Peck was unsuccessful in his bid to have evil classified as a mental illness is that I know this is a little controversial, but I think that the current paradigm that we're living in today was brought about by people who themselves are either sociopathic, psychopathic, or evil.
And they didn't want even define this sort of mental illness.
They don't want science to have any part of that.
Because if you've noticed, the scientific community in the last however many decades has striven to strip religion from the world.
Like you can't be a faithful person and also a scientist.
They've tried to drive this wedge as if the two things cannot exist in the same world.
I fundamentally disagree with that.
I think science is glorious, and I do not think that any part of it contradicts faith in God myself.
I don't see any clash, but they do.
And so we're playing in their playing field right now.
And that's why I have to frame this in terms of psychology and psychiatry, because that's acceptable to the scientific, secular, rationalist, materialist, reductionist worldview.
And the scientific, rationalist, reductionist, materialist worldview people are who I am trying to reach.
The controversial thing that's happening right now, in my opinion, is that people who think they are doing good are actually doing evil.
They are doing this thing, this virtue signaling thing, where it's a performative act to be good rather than actually being good.
And in my personal opinion, science is responsible.
Technocracy is responsible for this.
They have subdivided, categorized, compartmentalized people's minds to the point where they are able to do evil, pardon me, in the name of good.
Amazing Polly.
Well, not to be hypercritical, but in spite of her manifest sincerity, her position is incoherent.
You can no longer, no more classify evil as a mental illness than you can classify terror as a crime.
You can classify those who commit terrorist acts as criminals.
And you could seek to commit those who commit evil acts as bad persons or whatever.
But to just make evil as mental illness, it's absurd.
It's a category mistake.
It's just ridiculous philosophically, conceptually.
Now, I think the problem, too, with evil, and I myself indulge the word as an extreme form of bad behavior, you know, that is grossly abusive of human beings, such as genocide is clearly in my book, an evil, and I condemn it as evil.
And those that would write genocide is evil, it's got a degree of subjectivity.
You know, for example, is being gay evil?
Whether Sir Christian von Melson thinks being gay is evil.
I don't think being gay is evil.
But I mean, there are those who do.
So you want to try to classify the mental illness in the diagnostic and statistical manual of the American Psychological Association?
I don't think so, Gary.
Look, I appreciate her motivation, but I think this is a mass of confusion, and it needs to be sorted out more adequately, analytically, and philosophically.
But it was interesting you played it for the opportunity to address these aspects of the issues that are involved here.
All right.
That's why we've got the most dangerous mind in America.
Doing the response.
Okay.
You want to talk about real evil?
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law is an ethical code that has seeped into our culture, infiltrating Hollywood circles and spanning to the highest tiers of our power structure.
It's known as the law of Thelema, found in the writings of Alistair Crowley.
And while some have labeled Crowley the wickedest man in the world, others have affectionately dubbed him the most notorious occult magician of the 20th century.
So who was Crowley and does he really deserve the title of the wickedest man in the world?
Or was he just a spoiled rich pervert with nothing else to do?
Well, hopefully at the end of this five minute video, you'll be able to tell me.
Alexa Crowley's real name is Edward Alexander Crowley and he grew up in England with evangelical Christian parents, even attending a Christian boarding school growing up.
Crowley's life did at 180 when his father died of cancer.
His father's death marks the start of Crowley's dysfunction, accented by a growing hatred of his mother and the church, which spiraled into destructive behavior, drug abuse, and an obsession with sex.
From the diaries of Alistair Crowley, he recalled this period of his life and his resentment of the church as this.
I wanted sin, a supreme spiritual sin, but hadn't the slightest idea how to go about it.
So Crowley separated himself from his pious start, publishing his erotic and lewd poetry while at Cambridge, documenting his rapidly growing obsession with promiscuity.
There at Cambridge, his interest in magic, secret societies, and the occult ignited.
And thus his desire to become a black magician manifested, which became the driving force propelling him throughout the rest of his life.
The Golden Dawn, a secret society of literary and other notable figures, wasn't enough for Crowley.
He craved a darker variety of magic, and practicing dangerous rituals with risks of setting loose evil spirits sort of satiated his hunger.
But he wanted more, more sin, more power, at whatever cost.
Crowley joined covens, but never stayed in them due to his lack of respect for the practices of the coven as well as his homosexual inclinations.
He also became a high-ranking Freemason, holding membership at several lodges and gaining several masonic degrees.
On his honeymoon, Crowley and his wife visited Egypt.
His wife was said to have encountered a deity or a spirit or a demon on their honeymoon during a ritual they did.
When Crowley prompted her to reveal what spirit she encountered, she showed him an exhibit at a museum in Cairo.
The exhibit's number 666, the number of the beast in the book of Revelation.
And despite his well-published and documented dabbling, or really submersion in the occult, he was hired by British intelligence as an agent.
He even played a major role in the plot to overthrow the government of Spain.
Crowley's use of drugs is noteworthy.
Not only his self-medicating, but also his drugging of others, unbeknownst to them.
He would invite individuals over for dinner, drug them, and document their behavior.
Crowley's role in World War II involved propaganda.
He became the editor of a pro-German magazine called The Fatherland, pitched ideas to help the Allies, and dropped occult pamphlets to the German countryside, which painted the German leadership as satanic.
Thus, his prowess in propaganda might explain why his practices and teachings are still in vogue today.
An emphasis of Crowley's teachings is sex magic, which is really part of a formula and rituals that make use of sex itself as an integral element.
Crowley identified sex as the most powerful force in life and the supreme source of magical power.
Now that we have all the facts laid out, let us discuss some of the theories surrounding Crowley and his impact on the world.
Crowley was recognized by the BBC as the 73rd greatest Britain of all time.
Perhaps one of the most intriguing theories surrounding Crowley is the theory that he is Barbara Bush's father, making him George W. Bush's grandfather.
Meaning that Barbara Bush was a product of sex magic and a cold blood exists within our United States presidents.
Another theory is Alistair Crowley's connection to the founder of Scientology, Elron Hubbard.
And beyond that, Nathan Crowley, an admitted cousin of Alistair, was the set designer for Dark Knight Rises, which featured the name Sandy Hook in the film before the event even took place.
So was Aleister Crowley overhyped?
Are we giving him too much credit?
Was he really the wickedest man in the world?
Despite his depravity, despite whatever he dabbled in, despite his practices, he was still in the inner circle, and they accepted him with open arms, kind of like they do today.
Let me know your thoughts below, and I hope you all have a wonderful day.
Thank you so much for watching and subscribing.
He wrote that when you once had a miscarriage, you showed him the fetus in the jar.
We churched on it before.
But you didn't elaborate.
What?
Okay, really graceful.
Well, that was kind of intriguing at the end.
I would have liked to have heard the rest of what Barbara Bush had to say there about a fetus in a jar, but boys sound to me like Tina Foster.
I don't know if you know which, did she create this narrative, Gary?
No, it's another woman called Really Graceful.
She has a kind of, you know, what do you call it? Valley Girl kind of accent about it, but she does great videos, you know.
She sounds just like Tina Foster to me.
Now, I don't have any problem qualifying Alistair Crowley as an evil man.
So, you know, it's not that I'm reluctant to use the word.
This was kind of disjointed because the visual didn't correspond to the auditory track, even remotely in most cases.
I'd say 80% of the time we were looking at something that wasn't really reflective of the words that were used to describe Crowley.
So it was an oddity of the presentation.
But that this guy is a very sinister figure.
And he had a lot of demonic aspects to his life and did a lot of, I'm willing to call them, evil things in the world.
I'm not about to dispute.
So this was interesting, but in my opinion, only partially successful.
I mean, it invited attention to the subject, but I don't think it really did a very thorough job of documenting who he was or what he did.
It did.
It was like an appetizer.
Yeah.
We're still waiting for the entrees, the main meal.
I got you.
Yeah.
Yeah, for five minutes, I think she did a pretty good job.
Okay.
Your birth certificate.
We're not obliged to register your children.
If you do, it is at that point that you're creating a legal entity or a person.
You are associating this person with your offspring.
You are abandoning ownership or title to that person.
And the government is seizing that under the laws of maritime salvage.
It becomes their chattel property.
They use it as collateral to float loans or to float bonds for loans.
When they come to remove a child, they're not acting on the human being at all.
They're removing the legal entity you created and abandoned, and they now have title to.
It's like borrowing a rain jacket from your neighbor for your kid.
Your neighbor comes, says, I'm taking the jacket back.
You let them take it with your child still in it.
That's your person.
That is what the government acts upon.
Throughout then, since then, I've deconstructed a whole lot of acts, and I'm going to tell you a little bit about your person.
Next slide, please.
What I found in my research: a human being and a person are not the same thing.
We've been led to believe that they are, but they're not.
In Black's Law Dictionary, you'll find a definition of a person, and it says, A human being is not a person because he is a human being, but because rights and duties have been ascribed to him.
Specifically, the person is that legal subject or substance of which the rights and duties are attributes.
But not all human beings are persons, as was the case in Old England when there were slaves.
You are not a person.
Yeah, I'd like to say whoever this Illuminati guy is, he makes great videos.
They're short, and that's why we use them a lot, and they're perfect.
Well, Gary, let me say the concept of personhood is extremely important, and he's right about a person is an entity with a certain legal status and certain rights.
I tend to think of personhood as the occasion for the first primitive legal rights, a right to live.
So, I mean, this has a direct bearing on the issue of abortion with a certain legal, moral, political standing.
I believe Roe v. Wade was properly decided by the court that, in effect, of course, it declared that abortions unrestricted in the first trimester were okay, that how the state regulated in the second, but in the third, abortion could only be committed if it were to save the life or the health of the mother.
Now, that implies that at the end of the second trimester, the entity acquires certain legal rights.
And I believe that corresponds with the onset of personhood as a legal, moral, and political concept.
Now, and remember, I mean, the definition of murder is a deliberate but wrongful killing of a person.
We can have the deliberate killing of persons that's not wrongful.
Soldiers in combat, they're killing the enemy soldier.
It's deliberate, and it's killing a person, but it's not wrongful.
Police in their performance of their duty, citizens in self-defense.
These are deliberate killings that are not wrongful.
Now, my argument is that the Supreme Court ruled properly because it's the end of the second trimester that viability enters the equation, which is the ability of the fetus to survive external to the uterine environment.
It's not a function of heart or brain function, but rather of the lung, the capacity of the lungs.
So these all coincide.
Also, the pain system is functional at the end of the second trimester.
So Without engaging in a prolonged debate, which I have had of late, by the way, with Jonas Alexis, who's the editor-in-chief of Veterans Today in OON's Review, UNZ.com, from Darwin to Deontology is a title, three parts.
That's kind of elaborate.
Jonas likes to say a lot of things with a lot of words.
My parts, my responses are far more concise.
But I think there's a pretty good exhibition there of my arguments about reproduction and a woman's right to choose, especially for the following reason.
If women do not have the right to not carry an unwanted fetus to term, then they're being converted into reproductive slaves.
They're being obligated to do something they would not willingly do by force of the law with threats of punishment.
And in my judgment, this is wrong.
This is wrong.
This is coercive and improper, that it's a woman's body.
In fact, I don't understand why we don't have more arguments about a woman's right to choose, because it seems to me it's the only democratic and American solution to the problem.
It allows everyone to act in accordance with their conscience.
It doesn't force anyone to have an abortion.
And it also doesn't require anyone to carry determined unwanted fetus.
So in my opinion, this is the solution to the abortion.
And it's consistent with every woman acting in accordance with their own conscience, their own religious beliefs, their own family circumstances, their own physician's advice, and all the rest.
I spent 35 years in higher education and in courses on critical thinking invariably.
The most extensively discussed and debated issue of them all was abortion.
And I'll just say this is based on a distillation of 35 years of discussion and debate that I give you here in about two minute concise summary that I believe is why every American actually ought to endorse the right to choose as the American and democratic solution to this most controversial and vaccine problem.
Yeah, you've never been afraid to take on controversial subjects.
That's for sure.
And here's one.
And our leaders are low-life scum that screw little girls so the Jews can screw America.
That's what's happening in this country.
I just said it.
That's what's going on in this country.
And our FBI is corrupt.
The Supreme Court is corrupt.
The Justice Department is corrupt.
The news media is corrupt.
The whole country is corrupt because we've walked away from Almighty God and we've allowed Kabbalah practicing Jews to defile the nation.
Put that video out.
Go ahead and clip this video and send it out.
I dare you.
You won't do it because you're scared that the truth may get out to the American people.
I'm headed up to here with the corruption in this country.
Little children being raped for the benefit of Israel.
It's all about, Doc, little American children being raped for the benefit of Israel.
American politicians raping little American girls to be videotaped by Israeli Mossad so that Israel can blackmail American politicians.
That's the state of America today.
God ought to destroy this country for what we've become.
Well, I have to preface by saying, of course, there are good people and bad people of every race and religion.
I have good friends who are Jewish, and I have tremendous esteem and affection for them.
But in terms of this policy, the creation of Jeffrey Epstein as a blackmailer using child sex as the bait, the inducement, is grotesque.
It is evil.
So, you know, in terms of the sentiment he's expressing, I could not possibly disagree.
He is right to condemn it wholeheartedly.
And as I've said now, among those three new stories from Morrow, where it turns out that you have a prominent Israeli figure saying every anti-Israel, every American who's critical of Israel, even for genocide, deserves the same treatment they're giving to the Palestinians.
In other words, to be killed.
That Trump is under orders to go to war with Venezuela to punish Nicholas Maduro because Nicholas Maduro is supportive of the Palestinians.
And third and most important and relevant to this, that the Israelis want Trump to eliminate laws of consent that make it a crime to have sex with underage children as anti-Semitic.
How can laws of consent be anti-Semitic unless there's evil intent there to have sex with children, which I find to be an abomination, Gary?
This is really stunning stuff.
So, you know, the case for Israel having become a nation riddled in evil, I think it's virtually overwhelming at this point in time.
I see no way back.
I don't see any way Israel can redeem itself.
And indeed, they have shifted their propaganda efforts from trying to make us love Israel.
I'm sorry.
Too late.
To hate Muslims.
So we had that shooting in DC.
I guarantee that's one.
There's going to be a whole series of whole rash.
And it's going to be mossad handiwork.
They're going to manufacture events that are supposed to make us hate Islam more than we hate Israel.
I mean, that's their new strategy.
That's a new game pan.
So I'm empathetic with who this guy is very familiar, Gary.
Who is he?
Do we know the name of his name?
I'm not sure at all.
Well, he's speaking from the heart.
And I'm sorry to say, I think when you boil it all down, he's got it right.
Very, very sad to say.
All right.
And watch how uneasy people get when you start using the J-word here.
We're talking about COVID and the people involved with the COVID scam.
When COVID was being enacted, I'm going to read off the staff of who's in charge of this CDC.
The director of the CDC was Rochelle Walinski, dual citizenship with Israel.
She's a Jew.
Deputy Director of the CDC, Pan Shawalchi, dual citizenship with Israel.
Jew.
CDC chief of staff, Sherry Berger, dual citizenship with Israel.
Jew.
CDC Chief Medical Officer, Mitchell Woo, dual citizenship with Israel.
Jew.
CDC director of the Washington Opic.
This is pertinent to the topic.
We're talking about COVID, right?
Yeah.
This is pertinent to COVID.
So I love you, Jennifer.
Yeah, please.
So director of the CDC of the Washington office, Jeff Rezick, dual citizenship with Israel.
Jew.
COVID Tsar, Jeff Zains, dual citizenship with Israel.
Jew, COVID senior advisor, Andy Schlavit, dual citizenship with Israel.
Jew.
Assistant of Health Secretary for Human Services for our country.
The Assistant of Health Secretary, Rachel Levine, transgender dual citizenship with Israel.
I ask that you hold off, Christopher.
Ma'am, I'm almost done.
Mr. Firewood, the chair has ruled that your comments are out of order.
She's asked you to stop.
How is it out of order?
The chair has.
She said, Jew.
There's nothing wrong with you.
It's not derogatory.
Exactly.
Okay, keep on going.
Head of Pfizer vaccines, Algeria, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew.
Pfizer chief scientist, Michael Dost, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew.
Moderna chief scientist, Paul Zach, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew.
BlackRock, everyone knows BlackRock.
BlackRock CEO, Larry Faith, dual citizenship with Israel.
I said we're willing to sacrifice our ego, our reputation, and our lives.
Yes, ma'am, and I love you, and I appreciate your patience.
BlackRock president, Rob Capital, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew.
The CDC chief medical officer of Johnson Johnson, Joanne Walshreicher, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew.
Chief medical officer, Tom Merck, Michael Rosenvald, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew.
Head of Pfizer of the World Economic Forum, Yvald Harari, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew, and that's what we're talking about.
you need to stop nothing happens to anyone that he has not fitted by nature to bear
Well, some truths are bitter.
And I admire him for having the courage and integrity to undertake that enumeration.
I'm sorry to say, I think he's got it exactly right.
And that the depopulation program has been part of a global Zionist agenda for one world government where the world is to be ruled from Jerusalem by Jews.
I think that is the agenda.
The World Economic Forum, the Great Reset, the Rothschild Banking Empire, they're all in.
BlackRock, all in.
This guy was doing a service, and I can understand why the public officials were anxious and uncomfortable because it sounds anti-Semitic.
What is to criticize Israel for genocide, anti-Semitic?
That's what they want us to believe.
Of course not.
Genocide is inherently wrong.
It is grossly immoral.
It is perhaps the greatest atrocity human beings can perpetrate upon other human beings that try to slaughter a whole group because of some specific trait they share in common.
So criticize anyone who perpetrates genocide is legitimate and morally proper and correct.
And it just happens to be Israel.
We had the former Israeli minister of education on Amy Goodman.
This is like 30 years ago, Gary.
And they were talking about the Holocaust and how there are a lot of skeptics and criticism of Israel.
And she said that, yes, yes, it's a trick.
She said this, it's a trick.
If Israel is being criticized in Europe, we bring up the Holocaust.
If Israel is being criticized in America, we claim it's anti-Semitism.
That's what we've been undergoing.
And our own government, damnably, has participated in this fraud by expanding the definition of anti-Semitism, which classically refers to criticizing, rejecting, or disvaluing a person because they're Jewish, into a broader category of being anti-Semitic if you offer any criticism whatsoever of Israel, no matter how valid the criticism might be.
And I think bringing this up about COVID, this is a whole deep corrupt underbelly that has remained unexplored in the past.
I think this is a huge benefit he was doing there.
And, you know, I sympathize with the city council because they know they're going to be criticized, especially by Jewish members and community.
But I'll bet you the others, the non-Jews, are going to appreciate what he did there, Gary, and so must the whole country.
We must all appreciate exposing what's really going on and the politics behind even medical phenomena.
Who would have thought what we're witnessing, politicization of medicine, politicization of science?
It's not just these are areas where we have the rightful expectation that we're going to be treated on the basis of objective knowledge and not political bias or propaganda, but it's untrue.
And we're having to learn the very painful lesson.
So I commend him.
I think this was a valuable exercise.
And I'm profoundly appreciative that you included it.
Because frankly, Gary, until I heard him enumerate, I had recognized the connection between the fake COVID pandemic and the Israeli motivation here in terms of the global reset one world government agenda.
So I thank you for this profoundly.
All right.
After this next video, we're going to have a little fun, sort of like the seven-inning stretch.
But this is a guy that agrees with you, Dr. Patrick.
If I was going to Auschwitz with the BBC television team, and this isn't just somebody with an 8mm high-h camera, this is the BBC.
They're going to be marketing their film to television corporations around the world.
I'm going to be standing there in their so-called gas chamber at Auschwitz-1, and I'm going to be pointing out, oh, no holes in the roof.
So that rather makes a mockery of your eyewitnesses who said that they saw the SS men clambering up on the top and dropping the pillars through the holes in the roof.
Oh, look at that door over there.
It's got a glass pane in it.
A pane of glass and a gas chamber in the door.
There's a two-inch gap under the wooden door.
It's a drafty gas chamber, this one.
I'd be asking questions like that.
And they know they can't stand that.
And so this is the reason that I'm banned from the Auschwitz site.
Because I'll be asking the questions about the heaps of coke which don't exist.
What happened to the bodies?
I'll be asking questions like that.
I'd be saying, Tom Bauer, the famous British historian and journalist who wrote that recent book about the Swiss gold, Tom Bauer, he described how in May 1944, 450,000 Hungarian Jews were shipped off to Auschwitz.
Within the space of three weeks, they're being cremated and gassed.
450,000 people, as I wrote in a letter to the Sunday Times, of course, 450,000 people is just an awful lot of meat.
It's 45,000 tons of meat if you're going to be tasteless about it.
So what did they do with this mountain of meat after they'd gassed it?
Either they cremated it, they burned it, or they buried it, they plowed it under.
And you've got to be tasteless.
You've got to ask these questions.
If you're going to get rid of 450,000 bodies, you've got a mountain of flesh of 45,000 cubic meters to dispose of.
If you're going to bury it, you're going to have a pit of 45,000 cubic meters, which is the size of several football fields, which will be visible from the air.
And we have the aerial photographs taken of Auschwitz in precisely those weeks, and there's no such pits visible.
Or you're going to cremate them, and it's going to take 60 kilograms of coke on average to cremate everybody in the gas chambers in the crematory that was applied to Auschwitz.
We know that because we have the actual operating instructions of these crematoria and their efficiency charts and all the details that went came from the manufacturers.
So we know how many tons of coke are going to be needed.
Tens of thousands of tons of coking coal, and there's no sign of that on the aerial photographs either.
But nobody asks these questions because if they do, of course, it's off with his head, put him in prison.
And if I go to that building with the BBC television cameras, I'm going to be pointing out about the inside of the doors.
I'll say, what a funny thing.
That gas chamber door has got a handle on the inside.
Now, I was in Pentonville prison for contempt of court three or four years ago, and I can't remember having had a handle on the inside of my cell door.
Yet we're being told that 800 people packed into that room, according to the eyewitnesses, were so stupid that it never occurred to them to open the door with a handle that the Nazis had very kindly provided on the inside.
And everybody's believed it for the last 50 years, and tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, nay, millions of schoolchildren have been bussed across Europe to that site and told to go in that building and shudder, because that's where millions of Jews were killed by the Nazis during World War II.
And only now is the truth beginning to come out that nobody was gassed in that building, because that building was built by the Poles, as they now admit, in 1948, three years after World War II was over.
Okay.
Yeah, wonderful, wonderful, wonderful.
Full-throated repudiation of the Holocaust mythology.
That's actually wonderful.
Yes.
So some of these structures were built after the war was over.
How many Jews can have been gassed during World War II in structures they were built after the war had ended?
I mean, Gary, the absurdity is so manifest.
I'd like the guy.
For those who want a more technical-specific proof that it's all bald or dash, go to my piece entitled The Holocaust Narrative, Politics, Trump, Science, on the government rager on my own blog.
Or go to my blog and go to the 65 shows and scroll down to the World War II, the official World War II narrative, historical fact, or mass illusion.
And there you'll get very thorough documentation, including the bit where the former Israeli Minister of Education is talking with Amy Goodman, saying it's all a trick to accuse people of being Holocaust deniers, as am I or anti-Semitic.
And I say, for anyone who's done the research, you're either a Holocaust denier or a big fat liar.
There aren't any options.
And if you want the definitive work, debunking the Holocaust, Breaking the Spell by Nick Kohlerstrom is the place to go.
I was very flattered that Nick invited me to write the introduction to his masterpiece, which benefited from the British death books because they'd broken the German code and they had records that Germans were so meticulous all the records of all the camps and everything else,
confirming the International Committee of the Red Cross owned records, which showed that when they recalibrated the total in 1993 from all causes combined, from all the camps, 296,081 died, none of whom, none of whom, not one, Zilts, not a Zip was put to death in a gas chamber, Gary.
Let's get rid of this nonsense.
We got to emancipate ourselves from this yoke of propaganda.
And we may just be capable of doing it now because the Israeli slaughter of the Palestinians has broken the spell.
Just as Nick said, the spell of Israel being in humane, admirable nation, it's actually precisely the opposite.
Gary, once again, thanks.
You put together an amazing stream today.
All right, we got one more one-minute clip.
This is going to be more fun.
Now, a lot of people are really getting tired of people stealing their packages.
So here's what they've decided to do.
Why me?
They're not allowed to do that.
Do you hear me?
You're not allowed to do that.
I'm calling the cops.
I'm calling the cops on you.
If I told you, I'd open my face.
Sir, why were you putting the package in your truck to begin with?
Because I thought it was mine.
You always grab packages sitting on someone's.
I couldn't tell.
I can't in my eyes.
Come on, what is this?
No, no, no.
I'm calling the...
I think you get the idea.
It goes on for nine minutes.
I love it.
They are committing theft and they're going to call the cops.
It's the owners.
We should be calling the cops on them.
I think it's hilarious.
And yeah, that's a very nice way to conclude a really sensational sequence presentations today, Gary.
Thank you so much.
All right.
All right, great.
Perfect sequel to my birthday of yesterday.
Thank you so much, Gary.
All right.
Thank you too for responding.
This show is a belated birthday present from you to me.
All right.
I appreciate it very much and I appreciate all your responses because nobody can out respond.