All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 3, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:56:10
The Raw Deal (3 October 2025) with co-host Paul from CA
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I need somebody, not just anybody.
I need someone who's so much younger than today, I never needed anybody's help in any way, not so self-assured.
Now find the chain of mind and open up the doors.
Help me if you can.
I'm feeling down.
And I do appreciate you being around.
Help me get my feet back on the ground.
Won't you please please help me?
This is Jim Fetzer, your host, right here on the Raw Deal Revolution Radio Studio B this third day of October 2025.
I must begin with a couple of very disturbing reports.
Victor Orban, leader of Hungary, is a very solid guy, is warning EU leaders are preparing for war with Russia.
Soon after, he participated in the European political community meeting in Copenhagen.
He has denounced this as horrifying that the EU has decided to go to war and that at Wednesday's informal EU summit, leaders pushed a war strategy on how to defeat the Russians.
I hate to tell you, it ain't going to happen.
This reportedly features plans for a drone shield to counter Russian incursion into member states' airspace, as well as long-planned effort to confiscate, seize Russian assets held in Europe.
That's what they're all about.
Theft, stealing, looting.
That's what the European Union has descended to.
Conformity is being demanded of all member states.
The pressure is great.
So I will suggest to the Fidesz presidency that we start a signature campaign in Hungary against the EU's war plan because we need all our strength to stay out of this war.
He summarizes the situation on X in an English language post.
Kopanov and day two, the situation is serious.
Outright pro-war proposals are on the table.
They want to hand over EU funds to Ukraine.
They're trying to accelerate Ukraine's accession with all kinds of legal tricks.
They want to finance arms deliveries.
I will stand firmly by the Hungarian position.
Here's a bit of it on edge.
And of course, meanwhile, Trump's doing his part too.
Rand Paul, mediator Trump, approves Intel for deep strikes into Russia.
The self-proclaimed mediator in the Russian-Ukraine conflict, U.S. President Donald Trump, has, according to the Wall Street Journal, given a green light to share U.S. intel and targeting information with Ukraine to enable deep strikes into Russian territory.
He's also reportedly considering sending Tomahawk missiles, which have a range of 1,500 miles and can carry nuclear weapons.
Will Russia respond?
Here we have.
Hello, everybody, and thank you for tuning in to the Liberty Report.
With us today, we have Daniel McAdams, our co-host.
Daniel, good to see you this morning.
Good morning, Dr. Paul.
How are you this morning?
Good.
Why don't we start off today, Daniel, with something we've been talking about?
I was counting up the years, probably 10 or 11 years since 2014.
But the final answer is not in yet.
I don't know when we first talked about what kind of support we're given.
We knew about a coup coming on, and that was the big deal, changing the government of Ukraine.
But subsequently, there's been on again, off again, a lot of weapons spent and sent, a lot of money wasted, a lot of robberies of American taxpayers.
It goes on and on.
But it looks like it never stops.
But they were cautious.
They didn't give them a nuclear weapon yet.
And there was a mileage limit.
Oh, we'll let them fire in for 500 miles, but not the biggies, not the ones that can go 1,500 miles.
But all of a sudden, the news is, here it is on this article, U.S. to provide Ukraine with intelligence for missile strikes deep inside Russia.
Does this mean an escalation?
You know, even if nothing comes of this, it's looking for the possibility that could end up in escalation because it's more or less that principle is what bugged the Russians because NATO, you know, fell down on their promises.
We won't get within striking distance.
We're going to stay away from your borders.
And on again, that changed.
So Russia changed their opinion.
So right now, the mileage does have an important point about how Russia might interpret this.
I don't think that means today or tomorrow, hopefully, that there's no big bombing of Moscow, but it could happen.
There could be a false flag or who knows what could happen.
Paul from California, my co-host, has joined.
Paul, I know you're not deep into foreign relations, but we've had two reports here.
One about Viktor Orban of Hungary reporting that the EU has decided to go to war with Russia.
And the second, Trump has approved intel for deep strikes into Russia.
This does not look good.
Your thoughts?
Well, I don't keep up with the whole Ukraine war, Russia thing as much as you and probably a lot of others.
Well, what it reminds me of, I don't know who first it was attributed to about war and rumors of war, but this continual swirling around of potential escalation or nuclear war or World War III,
I think is just part and parcel of the continual tension and fear campaign that's being waged constantly by not just our mainstream media, but in many ways the global press infrastructure, if that makes any sense.
That's my 25 cent contribution for the moment.
Thanks, Paul.
I certainly hope that these are mere rumors, but when we have all the tankers being sent abroad too, I think it's very clear we are going to have either an attack on Russia or an attack upon Iran.
And I do regard the latter as more likely than the former.
The outcome in either case is not going to be a happy one for the aggressor.
Russia has lent Iran an enormous amount of support since the 12-day war, prior to which Iran did not feel they needed the Russian assistance, but learned to the contrary because of the attacks upon Iran.
They're now fortified with S400 anti-missile systems.
They now have 40 first-class fighters from China.
Both Russia and China have declared that if there's an attack upon Iran, Iran will be, they will be Iran's ally and not allow Iran to be defeated.
Nevertheless, it appears to me that Yahoo wants to keep wars going.
And he may or may not actually believe that an apocalypse in the Middle East would bring about the return of the Jewish Messiah, the Meshiak.
But remember, too, that requires all Christians on earth be jammed.
Meanwhile, we have a report about Israel's illegal interception of the Gaza Sumed Flotilla.
Here's...
Join Planet Fitness for $1 down, $15 a month.
This has been designed to bring aid to famine-stricken Gaza people.
It's just terrible.
Welcome to Navarre Live.
My name is Stephen Methan.
And let me begin by really apologizing for being a little bit late this evening.
But the thing you need to know is that every single person in this room has had only a few hours' sleep in the last 48 hours.
And that's all to do with the flotilla, its interception.
That's going to be our top story tonight, of course.
So we're a little bit under par, but I feel like we got there in the end.
Anyway, I'm joined tonight by Dahlia Gabrielle.
Dahlia, how are you?
I'm doing okay.
In a completely, for completely unrelated reasons, I have also had tech issues, which means that I'm not using my proper professional camera, but my kind of shitty webcam.
So apologies for that.
I'm going to try and fix it throughout the show.
But yeah, the tech gods are not looking at us kindly today.
Well, you look amazing as ever, Dahlia, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.
Coming up tonight, world leaders react to the illegal interception of the global summit flotilla.
Protests erupt across the globe in solidarity with the activists now detained by Israel.
We speak to a close friend of Navarre's Kieran Andreou, who is in Israeli custody as we speak.
And the latest on that horrific attack that has killed at least two people at a Manchester synagogue.
Now, if you would like to support our work, you can sign up at Navaramedia.com forward slash support.
Well, attacks at synagogues are highly likely false flags contrived to bring sympathy.
Where this is playing the victim card by the Zionists, their past practitioners.
Meanwhile, we have flotilla supporters rallying around the world.
Here are photographs showing massive degrees of support all over the world.
We have pro-Palestinian demonstrators in Rome.
Here we have Palestinian demonstrators more in Rome.
This is continuing free Palestine, more protesters in Spain.
It's truly a worldwide phenomenon.
We have more against the situation in Greece.
We have more, again, in pro-Palestinian called by different unions.
This is in Italy.
We have more supporters in Pakistan.
It's truly worldwide.
And actually, this is creating what might be called a perfect storm for Israel because the world was already enraged not only by the ongoing slaughter and starvation of Palestinians, but the seeming shooting of Charlie Kirk.
And while I'm convinced it was in fact a staged event, the world, by and large, has held Israel responsible, and it's had a shattering effect on any inhibitions about criticizing Israel on any grounds whatsoever.
Falling support for APAC, falling support for the ADL, falling support for Netanyahu.
The whole situation is a very bad one for Israel, but a very good one for the rest of the world.
Here's more.
Al Jazeera talking about the flotilla, you see, being one more element of this perfect storm against Israel.
Al Jazeera.
Israel has intercepted the global civil flotilla en route to Gaza.
We need a swift criticism from global leaders as protesters gather in cities around the world, including Istanbul, Athens, Buenos Aires, Rome, Berlin, and Madrid to condemn the raid.
At least 44 countries were represented in the 500-person flotilla, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Spain, Malaysia, Turkey, and Colombia.
Reactions from world leaders have ranged from outright condemnation to calls for Israel to provide their detained citizens with access to consular services.
Here we have more response.
Palestine, Palestinian Foreign Ministry Secret Dems Israel's attack and aggression.
Turkey, Minister of Foreign Affairs called Turkey's intervention and act of terrorism.
Malaysia.
Prime Minister called for immediate release of Malaysian citizens, South Africa.
President called for immediate release of participants in Flotilla, Colombia.
President House government expelling Israeli diplomats, canceling Colombia's free trade agreement in light of Israel's action.
Italy, foreign minister, told locals Israel had assured him there'd be no violent action against a flotilla.
But now Italian unions are calling for a general strike on Friday to show their solidarity.
And that, of course, would be today United Kingdom.
The government is very concerned about Israel's interception of the flotilla, adding it's in touch with families of a number of British nationals.
This is just one more outrage that illustrates the lawlessness of Israel.
And indeed, here we have an additional report.
Ben Gerb humiliates Flotilla, peace activist.
Well, I think it's obvious the circumstance worldwide has become a troubled sea for Israel, deservedly so.
Paul, any thoughts of yours?
Well, you know, as I was listening to you, I heard a number of different things, including falling support for Israel, falling support for the ADL, falling support for APAC.
And, you know, where my mind went with that is I don't know how they would measure that.
And I'm not sure if it really even matters.
In other words, I would like to think that the sentiment of people in such countries that you mentioned, like Colombia, Italy, Greece, and so on, that that general public sentiment actually mattered and had some influence on world affairs or on the conduct of Israel and the United States.
But unfortunately, I'm a little bit of a pessimist on that.
You know, you could call me black pilled.
I really don't think that entrenched Jewish power, which is, shall we say, pervasive in all the major important sectors of the world, not just any one country, but I'm talking about financial and corporate control, as well as media corporations, you know, what they call the weapons of propaganda.
It's all firmly in their hands.
I really, I don't think at this point there's anything other than military action.
So unless some of these countries are prepared to attack Israel directly, and we know that's not going to happen because they fear the United States.
Right now, the only thing that really matters, unfortunately, is the military and economic power of the United States, which is essentially the guardian state of Israel.
And many people would argue that we are essentially, you know, Israel's bitch, if you will.
So although it's good to see from my point of view, like I said, the outpouring of public sentiment, in the end, I think we all know that short of a revolution, the public, especially nowadays, does not really matter, in my opinion, the way that it used to.
If any of that makes any sense to any of the listeners out there.
Sure.
Meanwhile, Trump's peace plan for Gaza, colonization is peace, gray grease, lampoons that.
The guy is so brilliant.
During the 1980s, Benjamin Netanyahu became good friends with American real estate developers Charles Kushner and Fred Trump.
Kushner's son, Jared, went on to marry Fred's granddaughter, Ivanka Trump.
Jared has been talking about the valuable real estate in Gaza for a few years.
And Gaza's waterfront property, it could be very valuable.
In May of 2024, the Jerusalem Post publishes an image of Netanyahu's Gaza 2035 vision.
In October of 2024, candidate Trump said that Gaza could be better than Monaco.
It could be better than Monaco.
It has the best location in the Middle East, the best water, the best everything.
It's got, it is the best.
I've said it for years.
I mean, it could be the most beautiful place.
The weather, the water, the whole thing, the climate, it could be so beautiful.
On his inauguration day, President Trump began discussing Gaza in terms of valuable real estate.
You know, Gaza is interesting.
It's a phenomenal location.
On the sea, the best weather.
You know, everything's good.
It's like some beautiful things could be done with it, but it's very interesting.
But some fantastic things could be done with Gaza.
How do you see the future in governance for Gaza?
Well, it depends.
I can't imagine.
You could have, well, you certainly can't have the people that were there.
Most of them are dead.
On February 4th, he referred to Gaza as the Riviera of the Middle East.
Everybody I've spoken to loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land, developing and creating thousands of jobs with something that will be magnificent.
I don't want to be cute.
I don't want to be a wise guy, but the Riviera of the Middle East, this could be something that could be so bad.
This could be so magnificent.
On February 26th, Trump posted a bizarre AI video of Trump Gaza.
Trump Gaza shining bright, golden future, a brand new life.
On April 7th, Trump describes Gaza as incredible oceanfront property.
Well, you know how I feel about that.
I think it's real.
An incredible piece of important real estate.
And I think it's something that we would be involved in.
But, you know, having a peace force like the United States there controlling and owning the Gaza Strip would be a good thing.
On July 14th, Trump referred to Israel's 2005 removal of its ground troops and settlements from the Gaza Strip as one of the worst real estate deals ever made.
I call it the Gaza Strip, one of the worst real estate deals ever made.
They gave up the oceanfront property, one of the worst deals ever made.
On September 17th, Israeli finance minister Smotrich claimed the deal to rebuild Gaza was on Trump's desk and described it as a real estate bonanza.
There is a business plan built by the most professional people, which is on President Trump's desk.
How this thing turns into a real estate bonazam zoon, I'm not joking, it pays for itself.
By the way, I started negotiations with the Americans and I'm saying this seriously now because I'm also demanding.
After all, we paid a lot of money for this war, so we need to share.
How do we make percentages on land marketing later in Gaza?
But now, no, no, no, not joking.
The demolition face, the demolition phase, which is always the first phase in urban renewal.
We did.
Now we need to build.
Trump has chosen war criminal Tony Blair to oversee the rebuilding of Gaza.
And on September 24th, the Central Synagogue in Manhattan explained how the gods demand human blood for humanity to survive.
The greatest lie humanity tells itself is that we have outgrown human sacrifice.
We call it by different names now and make our offering to different gods.
We offer young men we call soldiers as if the designation means that their mothers cry less when they die.
We call masses of humanity collateral damage and turn our eyes away from the pictures of their lifeless bodies as we sip our morning coffee.
And the truth is, we don't do it because we are heartless.
We do it because we believe that it is necessary for the world to keep running.
We do it because we believe that the gods whose favor we so desperately seek, freedom, security, prosperity, flourishing, that they demand blood as the price of their favor.
We do it because we cannot see any other choice.
When Abraham prepares to sacrifice Isaac, he is just accepting the same bargain of blood we still accept today.
That some need to die for the world to flourish.
Greg Reese reporting.
And of course, you know damn well, Paul, that those who need to die are going to be Americans, not Jews.
That's their agenda.
Well, you know, I mean, I had not seen that piece before, but I think that just sums it up better than any number of multi-hour podcasts that we could all play.
I mean, there it is in your face.
It's a real estate deal.
And right now, Jim, we're in the demolition phase, right?
That's what, you know, everybody knows that before you develop, you got to demolish.
Can you see now?
You know, you and I go back a long time, as you know, and we butted heads.
You know, I was probably one of the first callers on your show.
Oh, we got the break coming up.
I'm just about to go on a massive anti-Jewish rant.
Oh, stick around.com, We'll be right back after this lesson.
I would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support as this made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio.
Join Revolution
Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary ZEN with host Zen Garcia at freedomslips.com.
The Opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
Now we return you to your host.
Paul, before you initiate your rant, which I welcome, we have Zionist Rabbi.
Americans must he was fired just three weeks before he was set to retire.
Now he's becoming an industry whistleblower.
Let's see if we if we can, you know, christen our Jen's hit list.
No one is above being forced to be on the front lines if it means dying for this cause.
So brace yourselves.
This language is pretty disturbing.
The greatest lie humanity tells itself is that we have outgrown human sacrifice.
So right off the bat, she's letting you know that human sacrifice is not only something that isn't taboo, it's something that is very acceptable and should be practiced.
And look at the cadre of the very, listen, you want to talk about very white people.
You see, when it comes to Israel and what they claim is theirs, these people that you see here are the biggest harpingers of the state of Israel.
How does he get that key that yarmuka to stay on his head?
Like this he is it like a suction cut?
But yeah, this woman is now going to be my official person on what Rachel, this was Rachel, my friend Rachel's idea was that I should have a hit list.
Except you can't make it very explicit, like that it's like something where you want to hurt people.
let me share this that's my hit list so So it's somebody that is worthy of a hit of me needing one.
And that's, that's this bitch.
We call it by different names now and make our offering to different gods.
We offer young men we call soldiers as if the designation means that their mothers cry less when they die.
We call masses of humanity collateral damage and turn our eyes away from the pictures of their lifeless bodies as we sip our morning coffee.
It's almost like she's saying it gleefully.
What the fuck is that flag doing inside that synagogue?
That's common.
That's common.
And you're well, I mean, first of all, the fact that there's a female rabbi, it's a reformed congregation, right?
So in a reform congregation is where you're going to get the majority of your white Ashkenazi Zionist Jews.
That's where the bulk of them will probably fall in this country will be in a reform synagogue.
So it makes sense.
It makes sense that there'd be an Israeli flag there and they'd call for the sacrifice, human sacrifice of Americans to benefit Israel.
Paul, your thought.
Well, I guess we could call what happened a rantus interruptus, but it was pretty much done.
All I was really going to say, you know, recalling some of our history, if you recall the way you used to resist me talking about or naming the Jew and sort of bringing the actual realities, you know, what they used to call real politik to the forefront.
Okay.
So, you know, you can easily see now, I'm sure you don't have any problem, Jim.
I'm sure the glasses that you're wearing, they might not be as sharp as mine, but you know, we're on the same page.
You can see how throughout history these people were hated.
Okay.
I made the point early on, probably when I was calling your show as well as others, that this whole notion of persecution is exactly the kind of thing they do, the kind of subterfuge they engage in.
Because I know I wasn't the first one, but I corrected that notion.
I said they weren't persecuted, they were hated.
You know, there's a little bit of a difference there.
Okay.
It is a distinction worth noting.
The fact of the matter is that throughout history, they've been hated.
And the reason they've been hated is, of course, because of their behavior, but also their nature.
And the nature and the behavior of the people go hand in hand.
They're mostly inseparable.
And coming from my position as what I, you know, other people have labeled white nationalism.
And I think I've made it clear to you audiences before, I go way past white nationalism to white supremacy.
And, you know, it only sounds bad until you briefly articulate the difference or the position, right?
It doesn't necessarily mean that we need to reign supreme over everybody on the globe.
Okay.
Although, to be honest with you, the British essentially had that going for a while and attempted it.
And it wasn't that bad of an idea.
Because here's the reality of the world.
And this goes back to the reality of nature or the natural world, which the National Socialists wrote about so clearly, is that there will be a domination occurring somewhere or another by some group of people.
And essentially, it's either going to be you getting ruled or dominated or you doing the ruling or the domination, especially in your own territory, what's also been known as the territorial imperative.
Now, because the world is essentially international and the Jews have created or perfected an international finance system, I don't think there's any choice for a people in this world, if they want to survive as an autonomous state, that they have to, at the minimum, expel Jews from power and likely geographically expel them as well, just has been done in the past.
Right?
It's really, it's a notion that, you know, it just, the conclusion is you are just led to it naturally by a logical thought train.
And for yourself, Jim, I know you probably have not read extensively in Mein Kampf or the writers, other national socialist writers of the time, such as Julius Stryker, or maybe even just listen to Mein Kampf on audio online.
But I'd recommend any listeners out there do so to get the kind of clarity that you need of what we're looking at, who these people actually are.
Because what occurred in the 20s and the 30s and the 40s in Europe in National Socialist Germany was just a reoccurrence of what had already occurred many times throughout history, which was an awareness and an awakening to essentially the menace that these people that they pose to, you know, essentially to the health and human happiness of the human community.
I mean, it's no accident they've been known as mankind's eternal enemy.
As I made the point before, what would you have to do to earn that designation?
So for the moment, I'll rest on this point.
But again, that video you just played, you know, by Greg Reese and, you know, Trump talking, oh, you know, it's a beautiful piece of real estate.
You know, never mind the Palestinians living there.
You know, that's just part of the demolition.
It's like, you know, these are not normal people with normal, you know, human thoughts.
Okay.
You can call them any name you want, and it's fine with me.
Monsters, demons, sociopaths, psychopaths.
Doesn't really matter what we call them.
So I'll close by saying this once again, something I've said many, many times on air.
We either rule or we get ruled, and we just have to decide as a group, as a race, what it is we want.
Well, Paul, you're certainly correct that there was a time when I was less aware of the role of Israel, APAC, Zionism in our lives, and that you were well ahead of me on the learning curve.
And I think that was very perceptive of you and perhaps mildly obtuse of me.
It took a long time for me to even become aware of the importance of the distinction between Judaism and Zionism, the role of Jewish supremacy, how APAC is controlling our Congress.
I see it as by far the greatest threat the United States has ever confronted.
And I have growing appreciation for your recitation of those from the past who have perceived the reality here.
It staggers the mind.
I mean, this group has been given the boot out of over 100 countries.
And it's because of the threat they pose to those nations, which is perhaps in some cases has been even worse than the threat now they pose to our nation.
I think you're completely in the right to be emphasizing now the importance of what I saw so much less clearly in the past.
So I'm in your debt.
Well, that's extremely generous.
And even if you hadn't said that very last thing about I'm in your debt, I think, Jim, that these things were brought to your attention by many others as well.
And on your own, you have discovered a lot of this.
But I was just going to characterize your entire response you just gave as quite on point.
And I really appreciate all that that you said.
And it's not an easy place to be, is it, my friend?
I mean, it's not a pleasant place to dwell.
And especially when you realize that not that many people can fully appreciate where you're coming from, as the old saying goes, or how it is you perceive things.
There is a kind of a blockage.
And in some ways, it's a natural blockage.
People don't want to believe this sort of thing.
And in many other ways, it's been imposed upon us by lots and lots of programming and brainwashing.
But nevertheless, it's certainly extremely real.
And it just goes to, again, I know you're not that so-called religious or spiritual, but it just reminds me of so much has been written essentially by the Catholics and the Catholic Church and Catholic scholars and speaking about the soul.
And, you know, when you think about it, I think having the concept of a soul and the concept of an afterlife is a very good thing overall, even if it is only imaginary.
And to be honest with you, I don't think that it is.
I don't claim to have any kind of a real understanding, much less a full understanding of these things.
I'm not sure anybody really does.
But it's been alleged that these people are soulless.
Okay, I don't know that, but it's an accusation that I think if you can embrace the concept of a spirit and a soul, you can clearly see that in many of these people, that concept is lacking.
I remember a Catholic friend of mine many years ago, and he's still to this day very, very Catholic, attends traditional Mass and Latin only and that sort of a thing.
And I remember what he told me, and I never knew about it until he articulated.
He said, essentially, what most people don't understand, the difference between Jews and Catholics or Jews and Christians, is that they don't believe in an afterlife, the Jewish people.
They believe that they make their kingdom here on earth.
And whereas Christians and Catholics believe otherwise.
So that is a fundamental gulf between in terms of philosophy.
Because when you only think about making your kingdom here on earth and that there really is no afterlife, well, then can you blame these people for thinking, well, no holds barred then.
Okay.
The end justifies the means.
And is there anything more clear than the behavior and the policies that these people implement through their control of governments and the financial system that they embrace that philosophy?
They're not only willing to impoverish people, which they've always done, but they're willing to, through the medical system and the vaccines, and through actually withholding of real, you know, actual natural therapies and cures through the withholding or suppression of actual technologies that would free us from this metered world we're living in.
As I said many times, if they could put a meter on the air and charge you to breathe it, they would.
So, this is a construct of, in my opinion, of a soulless and/or just strictly commercial Jewish mind, this world that we're living in.
It's not a construct of the sort of people that wanted to install a new world order in national socialism.
And, you know, what they've done is they've really stirred the waters and muddied the pot by creating all these, in my opinion, false intellectual and academic debates about these various systems of government, where in reality, there are many, many systems of government that would work quite well provided that we didn't have a fraudulent financial system.
But the fraudulent financial system that we have is only good for one thing, and that's to enrich one group and give one group power over everybody else.
Anyway, thanks for hearing my rant.
Well, as far as the concept of a soul is concerned, it's rather on a par with the concept of God, that there's no way to test for the presence or absence of a soul.
My interpretation would be slightly different, namely that by virtue of genetic inbreeding and cultural evolution, Jews generally have bought into the racial superiority thesis that the other races only exist to serve the Jew and that they have no compassion or virtually no compassion.
or empathy for Non-Jews.
Certainly, this is part and parcel of Talmudic teaching that the non-Jew, the Goyim, are there and exist only to serve the Jew, that the Jews are entitled to all their riches, all their wealth, that Jews can treat Goiem with impunity up to the point of death.
And as a consequence, I think you have the equivalent from a moral perspective of soulless entities who lack compassion for others because of their rigid, almost inborn belief in their own superiority.
That would be how I would cast at Paul Euratons.
Well, I don't really have an issue with just about everything you said.
You know, again, I think that we both state our positions quite well, and there are some subtle differences here and there, but we're mostly on the same page.
I have always appreciated your mind, which I think is one of the more keener and comprehensive minds on the internet.
And I'm not just trying to butter you up.
You know, it's funny.
I occasionally read the comments on BitChute after the shows are posted.
And there's a number of people, I'm not going to name them, but I kind of laugh when they'll make comments.
Many of them are positive, but there's quite a few people make comments about the fact that I kiss your ass, right?
Which is so absurd.
They don't have any idea of our history.
That is for sure, Paul.
How ridiculous can you get?
I know.
I still got to listen to that compilation of all the times I've kicked you off the show.
I know.
I mean, if I was to respond to any of them, besides, I will, of course, thank all the people because over the years, I've read many comments on BitChute that were quite favorable to me.
And I really do appreciate people like that just taking the time to write something.
And again, if I was to address any of the negative people that made comments such as that that I mentioned, I would just say, hey, you know, Jim and I are friendly off of the air and we're neighborly.
I mean, I regard you as the kind of friendly neighbor I would have a chat with now and then.
And no matter what our difference is, we could still talk about the weather and talk about the game and have a beer together, you know, that sort of a thing.
But I think far more today than at other times in the past, we align on the way that we look at things.
And the main difference, I think, probably still existing is the racial aspect, which I'll just mention briefly is that it's the only way we have to tell anymore because we don't really know what's inside of somebody's mind.
We don't really know for sure what it is they believe unless they state it.
And of course, these people have been shown over and over to be as they're known as deceivers.
So can we really take them at their word if they say something or they write something down?
Now, the fact that they put the sort of things that they did, whoever put them down in the Talmud and the other places that have written about their own view of their supremacy, well, I think that's quite, what's the word?
The, you know, ballsy would be, you know, the crude vernacular to put it in.
But they're quite upfront and clear about who it is they are and what they want.
So I think we can take them at their word that that's what they really think and feel.
And besides knowing what each individual thinks, which in many cases I call a pointless exercise, you know, similar to, you know, not to conflate too many things here, but similar to what Martin Luther King said about the content of their character.
The point has been made by me and others on FTJ and other networks that unfortunately we can't know the content of their character until sometimes it's too late, right?
In other words, we don't know we're going to be a victim of crime until it happens.
But here's one thing we can know for sure is that if Jews are in a position of power, both politically and financially, we know what they're going to do.
And it's not going to be for the good of society.
Paul, by the way, if you have that compilation at hand, I'd be glad to play it here on the air just to disabuse those who have illusions about our relationship.
And by the way, yesterday, Paul Craig Robert published a piece, How Israel Controls America.
Let me share parts of it.
The Israel lobby wants Thomas Massey gone.
Will American voters obey their Israeli masters?
Pro-Israel Republic and mega donors recently set up to make a Kentucky super PAC with 2 million specifically to oust Massey.
Paul Singer contributed a mill.
John Paulson had it 250,000.
Mary Madeline Preserve America back, another 750,000.
The Republican Jewish Coalition has promised unlimited campaign spending if Massey runs for Senate, with CEO Matt Brooks declaring that if Tom Massey chooses to enter the race for U.S. Senate in Kentucky, the RJC campaign budget to ensure he will be defeated will be unlimited.
I'm not so sure all the money in the world could defeat Thomas Massey in Kentucky.
He is such a principled guy.
He is the most forthright American patriotic member of our entire Congress.
And the very idea that these Israeli sources are willing to go all out financially to defeat him is very telling and reflects totally adversely upon him because they're trying to defeat, manipulate democracy, not let Americans have their representative defeat somebody because they're critical of Israel.
Here we have more.
President Donald Trump has also jumped into the frame branding Massey a pathetic loser who should be dropped like the plague.
Frankly, I think that might apply more to him than to Thomas Massey.
Thus, a case of projection.
Overall, a constellation of pro-Zionist forces is mobilizing at full force to unseat Congress's most principled non-interventionist politician since Ron Paul retired in 2013.
In many respects, Massey has taken up Paul's mantle of foreign policy restraint, a political agenda that has never sat well with organized Jewry.
Massey's legislate track record on foreign policy speaks for itself.
I'm a huge fan of Thomas Massey.
I find it insulting.
They're being so blatant about how they're going about to defeat him.
Your thoughts, Paul?
Well, we've seen it all before, as you've covered very well.
If you remember, you used to mention quite a bit.
It's been a while now, but you used to talk about Cynthia McKinney and her personal testimony.
We can also recall somebody like Jim Trofikanti, and I'm sure there's many, many others, the stories that we don't know for sure, but these people will use their money and essentially unlimited funds to buy the world, especially to buy the political world in which they want us to force to force us to all live in.
So, yeah, whenever there's a man of principle who would oppose them, they will spend whatever is necessary to keep that person out of office or to remove that person from office if they can.
So this is nothing new.
I mean, that's why they spent all this.
I mean, imagine the operational, if you will, planning and the continual, the ongoing funding it took to keep an operation like Jeffrey Epstein and Robert Maxwell and others going over decades.
I mean, in other words, that was not a money-making affair, right?
There was no business enterprise there.
It was all outgo.
Okay.
So, these people, again, because they have this unbelievable accumulation of so-called wealth, which is essentially in many cases fake based upon a fiat money system, well, they now know that people out there that are, and of course, the average everyday person can relate to this because they're struggling.
I mean, you must have seen when you go out grocery shopping, you know, how much the price of food has gone up.
And just everywhere you go now, it seems that more and more people are having a difficult time making it.
This is this is no accident.
Okay, I mean, it was much easier 30 years ago to just get a job, have get rent an apartment, or rent a house, or you know, even purchase a house.
Nowadays, it's just out of reach for the average wage earner, the average worker.
And that has to be, it's not just it's certain, and part of it is a result of the system, but also it's the intent of the system.
In my opinion, one of the things that I read years ago, and I really do believe it, is in many cases, you can discern the intent because of the result.
Very few accidents.
And I will be right back with all California, my co-host, and as it were, my guest for today.
I will be right back with all California, my co-hosts, and as it were, my guest for today.
This is Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, This is a drill, this is a drill on bullhoards during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities, and that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tomb.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston Either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
Second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly to yourselves.
This is what they do, and we must, you can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us.
Good evening. Be awake yet.
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use cast and resistance and loud voices to make a change.
The time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
RevolutionRadioFreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution, angered by the injustices inflicted upon the innocence of the world.
Do you have a message you'd like to share?
Any knowledge you'd like to impart to those willing to learn?
Have you ever listened to our shows and thought, hey, I could do this, but you just don't know how to kickstart your hosting ambitions?
Or are you an established professional host?
Thwarted by censorship in other areas, seeking pastors new?
Contact us here at the world's number one free speech network, Revolution Radio.
We provide the platform, the training, and the airtime to any budding host wanting the chance to take those first talk show steps.
Established hosts can find a safe and secure home here where their message can ring out loud and clear, unencumbered, free from sponsorship overreach.
Drop us a line via our email, support at revolution.radio, or head into our Discord server to say hello.
We'll take everything from there.
Revolution Radio, where hosting dreams become actualized reality.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to RevolutionRadio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
now we return you to your host.
Paul, go right ahead.
Take the initiative here, my friend.
I wanted to give you a lot of opportunity today.
And if you do have that compilation clip, I'm glad for you to play it.
Paul, where are you?
Well, meanwhile, since Paul seems to have disconnected at least momentarily, Paul Craig Roberts has yet another piece published today, how the Israel Lobby Took Over America's Universities.
It begins as follows.
Cornell, what's a place of discussion and learning, is seeking to remove a tenured Jewish professor, Eric Chaveheitz, who permits Israel to be discussed instead of simply praised.
The professor's daughter and granddaughter live in Israel.
But that doesn't save him from being charged with discrimination against a Jewish graduate student.
The professor trouble is brought to him by an Israeli student who previously served in Israel's elite military surveillance agency, Unit 8200.
None of the students support the Israeli students' claim.
And of course, that's a propaganda outfit.
So the fact he's there, he's there as a propagandist and to sabotage this Jewish professor.
That ought to be obvious.
It seems the Israel lobby is testing how far it can expand its power over America's universities.
If the lobby can get Cornell to punish a tenured Jewish professor based on a complaint by a former member of the Israeli military surveillance and Israel, well, I've set the standard for American university.
That truth about Israel constitutes anti-Semitic discrimination and is punishable.
Israeli lobby took over American University with large monetary grants.
Now, dependent upon those grants, university administrators have followed their line.
Paul, this is all so sad and so true.
When you temporarily disappeared, I was invited if you had it at hand to play that compilation of my giving you the boot.
I think that would be fun, but also to invite you to initiate where you'd like to go.
Because as I was saying, in your absence, I want to give you opportunities today you may not ordinarily enjoy.
Well, thank you for that.
Yeah, for one of those, shall we say, operator errors?
I temporarily disconnected from the show without meaning to by closing a particular window as I was actually looking for other things.
But I sent you an email of an audio clip of my co-host on FTJ.
It's about a five-minute audio clip.
And I believe it summarizes as well as anything I've ever heard our position.
If you want to open that and maybe play it, I don't know if that's any issue for you or not.
Give me a second, Paul.
Keep talking.
The other thing, too, is our friend of show, Michael Ivey, has supplied a, I have not seen it, but he says it's a really great and fairly brief summation of the lie of virology.
And I thought that that would be a little bit of nice content if we could play that.
So I will forward that to your email as well momentarily.
Let me see what I can do here, Paul.
Yeah, I wish I'd ahead of time, you know, work this out because I can easily do this when I'm on FTJ with my co-host.
I just send something to his email and he just can pull it up and put it right on the show.
Sure.
Oh, introduction and critical legal pathways.
I hope we're talking.
No, that's this would have been this morning, actually, during the show.
I sent it to you.
So it's the most recent email from me.
Let me see if I can find it.
Okay.
I think maybe I have it here.
Yeah.
It's a forwarded email.
So it's not original.
I forwarded it to you.
There's an audio file on there.
I have the email, but I don't, it's in the attachment, apparently.
And the attachment didn't come through.
You can't just play it from your end.
No, I don't believe so.
I could try and see if it goes on to the show, but go ahead and try.
Try.
Try.
All right.
Hang on a second.
I got to open it and see if it'll go on to the show, but I don't think it will.
Give me a second here.
Not a problem, Paul.
I would think of, okay, I'm going to go ahead and play.
We're going to see if anything comes through.
So ready?
I'm going to hit play now.
I'm ready.
Can you hear anything?
No.
Okay.
So, yeah, I didn't think it would work.
But you have the file.
You should be able to open up the file on your because since you're the host.
But, Paul, I said it was in an attachment and the attachment wasn't attached.
Okay.
All right.
Then I'm going to resend it.
Try resetting it.
Sure.
That's fine.
Yes.
I'll do that.
Hang on.
Go ahead.
All righty.
Oh, here we go.
Sorry about the delay here, listening audience.
Okay, here we go.
Paul, I do not have it as yet.
Yeah.
All right.
You know what's funny here is, gosh, darn it.
Here, okay.
I thought I had it right here, but it's not here.
I'm going to send you the one that Michael provided to me.
Go ahead.
So hang on a second.
I'm going to forward it to you.
and hopefully that works.
Okay, here we go.
Yes.
No.
Well, let's abandon the project to continue our discussion of many other serious issues.
One of which is the Charlie Kirk shooting, where you have seen so clearly, as have I.
And this was a completely staged production.
There's a here we have a wonderful lampooning.
I've wanted to share this.
It's marvelous.
Tyler Robinson did it.
Check this out.
Listen to this.
In too many cities, dangerous illegals walk free as police are forced to stand down.
Join ICE and help.
Watch what peanut butter does to our body.
That's based.
I mean, at least show the video of the lavalier exploding or the Israeli shaper.
Good morning.
Ongoing investigation on the active shooter leads us to a trans liberal with a Republican dad.
That'll create some division.
We go live to the trusted FBI for more.
Get in, Tyler.
Yeah.
We're taking you to Dairy Queen.
Great job, kid.
Okay, from now on, you just do what we say.
Now, go get your dairy queen.
It still hasn't been 33 hours as we wait for the 33 hours.
The FBI is hard at work coming up with a solid script to present to the public.
How do we get away with this?
I got it.
Let's just ask Chat GPT to generate us a story of young gay lovers from the 20s.
Genius.
When you're talking about things like going out to a crime scene, that's how you investigate that matter properly.
And when you're talking about why did it take 33 hours, all of that is being triaged by the FBI because that's what we do.
We trusted you with the Epstein files.
We definitely can trust you with this.
Right.
Trust your government.
Noticing is antiseptic, right, John?
That's right.
I think we might have found our suspect texting his furry lover.
We're just waiting for him to confess.
Ugh, fine, but nobody my age sounds like that.
Shut up, Tyler, and send it.
Good thing they're rigorously pushing for a confession.
It's like, let's get this over with, right?
Conspiracy theorists will believe anything these days.
And this just did.
We have footage of Tyler on the roof.
Okay, here he is after disassembling the rifle to fit it in his pants.
And now he doesn't have a shadow.
Shapiro Steen, explain what we're seeing here.
Just because his shadow disappeared and our donors offered $1.5 million to find the killer doesn't mean we did it.
But yes, he questioned too much.
That's why we got rid of him.
We'll just say he reassembled it.
33 hours, two hours after the video footage was enhanced and released, and the suspect's father turned him in.
Seems like they could just show the actual footage of him taking the shot instead of that edited video, and all these conspiracy theories go away.
Do they think we're retarded or something?
Hell yeah, Ching Chong.
That's based.
I mean, at least show the video of the lavalier exploding or the Israeli Schaefer security company retrieving the weapon.
Shut it down, John.
Let's not forget what happened to Jackie when she noticed.
Now, make the dad MAGA and have him call it in now.
Are you ready to confess?
He admitted it, okay?
Now, when do I get the 1.5 million?
Well, hope he gets his ransom money, right?
Well, it's officially been 33 hours.
Oh, how exciting!
Let's hear cash thank the Viking pagan gods.
Charlie would love that.
To my friend Charlie Kirk.
Rest now, brother.
We have the watch, and I'll see you in Valhalla.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
We got him.
Forgive Tyler, for we know it was him, and there's nothing more to see here.
Good call, Erica.
And if you still haven't followed Jake GTV yet, you might be severely retarded.
Certainly not based.
Well, that's about as good as it gets, actually.
In terms of satire, I love it.
You're the one.
Jim, yeah, no, Jake TV is unbelievable.
I think that he is head and shoulders above just overall in terms of just the not just the content, but the production, the humor, you know, just makes extremely pointed, you know, comparisons and juxtapositions.
And it's just, I've been, I discovered him only this year, believe it or not.
Others have known about him for a while.
But I was discussing him with my co-host, Davis Luhrmann over there at FTJ.
And, you know, I would think that it's like an organization or a team or some sort of small production company.
But Davis told me, no, he said, probably one guy who's talented, who can really work with AI and all sorts of other computer software, one guy could do that, could compile all that, which to me is just mind-boggling.
It is.
It's so brilliant.
And yep, we get a lot here.
We got Intel brief, possible motives for Israel, and then yeah, wanting Charlie Kirk eliminated.
I do, by the way, believe he had wandered off of the reservation.
They did want him eliminated, but he beat him to the punch by faking his death.
Here's what we have.
I don't believe it.
Charlie Kirk on the October 7th attack succeeding without a stand down order from IDF High Command.
Soon after the Moss attack of October 7th, Charlie Kirk expressed disbelief publicly and on the air that the attack on the most heavily defended, heavily survived, high-tech border in the world could have succeeded without help from the IDF High Command.
That sentiment was echoed by former U.S. Defense Intel Agency Director General Mike Flynn, who said, so soon after the attack, there was a decision made to have a security stand down on the 7th of October for seven hours on the Southern Zone up against a fence line against the Gaza Strip.
And I'm telling you, folks, that wasn't done by happenstance.
That's not a coincidence.
Somebody made that decision.
Gee, I wonder if his initials could be BN.
Don't know if Netanyahu made it or the Southern Zone Commander made it, but somebody made it.
Here's Charlie again.
I've been to that Gaza border.
You cannot go 10 feet without running into a night-year-old with a 19-year-old with an AR-15 or an automatic machine gun.
And that's an IDF, right?
The whole country is surveyed.
I think some question needs to be asked.
Was there a stand-down order?
Was there?
Six hours?
I don't believe it.
Israel is the size of New Jersey.
When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's 45 minutes.
Wow, six hours?
They're live streaming the killing of Jews.
Did somebody in the government say stand down?
That's a legitimate, non-conspiracy question.
The whole country is IDF.
And what he added, Paul, that I like so much, he said, it's not anti-Semitic or un-American to raise questions like this.
I thought Charlie was definitely coming around, but he was clearly wandering off the Zionist reservation.
Well, Jim, you know, I've made it clear I completely disagree with this notion that Charlie Kirk and or Team Charlie Kirk or Turning Point USA, you know, acted independently of the overall, you know, governmental corporate Jewish infrastructure that's already in place.
So in other words, we would have to have two opposing sides here.
We would have to have Team Charlie Kirk acting, shall we say, to circumvent the plans of some other deep state in their agenda.
And I just think I'm making my opinion known here without casting any aspersions your way.
I just think that that's absurd.
I think that these people are actors.
They're only actors.
It's clear that Charlie Kirk was groomed from a very young age.
I mean, who makes an appearance on Fox News at age 17, for God's sake?
Or who by age 18 has a wealthy billionaire who just so happens to be Jewish as well, fund a multi-multi-million dollar organization so that this kid, this punk who's still wet behind the ears.
I don't know, again, how many of his academic points were original or were given to him as the talking points.
But his job now is supposedly to go around to all these college campuses and other places and make speeches and presentations and engage the young people.
I mean, this is not any operation that would make money.
It's not like they're a rock band selling out concerts.
Again, this is a completely contrived and funded organization from the start.
And you will never get me to believe that Charlie Kirk and or his team around him acted independently to thwart some legitimate assassination attempt.
I think this is just part of the whirlwind of confusion that these people love to generate.
Just like this guy, I believe it was Charlie Zinn or whatever, this old man being dragged away with his paintings.
George Zinn.
George Zinn, right?
You know, yelling he didn't do it, right?
And just so happened to be people of the ledge.
And I've seen the photos.
It sure looks like the same person that was interviewed around 9-11 and or the Boston bombings.
It's like, what are the odds?
Oy Vey, right?
I mean, and you yourself have found the same crisis actor or actress appearing at different mass shootings, being interviewed at different role.
Paul, listen, this is fascinating.
Now, do you think then that was actually designed to implicate trannies and regressions?
Again, these are all side issues.
In other words, what they're always doing is giving us drama.
And I made this point clear before.
And I know sometimes I feel like, am I just a big boring, you know, repeat all the time?
But they never talk about the real issues, right?
Like, remember that time I brought that video and we played it, Dr. Anna Mahauchia, and, you know, finding, and she's not alone, but alleging there's all this self-replicating nanotech in our blood.
And we certainly know other people have done work on the blood clots and so forth.
So, you know, the real issues, such as what they're doing to poison our natural world or what they're doing to modify the weather or the actual mechanics of our fraudulent fractional reserve fiat money banking system.
These things are never discussed.
Instead, we get trannies.
You know, we get men and women's sports.
We get all these other unimportant.
We get Charlie Kirk.
I mean, think about it.
It's just a play is what it is, in my opinion.
It's a distraction because Charlie Kirk never really engaged in very important discussions.
These were always just sort of talking points, trying to draw the distinction and in many cases, deepen the divide between left and right.
And in my opinion, the left and right divide, even though it does exist, especially it exists in concept.
And of course, it exists in reality in many ways, but it's a false or artificial divide because if both sides knew the actual truth, they would be allies.
I mean, when you think about all the lies that we've been told about everything, I mean, pretty much since birth, then again, both sides, in my opinion, the right and the left, these so-called conservatives and or the Magatards versus the crazy left-wing lunatic nutjob liberals.
In many cases, these are both decent human beings that have been deprived of the actual truth and the true nature of our world.
Now, there's still going to be fundamental differences between opinions.
There's no doubt about it.
But Charlie Kirk and the agenda that they're pursuing aligns perfectly with what Miles Mathis has called driving everybody to the right.
In other words, to make the actual left or liberals or to make, you know, the so-called Democrats look completely crazy and unhinged.
And what that's going to do is to push everybody towards what they want, which is this Jewish-controlled surveillance state, you know, under the guise of conservatism, right?
That's that's where they're going with this.
And that's why, in my opinion, and this is more speculative now, that's why they're building all these data centers everywhere.
And if you listen to, like I said, Sasha Latipova, Anna Mahatia, even Whitney Webb, I mean, she's given some very compelling interviews, which we could play on a subsequent show, talking about how their goal is to merge with using this injectable technology, right?
Using vaccines to merge us with AI and the control of these data centers.
And I don't pretend to understand the technological aspects of it or even know for sure the veracity or the reality of it.
But my God, if you were to see the construction projects they're engaging in, I mean, just where I live, there's three or four data centers, all massive constructive projects, probably within two to three miles of each other.
Okay, two are already complete and there's two more under construction.
And I just spoke to a guy who lives about 10 or 12 miles away from me in another town.
But I mean, if you know the San Francisco Bay Area, it's just this huge megalopolis where one so-called town or city bleeds into another.
And so where he lives in Santa Clara, he told me, yeah, they're building these data centers everywhere.
And I know where a couple are.
And he was telling me about more under construction, just not that far from where he lives.
So can you really make the case that there's that much more data out there now that needs to be processed?
You know, no, I think they're trying to figure out a way to get everybody under control with implanted devices as well as through this 5G or what they would now call the upcoming maybe 6G technology and this so-called singularity merging human beings with AI.
I think that that's these demons' ultimate goal.
And when you listen to these crazy people like Peter Thiel and Noah Harari and these other extremely wacko Jewish faggots, and that's really what it is.
Think about that, Jim.
Think about how many Jewish homosexuals have tremendous power and sway in this world because of their control of both money and technology.
It's really a frightening prospect.
Paul, it seems to me you're suggesting these data centers are intended to be behavioral control centers, actually, that the way it's going to work out is they're going to have access to individual persons by virtue of, you know, these micro processors in the bloodstream.
And I have a friend who's just confirmed having a bunch of them in his, which he's had removed, but we don't know how long it will take for them to be replaced that these data centers actually are going to be able to control our behavior.
I made the point some time back that you cannot turn an inanimate machine into a thinking thing.
I think they're trying to turn thinking things, human beings, into more like robotic machines.
We'll be right back with Paul from California.
Stand by.
Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform, free speech, has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio.
Join Revolution Radio every
Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary ZEN with host Zen Garcia at freedomslips.com.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osaba had nothing to do with it.
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Massad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read America Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
Now we return you to your host.
Well, Paul, I have been able to fetch something you said.
Israel in America, the dog wags the tail versus the tail wags the dog.
So yeah, before you play it, we'll just finish up our brief discussion on these data centers and the supposition of what their goal is.
So, you know, again, we don't need to engage in that much speculation.
I mean, if we just take them at their word, what they've already written down and spoken about.
And for example, you know, if you're familiar with, you know, Ray Kurzweil and the singularity is near, I mean, they've made it clear that their goal is to somehow merge us.
And of course, they're going to try to sell it as an improvement, but we can all be pretty sure that there's not going to be going to be any improvement in human beings.
And, you know, to use, I guess, a baseball term, you know, I'm just, I'm just spitballing here.
But when you see, and again, I don't know if you've seen any of these data centers, right?
But they are so massive and there's so many of them.
And it just makes me think, you know, is there really that much data or that much more data that they need to go on this building spree to accomplish, to accomplish what?
The purpose of, you know, internet, you know, service?
To me, there's something nefarious going on, especially with the amount of land and the amount of money it takes to build these things.
And so, yeah, we were both engaging in what I feel is very well-grounded speculation on what it is that they intend.
And I will remind you and all the listeners out there that they were working with voice-to-skull technology.
That's what they labeled it, voice-to-skull technology in the late 50s and early 60s.
And I had it on good authority from the 70s when I first started becoming aware of some of these conspiratorial type thinking and what now today we call deep state.
But back then, I suppose they would have called the military-industrial complex, right?
That there was back then in the 70s, a separate room and processing for government agencies.
I don't know which one it would have been, maybe CIA, but somebody that worked at PacBell, Pacific Bell, which subsidiary of Mobile, they said there was a separate room where a government agency tapped right into the trunk lines of the phone system.
So we know back then, okay, how many that was 50-something years ago, that they were intent upon reading or recording, processing all phone traffic.
So in my opinion, there can be no doubt what it is they're trying to construct, which is, as everybody has been saying, a full-time total domination surveillance state where all transactions and movements and so on will be controlled.
And if they can know or discern our thoughts or intents, they'll probably go for that as well.
Paul, I suspect you're right.
Now, there's a collateral problem.
These service centers require a lot of cooling, vast quantities of water.
And there's some areas where they put in these data centers, and the local population is suffering from an acute water shortage.
You put enough of these around the country, it could have a devastating effect on our water supply.
I mean, that's totally separate, apart from behavioral manage, but which has to be the objective.
Why the hell can't they just let us be free and do our own thing?
We're crying out loud.
You know, this I love that you said that.
I was almost waiting for why don't they just leave us alone?
And what it reminds me of, we discussed this years ago, my co-host Davis Luhrmann and I, and he, he, you will hear his voice shortly, but he told me years ago, and it was, it was brilliant, and I've remembered it ever since, and I've repeated it, but it came from him.
He said, Those who want to be left alone will always lose to those who have an agenda.
Okay.
And it's just really that, Simon.
It goes right back to what I talked about with, you know, a territorial imperative and that you either, you know, rule or get ruled.
And that also there's a video I watched not that long ago, essentially about domination and the fact that they, you know, that nature and the real world is fairly unkind to the meek.
It's just unfortunately the way that things are.
I'll add one other thing before we play this clip to something that I have noticed.
And this is completely anecdotal because I have not taken a tape measure, but I've been living in the same area for a very long time, you know, the better part of 30 plus years.
And I know where a lot of these cell phone towers, cell phone arrays are.
And there's been a number of additional ones over the years.
But I am telling you right now, Jim, they have lowered the height of most of them.
I remember, and this is just perception alone, again, what you are used to seeing, but I know the difference between a medium-sized tree and a tall tree.
And these things, these towers, these arrays used to be up at a particular height.
And now almost all of them are lower for some reason.
So you can make of that what you will.
Oh, I think that's telling, Paul.
And it would have to do with setting up for, you know, controlling the population.
But initially, they're just becoming familiar, used to those mechanisms being there, and then actually lowering them for implementation.
I would say that has to be what's going on here.
I have the video, the audio.
Here we go.
Davis Luhrmann.
Davis Luhrman.
David World.
Davis Luhrmann.
Right Perspective Radio.
Davis Luhrmann.
Davis Luhrmann.
Israel and America.
The dog wags the tail versus the tail wags the dog.
The age-old argument over Jewish power, the tail wagging the dog and all that can be settled once and for all looking at the current dynamics between the U.S. and Israel.
Given Israel's abuse of American generosity and Israel's refusal to abide by any negotiated peace terms in the Middle East and the fact that Israel bombed Qatar, a neutral territory with U.S. allied protection agreements, Qatar, where the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East is stationed, the American president has to put his foot down and restrain Israel, right?
I mean, after all, this is Israel refusing to abide by any negotiated peace terms.
So the American president has to put his foot down and restrain Israel, right?
I mean, after all, the U.S. president must tell Israel what to do, right?
I mean, Israel's so small and the U.S. is so big after all, right?
Well, this is yet another opportunity to run the litmus test on whether the dog wags the tail or if the tail wags the dog.
Does the U.S. control Israel or the latter?
Does Israel control the U.S.?
From the dog wags the tail perspective, the arguments would go something like this.
Can we just treat Israel like we would any other country that racks up violations like Israel has?
I mean, Israel has a record of interdicting humanitarian aid drops, starving civilian populations, killing people while telling the world Palestinians are skinny because of genetic disorders.
Can't we just stop sending them foreign aid?
Or even better, we need to confront Israel like any other adversary.
I mean, after all, the dog wags the tail, right?
So we should treat them like any other country in violation of the rules-based order and all humanitarian standards, right?
In fact, Israel is just a murderous rogue nation.
So we need to at least confront Israel like we confront Putin or Xi Jinping or like we confront North Korea.
After all, how is Israel better than North Korea at this point?
Is North Korea committing a genocide?
What was the last time North Korea bombed a defenseless population?
So Israel is the pariah state in the entire world, more so than Russia, more so than China, more so than Iran, in fact, more so than the now irrelevant North Korea.
The Jews country is the pariah state of the world.
In doing this thought experiment based on real world events, I think I've made the case that treating Israel and Jews like every other country and people is simply not enough.
Just not an appropriate response for such a disgusting people with a disgusting nation engaged in a nihilistic murder spree across the whole of the Middle East and the world, in fact.
So what would an appropriate response be if indeed the dog wags the tail?
Well, we would need to be sanctioning Israel, right?
Forget about not sending them weapons.
If indeed the dog wags the tail, we would put sanctions on Israel.
After all, we appear to be the only ones that can stop these out-of-control Jews.
But where's the leadership?
Hey, MAGA, hey, America first.
Why doesn't the American president, the leader of the free world, stand up to this tiny country?
Would you like to know why the American president can't do that?
It's because you have no representation.
Jews control our system by design.
Your lack of representation and their control of our country is a feature, not a bug.
When you understand the American president can't confront Israel because he doesn't want to alienate the Jewish billionaires, the powerful Jewish dual citizen billionaires in America, you understand Jews made it that way to their benefit at the expense of your country.
So let me get this straight.
For those who still insist the dog wags the tail, the American president can't go against Israel because if he does, the Republican Jewish coalition, APAC, the ADL, the North American Jewish Federation, the many organizations of major American Jews, they'll all come down on Trump, assuming he does want to serve Jews, which we know he does.
So the tail doesn't wag the dog, but Wall Street, BlackRock, Hollywood, mainstream media, and the messaging of social media all converge on a pro-Israel, pro-Jewish narrative.
And we're supposed to think this was an emergent property of a representative government?
So the American people never get what they want and whites are consistently marginalized because that's what organic representation looks like?
No, Jews control your representatives and Israel has a nuclear arsenal.
If Israel ever felt that it was in peril, including imperiled by the United States, they would use their nuclear weapons on us and on the Middle East.
It's nuclear blackmail.
Domestically, Jews control America through concerted pressure campaigns, bribery, and extortion.
Internationally, Jews maintain hegemony through their nuclear blackmail.
It's high time to name the Jew, defy the Jew, and support what you want to see more of in the world.
Advance your interests, understand your enemy, know your friends, and love your people.
That is the best we can do, given our circumstances.
Davis Lerman.
Davis Lerman.
Damn, that was fucking good.
Go ahead and cut that down.
We, the leaders of this planet, can offer nothing but terror, conflict, pollution, fear, inequalities, and war to 8 billion people.
We must confront the truth.
We are complicit in crimes against our civilization and our planet.
There's got to be more swear words.
You want to drop it?
Yeah, that's that was quite good, Paul.
I thought even brilliant.
Summation.
Would you like to comment further on it?
Yeah, well, when he sent it to me, by the way, the reason I had you cut it off towards the end there, there was a couple of F-bombs and stuff like that.
But yeah, no, I mean, he's a very, I've known him for quite a while.
In fact, he contacted me years ago because he heard me calling into your show.
So we became friends, you know, offline, as it were.
And he gave me one of the best compliments I've ever had after contacting me.
You know, one of a handful of people that have reached out to me over the years after he heard some of my calls to your show back in the day, he said, I wanted to get a hold of this guy, me, because here's somebody that needs his own show.
But yeah, he's always been very insightful.
And I think that in the end, he's as astute of a political analyst as anybody that there is.
Yeah, he has a great voice for radio, too.
And very articulate, very intelligent, impressive, Paul.
Impressive.
Continue.
He used to work in actual terrestrial radio.
He has been in the past a disc jockey on FM stations, you know, back in the day.
And he has an academic background.
I'm not sure exactly what it is, but he's.
Keep going.
He's very well educated.
You're cutting in and out.
Here's a story I wanted to throw in.
But anyway, he sent this to me.
He sends me these regularly.
These are, you know, just excerpt from either shows or, you know, he'll put these things.
That's one of the better things I've heard in you.
No, I was done for the moment.
You're cutting in and out.
Go ahead.
Oh, sorry about that.
Yeah, I was finished.
Do you want to, in the remaining time, play the five-minute clip that I forwarded that Michael Ivy sent me?
He said it's about five minutes and it's really good.
Sure.
I need to play it, right?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I sent it to you.
It's just, it's, we're jumping, we're jumping topics here, but it's supposed to be about the virology.
Paul, I'm not seeing it.
Have you just now sent it or had you sent it earlier?
I forwarded it to you about the same time as I forwarded the audio clip.
So.
Oh, I'm not seeing it for whatever reason.
Let me put it into my set folder, but I know that I sent it.
Does it have Michael Ivey's name on it?
It may because I forwarded it, but it should be coming from me, though.
Yeah, yeah.
I've got the virology thing.
That's not what you mean.
You're talking about the class.
Yeah, so I'm showing it right now in my set folder.
I sent it 36 minutes ago.
Yo, you are talking about the virology.
Okay, here it is.
Here it is.
These have never actually been proven to exist.
It all started with germ theory.
When Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch couldn't find a bacteria for every disease, they didn't question their theory.
They invented a scapegoat, an invisible, filterable agent smaller than bacteria.
The virus wasn't discovered.
It was a concept created to save a failing hypothesis.
From the very beginning, its existence was inferred, not proven.
When virologists say they isolated a virus, you probably picture them taking a sample from a sick person and separating a pure virus particle.
That has never happened.
Not once.
Here's what they actually do.
They take unpurified fluid from a sick person, a mix of mucus, bacteria, human cells, and who knows what else.
They don't clean it.
Instead, they mix this gunk with toxic antibiotics, animal serum, and then dump it onto a culture of cells, usually from monkey kidneys or aborted human fetuses.
They starve and poison these cells for days until they start to break down and die.
They call this cell death the cytopathic effect, and they claim it's proof a virus is killing the cells.
The resulting toxic soup of dead cells and chemicals is what they call a virus isolate.
They never prove a virus was in the sample to begin with.
They just assume it and then use the cell death they created as proof.
It's completely circular reasoning.
But what about the pictures from the electron microscope?
Those famous spiky balls?
They take a drop of that same toxic soup, subject it to a destructive chemical process that kills and distorts everything, and then look at the debris under a microscope.
They point to a random particle, which is indistinguishable from normal cellular debris or exosomes, and declare, that's the virus.
No purification, no proof it came from a person, no proof it's pathogenic.
It's just pointing at a dot and telling a story.
And the viral genomes?
They're created on a computer.
They take all the random genetic fragments from that unpurified cell culture soup.
Human DNA, monkey DNA, bacterial DNA, and use software to stitch together a sequence they think looks like a virus.
This digital model is then called the reference genome.
It's not from a real purified virus.
It's an in-silico creation.
That's why there are millions of variants for something like SARS-CoV-2.
They're just tweaking the computer model.
It's a digital phantom, not a biological reality.
Antibody tests are just as bad.
The whole idea of a specific lock and key antibody is a myth.
These tests are notoriously nonspecific.
Antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 have been shown to cross-react with everything.
Other coronaviruses, herpes, the flu, bacteria claimed to cause Lyme disease, and even foods like milk, peanuts, and broccoli.
Using an antibody test to prove infection is like using a key that opens every door in the building to prove you live in one specific apartment.
The most damning evidence against virology is that they can't even prove transmission.
During the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, doctors at the U.S. Public Health Service conducted experiments on 100 healthy volunteers.
They sprayed fluids from sick patients directly into their noses and eyes.
They injected their blood.
They had them sit face to face with sick patients and inhale their coughs.
The result?
Not a single volunteer got sick.
They repeated these experiments multiple times, and they failed every single time.
If the deadliest virus in history can't be transmitted under perfect experimental conditions, maybe the whole idea of contagion is wrong.
Real science follows a method.
To prove a microbe causes a disease, you must satisfy Koch's postulates.
Find it, isolate it purely, give it to a healthy host to cause the same disease and re-isolate it.
Virology has never fulfilled these steps for any alleged virus.
They skip the science and rely on indirect evidence, assumptions, and fallacies.
They don't have proof.
They have a narrative.
A story propped up by toxic cell cultures, computer-generated genomes, and horrific animal experiments.
It's not science.
It's a belief system, and it's been deceiving us for over a century.
Don't take my word for it.
Go read the methods section of any virology paper.
You'll see they never start with a purified virus.
The lie is right there in their own words.
Oh, that's simply excellent.
That's probably the best piece I've seen yet about virology.
And in brief combust, five minutes?
That's sensational.
Well, we have friend of show Michael Ivey to thank for that.
And yeah, I agree.
And of course, I've seen, as well as he has seen as well, much lengthier presentations by brilliant people such as Dr. Thomas Cowan and others.
And of course, I recommend anybody who wants to read the PDF online, Virus Mania, and then also the book by Thomas Cowan, The Myth of Contagion.
It makes clear the lies we've all been told.
And what they count upon is our ignorance.
As I've mentioned many times, I was ignorant in 2020.
If you put a microphone in my face and asked me what a virus was, or could I tell you the difference between a virus and a bacteria, you know, so on, or what were the characteristics that they attributed to viruses, I would have not had anything to say, you know, and I was an educated adult.
But, you know, what they count on, I believe, is what we've all categorized as the appeal to authority.
So because somebody's a doctor, right, or somebody's Somebody's a lawyer or somebody's a scientist.
We just automatically assume that what they say is accurate or truthful.
And of course, I believe now we all know different, and more and more people are waking up to the fraud that has been perpetrated upon us for a very long time.
And I was actually aware of some of these experiments that were mentioned actually too in the 50s, I believe, 1950s or 60s, the Army did similar experiments to what they just talked about from 1918 Spanish flu,
where they tried to, they took people with the so-called flu or full-blown colds, and they used their mucus secretions and unbeknownst to other soldiers, they tried to infect to see how many regular soldiers would get colds.
And what they found is that no more got the symptoms of the cold or the flu than they would have been expected otherwise.
So again, I think we've all been lied to.
And what's interesting, and I'll end it with this because we're running low on time here, is I also heard or saw, I forget whether I read it or saw it or heard it, but this notion of six feet apart.
And somebody, and one of these people, sometimes I take in so much content, I forget exactly who it was, but they talked about the human aura.
And essentially, the human aura is more or less just this electromagnetic field that we all walk around in and/or project, and that it interacts with others.
So we've all known the feeling of being completely comfortable in somebody else's presence or enjoying that person.
And as well as we've also been uncomfortable by some people, even when they're not saying that much.
And this is the human aura of the human energy, which supposedly extends about six feet out.
So isn't that interesting that they wanted us to be apart?
And I really do believe that when people come together, especially in a social situation, there's a sort of a harmony and a resonance that occurs, and which in many cases is healthy that we all need.
Well, I believe Deborah Burks and even Fauci himself have admitted they just made up the number, that there was no basis for the six feet.
And of course, wearing masks is actually counterproductive.
The deaths from the Spanish flu were mostly generated by bacterial pneumonia, which was promoted by wearing masks because you're recycling human waste.
And Fauci knew that in the beginning.
So both of those measures were bad ones.
They ought never to have been approved, but then the whole pandemic was a fraud to begin with.
Paul, you've just had many excellent contributions today.
If you have a final word before we must conclude our conversation today, please.
Well, thanks again for having me on.
And I will say, honestly, as many of the shows that we've done, when you and I are together producing content, time flies.
Well done, Paul.
Well done.
Meanwhile, everyone, spend as much time with your family, your friends, or people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left.
Use it wisely.
And as I'm now disposed to say, God willing, I'll be back on Monday and we'll do it all over again.
See you again.
▲
Export Selection