All Episodes
Previous Next
March 9, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:27:23
Need to Know News (9 March 2025) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mr. Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news.
This is the 9th of March, 2025. Let's take a look at those topics and have opening statements.
The Ukraine war, or at least what we're shown in Zelensky, depending on how much that is Zelensky and not just a brand.
Dramatic endgame?
The Epstein clients' names, videos, arrests, when now?
The empire's debt system exposed with solutions prepared?
War?
Another great reset.
Official dictatorial censorship versus the public demand for truth.
Trump congressional address and the fallout.
And from COVID and health lies and crimes to recognized crimes against humanity and a demand for Maha.
Brian, brother, opening statement.
Oh, I spent a lot of time working this week, studying a lot, trying to reread the Bible, top to bottom.
This time I'm taking a much more delicate approach, carefully trying to understand everything that's written.
It's not easy.
It takes a lot of time and a lot of patience.
Other than that, you know, I'm just sort of testing out different theories about how we got into this mess.
And the more I dig on the research...
The deeper I go, the more I find problems.
For instance, I have sort of a way to research articles to try to find the earliest way a search engine spidered the article and basically committed it to memory.
And then I try to compare that with where we're at today, and I'm finding adjustments that don't seem to add up.
I don't know.
I have a feeling that artificial intelligence is working, but I just don't understand how it's working on servers to rewrite history.
And I'm starting to think that you almost need to find books and go through the old books if you want to get a proper version of history, because you're certainly not going to get it from Wikipedia.
You're almost always going to get a twisted, slanted sort of Handpicked machine that kind of rewrites it the way it wants.
And then when it comes to finding old copies of articles from the Wayback Machine, it's strange how an article can be published in like 2004, and yet the Wayback Machine will only give you a copy of the article from 2009, maybe at the earliest.
And it doesn't...
Maybe that's about when Wayback Machine came around.
I don't know.
I'm trying to figure out why it's working the way it's working, because this week I've been researching the sort of origins of Zionism, Theodor Herzl and others, trying to see what connections were there, how it was financed, where it came from, to find out if there's an underlying motive behind setting this up.
And so I've been taking a close look at Theodor Herzl's meetings with the Pope back in, I think it's 1904. And for some reason, I keep finding redacted, adjusted versions of the diary entries that don't seem to match.
Of course, they were all different languages and the translations, you know, so you're just trying to kind of reverse into it because I only read English.
It's challenging.
It's challenging to get to the truth.
You want to get to the truth?
Look, anybody can sit and throw broad strokes about history, thinking that they understand things.
But really getting to the bottom of it, it takes an investigation.
It takes an investigation.
And sometimes you just got to open up a file and start saving and hope it works out.
That's all I can say about it.
Yeah, as I keep saying, the easy part is to refute the officials his story as lies, but then to actually get to what happened, that whole next level.
Just today, a couple hours ago, I was looking at Jimmy Dore having a conversation or a five-minute video that probably I'm going to have on the show tomorrow.
Matt Taibbi was chatting with Jimmy Dore, and Jimmy and Matt were saying, you know, from what we learned of all the lies, Russiagate, Ukraine, COVID, I'm starting to question climate change.
What aren't they going to lie about?
And that's where I think that we're going, and that's the Great Awakening, the Great Choosing.
And I think we've already hit critical mass, and this breakthrough event will sort a lot of people out.
I don't think very many people can hold on to the official his story in the face of a breakthrough event.
We'll see.
We'll see.
Well, like we learned last week, there's 31% of the people that just can't be unbrainwashed.
They're diehard Democrats.
They'll follow whatever MSNBC says unhindered.
They just won't question it at all.
And I think that's because the closer that you get to sort of a cognitive dissonance about the way the world works, the more threatening it becomes.
And I think the older the mind is, the harder it becomes.
To deal with the idea that it's been deceived on such a level for so long on such a large scale and it's easy, like I've always said, it's easier to just sink back into your couch and let the brainwashing continue rather than rebuild and rethink and re-engineer your entire mind.
That takes hours and it's painful.
I mean, it can make you vomit.
Like, literally, that's a side effect of cognitive dissonance when it begins to hit on a strong level, is you get a feeling of sickness in your stomach because you have two opposing ideas competing for the same mind space, the same interpretation of reality.
And you end up, again, some people can break through and say, I'm willing to accept a new version.
I'm willing to at least consider a new version, and some people just can't break through.
It's like the idea of, like, the first time I saw it was in False Flags.
It was Orlando.
That was the breakthrough for me, because I had read about Sandy Hook.
I had listened to, you know, some 9-11 programs.
I think it was Loose Change was the 9-11 program.
I'd seen indicators that something wasn't right, but until Orlando hit, and I literally...
Opened up an investigation to figure out everything that actually happened.
Did I have the will to understand that things are not as they seem?
And again, for me, that was about a three-week mental process just to go through it.
And then the fundamental problem that came out of it was I didn't know who to trust.
And that's how I ended up on Fetzer's channel.
I said, well, at least he's telling me the truth about this, because I know this.
I know this now for a fact.
It cannot be denied that he's right about these engineered events.
And so I stuck with it.
But of course, once you start digging down that rabbit hole, all sorts of new ideas and new things begin to come up, such as historical revisionism, flat earth, what are the stars and the sun and the moon.
The other day, I think there was a big one that had millions of views, TikTok and YouTube and whatever, but it was a clear picture of Venus taken from multiple angles where it was sitting in front of the moon.
I mean, it's undeniable that that's what the picture was, and it was making the rounds.
I think people are beginning to wake up that what we've been told isn't right, but the question is, what are you going to do about it?
How are you going to adjust?
What basis for reality are you going to substitute and test?
And you should be.
If you're a good, open mind, you're going to begin testing different versions of reality and different teachers and different guides to kind of figure out where are we.
When I was all said and done with going through the process, maybe as a year and a half, two years, I determined that there was an old...
Theology professor that I had listened to, I remember one lecture very clearly where he stood on one side of the podium and he said, on this side, I'm going to argue for the Bible.
And then he stood on the other side of the podium and he said, on this side, I'm going to argue for the world.
So he'd stand on the left and he'd say, well, the world says, you know, billions of years old and big bang, third rock from the sun, whipping through outer space, out of the primordial who's comes.
Life crawls out and life evolves into humanity.
And then he's standing on the right-hand side and he's like, yeah, but the Bible says literal six-day creation, seventh rested, 6,000 years old according to the genealogies.
Which one's it going to be?
Remember being stuck in a spot where you're like...
Shipwrecked because all through junior high, high school, first year of college was a secular college.
I had been taught the left side of the podium.
And now here I am all of a sudden like, hey, I believe the Bible.
I'm doing this.
This is the direction that I'm going.
And you're stuck in this spot where you just can't really decide.
And so you try to synchronize.
Oh, well, you know, there was a gap between day one or day two.
You know, this is where all the time fits in, but they don't synchronize.
No matter how hard you think or how hard you try, it's going to be one or the other.
And it becomes, you can shipwreck if you can't reconcile it, if you can't come to a conclusion intellectually to do it.
Now, I did.
I came to the conclusion intellectually that Christ was exactly who he claimed to be.
I believe that.
And I believe when he quoted from the Old Testament, talked about Adam and Eve and talked about, I believed he was talking about, you know, historical people and historical times with historical genealogies.
And, you know, when he said basically from Abel to Zechariah, that one word of God's word will pass away.
I believed him, you know, and I believe it.
So I ended up having to reevaluate.
And came out on the other side.
I'm a better biblical scholar for it, I'll tell you that.
Well, as a professional scholar, I've, at this stage of my life, my working operation is to be very comfortable not knowing something.
As a scholar, if I want to demonstrate something that's factually true, that takes work.
I have to get hands on, eyes on, I have to document it.
And I have to be personally and professionally confident that the facts that I allege are objectively true, independently verifiable, and comprehensively accurate.
And that takes a lot of work.
So I'm just comfortable with the things that I don't know.
And I rest in the biblical offering to approach the Creator as a child.
Because, you know, even if I wanted to grow up, I don't think that...
I'm highly capable of doing very much down here in terms of being confident.
It would take so much work to go after the Moon, Venus, the Sun, all of that.
That would be dedicated work.
And there are some people who are doing that, and I appreciate all that.
Hey, Brian, with the work that you've done for False Flags, could you, in the BitChute comments, put all of that?
Just as a public service of the false flags that you've covered and the documentation that you have for that.
Yeah, the videos are out there.
I could put together a list of the different ones I've broken out.
Again, I don't break out every one that comes along.
I break out the ones I want to break out.
I don't get paid to do it.
And I break them out to the point where I'm intellectually convinced I know exactly what I'm seeing.
It doesn't mean I know who all the characters are, where they came from, how they originated within the matrix of the story.
It doesn't mean that I know every single detail, but I know this.
After studying them for a long time, it's pretty easy to see that counterfeit fingerprint now.
And so now when I go, I see it, I just look for sort of the indicators.
I'm like, okay, we got all these indicators.
Now I know.
And it wasn't, False Lives didn't come together for me until...
I was asked a question by Dr. Fetzer on Nashville.
Yeah, it was on Nashville.
It was the Nashville school shooting, and I was still struggling with, like, is this all about gun control?
Because this just isn't adding up.
This isn't adding up.
And it was at that time that I had done...
I had just seen a video with a rapper by the name of Crazy Bone.
K-R-A-Y-Z Bone.
And it's on Rumble.
And he was telling the story about how he went to this meeting back in sort of the late 90s.
And there was a bunch of, you know, high-end rappers at the time.
And at the time, rap music was, you know, wear a condom and be a good guy.
Will Smith, you know, MC Hammer, Salt-N-Pepa, you know, like positive themes.
For the black community.
And Crazy Bone says it was about that time that he went to this meeting and they were a bunch of basically investors, high net worth, high powered guys that tried to get him to sign a non-disclosure agreement.
And so he's at this big, you know, like mansion place.
And they say, OK, you've all signed the agreement.
Now, here we are.
We're going to tell you the story.
And so basically they say, you know, we.
We're going to tell you what to invest in.
We're going to get you involved with all the right financial advisors.
We're going to guide you along and make you rich.
And all you need to do is sort of change the theme of your music.
And what he figured out was under the hood in that particular situation was that these guys that were trying to change the culture that way were investors in a new breed of private prison.
And so their goal was to fill up all the prison cells because they were making like $75,000 per prisoner per year in private prison systems.
And so they were like, yeah, if we can just make the music and the culture go this way.
And now a lot of you out there will say, well, what does that have to do with false flags?
Well, qui bono, I think is the word, qui bono, who benefits?
It was a money machine.
I mean, it was a conspiracy to get the rap community together so that they could invest in these things and make money.
So it was at that time where I started, I changed and I started looking at all the false flags through the lens of, where's the money?
Where's the money?
Who benefits?
Who benefits?
And I started seeing that there was a security industrial complex under the hood that was...
You know, your G4-type contractors and your big government contractors that were all about rebuilding schools, new metal detectors, sort of TSA-style security apparatus that was hiring cops.
You know, this whole structure blossomed in the areas where the false flags began to take place at the schools.
And that's how I started seeing the themes in the false flags.
The themes were, okay, you got your maladjusted youth wearing the bulletproof vests, carrying the boogeyman AR-15, who built bombs in his garage and has a truck full of explosives, and he's got no history, and he acted alone.
And, you know, said and done, he's dead, he's gone.
Or he's, you know, whatever.
Buffalo is a little different.
They've made adjustments here and there.
And then I started listening to Ole Damogard, and he's like, yeah, look for the shoes.
It's like, wow, the guy's right.
He knows exactly what's going on.
But anyway, it was me that sort of, that's when everything came together, because Fetzer, during the national presentation, said to me, why are there bombs?
Why did the local news report that this...
Nashville shooter, you know, the little tranny with the shoes.
Why did they report that they had set off bombs at our house?
And it was shortly after that, not more than an hour, when it clicked.
Like, oh, this local police agency needs funding for their bomb-sniffing robot program.
Ah!
So I went and checked it out.
Sure enough, boom, right there in the next funding package.
You know, for the police.
So they got their Humvees.
They got their, you know, response.
They got their, there it is.
And I was like, wow, that's it.
And then with Uvalde, it was so clear because immediately after the quote-unquote Uvalde shooting, which I went to, there was a big push all throughout Texas to rebuild all the schools according to all these new security protocols.
There it is.
Find your theme.
Roll it out.
Every false flag you see is just a mini 9-11.
It's a mini false flag designed to drive.
And I don't know how much the politicians know or don't know because I really don't see the politicians as very bright.
I see them as great investors.
And why are they such great investors?
Because they know that these contracts are going to be floating around out there.
And so when there's an event, they know which companies are going to end up getting the contracts and when to buy and when to sell.
And I don't even know that the politicians care that we're being deceived.
I don't even know if they care to even face that issue.
I think some of them do and some of them don't.
But I think what's more important to them is just simply how much money can they make on the opportunity.
And as long as they play along, keep their mouth shut and toe the line in terms of the narrative, they'll get rich.
And so who's honest?
Who's left?
It's only us.
It's only the people out there that actually do the research.
You're not going to find anybody in media that's going to break it open.
And when I first came around, I was like, oh, Blaze, you know, Glenn Black broke loser.
No, you lied.
Everybody that came out of mainstream media.
It's such a racket.
Such a racket.
Anyway, that's sort of the story about how I got into it.
And no, I don't break out as many as I used to.
It takes time, like literally five days of sitting in front of a computer, downloading, analyzing, flipping, finding corresponding articles, going in back and finding the earliest and most reliable evidence.
I'll tell you right now, the big media sites are designed to allow whatever's written to be re-edited, rewritten, re-authored, and replaced as the narrative sort of tightens up.
Around the event.
So as Wikipedia, like early Wikipedia entries on a school shooting are going to be like, oh, here's all the articles.
And so you've got all this spread out events all over the place and witnesses and you've got all these statements and you've got everything that's sort of spread out.
Well, what happens in time is that that Wikipedia article just sort of shrinks down to, oh, here's the basics.
Here's the things that you can.
But they're literally modifying it.
Hosing it down until they have sort of the big, broad strokes.
And then forget about all those details.
That stuff's gone.
And it does.
It literally, like the servers for the big media companies, they literally delete old archived versions of articles.
It literally disappears and is replaced by a new version that's updated to conform to the narrative.
It's creepy and Well stated.
Thank you, brother.
In terms of what you were talking about for the people, the question of how are they going to see through the brainwashing or what is it that they do, that ability in Professional academics, flexible intelligence.
When I was at Harvard, that was a relatively new concept of different types of intelligences.
And flexible intelligence is one of the ones that were added in.
And that is the capacity to be able to recognize new data and then to shift the paradigm of how you view a topic based upon the new data.
And somebody who is highly...
Skilled, practiced, gifted, however you want to say it, with flexible intelligence is going to be very flexible with the new data and throwing out outdated paradigms.
And somebody who is not is going to fight with the new data and or display some level of cognitive dissonance to do mental gymnastics to dismiss the data and to retain the old paradigm.
All right, let's go to that first topic, the Ukraine war and Zelensky dramatic endgame.
We got five of those.
First, I want to play this with Jeffrey Sachs for a couple of minutes, because the overview for Ukraine is just an excellent briefing, and most people are unaware.
Now, when the Maidan occurred, I was called immediately.
Oh, Professor Sachs, the new...
Ukrainian Prime Minister would like to see you to talk about the economic crisis.
Because I'm pretty good at that.
And so I flew to Kiev and I was walked around the Maidan.
And I was told how the US paid the money for all the people around the Maidan.
Spontaneous revolution of dignity.
Ladies and gentlemen, Please.
Where do all these media outlets come from?
Where does all this organization come from?
Where do all these buses come from?
Where do all these people called in come from?
Are you kidding?
This is organized effort.
Now, when the Maidan occurred, I... And as so well said.
And I'm going to give him another couple of minutes.
To talk more, I set this up to go a little bit faster, but it somehow reset.
All right.
What was Putin's intention in the war?
Not the propaganda that's written about this.
Oh, that they failed and he was going to take over Ukraine.
The idea was to keep NATO. And what is NATO? It's the United States off of Russia's border.
No more, no less.
When the Soviet Union ended in 1991 and an agreement was made that NATO will not move one inch eastward.
Now, what happened after 1991, the United States decided there would be no end to eastward enlargement of NATO. And the decision was taken formally in 1994. When President Clinton signed off on NATO enlargement to the east, all the way to Ukraine and into Georgia.
So the NATO enlargement, as you know, started in 1999 with Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic.
And Russia was extremely unhappy about it.
But these were countries still far from the border.
So the next round of NATO enlargement came in 2004 with the three Baltic states, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovenia, and Slovakia.
At this point, Russia was pretty damn upset.
So as everybody recalls, in 2007, President Putin said, stop.
Enough.
And of course what that meant was in 2008 the United States jammed down Europe's throat.
Enlargement of NATO to Ukraine and to Georgia.
This is right up against Russia.
And Russia protested because if Russia decided to have a military base on the Rio Grande or the Canadian border, not only would the United States freak out, we'd have war within about 10 minutes.
And a month later a war broke out.
That gets Georgia destroyed.
And starting in 2010, the U.S. put in Aegis missile systems in Poland and then in Romania.
And Russia doesn't like that.
In 2010, Viktor Yanukovych was elected on the platform of neutrality.
Russia had no territorial interests or designs in Ukraine at all.
What Russia was negotiating was a 25-year lease for Sevastopol naval base.
That's it.
Not for Crimea, not for the Donbas, nothing in 2014. The U.S. worked actively to overthrow Yanukovych.
Everybody knows the phone call by my Columbia University colleague, Victoria Nuland, and the U.S. Ambassador, Peter Piat.
Listen to it.
It's fascinating.
I don't think we should go into the government.
I don't think it's necessary.
I don't think it's a good idea.
I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience, and, you know, fuck the EU. No, exactly.
And I think we've got to do something to make...
You don't get better evidence.
Then came Minsk, and especially Minsk, too.
It said there should be autonomy for the Russian-speaking regions in the east of Ukraine.
It was supported unanimously by the UN Security Council.
The United States and Ukraine decided it was not to be enforced.
There were many thousands of deaths in the shelling by Ukraine in the Donbas.
And one of the issues on the table in December 2021, January 2022, was does the United States claim the right to put missile systems in Ukraine?
And Blinken told Lavrov in January 2022, the United States reserves the right to put missile systems wherever it wants.
So the war started.
What was Putin's intention in the war?
It was to force Zelensky to negotiate neutrality.
And that happened within seven days of the start of the invasion.
Ukraine walked away unilaterally from a near agreement.
Why?
Because the United States told them to.
The idea was that there would be Ukraine.
Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Georgia that would deprive Russia of any international status by blocking the Black Sea.
And the American senators, who are as nasty and cynical and corrupt as imaginable, say this is wonderful expenditure of our money because no Americans are dying.
It's the pure proxy war.
And since the US talked the negotiators away from the table, about a million Ukrainians have died or been severely...
And that's strong.
And that is a great briefing.
Wait, let me deal with these two things.
Okay.
So, we had about 20 bases inside Ukraine that were covering all aspects of warfare, from bio to missiles to everything.
Those bases had been set up.
Prior to 2014 and then throughout 2014. It appears that the United States had a strategic goal of not just protecting its own hegemony, but of sending Russia back to the 90s, where things were pretty messy for Russia.
Putin came in.
And he really did a good job sort of straightening everything out.
But it was all about collapsing Russia's economy, collapsing Russia's culture, but more importantly, collapsing Russia's politicians so that the West could install their own version of a puppet so that it could be fully collapsed in time.
Now, I would say that the globalists have had the same...
The same approach here in America, which is the goal is to weaken culturally, the goal is to weaken economically, the goal is to divide and conquer a people group and destroy any real semblance of quote-unquote democracy worldwide so it can be replaced with a sort of communist Not communist,
more like an oligarchical system where it's only the powerful that have a voice and everybody else is just sort of a slave to the machine.
Blinken in September 21, we really started sending weapons to Ukraine.
This was just after July of 2021 when I believe it was Zelensky that met with And then by September of that year, we're beginning to basically stockpile all these weapons into Ukraine.
And it was always designed to lead to war.
There was no peace negotiations apart of it.
Now, that said, I want you to remember the Bay of Pigs scenario.
Okay, Kennedy blamed...
Russia, who was working with Fidel Castro, and they basically, what they were doing was they were smuggling long-range and medium-range nuclear weapons into Cuba, which would have the power to strike the U.S. heartland, and of course this nearly led to quote-unquote World War III at the time.
Well, what most Americans don't realize about The negotiations to end that was that we agreed quietly to pull our medium-range Thor missiles, Thor nuclear-tipped medium-range missiles out of Turkey.
Okay, so Turkey is to the south of Ukraine on the border.
And we had missiles that were basically capable of striking Russia.
And so Russia's counter move was to move nukes into Cuba through his communist brethren, Fidel Castro, and then use that as a negotiation tactic.
Well, most Americans don't know that that was what was negotiated, was we'll take our nuclear missiles out of Turkey.
If you take your nuclear missiles out of Cuba, and we'll avoid this whole World War III thing.
So it was a strategic move.
So Russia tried to move the nukes in in response to the medium-range missiles that we had already placed in Turkey, and they successfully did it because they got us to pull those nuclear things out.
Anyway, the whole purpose here is that the threat of war is necessary for the corrupt elites to launder huge sums of untraceable money.
It is the fastest and most economical way to shift massive funds around with zero traceability.
So as long as there's the threat of some sort of global catastrophe, the American people and other nations will allow these corrupt military apparatus machines to move this money around for the public safety.
And that's really what's behind it.
And again, go back to that framework.
You know, they drum up all this trouble because in the fog of war, there's a great opportunity for the contractors to make massive sums of money.
And that's exactly what happened in Ukraine.
We still can't trace all that money.
Very good.
I'll go ahead and put into the bit-shoot comments the article series that I have that the United States is an empire and nobody should trust them.
They've lied all the time.
This is all that they do is overthrow country to dominate resources, natural and human.
And that the Russian peace terms from the very beginning would have been easy to accept, except the U.S., at least what were shown, the U.S. and NATO, they wanted to have a war.
And now they're exposed for...
Wanting to have wars, always.
And the peace terms that the U.S. and Zelensky rejected were just two Russia's peace terms.
One, independence for the Donbass.
And that goes entirely consistent with the rhetoric of what the U.S. and NATO say that they want, virtue signal that they want is democracy.
Okay, well, they didn't want to give it.
And the second term was no NATO for Ukraine, which is what had been promised from the beginning.
And in terms of the Cuban Missile Crisis, I'll put into the bitchute comments the trailer for the movie 13 Days, which, did you see that movie, Brian, about 20 years ago?
Nope.
I recommend it.
I thought it was very well done on the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Kevin Costner, and I forget the actor who played Jack Kennedy, but I thought it was excellent.
Trump slammed Zelensky for saying end of Ukraine war is very, very far away.
And that was the meeting with the optics of Zelensky blowing up in the White House is that Trump said, all right, if you want peace, then a ceasefire.
And Zelensky wouldn't do it.
And then Trump said, all right, if you don't want a ceasefire, then you're going to have to do it without our help.
And good luck.
Trump hits pause on USA to Ukraine after Oval dust-up pressuring Zelensky on Russia talks.
Yeah.
Okay.
I like that.
That's good progress.
European leaders warn that conscription will be necessary as the EU launches an $840 billion program to prepare for war.
With Russia.
And when I was a lobbyist with results.org, to end poverty around the world and save a million lives, dying from preventable poverty every month, the total cost for 10 years investment would be about a trillion.
And now the EU leaders won $840 billion for war, and they're talking conscription.
And I don't...
You know, the destruction of all of the leaders just continues.
And it is orchestrated.
It is intentional.
All these EU leaders are as popular as FJB. I think that is by design.
And it keeps moving along for this polarization and the great choosing and the great awakening.
Brian, anything else on that topic?
Yeah, well, as Trump basically turns off the faucets of money heading to Ukraine to support this global war apparatus, the Europeans smell blood in the water, and they want access to the minerals, and they want to continue the encroachment on Russian territory in place of the Americans.
They think they can be a replacement, so basically Trump turns off the money, Zelensky comes over.
It becomes very obvious very quickly that Zelensky's a puppet actor, doesn't really know what to say, doesn't really know how to compose himself and address politically.
He's no Lavrov.
He's no, you know, he's no military genius.
He's just an actor puppet that's being put in there.
And, of course, what he's hearing from European leaders is, oh, even if America's out, you know, we'll continue to support you.
We've got to keep pressing this.
Well, all that is is the globalists whispering in the ears of European nations to keep the pressure up because, well, maybe we can't quite control Trump as much as we used to.
The political winds are changing.
Now, what I see is a lot of people saying, okay, well, Trump's just an actor, too.
And, you know, it's all just a show.
And there's...
Look, I don't know.
We've got a lot of history of Donald Trump.
And I agree he did The Apprentice.
I agree that he is an actor.
I mean, the guy's been in WWE events.
He tried to sell Trump-style shoes at one point in time.
He's got Truth Social worth billions of dollars.
He's got...
A reputation as a real estate magnate that goes back to the 80s.
Lots of books, lots of visibility.
I don't know that a guy like that is a puppet as much as we would think.
And I don't know that a guy like that really bows the knee to every influence that comes along.
And I know that, of course, a lot of people are going to say, well, he took $100 million from Miriam Adelson.
You know, he's always buddy-buddying up with the Jews on Zionism and Gaza.
And, you know, it's same old, same old all the time.
And it really is.
I mean, we're going to talk about the Epstein files later.
But like I said, I believe the full litmus test on whether he's a patriot or not is going to be when you see a perp walk among the globalist class.
I just simply don't believe that Bondi is going to pull that off or Patel is going to pull that off.
Obviously, there's chatter about the Epstein files and things like that.
But in the meantime, I think Trump, if you understand him historically, you understand that you have an ex-New York-style Democrat that is very close with a lot of Jews.
But one thing he does well is negotiate.
And the other thing he's doing very, very well is communicate.
And that's a whole lot better than the alternative because you can tell Trump ain't working off a teleprompter.
He's just calling it like he sees it when he does his job.
And to a larger extent, so is J.D. Vance.
And for these things, I give them credit.
But the question is, why have they held back from prosecuting the enemies of the state?
And to me, that's...
That's sort of a big deal.
I don't think the next four years we're going to see any sort of large-scale prosecutions.
I just don't believe it.
And so the question comes down to, are you going to sit and hope for a better America under sort of a right-hand version of the left-hand?
Or are you going to start looking for different factors than what you're used to?
In terms of what's controlling the U.S. government and the economy.
And I'm the one that's looking for different factors.
Right now, I'm digging deep into my books.
And I'm trying to find factors that are outside the normal influence of what we've taught are the governing influences.
And I'm putting a lot of energy into that right now.
Lots of energy into that right now.
probably four hours a day into understanding the spiritual implications and influences.
Look, what we have in this physical body is physical.
It comes and it goes.
But I believe that we've got a spiritual side, and I believe that that's more of the reality of the nature of humanity than who we are inside this body.
I'm not going to fall for the idea that we just die and slip off into nothingness.
I just I'm sure there's something coming after.
I want to look for What the standard is for how to understand that and understand what then I should do and how I should live.
Very good.
Thank you, brother.
Yeah, for the Empire, the Empire has bounced back and forth between the right and the left arm of the one imperial body.
And the only hope that we've ever had is that if somebody like...
A New York Democrat.
I mean, talk about being born into the machine and the inside knowledge.
We would have to have somebody infiltrate, somebody good infiltrate, and then we would need a reversal.
And I think that is exactly what happened.
And that is the only hope, to avoid another reset.
Okay.
Epstein clients, names, video, arrests.
When?
All right, so we got Pam Bondi here, Epstein Files, delivered to cash.
Okay, fine.
Yeah, we said that this stuff would be out on day one, and we have the theater where the whole world is watching, but we haven't had the breakthrough yet.
And I think that the people are ready enough.
We, the people of America, are done waiting.
What are the names?
Show us their faces.
When will they be arrested?
What are the charges?
When will they be tried?
What are the penalties?
We want answers.
We want justice now.
And then here, a little article from Haaretz in Israel.
Israel becoming a refuge for pedophiles, warns advocate for child sex abuse victims.
That is interesting.
And in terms of the factual background that we are looking at a pedophile network, this is the documentation that I have from five years ago, and that includes the videos of Jim Fetzer's Pizzagate Reeler Fiction, Fall Cabal.
I recommend that if you haven't seen that.
And the documentary Out of Shadows.
You have to look them up because these links, they were censored.
And removed, of course, because of the power of those documentaries.
So, I am optimistic that we are going to get this.
And I think that all that we're seeing is theater.
All that we're seeing are psyops.
And I'm not stressed because the progression continues to push the Great Awakening and the Great Choosing for people to choose a side.
And more and more people are choosing the truth.
The stories that we show seem to be showing is that fewer and fewer people can hang on to the narrative.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, the great news is that words like Pizzagate are making a comeback.
And people are going to start asking questions in sort of this new mindset.
It used to be only the, you know, one percenters of conspiracy theorists that read WikiLeaks.
John Podesta's emails and, you know, listen to the documentaries on what was inside those and, you know, even consider the Hillary Clinton side of it.
I can tell you there's a large swath of America that's just now beginning.
Like, I was sitting next to a lawyer having lunch the other day and the subject of Michelle Obama came up and I said, well, You know that was a man.
I said I was shocked when I first found out she was a man.
I was told by a friend of mine who has a friend in the Secret Service that he saw her peeing standing up.
This was in 2009. And it was reported to me secondhand through a friend of a friend.
And I was shocked.
But here I had this lawyer in 2024. Yeah, it was 2024. And he'd never even heard the theory floated.
Now, you talk about out of touch.
I mean, here's a guy that had never even considered that as a possibility.
So, look, the good news is a larger swath of the population is beginning to realize, and Candace Owens has done a great job with Macron's wife, husband, father, whatever.
I think there's a portion of the population that is beginning to ask the question, what was Pizzagate?
And of course, from my perspective, you've got the guys that walk around and say, it's the Jews, it's the Jews, it's the Jews.
The Jews capitalized on the nature of people that have an appetite for power at whatever cost.
We'll say Mossad capitalized on those people.
Well, the CIA does the same thing.
So does the Kremlin in terms of their secret services.
Look, I think if you think that all's fair in love and war and that these things are fair play, you're probably right.
But what's really at the heart of this is that People are being injured, destroyed, and, you know, don't forget, Jesus said it'd be better for you to have a large millstone hung around your neck and thrown into the deepest part of the sea than to, you know, injure one of these children.
So people that look at this world as if it's the end of the end of the end, I can tell you very carefully after my...
Latest survey of the Bible.
That's all you get.
You want money?
Sure, you can have it.
You're going to sacrifice everything else for it.
And you ain't going to have anything when it's all said and done.
When you exit, you're going to exit naked just like you came in.
And there's going to be nothing left on the other side.
And I think eternity is too long of a time to think that this world is all that there is to offer.
Well said.
Thank you, brother.
All right.
The Empire's debt system exposed with solutions prepared or another great reset.
Audit Fort Knox, gold, and audit the Federal Reserve.
Then seize the Fed.
And that would be what would happen.
The Fed is a criminal organization.
There is nothing federal about it.
It's as federal as federal.
And for a long time, when we had phone books, it was listed in the business section, not in the government section, because it is a privately owned organization, and the Fed has argued so in court.
And the Fed, Congressman Thomas Massey and Senator Mike Lee, reintroduced bills to audit and abolish the Federal Reserve Bank.
Okay, so this is what I'm talking about, step by step forward.
Oh, this is the purchasing power.
of the dollar and it has been ridiculously attacked and as a retired AP macroeconomics teacher I document and make my best case and that'll be the final article here as the historical overview in order to end the Fed because it is it is Orwellian this exponential growth of debt both national and total the aggregate debt Real government efficiency,
how to actually end debt and restore America's financial sovereignty in the face of misguided austerity measures proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency.
And that's what the old official story was, is austerity, that was your option.
And we can have prosperity.
And this is Congressman Dennis Kucinich, or former Congressman Kucinich, talking about monetary reform.
And Kucinich was connected.
His wife, Elizabeth, was working with the American Monetary Institute.
And the American Monetary Institute is an organization that I worked with.
And I spoke at a couple of their conferences with Stephen Zarlenga, who wrote an excellent book, The Lost Science of Money.
42% of available London silver vault holdings withdrawn over the last three months.
And that is what I keep pointing to, and a lot of the analysts are pointing to, is that when there is a demand to possess, not a paper promise for silver or gold, but the actual possession of the metal, of the physical item, then these derivatives contracts are going to explode.
And that's part of this article here.
And I'll just read this to you here.
In 2002, mega investor Warren Buffett wrote that the derivatives were financial weapons of mass destruction.
And a derivative contract is just a bet on future prices.
At that time, their total notional, that notational value, the value of the underlying assets from which the derivatives were derived, was estimated at $56 trillion.
Okay, so we have a quadrillion.
Of these contracts, but only the value of the assets are about $50 trillion.
So that means that these derivatives, these gambles, these promises to deliver is 20 times more than the physical assets.
And of course, if there's a demand for the physical assets, then that is all going to pop.
And if you'd like me to brief you the two reforms, public banking and monetary reform, just right there.
They're literally worth, as best I can tell, about a million dollars per average U.S. household.
So the good news with this is that there are solutions, and there have been solutions.
And the documentation that I provide, and this is published research via the Claremont Colleges, goes all the way back to Benjamin Franklin, who was so excited.
In colonial Pennsylvania, Ben and the other colonial leaders found out that if you're the bank, then...
You don't have to charge taxes.
It's an astounding game changer.
It's right there.
It's been right there.
And if we have a breakthrough and we have the truth, then pretty much every financial problem that we have today would be nearly instantly reversed.
And that is the good news.
Brian, your thoughts?
Following World War I, the Treaty of Versailles gutted Germany's economy resulting in hyperinflation.
And there are literally newspaper cartoons showing people taking a wheelbarrow full of money to trade for a loaf of bread.
The people were devastated.
The land was basically being sold off to carpetbaggers from England and others that had financed part of that war.
Remember, the Rothschilds have always made their fortunes financing both sides of conflict.
A fact that was illustrated in the fictional movie The International with Clive Owen that was pretty good, but the conversation that took place between Clive Owen and the banksters was indicative of how money really works.
Anyway, Germany was gutted.
The currency was destroyed.
The carpetbaggers applied more debt to Germany than the land was worth.
Hitler and his economic guys came along and they rose to power.
They were very upset because a once very proud people with a once very proud culture had been devastated.
What he did fundamentally, and I'm not going to say Hitler, I'm going to say his economic guy, whose name I don't remember at this point in time.
They said, well, let's do a bunch of infrastructure projects, including the Autobahn and other things, and we'll issue credits, which became Marx, and we'll rebuild the currency without the assistance of the usury inside the globalist banking machine.
And that didn't last long.
They did a great job.
Next thing you know, there was international demand for their marks.
I think it only took them five or six years to rebuild the economy and build up the value of that currency before, boom, World War II hits.
Was Hitler on the prowl?
Was he an occultist?
Lots of things were taking place.
At that particular time, and probably an insatiable appetite for power is certainly what we're seeing, or what we were seeing.
But there was a lot of the world that was on his side because he had managed to break loose from the machine.
Now, that said, I wanted to sort of sew this in on the other side of it, okay?
So he independently grew the nation's currency into something that was valuable.
Before World War II strikes.
The other day, I went to get a tire changed at the local, and right now I'm in a place called Brooklyn, Texas, at Lake Sam Rayburn, which is just outside of Jasper, Texas.
It's not like Hollywood.
They're really nice people.
Anyway, I went to get a tire changed, and I noticed that there were quite a few sort of...
Lower class people.
I don't mean to use the word class like class.
They just didn't have a lot of money.
And this one black lady, maybe 62, 63 years old, goes up to the desk and she's going to check out after new tires got put on the family truck.
And the tire place, which is a mom and pop shop, says...
Well, that'll be $563 today, Ms. Jones.
How much would you like to pay?
And I heard that.
And so I turned to the old fisherman next to me that I've been chatting with about fishing.
And I said, did you hear that?
He says, yeah, I heard that.
I said, is she giving her credit?
Yeah.
And I said, is she charging her interest?
She said, nope.
No interest.
It's been that way around here for years.
If you're old blood and you're the old family and we know you, I mean, apparently they make enough money on the tires that they didn't bother charging usury.
They just said, here's your price and, you know, pay it when you can because you're not going to come back and get next tires unless that old bill's paid.
No usury.
No usury.
So I asked the old man about it, and he said, yeah, they've been doing it like that for years.
It's just a family operation, and that's why people come here.
They come here because this is a classy operation, and this is all family stuff.
It's old blood, and if you're part of the old blood crowd, you can come in and get your tires and put down $100.
Credit check, no, no.
Nope.
All a handshake deal.
Anyway, I was kind of shocked because I hadn't seen anything like that being...
From Houston, as much time as I spend there, you've got to fill out a credit application.
You've got to pay interest.
You've got to do this.
I thought, well, that's just good business.
That's just good business.
I mean, the tire place probably spent $220 on the tires, and they're going to be owed $563.
They made a nice, healthy profit, but they didn't have to charge usury.
Anyway, that's my story about it, because we're just having to talk about...
Economics.
Well, take a look at the American economy.
Is there any place that you can go and borrow money and not have interest charged anymore?
It was just something I hadn't seen since I was a child.
Layaway programs when I was a kid.
Oh, you want to buy that letterman's jacket?
I remember high school.
Oh, you want to buy that high school letterman's jacket?
Yeah, we'll go ahead and sell you a Letterman's check.
How much would you like to pay?
I hadn't seen it since 1991. Very good.
For Germany in 1933, that is the best example of monetary reform, and that's the government creating what is used for money and directly investing it into infrastructure.
And the only real limits to the economy are labor.
And resources.
So if you have excess labor and if you have the resources, I mean, it's a no-brainer.
You should hook them up as the government because the investment in infrastructure produces triple benefits.
The upgraded infrastructure up to and including full employment.
And then you have...
Overall falling prices to the degree that the infrastructure investment improves the overall economy.
And that is one of the main ongoing topics of economics research is that infrastructure investments do indeed more than pay for themselves.
And Germany had an economic miracle.
If people want to know, well, why did they like Hitler so much?
It's because Hitler was the face of monetary reform and the possibility of having Honest conversations with the people.
Now, at the time, the international Jew was the enemy that they were talking about, but in terms of the central bankers, that is really the mechanism that they were shooting for, as well as the auxiliary people, the evil ones, pretending to have some sort of a religion other than Satanism, something other than total service to self.
Okay.
And in order for the empire to run, you have to have the official dictatorial censorship.
And that's versus the public demand for truth.
And we have a bunch of updates with that.
Jew patriot Meryl Nass, very important issue under the guise of stopping hate speech or misinformation.
The globalists are trying to accomplish planet-wide censorship using several governments under their control.
Yeah!
And she's saying that the House Judiciary Committee may, all of this stuff can fall if we just have the truth.
And the question is, is who's in charge?
Who's writing the scripts?
Because censorship has been official and it has been on the rise.
And we have covered this at the EU and the WEFers.
They have been promoting censorship as their most important issue, the number one issue, censorship.
And of course they say exactly what Meryl was talking about, is that they're saying, oh yeah, yeah, it's hate speech, that's what we're stopping.
And misinformation and disinformation.
Where the truth is, you get...
Stuff like this, and this is what they have to censor.
1900 scientists say climate change not caused by CO2, the real environment movement was hijacked.
And that there isn't an emergency.
And it's all bullshit.
And that's a big deal.
And this is the main event, or one of the main events, of Joe Olson as an engineer to be able to demonstrate the official lies with this so-called global warming.
21 states demand action as non-citizen voting scandals erupts.
And that's another area where the facts are going to make it obvious that, of course, we've had these stolen elections.
These electronic voting machines are designed to steal elections.
In another area where we have the official censorship versus a demand for truth, Trump suggests larger conspiracy regarding assassination attempts.
Yeah, damn right.
I mean, if you go back to July of last year and what we covered with this on the news show, is that we're in a psy-op and whatever it is that Trump is doing is also part of it.
And in terms of 9-11, I want to give this fire professional.
Three minutes here to give a briefing.
9-11 was a false flag.
For the first 10 years I did not think anything other than the official narrative.
Then after being shown a video, a close-up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down.
The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the impact of a of a jet.
From what I understood If you understand the outer skeleton of the building, the outer columns was like a fishnet.
And you had these inner core columns which were substantial, thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were.
The engineers always over-designed the building.
No steel frame building has ever collapsed.
And if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked, one on top of each other.
The stoves up at the top, yes, there's fire and they've been damaged.
But the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged.
So the structure underneath all of Something of this kind is what we should have seen when the top section of the towers collapsed onto the lower one.
The upper and lower sections should have mutually destroyed each other until all the energy is dissipated and the system comes to a rest.
Alternatively, as shown in this experiment with two towers made of snow, the top section could have fallen off to the side after the initial collapse.
What could not have happened is this.
A little tiny chunk of the building can't possibly fall and crush the entire structure below it.
This is such a simple, fundamental concept that architects and engineers were astonished in seeing it totally ignored by NIST. This is high school physics, and our whole society is being led to believe that these fundamental laws of physics, hard science...
Don't apply anymore.
...system to deform those members, it would slow down the descending mass and cause a descent at less than free-fall speed.
There is only one way for those buildings to have collapsed at the speed they did.
The buildings fall at a speed which...
can only occur if the structure has been removed, the vertical structure.
The same Shyam Sunder from NIST has acknowledged that freefall can only be achieved with the absence of a structure below.
Freefall time would be an object that has no structural components below it.
But what could have removed the supporting structure below, since the falling section didn't have any extra energy to do so?
The fact that it's coming down at freefall says all of the energy is being used to just make it go straight down, which means it's coming down through itself and not breaking up the building as it goes.
Something else has to be clearing the way.
There is only one known way to allow that kind of acceleration while removing the supporting structure.
A building cannot do freefall without it being blown up.
That's the only way it could come down at freefall.
The only way that a building can accelerate as it collapses is by having pre-engineered, precisely timed and precisely placed explosives.
In other words, controlled demolition.
Yep.
And this is just basic stuff.
RG911 to become a key player in 9-11 Presidential Commission.
This is Richard Gage, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth.
And he had over 3,000 professional architects and engineers put their license number on the line to say exactly what those gentlemen were talking about, is that the official story is not possible.
It is physically impossible.
And Joe Olson, as an engineer, has done great work along with Jim Fetzer to demonstrate that nukes were part of it.
Now, the idea of the blow-up point for people, government advisor warns the UK is heading for civil war.
And this is as their PM is asking for conscription in order to fight Russia in...
Ukraine.
And in terms of the destruction of the border, in terms of the destruction of the culture, the nanny state that goes on in the UK, where people who are even questioning what Israel is doing as a country are being arrested, then the Great Awakening is going.
Something is going to break.
Brian, your thoughts?
There's a lot there to unpack.
I don't know that I need to comment on 9-11 except I'll probably say something that I've said just because maybe there's some new listeners.
Before 9-11, all the agencies that make up the Department of Homeland Security had a combined budget of $36 billion.
After 9-11, they formed Homeland Security and the budget went up to $82 billion.
I meant billion, $32 billion, $82 billion.
Today it's $872 billion.
For the same security apparatus that on September 10, 2001 was spending $32 billion is now $870 billion.
I believe that these events are engineered as a smokescreen.
For a massive funding mechanism that allows contractors of all shapes and sizes to get rich and to funnel the money off to cultural shapers.
Those people want to see war at any cost, anytime, anywhere, anyhow.
But the problem is, how do you brainwash a population of people at this point in time, with the internet being what it is?
Into wanting to go out and fight that type of war.
It's different after Pearl Harbor because everybody believed that we had been attacked by those rotten Japanese as a process related to World War II, Vietnam, Gulf of Tonkin, same thing.
How do you get the conscripts?
How do you get the conscripts?
I wouldn't be surprised at this point in time if America, as a heartland, suffered some bruise or strike to be able to produce enough people that wanted to go out and fight with this military apparatus.
Now, my understanding under Pete Hegseth that enrollments have gone way up.
I think that's great.
If the military is a man's military filled with men and soldiers, I think that's a good thing.
But the question comes down to how do we deploy it?
And I think the same problems are going to develop in other nations as well.
So, again, I'm going back to what types of events can the government engineer that would get the response that they're looking for, which is more people willing to handle weapons to go in, kill their fellow man, to accomplish more of the warmonger's agenda.
I think it's getting more difficult every day.
But technology is advancing so far, so fast right now, that they may not need people to fight wars anymore.
It could all be done with artificial intelligence and computers that can launch the missiles.
It's a strange new world.
War is never what you think it is.
All right, next.
Trump, congressional address.
And the fallout.
We have four of those.
83% of Americans approve Trump's congressional address despite Democratic protests.
And the 83%, that was based on a corporate media poll.
If I believe.
I've got to get to that figure here.
Let's see.
Let's see, where was this?
Here we go.
Yeah, I didn't catch it here, but that was one of the...
83% of viewers supported Trump's speech according to the CBS News YouGov survey.
There you go.
Conducted immediately following the address.
And for CBS, for their audience, that's astounding.
Line of the night, Trump brings the house down, describing what was needed to secure the border.
And this was against the Democrat.
Well, I'll just play this.
The media and our friends in the Democrat Party kept saying we needed new legislation.
We must have legislation to secure the border.
but it turned out that all we really needed was a new president.
That was a good line. - Dude.
Honda shifts the civic production from Mexico to Indiana in response to Trump's tariffs.
And that is a predictable outcome in terms of the fear-mongering that you get from corporate media and officials.
I mean, these are the same people who have driven the economic policies for an exponential growth of debt, so you can't trust anything that they're saying.
And the tariffs aren't going to do anything by themselves.
It has to be coordinated with an intention in order to maximize the economic power for the people.
House Democrats obstruct the censure proceedings by blocking the floor and singing like asylum patients.
I'll go ahead and play this because this is also great.
This is what the people are seeing, the self-destruction of the Democrat Party.
And this is only going to work out if the Republicans are being used as vehicles for truth, which...
the breakthrough event for which has not happened yet.
On this vote, the yeas are 224, the nays are 198, with two answering present. the nays are 198, with two answering present.
The resolution is adopted.
Without objection a motion to reconsider is laid on the table.
The House will come to order.
The House will come to order.
Shh!
Will Representative Green present himself to the will?
By its adoption of House Resolution 189, the House has resolved that Representative Al Green be censured.
That Representative Al Green forthwith present himself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure.
and that Representative Al Green be censured with public reading of this resolution by the Speaker.
The House had come to order.
Clear the well, please.
Clear the well.
The House has to continue its business.
Pursuant to clause 12A of Rule 1, the House will stand in recess, subject to the call of the Chair.
The House will stand in the middle of the House.
As the show that we had, and Speaker Johnson decided to go ahead and punt, rather than to face that directly and to clear the well of the House.
But the American people are noticing.
And very few people are going to be excited about what they're seeing from the Democrat leadership.
Brian, your thoughts?
Seeing the last of a dying religion.
Sing and try to worship as a fake movement to protect their religion.
Look, the Democrats have to change and they know it.
They're not going to be able to change.
By the midterms.
They're going to have to start rolling out some new blood.
It's not going to be one of these idiots like AOC or any of these other younger, brighter styles.
It's going to be more something different.
They've got to find a different actor with a different image to change this program up.
The problem is they've got their claws and their teeth so deep into academia.
That it's hard to break loose from that level of psychological manipulation.
And so the children that are being pumped out, I think they've seen it, they've had enough, and they know.
The trans agenda was part of the smelly thing in the air that, hey, something really stinks around here.
And I think now that the Democratic machine as a money hoarding, money grubbing power machine, having been exposed more so than the Republican money grubbing, money hoarding power machine has.
But again, I really would say that most of those politicians are just money grubbing, money hoarding power machines with very rare exception.
I like Massey.
I wish we had 260 Masseys, but I just don't believe that that's possible.
I just don't think that's going to happen.
But the Democrats have to change their tune and they have to change it fast.
I've heard that they're coming out for paper ballots now.
I mean, you know, I've heard that they're going to change their policies and platforms and try to reform it, but I don't think anything's going to work.
I don't think anything's going to work for him either.
I think that the Democrat Party is going to end their existence.
They're going to cease to exist.
But we shall see.
It has to be the revelation of the truth, the breakthrough event, that is going to demonstrate the empire, and that looting and lying and killing has been a regular practice.
All right, and speaking of killing...
American virologist Dr. Robert R. Redfield, who served as the director of the CDC, has admitted that reports of, quote, so-called long COVID, unquote, are actually a cover-up for the global surges of the vax injury.
That is a big deal.
And that is the level that we need to get to.
Hawaii kills the bill to end vaccine exemptions after massive pushback from the public.
And that's a great step forward as people are taking steps to reclaim their sovereignty.
And we shall see.
RFK2 could go a long way with that leadership.
He's not there yet.
The world's deadliest parasite versus chlorine dioxide.
Clinical evidence, anecdotal evidence, and protocol.
And again, as I keep saying, I don't know anything about these alternative treatments.
This is not...
My field of study or very much of a practice other than trying to be healthy.
But I keep hearing and reading these reports of people who have paid attention and that they're able to demonstrate the benefits of these alternative treatments.
And because the official policy is to poison, torture and mind control us, then therefore it is completely understandable that anything that would have human beings be healthy.
New Mexico health officials mum on whether the adult died from or with measles.
And this goes with the attempt to have us all be shot with whatever it is that they're going to say is a necessary treatment for a measles outbreak is that it's all bullshit and you can't believe anything that they're saying is that these people, just like with COVID, There was a test for COVID. And I'll go ahead and put into the show notes.
Actually, I'll just throw it up right here, right now.
The article that I have, that the tests for COVID were unreliable.
And after this bogus testing, nobody should believe anything these officials say.
And everybody should be demanding arrests.
And this essay is sufficient documentation to get us there.
Brian, your thoughts?
You're supposed to put your plants in the ground 10 days after the average date of last frost for your region.
That's coming up about now here down in Texas.
So our garden isn't going to be as big as it used to be this year, but we have not only worked our seeds to see what kind of sprouts we got.
I think those seeds are getting a little old.
They're about three years old.
Which they declined over time.
If you think you're going to buy a seed bank and it's going to work 10 years from now as well as it works next year, you're crazy.
You've got to have fresh seeds because they go like 100% effective to 90% to 75% to 35% and then you just can't get any seedlings out of them.
Seed bank is probably one of the best things you can buy.
I buy mine from Liberty Seed Bank.
I try to cycle that about every two to three years.
Knowing what's in your soil, simple soil test, not very difficult to perform, and some fundamentals about how to feed them.
Basically, you're looking for an NPK that's going to be about on average 16, 16, 16, and then you've got some rare earth minerals to throw in there, copper, magnesium, potassium, and others.
I use the mix that comes with the Mitleider gardening method.
If you're just looking for something easy that you can try for a first time, try your squashes, try your eggplants, try your beans.
The cycles are shorter.
You get results faster.
The fruit is much bigger.
You know, you don't want some delicate tomato to start out with.
You don't want some rare hybrid or some rare type of...
You want something that's well tested, so ask your gardening center what's out there and just begin to learn to work a few plants.
I think you'll fall in love with it.
I think our garden this year probably will be about a third of the size of what we've done in the past.
I've had as many as 900 plants in the ground with 468 tomato plants and another 500. Either okra or beans or squash, eggplant, peppers, and others.
I've had a lot of success gardening.
I like doing it, but it really takes a lot of space.
It takes a lot of time.
And if you know what you're doing, it takes some water, but not a tremendous amount.
I use the Mitleider method.
It's been incredibly successful for me in the past.
It's just that...
We never made any money off, but it's a money pit.
You'll throw money in.
You'll grow it.
You'll have a great time.
It's a nice experience, but you'll never make a dime off it.
Very good.
We'll go on to final thoughts.
Well, Patriots, I mean, every week since the Trump inauguration has shown events pushing the Great Awakening and the Great Choosing forward, and the events become ever more important and ever grander in scale.
So hang in there.
Keep paying attention.
Keep looking for openings.
Keep on.
I had a family member who just this week who had voted for the actor playing Biden and now saying that this individual hates Biden from what they've seen just over the last few months.
So I think that we're seeing the remarkable transformation of AMREV-2 and World War III. I'm going to say the same
thing.
I think it's becoming a theme with me, but freedom...
You've all heard the term, you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
I can tell you this is not about a collection of more knowledge than the next guy.
The truth that sets you free is the truth of living a moral life because then you have nothing to regret.
And if you have nothing to regret and nothing to fear and nothing that you've done wrong and you can justify your actions, there's another thing I learned this week.
I've just noticed it.
John 18, 20, I think it was.
Jesus is in front of Pilate, and he says, I didn't keep any secrets.
I didn't have any secrets.
Everything I taught, everything I said, I did so openly.
There's no secrets.
So, you know, if you're involved in something where you have to keep secrets, and that's sort of the nature of the beast.
One of the things that's been nice about my life is that I've never, Really had to keep any secrets.
I've never really had to deal with something that was so shameful that I couldn't put it away.
I've made a lot of big mistakes.
But you take it to the cross.
You get it over with.
It's done with.
You start to clean up your life.
And you'll see that it doesn't take long.
It doesn't take long before you're absolutely fine with whatever's happening in current events.
And you can deal with whatever gets thrown at you because you're just a peaceful person.
That's well said, brother.
Yeah, take responsibility first for what you think and what you say and you do and have your life be as much of an expression of virtue as you can, each in our uniquely beautiful and powerful self-expression and experience.
All right, Patriots, thank you very much.
Thank you, Brian.
And we'll be back tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection