All Episodes
Previous Next
June 23, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
58:54
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (22 June 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome folks.
This is Truth versus News Incorporated here.
Today is June the 22th, the 22nd of June.
Summer's here right now, and things are hotter than ever from the country weather-wise, and news-wise, and world-wise.
And we have the best people here to share it.
And I want to introduce them.
And the first person I want to introduce is a guy named Dr. Jim Fesser.
And I'm going to read a little bit about that.
He's a PhD, retired Marine Corps officer, and a university professor who spent 35 years teaching courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning.
Jim's deep academic background has provided a solid foundation for his decades-long investigation into conspiracies, false flags and government deceptions.
Since 92, Dr. Pescher has been one of the most outspoken and fearless voices researching and exposing politically significant events, very significant.
Skibbin's body of work includes over 24 academic books and more than 12 books focused on conspiracies, six of them which have been banned, like about going to the moon and everything.
And Jim is best known for his pioneering research methods, being able to draw together experts from multiple fields to detect complex events that defy official explanations, and his comprehensive work challenges mainstream narratives and demands genuine and critical thinking from his audience.
That's you.
That's you thinking here.
And Jim's unwavering commitment to truth, his willingness to challenge the power despite personal cost, and his consistent decades-long research record demonstrate that Jim is not controlled opposition.
Rather, Dr. Fesser stands as one of the few who dares to peel back the deepest layers of deception.
Jim's work continues to empower those who seek sovereignty of mind, freedom of inquiry, and accountability in a system that thrives on concealment.
Don, I appreciate all that.
I appreciate all that.
Don, I appreciate all that.
We're not going to cover our stories, have you?
Yeah.
And then we have Jim.
And believe me, I'm so proud to be with you for the last 20, 25 years.
You're my hero and just shining example.
I salute you.
We also have Waikim Nagopi.
I could read about Waakim too out of Bali.
He's just outstanding writer and knows what's really happening with his military background and his experiences.
And outstanding.
And Brivin Davidson, the detective extraordinaire, who really investigates a lot of work out of Houston.
Well, it looks like we got a heavy day today, Jim.
I guess we'll let you lead on.
We're so proud to have you leading us.
Thank you, Don.
We're going to try a different format today.
I'm going to give a group of presentations.
Initially, beginning with Trump strikes Iran hard.
The world waits for what comes next.
President Donald Trump has taken the United States to a place no previous president was prepared to go, launching an all-out assault on Iran's nuclear facilities with a goal of denying the Iranians the capacity to produce a nuclear weapon, which they weren't trying to do, don't want, with no interest in, totally fabricated.
Having started down this path, at present, the world will await the Iranian response and whatever wider consequences follow.
I wish I could tell you there was any merit in this effort, but that is manifestly not the case.
Meanwhile, severe damage at the nuclear site, they're claiming officials assessed damage from U.S. strikes on Iran that Trump raises possibility of regime change.
President Donald Trump suggests that possibility of regime change in Iran on Sunday evening ain't going to happen after a day in which his top officials and the admin wasn't interested in such a move.
It's not politically correct to use the term the president said on social media, but if the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change?
We could ask that about the United States, by the way.
Comments came at the UN Security Council at an emergency meeting Sunday, called by Iran to address U.S. strikes on its nuclear facilities.
International Atomic Energy Agency officials are still assessing the extent of the damage to three nuclear sites.
Iran's permanent representative to the UN, Emperor Saeed Arvani, described the U.S. strikes as a blatant crime and accused Israel of drawing Trump into the conflict, adding that Rand's armed forces will decide the timing, nature, and scale of Iran's proportion of response.
UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres earlier said the bombing marks a perhaps a perilous turn in a region that is already reeling.
And what worries experts about the U.S. attack?
Let's what if one simple chew could turn constant in get an update from an expert about what's happening here on the phone.
James, don't know if you were able to hear my conversation right before, but just trying to get a better sense, James, of the types of facilities, these three nuclear facilities that the Trump administration says were taken out.
It was a successful series of strikes, they say.
Talk to us more about what was there and what the United States and Israel were most worried about.
Good evening.
The facilities that the United States attacked this evening were those that were designed to produce the highly enriched uranium for use in a nuclear weapon.
They were involved in converting yellow cake, refined uranium ore, into a form of gaseous uranium and then enriching that into highly enriched uranium.
The problem the United States and Israel have is Iran almost certainly has materials and equipment whose location we don't know about.
So I've heard a lot this evening about the success of the attacks and how about the United States and Israel have destroyed facilities.
But the problem that we now face is we haven't destroyed knowledge, we haven't destroyed materials, and we haven't destroyed equipment.
And I don't think this attack has set Iran back nearly so far as some of the suggestions have indicated.
So James, let me ask you more about that, because that is a suggestion that maybe you can't take out the knowledge, maybe you can't take out all of the equipment and facilities, but if you can set them back a number of years, that you weaken them dramatically, you could potentially reset peace talks or nuclear negotiations in the future.
How much of a setback do you think a strike like this could be for Iran?
Well, there's two things that I'm very worried we haven't destroyed.
The first thing is Iran's highly enriched uranium that was previously stored at Isfahan.
Now, that was one of the facilities that was attacked tonight, but the Iranians have claimed, and I tend to believe them, that the highly enriched uranium had already been moved from Isfahan.
This is material that is stored in things that look very much like scuba tanks.
It's that small.
Tracking that material is going to be exceptionally difficult.
After the collapse of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the IAA lost the ability to monitor the components that go into the centrifuges that Iran uses to enrich uranium.
In my opinion, they've likely been spread around the entire country.
What this means is that Iran has the ability to reconstitute its program probably in a short number of years.
And don't forget, one of the arguments against the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was that 10 to 15 years wasn't good enough of a delay.
So I think the reason why this is the beginning, not the end, of conflict is because when evidence emerges that Iran is rebuilding its nuclear weapons program, as I believe is likely to happen, are we the United States prepared to bomb it again?
And if it starts to reconstitute again, are we prepared to bomb it again after that?
Exactly.
And how long of a prolonged conflict could this mean that the United States just got itself involved in?
James Acton, thank you so much for your time.
We really appreciate it.
If you're turning 65, well, that was our initial.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Well, I think all of us saw it coming.
You know, the provocation, the jabbing and probing and poking the bear and poking Iran, poking China.
And you always have to look at qui bonno, who benefits the most here?
And if you look at the bigger picture, you realize that the central banking cabal that wants to control the world and depopulate the world, human population, are the ones that benefit the most from a potential nuclear war and major depopulation that comes from it,
along with all their other weapons of mass destruction they're using against us.
So the bigger picture is this is the way to destroy the West that neither, if it does not go nuclear, the West does not have the strength of the military of the Eastern countries, Russia, China, and Iran.
And Russia and China are not going to sit on the sidelines watching the U.S. and Iran go at it.
They are strategic allies of Iran, and they will not abandon Iran.
Although I think Iran probably can drag a war out, that is, if it doesn't go nuclear, or even much quicker, because they have weaponry technology that we hardly even know about.
So this is going to be very explosive.
And I don't know that any kind of peace settlement is going to come.
So it's setting up a situation on the world stage where perhaps millions or even billions could potentially die in a World War III.
And I say it on every podcast that the Freemasons and other secret societies have plotted well over a century and a half ago that there will be a three world wars.
And this is the third.
And they specify each one accurately way before they all happened.
And they said that the third world war will be between Islam and Zionism.
And so here we go.
Brian.
Well, obviously, I'm disappointed in Donald Trump for allowing this to take place so much for the no more wars under my watch if I'm your president.
That obviously was bravado that had no basis in reality, as the rest of this presidency indicates that the president is really the dog being wagged by the tail, which is obviously the military-industrial complex.
You know, what was really interesting to me this week, a couple of things.
This week was something was pointed out by Mike Benz that I hadn't seen.
I kind of knew it was in the back of my mind.
I didn't really put the pieces together, but he pointed it out.
But what we saw this last week was the plot of the movie Top Gun Maverick.
I mean, it's almost perfect in terms of how it was all in Top Gun Maverick.
They had to go take out of facilities that were enriched uranium was being made underneath a mountain, and they had to climb the mountain, missing the radar, dive down into the valley, shoot the bombs into the hole, just like in Star Wars, and then escape without a scratch while committing many, many other war crimes along the way.
And that is almost to a T exactly what happened according to the media that we've been fed this particular week.
So how a movie in 2022 that was picture of the year, obviously supported by the complex, the entertainment and the military-industrial complex is such a perfect match for this particular playout.
I don't know how they foresaw that unless this was something that was planned a long time ago.
Sometimes I wonder if this whole Iran involvement is another aspect of trying to weaken the bear.
And I mean that by Russia.
It has been a long-term project of the Americans, the warmongers, the politicians to villainize the Russians, to weaken the Russians.
I mean, take a look at the Ted Cruz interview with Tucker Carlson this week.
And if you were to go side by side, you've got the Jeffrey Sachs version of what's taking place, which to me seems a much more reality, realistic sort of viewpoint as to what's going on.
And then you compare that with the Ted Cruz interview and you see two diametrically opposed, completely different worlds that these guys live in.
Like, let's get our history straight.
Which version of history is the right one?
As for regime change, well, okay.
We tried regime change when we took out Poroshenko and replaced him with Zelensky.
Obviously, we got exactly what we wanted out of Zelensky, which was basically a mass suicide pact on behalf of all Ukrainian men of military age.
They had to go up against the bear, outnumbered 10 to 1, who was able to outspend them.
And Ted Cruz's goal of we're going to weaken Russia seems to have backfired.
The Russian economy seems to be pumping on all cylinders at this particular point in time.
Putin's popularity is high.
It's not low like Netanyahu's is, and it's not dropping like I think Trump's is at this particular point in time.
We haven't heard a lot about that.
But replacing a regime in a nation of 92 million people, let's be clear.
Israel has 8 million people.
Gaza had 8 million people.
Iran has 92 million souls inside of it.
And so to paint a broad brush stroke of we're going to do regime change in a nation of 90, that's one-third the size of America.
And I guess it's just going to be that easy.
To me, it seems like it's more of a provocation pointed toward Russia.
I listened to other Russian commentators this week, Lavrov in particular.
He's a great diplomat, very straightforward.
Obviously, the mainstream media, Western media was trying to trap him as much as possible.
But Lavrov's like, well, we don't care what you do with Iran, but that can't possibly be completely accurate because obviously it's a threat toward Russia, another nuclear power.
What about Pakistan?
Remember in 2002 when General Wesley Clark outed the story of how all of this was planned out well in advance and taken out?
That was September, it was maybe two weeks after September 11th in 2001 where Clark was informed that we were headed into Iraq.
Clark says, why?
Why are we going into Iraq at this particular point in time?
And the guy's like, I don't know.
I have no idea, but it's part of the plan.
And then a week later, he was informed that the plan was even bigger than that.
They had plans to topple Syria, Jordan, Iran, Iraq, and others in the Middle East in an attempt to, I'm assuming, an attempt to control the oil supply.
If we see this thing play out the way that I think it's going to play out, which is it's going to get ugly, with the Strait of Hormuz shutting down, you're looking at oil prices of $150 a barrel, which translates to maybe $7 to $8 per gallon, which is going to, in time, if that lasts for a long time, that's going to cripple the American economy.
And sometimes I think that's what was planned and what is wanted, as we're $37 trillion in debt.
It would take a fraction of what we sent to Ukraine to end the homeless problem in American cities.
We're spending our money in all the wrong places.
We're doing all the wrong things.
We're allowing the DEI to tear apart our culture.
We're allowing all sorts of shenanigans related to cultural changes and adjustments in academia.
I think the goal is not just to destroy Russia, to destroy America, to destroy Western powers, and then have a new hegemony rise up, which would be, in theory, our new masters, Israel, the Zionists.
So I'm pretty sickened about the way this week has developed.
Jim, I'd like to add one point to this.
Hollywood are the predictive programmers out there.
That's what they do.
That's their assigned role in this whole scheme.
So there you go, brainwashing.
Yes, absolutely.
Meanwhile, Iranian media assesses the damage from the U.S. attack.
This is from RT.
Iran's Ford out nuclear site did not suffer any serious damage in the attack launched by the U.S. FARS New Agency reported Sunday, citing Member of Parliament Mohammed Menan Rassi from Kuam Province, where the facility is located.
U.S. President Trump claimed the Fort of Nintendo and Estahan nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated.
Rassi said that contrary to the claims of the lying U.S. president, the Forta nuclear facility has not been seriously damaged.
Most of what was damaged was only on the ground level and can be restored.
The lawmaker described the effect of the American bombing as superficial, stating further that there were no fatalities and no radiation leaks from the sites that were attacked.
Hal Turner now reports, the Iranian parliament has voted to close the Straits of Hormuz.
The Parliament of Iran voted unanimously this morning to close the Strait of Hormuz, which leads into and out of the Persian Gulf after the unrevoked American sneak attack upon Iranian nuclear program sites.
The vote by parliament has to be approved by Iran's Supreme Leader and Supreme National Security Council.
But the impact of the vote is already being seen.
Oil tankers in the Persian Gulf are rushing to get out before the Iranians close the strait.
Over 50 oil tanker vessels are rushing to exit the Persian Gulf.
About 20% of the daily global oil and petrochemical supplies must transit through that strait every day.
Iran says it has a right to defend itself from the ongoing Israeli attacks and now the additional acts of a war that were perpetrated by the United States.
Bomb damage assessments are coming in from the U.S. and they are interesting.
Iran's main uranium enrichment facility, Fordow, was the most difficult to attack because it's built deep under a mountain.
Satellite imagery this morning shows penetration holes for at least six of the 12 3,000-pound bombs the U.S. dropped.
There was damage, but as we've already heard, it appears to have been relatively superficial.
Let me add, Russia says now countries are ready to arm Iran with news.
Ford's uranium was moved.
Polly market odds were up to 60% that Ford was destroyed.
The strike was supposed to end it.
Instead, it cracked the ceiling.
After the U.S. dropped 14 bunker busters on Iran's Ford facility, the world expected silence.
What followed was a Russian official stepping to a podium and saying a number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with nuclear warheads.
That's not a rumor.
That's a declaration from the chairman of Russia's Security Council.
The statement came hours after satellite images show Forto's entrance is buried in ash and dirt.
The ridge above the facility is cratered.
The Pentagon called the operation a success.
Trump said Forto was obliterated, but the numbers are shifting.
Polymarket traders had the odds of Forto's destruction at 90% Saturday night, but by Sunday afternoon, the number had dropped to 60%.
Something is off.
Let me add, too, by the way.
Forto was constructed for Iran by North Korea.
And of all the countries in the world that have an axe to grind with the United States, North Korea lost a third of its population to UN forces during the Korean War.
Joaquin.
Well, those bunker busters that America uses, they go supposedly about 200 feet underground.
My understanding is that Fordo is 300 or more feet underground, layered by special concrete and metals that those bunker busters cannot penetrate.
So the bottom line is that all that enriched uranium is unaffected.
And it's all a feeble waste of time and energy and money, risking the whole world's lives because they have the technology.
They have the know-how.
They've been working on this a long time.
And they have been signers of that non-proliferation nuclear agreement.
They will only go so high in their enrichment.
And they have, as Tulsi, Gabbard, and John Radcliffe have already put out there a couple months ago.
So they follow the rules.
And the ones that don't, these pariah-rogue terrorist states, America and Israel, they violate all international laws and rules.
And so they are the terrorists here.
That's the bottom line is that they have been ordained by their controllers, the city of bank money lenders, to obliterate the entire world.
And we're seeing it in real time now.
We've never been in a situation with a power like Iran before since World War II.
So here we go again.
Brian.
Why does it increasingly feel to me like the United States is a puppet in a larger machine?
And taking a closer look at this and running the analysis, I want to actually modify the statement that I made in the last section, and that statement was that it looked like Israel would be the new controllers.
Let me modify that.
Israel is scared right now.
Netanyahu has a 30% approval rating.
They've got enemies on all sides.
They've moved in a way that appears to be like a suicide going up against a nation with 92 million people.
They could easily be erased from the pages of history for good as a result of this.
The people are angry about all the death that's been taking place and the war crimes related to Gaza.
Israel could very well be a pawn in this game as well.
So you start to ask yourself, and I think the reason that Joachim is such an important part of this show is that he has better analysis than most of us do on what the secret power machine that's really above what we consider to be the governments of nations is.
The global banking cartels, the secret societies, the Luciferians and the Satanists at the top level of the power control structure seem to have an appetite for blood right now.
There's a bloodlust and there's no fear of retaliation.
There's no fear of prosecution and there's no fear of any enemies whatsoever.
They're acting as if they're the wolf and they're trying to extinguish the flocks all around so that they can take control of this and getting us into a worldwide nuclear war seems to be what's on the agenda at this particular point in time.
Maybe the Georgia Guidestones were onto something when they said population reductions to 500 million to control the world.
Maybe it's that the controllers are just trying to wipe everyone everywhere out all the way down.
And Tehran, Israel, Tel Aviv, Russia, Moscow, DC, and others are still just pawns in the game in the way of this banking cartel machine.
Nice point.
Meanwhile, Colonel McGregor.
Big forget.
Big forget.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Forgiveness.
It's crazy.
Is that picture you paint?
Is that because the Iranians would immediately hit?
I think there's 30 or 40,000 U.S. Army personnel, military personnel around the Gulf, around the Straits of Hormuz in particular, that they could block that.
I mean, is that why you see oil prices going so high?
Well, no, it's not just the losses it will take.
We're certainly going to lose some people, but I've just been told that we have successfully evacuated our troops on the ground in Bahrain and the officers that were there in the headquarters.
I'm sure we'll try to get as many people as possible out of harm's way.
But truthfully, we don't have the air defense capability to defend all of these bases that reach from the Persian Gulf all the way up through Iraq, Syria, and into Jordan.
Then, of course, we have who knows how many 40, 50, 60 vessels at sea, not including the submarines that are out there.
And those surface vessels are not invulnerable or invincible by any means.
They'll be targets.
So I don't think we can be certain that we'll come through this without many losses.
I think we probably will.
We've already seen F-35s shot down over Iran, and at least one F-35 pilot in Israeli is in Iranian hands.
I think we're going to see more of that.
And of course, that's always difficult once you begin not just losing the lives of U.S. servicemen and women, but when you lose pilots that fall into enemy hands, that's a huge issue.
And people here at home are accustomed to bombing with impunity.
In other words, for the average American, war is something that happens on someone else's soil.
And so most people don't pay much attention.
This time, it's going to have an economic and a financial impact.
And then we have, what, an estimated 30 million, 31 million people illegally in the United States, most of whom came over into this country over the last four years.
And we know that large numbers of them, how many that is, if there are 100,000 out of 30 million, that's too many, are very dangerous criminals and in many cases, terrorists.
So we might see terrorist action inside our country as well.
And we just don't have the forces here to protect this entire country with 330 million people.
It's a bad situation.
We're taking unnecessary risks and we're involving ourselves in something that we don't need to use military power to solve.
Just before we get to that, Colonel, the potential solution, can I just ask you about Israel and its position?
I mean, if Israel's own military assets start to degrade, in other words, the use of missiles and so on, and it gets into, kind of it feels into an existential or desperate corner, it is a nuclear power.
Surely that makes the situation quite dangerous, even though it's only on one side.
It's still extremely dangerous for the region, isn't it?
Oh, absolutely.
And there is the danger that the Israelis will say to us, if you don't eliminate our opponent, then we'll use nuclear weapons.
In other words, we could be held hostage to Israeli use of the weapon.
There's a problem, though, for the Israelis right now.
Let's say a third or more of Tel Aviv is being destroyed.
How much of Haifa is being destroyed is anybody's guess.
Large numbers of Israelis have been killed or wounded.
Their lives have been disrupted.
Their economy is in ruins.
And their air defense capability, air and missile defense, is almost non-existent.
We can't resupply them with everything they need.
In the midst of this situation, we're supposed to go in and quote unquote solve the Israeli problem by beating the Iranians into submission, either by destroying their nuclear facilities, of which there are at least three, two of which are far below the surface, or and cause regime Change.
In other words, to successfully kill, murder, or destroy people at the top of the organization, those things aren't going to work very well.
There's no certainty of anything.
And then finally, as we were discussing earlier, what are the Russians and the Chinese and others going to do?
I mean, are they just going to sit there and watch Iran pulverized out of existence?
I don't think so, because I think in people's minds today, whether you're China or Iran, Ira or Russia, you say, well, if I don't go to the aid of Iran, am I not actually the next on the list?
In other words, what's the incentive to stay out?
So this is a very dangerous situation.
And you talked about Tulsi Gabbard, who's the director of national intelligence, and she provided the truth to the best of her knowledge, which is that the Iranians are not building a weapon and they don't have a weapon.
But that's really irrelevant at this point.
I think the real goal is to destroy Iran as a large nation state, to weaken it, and then to replace its government.
I don't think you can do it with air and naval power alone, not even close.
But that's where we're headed.
So, Colonel, you were you were we.
I think that's excellent as McGregor always is.
Waiting, your thoughts.
Again, the bigger picture, the West is destined to go down, Israel in particular.
Henry Kissinger said in what, 2012, a few years before his death, not that long ago, at 101 or something like that.
He said Israel is not going to exist in 10 years.
And that put it at 2022.
So they're living on, what, three years of borrowed time now.
And that's where this is all headed.
The idea that regime change, I mean, come on.
The reality is the United States has not been successful at regime change in a long time at these three giant Eastern powers.
They haven't done it since, what, 1953, actually, in Iran.
And then they had, you know, the Shah of Iran, who was a puppet of the West.
It's not going to happen.
It's all a ruse.
It's all to destroy World War III, the Western civilization, with taking out, you know, casualties of the Eastern powers as well in World War III.
That's where we're headed, folks.
I don't see any off-ramp, exit, and avoidance of world blowing up on us, because that's where we are fast-headed right now.
It's a shame, but this is the reality game they're playing, the puppet masters.
Right.
You know, what's really interesting is there are reports, credible reports, that just three days before Israel attacked Iran, that they had Iran's hackers had accessed three terabytes of data related to Mossad's blackmail programs and the Epstein files in particular.
So Iran is saying that within the trove, evidence of unspeakable crimes, including some of the most powerful people on earth.
Now, what's really interesting about watching this is it seems that Israel is being used as a pawn in the global class game, just like America and Trump is being used as a pawn in the global class game, as well as Putin, as well as many other nations.
And so the question is, who is the real enemy and how are we going to identify them?
I like Dylan over at the Deep State Mapping Project.
He seems to have put together a really good program in terms of understanding the different secret societies that control the banking cartels.
But I think the world ought to take notice, just like many Americans are waking up to the mass media and propaganda machine.
The world ought to be waking up to the fact that there is a power structure that is above and beyond any government or any government's figurehead that seems to be pulling the strings.
And I would say start out with the global banking cartel.
And I'd turn to Joaquin for more information on that.
Where do we start?
How do we identify them?
And why aren't they scared of us?
Very nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, have U.S. bombings sealed Iran's fate?
Rest on the Truth Seeker?
The Friday, June 13th, Israel launched a wave of strikes on Iran's military command that was the earlier, its nuclear scientists, its air defenses, and many of its nuclear sites.
The objective was to take out the Iranian high command and the Iranian Republic's ability to mount a coordinated defense.
Though many of the Israeli strikes did indeed hit home, taking out much of Iran's high command and key nuclear scientists, as well as disabling some of the country's air defenses, the Israeli campaign wasn't entirely successful.
The fact that Israel subsequently warned its citizens to prepare for a long war means that the IDF failed to achieve its initial objectives of the strike.
Though some Israelis may have thought that they had the initiative, the illusion was quickly dispelled by successive waves of retaliatory Iranian missile strikes.
For after having been caught off guard on June 13th, Iran quickly recovered, putting Israel on the defensive with successive waves of missiles and drones to make matters worse for Israel.
Iran not only quickly reestablished its military command, but the Israeli strike also sparked a resurgent sense of Iranian national unity.
Perhaps even more disturbing for the Israeli military are claims that Iran had shot down four Israeli F-35s.
This cannot be confirmed at present, but now it appears that we're actually even five.
There's some who suggest Donald Trump is actually the Jewish Messiah.
I mean, it sounds frankly absurd, but we have that theory before us, and we shall find out how it pans out.
Meanwhile, Putin, Tonet Nyahu, read my lips.
Stop attacking Iran or prepare for consequences.
The West is providing Israel with diplomatic comfort while fanning the flames of war, a senior Russian diplomat stated.
They are sabotaging any path to peaceful negotiation.
In a direct and unprecedented warning, Russian President Vladimir Putin has issued an ultimatum to Israeli BM Benjamin Netiahu, cease all military aggression against Iran or prepare for broader consequences.
The statement comes in the wake of a series of Israeli airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear sites Russia has condemned as illegal, provocative, and destabilizing under international law.
The continued assault on sovereign Iranian infrastructure not only violates global norms, a Kremlin spokesperson said, but risks triggering a nuclear catastrophe and dignity.
Here we have more.
Here we are.
*music*
The great national religious work in hope of the speedy eruption of the messianic reign and the fulfillment of all the prophecies.
Julian was cognizant of Christ's prophecy regarding the permanent destruction of the temple and was eager to refute it.
In a letter titled, To the Community of the Jews, Julian explicitly stated his intention to exert all my efforts to resurrect the temple.
We know what's coming.
Meanwhile, let's get your response.
That, however, was Putin in reaction to the initial Israeli strike, not the subsequent U.S. blocking.
Yeah, the Friday the 13th shock and ah, decapitation strikes by Israel.
Hurrah for Israel.
They were so high on that for a couple of days.
You know, the glean in their eye, you know, for their triumph, you know, it was all so short-lived.
And obviously, Iran turned it around pretty rapidly.
Within two to three days, it was a complete turn of events where the tide was turned in favor of Iran with their relentless barrage of missile attacks.
They have thousands of missiles, many of them the hypersonic kind that cannot even come close to being intercepted, defended by the iron dome of Israel, the touted one, you know, oh, they're so strong.
Oh, shut up.
You know, that dome is gone.
There is no air defense system intercepting any of Iran's missiles now.
They're completely vulnerable.
And yet, you know, you go to the mainstream press and even days into it, like a week into it, they're saying, and Trump even said, oh yeah, we'll wait two weeks because, you know, Israel's winning this war.
He said that like about a week into it.
I mean, everything that comes out of the West and Trump's lips, they're all lies.
It's all deception.
And, you know, and my view is that we have the divide and rule.
The West is the bad guy.
They are the bad cop.
And the good cop are the Eastern powers.
Because after all, they're not the terrorists.
They're not the offensive weapons being used to invade other countries.
They're on the defense, just trying to preserve their governments.
So, you know, it's like the good cop, bad cop dichotomy, divide and rule.
It's all being played out right before our eyes.
Right.
Yeah, what's really interesting is there's no way this is about nuclear facilities.
Okay.
If we were trying to eliminate or destroy a nuclear program, we would have to have boots on the ground inspecting computers, inspecting the information structures that are there.
That is cover.
That is what we're being given in the media.
So I went and looked up that three terabytes of data that the Iranian officials had released through a proxy.
And of course, they haven't allowed the documents to be inspected publicly.
But let me tell you what they say they have.
Israel's full four-year nuclear development roadmap, classified details on all U.S. weapons imports to Israel, along with storage locations, records of large bribes paid to four prominent Arab figures to support the Abraham Accords,
complete intelligence profiles of 23 senior Israeli spies, including their contacts across the region, personal data of Facebook users, Twitter, Instagram, and Telegram, 6 million users.
They say sensitive infrastructure daily on data on Israeli electricity, water, telecom, postal transport, and healthcare systems.
Files on legal cases, judicial, police, and intelligence-related cases, detailed information on Israeli prisons and prisoners, personal files on Netanyahu and his wife, personal files on six four-terabyte hard drives,
1,720 pages of secret documents from Netanyahu's private secret office, portions of Mossad's classified archives, private surveillance data on Netanyahu's political opponents, thousands of high-resolution aerial images,
40,000 hours of CCTV footage, a banned recording of the Nesset debate involving Netanyahu officially erased, and among them, Netanyahu's personal blackmail archive, private footage of world leaders and politicians captured through hidden cameras and their homes, along with hacked phone and laptop data.
Folks, do you think that the global organizational control structures would nuke these people, drive these people into the ground, and kill all 92 million people if they had that kind of data on them?
It would be devastating to have that information leaked in a way that they couldn't control it anymore.
Obviously, artificial intelligence would be used as the cover to say it's all fake.
But with that list of what they say they have, there would be no more cover left in this world.
So I think that that proves that that's why they finally had to launch the plan to take out Tehran at this particular point in time, if it's true.
In order to break loose the release of that mass treasure troll, etc.
I think to negotiate to prevent it.
Yeah.
You know.
Very good.
I think that's highly likely.
Meanwhile.
Here we go.
Scott Ryder, this is a fabulous report.
So Iran has prepared for long-term conflict.
Iran, this isn't about, you know, for instance, the Israeli tactic of initiating a war that's supposed to be over in a matter of days.
Iran has prepared for a conflict that's designed to last months.
So Iran is prepared for this.
Two, the Iranians have offered Israel the opportunity to end this conflict at any time.
The war will end today if Israel stops bombing Iran.
That's it.
So Iran has put the power of stopping this war in the hands of Israel.
And the fact that the Israelis won't end this war is sort of an act of suicide on the part of Israel.
Today, one week into this conflict, Israel has suffered a half a trillion dollars worth of infrastructure damage.
A half a trillion dollars worth of infrastructure damage.
It's a small country.
This has already made, if the war stopped today, Israel would not be able to recover from this conflict economically.
A half a trillion dollars.
If this war continues for another week, two weeks, or three weeks, you're looking at the physical destruction of Israel.
Literally, the physical destruction of Israel, which makes Israel's survivability as a nation state impossible.
Israel is committing suicide as we speak because of the Iranian strategy.
So for the critics, what did they want?
I mean, the critics of Iran, were they looking for Iran to defeat Israel?
Iran is defeating Israel.
And Iran is defeating Israel in the only manner that is politically possible for Israel to make the decisions that lead to its destruction, not Iran.
A key aspect to the Iranian strategy is to keep America out of this conflict, because that's the only hope Israel has of survival is direct intervention by the United States.
And so far, Iran has been very successful in this regard.
But I do think we need to understand this is an existential war of survival between Iran and Israel.
Only one nation walks away from this victorious, and it will be Iran because of the strategic direction and thinking of their leadership.
So for the people that wanted Iran to be more aggressive and to do more things, I would say that you might get a different outcome than what you have right now.
The strategy of the Iranian government is a very pragmatic, responsible, realistic strategy that's premised on, as you indicated, a war of attrition.
But it's not necessarily a war of attrition of Israeli ballistic missile interceptors and Iranian missiles.
We've already shown, the Iranians have already shown that Israel can't defend against Iranian missiles.
So it doesn't matter how many missile interceptors Israel has.
They could have an infinite number of missile interceptors.
Iran has devised the ballistic missile solution to the Iron Dome.
The Iron Dome cannot defeat Iran.
Even the Iron Dome enhanced with American support, the FAD missile, the Aegis systems, satellites, etc., can't defeat the Iranians.
The Iranians are defeating the Iron Dome.
So while people say, well, in 12 days, Israel may run out of missiles, it doesn't matter.
Israel could have infinite numbers of intercept missiles, and it's not succeeding in stopping the Iranians.
Meanwhile, the Iranians continue to unveil more and more and more modern missiles that are capable of defeating this defense Shield.
So I think Iran is on a path of strategic victory against Israel.
And if the United States stays out of this conflict and Israel doesn't use nuclear weapons against Iran, Iran wins this war.
I think we got there exactly why the U.S. had to intervene.
Meanwhile, Iran vows to continue enriching uranium after the U.S. strikes.
Iran has reacted with defiance to U.S. strikes in its nuclear facilities, vowing to continue enriching uranium.
The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran issued a statement in which it condemned the strikes as barbaric and said the national program for enriching uranium, which is a result of the blood of nuclear martyrs, will not be stopped.
This action, contrary to international law, was unfortunately carried out in the shadow of the indifference and even the complicity of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The statement read.
The international community is expected to condemn the lawlessness based on the rules of the jungle and support Iran in achieving its legitimate rights.
I could not agree more.
And in addition, Israel is now conceding that it may have to prepare for a long war.
Here we have Trump's address to the nation following the U.S. tribe.
It's relatively brief.
Thank you very much.
A short time ago, the U.S. military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime, Fordo, Natans, and Isfahan.
Everybody heard those names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise.
Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror.
Tonight I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success.
Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.
Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace.
If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.
For 40 years, Iran has been saying, death to America, death to Israel.
They have been killing our people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs with roadside bombs.
That was their specialty.
We lost over a thousand people, and hundreds of thousands throughout the Middle East and around the world have died as a direct result of their hate.
In particular, so many were killed by their general, Qasem Soleimani.
I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen.
It will not continue.
I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu.
We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before.
And we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel.
I want to thank the Israeli military for the wonderful job they've done.
And most importantly, I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades.
Hopefully, we will no longer need their services in this capacity.
I hope that's so.
I also want to congratulate the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Raisenkane, spectacular general, and all of the brilliant military minds involved in this attack.
With all of that being said, this cannot continue.
There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days.
Remember, there are many targets left.
Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal.
But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed, and skill.
Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.
There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight, not even close.
There has never been a military that could do what took place just a little while ago.
Tomorrow, General Kane, Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, will have a press conference at 8 a.m.
at the Pentagon.
And I want to just thank everybody.
And in particular, God, I want to just say we love you, God, and we love our great military.
Protect them.
God bless the Middle East.
God bless Israel.
And God bless America.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Notice we even have God blessing Israel before God is blessing America.
Pretty pathetic.
So many false statements, Don.
Take us out and we'll return with a critique of the president's statement right after our blueprint.
Time's up here.
Come on.
Dang it.
There we go.
Anyway, yes, I'm taking this out of here, on time here.
And the name Trump has three letters of the same letters of another word, truth.
Does Trump speak the truth?
That's the whole thing.
It looks like he's got a double tongue or something here.
I'm not sure.
But anyway, hopefully we're going to find out here in the next hour on truth versus news here on June the 22nd.
And hot times, I tell you, war and everything else.
And I agree that Israel just ain't going to stand ain't going to stand really long with what's going on.
So hopefully we'll come to some resolution that will save the world.
Come on back, folks.
And thank you for watching.
Share this widely because it's very important.
Probably our most important show.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection