Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 9, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:36:27

Need to Know News (9 February 2025) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
	This is the 9th of February, Super Bowl Sunday, 2025. Let's take a look at our topics and have opening statements.
	Very important, significant USAID, the U.S. Agency for International Development.
	The funding is ripping the head off of the U.S. ongoing lying, looting Orwellian illegal rogue state empire.
	I got so much with that, I got it in two parts.
	Trump team actions and openings, so much of that, I got it in two parts.
	And then from COVID to a demand for Maha.
	And the recognition of ongoing crimes against humanity with so-called COVID. And then a kind of heaven on earth already existed on an apparently flat earth?
	We'll consider that topic.
	Brian, opening statement, brother.
	Well, it's been a relatively busy week.
	I spent a lot of time taking care of the files that I have and traveling to Houston.
	I spent a few days down there.
	I've got to go back this week for a few days.
	Hopefully all the pieces come together.
	Other than that, I think just like everybody in the audience, we've all been pretty shocked by the developments in the last three weeks.
	I frankly didn't expect Trump's administration to come off as well as it has.
	And I'm glad to see the Doge team doing a good job of at least trying to highlight and root out.
	Some of the unnecessary spending, which we're going to talk about here today.
	There's pros and cons, and I kind of knew going into this that Trump was going to negotiate and that certain structures on the chessboard that I'd like to see go down would not go down, and other structures might.
	It's all part of a negotiation, the way Trump looks at it, and I do think he's doing a good job so far, although there are certainly concerns that I have that are going to be Long-term issues, but you can't expect the world in a couple of weeks.
	And I think the greatest thing that we've seen so far is sort of an unmasking of the deep state in terms of the spending projects that they've been involved with and the emptiness of the Democrat rhetoric.
	I'm not going to say the Republican rhetoric is much better.
	There are patriots inside the group.
	That are in the right places, but I think a lot of this spending is just as much due to the Republicans as it is the Democrats.
	What I've been studying mostly lately is a lot of older philosophy refreshers, as well as getting deeper and deeper and deeper into the Bible to try to figure out who to trust, what to trust, what's coming and what's not.
	I've got some pretty good theories about that and went fishing this week with a couple of guys that I'm expecting that it'll take me about another six months before I can really reach a better viewpoint in terms of what I think is going to happen based on what we know about how God works in this world.
	Looking forward to rolling that out when I finish the research.
	I think it's going to be Maybe another 150 hours of research that I've got to do in order to start talking about those subjects.
	Wow, that's a lot more.
	But I'm glad that you're zeroing in on that.
	I had to let my dog in for a moment there.
	Thank you for that, brother.
	As I've emphasized, the biggest picture of taking a look at the most important questions, which include, who are we?
	What is this place?
	What are we all doing here?
	And then as you become a little more sophisticated, it's like, some evil is in charge here.
	What's up with that?
	Those are important.
	And the vantage point that you're looking at, brother, addresses them.
	And, you know, we talk about the news, which is the actions on the board, but...
	I can't really think of any news show that takes the perspective of what is this evil?
	How did it get here?
	And who are human beings?
	And then that Jesus guy.
	What's up with that?
	That's important.
	So I would encourage you to continue in that study and to contribute what it is that you have with that.
	It is the fundamental question of life, which maybe people forgot about when they were 16 or 17 or 18, and then they just went and lived it.
	But who are we?
	Why are we here?
	Who put us here?
	What does that entity require?
	What are the rules?
	How does it all work?
	I know a lot of people downgrade and display the Bible in a way that they think sort of discredits it.
	I can tell you that from an archaeological perspective, it seems to be one of the best history books ever written.
	From a perspective of trying to figure out what is truth and how do we define truth and where do we discover truth, I find it to be one of the best guides ever written.
	From a philosophical perspective, I find it to make perfect sense the deeper I go.
	And then from a historical perspective, I think Christ was exactly who he claimed to be.
	He knew things about this world that we don't.
	As many of you may or may not know, he claimed to be God.
	He claimed to be one with the Father.
	He claimed to know things that nobody else could know, yet there were still things that he claimed that he didn't know that were the sole possession of God.
	He claimed to be present at the creation of this world, and he seemed to know people better than they knew themselves.
	I think it's a...
	It's the most extraordinary personality that's ever arrived on the scene of human history, and he claimed to have the answers about life and death, and the answers about the afterlife, and the answers about other things such as sickness, disease, health, blindness, and other things.
	But I think most importantly, he was perhaps the greatest moral teacher.
	To ever walk the face of the earth.
	And there's really no comparing in terms of other personalities that have lived throughout history.
	Socrates, not even close.
	Plato, not even close.
	Buddha, no way.
	I mean, there's just nothing like him.
	And I think it's an extraordinary journey to study who he really is.
	And figure it all out.
	I think it answers a lot of questions about this world that we wouldn't normally even begin to ask.
	And hence, when you're ready to roll with the show, I encourage you to do so.
	And that is something that you've been gifted with, brother, and for all of our audience members.
	Some of the things that seem most natural to human beings, in my observation as an educator, looking at...
	Thousands of young human beings is that very often the areas where somebody is gifted, they're not going to recognize it necessarily.
	Because it's going to be like you're saying, these are obvious questions, right?
	But other people don't see it as obvious.
	And hence, it might be just a very simple manner of us contributing what seems obvious to us, but may not be obvious to others.
	Well, there's a lot of philosophical questions that need to be addressed if you're really going to do a comprehensive job of trying to answer the question of what is truth?
	How do we get to it?
	How do we know what it is?
	How much of it is that which can be observed?
	And how much of it is that which we can figure out about how the other world works, the spiritual world, the world that's real compared to the world that's here.
	A lot of interesting questions.
	It's interesting I've been getting deeper into philosophy and going back and trying to sort of find the roots of today's modern philosophical thinking, which I really see as more of a very old philosophical thinking.
	Remember the difference between the older cultures and this culture is that the older cultures spent their time in reflection.
	I mean, they had to do work too, but they thought.
	They thought all day long.
	They didn't have a TV to tell us how to think.
	They didn't have They didn't necessarily access to all the books in the world, so they had to observe and think.
	They were great thinkers that happened in the past, and they've explored these issues thousands of times over, and I think there's a lot that can be learned from them.
	Like I said, I'm trying to zoom in on what's at the root, what's at the heart of the problem right now.
	And the more I get to it, the more I see something known as humanism, moral relativism that's causing a lot of problems.
	And I think it might be sort of at the root structure of the problems that we're having today.
	Very good.
	The individual Jesus is the most studied individual by professional historians compared to everybody else, and that people don't know that, I think, is a communication that our official gatekeepers don't want serious inquiry.
	Into what we can read of the documentation of what that guy had to say.
	Because I think if people did, that they would be much more fiercely aligned with love and truth and against evil and to be able to recognize evil.
	Because our opponents definitely don't want to be recognized.
	Alright, let's take a look at what we got.
	Alright, so we got 13 of these stories.
	If you want to jump in on any individual ones, feel free to.
	Brother, otherwise I'll just go until the halftime report.
	Alright, Pfizer is number two in the list of top USAID contracts in 2024. There's a Super Bowl tight end right there.
	Gleefully...
	What a nice photo op.
	He's got two band-aids, so he's saying that get yourself shot a few times and be happy about it, bitches.
	Pfizer's number two on the list, and what we're seeing is the documentation and the ripping open that the Empire is being funded via USAID, and that all we're seeing with the exposure...
	Is that, of course, we the taxpayers are paying for our own destruction.
	These people are demons, they're evil, and yet they have an empire to run, and the empire requires political control so that you can get the policies that you want.
	It requires control over what is used for money in order to pay your minions and enrich themselves.
	And there are a lot of minions to pay.
	And then you've got to have corporate media and public education be able to propagandize to the people that this is all good.
	And this is a tremendously significant act to have USAID exposed.
	Behind the curtain, every wonder.
	Who is behind the Hollywood Zelensky PR Ops?
	USAID paid at least $4 million to Ben Stiller and $5 million to Sean Penn just to meet Zelensky.
	This is important.
	The Truman Show, War, Hollywood, Propaganda Machine is being exposed like never before.
	And I agree with that.
	And it is stunning, unprecedented.
	Elon Musk re- X-ing or re-tweeting, wow, to USAID was funding over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 media NGOs, including 9 out of 10 media outlets in Ukraine.
	That is huge.
	So the propaganda that we're going against, including the shills, the sock puppet shills who visit our comments, They're being funded, and we're funding them.
	USAID was spending $268 million to fund over 6,000 approved journalists, while at the same time spending millions to silence conservative independent media like the Gateway Pundit, like our channel on YouTube.
	I think we made it through one show, and then we got erased and censored forever.
	I don't even know the reason.
	All right, Damani Moni clips.
	This is a minute of satire, and this is sharp as usual.
	Well, Elon, I'm a little worried, particularly with this USAID stuff.
	And let's not forget, USAID advances national security, works to protect human rights and improve global health.
	So why they're going after that?
	Well, let me first, Bill.
	Frankly, I think you should rather be worried about the Epstein client list, okay?
	To your question, Whoopi, why are they going after USAID? How about a pull-up list?
	This one is not as famous as the list that you're familiar with, but this is a list of the taxpayer-funded USAID projects.
	$6 million to fund tourism in Egypt.
	$8 million to Politico, a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party just like this show.
	$47,000 for...
	Transgender opera in Colombia.
	What is that about?
	$2 million for sex changes in Guatemala.
	You will love this one, Bill.
	$1 million for bat research in Wuhan, China.
	$20 million on a new Sesame Street show in Iraq.
	Like it's U.S. taxpayers' responsibility to bring fucking cooking monster to Iraq.
	And the list goes on.
	We're going to go to break.
	I don't think they're going to be able to wiggle their way around it, but it goes more.
	RFK Jr. exposes what USAID is actually funding, and this is on Tucker, and Tucker has tens of millions, and I'm just going to give RFK2 like two minutes, and you'll get the general idea, and you can watch the whole thing if you want to get the full hit.
	2014, there are riots, and it's called the Madone Rebellion in Ukraine.
	Which we're not told that we are financing those riots.
	The newspapers never told us.
	Our government never told us.
	USAID, which is the CIA front.
	So what he's talking about, I'll give a little overview.
	So the U.S. overthrows governments to put in puppets, and that's what we did in Ukraine in 2014. Put $5 billion into funding those riots.
	Those riots lead to a coup d'etat against the first democratically elected government of the Ukraine.
	It was a government that refused to choose sides and to say, we're going to be on the side of the West.
	So we wanted them out.
	A month before that government has overthrown, Victoria Nuland, who's part of the centerpiece of the Neocon ideology and who is now a high-level official in the State Department, has a secret call with the U.S. ambassador, which is tape recorded and is now public, which anybody can go and look up.
	Where she is picking the new cabinet for Ukraine, which is a U.S. Western cabinet.
	So they're picking the new government a month before the old government is overthrown.
	Is that democracy when Tori Newland picks her government?
	Well, that's the point.
	USAID doesn't really do, and the CIA don't do democracy.
	You know, the CIA has overthrown, I think, 83 governments between 1947 and 1997. That's a third of the governments on Earth, and most of them were democracies.
	Brutal.
	And that is exactly how we roll.
	And that is hanging out in the open.
	Hold on, hold on.
	Let's pause right there because we had something in common on those stories.
	We had Bill Gates, who for a long time has been involved in vaccine production.
	We had RFK Jr., who's been sort of fighting against the vaccine machine.
	And we had USA giving a tremendous amount of money to Pfizer.
	So fundamentally, and of course we have all in the audience experienced what COVID brought in terms of a limitation of our liberties and a limitation of our freedoms.
	Plus there was a tremendous amount of pressure not only here in the nation but worldwide to Allow people to voluntarily choose to take this injection directly into their bloodstream.
	Now, I just want to kind of point this out, that there is a Greek word called pharmakon, which means a drug or a medicine, and the practice of applying drugs or medicine was also known as pharmakia.
	Which is the Greek word of sort of being one who practices that.
	And it's most often translated to be a sorcery or a type of witchcraft.
	It appears all throughout the Bible and a lot of key passages.
	But most importantly, the Bible doesn't have any sort of restriction.
	From traditional medicines, but what it does say is to avoid the sorcery, avoid the magic, and pharmakia is the word that was used associated with sorcerers, magicians, and witches to use drugs in their rituals to induce altered states of consciousness and to communicate with spirits and to work the power to...
	Cast spells.
	And so the practice was condemned very early on as the ancients started figuring out what different plants could do when they were mixed together.
	And you've heard the terms, you know, abracadabra and hocus pocus, which are very interesting terms related to that.
	But for the point here is that pharmakia is...
	Primarily associated with sorcery, deception, and idolatry rather than with traditional medicinal drugs.
	And so if you're really going to start to trace the origins of this COVID thing, I think what's very important is that we take some time to go through David Whitehead's series.
	I think it's like eight or nine hours called Cult of the Medics.
	And take a look at some of the symbolism and the rituals and the type of healing that's actually being tried there and ask yourself how much of this industry that we call Pfizer, This industry associated with Bill Graetz, this industry that we call medicine, is being used to adult induce or change the mind of mankind.
	And I know that there's those that are going to be on one side of the argument that are going to say, well, as long as it reduces pain, then, you know, it's fine.
	But I would argue that pain is there and suffering is there.
	For a reason.
	And a lot of people choose to sort of take a very simple approach to pain and suffering.
	They say, well, wait a second.
	If God was a good God, there wouldn't be any pain and suffering.
	But let me point something out.
	God gave humanity free will.
	And that was an important part of his plan.
	It was no surprise that mankind would experience sin and fall and be a separation from God.
	And as a result of that separation, there's been pain and suffering, murder and death and all sorts of terrible things that have happened.
	But that wasn't God's fault as it would be associated directly to him.
	Something that comes out of free will.
	And what's important about this from a philosophical perspective is free will is important to establish love.
	You say, what do you mean?
	Well, I think we've all heard the tiny phrase, you know, if you love something, let it go.
	But that's not exactly what it means.
	What it means more in this context is from a philosophical perspective, free will.
	It means that, well, we're not robots.
	We weren't programmed to give glory to God and worship God.
	And, you know, it wasn't built into the programming of humanity.
	And therefore, you know, the accuser, also known as Satan, would come along and say, well, of course they love you.
	They're programmed to love you.
	And he says, well, wait a second.
	I'll let him go free and allow him to fall.
	And then, you know, it'll all shake out in the very end when justice is properly applied.
	And so there's a very important purpose to free will, but the problem with free will, especially with mankind that's fallen, is that it results in pain and suffering at a lot of different levels.
	And there is a purpose for that, and I would argue that in the end, all the pain and suffering and all of the harm and all of the bad things that have happened to this world will work together.
	To glorify God.
	So that's just a 10,000-foot philosophical overview of some of the basic structure around why are we allowed to do terrible things.
	Man, that's brilliant.
	I appreciate it, brother.
	Because people do have to, we all answer the question, but we should be asking it rather than just answer it, is how come I'm in pain?
	What's up with the suffering here?
	And I agree that you're right, that through this journey, Is that human beings are witnessing evil and good, and the Great Awakening, the Great Choosing, allows people to sort themselves out and make fundamental choices and to move forward.
	And the idea that, you know, from my own experience, is that for me, for the Creator, I would say, you have chosen a particularly robust version of evil for this experience.
	I mean, pedivores.
	Raping, torturing, eating children.
	That's a robust evil.
	And the mathematician part of me tends to view the world kind of as a schematic and kind of the deeper you go.
	The further up you have the capacity.
	And I know that just for myself and my own experience, I've gotten a tremendous appreciation of virtue, as well as an appreciation of the depravity of how far evil can go and does go.
	So these are fundamental questions, and I think that there's a richness when you engage in these questions in the inquiry.
	So I appreciate the point of view that you bring to this, brother.
	Yeah, but obviously the accuser is going to be on the other side and he's going to say, yeah, but it's so bad.
	Let me just point something out.
	The deeper the hole, the higher the glory in climbing out of it.
	In other words, as sin increases, grace increases once you realize how it really works.
	I can tell you that the man who's been forgiven much tends to love a lot more than the man who doesn't need a doctor at all.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	All right, back to it.
	Report Trump to keep only 294 out of 10,000 USAID employees.
	Now that will do a lot.
	To defund the empire.
	And anything else or keep rolling, brother?
	No, I'll hit on USAID real quick from a political perspective.
	Look, what's becoming clear here is that Pandora's box has been opened up in order to show how the influence machine has taken captive.
	An institution which was originally put out there with a special name, you know, that Team America World Police.
	We're going to come on in and we're going to help the world be much, much better.
	And we're going to give money to all these ecumenical causes around the world to buy influence or to, you know, help people out of pain and suffering.
	But ask yourself, is that true?
	Does it make any sense?
	I mean, we're dealing with one of the highest homeless rates in America that we've ever dealt with.
	We don't see money going to hurricane victims.
	We see money being funneled around the world through all these non-governmental organizations in order to buy up influence.
	And who seems to be the recipient of the largest chunks seem to be those people that are farthest off to the left on the moral relativism scale.
	In other words, the government seems to have been captured by an evil that wanted to produce an agenda.
	That gets people to think in terms of, well, what's okay for me morally is different than what's okay for you morally, which is different than what's okay for another guy morally.
	And it creates all these sort of circles and some of them overlap in terms of this person and this person agree, others do not.
	But right now what we're seeing is an absolute stretching out of the Venn diagram so far so that there are people on the right hands.
	Oh, we don't even accept man and woman as being a fact.
	That might be your truth, but that's not my truth.
	And so the moral relativism has expanded in terms of its scope and in terms of its reach.
	And we seem to be producing more and more of this and using our money and our tax dollars and our resources to produce more and more of this moral relativistic thinking.
	It stretches farther beyond it.
	And it has produced a great, I would say, a great evil and a great suffering in the world just in terms of what it does to people.
	Imagine how confused you'd be as a young person coming out of school not knowing the difference between man and woman.
	I mean, we're going backwards.
	Even the early people.
	In history, you could recognize certain fundamental basics, which they said were rooted in observing creation.
	But today, it seems that a blindness has come over all of society.
	And where we press these agendas, that blindness extends so far that the children come out completely confused.
	They're, oh, I was taught this.
	I was taught that.
	Now I'm experiencing the real world.
	I don't understand the difference, and so there's a cognitive dissonance that's kicking in, and I'm very sick about that, and I can't tell, and so I'm going to act out in rage or in protest or in, you know, that's what you're seeing develop.
	There's a certain breed of insanity that's blossoming as a result of not even being able to agree on certain basic societal structures.
	And anyway, my point is on USAID is that we're...
	We're fundamentally trying to increase that globally.
	For what point?
	For what purpose?
	Who are the controllers?
	And why is this so important to them that they would be willing to expose themselves on this level?
	That's a question that you're going to have to start thinking through philosophically in order to get down to the bottom of it.
	Yeah, and the blindness is a function of the lies.
	Going back to the liar, the great deceiver.
	And again, you'd have to, if with a little bit of experience, you would say, huh, all these lies are coordinated by who?
	Who is, who, who's?
	And then that would lead to the great deceiver, that it is being coordinated.
	It is a choice.
	And this is a choice by somebody who doesn't like human beings.
	The idea that you could present in school that this so-called transgenderism is possible.
	And the answer that the experts, the experts, Brian, are saying is chemical castration and then surgical mutilation.
	And then the people who are taking you down that path will tell you, we want to be your friend.
	And then to weaponize them.
	So the evil is just, I mean, as I'm saying, this is a robust evil, brother.
	Nothing new under the sun.
	It's been around for a long, long time.
	It's just taking different forms and different societies.
	But the real fundamental question is, again, and you said it, what's at the source?
	And why is it important to try to discover that?
	Yep.
	And we will be healthier and stronger through the experience.
	Or so that we have the opportunity to express, given that we are in this type of a world.
	All right, part two of USAID. The tip of the iceberg of corruption.
	What is the totality of what USAID has funded?
	And I appreciate all of our...
	Colleagues who are into this and trying to dive in and take a look and see what's going on.
	And here, the Gavi Alliance, and that's originally formed by the Gates Foundation.
	So again, the funding of this destruction of health, the Open Society Foundation, George Soros.
	So we're funding our own propaganda, the World Economic Forum.
	So just crazy stuff.
	And hopefully this will be the beginning of the end for this.
	And it is the tip of the iceberg is that the idea that our government is funding this stuff.
	Well, no, this is the core of what our government is.
	The government is an empire.
	And just because you are an American doesn't mean that you're not going to be a target.
	And that something deeply, deeply evil has taken control.
	Of all of Earth.
	And it's got to be ripped open if human beings are going to have a chance.
	Let's take a closer look at that one right there, because that article is really about the CIA, USAID, and basically it makes the case that here are the allegations of the gain-of-function research that led to the weaponization of COVID-19 as a global censoring machine.
	It talks about the Gavi Alliance, the Open Society Foundation, and it's Rand Paul.
	This is Dr. Tenpenny writing it.
	But fundamentally, it's showing that it's a massive ball of worms with a huge budget that's been allocating large sums of money to countries like Ukraine and various other global examples.
	And the questionable spending includes...
	LGBTQ plus initiatives, climate change projects and other various programs in other countries that critics would argue they're a total waste of taxpayer money.
	President Trump has said that it's stolen billions of dollars from United States taxpayers and I think he's absolutely right and the question is what are we trying to export fundamentally?
	Why is it that we're putting so much time and energy into these sort of philosophical global initiatives and programs that are so different than what we would, you know, may normally conclude about how the world ought to operate and may normally conclude about how the world ought to operate and what our function is as an American
	And I think that at the end of the day, we've got a very good case here that there is a power that is manipulating politicians into authorizing expenses, which are designed to export a which are designed to export a new breed of misery around the world.
	Now, why?
	And it's all cloaked in a sort of atmosphere and titles of doing something good, like the Patriot Act.
	It's called the Patriot Act.
	It's cloaked.
	You know, that's what's really taking place.
	But you've got to ask yourself, what are they really after?
	Do you really think it's healthy to pump your veins or a whole nation's veins full of this poison?
	I mean, is that healthy?
	Is it healthy to push LGBTQ plus?
	Where people have to conform to no moral boundaries whatsoever because, hey, you're free to be a dog or a cat or whatever you want.
	Is that healthy?
	Does that create a healthy society?
	No.
	It creates a completely disturbed society that has no boundaries whatsoever.
	It drives a new breed of insanity.
	So what's the purpose?
	And who's exporting it and why?
	Those are central questions.
	Very good.
	All right, the CIA and USAID revealed to be behind the 2019 impeachment coup against President Trump.
	So, the funding also goes to so-called media that would pimp the idea.
	It's just a self-defense that all of it is propaganda and trying to save itself.
	We have here an important story, an important take on this.
	Alex Soros admits he's more powerful than elected officials.
	So when asked if he would go into government, he says, nah, nah, I'm in a more impactful position now.
	And he is right.
	So if USAID is funneling money through Soros in order to affect policies, then certainly there is an argument to be made that that would be a stronger position to affect change than if he was only in one meager government position.
	Meryl Nass, Patriot Jew, the end of USAID is the end of globalist power to overturn governments.
	We can learn the true history of the past 50 years.
	Alexander Dugan.
	Yeah.
	And that is not a overstatement of the facts, is that we have been funding the revolutions that have been meant to enslave humanity.
	And it all goes to that Daman Amani clip of you get, Empire bitch shills like Bill Gates and Whoopi Goldberg.
	And they're going to say, oh, but it's helping people.
	That octopus USAID that was choking off all reality, truth, sanity, and joy.
	It's in the net now.
	So why are we so glum?
	Can't we rejoice even briefly before the next round of despair?
	Excellent question by Celia Farber in trying to emphasize that this is a big deal.
	And it is.
	And we'll see where it goes.
	We need to have the breakthrough that leads to the arrests and for the normies to have their trust in these official his stories shattered so that we have an opening.
	And that would mean that corporate media's credibility would have to be shattered.
	And my estimate is that, oh look, there's Scary Poppins there, a reminder of her, is that we've already gotten there.
	And that we have already achieved critical mass.
	And it's just a matter of having breakthrough events and that we are witnessing the drip, drip, and flood.
	But we shall see.
	We still have more to go with this.
	Now that's interesting on that Celia Farber one because what she's doing is she's highlighting Mike Benz.
	Who summed up, she calls the USAID group basically an octopus, meaning it's got its fingers and tentacles in all sorts of governments around the world.
	And so what she does is she focuses on Mike Benz, who basically summarizes the USAID problem as being the anti-defamation league, as being one of the key drivers in the efforts.
	And that the octopus of USAID and the things are there and all the strings attached to the money, according to Benz, is to make sure that in the end it's the anti-Semitism response to the agenda is continued to be protected.
	In other words, the strings tied to the octopus tentacles are that you've got to Implement anti-Semitism protocols within your nations or the octopus will not be stopped.
	So Benz is taking sort of, hey, let's take a look at what's under the hood here and why does all these octopus tentacles seem to have strings attached that say that, oh, if you take this money, then you've got to promote an anti-Semitism agenda.
	I think it's simplistic, as we've seen in a number of different sort of debate platforms lately, to blame the Jew as the problem.
	I find that to be a vastly simplified consummation of the process.
	But there is something to it.
	But I look at more as the mindset behind the mindset.
	As terms of what the real driver is.
	And I would never just simply isolate it to the Jew.
	There are powerful families around the world that are not Jewish, that have their hands inside the globalist central banker cartel platforms.
	There are all sorts of secret societies that are trying to accomplish the same sort of thing.
	So I would never, as many of you know from the debate that's been developing, I'm never going to support a mob mentality of sort of create a list, grab your pitchforks, and let's go take care of this one area of the problem within our society.
	But I have no problem highlighting it, that it is the mindset behind that, what I consider to be totally false religion of legalism and of moral relativism.
	That has spread itself out in so many different places that's causing the problem.
	But Farber does a good job.
	She deals with it.
	And she points to Ben saying, Ben says it's the ADL that's underneath the hood.
	Whether that's true or not, Ben's a pretty reputable guy.
	The Weffers in Davos, just a couple of weeks ago, they had a section saying that we need to censor social media.
	Because...
	They hate all the Jews.
	It's anti-Semitism.
	And you're right, that is a major talking point.
	And, you know, in terms of my contribution, it's just as easy to point to the prima facie criminals and the prima facie crimes and the provable liars and that the government of Israel is it's just as easy to point to the prima facie criminals and the prima facie crimes and the provable And that just keep just you can't fall for that level of simplicity and propaganda.
	And the good news is, is that this is a fair test.
	And that I think that once we have a breakthrough event, that human beings will be on our side and they're not going to be fooled by this.
	Well, I want to say one more thing in context of that, that I think is important.
	This week Trump not only He began the enforcement of having the government talk to all these institutions and say, look, you've got to implement these anti-Semitism rules.
	But he also did exactly the same thing for another group.
	Does anybody know what that group was today that he notified?
	Yeah, think about it.
	It's the Christians.
	He went out and wrote an executive order that says that the government, and it looks almost exactly like the anti-Semitism executive order, but it says that the government needs to protect the Christians.
	Now, I think that's so interesting.
	First of all, my conclusion is, hey, we don't need that.
	I don't care if people come after us all day long.
	We're either going to stand or fall.
	We don't need the government's assistance in protecting.
	Our ability to say what needs to be said and do what needs to be said.
	Look, China's got the world's largest church.
	Do they need governmental protections for Christians?
	And it's all an underground church that they can't even seem to find.
	It's an invisible church inside China.
	So it's not something where I would say, oh, the government needs to protect my views like they need to protect their views.
	But I just think it's a very interesting sort of dark and light dichotomy.
	That Trump rolled out this week.
	And I thought, well, that makes sense.
	He's trying to let the Christians know that, or the quote-unquote Christian churches, institutions, whatever, know that, well, he's not just going to protect the Jews.
	He's going to protect us, too.
	Well, thanks, but no thanks.
	Appreciate it, but we can protect ourselves.
	Or we've got a God who protects us.
	How about that?
	Yeah, God is not.
	And in terms of what you're saying, that is probably the number one area that patriots are looking at Trump saying, oh, yeah, yeah, that stuff about owning Gaza and removing all the people, that people should be rightfully concerned and questioning, like, what does he mean by that?
	But it just depends.
	It depends on who's writing the scripts and what he means by that.
	Because this can pivot the extension and the vulnerability of the enemy is so out there that...
	It is also equally plausible that all Trump is doing is saying that, okay, there's going to be a distinction between the specific individuals claiming a religion and the people who are saying that just because you're in a religion, that that means something.
	We have about 15 million.
	I keep saying it, about 100 people who I know who have been concentrated into the area of activists who are sincerely attempting, like us, to get to the truth and to have something to say about it and to have something to do about it, that these people...
	Almost all of them that I know, they don't practice.
	They don't read.
	They don't think about it.
	They were born into that religion.
	They may do the holidays, but those certainly aren't the targets.
	And what we want to do as a strategy in the war is we want to isolate the enemy.
	And we want to give all the people of the Jewish religion An opportunity to stand with the patriots who are telling the truth, who want to expose and remove the criminal damaging liars who are literally engaged in killing us all.
	And that that choice and the polarization, there's a theory and political theory for polarization is you want to isolate these ideas and allow people to choose.
	And it's super easy.
	The ones that we want to isolate, those are the people engaged in the wars.
	Who want everybody shot?
	Who want censorship?
	And that we, the people, don't want that.
	But the people who are on that side, who literally can and should be prosecuted for egregious wars of aggression.
	This is 18 years that the Palestinians have had a military siege, which is an act of wars, the Orwellian opposite of lawful, and that...
	The people who believe in the Talmud?
	That sect?
	You could say the same thing about the Arabs, the Muslims, you know?
	Or not the Arabs, the Muslims.
	Look, there's problems in all.
	Look, I could point to problems in Calvinism.
	There's problems, and you could go around and go and take a look at all the churches and say, well, this denomination and that denomination.
	You could take a look at all the...
	Different breeds of Jewish synagogues out there.
	There's problems here, there's problems there.
	There's problems everywhere.
	And all those problems are problems that are a misunderstanding of the truth as it belongs to God.
	And all of those problems are problems that lead to different schisms that end up dividing us as a culture.
	And I'm okay with that.
	I don't mind some diversity in terms of your viewpoints.
	And certainly I couldn't find the Christian church coming out and saying, well, you know, we've got...
	Well, what is the Christian church?
	I guess is a bigger question.
	I call it the invisible church because it's not your local Baptist denomination.
	It's not your local Catholic denomination.
	Those aren't what Christians are.
	There are lots of Christians that go to church that are...
	Quote-unquote, Christians from a political perspective, they don't know Christ.
	And that's the difference between what the invisible church is and the denominations that try to wield political power.
	And right now, that's a problem, is that everybody's trying to jam up some political power.
	The Talmud, yeah, it's got problems all over the place.
	It's a commentary on the Torah, the first five books of the Bible.
	Written over a long period of time by lots of people that consider themselves scholars.
	And yeah, it's got evil things sewn all throughout it.
	You could argue that Calvinism is a commentary on the Bible, and it's got evil things written all throughout it.
	You could argue that Catholicism as a political practice is exactly the same way.
	Those aren't the issues because the difference between real religion and fake religion, in my mind, is whether or not you know God and understand God and have a connection with him in the proper, within his framework for what is acceptable and what within his framework for what is acceptable and what is not.
	Yeah, and for me as a Christian, is that all you got to do is take a look at Jesus' one commandment If you practice love, and that could be in any religion that says that, if you're sincerely doing that...
	You're not going to be a good person.
	You're going to be a great person.
	And that just to the easiest point is certainly the propagandist that all 15 million Jews are somehow guilty of nothing.
	That is sloppy thinking, immoral and anti-American that everybody is innocent until proven guilty.
	But the ones who are engaging in crimes.
	We should be passionate about saving lives and stopping that evil.
	You know, what's interesting about the Bible is that it creates a different enemy.
	It's not the Jews.
	The rich and powerful Jews, we've had that problem in every society and every nation.
	That problem's nothing new.
	And if you were to consult the Bible today...
	As far as I can tell, the way I'm reading it, Mystery Babylon indicates that there's a bigger problem in the corrupt political church.
	In terms of Mystery Babylon seems to indicate more that it's rooted in the Catholics and the Jesuits and the centralized political church, quote-unquote church, that is considered to be the universal.
	That will be the problem.
	If you take a look at Catholicism today, go look at some of the Vatican's press releases.
	Global climate change.
	Oh yeah, they really believe in God.
	Yeah, they're worried that God didn't build a world that was going to stay stable, so we need to be involved in this.
	You take a look at some of the organized religion, and I think that you'll find that there's a bigger problem And it's not just the problem that we have at home.
	And then you separate that out and ask yourself, well, who's at the top of the secret societies?
	I mean, I got a 32nd degree Freemason next door that thinks he's a Christian or claims to be a Christian.
	And I'm not going to say that he's not at all.
	I'm just saying.
	Well, look, I explained this to a friend this week.
	The Bible says do not judge.
	And it doesn't use the word kata krino.
	Krino is the Greek word for evaluate, judge, condemn.
	Kata is the word that goes on the front of it that you would say, oh, do not condemn.
	Do not judge down.
	Kata krino.
	No, it doesn't use kata krino.
	When it says do not judge, it says do not kata, evaluate.
	It's not even your job to evaluate your neighbor.
	Your job is to love your neighbor.
	Interesting.
	Interesting.
	It is interesting.
	And if people did practice that love, then life looks different.
	All right.
	This is the last part of this USAID thing.
	Then we'll go to Trump team and actions.
	So the civil rights are being destroyed throughout the West in service of Israel.
	Caitlin Johnstone.
	This is Richard.
	Medhurst, who already had been arrested in the UK. And the idea is that this USAID-type funding to censor any type of political wrongthink, anything that challenges the empire, is throughout all of the Western nations.
	The so-called developed, the so-called former colonial nations, they all engage in this stuff.
	And that the censorship is the only way that the Empire is going to go ahead and continue.
	And again, the idea that I think that the Empire has had their head ripped off with this, and we'll see what plays out in the next week or two.
	The Trump team and actions, the openings, I'll go over one, two, three, four of those, that is becoming fast and furious.
	Trump dumps Kennedy Center board puts immediate end to drag shows for kids.
	That's nice.
	That's important.
	And that is progress.
	And it's really just getting us to a neutral position again.
	But a exposure of where the empire probably wanted to take us.
	CNN data analyst points out that public overwhelmingly backs Trump on keeping men out of women's sports.
	And this is corporate media.
	Transgender female athletes and women's sports, 79% oppose it.
	Well, that's great.
	That is good.
	Those two stories, I want to take a little pause there, okay?
	So we've got keeping boys who are pretending to be girls out of girls' sports.
	And we've got the...
	What was the other one that was...
	The men pretending to be women reading stories to children.
	Oh, yeah.
	Men pretending to be women reading stories.
	Okay.
	This is a litmus test.
	Okay.
	If you are out there in the audience, you need to boil it down.
	Why?
	Why?
	Is it because you observe that men are different than women?
	Is that something that's observable?
	Well, wait a second.
	What about the morally relativistic person out on the thing?
	What about the boy who's born effeminate?
	What about this?
	What about that?
	Don't we make provisions for that?
	Don't we have provisions all over the place for all these different anomalies that happen in society?
	You have to ask yourself the question of, where do those provisions come from?
	Is it a matter of democracy that all people agree?
	We took a look at a poll that said 79% don't want boys and girls sports.
	Well, that leaves 21% that are morally ambiguous, if you consider it to be a moral...
	So don't we make accommodations for the morally ambitious?
	Are we in a democracy or are we representative republic?
	How does government make rules about what's right and what's wrong?
	Where do they draw the line?
	Is it the general consensus or 51% vote or is it much farther?
	And this is where I would say you really need to start thinking through this stuff in terms of...
	Do you believe that there is a standard?
	A standard of behavior?
	And what is the source of that standard?
	And what is the penalty for violating that standard?
	Okay?
	Very important questions.
	What is the standard?
	How do we recognize it?
	Where do we find it?
	Where does it come from?
	Why is it the standard?
	And what is the penalty for violating that standard?
	I think philosophically, if you really begin to break that stuff down, you'll begin to understand what 79% of the people see, which is there's something that makes sense in the difference between boys and girls.
	But why is it there?
	And what's underneath the hood?
	I think if you explore those questions, you'll find some eye-opening answers about the very purpose and meaning of life.
	Yep, yep.
	If we had a little more factual background, we would be able to find out that our wannabe masters have been chemically poisoning all of us, including our children.
	In ways that causes confusion about their gender.
	So they've been poisoning the well.
	Alright.
	Mass exodus on the horizon.
	CIA offers buyouts of its entire workforce with generous eight months pay and benefits packages as Trump moves to downsize federal bureaucracy.
	Now that's interesting.
	And of course, the CIA, like every agency, is going to be criminally complicit in some of the worst crimes.
	And for the CIA, especially in the assassination of President Kennedy, and with the ongoing wars of aggression, so literally killing millions.
	Breaking President Trump taps Elon Musk to audit the Pentagon.
	Yeah, that would be nice.
	That would reveal a lot if we did that.
	And the wars are, Orwellian, illegal.
	Not even close to legal.
	And we have here, they get rich while you struggle, Chuck Schumer, the Democratic president of the Senate, or the leading member of the Democrats in the Senate, 81 million net worth, 13 million gained in 2024 alone as a Well,
	I did want to comment on the Pentagon.
	To us, it's become a separate word.
	It's a five-pointed star as a pentagram.
	The Pentagon is our The United States military apparatus that is represented, which is the enforcement arm of U.S. will globally.
	I want to point out to all of the listeners an old documentary that's been around for a few years on Rumble called Belly of the Beast, Director's Cut.
	Because I think you'll find, if you go and take a couple hours to watch the director's cut of that show on Rumble called Belly of the Beast, which was put out by the guys that run the YouTube channel End Times Productions, and they really kind of highlight and focus on Tom Horn, who is a conspiracy theorist.
	I don't know if he's dead or alive, but he's a conspiracy theorist that tried to unravel the mystery of why DC is laid out.
	Like an old world religion or the old pagan temples.
	Why do we have this obelisk, which is the phallus, next to the chalice, which is, you know, the Congress building?
	And that, by the way, the big dome represents the pregnant Osiris, and the phallus represents...
	So you got...
	Why do we have all these pagan themes and these old world temples?
	And all this sort of mystery, religion, paganism laid out throughout D.C. Why did George Washington, you know, we've got the David Barton view of George Washington, which is, you know, these were a bunch of hardcore Christians that got together.
	And then you've got the other view of the founding fathers, which is they were a bunch of Freemason oligarchs.
	Who were trying to put together sort of the new Atlantis in terms of its focus on paganism and these themes that are sort of universal.
	And if you begin to sort of understand how Washington and why Washington was laid out like it is, it's to put those old pagan ideas and concepts And to export them globally as a power structure.
	And if you listen to Belly of the Beast, again, belly, pregnant, belly of the beast, to bring forth the enlightened one.
	And some people would say, well, oh, enlightened, that's Lucifer.
	They're looking for the birth of...
	The rebirth of Osiris incarnate, or Cyrus, which is a different version that the Jews are looking for.
	But all very interesting stuff as to what's really happening behind the scenes.
	But the reason that I point out the Pentagon is because I see the Pentagon as laid out for that reason, in that way, to export this particular breed of old-school paganism.
	I think it's a fascinating study.
	It is fascinating, and I'll put into the show notes at BitChute about a 10-minute video from a professional architect, college professor of architecture, Scott Onstock.
	And he had a professional article maybe about 15 years ago now.
	And he said, you know, the major cities of the world, they have these geometric patterns encoded into the architecture.
	The urban design.
	And it's everywhere.
	Everywhere.
	Sacred geometry.
	Yeah.
	It's all sacred geometry.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	Same thing that was used to lay out Babylon and other places.
	It's sacred.
	The old sacred geometry.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And when Scott published that professional piece, he found out that a bunch of people communicated back to him and says, yo, brother, you have no idea.
	How deep this goes.
	And Scott digested that and he put out, I think he has three documentaries called Secrets in Plain Sight.
	And he spends about 10 minutes taking a look at the urban design in Washington, D.C. And I'll put a link to that.
	It's fascinating.
	When I saw that probably 15 years ago, the first one, I watched it back to back.
	Because it was so amazing.
	And for whatever reason, the secret societies that were behind this architecture felt very strongly about these designs because it is everywhere.
	Back to it.
	Alright, so openings and actions of...
	The Trump team in the first three weeks, we have Jimmy Dore.
	5,000 FBI agents worked on the January 6th case, and that's 5,000 out of 13,000.
	And then he shows the picture of that these people were so dangerous walking in between the cordoned off sections so as not to cause too much trouble.
	And that is going to be, again, I don't know if our opponents are going to be able to survive this.
	Then I'll play this just one minute video here.
	In 2003, at the peak of its population, they hit 684 detainees.
	You might recall, during this time, the base was mired in controversy over questions of due process and allegations of torture.
	There was this Senate report.
	Ah, this CNN fucker, of course he's lying, and that what was disclosed was codified.
	And that the so-called detainees are being held without due process.
	But it goes on here.
	...back in 2014 that highlighted the interrogation techniques against an associate of Osama bin Laden named Abu Zubaydah.
	Excuse me.
	The intel committee said that the experience he had were awful.
	He had at least 83 applications of waterboarding.
	He spent over a...
	83 applications of controlled drowning, and this was the basis of the testimony used that gave the official 9-11 story.
	11 days in a coffin-sized confinement box and was subjected to other interrogation methods like sleep deprivation.
	Hold up!
	Wait a minute!
	No, no, no, no.
	Now, if you haven't noticed yet, it's Obama bin Laden.
	And this is CNN.
	So it makes me wonder who's writing the scripts here.
	Let's see it.
	That shit is hard, A, Brock.
	Come on now, dawg.
	Come on, man.
	That is sharp.
	But why does it matter?
	Oh yeah, so we terrorized some people trying to get them to admit that Osama bin Laden was part of the network that took down the Twin Towers, whatever.
	You know, we've all heard this propaganda before, but let me ask you a question.
	If the buildings truly came down in the morning of September 11th, how did we announce on the day of September?
	11th of the afternoon, without performing any investigation whatsoever, that it was Osama bin Laden that ran the team of terrorists.
	Oh, and by the way, we just found a passport here that proves it.
	Anybody who still believes that 9-11 happened the way the media told us 9-11 happened, I'm going to be crude here, but you got your head up your ass.
	Yeah, yeah.
	You're looking at a dark place, that's for sure.
	All right.
	Let's go on here.
	And we've got one more in this section.
	Joe Rogan calls out Bernie Sanders over criticism of Trump, the wildest fucking gaslighting I think I've ever seen.
	And I'll give Joe Rogan a minute for this.
	It's amazing to watch all these left-wing people suddenly, Bernie Sanders making a post about how Donald Trump is trying to silence independent media.
	Was the wildest fucking gaslighting I think I've ever seen from a politician.
	Independent media?
	You mean fucking CBS? You mean CBS that edited that Kamala Harris interview to make it look like she had a really good point?
	100%.
	And then I don't know if you caught Alex Soros reposting this claim that basically you have an unelected cabal wielding...
	That's you!
	That's you, Alex!
	That's your dad!
	This is crazy!
	Yeah, no, it's a very, very strange historical moment.
	Also, it's like you haven't addressed any of the exposed corruption.
	All you're talking about is the horrors of dismantling this amazing organization.
	What about all the shit that they've uncovered?
	There's not even a counter-argument.
	Like, no, we need to fund gender-fluid dance in fucking Turkey.
	Like, what are you talking about?
	We need $200 million for Starbucks Keurig cups.
	What?
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	All right, brother, anything else on the Trump actions and openings?
	Are you ready to go on to COVID? No, we'll go on to whatever's next.
	All right.
	So, you know, as somebody who looks at these news stories, and I compiled them, and I texted Brian, I guess, yesterday morning, that, hey, bro, I got like 300 emails of mostly news stories to go through.
	The escalation.
	And the reason that I'm saying drip, drip, flood is that journalists and media presenters are finding more and more to say.
	And just in my experience of putting together these stories and then organizing them into categories, like, sure, the categories are mostly the same, but the impact of the stories, we're at the endgame.
	I keep saying we're at the endgame, but we're at the endgame, and something is going to break.
	All right, on to COVID. This is excellent.
	The COVID pandemic was fake.
	Yeah, it was all fake.
	Everything was fake.
	And I want to give this guy a couple of minutes.
	This was, I forget the guy's name, but he was the lead UK health.
	This is the Anthony Fauci of the UK, and this is in May of 2020. It clearly is a very serious epidemic.
	But equally, the fact that actually the great majority of people will not die from this.
	And I'll just repeat something I said right at the beginning, because I think it's worth reinforcing.
	Most people, well, a significant proportion of people will not get this virus at all at any point in the epidemic, which is going to go on for a long period of time.
	Of those who do, some of them will get the virus without even knowing it.
	They will have the virus with no symptoms at all, asymptomatic carriage, and we know that happens.
	Of those who get symptoms, the great majority, probably 80%, will have a mild or moderate disease, might be bad enough for them to have to go to bed for a few days, not bad enough for them to have to go to the doctor.
	An unfortunate minority...
	We'll have to go as far as hospital, but the majority of those will just need oxygen and will then leave hospital.
	And then a minority of those will end up having to go to severe and critical care and some of those.
	So I was telling the truth with this.
	And the end statistics, and this was repeated in the German data, is that this wasn't even a strong flu season.
	And the health professionals in Northern California, when this came out, the doctors and nurses, I've said that, yeah, the local hospitals, they didn't even have to enact their protocol.
	For a severe flu season for this.
	And none of the hospitals were overwhelmed that they knew of.
	And this is the documentation that I came up with at the time in 2021 of the lies and crimes.
	This is crimes against humanity and the lies to force inject all of us, including our children, with this culling.
	And then the attempt to criminalize any dissent.
	This was the attempt to lock down and to end humanity as we know it.
	Breaking, Musk says his Doge team uncovered $100 billion in Medicare and Medicaid waste after gaining access to the system.
	$100 billion.
	The looting is everywhere.
	The lying is everywhere.
	And we shall see, baby.
	I am cautiously optimistic from this.
	We may even get some sort of a big event today on Super Bowl Sunday.
	Q did emphasize the sum of all fears and the plot of a sum of all fears included a nuke at the Super Bowl.
	So it may be attended by the United States president.
	No president has ever attended a Super Bowl until today.
	A couple of hours from now, about three hours from now, we'll see if something shakes out from that.
	The agencies that betrayed public trust.
	This is another excellent article, and it turns out it was all of them.
	All of the official agencies lied, and the documentation that I put together is sufficient for any reasonable person to withdraw consent and demand the leader arrest because they lied.
	And we can quantify that the best documentation that we've shared so far is that this is approximately 20, about 20 million human beings were killed by these forced injections.
	And there may be an accounting to that happening very soon.
	Brian, your thoughts?
	COVID was psychosomatic for the most part.
	I'm not going to say that people didn't have something, but remember, flu disappeared, and then it was the fear and the anxiety that drove most of the behavior that was driven by the propaganda outlets.
	And COVID was just as effective, if not more effective, than 9-11 in terms of trying to drive new policy.
	Remember, 9-11 resulted in the Patriot Act.
	COVID resulted in an even more intrusive restriction on our liberties.
	And I believe that all of the false flag shootings in the schools are there to drive security apparatus spending, as well as to get the next generation of kids who go to schools, who are afraid to be more willing to relinquish their rights.
	I think arms are an important part of the battle, but I think what's more important to this, just remember how, okay, so now Gaza is going to be gentrified.
	What did I tell you on October 8th, 2023, after October 7th happened?
	I told you it's a gentrification project that's going to drive a bunch of spending.
	That's what happens.
	When we have a false flag, what immediately comes after is either a new law, new spending, whatever.
	We saw 9-11, the Patriot Act, COVID, with the World Health Organization.
	We've seen all sorts of things that drive new spending.
	Those are the spending controllers that are controlling our society.
	And what's at the root of all of this robust, overrun spending?
	Fundamentally, is fear being driven by propaganda and mainstream media, opening up the Overton window, getting people to accept something that's a bunch of bullshit in a much easier way.
	The proper response to all of this fear campaigning is to get a grip and to find, I hate to say it, So simply, but to find out what you really need to be afraid of, because it's generally not these things that they push out towards us.
	There are some things, there is something to be afraid of in this world, but it's not this.
	No, not that.
	And once you get the insight, and I keep on saying, the title of my one published paper via the Claremont Colleges...
	Is the Emperor's new clothes?
	And that once you figure out that, oh, they're lying about that.
	Is there anything that they're telling the truth about?
	If they're lying in one area of this magnitude, then they're unreliable.
	And obviously, the rational conclusion must include arrest those fuckers.
	Because they're killers.
	They're killing people.
	And the Empire annually killing millions, harming billions, looting trillions.
	And then...
	Coming into our last section, the question arises, especially for me as a professional historian, so they're lying about the present, and they're lying about the past.
	And I kept going backwards in history, and I'll put it into the show notes at Bitchute, the 11-part series I have of U.S. Illegal, of kind of a top 10 list of the wars, the treaty-violating, lie-started wars of aggression.
	And who wouldn't they kill?
	How bad are the lies and the history?
	Well, let's take a look.
	So one of the questions that I have is the evidence that I've been paying attention to for maybe 20, not 20 years, about 15 years.
	No, no, no, no.
	Eight years.
	Get my numbers confused looking at all these numbers.
	So the World's Fairs from 1850 to 1915, that all of these World's Fairs, and if you want to take a look at this picture of this and dive into some of it, these apparently were palatial complexes, and I'll give you a case study in San Francisco with about a minute of this film evidence.
	And what we see here is absolutely breathtaking.
	The San Francisco World's Fair of 1915. And that central tower was almost 400 feet tall.
	All claimed to be constructed out of temporary materials.
	And yet it could withstand all of the traffic.
	Tell me anybody's building that tower with plywood and stucco.
	Or any of these buildings.
	In less than two years, all the fully grown trees and shrubbery, the over-the-top architecture, all to be torn down in six months.
	Except for the ones they decided to keep around, of course.
	Perhaps a trophy of the old world.
	All these canal systems, all these reflecting pools, all the decorative ordemain tops on the buildings, the tropical gardens.
	To think this could be done in two years in modern times would be stunning, let alone in 1915.
	And even amazing yet is these were popping up all over the world, nearly happening yearly, all looking to this same grand scale, telling us the same story two years.
	Yeah, that's true.
	And part of the voices that I pay attention to are the people who are professionals in construction with academic training and professional experience.
	And some of them try to estimate how long would it take to build one of these things and if it is possible at all with unlimited labor.
	unlimited labor, unlimited access to resources, the answer to build one of these things would be 10 years minimum in the current time.
	And in terms of the documentation where I presented, if this subject is of interest in my presentation at Jim Fetzer's fifth annual False Flags and Conspiracies Conference, the last part of the presentation, I give my best shots, which include Brian and I spending pretty much a whole show taking a look at the 1904 World's Fair in St. Louis.
	And to close it out here, the idea that apparently we live on a flat Earth.
	and we'll take a look at a couple of other areas of proof.
	...online tool here.
	Applying our Earth curvature formula to the following examples, we will check whether the outcomes we anticipate align with observations one would expect if the Earth is indeed a globe of the reported dimensions.
	This formula is officially used and endorsed by NASA and the scientific community.
	No prior knowledge of algebra or spherical trigonometry is required using the online tool.
	From the vantage point of Apple Pie Hill in the New Jersey Pine Barrens, 40 miles distant, the Philadelphia skyline can be seen in its entirety.
	Taking into account the 211-foot elevation of an observer from Apple Pie Hill, Calculations of the Earth's curvature posit that the skyline should be obscured and not visible by 329 feet below the horizon.
	And the formula is 8 inches times the miles squared should be obscured by the curvature of the alleged sphere.
	However, contrary to the expected calculations, the skyline is in full view.
	Real-world test number two.
	From Bear Mountain in Harriman State Park, situated 60 miles away, one can easily see the New York City skyline.
	According to the curvature of an Earth with an 8,000-mile diameter, the skyline should be hidden from view by 174 feet of curvature when observed from Bear Mountain Summit, which stands at 1,283 feet.
	Despite this, the skyline is fully visible.
	Real-world test number three.
	On days with clear visibility, it is possible to see the complete Chicago skyline down to street level from Grand Mere State Park across Lake Michigan, a distance of 59 miles.
	According to standard Earth curvature calculations, This view should be entirely obstructed by 2,091 feet.
	I want to point out that photograph, which is showing a geometry of those rays of light from a relatively local light source of Earth's curvature.
	Real-world test number four.
	In Genoa, Italy, standing 70 feet above sea level, one can see the island of Gorgona, which lies 81 miles distant.
	Under the expected calculations, this island would be obscured entirely from view.
	Scientific attempts to debunk these findings often cite atmospheric refraction as a factor influencing observational outcomes in our previous examples.
	However, the impact of atmospheric refraction on visibility calculations is quite minimal, typically amounting to only a few percent of difference.
	This slight variance is far insufficient to overturn our conclusions supporting a flat Earth model in exchange for adopting a spherical Earth model.
	While countless other real-world observations supporting a flat Earth are abundant, The particular technique provided previously serves to highlight key verification approaches that support our assertions of a flat rather than spherical Earth.
	Guglielmo Marconi's historic radio test transmission occurred on September 22, 1930. The Italian inventor successfully sent a wireless signal from Poldu Cornwall in the United Kingdom to Sydney, Australia, marking a significant milestone in the history of radio communications and demonstrating the feasibility of transmitting radio signals across vast distances.
	During the test, Marconi employed high-power radio equipment and sophisticated antenna systems to span approximately 12,000 miles.
	The reception of these signals underscored the potential of wireless technology to connect disparate locations worldwide.
	Marconi's radio test transmission to Australia played a pivotal role in advancing the field of wireless telegraphy and laid the groundwork for future developments of worldwide communication systems that we rely on today.
	This experiment significantly contributed to the advancement of radio communication technology and understanding, eventually leading to more regular and reliable long-distance wireless worldwide communication.
	Using the official Earth Curve calculator, the calculation determined that, based on a spherical Earth model, the receiving antenna in Australia would have to be approximately 7,893 miles below the horizon.
	This prompted me to investigate the feasibility of such an extremely distant radio transmission scenario using an AI chatbot, based on a spherical Earth model.
	Question.
	Can you envision a scenario where a radio signal Yep, it's just not possible.
	By all of the evidence, observable and walked through that little video, uh, looks flat.
	That would have to be, I think, the working conclusion that you would have to draw, but certainly you can refute the official history of the sphere of the given size and the terms of these ancient complexes of, in some cases, thousands of acres and thousands of buildings.
	Yeah, it looked like we had some sort of a paradise here, and those civilizations got wiped out.
	And they got erased from history, which should inspire people even more for the importance that we should probably win this war that we're in.
	Otherwise, we're going to end up into the dustbin of history as those other civilizations.
	Brian, your thoughts?
	That's for the buildings.
	I mean, even Plato wrote about...
	The lost civilization of Atlantis.
	Plato was a contemporary with Socrates.
	That was 300 BC, I believe.
	One of the most famous Greek philosophers wrote extensively about Atlantis being the lost civilization, leaving lots of clues.
	A lot of people believe it was somewhere in Northwest Africa.
	And they've got some pretty good archaeological reasons for that.
	We've found all sorts of ancient structures around the world that don't seem to fit with the history that we've been given.
	As you know, we've been programmed to believe the heliocentric model since we were small children.
	The generation before that was programmed with the same idea, and the generation before that had some inkling that Flat Earth was around.
	It was in the super old encyclopedias.
	And it was something that wasn't considered a heresy until guys like Copernicus and other Jesuits came around and started putting the programs together.
	There was a lot of evil that sort of rolled out around the 1700s and the 1800s in terms of rewriting things, in terms of rewriting history.
	So I would attribute those ancient structures to some sort of Atlantean sacred geometry sort of culture that was able to travel, levitate.
	I've seen all sorts of things.
	I don't have a problem with it, and I don't think that, you know, the Bible doesn't speak to whether or not history is going to remain unwritten.
	I mean, the close of the canon was 2,000 years ago, and so a lot has happened since then.
	But the same influences that have been around since the beginning of time continue to still be around.
	So we had a pre-flood civilization that was going to build something called the Tower of Babel.
	That has been found.
	We know where it was.
	We know where Babylon was.
	We know all sorts of things about what happened way back then.
	And just to point something out that I think is important about this, there's basically 2,000 years.
	Between Abraham and Christ in the archaeological record.
	2,000 years from Christ's crucifixion would be 2031. So if time, I think we had 1,500 years basically from Adam to Abraham, 2,000 from Abraham to Christ, and then if we would say it was another 2,000 from Christ.
	To the end, not that we're predicting time, but I would say if the pattern makes sense, you've got about seven years to figure it out.
	There'll be a big, great awakening that happens at the end.
	Knowledge will increase, which it obviously has, and so will deception.
	Deception will increase just as much, and these deceptions get recycled in a lot of different ways.
	And so the truth is out there someplace, I could say that.
	And I think it's just up to trying to figure out what can be relied on and what can't be relied on in terms of historical accuracy and credibility.
	Thank you, brother.
	Which is why I'm in the Bible, by the way.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And that's why you should have something to say about that publicly, brother.
	Oh, I have plenty to say.
	I mean, I've been writing for days.
	I've been preparing.
	I've been...
	Oh, there's a lot of work that I've done.
	But this audience isn't...
	I'll probably have to start with my own independent show to begin to deal with what this really is.
	Because I take a lot of hits.
	That's fine.
	That's fair.
	But...
	This isn't necessarily the audience I'm going to roll out all those pearls to.
	I would encourage you to, and I would encourage Jim to approve of this as a show.
	I don't think anybody can make an argument that is rational.
	And again, we are targeted is that the Empire bitch shills will be looking to destroy, distract, and to discourage.
	And you have a lifetime of consideration for this.
	And I would challenge anybody to make an argument comprehensively on what you're saying.
	And I stand with you that you're pointing to the most important questions to get to.
	All right, final thoughts.
	Just be good people.
	If I'm going to talk about those things, I want to be invited to do it.
	I'm not going to go asking for it.
	If I wanted to start my own thing, I could do that too.
	I've always been loyal to Jim for a long, long time.
	I've been loyal to Jim and to this channel.
	And by the way, and also to our listeners, you know, a lot of people think I'm abrasive or stupid or whatever.
	It doesn't really matter.
	But I do care about this audience.
	I mean, I really do.
	Y'all probably don't see it.
	You probably don't know it.
	You probably don't know it.
	But I do.
	Whether I know your name or not, or whether you're down in the comments or not, trust me, I'm spending time on you.
	I'm helping to break the fallow ground the best I know how, and that's code for the people that understand.
	And I respect you and appreciate you for it.
	Brother, all right, so for final thoughts, hang in there.
	Be strong.
	Things are moving rapidly, as they always have.
	I mean, I'm saying the same thing that I always say, but we ministers tend to say the same thing a lot, because when the breakthrough happens, it happens like that, and you should be prepared.
	I think that the basis is to recognize that you've been lied to, therefore don't have any trust in any of the official.
	His stories have an empathy and an appreciation for how much you've been tortured, poisoned, and mind controlled, and that everybody is in that condition.
	We've been under war for generations.
	The human beings in the present, I mean, we put on a good face, but everybody is going to be deeply upset by the evil that we experience that isn't talked about by corporate media.
	And that the response is simply to find a place to stand.
	And I agree with Brian that the best place to stand is on the highest ground, which is we are children of the Creator.
	And to look within and to look without.
	When you look without, you say, all right, so those are the psychopathic liars that have been trying to kill us.
	And probably have wiped out entire civilizations.
	They lie about everything.
	Everything.
	Everything.
	So to withdraw all consent from them and to, you know, if Jesus' message makes sense, he's got one commandment, not ten, just one.
	And if you truly practice a love, and a love is a connection to, a respect for, and again, appreciating that it's been a war, baby.
	People are going to be roughed up.
	And to help each other out as much as possible.
	And the promise on the other side, just in this world, the unleashed technologies, the experience and expression of health.
	People don't know what it's like to be healthy.
	From the poisons and the tortures and the mind control.
	Oh, it's been rough.
	And that that is going to give a new...
	Experience and expression and unprecedented creativity and synergy of human beings that is possible.
	And then, outside of this domain, I think that Jesus had something to say that we should all be like children.
	And if you appreciate the...
	Just do the best you can, kids.
	Do the best you can.
	All right, Brian, final thoughts.
	It's not knowledge that makes you free.
	What makes you free from slavery is having a clean conscience.
	You can go collect all the knowledge in the world and you can have the answers to the greatest mysteries and you can still be a dirty, rotten slave and miserable.
	You can have all the money in the world and you can be miserable.
	But how do you sleep like a baby?
	You live a clean life within the bounds of what you've learned is acceptable behavior.
	And you have to learn to resist darkness.
	You have to.
	With what tools?
	With what resources?
	But freedom is moral freedom.
	Slavery is becoming a slave to immorality.
	Okay, brother.
	Well, thank you very much.
	Our audience members, thank you.

▲