All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 28, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:50:59
The Raw Deal (28 February 2025) with Guest Host Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
may hear in this program is of the sole discretion and benefit of the host of this program you are listening to.
Revolution Radio does not endorse any commercial products, nor does it accept monetary compensation for on-air advertising of commercial products, nor will it ever.
We are and shall remain 100% listener-supported.
Any product advertising on this program are considered used at higher risk, and Revolution Radio shall not be held liable for any claims or damages received from any product advertised.
eyes within this program.
Revolution Radio, where information never sleeps.
Help!
I need somebody.
Help!
Not just anybody.
Help!
You know I need someone.
Help!
When I was younger, so much younger than today.
I never needed anybody.
It is helping anyway.
But now these days are gone, I'm not so self-assure.
Now I find a gentline.
I'm open up the doors.
Help me if you can, I'm feeling down.
And I do appreciate you being around.
Help me get my feet back on the ground.
Won't you please, please help me?
Greetings, everybody.
My name is Brian Davidson.
I'm in for Dr. James Fetzer today.
He is at his brother's funeral, and he asked me to cover his show.
I am, wait a second, getting a message here.
Let's just make sure I understand that.
All right.
All audio is good.
I want to let everybody know who I am.
I've been a contributor to Dr. Fetzer's show for about four years, I believe.
I've done a number of different shows with him on a number of different topics.
I've specialized in helping break out false flags and come up with the analysis of current events.
For a long time for Dr. Fetzer, he's had me run his Truth vs.
News show.
He's had me run a number of different shows and fill in for him.
I'm a friend of Dr. Fetzer.
I met with him again in New Orleans last, I believe it was last weekend or the weekend before last, as well as a number of other people who listen and are fans.
I have spent time with Dr. Fetzer at his house, especially on the Sandy Hook scenarios.
I have made attempts to outreach to some of the people in Sandy Hook, and without saying any names, I've had some verbal chatter with some of the people that Dr. Fetzer claims are involved with the Sandy Hook stuff, so I'm pretty familiar with that.
I provided a number of different affidavits for Dr. Fetzer's Supreme Court cases, and I've taken Dr. Fetzer's critical thinking course as well, which provided a nice little framework for how to understand and break through different argumentation cycles.
I wouldn't consider myself to be an apologist.
Quite as much, but I would consider myself to be pretty good at figuring out what's going on with current events.
That said, it's also well known among the people that Dr. Fetzer, among our listeners, that Dr. Fetzer will allow all sorts of people with different frameworks for understanding current events to come on to his shows.
I particularly have a framework from a Christian perspective that I'm pretty proud.
I've been developing it for quite a few years, and I'm a lot more advanced than I probably let on in the live shows that we do with Dr. Fetzer, just because I understand that the audience isn't necessarily looking at things through the same lenses that I am looking at.
And so for that said, I'm going to go ahead and start this show out today talking a little bit about my framework for understanding current events.
This is going to be a little bit different for many of you, and I'm doing my best to sort of shoot from the hip before I get into the current events.
But generally, I believe that there is an outsider.
Who is outside of this world, who's simultaneously present throughout all time and history, who gives us feedback in terms of through the Bible as well as through His Spirit to help us understand how we should live today.
And while a lot of people will take the time and get caught up in sort of gathering up I find that approach to be, well, it's enlightening on a lot of different levels, but it's not the light in terms of how we should live.
What happens when looking at current events from a two-dimensional perspective, like a puzzle piece, is that we We tend to end up with a very fragmented picture of what's happening in this world today.
The fragmented picture might find us in a position where we're over-focused on one particular villain and under-focused on another, where we end up having a number of different blind spots about who is driving events and what the events are being driven toward.
And so the two-dimensional picture is inadequate.
I instead prefer to take a different approach where I think more in terms of what is it that I should do today or what is it that I should do tomorrow to prepare myself for whatever these villains of culture are putting together for us.
I like to...
Help people understand this, but my approach is more of a, the scripture is a light unto my path approach, and the path is a path that I have to walk on the straight and narrow one step at a time, making decisions from the time I wake up in the morning to the time I go to bed at night.
And then paying very close attention to whatever comes to me throughout my thoughts in the day.
Now, I can say this for certain.
A quick study of history will show that some of the greatest thinkers that ever lived are not contemporary to our generation.
There are still a lot of great commenters out there today, but there are also a lot of people who are caught up in the world of the illusions.
The great delusion is what I would call it.
People who are caught up in thinking that they're going to get the answers for how we should live from diving deep into the puzzle pieces of current events and understanding what drives them.
That, to me, just simply doesn't work as well as one step at a time.
Besides, There are a tremendous amount of mistakes and misconceptions that can be developed when looking at events in a fragmentary way.
Now, I'm not saying that we shouldn't have to analyze them.
I'm not saying that it's not an important part of what we're after, but my goal in life is a lot more towards helping the individual So,
you might say, well, this sounds crazy, this philosophy is ridiculous, but let me point out to you that the Bible does give us a tremendous amount of insight.
Although it's very mysterious and very fragmented and very, frankly, difficult to study, but it does encourage us to put a great deal of time into understanding what happens with end times events.
So as a Christian, we are told to pay very close attention to the end times.
We're told to...
Think about these things and make an attempt to analyze them.
And while there's a tremendous amount of words that can be used that are unfamiliar to the normal layperson's vocabulary that can make it seem incredibly complex, it's really not.
Once you understand some fundamentals about the nature of God and the way that He interacts with His creation, A lot of the pieces begin to fall into place very well, and as those pieces fall into place,
they create something called a hermeneutic, which is a big word for saying a proper way to interpret the Bible as well as a proper way to interpret current events as they lead to a conclusion at the end of time.
Now, whether or not the end of time is...
Seven years away, 300 years away, or 2,000 years away.
I do not know, but we are, as Christians are told, that we're supposed to be looking through the lens of Scripture toward the second coming of Christ himself.
And let me just remind you all that between the...
The opening of Genesis and Genesis 11, which is a chunk of the Bible, there was approximately 1,500 years.
And between Genesis 11, I'm sorry, that's the opening of the Bible to Genesis 6, appears to be about 1,500 years.
Then from Genesis 6 to 11 appears to be another period of time that could have been as much as 500 years or more.
And then from Genesis 11 up to the arrival of Christ in person was approximately 2,000 years.
And since Christ has been here, it is approximately another 2,000 years.
Now, what's interesting is that the crucifixion of Christ took place, and it's debatable, but the year would have been 31 AD. And the destruction of Jerusalem took place in approximately 70 A.D. Well, guess what?
We're coming up on another 2,000-year period in the year 2031 A.D. to 2070 A.D. So I happen to be a guy who believes in something called the time-year principle in the Bible, which is a hermeneutical approach for interpretation of the Bible.
And I believe that we may be very well coming up on the end of times, which means that if I'm correct, that we can begin to really understand current events today in a structure that helps us feel like we are adhering to biblical principle in anticipating the arrival of a new future.
So that said, I've given you the 10,000-foot overview on how I think, and now we're just going to go ahead and cover some stories before we get into the callers in the second hour.
And I imagine that there are going to be quite a few callers out there that may have questions.
I'm happy to do my best to answer them.
I'm not an apologist for Christianity because I'm a professional private investigator by trade.
But I do spend some time reading the scriptures and making sure that I understand what they are, how they work.
And so if you have questions, I'll be happy to field them and do my best with them in the second hour.
That said, we're going to start out with a story that Dr. Fetzer sent me from the Dennis Kucinich Report.
It's called The Plunder of Ukraine, a Story of Debt, Greed, and Betrayal.
I'm sorry, this is not Dennis Kucinich, this is Elizabeth Kucinich.
And she just published the article a couple days ago.
Basically, it has a large picture overview of the systematic plundering of Ukraine by international financial institutions and governments.
It says that it's underway, that it's basically, they have predatory terms that will cripple Ukraine's future, cause, a continuation of war, and it's fundamentally colonization that's in action.
She makes the point that Ukraine, and this is a point that I've made before, is home to some of the world's richest agricultural land and vast mineral deposits, including critical rare earth elements, and today it's being sacrificed to an international community.
Its natural wealth is placed on the altar of global capital for fertile land, water, and fragile ecosystems, stand on the brink of exploitations viewed not as living, sustaining forces, but as natural resources for extraction, debt collateral but as natural resources for extraction, debt collateral for creditors, for fuel, and industrial appetites.
Now, from a current events perspective, I'm just going to sum it up right here that you could write forever about the different forces and influences that may be involved in setting up or had been involved in setting up Ukraine for the disaster that had taken place.
It is clear to me that Ukraine could have settled their problems with Russia by adhering to the Minsk agreements back in 2014.
However, we and Ukraine worked together through Victoria Nuland, Jake Sullivan, and others to help implement a program that would inevitably change.
Lead to Ukraine's war with Russia.
And let me give you the big picture on that.
Russia had made agreements in the Donetsk region that the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine would be protected from UN involvement and westernized involvement.
And that was the agreement, but the Minsk agreements, we backed out on our side of the deal and we continued pushing western forces and western concepts.
Into the Donetsk region and that threatened Russia because basically we were putting a military installation on their border in Ukraine and Russia by 2022 felt like they had no choice except to begin to take action toward this continued Western hegemony.
That was encroaching on its borders and becoming a threat for them.
And so while the Western media's discussion of how it all took place, they're of course going to blame Russia.
They're going to do what they always do, which is gaslight.
Make the situation appear like Russia was the big aggressor, that Ukraine was just the poor little victim, and poor Zelensky and all of his partners are up against the Hitler-esque style of Russia.
So it's just a vast oversimplification of the issue, but it was planned all along.
Now, why?
Why did it take place?
Well, we helped perform a coup in Ukraine.
And made sure that our Western-allied puppet actor, Zelensky, was put into a position of authority.
He has now been installed as fundamentally a dictator, as there's no more elections in Ukraine, and this war has been financed not only by the West, but by Westernized forces as well.
And what was the long play?
Well, I can guarantee you that we don't go out there and help Ukraine or any other nation get into a war unless we believe that there's an upside for us.
And one of the upsides in this particular war was that there would be, oh, fundamentally approximately $300 billion sent over to them, a number of different arms that had to be cycled out of our inventory.
And that it would all come with strings attached, that Ukraine would have to repay that.
Well, how would they repay it?
Well, the mineral rights in Ukraine are now what's under negotiation.
Ukraine has been devastated.
They've lost over a million of their soldiers.
They're unable to continue to effectively fight in their own power, even with the weapons that we continue to provide them.
And so now it's time for Donald Trump and Putin to divide up the spoils and decide who gets what in the match.
It looks like Trump is trying to tie himself to the different capitalistic forces that are in play and try to take out as many minerals as they can as repayment for the debt for the war.
So this particular article that was done by Elizabeth Kucinich talks about how Ukraine is basically going to be divided up, plundered under the guise of aid, global powers, and seizing its land and wealth, therefore running it out.
And so she makes a big, long...
Presentation about how it's been a geopolitical chess match from the very beginning with color revolutions, Western control, propaganda, a push for privatization, and creating a debt trap, which we know the Rothschilds have been involved in creating wars, fomenting wars, and creating debt traps for many, many centuries.
Fundamentally, I think their first major play on this was one where they came in and financed both Britain and the French on the French Revolution side prior to Napoleon.
And again, they financed both sides of the war and then decide who would win and who would lose, creating a massive debt trap.
They ended up making the decision that Napoleon would lose.
But out of Napoleon, remember that the Jews were virtually nothing.
Prior to Napoleon's arrival, one of Napoleon's strong plays and strong ambitions in conquering the areas of Europe that he did was that he believed in something called Zionism.
He believed that the Bible indicated that the Jews would come back to their land, that they would create a new kingdom.
And that this kingdom would have to be established to usher in the return of the Messiah, and that the Jews were basically just innocent people who had been harassed for the previous 1700 years.
All they did was study for the test, which is, you know, theoretically what the Jews would have claimed that they would have done.
They're sitting around reading their Talmud and reading their scriptures, studying for their tests at the end of life, and that they were basically just innocent victims and that they needed to be re-established.
While the Rothschilds beat Napoleon in that conquest, the French Revolution was fomented, and it did begin, and it was sort of an off-with-their-head transition.
In history, the other nations continued to go more towards a traditional type of Christianity, although there were certainly corruptions involved in that.
Think of the Founding Fathers, think of the Puritans.
The Puritans were trying to escape the new church that was being formed in England.
Which was basically a knockoff of the Catholic Church with the king as the monarch as the head instead of the Pope.
The Puritans said, we're not going to have any of it.
And they bought boats and they moved over to America on many of the boats, the Mayflower, Nina, Pinta, and Santa Morita being other ones.
They set up colonies.
There ended up being 13 colonies.
And while we say it was sort of a new birth or a new beginning at that particular time, it didn't take long for that movement to be corrupted from its natural, original intentions.
And fundamentally, the founding fathers, many of them were oligarchical-style Freemasons.
That ended up setting up constitutions.
We broke loose in the Revolutionary War from Britain's control, even though we owed them a tremendous amount of money.
But again, they were the ones that financed both sides of the Civil War, and at the end of the Civil War, they were the ones that ended up adding a tremendous amount of debt to the situation.
That's the 10,000-foot overview.
And fundamentally, the United States Constitution was formed, and then by the time Abraham Lincoln got around and the Civil War came around, again, the Rothschilds are financing both sides of the disagreement, and they are the ones that come out at the end with the most to gain, and America is fundamentally, in 1871, reformed as a corporation, is my understanding of generally how things went.
So now the corporation of the United States, which controls the Federal Reserve and other aspects of what I'll say is sort of our deep state or the secret state behind the state, have had a tremendous amount of control and power over America while America is deceived into believing that our votes really matter and that we can really control the politics.
At the same time, the whole left-right paradigm between Republicans and Democrats has continued to be fomented to keep America divided against the oligarchical rulers that are in place and the corporate interests that drive the debt that we as a nation have had.
So that's sort of a huge 10,000-foot overview on the situation.
And that said, let's go ahead.
Let me see.
Oh, I'm supposed to be taking a close look at my time to see when there's breaks, but I'm not hearing any of the music, so I'm just going to continue with the next story.
That said, that was my 10,000-foot overview of how Ukraine is going to be plundered, and according to the article, it will end up doing nothing but enriching even further the rich folks that are running society.
So this is a Politico article, the next one that Dr. Fetzer put together for me that was under the category of trade, and it's called EU Offers Its Own Win Win Mineral Deal to Ukraine.
So now I guess the European Union is calling the shots with Zelensky.
This was written by a writer by the name of Seb Starsevich.
And the European Union offered its own agreement on critical materials to Ukraine on Monday, just as the U.S. President Donald Trump claimed Washington was close to inking the deal with Kyiv for the rights to its vast natural resources.
So look here, we have sort of a jockeying for position between United States interests and European Union interests.
And it's all about who's going to get the plunder of Ukraine once this thing is all over.
Now, Europe's Commissioner for Industrial Strategy, Stephanie Seorn, said he'd pitched the rival proposal to Ukrainian officials he met in Kyiv during a visit by the European Commission to mark the third anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion.
21 of the 30 critical materials Europe needs.
Can be provided by Ukraine in a win-win partnership.
So I guess the question here is, what is it that the EU is going to try to offer to Ukraine, given that their current government is gutted, that they're running on a dictatorship system where the current dictator has very little power,
very little control, and how is he going to use his position, Zelensky being, To provide these materials to this special interest in Europe that wants these minerals just as well.
So, what Trump has done is he has made increasingly aggressive overtures towards Ukraine for the rights to its mineral riches, and he's demanded as much as $500 billion in compensation for Washington's continued support for Kyiv in fending off Moscow's invasion.
Folks, we're going to a time break here, so let's go ahead and let the time break run, and I'll be back after that break to talk about the rest of what's happening.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host. and now we return you to your host.
Thank you.
Well, welcome back, folks.
This is Brian Davidson sitting in for Dr. James Fetzer on our show today.
I'm happy to be here.
We were talking about Ukraine, and I think I want to continue to talk about Ukraine for a few minutes.
And so I'm going to pull up an article here that has just come out recently on lourockwell.com.
I'm just going to use a little program called Perplexity that I have loaded into my research browser.
That is an artificial intelligence summarizing structure.
That way we don't have to read the entire article, but we can get a summary and discuss what it is.
Many of you might like this particular application because when I see an article that I don't have time to go over, as I prepare for the news, I'm looking for headlines and I'm looking for content that helps me understand the situation.
But sometimes there are issues where I just simply can't go as deep as the author of the article really would like me to go.
And the research is really deep.
So I use this app called Perplexity, which is basically an artificial intelligence.
And if you can see my screen, which will happen when we post this recording later on, you'll see that Perplexity just takes the article and provides an artificial intelligence summary.
So let's go ahead and read that.
This article is called, Does Trump Really Have a Plan for Ukraine?
It was put up by the Moon of Alabama, who is a frequent contributor to the LewRockwell.com.
And I'm going to go ahead and summarize that and get into it real fast.
According to the article, it's unclear whether President Trump has a concrete plan for Ukraine, despite his claims of working to end the war.
Experts like Professor Mearsheimer have pointed out inconsistencies in Trump's behavior.
While Eve Smith cites Brian Berletich and John Helmer, who suggest that Trump's approach may be more about maintaining U.S. dominance than achieving a genuine break from past foreign policy.
The article raises concerns that Trump's administration may lack a clear strategy and that his actions might be aimed at creating a perception of progress rather than making real progress towards peace.
Ultimately, the author concludes that the conflict may need to be resolved on the battlefield.
Excuse me.
Well, isn't that interesting?
Isn't that interesting?
Now, I would say, if I'm just simply running an analysis of Trump's movement so far, United States continued hegemony.
Then I see him as a peacekeeper.
For instance, take a look at the problem in Gaza.
He's not trying to achieve a peace or get the Israelis to back down on the people in Gaza and the Palestinians.
He's simply trying to negotiate how he can How he can supplement his promise to the Zionists that I'm sure that that was a deal that was made prior to the 2024 inauguration and maybe even much earlier.
But take a look at what's really happening.
He's negotiating on behalf of Israel and on behalf of the Zionists.
To try to find a way to displace the Palestinians as safely as possible, while at the same time putting himself, America, and other interests into the driver's seat in terms of what the developmental interests are going to look like in the future in Gaza.
So he's tried to negotiate with the Egyptians about displacing the Palestinians.
He's tried to negotiate with the Saudis about displacing them into Saudi Arabia.
He's tried to negotiate with the Indians.
And he's basically, it seems to me, that he's made a promise to Israel in exchange for what?
Who knows?
But he's made a promise.
Well, we can talk about that later because I do have a lot of theories.
But he's made a promise to them to do it.
Now, that said, let's take a look at some of the other movements that he's made towards continuing.
And again, does Trump really have a plan for Ukraine?
So, whether or not the author thinks it's clear, he suggests that Trump's approach may be more about maintaining U.S. dominance than achieving a genuine break from past foreign policy.
Well, Trump has gone after BRIT. He has warned the BRICS members that any attempts to displace the United States dollar as the chief global currency would result in sanctions to say the least, if not potentially outright war.
Let's look at some other vast moves that Trump has begun to telegraph that he's going to make.
It appears that he's trying to create a new North American Union.
Absorbing Greenland, Canada, and Mexico all have been things that he's talked about in terms of what the new outlook might look like if he could have his negotiations go his way.
So, folks, I must ask, look at the inefficiency of the European Union.
Look at how more government More consolidation causes more problems for more cultures and more people.
Look at how the genuine centralized global new world order creates such dissatisfaction for the people of the world.
And the question is, do the people of the world actually have any power to negotiate their own authority separate from these large...
Do we want that to happen in North America?
Do we want to see Ukraine absorbed into a European Union-type situation or what's left of Ukraine when this is all said and done?
Why do this?
Why make a move towards Greenland?
Well, Greenland represents a lot of Russian shipping routes.
There's four major shipping routes that go across that North Pole that all have important connections to Greenland.
So Russia does provide a tremendous amount of resources across that North Pole into this.
Now, I know what you're thinking.
What do you mean, Brian?
I thought the North Pole was covered with ice, just like the South Pole was covered with ice.
No, those are just simply waters.
And if you go check it out and you dig deep enough, you'll find that the northernmost confluence that's ever been recorded on the...
On the Influence Project shows people literally floating in boats out in the middle of the confluence of latitude and longitude that they got to.
So it is not solid ice, and there are basically four major shipping routes that come through there that pass from Russia through Greenland and to Europe and to America.
So it's very important.
But if you're reading between the lines, it seems like Trump is trying to negotiate for some sort of...
North American Union, which if many of you know your history, it goes way back.
The North American Union was an idea that was floated a long time ago with the, I forget the name of the bill that was passed that was trying to create basically a highway superstructure through Mexico all the way down to South America.
That failed.
It's been something that's been pushed by the globalists for a long, long time.
Why?
Because the American people are not as easy to control as they would probably hope that we are, because our Constitution isn't as easy to displace as they would hope, because the Second Amendment isn't going away anytime soon like they would hope would happen.
And because the American people really do take a lot of pride in America and believe that their vote continues to work and demand, quote-unquote, democracy.
So that makes America very difficult to absorb in sort of the globalist union, although I can guarantee you that it was the plan.
Of many of the original founders, that at some point in time we would become the rising global figure who would generate a single world leader underneath the guise of Washington, D.C.'s influence.
Now, why would I go and make a statement so crazy like that?
Well, take a look at the layout of Washington, D.C. Take a look at the people.
George Washington, frankly, is the one who ordered the design from a French mason who used all sorts of sacred geometry and layouts and pagan temple-style buildings and structures to lay out Washington, D.C. It is a mystery that's been protected.
For quite a while, there's a very good documentary on the layout of Washington, D.C. It'll come to me.
It's End Times Productions did it, and it's called The Belly of the Beast.
Now, if you go to Rumble and watch that documentary, I think they have the director's cut that's over two hours long, you'll see a little bit about why Washington, D.C. was laid out the way it was.
And when it says the belly of the beast, they're talking about the Capitol building with the very large oval dome that's in place in the Capitol building.
Now what's interesting, what's directly across from that oval dome?
A massive obelisk.
An obelisk is something that goes back to the ancient fertility cults.
The dome is something that goes back to the ancient fertility cults.
And both these two symbols represent the, how should I say this, the incarnation of a new god.
The 13th part of Osiris, I believe it was, but basically Egyptian symbolism.
For fertility, the Asherah pole being a giant male member fundamentally when you break it down and get underneath the hood on what it means, in the Bible they called them Asherah poles, and the dome being a giant womb symbolic of ushering in a single central world leader who would bring all the nations together.
Underneath America.
Now, you might not be somebody who gives a lot of credence to these particular perspectives on things, but for a Christian guy like me, I'm always trying to figure out what I can rely on and what I can't rely on and what is noble and what is pure.
There are two general approaches to understanding American history.
Number one is sort of the David Barton, all the early founding fathers were solid Christians that felt nothing but the love of Christ in their hearts and were just doing their best.
I can assure you folks that that wasn't always the case.
There was always a Christian influence, but that was necessary at the time.
On the other hand...
Many of the founding fathers, including George Washington and others, Thomas Jefferson and others, Adams and others, Benjamin Franklin and others, were members of secret societies.
Now, were they primarily Christians or were they primarily members of these secret societies?
The secret society you really had to be careful for was that which was being born of the French at that particular time.
While that's a study in and of itself, I think it's two ways to look at the American history and the American founding fathers.
Remember, we had 13 colonies.
Remember, Osiris was the Egyptian god who was cut into 13 pieces, 12 of which were recovered, and the 13th piece is not, and the 13th piece represents the rise of the new god.
And so the Founding Fathers did believe that there was a purpose for America, but I would argue that the purpose that they thought so was not in alignment with the Bible whatsoever.
It was more in alignment with the old ancient pagan fertility cults, which is why you see the Greek-style temples in D.C., the architecture and the sacred geometry that's laid out across the nation.
Let's get into the next...
The next article, this is another one.
Okay, now this one is by the Truth Seeker.
I ran nuclear sites on high alert amid attack fears.
And again, let's see how long is this one.
This one's pretty long, but I'm not going to read the whole thing.
Let's sort of get through the first couple chapters.
On the picture that's with it, there's just simply a large missile.
Iran-made defense system as Karsh unveiled February 18, 2024. So they're quoting from Iran International.
Iran has placed its nuclear sites on high alert, deploying additional defenses amid escalating fears of a joint Israeli-U.S. attack.
The Telegraph reported on Tuesday.
Citing two unnamed government sources, the outlet said the Islamic Republic has also been bolstering defenses around key nuclear and missile sites, which include the deployment of additional air defense system launchers.
According to the sources, the measures are in response to growing concerns of potential joint military action by Israel and the United States.
They, Iranian authorities, are just waiting for the attack.
And are anticipating it every night as everything has been on high alert, even in sites that no one knows about, one source said.
Now, folks, we have heard a lot of banging of the war drums in the Middle East related to nuclear-scale attacks.
And let's just take a look.
Of course, we had these large bombs that were deployed to end World War II. All of the propaganda tells us that Oppenheimer put together the project, which resulted in Fat Man and Little Boy, the two nuclear bombs.
Once it was revealed that these quote-unquote nuclear bombs existed and were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a massive display of American power and force, the whole world went into a nuclear arms race which started a Cold War with Russia by the time it got to Reagan.
The Cold War was in its coldest particular point, and Reagan would have to begin to fight us out of it.
But fundamentally, in America, as a result of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they used those, quote-unquote, nuclear events to propagandize the American people in many, many ways.
Many of the people that were born in the 40s and 50s can tell us about They were 10, 11, 12 years old, and they had to hide under their desks for safety purposes.
Remember, it's all about public safety.
They had to hide under their desks during the air raid sirens, the bombs, and there was, of course, the videos that were released of...
Massive swaths of property being destroyed.
And there was the videos being released of the bombs going off in the upper atmosphere.
And everyone was in a state of tremendous fear.
And people thought, oh, we must build bunkers.
We must have a government continuation plan.
We've got to dig deep holes in the ground and giant tunnel structures and systems.
And let me remind you that these were again massive spending projects that have never been used to this day, all done in the name of public safety.
So you had an American population that was trained and conditioned to believe that the end was nigh.
With such bold moves as the Cuban Missile Crisis and others, that it was all going to come to an end in a split second, and that we had to do everything we could to protect ourselves from the big bad boogeyman, Russia, who now had these nuclear things as well, and war was always on the edge.
Therefore...
Gotta up that government spending.
Up and up and up and up and up and up.
Folks, let me remind you of 9-11.
9-11 was there to destroy the buildings on behalf of Eldon Silverstein.
But the big play in 9-11 didn't even have to do with Saddam Hussein.
It didn't even have to do with, quote unquote, Osama bin Laden.
It had to do with getting the American people to accept and agree to a security infrastructure spending program that would consolidate the power of government underneath one large militaristic umbrella.
And the spending would be unbelievable.
Let me tell you something.
All the agencies that became Department of Homeland Security prior to September 11th had a budget of approximately $36 billion.
As a result of 9-11, the Patriot Act was hot off the press.
How long had it been being developed?
We don't know.
But the Patriot Act, hot off the press, all of a sudden, as a result of 9-11, the political will was there for the people to fear for their safety, which allowed the passing of the largest spending bill America has ever seen in proportion to anything we had ever seen.
And what it did was it created the Department of Homeland Security.
And all of a sudden, that $36 billion budget for those same agencies that were consolidated under the Department of Homeland Security was $86 billion.
$86 billion.
More than doubled overnight as a result of the quote-unquote 9-11 attacks.
Because some guys with box cutters and passports Stole planes and took out buildings, and it was a threat to the whole wide world.
$86 billion.
$86 billion became $140 billion, which became $240 billion.
And folks, do you know where we are right now?
That's right.
The same agencies that make up the Department of Homeland Security today spend $870 billion.
To protect our infrastructure.
Folks, 9-11 was a tremendous success.
And the only reason that the American public went along with it, the only reason the American public went along with it, was that we were scared.
And that our mainstream media scared Susie's soccer mom and sued Jim Middle Class and had all these people running scared, thinking that, boy, if they can intercept a couple of airplanes, crash them into buildings, what else could they do if they were really, really on the way?
And then the boogeymen had to be developed.
We had ISIS. We had other spending programs and others.
Back to the article, Iran International.
How much is real?
How much is propaganda?
How much is saber-rattling to try to get position, to try to keep the Israelites and Trump from continuing to expand?
Let me tell you something, folks.
The Greater Israel Project is much, much bigger than you can imagine.
The Greater Israel Project is not just the Gaza Strip, folks.
That's just going to be where they do the new buildings, the new hotels.
That's just where they're going to set up the tourist destinations for all of the world's Jews and Christians that will come together as Christian Zionists.
And I say quote-unquote Christians that will come together as Christian Zionists to...
Restore the Jews to Israel to usher in the new great leader.
That's my take on it.
I'm always looking for who this new great leader is going to be that's going to consolidate the nations.
Folks, I hope you understand something.
Mystery Babylon, the Antichrist, if it's true, if the Bible is true, which I believe it is, There is going to be a consolidation of the nations underneath a single leader.
It's going to happen.
Now, how in the world could that happen, given the situation today, with all the different religions that are out there, with all the different problems?
I mean, we've got major influences coming from the Vatican.
We've got major influences coming from Iran.
We've got major influences coming from the Zionists.
Major influences coming from the Christians.
How will they all come together under a single ecumenical model?
And how will they all come together to a single ecumenical leader?
And how will that possibly form itself up if indeed we're in the end times?
This is the mystery.
This is the mystery.
And for those that are out there, and again, just like I opened the show, this is about puzzle pieces.
You can put puzzle pieces together all day long.
You can figure out what was the source for Zionism?
What was the source for Islam?
What was the driving factor in the corruption of the Christian church?
What was the driving factor in the development of the New Age movements?
All these different movements, India, Hindus, all of these things are going to, at some point in time, come together.
And the whole world is going to come together underneath it, whether by force or whether by voluntary action.
If the Bible is correct, these things will all come together in some mysterious way.
Now, I bring that up because we were talking about nuclear war.
I bring that up because we're talking about potentially, on a different note, a fake...
Alien invasion.
You remember what was all happening prior to the inauguration of Trump?
Oh, drones!
There's scary things in the sky we can't explain.
What are they?
Where did they come from?
Are they aliens?
Folks, it's all part of a larger deception designed to get the people to move the Overton window.
Directly more towards more global influence and more global power than you can ever possibly imagine.
Keep your eyes open folks.
Keep your ears open.
Pay attention to what's going on.
How will all these powers consolidate together?
We're going to head to a break now before we come back and we're going to be taking calls.
The number is 540-352-4452. The number is 540-352.
The number is 540-352.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting this is a drill, this is a drill on bull hoards during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities?
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out, and nobody died in Boston either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com That's moonrockbooks.com We've
tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
But time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
It's coming.
And it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
RevolutionRadioFreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution Radio.
Well, folks, welcome back. welcome back.
This is the second hour of our show here today.
And I've given some large strokes in terms of broad strokes, I mean, in terms of how the world is developing.
There may be people out there who'd like to speak to some of the issues that I've brought up.
If so, the number for the call-in is 540-352-4452.
And you're welcome to call in, and when Mitchell lets me know that you're on the line, I will do my best to try to field your call and try to answer it as carefully as I can, given the situation.
That said, we're going to go ahead and take a look at an article now called Trump Reigns in Europe and Israel.
While Daniel Levy shines before the UNSC, which would be the UN Security Council.
This is an article that just came out a couple days ago, and it has a picture of the big semi-circular desks with all the UN Security Council people, and they're putting together a vote.
So let's go ahead and read the article and take a look at what they're really saying about global power play at this particular time.
This is going to be an interesting week with respect to Ukraine and to the Palestinians.
Let's start with Ukraine.
If you have tried to follow events at the United Nations, you may be a bit confused.
The General Assembly passed a U.S. resolution with European amendments with 93 votes.
Oh, hold on a second.
I've got to close the door because the dogs are barking.
Must be somebody here.
All right.
Ninety-three votes passed U.S. Resolution European Amendments.
The resolution to the U.N. General Assembly titled The Path to Peace advocated for a sustainable peace between Russia and Ukraine without assigning blame for the war's initiation.
Let me tell you something, folks.
There is blame for the initiation of the war.
Zelensky didn't have to do what he did.
He didn't have to take the bait from Victoria Nuland and others.
He didn't have to start this war.
He chose to.
Why?
Because he's a puppet.
And the puppeteers convinced him that it had to happen, and the puppeteers placed him in there to make it happen, which is why the Minsk agreements themselves were there.
Until that truth is reached, I don't believe Don Putin...
Is going to be able to tolerate or stomach all of the different negotiations that takes place.
But, let's continue with the article.
This resolution expressed sorrow over the tragic loss of life in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Yes, folks, a million dead men.
We're very sorry.
We're very sorry.
It reiterated the UN's role in upholding international peace and facilitating a peaceful resolution of disputes.
Yes, folks, the UN is all about peace.
Right.
It called for a swift end to the conflict and a lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia.
Blah, blah, blah.
Notably, refrained from directly attributing blame to Russia.
For the conflict.
Oh, the UN peace agreement notably refrained from directly attributing blame to Russia for the conflict.
And it did not mention Moscow's invasion or Ukraine's territorial integrity.
Oh, does that sound like it's written by a bunch of UN globalists or what?
Okay, the original US resolution was brief, acknowledging the tragic loss of life throughout the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
And urging a swift end to the conflict while further advocating for lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia.
However, France and other European nations amended this draft to include references to Moscow's full-scale invasion and Ukraine's territorial integrity.
Yes, folks, Russia started the war.
Does that sound like Mockingbird Media to you?
The amended resolution was ultimately approved by the UNGA, which would be the General Assembly, with the US choosing to abstain from voting on its own modified proposal.
Trump sent Putin a message with that gesture.
Yes, folks, we're going to flex our muscles in front of Putin at this particular point in time.
You see why it's so important to talk about the truth?
There was a European Union meeting last week where a guy by the name of Jeffrey Sox, S-A-C-H-S, spoke.
And folks, I've got to tell you, I watched all of that particular speech.
I think it was around 45 minutes long.
Sox told the truth.
He told the truth.
And this is something that you're never going to see from Western media or sources.
Sox ought to replace Rubio in all of these negotiations.
Sox is a guy who can tell the truth about what happened, how it happened, and where it happened in the future.
If you're looking for that video, I can find it and put it in the show notes.
But it was one of the most refreshing videos I'd ever seen for a guy to just shoot from the hip and lay out the truth about the situation.
Anyway, the UN resolution was meaningless, at least in terms of incurring a legal obligation.
The real action came later at the UN Security Council.
The United States Nations Security Council approved the U.S. drafted resolution on Ukraine on February 24th with 10 votes in favor and five abstentions.
The acknowledgment acknowledged the tragic loss of life throughout the Russia-Ukraine conflict, called for a swift end to the conflict, and urged a lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
How much is diplomacy going to get us with a very upset Putin?
Remember, Russia is a very important piece on the globalist agenda chessboard, and Russia has to go if the globalists want to be able to establish their one-world government.
There's just too many other nations out there that listen to them, that work with them.
They're not the meathead neophytes that the media would make them into, and Putin is certainly not a meathead neophyte.
He gets it, and he understands it, but he also knows what he's up against, which is a whole world that's captivated by Western influence, UN forces, and others.
Continuing the article...
Okay, continuing article.
This marks a clear reversal in U.S. policy toward the war in Ukraine under Biden.
Russia was characterized repeatedly as the villain, while Ukraine was treated as the aggrieved party.
Folks, that needs to be righted.
This policy is now dead.
Trump is sending a clear message with this resolution that U.S. policy has changed.
I'm confident, the writer of the article says, Settlement in Ukraine.
So let's take a look at what are these things that Russia wants.
Complete withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the territories of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia, and the Kursan region, which Russia claims as its own.
Folks, do those places sound familiar?
Yes, they do.
They were all part of the Minsk agreements.
Number two.
Ukraine's formal renunciation of its intention to join NATO. Yes, we don't want any more NATO, Western-controlled power structures on our border, so back off.
Demiliteration of Ukraine, that's going to be very important for Russia, so they know that their continued safety, and they're not going to have to, this isn't just another...
Backstabbing job conducted by Western influences.
A recognition of Russia's sovereignty over the claimed territories and acceptance of the new territorial realities globally.
Folks, that includes Poland and other nations that border Russia.
Stop putting military installations on our borders and rattling your sabers.
Since I'm speaking to an American environment, let me just ask you a simple question.
How would we feel if Mexico aligned itself with the Russians and put a bunch of Russian military installations on the border between Texas and Mexico?
Or on the other hand, Canada.
How would we feel about that?
Folks, look at what happened during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
And that was Cuba.
Serious business.
Russia wants sovereignty over the claimed territories and acceptance of the new territorial realities.
And he wants all these Western forces to accept these globally.
He wants full protection of the rights, freedoms, and interests of Russian-speaking citizens in Ukraine.
Remind you of anything?
Yes, again.
That's another component of the Minsk agreements in 2014. And he wants a lifting of all Western sanctions against Russia.
Now, that's six bullet points.
Where's number seven?
Hey, Western forces.
Hey, Western-powered banking structures.
We want our money back.
You swiped $300 billion from our economy by putting sanctions and making the banks hand that money over to you.
Russia's just willing to forgo that?
That was an act of economic war if I've ever seen one.
Continuing the article, while President Trump continues to hope that a ceasefire can be put in place and seems open to Europe sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine, the Russians reiterated that they are not interested.
Let's read this.
The Kremlin on Tuesday reiterated its opposition to the presence of European peacekeeping forces in Ukraine to secure a potential ceasefire, following comments by U.S. President Trump claiming that Russia would accept such a move.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov merely noted that there was an official position by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov when questions on the issue I don't have anything to add to that, Peskov, was quoted as saying by Russian state news agency TASS. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov called the presence of peacekeepers from NATO countries in Ukraine unacceptable.
Yeah, NATO peacekeepers in Ukraine.
Folks, this isn't just using language to gaslight.
I don't know what is.
NATO peacekeepers.
NATO peacekeepers in Ukraine is unacceptable, while his deputy, Alexander Grushka, labeled such a deployment as an escalation in the war launched by Moscow three years ago.
Mm-hmm.
The war launched by Moscow three years ago.
Still to come are two meetings with Donald Trump.
UK Prime Minister Starmer.
Shows up on Thursday, followed by Ukraine's Zelensky on Friday.
And the author says, I expect Trump will put on a happy, cordial face in public with Starmer, but will be less cordial and non-receptive to Starmer's attempts to persuade Trump to back Europe's efforts to keep the war going.
The author says he expects Trump to remind Starmer about how foolish his decision to send Labor Party hacks to campaign against Trump on behalf of Kamala Harris.
Then there's Zelensky.
And the author says he's a grifter and has said some very impolite things about Trump.
Trump is going to make sure that Zelensky, who is the equivalent of an organ grinder monkey, understands that when Trump plays the music, Zelensky must dance.
Zelensky has got a big problem.
For example, he's already reportedly sold the rare earth mineral rights to the UK. My friend Alex Cranor provides an excellent summary of the dilemma.
So he's saying Zelensky's already sold the mineral rights.
Now he's got to unsell them and pay back America the debt.
Okay, so here is a portion of the article that Cranor put out which summarized the dilemma.
It seems extraordinary that the same Zelensky who is desperate for continued U.S. support has responded.
To Trump's request in such a brazen manner, including insulting Trump, the explanation may have emerged from a Czechoslovakian publication, AEN News, citing links from Ukraine's intelligence.
AEN News reported that Zelensky is unable to cut a deal with the U.S. because he already signed over Ukraine's mineral resources to Britain.
The rarest deal isn't a new thing.
Zelensky already offered it to Trump last September when the two met in New York.
That was, of course, prior to his inauguration this time around and prior even to the election.
To pre-empt Trump, Keir Starmer rushed to cut a deal with Zelensky, who signed over Ukraine's resources in the framework of the 100-year partnership.
Does that sound familiar?
A 100-year partnership?
Yes, folks.
That's what we did to Hong Kong.
Well, that's what the British forces did to Hong Kong as a result of the opium tragedy that began to develop back in 18. I think it was 97, July 1st, 1997, so it was 1897, when that 100-year partnership as a result of the opium wars took place.
It kind of obviously changed a tremendous amount during the course of that 100 years.
They became communist.
Hong Kong retained some aspect of Western capitalism.
And then, of course, July 1, 1997, when Hong Kong reverted to Chinese control, there was all sorts of fear and war drums.
I happened to be personally in China.
I was in Shanghai during that transition.
And I can tell you that I have never seen more propaganda in my life.
That not only would Hong Kong return to the quote-unquote motherland, but Taiwan was next.
And they're still beating the drums about Taiwan 20 years later.
So continuing, the new partnership was signed off on 16th of January this year, only four days before Donald Trump's inauguration.
Allegedly, it included a secret appendix which provided that after the end of hostilities, the UK would gain control.
Of all of Ukraine's ports, power plants, natural gas concessions, storage facilities, and pipelines, titanium deposits, and more.
Apparently, Zelensky signed over these resources in exchange for UK's commitment to Ukraine's security, support for NATO membership, and no less than £3 billion a year for as long as needed to support Ukraine.
The intelligence leak cited by AEN News may or may not be true, but reading through the 100-year partnership certainly makes them seem plausible.
To begin with, it's very unlikely that the UK is committed to providing such general support to Ukraine out of pure charity.
Also, the 100-year partnership is not the whole agreement.
Estimarily, agreements contain...
The whole agreement clause, which stipulates that contracting parties' commitments are limited to that which is explicitly spelled out in the agreement.
Instead, the partnership's Article 11 refers to unspecified further agreements.
So, folks, there was a backdoor deal four days before Trump was inaugurated, where even though America largely financed the war in Ukraine, UK was now going to come in and save the day with 3 billion pounds a year,
and that would increase, I'm sure, with the cost of living adjustment or something like that, but a 100-year agreement basically making Ukraine another colonial partnership or another colonial extension of Great Britain.
Folks, do you see how everybody out there has been scrambling for position?
Scrambling for position to get a hold of Ukraine's minerals.
That's right.
It's a free-for-all right now, and it comes down to who's the biggest dog that can promise the biggest things that can bring peace between Ukraine and Russia, and how is Russia involved in these particular disputes?
Very tough situation, although...
Trump makes it seem like he's just going to be the hero.
He's going to sweep in, negotiate an end to all these things.
Folks, this isn't going to be nearly as easy as you had thought unless there is something changing.
Let's go ahead and take a look at the next article because it's been a lot of talking about Ukraine, but I just think it's very, very interesting how that...
Let's go ahead and move to an article from The Cradle.
And let me remind you while we're in the transition, it's always nice to get callers.
I hate to talk for an entire two-hour show.
It's too much.
I mean, if I had somebody that could interact with me, it might be a little more helpful.
540-352-4452.
I'd love to get your input if you want to go ahead and give a call in.
Mitchell will join you into the conversation and we can have a chat.
In the meantime, let's continue with an article by TheCradle.co.
Biden, Blinken, Austin referred to ICC over intentionally aiding Gaza genocide.
Before I get into this article, let me remind you that the International Criminal Court is a voluntary agreement between all the nations that are signatories to the International let me remind you that the International Criminal Court is a voluntary agreement between all the nations that are signatories to the International Court, and that does not include Russia, and it does not include the United States, and some other nations are not included.
The International Criminal Court also has no police force whatsoever.
They rely on their signatories to turn over the criminals to them if the criminal enters their territory.
And so the article has Biden, Blinken, and Austin all sitting, looking, very professional, clapping.
And so let's take a look at what this International Criminal Court has to say about the Palestinian Gaza issue.
The U.S.-based human rights NGO, Democracy for the Arab World.
world, and here we have another human rights NGO called Democracy for the Arab World Now, is also known as DAWN, has formally requested that the International Criminal Court launch a probe into former U.S. President Joe Biden and several of his officials for aiding and abetting Israel's war crimes on the Gaza Strip.
Dawn submitted a 172-page request that argues that Biden Why not, folks?
Why not?
It sounds right to me.
The case might face political pushback, but that doesn't change the message it sends.
Impunity isn't a given.
If the rule of law is supposed to mean anything, it has to apply across the board, not just to our enemies, but to our friends.
And yes, to ourself.
Prosecutor and Don board member Reed Brody told the Zedio media outlet.
Folks, there are a lot of people clamoring for heads on this particular issue.
But they seem to have no power.
The International Criminal Court is unfortunately largely powerless to take any action against the criminals that started the attacks on the Palestinians in order for Israel to expand its territories and create a larger fence of hegemony around it.
Folks, that's all I'm going to say about that particular article.
We've got some more time on the show.
I want to take the first caller, which didn't call in.
It looks like a 309 area code.
And so, Mitchell, why don't you go ahead and pull that caller on in.
And 309, let's hear what you have to say.
Hello.
Good.
Happy Friday to you.
Thank you.
I'm in Illinois.
You got my attention when you mentioned some of the latest Jeffrey Sachs.
Uh, content that's out there like on YouTube.
It is excellent.
It is excellent.
It's very poignant, very to the point, very straightforward and honest.
And he's a very highly credible academic.
He knows what he's talking about.
I'm gonna search for a link and post it in the chat because it is refreshing to hear it.
And he articulates it very well, our situation in Eastern Europe and what led us to this predicament we find ourselves in.
But this is kind of unrelated.
I was in Chicago yesterday, and I had a hard time using cash.
Nobody wanted cash.
They wanted other means of payment for services.
Besides cash.
I've never been faced with such a predicament where I had a pocket full of cash that nobody seemed to want.
It was very odd.
Why do you think that happened?
Because the store vendors are afraid because of crime that carrying cash is going to make them a target?
I think it's so clean and tidy.
It's so...
Seamless and easy to do these digital transactions.
But if we forego the use of cash, if we play along with this, it's going to stop.
It'll go away.
It'll be a thing of the past if we allow it.
Stay on the line and I'll go ahead and answer that when we get back and let's take a look at it.
Spectacular, so many people come and let me see.
Spectacular, so many people come and so many people come and let me see.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio Radio Radio Radio Even the government The opinions expressed on
Okay, so We did just have a caller From Illinois I'm sorry, sir, I forgot.
I did write down your name.
What is your first name?
I'm Darren in Illinois.
Darren.
And you're in Chicago?
No, I live south of Chicago.
I went up there for something yesterday, and they preferred not to use cash.
In my experience up there yesterday, I've never been faced with such a predicament to have a wallet loaded with cash that nobody wanted any part of.
They wanted plastic or other digital means of doing transacting.
Nobody seemed to want my cash.
Well, it is my instinct that It's becoming policy among the store owners not to accept cash.
Now, let me point out that in the urban areas in Chicago, they have a murder rate of 27 or 28 per 100,000.
It is an incredibly high murder rate.
It's one of the highest in the nation.
And as a matter of fact, it is virtually equivalent to the murder rate in the northern areas of Mexico with cartel controls.
And I believe that when you have a society that descends that deep into chaos as a result of democratic control and open society foundation type policies and procedures, That it causes the store owners to be very nervous about carrying loads of cash and transferring it.
Now, I would speculate that the overarching issue is will this concept of a cashless society Be used as it's been used in China to control the American population when the SHTF platform is finally implemented.
In China, travel is restricted and your phones will not work if you become a menace to society by showing up at a protest.
Or if you speak out against the government or make comments on news stories publicly, and they use the idea of limiting your yuan credits in your ability to spend them for public infrastructure type necessities, such as transportation, as a means to control you and as a means to scare the rest of society.
Now, I do believe that the idea of a CBDC or global, I'm sorry, central bank digital currency is on the plan.
By the way, it's part of the plan in Russia.
It's part of the plan, I believe, in the United States.
It's part of the plan, certainly in Europe, where they've already had test programs.
And we've heard...
A lot of buzz among the economists that analyze banking structures that it's all something that's been tested and something that can be migrated to.
So the idea would be if they can convert to a cashless society, they're going to argue that they can reduce crime.
They're going to argue that they can tax every dollar.
They're going to argue.
But I think fundamentally what they're after is the ability to control.
And cut off their ability to spend money if they become social deviants or become part of the sort of 1984-esque type of population that starts to kick against the governmental goads.
So I think what you say here is it's deeply concerning to me that it's happening.
We know that recently Trump also eliminated the penny, which is a step.
Or at least put out an executive order to eliminate the penny, which was a step in the direction of moving towards a more cashless society.
So I think it's just a matter of time, but I still think that there are some other global catastrophic events that need to be executed by the global new world order before people are willing to accept and admit.
I'm deeply concerned about the issue as you are.
I'm glad that you called and told me about what you saw.
I went to college in downtown Chicago.
Used to walk all along Lakeshore Drive and Wells and State and Rush.
When I went to Moody Institute back in, I believe it was about 93, 94 prior to being moved off to a radio station in Spokane, Washington, where I finished up my degree.
Great town, great city, great people, bad politics, man, bad politics, and it's a rough place now.
I'm sorry that you've had to experience that part of Chicago, but I do love the city.
It is a wonderful city.
Thanks for the call.
Thank you.
I appreciate your response.
Yep, my pleasure.
Okay, let's go ahead and take the next caller and see what we're up against here.
Let's see what the gauntlet has to say.
No, no other callers.
Okay, never mind.
I thought I had seen another one, but that one's not there.
So, let's go back to...
Okay, I wanted...
The last caller brought up the Jeffrey Sox interview.
Now, I watched that a few days ago, and I gotta admit, my short-term memory isn't what it used to be.
And, you know, just when you watch a YouTube video, you can't necessarily retain...
All of the components.
So let's go ahead and all I did here was use ChatGPT to go ahead and extract the transcripts from that one and a half hour video and summarize them.
So let's go ahead and take a look at what ChatGPT says.
They summarized from Consortium News and Brave News Europe and a few other different resources that ran articles.
Let's take a look at what they have to say.
And this is, by the way, one of the most important interviews I've ever seen.
So if you've got time after the show, you should go watch it.
It's available at the India Times website called Jeffrey Sox Roaring Ukraine Speech at EU Parliament Blasts US Says We Are Not Putin's Puppets.
So let's take a look at it.
It's February 19, 2025 addressed to the European Parliament.
Sorry, I misstated.
I said European Union, European Parliament, titled The Geopolitics of Peace, Professor Jeffrey Sachs provided a comprehensive critique of U.S. foreign policy and its implications for Europe, particularly concerning the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Growing from his extensive experience as an advisor in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, Sachs offered a nuanced perspective on the historical and geopolitical factors influencing current events.
Historical context and U.S. foreign policy posture.
Sachs began by reflecting on his advisory roles in Poland, Russia, and Ukraine during the 20th century, emphasizing his first-hand observations of U.S. policy decisions.
In other words, he's an insider.
He recounted efforts in 1991 to secure U.S. financial assistance for the then-Soviet President Gorbachev.
Which were dismissed by the U.S. administration.
The dismissal, Sachs argued, was signaled a broader U.S. strategy of asserting unipolar dominance following the Soviet Union's dissolution.
He highlighted the prevailing mindset among U.S. policymakers that now America could unilaterally shape global affairs without accommodating other nations' security concerns.
So prior to taking down Gorbachev, Sachs says, We moved to a U.S. hegemony platform and concept where we just didn't have to care about how other nations feel.
A significant portion of Salk's speech focused on NATO's eastward enlargement.
He traced the alliance expansion from 1999 starting with Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic and noted Russia's consistent Objections to this movement towards its borders.
Sox referenced strategic plans from the late 20th century, particularly those articulated by Zbigniew Brzezinski, that's Michaela Brzezinski's father, which envisioned extending NATO's reach to encompass countries like Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Georgia.
So he's saying that from the collapse of...
In 1999, NATO began to think about how can we expand our reach to encompass countries like Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Georgia, all of which on Russia's borders.
In other words, the hyenas were beginning to get hungry.
Talks about the Ukraine conflict and missed diplomatic opportunities.
Delving into Ukraine's crisis, Sox challenged the narrative.
That Russia harbored imperial ambitions to reconstruct a Soviet-like empire.
Instead, he posited that Russia's actions were primarily defensive, aimed to prevent NATO's military infrastructure from advancing into Ukraine.
Now, hear what he's saying there, folks.
This is a man with tremendous Eastern European foreign policy experience.
A man that's been there for a long time, since 1991. And he posited that Russia's actions were primarily defensive, aiming to prevent NATO's military infrastructure from advancing into Ukraine.
This is the truth I was talking about earlier, folks.
Sox criticized the U.S. for dismissing, and this is the Biden administration, okay?
For dismissing Russia's security concerns and for its reluctance to engage in meaningful negotiations.
In other words, he criticized the U.S. for ignoring Russia's concerns and choosing not to negotiate, but instead choosing to backstab them on the Minsk agreements.
He recounted the conversation that he had with U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan.
And folks, just so you know, there are a lot of people who think that it was Jake Sullivan and Victoria Nuland that were running the White House in Biden's quote-unquote cognitive decline.
Whether or not that's true, I don't know if we'll ever know.
But there are people that believe that Jake Sullivan and Victoria Nuland were, of course, the warmongers that were signing on the dotted line on behalf of Biden.
Anyway, he recounted a conversation with U.S.-NATO Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, in which assurances were given that NATO would not expand to Ukraine, yet no public commitments were made that Stantzak believes contributed to the escalation of hostilities.
Folks, what he did was he told Sullivan, Come out publicly and say it.
You're not going to expand NATO into Ukraine.
You need to do this.
Sullivan brushed him off because he knew the whole time exactly what they were going for.
The implications for Europe and calls for independent foreign policy were addressed next.
Sox expressed concern over Europe's subordinate role in international affairs, suggesting that European nations have often deferred to U.S. leadership.
At the expense of their own strategic interests.
In other words, European nations defer to the United States because they are under control of the same puppet structure that we are under.
And they look to the US to pull the strings, just like the US is having its strings pulled by those other structures.
So they defer to U.S. leadership at the expense of their own strategic interests.
He urged Europe to adopt an independent and realistic foreign policy that acknowledges the security concerns of neighboring countries, including Russia.
By doing so, Sox argued, Europe could play a pivotal role in de-escalating tensions and fostering a more stable geopolitical environment.
Let me point out something, folks.
U.S. aid, the Epstein scandal, Pizzagate, secret agencies, and all sorts of dark secret agencies, and all sorts of dark interests have controlled other nations through the CIA and through the funding apparatuses that go into place. and all sorts of dark interests have controlled other nations
We have been setting up, or whoever is behind us has been setting up, a global network of world control that determines who will be politically active and politically successful around the world for years.
This is nothing new, folks.
This is nothing new.
And the same way that our politicians appear to have their strings pulled by outside forces.
Folks, look at Dan Crenshaw.
He's been in the news a lot lately.
You think that guy is acting independently on behalf of Texans to represent Americans in Congress?
You're out of your mind.
There is not a move that guy makes that's in alignment with a street-grade Texan.
Anywhere except for some circuits of Austin where there's a bunch of academic blowhards.
That guy's moves are all warmonger all the time.
Why would that be?
Well, folks, because there's organizations that have influence over him.
Do you think he's the one of a kind?
Do you think he's the anomaly?
The one guy that's controlled?
Look at...
Look at the head guy at the Senate, Mitch, whatever his name is.
You think that guy's controlled?
Look at Nancy Pelosi.
You think somebody's behind her controlling the strings?
Look at Donald Trump.
What influences are pressing on him?
Folks, there is something very, very dark out there.
It was a long time ago that secret societies learned that they could destroy They're enemies using blackmail, propaganda, fake or controlled news outlets, carrots and sticks, money, along with threats.
And I believe for a long time they've been deciding, those agencies, those people have been deciding who would be allowed to run for office in a particular area and when they would choose to activate those people once they were elected.
In other words, We've got you now.
We've got the blackmail.
You've taken the money.
Strings are attached.
We're going to make sure that we put you into this place because now we know that we can control you.
And if you begin to misbehave on the issues that we are concerned about, we will destroy or eliminate your influence.
We will release the blackmail.
We will let your wife know about the thing that you've done.
Take away your lake house in the special place.
We will crash your jet and kill you.
We will eliminate you and make you disappear when you fall out of a window.
There are all sorts of carrot and stick maneuvers that take place, folks.
I want you to think about the secret societies.
Think about the Hollywood actors that cover up one eye.
Or that use a single finger to cover up their lips, pointed up, to show we don't talk about pedophilia.
Think about all of the different control structures that are in place.
The other day, Mike Benz was analyzing some USAID expenditures, and he, live on air on his podcast, decided that he was going to start analyzing some of the budget and try to figure out the operation behind it.
And I was listening along and I thought, well, this would be cool.
Let's see Mike Benz, this sort of master of spending with the Secretary of State, do this because this is one heck of a private investigation drill.
So let's see how he does it.
I'm curious about it.
By the end of the session, he had identified the Southern American rapper that had been recruited by...
State agencies to put music out that would decay the civilization under strings.
And he would be sooner or later activated in some sort of color revolution as the sort of leader of the new younger generation.
Benz backed into that information.
Online, in a live session.
Folks, it's not as hard as you think to do so if you know where to look and you know where to find the money.
Now, this has to stop.
Can Trump cut the head off the snake?
Folks, we've got a few more minutes on the show.
If anybody out there wants to give a call, 540-352.
4452. I'd love to get some more input on this particular stage.
Next story that we had to deal with, we just did that one.
I'm not going to do a YouTube video because I'm not exactly sure that it's going to work in terms of how we do this.
So let's take a look at antiwar.com that has a Trump shares artificial intelligence video of Trump Gaza.
Drawing backlash.
From antiwar.com just a few days ago, Dave DeCamp.
President Trump has shared a bizarre video generated by artificial intelligence that shows what the president's vision for turning the Palestinian territory into the Riviera of the Middle East might look like.
Drawing backlash on social media.
Folks, listen to this.
This insanity.
Trump puts out a video which shows a golden statue of Trump and what appears to be Trump and Netanyahu lounging near a pool on the Gaza Strip.
Have you seen photos of the Gaza Strip lately?
The place is without a doubt a war zone and it was carefully demolished in a way that nothing...
Could be rebuilt.
Now, I want to remind you of something from the Bible.
Ezekiel chapter 40 to 48, I believe.
Off the top of my head, I think those are the chapters.
Something called a millennial temple.
Now, those of us who really understand the Bible and hermeneutics recognized Christ is currently king, and at the ascension, he rose to his kingdom, and he is currently the king.
He is the Messiah.
Now, the Jews don't recognize this.
So what are they doing?
They feel that they have to build a new millennial temple where sacrifices will take place on Mount Hermon.
In order to usher in their quote-unquote new messiah, and that's also possibly plural, because they sort of Kabbalistically believe in sort of a yin-yang thing.
They're sort of good messiah and bad messiah.
This is my understanding of what they currently believe.
Now, they believe that they're going to set up that temple.
They believe it's going to be a real temple, folks.
It's going to be a deception.
Now, my point is, you put the trunk...
Style on that Millennial Temple, and what do you get?
You get a casino.
You get the abomination that causes desolation.
Now, I'm not saying that's what it is, but you can have a Trump-style casino right next door to the new Millennial Temple and all the Christian nationalists from the new apostolic religion.
The new apostolic religion can go and help all the Israelites return to their promised land, thus influencing the return of the Savior for the world.
They believe that that's something that has to take place to usher in something called a millennial or thousand-year reign of their Messiah.
Is that one of the sickest things you've ever heard of?
That they believe that the Antichrist will be ushered into an...
I'm sorry, the Messiah will be incarnate, born into this world through these pagan influences, will take his position on the throne for a thousand years.
Folks, that's born from something that was born in the 1700s.
What was born in the 1700s that became this idea or this concept or this particular hermeneutic to understand the Bible?
It was called dispensationalism.
Yes, folks, at the very heart of that is the idea that God changes.
He has different times and He acts different ways and different periods of history, and that in the new dispensation, He will come down, rapture the Christians up into the air.
And establish his thousand-year reign after the Tribulation.
Some people believe in a pre-millennial rapture, and some people believe in a post-millennial rapture.
It doesn't really even matter.
It doesn't really even matter.
But during that millennial kingdom, he will rule the world from atop what they believe is to be a real temple, not a spiritual temple, set up.
In the new nation of Israel that was resurrected in 1948, post-World War II, funded by the Rothschilds and set up.
Now, the Israelites were nothing prior to Napoleon.
Scattered peoples all over the world that had lost their identity.
They'd lost everything.
Folks, we're at the end of our show today.
I appreciate...
I appreciate you coming on in.
You have a good one.
▲
Export Selection