All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 17, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:41
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (16 Sept 2024) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
News Incorporated.
And this is September the 16th, 2024, halfway through the school, the start of school month, and getting serious time here in the closing quarters before the election, 50 days away.
And we have got a great show here on Truth vs. News, and we're greeting the very best people in the world here.
And it's Jim Fetcher, of course, who's a great professor, and he's written books like Can't believe, you know, that we have, uh, look, uh, nobody's out of sanity hooked and didn't go to the moon or JFK.
But that, I, and the other things are just outstanding.
These are classics that you really got to have it to know what's really happening in history.
And I will say we have another person who is also quite an author here.
And here's Scott Bennett.
He's written this book along with 24 other McCarthy's people, and he's also written this magnificent book here, Policy Analysis About Pushing Russia, and this is really a heavy book.
It's got lots of stuff in there.
I would say this book here is one that everybody can have for every high school kid to read this book.
What are two pages at a time and pass a test to graduate high school?
I would say this is a mandatory book for American citizens.
And then we also have besides more books like this one in there, like this book from Scott Boyd, I think it's not bad, and another one here.
These are all Outstanding things from Scott's Library.
I'll try to get you a link to get to Scott's information.
And if I sound a little hoarse today, we have Brian Davidson out of Houston.
He's an all-star private investigator who really gets and digs deep into what stories we're telling.
And today we've got some stories Well, thank you, Don.
We got major developments in relation to Ukraine.
and Russia in the wars and assassinations and things.
Listen close friends, it's true this way.
Go for it, Jim. - Well, thank you, Don.
We got major developments in relation to Ukraine.
Following Putin's warning that any attacks on Russia with Westerns-applied missiles making deep strikes into Russia would be treated as an act of war, NATO has reversed course.
Well, that didn't take long.
Two days ago, leaks of British media indicated the UK was going to approve the request to roll storm shadow missiles further into Russia.
Congressman McCaul had been known Biden was going to jump in and approve it too.
That was then.
Today, following Putin warning that any such strike would be viewed as an attack on Russia by NATO and result in retaliation.
As a declaration of war, the press was informed the U.S.
and U.K.
are not going to give Zelensky what he wants.
Looks like some degree of sanity has returned to NATO decision-makers.
Before we deal with the threat of nuclear war, counter-current, I was posted my interview with Matt Hull.
If you watch Judge Dermot Daniel Davis, you already know more about him.
Meanwhile, what Putin did was to have three Russian nuclear subs surround the UK.
On September 12, 2024, at least three subs, known as Project 885, yes, in class, of the Russian Northern Fleet, armed with Zircon hypersonic missiles, left their home base at Sarovorsk and headed toward the Atlantic.
The map below shows the location of the Severoborsk submarine base.
It was that same day British Prime Minister Keir Starmer departed the UK for a meeting with Biden to discuss grain permission to attack Russia with long-range missiles.
According to the authoritative military expert in HALE, Kotelnik, The subs left their own part headed to the Atlantic for a specific reason.
Considering that this happened the very moment the West began to declare it would allow Ukraine to use these Western's applied long-range weapons.
Kodmok expressed confidence the nukes are already off the coast of Britain waiting for the order to strike.
According to him, if, if, if British storm shadow missiles fly toward Russia, these subs will destroy the facilities of the British division of the Pan-European Missile System Company, MBDA.
Specifically, the company facilities in Severance, Bristol, and Bolton, UK, will be taken out.
Meanwhile, Russia says it can combine with China.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Russian partnership with China not aimed at any third country, but they could combine to respond to threats from the U.S.
I'd like to remind you Moscow and Beijing will respond to double containment by double counteraction.
When asked about U.S.
plans to deploy a Typhoon missile system to Japan and Vermont, the Typhoon is a new missile system developed by the U.S.
that would have been banned under the INF Treaty, which Trump tore up in 2019, which prohibited land-based missiles with a range between 310 and 3,400 miles.
The Taifun can file nuclear-capable Tomahawk missiles with a range of over 1,000.
The U.S.
recently deployed a Taifun system to the Philippines, planning on sending it to Germany by 2026, which Russia views as a major threat.
It's clear Russia and China will both react to the emergence of additional and significant missile threats.
And note this, the reaction will be far from being political, which has also been repeatedly confirmed by the two countries.
Our comments come amid large-scale Russian naval drills.
Russian military said involve over 90,000 personnel, 400 warships and subs, and 120 aircraft.
China is participating with three ships and 15 planes.
Russia and China have increased their military cooperation in response to the pressure they have been facing from the U.S.
and its allies.
Our relations are not directed against third countries.
Double counteraction does not contradict this.
It is a defensive position, not an initiative to target other countries.
But if an aggressive policy of attack is being implemented against us from one center, why not combine our potential and give an appropriate rebuff?
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, this is seen as a game changer by Russia, and I can't fathom the childlike idiocy that occupies the White House or members of Congress to think that they can do something like this without a response, that Russia has the capability to overwhelmingly respond in a way that the U.S.
can't react to.
So the U.S.
may fire a missile at Russia, but Russia will then fire its, not nuclear, but hypersonic missiles at the factories in London and possibly Germany and elsewhere that the U.S.
can't respond to.
No one can respond to the hypersonic missiles.
So they will end up, by punching Russia in the nose, Russia will respond by breaking, you know, NATO's jaw and giving a concussion and knocking it out cold.
And it may get even a little more dicier.
It could very well use nuclear weapons.
I don't think it will, though, because Russia is playing the diplomatic game as well.
It needs to win the hearts and minds and keep the hearts and minds of the majority of the world while the West and NATO wants a war to justify its own political stranglehold on power.
All of this I perceive as a ploy by the globalist, Democrat, whatever you want to call them, lunatics in power, trying to stay in power, using a war to trigger that.
They have to create a war to create the psychotic fight-or-flight conditions in people in the United States and the West.
to marshal them, to control them, to curfew them and all sorts of other things.
So they're trying to provoke Russia to react so that they can in turn solidify their power in the West.
And I think they're going to attack Russia at the BRICS conference when Russia goes and organizes its countries so that their strategy is to try and provoke Russia into such a serious reaction that the BRICS nations abandon Russia or put things on hold.
So they will most likely strike.
And they've already attacked Murmansk, and that was done by Finland or Sweden.
It was not done by a Ukrainian drone flying 1,000 miles, 10 hours, up across heavily defended Russian regions.
That came from Finland or Sweden or was waterborne.
So I think this is an escalation, and politically and diplomatically, it's unifying the rest of the world as the West becomes more psychotic and maniacal.
The alternative, China, Russia, Iran, the BRICS nations, they're becoming much cooler and much more girded in their maturity and in their response.
So I think that's an interesting phenomenon too.
Jim?
Yeah, excellent.
I think Russia can respond with sophisticated non-nuclear weapons so they're not accused of initiating a nuclear exchange.
Brian, your thoughts?
In 1959, Lord Montgomery wrote his rules for war and rule number one was do not ever march on Moscow.
That was in 1959, the beginning of the Cold War.
Whoever is president next and whoever is president now ...are going to try to start this war before February 5th, 2026.
That's because that is the day when the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, also called New START, which is the last remaining nuclear accord between the US and Russia, which limits the size of their arsenals, expires.
Okay?
So...
The treaty, which was signed in 2010, limits each side to a maximum of 1,550 deployed strategic nuclear warheads, along with 700 delivery systems, and it has a number of other provisions that are built into it.
that are built into it.
But Putin may abandon that, or we may abandon that prior to that, but basically it's going to start a new nuclear arms race that's going to be a little bit different than anything it was before, right?
Right now, Ukraine, in my opinion, the entire conflict, what's at the heart of it, has nothing to do with
Russia being worried about Ukraine encroaching on its borders, and it has more to do about the West and Western allied countries setting up and maintaining a massive money laundering operation prior to the collapse of United States in economic interests, which I think that the powers that be know are coming.
And so the West continues to poke and prod at Russia to allow this Ukraine War to continue to drag its way out.
And of course, they're willing to sacrifice many, many soldiers and many, many lives to do it.
But at the end of the day, this is fundamentally about cleaning all that money that comes from the U.S.A.
and other nations and funneling that to military industrial complex vendors that are friends of the machine.
And I think that's why the United States and Blinken and Nuland basically avoid the idea of peace talks because they have a motive to continue to build this potential war.
And I think that that February 5th, 2026, whether it's Trump in office or whether it's Harris or whoever's in office, that's going to be a day When the money may begin to run out under the National Defense Authorization Act to limit the Senate Armed Services Committee to limit their spending.
And that's, of course, if we don't have an economic crisis between here and there, which, of course, right now we're putting on a trillion dollars of debt every hundred days.
I think that's why they're trying to jam this through.
That's basically like a year, 500 days from now, or just a little over a year, or a little bit longer than a year before that new start treaty comes into place and begins to limit the amount of munitions that can be in place.
Wonderful.
Very, very astute observations.
Meanwhile, Here's the situation we're in.
Ukraine ordered by U.S.
neocons to provoke World War III before the election.
We have a major problem with Ukraine not defending their territory or fake democracy.
Ukraine has invaded Russia and last night, Zelensky launched scores of attack drones, even targeting Moscow.
If China invaded the U.S.
and landed in California, was 500 miles into the state and launching missiles at Washington, D.C., would we do nothing?
Now, this attack was coincident with a debate Putin's the only adult among world leaders who fully understands the ramification of what NATO and the neocons are doing.
Trying to provoke a response where Putin attacks anything in NATO, then they can pretend he's the aggressor and launch World War III.
This was staged at this time to influence a debate which was then being held that night by ABC and neocon Malapiece.
Trump and RFK are anti-war.
We may see Kamala or ABC as questions of resurrect Trump as a Putin puppet, because he's against World War III, as is RFK.
I'd say Putin deftly defanged the issue by endorsing Kamala and even complimenting her fascinating laugh.
Can you imagine China invading Washington or California and Washington doing nothing?
There'll be a call to impeach a president immediately.
That's my concern.
Despite all the propaganda by the West, choreographed by the neocons, many quoting as their source, the Institute for the Study of War, which the neocon Victoria Luland's sister-in-law runs, Putin is not a warmonger.
If he were to be overthrown, trust me, it'll be by someone far less restrained.
Today, neocons are following the same playbook used by FDR.
Congress went on to issue a declaration of war to enter World War II in Europe.
FDR did whatever he could to force the Japanese to attack us, which was a justification for a World War II.
We are following the same playbook.
Because it came out the U.S.
had already broken the Japanese code, we knew about the coming attack.
There was a Senate investigation into this manipulation of Congress, even a leak to the press that the Japanese might attack Pearl Harbor on November 30th.
Prior to the attack that took place on December 7, 1941.
I fear that unless Putin uses a tactical nuke inside Russia to eradicate the invading Ukrainian force, we may see a coup where he is overthrown.
The only way to wake up the West is to demonstrate he will use a nuke for NATO and the American neocons say he is bluffing.
That's the only way to get the West to question our leaders, which he has now done by sending those sobs to surround the United Kingdom.
The neocons in NATO say Russia is weak to support the idea that Ukraine has invaded Russia, and they are weak so that NATO can take Russia in just three days.
Absurdity of absurdities.
This is why Adam Kissinger and Cheney's daughter are pushing Republicans for Kamala because she is a stooge of the neocons, just like Biden.
These people cannot sleep at night if there were world peace.
They are warmongers.
It's like I punch you in the face and call it self-defense because I know you want to hit me first.
Russian version of neocons would respond if they overthrew Putin, because they also want World War III.
Every country has its left and its right.
The same true in China.
If these neocons seize power worldwide and all three superpowers, we're in for a very bad time, because the nukes will be flying.
Slonsky is an actor.
He's destroyed Ukraine.
Boese would get trillions to rebuild Ukraine and line his pockets, of course.
Our computer warns Ukraine would not exist as a nation after 2027.
He hates Russians, wanted to destroy the country completely.
The minister in Estonia has come out and had the audacity to say Russia is too big and should be carved up, and the West will rape the assets of Russia, which was a goal of Napoleon and Hitler, which today's neocons have adopted as their own.
JFK observes so wisely.
Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind.
Scott.
Amen.
Well, you know, the tragedy and the stupidity of this is all of this warmongering has come out of people over the age of 55.
I would say, you know, the assassin of President Trump, 58.
He's a lunatic leftist with split hair and split personality, of course.
We'll get into that later.
But every single one of them are over the age of 60, if you will.
And it's this ridiculous Cold War mentality.
No one under the age of 50 has this venom, this animus.
We grew up in the 80s knowing the Cold War, knowing the Soviet Union, knowing Reagan, knowing the infrared October, knowing all of the Red Dawn, knowing all of that stuff, and it all came to an absolute end.
Crashing end.
Game over.
The lights went out.
On 1990, when the Berlin Wall fell, and Russia instantly began to decompartmentalize and disintegrate and come apart, not in a chaotic way, but in a willing way to willingly unite with the West, unite with NATO, unite with the United States, with great optimism and hope.
I remember those days.
And that was met with a response, no, no, no, we're not going to marry Russia, we're going to rape and cannibalize Russia, like that story from the Bible where the concubine was raped and chopped up.
They didn't work the way they thought.
They did a lot of damage to Russia.
They killed a lot of people.
They depleted the currency.
That book that Don held up, The 30 Years War Against Russia, that is a very exhaustive policy analysis of everything that occurred in the 1990s until 2001-2002.
Vladimir Putin in Russia, he came into Russia, you know, he was in Russia, he's in the intelligence circles for a long time, came in and saved the country.
And he is the most remarkable statesman on the planet stage, I would say.
No one matches Putin.
Medvedev is a wild card and more of a war horse, but Putin is a restrained lawyer.
The West is lucky to have him in a position of moderate reflection and patience, because if they didn't, if they had Medved or someone else, they would be getting their asses kicked months ago.
They would be having every American embassy in Kiev blown up.
They would have every British embassy blown up.
Every person coming into Kiev, into Ukraine, from France, Germany, Britain, America, killed.
They would be hunted down.
They would be brought in as war criminals.
Russia would take the gloves off.
That's not happened.
And it may happen.
So, this acceleration and pushing for war is coming from a certain generation that I think is stupid, vaccinated, and really, really not in sign with the times.
And, you know, Trump, I hope and pray, really taps into what the generation of young people under the age of 51.
They don't want war.
They don't want a conflict with Russia.
I've grown up with the 9-11 wars, and I've seen the fruit of that is nothing but death and destruction and the hatred of America.
They don't want to continue reading that book.
They want to turn the page.
They want to throw it in the bonfire and say, look, let's change the page.
But no one is really militantly saying that other than Doug McGregor and Scott Ritter and Larry Johnson and our circles.
So I think this is an ideological moment of when the country in the United States really has to have radically peaceful, intelligent, articulate orators, rhetoric speaking people to come up and say, all of you should be ashamed.
And Kinzinger, you have no idea what you're messing with.
If you think you can set off nuclear weapons and take over Russia in three days, You are a liar or a fool.
And I suspect he's a liar because he wants, as his Jewish, Zionist, Talmudic masters and instinct controllers want, they want Russia and the United States to be destroyed and depleted so that the Israelis can come in and do all sorts of masterful operations.
It's just a perfect storm that I think is going to result ultimately with Europe falling away, peeling away from the United States, retracting back to Russia.
That's why Putin is playing it very low-key.
Uh, and I, I think the BRICS, uh, you know, if they got better public relations, they'd be a lot more successful in, in attracting people to the BRICS organization and, and their whole, uh, workshop and, and their whole, you know, ideology, but they've been.
They've been playing it very low.
But I think this animosity, ideologically driven, you really need people up on Capitol Hill who are expelling this neocon war rhetoric.
And Dick Cheney turning to Kamala Harris is, you know, the leopard doesn't change his spots.
He is the devil incarnate.
Jim?
Yeah, well, BRICS may be low-key, but so many nations are joining BRICS.
I mean, they're winning the battle.
Brian?
I'm going to try to answer the question as to why, what to look for to understand what's coming.
I think in the SVR, that's the Foreign Intelligence Service in Russia, is the SVR.
And they came out this week and made a few press statements that were advertised in some places on RT, but basically saying that Kiev was planning a massive false flag attack on a children's school, either a children's hospital or a kindergarten.
And they were going to basically plant a Russian missile in there, explode it and, you know, blame it on on Russia inside Ukraine.
The SVR came out earlier and said the same thing that they had started advertising for that type of attack on July 8th when they accused Russia of targeting those facilities.
And Russia came out and said, what are you talking about?
We're not targeting children's hospitals.
It's ridiculous.
But the SVR has concluded that they've got this plot afoot to Basically, allow the world to continue applying pressure to Iran and North Korea to stop arming or allowing their arms to be sold to Russia.
The Kremlin spokesman, his name is Dmitry Peskov, came out and he said that they were going to use Western media forces and and this deception techniques to start this war with images of bloody Ukrainian children.
that have been put in harm's way by Russia and then they're going to use that to inflame the rest of the world, which I would say is perfectly indicative of how Mossad and the CIA currently conduct their operations using false flags.
Now that said, it's becoming more and more important than ever that the false flag whistleblowers like ourselves and other sites and other Other informers from the truth community keep their eyes peeled for this to take place.
And this is very important because a lot of the world right now is waking up to the concept of a false flag.
Ever since I believe, I believe Las Vegas was the first one where they really dramatically overplayed their hand and underplayed the, uh, the, the exception for us.
And of course that was October of 2017 under Donald Trump.
Um, and he even went to Las Vegas, I believe, to show support after the shooting, which was basically just an audio file that was played over the loudspeaker system.
I don't have to go into all the Las Vegas false flag stuff, but my point is, right now, at this point in time, We ought to be watching out for this and blowing the whistle so that when it takes place, we can gather all the earliest and most reliable evidence, get it documented, and get it properly covered, because that's the type of thing that could really result in massive casualties.
Good points, good points.
Yeah, yeah, Trump winning.
Persons who allegedly had been shot popped right out of bed as though they were saluting him.
It was ludicrous.
Doctors galore were reporting these weren't real victims of a real shooting.
Meanwhile, this was the key development.
Russia formally notifies the U.N.
if the U.S.
and U.K.
approve Western weapons strikes deep into Russia, a state of war will exist.
September 13.
Russian leadership has issued a follow-up to Putin's brief video address warning if the U.S.
and U.K.
authorize long-range strikes on Russian soil, the NATO and the Russian Federation will be in an official, formal state of war.
On Friday, Russia's ambassador to the U.N., Vasily Nemezia, informed the U.N.
Security Council NATO countries would start an open war by allowing Western long-range missiles to target Russia.
If such a decision is made, that means NATO is starting an open war against Russia.
In that case, we will obviously be forced to make certain decisions, with all the attendant consequences for Western aggressors.
Russian leadership issued the follow-up.
Friday, he informed, just as I reported here, Defense Minister Don Juan publicly announced today China will militarily support Russia if NATO attacks Russia.
Earlier this week, Putin made clear in a TV interview that if the U.S.
and NATO allow Ukraine to hit the Russian interior with long-range missiles, that would be direct involvement by the U.S.
and European countries and NATO in a war with Russia.
He went on to point out, modern precision weapons from the collective West requires satellites to hit targets, and Ukraine does not have any.
As such, Ukraine would be able to use U.S., would have to be able to use U.S.E.U.
NATO satellites, which is direct involvement in the conflict.
More importantly, modern precision weapons of the collective West cannot be programmed by Ukrainian troops because they don't know how to do it.
Because of the complexity, such target programming would have to be done by actual NATO troops.
Again, direct involvement by NATO in the conflict.
China and Russia?
This is a serious development.
Will the death cult escalate into a full-blown hot war before the election?
They are desperate and running out of options.
Anything possible?
Hal Turner gets these reports.
I don't know how he does it.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I think the revelations of Hal Turner are pretty stark.
I mean, it's pretty remarkable that you see all of these maneuvers and the use of military vehicles, you know, submarines and others.
There's things that we don't even see and know, of course, they're preparing I think for an escalation through winter and a allowing of winter to step in and finish the job, winter is the ally of Russia, it's the enemy of everyone else, and Ukraine is essentially lost.
You're seeing Zelensky going on American media again, beating the dead horse of a geopolitical information warfare strategy of Trying to affect the Russian population with so much pain and suffering and fear that they turn against Vladimir Putin.
That's not the way Russians work.
Russians have a tribalism to them.
They know war better than anyone else.
It's in their culture.
It's in their DNA.
And when war comes to them, Uh, they unite like, uh, you know, a bunch of Indians uniting against Custer.
And, uh, they put everything aside.
And, uh, you saw that in, you know, World War II to an extent.
They may have hated Hitler, Stalin, but they hated Hitler more.
So...
Any concept that Russia is going to shake apart is grotesquely naive.
The only organizations, people, and countries that are going to shake apart are going to be the West.
And this will ultimately, sadly, crumble the US.
This will destroy the dollar.
This will crumble the US petrodollar because every country is going to increasingly divorce themselves from the United States.
There's nothing compelling any country to have any kind of a relationship with America.
If it's behavior and it's moral direction is moral insanity, violence and aggression and enslavement.
And the Palestinian genocide is a confirmation of the moral emptiness.
And the war against Russia is, you know, the strategic imbecility and violence.
So all of the world is watching this.
And if they pull away from the dollar and it crashes, there's nothing left in America to tie them to America.
It's not our songs they like.
It's not our videos or movies they like.
It's not our debauchery.
It's not our cultural brokenness.
It's not our transgender homosexuality, gay flags, all of the other perversions of wokeism that we try and advance.
And which you can see again in that Trump assassin glorifying everything.
We have become a toxically sick and irredeemable country to a certain degree that really has to have an internal combustion to burn it out of us.
And I think the world is going to give us that space and time to do that.
And we'll see what happens, but I think only a civil war and a revolution inside America is going to burn out this toxic madness that is seeking to continually wage war against every other nation.
Jim?
And the fuse may be lit in Springfield, Ohio.
Brian, your thoughts?
Oh, remember the old Superman catchphrase, truth, justice, and the American way?
A little bit outdated.
At this particular point in time, the Iranian ambassador came out to Russia, came out and started talking this week about the psychological war that the Americans are trying to play.
They basically accused America of having three methods of fighting the war.
Number one was straight defamation.
Number two was Accusation.
They're always trying to accuse the media countries, organizers, and groups that don't work inside Washington's interests to accuse them of something and sort of break their dignity.
And then the third way is the sanctions that the Americans always place on other countries to make it look like they're legitimate American interests that are taking place, but really they're doing this.
Russia has proved incredibly Capable of withstanding the propaganda attacks, which is very interesting to me, because even prior to this show off air, we were talking about RT in particular, and Scott said, well, you know, they're a reliable media source.
And while I give RT a lot of credit, the one thing I haven't seen RT do is bust a false flag.
Now, why is that?
Is it because Russia uses the same techniques to a large extent that the rest of the world has begun to understand and use, which is deception is an interesting path to victory?
But let me tell you something.
Deception is a path to short-term battles, but it is not a path to long-term winning the war, because the problem is Truth continues to be that foundation and remain on that rock.
And just because you can censor internet campaigns and shut things down, they've shown themselves incapable of shutting down all the truth-tellers that are now beginning to be growing from the seeds of distrust that started to be sown back in 2016 when Trump started throwing, you know, hey, the mainstream media fake news mantra out there.
RT doesn't necessarily tell the truth.
They tell more truth than any Western American institution, including Fox News and all the others, but they don't tell the truth all the time.
And so that leaves me stuck with the question, if Russia is saying that Ukraine is going to start the war with propaganda, psychological methods, Accusations, imposing sanctions, and false flags.
Then why is RT not going or not Breaking these things out for people.
Why are they limiting what they're willing to write in their stories and not exposing this?
See, I thought when Trump came into office back in 2016, me being the young, naive, new sort of truther that was just developing at the time, I thought, oh, Donald Trump's going to get the office now that he's wrestled it away from Hillary Clinton.
He's going to expose all these methods.
That never happened, folks.
That never happened.
All he did was sort of begin to create a current of don't trust the media.
But he didn't come out with any facts.
He didn't have any releases.
Nothing happened in the realm that we exist in, which is trying to bust out these false flags.
At the end, what I'm saying here is that the United States is going to lose the battles.
They might win the battles with their money and with their power and with the great flex that we put by applying pressure to other nations, but we will lose the war against the truth tellers in the long run.
Now, who are they?
Where are they?
You know, your guess is as good as mine when it comes to how are they originating out of Russia or Germany or Europe or Africa.
I can tell you this though, there's a lot of truth tellers that have been developed over the past eight years that wouldn't, that would not have ever come out and started telling the truth if they hadn't seen the absolute garbage that they've seen in the last eight years.
Very, very thoughtful.
And that's why they're doing the shutdown of RT now though, too.
Which we can get into later, Jim.
Right, it's the defamation game.
It's the RT's bad RT.
Look, now we have a Ukrainian activist who's going to try to assassinate Trump.
And what is he really... Oh, RT's bad.
RT bad because he's a big Ukraine supporter.
Something stinks about that entire setup.
We're coming to it, Brian.
Save your thoughts.
Meanwhile, RAND successfully launches a domestically built Chamran-1 research satellite into orbit.
QEM-100 is a three-stage SLV with solid fuel developed by the Aerospace Force of Iran's Quds Corps.
Amazing.
Several hours into the launch, the Iranian research satellite sent its first signals back.
The satellite was designed and manufactured by Iranian technicians in the Space Division of the Iranian Electronic Industry, a state-owned subsidiary of the Ministry of Defense, in conjunction with experts at the Aerospace Research Institute and private knowledge-based firms.
Weighing approximately 60 kilograms, the primary mission is to test hardware and software systems for orbital maneuver technology validation.
It has a secondary task, including assessing the performance of cold gas repulsion subsystems in space and performance evaluation of navigation and altitude control subsystems.
Despite sanctions imposed by the West, Iran has taken giant steps in its civilian space program.
The country is among the world's top 10 capable of developing and launching satellites.
Earlier this year, Iran successfully sent the homegrown Mod Research Satellite, along with two research cargos, to space on board the domestically developed Simorgh Phoenix satellite launch vehicle.
MEDA weighs 32 kilos, and its primary task is to test the satellite-related subsystem, verify the function of Simorgh SLV and dispensing space cargoes, and evaluate the performance of new designs and the reliability of indigenous technologies.
Earlier, the Aerospace Force successfully put the Sorya satellite into orbit 750 kilometers above Earth in 11 minutes.
The research satellite, manufactured by the ISA, was launched with a QAM-100 space launch vehicle.
Meanwhile, at what point are we permitted to five questions plus a six?
At what point does it become irresponsible not to compare Israel's slaughter of the Palestinian people with a genocide Westerners know best, the Nazi Holocaust?
At what point does shielding Israel from the revulsion its actions naturally inspire not turn into complicity?
At what point should Western public be offered proper historical context to make sense of Israel's genocide?
One that lets him understand how the Zionist movement was ideologically shaped by his exposure to ugly century-old European ethnic nationalisms that culminated in Nazism, and how the Zionists chose to mirror those supremacist ideologies rather than reject them.
At what point?
Are we allowed to say that Israel cannot continue to exist in its current form as a racist, settler, colonial state masquerading as the state of the Jews and that it must be remade as apartheid South Africa once was?
And at what point are we permitted to prize Palestinian life over the sensitivities of Zionist persimmonists?
Is the answer never?
Scott?
Well, I think, you know, the Iranians and the Russians and the Chinese have a unique community and relationship and that's going to be increasingly solidified as the West goes into its tantrums and its delusional, you know, narcissistic policies.
I cannot understand why they think the rest of the world likes them, or wants to listen to them, or even needs to listen to them.
China, Russia, and Iran represent the, you know, power block of the heartland, as Mack Einder would say.
They represent the strongest military alliance in history, because there is no NATO.
There is no NATO anymore.
You already see it coming apart.
You saw that when Putin said, in an answer, when they started barking about sending missiles to Ukraine, long-range missiles, Putin stepped in and said, any of these missiles that hit Russia, we will respond and it will be defined as a war of NATO against Russia.
Now, when these European countries, France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Poland, they all heard that, they instantly saw the dog snarl its teeth, and they knew Russia will bite.
Russia doesn't bluff.
So, they make a lot of noise and then flatulence, and again, I think it's meant for domestic consumption.
But when Russia said in no uncertain terms, long-range missiles striking Russia, the moment we even get a whiff of that is the moment we go to war.
And that means they'll take out everything they need to in Europe, in NATO, with hypersonic missiles, with submarines, They won't go necessarily nuclear, but the other report was they would set off nuclear explosions in the sea to demonstrate their deadly seriousness.
The next one will be over your city.
So I think NATO is coming apart because they realize this is a game.
They don't have the cards and they don't have the money to win.
And with their own domestic disturbances.
That's the other thing.
All of these Muslims, all of these Muslims in Europe are not going to fight Russia.
All of these Hispanics and these third-worlders who can't spell cat coming up into the United States, they're not going to go and fight Russia.
They may take a uniform and take a gun, but they're not going to go overseas.
They're going to take over their local towns and do what they're doing in Colorado.
So this strategy, thinking, well, we'll just get every Muslim in Europe and every Mexican and Central American in the United States, we've brought up, put a uniform on them and send them as proxies like the Roman Empire did.
We'll cannibalize Russia that way.
No, it's not going to work.
No one is going to fight Russia.
No one is going to fight Russia.
Because to fight Russia means to die.
Look at Ukraine.
800,000 men gone.
Boris Johnson should be grabbed, and I'll tell you that if there's one redeeming thing that would be worth seeing, you know, a new president, someone rising up to replace Putin, you know, God forbid he dies or something.
But would be someone with such an ass-kicking personality that they go after and they grab Boris Johnson by the scruff of his hair and drag him in and hang him by the neck.
And they grab Macron.
And they grab Shultz.
And they grab Biden.
And they grab Kamala Harris.
And they grab Lindsey Graham.
And next thing you know, they're gone from Washington and they show up at a Russian court and they're getting executed.
I don't think there would be a tear shed from anyone in the Western countries if these parasites were removed from the body politic of the West.
Jim?
Oh, I couldn't agree more.
Brian?
Well, I want to continue a little bit about, you know, why Iran is such an important factor in all of this.
If you recall, it was what, six, eight weeks ago when Iran lost its president?
I believe it was in an airplane crash.
And so, a new guy has been installed now, and he's been in office for about six weeks.
He's generally a conservative.
He's followed the Supreme Leader's plans.
You would think if that assassination attempt was CIA run or Mossad run that they would have installed somebody that was sympathetic to Western values and that doesn't seem to be the case.
Of course, Iran is, you know, denying to the world that they're the ones arming Russia But the world is saying that Iran is really doing it.
What's true, what's not, it doesn't really even matter.
That whole portion of the Middle East is such an important part of this game right now because it appears, and Scott's exactly right, nobody's going to go against Russia.
China's not going to go against Russia.
Iran's not going to go against Russia.
And they're emboldening the rest of the world to begin to kick against the Western forces' goads.
That are trying to push around everybody and the problem is the propaganda is not having the same affected influence.
You know, if somebody if somebody is going to hurt my feelings by lying about me, it's probably I'm going to be probably pretty impervious to it because it's not it's not the truth.
But if somebody is going to try to hurt my feelings by telling something that's embarrassing, that's true, then they might be able to hurt my feelings that way.
But a lie is not going to hurt my feelings.
All it's going to do is make me angry and disrespect the person much, much more.
Well, a lot of that's what's going on in Iran right now, as this new leader seems to not ally himself with The Western forces and he seems to be kicking against those Western goads while he pushes and while he seems to be gearing up for, you know, World War Three.
Are they doing that defensively or are they doing that offensively?
You know, Iran has never been the type of nation that's out there picking themselves around in everybody else's business.
They've kept to themselves pretty well on the worldwide front ever since the revolution back in 1979.
They've said, Hey, we'll worry about our business.
You worry about your business.
Then we're going to go ahead and shut down our borders and lock them down.
And we're doing our own thing over here.
Thank you very much.
In the meantime, they've got to run industry, so they manufacture missiles.
Where do those missiles go?
Well, it looks like they're not going to Ukraine.
They're going to Russia.
So, I think that's an important factor to look in as this new president.
He looks like he's gearing up for a war against Western forces.
Excellent commentary, Brian.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, Nothing will slow me down.
Trump reacts after second assassination attempt.
Summary from zero head.
Shots were exchanged between a shooter and secret service at Trump International Gold Club as a former president played.
It was 300 to 500 yards away when the shooting occurred.
The FBI confirmed they were investigating this as an assassination attempt.
Trump said after, nothing will slow me down.
I will never surrender.
The shooter has been detained.
An AK-47 backpack and GoPro camera were recovered near the scene.
The shooter has been identified as Ryan Ruth, whose social media suggests he was a Trump-hating, Ukraine-war-supporting liberal.
Trump was not given complete perimeter protection because he's not a sitting president, despite being hit by an assassin bullet a couple of months ago.
And Barack Obama is being given 24-7 protection, I guarantee you, even though he is a more distant, not sitting president.
Here's from Robert Malone talking about this fellow, what he found by doing a search of the internet.
I'm posting this substack with some of my thoughts, as well as images collected off the web.
My goal with this edition is to open up space for comments.
Everyone has a lot to say, and we'll wish to keep each other informed.
Begin with, remember Biden saying this yesterday?
Statement by Joe Biden on September 14, 2024, yesterday, in relation to the day he wrote this, published this yesterday.
It has to stop.
It's simply wrong.
There's no place in America this has to stop.
What he, Trump, is doing, it has to stop.
And today, there's another assassination attempt on Trump.
Coincidence?
I think not.
Here are images from a couple of D.C.
politicians also calling for action against Trump.
Hakeem Jeffries.
Extreme mega-Republicans are the party of a national abortion ban in Trump Project 2025, which Trump has disavowed.
We must stop them.
Libs of TikTok.
Right now, I feel like Meghan General, they are threats to us domestically.
Represent Jasmine Crockett this morning.
A few hours later, someone tried to kill him.
This news story happened about two hours ago.
In the press conference, officials say Trump did not have Secret Service protection surrounding the golf course because he is not a sitting president.
So Trump only gets limited protection, even after the first attempt.
For Trump to have only limited Secret Service instead of fully protected, that decision had to come from the White House, as DHS Secret Service take direct orders from the President.
So, who is this would-be assassin?
Anthony Jake, Cut His Body, reports.
I was able to see Ryan Wesley's Facebook page before it was taken down.
He was actively recruiting Americans to fight in Ukraine.
His Facebook page explained all the requirements in terms of passports and to which country volunteers would need to fly.
When I tried to go back to take screenshots, his page had already been taken down.
I'm certainly no expert in this, but if that doesn't look like a situation right out of a CIA playbook, I don't know what does.
I will also say, there was nothing I saw on this guy's page that had anything to do with domestic U.S.
politics or Donald Trump.
It was all about getting people to fight in Ukraine, of course, on the side of the Ukrainians.
Here we have more Travis.
Meet Ryan Wesley Ruth, a Democrat from North Carolina, who moved to Maui to work with FEMA building shacks.
He's been to D.C., works with the government, been working with Ukraine to recruit soldiers.
He stands against everything Trump stands for and believes.
Here is his website.
I took screenshots.
If it comes down soon, I can post those also.
His Facebook account has already been removed.
Trump assassination suspect, Russell Wesley.
Facebook page was scrubbed as I was taking screenshots.
Look at the lower right.
You can see it's been taken down.
Meanwhile, Ryan We currently need an Afghan International Force soldier to take perfect English.
Send me your passport, military certificate, and CV in one file by WhatsApp.
Two, do not call me.
Moreover, he's got it in Arabic as well.
Moving on, earlier today I had a DNCGov troll query me in a comment.
How come I was adding to the conspiracy theories by boasting about the shootings?
Why couldn't I just wait until the news stories came out from reputable sources?
I just blocked the troll, as I always do with bots.
But here's the reason why we need to review everything coming out at most what we can find out.
One, Mainstream media cannot be trusted.
It's lost all credibility.
Two.
Mainstream media is biased.
Three.
Mainstream media goes back and edits their news stories in real time.
We need to document different things as they happen.
For example, Kamala labeling it Border Czar has been edited out of news stories from years past, edited out in the last month.
One asked to go to the Wayback Machine to find the evidence, and yes, she was called that by the White House and Mainstream.
This is how sneaky they have become.
Mainstream has already changed the story on the shooting.
They either lied or initially got the reporting wrong.
We have to call them out and question everything.
Trust is broken.
Citizen journalists will save America, not the state-sponsored legacy media.
Tony Saruga posts.
We are very, very early in our data analysis.
An accurate overview is still developing.
But there are a ton of messages between Ryan Routh and this person.
Is this his CIA handler?
Dr. Sue Kim.
Policy, practice, area, lead.
There's much about her that makes it sound to me like she is indeed his CIA handler.
Here's the guy.
Please tell me who you are and why are you here?
I'm 56, from the U.S., from North Carolina, originally.
I still live in Hawaii now, so flew all the way from Hawaii here.
So the question as far as why I'm here?
To me, you know, a lot of the other conflicts are gray, but this conflict is definitely black and white.
This is about good versus evil.
This is a storybook.
You know, any movie we've ever watched, this is definitely evil against good.
I mean, we're battling a situation here where, you know, the Ukrainians and the rest of the world are caring and kind and generous and unselfish and take care of one another.
And it's just a matter of You know, we need to stand up for that.
That is the most important thing in the world is just to show human beings that we're kind and we're caring and that we take care of one another and that the world is united so that we feed each other and make sure that, you know, we all move forward as one collective whole unit.
So, you know, we feel the pain of one country's failure and their conflicts and we enjoy the successes of other countries that are doing good and we all work together and for some reason, Russia does not grasp this concept that we're all one unit and we have to get along and work together and be normal human beings.
This is 2022.
We have to work together.
It seems asinine that we have a leader in a country that does not understand the concept of being unselfish and being generous and being kind and just the basic moral values that are required by human beings these days.
Well, I'd say someone's asinine and deluded, but that would not be Vladimir Putin.
Take us out, Don, and we'll get Scott and Brian's response when we return.
Yeah, oh boy.
This is September the 16th, 2024, and this is one heck of a time to be alive and Witness all kinds of craziness around the world and right here at home.
And so if you want to share this, I appreciate the readers out there and the comments and things.
So share this widely because nobody else will hear the truth and let's say hear it from you through us.
And we love you and we hope to see you real soon.
So come on back the second hour and we'll give it another round of truth.
▲
Export Selection