All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 3, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:31
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (2 December 2024) with Don Grahn, Victor-Hugo Vaca, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
To Truth vs.
News Incorporated.
Truth vs.
News.
This show should never exist because truth and news should be right there together.
But I'm afraid that there's not a marriage to fight these days.
And we're winning a fight, especially with this new regime and Trump's coming in and things.
Looks like things are finally turning around after so much corruption has been exposed.
Even last night.
To come back for a second hour where we discuss Biden's pardon.
But today we have a great show.
And we have the most wonderful people to show it to you again.
Of course, we're missing Scott Bennett.
Praise him and bless his passing year.
We love him and miss him, but we have Jim Fetcher, the author of many books, including J.O.K. and about Nobody Dying at Sandy Hook.
Books that you need to know facts about of these historic incidents that nobody else will tell you and these haven't been reputed as far as I know.
Jim's leading on again here and I'm just so proud to have him as my Guideline here.
And we also have good old Brian Davidson, a private eye out of Texas, who really knows what to look at, and he gets in the depths of things.
Right, Brian?
Yep, I guess so.
And from across the way, we have Victor Hugo Macca out of Georgia, by Russia, and I understand there's things happening in his backyard.
there, there's a little tensions politically there.
But I guess we'll just start off here, Jim.
What's happening between Russia and Ukraine?
Anything Putin's doing now?
Well, Don, let's take a look.
Putin threatens Ukrainian gamble with new hypersonic missile.
Another day, another record-setting Russian missile and drone attack on Ukraine.
At a moment, the West is escalating its support for Kiev.
Putin announced as security officials at the Collective Security Treaty Organization in Kazakhstan that 100 drones and 90 missiles were launched at Ukraine over the last 48 hours in response to deep strikes.
These have included attacks with U.S. and U.K.-supplied long-range missiles, which Russia has ignored, killed, and wounded some personnel in a radar site in Kurs.
We can't add a comprehensive strike in response to an ongoing attack on our territory using U.S.-supplied ATAK-MS missiles.
He warned Russian military is actively monitoring the location of Ukraine's long-range weapons to determine Where they are, and mark my words, to take them out.
He warned Moro Reshnik deployment would be necessary if Ukraine continues to attack Russian territory.
Mention of the advanced weapon for which there is no defense.
He will be targeting decision-making centers in Kyiv.
The Russian leader boasted that it can turn targets into dust, that multiple launches would be comparable to nuclear strikes, but remarkably non-nuclear.
For these latest attacks, the country's energy minister, German Golichenko, acknowledged the power structure came under massive enemy attack.
Emergency blackouts, conservation efforts imposed among freezing temperatures, the electric grid in Ukraine, in other words, have been taken out.
Poles say both Ukrainians and Americans want the proxy war in Ukraine to end, but instead of ending, Washington is pressuring Kiev to throw teenagers into the threshing machine of an unwinnable conflict, that they should start recruiting, drafting 18-year-olds, heretofore it's only been 25. Meanwhile, Putin compares the new missile to a meteorite.
The striking power of the new Rishnik is similar to that of a meteorite, the hypersonic weapon capable of hitting heavily fortified targets and utterly destroying them.
It's like a falling meteorite.
We know from history where meteorites had fallen and what the consequences were, what lakes were formed, for example.
He didn't elaborate, but one of the world's largest impact raters, Lake Manicoogan in Canada, has a multiple ring structure with a diameter around 100 kilometers, in a ring about 70. The Ereshnik has dozens of homing warheads, actually 36. A massive strike would be comparable to that of a nuclear blast.
The Russian military is selecting targets for potential Ereshnik strikes, yes.
They would include Ukrainian decision-making centers, military and industrial facilities, Last week, Russia deployed the Ureshnik to strike a large weapon factory in the Ukrainian city of Donprotevskov, also known as Denver, in Ukraine, part of what was called a combat test.
The Ukrainian military has launched several attacks against targets in Russia of late, using U.S.-made ATAKAMs and British-French Storm Shadow Scout missiles.
Monday, Washington confirmed it had lifted range restrictions on U.S. missiles to attack Russia.
Putin said Moscow's weapons are superior to Western-made.
Russia is also producing many more than the entire NATO bloc.
Yurashnik has no counterpart in the world, and I believe none will appear anytime soon.
Meanwhile, Scott Ritter has revealed Russia wiped out 100 HIMARS and NATO's the lead.
The video, and I can't quite explain, won't play for me, but there it is.
Meanwhile, Zelensky says he's willing to cede territory in exchange for NATO protection.
If we want to stop the hot stage of the war, we should take Under the NATO umbrella, the territory of Ukraine under our control.
That's what we need to do fast, and then Ukraine can get back the other part of its territory diplomatically.
Fat chance.
Slenty's suggestion is a non-starter for Russia that the invasion was not to keep Ukraine out of NATO, but it does reflect a shift in position.
Lenski previously maintained his war goals include driving Russia out of all the territory it had captured in February of 2022, as well as Crimea, and becoming a member of NATO. In a recent conversation with German Chancellor Scholz,
Russian President Putin pointed to a speech he made earlier, outlining his conditions for peace, including a Ukrainian withdrawal from all territory Russia has annexed, Ukrainian neutrality, that means not becoming a member of NATO, and lifting of all Western sanctions on Russia, perfectly reasonable.
I think any objective observes that Russia has already won the war.
Zelensky said Ukraine wouldn't agree to a ceasefire without a guarantee of NATO protection.
We need it very much, otherwise Putin will come back.
How are we going to go to a ceasefire for us?
It's very dangerous.
While Zelensky and Putin's terms are far apart, the Ukrainian side could be forced to make more concessions if President-elect Trump follows through this campaign promise to end the war and pressures Zelensky to negotiate.
Victor Hugo, your thoughts?
The whole thing is a money laundering scheme.
When he says that he needs NATO to protect them, what he's saying is he needs continued flow of this fiat currency, the Babylonian magic trick of the dollar.
to go to the Ukraine.
Regardless, this whole thing from the beginning to end has been nothing but a money laundering scheme using everything from the Federal Reserve notes to the FTX, that whole scandal that has been mysteriously, just like everything else that the United States does, swept under the rug and forgotten. just like everything else that the United States does, swept I mean, it's just unbelievable.
We've got the biolabs in the Ukraine that are directly connected to the bioweapons disguised as vaccines, the COVID that has affected so many lives in the United States and around the world, the whole lockdowns with the Wuhan virus, which again, allegedly the whole lockdowns with the Wuhan virus, which again, allegedly originated in the United States, then made its way allegedly to a biolab that nobody's talking about in Tbilisi, the Lugar biolab, which I'm just shocked
the Lugar biolab, which I'm just shocked that nobody's been looking into that because and then from the Ukraine to Wuhan and then of course from Wuhan to the whole rest of the world and now we're in this situation so there's just so many things that are being ignored and we're talking about peace again
I keep saying it but there's not going to be any peace unless there's justice Zelensky is going to get away with this as well.
There's been human trafficking out of the Ukraine.
There's been body parts that have been used in, what do they call that?
You know, when they take the body parts from the soldiers, from the living people over there.
And all of this, again, goes back to Israel.
I don't know what Trump's going to do about it, if he's able to do anything about it, because the people that he's putting in his administration are also either Zionist, Satanic Christians, or Jews.
So I think what's going to happen is it's going to shift from the Ukraine to Israel, and if Zelensky isn't assassinated, he's just going to keep Getting bribes from everybody because he's got all the information on everybody.
Although now with what happened with Biden pardoning his son Hunter, he in so doing also pardoned himself.
So I don't know.
I mean, basically the United States is just a cesspool.
Really, I'm disgusted.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I think Trump is beginning to telegraph the type of economic warfare that he's going to be Engage again.
He said he posted on Truth Social the other day that if the BRICS nations continued to pick against the dollar, that he would put 100% tariff on any nation that supported producing, abandoning the dollar for another foreign currency.
They can't control How global transactions take place.
But I think Trump knows that America needs to have the strength of the dollar in order to rebuild the economy, which is one of his major promises.
And everybody knows that the fastest, easiest way to rebuild the economy is with the war machine.
It's always been the most effective in the past, but now we've got moral problems associated with continuing that.
Plus, you have to ask yourself the question, would we even win a war against Russia?
There's a recent RAND Corporation Report out that indicates that we don't have the industrial base to do it.
We don't have the soldiers to do it.
And in a conventional type of war with conventional type of warfare and conventional type of weapons, we would lose rather decisively in a situation like that.
So for us to continue to Kick or allow this Ukraine faction to send missiles into Russia, I think, is a way to keep Trump engaged in war.
The question is whether or not Trump can reverse the direction that America is headed with this new administration that he's putting out.
Of course, we all want revenge and we all want justice, but we also don't want to Use revenge and justice as an excuse to destroy the United States' ability to continue to trade Globally, which apparently Trump may be willing to make that sacrifice with 100% tariffs.
So I'm deeply concerned about the situation.
At the same time, we're getting closer and closer and closer to a nuclear standoff.
There's going to continue to be deep state actors working behind the scenes without the support of any MAGA-type patriot that's in any type of administration.
And they're going to be pushing to get Trump...
involved in a war that we may not be able to handle.
So it looks like we're in a pretty bad spot right now.
And I think that in order for us to continue to rebuild or put ourselves back in a position where we are able to achieve sort of a Western hegemony, but without an Israeli influence, might be too much of a sacrifice for the economy.
So I expect that there's going to be hard times ahead.
And if we don't break out a nuclear war between here and there, Then expect the recession to get even worse, especially as we continue to threaten the BRICS nations that are, I think, justifiably wanting to end U.S. hegemony worldwide.
So which is it going to be?
Is it going to be a good economy?
Is it going to be more war?
Or is it going to be fix the domestic issues first while we lose on the global scale?
I'm not exactly sure which direction Trump's going to go.
Two or three comments.
Number one, we cannot win a war with Russia.
Without any doubt, we cannot do it.
The Ereshnik is a non-nuclear weapon, but it's extraordinarily powerful with 36 warheads that deliver kinetic energy at Mach 12 and have devastating impact.
It turns out it would be a perfect decapitation weapon because one missile can take out whole airfields, whole ports, whole industrial regions, and so forth.
And if Russia is forced to act, I believe that will happen.
And that there's no way the West can cope.
Putin is very keen on not going nuclear because it would have basically extinguished the northern hemisphere of the globe with a nuclear winter to follow.
The war economy thing has always baffled me, because military equipment has a very limited multiplier effect.
Unlike, say, conventional automobiles, we have leather, stereos, rubber, tires, blah, blah, blah.
Military equipment is so specialized.
The only beneficiaries are Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon.
It's very limited.
So it has always puzzled me, and perhaps you can address this, Brian, as to why a wartime economy is going to benefit the nation as a whole.
I do not see it.
Third, I think 100% tariffs may sound good.
But I think the rest of the world is fed up with the United States.
We've manipulated currency.
We have compromised by sanctions.
Russia, that's what led to the emergence of BRICS in the first place.
We put ourselves in an intolerable position.
Frankly, I don't think they will work.
Your thoughts and then Victor Hugo.
Yeah, my counterpoint on that is we haven't even begun to break out the major weaponry that we probably have access to.
During our False Flags and Conspiracies conference, I'm going to be doing a talk about flight MH370, which many of our listeners are probably aware of, a guy by the name of Ashton Forbes.
That has broken out some of the technological advances that we've probably achieved in order to make that plane basically disappear in midair.
And if that's true, and if this guy's research is up to par, it means that our military...
Look, we've been fighting with 50s, 40s, 30s, 20s weaponry for so long.
We've been exporting all that to Ukraine and Israel.
That's old school weaponry.
The question is...
Are we going to break into the classified militaristic apparatus?
And if we do so, is that going to break loose new energy independence options?
Is it going to break loose new military warfare techniques that haven't been considered before?
I can tell you that when we think of guns and bullets, that's bows and arrows compared to missiles.
And I think that the new technology that we have would make it an asymmetrical warfare that could take place instead of a traditional ground-based warfare.
Victor, are you?
I agree with you, Jim, as far as using a war as an economic Pump for the United States because that doesn't benefit anybody.
But one of the things that really struck me as showing the weakness that Trump has, the fact that he's threatening people with a 100% tariff, that doesn't work anymore.
I don't think the people in the United States realize how the rest of the world sees the dollar.
That's...
It's a fiat currency.
It's that slavery.
The rest of the world understands that the United States has already indebted trillions of dollars.
That means generations worth of slavery.
So people are moving away from that, and they're actually moving towards currency, actually towards money that has value, that's backed by gold, backed by silver, not gold.
The full faith in the Federal Reserve, which has not been audited, and by Fort Knox, which has also not been audited.
I don't think Trump understands that the rest of the world doesn't trust the United States anymore.
The United States has lost trust.
And if you don't have trust, why is anybody going to take the money that you're claiming you're going to offer them?
And why is anybody going to give a shit if you charge them tariffs when they're already trading?
India is trading with Russia.
Russia is trading with China.
And because the rest of the world has boycotted Russia, India and China are benefiting because they're trading with Russia at a good price.
And then they're selling Russia's oil and Russia's products to the EU and the rest of the world.
So the only ones who are actually losing with this boycott are the United Slaves of America.
And Trump's making a huge mistake by trying to keep the dollar alive.
That's like the movie Weekend at Bernie's.
The dollar is dead.
The sooner the United States...
Gets rid of that.
He's got to come in on day one, get rid of the Federal Reserve, get rid of the IRS, get rid of everything that goes with it.
Because remember, when the Federal Reserve was put in, so was the ADL. Why?
Because the ADL is there to protect the Jews who control the Federal Reserve and the central banks.
And they got to get rid of the FBI, which is not there to protect the people.
It's there to protect, again, The central bankers and the crimes that they're committing.
See, everything that's being fueled right now, these wars, the corruption, the pedophilia, all the horrors that exist at this moment in human history are being financed by the central bankers and being allowed and all the horrors that exist at this moment in human history are being financed by the central The rest of the world is done with it, Jim, I'm telling you.
Trump could take his threats and shove them right up his ass.
The world is telling Trump, because you know what?
Trump couldn't do shit in these past four years.
He rolled over.
Biden stole that election and Trump with the cue, trust the plan.
Oh yeah, yeah.
Really?
Trust the plan, huh?
This is the plan you got?
It sucks.
And the world ain't going for it.
The dollar's dead.
Rest in peace.
The plan collapsed.
You're right.
Meanwhile, Russia responds after NATO allegedly threatens to launch preemptive strikes.
That's Admiral Rob Bauer, Chair of NATO's Military Committee, stated earlier, The Group of Nations is preparing for strikes against Russia.
The Kremlin launches an attack on any NATO nation.
A media outlet called Eurasia Daily published a quote from Bauer that was slightly mistranslated, actually it was edited, and then falsely attributed to Bloomberg.
And more confident not to wait but to hit launchers in Russia in case Russia attacks us.
A combination of precision strikes is needed that will disable the systems that are used to attack us.
And we must strike first, he said as quoted by Bloomberg.
In reality, he stated, it is smarter to attack the archer that is Russia if Russia attacks us.
So you need a combination of deprecision strikes with which you can take up the weapons systems used to attack us, and of course, because we're a defensive alliance, We'll have to take the first blow.
So Russia will start the conflict because we're not going to attack Russia out of nothing.
Tuesday, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov condemned his comments, saying the NATO leader bluntly stated that to achieve the goals of protecting and defending the member countries of the North Atlantic Alliance, It's necessary to preemptively strike at those targets in the Russian Federation that, in NATO's opinion, could pose a threat.
Lavrov suggested Bauer's remarks showed all decency has already been discarded by NATO, which he claimed announced its true intentions via the Admiral's statement.
Russian MP Sergei Mironov provided a statement to Newsweek.
Mr. Bower is either a fool or a provocateur, perhaps both at once, pointing out Russia just debuted a hypersonic weapon from which no one has protection.
Is it possible the botched translation reached Lavrov and other prominent Russian leaders, deliberately leading them to falsely believe the body of nation is preparing a preemptive strike?
With the threat of World War III looming, Its imperative media outlet or political leaders accurately report statements made by both Western and Eastern leadership before a misunderstanding leads to a global cataclysm.
Meanwhile, moon of Alabama.
U.S. allies reignite war on Syria.
It seems an earlier assessment of mine about the situation in Lebanon calming down was wrong.
I then did not expect the situation in Syria to escalate further.
As of now, however, the situation, contrary to my previous supposition, continues to escalate.
I had underestimated the role of Turkey.
Brent Erdogan seemed to have taken control of HDS, which is a successor of Al-Qaeda and of ISIS, Using it to pursue his aims.
These include widening Turkish control over Syrian lands, further damage anti-Turkish resistance within the Kurdish population, and impress upon Trump that he can be a reliable ally in fighting against Iranian influence.
Jihadists under Turkish control have attacked Syrian government positions on the western side of Aleppo and seem to have infiltrated the city itself.
A large part of the op is a fake news onslaught accompanying it.
Current information is way to confuse the state with certainty exactly who's in control.
There are several factors fighting in Syria.
The Turkish rebel side, supported by Israel, Turkey, and the U.S., include two distinct groups, the former Al-Qaeda, Jihadists, now HTS, and likely still financed and armed by the CIA through proxies in Qatar.
HTS includes a significant number of Turks and Ugar Jihadists from Central Asia.
The second is the so-called Syrian National Army, a group of Sunni Syrian mercenaries paid for and controlled by Turkey.
They're distinguished through their depraved behavior, including the decapitation of a young soldier, brutal.
On the other side are the Syrian Arab Army, which seem to have forgotten all the lessons they've learned in previous phases of combat, supported by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, In strong coordination with Hezbollah, with some units of its Rawan's vessel forces are stationed in Syria.
Russia is backing the Syrian government and is currently using air power to interrupt further attacks from the rebel side.
The Kurdish People Protection Unit is the anti-Turkish movement, forming a major part of the Syrian Democratic Forces, supported on and off by the Pentagon in East Syria, currently fighting on the side of the Syrian government, but in its own interest in securing areas with significant Kurdish population.
While it was known that conflict would soon be revived, the immediacy seemed to have come as a surprise.
It's sad about no information yet to make an unbiased assessment about who's really in control.
My impression is many of the claims of jihadists are only media ops without military significance.
But what can be said is the Syrian government has obviously failed to secure its lines in the field and prepare its army for renewal of conflict.
The Syrian Arab army seem to have given up many positions without a significant fight.
It'll cost a lot of blood and treasure again to regain control.
Soon rebels celebrate outside the Aleppo Cathedral after storming the city.
They were posting pictures, they were taking selfies, they were singing, displaying a white flag with black writing.
Lots going on there.
Meanwhile, in a huge shock to the U.S., Israel, and Turkey, Russia stopped the victorious advance of terrorists in Syria.
And let me just say about this.
Russia intervened with military attacks on a massive long HTS convoy made up of, you know, hundreds and hundreds of brand new Toyota pickup truck merchants with American money.
And in every single case, the planes attacked and blew up every single one of those Toyota pickup trucks.
It was a very impressive display by the Russian Air Force in Syria, in defense of the Syrian government, and I expect it to continue.
Victor Hugo, your thoughts?
It reminds me of what Brian said, that the United Slaves of America have been sending their antiquated military gear to the Ukraine, and they're not even showing the rest of the world what kind of new death machinery they have.
It's just horrific when you see the description of the slaughter that these Non-Jews, these goy, these useless eaters, these untouchables, these cattle as this satanic cabal, the synagogue of Satan, those who are of the father of all lies, are just sitting back and financing all sides of this horror.
Imagine the trillions of dollars that exist, of course, printed out of nothing.
But instead of creating these machines, and instead of fueling this hatred, like you said, both sides, the CIA... It's funding one side, and meanwhile, ISIS is also a creation of the U.S. taxpayers.
Hamas is a creation of the...
It's hatred all around.
Again, this is nothing new.
The central bankers, they not only fuel this side of the war, but they fuel this side of the war.
And then what they do is they depopulate and then the one, they never lose because the thing is the losing side has to give land over.
The winning side has to pay debt.
So it's a win-win situation for these central bankers.
And the thing is people still haven't figured out, like Smedley Butler said, war is a racket.
So anyway, this is a depopulation plan.
They're sitting back.
They're loving it.
They're watching everybody kill everybody.
But they're sitting in their bunkers.
They're sitting in their islands.
They're eating the babies and screwing little kids.
And they've taken over the justice system.
There's no justice.
There's no peace.
I mean, that's the world that we're living in.
And it's absolutely horrific.
It's unsustainable.
Because if this is the kind of nightmare world we have to live in, where we have to just condone people, I mean, the way that description of the person getting their neck chopped off, that the blade actually got stuck and the guy had to hammer the blade in so that it could go and just decapitate the guy while they're singing.
I mean, I can't believe I'm even listening to this.
This is...
But I'm the bad guy, because I pointed out.
Brian?
Well, as for the technology, remember it was Donald Trump's uncle that cleaned out Nikola Tesla's estate and took all the important paperwork from Tesla's estate.
He was the one that was given the job of doing that.
Now you've got Donald Trump, the son, that's teamed up with Elon Musk, businessman who's going to save the world.
You've got all the cards being laid out with the congressional hearings on UFOs for the fake alien invasion, which is the last card in the Illuminati tarot deck that's supposedly played before the return of the They're lord of light to bring peace to the world and a global new world order.
So I think things are getting themselves set up.
And right now, the big question is, again, is Donald Trump the Pied Piper for the new world order?
Or is he truly a patriot?
Or has he grown into his role as a patriot?
Or is he going to make deals with these evil people that are practical, but they will help us to descend deeper into our moral abyss?
I don't know what the answer is going to be.
I know this.
The first step in the right direction is the prosecution of the pedophiles.
And if you can break out the pedophile networks and start to clean out the different agencies in the United States government, it'll give us a good platform for resetting the Constitution here in America and allowing the The true patriots to begin to fight back by educating their children differently than what the state has been doing.
I think that's a great suggestion to view the benefial issue as a litmus test.
If Trump really does crack down, then we have reason for hope.
And if he does not, we don't.
Well said, go ahead.
If I could just answer, both of you are absolutely correct.
But what we have to realize, and again, I hate to be the bearer of bad news here, people, but the pedophiles are the ones that are running the world.
So we just have witnessed over this holiday weekend on Sunday, the pedophile in chief Just pardoned his son, who's a pedophile, and in so doing, pardoned himself.
Realized the judges at the highest levels are pedophiles.
The FBI at the highest levels are pedophiles.
The CIA at the highest levels are pedophiles.
The Freemason police at the highest levels are pedophiles.
You're not going to be able to get rid of the pedophiles.
And I agree with both of you.
That's absolutely what we have to do.
But we're coming into a hard reality, people.
They're not going to take themselves down.
We may have to get into a situation where we're going to have to grab that blade and get rid of the pedophiles because, like the pedophiles say to the little kids, it don't lick itself I reiterate my belief that a pedophile issue is a litmus test for how well Trump can do here in benefiting the nation.
Meanwhile, experts warn of an imminent false flag in London to be blamed on Russia.
The British government is planning to launch a false flag attack in London to be blamed on Russia and used to initiate World War III. Why someone would decide to cut all the webcams?
This is security expert Alec Cranor says, after watching a YouTube video entitled, why are all the London webcams offline?
He began researching what UK Intel services were engaged in.
Zero Heads reports.
I was nearly floored.
Mr. Houston looked through hundreds of webcams across the ground and couldn't find a single one live.
Look here, look here.
Extremely hot.
Clearly someone, and I'd say it had to be at the level of the Prime Minister, made the decision to switch them all off.
They could not have all failed randomly.
One on the Westminster Bridge displayed the last image it recorded on 2 September, which gives us a clue about when the heart of darkness went dark to the world.
I posted a comment about it on my Trend Compass report, and one of the readers found a working webcam in Abbey Road.
Still, that's one of hundreds that are still dark.
Why someone would decide to cut all the webcams is a mystery, and an ominous one.
Clearly, they didn't want to be surveilled when they were undertaking scurrilous activities.
Mr. Hooson didn't offer an explanation.
Understand that he lives in Britain where singing, kung fu fighting, or silently burying on the sidewalk can get you abreast.
But where he declined to tread, I'll venture a guess.
They're planning a false flag to blame on Russia.
It's the only explanation making any sense to me.
They're planning a false flag terror attack on London to be blamed on Russia so they can trigger an all-out whole-of-society mobilization by all the Western powers against Russia.
Now, that seems far-fetched.
There are several important elements that fit coherently with this scenario, beginning with the general geopolitical state of things.
The Western Empire and the UK in particular bet heavily on Ukraine and lost.
By now the situation has become as undeniable as it is holoplus.
But Western bowers aren't showing any inclination to cut and run, as they did from Vietnam.
In March of 72 are Afghanistan and August of 21. Today, the West is facing the world's largest nuclear power with an established escalatory dominance in the region, a highly motivated, well-trained, battle-hardened, well-equipped force, including new devastating conventional weaponry that eclipses anything the West has in its depleted arsenal.
In spite of that, they are still escalating.
The question becomes, why in Ukraine?
The whole world's at stake.
Ukraine is too important for them, and the stakes could not be higher.
From the imperial cabal's point of view, the prize, in fact, is the whole world.
In his paper, Democratic Ideals and Reality, Sir Alfred McKinder wrote that who rules East Europe commands the heartland.
Who rules the heartland commands the world island.
Who rules the world island controls the world.
By world island, he means the Eurasian landmass.
His theoretical framework remains the foundation for foreign policy for British American government to this very day.
As we learned in 2018 from Wes Mitchell, President Trump Assistant Secretary of State for European Interest Eurasian Affairs, in a briefing to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
He made it explicit that the central aim of the administration foreign policy is to defend U.S. domination of Eurasian landmass as the foremost U.S. national security interest and to prepare the nation for this challenge.
Mitchell also said the admin was working with our close ally, the UK, to form an international coalition for coordinating efforts in this field.
These views aren't just idle musings of academicians or entertainment for think tanks.
The reality on the ground confirms this is indeed how the imperial cabal regards the outcome of the battle for Ukraine.
From the beginning of the war, a few of their lieutenant voicey entrenched mindsets.
If we lose in Ukraine, a world order we created 80 years ago will crumble, said then U.S. Chief of Safe Mark Milley in April 2022. If we lose in Ukraine, we will lose the world for decades.
Defeating Ukraine could be the beginning of the end of the Golden Age of the West, Matsuzu Morawiekschak, Poland Prime Minister in a TV address, April 2023. If Ukraine loses, world order,
We'll be established by our enemies, former NATO Secretary General 99-203 and member of the House of Lords and the Parliament, George Robertson, in the Telegraph, January 2024. If Ukraine falls, it would be a catastrophe for the West.
It would be the end of Western hegemony, and we'll have no one to blame on ourselves, Boris Johnson, April 2024. It's unlikely the Empire's vested interests will quietly accept its catastrophe, which is why they're escalating provocation against Russia,
desperately hoping Russia will strike a NATO member nation, creating the pretext to invoke Article 5 and unleash a unified response where the collective West would confront Russia in a whole-of-society effort and hopefully snatch a victory from the jaws of defeat.
Sometimes revocation to work and trigger the intended response.
An example, the attack on the RMS Lusitania in 1950, another Pearl Harbor, which galvanized the unwilling Americans that joined World War II. The most recent was a crisis that precipitated the current Ukraine war, created a helpful wave of national indignation.
But there are circumstances where a galvanizing event must be orchestrated to detonate the greater conflict.
And the list of known examples through history is very long.
Here are just a few cases.
The Manchuria-Merkman incident, September 1931. Japanese troops have a small explosion on a train track owned by a Japanese company, then blamed it on China to justify the invasion of Manchuria.
Attack on the Gliwitz radio station, September 39th, the Nazis shelled the station.
Accused bullet troops for the deed.
Giving Hitler the pretext of launching an invasion of Bola.
Shelling of Manila in November, 1939. Soviet shelled the Russian village of Manila.
Blamed the Finns.
Triggering the USSR attack on Finland.
Operation North Woods.
March 19th, 62, shut down by JFK. But the Joint Chief planned a campaign to interrogate civilians in Miami to greet a helpful wave of national indignation and promote a U.S. invasion of Cuba.
Gulf of Tonkin, August 1964. Two U.S. destroyers stationed in the Gulf, radioed they'd been targeted by North Vietnamese forces, triggering Congress to pass the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and authorized LVJ to go all-in in Vietnam,
September 11, 2001. Help Bush, Forty-three, launch their excellent global war on terror, and radically reduce civil liberties at home through the passage of the Patriot Act.
Ghouta chemical attack, August 2013, orchestrated by Western proxy forces with the help of British lead and ISIS-stamped white helmets.
A chemical attack on civilians in Ghouta was blamed on Bashir al-Assad.
He had the charge stuck.
It went across the red line for U.S. and NATO intervention in Syria.
But it was totally fake.
The examples are numerous.
A new false flag attack aimed at triggering World War III against Russia would not be unusual in the context of history.
If the population were taken by surprise, people genuinely believed the official narrative, it would invariably create helpful waves of national indignation, allowing a nation's leader to wrap themselves in the flag, promise justice at whatever cost, and begin moving the places irreversibly toward the desired military escalation.
I believe this is the reason why Western powers are encouraging Ukraine to strike into Russia with her missiles, even though there's virtually nothing to be gained.
Such escalation only makes them directly involved as belligerents in the conflict.
That's why, incredibly, the U.S. is suddenly discussing providing Ukraine with nuclear weapons.
Hail Russia will respond impulsively.
But they know that Putin almost certainly won't take the bait.
That's where the false flag comes in, probably in the shape of the detonation of a nuclear weapon in London.
I can't imagine how this could be done.
There should be a very rigorous custody control chain with every warhead warehoused in any Western power.
But if such weapons were to be given to Ukraine, the custody chain would end.
From there, nuclear devices could freely roam or drift back to the heart of darkness to serve their false flag purpose, perhaps on special CIA or MI6 flights, or perhaps in ordinary shipping containers.
Suppose such a device were detonated from a shipping container on a ship, a train, a truck, some webcam might catch the event.
But if all the webcams were dark, the news...
Where the media would have their stories scripted beforehand and report it was a Russian missile.
Be very unlikely anyone could ever prove otherwise.
If such images were to surface, it almost certainly be few and they could be quickly traced and removed for circulation.
Just as when the BBC reported the collapse of the Solomon Brothers buildings 23 minutes before it happened.
That time, the actors read their lines out of sequence, revealing the news was scripted in advance of the events.
Switching off the webcams can't be a random event.
It requires explanation.
Mine's a guess, but if there's a different, oh, we heard explanation for why all London webcam went dark in early September, I can't begin to imagine.
It's time to be brave.
Today's Thanksgiving, it almost pains me to share these dark musings.
For one thing, I could be wrong.
That much is obvious.
And then it's a downer.
It's nothing to be thankful for, but if I happen to be right.
One way false like events can fail is if the public sees through them.
False light planners must ambush the people and shock them from the clear blue skies.
A spectacular event like 9-11 will have a powerful impact on people's emotions in that moment that is susceptible to deceptive narratives and a helpful wave of indignation would materialize.
But if the public were forewarned and expected a false fight might take place, they might then suspect it was an inside job and the attack could blow back into the conspirators' faces.
I have therefore decided to take the risk of ruining my American reader's long weekend and also risk embarrassing myself.
Well done.
Wonderful statement.
Victor Hugo, your thoughts?
I don't think he's embarrassing himself at all, or she, whoever wrote that article, because the synagogue of Satan, these satanic cabal that's been running all these wars throughout history, the central bankers, they're not very creative,
and they really don't have to be, because they've already realized that for the most part, the Useless Eaters, that they call them, the United Slaves of America, they're dumbed down and drugged up, and they haven't figured out already that September 11th was an inside job.
They haven't figured out that Sandy Hook was ridiculous.
They haven't figured this stuff out before.
And thanks to the Pilgrim Society, they already have the control of the BBC, of the NBC, of CNN, the New York Times.
So even people like you, Jim, who can see right through all the nonsense, they shut you down.
They've got control of the courts in case you get too boisterous and you start pointing out too many things.
And then they've even got control of the alternative media, so-called information warriors like Alex Jones.
They have the Sandy Hook case where they sue him for the ridiculous amount of money so that anybody who dares to point out the obvious, that the emperor's got no clothes, that shuts them down and makes them cautious.
I know people who are afraid to talk about Sandy Hook now because of what happened to Alex Jones, which was exactly the point.
The case was thrown.
They can do all the false flags they want.
They'll get all the indignation they want.
They'll get all the useless eaters to say, just like what happened with September 11th, let's go after Iraq, even though Iraq had nothing to do with that.
It was Israel, but you're not allowed to talk about that.
And then I also want to address what Mark Milley said.
If we lose in Ukraine, the world order we created 80 years ago will crumble.
I got news for you, Mark Milley.
You've already lost in the Ukraine, and the world order that you created 80 years ago is already crumbling.
And then the other people who claim this guy, Wes Mitchell, briefing to the U.S., He's saying the central aim of the administration's foreign policy is to defend U.S. domination of Eurasian landmass.
That's bullshit.
The U.S. is controlled by Israel.
So basically what he's saying is the central aim of administration's foreign policy is to defend the central bankers' domination of Eurasian landmass, i.e.
Israel, which is the home of the satanic cabal and this so-called deep state, chaycom, Whatever you want to call them, the Jews.
They're controlling all this.
They're trying to depopulate the planet.
As soon as people wake up to that, then they'll understand what the problem is.
Until then, the point is to get us down to 500 million.
And if you're lucky enough to survive and you're a Jew, you'll get 2,800 non-Jew slaves.
That's the script, people.
I'm sorry to say that's right.
That is a script, Brian.
Well, I want to point this out.
You know, there's another boogeyman out there that doesn't get as much coverage as the Zionists do.
But, you know, ask yourself the question, where is the heart and center of most of the wars that have happened in this world in recorded history?
And it's London.
Frankly, all your color revolutions, London was involved in everything.
There's color revolutions in Georgia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Yugoslavia, Slovakia, Belarus, Bulgaria, Moldova, the Arab Spring, Libya.
Those were all color revolutions.
And then if you just take a look at the recent history of wars that Britain has been involved in, Let's see.
I've indexed here 156 wars since 1700 that the British Empire has been involved with.
That's 156 wars.
Currently, in 2023, you had Operation Prosperity Guardian that was British.
In 2014, you had Operation Shader, that was British.
2011, the first Libyan Civil War.
2003 to 2009 was the Iraq War, which is both, you know, it's Western in terms of it's either British or American or both.
There's the war in Afghanistan, Sierra Leone Civil War, Operation Desert Fox, Kosovo, Bosnia, the Gulf War, the Falklands War, the multinational force that was in Lebanon in 72 and 73.
The second Cold War was 68 to 98.
There was the troubles from 63 to 67 and the aid and emergency, just to label a few.
Now, we all know here in America that these wars are planned out and scripted well and advanced.
And that's largely due to Machiavellian principles, which is in Machiavelli's Rules of War, what he says is, if you are going to go to war...
you need to go to war as fast as possible, because the longer you give your opponent to prepare for that war, The more likely your opponent is going to be able to prepare to defeat you.
So according to Machiavelli, you strike first, you strike hard, and the best way to strike first and strike hard is with a false flag attack, which is exactly what we saw October 7th.
And here we are two years later, and this thing is still going on.
It was a false flag event that was designed to allow Israel to do what politically they could not, which is clear out and capture the rest of those lands over there.
They couldn't have pulled it off politically.
So instead, they decided to conduct the false flag using their own youth military at a musical event, just like Las Vegas and others, as a precept.
And then there was hostages taken, but the whole thing was false.
You can go watch the video 153 News to make a decision for yourself, but it was so scripted, so set up, and so staged all along the way.
But we've been doing this September 11, 2001 is the perfect example.
Consider what's happened to the budgets of the national security apparatus since then.
They've multiplied and multiplied and multiplied over and over and over.
War is good for the economy, according to the warmongers, and they don't care who gets killed in the process.
They don't care what moral turpitude they have to sacrifice in order to conduct their war.
So expect that they're going to continue, even under Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is powerful at this particular point in time, but I don't think he's powerful enough to take on the military-industrial complex, which has grown so out of control in the last century.
I gotta say, listening to our discussion today, I'm increasingly skeptical that the U.S. can be salvaged.
And the very idea, you know, the dollar is a defunct currency.
We abused our role.
We imposed these sanctions.
We were forced other nations to take self-protective measures, and now they have succeeded.
In creating an alternative to the financial system that was created by and dominated by the United States, I think thereby our fate has been sealed.
Victor Hugo.
I want to thank Brian for not listing all the wars that the UK has been involved in for a second there.
I thought you were going to literally go through every single war that they've done.
So thank you, Brian, for not listing them all.
I also wanted to point something else out about these false flags.
Well, yeah, the UK, they're above the law.
That's the whole thing.
They've managed to do what the letter to Sanhedrin did in 1492.
If you take control of the justice system, then you're above the law.
That's why Scotland Yard could never investigate any of the allegations of human sacrifice and pedophilia that's going on.
That's why you see Prince Andrew running around still free, even though he was Jeffrey Epstein's best friend and all.
So we have a two-tier justice system.
And that, again, is the reason why we're in this situation that we're in, because the four of us here are nothing but useless eaters in the eyes of the people who, if they want us dead, they have the technology that they can quite literally give all four of us a heart attack they have the technology that they can quite literally give all four of us a And then the fake news media will come on and claim that all of us were smoking crack or something beforehand.
And we did it to ourselves.
And everybody would be like, yeah, I heard Jim Fetzer's a big crackhead.
And Don is a big crackhead, too.
And I always figured something was up with Brian and that guy, Victor, for sure he's a crackhead.
And they would move on.
You know, the four of us will be gone.
We've got to stop this, people.
Again, they're trying to kill us and they're doing a damn good job.
And good on them.
They're using our own money to do it.
And they're using our own fathers and our own mothers and our own brothers and our own sisters and our own neighbors to kill us.
And we're letting it happen.
So I disagree with you, Jim.
I think if we all actually unite and we put a stop to this, The United States has a chance.
But I think if we're all thinking that Donald Trump alone is going to be able to do this, we don't stand a chance.
He's one man.
And we are billions.
Brian, a final thought.
Well, most importantly, Donald Trump is a politician.
And these days, even though we're in a representational republic, democracy tends to rule.
It's a good thing that democracy doesn't rule because we'd probably all still be wearing masks at this point in time.
But you've got to realize that Donald Trump has the job of wrestling the bear that is the Republican Party.
I mean, it is a big, vast swath of an organization that's got people that have been compromised on every level in every country.
In every way.
The only way the problem is going to begin to get solved is if messages of justice and fairness start going out, whether those bullets fly over the Republican Party or whether they fly over the Democrats.
I sure hope he hits the Democrats.
He needs to destroy them completely, or they're going to come back and do it again.
But he's got a large-scale task on his plate right now, and I'm deeply concerned that it might be above his head.
I like some of the appointments that he's making, but do I trust whatever deals he's made with the Zionists?
No.
I know he deals with the Adelsons to get control of resources to do this.
How far will it go?
I don't know.
How much of them is patriotic?
I don't know.
How much of them is...
Is truly a leader that believes in America?
I don't know.
And how much of him is somebody who's made deals to sacrifice what's right in order to get done what needs to be done?
I don't know.
We can make evaluations and we can try to judge.
I'm not going to condemn the man until I see how this administration turns out.
I did condemn him very heavily for what happened during COVID. But this time around, I feel a little bit differently because of the appointments that he's putting in place.
Don, take us out.
You're muted.
Don's muted, but I'll translate for him.
Oh, okay.
I'm back.
Yeah, I was muted here.
But boy, what an hour this has been on World of Events from perspectives that you ain't going to get nowhere else.
And I think the outstanding information that is needed by this whole world to try to settle things down, you're Because we're still having a lot of tensions being risen.
So thanks so much for watching.
You want to come back for the second hour when we get into Biden and his son there.
And so it's going to be a heck of a show you want to share with everybody.
So thanks for watching so far and come on back.
▲
Export Selection