Jim Fetzer - The Raw Deal (5 December 2025) with co-host Paul from CA and special featured guest, Alen Salerinar

Dec. 6, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:56:44

The Raw Deal (5 December 2025) with co-host Paul from CA and special featured guest, Alen Salerinar

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host of the Rawdeal, right here on Revolution Radio Studio B this fifth day of December 2025.
	I expect to be joined by co-host Paul from California and have a very special guest today, the former head shrink for the FBI, Alan Solarian, who has much to share with us, his reflections on the Jeffrey Epstein case.
	You are going to find it fascinating.
	Meanwhile, we begin with some of the latest news.
	There's a photo of the J6 pipe bomber who has been arrested now.
	Frankly, I'm kind of startled because this turns out to be a black man, whereas previously it appeared to be a white woman who I took to be a DC cop.
	I'm uncertain what to make of that, but a bait and switch would not be surprising.
	We have the DOJ announcing.
	If you live in a Wisconsin zip code and have zero DUIs in the last five years.
	Good afternoon.
	As you all know now, early this morning, Brian Cole Jr. was arrested and charged with placing the pipe bombs at the RNC and the DNC on January 5th, 2021.
	He has been charged with violating 18 U.S.C. 844, which is use of an explosive device.
	This investigation is ongoing.
	As we speak, search warrants are being executed and there could be more charges to come.
	I'm going to let our U.S. attorney discuss that shortly.
	This was the work of multiple agencies working together.
	This morning's operation was carried out safely and successfully.
	We know that there are so many issues when you're issuing search warrants.
	Dangerous things can happen.
	And this was carried out safely and securely thanks to all of the people standing around me.
	They have worked tirelessly on this.
	Today's arrest happened because the Trump administration has made this case a priority.
	The total lack of movement on this case in our nation's capital undermined the public trust of our enforcement agencies.
	This cold case languished for four years until Director Patel and Deputy Director Bongino came to the FBI.
	The FBI, along with U.S. Attorney Pierrow and all of our prosecutors, have worked tirelessly for months sifting through evidence that had been sitting at the FBI with the Biden administration for four long years.
	Let me be clear, there was no new tip.
	There was no new witness, just good, diligent police work and prosecutorial work, working as a team along with ATF, Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police Department, and of course, the FBI.
	We are working every day to restore the public's trust.
	We hope that today is a significant step towards that progress.
	We'll share more information when we can and when it unfolds.
	I cannot stress enough how hard Director Patel and Deputy Director Bongino have worked for months to make our nation's capital safer and to make our country safer.
	I'd like to introduce now Director Patel.
	And the Department of Justice, we are finally able to make an arrest of an individual by the name of Brian Cole.
	As the Attorney General has indicated, he is arrested for transporting an explosive device in interstate commerce, as well as the attempted malicious destruction by means of explosive materials.
	You know, folks, this case involved millions of pieces of data.
	And it is a huge win because it was like finding a needle in a haystack.
	So much of this evidence was very specific, but a lot of it was also very general.
	For example, there were 233,000 black end caps of the type that were used in this case.
	I want you to think about the fact that the FBI had to go through the sale of every one of them to try to find commonality with an individual along with the purchase of the pipe itself, the cap ends, the wires, the steel, and the nine-volt batteries.
	Every one of those had to be mined and remined to the point where we were able to then connect and make one more report before I invite Alan's comments on this case where he's in a perfect budget.
	We have, of course, one one more.
	We go.
	Brian Cole, was he working alone?
	And why did it take five years for this man to be found?
	He was living just miles from the scene of the crime.
	We are pouring over the criminal complaint right now against Brian Cole Jr., 30 years old, Virginia man now under arrest for allegedly planting two pipe bombs outside the RNC and the DNC the night before the January 6th riots on Capitol Hill.
	They were discovered before they were detonated, thankfully, but then Vice President Harris came within feet of one of them after a thousand interviews, tens of thousands of videos, hundreds of tips, and a half million dollar reward.
	FBI Director Kash Patel says it all came down to this earlier today.
	We did not discover any new information.
	What we did, an investigation spearheaded by the deputy director and the ADIC of our Washington field office, brought in a new team of investigators and experts, re-examined every piece of evidence, sifted through all the data, something that the prior administration refused and failed to do.
	Correspondent David Spunt live in Washington reading through the criminal complaint as we speak.
	Hi, David.
	Hi, Martha.
	It's not even 10 pages long.
	I've been looking through it, and it shows that Brian Cole Jr.'s cell phone pinged in the area of the RNC and DNC the night of the crime, January 5th, 2021.
	Authorities say bank receipts show that Cole purchased bomb-making materials in 2020 used to make those specific pipe bombs.
	We'll just leave it generally forensic evidence.
	Yeah, it's fair enough to say.
	FBI agent spent hours at his home in Woodbridge, Virginia, a D.C. suburb today.
	He's charged with transporting an explosive device in interstate commerce, as well as attempted malicious destruction by means of explosive materials.
	Authorities say search warrants are being executed.
	More charges could be on the way.
	Just this past October, Martha, the FBI put out enhanced video of who they now say is Cole planting the pipe bomb near the bench outside the DNC in Washington that night.
	This was the night before the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
	Then they say Cole placed the same type of bomb outside the Republican National Committee minutes later.
	He wore a mask, a hooded sweatshirt, glasses, and gloves.
	Agents say the two bombs were placed between 7:30 and 8:30 at night.
	The bombs did not detonate, but were viable and discovered the next day.
	Over almost five years, agents visited 1,200 homes and businesses, more than 1,000 interviews, 39,000 video files to look through.
	They also went through more than 600 tips.
	Let me keep that in mind, but I want to have Alan's comments here prefaced by a few observations of my own.
	Alan, taken four years for some as trivial as this is ridiculous, in my opinion.
	And I regard Kash Patel as totally incompetent and unqualified to be director.
	And Judge Janine Pierre, now being a U.S. attorney, it seems to me Trump kind of selects people for position based on who he sees on television.
	Your thoughts, my friend.
	As a former head shrink with the FBI, I'm sure you have many observations of value.
	Really, based upon what I'm hearing, it's very difficult to make any judgments.
	That's all I'm going to say.
	I really cannot make any sense out of it.
	I would like to see the evidence.
	The evidence is really not shared and usually remains secret.
	So everything is speculative.
	And that's a trap that I refuse to take.
	I really have my own doubts based upon other government investigations that were completely phony and misleading.
	So I'm going to reserve my opinion until I have access to the data.
	Sure.
	Fair enough, Alan.
	You've already heard my thoughts.
	And I saw previous photographs that suggest it was actually a white woman, relatively young.
	I'd say 30-ish.
	She was actually a DC cop who had planted.
	So I'm suspicious about every aspect of this.
	I find it very troubling.
	And the idea that it took so long to solve this case, I find really quite ridiculous.
	Meanwhile, we have 94% of self-described mega-Republicans approve of Trump bombing Iran.
	I think this is ludicrous, really outrageous.
	Here we have, this is Russ Winter's Winter Watch as a meme.
	I decay man, I'm starting to doubt that this bloated surveillance state war machine run by an ancient demonic cult of child rapists can be fixed by voting.
	There's nothing to be said.
	As expected, 94% of self-describing Republicans approve of Trump bombing Iran.
	But remember, he betrayed his base.
	This is bizarre.
	Approve all Republicans, 85%.
	Mega Republicans, actually, 94%.
	This is a violation of international law.
	Iran is a sovereign nation.
	There's no justification whatsoever for attacking Iran.
	I have suspected that among the motives for going after Venezuelan oil is in anticipation of another strike on Iran by the U.S. and Israel combined,
	where Iran would promptly shut the Straits of Hormuz and make world's oil supply to Manish, where Trump is compensating in advance by going after Venezuelan oil.
	Alan, would you have any thoughts on this?
	Yes, yes, I do.
	I think my first point will be that President Trump told us he was not going to bomb Iran.
	And a week later or 10 days later, we were bombing Iran.
	And now, our Constitution is very explicit about honesty and presidential honesty.
	That is, if you lie to the people about any issue, then you're violating the U.S. Constitution.
	And I think this happened.
	And to me, it represents a fundamental basis for impeachment.
	He did it.
	We all watched it.
	And we're all passive about it.
	But it's a major, major violation of a president saying to the nation and internationally, reassuring that he's going to think about it and take time, not bomb.
	And then a few days later, bombing.
	And secondly, I think the point that you're making, Iran is an independent country, and there is no justification for this kind of violent act.
	So I concur with your views on that.
	Well, I have been to Iran.
	I was there for an international conference in 2014.
	It is a great nation with a great history and a dedication to peace.
	Iran has not launched a war of aggression against any other state since Alan 1775, which, as you know, is even before the ratification of the Constitution in 1778 or the election of George Washington as our first president, 1779, for longer than the United States has existed as a constitutional republic.
	Iran has not launched a war of aggression against another state.
	I only wish we could claim a similar record.
	Further.
	A wonderful point.
	Meanwhile, One in three school children in Britain's asylum capital, Glasgow, don't speak English as their first language.
	Figures show amid fears city can't cope with more arrivals.
	This has to do, of course, with the devastating impact of migration under the Callergy Plan, which is devised by a Jewish intellectual in the mid-30s to flood Europe with migrants from Africa to destroy their culture and their genetic integrity,
	where similar events then have been now applied to the United States to destroy our culture and our genetic integrity.
	Estimates now have it that whites will be a minority in America within a few years.
	Here's the truth seeker.
	One in three school children in Britain's asylum capital, Glasgow, don't speak English as their first language.
	And this is such a traumatic event.
	We now have in our own public schools, hundreds of different languages.
	How can the public schools possibly cope?
	I mean, it's overwhelming.
	They don't have the resources.
	It's an unconsciousable imposition.
	Around one in three school children in Britain's asylum capital do not speak English as their first language.
	Data has shown.
	Scottish government figures show 28.8% of students in Glasgow speak English as an additional or second language.
	It is the highest figure anywhere else in the country, which led one Scottish politician to describe the figure as staggering.
	Of the 71,957 students in schools in Glasgow, 20,707 are EAL, English as an additional language learner, according to figures from last September.
	That's a rise of a third since 2019 when it stood at 22.5%.
	It believed the increase is purely due to a more precise recording of students reported the Telegraph.
	Glasgow was recently branded as the asylum capital of the UK.
	After figures show it has the highest proportion of asylum seekers of any local authority.
	65 per 10,000 residents, totaling 4,023.
	Alan, your thoughts.
	I think that the whole immigration business has been a catastrophe, but nowhere more prevalently than in the public schools, where the systems are overwhelmed by multiple non-English speaking students.
	How are they supposed to cope?
	Your thoughts.
	I do not know what the political angle is on this, and I don't really have any bright ideas, but I would say that humans are humans and kids learn and speak multiple languages.
	I don't really see that as a challenge.
	It's natural and it follows basically evolutionary principles.
	That is, poor people are going to move and migrate to places where quality of life is better.
	And that's going to happen no matter what.
	So it's an evolutionary natural inclination to seek better conditions.
	I don't have an answer politically about how to manage it, but that's really, this is what's going on around the world all the time for thousands of years.
	That's how we migrated from Africa, from Japan and any other place.
	I agree, of course, with the Out of Africa hypothesis, and we're now joined by Paul from California.
	But the open borders policy, which was implemented by the Biden administration and enhanced by Alejandro Mayorkas, who was then secretary of DHS, giving all this free stuff, free lodging, free food, you know,
	all kinds of benefits has brought about a surge that was most assuredly not a matcher of natural evolution, but it was artificial selection and opportunity.
	And I have no doubt Paul has a good number of opinions about it.
	Paul, we just reviewed a report in Scotland showing about a third of their students have English as a second or additional language.
	And the point I was making is it's overwhelming the public school system right here in the U.S.
	I mean, they're really being turned into remedial education for all these immigrants when they ought to be advancing the educational level of American citizens.
	Your thoughts.
	Right.
	Well, this is a very broad topic, and there's a lot of things at play.
	Apologize for arriving late ahead.
	I was running a little behind, but also had trouble logging in, as you alluded to in your email.
	But I was finally able to join.
	You know, the thing is, as I've made clear in many of my statements in the past on your show, that I'd like to, you know, boil things down to what I would call the intrinsic nature of what it is that's going on.
	And, you know, we use words like culture and immigrant and illegal immigrant as in many ways a what's the best word I can think of?
	A term that stands in place of another term, which, of course, is race or racial.
	So there's no doubt about the fact that a war is being waged against the white race.
	You know, we can call it Western civilization or Western Christian civilization, if you will.
	But essentially, every European country and every New World country that was settled by European immigrants, such as the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, it's well known, well documented.
	All these countries are being subjected to a racial attack by inundation.
	Essentially, it's a deluge.
	It's not just immigration.
	It's really in many ways a deluge.
	And no place you can see it more clearly than California.
	It's just really unreal, the amount of non-white foreigners that you see.
	And I really do believe they want to turn the entire nation into California, where the Caucasian or white population has dipped below 50%.
	And that's clear just by the eye test, as they say.
	So what is behind this?
	In other words, these people are not of any economic benefit.
	This has been very well covered by academic and scholastic articles going back 30 plus years or more.
	So there's no, we don't derive any economic benefit from their presence here.
	They're not, except for the East Asians, for example, they're not good students as a rule.
	The Hispanic dropout rate exceeds the dropout rate of blacks in most counties and most school districts.
	They don't really assimilate.
	Hispanics are one of the few foreign populations that continue to speak their language 10, 15, 20 years and beyond their presence here.
	And I have personal experience of this.
	Whereas, for example, many people from other countries, including Iran, and of course, a lot of European countries and also Russia, they either get English training in their own country or they pick it up here very quickly because they have the acuity to do so.
	So there's no doubt that this is a degrading of our level of civilization, our level of material comfort and our standard of living.
	That can only occur if we continue to, shall we say, allow our own displacement by these people that could not and would not be able to invent on their own the level of technology and the standard of living that we have achieved here in the West.
	I like to make this, it's not really a joke, but I've said this many times on the air that every time a non-white foreigner flips a switch or pulls a handle in this or any other Western country, they are treating themselves to something that our race has provided for them.
	Because as I've made this clear, when the Spanish and the Portuguese and the other European explorers went to other continents, you know, centuries ago, they encountered a Stone Age people who, except for the Far East, who in most cases did not have the wheel or the written language.
	And that's Africa, Central America, South America, and most of North America.
	Most of these tribes were not writing anything and did not have any technology that you could think of that would be anything past the Stone Age.
	And this is only a few.
	You clearly arrived in time for one of your copies.
	We'll be right back with our special guest, Alan Solarian, right after this break.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Do you have a message you'd like to share?
	Any knowledge you'd like to impart to those willing to learn?
	Have you ever listened to our shows and thought, hey, I could do this, but you just don't know how to kickstart your hosting ambitions?
	Or are you an established professional host?
	Thwarted by censorship in other areas, seeking pastures new?
	Contact us here at the world's number one free speech network, Revolution Radio.
	We provide the platform, the training, and the airtime to any budding host wanting the chance to take those first talk show steps.
	Established hosts can find a safe and secure home here where their message can ring out loud and clear, unencumbered, free from sponsorship overreach.
	Drop us a line via our email, support at revolution.radio, or head into our Discord server to say hello.
	We'll take everything from there.
	Revolution Radio, where hosting dreams become actualized reality.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution RadioFreedomSlipsy.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio.
	Join Revolution
	Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary ZEN with host Zen Garcia at freedomslips.com.
	the people station the opinions expressed on this radio station its programs and its website by the hosts guests and calling listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	now we return you to your host most of the world is well aware uh
	Modern-day Israel, formerly Palestine, has reduced the Palestinian population to do enclaves known as the West Bank and Gaza that represent less than 10% of the geographical area that was 100% Palestinian before the declaration of the State of Israel.
	And while the massive slaughter has been taking place in Gaza, other events have been taking place in the West Bank, which Israel also intends to annex, including over 21,000 arrests since October when we had the famous event, The alleged attack by Hamas,
	which appears to have been essentially orchestrated by Israel with fake footage and a lot of attacks, and allowing things to happen where IDF, former IDF, were already reporting it the very day it was happening that something was completely wrong because the security was so massive along the fence line that if a pigeon were to crap on the fence, the Israelis would know it.
	The Palestinian Prisoners Club has reported that the Israeli occupation army has arrested approximately 21,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since the start of Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza on 7 October, 2023.
	We have more.
	We have UK lawyers use secret evidence to justify a ban on Palestinian action.
	Judges hear secret evidence as lawyers and public for Palestine Action co-founder told to leave court during a closed session.
	The UK government closed the final day of the judicial review into Palestine action by presenting secret evidence hidden from both the group's lawyers and the public to justify its ban on the direct action organization.
	I can't think of any more clear illustration that totalitarian ways have befallen the United Kingdom.
	Following brief open court submission from government lawyers on Tuesday, the court asked lawyers representing Palestine Action co-founder Huda Amori, as well as members of the public and journalists to leave.
	Abortion of Tuesday's hearing was held in closed session to allow the government to present material it says cannot be disclosed on national security grounds.
	Where have we heard that before?
	Meanwhile, Hillary, of all people, blames pure propaganda on social media for youth views about Israel.
	Clinton said it was a serious problem that people were getting their information from social media, particularly TikTok.
	Get this.
	Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has claimed that young Americans, including young Jewish Americans, hold increasingly critical views of Israel because they are being misled by pure propaganda and totally made-up videos on TikTok and other social media platforms.
	Speaking at a summit in New York hosted by Israel Hayam on Tuesday, Clint repeatedly suggested widely documented information circulating online about Israel's genocidal actions in Gaza is fabricated and expressed concerns that students don't know the history and don't understand.
	I dare say, watching the genocide, the slaughter of the Palestinian day after day after day for year after year is having an effect.
	And it is anything but propaganda.
	That our students, smart, well-educated young people from our own country, from around the world, where were they getting their information?
	They were getting their information from social media, particularly TikTok.
	That is where they were learning about what happened on October 7th, what happened in the days, weeks, and months to follow.
	That's a serious problem.
	It's a serious problem for democracy, whether it's Israel or the United States, and it's a serious problem for our young people.
	And it was frankly shocking to me how little the students we were encountering, not only in this class we teach, which is a very large class, international relations about crisis decision-making, but students more generally.
	And that's why I mentioned the social media piece of it, because when you would try to talk to them to engage in some kind of reasonable discussion, it was very difficult because they did not know history.
	They had very little context.
	And what they were being told on social media was not just one-sided.
	It was pure propaganda.
	And so when you think about it, it's a lot of fun.
	It's a real story.
	And it's important.
	It's not just looking internally.
	It's looking externally and particularly looking at young people because, you know, it's not just the usual suspects.
	It is a lot of young Jewish Americans who don't know the history of the usual suspects.
	This is so embarrassing to have someone of her prominence in American society issuing such balder dash.
	Go right ahead.
	Well, I don't know.
	To my eye, that looks like another or different Hillary Clinton than the, I mean, I've seen enough photos of the old, the older, you know, so-called original, you know, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton's wife, to know the difference.
	And she looks like another fake to me.
	I mean, just, I don't know.
	What do you think?
	Well, of course, I documented her use of eight or ten different body doubles, including during her national debates with Bernie Sanders on the one hand, with Donald Trump on the other, which was a younger, thinner, healthier, far more attractive version of the real Hillary, though the voice was indistinguishable.
	Yeah, it's amazing how close they get with the voice sometimes.
	Yeah, yeah, there's a voice box that gives you the same voice, Paul.
	On this very topic, not to divert, but just really quickly, recently in an email or text exchange with my sister, I talked about this fact that sometimes what I think, because I've seen her double at least twice in my life.
	One time I met a woman who looked exactly, I mean, literally like a carbon copy of my sister.
	She was a little taller, and she had the same first name on a name tag.
	She was a waitress in a coffee shop up in Reno.
	This is probably back in the 90s.
	It was like before cell phones or I had a cell phone with a cell phone camera.
	Otherwise, I would have taken a picture.
	It was amazing.
	And I had a similar experience another time as well, not quite so dead on.
	And I remember one time way back in the day in the 1980s when I was canvassing knocking on doors, a woman opened the door.
	And the first thing she does is she gasped.
	And she goes, oh, my God.
	And I smile, I go, what, what?
	What?
	And she says, you look just like my son.
	I go, no way.
	She goes, hold on a second.
	She goes back and she gets a picture of her son and shows it to me.
	And my gosh, there was a tremendous resemblance.
	And the reason I mentioned this text or email exchange with my sister is I told her, I said, I think maybe there's a factory somewhere, and there's variations of the same models of humans.
	They just spit them out, you know.
	So it's probably not that hard to find doubles of particular people.
	Well, it may be somewhat difficult, but I really do believe that this doppelganger thing is something that's not that uncommon.
	Go ahead.
	I think there is something to be said about the content of what she said, whether this is fake or real, that the content itself is absurd.
	Right.
	Because genocide is genocide.
	We all have eyes, unless we're seeing the wrong thing.
	We're seeing that civilians are being bombed.
	And bombing civilians is genocide.
	So there is no question about it.
	There should not be any discussion.
	Yeah, bombing civilians is a war crime.
	And when it's to eliminate a whole group of people with a distinctive ethnic, it is ethnic cleansing and genocide.
	100% right.
	Paul, addition, no thoughts of yours.
	Well, I mean, of course, but at the same time, I mean, who are we to criticize other people for bombing civilians?
	I mean, we made it sad to say, right?
	I don't like to look at the photos or read much history of World War II because it makes me sick to my stomach.
	What we did to the Japanese and the Germans was quite dishonorable.
	And I don't really think it's a...
	We committed genocide, period.
	We committed genocide against Japan and Germans.
	And we fooled ourselves that we were on the right side.
	But history is history.
	We did the same thing in Vietnam and other places.
	We did commit genocide.
	But we should not be defensive about it.
	Genocide is genocide.
	We're not perfect.
	And just because of our own past, we should not be defensive of saying that now Israel is committing genocide.
	And I also want to make the difference between Israel and Moses and the Jewish culture.
	This is not what something that Moses wanted or said.
	Okay.
	Moses said, do not kill and do not lie.
	And here, basically, when it comes to Israel, we're killing people and we're also lying about it.
	So there's always a defensiveness about Jewish culture and being called anti-Semite.
	And it's kind of funny, but it's a personally sensitive issue because I'm Armenian, I'm Christian, but I'm married to a Jewish woman for 53 years and I have Jewish kids and Jewish illness.
	I love the culture and the culture is not what Israel practicing now.
	And of course, while genocide is genocide, wrong is wrong.
	And whether the United States is committing these dreadfully horrific wrong acts or Israel is committing these horrifically wronged acts, we need to condemn them across a board even-handedly, Paul.
	Well, of course, I do not disagree, obviously, but I'm putting it in perspective.
	In other words, I'm not talking about guilt or being defensive.
	I'm just stating the reality.
	It's the history of civilized warfare or uncivilized warfare, if you will.
	I mean, if you read of the many invasions, I mean, we just know about our own history, our own culture.
	Many, many other cultures in history, they have their own history.
	I mean, the Indians here in this country, the Native Americans made war upon each other for centuries before we ever arrived.
	European history, European civilization, we fought wars, we fought invaders for many, many centuries.
	And in many cases, what were we fighting for or defending against?
	We're defending against being genocided because many of these people, the Mongols, the Huns, the Ottoman Turks, when they took a city, in most cases, I don't know about most, but many cases, they put everybody to the sword.
	So, you know, this is nothing new.
	You know, I just, again, you know, without being so-called defensive, as you put it, it's, in my opinion, a faux F-A-U-X, a faux outrage.
	And by the way, may I also comment on it?
	There's also a UN resolution on genocide.
	And so there is some progress.
	We said genocide is wrong and it's a crime against humanity.
	Now, we have that document, but that document and that resolution of 191 is not being respected, is being overlooked.
	And we're ignoring, we're claiming that it doesn't exist, whereas it does exist.
	Just consistent with 91, perhaps it needs clarification, more clarification, more better language, broader language, and so on.
	But the message is there.
	Genocide is a crime against humanity.
	So we should be able to address this, whether it's we're doing it now or Israel or any other country.
	Well, Alan, I mean, again, and I don't know you, pleasure to meet you.
	But you've been following, I take it you've been following politics here in America for a while, right?
	So you, I'm sure you remember George Bush Jr. saying that the Constitution is just a damn piece of paper, right?
	Yeah, well, I didn't want to bring God, but you know, the UN resolution, you know, great, great.
	These are some guidelines, you know, fantastic.
	You know, it doesn't matter.
	In the real world, there's people in power, and these people don't care about the rules.
	It's just an observation that can be made.
	I don't need to make it.
	It's an obvious thing.
	And that's the situation.
	It's like people talk about the Constitution.
	And okay, great, but it's an academic discussion because in reality, the Constitution means nothing to the existing rulers, the power structure that's in place.
	I don't agree with you.
	Yeah, we, we, if we, we have the pleasure of pointing that out again.
	Yes, again, I guess we're ensconced in our in our uh our environs that, you know, we have the luxury here of not being under attack in this country pretty much ever.
	I mean, in other words, you know, we've had a couple of oceans that have insulated us from invasion.
	And so the people that dislike us and want to take down our society have managed another type of invasion with their money.
	So that's the war that we're currently experiencing.
	Here's more Israeli occupation of 6,000 aid trucks, enough for three months, says the UN Refugee Organization.
	The UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees has said the occupation authorities are holding around 6,000 lorries loaded with food and relief supplies, enough to meet Gaza's need for a full three months.
	The shipment also includes hundreds of thousands of tents and blankets intended for 1.3 million displaced persons.
	The media advisor, Adrian Abu Hasna, told reporters that although the number of lorries entering Gaza has nominally increased compared with a period before the ceasefire, it's still far below what is required to meet the huge needs facing the territory after two years of war and blockade.
	He said the occupation continues to block the entry of hundreds of essential items, including health supplies, water and sanitation equipment and basic food stuff to adding.
	What has been allowed in is a limited number of trucks carrying commercial goods.
	95% of the Gaza population depends on humanitarian aid and cannot afford to buy these materials.
	Needless to say, it's an ongoing aspect of the genocide program, including, of course, the imposition of starvation.
	Paul, your thoughts first.
	Well, you know, again, it's horrific, you know, and it's frustrating.
	I can't do anything about it.
	You know, I'm drawn to, it's a human thing, I believe.
	I'm not alone on this, that I'm drawn to empathize with suffering.
	At the same time, I want to avoid seeing it, right?
	Because it upsets me.
	and especially with animals and children and, you know, so forth, right?
	I mean, it's like, and again, to put it in perspective, you know, we've done it ourselves, right?
	In other words, you, Jim, have covered the topic of the large open-air camps that we kept German POWs in and starved them.
	And the numbers are inexact, but the estimates are over a million.
	So this latest genocide by the Zionist state of Israel against the Palestinian people compared to history and even recent history is just, it's a drop in the bucket.
	And I myself would love to be able to be of some help.
	I have no ill will against the Palestinians.
	But it's like, you know, what can you do?
	What can I do?
	What can Alan do?
	It's really frustrating.
	I think what we can do is talk about it and address those issues.
	I think that's helpful.
	But one other thing that not the acute humanitarian crisis, but in general, if you look at the Israeli society, you see that non-Jews or Palestinians are second-class citizens, period.
	And it is covered up very well by intelligent laws.
	But it reminds me of what happened in the U.S. with Jim Crowlaws that after freedom and equality, African Americans continue to be discriminated through subtle laws that lasted a long time.
	And the same thing is being now observed in Israel, that they are not Palestinians, are not equal citizens.
	They do not enjoy equal rights.
	They're second-class citizens.
	And to me, that issue is almost as important as the genocide issue, because genocide affects the much smaller people, but the greatest victims are the Palestinians that are living under second-class citizens.
	And the socioeconomics clearly show this, and there is no change of progress.
	Right.
	Well, you know, you're talking to the wrong guy here on that aspect.
	I think Jim knows that.
	So, you know, again, I don't have any problem with a people who view themselves as racially distinct preserving themselves amidst a lot of others that would outnumber them.
	And to me, I'm a separatist and a white nationalist, just so you know.
	So I don't have any problem with viewing certain people as second-class citizens.
	In fact, if I was dictator, I would make all non-white immigrants second-class citizens.
	And what would that entail, Paul?
	What would it mean with them to be second-class citizens?
	Well, they can't vote.
	They can't hold office.
	That would be right up there.
	Yeah, so and I don't believe in women in politics either, Alan, just so you know.
	Because all this ends in racial destruction.
	See, if the goal, and this would be my only goal, I don't have a desire to be mean to people for no reason, but if your only goal is to preserve your biological integrity or the biological integrity of your race, which does exist, we cannot deny the existence of our race any more than we can deny the existence of the Japanese race or the black race and so on.
	So if you don't want to be overwhelmed, inundated, and basically reproduced or miscegenated out of existence, you have to have some sort of exclusivity.
	And that would start at the minimum at the territorial level.
	Okay, now if you can't have this territorial integrity, then you're going to have to do other things, such as what we used to have, which is laws against miscegenation or what you call Jim Crow laws.
	Because one thing can be sure is when the races mix together, when they are not segregated, there will be racial mixing.
	And this will, of course, dilute the white race.
	And this is what I'm against because I believe that the white race is the finest example of the human race.
	You may or may not agree with that, but I think the evidence that can be accumulated in that regard is overwhelming.
	We have a new piece by Joaquin Goldpin, reviting on the big picture, death of American hegemon and Western neo-imperialism published today.
	He begins as follows.
	At every turn, President Trump's false bravado, aggression, dictates irrational orders for the rest of the world, gone multi-buller, as if the U.S. were still the center of the universe.
	Donald Trump is feebly playing out his role as 21st century overlord Kingpin Head.
	Meanwhile, the rest of the world is no longer buying into this U.S. president as inherited leader of the free world.
	Donald Trump's near first year performance, back on the job a second time round thus far, is viewed as a colossal failure.
	As a peace president, he stands ready to ignite the next U.S. war in Venezuela after his regime change operation failed during his first term in office.
	Under the ever-burning spotlight at top world stage, at almost 80 years old, Trump shows signs that his physical and mental decline are growing inescapably.
	And the reckless old battering ram that throws fits at growing numbers are noticing his frail weakness.
	Trump has now become a totally humiliating, bumbling, wasted up liability of a joke to the rest of the world, no longer buying into this pompously erratic windbag, much less take him seriously as a global leader anymore.
	Indeed.
	Donald Trump's apparent instability and eventual self-undoing place the naked last emperor's glaring narcissistic psychopathy, a growing concern.
	And as a result, the entire world is subsequently in evergrave danger.
	Let me observe.
	Joaquin himself has like 25 years as a counselor.
	I mean, he has a background in psychology.
	Alan, of course, has a profound background in psychiatry.
	Let me begin with you, Alan.
	Therefore, is Joaquin's assessment more or less accurate, or would you take exception?
	No, I think I agree with the central message.
	I do not agree with the particulars about character analysis.
	I think he is a leader, and he's acting like a leader, and he's acting more like a politician, flip-flopping his position.
	But what I think his policies seem to be in concert with the military-industrial complex.
	That is, we are searching for, looking for wars, regardless of why.
	And then we're very good at creating fictional enemies and justifying then wars based upon fictional enemies.
	We did this and we have been doing this for a long, long time.
	I think including the Second World War.
	Yes.
	Ben, stand by.
	We'll be right back with co-host Paul from California special guest Alan Solarium, the former top shrink for the FPI.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston Either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think the second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself.
	what they do and we must you can torture us and bomb us Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us.
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	RevolutionRadioFreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	revolution angered by the injustices inflicted upon the innocence of the world Do you have a message you'd like to share?
	Any knowledge you'd like to impart to those willing to learn?
	Have you ever listened to our shows and thought, hey, I could do this, but you just don't know how to kickstart your hosting ambitions?
	Or are you an established professional host?
	Thwarted by censorship in other areas, seeking pastures new?
	Contact us here at the world's number one free speech network, Revolution Radio.
	We provide the platform, the training, and the airtime to any budding host wanting the chance to take those first talk show steps.
	Established hosts can find a safe and secure home here where their message can ring out loud and clear, unencumbered, free from sponsorship overreach.
	Drop us a line via our email, support at revolution.radio, or head into our Discord server to say hello.
	We'll take everything from there.
	Revolution Radio, where hosting dreams become actualized reality.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to RevolutionRadio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Well, here's something we all saw coming.
	Representative Shuri Thanadar moves to impeach Defense Secretary Heg Seth over alleged war crimes and Caribbean strike.
	I personally, it's cut and dry.
	It's obvious these are war crimes or murder or both.
	Representative Sherry Thanadar, Democrat of Michigan.
	And Wednesday, he plans to introduce articles of impeachment.
	Again, Defense Secretary Pete Hedseth, Representative Reserve's 2016 remark on war crimes as question over a U.S. military strike that killed survivors of a suspected drug boat in the Caribbean.
	In a post 2X on Wednesday, Representative Thanadar shared a report from The Hill highlighting 2016 remarks by now Defense Secretary, actually War Secretary.
	And I'm interested in Alan's opinion about the change from Department of Defense to Department of War, which I think was ridiculous.
	Pete Hegseth, in which he has observed, I do think there have to be consequences for abject war crimes.
	Editor added his own comment.
	I agree, which is why I'll be introducing articles against Secretary Hagseth.
	The 2016 video first reported by CNN and later detailed by The Hill features Hagseth speaking in an event hosted by the Liberty Forum of Silicon Valley.
	If you're doing something that's just completely unlawful and ruthless, then there's a consequence for that, Hagseth said at the time, referring to the military's obligation to refuse unlawful orders.
	There's a standard, there's an ethos, he added, describing the moral framework.
	Guy in the U.S. Armed Forces now, of course, says a former Marine Corps officer who used to give instruction on the UCMJ to recruits at the recruit depot in San Diego.
	When this flap emerged by former military and intel officers observing that you are not to obey unlawful orders, which is straight out of the Uniform Code of Military Justice,
	I couldn't believe there'd be a controversy that they'd be accused of seditious behavior by the President of the United States, whose commander-in-chief ought to be expected to know at least the basic elements of an issue of this magnitude, much less targeting an attack on all these boats with no evidence or transferring any drugs, doing anything other than possibly pleasure cruising, who the hell knows.
	In violation of standard operating procedure, where they'd be halted, interdicted, searched to determine in accord with due process what the hell is going on, Paul.
	Well, okay, Jim, and I definitely want to hear Alan, but this has been covered ad infinitum, and you do the same thing or the same treatment to this issue all the time.
	And you mentioned this unlawful order.
	And again, there's no soldier that's going to determine on its own, on his or her own, whether an order is unlawful or not.
	Okay.
	They're not allowed to.
	And plus, I would question their ability to, given what we call the quality of the average recruit.
	So again, it's just, it's conceptual only.
	Right.
	I mean, these people, I mean, if they're if they're told.
	Yeah.
	I'm not disagreeing with you about that.
	I mean, these officials making a statement in his textbook, they might as well be quoting from the UCMJ to be savage for making an obviously true statement.
	That is what I'm addressing.
	I know.
	You're 100% correct about lower ranking.
	You run serious risk in combat.
	Can I just add?
	If you're given an unlawful order in combat, you did a problem.
	Yeah, but to me, there's no, it's a misnomer.
	In other words, what's an unlawful order?
	An order is an order.
	You know, there's no modifier before order.
	Okay.
	In other words, there's no good order or bad order.
	There's no unlawful order or lawful order.
	None of these soldiers pay any attention.
	If they're told to fly a mission and send a missile, they do it.
	Right.
	I mean, it's really just that cut and dry.
	And, you know, before we go to Alan, just I'll add to this.
	You know, this is a joke about a resolution of peace.
	When's the last time any government official was officially impeached for war crimes?
	Okay.
	Tell me the time, the date, the place, the name.
	I don't really believe there has been one.
	And again, it's just this Hagseth is an odious character.
	I think he gives me the same creeps as he does you and everybody else.
	I'm sorry, the tick-tick time.
	Go ahead, Alan.
	I'm on side of evolution and progress, that there was a time cannibalism was okay and okay.
	Okay.
	And it was not a very long time.
	I think only a couple of centuries ago.
	But the point is, I agree that the commander of chief-in-chief is the boss.
	If he gives orders, it has to be followed.
	So I don't have a problem with that particular issue.
	I think, but there have been times in our history that we know commander-in-chief like JFK gave orders that were not followed.
	Okay.
	To me, that's the example.
	Now, about the bombing of Caribbean and Venezuela and so on, here is the issue.
	How about due process?
	Do we have laws?
	We're clearly stating that we don't give a damn about laws or due process, that if we decide, we're going to bomb anybody we want.
	And that is very, very wrong, even for a totally white society.
	So it's not a racial issue.
	I think it's a basic humanitarian principle of progress.
	If we're making progress, we have to say we're going to respect due process.
	You're exactly right.
	And you made the, in my opinion, you just summed up United States foreign policy right there by saying, we're going to bomb whoever we want.
	I mean, that's it.
	You know, you could toss everything out the window.
	And the fact of the matter is, and I think you would agree with this, Alan, most people are innately moral.
	Most people do get along and can get along with their neighbors.
	What we have going on is the power structure, the elite, so-called, our so-called leaders, are corrupt and in many cases, morally bankrupt.
	That's the issue.
	I agree.
	I agree.
	Fully agree with that.
	Well, let's take one more before we turn to Alan's principal issue.
	Max, my energy bill dropped from $150 to $50.
	Why Marjorie Taylor Green resigned?
	I'm very upset with her resignation.
	In order to simply survive.
	And today, many in my children's generation feel hopeless for their future and don't think they will ever realize the American dream.
	And this comes after Trump attacked her and called her Marjorie Trader Green because she broke with him over many issues, including the release of the so-called Epstein files, and also because she broke with him over Israel and became the first Republican to call Gaza for what it is, a genocide, and said, you know, she actually wanted to uphold America first, not Israel first.
	And so I'm surprised, though, to see her resigning.
	I thought she was in it, but I guess falling out of favor with Trump become, you know, in her political situation, this becomes untenable on top of falling out of favor with the Israel lobby, which also is very, very powerful.
	Well, Marjorie Taylor Greene came into Congress campaigning as the ultra-maga congresswoman.
	I don't know if you remember her first campaign ad was her holding an AR-15, I think, an assault rifle, campaigning on the basis of Second Amendment, anti-immigrant stuff.
	She was very anti-Palestinian for much of her tenure.
	She voted with the GOP on all of their measures to slash health care for Americans.
	She complained about, you know, the in during the inflation crisis under Biden, she she joined the chorus of uh the GOP complaining correctly, complaining about the high price of infant formula, baby formula and the unavailability of baby formula, but then voted against subsidies to make it easier to afford baby formula.
	And as, when Trump got into office, something changed.
	Remember, she actually attacked uh JVP, Jewish Voice FOR Peace when they protested the genocide in in the U.s Capitol and said this is an insurrection.
	She led the charge to censor Rashida Tlaib for condemning Israel.
	And then something began to change.
	I mean, it had already been changing.
	She was emerging as, I think, one of the most articulate opponents of the Ukraine proxy war and she then began to speak out about the Gaza genocide.
	She noticed that Palestinian Christians existed.
	She started to stand apart from her peers on that issue to the point where she was actually condemning aoc for not voting to cut off So-called defensive weapons to Israel as well as offensive weapons, and she really became like the moral voice on Palestine other than Rashida Tlib in the House.
	And then finally, she broke with Trump and Mike Johnson and the Republicans on Medicare when they were going to cut ACA subsidies for medicare for Americans, because there were so many people in her district who didn't want their medicare cut, and her own family too, in her own family, in her own family and I mean, and Trump basically lied to his base because he's he never said that he would cut medicare and then he shuts down, supports the shutdown of the government, in order to do it.
	Um, Trump's base was not in, was never in favor of cutting medicare, so she in many ways was standing with the base, but also she was getting I think she was getting out ahead of the curve because the support for Zionism has collapsed among the Republican grassroots.
	There's no support for anything Trump is doing.
	Uh, to threaten Venezuela.
	I think only 30 percent of Trump voters, according to a new Yougv poll, support his show of force and potential regime change war against Venezuela.
	It's all gone.
	So she was kind of emerging as the moral voice, along with Thomas Massey.
	AOC has accused her of quitting in order to basically make money and avoid the political consequences and backlash she would get from Trump, and said that, or pointed out that she quit two days after she was eligible to receive her pension and accused her of massive amounts of insider trading, using the financial intelligence you get as a House member to increase her wealth from $700,000 to her.
	personal worth to something like twenty fillion dollars through stocks.
	I don't know if that's true.
	That's what she's accused of doing.
	I think being in in in the house is so uh, And especially as a Republican member, is so thankless under Trump, where he demands total loyalty for an agenda that's gone so far awry that she has a better future as a political pundit.
	I could see her being on the view.
	She's getting treated to favorable interviews by CNN, which was calling her an anti-Semite who believed in Jewish space lasers just a few years ago.
	Her stock has really risen inside the Beltway and across middle America.
	She could probably run for president in a Republican primary.
	So I think it's getting out at the right time.
	And now Thomas Massey's sort of alone, exposed to the wrath of Donald Trump and his Israel first billionaires who are pumping money into his district to support his ouster.
	Paul, your thoughts first.
	Paul.
	Do we lose you, Paul?
	Are you there?
	Alan, go right ahead.
	Any thoughts you have about Marjorie Taylor Greene?
	She's a wonderful voice.
	I'm fully supportive of her observations, and I have great respect for her decision to quit government.
	I think it was a very brave move.
	And whether she would be benefiting from her decision, financially or not, is really secondary.
	I think everybody loves money, but it will be wrong to think that that was the primary motive of her actions.
	The essence of her message is very valid and correct.
	That is, Palestinians are being treated unfairly, and there is genocide, and all kinds of things that Trump administration has been doing are illegal.
	And she's openly, she has the courage to speak up.
	And I have great respect for her decision to quit.
	Yeah, I think she's a huge figure, in my opinion, morally, politically.
	I admire her beyond words.
	Paul, have we regained you?
	Are you back, my friend?
	We lost you momentarily.
	Are you there?
	Alan, I'm sorry to say we seem to have lost Paul, but I want to invite you to pursue one of the issues that affected Marjorie.
	She was all for the release of the Epstein files.
	And of course, we all know this is something that Donald has opposed.
	I'm here, Jim.
	I must have been somehow muted.
	I don't know why, but it looked like I had unmuted, but I guess I hadn't.
	Okay, you want to comment on Marjorie Taylor Greene's resignation?
	I assume you heard it.
	Yeah, no, I heard what Alan said too, and I agree.
	I respect mostly what he said.
	However, it's quite beside the point what her motivations were and, you know, that financial motivations may not have played a part in her resignation.
	And still, her views were, you know, in keeping the way you guys feel.
	But, you know, to me, I think it's all, it's overwhelmingly important, the fact that she, unlike most Americans, can and obviously did benefit from being in office.
	In other words, running for office itself is quite a lucrative profession because you get to keep all your donations.
	So if you are lucky enough or shall we say, you're part of the system, and you can get the donations, they're yours to keep.
	So that's part of it.
	And the other thing, of course, is did she receive any sort of insider?
	I mean, I would love to see her portfolio and what stocks she bought and sold.
	So is she indeed worth $20 million?
	And, you know, it's easy to be moral and take a stand when you got $20 million in the bank, right, Jim?
	So, I mean.
	I will never know.
	I will never.
	Yeah.
	So to me, that's an important point.
	In other words, it's not nothing.
	Okay.
	She may, I'm not disputing the fact that she is or is not moral or that she sincerely is outraged by what Israel is doing to the Palestinians.
	That's all well and good.
	But if she indeed went from, you know, a net worth of $700,000 to $20 plus million dollars in the very short time she was in office, well, I think that's more indicative of the very system under which we all labor.
	And the very system that in many ways deprives the rest of us, you know, it's like George Carlin said, there's an exclusive club and you ain't in it.
	Let me say something.
	What if she did?
	And if she openly acknowledges it, to me, that's the point.
	If she says yes, I got rich.
	Okay, I'll take that.
	That's our system.
	I'll take that.
	There's nothing wrong with that.
	That's like when Trump says that he takes advantage of the bankruptcy laws and the tax laws, you know, and they're, okay, fine.
	We know what he is.
	And, you know, going back to what you had said earlier, Alan, about Trump and after Jim read Joaquim's assessment, I would just say this.
	I don't believe personally that Trump is that complex to necessitate the use of all sorts of psychological terms and labels.
	You know, he's pretty transparent.
	And he reminds me of a lot of guys that I knew coming up.
	In other words, I have mentioned this before.
	I did sports.
	I was in a fraternity.
	I was in commission sales.
	And all these things attract aggressive alpha males.
	Not everyone who participates in these things is an aggressive alpha male, but they're certainly on that spectrum as a rule, and some more so than others.
	And Trump reminds me of so many guys I knew when I was younger where, you know, they got the money, they got the girls, they're used to people deferring to them, and it's just become a way of life.
	You know, Trump is used to people doing what he says, and it's mostly served because of his position and a paycheck.
	But that changes your personality.
	It changed mine.
	I mean, I was a manager when I was 20 in charge of a crew.
	When I was 22, I was a boss.
	I started my own business, and I had people working for me the majority of my adult life.
	So I know how it affects your personality and the way that you relate to others and live your life.
	And some people would call it an entitlement or a sense of arrogance or whatever you want to say.
	But Trump is essentially what I guess the psychological term would be, he's an operator, you know, and he operates quite well in his world.
	Now, people can make what they want of the fact that he's been financed and he's been bailed out and all sorts of, you know, you can say that all you want, but the bottom line is the average person does not have the business success or the business acumen that Trump has because that's not who they are.
	And so we're dealing with a man here, like I said, who is used to people listening to him, is used to having his way.
	And if this is indeed, again, speculation Jim has covered, if this is indeed the real Donald Trump, which if you have familiar with Jim's work on this, Alan, we can have our doubts.
	I fully support what you're saying.
	He's a successful businessman, period.
	And it should not be a psychiatric diagnosis.
	It has nothing to do with psychiatric issues.
	He is a successful operator.
	That's all.
	We don't need to analyze it.
	Alan, I want to go in your direction.
	You have so many interesting, thoughtful things to say about Jeffrey Epstein.
	I want to invite you to lay it out.
	It'll be interesting how Paul and I react.
	The floor is yours.
	Thank you.
	Just a few words about my background.
	For five years, I was the chief psychiatric consultant to the FBI, and luckily or fortunately, my specialty was working with undercover agents, spies, and what we termed assets.
	It's a very important term.
	We should familiarize ourselves because our system depends on it.
	That is, the system, CIAs and FBIs and M6s and so on, use a lot of people who are not officially members of the organization, but they really do the dirty job.
	And then we have a fascinating and intelligent system called plausible deniability and reasonable doubt principles.
	So when you put these things together, it becomes very difficult to prove the point that you're dealing with somebody who's a spy.
	Now, coming to Jeffrey Epstein, and I agree with some of the rumors that he may still be alive, that despite the claims that he committed suicide, we know for sure that he did not commit suicide.
	That I will come to.
	But we know that he was a spy.
	And there's plenty of evidence and paper trail evidence that well exposed now.
	It's public knowledge that he played a role in setting up a backhand deal between Israel and Russia during the Syrian war.
	He was involved in brokering security arrangements between Israel and Mongolia.
	These are all recorded things.
	But quickly, how did he get into this position?
	His background does not match.
	I'm not even sure whether he finished college.
	That I don't know.
	But he really did not have a political background or educational background to be in the position financially or politically.
	So to me, that's a red flag.
	It's a very big red flag.
	Then he has proven associations with the Prime Minister Ehud Barak.
	He had a close relationship with Larry Allison, a well-known pro-Israeli donor.
	So his background really fits and also activities and the political consequences of what happened when he got exposed.
	That we saw a British prince, I think, quit the royalty or was kicked out or was forced out.
	Now, my calculations are based upon two things: forensic evidence and mathematics.
	I use the probability theory to address specifically the issue of plausible deniability and reasonable doubt issues because the system is so intelligently designed that criminals engaged in those things give you a lot of cues that they're all considered circumstantial evidence.
	We never have a smoking gun.
	Okay, to prove the point.
	But if we use statistics and put all the evidence or observations, independent observations together, we can make scientifically and mathematically valid conclusions or projections.
	My projection, without boring you with details, is that there's a 99.9% chance that Epstein was a spy.
	And there's also a 99.9% chance that he did not commit suicide.
	Okay, nothing matters.
	We'll be right back with Alan Solari, the former top shrink for the FBI right after.
	right back.
	Never sleeps.
	To Revolution Radio, where truth breaks the spell, and information never sleeps.
	Join Revolution
	Radio, every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time, on Studio B, for Momentary ZEN, with host, Zen Garcia, at freedomsteps.com.
	The People Station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it.
	That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Massad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read America Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily present the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	Now we return you to your host.
	We continue with Alan Solarian's observation about Jeffrey Epstein, some highly unexpected and extremely interesting conclusions.
	Go right ahead, Alan.
	Thank you.
	I welcome the release of the records, but I say this clearly and emphatically: that we don't need the records to know that he did not commit suicide.
	That doesn't mean that he was a victim of homicide, but we know that he did not commit suicide.
	The guy had never did not have any history of depression.
	Number one, he did not show any evidence of depression or suicidal act in prison.
	The autopsy evidence actually is more consistent with homicide than suicide because three bones in his neck were broken.
	And that's unusual.
	Oh, so you actually believe he was killed?
	Everything is a lie.
	So how do I know that the autopsy report that we've been given, or at least I think the forensic psychiatrist examined for the family was actually accurate.
	So I can second guess that.
	But if the autopsy report, government's autopsy report, is correct, then it is more consistent with homicide than suicide.
	Right.
	Yeah, and of course, I don't believe there is an autopsy report on Jeffrey Epstein because evidence I've put together suggests he actually was sprung that night.
	All the cameras were deliberately shut off.
	The guards were involved, some of them, in his making his escape.
	And you can see a glimpse of an orange jumpsuit exiting upstairway that I think is the last we've seen at Jeffrey Epstein.
	But he's almost certainly, my opinion, he's in Israel and enjoying a good life.
	Ellen, go right ahead.
	Okay, there are other circumstantial evidence that supports the mathematical projections.
	It's very unusual for somebody not to leave suicide notes.
	And also, he was under suicide watch supposedly, and he was in prison.
	It's very unusual for somebody on suicide watch in prison to commit suicide.
	And watch this.
	Then we also know that the camera right in front of his cell did not work.
	What else?
	The medical records, the medical records were all altered.
	Number of them.
	Number one, I mean, and because of the alterations, then people were charged with crimes.
	So the guards on duty were charged with multiple counts of record falsification.
	This is the official record.
	The official record is malfunction of two cameras in front of Epstein.
	So when you put all the pieces together, the story, the end result is that we can say with 99% certainty, 99.99 certainty, that this fellow did not commit suicide.
	Right.
	No.
	The option then, if he didn't commit suicide, what happened?
	He was a victim of homicide, as the autopsy shows.
	Or he escaped.
	There you go.
	Everything is fake.
	And that, you know, he's either Venezuela, Argentina, or Israel somewhere.
	Well, one thing that Jim and I have learned together, you know, we kind of have both come up on his show together is that the third possibility that it happened at all, okay, is normally the one that you need to look at first.
	So because there's been so many fake shootings, right?
	I mean, Charlie Kirk has a Siegel event being the latest, but of course all the school shootings where in many cases there's allegedly multiple victims, when in reality there's no victims at all.
	So the Butler alleged attempted assassination, I think, is also a stage event.
	Right, right.
	So anyway, I just wanted to throw that in the mix, Alan.
	I don't know how much you follow Jim's work or the work of others that do.
	I follow it very closely and I agree.
	So there are many unknowns there and the possibility does exist that this is all fake and he is living a good life somewhere else that we don't know.
	But if we go with the government report and the data we have, we can confidently say that he did not commit suicide.
	So that's it.
	That's the most important bottom line.
	In fact, there is another thing there.
	This is my forensic experience.
	There was an attempt to make him look suicidal because he was attacked while in prison by a fellow prisoner.
	And that was used as an excuse or as a reason for him to be under suicide watch.
	But then the psychologist comes, interviews him according to the records, and writes a report that in her or his opinion, Epstein is not suicidal, but just to be cautious, he should remain under suicide watch.
	Why I point this out is that as if this is an engineered story to convey the message that this guy is going to commit suicide, we were already aware of it, and this is one piece of document that we have that shows that he was suicidal.
	The historical reference point, James Forstall, the first defense secretary of the United States and Truman's men, was assassinated at Bethesda Naval Hospital in 1949.
	And a similar trick was used.
	I have written an article about it, as to how they set this poor guy up, a brilliant guy actually, by false reports that he was suicidal when he was not suicidal.
	There's no evidence that James Forstall was suicidal.
	He was tired, he was pissed, he was upset of losing his position, but he was not suicidal.
	But at the same time, he had left his diary in his Pentagon office.
	So when the Pentagon guys or CIA guys found and read his diaries, they said, oh my God, we're violating all kinds of national secrets that we don't want people to know.
	And the biggest secrets were the unnecessary bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the Pearl Harbor lies that we knew in advance, Roosevelt in advance knew that the Japanese were coming.
	So these two things were in his memoirs.
	And not surprisingly, the very pages of Hiroshima and Nagasaki vanished.
	And then he was brutally killed by throwing him from, I think, the 10th floor of Bethesda Naval to his death and declaring his death suicide, whereas he was not suicidal.
	So I see a similar trick here with Epstein.
	That's my association, but it's only an educated guess.
	Overall, two facts, at the risk of repeating myself, are very clear.
	That I know Epstein was a spy, and I know that he did not commit suicide.
	So the rest is open for speculation.
	I don't have much confidence in the records because the records are often manipulated.
	I mean, it's the same thing with JFK MLK records.
	We don't really need the records.
	We know what happened.
	The records is another confusion and obfuscation of the truth, a delay tactic.
	So these are my observations about Epstein.
	And I hope we will have more publicity.
	But Alan, Alan, your most interesting stuff is yet to be mentioned about his role as a spy versus a pedophile.
	I want you to address those questions.
	Okay, now, again, I don't have access to full reports, but from the descriptions that I read and the records that I reviewed, the guy had a compulsion.
	Okay.
	And by the way, this is not an unusual thing.
	As a psychiatrist speaking now, he liked affing young girls who were sexually active.
	So, I'm particular about this.
	This is not somebody who's a pedophile.
	Pedophile is somebody who's doing sexual acts to kids.
	Unless somebody shows me that evidence, I'm not going to call him a pedophile.
	And his success was finding very wealthy and powerful people who enjoy the same thing.
	They enjoyed making love to sexually active young girls.
	So I'm trying to make a distinction between morality here and judgments about him as a pedophile versus that he had his compulsions, yes, perhaps his psychiatric diagnosis, that he could not really control it.
	But at the same time, he really benefited from it tremendously, financially, politically.
	He was the king of politics, and he made a lot of friends.
	And a lot of people enjoy the same thing.
	There is nothing surprising about men who can get away, you call it type A alpha personality, that they would love to do what he was offering.
	And that was a very intelligent, also, a trap for his victims.
	Just for the record, Joaquin and I take exception.
	He was pissed off when Donald Trump had one of the girls before Jeffrey had.
	He wanted to be the first.
	These were primarily virgins that were being converted into Epstein or Trump?
	Epstein was pissed off that Trump actually had one of the girls before Epstein had.
	He wanted to be the first.
	And you listen to some of the descriptions of some of the victims.
	They're very unflattering to Trump.
	Katie Johnson, in particular, talks about her introduction at Trump.
	And I think it was Ghelane Maxwell who's telling her what she could and could not do with Donald Trump private parts.
	I mean, it's really excruciating and utterly consistent with his claim to be a germaphobe.
	So there are very peculiar aspects of this that would not apply to most men would find what happened here really rather absurd and ridiculous.
	But I personally am convinced Epstein really wanted to be first.
	Of course, he had this ranch out in New Mexico where he was trying to make little replicas of Jeffrey on the scale of like 500 offsprings.
	Alan is probably not going to address that, but I'm very interested in what he has to say about Epstein's role as a spy.
	Yeah, just I'll quickly throw in, just for the fun of it, I almost resent the application of the word spy to Epstein, which spy sort of brings up the idea of, you know, somehow procuring information and or involved at some of the highest levels of political intrigue.
	You know, Epstein was basically a pimp and a procure of young girls.
	And so at best he was an operative in the oldest blackmail scheme in history, which is to entrap men with sexual blackmail.
	Right.
	I agree.
	That's a spy.
	You know, he used his skills and methods and sex for covert governmental purpose for Israel.
	I mean, to me, that's a definition of a spy.
	Or I can call, this is why I say that maybe the FBI or CIA language, he was not a spy.
	He was an asset.
	Okay, so okay, he was an asset for the government of Israel because that information is powerful enough to blackmail any president.
	Imagine these things that you know, Jim, and so many other people know, now is in the hands of Israeli government.
	And when they are talking with Trump, they may be showing him the pictures they have or evidence they have.
	And that's whether it's happening or not, the fact that it can happen itself indicates his particular role as an asset.
	Sure, sure.
	I mean, I just draw on the distinction because I would imagine there are some men that would take pride in being a spy, but I don't really think you can take pride in what Epstein did as a rule.
	Although, of course, we could all see the enticements of it, especially when some of the gals are quite attractive.
	I don't think he was not in the habit of bringing dogs to these parties.
	You know, that's why men showed up.
	You made good points.
	And let me say you, it is true that the great majority of people would not find any pleasure in what he was selling.
	Okay, great majority.
	But I would say, and based upon my experience as a psychiatrist, that I would say at least 15% of the population would welcome something like this.
	Not necessarily, I'm not talking about the virginity issue.
	No, no.
	About if you know somebody sexually active, if you ask 100 people, I bet 15%, 20% would say, why not?
	I think it's higher than 15%.
	Okay, I mean, responding to Jim's earlier comment that, oh, this is most people will be offended or no, not true.
	It's absolutely not true.
	You know, I'll add a quick animals with animal pleasures.
	A two-sentence contribution, something that my brother told me back in probably the 90s, and I knew he was right the moment he said it.
	He summed it up this way: he said, Most men, now we can quibble about what the percentage of most is, most men will not turn down a sexual encounter.
	So there you go.
	Bravo.
	Very good.
	Well said, Bravo.
	Excellent.
	And by the way, alcohol increases that number.
	Yes, that's absolutely true.
	And drugs, any and you know, anything euphoric would activate your central nervous system.
	And now, if I may digress, biologically, if you come to the very basics, in the animal kingdom, for the primitive men, there was no such thing as sex.
	It was all rape.
	It was always one way.
	I don't think the horses made love because of meaningful relationships.
	No.
	Power dictated.
	A bull was looking to release his discomfort and pain, testicular pain.
	What do you want the bull to do?
	He's looking for a soft spot that would accommodate his swollen testicles and fetus.
	And of course, the cow for survival reasons would accommodate.
	And now this going on for thousands, millions of years.
	And so what your brother said is absolutely true.
	No man, most men, would not turn down a sexual opportunity.
	I'm going to take your new logic and reasoning there to my next coffee date, Alan.
	Just joking.
	Can I digress?
	Because the topic I love.
	Like, look at why did Clinton and Monica Lewinsky have sex?
	Okay, one is 18, one is, I don't know.
	Or what happened to Petty Hurst?
	If you look at the story there, it's the relationship, sexual relationship, but it's much more meaningful in terms of complex human relationships.
	Here, young women were looking for safety and security.
	Patty Hurst suffered from Stockholm syndrome.
	She was kidnapped and at the end was participating in criminal activities, bank robbing, and so on.
	And after she was freed, guess what she did voluntarily?
	She married her security guard.
	Okay, bam, remember this.
	So there is, in sexual relations, there's something much more about dependence and power, the same thing.
	What was Lewinsky looking for?
	Okay, it was not sexual pleasure.
	It was comfort.
	It was pleasure of associating with a dominant male.
	Well, Alan, let me ask you this, because you raise some very interesting points.
	I have heard that a certain percentage of women, I don't know what that percentage is, have admitted to having rape fantasies.
	Yes.
	I would guess around 15 to 20%.
	Now, women and men, I know we're switching off topics.
	Women and men are different.
	Women are biologically 50%, 100%.
	All women are biologically bisexual.
	If you look at the biology and what determines sexuality, it's not because the simple answer is they do not have enough testosterone to be sexually active.
	So it's secondary psychological pleasures or feelings that dictate how they choose a mate.
	It's not true for men.
	Men are, you know, 90, 95%, I would say, are one-sex, heterosexual.
	But women are bisexual.
	The reason we have, I think in statistics, maybe 15 or 20% of lesbianism is because of societal and environmental influences that contribute to their sexual choices.
	But in a totally free society with different values, I will not be surprised if 50% women would find comfort in homosexual relations because their biology dictated by biology.
	Fascinating.
	Jeffrey has to have been conducting one of the most successful espionage blackmailing operations in all of history.
	I would welcome any thoughts you have about that aspect, Alan.
	Yeah, I think that person to talk about is Maxwell.
	Elaine.
	You know, yeah, I forgot her first name now.
	Yeah.
	And her father, Robert Maxwell, was honored as a distinguished person to help Israel on all levels.
	And he had a state funeral.
	He was honored.
	And I think he is buried in Jerusalem.
	And that connection is really worthy of emphasis that we're talking about different people now in Epstein's circles.
	But the influence really came from Maxwell's family and those connections that led to Barak, the prime minister, and the Israeli spy, now well documented.
	So it's his background, and again, at the risk of repeating myself, Jeffrey Epstein's background did not match any of his accomplishments.
	God, no, how did he make money?
	How did he start making money?
	He was a chronic failure in whatever he touched.
	And suddenly he became rich and richer and richer.
	Okay.
	The inconsistency, the incompatibility of his background and his success is a red flag.
	Les Wexner, who founded Victoria's Secret, gave him Les Wexner's mansion in New York, the largest in the city.
	And of course, that made tons of money over, you know, lingerie for women that was racy.
	I mean, he made a fortune and he set up Jeffrey.
	I have no doubt he also is connected to Israeli Mossad.
	Yeah, that, you know, statistics give us a very confident number of 99.99% that he was a spy.
	Or he was an asset, let's use that word.
	Paul, a final thought where you're drawing to the conclusion?
	Oh, one other thing that I would say that I should say it's about free press and science and medical journals.
	I submitted my Epstein article.
	Basically, the title of the article is Epstein is CS Spy.
	And then my analysis and the forensic and mathematical findings.
	I'm not mentioning names, but submitted to three journals, forensic journals.
	All three of them were automatically rejected.
	All right.
	Alan, it's wonderful.
	I want to have you back, my friend.
	This has just been splendid.
	Paul, I'm so glad you could be here.
	Meanwhile, everyone, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, people you love and care about.
	We don't know how much time we have left.
	To waste a minute of it.
	Thank you.
	As I'm now disposed to say, support Revolution Radio, and God willing, we'll be back on Monday and we'll do it all over again.
	I'll see you then.
	Fight it then.
	Fight it with all that is in it.
	And may God defend the right.

▲