Need to Know News (10 November 2024) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
|
Time
Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news, the 10th of November, 2024.
Let's take a look at our opening statements or our stories and have opening statements.
Trump victory!
What does that mean?
Trump and the team's promises make America healthy again.
That could be a big deal.
More election outcomes and potential reversals.
But Trump supports Israel's genocide on Gaza?
What?
Weather warfare, some more of that here in California, about 80 miles north of me.
Tartaria, hammer and chisel work without power tools and with donkey transport, or an advanced civilization, great reset out of official his story.
And then what about that Tartarian lost countenance of Mu?
We'll take a look at my lunch break for a little bit of that insight and to give people a perspective.
Of the type of information that we look at that has us question where we really are and what year it is.
Brian, opening statement, brother.
Well, this is the first show I've done since the election last week, and so obviously there's been a lot to talk about.
I have been being a bit of a news junkie just trying to process everything and get it right.
I do have an admission to make I was wrong.
I thought the Democrats would get away with the steal this time, and it looks like that they have not, and that they were...
Willing to concede, so I apologize to the audience.
I never considered myself to be an expert in predicting elections.
And based on 81 million votes last time around in 2020 with Joe Biden, I thought that they'd do it again, or at least they'd get away with it again, or they'd try it again.
But maybe the poll watchers had a nice surprise for them and kept their eyes peeled.
There was hundreds of thousands of them.
I understand that we're watching very carefully.
It looks like they got away with it in most states, except for Arizona.
And of course, there's a lot of speculation as to why they followed through with the cheat in Maricopa County and the rest of Arizona.
I think we can talk about that later today.
Dr.
Fetzer had a good post on his blog today that dealt with Mike Adams at Natural News, and he's making the case for...
Some rather suspicious activity that might be militaristic taking place over there.
As for what's going on with me personally, business has been a little bit slow and right now I'm really focused on gearing up for the hunting and fishing this winter.
I've found a place where I really want to spend a lot of time that's got, my understanding is, between 8 and 12 pound bass in there inside the lily pads.
And I've also heard that there are deer so big back there and so isolated back deep in this forest that they've probably never seen a human being before.
As a matter of fact, they warned me about the size of my boat.
This particular boat that I'm using for this adventure is only 12 feet.
It's a 12-foot John boat with a 15-horsepower Evinrude, and it's the only thing that can get in there because it's so shallow and swampy.
So they warn me that the gators back there are big enough to turn the boat over and that the pigs are very dangerous and that they've seen snakes the size of logs.
So if I go in and one of my neighbors is Telling me if I go in, I better tag myself pretty good with a GPS and make sure that they can find my body in case I don't make it back out.
I guess hunting this particular part of Texas is quite dangerous and I plan on doing it myself this year.
Trying to get myself a nice big buck and some really good sized bass.
So I'm going to spend a couple weeks back there scouting out that forest.
It's huge.
It's a massive swath of swampy Texas that nobody goes into because it's only accessible by water.
So we'll see how that goes, but I'm really excited about it and I feel good about doing it.
You know, I've done this type of venture before, but The fact that Trump came away with this election makes me feel a whole lot better about the economy and about everything else.
So I'm going to try it out.
Hopefully I don't get eaten or killed or snake bit or something.
We'll see what happens.
Well, an adventure, brother.
Yep.
Alrighty.
So the Trump victory, what does this mean?
We have a nice...
Meme here.
Trump defeats Kamala, Hollywood, news media, deep state, FBI, universities, DOJ, political experts, science, medical community, all of Diddy's homies.
And yeah.
The biggest question is what does it mean?
And is Trump really a front for the White Hats?
And are we going to get the truth?
We're going to take a look at the promises of Trump's team.
We won't have long to wait.
I was with you.
I didn't think that it was going to come away with a Trump victory.
But we shall see what happens.
The short answer to the question, what does it mean, is my answer to a lot of things as a professional scholar.
I don't know.
We'll see.
Yeah, it's really hard to figure this one out.
I mean, it looks so rosy on the outside.
But the question is, you know, what sorts of deals were made on the inside and how...
Will they strike back when they're really, really threatened, which it looks like Trump and Vance and Musk right now are really threatening the big machine and That's what needs to happen, obviously.
But Trump's only got four more years left, they say.
And then hopefully they'll run Vance.
I like Vance for 2028.
But we'll see how it goes and we'll see what the Democratic apparatus does to try to defend themselves from...
What should be an onslaught coming on.
Obviously, there's a lot I'm deeply concerned about in terms of things that the deep state could possibly do to America to try to destroy Trump's presidency and destroy this opportunity of his or of ours.
But we can't really worry about that.
Trump has dodged all their bullets so far.
And I don't mean that literally, because I don't think that he really was shot at at all.
I mean that figuratively.
He's dodged the lawfare.
He's dodged all the fake news stories and the Russia collusion and everything else that they put on him.
So, beginning to think the guy's protected from on high, and that those witches that can't seem to cast a spell on him, That are all frustrated on Reddit.
They're having a hard time because they can't cast spells on him for some reason.
He's resistant to these things, they say.
And I'm hoping that it's appointed by God, but maybe it's appointed for judgment.
I don't know.
I would say America probably deserves it.
We have a little bit of it coming and there's quite a reckoning to take place.
And I don't necessarily think that, you know, cleaning out academia is going to be effective because this democrat disease is so deeply embedded into the structure of our nation right now in terms of cultural That it's going to be almost impossible to root out.
Trump's right.
He's going to have to start cutting funding to the educational and academic agencies that drive this.
To me, that's at the very foundation and the heart of the problem.
But if he can get out of the next four years and just solve the censorship problem within the presidency, then he's going to end up being one of the greatest presidents in all of history.
And that's excluding what happens with the wars, which I think they will continue because I think the U.S. economy needs the military-industrial complex and that side of it in order to keep it alive.
I think we would crash the economy without the wars that we have.
But I don't know that for certain, and I wouldn't say I'm a big economics guy, but boy, it's nice to hear him talk.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's nice to think about it.
All right, I haven't even really thought to myself to speculate with what's going on because I'm so used to not knowing stuff and I'm completely comfortable with it, but if I had to guess.
So because I think that the White Hats are in charge, I think that the only thing that we need to worry about are the undisclosed weapons of the deep state and what we can point to definitively We're going to take a look today at the fires in California that are certainly not fires.
They're directed energy weapons, and we can definitively prove that.
And in New Jersey, I was just taking a look at on my other screen here, some videos in New Jersey, same thing.
And the title of the video is that there were a hundred of them, a whole bunch of communities.
So I think that the White Hats have to deal with these weapons.
Now, hopefully, once the weapons are used, then they can be discovered and then destroyed.
But we shall see.
In terms of the assets, yeah, that is going to be messy.
And if I had to bet on the strategy of the Black Hats at this point, it would be to retreat.
I don't think it's safe for them.
But we shall see.
We shall see.
Very interesting times.
And I'm sure that our audience is overall feeling much better about the opening, the potential opening.
And for that opening, let's go ahead and take a look at the promises of So dismantling the deep state, this is three minutes and I'll let Trump go ahead and speak for himself here.
Here's my plan to dismantle the deep state and reclaim our democracy from Washington corruption once and for all and corruption it is.
First, I will immediately reissue my 2020 executive order restoring the president's authority to remove rogue bureaucrats and I will wield that power very aggressively.
Second, we will clean out all of the corrupt actors in our national security and intelligence apparatus and there are plenty of them.
The departments and agencies that have been weaponized will be completely overhauled so that faceless bureaucrats will never again I'll pause here for just a moment.
Now, how would you find those people out?
Then it would have to be that NSA has it all.
...can be able to target and persecute conservatives, Christians, or the left's political enemies, which they're doing now at a level that nobody can believe, even possible.
Third, we will totally reform FISA courts, which are so corrupt that the judges seemingly do not care when they are lied to, In warrant applications, so many judges have seen so many applications that they know were wrong, or at least they must have known.
They do nothing about it.
They're lied to.
They knew where they should have known is the legal standard there, and they knew.
It's not possible that they didn't ask the questions that they're trained to ask.
To expose the hoaxes and abuses of power that have been tearing our country apart, we will establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to declassify and publish all documents on deep state spying, censorship, and corruption.
And there are plenty of them.
Alright, and again, so the truth and reconciliation, this is a big deal, and what it's going to do is it's going to encourage Americans to come forward and say, hey, I got some information, and you know, I did participate in criminal activity, but in the category of crimes that are allowed, then the deal for truth and reconciliation is you come forward, you tell everything, and then you won't be prosecuted.
Anything that you don't tell, You can be prosecuted for.
And this is a model that was used, I think, effectively in South Africa.
And I had been publicly advocating for the truth and reconciliation process since 2009.
Fifth, we will launch a major crackdown on government leakers who collude with the fake news to deliberately weave false narratives and to subvert our government and our democracy.
When possible, we will press criminal charges.
Sixth, we will make every inspector general's office independent and physically separated from the departments they oversee so they do not become the protectors of the deep state.
Seventh, I will ask Congress to establish an independent auditing system to continually monitor our intelligence agencies to ensure they are not spying on our citizens or running disinformation campaigns against the American people, or that they are not spying on someone's campaign like they spied on my campaign.
Take a look at that right ear, by the way.
That was shot.
That ear was not shot.
My campaign.
Does the Truth and Reconciliation Commission include his own false flag?
Or is that one out of the mix?
We'll see.
We'll see how much he shows and tells.
...the effort launched by the Trump administration to move parts of the sprawling federal bureaucracy to new locations...
And I think that right ear show is intentional.
Look at that, because the left ear is covered with a little tuft of hair.
We'll see if we get a better view as we go.
Outside the Washington swamp, just as I moved the Bureau of Land Management to Colorado, as many as 100,000 government positions could be moved out, and I mean immediately, of Washington to places filled with patriots who love America, and they really do love America.
Ninth, I will work to ban federal bureaucrats from taking jobs at the companies they deal with and that they regulate.
So they deal with these companies and they regulate these companies and then they want to take jobs from these companies.
It doesn't work that way.
Such a public display cannot go on.
And it's taking place all the time, like with Big Pharma.
Finally, I will push a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on members of Congress.
This is how I will shatter the deep state and restore government that is controlled by the people and for the people.
Thank you very much.
All right.
Interesting.
And we'll see.
I hope so.
Alright, we got the stars are aligning for the reckoning.
And this is powerful for the possibility of knocking everything out that is dirty.
And I'll give this Vivek Argy a moment here with Tucker Carlson.
And I got a remark that the Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens scripts are catching people up fast.
See if I can get this to play.
Yeah.
What does Trump do with the mandate that he has?
I hope as much as possible, as quickly as possible.
I think the lesson from last time around is, if you don't move fast, the beast ultimately will swallow any individual hole.
Of course.
And so I think he's ready to go in with real determination this time around to move quickly, move fast.
I think we need wins behind our back early on.
You know, one of the things that I think we learned from last time around is a lot of this is just early momentum, right?
Let's say we have all three branches.
Let's say we've got judicial branch.
We have a great judicial branch right now at the top of the Supreme Court, the best we've had, certainly in our lifetime.
But you combine that with a strong electoral mandate for the presidency, a strong, decisive majority in the Senate, hopefully get a good Senate majority leader picked.
And then I think Rick Scott would be great for that.
It can't be John Cornyn.
John Cornyn is an aggressive liberal.
And if Donald Trump wins the popular vote in John Cornyn, I guess the main message is that you've got to go quick.
J.D. Vance, I can't wait to clean up D.C. by releasing the Epstein client list.
But I can't let Vivek go without reminding people that he was a weffer.
And he literally, when he was campaigning, he stole a line from Obama when he was campaigning, saying that I'm the skinny guy with a difficult last name to pronounce.
So...
I don't know what's going to happen with that.
The Epstein client list, of course, that would be potentially empire ending.
And Kash Patel announces a massive declassification will occur under Trump's administration from the Epstein files to the Diddy list and more, which is what we need.
And then Elon Musk says hammer of justice coming for fact checkers who falsely debunked Pizzagate.
And this was the tweet that The hammer of justice is coming.
And a reminder that John Podesta's so-called friend, who claimed to debunk Pizzagate, was arrested for raping toddlers.
The editor-in-chief at the recount...
And friend of Hillary Clinton's former campaign chair, John Podesta, and Podesta was also the chief of staff for Bill Clinton, I believe, he was arrested for literally raping multiple toddlers and babies.
So there are Empire Enders on the table, possible And we shall see if that comes to pass.
Certainly the Epstein and the Diddy List would be empire-ending for all of those people, and that is something that we need, but, you know, that's just one area of that magnitude, maybe 20 of those that we have.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I first started researching Pizzagate around...
I think it was September of 2016, maybe October 2016.
I went through Titus Frost's series on Pizzagate, and I was absolutely convinced that it was a legitimate concern.
When the Comet Pizza...
When the shooting took place, then I was sure that there was going to be a massive cover-up because of that one lone bullet that ended up in the hard drive behind in the closet that hit the hard drives.
You know, just too many things going on and then a big false flag that was set up to destroy the evidence and extract it.
It's been said by many people smarter than me that Epstein was part of a CIA-Massad operation that was designed to blackmail and control, and I think this is the foundation for what the Democratic Party does.
How did they go from the Democratic Party of the 60s to the absolutely corrupt Democrat Party of 2020, 2016, of this latest era?
Well, the only answer is greed, corruption, rot, and blackmail, because So abandoning that original Democrat ideal for this new corporatism military machine couldn't have happened naturally.
Now, do I think it was assisted by academia?
Absolutely.
You take a look at the Epstein client list and you'll find big-time academics like Stephen Hawking and many, many others that were part of the crew that were out there.
What's Stephen Hawking doing?
That's just sick.
I mean, something's absolutely wrong with these guys.
But I think that the corruption goes so deep and this federal money, the amount of influence that they've had to guide federal money to...
to academic universities and institutions to corrupt kids, children, high schoolers, and college has been astronomical.
And I think right now is a really great time to talk about how the sciences have become corrupted.
You know, what we used to call science Back in the 60s and 70s and 80s was literally pure scientific method type stuff.
Now, it was corrupted a long, long time ago in terms of the encyclopedias were starting to be adjusted to affect new things.
Then we got the internet, which has been manipulated on some scale since its early days.
But most importantly, By the way, I just want to remind everybody that there are no two scientific disciplines that agree on the timeline of the age of the Earth.
You'll take one scientific discipline, such as oceanography, And it's got one timeline.
Then you take another scientific, like botany, or one of the other ones, and it's got a totally different timeline.
You look at anthropology, completely different timeline.
None of them agree completely, and you hear stories all the time about Well, it's not just stories.
It's cultural mantra that the Earth is 435 million years old or billions of years old that we've been floating throughout our space since the beginning of time.
Yet all of recorded history, the stars are all in exactly the same place they were at the very beginning.
All the constellations are still there.
And there is all sorts of evidence all around this world geographically that we've got a young Earth that had a reset in some sort of large-scale catastrophic flood, and I happen to believe that.
There's no way you could get the rock formations like the Grand Canyon and many others without a large-scale catastrophic flood, plus you have the remains of what they're calling the dinosaurs.
That are piled up in massive places where they would have been low lying.
And, of course, what's in those same places are clam shells and sea shells and, you know, shrimp and squid and all sorts of things.
All sorts of things.
So it indicates to me that there was a massive killing off of it.
To what the extent the world was different at that point in time, I do not know.
But if you'll remember, the flood theory had with it the implementation of the rainbow.
Which indicates to me that the entire density of the atmosphere may have changed dramatically at that point in time.
Something obviously changed because the rainbow wasn't there prior to that.
A lot of people speculate inside the Genesis and biblical communities that it was...
More like a large-scale hyperbaric chamber that would have been better for giants and gigantism and giant trees and giant this and giant that, which would explain some of the labor that might be used for some of these ancient relics.
Not the technology, but the labor at least.
To move these large stones.
How much of that, what the world looked like at that point in time, we don't get too much insight into that, but I can tell you that science is failing to coordinate its octopus tentacles In the proper direction and it's becoming a joke,
becoming an absolute joke that these people can tell us that, you know, this happened four and a half million years ago when they can't tell us, you know, what happened in 1620 really gives you a lot of insight into how far we've fallen.
Very good.
Thank you, brother.
Yeah, I think that the universities are going to be destroyed with major media with the revelation of truth because people are going to say, hey, How come the university professors, those smart guys who studied, they'll be able to demonstrate that they were pimping the same lies?
And in terms of the Democratic Party, I think it's always been a head fake.
I think that we've had the left and right arm for empire for a while.
Just in the century that we were born, you have the Democratic leadership initiating World War I and World War II. And for the right wing, the right wing was also captured as well.
If you take a look at Prescott Bush rooming Dick Nixon as the puppetition, and then when Dick, in the 1960 presidential election, the Kennedy family, they used the mob to steal Illinois, and that was a stolen election.
And then the Kennedys went after the mob, and the mob and Bush, and by that time Prescott's son, George Sr., went after the Kennedys.
So, It is going to be dirty on both wings and the revelation of truth.
Hopefully, if we can get the censorship out and we can inspire people, and then once we have a few breakthroughs like free energy or healing technologies or just the simple truth of not fucking poisoning us, then we could be on a roll.
But we shall see.
Yeah, it sort of reminds me of the Matrix, you know, where Morpheus is talking to Neo and he says, we usually don't free a mind once it's become a certain age.
I think you'll run into a lot of that in academia.
These people will reject truth as a description because the confrontation of real truth versus what they've been taught is going to cause a mental illness, a cognitive dissonance.
That they can't break through.
They're going to sink back into the MSNBC, CNN academic platforms because that's what they had their personality invested in.
Their mindset was all invested in that.
It's very hard to go back and say, yeah, well, I really thought I knew something, but it turns out I didn't know anything at all.
That's a position that's very difficult to get to.
And let me just remind anybody who might be coming out and coming around that Socrates was always considered to be one of the wisest men to ever walk the face of the earth by the Romans and many of the Greek philosophers, and Socrates went around claiming to not know anything.
He questioned everything and didn't take anything for granted.
He wouldn't have taken the heliocentric model for granted.
He wouldn't have taken a lot of the foundational truths like we have gravity and many others that we consider in our society as foundational.
He wouldn't have done that.
He always wanted to question everything and find out how people come to the conclusions and whether or not they were critically thinking through the process to get there.
And I think no matter what age we are, we ought to be doing that.
We would be so much more effective if we took our children and taught them the truth from the beginning.
But right now, coming to a consensus on truth means that academia is going to have to give up their federal funding.
At least that's what it's going to look like in the future, hopefully, if what Donald Trump says is true.
So it's going to be very difficult.
I'd like to see a new model for education here in America get introduced, and I don't know what that's going to look like or how it's going to How it's going to develop, but it would sure be nice to have a renaissance of conservative critical thinking break loose here in America.
I just don't know how it's going to get funded and how it's going to get started because we've relied on the government for so long to run our academic institutions.
I think the breakthrough of the matrix is going to help a lot.
I'll put into the show notes at BitTube, the article series that I have that definitively or sufficiently demonstrates that the textbooks for public education are a whole bunch of lies.
Let's see, I was going to think of another point, but I don't remember from what you were talking about.
Yeah, yeah, it's going to be interesting.
And you said that 5% are going to be gone forever.
So we shall see about that.
I think it's closer to 35 or 40%.
I think those minds have developed themselves too deep into the lies for too long, and they're never going to be able to break out of it without some sort of come-to-Jesus meeting.
We shall see.
We shall see.
All right, for those who are interested in Pizzagate, I pulled up Jim Fetzer's Pizzagate Real or Fiction.
This is a two-hour briefing that walks through the evidence, and the Podesta leaked emails are...
There are prima facie evidence of crimes against children, and anybody looking at the evidence, I don't think that they would construct an argument that they would be proud of to be publicly known for, to defend this, the rational explanation of these high political leaders emailing each other with FBI-confirmed, coded pedophile talk.
And the opening of saying, hey, you know, at this party we're going to have...
Three kids in the pool to play with, ages six, eight, and nine, or whatever they were.
And people can go to the pool and play with them.
It's hard to construct anything other than an indictment.
And that it would have to be, as a public school teacher, you know, we were trained.
Yeah, yeah, you should report that.
Because if you don't, then you are in potential criminal liability because a reasonable person would have to conclude that that Would mean what it says.
Alright, four updates on making America healthy again.
And RFK2 goes through.
This is about a five minute video here.
And all he's basically saying is that these these so-called foods have poisons and these are poisons that are known.
And these are poisons that RFK2 says that I have prosecuted as an attorney and we're going to get those poisons out.
And says, moreover, the United States is the only country who is putting these poisons in these products.
Steve Kirsch, my maha to do list.
And the liability protection for all vaccine manufacturers begin a massive advertising campaign educating the American public about the dangers of childhood vaccines and citing the studies that have been done, noting that there is a reason the NIH refused to ever fund such a study.
Require the ongoing active safety monitoring of all drugs by an independent company.
And all local, state, federal, government mandated health directives, including masks, vaccines, et cetera, for people and pets.
Yes.
Compensate those injured.
Reinstating all medical personnel who lost their jobs.
Replace the heads of the CDC, NIH, HHS, FDA. Immediately replace the outside committees of the CDC and the FDA. Release the long-hidden NIH study of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
And it goes on and on and on and on.
And that would be a big deal.
Wouldn't it be better to just get rid of those agencies and reform them as something completely new?
I think it would.
Sometimes you can't uncorrupt something that's so desperately...
So desperately rotten at its very source.
Why not re-engineer an entirely new program and sunset all those programs?
It could be.
There is going to be, you know, questions at that level of do we keep anything?
For me as a professional, as a retired teacher, the department, the federal department of education, I would say trash all of it.
They don't need to be involved.
All they're doing is the trick of the Department of Education is to give the local districts about 10 percent of their funding and then to leverage that 10 percent to make sure those bitches stay in line.
And that's what they do.
And then they have lawfare and it's all aligned.
The states are grooming people to be puppeticians as well.
And I think that the only purpose of a federal bureau for education is just to be a portal through what's been hidden by the Smithsonian.
So, yeah, I think you're right that a lot of it just needs to go because the purpose of it, because the United States has been an empire, the purpose of those agencies has been control.
It has been the Orwellian opposite of what they said.
It hasn't been an organization for anybody's health.
It's been an organization to poison people and to burden them.
So we'll see.
It's going to be interesting.
It's been the legal cases that have cleaned up more poisons in this world than our government agencies.
It's been the lawyers that went out there and fought civilly for damages that have done more to clean up our environment than the EPA and others.
To me, those are political entities that are bought and paid for by political apparatus.
So I think Donald Trump is right in his estimation that the best way to fix it is to make sure that the people inside the agencies cannot just quit their job with the federal government and go straight into work with one of those agencies that they're supposed to be policing.
That does make it a lot more effective.
Now, I don't know how he's going to get away with that, given that people have a right to work and a right to quit their job and that they have a general freedom.
To do such, but it's a good idea.
I just don't know how I was going to be able to pull it off.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's going to be a big change.
I'll have to tell a story.
So at Harvard, I took an educational law class.
And at that time, this was shortly after you were talking about the cases that have been prosecuted against public companies that have been poisoning the environment.
This was the movie, A Civil Action, which followed up with the book.
And in the movie, John Travolta played the lawyer who prosecuted the I forget the name of the company, but they were they were poisoning a community and a community was developing skyrocketing cancer rates.
And the attorney that the company chose was a Harvard Law professor.
And in that class, they actually brought the actual law professor in to talk about the case.
And this gentleman, in my estimation, was a psychopath.
So this was after the movie, and we had seen the movie and read the book.
And the guy, Robert Duvall, played him in the movie.
Love Robert Duvall as an actor.
And they just showed the guy as just pimp and lies, representing a company with the best legal arguments that they could manufacture, but without any consideration for the damages done and the actual truth.
It was just the best bullshit legal defense that they could construct.
So the actual lawyer who did this comes into our classroom, and he's beaming with a broad smile, and he starts out spending about a minute just in over-the-top self-aggrandizement that,
you know, I was played by Robert Duvall in the movie And then the guy attempted to defend his case, and unfortunately, I did not get called upon.
I had a question, and I can't remember the question that I asked him, but pretty much after that introduction, I began formulating and writing out how I would best hit him with a question, but I didn't get to deliver it.
Let me point something out along that line, okay?
Where our government goes wrong is that when it decides to set up an agency, the first thing the agency does is eliminate all competition.
They want an exclusive to manage whatever it is that they're going to manage, and they think the government's going to do it.
And since they're now the government, they basically legislate away any competition.
I can tell you something.
People talk about health insurance.
It's kind of the one area of expertise I have outside of investigations.
The health insurance industry began to be regulated in 1974.
ERISA was passed, which allowed employers to work basically across state lines and avoid state mandated benefit plans.
And so ERISA rolls on out and there's a lot of healthy young competition with fresh outlooks and fresh designs for new health plan concepts.
And there's all sorts of new and creative ideas that are taking place.
Some are effective, some are less than effective and Some of them fail because they're simply poorly thought out, and there was just some over-ambitious salesman that had built the companies out.
But other ones, at the time, there was a lot of different ideas that were competing for what should a health plan look like.
And I got a point in saying this.
The point is this.
Competition drives efficiency.
And when you have the government come in and say, I'm going to be the new 10,000 pound gorilla that's going to tell everybody exactly how they're going to do it because I have the moral high ground because I'm the government.
Then what happens is they end up passing enough regulations that compound over time where younger, smarter, more agile players cannot come in and play the game.
Right now, if I wanted to become a health insurance company, which I probably have the knowledge to be capable of designing the programs and setting them up, I couldn't do it because I don't have the minimum $5 million that are needed to get the licenses and set up the backing and go get the stop loss arrangements and the reinsurance arrangements to come up with the administrative technological platform that would administer my plans.
We're talking a minimum of $5 million just to be a low-end vendor because of all the regulations that have to go into place because of the compounding of the regulations.
That said, I want to point out that it's competition that drives innovation and innovation that keeps the market healthy.
There's a place for bad guys to get arrested and go to jail.
That certainly is true.
But when the motives are correct, but there was just something unforeseen in the thing and some people get hurt, that's the nature of the beast.
That said, I'm also going to point this out.
When it comes to federal agencies, I think of it very much like the Catholic Church.
Okay, they've got a monopoly on this thing.
They're going to hold on to their monopoly.
Martin Luther went and put his 95 theses on the church at Wittenberg, and his goal was to try to get the Catholic Church, my parallel being the federal agency, To reform.
Is Donald Trump going to slap a 95 theses on the federal agencies that are out there?
Because what's going to happen is that you're going to end up with...
And Luther wanted to reform the Catholic Church from the inside out.
Donald Trump wants to try to reform our federal agencies from the inside out.
That fails when the entity is too large and too corrupt and won't give up its power base.
And then what you end up with is a war between two competing parties.
If we're going to have a war, we need capitalistic competition that allows smaller individual players to come in with better, fresher, younger ideas and more agile, better programs.
I can tell you right now, health insurance under Obamacare is a one big fat government mandated commodity.
They all look the same.
They all do the same.
They're all the same everywhere all the time.
And the only ones out there that deviate from the plan are the ones that are written on a different legal platform called ERISA, where there's a lot more liberty in terms of what you do when you design a health plan.
So I guess what I'm trying to say is Donald Trump will fail if he tries to reform these federal agencies from the inside out.
I think he will, because the federal agencies are that large and that corrupt.
I think a better way to go about it is to allow smaller More agile, better ideas, more competition to come in and compete with these federal agencies with a better model.
That would allow for the downsizing of the government up to 80%, which is what he and Musk are talking about.
And it would allow for new, younger players to come in with better ideas to do a better job running something like the EPA or the FDA or many of the others.
Yeah, yeah, good point.
And for our audience members, that's something to look forward to, is that the red tape in the organizations is going to be key.
And again, the organizations are there to promote the scripts of the Empire to keep us suppressed.
So we shall see what happens.
These key agencies chopping off the heads of these agencies and who knows what...
NSA has on these people, but it is a big deal, and it's not to be taken lightly.
Every agency has been captured, so on its face, we would have to anticipate that they're not going to just surrender, they're going to fight back, and they're going to fight back.
Fighting occurs in asymmetrical warfare, and even for Trump to stay alive is going to be a key deal, and that is going to be forever moving forward.
All right, so...
Back to the Maha thing.
We got this thing.
Meryl Nass is pointing out the CDC planned quarantine camps nationwide, and she gives that documentation of the CDC's own document.
Now...
Again, who knows what they're going to have to do with the CDC and maybe just cutting the whole thing, similar to what I've been talking about for the Department of Education.
But in terms of the documentation for making America healthy again, we do have prima facie crimes against humanity with COVID. And the article that I wrote in 2021 is sufficient documentation.
And I just want to give a quick briefing about a minute.
For people to understand the severity of this and all of these people who participated as leaders in crimes against humanity, first of all, everyone who has an oath to limited government has to enact that oath.
And then those of us who did ask, we found out official obfuscation and refusals to answer.
And then these are some of the key data points the CDC admits.
The PCR test cannot distinguish between COVID and ordinary flu because the test was made with generic flu stock.
Because the CDC have not isolated any COVID sample in either of who.
There's over 100 leading health and science institutions.
And during COVID, flu cases were reduced by 99%, huh?
Yeah, yeah, no, no, because the test tested for flu.
And then the certified deaths for COVID was anybody who was tested with this false over-cycled test.
And even if they got hit by a car or got shot, if they got a...
CDC positive tests, they were listed.
And then all of the documentation that we've had for the deaths caused by those shots.
And then the bigger picture of the vaccine safety studies have never been submitted.
The masks were refuted.
The leaders didn't do it when they weren't.
In an area for a photo op.
And then the DHS National Terrorism Advisory System bulletin equates challenging COVID policies to domestic terrorism.
That's where we were headed.
And then this part that Merrill was talking about, that the CDC did want isolation camps for us to shield the vaccinated.
And Australia actually built some of them.
So It is a long way to go.
It's not going to be easy.
But it is a good start.
And the making America healthy again and all the promises from the Trump team, we shall see.
We still need for those to really go into effect.
We need the breakthrough events.
We haven't had them yet.
The breakthrough event would be something like the paper collapse of the dollar and the revelation that the so-called too-big-to-fail banks Are just bankster looters, or that the wars are illegal, or the Diddy Epstein stuff,
or something like that, so that the official history is forever destroyed, and the only people who are going to be left holding it up are going to be those 5%, because the rest of us are going to be flexible enough in our thinking to point to the release data and to understand that we were totally played And that we were on the fast track to another great reset to be literally killed and having our history erased again.
Alright brother, anything else for that section?
Yeah, I want to point something out.
I think what's at the foundation of this change is the thing that Donald Trump is addressing right now related to government censorship of information and competing ideas.
There is a guy out there on YouTube that thinks of himself very much as a guy who's dedicated to the truth.
And he's such an outside-the-box thinker that he says some things that's just laughed out of the room by what is, quote-unquote, the scientific community.
But the more you listen to this guy, he runs a YouTube channel called Mud Fossil University.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, it's like the guy's ideas are...
So far out that it's almost...
I mean, he would be laughed out of the room at any scientific convention.
But they have chosen not to censor him or throttle him back.
And the more people listen to him...
The more people are like, you know, that does sort of look like a bone, or that does sort of look like a vein, or that does sort of look like a two-mile long, you know, log that fell on top of this mountain.
That does sort of look like a face or a stone giant, you know, and He literally comes up with some of the craziest things that you would ever think anybody could come up with.
But he's constantly thinking and he's constantly analyzing and looking at things through a different lens other than the academic lens.
And I got to tell you, I think the guy's probably sitting on about a hundred different archaeological unique ideas and concepts.
And I don't listen to them all that often very much anymore because I've seen some things that just blew my mind.
Hey, that's interesting, but I'm not that far out of the box and I'm not that advanced and I don't understand it.
But here's my point.
Guys like that will start getting traction if...
He's allowed to continue to talk.
And that's where COVID made the big mistake in terms of government or academic control.
They tried to shut down competing thoughts, ideas, competing thought leaders and others.
And that ended up making them more powerful along the way.
But it also meant that their channels couldn't be found on YouTube or, you know, they had to move to alternative platforms, which was good.
But if Donald Trump can pull off what I think he can pull off, then nobody's going to be going to YouTube for their academic information anymore anyway.
They're going to be going to alternative platforms where the free thinkers, the independent thinkers are really out there.
There's a whole bunch of them.
There's BitChute, obviously, that we're on.
There's Rumble.
There's Rockfin.
There's hundreds of different platforms.
There's 153 News.
Many, many platforms, all with sort of a unique specialty that sort of tend to gravitate from one type of information to another.
And it's almost impossible to keep up with it.
That's open competition.
If Donald Trump can accomplish getting the government out of deciding who the winners are going to be and who they're not going to be, then he will be one of the greatest presidents ever to grace our history books.
If he can just...
Get that far.
He's made the first step.
The first step was getting everybody to believe that the mainstream media was probably lying to them and opening that door.
The next step is now let's get the government out of the machine of picking winners.
And I think if he can do that, he will have been a great president.
Definitively.
And the idea, the breakthrough ideas for Mud Fossil University and those ideas, just one of the ideas that that guy was talking about is that, I forget how big the rock was, something like this big, but he had it forensically analyzed through a major university and they said, yeah, that's heart tissue solidified into a rock.
It's a big guy with a heart like that.
Yeah, he comes up with that stuff.
Yeah, it's crazy.
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But if we can get the...
So, for example, for the Tartaria, if officially disclosed is that, yeah, some of these guys were really bad, they killed everybody more than once, then that is going to open up a lot of doors to technology.
And plus, if the general public gets a whiff of the power of what has been censored, such as free energy, Such as frequency healing.
Then people are going to be very quick to embrace these new ideas.
And plus ideas that are going to move forward from that as people start experimenting with what we can do with some of these new ideas.
So Star Trek future could be opening up and I'm cautiously optimistic for that.
Well, the question is going to come up with is, if it can be weaponized, will the government take control of the patent?
You know, free energy.
Okay, great.
Can it be weaponized?
Does that mean that the government needs to protect people from it?
Or should the government stay out of that business and allow free market capitalism to do its thing?
How far do we go?
And what is the real role of the government in terms of Guaranteeing the safety of the people in light of some of the technological inventions that could be achieved with Tesla-style understanding.
We'll see.
We'll see.
What we have right now is the government using the weaponized technology against us.
So that for sure, if we could just make it so that we're at least not attacked by our own government, that would help.
Yeah.
Alright, more election outcomes and potential reversals.
Got a whole bunch of those.
Let me actually move this over here first.
Okay, so Pennsylvania Amish turned out in unprecedented numbers to elect Trump after the state cracked down on local farm over raw milk.
Trump went on to win the state of Pennsylvania.
Bringing in 50.5% of the votes.
And the Amish went after them for going after their raw milk.
And that is part of the overreach.
And the idea that the government is going to force you to destroy your...
Produce, through heat, and this idea of pasteurization, all of these ideas are just meant to cripple us and to poison us.
California voted in favor of Proposition 36, which will reintroduce punishments for theft and drug crimes.
The move will undo the Democrat relaxing.
They made it so that you can steal up to $950 of stuff and not get caught.
And as I have...
Testified again and again, half of the businesses on Market Street, the main street of San Francisco, were shuttered.
And I could count hundreds of homeless people on Market Street.
For anyone, whether in America or other countries, who finds this result of the election shocking, they should reconsider where they get their information.
And this is Musk.
This trend was obvious on X for months, but almost all The legacy mainstream media pushed a completely false reality.
They lied to you.
And they did.
See the map?
And this is what Brian was talking about.
Kamala won all the states that don't require voter ID. So we still have a lot of work to do.
And Trump promised to prosecute anybody involved in election fraud.
And in terms of where...
What proof they have and how they're going to roll it out and how many people are involved.
We'll see.
I'm going to point something out.
I'm going to point something out on that real fast.
I found it hard to understand.
I knew that there were people out there that were diehard, dyed-in-the-wool Democrats that were just out there.
No matter what, they're going to vote blue.
And I kind of thought that number was 35%, maybe even 40%.
You're just not going to change their mind.
Well, this last election season, with Donald Trump coming out up against the weak-ass opponent, Kamala Harris, I was like, even that 35% or 40% has got to drop.
It's going to drop somewhere.
Either it's going to drop to...
I thought it would drop to about 25%.
Maybe less.
That's the difference.
10% of those people are just going to be done with blue.
My county, which I'm in Chambers County, which is just east of Harris County, which is one of the largest counties in the nation, Houston, obviously.
My county voted 82.6% for Donald Trump.
And I started looking through all the different counties, and you can kind of get into the blue areas where they're real dependent on the government.
You can see, you know, that number go up, you know, even as high as 40, 45%.
But here in Texas, I mean, it was a crazy red wave.
And I'm pretty sure that my county is not cheating or flipping votes.
I'm pretty sure my county's, like, legit on all this stuff.
And it seems about right that Trump would have been 86% in a place like that, where people are thinking.
So that said, it doesn't add up to me.
When I take a look at the red map in Washington State, or the, you know, it's just all red, except for Pierce County and King County, which is Seattle-Tacoma.
It doesn't add up to me that they're getting that many votes.
Well, you can take a look and ask yourself one simple question.
How many registered voters were there in 2020?
The answer is approximately 135 million registered voters.
How many votes were cast?
151 million.
We had 20 million, 18 to 20 million more votes than there were registered voters.
And then you look at a map like this and ask yourself, oh, how did Kamala Harris win all these areas where there's no voter ID? And, you know, what happened?
Well, Obviously, there are people that, or there are ballots that don't match an actual human being in those particular areas.
And it's my opinion that there was still widespread fraud in this particular election.
It's just that they couldn't outrun the electorate.
They just couldn't do it.
They couldn't cheat the electorate because the states would literally go to war with the federal government if they tried to cheat the electorate.
I think so.
It would have been nasty.
I'm relieved that we have the step forward that we have.
Yeah, the 81 million votes my ass.
The roof is there as you're talking about and listing all of the data points and we'll see if and when the Trump campaign rolls that data out.
Because again, the situation for us is all of the facts are on our side.
Our opponents, they're liars.
They're psychopaths.
And all they're going to do, they can't have a factual discussion.
And they've evaded it.
And if power forces the truth, and in a court of law, all you need to do is ask the right question.
And then tell them, yeah, take your time over that.
They won't be able to answer.
They can't answer.
There's nothing they can say that won't be damning and evidence against them.
So, we'll see.
We'll see.
All right.
So this is a good question.
Steve Kirsch raises it.
Hey, what would happen if the government required AI models to tell the truth?
Oh, then you'd get the truth.
And he tested this and he's the idea of linking vaccines to autism and asking an AI that has not been instructed to not discuss that data.
And in that question, he got a very detailed response of all of the links that if all you were doing was sifting through the data, then you would find it.
Because what we do as Patriot Journalists for Truth is we're just doing the same thing.
And we're just, you know, how I demonstrate that the wars...
I'll talk to you for just a moment.
How I demonstrate...
That the wars are illegal is I go to the treaties after the two world wars.
And I point to the section.
See, war is illegal.
It says it right there, right there.
And then all of those reasons that our government gave to go to the war formerly known as on terror, they were lies.
How do I know that?
Because our most authoritative agencies, most authoritative documents state it.
And then I list it.
And there's no escape from that evidence.
So if we can get an opening for the truth, we're going to be okay.
Exclusive!
FEMA official ordered relief workers to skip houses with Trump's signs.
That person responsible has since been fired.
But this was another thing that Trump talked about when the hurricane came out.
And of course, corporate media said that that was an unfounded conspiracy theory.
And smirked again.
Breaking Maricopa County recorder Stephen Richer's deposition transcript shows a desire to, quote, make life hell for Cary Lake, unquote.
Calls himself anti-MAGA in text messages.
Now he's counting the votes in Lake's Senate seat.
And that's still a drama.
And I hope that all these people get caught.
And then finally, the Washington Post, which is really...
This CIA's Operation Mockingbird major publication, conservative so-called Jennifer Rubin claims it's 1933 and Trump is Hitler.
So they're going to continue to double down with this to try to paint the resistance.
And we went over a show, maybe Wednesday, maybe Monday.
I don't know.
It wouldn't have been Monday, probably on Wednesday.
The idea that the corporate media...
And our opponents, if they can do it, they're going to try a color revolution in this country.
And how that basically works is that we did go through the five steps of the color revolution is that they need to get the mob.
They need to fire the mob up, get the mob up, and then enact violence.
But if you control the government and the National Guard, and you're not going to have that violence, then the violence doesn't exist.
So strange.
We'll see how it plays out.
I don't know.
Any more thoughts on this topic, brother?
Well, that's old weather underground rules for radicals stuff there.
Don't expect that they won't use it.
They've got to kick against the goats.
They're going to try.
Yeah.
Trump's going to be inaugurated January, what, 20th?
Yeah.
In January 6th, the electors will cast their votes.
So they still have two months to come up with their radical plan, and that may include dark aspects of our United States intelligence services busting loose with a false flag and bombing, you know, even something domestic here in America.
I mean, I could see them hitting a large city and blaming it on Trump.
I can see that happening.
And they still have enough of the mainstream media doing the Mockingbird thing that they might be able to run a program like that and do it successfully.
Yeah, for me, there is no evidence that corporate media is anything other than controlled by the Black Hats.
Now, Mike King of the anti-New York Times, his idea is that the New York Times now has been commandeered by the White Hats.
And what they are reintroducing as topics, such as Pizzagate, is to bring the public to reconsider these ideas.
Now that said...
For this to be pulled off and to snap people out of their mind control is there needs to be this breakthrough event that will destroy the credibility, the official credibility.
And again, that could be the economic collapse.
It could be just on paper, solutions are ready to go.
It could be the Diddy and the Epstein stuff because that could be pretty inexcusable.
And especially if you bring somebody into the evidence such as Hillary or Kamala herself, then there aren't going to be anybody trying to protect and defend those people anymore.
But we'll see.
Something still needs to break to shatter the credibility.
All I'm going to say about that is that there are a lot of religions out there.
One of them happens to be the Democrats and MSNBC. There are a lot of religions out there.
Think about the NFL. I mean, there are people that are more concerned with the NFL than they are with religion.
Think about all the different distractions that are out there that allow somebody to go in deep enough that it becomes a religion or an idol in their lives and Politics and political wonks like us are current event wonks.
I think we're a rarer breed of cat because it takes years of a lot of study to really understand who you can trust and who you can't trust and what the sources of the information are and what's written below the headlines.
People like us are probably 5% of America in terms of what we follow.
I mean, I don't know anybody, maybe one guy, that kind of is on the same level.
I know a lot of people that are flirting with the things that I know or I've studied or I talk about.
A lot of people that wouldn't be surprised at this point in time that the things I tell them are somewhat true, at least.
But I know a lot of people that just simply...
And you can see it in their body language.
Their feet will turn away.
Their shoulders will turn away.
They'll block you out.
They don't want to hear it.
It's too much.
I can't.
I'm going to look away.
I've got to get away from this guy.
And Pete's against one of those issues.
Where they just refuse to believe that there are people that are that wicked.
Well, I'll tell you what.
There are.
There are.
And to me, it's not a matter of having gotten caught up in something bad.
It's a matter of having wanted people.
To be a part of something that bad is because they're so desperately wicked and deceitful above all things.
I mean, who could treat another human being, especially a child, like that?
Only somebody who is seeking to destroy their conscience completely.
Which, by the way, that's exactly what progressives do, right?
We're all born with a moral compass.
The conservatives are the ones that want to conserve the moral compass, that want to protect the moral compass, that want to conserve the ways of our fathers and the foundational moral rules.
It's the progressives that want to be tranny this, gay that, you know, pedo this, whatever.
The progressives are the ones that want to break loose from all of the chains that society has to offer so that they can be free to be gay and That's what happens when you break loose from it.
Next thing you know, you're given over to all your Most darkest lustful desires when you go that direction and choose to absolutely abandon the moral compass that's built into you.
We should be harvesting that moral compass for the greater good of society and especially rich people.
Especially rich people.
They ought to be using the power of the money that they have to do good for the population rather than to selfishly And do selfish things.
That's how it ought to be the way I see it.
But remember, that's the difference between a conservative and a progressive.
And progressive is the religion that's been taught in the schools for the last 15 years.
Progressive.
And still is.
And that's part of the shuffling and the encouragement of people to go into the university system where they can have another four years to mind control you.
Instead of in the trades of people working with their hands, people who work with their hands, they get pretty practiced at saying, I gotta get eyes on and hands on before I really understand anything that's going on.
And you're talking about to bring people back and the percentage of people who can have the background of factual knowledge to be comfortable with these topics.
Candace Owens and Tucker are killing it and they're moving forward and you can see Tucker's evolution On his shows, I was just watching a clip and we're showing this on tomorrow's show, but Jimmy Dore gives him two minutes of how January 6th was a false flag and then he just hits Tucker with a question.
And Tucker, you know, you could see that that was a little much.
He hadn't gone that far yet and he was beginning to feel the implications that January 6th was a false flag.
And...
But that's the process that we all got to go through.
I don't think Tucker's even realized that 9-11 was a full-on false flag yet.
Look, everybody moves along at their own rate.
And there's a lot of concerns out there.
But I'm going to tell you something.
Of all the channels out there that we watch, We're the ones, we're the ones that know, that are telling you the truth about Sandy Hook.
Why is nobody else telling you about that?
We're the ones that are uncovering and doing the conspiracy research that Candace Owens is talking about and Tucker Carlson's talking about.
And we're not out there looking for big accolades.
Second point I want to make in response to what you just said, A moral compass is a good thing, okay?
Nobody likes to live their lives with a bunch of shameful deeds in their closets.
Nobody wants to live with things that they're ashamed of.
And when you violate your conscience, that is the very definition of it.
You become ashamed of that.
What are you going to do with that shame?
How are you going to deal with it, okay?
And right now, we're seeing the progressives Descend deeper and deeper and deeper into a mental health crisis because they don't know how to deal with the shame that comes with the experimental thoughts and ideas and concepts that they've had.
It's very bad.
It's a very bad situation to be in.
I, for one, am one who promotes religion.
Yep, I'm an old-school Christian, old theology degree, studied the Bible, believed Jesus was exactly who he said he was.
I believe that is a foundation, and it's an experiential belief just as much as it's an intellectual belief.
But that is how you get rid of shame right there.
It's designed for that.
It's designed not so that you can go live a hedonistic lifestyle, so that you can understand how offensive it is to the one who designed this very, very good world to do something so shameful.
So that's my 10,000-foot overview from it.
All right, very good.
Thank you, brother.
A couple of quick points for that.
Candace Owens, in a clip that I think Joe sent, he's interviewing a guy who was with the CIA, and Candace was all over 9-11, and this guy was all over 9-11, JFK, RFK, MLK. Those were state heads.
Yeah, but what wouldn't he talk about?
I watched that interview.
What wouldn't he say?
What wouldn't he say?
Sandy Hook.
False flags.
The shootings.
He would say everything that people have begun to swallow in terms of the red pills that they've been taking, but he would not touch the false flags.
Would not.
Now, you're either ignorant or you're stupid or you're deceptive if you're not going to deal with the one elephant in the room.
These fake Damn shootings.
Fake.
But by the way, he was right about 9-11.
Oh, they did 9-11 because it started a lot of wars and it spent a lot of money and it ended up with the Patriot Act, the big huge security act.
Why can't you take the same principle and apply it to Sandy Hook?
What happened as a result of Sandy Hook?
Oh, we got to re-engineer all these schools.
We got to make sure that the new security industrial complex grew out of control.
The American citizens were fearful.
We had all sorts of new measures that went into place.
And we get to have kids hiding under their desk, afraid that somebody who walks in with a bulge on their hip is a school shooter.
How come they won't go there?
They'll go everywhere but not there?
Are they a hero?
I'm glad they're out there doing it.
But sometimes you gotta do it on a larger scale.
Yeah, you're right.
They're either ignorant, stupid, or they're complicit.
So it's one of those.
Let's see, I did want to say for the progressives of the destruction of our children is that they have been so poisoned and tortured and mind controlled and hopefully when we get free from the poisons, then people will just have a natural reflection of who people are and what sexuality is and we'll have a much easier path forward.
But we shall see.
Alright, soon!
One of the things that I am concerned about is the Trump rhetoric, and I understand that disinformation is necessary in a war, but he supports this genocide.
And the U.N. report says 70% killed in Gaza are women and children after a year of this, and yeah, that's how it works in war.
Typically, 90% of the casualties since World War II have been civilian, and most of the civilian casualties are going to be the most vulnerable, and that's going to be the kids.
The elderly and the women.
So the war still needs to shake out.
And if I had to speculate, I think that that's going to be one of the areas to bring the normies back, is there needs to be a scare event for the war.
And for if I, because I think that the White Hats are in charge, taking a look at the position of orchestrating the show, is that I would want the people begging for For real leadership and truth.
So I think that the Biden actor could, and even Kamala as vice president, could be very helpful in the next two months with the show of the brink of nuclear war and total destruction.
I think that would help.
Your thoughts, brother?
Everybody should go back and listen to the speech that got John F. Kennedy killed.
The one about secret societies.
The one about that we should find this abhorrent that these things should take place.
I'm glad Donald Trump is hitting on the tones that he's hitting on.
I'm glad that he's doing that.
But as we've mentioned here, we take a look around in mainstream media.
Yeah, a lot of these red pills are slipping in.
They're slipping in.
They're slipping in.
Nobody is talking about Israel.
The existential threat.
Donald Trump has told everybody that he's aligned himself with them, that he's their biggest fan, their biggest supporter, and he's going to continue arming them to do the genocide that they're doing.
There are problems that need to be dealt with on a lot of different levels.
When the question comes down to, if we pour on too much too fast, Do we break their minds?
Or is this something that needs to slip out, leak out, move forward progressively until enough truth is out there?
Again, it all comes down to eliminating the censorship industrial complex and allowing those voices that are the strongest in each particular area to begin to rise up like the cream on the butter.
It's what needs to happen.
And then you'll hear more about Brother Nathaniel, and you'll hear more about Stu Peters, and you'll hear more about a lot of these guys that are out there talking about this disease that we have with this powerful breed of people that really believe that they're superior to the rest of humanity.
That particular sickness needs to be addressed.
It needs to be addressed at some point in time, but are we ready for that?
I don't know.
I don't know.
But we're heading in a good direction, and for that, I'm happy.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And just looking for my seat in the stands is that the White Hats would have to be concerned over the military potential, the weapon potential, and we're taking a look, coming up with the fires, of what assets do the Black Hats still have to deploy?
And exactly as you're talking about, I think that what they're doing is with every step forward, they're monitoring.
So these Candace Owens interviews, what Tucker Carlson's scripted to say is that the responses are being monitored so that we break the fewest people possible psychologically.
Maybe some people need to be broken.
Maybe it's time for a mental health crisis.
Maybe.
Maybe.
And certainly those hard questions are what has to be addressed.
And we'll see what plays out.
Alright, Weather Warfare.
This is a time lapse.
This blows my mind.
This is in Barcelona.
And this is north of Valencia.
Remember they had the flooding, of which they had no warning.
And that weather warfare was going on.
That's apocalyptic there, man.
Yeah.
That's apocalyptic.
Alright, so here's the...
This wildfire, which is about 80 miles north of me and about 20 miles to the west of my younger brother and about 20 miles to the east of my older brother.
My older brother's wife stayed home from work.
One of the days to keep an eye on their house.
So you see the...
I'll just play a little bit of this.
It's your county in California, and we'll talk about some of the standard burn patterns that show that it's plasma fire.
But first, she's going to show this long line of rocks that are burning like pieces of coal.
And this is a new and different feature that I've never seen.
You'll see what I'm talking about.
...of heavy smoke throughout these neighborhoods.
And we came across...
And I'll put into the show notes the two California fire captains after the fires years ago to be able to, they walk through and they point to these houses that are obliterated.
They look like they've been bombed.
The cars that have suffered a heat damage impossible from fire of their definitive professional explanation that this is not a fire.
And you see these green trees all around where it takes 2700 degrees to melt glass from these cars.
And yet you got the palm tree right next to it.
Notice all the unburned palm fronds, just like normal plasma fire.
All the vegetation between the houses is not burned.
What does burn is the cars and houses.
All of the cars have zero glass.
It burned hot enough to melt the glass, which is like 2700 degrees.
Far hotter than any forest fire or any car fire, and every one of those cars has zero glass.
All of that glass is melted.
The engine block is pouring out the front of that vehicle.
Now look at this.
What the hell is that?
And notice all the unburned foliage all around it.
She calls it a brush fire right here.
You can see the brush behind it is doing just fine.
Is this lava rocks that they were using for just a landscape feature?
these rocks, this pile of rocks just goes along that fence right there yeah I haven't seen that before and And then the evidence is just the same and he goes on and we're all...
Have on the show tomorrow.
Similar evidence in New Jersey.
Meryl Nass again, the entire climate narrative shown up as a sham by Science Magazine, AAAS, the biggest scientist organization in the U.S. and the Washington Post.
How long before everyone finds out?
And that the idea, and we've shown this graph before, and I just want to put this in context, that we're being lied to massively.
We're being told global warming, and then they changed it to climate change.
Even in the official story that's refuted.
Now, I don't know how reliable the official story is trying to go back 485 million years.
I would doubt that it's reliable at all.
But I want to point out the internal inconsistency.
That is something that what we do as pattern recognition specialists is we point out, wait a minute, you're saying these two things at the same time.
Which is logically impossible.
Alright.
Your thoughts on the climate?
Climate change is obviously a tax.
It's just a tax.
It's a psyop.
Yep.
Yep.
Alright, let's go on to our final topic.
Is that the idea that we have hammer and chisel work without power tools and with donkey transportation in areas of population, especially in the US, whereby you don't have the population to support this kind of work, but yet here you have these buildings.
I'll play just...
I believe this is two minutes to appreciate this work.
I believe this is two minutes to appreciate this work.
I believe this is two minutes to appreciate this work.
I believe this is two minutes to appreciate this work.
Yes, indeed.
I don't give about a minute of my lunch break to be able to point to the possibility of an entire hidden partial continent.
We all want to know who built these massive cathedrals, right?
We all want to know who had the knowledge before we were all born.
We want to know why we're being told that they were built with hammers and chisels.
Today, I think we take a step closer to finding out where this incredible knowledge of construction truly came from.
Where we are all aware of the massive continent that was completely left out of our mainstream textbooks.
The land of Mew.
So let's go even deeper.
When we go back to this article from the Courier Journal from 1925, nearly 100 years ago.
Where it reads, according to the records from Colonel Churchward and the East Indian High Priest, the records state that some people were brought by flying machines to India from the land of Mew in the Pacific Ocean.
The records say that Mew was the motherland of man.
In Mew was the Garden of Eden, where they had cities, where they learned to build palaces of marble.
They acquired the skill to query gigantic blocks of stone and to transport them long distances and to carve them into human faces, where the records say that the people of Mew navigated the air and had ships where they sailed to far distant lands with rich cargo.
And now that we know all of this, I want to show a few things.
First of all, this is showing that the technology of flight has been here before.
Where the Wright Brothers' story, creating the first plane in the 1800s, would be a massive lie.
Where they have this information stored, and giving it back to us slowly, as we've discussed.
Secondly, they mention in the tablets that the land of Mew was in the Pacific Ocean.
The Pacific Ocean has been named the Pacific Ocean for 13,000 years?
Or was the land of Mew here much closer to our timeline?
Or is there more land?
Not the entire continent, obviously.
But are there other lands, possibly bigger than Easter Island and possibly bigger than Hawaii, left over from that cataclysmic event that are still here today and simply hidden from our maps?
And our flight paths.
Where our current day planes could simply just be flying around that area.
Where these hidden islands could be.
Hidden knowledge.
Where our flight paths are just circling it.
The Garden of Eden.
The place where humans had cities.
Where they learned to build palaces of marble.
And learning all of the construction skills that we are all asking questions about worldwide today.
We are all wondering who built these cathedrals.
We all know at this point that the horse and wagon community did not hire Donkeys Incorporated in the 17 and 1800s to chisel away at some stone and marble and knock out the Cologne Cathedral.
We know this.
We know that they didn't hit the stone with a hammer.
A little harder and with a little more precision than we do today.
And their work just lasts forever.
And ours doesn't.
It's not about effort.
There's knowledge involved here.
The Gloucester Cathedral, located in England, we are told was constructed by the people of the 1100s 900 years ago.
And of course, the narrative holds a major fire in the year of 1088.
Yeah, it goes on and on and on.
It's fascinating stuff and compelling evidence that we have been great reset before.
And again, if we can get the truth, we can find all that stuff out and it'll be a whole new ballgame.
Brian, your thoughts, brother?
Um...
I don't know.
I don't even know if Pangea existed the way that they taught me that Pangea existed.
I don't think that they could have an entire continent hidden.
But then again, I've heard and I've seen maps that show something beyond the outer edges, you know, beyond the South Pole.
I've heard Admiral Byrd talk about the other lands that were beyond the outer rim.
I don't know.
I don't know.
It's not that I don't want to look at it, but my neighbor, my fishing buddy, he's a 32nd degree Freemason.
So I kind of started probing him.
Hey, who were the builders?
Who were the builders?
He didn't know what the hell I was talking about.
And I said, well, you know, come on, the stone builders, the ones that built the great cathedrals, the ones that, you know, What do you know about these people?
And he's like, well, we don't really cut stones.
We're the Freemasons.
Isn't the Mason a stonecutter?
He's like, well, no.
I mean, what does Mason mean?
Oh, well, I think we think of the man as the stone, and we're shaping the stone.
He basically said the Freemasons don't have anything to do with stonecutters.
And I said, well, my understanding of the early records of the Freemasons, where they're a bunch of rich guys getting together, Having their little secret boys club meetings, I don't know if any of them had dirty hands or rough hands from actually being a Mason.
I don't think they did either.
I'm not able to get any answers out of him.
I don't know if they have secrets at higher levels.
I guess there's a lot of 32nd degree Masons.
I don't know, but he didn't have any idea what I was talking about.
Yeah, it's ironic, the name.
Freemasonry.
So, like, they founded, found that stuff.
It's crazy.
I do recommend the videos.
Yeah, I was talking about, started talking about the square and the compass and all this, and I'm like, okay, so who are the builders?
Who are the ones, you know, laying these stones?
He didn't know.
He didn't have any idea.
And these buildings in these major cities in the United States were designated for the government buildings, because you've got to have the policies in order to run the empire, universities, because you've got to have the propaganda, the healthcare system.
But then they had all the insane asylums, these huge complexes to apparently put the people who aren't going to buy the new script, just call them insane and lock them up.
All right, we're going to find the box.
What's that?
I said it's a convenient scapegoat.
Insane?
Yeah.
All you gotta do is fit some new definition inside the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual number five.
You know, it's so interesting to see the difference between the DSM-IV and the DSM-V. In terms of the things that the DSM-IV was willing to call a mental health issue, and the DSM-V just sort of Orwellian took out all those words and normalized them.
They're no longer mental disorders to be homosexual like it was in the DSM-IV. They're redefining psychology as if we don't have a conscience, as if we don't need to clear our conscience.
And it's a shame that people aren't having to face their morality as much in this world or in this life.
If you don't have to face it, then you don't have to deal with your need for redemption.
And if you can get all the words...
shame and you can eliminate them from the vocabulary, then people don't need redemption.
And so I begin to wonder if this is more of a spiritual war than it is an actual war.
And when I take a look at what academia has been doing, if they're desperate attempts to convince us that we evolved from the primordial ooze into the sophisticated beings that we are today because of massive time and collisions of atoms.
And forget that pesky second law of thermodynamics, which is...
We don't need that anymore.
Things grow.
Life exists.
Life prospers.
I think that was a Jurassic Park comment to sort of Sort of make evolution look a little bit more true.
I'm a bit ranting on it in terms of what it means, but I think one of the most important things that one can do to prepare themselves for the rest of the life that they have is to confront the issue of sin and darkness.
Why do we do it?
Where does it originate?
Is it inside of us?
Is it something we're responsible for?
And what's the cure?
And I think that's the most important issue that one can take a look at, not just to build a higher, stronger, better moral character.
But to prepare us with a reason for the next life and the one minute after you die scenario where you're confronted with, oh my God, did I live my life the way I was meant to live it?
I think those are important things.
Indeed, brother.
All right, final thoughts for me.
Just keep exploring.
I don't think that we're done until we have the breakthrough event that destroys the credibility of the officials and their history and their leaders.
Final thoughts, brother.
That was it.
That was my final thought for today.
I'm happy the way the election turned out for right now.
You know me, I'm suspicious.
I'm not going to sit here and say it's going to be great.
It's all going to be smooth sailing from here, but we're definitely heading in a better direction in terms of a mass awakening.
And that, to me, is the most important thing right now, is get the people to wake up.
And I can tell you what, in the last couple of weeks, there's been One hell of a lot of red pills dropped on America and on the rest of the world as well.