All Episodes
Previous Next
May 24, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:26
Fetzer Fights Fox, Cem or Con Trail? AIPAC, Amazon Grocery Store, Ambush, # of Cops per Country
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to episode 128, if you can believe, 128 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents video clips and stories I don't know are coming for my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
Gary, what do you got for me today?
Well, let's find out.
I'm going to surprise you a little bit, I think.
Hold on.
This new Zoom is acting a little funny here.
So let's get this one up.
Alright.
I call this one Fetzer fighting Fox.
When they had their facts foxed up.
We're fighting global conflict.
Where one system is trying to change the other system.
It deals with gaining the objectives.
Short of nuclear war.
By the various themes that it promulgates.
What I call a wilderness of mirrors.
They can have you believe whatever they desire you to believe.
He's joining us now the co-chairman of Scholars for 9 /11 Truth, Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota at Duluth, James Fetzer.
Professor, thank you so much for being with us.
First of all, is this a required course?
Can you hear me?
Yeah, go ahead.
Is it a required course?
Well, you got your facts, Foxed, I'm sorry to say.
In fact, I created an organization of faculty and experts to study 9 /11, not to teach in courses.
But I must tell you what we have discovered would certainly qualify as material for an important course the university's ought to be teaching.
So you're saying you're not teaching this?
I want to be clear here.
You're not teaching a course in this?
No, you're confused.
And I hope that Fox usually does a better job on their research than this.
I want to get into that in a moment.
I just want to be clear.
As far as you know, there is no course on 9 /11 conspiracy theories being taught at your university or any place else that you know of?
That's right.
But it's a great idea.
I would certainly support having such a course because there's a lot of material to work with.
All right.
And what evidence do you have that the government was involved?
That Cheney knew, that anybody in the chain of command knew ahead of time that this was going to happen on 9 /11.
Can you give us any piece of evidence that would substantiate that argument?
absolutely for example norman minetta testified Sir, it's 30 miles.
Sir, it's 10 miles out.
Sir, do the order still stand?" Cheney turned around, jumped on him, nearly bit off his head and said, "Of course the order still stand.
Have you heard anything different?" The order had to be to not shoot down the plane that was approaching the Pentagon.
After all, the order should have been to shoot it down.
Shooting it down would be the obvious thing to do when you consider that.
You're going to lose the passengers and the plane if you shoot it down, but if you don't, you're going to use the passengers and the plane and also, of course, all the personnel and property at the target.
a problem that let me ask you i i want to go back to something in exchange at you and alan just had a moment ago in fairness to our producers when they talk to you early you said Am I correct?
No, you're not correct.
What I said to him was in courses on critical thinking, sometimes issues related to, for example, tax cuts or global warming or reasons for going to war in Iraq might be discussed as examples, but I know of no courses as such that are being taught that way.
So let me ask, how big is this group of professors that you've put together, this organization you've formed, that gives credence, if you will, to the theory you just advanced about 9 /11?
Well, there are over 300 members, Colonel North, including about 200 with advanced research skills.
In about 85, they have affiliations, including physicists, mechanical engineers, pilots, aeronautical engineers.
We've discovered that the Twin Towers are brought down by controlled demolition.
We've discovered that the Osama bin Laden appears to have had nothing to do with it.
Help me out here.
Haven't been involved in a couple of controversial undertakings over my years in government service.
How many people in the government were part of this conspiracy that you envision?
Hundreds?
Thousands?
No, no, Ali.
I think it's a small number.
You know about classified, controlled operations where everything's compartmentalized.
Do you know, Ali, that the FBI has confirmed that they have no hard evidence relating Osama bin Laden to the events of 9-11?
Are you aware of that?
Well, Osama bin Laden himself claims that.
I mean, they didn't manufacture those tapes.
This is the FBI, Ali.
This is the FBI that has affirmed in the last couple of weeks they have no hard evidence tying Osama bin Laden to 9-11.
And so all of these people that died on 9-11, We're trying to find out exactly what happened.
our government has a considerable reputation for telling things that are not true okay that That's probably my best four minutes ever on television, Gary.
This was right before the American Scholars Conference held in Los Angeles in June of 2006.
Where Alex Jones was hosting and he invited me to be the keynote speaker.
So I was contacted by Fox the night before and asked if I could come on so I could explain what Scholars, the organization I founded, Scholars for 9 /11 Truth, had discovered.
So I said, "Sure." Now I'm in the waiting room and I just say, "Why don't you bring in a TV so I can see what's going on?" And then when I hear Alan Coves say, "You won't believe what your students are being taught by their professors." I knew I had them because they didn't know enough about my courses to get things right.
And as you can see, I was able to seize control of the program from the beginning.
It would be years before Ollie North would return to the stage, by the way.
And I only recently discovered that there were Commentators talking about the show and were just giving me the highest praise for being able to handle this so successfully.
I think they picked the wrong target.
It would be followed by Sean Hannity a couple months later trying to do the job better without much success.
And then Bill O 'Reilly being especially nasty.
I'm sitting in a studio here in Madison with bright lights in my face.
And all of a sudden, the voice pops up and says, "I'm going to tell the world that you're a nut and you hate your country." Boom!
And I'm on the air, and then he hits me with another smacker, another zinger.
And because he piled him on so fast, I'm not even able to respond.
Well, I thought that had been quite a disaster until the following year.
There was a 9 /11 event at Cooper Union in New York City.
The Great Hall, where I gave a 9 /11 speech.
And then my wife and I and a friend wandered over to a theater where Alex Jones had coordinated a 9 /11 event.
And I was astonished, Gary.
When I walked up, they knew me immediately.
They rolled out the red carpet.
They put me up on a platform with first responders.
And as I'm sitting down, a fellow next to me leans over and says, It was seeing you and O 'Reilly that convinced me 9 /11 had been an inside job.
And I figured, well, Gary, maybe we're going through all that hassle with O 'Reilly.
Those are all available online, by the way.
Anyone can follow up.
All right.
Good one.
Okay.
How marvelous.
What this one's titled?
Isn't it marvellous what the possibility of a war can do?
Because suddenly we've got billions of pounds that we can give away.
Billions of pounds that before we didn't have, so we had to take it off the pensioners.
We had to take it off the farmers.
We had to take it off the business people.
But now, suddenly, miraculously, we can come up with billions to give away to a war in another country.
And then people.
Suddenly we can sacrifice young people.
Whereas during Covid, remember, we all had to stay indoors in order to save Granny.
But now suddenly that doesn't mean anything because we can send out young people, boys and girls, to go and fight in another country.
And also climate change.
Isn't it amazing that suddenly nobody's talking about the effects of war on climate change?
Net zero is not mentioned.
No, I mean, taking all sorts of horrendous weapons into another country, blowing things up.
I mean, can you imagine what that would potentially do to the climate, to pollution levels?
Nobody mentions that.
I'm not hearing Greta Thunberg do anything.
She's not saying a word.
The Greens are entirely silent.
Nobody says anything about that because everything How marvelous.
What do you think?
I think you're marvelous.
She's wonderful, Gary.
That was sensational.
I loved every word of it.
She's quite fetching, very articulate.
She's hitting it hard, making great arguments.
Yes, yes, yes.
We've got similar going on here with the big, beautiful bill that Congress is passing.
It's going to slash and burn programs that benefit ordinary American people.
And for what?
To support the ongoing war effort in Gaza, which Trump continues to support?
We've even got Bibi saying Trump has said that he's 100 percent.
Following me.
He's devoted to me.
Give me a break.
You're supposed to be devoted to the American people, Donald, not to BB the Butcher.
This is a disgrace.
She got it right, Gary.
That was a sensational clip.
Good work.
Great find.
All right.
Okay.
This is about cash.
When I started talking to people about cash, the first they would go, well, You know, it's not convenient or, you know, what, but they, and they would start to think about it and then it would, it could take as much as a year or two, but they would really turn around because they started to realize, oh, I don't want to be controlled.
And if I keep cash alive, it's going to be harder to control me.
And suddenly, so you had to plant these seeds, but it would, you know, they could really mature in time.
Were you seeing that?
Yes.
I felt like I was planting a lot of those initial seeds and talking about the digital control grid.
And because I'm from Silicon Valley, because I've built a lot of this technology and I really understand it, people tend to take me a little more seriously about the control grid part of it.
But I still feel like I'm planting a seed.
They need to hear it over and over and over, which was why my goal on this from the beginning was to get people talking about cash, cash in the newspaper, cash on the nightly news.
The more they hear the word cash, The more it sort of sinks into their brains and they think about it.
I think the control grid element, you know, it takes a few seeds and waterings of those seeds to get people to understand that.
And I'm not 100% sure in South Dakota, you know, that could take a while to get those to grow.
Like you said, years.
I started by the end, I had the same experience.
It's more convenient to just use my credit card and I get miles or I get cash back on my credit card.
And I finally just started being a real jerk about that.
And I just said, you know what, if I can just talk about some of the statistics quick, I'll explain what I tell them.
So I looked at some statistics from the Federal Reserve and it showed us that.
In 2022, about 18% of all payments are made with cash.
Okay, 18% of all payments are cash payments in 2022.
And then on the Federal Reserve website as well, in 2023, if you look at the credit card, they have a table about who has a credit card and who doesn't.
And you'll find that low-income families, families with less than $25,000 a year in income, 54% of them don't have a credit card.
Okay, so a lot of low-income families don't have a credit card, which kind of makes sense.
And the overall, a lot of people, if you look at the same table, a lot of young people don't have a credit card, which makes sense.
And many of the people without a credit card, 30% of Blacks don't have a credit card, 26% of Hispanics don't have a credit card.
And 31% of people with a disability don't have a credit card.
So the overall percentage of people without a credit card are 18%.
So let's think about this.
18% of all payments are made with cash, and 18% of people don't have a credit card.
So the people that are using cash are the ones without a credit card.
Now, who are the people without a credit card?
I just said they're low-income people.
Young people, Black and Hispanic people, and people with a disability.
So that the low-income minorities with disabilities are keeping our freedom alive.
Right.
Not us, but the people that are low income with disabilities and our minorities, they're keeping our freedom alive'cause they're the 18% of people without a credit card who are using cash.
So those of us with them, So, those of us with a credit card.
So every time you use your credit card and you're getting your miles and you're getting your cash back, who's paying for that?
The low-income minorities with a disability.
So you're using your credit card so you can get your miles and your cash back.
Meanwhile, you donate to a charity for low-income people.
Why don't y 'all just use cash?
And that's your charity for low-income people because they're the ones who are paying for your miles and your cash back.
So let's stop praying off of low-income people.
And I know I'm kind of a jerk when I say that, but sometimes when I say that, they start to think, oh, yeah, my vacation miles are being paid by low-income minorities.
Okay.
Well, that was just wonderful, Gary.
I mean, Catherine Offen fits, of course, and I think this is a governor of North Dakota.
She's wonderful doing her research.
I've been very, very troubled by the whole cryptocurrency idea of moving the digital payment system because there are so many in America that don't have it, as she's reporting.
18% lower don't do transactions in credit cards.
They don't even have credit cards.
And you're impacting the low-wage earners.
Think about homeless people.
How many homeless people have a credit card?
Homelessness is endemic across the country.
What are we going to do?
Go to a credit card and let them starve on the streets?
Sometimes I think that's the agenda.
The depopulation.
Let them starve on the streets.
This is inhumane.
This is disgusting.
It's un-American.
It's undemocratic, and I can't believe Gary, I am sick.
Sick.
We cannot abandon cash.
It would be an absolute calamity for the nation.
But it would promote the objectives of the New World Order, the Great Reset, and the World Economic Forum.
Stand by.
Yeah, it's a double-edged sword.
I actually made $10,000 in two days with my Bitcoin the other day, so I'm not really sure how to look at it.
And I didn't do anything.
I literally didn't do anything.
Okay, here we go.
Look how the people residing in the greater Boston area failed to say no and fight back against the military lockdown.
Remember that?
And the occupation following the ridiculous Boston Marathon false flag attack of April 2013.
What did they do?
Well, they thanked the military troops pointing guns at them and their children.
And commandeering their homes and later head parades celebrating each other as "Boston Strong".
Well, that was ten years ago.
And the Communists have learned much from that.
The strong and relentless programs to neuter boys and girls and men in this country.
Be it chemicals, schools, media, social media, conditioning and...
And God knows what chemicals and poisons that have been put into the food and water supply have only further neutralized the male population of the US and those in other Western countries.
How this almost entire country rolled over to the tyrannical lockdowns, loss of livelihoods and forced injections of experimental substances because the government said so.
All I can say, Jeff, is that we are way too gone and long since passed having any kind of resistance or fight back from the American people who have for decades been bending over and grabbing the flag, shouting USA and thanking the big, well, jerks who have raped and pillaged them when it's all over.
Maybe you'll want to read this on air and share with others.
There is not going to be any kind of patriot uprising, no matter how many guns and ammunition each of those patriots have.
And when there is one or two who bravely step out onto the empty battlefield, once they start taking heat, they will be left out there all along.
you you you you you you Okay.
Let me just add on reflection.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
This was an Israeli op designed to provide a motive for American troops to be sent to the Middle East to take out the modern Arab state that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region and eventually to confront the immersion nation of Iran.
Which, as you can see, is on the horizon today.
Despicable.
Indicative of how Israel has been controlling America.
And they openly boast about it.
Ariel Cerrone, Gola Meir, Bibi Netanyahu foremost, an arch-villain if ever there were one.
Regarding Boston, what a joke.
The Boston Marathon bombing, even the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set up during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
Another tweet.
One will be set up in a minute office at the library.
Lo and behold, there was office at the library, a puff bomb.
And I say that as a former artillery officer in the United States Marine Corps.
Those are not powerful enough, explosive to kill anyone, and perhaps you're sitting right on top of it.
It's outrageous.
I have books about Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland.
Anyone who wants to learn more ought to read them, but bear in mind they've been banned by Amazon.com.
So go to MoonRockBooks.com and check it out.
Check it out, Gary.
We've been playing far too long.
And this latest shooting at the Israeli embassy is a joke.
It's a farce.
There's at a time when Israel is suffering maximal public relation damage because they're slaughtering the Palestinians in Gaza in far more sadistic, cruel fashion than they were themselves treated by the Nazis in World War II.
They need a relief.
So a stage of fake shooting coming out of an embassy, an obscure building.
No one would even know they would have been there.
And then it turns out they're claiming the man and the woman, he's Israeli, she's American.
They were going to be engaged.
This is a sob story, Gary.
Don't believe it.
This is as bad as it gets.
Original amateur hour brought to you by the Israeli government.
Sad to say.
All right.
There's some good reporting on 153news.net about that.
Okay.
So let's talk about a sensitive subject in regards to American politics and the interest groups that lobby American politicians.
As you can see, I have the Wikipedia article here for APAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
And this is, as Wikipedia describes it, a pro-Israel lobbying group.
That many people for a long time have felt has simply bought loads of American congressmen and senators and other people in positions of influence and authority to unduly extend and enhance the influence of Israel over American politics and indeed many many many American politicians have been described as being Israel first rather than America first.
And this is one of those things about the America first types that they have taken issue with because Israel is, of course, a foreign country and is usually considered by most people essentially to be a kind of extension of just the United States, given how much the United States funds it and how much Israel funds American politicians in turn.
But something really, really strange has been happening.
There's a kind of suite of politicians, which I'm just going to call the sort of Dan Crenshaw types, who themselves are moderate Republicans on most issues, but extreme Israel partisans when it comes to this particular topic.
And in fact, there's a few months ago, Dan Crenshaw had a beef with Tucker Carlson over this.
And Steven Edgington interviewed Dan Crenshaw and off camera.
Apparently, Dan Crenshaw said, quote, I would kill him if I saw him.
Because, of course, Carlson has been a critic of America's political marriage to Israel.
Now, I just want to make it clear, I'm completely ambivalent towards Israel.
I'm completely ambivalent towards Palestine.
This is not my business.
I've never received any money either way.
So I just don't care.
I'm England first, in the sense of the sort of America first type people.
This is a fascinating thing because you see a lot of politicians who clearly have a vested interest in supporting Israel because they receive lobbying money.
And that's fairly understandable.
That's politics as usual.
There's nothing actually surprising to say about this.
The interesting thing is that, of late, people have been asking a few questions because Donald Trump has been making a few really significant moves.
Now, there's definitely been a kind of The hierarchical relationship that people perceive between the United States and Israel, and the United States, despite being the guarantor and often funder of much of what Israel does, has perceived to be the junior partner in this arrangement.
And many people are not happy with this.
Many people don't like what they perceive to be a kind of ex-experiment, Now, this isn't the same as the radical left wing who are convinced that Israel is committing a genocide and want to destroy Israel.
That's not what these people on the right are perceiving.
What they're perceiving on the right is a lack of parity in the relationship between America and Israel.
And they find that to be inappropriate because, really, The difference should, of course, be Israel deferring to America rather than America deferring to Israel.
And so these people on the right aren't Israel haters and or not generally.
There are some, of course, who are Israeli, but they're not like the people on the left who are just congenital Israel haters and hate.
What the state of Israel is doing to the Palestinian people and characterize it in ways of which the other side doesn't agree.
What they're concerned about, really, is the condition of the relationship between America and Israel.
And this picture kind of summarized their issue.
It was a bit weird to see Donald Trump seating Benjamin Netanyahu as if he was his subordinate.
But there's something about this photo that always made me question, because if you look at Trump's face, I'm getting kind of Godfather vibes from this.
Like, this doesn't seem to be a man who is actually deferring to Netanyahu.
This, to me, looks like a man who's laying a trap, actually, seeing how far Netanyahu will let him go before he pulls the rug.
And I say he pulls the rug because it's very interesting.
I mean, as you can see here, President Trump, you're the greatest friend Israel has ever had, says Netanyahu.
But the rumor behind the scenes is that Trump doesn't like Netanyahu.
There have been some affirmative moves to demonstrate this.
For example, Mike Waltz in Trump's cabinet was the person who added a journalist into the group chat, the signal chat, to leak the war plans or the strategic maneuvers that we're going to take against the Houthis.
And Trump has fired him, and he's fired him because of his close coordination with Netanyahu.
And his eagerness to strike Iran, which, of course, Netanyahu and Israel have wanted to do for a long time.
Well, that's generally a very good and balanced account, or I should have added, you know, the embassy shooting brought to us compliments of AIPAC, which is a PR firm for Israel right here in the U.S. that runs the American Congress.
I liked his presentation, except for saying he's ambivalent about Palestine, ambivalent about Israel.
He can't be a decent human being and be ambivalent about the mass slaughter of an indigenous population in an effort by a brutal sadistic force to steal the land.
And they have had a legacy for thousands of years when the interobras only arrived in 1948.
So I'd like to...
He ought to be outraged.
I believe it was St. Thomas Aquinas who observed to not be angry in the face of injustice is itself a sin.
That is correct.
We should all be outraged at what's happening to the Palestinian people.
This guy, alas.
It's probably one of my biggest subjects that I'm more outraged about than anything else, no question.
We're bringing up every show.
America is going to be very rich again, and it's going to happen very quickly.
It's time for the United States to return to the system that made us richer and more powerful than ever before.
You know, the United States in 1870 to 1913, all tariffs, and that was the richest period.
In the history of the United States, relatively speaking.
In other words, relatively.
And they set up the great tariff commission of 1887.
And this commission had one function, what to do with all the money that we took in.
It was so enormous that they had no idea.
It was a blue ribbon committee that was set up in 1887.
And what to do with all of the money that we had.
Again, Teddy Roosevelt was a beneficiary because when McKinley was killed, he took over this vast sum of money and he did all of those national parks and all of the other things.
And I'm not knocking him, but he was given a vast amount of money.
And that was all made through tariffs.
We had no income tax.
The income tax came in in 1913.
As I said in my speech last week, instead of taxing our citizens to enrich for our nations, we should be Does that make sense, right?
Okay.
I thought he was He seemed to be antagonizing a lot of our more serious trade partners, none more so than China, where, I don't know, like 40% of the goods that appear on the shelves in Walmart are Costco come from China.
Now, because of the tariffs, Chinese diverted their ships in route to America, to other ports, to other destinations.
We have no Chinese ships that are being unloaded on the West Coast, whether it's in Seattle or Los Angeles, Long Beach.
This is a catastrophe.
And Gary, it's going to show up on the shelves in less than two weeks.
Two weeks from now, You're going to walk into places like Walmart and you're going to find half the shelves are empty because they don't have the Chinese-made goods that would ordinarily have appeared there.
And now Trump's going to react to the public response, which is going to be outraged, is yet to be seen.
But frankly, politically, I think this president of the United States, whom so many of us supported with such great enthusiasm, has lost his way.
And he's no longer, in my opinion, really in full control of his faculties.
I mean, we had four years with a cognitively incompetent imposter president called Joe Biden.
But the real Joe died back in 2017.
This guy had a different shape and size of cranium.
He had a different signature.
He had different social interaction with Joe.
He was not the same guy.
Everyone in Washington had to know.
Nobody in Washington spoke out.
Gary, I find that completely outrageous abdication of responsibility.
I say to hell with them all.
I am stunned.
I am baffled.
And I'm profoundly troubled about the consequences for the American people that the action Trump is taking before our very eyes.
I agree.
This is a bit of an unusual clip.
It's how many police...
There's no narration.
You'll just have to look at the charts.
Oh!
Oh, and another reason is that Pink Floyd is one of my favorite bands and it's to the backdrop of Pink Floyd Pigs.
Pink Floyd Pigs
Pink Floyd Pigs
Pink Floyd Pigs Pink Floyd Pigs Pink Floyd Pigs Pink Floyd Pigs Pink Floyd
Pigs Pink Floyd Pigs Pink
Floyd Pigs Pink Floyd Pigs Big state on your back, yeah, walking your hopes are fine.
Down in the pit of mine, you're nearly alive, you're nearly alive, but you really, really cry.
All right, that's an awful lot of police.
That's pretty fascinating Gary, I like that a lot, it would be good to know the I think that would be more informative.
And I think it would change the order to see who had the most police per capita population of the country.
So I'd like to see another version of this.
But it's fascinating just in terms of the bare numbers, Gary.
I thought that was very worth including.
Thank you for that.
Alright, here we go.
How about your Amazon store?
On the way.
So, I was in London a few days ago and I saw something that I've never seen before.
And I've been thinking about it ever since.
It's kind of bothering me.
Have you guys seen these new stores that Amazon is building?
There's no cashiers, no checkout area, no cash registers.
You just scan your Amazon app, walk in, take anything you want, walk out, and your Amazon account is automatically charged and a receipt is sent to you by email.
I'm honestly not sure what to think about this.
On the one hand, it is very convenient.
Even kind of cool.
On the other hand, it feels like the next level of surveillance.
It feels kind of scary to be normalizing this.
And it is going to be normalized.
This is the future of grocery shopping, and probably all shopping, and I'll tell you why.
Walmart, for example, says that they lose about $3 billion a year from theft.
But it's basically impossible to steal from a store like this.
You can go ahead and try.
Take anything you want.
Stick it in your pocket and walk out.
You're still going to be charged.
You can't even get into the store without scanning your app.
They know who you are the moment you walk through the door and they have access to your credit card.
This means that Amazon stores will automatically be more profitable and that will force all the other stores to either drop their prices to compete or adopt the same model.
And I suspect they'll do the latter.
So imagine that in the not too distant future, shopping as a whole is going to be basically automated surveillance.
Interesting as well that the book of Revelation says that there's going to be a time when you won't be able to buy or sell without a particular mark.
You can really see how something like that is possible now.
You can't just walk into a store like this and try to buy something with cash.
It's not even that they won't let you use cash.
You just can't.
It's impossible.
So again, it's convenient, but I think kind of scary.
What do you guys think?
Absolutely fascinating, Gary.
Fascinating.
With individuals who don't have Amazon accounts, obviously they can't use the Amazon store, but that's just as well because they may be into shoplifting and whatnot.
I find that utterly fascinating.
I'm going to have to think through what this really means for the future because It could affect our lives on a daily basis.
So I'm super happy you included this, a development of which I was completely unaware.
And I want to give this more thought, Gary.
Fascinating.
Absolutely fascinating.
Yeah.
I didn't see any employees in there, but someone's got to stock the shelves.
All right, now this is a clip for a minute, 30 seconds, about how the mainstream media parrots the same thing.
Donald Trump meeting with the president of South Africa and attempting to ambush and humiliate that leader inside the Oval Office.
President Trump orchestrated another Oval Office ambush.
A political ambush inside the White House.
All of these videos, that's the presentation that he made, the multimedia ambush that they've just presented with these videos and the printouts.
The dramatic scene in the Oval Office today, the tense confrontation, President Trump ambushing the president of South Africa.
But very quickly descended into Zelensky territory, where essentially he was a bit ambushed inside the Oval Office.
Why did they choose to ambush the South Africa?
Live from Singapore, this is BBC News.
Another White House ambush.
President Trump confronts his counterpart Cyril Ramaphosa with discredited claims of a white genocide in South Africa.
Another Oval Office meltdown.
President Trump ambushing the president of South Africa and pushing unsubstantiated claims of genocide.
President Trump is being accused of conducting something of a diplomatic ambush of South Africa's president in the Oval Office with claims of, quote, white persecution.
Well, Katie, I mean, it was an ambush.
Felt like an ambush in there, kind of like the President Zelensky meeting in the Oval Office.
Cyril Ramaphosa brought his best diplomatic self to this meeting, but nothing could have prepared him for this multimedia ambush that President Trump laid out with video, with printed out news stories.
Okay.
Well, this is a troubling case.
I've heard a lot about, you know, slaughters.
of white farmers in South Africa.
I've tended to believe them in the past.
Trump is of course now admitting as refugees, political refugees seeking asylum, a group of 59 South African Africaners.
These are the farmers who developed South Africa, making it a prosperous, successful nation.
Since it's gone toward black governance, it's not supposed to be an apartheid state, but it appears now there's been a reversal.
If there was discrimination against blacks in the past, there's discrimination against whites in the present, rather analogous to what's going on here in the United States.
Under Obama and Biden, an attempt to invert the roles.
and put the less competent in charge of the more competent to their great detriment.
Only now are we having Pete Hegeset, the Secretary of Defense, assert that admission to the Air Force, Army and Naval Academies, West Point and Annapolis, are going to be strictly based on merit without taking into account race or
The situation here politically with South Africa is a bit murky to me, so I'm reluctant to say more, but there is no question but what Trump politically did execute, a PR ambush of the President of South Africa to confront him, and some at least of the evidence he asserted was mistaken.
They're supposed to be mounds that were graves, but they're either from foreign nations or they weren't what they were represented as being.
I wish I could say more in greater detail, Gary, but I'm not going to feign knowledge I do not possess.
This is a troubling development.
I'm not at all sure it's going to win Trump any more, friends.
It may very well alienate others who were on the fence.
Probably not fair play.
Okay, talk about step in the right direction.
Texas has passed a bill making Big Pharma responsible for any injuries.
The point of order is withdrawn.
chair organizes miss luther to continue on the bill If you advertise a vaccine in Texas, you will answer to Texans.
It's time for Big Pharma to put their money where their mouth is.
I move passage.
Question occurs on passage to engrossment of House Bill 3441.
This is a record vote.
The clerk will ring the bell.
Show Mr. Hunter voting aye, Mr. Alders voting aye, Mr. Leach voting aye, Ms. Bowers voting nay, Ms. Troxclear voting aye, Mr. Schatzlein voting aye.
Members, I'll give you time to get to your desk.
Thank you so much.
I really appreciate that.
Thank you.
Mr. Little, voting aye.
No.
We've all voted.
We've all voted.
There being 99 ayes, 43 nays, House Bill 3441 is passed to engrossment.
The chair lays out House Bill 5520 as a matter of post-home business.
On second reading, the clerk will read the bill.
HB number 5520 by Gomez.
Okay.
That's good.
I'm not sure they can exceed over confederal law, which exempted them from liability for experimental procedures.
Where they then conned the American people by downplaying the idea they were experimental, by denigrating alternative medicines that were then available, HCQ and ivermectin, which actually were perfect solutions to the medical problem, but it was all a scam to induce a mass herd mentality toward the vax, which was designed to kill and maim with great success.
And we've had individuals as high as the vice president of Pfizer, former vice president of Pfizer, explained this was always intentioned to depopulate planet Earth.
Gary, it's as disgusting an event as we've ever encountered because big pharma views a position.
We have a safety net, or so we thought the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, they were all in on it.
We've been at the World Health Organization promoting genocide by vaccination, and of course it wasn't a real vax.
It was actually mRNA, a gene-altering form of therapy that no one ought to undergo.
If you have any sense, stay the hell away from vaccines and especially avoid mRNA, but evildoers like Bill Gates are doing their best.
To even create an aerosolized version of the vax, he calls it air vax, that's being spread over parts of Canada as we speak.
Beware.
There's a very powerful, very evil cabal out to kill you and your brogeny.
Don't let it happen.
Fight it.
Do your best.
Resist.
Ignore the vax.
End it.
All right.
This is another one of my big subjects.
Stories of deep state overhanded control in your heads, Americans.
If you're listening, you've got to really pay attention here.
Never forget what can be done to you and your children after they disarm you.
Now Mike Adams, along with Jane Ruby, found some...
Using ICP-MS analysis, the gold standard in elemental detection, Mike's team found barium-137 in Florida fallout samples at levels exceeding 150 ppm.
Not regular barium either.
BA-137, which is the radioactive isotope created by the beta decay of cesium-137, a compound so deadly it's used in dirty bombs and lingers for decades.
In simple terms, it would be It would be impossible to be just industrial pollution.
This is nuclear waste raining from the clouds, barium, lead, cadmium, mercury, and aluminum.
We're all found in the same air sample.
This is poison by design.
Isn't that crazy?
They just basically put a bunch of Pfizer vials of the COVID vaccine in fuel exhaust and rained it down on the people.
This is desperation, folks.
No one accidentally dumps large amounts of cesium-137 down from the clouds, okay?
This is weather warfare.
And when they're caught, they say, well, it's just weather modification.
You know, we're doing it to fight global warming.
We got to spray you with uranium and cesium.
Why is nobody in government talking about this right here?
Florida state officials and federal agencies I mean, it does seem like it's happening more often now, but what are the numbers?
Like, how many plane crashes, just for example, took place in 2007 in between January and March, right?
And let's compare that to now.
I really wonder what the numbers would be.
I don't know.
So we have undeniable proof now of radioisotopes in our reign, and it fits perfectly with the wider agenda, if you think about it.
Vaccination rates drop, public skepticism rises.
I mean, many articles showing now that parents are really stepping away from the vaccines.
A lot of people are like, wait, hold on, what?
What's going on here?
We don't trust this anymore.
So the demons in charge are like, okay, well, screw you.
We're going to rain it down from the clouds.
So clearly their tactics change.
So they go from needles to nanodust, from mandates to aerosolized compliance.
So basically, poison people by enemy is necessary.
And anyone who dares to sound the alarm, whether it's a cop, a father, or a former airport worker, gets stripped of their job, their voice, labeled insane, and then forced to get out of the way.
Okay.
Excellent.
What a perfect sequel to my previous observation, Gary.
You're just spot on here.
That's exactly right.
And again, it's part and parcel of the depopulation agenda.
Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Klaus Schwab, all principles in this monstrous attempt to cut a population of the earth from around 8 billion down to half a billion, 500 million.
The vast majority of whom are going to be serving as slaves.
That's how they arrived at the number.
I want everyone to understand.
This is not fiction.
This is not just a theory.
This is not speculation.
This is a fact.
And if you know somebody who died from the vaccine or has been seriously impaired, you've got to realize that's evidence before your very eyes.
They're out to kill us.
And just preserve Earth for themselves.
It is an outrage.
It is grotesque.
But I'm very sorry to tell you, it's the grim reality we confront today.
All right, this is for people who may be new to this subject.
This is about the difference between a chemtrail and a contrail.
I actually had a big confrontation on WWL radio with a...
Do you guys want to see the difference between chemtrails and contrails?
Here, let me show you.
Okay, so you see this?
See that?
That is a chemtrail, okay?
That right there, look it, that is a jet.
See how the back of that disappears?
That's water vapor up there.
That's smoke and whatever from the engines that's disappearing.
Beside it is a chemtrail.
That will expand and become some kind of misty cloud over the sky and block the sun.
We did not consent to that.
That is filled with chemicals, all sorts of crap.
When did we consent to that?
That is a jet.
That is a chemtrail.
That is a jet.
That is a chemtrail.
And chemtrails, by the way, barium salts are in chemtrails.
They are 10,000 times more toxic to your nervous system than lead.
They contain mycobacteria, viruses, Pseudomonas florentis, bacteria, human plasma.
Hmm, I wonder what human plasma is doing in chemtrails.
And this is not by conjecture.
I did a lot of research before I'd ever say this.
But these chemtrails are nasty.
And there's three reasons for chemtrails.
The first is, and I talked to my NSA buddies at Fort Carson.
Peterson Air Force Base at Buckley, where I was actually their doctor taking care of the pilots flying and spraying the chemtrails.
So I know it's real.
If anybody says it's not real, they're full of it.
Okay?
Because I'm a whistleblower on the inside.
It's not open for discussion.
And my NSA buddies told me, 95% of them told me, they were up there trying to spray to reflect the sun out to stop global warming.
So most of them are dumb enough to believe that garbage.
Okay?
And also in the chemtrails, and there's a link directly that Jeff Francis found out, and I'm going to have Dr. Stanninger and Dr. Karju on in about a week on my radio show.
And I've done some investigations, and there's very solid evidence now that Morgellons is...
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean, this is all good.
It all ties together to explain what's going on here.
They're using multiple methods.
To depopulate the planet.
Some are more direct.
Some are more indirect.
Some are obvious.
Some are subtle.
I'm very glad you're talking about all of these, Gary, because they all have the same objective.
The greatest land grab in world history control of planet Earth for a tiny elite that want to leave such population as they allow to live to serve them as slaves.
Slaves!
Slaves.
Slaves in the field, slaves in the house, sex slave, you name it, that's what they want from those they allow to survive.
Grim future for those who are able to endure.
I'm not so sure it wouldn't be a case where the living would envy the dead.
Yeah, get involved with this.
There is legislation in Louisiana concerning aerosol injection, and I hope we make some head.
There is a lot of water that is in the water, and it is a lot of water that is in the water.
There is a lot of water that is in the water, and it is a lot of water that is in the water.
Okay.
Yeah.
See you now.
No.
When you have satanic symbols and gestures coming from the Vatican, you know something is terribly wrong.
The world's upside down, inverted, good is bad, black is white, truth is false, the false is true, and the good evil is good.
Gary, I find all that very disturbing.
Obviously it's purely suggestive and symbolic, but I'm Afraid it actually means something very, very bad.
I agree.
All right, we've got two short clips, and we'll be done for the day.
Okay, next one.
Henry Kissinger, back in the day.
And there exist problems which are genuinely not national, like environment, nuclear proliferation, and similar issues.
In this sense, we're living in a new world, and a new world order will emerge.
A few centuries ago, the German philosopher Kant said, "Someday, there'll be perpetual peace." The only question is whether it will arise out of intellectual and moral insight and by design.
Or whether it will be forced on mankind by a series of catastrophes.
That's the challenge of our period.
And it makes it, to my mind, one of the most exciting periods in which anybody can live.
*music*
Okay.
*Mario's voice*
Henry Kissinger was a personification of Dr. Strangelove of the movie by that title about the horrors of nuclear war, which I believe everyone in the world should watch every single year at least once.
I'm sorry.
Henry Kissinger was a force for evil, not for good.
It was he who observed that if you want to control a government, control their finances, if you want to control a government, That's, of course, what's happening in Gaza today where the Israelis have cut off all the food, not to mention water and electricity and bear in mind the rule of threes.
We can only survive three minutes without air, three days without water, three weeks without food.
Israelis have checked all the boxes.
Mass starvation in Gaza is upon us.
Evil doers like Henry Kissinger laid the background historically for events like this to transpire.
Alright, last clip of the day.
I think a lot of us are in trouble if this is true.
...to researchers at Wake Forest in North Carolina, where I underwent two MRI brain scans.
This first scan with no caffeine in my system.
Then I down just one drink.
Now my second MRI.
This was my brain before caffeine.
This was after.
The difference was remarkable.
It's like a 40% drop in the blood flow to your brain.
So that's a lot.
So before caffeine, with caffeine, the blood flow to my brain dropped about 40%?
Went down 40%.
Really?
Okay.
That's sounding, Gary.
I have never heard such a thing.
Caffeine?
Mountain Dew is just loaded with taffing.
It has, like, tripled the amount of any other drink, which is why it's so popular.
But look at the effects.
Bad, bad, bad, Gary.
This is really startling information.
I like coffee.
I just finished a cup as we were going on the show.
I'm going to have another cup now.
I'm telling you, this is very, very serious.
The consequences appear to be profound on the human body and the brain.
We need to follow up on this one, Gary.
It's very, very troubling and sort out what it means for those of us who really do enjoy Java.
I mean, coffee is such an important element of most of the world's day.
This is profoundly troubling, my friend.
And again, I thank you for just a sensational series of video clips and stories today.
All right.
Inconvenient Truths.
We'll see you next week.
Thanks again, Jim.
▲
Export Selection