Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 12, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:58:29

The Raw Deal (10 March 2025) with Danny Cirrus

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I need somebody.
	Help!
	Not just anybody.
	Help!
	You know I need someone.
	Help!
	When I was younger, so much younger than today.
	I never needed anybody's help in any way.
	But now these days are gone and I'm not so self-assured.
	Now I find the general mind, I'd open up the doors.
	Help me if you can, I'm feeling down.
	And I do appreciate you being around.
	Help me get my feet back on the ground.
	Won't you please, please help me?
	Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, right here on Revolution Radio Studio B.
	It's March 2025.
	I'll be joined today by my co-host, Keith Rogers.
	and by, during the next segment, Danny Sears, looking at these various plane crashes and explaining why something is very wrong.
	With what we're being told.
	I want to begin with U.S. admitting Ukraine proxy war defeat while European allies participate in self-destructive delusions, which we are going to review.
	Here we have strategic studies in an interview on Fox this week.
	America's top diplomat Marco Rubio made a damning admission.
	He called the conflict in Ukraine a proxy war between the U.S., its NATO allies, and Russia.
	Stop the press!
	In one fell sweep, the narrative justifying the NATO-backed war for the past three years was exposed as a naked lie.
	It's not about defending Ukraine.
	From alleged Russian unprovoked aggression, it's a proxy war.
	That means it has deeper causes and responsibilities than that Russia is the target.
	This is what Moscow and other international observers have been saying all along.
	To recognize it as a proxy war is to begin admitting wider culpability and to start addressing the root causes for a genuine peaceful settlement.
	Secretary of State Rubio went on emphatically calling for an end to the war to spare lives.
	He claimed the conflict was in a stalemate, not quite bringing himself to use the word defeat, but defeat is what this debacle is.
	He described how the previous Biden admin in Congress, including himself as a senator, That fueled the conflict along with other NATO members in a futile campaign.
	It's now time to bring the conflict to an end.
	There can be no doubt, of course, that Russia has won by any measure in terms of territory taken, lives lost, and dominance on the battlefield.
	- Danny or Keith, your thoughts about what's going on here.
	Good morning, sir.
	How are you?
	Danny, delighted to have you here, my friend.
	Great, great.
	It's good to be on with you, sir.
	You know, this Ukraine thing, to me, I would just say, I watch it, I follow it, I don't really report on it, but I can see it's 100% a proxy war.
	The U.S. started it, in my opinion, by looking at all the evidence going way back, and they just don't like Russia.
	Russia is not going to conform to what they want, not going to conform to NATO.
	And they parked missiles on the border, pointing them at Putin.
	And I'd like to point out how would we feel if Russia went to Canada and pointed missiles over the border, over us into the United States, or went to Tijuana and Mexico and put a bunch of missiles there and pointed them at us at our southern border.
	You know, we would go crazy.
	We'd be at war in 10 seconds.
	If that happened.
	And that's basically what we did.
	And, you know, helped overthrow the other Ukrainian government.
	And then we're funding the war.
	You know, if you look at the videos, it's all American weapons that they're using.
	There's a lot of American weapons in that battle.
	And basically, it's just Ukrainian bodies with all American weapons and American money fighting that fight.
	The biggest thing that we're using now is the drones.
	There's a lot of video on YouTube, which I'm surprised it has not been censored.
	But you can actually watch the bits of the war unfold on several YouTube channels where you can see the drones come in.
	They don't make those drones in Ukraine.
	Those are American-made drones.
	And they're using drones to kill American soldiers.
	I mean, they're called kamikaze drones.
	And they basically fly around like mosquitoes.
	Some of them are really small.
	Some of them are large.
	And they fly around on the battlefield and they drop bombs.
	You can see they drop these little tiny bombs on the soldiers when they hide into the bushes and stuff.
	They can see them with special cameras on the drones and it kills them.
	Or sometimes they even use some of these drones known as kamikaze drones.
	That's what the media nicknames them.
	And they crash them straight into either people.
	And they blow up and kill them, or they're so powerful, they crash into tanks and other vehicles, and they blow them up, and they kill the occupants inside with these drones.
	It looks like an electronic video game, almost, when you watch it.
	And they glorify it on some of these videos.
	You can see it, and those are people that are dying.
	And they're dying at the hand of our drones.
	So if you can imagine when you're watching those videos, sir.
	That those are American drones.
	And Poop knows this.
	You can see why he's upset if you take both sides of this war.
	And it's time it ends.
	There's a lot of senseless killing going on.
	It's just time.
	I agree with Trump.
	It's time this thing ends and get a solution to it.
	That's my opinion, sir.
	Well, get this.
	Talk about the delusions of the Europeans.
	You have Emmanuel Macron, the president of France.
	Suggesting extending France's nuclear deterrence to all European allies.
	Creating a French nuclear umbrella to protect the other nations who are willing to join.
	He refers to this as a coalition of the willing.
	Russia has taken it very badly, of course.
	Russia reacts to Emmanuel Macron's nervous Napoleonic statements.
	Moscow has reacted to a recent statement from French President Macron, who declared Russia a threat to Europe, and raised the issue of nuclear weapons.
	Russian officials sharply criticized the French leader, calling his words treacherous.
	Here's Lavrov, the most experienced diplomat in the world today.
	Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov.
	Describe Macron's statements on Ukraine and Russia as nervous, according to TASS. Macron, as I understand it, made a rather lengthy and quite nervous statement yesterday, saying the war must not end with Ukraine's surrender.
	According to the head of Russian Foreign Ministry, there's a great distance between the strategic defeat of Russia and Ukraine's surrender.
	He emphasized they had found the strength to bridge this gap.
	Well, needless to say, Ukraine ought to surrender.
	Russia has achieved massive territorial gains, including Crimea, the Donbass, a host of other territories.
	And, of course, the demands are going to—they have killed over a million Ukrainian soldiers.
	To roughly 100,000-150,000 Russians, they have superiority in weapons.
	Trump has now, by virtue of the fiasco with Zelensky in the Oval Office, cut off aid to Ukraine, cut off funding, sending any more materials, and even intel.
	But there's reason to believe someone may be contradicting that intel directive, Drones to strike inside Russia would require their use, which, if everyone were following Trump's directive, would not take place, could not take place.
	Since it is taking place, it appears evident Trump's directive is not being fully implemented.
	This is unsurprising.
	There are all kinds of resistors in the...
	Deep State and the bureaucracy are resisting his every action.
	And of course, most of the Democratic Party is right there pitching.
	Meanwhile, you have a report.
	Europe marches to war?
	You can't Rance lead Coalition of the Willing in a Ukraine gamble.
	It's not going to play out well.
	They're talking about putting together a A vast financial gambit to continue the war with Ukraine.
	Here's a report from Defense Feeds.
	The war in Ukraine has entered a new dangerous phase.
	On March 2nd, 2025, British PM Kerr Starmer made a stunning announcement.
	The UK and France are spearheading a Western coalition of willing nations to deploy ground forces in Ukraine.
	The unrested move marks the most aggressive military intervention by Western powers since the conflict began, significantly escalating tensions with Russia.
	With NATO allies deeply divided over the wrist, the Western coalition decision raises a critical question.
	Are we on the brink of an all-out European conflict?
	There's more, too.
	Will British...
	Boots on the ground include recent immigrants?
	A reader asked me if Britain, France, and Germany may consider conscripting recent immigrants because they've declared they've got a vast $840 million fund they want to use to support all this, but it's going to require conscription or a draft.
	So are they going to draft recent immigrants to join the fight against Ivan, meaning Russia and Ukraine?
	The question reminded me of the famous area in Mozart's Marriage of Figaro in which the Count, Emma Viva, finds the lustful Cherubino hiding in Susanna's quarters on the spot.
	The Count commissions a boy for military service and sends him packing to a barracks outside of Seville.
	Figaro then mocks Cherubino with a song.
	Well...
	We're going to have a similar situation here.
	It turns out that even Macron doesn't seem to know what he's talking about because it turns out that France's own nuclear policies preclude the use of French nuclear weapons for any other purpose than to defend France.
	Therefore, it cannot serve as an umbrella.
	And when you look at the relative forces arrayed here, it's paltry.
	What the UK, France, and even Germany could put together.
	Very, very bad.
	So I think this is really a rather ridiculous situation for them to be making these barking sounds without having any bite.
	Danny, your thoughts?
	Well, sir, can you hear me okay?
	Yes, yes.
	Yeah, again, I'm just going to say this is...
	This is a proxy war to me.
	You know, people are needlessly being killed in this thing, you know.
	And the whole world can see these drones and stuff.
	And, you know, Macron, I don't know, I think he's kind of a puppet of the NATO regime, you know.
	And I don't really understand what's going on.
	I like Trump's approach, kind of on his side, which is trying to bring this thing to an end.
	And I can see that there are people there that are...
	Definitely resisting and want the war to continue, even in our own Congress.
	They just want a never-ending money to be spent there.
	They want never-ending weapons to go there.
	I mean, this thing could go on for, you know, another 10 years or so if we did that.
	You know, I also noticed a video the other day, sir, worth mentioning is there's a lot of North Korean soldiers that are on the Russian side, that are on the battlefield.
	And there's POW footage online.
	Some of them have been captured.
	So there's other, and I don't know who else is on the ground besides that.
	Maybe there's some other countries as well.
	But particularly, I think it's interesting to point out that North Korea is on the ground fighting for Russia.
	There's a lot of, like Trump said, there's a lot of death on both sides.
	And it just seems when you look at those drone footages, it seems to be needless that they're out in the middle of a field fighting each other.
	And we just keep funding it with all this money and all these weapons and stuff.
	And again, my opinion, this needs to come to an end.
	Well, the fact is, it appears to be a desperate effort by the Rothschilds to preserve Ukraine, where even Klaus Schwab, their spokesperson, has said that the new world order cannot go forward without Ukraine.
	Thus, if they don't have Ukraine, there's no new world order, which is one world government with the Rothschilds in charge.
	So I think that's what's happening here.
	It's a rearguard action.
	Russia is far too strong for them to succeed.
	And it's semi-hysterical.
	It can't work militarily.
	it's ridiculous politically, but it's a gesture out of desperation to try to salvage what appears to be a homeless situation.
	And of course, Trump has hinted at America even withdrawing from NATO.
	I declare that U.S. forces are no longer going to participate militarily in training ops, or I dare say any other ops with NATO.
	So I think the end of NATO is coming.
	Well, Trump is also talking about pulling 35,000 troops out of Germany.
	There's some suspicion he may be sending them to the Middle East.
	Now, in my view, the situations are dramatically different.
	Trump has a realistic appraisal of the war between Ukraine and Russia and is coming out on the right side.
	He wants friendly relations with Russia, economic development, believes...
	The two superpowers could make a colossal combination and bring great stability to the world in relation to the Middle East, however.
	He appears to be following the lead of Bibi the Butcher in the ongoing genocide of Palestinians, and we see it manifest on innumerable different fronts.
	Including the whole anti-Semitism campaign on which Pam Bondi and many others have weighed in, based upon the international Holocaust definition of anti-Semitism, which includes any criticism of Israel on any grounds whatsoever, which is, of course, an enormous expansion of the classic definition.
	Which would be discounting the worth or the value of a person because of their genetic origin or their ethnic legacy as Jews, which can be viewed as a form of racism and is deplorable.
	But frankly, on the college campuses today, I see no anti-Semitism in the proper narrow sense, but a tremendous amount of protests and criticism against Israel for the genocide.
	In which no protest could be more appropriate.
	Now, John Mearsheimer has been on with Judge Napolitano talking about Net Yahoo and how Trump appears to be following him virtually like an obedient dog.
	Let's take a look here as soon as we can, you know, check, get past.
	Here we go.
	He always gets his way.
	And in fact, whenever he's in political trouble in Israel, he flies to the United States and he meets either with the president or talks before Congress or does both.
	And he props up his standing in Israel and he lives to fight another day.
	So in terms of Netanyahu's dealings with the United States, he is in a win-win situation.
	And is the answer to my question the lobby?
	Why is Donald Trump, who is a man of peace and willing to frustrate the entire foreign policy establishment on Russia and Ukraine, simply going along, even doing more than Joe Biden, about which more in a moment, on Israel and Gaza?
	It's the lobby.
	I mean, the idea that the United States has a special relationship with Israel that has no parallel in recorded history tells you that something extraordinary is going on here.
	This is an unbelievable relationship.
	Israel is a country that is effectively a strategic albatross around our neck, number one.
	And number two, it is in the process of committing genocide in Gaza.
	Yet we support it unconditionally.
	The United States is a liberal democracy.
	For a liberal democracy to be supporting a state that behaves like this...
	Is truly remarkable.
	And again, we're not just supporting Israel.
	We give Israel unconditional support.
	And the question you want to ask yourself is, why is this the case?
	And the answer is clear.
	It's the Israel lobby.
	They basically have so much power in the United States that they get their way almost every time.
	So yesterday, Secretary of State Rubio, in my opinion, There's a statute that allows,
	as you know, that allows the Secretary of State to do that.
	When Tony Blinken did that, I accused him of perjury, and I accused false swearing under oath.
	I accused the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, of the same thing.
	What emergency?
	Is it a political emergency?
	What conceivable emergency is there that they don't have time to go to the Congress, which they know will give them whatever they ask for?
	I mean, there was no emergency, at least emergency involving Israel.
	But this kind of thing just happens all the time.
	I'd put it in a slightly different way.
	I think the dishonesty in our mainstream discourse about Israel is just off the charts.
	It's really hard to believe.
	The discourse that we engage in...
	Newspapers like the New York Times and especially the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal and the discourse that our politicians are involved in about Israel is almost laughable when you actually look at the facts and then compare the facts to what's being said.
	But this has been true for a long time, and there's no reason to think it's going to change.
	Commit genocide and receive financial aid from the United States in violation of two federal statutes.
	Not only can Israel have an atomic weapon without authority of the United Nations in violation of a treaty as well as a federal statute, Israel can benefit from secretaries of state lying about the immediacy of its need for all this.
	Gear and military equipment.
	All right, I get it.
	Is there an organized resistance to Israel in the Middle East?
	How to store and sort all your photos and videos in seconds.
	No computer knowledge required.
	This tiny device...
	No.
	I mean, there's no question that there are lots of countries in the Middle East that are deeply dissatisfied with what Israel is doing.
	But the Arab states have never organized in any meaningful way to stand up to Israel.
	And in a number of cases, they've thrown the Palestinians under the bus.
	To the extent that there is resistance, it involves Iran, it involves Hezbollah, and now it involves the Houthis.
	That is the real resistance here.
	It's had some effect, but not much effect in terms of stopping the genocide.
	What about Turkey and Egypt?
	Colonel McGovern seems to feel that both are under tremendous, the leadership of both are under tremendous pressure from their own people to do something militarily, particularly president slash general, I don't know if he's still a general or not, al-Sisi in Egypt.
	And Colonel McGovern, who's a former tank commander, says the Egyptians are amassing.
	Huge numbers of tanks in the Sinai.
	Does that tell you anything?
	Look, I think there's no question that in countries like Egypt and Jordan, more so than Turkey, but even in Turkey, there is tremendous pressure from down below on the leadership in those countries to do something about the genocide in Gaza.
	But the question you have to ask yourself is, do those countries have the military wherewithal to challenge Israel?
	And I think if you're talking about an armored battle involving Israeli tanks and aircraft up against Egyptian tanks and aircraft, that the Israelis would win easily, as they did in 1956, 1967, and 1973. Therefore, I find it hard to believe that the Egyptians would pick a fight with the Israelis.
	I don't think the Jordanians would under any circumstances.
	And I find it hard to believe that the Turks would either.
	The fact is that the Israelis pretty much have a free hand.
	And you want to remember that backing them up at every turn is the United States of America.
	So if they pick a fight with any one of those countries or any combination of those countries and they get into trouble...
	The United States will come racing to the rescue.
	I dare say, Danny, that in my judgment, Trump's attitude toward Gaza is a litmus test of his moral authority to serve as president of the United States.
	And frankly, right now he's failing the test.
	He's supporting the genocide.
	He came up with a bizarre plan to turn Gaza into the Riviera.
	Mediterranean by completing the ethnic cleansing, shipping all the Palestinians anywhere other than Israel.
	Echoing Mike Huckabee, our new ambassador to Israel's declaration that he's all for a Palestinian state as long as it's outside the borders of Israel.
	Trump's Stephen talked about shipping them off to Indonesia.
	This is so absurd.
	He's also threatened Hezbollah.
	With a terrible outbreak, if they don't release the hostages by last Friday, which they did not do, and I'm just glad to say we have not yet begun carpet bombing Gaza with B-52s.
	We'll be right back with Danny Zerus.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution
	Radio. Revolution Radio.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomStitch.com The People Station The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Danny, it's just embarrassing. - Yeah, Shane.
	Professor Mearsheim, of course, suggests Trump is completely under the control of the Israeli lobby.
	There may be more to it than that, but I find his support for genocide, his threats against Hamas and the Palestinians, and now against Iran, completely unacceptable, unprofessional.
	Violations of the role of diplomacy, even violations of international law by threatening mass killing and attacks.
	I mean, this is, in my opinion, unconscionable.
	So as strong a supporter of Trump as I have been, having voted for him now three times with a great deal of enthusiasm, I'm profoundly troubled.
	By his attitude toward Israel and Gaza and that he's going to fail this ultimate ethical litmus test.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, sir, I'm going to start by saying I support Trump as well.
	I like a lot of things that he's been doing.
	Frankly, I don't understand this Israel support never ending.
	I often wonder, what does Israel have on the United States that they have this kind of control?
	You know, we have so many dual Israeli citizens that are in our bureaucracy.
	They have dual citizenship in the United States and Israel, which is very troubling that they can be in our government with that.
	And what exactly is the control that they have that gets this?
	Is it blackmail?
	Is it 9-11, the truth?
	Like Netanyahu is going to broadcast to the world the truth that me and you have covered a million times and make it official and they don't want that.
	What exactly is the blackmail that gets us to go along with this stuff and I understand Trump not wanting the war over there, and he wants to put an end to it.
	And I understand that.
	And it's a really tough situation where Palestine is located in Israel, in that little Gaza Strip, you know, and they're constantly, Hamas have been lobbing missiles over the fence at Israel.
	I mean, that would go on, that battle's going to go on for another hundred years.
	It's never going to end.
	Personally, I think about it, sir, a little deeper than that.
	I'm thinking if you're a Palestinian, And you were born in that little area or you lived there.
	You know, it's not like you can just leave whenever you want and go on vacation and prosper.
	You know, what kind of a career or job could you hope for living in that little area?
	What kind of a life would that be?
	You know, I would want to get out of there and go somewhere else in the world where I could prosper.
	I would not want to be a part of that whole situation whatsoever.
	And I think it's a good idea that they leave and go start a new life somewhere else and get out of there and not be part of that constant violence and the shooting and the bombings and be under that Hamas thumb all the time.
	You know, and I'd like to see a solution and like to see it end.
	There's no doubt about it.
	I wish that Netanyahu could have sent in a bunch of buses.
	And everybody just got on the bus and left and they didn't have to drop the bombs and all that stuff and all this endless killing.
	You know, rather than seeing what we're seeing now.
	But I'd like to get out of it.
	I'd like to see it end.
	And I think Trump wants to end it.
	But it's a very confusing state that he is supporting Netanyahu no matter what he wants to do.
	You know, he's been quoted several times as telling Netanyahu, hurry up and finish this.
	You know, get it over with already.
	You know, but this new state of Iran and everything else that's going on, you know, the other day, they cut the water off for Palestine, according to the report.
	They cut off the desalinization, yeah, so they can't convert salt water into drinkable water.
	Yeah, they cut the power.
	You know, you can't, if you're a Palestinian, sir, and I'm just generally talking, you can't live your life like that.
	Imagine in a town, if you're from the United States, we don't have that.
	But imagine if you take a small town somewhere in the United States that's on the border of the ocean, whether it's Texas, California, wherever, and you cordon off a little area there with a fence, and then a bunch of Hamas, Muslims, whatever they are, they take it over and they say, you know, this is a new country, this is ours.
	And, you know, other countries supply them weapons through the ocean under their little strip, and they're constantly lobbing rockets over the fence into the U.S. cities, you know what I mean?
	I didn't know if something like that was to happen in the United States.
	I mean, we would bulldoze that thing flat in the ground.
	It would never take hold at all.
	And, you know, it happened way before my time, Palestine started.
	But, I mean, it's just, it's been going on too long.
	I don't know.
	If I was a Palestinian, I'd want to get the hell out of there.
	If I had a family, move them and go start somewhere else.
	I'd just be tired of living my life on this little strip.
	But Danny, that's the whole issue.
	This is Palestinian land.
	The Israelis have no right to it.
	They're an occupying force.
	They have violated all their obligations as an occupying force.
	To the population under their control.
	The International Court of Justice, in response to a petition from South Africa, reviewed the legal history and discovered there is no entitlement under law for the existence of the State of Israel.
	Why should the Palestinians give up their land, their homes, for the sake of intruders who are in effect?
	Stealing their land.
	I mean, Danny, just because you were being harassed in your home, would you say, well, what I ought to do is get on a bus and move somewhere else?
	And where the hell would you move and how could you justify doing it?
	Let me continue, by the way, with John Mearsheimer.
	He has more observations that are of great value.
	Do you think maybe the kerfuffle in the Oval Office on Friday between the president?
	And his vice president and President Zelensky might have sent a message to Prime Minister Netanyahu?
	Not at all.
	Not at all.
	I'm sure that Netanyahu is fully confident that he can manipulate the Trump administration in all sorts of ways and prevail over them.
	There may be some cases where there are domestic political forces inside of Israel.
	That combined with some pressure from the United States to get Israel to do what it doesn't want to do.
	I think this explains why Israel agreed to the ceasefire with the Palestinians that took place on January 19th of this year.
	You want to remember that Steve Witkoff went over there and told Netanyahu that President Trump wanted a ceasefire by the time he was inaugurated, which, of course, was on January 20th.
	But the only reason Whitcock was successful was because the IDF, the Israeli military, desperately wanted a ceasefire, as did some other forces in Israel, and they were putting pressure on Netanyahu.
	So there you had the combination of pressure from President-elect Trump at the time and from down below.
	In Israeli society to cause Netanyahu to accept the ceasefire.
	Why does the donor class still have a hold on Donald Trump?
	He can't run for re-election.
	He doesn't need them anymore.
	Well, the fact is that he has a broad agenda.
	Basically, four years left as president.
	He has to worry about midterm elections.
	And he doesn't want to challenge the lobby this early in his presidency, because it will just lead to one headache after another.
	The lobby is incredibly powerful.
	They put their gun sights.
	On Trump, it will cause him enormous trouble moving forward.
	And he has enough other problems without having to pick a fight with the lobby.
	So he'll just go along with Israel.
	I think that's just a wonderful summation.
	And there's so many other troubling aspects of what's going on in the Middle East.
	On the other hand, I really truly believe that the situation in Ukraine is basically resolved, that we're seeing the last desperate gasp of dying European support for a war with Russia, which they could not possibly win, where Russia would prevail.
	Putin actually gave a speech in response to all these efforts.
	You know, he anticipated his...
	Intel is so good.
	Russian intel services are so good.
	Putin knew this was coming, and he said, look, if you think you can pull this off by attacking Russia, just know our response will be lightning fast and devastating that what we have done in Ukraine is because historically Ukraine is a part of Russia, that many Russians live there, and they're doing their best to preserve their lives.
	But that the situation with regard to European attack on Russia by UK, France, Germany would be met with a wholly different type of response.
	It would be apocalyptic in that the world might end, but Russia will not fall.
	He means those words, Danny.
	Your thoughts summing up?
	Well, sir, you know, it's very troubling.
	I see Trump is trying to put an end to this Ukraine.
	I like the way he's pulling out all the support.
	He's stopping the weapons flow, you know, and he wants it over.
	And he says he wants the killing and all that stuff to stop, and I'm totally 100% for it.
	I like the way he's telling NATO no, and I'd love to see us pull out of NATO.
	That's a big, huge mess, a big waste of money.
	And you're saber-rattling, saying they're going to continue.
	I mean, the guy from Europe said the other day they can't do it without U.S. support, and they're not going to be able to do it either.
	So I think Trump's going to be successful in ending this thing and getting a solution to Ukraine.
	And maybe that professor's right.
	Maybe later on in his presidency, he's got a plan to tackle the...
	The stuff going on in Israel, one thing at a time, you know?
	I don't know what his overall master plan is, but, you know, he's done some things so masterfully so far, except for the Israel thing.
	You know, I don't know what his plan is.
	I'd love to sit down with him and ask him overall what his plan is, you know, over playing some golf or something like that.
	You know, that's probably the only way we're going to know about it.
	But the way he's handling Indian and Ukraine, he's got his own method.
	It seems to be working.
	It seems to be coming it down.
	It seems like he's getting ready to bring everybody to the table and put an end to it like he said he was going to.
	And you know what?
	I'm just watching him like you, sir.
	And so far it seems to be slowing down.
	And let's just hope that it works.
	I think he will be successful in one way or another.
	Well, Danny, let me just add.
	I want Trump to succeed.
	The question becomes is...
	America first.
	Patriotism.
	Nationalism is going to prevail, or is it going to be Israel first?
	And the neocon agenda, which is very much driven by Netanyahu, who turns out to have more political lives than a cat.
	I think in very short order, we're going to see how this plays out in the Middle East, and I'm just sorry to say I'm not at all expecting to be happy with the outcome.
	Now, Danny, you and your astute mind have observed that we've had a lot of plane crashes and that there are anomalies associated with these plane crashes that they don't all look to be on the up and up.
	Could you give me a little background as to how you tripped over this and what got you thinking about it?
	As we proceed, I've got the first one set up for us to watch.
	What?
	WTF, what is going on?
	87 plane crashes and it's only February?
	Vampires?
	Cashing social security checks?
	Yeah, that's just a bad must, discovering that people who are, you know, in excess of 100 years old or even 200 years old are getting social security checks.
	I think there's one that's reported to be as old as 360. Danny.
	Yeah, it's funny.
	I sent you that comedian, Terrence, that pretended to be the 360-year-old man.
	I thought that was pretty funny.
	He dressed up like in a costume when he was coughing, and he's like, tell him Trump to keep sending him, don't attack my, Elon, don't attack my social security check.
	Yeah, he was falling asleep in a chair.
	I don't know if you saw that, but it makes me see, you know, that was pretty funny.
	Yeah, that's...
	That's definitely, this plane crash thing, sir, is really, you know, I've been trying to watch it as close as I can.
	And it reminds me of a lot of fake plane crashes that they've staged, you know.
	A lot of people just watch the news for a few minutes and they don't have time to look into these things.
	But I'm just going to quote one I think we're going to cover today, and that's the Asiana 214 crash in 2013 in San Francisco.
	You know, it turns out, sir, and we're going to watch this, and I want to take that out of the bag, but we have a video.
	We're going to show that this was all done with CGI and a prop that they laid on the ground afterward, and it really, there was no plane crash at all.
	And as a matter of fact, even the media was involved in this, and we have video of that where they name the pilots over the air, and when you hear it now, you can see the absurdity of the fake pilot names that they read out.
	After I discovered that back then, and I was still busy working at the time, but when I discovered that, I was thinking to myself, why would they stage a plane crash?
	Why do they want people to think that a plane crashed at a busy airport when it really did not happen?
	Why would they go through that effort?
	And it's obviously some sort of a distraction they wanted to put on the news.
	They wanted to create a narrative back then that planes were crashing.
	I don't know if they wanted to put a chill effect on the travel at the time.
	I'm not sure exactly what their objective was at that time to actually put it on.
	But the fact is, sir, they put it on.
	And, you know, they got caught dead to rights doing it, and they don't care that they get caught doing these things.
	And when I looked at this latest crash in Toronto, there's a couple of videos out there that kind of show...
	The shell or the carcass after the fact was sort of used in another event, and we're going to cover that.
	And I'm like, what the heck is going on here?
	You know what?
	Did this really happen?
	Was it CGI? There's some strange anomalies, there's no doubt, sir, that are happening in these plane crashes.
	Are they trying to send Trump a message?
	I'm not sure exactly what's going on.
	So have fake plane crashes replaced?
	Fake school shootings, Danny?
	I mean, is this a new method of insulting American people and deceiving us?
	Very strange.
	Shall we begin with this video here?
	Yeah, sure.
	Go ahead, sir.
	I'm not sure what video it is.
	Here it is.
	It's coming in.
	Do you see it?
	Oop, oop, oop, oop.
	Your screen appears to be frozen.
	It's kind of stuck on a web page like you were trying to...
	Do you see it now, Danny?
	Do you see it now?
	No.
	Something's wrong with your...
	No, I'm seeing it, Danny.
	It's a plane coming in.
	And it's going down.
	And then this one is going to flip over.
	There it goes.
	Wings over.
	You know the video's awfully well.
	Here we have bringing equipment out and the plane's upside down, Danny.
	I'm troubled you're not able to see it.
	Something, sir, we're having a technical glitch here because you can see it on your screen.
	It's just not broadcasting out.
	It's frozen on our side.
	I don't know if you can refresh or whatever, but it looks like the screen is frozen.
	I can see you on our call, but the screen share, whatever, appears to be frozen at the time.
	Well, Danny, I'm pretty sure it's being recorded.
	Can you talk about it?
	You know it so well.
	I can just talk.
	Were you showing the San Francisco crash, or were you showing one of the crashes in Toronto?
	I don't know.
	Which one were you showing?
	It's the one where the plane comes in, and then it flips upside down.
	Yeah, that particular one is the San Francisco one.
	So, unfortunately, since we're having a glitch here for the viewers, I can just kind of walk you through it.
	So, there's an Asiana flight coming in into San Francisco in 2013. I think it was October 6th, I believe, was the date.
	And you can Google the event.
	It comes up, Asiana 214. And this plane supposedly comes in short.
	And it lands in San Francisco.
	And, you know, everything looks normal.
	Two people survived that crash.
	And while Trudeau was getting slammed for posting about hockey instead of this...
	Let me go back and redo it again.
	Is it possible you can see it now?
	Here it comes in, Danny.
	Here comes the sound.
	Oh no, no, no, no, no.
	Another plane belonging to a US airline crashed in Canada, creating panic and confusion while raising even more questions about our seemingly crumbling aviation industry.
	So this is a Toronto.
	- Get everything, drop it.
	Come on.
	- Take the video. - Don't take your video. - Don't take that phone away. - Don't. - Don't. - Holy.
	Holy. - My plane crashed.
	I'm upside down We just landed Our plane crashed.
	Delta.
	It's upside down.
	Fire department's on site.
	As you can see, it's a miracle that more people didn't get hurt because this could have easily turned out like what happened in South Korea.
	A new report is revealing more about what may have caused a Jeju airline flight to crash in South Korea in December.
	Only two people survived that crash.
	And while Trudeau was getting slammed for posting about hockey instead of this crash, NBC decided to blame Donald Trump for a crash that took place in Canada.
	Maybe staff at the FAA as a part of President Trump's effort to trim down the federal workforce.
	And yet, as you also know, the FAA has been complaining for years that they are understaffed in critical job positions, especially air traffic control.
	Folks, I think at this point it's pretty clear that there is something very, very wrong with our whole aviation industry.
	But let me just show you the people who have at least tried to look into this problem.
	Boeing has not provided us with the documents and information that we have requested numerous times over the past few months.
	Specifically with respect to opening, closing, and removal of the door and the team that does that work at the Renton facility.
	Wow.
	Are you telling us that even two months later you still do not know who actually opened the door plug?
	Well, I will say that is utterly unacceptable.
	And the parties who are being investigated by NTSB need to cooperate fully.
	And Congress expects them to cooperate fully because you have an obligation to the American public to get to the bottom of what happened.
	Last I checked, Ted Cruz was a Republican.
	And he isn't even the only GOP senator who has tried to go after this greed-infested industry.
	Just listen to how Josh Howley slammed industry executives for their borderline criminal practices.
	You guys do appreciate that flying on your airlines is a disaster, don't you?
	I'm slightly amazed by the general attitude of all of you.
	Flying on your airlines is horrible.
	It's a terrible experience.
	I mean, I say this as a father of three young children, but I can't tell you, nobody enjoys flying on your airlines.
	It's a disaster.
	You charge people fees that they know nothing about.
	You harass them to death.
	I'll never forget, Mr. Johnson, during COVID when an attendant on your airline threatened my wife because our then five-year-old son, his mask had slipped.
	This is back when we all had to wear those ridiculous masks.
	His mask had slipped below his nose.
	This flight attendant came up to my wife and said, if she didn't keep that mask over his nose at all points on this four-hour flight, she would personally see that my wife was banned from flying.
	This has happened over and over to families.
	It's terrible.
	It's absolutely terrible.
	And your attitude here today seems to be, well, the devil may care.
	There's nothing we can do about it.
	Well, I think we are going to do something about it.
	But despite all these efforts, I would still remind you that companies like Boeing have been accused of serious crimes by whistleblowers, and yet there has not been a serious investigation conducted by either party.
	Boeing routinely states that their airplanes meet or exceed all safety standards.
	This is untrue.
	And misrepresents the safety of the airplanes.
	The company illegally removed thousands of quality control inspections on individual airplanes without the FAA's knowledge and without the knowledge of the airlines.
	Although many of these inspections have been reinstated, hundreds of airplanes have left Boeing factories without those thousands of inspections.
	My last point is the Department of Justice and FBI relied on the slanted results of the first accident investigation to develop an illegal and unjust This is Muslim.
	A simple, beautiful tea infuser designed to change where you brew and drink.
	...deferred prosecution agreement.
	The NTSB chair reiterated to Congress last week that Boeing has said there are no records documenting the removal of the Alaska Airlines door.
	I'm not going to sugarcoat this.
	This is a criminal cover-up.
	Records do in fact exist.
	I know this because I've personally passed them to the FBI. I mean, if Donald Trump and his administration are really all about transparency and bringing people to justice, I think they should tell us how those whistleblowers really died.
	No way, it gets so much worse.
	John Barnett had been working for Boeing for 32 years until his retirement in 2017. In the days before his death, he had been giving evidence in a whistleblower lawsuit against the company.
	The 62-year-old had died from a self-inflicted wound.
	No, no, it gets worse.
	Worked for Boeing for 32 years as a quality manager in the North Charleston plant.
	In 2019, he told BBC that workers had deliberately been fitting substandard parts to aircraft on the production line.
	He also told BBC that the workers had failed to follow procedures, that substandard parts had been removed from scrap bins and fitted to planes that were built to prevent delays.
	And they should also investigate why all of a sudden we're seeing more and more plane crashes.
	I mean, 87 aviation accidents have already been recorded across the US this year and we're only in the third week of February.
	This is absolutely insane and we need to know what's going on.
	And speaking of insane things, Elon Musk gave people quite a scare when he made this tweet about Fort Knox.
	This gold is the property of- The American people.
	I sure hope it's still there.
	It scared people.
	It was according to me.
	I'm stiff there.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This Is A Drill, This Is A Drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tomb.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself.
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do.
	And we must fight back.
	We must fight back.
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	RevolutionRadioFreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution!
	Radio.
	Radio.
	- Oh, bring it up, bring it up, bring it up, bring it up, bring it up. - It is no secret that the so-called mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda,
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
	And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10pm Eastern and learn why.
	The Story Behind the Story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing Unparalleled Broadcasting Excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
	100% listener-supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Danny, I'm sorry you can't see the screen.
	I know what happened.
	I brought you in via Zoom, and I'm actually recording via Skype videos.
	I'm sorry about that.
	But look, we're talking about...
	It's working now, sir.
	It is working.
	You managed to fix it.
	The last part we were able to see just fine.
	Oh, wow.
	Okay, well, let me drop, you know, replay the landing here.
	This is the Toronto crash.
	Here's a plane coming in.
	And then a plane flips upside.
	A plane belonging to a U.S. airline crashed in Canada, creating panic and confusion while raising even more questions about our seemingly crumbling aviation industry.
	Wow, one after another, Danny.
	Give everything, drop it.
	Come on.
	Take the video.
	Now that looks...
	That looks artificial.
	Tell us, Danny, what's going on here?
	Well, sir, a lot of the experts are saying that this is CGI video that we're looking at and that this is a Hollywood prop sitting on the ground.
	And I'd like to point out some things.
	That we like to talk about on your show, which is mainly the truth, you know?
	We see the fire break out in the CGI video or the video of the crash.
	It's really interesting as it comes in.
	The perspective is there's a co-pilot in a Learjet that happened to flip on his camera.
	You know, there's hundreds of landings all the time when you're holding short, ready to take off.
	But he happened to have the camera out the window at that exact moment when that...
	Plane happened to land and he caught it.
	I mean, does he film every single plane that lands all the time when they're flying?
	I mean, what are the odds that he happened to be filming it like that?
	And then when we see it flip over, you know, we see the fire.
	It rips the wing off.
	And quite often when planes crash, the wing doesn't come off.
	I mean, those wings are so strong.
	If this wing comes off, we see this horrendous fire.
	But then in this next scene, sir, all of a sudden the fire's gone.
	Just like the fire's out.
	How can the fire have gone out and there's no flames all over the place and people are just calm inside in this plane and they're getting out and nobody's hurt, nobody's injured, you know what I mean?
	It's just, you'd be screaming going on and all kinds of stuff.
	It looks to me, sir, like a bunch of actors in the state prop.
	I mean, if you look at it over and over again.
	It doesn't look real whatsoever.
	And when they get out under the snow, there's no flame.
	There's one truck squirting a little bit of frozen water on the flame, but there's no...
	What happened to the flames?
	How could the flames go out that fast after the crash when these people are getting out of a hole, getting out of the plane, sir?
	It looks completely fake and staged.
	I mean, I don't know what you think, but the more I watch it, it just...
	It doesn't look right.
	And then they share the same fuselage.
	That they're getting out of.
	I sent you the video clip on it.
	I think it's attached.
	Or you can see it in another plane crash where people are getting out of it.
	The same mucilage!
	Oh, Danny, that's so wonderful.
	Yeah, it's the same product.
	You know what I mean?
	So, is this just a CGI fake that we're watching that they've played on the news?
	And, you know, we all know all the anomaly, all the events that they've done that before.
	It just, there's too many things, sir, when you break this video down of the crash and the people getting out.
	There's no flames.
	There's no fire.
	Nobody seems to be injured after a rollover like that.
	You know, people walking on the ceiling.
	Danny, I got here a pilot talking about the Delta crash in Toronto.
	What is going on?
	That is the consensus right now in the aviation industry.
	And I completely agree.
	I have no idea how these string of events keep happening, but this is quite actually surreal looking at this incident today that happened in Toronto.
	So let's get into it and talk about it.
	Real quick, my name is Gary.
	Welcome to the channel if you're new.
	I'm an airline pilot.
	I've been doing that for 18 years.
	I have four different type ratings, including that upside-down jet CRJ, which is known in the CL-65.
	And I think that will give me a little unique insight later in this video of my opinion of what happened.
	But let's get into it and talk about it.
	So obviously, you've probably seen by now that this was a CRJ-900 Delta flight coming in from Minneapolis to Toronto and somehow ended upside down.
	Now, I'm in a face group.
	Facebook group with the rest of pilots at my company.
	And the first thing everybody kept saying is, what in the world?
	We've never seen, at least that I don't remember ever seeing, a plane that's been upside down like this.
	I mean, it looks right out of a movie set.
	So we're going to talk about what happened.
	We're going to review the weather.
	We're going to go over the passenger do's and don'ts based on what I've already seen.
	And again, I'm not trying to scold here.
	I'm just trying to educate.
	OK, that's it.
	I'm not trying to put anybody down.
	I'm not trying to talk down.
	I'm just saying, look, next time may save a life.
	OK, so that's it.
	And then the media is misinformation like this is just I can't.
	I mean, I can't.
	I turn on CNN for a second and I hear the I wrote it down here.
	I'll tell you in a second.
	I hear the dumbest statement I've probably ever heard.
	And I'm like, these are the so-called experts.
	So I'm going to give you the source from somebody that's actually in the industry that does this.
	It's frustrating when you know what you're talking about and you hear other people on TV spewing absolute nonsense.
	And at least that way I can kind of counter the news's misinformation.
	We got a newly uncovered video that kind of goes exactly what I was thinking.
	Didn't even get a chance to really form an opinion, but that will kind of show my opinion of maybe what happened.
	If you get value in this video, I always forget to ask to like and subscribe.
	So if you don't mind, if you're getting value in this video, hit the like button and consider subscribing.
	All right, let's get into this.
	And I'll have to apologize in advance.
	I'm just getting over a sickness.
	I don't know if it's a norovirus or what I got, but it's been lingering.
	And so my throat might be a little off, but I'll do my best.
	Okay, so first off, let's review the weather.
	All right, I did this decoded for you.
	I don't want to do it raw.
	That's like...
	For somebody that doesn't know, like reading The Matrix, so this is decoded.
	But really, the two important things here that we need to focus on is the wind and that blowing snow.
	Those are the two things.
	Visibility and the rest of that I don't think has much of a difference at all.
	But this was the weather right about the time of the incident.
	And the winds, they were landing 2-3 from everything that I read.
	Can't confirm that yet, especially because it's the news.
	It was 270, so the winds were at 270 at 27 gusting to 3.5.
	Now, the wind is the direction, so that means 270, that means it's coming straight from the west.
	If the runway is 23, that's 40 degrees off, if that makes sense to you.
	And 27 gusting to 3.5, that's fairly significant.
	I mean, you're not quite hitting your max crosswind because of the angle, but remember, these METARs...
	And these, you know, the ATIS that comes out, they usually update every hour.
	So, at that time...
	Now, Danny, tell me if you want me to leap forward or whatever.
	So, all of a sudden, it could have sloshed over and exceeded the mass.
	Well, we'll get...
	I'd like to point out, sir, that was really interesting.
	Every time I watch these clips, I see something different.
	But just a few seconds back, they showed the inside with a few slosh.
	And if you look at that flight attendant in there, sir, she was actually smiling.
	I don't know if you caught that or not, but she had a smile on her face, like somebody said, action, and they started to go out.
	And it's very clear.
	She's smiling.
	She's in an upside-down plane, and it looks like she's getting ready to start her job or whatever.
	She had a big smile on her face.
	And I don't think anybody would be smiling after a plane crash.
	How bad is that, Danny?
	That's a great catch.
	I'm not quite sure what it is.
	I don't care what anybody says.
	She was smiling.
	I just saw it.
	It was very clear.
	You just showed it.
	And, you know, to me, sir, there's another clip that was attached to that email also as an attachment.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I've got it.
	I've got it.
	The same fuselage, sir, was used in another crash.
	Okay.
	It's exactly the same thing with the gear up.
	It's the same fuselage, whatever it is.
	I'll pull it up, Danny.
	Yeah, it's upside down, and it's been used before.
	So this guy here, he gives a pretty good report.
	He's an airline pilot, so he flies the plane.
	He's type rated, and he's got hours in that plane.
	And right away, he said, this looks like something out of a Hollywood movie set.
	That's exactly what it is, the sound of a Hollywood movie.
	Get into that in a second.
	35 knots.
	Excellent, Danny.
	Excellent.
	I happen to be watching CNN, and I took this dope down right here.
	This is some of the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen.
	This is just one example.
	Okay, I couldn't even write down everything quick enough, but there was this lady named Mary Schiavo, I believe it is, on CNN. And she said, and I'm paraphrasing here, right, because I just took a quick note.
	I didn't record it.
	She said, once pilots pass a certain point, they must continue.
	Okay, that's just one example of some of the crazy stuff I've heard today.
	But let me assure you, That statement is 100% false.
	There's not even a way to distort that as like, oh, maybe you could kind of see it that way.
	No, there is never a point where pilots pass a certain point where they must continue.
	Matter of fact, in a bounce landing situation, that means you go to touchdown on the runway, right?
	And you happen to have too much energy or whatever reason, but you bounce up.
	It is mandatory that you go around.
	So just think about that for a second.
	You can come all the way in, touchdown on the runway.
	And then still fly off because that's actually the required route.
	So at what point is she talking about that you're required that you must continue?
	Like, as I said, it's just frustrating watching that as somebody that does this for a living.
	Let's go over the passengers' do's and don'ts.
	So let's watch this video real quickly, at least the first part.
	She is smiling.
	She is smiling, sir.
	Yeah, I saw it.
	Holy fuck.
	Oh.
	Holy.
	Okay, look.
	No fling.
	I'll say it again.
	I'm not trying to scold anybody.
	This is simply educational.
	If you ever find yourself in the rare, and I do mean rare situation, that you're in a situation like this evacuating, do not bring your bags.
	You hear the flight attendant there yelling, drop it, drop it, drop it.
	She's probably talking to the guy filming this with his phone.
	I understand you may want, you know, get some TikTok clout or whatever, but trust me when I say this is not worth it to film.
	I mean, you should be in the zone trying to get out, and I cannot explain to you that seconds in stuff like this, right, in an evacuation like this, where you don't know what's going on, this plane could have blown up, there could have been still fires going, there may well be fires, like in this video, if you keep watching here.
	Somebody's already spraying fire on top.
	So there could have been a fire here going on.
	You don't know what should happen, right?
	Seconds could mean the difference between life and death.
	Do you really want to be the person that held up and got somebody killed?
	Especially imagine a young kid in the back that got held up and it was a difference between literally an explosion and it was the second difference.
	I'm just saying, do not film.
	Get your ass out.
	Drop your bags.
	In my opinion, even a purse, anything, if it's not worth a life, do not take it.
	If it's not already in your pocket, don't take it.
	Hands-free.
	You may need to be grabbing.
	You can see this plane is upside down.
	This is not a usual day of an evacuation, right?
	Let's say evacuations are usual anyways.
	But let's think about this.
	It's upside down.
	You need both hands-free.
	And unless you're wearing those Ray-Ban glasses with the cameras in them, you should not be filming.
	And then even when you get outside, it's my opinion, you should be helping your fellow citizen get out there and get those people away from the plane.
	You got to realize here, that flight attendant there, we, flight attendants and pilots will risk their lives to make sure that plane gets evacuated.
	Just as an example, on the 777, if we have three pilots on the flight and there's two aisles, one pilot goes outside to help get people away.
	The other two pilots go down the aisles.
	And we'll go as far down as we can.
	And you know what we're doing?
	We're looking for little kids because that's the first thing that happens is little kids go underneath the chairs and they hide down in the seats and they get scared if they get separated from their parents.
	We're looking for kids underneath that seat and we will walk as far as we can to a fire as far as close as we can get and then to evacuate everybody else.
	So my point is, again, I'm not trying to scold.
	I'm saying don't bring your bags.
	Don't film.
	Help out and be a human being and help people get out of there.
	Educational, right?
	Future learning.
	An ounce of prevention better than a pound of a cure, right?
	All right, so let's watch.
	Now, the first thing I saw when I saw this, right, before I saw the video that I'm about to show you, this is insane.
	The whole wing is gone.
	I'm like, first off, how did this thing flip over?
	Secondly, it's the wing.
	I mean, do you understand the force that it takes to rip the wing off?
	And I mean, this whole thing looks like out of a movie scene.
	You know, we got another guy over here to the left filming.
	Like, I get it that that's a natural instinct.
	But come on, I'm hoping that if somebody watches this video and they end up in a situation like that, hopefully you never do, is that you're out there helping people instead of trying to film.
	And, you know, you can get plenty of pictures later.
	Yeah, this whole thing looks out of a movie set.
	So initially, what I saw people saying is...
	Oh, it must have been going very slow speed and, you know, flipped, rolled over, and they were trying to make a turn, and they flipped.
	And I didn't buy that for a couple reasons.
	One, that doesn't explain...
	You got to understand, with the wings out like that, for this plane to tip over, I just...
	That is a very hard thing.
	Secondly, the wing is gone.
	It was my opinion that that plane had to be moving so fast that that ring ripped off.
	And sure enough...
	Let's get to the actual video that we have, allegedly, of the crash.
	Here, let me go ahead and play this.
	So, as I'm watching in here, there's the right wing, so I do believe this is the correct video.
	Now, we're going to watch it again in slow motion.
	And as it drops...
	Danny, I don't even think that's the same plane.
	Notice this plane has two jets in the back.
	Look at the tail there.
	It's not the same tail.
	It's not the same plane.
	This is two different crashes, Danny.
	And as they were trying to land, it appears to me that the airplane stalled right before and dropped out really hard.
	Now, that's not the best video, and the quality is not that great.
	But, you know, that was one of my thoughts, is that when I saw this plane flipped over, I go, maybe the gear collapsed.
	You know, the CRJ, when I was a sim instructor teaching this plane, one of the simulations you can do...
	Right after you touch down, one of the main gears collapses.
	But it doesn't flip over.
	It just drops and skids off the runway.
	It's very hard to control.
	I think what happened here is they came in and these winds were factoring in.
	And you could have got some wind shear, some type of change.
	And it looked like the plane stalled to me, dropped out far enough to hit hard.
	And, you know, I think the wingtip could have caught something on the side or the snowbank or something like that and flipped over.
	And that's what happened.
	You know, at least in my opinion.
	Danny, I think this whole thing is bullshit.
	I think when he said it looked like a movie, he got it right.
	I don't see even those two different crashes don't seem to me to be of the same plane.
	Do you have an opinion about that?
	Yeah, it doesn't, sir.
	He keeps saying that.
	Because he's trying to be professional because he is a pilot.
	So his mind is trying to make sense based on his experience.
	And me and you don't have his experience, see?
	So he's recalling from memory all of his landings and his scenarios on how could this happen.
	Well, sir, it can't happen based on what he's seeing because the plane flipped over, the wing would not rip off, it would cartwheel.
	And there'd be a fire, sir.
	There'd be a massive fire.
	That thing would have broken into a million pieces for the ring to break off.
	And everybody in there is fine.
	And you notice some people are carrying their bags out of the hole and filming, sir.
	Like, it's ridiculous.
	Who has the time to turn on their cell phone when you just did it in a rollover crash?
	Think about it.
	It's on fire.
	And the fire's out.
	Danny, here's this other video you wanted me to show.
	I think it's meaning the same prop plane.
	Let's see what happens here.
	Very short.
	We have a few questions.
	We can't see the video yet.
	We hear it.
	Why does it look so suspiciously similar?
	Why does it look so suspiciously similar?
	It's very similar.
	Maybe you can refresh it.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Let me see what I can do, Danny.
	Let me see what I can do.
	Yeah, we got sound on it.
	There's a clip I sent you that was attached.
	This is it.
	You can see the fuselage in another crash.
	Try to play that again, sir.
	Danny, I am playing it again.
	Danny, there.
	Yes!
	Yes, that does look like the same fuselage, Danny.
	It sure as hell does.
	It does, doesn't it?
	We can't see it, sir, but I'm glad you can see it.
	And maybe you can screen share or your screen share is locked up again.
	But it's the same fuselage with the same gear sticking up, the front gear sticking up.
	Everything is exactly the same.
	And it appears to be like a Hollywood set.
	And hopefully we're going to get to the San Francisco, the Asiana crash, because I sent you a bit shoot of that.
	Yeah.
	It's still up.
	I found it on bit shoot.
	And, you know, sir, I'm just pointing out that he's trying to use his memory on how could any of these things that he's seeing happen.
	You know, and I'm telling you, sir, they couldn't happen.
	But he's trying to make it sense and saying, this is right out of a Hollywood set.
	How could this happen?
	He's even saying, I don't understand how this ring could have.
	Well, if it didn't really happen and they took a Hollywood set and put it upside down and put some actors in it and said action, that's how it could happen, sir.
	It could happen if they used CGI video and fake the whole thing.
	It could happen if they used two different planes.
	One, we see one plane coming in from one pilot.
	We see another angle and the plane looks different.
	It even has some different colors on it.
	So if it didn't really happen, because it was CGI, and it was a Hollywood set that they put upside down on the tarmac and sprayed some water on it, right, with no fire, by the way, and they had some actors climbing out with their bags, right?
	So who's in a rollover accident like that, sir, at that high speed, and doesn't try to exit the plane, but they get their bags and have enough time to have their cell phone out and be filming, and have the, you see that guy walk out.
	Here's a San Francisco, Danny.
	Here's a San Francisco crash.
	Let's see what we got here.
	There must be an audio here.
	Ew, look at that, man.
	That's flipping around in the water, Danny.
	Again, we can't see it.
	If you can see it, it says you ended the screen sharing for some reason, so your software must be glitched because the screen sharing is not working on the software.
	Yeah, those are fake names, Danny.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	Wow!
	Sir, if you could, I'm sorry, we have to have a little fun today, but read those pilot names again, because I want to tell you something.
	Those pilot names were read out by the news crew in San Francisco.
	They read that over the national airwaves.
	They read those pilots out, and when she sent them, she sent them just like you did.
	So the way she pronounced it is the head pilot's name was way too low.
	Here it says Sum Ting.
	Oh yeah, way too low.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	That's not the captain, but that's another.
	The captain was Sum Ting Wong, but the other was way too low.
	Yes, and holy fuck.
	Sir, get the Sum Ting, Sum, S-U-N, Ting, T-I-N-G. Wrong.
	W-N-G. Something wrong.
	Something wrong.
	Something wrong.
	Yeah, and how about H-O, and then Lee, L-I, and the last name, F-U-K. Holy, holy fuck.
	You got it, Danny.
	You got it.
	What?
	You got it.
	Ow, D-Bang, or whatever.
	And bang, ding, ow, bang, ding, ow.
	You know, this is a joke.
	I wish you could play the lady from Channel, whatever that is, Channel 4 News, because to hear her accent when she reads those names out, so serious.
	Yeah.
	This is a live news broadcast.
	Yeah.
	And they're pointing out here, you got the plane and it doesn't have a scratch on it after having allegedly gone through this spectacular crash.
	And if you watch the video, sir, you can definitely see the CGI where the wing appears and then it disappears as it skids.
	And on the big ship, the guy that goes through it, the investigator, he shows how it skids all over the nose.
	And then when you see the wreckage, there's no damage on the nose whatsoever.
	And then he says, look at it skid on the ground.
	You can see the dirt in the CGI kick up.
	And yet when they show the wreckage in San Francisco and it's all over with, there's no dirt marks, no grass torn up around it or anything.
	It's like they just placed...
	a fuselage on the ground and there's no damage anywhere on the runway.
	Here it comes in.
	There's nothing.
	And there'd be a huge trench dug in the ground that would match the CGI video.
	So the whole thing is fakes there.
	And they're also...
	Maybe you figure out how to play it.
	They even...
	Awesome.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Here it is again.
	Yes, yes, yes, yes.
	But the page, the page name, you know, "Stone" "Stone" "Stone" "Stone" "Stone" Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and posts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform Free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Revolution Radio, so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going dead to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in the dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution. Radio, radio, radio, radio.
	Is it a distraction?
	are the trend high side.
	Now let's see what's going on.
	Let's do it.
	Why do this?
	Why do this?
	that we would see in a plane crash. - Wow, Danny, you do such a sensational job I'm going to open the call line lines, by the way, right after the break.
	We'll take your call.
	608-957-8727-638-957-8727.
	Great.
	And then, sir, I just want to point out that your screen sharing...
	Even the government admits that 9-11...
	And I can't hear the inside job that Osama had nothing to do with it.
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro newts.
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Terry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read America Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonwalkbooks.com.
	This is upside down.
	It's expressed on this radio station.
	Its programs and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return to the radio.
	There was a huge...
	We don't have any sound to it, but there's no damage around the plane whatsoever.
	It's like they just put the fuselage there, and that's the end of it.
	And yet we see people holding their bags after that crash, sir.
	After that fire, people cut their roller bags and they're walking around.
	This is so fake, Danny.
	It reminds me of that Kobe Bryant chopper crash, which was...
	There it is right there.
	People in that video you're watching right there in one of those subsequent clips where they're holding their roller sleeping bag.
	You can see the guy right in the middle of the screen has his roller bag to his lap.
	There it goes.
	Look at them carrying their bags off of the plane.
	You can see they got their purses.
	And they're suitcases.
	They're rolling their bags through the field, sir, after a radius crash like that.
	It's insane.
	That would never happen.
	If you look at the damage, sir, if you look at that crash, it was skinning on its nose backwards, and it flipped over, and you notice there's no damage on the front of that plane whatsoever.
	The nose is intact.
	There's no dent on the plane.
	There's no nothing.
	That was a Hollywood set, sir, that they put there.
	And again, there's no damage in the field whatsoever.
	There's no skid marks on the tarmac, no skid mark.
	There they are with the suitcases.
	You can clearly see them right there.
	He's circling with suitcases.
	You can see it all right there.
	And it's just, there's a bunch of actors, sir, that are standing around.
	And, you know, again, your guess is as good as mine.
	Why would they go through this effort to create a plane crash when it didn't really happen?
	Danny, this is such a doozy.
	I repeat the call-in number.
	Look at the plane, sir, right there.
	It's being circled right there in the front.
	There's no damage underneath the landing gear in the front.
	It's skidded on the nose.
	That thing would be completely broken off or bent or busted or whatever.
	The fire is just on the top of the plane.
	Look at the wing.
	It's still on the plane, sir, after this horrendous...
	This thing cartwheeled.
	If we go back and watch the video, it actually cartwheeled on the wing.
	Yeah, compare that...
	With Toronto, Danny, where the wings...
	Look at the skid marks right there, sir, in the ground.
	See the tail?
	It dug like a 10-foot ditch behind it, if you look at that particular crack.
	But this one, there's no...
	The dirt is underserved, sir.
	There's no dirt disturbed.
	There's no grass disturbing.
	There's no nothing except for the fire trucks leaving some trails there.
	There's no damage anywhere from anything.
	It's like somebody just placed that plane there from a crane or a tractor of some sort, but there's no damage anywhere.
	There's no damage on the front of the plane.
	Why can't we see all the damage after we saw the plane skidding on the front of the plane?
	We don't see any of that stuff.
	And cartwheeling on the wing in the CGI video, there's a good shot.
	Yeah.
	But the big anomaly is the passengers with their roller bags are walking into that afterwards.
	It's unbelievable that that happened.
	Here comes the CGI. Now you got it up, sir.
	If we can watch that.
	Here it comes in.
	Watch it closely.
	Watch it closely.
	Now it disappears.
	Now it reappears.
	There's the CGI. Now watch it.
	It skids over.
	Here we go.
	Cartwheels to the front of it.
	And nothing happened to the front end.
	We can see the wing disappear when it went behind that other plane.
	It carver-willed, sir, and skidded on the nose, and there's no damage on the nose of the plane whatsoever.
	Nothing.
	That's impossible, sir.
	What we just saw was a CGI. That's a bird strike.
	Yeah, that's just from a bird strike, yeah.
	That's from a bird strike.
	But yet there's nothing wrong with the planet left.
	Nothing.
	It's unbelievable.
	We have a caller from 816. I think it's Brian.
	Join the conversation, 816. Well, of course there's no damage to the front of the plane.
	We watched a plane go right through the...
	816, are you there?
	You're welcome to join the conversation.
	Yeah, you can't...
	Can you hear me?
	- Hello? - Hello? - You just got another plane? - Hello?
	Hello?
	You just got a...
	Of a plane that had a spectacular event.
	And he's smiling, sir.
	Hello?
	That kid is smiling.
	Are you there?
	People don't believe it until they see it on television.
	Richard Nixon.
	That's the way it is.
	President Nixon said the American people will believe anything as long as they see it on TV. Yeah.
	I don't know.
	816, can you join the conversation, 816?
	I'm trying.
	Can you hear me?
	Hello?
	I'm not sure if we're having a technical glitch.
	I know.
	Hello?
	I know.
	Hello?
	You got a lot of great stuff here.
	I hope you keep it for the future because it's really something else.
	When you see the level of anomalies, sir, on this particular crash.
	Are so over the top with the CGI video.
	And the CGI wasn't as good as it is today.
	You know, the technology is much better.
	The Hollywood technology is much better today than it was back in 2013. So this is the best they had.
	You can see when it lands, and you showed it very clearly, you can see the plane disappears.
	It reappears.
	That's a CGI glitch, right?
	And then we see the plane skidding on the nose upside down as it's cartwheeling.
	And yet we see that the Hollywood set has no damage.
	816 went out and came back.
	Let me see.
	816, are you there?
	Can you hear me?
	Can you speak?
	Yes.
	Can you hear me this time?
	Wow.
	Hello?
	Wow.
	Hello?
	Something wrong here.
	Yeah, I'm here.
	Something wrong.
	Something wrong.
	That's one of the names of the pilot.
	I know, Danny.
	What a...
	I love Captain Way Too Low.
	Yeah.
	Some Ting Wong, and the excerpt of the other pilot was Hole Lee Fook.
	Yes, yes, yes, yes.
	I wanted to talk about that.
	I don't know if we have the audio, but, man, they actually read that out on the air.
	The reporter was very delicate.
	Hello.
	I know.
	You've got to tell me.
	Hello!
	Sir, I'm glad you were able to play some of it.
	So, basically what we're pointing out, sir, overall, they're CGI-ing a lot of these crashes.
	Hello!
	We didn't show the one clip of the fuselage used in the other crash.
	We were having a glitch at that time.
	But for our listeners, they obviously used the Toronto wreckage in another crash.
	And then on this particular crash, again, we see no flames, right?
	No fire whatsoever.
	And the presence of mind, after a big rollover like that, people would pull out their cell phones and film, and a few of them grabbing their bags on their way out.
	And the guy even, you know, let that be a lesson, sir.
	If you're ever in a plane crash, you want to pull out your phone, grab your suitcase, and walk on the ceiling as you're going out the door.
	You know, he points, there's the records right there from San Francisco.
	They're showing it right there.
	Here it is, Henry Bleed.
	Here's the name.
	There's the name, sir, right there.
	There's the name.
	Go ahead and read those names again, sir.
	What do you see?
	Captain, something wrong.
	Way too low.
	Holy fuck.
	Banged in.
	Ow.
	It's just ridiculous, Danny.
	This is so insulting.
	It really is, sir.
	That's national news right there that they read that out.
	They're showing the crash.
	They got the pilots' names right there next to it, and they're putting this out on the National Airways while this is breaking, sir, to try and sell us.
	And they're rubbing it in our face, sir.
	With these names, sir, they could have picked some real names or, you know, something close.
	But instead, sir, to send out a code, they really wanted to rub it in our face.
	And here's a comedian going, yeah.
	But they really wanted to put it in our face, sir, with these names.
	To show us that they're in control and they can do something like this.
	Again, your guess is as good as mine.
	Yeah, there you got Robbie Parker coming up, jocular, about to go into it.
	You know, and they're just, the guy's trying to make reference of all the false flags and all the fakery going on.
	And it's really, really a very powerful video.
	Maybe in another broadcast you can show it.
	Yeah.
	Showing, sir, to your viewers.
	We can do a whole show just on the asiana crash alone.
	But again, for the purposes of today, we're just basically showing this is not the first time that they've created CGI. We all know about 9-11.
	We know about...
	Many different of these things where they've used fake footage and CGI to create an illusion of something that's happening that is not happening.
	But yet, this Toronto crash is just one more thing.
	In the snow, we don't see the fire.
	All we see is one water truck spraying some water on it.
	Everybody's in good shape.
	We have a flight attendant that's smiling.
	We have people pulling bags out of the plane that are in...
	Good shape.
	Nobody's limping.
	Nobody's helping each other.
	We don't see any of that, sir.
	They're just standing there filming with their cell phones, reflecting on, gee, did I just get out of that horrendous crash?
	You know, checking on their bags are okay.
	I mean, all these things, sir, would never, never happen.
	And why they did this again, to pile on, we covered the other show on the crash in DC, the helicopter crashing in the plane.
	Was that really a real crash?
	Or was that CGI? And they're just simply playing it on the news and telling us that it happened that way.
	Could it have been CGI? It sure could have been.
	Absolutely.
	Because we had that female pilot.
	Everybody kept saying, I don't understand how this can happen.
	Well, you know what?
	If it didn't happen, and it was CGI, right?
	It really didn't happen.
	Did it really happen?
	Well, we didn't go there.
	You're showing the best of the footage out there where it's cartwheeling.
	You see it clearly cartwheeling on the net.
	That plane would be destroyed, sir.
	As it flips around, here comes the cartwheel right there on the nose.
	Look at its skin on the nose.
	But yet when they sew the plane, there's no damage at all on the nose.
	So it's clear CGI effects.
	This is the technology that they had back then.
	And it really went over the top with the pilot's name, sir.
	I mean, that's where they really blew it.
	They really wanted to rub this one in someone's face.
	At this point, I don't know how much went out to broadcast.
	I'm certainly...
	I think we're still rolling, sir.
	You're showing the video.
	You're doing pretty good.
	Are we still on the air?
	Yeah.
	I believe we are, Danny.
	Yeah.
	So the point being, sir, is, you know, why would they stage the Toronto crash?
	Why would they do that?
	So they could have something to blame Trump for?
	Because they needed another, you know, because he's doing all these cuts.
	You know, Trump is, what he's been really doing, sir, inside the FAA is he's getting rid of a lot of the DEI hires.
	Unfortunately, it's very strict to get a job in the FAA. It's very difficult.
	It's very difficult to get certain positions, especially air traffic controller.
	You have to be a certain kind of person, sir.
	So there's some very...
	Very stringent testing you have to go through.
	There's psychological testing.
	Only certain people can do that job.
	It's a very high-paying job.
	And it comes with a big pension and medical benefits and all that.
	And a lot of people wash out.
	They don't get that job.
	But yet we have all these DEI hires that have been in there that have been making these near-miss mistakes.
	And they've been covering them up.
	And Obama tried to cover them up.
	And when it's a DEI hire, all of a sudden...
	These people, instead of being suspended or fired, you know, they would just keep going with these people where a normal person would be fired or suspended.
	It's very strict inside the FAA. We've had hundreds and hundreds of near-misses that are just almost crashes.
	They call them near-misses.
	They got close and there was a mistake by a DEI hire.
	They're covering that up.
	So to me, this was just an opportunity maybe to bash Trump, create another plane distraction.
	sir i don't know if you have any guesses on why they would want to pull off a distraction like this but i think we clearly showed all the anomalies sir and how this is just you know this plane upside down it's not really what happened it's not the plane that crashed in that cgi footage that you showed uh in the first place do you have any thoughts on why they would put this on yourself janny i'm completely baffled other than just to show the power they have to control.
	All...
	believes in the American population by testing what percentage of population can figure it out.
	I think they realize they have virtually complete control because a minuscule percentage who figure out what actually is going on here, they don't care because that minuscule percentage can know.
	But in fact, since most believe it, They're discredited when they point out what is actually true.
	Namely, it's all fake.
	It's like when I point out Sandy Hook was staged, that it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder, people are incredulous.
	Maybe today less so, but certainly in the past.
	Even in my own family, Danny, I mean, it's just kind of crazy.
	You know, here I've got all the goods, brought together 13 experts, including six PhDs.
	We established this school.
	It had been closed by 2008. Actually, it turns out it was closed in 2006. There were no students or teachers there.
	We've not only got the FEMA manual, we've got the Connecticut.
	Schedule showing it's on the schedule for Connecticut FEMA where they even set out a map how to get from there to Sandy Hook to the school.
	They set out a map?
	Danny, it's so embarrassing.
	Well, you know, with the Sandy Hook, sir, we even have footage, satellite footage.
	There's a video out there where they show...
	The satellite shows that there's nobody around the school whatsoever, but it goes just across town and you see all the buses parked on the curb at a busy school that's just down the road.
	And you see all the buses and the activity and all the cars and everything around the school that you see at a busy school.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	But you don't see that, sir.
	In the satellite video, you can see that the Sandy Hook is empty.
	And there's no cars parked around it.
	There's no activity going on.
	But yet the school just down the road, maybe less than a mile down the road, is fully busy with buses on the curb and everything's going.
	So obviously the school was closed.
	You know, anybody that looks at that objectively, sir, can easily see the anomalies that that thing was a complete fake.
	I'd like to point out with the Sandy Hook, we even have the guy that gave you that letter.
	That said he went there to buy a school desk in an auction.
	Right.
	And he went there and went through the rooms and said all the furniture was piled up in the middle of the room.
	The school was closed.
	Actually, he shoved up against the wall.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, he was able to pick out the desk of his choice of the two desks.
	The custodian said, yeah, you purchase two items.
	You can pick out the best ones that you want.
	And he would literally walk through classroom to classroom looking for the desk and reported that the school had been closed.
	But yeah, people still want to go with, oh, there were really kids there and it really happened.
	I mean, there's just so many anomalies with the actor, sir.
	Danny, I know, I know, I know, I know, I know.
	It's crazy!
	At another time, sir, I really hope you'll bookmark that video right there that you're showing with the circles on it.
	And you can play it or even watch it in your leisure, you know, and do another show.
	Because this really is, this video that you have up right now, is really the benchmark video for showing the massive anomalies in these plane crashes.
	From the passengers, how they stage them, how they stage the wreckage on the ground.
	I mean, this Toronto, sir, is not the first time they've done this.
	They've done this before.
	It's just that people...
	I think people are so busy working, trying to make their next dollar.
	They come home, they watch the news for a half hour, they're eating dinner or whatever, and they just assume what they see on television is real.
	Just like Nixon said, American people will believe anything as long as they see it on television.
	That's why they call it television.
	Television.
	Well, they're telling you a vision that they want you to believe.
	That's why I call it television.
	And they can put any vision on there that they want.
	So is this really happening?
	Or are they sending a message to Trump?
	Are they trying to create a chill effect to keep people from falling?
	Exactly what is their objective?
	Honestly, Danny, I think they're just having fun.
	They're just having fun at the public expanse.
	And the names of the pilots, the crew is the tell that this is just a joke.
	This is a mind death.
	They're just amusing themselves to see how many are going to be able to figure it out when it's this blatant.
	They might as well say, we're effing over you.
	Can you tell?
	And nobody can tell.
	God damn it!
	Imagine if you were the president.
	Your president would come.
	And I'd like to think of myself as maybe like a Stephen Miller kind of character, right?
	I like Stephen Miller, by the way.
	I think he's a brilliant guy.
	And you know what?
	And you give me an assignment, sir.
	Like, you know, hey Danny, I'm really bothered by these plane crashes.
	Can you go investigate it?
	And I can only imagine us sitting around in the Oval Office and me presenting all this stuff to you.
	And I'm saying, Mr. President, this really didn't happen.
	Look at this video.
	You know, would you go along with it, sir, when the cameras come on and all the press comes in in 10 or 15 minutes and you're going to talk about this after I showed you all these anomalies are going on and I showed you all this stuff?
	I mean, how exactly, I don't know, how do you think you would act in front of all the cameras knowing that all this fakery is happening and I'm showing it to you?
	What do you think you would do?
	Would you go along with it?
	Would you come out and just say, hey, I just had a briefing here, and something was wrong, you know?
	And show the pilots.
	I mean, yeah, something's wrong is right, way too low.
	I mean, I wonder, I don't know, I often wonder, what would I do if I was in this place?
	I don't know, sir, exactly how I would handle it.
	Here we go with some of these people.
	This is a wonderful video, Danny.
	This is a wonderful video.
	It's amazing, sir.
	It's a benchmark.
	It was censored off of YouTube because it really showed how big the coin crashes are.
	So when we had the heavy censoring of this particular investigation...
	We got the number 322 in there.
	Oh, wow.
	Yeah, there's the symbols.
	You know, he points out all the symbols.
	This investigator was a long time kicked off of YouTube when they did all the censoring.
	And this particular guy has broken down all the fake shootings from the one in Colorado, the big one, to the movie theaters, to Sandy Hook.
	He's pointed out, but he goes through and catches a lot of these video anomalies.
	He's really good at doing that.
	And I'm glad to say he's still on BitChute, and he still posts from time to time.
	But this was a big one, sir.
	This was a really big one.
	He caught all the CGI. He caught all the fake actors.
	He caught all the damage and all that stuff.
	It really is true.
	When you look at this video, you really understand that they've been pulling the wolves in America's eyes for a long, long time.
	This is not anything new.
	Very, very, very embarrassing, Danny.
	This is very embarrassing.
	Well, can you imagine tax dollars, sir, being used to put this stuff on?
	I mean, you know, we still have homeless vets, and we're using millions of dollars to stage this kind of stuff and to put this on to create some sort of a narrative that planes are crashing.
	We do have plane crashes all the time.
	Sure they do.
	But the real ones, we can go out and we can see the wreckage.
	We see the evidence of the crash.
	Ditch in the ground.
	We see it.
	We see it.
	You know, we see bodies that people have died.
	But when they put on these fake ones every once in a while, for whatever reason, sir, your guess is as good as mine why they're creating the distraction, why they would spend the money to do it, why they would tell us Captain Sun Ting Wong way too low or holy food for flying the plane that day.
	I mean, just the nature of the mindset for them to do something like that and try to fool the public.
	Can you imagine the tenacity, sir, of putting it in an American space like that?
	I don't know.
	I'm not on the inside, sir.
	I'm on the outside like you.
	I just call it when I do see them.
	I like to point it out.
	I just think it's very important.
	That's why I love your show, sir, because you point out this stuff.
	You take the time.
	to point out to the people, hey, wait a minute here, something's not right, and you're showing it.
	There's so many shows that just go along with this, and they don't ask any questions, they don't look at the evidence, and they just go about it.
	And every time I hear them, I'm like, that's fake.
	I already investigated this.
	We already showed that that didn't really happen.
	But there's so many other news channels out there that just go along with everything.
	That's amazing.
	Well, Danny, I'm fortunate enough to have contributors like you Who nail these things so effortlessly.
	I love it, Danny.
	Every time I feature you, it's just sensational.
	Here you have, no, hundreds of millions are spent to control minds.
	If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes gold balls.
	Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying that eventually they'll believe.
	We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American people believe is false.
	I have a friend.
	Barbara Honiger was actually there at the CIA headquarters when William Colby, no, it was Ronald Reagan's CIA guy.
	Here we go again.
	Chomsky, Goebbels, Hitler himself.
	And William Casey.
	First staff meeting, Barbara Honiger was there.
	She has told me.
	She heard him say it.
	So it's not imaginary.
	It's for real.
	Not for any stretch of the imagination.
	You know, back in that 2013, sir, I was just like, you know, I was still working.
	And I'm kind of...
	I think I want to say I was kind of waking up to these anomalies, you know, because I was in that trance where I was just busy at work all the time doing day-to-day grind stuff, right?
	But then I started seeing this stuff, and I got to hand it to the guy that made this video.
	You know, his name is actually his nickname is Russian Video or Russian Vid that he goes by.
	You know.
	Over again.
	I'm not going to do that.
	Thank you for listening to Revolution Great Ghost.
	Yeah, we didn't see it because it didn't happen.
	I love you.
	I love you.
	I don't know why they're spending our money doing this.
	Why did they create the Toronto crash?
	Welcome to Coffee Rants with Dan.
	I am the spiritual anarchist Dan Arnold, your host.
	Tune in for what's really happening every Thursday at 9 a.m.
	in Studio 8 on Revolution Radio.
	Hey, let's tie it up.
	Thank you, Mike.
	You're an absolute slave.
	They don't have to treat themselves.
	Only you can put their mind in control by healing the contradictions within belief systems that allow you to accept their lives in the first place.
	Time is complex.
	Remember, it's been a service to others, to return to nature, to reclaim our birthright, that which is freedom.

▲