| Time | Text |
|---|---|
|
Virology's Fictional Virus
00:04:59
|
|
| Virology is a pseudoscience, and the viruses they claim cause disease have never actually been proven to exist. | |
| It all started with germ theory. | |
| When Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch couldn't find a bacteria for every disease, they didn't question their theory. | |
| They invented a scapegoat, an invisible, filterable agent smaller than bacteria. | |
| The virus wasn't discovered. | |
| It was a concept created to save a failing hypothesis. | |
| From the very beginning, its existence was inferred, not proven. | |
| When virologists say they isolated a virus, you probably picture them taking a sample from a sick person and separating a pure virus particle. | |
| That has never happened. | |
| Not once. | |
| Here's what they actually do. | |
| They take unpurified fluid from a sick person, a mix of mucus, bacteria, human cells, and who knows what else. | |
| They don't clean it. | |
| Instead, they mix this gunk with toxic antibiotics, animal serum, and then dump it onto a culture of cells, usually from monkey kidneys or aborted human fetuses. | |
| They starve and poison these cells for days until they start to break down and die. | |
| They call this cell death the cytopathic effect, and they claim it's proof a virus is killing the cells. | |
| The resulting toxic soup of dead cells and chemicals is what they call a virus isolate. | |
| They never prove a virus was in the sample to begin with. | |
| They just assume it, and then use the cell death they created as proof. | |
| It's completely circular reasoning. | |
| But what about the pictures from the electron microscope? | |
| Those famous spiky balls? | |
| They take a drop of that same toxic soup, subject it to a destructive chemical process that kills and distorts everything, and then look at the debris under a microscope. | |
| They point to a random particle, which is indistinguishable from normal cellular debris or exosomes, and declare, that's the virus. | |
| No purification, no proof it came from a person, no proof it's pathogenic. | |
| It's just pointing at a dot and telling a story. | |
| And the viral genomes? | |
| They're created on a computer. | |
| They take all the random genetic fragments from that unpurified cell culture soup. | |
| Human DNA, monkey DNA, bacterial DNA, and use software to stitch together a sequence they think looks like a virus. | |
| This digital model is then called the reference genome. | |
| It's not from a real purified virus. | |
| It's an in-silico creation. | |
| That's why there are millions of variants for something like SARS-CoV-2. | |
| They're just tweaking the computer model. | |
| It's a digital phantom, not a biological reality. | |
| Antibody tests are just as bad. | |
| The whole idea of a specific lock and key antibody is a myth. | |
| These tests are notoriously nonspecific. | |
| Antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 have been shown to cross-react with everything. | |
| Other coronaviruses, herpes, the flu, bacteria claimed to cause Lyme disease, and even foods like milk, peanuts, and broccoli. | |
| Using an antibody test to prove infection is like using a key that opens every door in the building to prove you live in one specific apartment. | |
| The most damning evidence against virology is that they can't even prove transmission. | |
| During the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, doctors at the U.S. Public Health Service conducted experiments on 100 healthy volunteers. | |
| They sprayed fluids from sick patients directly into their noses and eyes. | |
| They injected their blood. | |
| They had them sit face to face with sick patients and inhale their coughs. | |
| The result? | |
| Not a single volunteer got sick. | |
| They repeated these experiments multiple times and they failed every single time. | |
| If the deadliest virus in history can't be transmitted under perfect experimental conditions, maybe the whole idea of contagion is wrong. | |
| Real science follows a method. | |
| To prove a microbe causes a disease, you must satisfy Koch's postulates. | |
| Find it, isolate it purely, give it to a healthy host to cause the same disease and re-isolate it. | |
| Virology has never fulfilled these steps for any alleged virus. | |
| They skip the science and rely on indirect evidence, assumptions, and fallacies. | |
| They don't have proof. | |
| They have a narrative. | |
| A story propped up by toxic cell cultures, computer-generated genomes, and horrific animal experiments. | |
| It's not science. | |
| It's a belief system, and it's been deceiving us for over a century. | |
| Don't take my word for it. | |
| Go read the methods section of any virology paper. | |
| You'll see they never start with a purified virus. | |