All Episodes
Nov. 11, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:57:04
The Raw Deal (11 November 2024) with special guest, Jerome (Jerry) Corsi
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Boris?
Make sure when you discuss the reason they cannot afford him, it's not just what he's going to do logistically, but he's going to appoint at least three special councils.
One special council to look at the assassination attempts, both of them.
Second special council To look at weaponization of Justice Department and FBI and intelligence against President and other conservatives.
And that investigation is going to start with 2015.
It's going to revisit all the Durham investigation.
It's going to dig deeper.
And it's not going to finish in 2015.
Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal right here on Rebel.
Go ahead.
I'm getting ready to go on the podcast.
This 10th day of November, 2024, Veterans Day.
Special guest today, Dr.
Jerome Corsi.
Interesting background.
I will.
He earned his PhD in political science at Harvard.
He's published a lot of books, about 20.
You can find it on Amazon.com, two of the most well-known, unfit for command in the Obama nation, where he was among the very first to recognize Obama.
Barack Obama was a phony, a fraud, a charlatan who was doing enormous damage to America.
He also, in the past, served as the Washington bureau chief for InfoWars.
And Jerry, I'm sure you've been struck by Donald Trump appointing Alex Jones to be his press secretary.
To me, this is a remarkable development.
I interpret it broadly as an endorsement of conspiracy theories.
Your thoughts?
Well, first of all, I'm not sure.
Did he actually appoint Alex Jones?
He's actually done it.
And I'll tell you, when I first heard the announcement, I thought it was satire.
But no, Donald Jr.
recommend him.
Candace Owens, who would have been my pick, The Press Secretary endorsed him, and he made the appointment, and Alex has accepted.
Now, he said it might be for a brief term, and it may be when he's back on the air.
I think, you know, Elon has a plan for him on X. I don't think, Jim, it's real.
I mean, I think Alex Jones has promoted it.
And it's certainly a revolutionary idea, but it's not been done yet.
It's just been circulated around.
Jerry, if you go right now to InfoWars, you can see video and reports of Alex formally accepting Donald Trump's offer for him to serve as press secretary.
Yeah.
You may be just as blown away as I. Jim, I don't...
I mean, Alex might put that out.
But I don't...
I mean, all the articles I'm seeing, it's still not decided.
If Alex Jones were the press secretary, there would be a major story.
It would be a blow-up all over the internet.
It wouldn't be hidden.
So I'm reserving judgment on it.
Listen, I've been...
Very concerned as to whether this were true or false.
And I'll just tell you, I mean, I've heard of it a couple of days.
I've had a couple of sources confirm it.
Alex Jones is publishing about it.
As I say, I thought Candace Owens would be sensational.
Because obviously, unlike Alex, she doesn't have a reputation of being an entertainer, you know.
She's a serious woman and quite brilliant.
Alex is a very smart guy, and I think he does a lot of good, mostly in drawing attention to controversial stories, and he's willing to go there and talk about alternative points of view, which the mainstream media tends to be reluctant to undertake.
He's not good at following through.
Marshaling all the evidence and assessing which of the alternative hypotheses is More supported, better supported by the evidence where when it settles down and points in the same direction, you can accept the best supported hypothesis as true in the tentative and fallible fashion of science.
Just hypothetically, Jerry, since I get your reservations and I understand them 100%, I assume this has happened.
What's your interpretation?
Well, first of all, I can't assume it's going to happen.
It's just too out of all possibility for me.
I mean, first of all, I know Alex very well.
And Alex is about Infowars.
And doing being press secretary, he's really not equipped to be a press secretary.
He's a press commentator.
And all the things I'm seeing, I think that's just one of Alex's Publicity efforts.
And it's a good one.
It's one that shakes things up.
But I don't see Susie Wiles, who is managing, co-managed the campaign, is now chief of staff, that she's going to bring in Alex Jones as press secretary.
Jim, I just don't see it.
So I'm not on board with that.
Because I'm getting...
Look, the first time I got this story, Jerry, I put in the word satire question mark to leave the headlight.
I mean, that seems to be so fantastic.
Wouldn't Candace Owens be sensational in that job?
Candace Owens would be very good in the job, yes.
I think Candace Owens now is a much more reasonable choice.
Again, Candace Owens does not have the press experience.
I mean, it's a very tough job.
Very tough job to be able to, you know, because you're constantly, especially if it's going to be a Trump presidency, The press secretary is going to get bombarded with, you know, with adverse questions.
I mean, I've written the presidential campaign press plane of Mitt Romney.
I did it in 2012.
I did it for going on to, it must have been almost a month.
And the press is hostile to any Republican.
I mean, they're just hostile.
They sit in the back of the airplane or the back of the bus and compliment each other who's got the best gotcha piece.
That's what they amuse themselves with.
I mean, these are young reporters and they're not trying to report.
They're just trying to score points.
Yeah, they're just trying to score points.
They're trying to be kind of, you know, smart alecks and say, who can do the best to embarrass the candidate?
That's all they're out for.
So when they're constantly...
Whenever you get Romney or any of his surrogates to come out to answer questions with the press, they would immediately jump on whatever story they thought would embarrass the candidate.
And it's fundamentally different when the press is covering a Democratic candidate.
Now they're asking questions to try to promote the candidate, and they're trying to cover up anything that might be adverse to the candidate.
And it's very much of a partnership.
So Alex Jones, I don't think, is equipped to kind of deal with the subtleties that would be required of dealing with the Washington Press Corps at White House duty.
They'd tear him up in 25 seconds.
and it wouldn't He'd be blasting and screaming at them and it would go nowhere.
He's just not equipped to do that job, Jim.
That's my opinion.
That's very interesting, Jerry.
He said something about might be a brief tenure.
Maybe it's only until the inauguration, you know, sort of shake up the community.
I think the tenure ended as soon as he suggested the idea.
Well, I'll tell you, we had this most astounding campaign with all its twists and turns.
The debate with Biden, where he really did fall apart.
I mean, his lack of competence was evident.
Let me just say, by the way, Jerry, I believe the real Joe Biden died in 2017, and he's been replaced by a couple of couples, a couple of which are even wearing latex masks.
And I don't know if you noticed, after that return from Las Vegas, where they introduced a new Biden at the White House, he was four inches taller than the old one.
I don't care about any of this, but I and Joe Rogan and...
You know, I'm not alone in noticing what happened here.
Very damn peculiar.
Have you paid any attention?
And yet the guy who's out there seems to have the same mental deficiencies.
I don't know quite how to...
They did get...
They had doubles.
There's no doubt they had some doubles for Biden.
But the point is...
Biden was so far gone, and the doubles were no better, if they were doubles.
But again, Biden was just mentally incompetent for most of the time.
I don't know how they got it, whether they had drugs or whatever they did to get him to be able to give at least a partial speech.
But, you know, after the debate with Trump, Biden was so much of an embarrassment to the Democrats that they knew they had to get rid of him.
And they also couldn't get him close enough in the polls where they could have pulled off the steal they were planning to pull off.
They were planning to say that, you know, that he was gaining and the things that the Democrats usually do when they're, you know, stealing an election.
And the big contribution that we played in this campaign was, if you go to our website at gods5stones.com, I don't know if you looked at it, Jim, but G-O-D, no apostrophe S, gods, and you spell out five, F-I-V-E-S-T-O-N-E-S, gods5stones and you spell out five, F-I-V-E-S-T-O-N-E-S, gods5stones is plural, dot com.
You'll see that we found that there are algorithms, which are these codes that have been placed in the state voter registration databases.
and they're quite complex codes.
We found them in all, and we found them in five of the We found them in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Wisconsin.
And so therefore, you know, I mean, we knew that the Democrats had these codes.
The codes are very elaborate.
Computer genius Andrew Paquette broke the codes.
And we started working with Andrew.
Going back months and showing how these codes allowed the Democrats to create false voters, voters that didn't exist, and put them in the database of the state boards of election voters so that they looked real and they got actual voter IDs.
And the voter IDs were such that They could vote these clones, these false voters, whenever they wanted to.
Some of the states have millions of records that are available to be used in the false voting scheme.
They have voters that are actually clones, just duplicates, double registration for that person.
Some of the clones have a missing middle initial or they change a little bit.
Some of the clones are just copies.
They have voters who have moved out of the state, deceased voters.
They put back the purged voters into the regular active database.
They have phantom voters that they just create out of nothing, a name and an address.
And these are like marked cards in a marked card scheme.
So, you know, you first have to shuffle the deck.
Can't just place the marked cards in there.
It'll also be the ones out of order in the deck that comes from the manufacturer.
That's ordered from high card, high suit, to low card, low suit.
So you've got to shuffle the deck, which they do.
And then they, since the deck is now out of any logical order, they can insert records that are false, and they look legit.
But they have to also have enough ability to hide those boats back into the database so that they're not seen by anyone who's going through the database.
And then they can be pulled out as the criminals want them used Typically a mail-in balance scheme.
So, you know, for instance, we're now I'm taking a hard look right now at what goes on the Carrie Lake election, which was just announced for her opponent.
And I think that's sure that certainly is looking to me like a stolen election.
Oh, yeah.
I agree.
No way.
No way.
Nor could Katie Hobbs have possibly beaten, you know, Carrie Lake in the past.
I mean, it's just outrageous and insulting.
Jerry, I'm getting the impression Arizona may be the most corrupt state in the nation.
Right now, it probably is.
I mean, I think it's even outdoing Georgia, which surprises me.
I thought Georgia would be...
You know, the worst one.
But now, I think Arizona is rivaling Georgia.
And the other state that's still going on is the election in Pennsylvania.
I guess it's this candidate they've sent in, one of the operatives from the Perkins Coie firm, Mark Elias, who's in there contesting whether You know, Casey, who is Bob Casey, the current Democrat incumbent, they're going to try to get him to win over the announced winner, which is a guy named McDonald, I believe.
And he, I think, was a legitimate winner.
Now, what you've got going on here is a pattern where you can detect this, where, first of all, the Democrat is lagging behind.
And then the Democrat begins to gain.
And then when they either halt the counting or they don't announce a winner that night and say they've got to continue the counting.
So they continue counting votes for several days after the election, in which time they're going into the algorithms and they're saying, we need 25,000 more false votes to be generated to make Carrie Lake lose.
So they pick false voters out and they say, you know, you can't mail a mail-in ballot to a voter who doesn't exist, so they don't print it.
But the machine records it as having been requested.
Then they do print one to run it through the machine and tabulate it.
Now, since the voter has a legitimate ID, And it was issued by the state in the scheme.
That was the first part of the scheme.
And then it's retrieved from the database and voted.
And the vote has the same number, the voter.
It's a certifiable vote, even though the voter doesn't exist.
And the states in Arizona or New York or Pennsylvania or any of the states, certainly in 2020, will not go back, and they will not go back, and they will not Look to see whether or not these voters were real.
They won't examine the signatures on the registration cards against the signatures on the ballot.
They won't go and take a look at whether or not the person exists.
They won't go out and do a forensic examination and see if the person actually exists.
And so therefore, these cases get by.
And then the Board of Supervisors who are either politically motivated or You know, scared to death to object to the election, rush to certify it, and once you've got a certified election, it's very hard to dispute.
So, you know, Carrie Lake, if she wants to fight this, has to now do whatever she can to slow down the certification.
And at the requesting a, lawyers request a recount based on suspicion of fraud.
And we can give her the evidence where we have suspicion of fraud.
We can't prove it yet, but we have reason to suspect it.
And so therefore, that should be enough.
You know, we can show them that there's an algorithm in the Arizona database.
There's also an algorithm in the Pennsylvania database.
Both databases have enough clones and other false registrations to get in the database that could be used in the scheme.
So it merits investigation that would require pending certification to make sure that the final tally is legitimate.
And that's what we're going to encourage now both Carrie Lake and her opponent to do.
And once we get this done, we have the ability to go forward and do a forensic investigation in these two elections and hopefully expose the fraud.
And that's been our major contribution in the current election.
And I think we stopped the mail-in voting fraud across the five battleground states that used that same technique in 2020.
Because we found the algorithm, they couldn't go ahead and use it.
And so therefore, the ballots were printed, they were even interdicted in Philadelphia, the trucks coming in with the ballots in the middle of the night like they did in 2020, but they didn't use them.
And they didn't stop the counting, they declared the winners in every one of the battleground states except Arizona, and they just declared Arizona for Trump.
But they're trying to steal a Down-ballot election, namely the Senate election from Cary Lake.
And I think all the signs are there to merit suspicion of that, that ought to be investigated by the court system.
We get independent auditors in there to examine these mail-in ballots and find out whether or not they were legitimately cast or not, whether the algorithms were used.
And we can look at the database and we can tell them what to look at.
We know the techniques now to detect the votes.
We can actually say there were X number of illegal ballots that we've identified that were cast.
And it would take us a couple weeks to do that, but it would merit the time in order to get the election right.
The algorithms are...
It's amazing.
Sensational stuff, Jerry.
I'm so glad...
You became involved in this.
And the guy who wrote the algorithm must have had a stroke of conscience.
I mean, he must have decided...
I think it's different, Jim.
First of all, I think these algorithms are of such complexity.
I mean, if you go to God's Five Stones now and take a look at them, are we doing video as well as audio or just audio?
Yes.
No, I'm recording the show.
Okay, well...
I can make you host and you can go there if you like.
Yeah, make it so I can share my screen.
Yeah, hang on.
I want to show you what the New York algorithms look like and how they work.
Okay, well, you can take me a minute to find what I want here and then I'll pull it up.
I can't think of a single topic more important for us to be addressing than this right now.
I think it's very important.
I mean, this is key.
And having people understand this is important.
It's not entirely easy, but I've learned how to explain it so it's comprehensible.
Okay, now here's...
I'm going to share the screen.
And here we go.
Okay, you can see this paper by Andrew Paquette.
And it's on the Caesar cipher.
Yeah.
Okay, so now Andrew Paquette's a computer expert.
This was a published paper.
It was published in the Journal of Information Warfare in 2023, which is a peer-reviewed journal.
Okay, now what he did is he studied the New York State Board of Election database, and he found that it has algorithms in it to first scramble the voters.
I'm going to go to a certain...
I'm going to show you how it's done.
You can see how complex this is.
I mean, this is really, I think this is intelligence agency level complexity.
And so that, I suspect that this was a professional job.
And it was a professional job that required expertise.
And I can see the CIA creating an election intervention unit that was determined to start...
You know, the CIA has been intervening in foreign elections for decades.
I think they decided to start it...
Running our elections, going back to 2002 with the HAVA, the Help America Vote Act.
I think that's when it started.
These algorithms started showing up in the state databases in 2004 and 2007.
And I think they're pretty much ubiquitous right now.
Almost all the states, I think, are going to have algorithms built into them.
Now, I want you to look here at the middle four columns.
If I get my cursor in here, I'll kind of follow it if you can see my cursor.
The CID sort, which is a county sort.
County ID. So, if we take the county IDs sequentially, and you look at the voter number 8 in the list, that voter's number is 20,307,396.
Now, you would think that the next voter would be 397.
And that is if the voters were getting their state ID, the short ID is the state ID, that in relationship to when they registered.
In other words, if you registered a few years ago, your number should be lower as your state voter ID than if you registered just recently.
But that's the logical way to do it.
The logical way is your state ID is a function of when you registered.
But what this scheme did, what the criminals did was that they tore out the registration date as being a variable that would determine the state ID, and they started using a number scheme.
So the next one after 8, 8 is 397, and 9 is 20,308,507.
As you can see, that's 1,111 more than the previous number.
And they go in a sequence for a while where each one from this county, in order, is put into the database with 1,111 other votes put between them from other counties.
Now, I'm going to explain the scheme in common sense terms.
And by the way, 1111 in mathematics is called a rep unit, repeat unit.
They call them rep units.
And it is a very powerful number for rearranging databases.
And the ref units have been studied mathematically pretty extensively.
Now, Jim, I'm going to give you a common sense example of what's going on here.
Everybody knows the order in which their children were born.
So your first child is number one.
And second child, you know, when people, husband and wife talk about their children, our first child was, you know, really smart in math.
Well, they know who that child is.
They don't have to identify that child by name.
They say our third child, however, was better in music.
Well, again, they don't have to name the child.
They know who they're talking about.
But when the state says, okay, your first child is number one, your second child is number 12, your third child is number 23, then your next child is 34, next child is 45, and the final child is 56.
Okay, so what they've done is they've added 11 between each of your children.
So wait a minute, I don't have 56 kids.
I've only got 6 kids.
Okay, well, I say, yeah, but we did put, there is a child 2 to 11.
They're just somebody else's child that we put in your database.
And by the way, child number 3 and child number 7 don't exist.
They aren't real.
We made them up.
Okay, when you look at child three and child seven, it looks like a regular child, because again, you know, it's all...
We got a brief break here, and we'll return with Jerry Corsi to explain how Democrats have been stealing elections using complex algorithms.
We'll be right back.
I'm going to run and get...
I just dropped off my lunch.
lunch.
I want to pick it up at the door.
Perfect.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light, dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution.
Radio, radio, radio, radio.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Join Revolution Radio, every Wednesday, 8 p.m.
Eastern Time on Studio B, the Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreeGesiff.com, the people station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Jerry, please do continue with this fascinating explanation.
Trump obviously is aware of all of this at this point in time.
Yes, Trump's aware of this, and his team is aware of it.
In fact, we're getting international recognition for this.
I'll explain that as we go along.
Excellent.
So, I'm pointing out here that the first step of this is to reorder the voter registration database so it's not in any logical order.
In other words, the logical order would be that You know, you should have a lower number voter ID if you registered earlier and a higher number if you registered later.
Well, that's logical.
In other words, that your number is a function of when you registered.
This says we're not going to do that.
We're going to forget about when you registered.
There's just a bunch of names and we're going to mix them all together.
It's too easy to detect that they're adding a whole bunch in a very short period of time, and it's preposterous.
So to conceal it, they randomize.
I compare this to a card marking scheme.
When you take a deck of cards from the manufacturer, they come in cellophane, they're in a box, you open the box, the cards are ordered.
From, you know, ace of whatever the highest suit is to the lowest card of the lowest suit.
They're in order.
So if you take your mock cards and just randomly insert them in the deck, they're easy to find because the mock cards are the ones that are out of order.
So the first thing you've got to do is make the database out of order.
So all the cards look random.
You don't know where they came from.
And so you take the...
You take a county, like there's numbers 4 through 20, and you're going to...
For those, everyone is going to get, except for a couple of rare, you know, in between, they also throw in some wild cards, but look at 23 to 39.
Every one of those, the next one is 1,111.
Are placed in between each of the ones from that county.
So number 23 in the county, let's do 25.
25 was 20,289,329, and 26 was not 330, 20,290,440, which is 11,111 more than the previous number 25.
So they've added 1,111 other people in between those from other counties.
They'll do that for a while for this county, then they'll jump to another county and put some other county's people in there.
It's a very complex scheme.
And I compared it to children.
Like, you know, I was saying, our child number one was good in music.
You know who you're talking about.
And child number three, you know who that is.
But the state says, no, your children are number one.
Your second child's 12.
Your next child's 23.
They add 11 between each of your children in your database.
Those are other people's children.
They look like who could tell.
It just looks like another file.
And they say number 3 and number 7 didn't exist at all.
We made them up.
They made them up to look just like it was real.
Okay, now, the made-up cards can come from...
Oh, by the way, so if you look at the first three columns over here, the state board ID sort, so you go through the state board ID numbers, you can see every number is used.
So there are 1,111 other people put into the record, and those numbers are used.
And then the state, the county IDs, they rearrange to comply with the state IDs, and the dates are not in any particular order at all.
And if you order by the dates, the last three columns, by the date of birth, The county IDs are not in any order, and the state IDs are not in any order.
So you can see that the reordering is the first important aspect of this scheme.
Okay, got that, Jim?
Absolutely.
Okay, then what they do is they got to sort them back into the database.
And now it's very complex, and I guarantee you this is almost hard to follow the first time.
They divide the records in a county by how many records are...
They're going by a power of 10.
So they're basically getting a sequence here of numbers from 1 to 99, numbers from 100 to 999, From 1000 to 9999, etc., how many records actually fall within those 10 decimal groupings?
And then what they do is they consider those to be blocks of the Caesar cipher, which is the alphabet, and But you move it over three spaces, and then the next row you create, you start with XYZ at the beginning of the alphabet,
and then you move that over, so the next one's going to start with UVW. Very complex way of resorting the files into the database so you don't recognize it.
The best way to understand it If you're card cheating, mark cards, and you're dealing to five players, player number three, you want to give a royal flush.
Well, then the deck you're dealing has to have, the third card has to be the Ace of Hearts, because that's the third card you're dealing.
Four, five, six, seven, and the eighth card has to be the King of Hearts.
So you put that in the eighth spot.
The 9, 10, 11, 12, 13.
The queen has to be in the 13th spot.
14, 15, 16, 17.
The jack's in the next spot, 18.
And the 10 is in the 23rd spot.
Now, if you just looked at the cards, you wouldn't recognize that that was set up that way.
You'd have to think it through which card was going to go to which person.
And so it's not obvious that this is a marked card and it's going to deal a royal flush to player number three.
Which it was set up to do.
And so therefore, when the false votes are put back into the deck, they have to be put back into the deck in a way that the criminals know where they are.
Okay, and so you're sorting them into these different piles of votes separated by decimals, tens.
And it becomes very complex what they look like as a result of how the cipher works.
But again, you've got the point.
So it has to be...
When you do a code...
The commander of a military has written out the code, and the person in charge of putting it into a code puts every one of those letters into another format, another letter, by rules.
So you have to be able, when that is delivered, to reverse the code and to read the message the way it was originally sent.
You've got to have a code book.
And so this creates an algorithmic Numbering scheme, which tells the criminals where the false voters are.
And so they can go to those locations and pull those votes out of the database and vote them.
Now I'm going to show you another paper that actually explains how this is done a little more clearly.
In fact, it gives another whole dimension to it.
So let me find that paper and I'm going to show you how this is done.
By the way, Chuck Schumer is not allowing the called winner in Pennsylvania to participate in the Senate orientation, holding out they're going to be able to defraud the public and keep Casey in play.
Chuck Schumer has to be among the very leaders who know all these schemes for stealing elections.
In fact, he has to be one of the great criminals of our present government.
In fact, he is.
And the Democrats in general are.
And this is part of the difficulty here.
So, okay, let me share this.
Okay, this is another paper I've written.
This was published in American Thinker.
American thing is just excellent.
After the January 6th, they had a wonderful peace.
Meanwhile, Trump was being charged with inciting an insurrection.
There was, number one, no incitement, and number two, no insurrection, which Ottawa put the end of it right there.
But of course, the Democrats aren't going to let it go just because it's been exposed as a fraud.
If it helps them, they're going to use it.
Democrats are not particularly interested in truth right now.
The Democratic Party has moved from being, in the 1950s and 60s, it was a liberal party, classic liberals.
They were interested in the downtrodden, and they wanted a fair society.
Well, then they became communist, and now I think they're just outright treasonous.
They just want to destroy the United States.
And what they want to put in place is this neo-Marxism, critical race theory, but with a combination of all the elements that the transhumanists want for their own control.
We'll get to that at the point, because I want to comment on Jim Mars before we get finished today, and I think Jim was prescient in all of this.
I got to know Jim very well before he passed away.
Excellent.
Okay, so now, so we have proof that the Georgia State Board of Elections creates illegal clone voter IDs in the thousands, capable of being activated to create certifiable voters in an election fraud scheme consistent with embedding cryptographic codes in the State Board of Election voter registration databases.
As reported on our website, God's Five Stones, Andrew Paquette has discovered cryptographic algorithms in New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Georgia.
I have to add Georgia in this list now.
With algorithms found yet to be reported in New Jersey, Texas, and Hawaii.
Okay, so the cloned records...
Can be used, as I say here, the...
So this was found by the Georgia Nerds.
On X there, the, T-H-E, and capital G-A, Georgia, G-A-N-E-R-D-S underscore real.
They have a series of podcasts on Rumble, and they're headed by Kim Brooks.
Okay, so...
Because these cloned voters get legitimate Georgia State Board of Election database ID numbers, the cloned votes when they vote are certifiable.
Okay, so the cloned records are duplicate voter records, but they have their own separate independent State Board of Election voter ID. And usually they're copied from an original ID And that original ID might be deceased voters,
voters who have moved from the state, voters who have been inactive, not voting for several years, even felons, or just simply made up, phantoms.
The state ID numbers of the legally cloned victims are typically removed from the State Board of Elections voter registration database once the fraudulent vote has been counted.
So, legally cloned records appear legitimate until you search the State Board of Election databases past and present to see if any other voters with the same name and database appear with different state IDs.
So, you see, once you copy a record, now you put it into the database through these algorithms so it can't be easily spotted.
It does get a legitimate state ID. You've got different databases from which you're drawing these potential clones, the potential false voters, including just making them up.
Okay, now, the election fraud is a scheme to defraud voter integrity.
It's conducted by a criminal group that in Georgia appears to have access to the computers on which the Georgia State Board of Election voter registration database resides.
So this is not individual voter fraud casting vote ballots illegally.
This is a systematic pattern of record manipulation consistent with the previously found algorithms.
So the massive scale and complicated mechanics of illegal clone voting in Georgia would nearly be impossible to operate clandestinely Without embedding complicated cryptographic algorithms in the Georgia State Board of Election voter database directly.
Now, you can get access to that database by maybe somebody from the CIA goes undercover and gets a job with the Georgia State Board of Election database.
They create a backdoor where the criminals in Langley can get in and operate the voter registration computer.
Or maybe it's hacked and entered into.
I don't know.
Jerry, Jerry, listen, Obama, before he left office, declared our electoral system to be critical infrastructure and put it under Homeland Security, which can monitor to the precinct level and even change the vote.
So it would be DHS in all problems.
It could be easily DHS, but I'm sure they're in combination with CIA. This is an intelligence operation that probably involves several different departments, possibly involves NSA, too.
And again, I think it's worldwide.
I think the five eyes are involved in it, because we see similar patterns in Europe.
I'll get to that in a minute.
So, in a recent video, the Georgian nerds disclosed over 3,000 absentee ballots that were cast by voters in this year's 2024 election.
And these 3,000 were not in the Georgia State Board of Election voter registration database.
They voted, but they weren't in the database.
Now, voting without being registered is prima facie evidence of voter fraud.
It's also impossible.
So what happened was that these 3,000 voters, once they were voted, their voter ID was erased from the voter registration database.
So again, they can't be found.
Okay, but they did vote.
They had IDs that allowed them to vote.
The votes were counted.
And now the registration numbers for those voters who voted that way are gone.
Now, you have to look through several different databases to find this.
You've got to take the people who voted in absentee votes.
You've got to compare that to the individual.
Those people have got to look at their voter ID, which is part of the record for that voter.
And if voter IDs are accurate, it will tell you that that voter did vote in the absentee election this year, early.
But if you look at the voter registration database, you see that person is not there.
Okay, so again, Among those illegal absentee voters, the majority were early in person, not just through an absentee ballot, but conceivably, it's unlikely that these people actually showed up.
The computer, however, registered that they voted early in person.
Just like the absentee ballots for these cloned voters or these falsified voters weren't really sent, they were probably...
Just in the computer.
The fraud is largely conducted within the computer.
Although the absentee ballots, you will produce an absentee ballot that can be run through the system and is there for forensic evidence of the vote having been casted.
Although it's unlikely that that bail-in vote will have been folded or postmarked or the signature will match the signature in the registration file.
But it won't matter.
These things won't be checked.
The state boards of election running this fraud try to do minimum inspection of the mail-in ballots, and they try to rush to certify.
So it's hard to question it.
Okay, so with the illegitimate votes that are ultimately destroyed into purged and inactive files, the election fraud may have been committed entirely within the Georgia State Board of Election computer.
And given the algorithms that Paquette has found so far, given that they're of intelligence agency complexity, it is conceivable that criminals may have accessed the Georgia State Board of Election computers from the outside, but it strains credibility to believe that the volume of illegal voting activity could be successfully conducted without the collaboration of some of the State Board of Election employees or the Georgia Secretary of State.
Now, in a recent video, the Georgia nerds found a voter who had been a resident of Georgia but moved to South Carolina.
Now, that person's registration was still in the database for Georgia.
So the criminals found it and voted it.
Then they developed a clone.
They put the clone in the voter registration database.
They removed the original.
They voted the clone.
Then they removed the clone and they put the original back.
So they got double voting.
And it was a phenomenon that Georgia nerds documented only by comparing.
They had to compare the list of deceased voters and the voters not living in the state.
And in this case, the voter showed up in the history file as having voted, but the voter was a resident of South Carolina.
So you've got to get different database breakouts in order to find these and to actually find if the clone was voted.
But we can do that, just like the Georgia nerds have.
In other videos, the Georgia nerds demonstrated that 50,000 voters who were in the purged database were restored into the active voter database.
And made to be able to have votes again, although they were purged, which means the voter had been removed from the file because it wasn't any longer a real voter.
So it looks like Georgia has two voter registration databases, one legal and the other illegal.
But maintaining this kind of a double voter registration risks detection.
Thus, you've got to make use of the cryptographic algorithms To allow the criminals operating the illegal activity to hide the illegal created votes until needed.
The retrieval of the hidden votes for use demands a cryptographic scheme, intelligence agency complexity, because the algorithms that hid the votes must be reversed to find them.
In effect, the hidden illegal votes receive an algorithm locator number known only to the criminals, and once they're used, they can be removed from the database and disappear.
Okay, so that's how it's done.
And I suspect this is how it's being done right now in Arizona with Carrie Lakin and Pennsylvania with, I think the guy's name is McDonald, who won the election against Bob Casey.
Right, right, right.
Do you think there are double sets of books then in all the states where they're using the algorithm?
Yeah, everything we found, we find a lot of clones and everything, you know, hundreds of thousands, millions of clones and other false records.
Another thing they do is they've got a whole set of records that have their registration date as January 1.
There's other records where people are registered before they were born, which is a good trick.
A lot of registration dates, dates that don't make sense.
There's a lot of faulty registrations in the database, literally millions in most databases, certainly hundreds of thousands.
And they're not cleaned out.
I'm convinced the whole idea of introducing these machines wasn't to make them simpler, faster.
No, it's not me.
After another, that's their sole purpose.
There's no legitimate reason for putting these codes in.
They don't make the computer run faster.
They make it more complicated.
These allow you to take purge votes that you don't destroy.
You just bank them somewhere in another database.
Then you bring them in when you want them.
You get rid of them when you don't want them anymore.
So in other words, once you know how the scheme...
It's like a magician's trick.
The magician is relying upon misdirection in order to get you to look at the wrong thing, and then the trick is enacted so you don't see it being done.
But once you know how the trick is done, once you know that the rabbit is pulled out of the magician's coat and not out of the hat, it's no longer a trick.
Pulled out of the hat, a coat and put into the hat to be taken out of the hat, Once you see that, the trick is not interesting anymore.
And you can show how the magician did the trick.
Well, once we break the code, we can read the message.
And we can show how the trick is done.
And so therefore, if we get an election that follows the pattern that we're seeing now in Arizona, that we're seeing now in Pennsylvania of an election that was declared a winner, somebody won the night of the election, But then they say,
hold on, we've got more votes here, we've got to count, we're going to have the underdog, the one we want to win, the Democrat, is suddenly going to start getting a lot more votes, and then the Democrat surges above the Republican, and that persists until they have enough votes where they declare the Democratic candidate won.
And usually they try to get somewhere between 10 or 15,000 votes in favor of the Democrat before they quit counting.
When they reach their number, they quit counting.
They keep counting until they reach their number.
They keep making up votes and keep bringing them in.
Oh, we found another bunch.
We haven't counted these people yet.
We've got another 600,000 votes to call.
Okay, so again, it's a scheme that is quite complex and I'm confident that criminals never imagined we'd find it.
In a million years, they never imagined we'd find it.
But now that we have found it, and we've exposed it, it's extremely difficult for it to be used.
And I think you see the same pattern, Jim, in the European Union elections.
You know, the most recent one, they said there's two ballots in the European election.
So the first ballot, the conservatives were doing very well.
Le Pen and France and others in Germany and other countries were doing quite well.
Second ballot, they say, oh, the left woke up and the left surged.
Well, I called into France and Italy and said, you know, are there people showing up in record numbers at the polls?
I know, Dr.
Corsi, there's nobody at the polls.
The surge is occurring in the computers.
Okay, so again, same kind of operation.
Jerry, this is so sensational.
I can't begin to congratulate you, your effort, your team, for having exposed them.
But the Democrats are going to fight tooth and nail because their control is at stake.
We'll be right back for Jerry Corsi after this break.
How long did we go on, Jiminy?
Another hour?
One more.
One more hour.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bull hordes during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself.
Because we know who they are and what they do.
This is what they do!
and we must fight back.
You can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us!
3 Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
The time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution Radio.
Revolution Radio.
Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
Join Dr.
Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10pm Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing Unparalleled Broadcasting Excellence in 1997.
That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Well, it's simply sensational to have Jerry Corsi here to explain how the Democrats have been stealing election after election using very it's simply sensational to have Jerry Corsi here to explain how the Embedded deeply within the system to create and manufacture certifiable voters who are non-existent.
In the absence of the exposure, of which I doubt very much, we would have had the following headline, Decision Desk Edgard finalizes Electoral College Count Trump sweeps battleground states.
I don't think it would have happened, Jerry, absent this expose.
Here we have a great battle.
Go ahead.
Well, Archbishop Regano just gave out a statement.
I want to show you what he said.
Okay, I've got to make you the host again.
Make me the host again and I'll show you What his statement was You're there my friend Okay, let me share my screen.
Okay, here we go.
This Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, I've been working with him in Italy.
He's doing some excellent statements.
Oh, yeah.
He is wonderful.
He just issued this statement on November 8th, which is some considerations after the election victory by Donald Trump.
And what he says is, I'm going to read the first two paragraphs.
He says, a few days ago, on the eve of the U.S. presidential election, the arrogance of political commentators in the United States and all vassal nations had reached unexplored heights.
Singers, actors, philanthropists, public figures, and journalists who supported Kamala Harris went so far as to threaten to leave the United States if Donald J. Trump was elected.
And in truth, many today expect them to fulfill their promises.
Even Jorge Maria Bergoglio, that's Pope Francis.
Archbishop Vigano refuses to call him Pope Francis because Bergoglio excommunicated Archbishop Vigano, and Archbishop Vigano considers Bergoglio an illegitimate pope who is, in fact, the heretic introducing LGBTQ plus in fact, the heretic introducing LGBTQ plus into the Catholic Church.
So even Jorge Maria Bergoglio made a gesture with his trademark politeness traveling in a wheelchair to the penthouse of radical Sorosian, Soros, activist and abortionist Emma Bonino with white roses and chocolates as if to issue a final desperate plea to American Catholics not to be too sleazy and to vote for Harris Who shares with Bergoglio the woke religion?
Mainstream media, owned by the usual big investment fund, shamelessly endorsed Kamala and ridiculed, indeed criminalized Donald Trump.
And the more rude, the more transgressive, the more obscene, the more profane Harris supporters were, the more space they were given on television and social media.
Trucks with millions of already printed ballots were ready to reach Pennsylvania and those states where the votes of deceased, relocated Democrats and illegal immigrants were not enough to skew the election result.
Insidious algorithms embedded in the state election commission's voter registration databases were uncovered by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D. These algorithms allowed false voter registrations to be printed and concealed, Which could be used in various election fraud schemes, including counting absentee ballots cast by non-existent voters.
In exposing the scheme, Dr.
Corsi prevented the creation of millions of fraudulent votes for Kamala Harris.
That's, again, credit internationally for what we've done and true.
Dr.
Korsi prevented the creation of millions of fraudulent voters for Kamala Harris.
In multiple states of the Union, computer reports revealed that electronic voting registration machines allowed votes to be changed remotely, and in one case, access passwords were even leaked online.
Okay, the key difference between 2020 and 2024 is that the algorithms weren't used in 2024 in general.
I think they're being used now that the election's over with these two Senate races, the one in Arizona for Harry Lake and the one in Pennsylvania for this guy, McDonald's.
You should get Bob Casey's seat in the Senate.
And again, you're seeing that Archbishop Vigano is recognizing, in fact, that this steal was critical to Donald Trump winning.
If we had not done this, if we had not exposed these algorithms, I believe the Democrats would have repeated what they did in 2020 because they would have thought nobody had caught on to them.
But what I've been told, and I'm told by some top intelligence agents, is that we caught the criminals.
We caught the CIA, we caught the DHS, whomever's doing this, we caught them.
And once caught, they couldn't get away with it anymore.
And I think, Jim, that's the key feature of what we were able to do here.
I'm profoundly impressed.
The nation is in your debt, Jerry Corsi.
This is a sensational development.
And I am a huge fan of the Archbishop.
Meanwhile, we have the result.
Nevada and Arizona have now been called for Trump.
He finished with 312, the most for a Republican since 1988.
Won Arizona in a 2024 presidential election, completing a swing state sweep.
Biden has won Arizona, scoring a comeback after losing it to Biden in 2020 because of the algorithms.
And completing a 2024 swing state seat because they were not used.
The Republican leads Harris 52.1% to 47% with 67% of the votes counted.
Trump picked in Arizona with 11 electoral votes, follows that a neighboring Nevada where he picked up six.
A feat no Republican has completed in 20 years.
Both candidates made their final trips to the southwestern swing state on Halloween, haunting Arizona with their contrasting visions of how scary America could get at if their opponent won.
Meanwhile, Trump reclaims the White House.
Americans return to Trump for economic restoration and national strength in a comeback that defies political history.
Donald Trump won the 2024 election, ousting Harris from her short-lived candidacy, despite projections that would be one of the closest in memory had the algorithm been in play.
Trump took a commanding early lead, winning pivotal swing states including Georgia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania.
If I just passed 1 a.m.
Eastern, Trump had secured the necessary 270 electoral votes to return to the White House.
Indeed, when Pennsylvania was called, he had 267.
And when my state of Wisconsin was then called, he had 277.
Where I'd been anticipating, I'd been telling people I thought Wisconsin would go for Trump, and indeed he did, no doubt, absent the algorithms.
The atmosphere in West Palm Beach was electric.
Celebrating his historic win, Trump, who first won in 2016, is set to lead again.
For years, Conservative had a question about Biden's mental health, concerns Democrats ignored, until he was replaced by Harris earlier under concession.
Harris expressed disappointment.
Warned a Trump presidency would bring fascism to America, a notion dismissed by many on the right of political posturing.
I can't think of anything more fascistic than manipulating the outcome of elections in America using algorithms as the Democrats have been doing it now appears for decades.
The 2024 election may be remembered as one of the most volatile.
Trump's campaign faced relentless opposition, including two assassination attempts.
In a shocking incident, it quickly went viral.
A bullet struck Trump in the air.
Rising from the ground, he shook his fist and shouted, fight, fight, fight, a moment hailed by his supporters as a testament to his resilience and determination.
Even Vladimir Putin has complimented Trump for the courage he showed under fire.
Trump's platform emphasized making America safe, strong, and prosperous again.
Immigration and border security.
He's pledged to conduct the largest deportation operation in U.S. history, sealing the border.
Economic reform.
Vowing to make U.S. energy and manufacturing powerhouse, reduce inflation, make the country more affordable and lower taxes.
American City is a military strength.
He plans to revitalize American cities, enhance the nation's military, bringing modernized security every corner of the United States, protecting freedom.
Promising to defend constitutional rights, including preserving free speech, religious liberty, and the Second Amendment, where an anomaly here is his criticism of student protests who are not anti-Israel, but anti-genocide, where he has made remarks I consider to be totally inappropriate, even despicable, but where I do not believe he could follow through on his claims to Have them removed from campuses or even the country.
A key component also involves cleaning up the nation's schools, adding federal funding to those pushing radical ideologies, from rejecting divisive racial and gender addendas to defending the integrity of women's sports.
Amen!
Trump's education policies resonate with Americans seeking traditional values.
And Jerry, as no doubt you're aware, look how without the algorithms, Trump picked up 27% more support from Latinos, 3% more from Black, 12% more from Asians, 7% more from women, 13% more from younger, 18 to 29, 9% from 45 to 64.
Jerry, your thoughts about all of the above before we turn to how The counter movement is in place now, and efforts are being made to make sure this cannot be carried forward.
Your thoughts?
Well, first of all, I think the algorithms, now that they've been discovered, we've got to proceed to continue this work to make sure that everybody understands how they operate and how the voting theft has been going on.
This has not yet gotten to be a mainstream media story.
It has been one that experts know it stopped the steal because the work we did was noticed almost immediately.
I've been told for quite a bit of time that they really had no plan now that they couldn't use the algorithms.
What I want to do, Jim, is I want to...
what I think we're at the verge of here is where I think there's a danger point for Trump because Trump has made it clear that he's going to expose the deep state and dismantle it.
And so they, they, they state now as an existential threat from Trump.
And I want to bring up another subject and show you, I want to discuss my book on the Kennedy assassination, which is this book right here.
Yes.
That I did with, I've done this with David Mantic.
Yes.
The final book is called The Final Analysis.
It's The Assassination of John F. Kennedy, The Final Analysis.
So that's the book.
And we're on Newin's Review, UNZ.com.
I have an article entitled, How New Book!
Nails how JFK was taken out in Dallas about this very book that Jerry did with David W. Mantic, MD, PhD, as the leading expert in the world on the medical evidence and the assassination of JFK. Jerry?
Well, I think it was a combination.
First of all, David Mantic, he's a radiation oncologist, an MD. And he's been doing this for over four decades.
So he's been reading x-rays for cancer patients for more than four decades.
He's a PhD in physics, and his PhD specialized in x-ray science.
And so he's studied the x-rays in the archives.
There's three remaining x-rays of JFK's skull from the autopsy done on November 22, 1963 at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
And all three of the x-rays have been forged to hide evidence of frontal shots.
And you can see in the x-ray clear evidence of two frontal shots.
Okay, now that means that Lee Harvey Oswald was not the lone gun assassin.
Now, the reason I want to go into this is because I want to make a point to you, Jim, and that is I think that we now have the evidence, especially with these algorithms being found, To say that the CIA has been running a Truman Show.
We've been living a Truman Show.
Because the CIA was involved in killing JFK. And this book demonstrates that because the CIA was intricate in the cover-up.
Also, he, in the planning of the book, of the execution of John Kennedy, it was a coup de token.
And my first book, which Who Really Killed JFK, I wrote that 10 years ago, Was really named Alan Dulles, head of the CIA, as one of the principal plotters that organized the plot to kill JFK, organized the conspiracy that put it in place.
Now, the CIA... This raises the question.
I want to show you the evidence on this.
Let me just interject.
You...
May or may not know, but David and I have been collaborating since 1992.
Oh, I know.
In fact, one of the things, Jim, you have been publishing these books like Assassination Science books back in that era, and David Mantic had contributed some of his first pieces there.
And part of the problem was that both those Assassination Science books and David Mantic's piece were very heavily scientific.
And so, therefore, it took a certain degree of expertise to read them.
They were not written for the common reader.
And so, when I got in touch with David, and I started getting to know David, maybe three or four years ago, I said to David, you know, David, the problem is that you haven't explained this in a way that the average person can understand it.
I said, I've already written one book on Kennedy, so I know the literature.
I've read your work that Jim Fetzer's been publishing for a long time, since the 90s.
I understand the science of optical density measurements, which is a A scientific instrument measuring the amount of light coming through an x-ray.
And it's an instrument where you put the x-ray in and a little beam of light comes through into an arm and it reads how much light comes through to know exactly what you're looking at in the x-ray.
It's a logarithmic function.
It's a negative is a reverse image.
You know, the black is really white.
The white is really black.
And so average people are lost.
But however, my father was a professional photographer, and I have been dealing with negative photography since I was a child.
And I also did a lot of work when I was younger.
I did dicoupler photography.
I actually had shows, one-man shows of my photography as art.
So I really understand the science of photography.
So why don't we write a book where we explain you to the average person and put all the science in appendices?
And that's what I've done.
Yes, I congratulate you.
It's two minor, or perhaps three, emendations.
We collaborate on three books together, Assassination Science, 1998, Murder in Deedley Plaza, for which David even suggested the name, and The Great Zubbruder Film Hoax, 2003.
Alan Dulles played a major role in the cover-up by being appointed a member of the Warren Commission, but this was a case of LBJ all the way.
The plot originated in 1960 in Los Angeles when he lost the nomination to JFK, and where he boxed in Bobby and Jack by threatening to expose Jack had Addison disease, that he had had a dalliance with a beautiful woman who was a spy for East Germany, and that if he were not on the ticket, That he bottled up any legislative proposal sent down by the White House, which would be dead in arrival in his role as a powerful majority leader of the Senate.
They had to accede.
He had to withdraw his invitation to Stuart Symington, the only reversal in his career of a political decision.
When a wealthy backer of Lyndon learned of this development, he burst into the Johnson's week cursing and swearing because now LBJ would help JFK become president.
Bobby Baker took him into a bedroom and explained what they had in mind.
He came out all smiles, saying he thought that was an excellent plan.
Bobby would later declare in public JFK would not live out his first term and he'd die a violent death, and Lyndon Johnson would send his chief administrative assistant, Clark Clifford, Cliff Carter down to Dallas to make sure all the arrangements were in place for the assassination.
I worry about the devil's chessboard and even your book as distracting attention to Alan Dulles, who no doubt played a role, but especially in the cover-up.
This was all the way with LBJ, and the Democrats have sought to conceal it from the beginning.
Proceed.
Well, I think we don't need to argue about that point, because Johnson...
Lee, by the way, Jerry, as you may now be aware, was actually in the doorway of the book Depository, which is, Larry Rivera was able to confirm, Ralph Sengay, and many others.
I've published about a dozen articles about it, and it's in my latest, my fourth book, entitled JFK, Who, How, and Why 2017.
We've confirmed it.
There's no doubt about it.
So he not only was not the lone gunman, he was not one of the multiple shooters, of which I have identified eight.
I don't think he fired a single shot that day.
Now, a couple of things.
Number one is, Johnson had the motive, and Johnson might have wanted Kennedy killed.
And I don't have any doubt Johnson was involved.
But it took operational planning and Johnson wasn't the operational planner.
That's where I put the role played by Allen Dulles.
Allen Dulles, I think, assembled the team.
Well, actually, on the ground, George Herbert Walker Bush was there.
He was actually in the DalTac supervising Anna Castro shooting Nestor.
Tony Nestor Escedo fired three shots with a Mandler Carcano.
The only unsilent shots has set up the acoustical impression of only three shots having been fired by Edward Lansdale.
Appears to have positioned the shooters and determined the sequence of shots.
So we may be in the same ballpark.
I'm not worried about details, Jerry.
Just getting the record out there.
Go right ahead.
Well, I mean, all of what you're saying is, you know, within varying degrees, I might put some different spin on it or a different view on it, but I don't disagree with anything you're saying.
Now, the difference between everything you just talked about and what David and I have done in this book is that all those issues are issues that are yet debatable.
In other words, there can be arguments, there can be refinements, there's going to be arguments about those for a long time.
But what David Mantic did with the x-rays is indisputable because it's forensic evidence.
I want to show it to you, Jim, and show the people who are listening who haven't had as much exposure to David Mantic's work as you have, but let me share again my screen.
Yeah, I'm going to make you post again.
Go right ahead, Jerry.
Okay, and here we go.
Okay, I'm gonna share this.
Okay, now this is the typeset, this is my copy of the book.
I want to show you some of the key aspects of what we found.
David Mantic...
Let me first get the...
It's been a while since I've done this presentation, so I'm going to have to remember how I organized it and where things are.
It'll take me just a second to get my mind back onto it.
But...
Let me see where the first x-ray I want to show you is.
I'm going to show you the x-rays, Jim, and explain how the shooting occurred.
And let me just find here if I get the one I want.
Hold on.
Well, it's actually even the cover of the book.
But here we go.
This is the one I want.
Figure 3.9.
Okay.
I'm going to find it by scrolling down to it.
The book is really very, very heavily, heavily illustrated.
Okay.
This one's good enough right here.
This is the x-ray from JFK's right lateral.
This is the back of his head.
This is the front of his head.
I'm going to zoom it up a little bit and show you the shots that occurred.
Okay.
JFK was hit three times in the head.
Once was a low angle, back of the head.
That was the first shot that hit him.
Low angle, back of the head.
Actually, first shot came through the windshield and hit him in the throat.
And he put his arms up to go through his throat.
Actually, he was hit in the back before the second shot was through the throat.
And this one to the back of the head was fired by him.
Okay, Jim, let's not argue about these details for a minute, okay?
Maybe it was throat wound and back wound.
We're pretty close simultaneously.
I mean, they were very close together.
Those were the first two shots that hit him.
Then a shot hit him in the back and they had a low angle.
We have one more break and we'll be right back with Jerry Corsi discussing the assassination JFK and what it has warned us about the future of our president-elect.
Thank you.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back.
Management
would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support, the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light.
Start, world.
Revolution Radio, freedomslipsy.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution.
Radio, radio, radio, radio.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Join Revolution Radio every last day, 8 p.m.
Eastern Time on Studio B, the Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSips.com, the people's station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it.
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro noobs.
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to as compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Jerry, if I might, I don't know if you saw my chat notes, but I would prefer we defer this to next Monday.
Talk about JFK. It's a week from Friday the 22nd.
And I'll invite David to join us because there are a couple of important developments in the Senate where they're trying to kneecap Trump right now in the Senate.
Mitch McConnell is behind it.
And I'd love to get your comments on that.
And then we can go into the details about the assassination on Monday.
Jim, let me show a couple things I want to show.
I've got them all queued up to show, and then we'll get into McConnell.
David will cover the book differently than I do.
We can do it on Monday again, but let me just show you a couple things I've queued up to show you, okay?
All right.
Go right ahead, Jerry.
The three shots, this is the cover of the book, and three shots that hit, I'm going to zoom out in a bit, You can see the first shot that hit was in the back, it was low angle, came from the Daltex building.
The second shot hit at the temporal bone by the right ear, and it blew out the back of JFK's head.
The third shot hit at the forehead, And it went across the top of the head, but did not exit.
I want to show you that one in more detail.
And if we look here at this one right here, You can see across the forehead wound entered at the forehead by the hairline.
It went across the top quadrant of JFK's head.
The largest fragment was in the back.
And that fragment had the most weight and it had the most momentum.
So when a bullet breaks up, the fragment with most momentum ends up at the back.
And if you look at some of the more close-up Of other x-rays that have been done, when it first entered at the forehead, little tiny particles of the bullet began to break up, which again is characteristic of an entry wound.
There is where it entered, and you can see as these fragments went across the top of the head, again, entry point.
That's clearly a frontal shot.
That's been in the x-rays from the beginning.
And if we take a look at the wound on the side of the head, it's also very clear.
In other words, the x-rays don't tell any lies about this.
And that's what was so remarkable about the lies we've been told by the CIA. When a bullet enters the side of the head, it's called a tangential shot, and it forms a keyhole fracture, just like this.
Okay, so it looks like a keyhole.
It breaks the bone in front of it.
It enters in a circle and breaks the bone in front of it.
And that's exactly what we see in the x-rays.
The x-rays show, right by the right ear, a keyhole fracture, and it breaks up behind the entry point into this kind of a keyhole structure.
And so, therefore, there's really no doubt that the bullets that hit JFK came from the front, one shot from the rear.
But the shot I want to emphasize is the shot at the back of the head.
Now, at Parkland, the doctors all saw that that was the clear wound that was obvious, the shot at the back of the head.
And Jim, I want to show you in a minute something that has not been seen clearly.
What was obvious was the defect, the huge gaping hole at the back of the head.
Yes, that was obvious.
They all saw that.
That was clear.
That was from a shot from in front.
It was a shot that hit here and blew out the back of his head.
That shot came from the grassy knoll.
It came from the grassy knoll.
We know because we show in the book, the picture is a Clint Hill running up in the back of the car and show Jackie coming out of the car.
That shot...
I want to show you that sequence for a minute because it's not commonly seen in terms of a couple points I want to point out, Jim.
They're not commonly seen.
Hold on.
Let me just get it here.
Figure 4.2.
Jerry, I'm going to go into the medical evidence in detail next week.
I want to use this time with you to talk about what's going in the Senate right now.
Right now.
Well, Jim, I may not be conversing on what's going on right now, but I'm going to show you one more thing, please.
All right.
One more thing.
Go ahead.
I mean, you know, everybody's been familiar with Clint Hill running up into the car and Jack has been shot.
As you can see here, this is the first shot that hit...
Had the shot that hit the back of the head, and it's frame 313.
You can see the plume of blood and gore coming out of the front of Jack Kennedy's head.
The frame that's usually missed is this 331, where you can see essentially the shot hitting the side of it.
This is a shot that people have not really focused on.
And I think it shows the shot to the templar bone that blew the back of Jack Kennedy's head out.
The whole side of his head is blown apart there as the bullet hits the temporal bone.
And then as Clint Hill runs up onto the car, as he runs up onto the car, What you can see is, you can actually see Jackie, at 3.30 he's thrown violently to the left.
It's two separate sequences.
3.13 when he is hit and moved forward by the shot that in the back of the head.
And then 3.30 when he's thrown violently to the left.
That happens less than two seconds apart.
As Clint Hill's running up the car, and you can even see the blood and gore in the back left of the limousine.
Jack Kennedy's thrown back.
Clint Hill is hit by Jack Kennedy's brain in debris as is the motorcycle on the left.
That's clearly a shot from the grassy knoll.
Jerry, Jerry, look, look, look, look.
Those shots to the head all occurred after the limousine was brought to the left and to a halt by William Greer, the driver.
The whole film has been massively edited.
We can go into this in detail next week.
I want to get your opinion about the following development, which seemed to me to be absolutely crucial.
Tucker.
What the hell is going on in the U.S. Senate?
Hours after Donald Trump wins the most conclusive mandate in 40 years, Mitch McConnell engineers a coup against his agenda by calling early leadership elections in the Senate.
Two of the three candidates hate Trump and what he ran on.
One of them, John Cornyn, is an angry liberal whose politics are indistinguishable from Liz Cheney's.
The election is Wednesday.
It's by secret ballot.
It will determine whether or not the new administration succeeds.
Rick Scott of Florida is the only candidate who agrees with Donald Trump.
Call your senator and demand a public endorsement of Rick Stock.
Don't let McConnell get away with it again.
Here he is, talking about it.
With Republicans winning control, Mitch McConnell and Kentucky has come into sharper focus.
The new GOP majority will be tasked with selecting a caucus leader after being sworn in on January 3rd.
Since McConnell announced earlier, he will step down in the new term.
Rick Scott has renewed his push.
He is the Trump-backed candidate.
But the problem is, while some of the senators are supporting Scott, others are not.
Here we have Republican internal web count for leadership vote on Wednesday leaked.
Forty-two members support war pigs Cronin and Toon.
Call your senator.
Demand they vote for Republican voter choice Rick Scott.
This is why so many voters hate our representatives.
They really don't care what you think.
They believe they know better.
Elon Musk.
RFK Jr.
Republicans are calling for the Republican senators to vote for Rick Scott for majority leader.
He's a logical choice to lead the Senate Republicans.
He just blew his Democrat opponent in Florida by 12 plus points.
But the Senate Republicans have a long history of shitting on their voters.
Senate Republicans overwhelmingly support the Ukraine war, a lost war, despite the danger of escalation.
Senate Republicans gladly vote to hand over billions to the Ukraine cause taxpayer dollars that were never audited, by the way.
Republicans had refused to fund the Trump border wall during Trump's first term.
Again, they gladly sent tens of billions to Ukraine.
Senate Republicans stalled Trump's mega-agenda.
Trump just won a mandate to govern in 2024 with 312 electoral votes.
The popular vote took the Senate, regained the House, and the American people overwhelmingly chose its mega-agenda Sunday.
A whip count memo was allegedly leaked for the upcoming leadership.
Here's where the race stands now.
Cornyn 18, Scott 11, Thune 24.
Jerry, if it's Cornyn or Thune, all bets are off for the Trump agenda making it through the Senate.
This is a devastating development.
The rhino McConnell is despicable.
He's abusing his position to try to sabotage Trump's I want your thoughts about this, Jerry Corsi.
Well, Jim, it's predictable.
McConnell's been opposed to the MAGA agenda from the beginning, just because they're Republicans doesn't mean they're MAGA. And what Trump is going to have, Trump's going to have a lot of problems to begin with.
That he's going to destroy the deep state, he's going to dismantle the deep state, he's going to do all kinds of investigations, he's going to close departments, and he's going to fire people.
And he announced that in advance.
In a sense, it's the same mistake JFK made by saying he was going to break up the CIA into a thousand pieces, and he didn't do it.
You don't talk about these things, you do them.
Now, the entire establishment, the agencies, the CIA, all the rest of them are going to be doing everything they can to make sure Donald Trump isn't president.
You've got a hearing coming up in New York before this Judge Meacham on the 26th of November, and he could, well, sentence Trump to a prison term and seek to put Trump in prison right away.
If he doesn't put him in prison right away, he'll be a convicted felon and they can try to abolish the Electoral College.
These agencies, Trump is going to be at risk of another assassination attempt.
These people can't let Trump take office.
If Trump takes office and he rules the way he says he's going to rule, McConnell and the others in the Senate are going to be exposed for their corruption.
People have made millions of dollars.
McConnell's wife is Elaine Chao.
She's Chinese.
But McConnell's received millions of dollars for the Chinese.
The only reason Malang Chow's family is still alive in China is because McConnell's done what China wants them to do.
McConnell doesn't want to be exposed, nor do the Democrats who have been hand-in-hand spending money with the Republicans so that they can send it to Ukraine, money-launder it, and steal it.
They've all become wealthy with this.
They don't want the gigged end.
They have no intention of ruling for the American people.
So this is business as usual.
The key is whether Donald Trump, with this agenda, is going to A, live long enough to do it, and B, whether he's going to be able to put enough in place that he can do it by executive order and fiat, because he's not going to get the cooperation of the Congress, even though the Republicans because he's not going to get the cooperation of the Congress, even though So this is going to be a bloody fight.
And it's going to be a bloody fight to the end, because either Trump wins and the deep state is destroyed for at least setback in a major way, which would involve not only Breaking up departments and firing massive numbers of people, but investigating and bringing criminal charges against a lot of government officials.
You can name them going back to the 2020 election or the Russian collusion or two assassination attempts and what was the Secret Service doing.
You could have treason charges result from Donald Trump's investigation, and I don't think Donald Trump would stop at doing it.
So these people know that this is a death match.
And Donald Trump has called it out, and they know he's coming.
So the key is Donald Trump's got to survive until the inauguration.
He's got to dodge Judge Meacham, and that's got to be engineered with some lawfare.
Judge Meacham tomorrow is going to decide whether the Supreme Court case on immunity applies to Trump, and he probably will rule that it does.
Judge Meacham could be indicted under Trump if Trump gets his way.
He could clean up the court systems.
The administration has already threatened Letitia James.
And so therefore, Trump has made it clear that he's coming after these people.
And John Kennedy made it clear that they were coming after these people.
The point I wanted to do today with bringing the two together is to make the point that the CIA eliminated John Kennedy when he wouldn't go along with them.
John Kennedy would not fight a nuclear war like Curtis LeMay wanted him to do in the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.
He'd signed an executive order to pull out of Vietnam that was not revealed to the American public until the Pentagon Papers came out in 1971.
Lyndon Johnson lied about that.
He said he was continuing John Kennedy's policy in Vietnam.
He wasn't.
He was doubling down on escalation.
And John Kennedy was printing direct money from the Treasury.
It was not going through the Federal Reserve.
We weren't borrowing our own money to print it.
Jack Kennedy was going to get rid of the Federal Reserve.
Jack Kennedy was going to abolish many things.
He didn't want the CIA. He knew the CIA had lied to him.
He was going to break it up.
He knew that he wasn't in control of the government.
The government wasn't doing what he wanted the government done.
They didn't pay any attention to him in the bureaucracy either.
He was trying to make peace with Khrushchev.
These people didn't want peace.
They wanted war.
It's not much different today, except for the CIA is more powerful.
And this is exactly what I wanted from you.
Here we have a comment about it.
We have multiple pressing stories to get to.
Stories that include a midnight coup taking place in the U.S. Senate.
Something I've been trying to point out on X for the last few days because it's happening.
The establishment wing of the Republican Party, what's left of it, The RINOs are trying to make an end run around President Trump's mandate.
This is a super important story that will have ramifications for the next two to four years.
Also, we have Tucker Carlson weighing in, RFK Jr., hopefully getting word to the President, or at least his inner circle, And it's not stopping at the Senate, people.
Establishment Washington are up in arms over Trump's sweeping victory.
You can see it now.
It's clear as day.
They are coming for his transition team, trying to worm their way in to Trump's good graces.
We have the details and more stories from around the country.
But before we get started, thank you for liking and sharing these videos.
It really helps out the channel.
And consider subscribing so you don't miss these regular updates.
So what the hell is happening in the U.S. Senate?
An institution that the American people just re-elected Republicans to gave the Republican Party a significant majority because of Donald Trump.
Because we are sick of the establishment class, the pro-war caucus lining their own pockets instead of doing what's best for America.
Well, they're at it again.
Last night, Mitch McConnell announced a surprise snap vote for Senate Majority Leader.
Who will be the new Senate majority leader?
And he put up three choices, all of which are bad, two of which are absolutely terrible.
And for the record, Mitch McConnell despises Donald Trump.
He was the chief proponent in the Senate, working in the background to curtail Trump during his first term.
In the last few weeks, It was Mitch McConnell who stopped him from pardoning Julian Assange and Edward Snowden.
Mitch McConnell, along with Mike Pompeo and others, who stopped that from happening.
At the time, Trump was going through his second impeachment inquiry.
Mitch McConnell reportedly told Donald Trump, if you pardon either of them, I can promise you won't be acquitted in the Senate.
Now, he did this two times to Trump.
Twice Trump wanted to pardon Assange and Edward Snowden, and both times Mitch McConnell and Mike Pompeo worked to undermine that effort.
Watch.
So in last night's show, and on previous shows, we've told you about the cases of two men, Julian Assange and John Karakou.
Julian Assange is a kind of international journalist.
John Karakou is a former CIA officer.
We should be totally blunt and tell you we're not sure we share the politics of either man.
But both of their cases tell you something really important about what's going on in this country, about what matters, and about what the people in charge Would like to prevent you from doing.
Julian Assange and John Karakou both went to jail for telling the truth.
Neither one stole classified documents from the US government.
Neither one of them hacked into anything.
In both cases, those men went to prison.
And in both cases tonight, as one of his final acts as president, Donald Trump has the opportunity To make that right.
To pardon both of them.
We told you that last night.
We told you it before.
We're hearing tonight that neither man, particularly Julian Assange, we don't know if this is true, is likely to get a pardon.
Why?
Well, apparently, because Republicans in the Senate, and by Republicans in the Senate, we mean Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the leader of Republicans in the Senate, has sent word over to the White House, if you pardon Julian Assange, we are much more likely to convict you in an impeachment trial.
Now, is it legal to hold that over a president's head?
We're not lawyers.
We don't know.
It's certainly wrong.
But more than that, it tells you everything about their priorities.
Now, I first learned about this snap election yesterday from Senator Mike Lee, who, by the way, Mike Lee, he's a great U.S. senator, great Republican senator.
He posted this survey on X. Who would you like to see as the next Senate Republican leader?
Right now, Mitch McConnell is securing votes as we speak for John Thune, which would be a terrible setback, a massive setback to Trump.
John Thune is Mitch McConnell's number two.
He's basically mini Mitch McConnell.
He hates Trump.
Is President-elect Trump involved and does he have a chosen preference in the Senate?
Do you know, Senator?
And will that come into play?
I don't Well, I don't know that he does.
I stay in regular contact with him and with his team.
And, you know, obviously, if he wants to, he could exert a considerable amount of influence on that.
But honestly, I think my preference would be, and I think it's probably in his best interest, to stay out of that.
These Senate secret ballot elections are probably best left to senators, and he's got to work with all of us when it's all said and done.
He is the opposite of MAGA, supports the Ukraine war full stop.
John Cornyn, the second option, just as bad.
He was one of the chief proponents of the Democrats' border bill that Kamala Harris wouldn't stop talking about on the campaign trail.
He not only endorsed it, he helped write it.
Rick Scott, the third option, is the only one out of these three choices who actually liked Donald Trump.
Now, good news.
We have some good news.
Last night, thank the Lord, Tucker Carlson got involved writing this on X. What the hell is going on in the U.S. Senate?
Hours after Trump wins the most conclusive mandate in 40 years, McConnell engineers a coup against his agenda by calling early leadership elections in the Senate.
Two of the three candidates hate Trump.
And what he ran on.
One of them, John Cornyn, is an angry liberal whose politics are indistinguishable from Liz Cheney's.
The election is Wednesday.
It's by secret ballot and it will determine whether or not the new administration succeeds.
Rick Scott of Florida is the only candidate who agrees with Donald Trump.
Call your senator and demand a public endorsement of Rick Scott.
Don't let McConnell get away with this again.
rfk jr piping in as well writing this without rick scott the entire trump reform agenda begins to get wobbly isn't it amazing how mcconnell's making this a secret ballot so you can't see what your senator or who your senator's voting for it's unbelievable now i feel much better now that tucker said something you know it's going to at least reach the president's inner circle After Tucker posted this,
you saw Don Jr., a ton of other senators pick up on the fact that Rick Scott is the popular candidate.
Basically, pick Rick Scott is going viral right now.
Let's hope the Senate Republicans listen.
Jerry, I want your assessment.
McConnell is such a skillful Well, I always say Donald Trump always looks like he's going to lose just before he wins.
Now, the point here is, right at the moment, this election is just symptomatic of the more deep problem, which is the deeper problem, that GOP does not support Donald Trump.
GOP is Democrat-lite.
They're not Democrat-lite because they believe in the gender-critical race theory or because they're communists.
They're gender-lite because the Democrats will permit them to make a lot of money under the table.
And they also engage in sex and drug parties and all the other ways that they're blackmailed.
And Mitch McConnell's had Elaine Chao, and he's had millions of dollars going over to China, and he's been treated like a king there, and he's not going to do anything against communist China.
Half of these GOP are either criminals or traitors.
Take your pick.
Now, the point is, Donald Trump is in...
This is a war.
We won the election because we stopped the algorithms.
Okay, now the next part of it is going to be beating the deep state.
And they're going to try to kill him.
They can't kill him.
They're going to try to do something to make sure he can't get anything done and cause nothing but resistance like we saw in 2020 and the run-up to the 2020 election, where they tried anti-faz and they tried George, you know, whatever, you know, the whole Black Lives Matter, and they did everything they could to create disruption, chaos, and confusion.
They're good at it.
And then they had two impeachment trials against Donald Trump.
Donald Trump has had all these criminal trials against him.
He's had two assassination attempts.
So if anyone has any doubt that the deep state or the GOP loves Donald Trump, this is not news.
This is predicted.
Now, what's Donald Trump going to do about it?
Well, he's got several alternatives.
He's still going to be president.
He's still going to have the ability to write executive orders.
He can go to war with Congress.
He can expose these people.
He can begin exposing Mitch McConnell.
He can begin exposing the whole variety of the Republicans in Congress.
Donald Trump has got the ear of the American people.
The American people are going to be sick and tired of this nonsense.
And I think the Democrats have overplayed their hand already.
Why the woke didn't go anywhere when you had an honest vote.
Donald Trump had a landslide.
Well, Donald Trump would have a landslide against Mitch McConnell and the others.
And if they don't understand that, if they think they can play some legislative maneuver and put in an anti-Trumper as Senate majority leader and get away with it, the fundamental point is the American people are still sovereign.
And you can't rule a people who don't go along with what you're doing.
It's been a magnificent interview.
I'm so glad to have you here.
Congratulations on your dazzling work on the algorithms.
Everyone out there, Revolution Rail, contact your senator.
Tell them to support Rick Scott.
We must win this election.
I encourage you.
Export Selection