All Episodes
Previous Next
June 23, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:03:25
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (22 June 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back, folks, to Truth vs.
News Incorporated.
All this stuff is going on in the world here on June the 22th, 22nd of June.
Well, what first hour you got to see all that stuff, especially with Scott talking.
And so, Jim, lead on.
We got more heavy work ahead of us here.
Well, we want Joaquin and Brian to comment on President Trump's statement, which was just laden with false claims and misrepresentation.
Frankly, I found it repulsive.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
All you have to do is flip the switch and know that pretty much everything Donald Trump says and said in that little bleat there is fault.
Everything is upside down.
Everything's twisted around.
And, you know, I mean, for instance, you know, they always have to, you know, it's the divide and rule game all along.
Oh, Iran and Bash.
Oh, they're the bad guys.
Oh, they're evil.
They're the terrorists.
No, all you have to do is flip the switch and see that Israel, the Gulf states, and America are the ones that produce al-Qaeda and produce the, what, the al-Qaeda terrorists, now president of Syria.
They're behind all of this.
You know, the Islamic State, they took out General Soleimani, the Iran favorite general, because he was taking care of business, getting rid of the ISIS terrorists.
He was the guy that was taking them out in Iraq and Syria.
And they took him out.
Trump, Trump took him out.
So everything's in verse.
Everything coming out of the fork tongue Trump is false.
And, you know, and as I mentioned earlier, we have the good cop and the bad cop.
And the good cop is the wise Putin that is all very deliberate and very, you know, thoughtful about everything that comes out of his mouth.
And you have to say, you know, I am amazed that, you know, pretty much everything the guy says seems to be right on with truth.
And then, you know, you look at, you know, puppets, you know, I mean, Trump, you know, I've written extensively to expose him.
This guy, like his son-in-law and daughter, he's a Lubavitch, Shabad, pedophile, completely owned and controlled by city of Rothschild.
Rothschild, they bailed him out a couple of times out of bankruptcy, and they own this man.
So yeah, he's a completely, and his God that he's referring to, Satan.
You better believe that.
Shaban Lubavitch, Satanist.
So yeah, everything comes out his fault.
And I'm not going to say that, you know, Putin, on the other hand, is the saint, you know, but I'll tell you, in contrast with everything the Western quote leader puppets say, you know, between Labrov and Putin, well, hey, they make sense, at least, you know, so that's what I have to say.
Right.
Well, who knows what sort of machinations have taken place related to Trump?
Obviously, there's been a lot of hanky-panky and funny business related to what's going on here, because if you look at the words that have come out of Trump's mouth in the past, no more wars, I'll end this, make America great again, all of these things are now invalidated.
It's as if there's somebody that has a great deal of leverage over him, so much so that he cannot break loose.
Maybe it has something to do with 230 million from the Adelsons.
Maybe it has something to do with the AIPAC lobby and the machine that they control in the United States.
Maybe it has to do with threats on his life or his family's life.
We don't know the answers to any of that at this particular point in time because we're not being given insights into the private conversations that are really taking place.
Now, do I think Trump is a patriot?
I do.
I think his heart's been in the right place.
I don't think he's been able to deceive everybody in America and the MAGA movement in terms of where he's going.
But at this particular point in time, we have no choice but to assess the situation and determine that the war machine has gotten a hold of him and that this was a premeditated designed program that was activated within the last few weeks due to political exigency or whatever it happens to be.
And so therefore, Trump seems to have to support this, thinking that America is going to buy into this.
The good news is that the alternative media, including many big names in the alternative media, are seeing right through it for what it is.
And it's largely due to the damage that he did to the mainstream media that people can begin to see clearly now.
So I say that there is hope in the long haul, but that hope is only realized once we're able to get out of the trouble that we're in as a nation.
Don't expect any domestic programs to be rolled out anytime shortly to make the American people happy.
Don't expect that he's going to be able to redeem himself from this particular disaster anytime quickly.
This is a much deeper pit of despair than I've ever seen America in.
And I don't think we're going to be getting out of it anytime soon.
Therefore, he's just making the best out of it that he can.
Well, let's see.
Meanwhile, We have Scott Ritter with Judge Napolitano.
This is really quite fabulous.
The judge begins with a statement.
Not me.
Say that.
there.
Later.
Thank you.
Thank you.
That's all moves.
Your baby's microbiome says the foundation.
Yeah, the way they got them set up now.
Here we have the judge making a statement.
very powerful.
One.
Hi, everyone.
Judge Andrew Napolitano here for a judging freedom.
Welcome to this special Sunday edition, Sunday, June 22nd, 2025 of Judging Freedom with Scott Ritter.
Before Scott and I begin our conversation as to what the President of the United States ordered and the military carried out last night and this morning in Iran, a brief statement from me.
What the President of the United States did was profoundly unconstitutional, absolutely unlawful, was an impeachable offense and was a war crime.
Under our Constitution only, the Congress can declare war, not the President.
And Congress can only declare war on a country that poses an immediate and grave military threat to the United States of America.
President Trump has started a war with Iran, which poses no threat, let alone immediate or grave whatsoever, to the national security of the United States of America.
Under an unconstitutional statute, but still the law, the war powers resolution, the president is required to give notice to Congress and give Congress an opportunity to respond before he attacks a foreign country.
He can carry out the response, but he has to tell Congress and give Congress an opportunity to respond.
He not only ignored the Constitution, he ignored that law.
As unconstitutional as it is, it hasn't been tested by the courts.
It is still the law.
The president ignored it.
Killing people and destroying property in another country without a just cause is a war crime.
It is the moral and legal equivalent of a high crime and misdemeanor.
It is an impeachable offense.
And it is time for the American public and the Congress to do something about it.
Now to the military aspects of all of this.
Scott, what did the United States military do last night and this morning in Iran?
Well, what they did is carry out an illegal war of aggression.
It's a war crime.
It's not just a war crime.
Judge Jackson from the Nuremberg trial period, lead prosecutor of the Nazi war criminals, asserted that a war of aggression is the ultimate war crime because from this war of aggression, all other crimes emanate.
And this is what we did.
I don't know why Americans are proud of this.
This is an act of perfidy, a surprise attack, an undeclared act of aggression that had no foundation and justification.
Again, to justify something like this, which is the equivalent of what we would say a preemptive, you know, a preemptive act of self-defense, there needs to be an imminent threat, an imminent threat that can only be dealt with through this act of aggression.
Iran was in the process of negotiations that would resolve all of the issues that could be perceived as a threat.
So there is no imminent threat.
Moreover, we know that the sites that had been targeted, three nuclear sites, Isfahan, Natans, and Fordot, were empty, that these strikes would have zero impact on an Iranian nuclear program that had long since been evacuated from these sites and sent to other locations.
It's come out that this strike plan, which was done in cooperation with Israel, was something that had been planned more than a year ago and actually been practiced by the United States and Israel.
So this was a pre-planned strike against three designated sites that had no military value.
So this was purely an act of theater, and any military commander that put American lives at risk to carry out an act of political theater should literally have their commissions revoked and be drummed out of the service.
There was no justification for this.
But moreover, the attacks didn't even accomplish what they claimed to have accomplished.
We had one B-2 bomber drop two GBU-57s on the Natan's facility.
What is that?
What is the GBU-57?
Is that one of these 32,000-pound monsters?
Correct.
The massive ordnance penetrator weapon that only the B-2 can carry.
And it's upon the shoulders of this weapon that the United States has based its hopes of interdicting Iran's nuclear program.
But Natans had been struck at least twice and probably three times by the Israelis prior to this attack.
And whatever was in Natans, that, you know, centrifuges, et cetera, of value had long since been evacuated.
People should understand that Natans is the principal home of centrifuge cascades of the oldest type, the IR-1 centrifuge, which is a very inefficient centrifuge that Iran had long since replaced with these more modern centrifuges that are in Fordot.
So to strike Natans doesn't put back the Iranian program at all.
And anything of value in that program had been evacuated.
So we put a B-2 bomber over a target to drop two very large bombs that accomplished nothing.
They literally put two additional holes in the ground of a piece of terrain that had no military, scientific, or Meaningful value.
It was purely a political act.
The same with Isfahan.
We fired 30 cruise missiles into the Isfahan nuclear complex.
It appears that even the U.S. government is admitting that these missiles didn't accomplish the level of destruction that they were hoping to, that the Isfahan facility was deeper underground and more protected.
So, in normal circumstances, and this dates back to my time as a battle damage assessment officer during the first Gulf War, this would be immediate reattack, which means that because we initiated this, that there was legitimate military purpose to this attack, we would have to reattack to achieve those objectives.
It appears, though, that Donald Trump says, no, we're done.
We're willing to be done with this, which means, again, this wasn't about achieving anything meaningfully, militarily meaningful on the ground.
This was an act of pure politics.
And then we get to Ferdot, the crown jewel of the three targets, a facility that's 90 meters or 90 feet underground, 100 feet underground, but that's street level measuring.
What they're not counting are the ridges above the facility that make it even three or four times deeper than this.
We struck with six B-2 bombers, each of which carried two of these massive ordnance penetrators.
And the best that we could accomplish is that we did damage to one entrance and one exit of a facility that has five exits.
We didn't damage the hall.
We didn't penetrate.
But even more critical is that we know the facility was evacuated.
There is satellite imagery that shows on June 18th and 19th, the Iranians had brought up trucks to remove the high-value centrifuges that were stored at Fordo.
And these centrifuges have been moved to other facilities around Iran that we don't know about, together with the totality of Iran's enriched uranium.
You know, that 60% uranium that everybody says could be converted into a bomb in three to five days.
We didn't destroy that.
That's all moved.
So these attacks accomplished nothing in terms of retarding or limiting Iran's nuclear enrichment program.
These attacks were purely an act of political theater for a president who's desperate to be seen as being a decisive leader, but all he showed was American impotence.
Don't take painkillers before you watch this.
Pretty damn good reporting by both Judge Napolitano and Scott Ritter.
Joachim, your thoughts.
I go with the divide and rule again.
You know, the West has been divided against the East, Cold War.
You know, it's been around a long time.
And the effect of it is that it brings the Eastern powers together.
Supposedly, the whole thing is we have to crush the Eastern powers, but the effect of this aggression by the West only makes for unity and strategic alliance amongst the Eastern powers.
And my view, that is all by design.
And the same applies in this case with, oh, we got to stop Iran from having the bomb.
Oh, my God.
Well, this only means that the non-proliferation treaty that Iran is a signatory of, that they have honored all these years, is not going to happen.
They are going to seek the bomb as a way of holding back the terrorist pariah state that's always had the bomb since the early 60s and helped take Kennedy out because he wanted to stop it.
And then they took out his brother, RFK, because he wanted to make the APAC, which went under a different name at the time, he wanted to outlaw that because there is a law that says no foreign agent operates in the United States.
And so he wanted to get rid of that.
And he got taken out.
So there's these long-term repercussions of history that are involved where the West, the belligerent West, is always trying to accomplish the divide and rule, the regime change operation, always, and it always backfires.
And I believe it's all by design to set up this horrific situation of World War III, West versus East, and the Zionists versus Islam.
You know, we go back to that old Freemason plot.
You know, here we are, World War III.
And so, yeah, it's all by design.
And everything that comes out of mainstream media and Donald Trump and all the puppet leaders of the West, you can invert it and then you know the truth.
That's the bottom line reality to all of this.
Brian.
Abie.
Yeah, as for Trump being prosecuted by anyone, the Democrats have used everything they possibly can and they haven't gotten any place.
Maybe the International Criminal Court might choose to bring charges.
I doubt it.
They haven't really been successful going after Netanyahu, even though they have brought articles inside the International Criminal Court.
The United States doesn't seem interested in prosecuting anybody who's in the club.
And at this particular point in time, Trump looks like he's joined the club pretty well.
We still have yet to see a purp walk of any significance.
We've been waiting on that since Kennedy was assassinated, frankly.
I don't think that we'll see it in our lifetime or in our generation.
We're not going to see justice.
Justice doesn't come in this world.
It's always going to be unlevel in terms of the playing field.
And Donald Trump seems to be getting away with, in a sense, treason.
Now it's a risky gamble.
It could mean the End of his presidency.
He could go out like a lame duck, just like George Bush, W. Bush did, or he could go out as quote unquote, a big hero if he's able to bring a settlement to it.
But I don't know how you say peace, peace, peace, while dropping bunker-busting bombs on the next guy.
I just don't, it's too much of a mixed message, and it doesn't lead to trust.
Peace is achieved through trust and diplomacy.
There's been none, none, none of that coming from Donald Trump's administration.
Maybe he doesn't understand peace, or maybe he just thinks the only language these animal Iranians who live in a theocracy will ever understand is power and death.
It seems to me that most of the American foreign policy lately is power and death is the only language they'll understand.
And so there's no sense in bothering with a serious effort at diplomacy.
Hell, if they would have, they wouldn't have brought in Rubio.
I mean, what a joke.
And I'd like to interject one quick point.
right ahead.
The whole thing with the 2009 paper that is basically the whole playbook of how the U.S. attacks Iran through...
And in the meantime, as a Rus, they engage in negotiations, quote, peace talks with Iran.
And so this is all being played out.
And it was what?
A few days ago, Trump was saying, yes, I'll give him two weeks as a maximum two weeks.
Two days later, he does these strikes on these nuclear facilities that are totally ineffective.
So in other words, Trump, he's completely a liar.
Everything that comes out of his mouth is false.
And the bottom line, the rest of the world knows they cannot trust this man.
He's totally a liar and they cannot trust him.
So yeah, going forward, we're in a world of hurt, the United States.
I think that's quite right.
Quite right, alas.
Meanwhile, we have the presidents of Russia and China announcing the cardinal points of the obvious.
This is John Hillmer explaining.
This has to do with an agreement between Russia, China, and Iran.
Just before high noon in Moscow, Thursday, June 19, when President Putin initiated a telephone call to President Xaijie being in China, renapped by Putin's foreign policy assistant, Yuri Yushakov, followed almost immediately.
Xai did not authorize his summary for 24 hours till a Chinese official media org and Global Times published an editorial titled, The Four-Point Proposal Injects Stabilizing Force into the Crisis in the Middle East.
Another official version from Beijing, delayed for nine hours, can be read here.
In between Putin's readout and Zai's editorial, the Russian General Staff leaked its assessment that the U.S.-Israel and their allies are demonstrating in the Iraq war, as they have already demonstrated in the Ukraine war, that negotiations for a ceasefire, a truce, or a peace agreement are pointless now.
Pretending this isn't so is the Kremlin consensus for the time being.
According to Xinjiao, repeating the pretense in public, it's also the Beijing consensus.
Before he called Xai, Putin told the Zenel press agency and other reporters, we are ready and substantially guide the Ukrainian war negotiation on the principles of settlement.
We are in contact.
Our negotiation groups are in contact with each other.
Only just now, Kremlin negotiator Vladimir Minsky asked, he says that only today he was talking to his counterpart from Kiev in principle.
They agreed to meet after June 22nd.
Unspoken in public for the time being is a discussion among Russian political and military leaders on what Putin surprised Avon, revoking the terms of the Russian pact with Iran.
Revoking the terms of the Russian pact with Iran means to the remaining treaty allies, China and North Korea.
With regard to the strategic treaty Putin announced, or the treaty on the comprehensive strategic partnership between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Russian Federation, he signed on January 17, 2027.
There are no articles related to the defense sphere.
Let me add what's going on here.
I'm absolutely floored by this, but it turns out that the treaty agreement said that if there were an aggressive act against Iran, the parties to the treaty would not support the aggressors and would do what they could to negotiate settlements, but nothing about defense.
And a phone call I had during the break explained to me that Putin has made it clear that Russia intends to defend Israel, not Iran, Israel, because Putin, too, is a Chad Lubavitcher, to say.
Joaquin, your thoughts, my friend?
Yeah.
I have a dog barking here in the background, but so.
Yeah, this is actually a surprise that Putin would pull out of the strategic partnership with Iran.
That's a little bit surprising.
I think that may be an overt front, but I think he will always be in support of Iran because they are not the aggressor.
So, you know, he'll be behind the scenes.
But with the Strait of Ormond closed as of a few hours ago, maybe a day, it looks like China is out of 80% of their oil import, and that affects them gravely.
So, and I think that Iran will make a deal whereby, as the controllers of that strait, they will allow ships that are shipping their cargo of oil and gas to China.
I think that will continue because that would be totally against what China is all about.
And they are still, my view, to my knowledge, is that there still is a very close strategic alliance between China and Iran.
I agree with all that.
I believe it's going to be like the Houthis.
They're only attacking ships that are supporting Israel.
And now, of course, the United States are letting other shipping go.
I believe any ally or supporter of Iran is going to be entitled to have their shipping go, and that the oil between Russia and China, between Iran and China, is going to continue unabated.
And I see now how Putin is in this awkward position, having declared the defense of Israel, but not willing to let Iran go.
I am convinced he can't.
He can't.
He would be deposed.
He would be out the next day if the other, the nationalists in Russia, felt he were going to not come to the defense of Iran.
But it's awkward, awkward as hell.
I now see.
Brian, your thoughts.
Yeah, there's a lot of very interesting scenarios that come up, assuming that you take the academic version of history and expect that that's how it's going to play out.
Again, I think on this show, we have more of an emphasis on that there are powers above and beyond and behind the structure that wouldn't mind seeing every government in the world collapse and fall underneath their authority.
So it's a very interesting scenario.
BRICS seems to be getting stronger, although they haven't made a move on the currencies.
If Iran was toppled, BRICS would be set back quite a bit.
BRICS seems to be a very important machine, and I can see a lot of the global power players in a lot of the non-hegemonic nations would want to see a decline or a destruction of the Western power structures.
And this is one way to see it come around is with grinding us down with foreign wars.
You know, there's a saying about fighting on two fronts is crazy and fighting on three fronts is even worse.
But you've got China, Taiwan banging the war drums, which obviously America is going to get involved with.
Now it's America as using Israel as a proxy and fighting a 92 million person nation of Iran.
We've still got the Ukraine-Russia front that we're fighting on right now.
Plus, the CIA is busy and active inside all of the smaller African nations as well as South of America.
We've got a bit of a war going on with Mexico in terms of our ability to deport everybody that all the 30 million illegals that have come in here.
We've got a lot on our plate, $37 trillion in debt, a narcissistic maniacal leader who believes that power is the only language that can be spoken, and puppeteers inside or puppets all throughout all of our Congress.
We've got spending bills and packages that are going through that's going to put us even deeper into debt.
I would say right now, Russia is in the strongest position in that their economy is getting stronger every day.
They're not going to want to see the momentum get lost.
And they're in a more powerful position to sort of lead the new takeover of the West.
But Europe is still a very strong player.
And so are many of, you know, even Canada can be considered a decent player from the West side.
But don't forget Britain.
Don't forget everything that happens over there in Europe.
There's a lot going on, but the power play, it seems to me the pendulum is swinging in favor of the BRICS nations.
Oh, I think you got it absolutely right.
Historically, I think you're exactly right.
Meanwhile, and this is rather fascinating, Germany's MERS says Israel is doing the dirty work for us in Iran.
And by the way, I have a report that while the U.S. provided the planes for these attacks, that it was Germany and Israel who loaded the bombs, and that there were even missiles, Tomahack missiles fired from German submarines, which frankly dumbfounds me.
The German Chancellor's support comes amid fresh strikes launched by both Israel and Iran meanwhile in Gaza.
Dozen were killed during a GHF aid distribution site, which of course is all being run for the purpose of using the aid as bait.
What you need to know.
Germany's chancellor defended Israel's attacks on Iran, saying it was dirty work Israel is doing for all of us.
U.S. President Trump said he wants a real end to the conflict rather than a ceasefire.
Trump seemingly threatens to take out Khamenei if civilians or U.S. soldiers are targeted, even though he turns out to be a direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad.
And this would raise in flame 200 million Shia.
I can't imagine the consequences were Trump to follow through on this threat and utter ignorance, no doubt, of the nature of the religion and his role therein.
Israel's defense minister has issued a warning to the Iranian supreme leader.
The International Atomic Energy Agency says Israeli strikes have directly hit enrichment halls in the Nants nuclear complex.
Israel has reported a fresh wave of Iranian missiles.
Yes, yes, indeed.
Moreover, the German government supports the Israeli war of aggression.
The German government has pledged its full support to Israel following its attack on Iran.
Chancellor Frederick Marx, Vice Chancellor Lars Klingbell, and Foreign Minister John Welfall have justified the unprovoked assault on the country of 90 million with Israel's right to self-defense.
In doing so, they not only scorn the facts, but also international law.
Their support for Israeli aggression shows they will stop at no crime in pursuit of their geopolitical objectives.
Having ordered back the bombing, starvation, and displacement of 2 million Palestinians, they are now defending the targeted assassination of senior Iranian military figures, politicians, and scientists, the bombing of Iranian high-rises, industrial facilities, and fuel depots, and Israel's attempt to set the entire region ablaze.
Just stunning.
Meanwhile, we have a report about how Israeli spies and pilots crippled an Iranian counter-strike.
The U.S. and Israel were bracing for swift, fierce retaliation from Iran overnight.
Thanks to intricately planned maneuvers by Israeli spies and pilots and shock and disarray on the Iranian side, there was silence.
Zoom in.
As it became clear that Israel was about to attack, the commanders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Air Force convened in a bunker to coordinate the response.
But Israel knew that emergency protocol and the location of the bunker.
They destroyed it.
So we're talking here about the initial Israeli attack.
The fact that there was nobody to give the order neutralized an immediate Iranian response.
They were among the more than two dozen Iranian commanders targeted in a sprawling attack on Iran's military command and control.
The heads of the IRGC, the Iranian military, and Iran's emergency military headquarters were all eliminated in the opening salvo.
Another key target was Iran's air defense systems and radars.
Israeli intel mapped their location, and most were hit by the Israeli Air Force in the opening strike.
That gave the IDF virtually unchallenged freedom of operation in Iran's sky.
This, in other words, was the work of Mossad in preparing for the attack.
And I certainly agree they did a sensational job from a military point of view.
Joaquim, your thoughts.
Well, I want to add that Palantir, you know, the one that's collecting all the human data harvesting on Americans now, probably have been for many years, but they are very active with Israel.
After all, Theal, the current CEO and co-founder, they're all totally Zionists, Jews, all for Israel.
And Palantir has been working with Israel for now, for years, and they are able to pinpoint locations of the Gaza people, whether they're doctors,
whether they're the United Nations workers, whether they're journalists in Gaza, or whether they're high-profile generals in Iran or scientists, nuclear scientists.
They are working with Iran for these decapitation strikes.
And soon we'll be working with the Trump government, basically taking out Americans.
I believe it.
I believe that we're on lists.
People like us are on lists already.
They've been compiling.
And they will take out anybody who is a dissident and who is truthful.
You know, they call it anti-Semitism as their fake reason.
But they're going to take out anybody who speaks the truth.
And that's the agenda with AI Palantir forwarding this whole project of depopulation.
Right.
Germany has a lot of problems, but there's been a lot of chatter that Germany is the new front and going to be the new front in the Russian war.
Like we haven't been through that before.
Germany's right now, my understanding is their economy is way down.
They're looking for a short-term fix.
They've made alliances with the banksters, which is what their history tells them they shouldn't do.
And they're in big trouble right now.
So of course Germany would like to see the rest of the world's powers continue to weaken themselves in that particular area so they can come in and mop up the different pieces.
Remember, it was the Nord Stream pipeline that connected Germany to Russia that was to provide Germany with cheaper Russian oil that was destroyed as a predicate for the Ukraine war.
And there's talk that it's going to reopen sometime in the Future, but at this point in time, it still hasn't reopened, which forces Germany to buy Western oil at this particular time.
As for the last article, let's see, that one was we have two German government issues.
I can't remember what I was the Axios article.
Yeah, I would classify that as propaganda just because of who it comes from as Axios.
Not going to say that Mossad wasn't involved and Mossad isn't a very powerful structure.
It's just that Axios is so open to taking whatever stories are fed to them by CIA and Mossad that I would suspect that that Axios article about Israeli spies and pilots crippling the Iranian counter-strike is likely Mossad propaganda.
Fascinating.
Meanwhile, Glenn Greenwald.
Oh wait, Kevin Barrett, if they don't get rid of Net Yahoo, the genocide will just keep getting worse every day.
I am traveling.
Thus, it's a short report from Kevin, but no doubt he's got it right.
Meanwhile, we have Patrick J. McShea.
Does the Bible command Christian to protect the liars and psychopaths in Israel?
He begins with some quotes.
Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our God is Lucifer.
Harold Walt Rosenthal, senior aide to Jewish Senator Jacob Javits.
I'm 100% positive that Israel was behind the 9-11 attacks.
Dr. Alan Sabrosky, the Jewish director of studies at the Army War College on 9-11.
My opinion of Christian Zionists, they're a scum.
But don't tell them that.
We need all the useful idiots we can get right now.
Benjamin D. Benyak in New York City.
He was president in New York City on 9-11, president in London during the 7-7 subway bombings.
Gee, what a coincidence.
It was one of the most bizarre things I've ever heard by a grown man, Ted Cruz, who professes to be a Christian.
The New Testament is called the New Testament for a reason.
It's not about helping Israel.
Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior, is a new covenant.
Steve Bannon, host of the war room.
It begins as follows.
Christians have been deceived about Israel and its machination for decades, and while it's cost them dearly, they haven't woken up yet.
The New Testament defines Israel as a church, not some government established in 1948, founded by radical atheist converted Jews from East Europe.
The notion that the Bible commands us to protect Israel today is Zionism, not Christianity.
The father of Israel, Theodore Herzl, started the Zionist movement in 1897 and was himself an atheist, the first of a long line of atheists and Christian haters among rabbis and Israeli leadership.
I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan from Revelations.
The first Israeli prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, was also an atheist who admitted that they were stealing the land from the Palestinians.
The notion that Christians must protect Israel came much later to bring in Christian support and money.
And Joaquin Egopian, Trump's unprovoked Iran attack bombs away to Armageddon madness begins as follows.
U.S. President Donald Trump addressed the nation in a televised 10 p.m.
broadcast to announce he deployed U.S. bomber airstrikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities at Fardo Nuts and Itzafan earlier this week after declaring he would wait up to two weeks to give peace a chance to take shape.
Just two days later, he bombs three of Iran's nuclear facilities again.
This once again gives way, gave away the fact that the untrustworthy orange-faced showman continues his audacity using peace talks as a deceptive roof.
And then, smugly certain that by Saturday night, he successfully took out Iran's nuclear weapon capability.
The President and Grandiassi were on full public display for the world stating, tonight I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success.
Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally annihilated.
We know it's false.
We know what he's saying is untrue.
It's fairly stunning.
But he's made a mockery of America before the world and our trustworthiness is permanently shot.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Yeah, again, we're reminded that, you know, the Zionists got it all wrong, whether they're Christian or Jews, it doesn't matter because they got it completely wrong.
And yes, as you mentioned, I think it was Kevin Barrett, but anyway, it's been written many times, including myself writing it, that these Jews from Eastern Europe that ended up mostly in Israel as citizens, along with Russia Jews, they are Khazarian, Ashkenazis.
They have no connection ethnically through lineage back to the original Israelites of the Bible.
So that's a complete falsehood that they've come in and claim This is their ancient homeland.
No, it is not.
And so, yeah, Erzel and the Zionists have been going since the end of the 1800s.
And even that 1871 letter with the Freemasons talking about World War III and Zionism versus Islam, the Zionism has been around.
The protocols of Zion also has been around since the 1800s.
So this is all based on a foundation of lies.
So yeah, it's been exposed.
And, you know, we're going to keep exposing the reality for all the people.
So we wake up, we rise up, and along with God, we turn the tables because right now Satan's winning, but we got to stop it.
Brian.
Well, perhaps Satan's winning because most Americans don't recognize, or most Christians, I should say, don't recognize which authority comes first in their lives.
Is it the nation that you are a citizen of or are you a citizen of the kingdom of heaven?
Politics and spirituality are two different things.
They are a distortion of faith to think that your spiritual accomplishments are going to take place through political means.
Christ, after the resurrection, assumed all authority over the spiritual realm, and he removed the need for Christians to try to seize political power.
He's the king.
He reigns from heaven.
In the Old Testament, religion and politics did mix because the original purpose for Israel was to be a nation that was a theocracy where 10% of your money was given to the temple for certain religious services, and the rest was that God would provide protection for them.
That theocracy was ignored and basically kicked to the curb, and God allowed a monarchy to take place in terms of the change in the type of kingdom it would be.
There's been a lot of attempts out there to merge Christianity with politics, including something called the Seven Mountain Mandate.
But it's a deception to believe that our political leanings, whether liberal or conservative, and religious language can go together and work in unison to do anything but emotionally manipulate and bait Christians into a false battle between left and right, which are basically two different sides of the same satanic system.
Our struggle is not against the flesh and blood, but against the powers and the principalities and the rulers of the dark world and the heavenly realm.
As a Christian, that's the direction we ought to be going.
I'm sorry, Ted Cruz, but no wonder you look like a fool on Tucker Carlson.
You tried to answer theological questions to political problems, not realizing that you're mixing the two.
And by the way, all of Israel is doing the same thing, and that's what Zionism is.
It's a relentless quest for political power while sacrificing the spiritual nature of what you're supposed to be accomplishing.
You are no longer children of Abraham without faith, my friends.
Your political appetite for power gets you nowhere except on a fast track to hell, frankly.
That's an 18. Meanwhile, Glenn Greenwald, Tulsi's Senate new testimony versus Trump's push for war.
One of the things that's made me most worried that Donald Trump is going to engage in bombing Iran is his recent assertions that they are developing a nuclear weapon and could have them in weeks or months, even though that is not what our intelligence community thinks.
He reiterated that earlier today, saying they could have it in weeks.
And when he was told that our intelligence agencies, which just once again reiterated that that is not the case, when he was asked about that, he said then our intelligence community is wrong.
And so this is feeling super run up to the war in Iraq, just again, baseless belief that we have to go in there because of weapons of mass destruction.
And one of the interesting sort of factional fights that developed from this was that to assert that, he had to contradict Tulsi Gabbard specifically, who had testified in March that they were not developing a nuclear weapon.
And he seems dead set on the idea that she was wrong.
And that was fascinating.
Tulsi Gabbard maybe being pushed out of the administration because she stood for the truth for once.
And we have a little bit of an update on that.
But first, here is Donald Trump being asked about this disagreement.
I think within a matter of weeks, or certainly within a matter of months, they're going to be able to have a nuclear weapon.
We can't let that happen.
What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a nuclear weapon?
Your intelligence community has said they have no evidence that they are at this point.
Well, then my intelligence community is wrong.
Who would the intelligence community said that?
Your director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabber.
She's wrong.
She's wrong.
And remember, Tulsi Gabber didn't just say that they don't have weapons.
Like a week ago, she put out a really flashy Russian-style video about World War III.
She seems to actually not want us to engage in actions that could lead to nuclear war.
And so finally, you have Donald Trump, who seems to be willing to gobble up propaganda and spread it baselessly to get us into a war, and Tulsi Gabbard standing for the truth, which after the last few years is refreshing.
And if that makes you uncomfortable, it's not actually going in that way because Tulsi Gabbard just tweeted, the dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division.
America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months if they decide to finalize the assembly.
President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.
They took it out of context.
She said in March, the U.S. continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.
Yeah.
She didn't want to lose her job.
That's it.
This is utterly pathetic.
I'm so glad you read that second comment, John, because I was about to give her credit.
And I did when it first happened.
I was like, huh, I thought Tulsi was going to be in favor of war against the Muslim country, to be honest.
And so I didn't believe her that she was anti-war.
And so when she came out and said, oh, no, Iran's not developing a nuclear weapon.
I was like, all right, where credit is due.
That's true.
And that's kind of an anti-war position.
I now take it all back.
Okay, so she's now.
Yeah, take it all back.
Here's more.
Trump Intel Chief Gabbard off message on Middle East.
When the president thinks you're off message, he doesn't want you in the room, senior White House advisor said, according to CNN.
U.S. President Donald Trump has come to see Director of National Intel.
Telsi Gabbard is off message on the conflict in the Middle East, CNN reported.
Sign as senior White House advisor, CNN said Trump's annoyance with Gabbard peaked earlier this month when she posted a three-minute video warning that the world is closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before and blaming political elite and warmongers for stoking fear and tension between nuclear powers.
Trump viewed the video as a thinly veiled criticism of his consideration to allow Israel to strike Iran.
And many inside the White House agreed Gabbard was speaking out of turn.
CNN said, citing the advisor, when the president thinks you are off message, he doesn't want you in the room.
The advisor was quoted as saying.
Moreover, Tulsi Gabbard makes a U-turn, backtracks, now claims regime could build bombs in a matter of weeks.
I am disappointed, to put it mildly.
Tulsi warns Iran could build nuclear weapon within weeks after earlier denying threat.
Tulsi Gassard has issued a sharp warning that Iran could potentially produce a nuclear weapon within weeks.
Gag me with a spoon.
Just months after she testified before Congress, claiming Iran was not building such a weapon, though she now says earlier comments were taken out of context, which they manifestly were not.
The sudden shift in Gebrit's public position has added fuel to an already heated debate in Washington as tension with Iran rise, following Israeli airstrikes and threats of further U.S. involvement.
With top U.S. Intel agency, Israeli officials and Iran's own statements clashing, questions are growing about how close Tehran really is to developing a nuclear weapon.
Well, I'll just tell you, right now, they're going to acquire nukes from multiple sources.
I guarantee.
If they wanted Iran not to have nukes, attacking him was not the way to achieve that outcome.
Joaquim, your thoughts?
Well, this is another tale where if you speak honestly and have integrity, you are not welcome at the White House.
You're not welcome in the federal government.
Because to reach a level that high where you end up the director of intelligence in America, you have to be compromised.
You have to be willing to go along with the program.
So she has an inclination from time to time to speak the truth.
We thought with RFK Jr. and her in there, hey, at least Trump's doing something right.
We had hope anyway.
But lo and behold, same old story.
You know, she has to blame the news for her weakness, for her weakness to not stand up for truth.
She bowed down.
I don't know what her motivation might be thinking, well, if I, in this case, look like an idiot, maybe I'll still have a little bit of power still as the director of intelligence of America.
But in the eyes of those of us who value truth and honesty and integrity, she's another washout.
Big disappointment.
I'm sorry to say she ought to have resigned on principle and emphasized Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons.
Iran doesn't even want nuclear weapons.
Who knows whether it could have made a difference, but that was a principled way to go and she would have been a modern day heroine.
Ryan.
She would have aligned herself just as well with Jeffrey Sachs and a number of other actually accurate historians that say Iran hasn't been after that.
But let's face it, Iran's not a perfect regime.
What regime is perfect?
Certainly not America.
We're not the model for truth and justice and all things good and well anymore.
I mean, there might have been a thought of that back in the 50s, but the question to me comes out of very simple.
If you're a citizen of Iran versus a citizen of America, which one is being told more truth by their government?
And I don't know the answer to that.
Yes, Iran is a theocracy.
Yes, they have the Ayatollah Khomeini.
They've been getting along just fine.
Frankly, they're one of the oldest civilizations on earth, being a descendant of the old, old Persian empire that's been around for thousands of years, frankly, about 5,000 years, frankly.
So are they stable?
Are they unstable?
Why do we need regime change?
What are we doing?
What makes us think that we're so much better?
We're just the big boss now.
We're going to tell the whole world how to live.
We're going to tell each government what they can and cannot do.
Team America World Police, get at it.
Come on, let's make all the new rules.
While we're at it, maybe we should give Israel a lesson in morality.
Maybe we should give China a lesson in communist Dictatorship because we seem to be doing just a faux version of democracy anyway.
Our constitution is ineffective against the elites.
There's not equal justice anywhere.
Who are we to talk about?
We kill and murder and maim and bomb in the name of safety and security.
We rolled out COVID over our people in the name of safety and security.
We're just as much of a pusher of the Kalergi plan as any other nation out there.
They're all rotten as hell.
I'm not saying Israel's anymore rotten.
I'm not saying America.
I mean, look at DC itself, just as a layout.
I mean, doesn't it tell you everything you need to know?
That we have a massive phallus obelisk across from the pregnant belly of the beast sitting right in the middle of DC with every one of our buildings and national monuments looking designed like the old pagan temples of the old world.
We have a massive bull of Bashan in steel on Wall Street sitting right there as a symbol of the old occult.
We have the old gates of Thermopylae in New York.
We're rotten as can be.
Our founders, frankly, were a bunch of oligarchs who had a Christian veneer that were members of Freemason cults, just like anybody else.
It's the oldest crick in the book.
Who are we to say that they're so good or so bad?
Oh, their people have to wear some headdressings every now and then, or the women do, so they must be backwards.
Some women can't drive.
Well, women can't drive very well anyway, frankly.
Maybe I shouldn't have said that, but it's ridiculous.
And for the American people to be caught up in this Christian nationalism versus Christian Zionism sort of mindset just goes to show sort of a Mike Huckabee style of insanity that seems to be setting in when you mix politics and religion.
It's foolish.
It's stupid.
And we're no longer in a position to lead the world from a moral perspective.
We're willing to take lives just as fast and just as easy as most evil nations that have Wow, wow, that's terrific.
Meanwhile, we really have, well, one final story.
Mona Alexis exposing the expose.
Why Dr. Fatzer's work defies a controlled opposition narrative.
Don, you are very dear to begin reading this in the beginning.
You're welcome to read a bit more if you would like to conclude our show for today.
Your choice, my friend.
That's okay.
Everybody should read it.
Lord did an excellent job on pinpointing the pinnacle of truth that you represent.
You're it.
Let me just add one little paragraph here, the public smear of conspiracy theories.
Fetzer observes how mainstream media and political systems weaponize the term conspiracy theory to discredit dissent.
Most major political parties routinely engage in their own conspiracies while dismissing others that challenge state narratives, whether related to JFK 9-11 or election fraud.
Fetzer highlights that serious conspiracy research is often dismissed without any rigorous scientific examination, revealing how this label is used to shield official lies rather than encourage transparency.
Gentlemen, you are simply excellent this evening.
I thank you both.
Don, take us out.
And Joaquim put out that article that you read a little bit from, but the whole article is a heavy hitter, right?
Current today.
And everybody should read it.
I'll try to link too and they go and send it out.
So this is June the 22nd of 2025, heavy hitting time.
I tell you, we're in a crisis.
I mean, the world's, the years are not even yet half over yet.
And I'm not sure if we're going to make it to the half mark.
It's really getting tense out there.
So you want to stay tuned to the truth and things.
And I think if you can find anybody better than Jim and Dave and Brian and Joaquim here, let me know about it.
Because I think these guys are the top-notch people to admire and follow and listen to.
So I feel very blessed.
And so thank you again for watching.
▲
Export Selection