All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 2, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:10:19
Need to Know News (1 December 2024) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news.
We are in December 2024. Let us take a look at our topics and have opening statements.
To the brink of World War III? And on to Israel for their portion of the wars.
The destruction of Mockingbird slash corporate media and their required censorship to control official his stories.
2024 so-called election fallout.
And then, the Patriots striking back their works for truth, justice, and the American way of limited government under the U.S. Constitution and upholding inalienable divine rights.
Brian, opening statement, brother.
Well, I'm still out here at the Lake House.
I just enjoyed a nice Thanksgiving weekend.
We went up and watched the playoff game, the third round of the playoff games for the state high school championship, which is some great football.
Some friends of ours' son was playing in the game, and it was fun to go up there and watch.
We had Thanksgiving with that family, and it was just a wonderful time for everybody.
I'm looking forward to having a productive and busy week this week coming up.
I have quite a few files that need a lot of love and attention, so I know that I'm going to have a busy schedule.
Plus, I'm going to spend a lot of time planning for some changes and adjustments in the future in terms of what our new programs are going to look like this year.
Another typical week.
I don't think there's a whole lot of surprises out there except for I expect that there'll be a lot of kickback kicking against the goads with Kash Patel being nominated to run the FBI. I think it's hilarious that Donald Trump is appointing people like Pamela Bonds and he tried to appoint Gates and many others that are going to be a part of the program.
I think it's great.
It looks like it's all going very, very well.
But you know you're going to have a lot of kickback from the organizations that call themselves the mainstream media.
So let's see how that plays out.
Other than that, it looks like a good set of stories today.
Let's take a closer look.
Yeah, let's take a look.
Yeah, I got nothing to say as an opening statement.
It's just more of the same.
And like you, I'm cautiously optimistic.
As much as you can be with our first topic to the brink of World War III. We have, this is an excellent article with context, a history of humiliation.
So starting with JFK's peace speech, and I want to go ahead and quote him.
I won't use my Boston accent.
Above all, while defending our own vital interests, nuclear powers must avert those confrontations which bring an adversary to a choice of either a humiliating retreat or a nuclear war.
To adopt that kind of course in the nuclear age would be evidence only of the bankruptcy of our policy or of a collective death wish for the world.
And some of the history that we mentioned from time to time, and this is a key part here.
So after eight years of US and Wall Street dominance after the fall of the former Soviet Union, Putin became the political leader and in 2000 he requested to join NATO.
And then Clinton turned them down within hours because they're for peace.
And then the history of the promises to Russia, oh yeah, of course, no, NATO's not going to expand, not an inch.
And that's all that they have done, and that extends into the present.
The best political frame of what happened in Ukraine is that, you know, all the U.S. does, and I'll put into the show notes again, it bit you the article for U.S. Empire.
I'll talk to you for just a minute.
That's all that they ever do.
And that first article is a good key to the mood and the arrogance of the U.S. Empire.
The puppet...
That currently is Zelensky, the actor, the piano playing with his penis, humiliated actor, that guy.
So he's been the front person.
And the eastern part of Ukraine, the Donbass, they refused the puppet.
And they wanted their political independence.
So did Crimea.
Well, the U.S. Empire can't have that.
So they used artillery and shelled the Donbass from 2014 to 2022, killing approximately 14,000 Russian-speaking Ukrainians.
And then finally, Russia intervened.
Now, of course, that background history is going to be disappeared just as much as the ongoing military siege by Israel onto Gaza.
And that's what has happened with Ukraine, and we have the ongoing escalation with that.
But that's a little bit of the history.
And what happened to start World War II is very...
Let me touch on that.
Let me touch on that one real quick.
Okay.
Okay.
So, our military industrial complex and our security industrial complex very badly need to have a boogeyman.
There always has to be a boogeyman to keep people in fear.
And they've done this since, well, you can remember 9-11, of course.
The budget for all the agencies that made up the Department of Homeland Security was $34 billion dollars.
On September 10, 2001. On September 11, 2001, we had the attack on the World Trade Centers.
And then we had shortly thereafter, because Americans were scared, the passing of one of the most overreaching law sets in the history of Americana, which is the Patriot Act, which provided new financing and funding for security systems and solutions all over the nation and globally. which provided new financing and funding for security systems and So we had our boogeyman in place after the World Trade Centers came down in that great false flag event.
And so what happens to the budget?
So the $34 billion that had made up all the departments that were the Department of Homeland Security now had a budget of $80 billion.
So it went from $34 billion to $80 billion as a result of the Patriot Act.
And they've continued on that same course with the media trying to keep America scared, scared for our children to go to school, scared of the boogeyman around the corner, scared of all the foreign countries, scared of all the threats that would come scared of all the threats that would come down here in America.
And it's that fear that drives the spending.
Today, the same departments that make up the Department of Homeland Security that in 2001 spent $34 billion are now spending a whopping $850 billion.
That's what happened since September 11, 2001, here in the world.
I remember them carefully telegraphing Russia as the new boogeyman when Hillary Clinton was running prior to 2016. And the world powers have been making them into the boogeyman now consistently ever since 2016, stating that there's going to be war, there's going to be war, there's going to be war.
Well, guess what?
We're the ones that are starting all the trouble.
And that's how this is going right now.
The fact that Russia has been double-crossed and stabbed in the back this many times, it does give food for thought.
What if?
And that's what the article is about.
What if Putin was overthrown by the hardliners in Russia who Are tired of being embarrassed by the failed promises of Western forces and Western elites?
What if those hardliners were to get control of the military apparatus in Russia and decide that it's time to exact some revenge for the humiliation that's taken place with all the lies and double-crossing, and they decide that Putin has been too weak against Western forces?
And too weak on his position on NATO, what if is the question that begins to arise at that point in time.
And I think that right now, I wouldn't put it beyond the CIA to team up with those forces to try to overthrow him and start the war.
Yep, yep.
As a matter of fact, you can bet that there are ongoing operations to try to get puppets everywhere.
There are ongoing operations to assassinate Trump.
There are ongoing operations with these psychopaths.
And yeah, good point.
We're good points.
Oh, and I wanted to make the point that in tomorrow's show, we're going to have an article by Mike King, the anti-New York Times, to draw the similarities with what Russia's special military operation in Ukraine was similar to the German special military operation to draw the similarities with what Russia's special military operation in Ukraine was similar to the German Who were now in Poland from the treaty after World War I.
of course, was spun and it is still spun today in the textbooks that Germany invaded Poland.
Update, the war in Ukraine, zero hedge.
So the status with the Oresnik is that after the first attack, is that there were two further attacks on the 23rd and the 25th and this is with longer range missiles supplied by NATO and hitting within Russian geography within Russia territory and so far that hasn't escalated but we shall see Zelensky may have read my lips the bargaining has begun to end the war Zelensky
I'll give up Ukrainian territory to Russia to achieve peace.
Nah, the bitch is trying to win the war.
He's trying to get a NATO umbrella.
So he's trying to get de facto NATO membership.
And in exchange, remember the Russians, their peace deal from the very beginning was no NATO for Ukraine.
And Independence for the Donbass.
But, of course, that was unacceptable to the West.
Blinken, Biden administration will send Ukraine every dollar possible before leaving office.
That's the Secretary of State of the U.S. And the last act of a corrupt criminal regime is going to loot the Treasury.
And it's not going to fucking Ukraine.
It's being laundered.
It's going to empire.
Moon of Alabama to the last Ukrainian.
The White House presses Ukraine to lower the draft age to meet manpower needs against Russia.
Well, of course they do because they are against human beings and they actually want to be masters.
They want to empty out Ukraine and then make it a part of greater Israel.
But on the other side, Trump and Putin will prevent World War III clandestine and that The brand of Putin.
And I, if I had to bet, no way we're seeing the original Putin.
We're seeing some sort of an avatar, some sort of a prop for that, too.
But the optic is, is that, and hopefully and the hope of the world, is that we have an opportunity for peace with Trump.
We shall see.
We need to have a breakthrough.
We need to have the credibility of our leaders shattered in such a way that they cannot recover.
Otherwise, we're at risk of a great reset, total destruction, worse than one can imagine.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, we are at risk of a great reset.
And I think the jury is still out on to whether You know, and we've been discussing this for a long, long time.
I think since 2016, it's been sort of the looming question.
Is Trump the Pied Piper for the New World Order?
Or is he truly a patriot who's interested in reforming this government and giving the power back to the American people?
Which one is it?
Or is it some combination of both?
Or has he sort of swung in two different directions or been pulled in different directions?
Has he changed his opinions?
We have yet to see January 20th is not here yet.
That's inauguration day.
It's not too far off.
We've got to get all through December and through pretty much half of January before we're there.
So another six weeks before we begin to see if he's going to be effective.
He's going to have to protect himself very well until then.
But I think going back to the issue is...
Which power apparatus will begin to take control?
Will it be controlled by more nefarious forces than ever before?
Will those forces drop back in the dark and hide for a while?
Because they've obviously spent billions and billions, if not trillions of dollars, preparing themselves for some sort of Fake alien invasion or world outbreak of something or some new pandemic or something that would usher in this new world order.
What is Trump up against?
Is he working with them?
A lot of people would say that his close affiliations with the Zionists put him into that category.
I don't know that I'd be willing to go that far.
I think he made some political concessions in order to get at Adelson money and other Zionist money and resources that are in place.
But whether or not he's going to double-cross them and shut them down and shut them out, I don't think we'll see anything happen to AIPAC. I don't think it'll be considered a foreign organization.
That would be burdened by the Foreign and Corrupt Organizations Act.
What's going to happen?
I guess that's the big question that everybody has at this point in time.
And is it going to be a global phenomenon or is it going to be a localized American phenomenon?
I tend to think with all the buzz about aliens lately that they're getting ready to launch the fake alien invasion, which is the Supposedly, in the Illuminati card set, it's the last card to be played.
I think they're setting themselves up.
I've seen a number of different YouTube channels that are a little bit more mainstream, that are starting to get a lot of traction on this unidentified object phenomenon.
So I do suspect that that may be the cover that they use.
But, you know, I've always said that these people that are in power will burn it down before they give up power.
Well, here it comes.
Thank you.
So, what should we be afraid of right now at this particular point in time?
I don't fear anything, but from a catastrophic perspective, is it going to be an economic collapse?
Is it going to be some sort of fabricated exterior attack?
What's it going to be that's going to sort of tie Trump's hands and make him respond like he responded to COVID? Remember how he responded to COVID? It was...
It's terrible.
He just acted like he was another apparatus of the deep state in that response.
He did nothing independently.
He thought nothing independently.
He appointed no one to operate against the narrative that had taken hold.
And by the way, that narrative is controlled by the Zionists who control the mainstream media.
Is he going to kick against the goads now?
What are they going to try to pull off?
I don't know.
But it's all food for thought.
Yeah, the whole world is watching.
And in terms of military strategy, war is never what you think it is.
And much like an athletic competition, deception is going to be key in warfare.
Real military, they don't want you to ever even know that they are there.
And concerns on the playboard is that you do have Trump pimpin' genocide and holding up Israel.
And As far as that goes, I am at 95% certainty that what we're seeing is white hat op.
Now, the reason that it's 95% is because all of the behind-the-scenes moving is pushing patriots.
And I believe that we're already at, if we were to have gotten a true vote in the 2024 election, the ratio would have been four to one for Trump.
That would have been the closest magnitude figure.
But you got Trump pimpin' the genocide.
You got, as you're saying, Brian, the prima facie COVID criminal against humanity.
But each of those can very subtly move All you would have to do is for Trump to say, I have just found out that October 7th was a false flag.
And that would be it for that.
Similar mock surprise for COVID. So it's...
There's nothing yet.
We still need to have this breakthrough.
It still is just a show.
So we'll see.
We'll see.
The whole world is watching.
You'll know we're close when we start to hit the pedophiles where it hurts.
You'll know that we're actually in patriotic action when the pedophiles start to go down.
He's going to have to use a lot of deception and Machiavellian tactics to defeat the deep state.
There's no doubt about it.
Let me remind you of one of the most important rules for war.
If you want to win a fight, You need to strike first, and you need to strike hard.
Now, that's Machiavelli's rules for war, because the longer you wait to strike your future enemy in war, the more time they have to prepare for that war, and thus, the more time, the more likely they're going to be to have prepared enough to defeat you.
So the American system works very much under Machiavelli's rules for war.
Strike them first using deceptive tactics, hit them hard, give them no time to prepare, and take them down and take them out quickly.
This is what the CIA has been doing for years and years and years.
And let's see if Trump can adopt the same rules.
Because waiting until January 28th to start, or January 20th, to start hunting the pedophiles?
Might be a little bit too late.
We've already seen a mass exodus among CEOs, billionaires, Hollywood elites, and others.
Are we going to have to go on a worldwide manhood for these people?
Or are we just going to let them into the wind?
I don't know.
Yeah, we'll see.
Whatever our opponents have, they're going to use it.
And in terms of the fake alien invasion, Dr. Carol Rosen, Werner Von Braun's personal assistant, she said that at the end of his life, Von Braun told her, he said, When our opponents, our opponents are going to try terrorists as a rationale for global domination, and their final card is going to be the fake alien invasion.
Now what would that look like?
Well, okay, so you get now Von Braun new About some of the alien repurposed technology that the Germans had in World War II. Alright, well they've had 80 years to go ahead and improve that.
And assuming that our opponents do have that type of capability, then the type of weaponry that would be on board for that, you could kill millions with that advanced technology.
Millions.
Tens of millions.
Hundreds of millions.
Even a few billion.
Whatever it would take for our opponents to go ahead and recapture.
So, it is definitely at risk and part of the optimism that I have is that that aspect of an evil ET component taking advantage of the poor, innocent humans.
That got a red card From the good ETs, or so the documentation that I have reviewed, because I'm with the late, great Jim Mars, the best-selling author for both UFO topics and the JFK assassination,
that if you are Unaware of the ET component in human history, then you're missing a lot and you're not going to be able to explain the world of the present.
So I think that what has happened is that the good ETs have decapitated the bad ETs because of the best summary is a violation of the Prime Directive.
And the Prime Directive is the same thing as in Star Trek, is that Human beings were not as a creation of the Creator, as children of the Creator.
These humans have never had a chance.
Never!
They've been so manipulated, poisoned, tortured, propagandized, and mind-controlled, and I believe that that was the violation that decapitated the evil ET components, which, again, it's the slash ET slash Satan.
The Elohim, the Old Testament, wannabe fake gods and rebellion against the Creator.
I think that they got pulled and what we're seeing is what will go down as the most brilliant military Warfare in recorded history.
Because if you have an entrenched enemy for hundreds of thousands of years, and again, Gene Deco documents about 500 deep underground military bases, DUMs in the US, 5,000 worldwide.
And even if Trump had commanded the military beginning in 2016, how many years would it take to clear out those DUMs?
And the Dumbs is going to also contain some of that exotic weaponry for the contingency of the Black Hats of having to use the fake ET invasion to gain control.
But, again, that's just a lot of chatting and speculation based upon, you know, trying to answer the question of what is going on.
And...
Again, there's nothing to do except to pay attention.
Just look at Hollywood.
How many Hollywood movies have dealt with this issue?
I can think of District 9. I can think of...
There's got to be hundreds of contact.
Interstellar, in a sense.
You can name them one after another in terms of...
How they've begun to prepare us for this particular advent in the history of the world.
And look at all the preparation that they've done to try to scare us into, oh, the aliens are going to come, the aliens are going to come.
And then you'll have your big savior, and then you'll have your, you know.
I think the movie Independence Day, that was the number one that they wanted us to hold on to.
But there's also been, I mean, you could look at the Terminator Matrix trilogy.
Well, I think Terminator is much more than a trilogy, but Terminator is supposed to be the predecessor.
You could look at that as also another form of the conditioning.
Could it be the robots?
Could it be the artificial intelligence?
What is the next big threat?
You've got Trump out there talking about 7G and 6G and 7G and 8G in terms of the poisonous wave forms that they're going to let loose on the American people.
A lot of people were obviously rightly concerned About 5G, but then again, people were concerned about microwaves when they first came out, too, in terms of the countertop appliance.
So, what is it all going to look like?
I have no idea, but I like to be prepared for it, eat healthy, keep clean water, have an extra water supply on tap, and lots and lots of bullets.
Yeah, as best we can, yes.
All right, let's go to Israel.
Israel.
Three of those updates.
So going back in time, the Israel minister condemned for saying starvation of millions of Gaza might be justified and moral.
That is just a reminder of that.
And then silence from the corporate media.
Then US backed starvation in Gaza at Thanksgiving.
Of course they do, and it's been 17 years of the military siege upon Gaza by Israel.
That is, of course, an act of war.
So there has been an ongoing war and, ironically, the world's largest concentration camp imposed by Israel.
And France has abandoned international law to protect the war criminals.
And France is saying, OK, so we respect the ICC, except that that that we we can't arrest Netanyahu because he is a sitting politician.
And they just tried some bullshit that is refuted by the case law.
And one of the individuals involved wasn't even in office.
So it is all bullshit.
And that is all our opponents are ever going to do.
If they can, they're just going to bullshit and just lie by omission.
But if they have to, they'll do lies by commission.
Brian.
OK, so I want to point out the article that you just mentioned talking about Israel.
Israel.
Doesn't consider it a war crime to starve out their opponents.
This is inside.
Remember in Israel, every youth has to go through military training.
Their manual Makes it clear that it's okay to kill babies and to slaughter Goyim by these particular means, because if not, If they do not kill them, then they and their descendants will end up rising up against you.
So it's the best strategy overall to just simply kill them all.
But since the global public doesn't have the political appetite for blood to see these people slaughtered with bullets, swords, bayonets, and whatever other means that Israel can kill, They train and condition their troops to continue to lay out, which they've laid out some absolutely horrendous things on real human beings that are the Palestinians.
They say that it's okay to go ahead and kill them according to the Talmud because otherwise their children and their descendants will rise up against you in the future.
I think that they even trace that back to some old biblical, Old Testament type stuff where, you know, it was old, you know, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, 1 Kings, 2 Kings, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel.
Hey, you've got to take out the entire tribe if you're going to go up against them, because if you leave any to remain, they're going to continue to corrupt you.
And that's the attitude right now, and it seems like the rest of the world...
Is more worried about politics than they are about crime and punishment.
Since when does crime and punishment have to go through the political filters before it's okay to begin to punish the crime?
Well, that's how it is with the International Criminal Court.
That's how it is with Israel.
For some reason, everything has to go through the political twist machine prior to it being prosecuted.
And hopefully there'll be an end to that soon.
And that's why I raised the question.
Will Trump double-cross Israel?
Because they certainly have committed these war crimes and we're going to overlook them.
We're just going to leave them alone?
Oh, well, we, the West, have done war crimes with our proxy war in Ukraine.
We're the ones that give them the weapons that they use to kill the Palestinians.
Doesn't that make us a partner to the crime?
Will we stop?
Will we change?
Are we involved in a conspiracy to help these people?
Hell, they're just the toy soldiers that we happen to be using if we're the ones providing the money and the armor to go and do it, and we're telling them it's okay.
We tell Ukraine it's okay to launch long-range missiles into Moscow.
Does that not make us just as bad or the same as the criminals over there that actually press the button or give the order to send the missile?
We're the ones equipping them to do it and telling them it's okay.
So, At what point are we going to say we need to heal ourselves first?
We need to take the board out of our own eye before we tell everybody else about the speck in their own.
At what point do we need to do some reflection and self appraisals to determine what America's role is in this world and how we're going to make corrective action so it doesn't continue that way.
I think those are important questions.
Yeah, and in terms of the law, the law is easy.
Yeah, for me as a U.S. government teacher.
So the treaty, the U.N. Charter, which is a treaty, and we know that because the Department of State has an annual publication called Treaties in Force.
And under Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution, a treaty, when signed off on a president and ratified by two-thirds of the Senate, that becomes supreme law.
And there was a treaty after World War I, and I'll put into the show notes at Bitch Youth the article that documents all this, is that war is not an option.
When you are controlled by evil, you are going to have a virtue signaling organization and you're just going to give pretense and all the UN is there is for people to pretend that war is somehow going to be stopped and the UN's job is to enable the wars.
So you're right is that the US is a party to these wars of aggression and then we have the war crimes within the war and But Israel is saying, okay, so the reason that it's lawful is because there are no civilians in this war.
They're all the enemy.
And they have to destroy the definition of what an enemy combatant is to include all of the civilian population.
And that's what our opponents do again and again and again.
They'll take a key term And then invert the definition of that term in order to serve their justification for evil.
Okay, destruction.
And they have to have mockingbird corporate media in order to do it, because they have to have the liars, otherwise their crimes are going to be discovered.
Top media outlet killed my piece praising Make America Healthy Again Coalition after editorial board lambasted RFK Jr. So this is just a story here of this guy thought he was going to get An article into corporate media.
But no, they killed it.
And that is how it's going to work with these censorists.
Because they cannot have anything other than propaganda.
Otherwise, they will be discovered.
But there's all kinds of potential possibilities.
CNN freaks out after truth bomb drops.
You can't say that.
Now, I had the video for this on one of those meme I wasn't able to find it again after that.
But CNN was having a little chat, and one of the persons said, Isn't the issue that the left has gotten so used to controlling almost all institutional information distribution arms in this country that when one little piece of it, whether it's X or MSNBC or anything else, gets taken away, the panic is so outrageous.
And this is based upon the data that for Twitter X, it's evenly split.
48% Democrats, 47% of Republicans.
And in 2022, the Democrats made up 65% of the users.
And when this gentleman made that remark, of course, he got attacked by the other CNN people saying that you can't say that.
And with their rules of censorship, they're right.
He can't.
He won't be on if he says that.
Mainstream media suppresses the study, finding DEI increases hostility and causes psychological harm.
And it is.
Anything that isn't going to be a meritocracy, anything that is going to be a diversion from the purpose of the organization, Is going to cause a psychological split among the teammates because they're not going to know what we're playing for.
The game has been changed.
Now, for the liars, for our opponents, I'm going to play Jimmy Dore, Rachel Maddow, flat out lying.
And this is all that they do when they lie by commission.
And this will be a few minutes.
So Rachel Maddow is back to lying about COVID and the people who got it right.
So Trump has nominated Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a guest of this show.
He's a super smarty pants scientist doctor person from Stanford.
And he was one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which came out at the beginning of COVID pandemic, and they talked about how to handle it.
And they said, you don't do lockdowns, you do targeted protection of the people who are the most vulnerable, like you do with the flu, like you do with the elderly, the people with comorbidities.
Now she's going to lie about that.
She's saying that Trump is appointing all quacks.
Now let's remember, there was no bigger liar and spreader of misinformation during COVID than Rachel Maddow.
She was wrong about everything and lied about everything.
She said if you got the vaccine, it would stop the virus dead.
The virus can't use you to go to another person.
And the virus will get us out of the pandemic.
The vaccine will get us out of the pandemic.
Those were always lies.
I knew it when she was saying it.
I knew it at my show in my garage.
So here we go.
Here she is.
She's going to try and slander and smear at the behest of the people who pay her.
Big Pharma pays her salary.
On the heels of Donald Trump picking him to run Medicare and Medicaid in this country, we also got news on other healthcare picks to run the CDC. Donald Trump picked a former Republican congressman who for years has crusaded on the false claim that vaccines must be the cause of autism.
Just because Joe Scarborough of MSNBC agreed with Robert Kennedy years ago on this, so did Jon Stewart, so did Robert De Niro, so did Jim Carrey, so did Jeremy Carter, so did...
So do a lot of people who look into it.
Just crazy.
So do lots of parents of autistic children.
They're just assholes.
They're crazy.
But the person who got everything wrong about COVID, about Russiagate, about the Ukraine war, and Syria, I'm sure she's right about this.
I'm sure she's right about vaccines and autism.
Why would Big Pharma ever lie?
Why would they need a liability shield?
Why does Big Pharma need a liability shield for their vaccines if they're so fantastic?
I bet they are.
That's why I'm saying get rid of the liability shield.
What do they need it for?
Okay, here we go.
On the heels of Donald Trump picking him to run Medicare and Medicaid in this country.
We also got news on other healthcare picks to run the CDC. Donald Trump picked a former Republican congressman who for years has crusaded on the false claim that vaccines must be the cause of autism to lead the National Institute of Health.
Trump's top candidate endorsed herd immunity as the best way to address the COVID pandemic.
Just a fancy way of saying, let's get everybody sick and see what happens.
Call the weak.
Call the elderly.
Okay, so that's a direct lie.
Because that's not what Dr. J. Bottachera recommended in the Great Barrington Declaration.
It wasn't call the weak and call the elderly.
It was actually protect them.
You want to hear it?
because here he is saying exactly what the Great Barrington Declaration called for.
And it goes on and it's just brilliant.
And that's what you got to do.
You got to call out the lies.
I want to give Tucker Carlson a minute to explain his awakening.
All media or state media.
I'm ashamed I was swimming in them, I was marinating in them, and I didn't realize that they were lies.
I kind of joined the team, but in my heart I was like, this doesn't make any sense to me.
I didn't become disenchanted with the empire so much as I learned that we had an empire.
Most people don't hate each other on the basis of race in this country.
What they really do care about is endless war.
The whole purpose of being on Earth is to create, is to make things better.
And we were doing the opposite.
He's what's called a useful idiot.
Okay, well that sounds bad.
Do we have any evidence?
Shut up!
What exactly are you talking about, Mr. Powell, in your speech to the United Nations?
Don't you wish the press had been a little tougher on the administration?
I just feel like, no.
Why don't you answer the question?
The whole premise is insane.
We're defending democracy by ending it?
We're going to begin where the Bill of Rights begins, with the freedom of speech.
It's not just that we're being fooled, we're fooling ourselves. - Yeah, that's nice.
It might be that we're moving as fast as Tucker Carlson's scripts will move us forward.
Brian, your thoughts?
You know, there's an interesting theme among all the articles that you just covered, and that's an adjusting language.
Remember George Orwell's 1984, how they had to purge out the old speak and replace it with the new speak?
When I was back in college, it was my freshman year, I did sort of man-on-the-street interviews and I went out It was for, I think, one of the psychology classes I was taking.
And I selected four words that indicated varying degrees of what we would consider to be abnormal behavior or something that's stigmatized as sinful or dark or something that we shouldn't do.
And so I would start out with words on the left.
And words on the left were the harsh words.
This is a hooker.
This is a street girl.
And then as we went right, they would be down to, okay, this is a call girl.
You just sort of have the harsh words and then the weaker words.
And then you'd come down.
But they're all synonyms, basically.
And I would do the man on the street interviews and I would say, okay, which word do you prefer?
And some of them, you know, would be real blunt.
Oh, you know, let's be straight to the point.
Others would, you know, oh, I'm going to go stay on this side of the page where all the words didn't have any stigma associated with them.
Well, what are we doing here?
I mean, All these wars, all this justification, all this changing of the language to make it okay.
So, oh, we're not involved in war crimes.
We're just simply arming the enemy.
That person there, they're not a psycho or they're not crazy.
They've got a mental illness or a bipolar disorder.
Well, it justifies everything if you go as far as, oh, this isn't an abortion of a fetus.
This is a woman's right to choose.
You know, you can find the words all along the way that tend to reduce...
The dark stigma of the action that takes place.
And that's what we found and that's what we've seen with this newspeak that has begun to emerge in academia where you take the stigma out of any particular disorder that used to be considered part of abnormal psychology by simply giving it a new label so that the psychologists can throw a pill at it.
Oh, are you depressed?
Okay.
Are you, you know, are you bipolar?
You know, Okay, now we can throw a pill at you.
It's okay to be bipolar.
It's okay to be out of control.
It's okay to kill your baby.
It's okay to, you know, just take a look at the entire spectrum of this.
Well, this is what all those articles had in common.
The question of, are you going to call a spade a spade?
Or are you going to simply redefine, come up with some new language to redefine the behavior to make it seem like it's more acceptable as part of society?
Well, I've always believed that part of implementing communism was going to be removing the language of self-guilt for any action that you might be involved in.
Oh, it's okay to masturbate to pornography.
It's natural.
We don't have to worry about the stigma associated with that.
Whereas when I was a kid, it was shame, shame, shame.
Oh, we caught you.
We caught you.
It seems like everything seems to be leading that direction.
And by the way, a conservative looks back on what it is our forefathers had in common.
They look back at the culture.
And back in those days, you would get a whipping if you said the F word.
I mean, it'd be out to the woodshed.
Remember the movie A Christmas Story, how Ralphie says, oh, fudge, as he drops the, and his mom has to wash his mouth out.
That's how it was back then.
Words had stigma negatively.
Now, these days, it's gone.
There's no more boundaries.
There's no more limits.
Guys, that's an indicator of progressivism.
What are they progressing toward?
No boundaries.
Imagine all the people living without having to fear.
Imagine there's no heaven.
Imagine we live in a new world that has absolutely no boundaries, where everybody's just In love and love and love.
Guys, that's Lord of the Flies.
We need to have boundaries.
We need to have rules.
We need to have, you know, and by the way, take a look at everything that's happened in your life that would be shameful.
Take a look at everything you've done that would produce shame.
Everything that you can look back on in your mind.
Oh, I'm ashamed of this.
I'm ashamed of that.
Why did that happen?
That happened because you didn't understand your boundaries.
You drank too much.
You pressed too hard.
You trespassed where you shouldn't have trespassed.
Because you either chose to ignore your boundaries or you didn't know your boundaries.
All those things you did in your youth that were shameful, that you would have been punished for, what was it all about?
You didn't respect the boundaries.
So what I'm saying...
Is that this new religion that's being pushed in academia, this new talk of this new language, is all about removing the boundaries that made us a civilization.
That's what progressivism is.
Next time you see a leftist watching MSNBC, just remember, that person is trying to remove all boundaries, whereas you're trying to reinstall them.
Well said, brother.
Thank you.
Yeah, we do need to have our lives based upon reality.
And our opponents, they will invert everything to their liking.
And that's part of my conclusion of human beings have never had a chance for that.
And the rate of change of society, the turmoil of it, And I keep referencing my own family with it, is that both of my grandfathers were lied into the First World War.
Then my dad, my only uncle, and my wife's father all lied into World War II. Now, those are going to be traumatic.
And then life keeps changing and information comes from the officials and the authorities and your parents are put into a position where they don't understand what is being presented as coming from the experts.
And then people want to get the information coming from the experts because you don't want the life.
That your grandparents had fighting in a world war.
You don't want to have the life of your parents' generation, a Great Depression and a world war.
They do trick you.
They do deceive.
It is evil.
And the way that you could reframe things...
I wrote satire for years, and part of the satire that I wrote would be if I had press conferences with President Obama reframing George Washington as the terrorist leader.
Acting against his own government.
The slaver, Jefferson, acting against his own government.
And then even I went so far as a satire essay, and I'll put those into the show notes, of President Obama calling Jesus a terrorist.
Because his first act in going into the big city...
He went to the most sacred temple and caused a fight, an attack upon the financial system of the empire, and being a rebel, being a traitor against his own government.
They will just go ahead and roll on that, and that's why they've got to control corporate media, and that's why they've got to have censorship so that they can control the story so that it only comes from them.
And then God knows what they've done to human beings to turn them into a pathetic creature that would allow that type of dictatorial evil.
Alright, we've got four updates of the election fallout, the way forward, securing the future of U.S. election, a 10-point plan to rebuild trust to protect liberty in our electoral system.
So there are ways of doing it.
And...
You need to have ID. You need to get rid of the people who shouldn't be on the voter rolls.
And if you have secure paper ballots, that goes a long way forward.
Gavin Newsom, or the actor playing him, and his wife's Thanksgiving message blows up in their faces as they are hit with brutal reality checks, including where the video was filmed.
Yeah, the optics, and part of why I'm so optimistic, is the scripts that we're getting.
Newsom allegedly has just purchased a $9.1 million mansion in Marin County, and that's from where he gave that greeting for Thanksgiving.
Happy Thanksgiving.
How's the weather over there in the $9 million mansion?
Will you be offering tours as you destroy the finances of the state of California?
How's slumming in your $9.1 million mansion?
Where did that money come from?
Failed Trump assassin Ryan Ruth calls the president-elect a dictator in the jailhouse letter.
And this optic also is horrible because you have, from the left, talking about the Hitler rhetoric, the threat against democracy, of how Trump is the threat, and then those talking points are mirrored in the rhetoric of this person who was arrested attempting to assassinate Trump.
Biden declares another national emergency because of the threat posed by tiny Nicaragua.
So the idea that this is just more of John Perkins' economic hitman type of an analogy, that everything south of the border belongs to us.
Anybody who attempts to use their government for their own purposes, that is going to go against them.
All right, Brian, go ahead.
I'll be right back.
I've got to let my dog outside.
Well, the Nicaragua article is the greatest doublespeak of all time.
This is America pointing the finger at Nicaragua saying democracy may die if you choose to try to implement self-rule and try to kick against the Western media goads in terms of our power structure.
We're going to declare this a national emergency that Nicaragua is starting to kick back against the Western-controlled power structure and starting to lean towards self-governance.
It's a threat to democracy.
They did the same thing with us.
They were the ones that were the threat to the democracy.
They always accused their enemies of what it is that they are and what it is that they're doing.
I couldn't care less what happens down in Nicaragua, but I guarantee you that there's some Spook someplace that's assigned to Nicaragua, who's in there pulling strings, making sure that the right money gets advanced to the right partners who will advance the right politician to make sure that Western ideals will continue.
I've watched a lot of this guy, Andrew Bustamante, who did a Lex Friedman show.
I think he's an ex-CIA officer.
He's got curly hair.
He's a CIA guy.
He talks about the things that he would do That shocked him in terms of what moral flexibility he found himself in to try to achieve the overall goal of American power and American independence while he was working internationally.
And he tells this one story how There was this, let's just say, a hypothetical African warlord that was going to start revealing secrets to somebody related to, you know, what direction the nation was going to be going.
And he was, in other words, either we buy this information from him or somebody else will buy the information from him.
So Bustamante tells the story about how he approached this guy.
And says, hey, you know, what is it that you want?
What is it that you want to give these secrets to us so that, you know, these secrets aren't given to somebody else?
We're talking about he's trying to convince him to betray his own government at the time.
No, I don't know the circumstances, and I don't really think it matters.
But the guy's like, hmm, okay, I want 16 ounces of adrenochrome.
And Bustamante doesn't say the word adrenochrome.
He says it's a substance that's highly illegal that is...
And he basically indicates that that was the type of substance that the guy was after in order to trade these secrets.
And Bustamante said that it's the type of thing that would have made him sick To his stomach, but he went and did it to go and make the transaction and meant our government was trafficking in adrenochrome to buy the secrets of other nations.
And this is the type of moral flexibility it takes to work inside the Central Intelligence Agency.
Now, I don't know how much I want to be judgy, you know, to look down on it or to condemn it.
But from an evaluation perspective, if we're involved in that Garbage?
That type of evil, that type of wickedness?
Something's very, very wrong.
And apparently the CIA had no problem delivering that particular substance to that particular warlord for those particular secrets under those particular ideals.
Where do we draw the line?
Where do we draw the line?
I can tell you one thing.
The Founding Fathers would have been turning over in their graves.
Because if they understood and they knew what that stuff was, where that stuff comes from, they would have launched every resource they possibly had to shut that shit down forever and ever and ever.
They would have fought the good fight.
Apparently, we trade in whatever currency happens to be applicable under certain situations.
Yeah, and it might be that phrase, moral flexibility, might be what the CIA management uses to try to encourage people to play ball.
John Perkins, the economic hitman, two bestsellers, described his role.
He was recruited out of college by CIA, and they told him, we're going to put you into a private firm.
You're going to be an economist, but you're going to talk to these heads of state.
And you're going to make sure that the contracts go to our approved businesses.
Otherwise, we're going to kill those heads of state.
And Perkins said that, yeah, two of them didn't want to play ball.
They wanted the resources to go to their own people rather than to the U.S. chosen ones.
And we live in an economic system, again, where the 0.1% own more assets than the 90%.
And Perkins confessed.
He said, hey, it was evil.
And as a young man, they gave me money, they gave me sex, and they gave me drugs.
Money, sex, and drugs.
And I was good.
I was good.
And he said that he was good all the way until September 11th, where he concluded...
That the target of the American empire had turned domestically to loot the very profitable sector of Americans, and that's when he violated his secrecy oath and decided to go public.
And Perkins anticipated...
But it's not just that.
Yeah.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry to interrupt.
It's not just that.
What is the whole Epstein thing about?
Oh, it's about people that have gotten themselves in compromising position but caught on video and then blackmailed in order to give this vote this way or that vote that way.
Okay?
In other words, it's about people that have chosen to trade their morality For money.
Their moral compass, they've chosen to throw it out for money or sex or whatever selfish thing that they could possibly get for it.
And they've chosen to go that direction of allowing themselves to be controlled because if word ever got out what they did, they'd be destroyed forever in whatever communities they happen to be in.
And what the whole Epstein story is, is apparently a list of all the people that have been compromised in those sorts of black male type scenarios.
Okay, well, what are we going to do with those people?
Are we going to purge them from society?
At what point do you pull the strings too hard?
Was John Roberts compromised when he chose to change his vote on Obamacare?
How many times have we seen, you know, powerful officials that ought to be doing what's right all of a sudden or powerful politicians that ought to be doing what's right all of a sudden reverse their entire direction for money or for whatever, for political purposes.
That's why I believe that Trump is actually making a move the right way with guys like Gates.
Now, I'm not saying Gates is perfect.
I do believe Gates had sex with that girl.
It was before he was married.
Was she 18?
Was she 17?
Well, she had a Florida State issued ID that said that she was 18 years old, an official Florida State issued ID that said that she was 18 years old, given to her by her handler, who introduced him to Gates, So she had the ID. Did he have sex with her?
Yeah, probably.
I'm sure he probably did.
Does that make him the moral equivalent of a pagan?
I don't know.
I mean, is it a violation?
Maybe.
Was it consensual?
Maybe.
I really don't have to place that down there.
The fact that Gates is willing to come out and say this is exactly what happened, this is how it happened, and this is what went down, shows that he's got some character and some integrity.
You name off The politicians.
And you can name off maybe 10 or 11 of them.
I like Josh Hawley.
I think he's a pretty straight guy.
I like Thomas Massey.
I think he's a pretty straight guy.
I like Marjorie Taylor Greene.
I think she's a pretty straight guy.
I liked Boebert.
She's a pretty straight...
She was a pretty straight player too.
Yeah, she got caught up in a little bit of a honeypot with Mr. Good-Looking.
So what?
But there's a lot of people out there that I think do have some character.
The problem is...
They're willing to compromise that character under certain circumstances, and that has got to stop.
Those people need to be exposed and rejected and purged.
Right now, our government in the last four to eight years has been purging patriots.
We need to attract the patriots.
The only way the Patriots are going to be attracted is if they see the justice begin to get doled out properly, fairly, and with purpose.
And then the Patriots will come back and say, okay, it's like trying to be a good cop in a bad cop zone.
You ain't going to fit in unless you play ball, unless you take the drug money.
I mean, how many times have we seen those stories?
Yep, yep, yep.
The Boy Scouts have no place.
There's no place for an honest person under the Empire.
And I don't remember what it was that Q wrote, but something on the line that deals had to be made because I think it was 90% of the members of Congress are thusly compromised with that.
All right, let's move on.
I'm not saying we need to populate the entire halls of government with You know, perfect faints.
But I am saying that there needs to be some light shed on the situation.
I'm not even saying we need to purge them out, although that's what their political enemies will do with this type of information.
But there needs to be light shed on the scenario.
Yeah, the Patriots were taken out, and they have been taken out over decades.
And if we had an honest corporate media or an honest media, then that would make it a lot easier to move forward with the truth.
But until we get that, until we get some sort of a breakthrough to shatter the belief, then it's all at risk.
Alright, so speaking of the Patriots striking back, Rumble files a lawsuit against California, says states' war against political speech is censorship, plain and simple.
And this is with Gavin Newsom speaking up and signing on a bill, saying that you can't use any type of deep fakes as satire.
Stop the mRNA shots now.
And this is an organization called North Group and these are medical professionals and they have asked for a stop of the death shots and they have sent informative letters making that request To the heads of state of 10 European countries, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, calling for suspension of the modified mRNA vaccine, citing serious health concerns.
Now that's great.
For 18 years, I was a volunteer lobbyist with Results.org, working for U.S. Domestic and Foreign Policy for Ending Poverty.
And this is a great move because it's going to elicit a response from those heads of state.
And we'll see what happens.
And that's kind of the moves that you have to make.
You have to figure out something to do.
And for patriots who are called to do something like that, by all means.
Pay attention to your intuition, what your heart and mind best tell you to move forward to do and to go for it.
Certainly, there are openings for actions.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, that's a tough issue in terms of all the people that went ahead and took the vac.
At least maybe now they'll wake up and begin to realize that the government's been lying to them.
If word gets out that the whole thing was entirely dangerous, I think it's going to play very, very well for the future of America for a little light of day to hit this particular issue, because I think it'll be the last time people come along and just blindly trust their all-knowing eyes of the federal agency that spent all the money to help drive this particular issue or that particular issue.
I think there's going to be a lot more skepticism as a result of it, and I'm glad to see that These heads of state are being called into some level of public accountability over the issue, although I don't expect the mainstream media to cover it very effectively.
Yeah, and that's what happened with results.
We never had corporate media give us any coverage that was helpful.
For the first UN Summit for Heads of State, the 1990 UN World Summit for Children, Bush Daddy, he ignored our invitation to attend the summit.
And this went on for months.
And finally, on a Saturday conference call, our liaison to the White House said, I don't know what to do anymore.
They're ghosting me.
And I said, I don't know what to do.
So on Monday morning, 9 a.m.
when they open up, you call your contact and you inform them that the president has until 5 p.m.
on Friday to either accept or decline the invitation to the summit.
Either way, what we're going to do immediately is activate.
And we were in...
200 U.S. communities in six countries.
But I said, we're going to activate our volunteer network and we are going to write letters to the editor this week.
And we had reached into like 500 major publications.
And in that letter to the editor, we are going to inform...
The public on the facts of the upcoming World Summit for Children.
And we're either going to go one of two ways.
And you're going to inform the president that this is what we will do, no matter what he does.
If he accepts, we'll take that as an opportunity to thank him.
If he ghosts us, we're going to tell the public, hey, we've been inviting the president for months, and I don't know what he's doing.
We got a million children dying from preventable poverty every month, and we don't know his position on it.
He hasn't responded, and here's the phone number to the White House.
And maybe if enough of the American public call, you can find out why he doesn't want to even answer the invitation.
And by noon on Monday, we got the president's response that he accepted the invitation to show up.
He did show up, and as usual, they promised everything, did nothing, and corporate media let him lie.
All right, final thoughts.
Just hang in there.
Nothing is broken yet.
Pay attention to the field, and...
Again, if I had to bet, there is going to be a breakthrough, and a breakthrough by its definition is going to be, I keep saying it, but I don't think people appreciate the meaning of it.
It's going to be something unimaginable and unpredictable.
It could be an ET thing.
It could be huge.
But that is what it's going to need for an opening unless we slow walk End of January, and then Trump can deliver on some of the promises that'll slowly snap the trust of the normies on official his stories.
Brian, closing statement, brother.
I believe now is the time for private, personal self-reflection.
For the greatest interest of the nation.
You say you love this nation, then you should be acting in the best interest of the nation.
That's what love is.
Everybody thinks love is some sort of emotion or some sort of, you know, bond or whatever.
That's bump, okay?
Love is acting in the best interest of the one loved.
And I'm going to tell you something.
You can act in the people's best interests that are in your life by cleaning up your own messes.
And I don't mean this to say you've got to go wallow in self-pity whatsoever.
I mean this to say it's time to begin to reflect on the things that we have done that have contributed to the delinquency of this particular nation, that have contributed to the fall of this particular nation, that have contributed to the slide.
Remember, there's a cycle that goes into play.
The cycle is hard times make tough men.
Tough men make good times.
Good times make weak men.
Weak men make hard times.
And the cycle just continues and continues and continues.
To me, it's very simple.
What has to happen is that a man needs to sit down with his thoughts alone, privately, and he needs to write down all the things that he's done that he's ashamed of.
He needs to look at that piece of paper and understand the things that have caused him to slip in his personal life that have made him a weaker American or a weaker person or have caused him to...
Offend other people.
Again, I believe at the root of all different types of sin are boundaries.
People accepting money for things that they should do.
People accepting doing something against somebody else's wills for personal gratification.
I think if you can identify these things, write them down, and lay them at the foot of the cross with a couple of basic Bible verses to understand, such as, As far as the East is from the West, find out what that means.
70 times 7, find out what that means.
Lay them down.
They're done with.
They're in the past.
You know they happened, but you've been forgiven.
Time to move on.
Don't do it again.
Fix yourself first, and your community will come along later.
People in your life will appreciate you very much for doing that and going through that process.
Very well stated.
Thank you, brother.
Thank you, audience members.
▲
Export Selection