All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 6, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:11:49
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (5 August 2024) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back, folks.
This is Truth vs. the News, Incorporated.
The News, Incorporated is full of lies and other things and garbage, and that's, I mean, we've just been covering that and how bad it is, but I mean, it's so bad that you can't handle it, and you gotta have the truth here.
Desperately, we have the truth these days, because the world is going to hell with the news.
Is that right, Jim?
Well, I think that's pretty close to the mark, Don, and we were just extolling the authenticity of Donald Trump.
Compared with Kamala, where they gotta figure out how they're gonna pitch her.
Trump and his unapologetic authenticity are the perfect foil to Kamala Harris' fakery.
One of the many unprecedented tactics that then-candidate Trump employed in 2016 was to assign nicknames to his various opponents in the primaries.
Rather than random monikers or insults of the moment, each and every one of his nicknames was carefully planned, a label that lined up with preconceived notions about its target.
There was Low Energy Jeb, pointing out the red-headed stepchild of the late political dynasty was nowhere near as energizing or exciting as he needed to be for a crucial election.
Then there was Little Marco, portraying the Florida senator as a small man who is simply not up to the big challenges of a presidential campaign.
Then there was lying Ted, feeding into the already held belief that then upstart Texas Senator was simply lying about everything he promised just to outpace Trump in the polls in a course.
Who could forget perhaps a crowning achievement of Trump's campaign game?
Crooked Hillary.
While many adjectives would have suited her better than her infamous pantsuit, the word crooked played perfectly into the image of Hillary as a corrupt member of the elite who escaped accountability for numerous crimes and other wrongdoing.
Trump had similar success with Sleepy Joe, an all-too-easy nickname for the oldest president in American history whose mental state is simply not there anymore.
For as long as the media tried to cover his condition, it became unavoidable, and President Trump, in the fitting nickname for the 46th president, was vindicated once again.
For what is almost certain to be President Trump's final election, regardless of the outcome, it's fitting he rolls out one last trend-setting nickname with which to brand his final opponent.
But there's plenty of material to refer to when it comes to Kamala.
One adjective, and thus one nickname, stands out from the rest.
President Trump said it already during a rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Kamala Harris most simply is fake, fake, fake.
Through the years, politicians of both parties have been called flip-floppers, liars, terms that perfectly fit Kamala.
Candidates have been accused of being too radical or too willing to suddenly change their position for political convenience.
But all these ascriptions and many more fall under the same umbrella when the word fake is used above all else.
Kamala's position on the border, for example, that she'll be tougher than Donald Trump, is fake.
Her 180-degree turn on Israel, including her statement denouncing the anti-Semitic riots tearing the country apart, is fake.
Her rise to power objectively only because of her race and her calculated choices in boyfriends is fake.
Even Kamala's very appearance and identity are as fake as it gets.
Her smile and laugh are fake.
Her blatant and repeated use of fake accent to address various audiences, just like one of the more infamous mistakes Hillary made in 2016.
And yes, Trump is right.
Even her racial identity is fake, fabricated, falsified, fiction.
The real reason Democrats in the mainstream are melting down over Trump's questioning of Kamala's bizarre switch from Indian to black is not because of full outrage over racism.
They are panicking because they know it's one of the most effective, most powerful, and yet simple lines of attack they could possibly use against a new presumptive nominee.
No other Republican would dare go where Trump has gone, which reaffirms why he remains the Left's biggest nightmare.
The attack on Kamala's race flip-flopping is not even a matter of trying to pander to African Americans or Indian Americans, though both groups could justifiably be outraged at Kamala Appropriate both identities for political gain and being so willing to abandon one for the other at the drop of a high heel.
It's a broad statement to all Americans.
If she's willing to lie about her own race, what else is she prepared to lie about?
Trump and his campaign have wasted no time weaponizing Kamala's racial past against her, portraying her as a far-left, California-bred radical who will throw our open borders ever wider, give amnesty to hordes of third-world illegal aliens, take away all our guns, defund the police, give Marxist rioters a pass to burn down the country, among other dystopian goals.
But if there's one thing in American politics even more powerful than policy, it's personality.
And that's why branding your opponent with a single accurate and unforgettable description is far more effective than attaching them to a particular piece of legislation or controversial vote.
I think they got it right.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it's useful to really analyze deeply the difference between Trump and Kamala Harris on a lot of different levels.
Number one, Trump, when they went through this elaborate assassination psyop within the psyop, I'll just say, Trump has to communicate that he was in fact changed.
Because when you're shot at, allegedly, when you're shot at or thrown in prison or any other traumatic experience occurs, You are changed in a way that you don't have any control over.
So to deny a change has occurred or try and invent or manipulate the way you were changed is disingenuous.
You are changed as a result of the trauma, and what you do with it, how you adapt to the change, is either positive or negative.
Either you crumble into a fetus position and go into an insane asylum because you're incapable of coping with reality, or your coping skills are enhanced.
Your wisdom is advanced.
Your patience is advanced.
Your compassion is deepened.
These are the positive attributes of a traumatic experience and the adaptation that results.
Trump needs to get ahead of that.
He can't simply say it happened and then resort back to his, you know, good old-fashioned ways of, you know, how he behaved.
That's reckless.
That's not intelligent.
It may be satisfying to his own personality and his own ego, and he's got a big one of those, but it's not intelligent strategically when it comes to the game board of politics.
He has to demonstrate positive change as the result of a traumatic event.
It's almost as if Kennedy, if Kennedy lived through the assassination and he said, you know, I was changed, but I'm also going to be more resolute and I'm getting us out of Vietnam tomorrow, not next year, you know, you would have, you would have seen a positive enhancement in the momentum behind it.
Trump needs to understand that and recognize that, so he does need to demonstrate and enunciate his positive change as a result of this.
He can't just be the same old guy, or else he'll lose independence, and that's the only way he wins.
The common trajectory of political rhetoric is that you start out very strong, very right wing, and then you level out and become more moderate as the election comes to a close so that you win independents and libertarians who make the decision.
The undecideds, that's the political calculus.
So that's what he needs to do.
Now, in comparing Trump to Kamala, the biggest danger, and I hope they're smart enough to realize this, you cannot go after her for her sexual infidelity, whoredom, and self-prostitution before Willie Brown.
You cannot touch that, I don't believe, because every woman would stand up, because every woman is quite capable of behaving just like a whore, just like Kamala Harris was and is, Every woman would instantly go against Trump and come to her, you know, defense, even if it's just by neutrality, because sexual indiscretion to a woman, that's a different animal.
So he can't come near that.
He can't, you know, say, well, I didn't start out as a boyfriend of Willie Brown and, you know, elevated through the ranks.
I hope he doesn't do that or else it's going to be shooting himself in the foot that he may not recover from.
He has to come at her in a way that women are going to be encouraged and agree with him on, such as, you know, this cackling fool laughs when your children are subjected to transgender education.
This cackling fool thinks it's funny to have an open border where you can't get into the hospital rooms or you can't, you know, buy and rent a place to live because they're flooded with migrants.
This is what she thinks is funny, is overthrowing The American Republic with unqualified illegal voters.
You have to make every woman despise Kamala Harris for her injuries that she's caused against these other women's sons and grandsons and brothers and fathers and husbands.
So this is how you turn women against Kamala, is making her really just a brain-dead idiot.
And smart women hate dumb women who pretend they're smart.
Smart women hate dumb women who pretend that they're leaders when they're dumb as a bag of rocks, which she is.
So he needs to attack her on her idiocy and her incompetence and her babbling and be aggressive on that level and show clearly this is a time that America will only survive when a man is in charge.
A man is the one who fights a grizzly bear, not a woman.
A man is the one who pulls a knife out of his belt and attacks A mob that's looking to rape his wife, not a woman, a man with warrior gut instinct, serrated masculine energy, is required to defend against Americans suffering the same mob attacks that are occurring in Britain right now, with Muslim mobs, you might say Hispanic mobs, coming against and attacking people.
So, this manliness needs to be required, and women need to see the only man up there is Donald Trump, not this cackling baboon.
And finally, I would say as things progress, you're going to see, I think, I'll say it again,
Kamala Harris is most likely going to try and assume the presidency by removing Joe Biden and then appoint Gavin Newsom or Barack Obama as her vice president, and then they'll assassinate her and do the musical chairs and put Gavin Newsom up or Barack Obama up in a presidential Civil War sort of suspension of the election kind of thing.
I hope it doesn't happen, but I think that is what is their plan to happen.
That's, again, the reason why affidavits affirming that she is not a natural-born citizen, therefore she's not naturally able to be president, she's not qualified, need to be registered, notarized, and submitted to all forms of local and state government before they can do that, before she can get away.
I've talked to Stephen Pidgeon about that, because if she's allowed to take the oath, And there's no legal filings to stop her.
I know you'll get Scott Bennett filing to stop her and I'll go to the Supreme Court and hopefully a lot of other people will do.
That doesn't happen.
And she's not challenged.
Then they can say like they did in Biden.
Well, he's taken the oath.
He's already president.
The horse has left the barn.
Not in this case.
This is very clearly an usurpation and an overthrow of the Republican form of government of the United States of America and a violation of the Constitution if she is recognized as president.
And she cannot be.
And any oath that she swears is fraud.
I think that was quite a brilliant critique, Scott.
I compliment you.
Brian, your thoughts?
I've got to keep this elegant because I do like Donald Trump.
I watched a video of him the other day, going back to like 1983, where it was Something Trump said every year for, you know, 30 years.
He's been consistently the same type of person for a long, long time.
And then of course you go watch his golf game and you're like, this guy, this guy can focus.
This guy can play.
This guy's been, he's gotten better and better and better.
And now he's so good.
He nearly broke 50 with Bryson DeChambeau.
I do like it, but here's, here's the big picture of what I'm, I want to say.
It doesn't matter what they do.
And I mean they, I mean Harris, Jeff Sessions, Tony Blinken, Kamala Harris, President Trump, the people that surround him.
It doesn't matter what they do.
It matters what we do.
Who are we?
And I'll tell you what, this whole world could be in a death spiral in a matter of a few days with the economy and the threats of war and this and that.
Your life could be in a death spiral tomorrow.
You don't know if you're going to have a heart attack or not.
It happens.
I had one.
It doesn't matter who they are.
They're people in power.
They've been put into these positions.
We've allowed this to happen.
Theoretically, we get one vote.
What matters is what kind of character we have when this is all said and done.
If we want to be strong and we want to get out of this mess that we're in as a nation, we start out with the mess that we're in individually.
So when times get tight, there's always temptations to cut corners, commit some fraud, steal some stuff.
Treat people bad.
Do some things that we shouldn't be doing.
I can tell you, right now is the time that all Americans ought to be thinking about, okay, am I drinking too much?
Am I smoking too much?
Am I going off the deep end here?
Am I looking at this that I shouldn't be looking at?
Am I treating my kids the way they ought to be treated?
Am I treating my wife the way she ought to be treated?
If our game is good, and we can control our house, then there's no reason that we can't lead our entire neighborhood and our community in the day that that's needed.
And trust me, the neighbors are all looking.
They all get to know.
They talk over fences.
Oh, that's a good guy.
That's a bad guy.
That guy can't control himself.
That guy drinks too much.
That guy steals.
That guy... They all know.
Right now is the time to be thinking about, how am I going to make it through it?
If that Dow takes a massive Black Friday-style hit, how are you going to do?
What are your credit cards going to look like?
How much debt are you going to have?
Can you continue to feed yourself?
Can you continue to water the flock?
So I hate to take the context of, oh, let's have this big political discussion about Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
On a scale, I'll give Donald Trump A B. He's aligned himself with some pretty rotten friends.
There's no doubt about that.
And I don't know where those alignments are going or how that's going to take, but I'll tell you what, the man has lived his life better than any politician I've ever seen emerge from the Democrats prior to, well, any of them, frankly.
I can't even name them.
By the way, character is important when times get tough.
That's when we need to have the character, and character is developed on a daily basis as we do the right thing and resist the wrong thing.
Very, very nice.
Very nice.
I like that.
Very good.
Muscatex Kamalha.
The comment came after Musk viewed a video in which Harris articulated her palpable fear and anxiety young people harbor regarding their future, especially in relation to climate change.
Shamala is an extinctionist!
The natural extension of her philosophy would be a de facto holocaust for all of humanity, Musk declared on his social media platform.
The vice president, in the video that sparked his remarks, was addressing the role climate change play in galvanizing the youth vote turnout in the 2020 election.
She highlighted the proactive stance young voters have taken Refusing to defer responsibility of addressing climate crisis to others, should I add, the non-existent climate crisis.
Because young people said, we're not leaving it to others to decide how we're dealing with a climate crisis.
During her discourse, Harris also touched on a concept she discussed with young leaders, a phenomenon termed climate anxiety.
This term encapsulates the existential dread and uncertainty young people feel about the future, marred by the ongoing climate crisis.
The anxiety raises questions about the feasibility and rationality of life milestones, such as starting a family, owning a home in an increasingly unstable environment.
You know, I've heard young leaders talk about A term they've coined called climate anxiety, which is fear of the future, the unknown, whether it makes sense for you to even think about having children, whether it makes sense to think about aspiring to buy a home, because what will this climate be?
Harris elaborated on the anxiety plaguing the young, underscoring psychological and practical implications of the environmental challenges ahead.
Elon Musk.
Shameless and extensionist.
The natural extension of philosophy would be a de facto holocaust for all of humanity.
Meanwhile, Vance.
It's almost something these people don't want.
Young people starting families or something.
Really weird stuff.
Donald Trump.
Resurface video shows Kamala suggesting young people should not have children due to climate change.
She calls climate anxiety the fear of the future and unknown whether it makes sense for you to even think about having children.
Meanwhile, new voters are concerned about Kamala covering up Biden's mental decline.
If she's willing to hide that type of information when she's in office, now what's she willing to hide about herself?
Listen to this.
Who do you blame for President Biden being in office in this condition?
Who deserves the blame?
His close staff.
They work with him every day.
So I think that's what also makes me nervous about the Vice President Harris.
Talk about that a bit.
So yes, she's going to be in it, but she also helped keep him in where he's at right now.
And if he really is as bad as what they've been saying, I think if he steps down as president and she steps into the presidency before the end of his term, it almost makes me question a little bit more why it didn't happen sooner.
She's worked with him.
She's been, to my understanding, with him daily, or at least a couple days a week.
Why hasn't this been brought to attention?
If she's willing to hide that type of information, once she's in office, now what's she willing to hide for herself?
What's she willing to hide about herself?
Meanwhile, here's an electoral college update.
Trump, 297.
Harris, 241.
Look at the math.
They've now put Michigan in the Harris column.
Trump was leading Biden by two, but now trails Harris by 1.9 in Michigan.
Meanwhile, on the other side, voters believe J.D.
Vance is a phony and wrinks of inauthenticity.
Vance's having difficulty in swing states poses a critical problem for Trump.
The thing that's killing J.D.
Vance is that voters—and I've listened to tons of swing voters since he was elected—they don't like him at all.
They think he seems like a phony.
Voters can smell inauthenticity.
And that's what J.D.
Vance reeks of to them.
Here we go.
Listen.
Yeah, well, I think this is where I think both Shapiro and Waltz do a good job, which is that they both seem pretty comfortable in their own skin and they feel authentic.
The thing that is killing J.D.
Vance is that voters, and I have listened to tons of swing voters since he was picked, and they don't like him at all.
They think he seems like a phony.
The only things that they know about him really are how he flip-flopped on Trump, but also they just get, it's like vibes, right?
People, voters can smell Inauthenticity.
And that's what J.D.
Vance reeks of to them.
And I think that in both Shapiro's case and in Walz's case, their ability to sort of talk to people, to articulate their positions effectively, to seem comfortable in their own skin, to look like they mean what they're saying, that is the kind of thing you just sort of can't put a value on electorally until you see it put into practice.
Because the voters, that's what they respond to.
I think that report was totally sincere.
I think both of those reports about Kamal on the one hand and Vance on the other were absolutely authentic.
I don't like Vance at all.
I think he's a phony.
I also think he reeks of lack of authenticity.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I don't know.
I haven't studied Vance, you know, and these commentaries from MSNBC are very well calculated.
PSYOPs with CIA and everybody devising the talking points.
So, they're trying to take out one leg of the stool to collapse everything.
Inauthenticity is fixed by focusing on something you know, and you feel passionate about, and it's in your DNA.
Not about things that you don't know, or you're just academically learning, or you're getting advised on, but what is in your deep gut?
What is in the grit and grizzle of your being?
That you can stand up, and what he can say is, I was a United States Marine, and I went to war to defend my country, and no one knows war better than a soldier, and no one wants less war than a soldier.
And I promise you, I am going in to stop us, stop the United States from these endless, reckless wars that we do not need to be a part of.
He has authenticity to talk about that that no one else can talk about, not even Trump, because he's been in the Marine Corps.
Now, he may not have been Rambo and all this other jazz, but that's okay.
He still went through basic training.
He still went through advanced infantry training.
He went through Marine Corps training, which is above and beyond.
And it's not the Navy.
It's not the Air Force.
It's the Marine Corps.
I went through special operations training, Benning and elsewhere.
It's not for the timid.
So Vance has been through training and has seen things no one else has been through.
That's his authenticity.
You know, the other things, you know, and I'm hoping for the best.
But he needs to make this adaptation.
And he can always say, too, no, I didn't like some of the things Trump did.
I didn't like some of the things Trump said.
And that's why I'm glad to be vice president, because now I'll make sure he never does those things again.
I'll make sure that he gets the intel that he didn't get last time.
I'll make sure that he's not surrounded by liars and frauds and traitors that pushed him and gave him bad intel.
That caused a lot of this.
I'll make sure that no election is ever stolen again.
So he needs to harness and focus that aggression.
He can't be a limp milquetoast.
And he can't take advice from his Hindu wife or their family.
They have no combatant spirit in them whatsoever.
They don't have the gravitas or the grit or the fire in the belly.
They're Hindus.
I know them.
Yeah, they vote Republican sometimes, fine.
But don't be taking advice from his Hindu wife, the lawyer, about how he should articulate things or energize things.
That's the wet noodle.
And I'll finally say the reason that Donald Trump is hated because he's a man of truth.
Brian hit, you know, he's always liked Trump, so have I. The reason that Trump is hated by the left, by the media, is because they're of the lie.
Kamala Harris is of the lie.
The lie, the people of the lie, Hate reality, hate God, hate life, hate the earth, hate the way things are, hate that sin and judgment and eternal damnation and all sorts of religious principles of existence exist.
They want to live in a world that has no moral accountability and that somehow just kind of fell through, fell together in environmentalism or evolution or all this other bullshit.
That's the people of the lie, full of hating themselves and they hate people of truth.
Trump is a man of truth who walks in and calls things as they are, says this is the world we're living in, these are the moral limitations, and here's the principles of business, here's the principles of profit and private property.
It's good.
It has an Ayn Rand flavor.
The virtue of selfishness is a very real thing.
The virtue of selfishness causes some people to work 15 hours a day.
And guess what?
When they work 15 hours a day, they create 15 jobs for other people.
And they generate profit that creates a company into a corporation or into an international business.
That's what hard work and entrepreneurship and discipline and character build.
That's what Trump is and celebrates.
That's why they hate him.
So people need to understand the reason that Trump is despised.
It's because he's a man of truth and he's a man of principle.
The reason that Kamala Harris is loved by people of the lie is because she perpetuates the lies, hates America only by causing people not to have any more children, specifically white people.
Can we continue?
They're all about fear and guilt.
And the sooner Trump and sooner he has people in his team that goes on the rampage and ass kicks these guilt fear mongerers and says things like, you know what, don't listen to a word that comes out of their bullshit mouths.
Not in the media, not in the Democrat Party.
Young people, and I guarantee if I was on the stage they'd be roaring.
Young people, you go out and you get married and you have lots of kids and have a big family.
You go out and you enjoy the fruits of what your parents and your heritage before you bought and created this country to be.
See all this infrastructure?
The freeways, the buildings, the bridges, the boats in the United States?
That's what you have to celebrate your ancient relatives for.
And you see all these Mexicans and Hispanics and third-world Haitians sneaking up into this country?
It's to take advantage of the infrastructure that was built by the blue-collar relatives of yours in the 40s and the 50s and the 60s and before that.
So, the more militant and celebrational and enthusiastic Trump and his people are about, no, don't pay attention to the guilt, don't flagellate yourself, don't get vasectomies, don't get COVID-19 vaccines and all this other bullshit, don't eat bugs, don't worship in the environment, go forth and live life with great joy, and do it in a way that you don't go and start bombing the crap out of other countries, because that's only going to hurt you in the long run.
If we had totally altered our national perspective to keep Israel out of all decisions that we make in the world, we'd be a lot healthier and happier of a country, and I hope we go that way.
Jim?
Wow.
Well, I worry that his choice of answer is just as bad as his choice of my pants, and it troubles me profoundly, profoundly.
Brian?
Yeah, if you go to the American intelligence media site and actually take the time to sit down and read their research, you'll find out that, I mean, they've got it pretty clear cut that he's being handled by the British Pilgrim Society.
But remember, Trump is a much smarter politician today than he was back in 2016, theoretically.
And so look at the alliances he's making.
Okay, we're going to take JD Vance.
We're going to get our Pilgrim Society powerhouse buddies in tune or in line.
We're going to align ourselves with Netanyahu and Israel.
We're going to go ahead and get that faction in tune and in line.
The Democrats always accuse you of being what they secretly know they really are.
They hate themselves.
It's self-loathing, this diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Anti-white thing.
It's self-loathing.
So, J.D.
Vance has a Hindu wife.
Maula Harris has a Jewish husband that's got three kids.
I mean, they look like the whitest family in the world, but she's supposedly Black.
So much inauthenticity there.
If you go back and listen to some of J.D.
Vance's old speeches when he was running for Senate, you'll find What I thought was a pretty persuasive, standalone, independent-thinking politician who had academia in the crosshairs.
That's what he was really doing.
He's saying, hey, look, you're doing this wrong.
In the way that you're conditioning the minds of our children.
Academia is the problem.
This is what he was, this is one of the platforms he was running on.
So he was really attacking academia and going after, you know, this is, you can have a great job.
He was sort of like that work hard Mike Rowe guy.
In terms of, hey, we're blue-collar and proud of it, and he had a little bit of that edge.
Although he went to Yale Law, his background, theoretically, was sort of that Mike Rohard working, you know, didn't have everything, so you had to work hard to get where you went.
Now, he got some favors done to him.
Peter Thiel, obviously, was a big favor as well.
Why Trump selected him and what he thought he could get out of him?
Youth.
I mean, he was doing well in the Senate.
He got elected.
He got into that position.
He had youth.
He had vigor.
He had the mind.
And the other thing that he had that Kamala Harris certainly never had was the work ethic.
The reason that Kamala Harris sounds like such a dumb, loony ditz is that she doesn't do the work.
Guys, I'm not that smart, but I do take the time to do the work so that I can speak coherently When I prep for these shows, I don't see Kamala Harris ever doing the work prep for any event that she ever went to.
With a work habit like that, what makes you think she's going to be successful as a president?
She won't read a damn report.
I mean, and now she's going to be president?
Give me a break.
So, the gaslighting on the left-hand side is so obvious, it's almost like a It's almost like dynamite.
Nobody will touch it.
On the right-hand side, at least we have a chance.
At least we have a chance.
Although, I still don't think I've bought into what's going on with Trump and Vance right now.
I'm deeply, deeply concerned, but it's better than the alternative right now.
I think we all agree.
I'll agree with that.
Better than the alternative, indeed.
Meanwhile, Secret Service Trump shooting rejection goes public.
They turn down drones.
There's so many signs he was being set up.
Lead Secret Service agent called off security for building before sniper shot president, and she is still deciding security and advance teams at rallies.
Acting Secret Service chief played key role in limiting resources for Trump.
Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rove was directly involved in denying additional security resources and personnel, including counter-snipers, to former President Trump's rallies and events, despite repeated requests My agent has signed a Trump's detail in the two years leading up to his July 13th attempt at assassination.
According to sources familiar, Secret Service whistleblower states he was ordered to stand down.
Here we know.
We got P.K.
telling us.
The crowd looks like it was a bunch of crisis actors.
Here we have Trump's ear exposed.
No more bandage.
Where's the wound?
No bullet here.
So a bullet through the ear theory cannot be correct, but unfortunately we're still in the fog, because there's no ear wound, no scab to even indicate grazing.
The maddening thing about the hole is it doesn't make sense.
Hard to believe Trump faked it with a seedy character's mention who wanted him dead and gone.
It's hard to believe Trump just lucked out and only got a grazed ear.
The rise of the false-false flag bite hit blindly.
The false flag operation is generally defined as a act committed with the intent of disguising the actual source of responsibility, pinning blame on another party.
Recent years seem to have seen the rise of a new idea, the false false flag.
That is to say, entirely fake events with only the barest relationship to objective reality.
Blanks and crisis actors, fake victims, fake shooters.
So we could be looking at a double false flag event.
It means we're creating election melodrama, kabuki theater, to keep the public's attention fixated on the election process.
Biden bombs out of the debate.
Trump is almost killed.
Biden is forced out in a palace coup.
Kamala steals Biden's election money.
The Obamas do not immediately endorse Kamala.
Trump's VP makes incendiary anti-abortion statements.
So, you see, the outcome has already been determined months or even years ago.
The owners are just pointing strings to fake out the public that their votes really count.
The link to the bloody ear picks looks to me like blood, squib, fakery, not real blood, not a real wound.
Like you, I grew up with a gun, hunted and trapped, shot thousands of bullets.
It looks like Trump faked it to me.
What makes no sense, as you meant, so let me repeat in my opinion.
The blood on Trump's ear does not look real.
And I spent my childhood hunting and traveling and harvesting thousands of games, so my brain is familiar with what blood is supposed to look like.
I'm left not understanding what real politics was in the fog.
The authorities aren't releasing the evidence of the shell casings.
It'll forever be a mystery unless someone talks.
And there is a good chance of that.
We live in a post-WikiLeaks world and America is going down.
So insider loyalty is tenuous at best.
Anyone can and will tell all.
What we need is an insider to squeal some critical information about this psy-op.
The FBI hosing off the roof of the Dead Patsy is most disturbing.
A new theory has emerged on the stage event being called the false false flag.
Did he earn his Academy Award?
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, you must have been reading or watching Scott Bennett, because I was the first one to say that on Russia Today.
I said, this could be a PSYOP within a PSYOP.
Either it's a setup for political advantageous purposes, where Trump's political ratings are accelerated through a dramatized kabuki theater event, or it's real and natural and organic and has the same effect, ironically enough, the bolstering of his political fortunes.
So, you know, I agree with the concept of a false, false flag or a PSYOP within a PSYOP, as I said.
But, you know, you study the forensics and the blood and the wound and, you know, the nature of the bullet, the projectile.
A 5.56 round is a different kind of round and fired from that kind of a gun and from that kind of a person.
Uh is you know very very odd and uh the type of gun sight that it's fired from it's just not uh not natural and then the absence of Shell casings and the photographs of shell casings on the roof.
There should have been what?
Five to eight shell casings on the roof with those little yellow tags that criminal investigators always put on the ground when they find bullets?
Where were those photographed?
The shell casings and the little yellow tags to show you every shot that was fired from that guy on the roof and the gun.
I wouldn't doubt it.
I smelled this a while back.
This just doesn't feel right.
It doesn't look right.
It doesn't smell right.
Don't put vanilla frosting on a horse apple and call it a cupcake.
This is something else.
And whether Trump's involved or not, you know, is another matter and come out.
The reason I don't like black propaganda and black propaganda is when you blow up your own buildings or kill your own people and say it was done by the other guys, because if it comes out, and it always inevitably does, you lose all credibility.
And maybe that's the psyop within the psyop within the psyop.
The third level dimension is this will come out eventually that this was all fraudulent and Trump fraudulently participated.
What will that do to his ratings across the United States?
They will drop him like a lead balloon if it comes out that Trump and his people were part of a false flag psyop pretending he had been shot.
Uh, and then what happens?
Then you have, what, Kamala Harris and then Barack Obama because Kamala Harris is killed by a Trump supporter that's all pissed off because suddenly, uh, you know, Trump, uh, uh, participated in a false flag.
I mean, we're in the beginning of the Kapuki Theater, not the end.
And I, I suspect we're going to go into some very rambunctious times in the next few months.
I'd like to think Trump and the Republicans and the Conservatives all congeal into a constitutional election process where the Constitution and the will of the American people is advanced and the deep state and these bureaucrats are Here's what I think happened.
by all means necessary and prosecuted.
But I sense that there's a lot of evil afoot that we have not even yet seen reveal itself yet, Jim.
Very nice, Scott.
Brian.
Here's what I think happened.
I think that there was going to be a real assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
We all saw that as a possibility.
We all, even Tucker Carlson, saw that as a possibility.
I think there was going to be a real false flag attempt on Donald Trump.
And Donald Trump made alliances with the guys that run the false flag shadow group.
And I think the alliances were made To teach the deep state a lesson.
It was sort of a chess move.
Because they were going to assassinate him, so he teamed up with Netanyahu's buddies from Mossad and the CIA.
And he managed to get a faction of them to allow this false flag to go off.
Now, they can't expose it as a false flag, because otherwise Trump can expose everything else they've done as a false flag.
It accomplishes a few goals.
Number one, they're not going to make the same attempt on Trump, and it makes it a whole lot more difficult for them to continue to try after one failed attempt like this.
But in my opinion, it was sort of a counter free adjusting approach.
In other words, he He set it up to counter what was going to be a real assassination attempt with a fake assassination attempt that ended up backfiring in all of their faces, showing that he had moved that faction of our shadow government over to his side.
And that faction of our shadow government can never expose it, just like Sandy Hook and all the other ones can never be exposed.
Now, we knew it was a false flag from the very beginning.
I remember the very first show I did, After it, right here, I said, look, the photo's impossible that caught the bullet.
The supposedly leaked photograph with the head didn't blow up.
There's no way a shooter could get up there.
Nobody's answered the important questions about the ladder, the gun.
It was the boogeyman of all guns.
All these things I said right at the very beginning.
Now, at the time, I was confused just like everybody else.
Did they use a real projectile?
Well, of course, now I've adjusted it.
No, I don't think they used any projectiles whatsoever.
As a matter of fact, I think Corey Capitore's was a mannequin that was brought up From underneath the bleachers and then used to show that they were pulling somebody out of the crowd because it was just way too light.
It wasn't a 220-pound, six-foot-two man.
It was a couple of cops evacuating a body in a big hurry, just like we see in all of the false flag events out there.
As a matter of fact, the mannequin had carry handles on it.
So we knew it was a false flag.
The question was why?
And I think I think that was masterful, Brian.
Just masterful.
of the black magic that's been used against us for a long time.
Now, I'm not saying that Donald Trump is going to use it for good.
I'm saying his power has reached the level where he is the new warlock with control of the black magic false flag.
I think that was masterful, Brian, just masterful.
I can't tell you how much I enjoyed that.
Meanwhile, Dr. Rima Labo especially is worried the UN has is having a meeting shortly—the summit of the future.
New York, 2021, September 22-23, the summit.
It's going to concern Commitments about future moves, emphasis on climate change, getting rid of automobiles, constraining what we can eat, going to digital currency.
She's very, very worried because while they're having it in September, they want it to begin to be implemented in October.
Thus, she's issued her 10 million Patriot Challenge.
You have the balls to participate in getting the U.S.
out of the U.N.
Now, frankly, this all sounds just a tad preposterous, because how could you have the U.S.
be committed to all these dramatic moves without having ratification by the Senate?
Who's going to want to give up their automobiles, their property, basically commit to 15-minute cities beginning on October?
I don't know whether the threat is real or not, but I sure agree with getting the U.S.
the hell out of the U.N., Scott.
Your thoughts?
Well, always remember this whole climate change and the adoration of climate and the adoration of the sun and solar power, this, and frog fart manufactured energy sources, this, and here, all of that is religion.
It is a quasi-pseudo-religion of nonsense that hysterically throws a chicken little guilt trip on every person who even questions, right, the science and questions the high priests of environmentalism.
And they are planning on disrupting all vehicles by forcing electric cars on people and all of that.
Well, the batteries run out, the batteries die, and guess what?
Chinese have control over lithium, so these batteries are only going to go up in price ten times as much.
That means ten times less people are going to be able to purchase these cars.
So, guess what?
You're not going to have people on the road.
You're going to have a lot of forced Brian?
changes that they think they can get away with.
But what they think they can force upon the American people, I think will only result in the American people being provoked into higher states of aggression, civil war and violence.
Jim. Brian.
United Nations is a mistress that we don't need anymore.
I don't know why we had that mistress in the first place.
This is a It is time to buckle down and rebuild this nation from the inside out, and that is not a globalist agenda.
And that is what they're afraid of.
If America rises back to power, it's going to be because we worked our asses off to do it, and we got smart, and our media got smart, and the internet got smart, and they stopped censoring the opinions, and people started coming around to see the truth.
That's the only way to bring us out of this darkness is for people to wake up, you know, drip, drip, drip, begin to understand the darkness that was inside and basically turn around, cut loose all those old whores that have been eating up all of our lives for so long and grow up and become a man.
Right now is the time to do it.
The United Nations has to go.
All foreign endeavors need to go, including Israel.
Big one needs to go as soon as possible.
Love it.
Absolutely love it.
Now, it's taken me years to sort out why I got beat up like a piñata in court, but I figured it out.
And I've submitted a series of briefs.
I've put the judge on the defense.
He's been rattled.
He's committed multiple procedural mistakes.
And frankly, there's an array of issues here that I think may lead to my vindication.
Let me share with you my final brief, my reply brief, and if I can perhaps get it to—well, here we go.
Now comes James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. Pro-Se defendant, with a reply to the response from Blaine's attorney filed on July 24, 2024, to Dr. Vetscher's motion to recuse Judge Frank Remington pursuant to Wisconsin Statute 757-19-2-G, to Dr. Vetscher's motion to recuse Judge Frank Remington pursuant to Wisconsin Statute 757-19-2-G,
Blaine's response observes correctly that ruling against a party per se does not require a circuit court to recuse.
But this case involves conduct by Judge Remington that has been egregiously biased in favor of the plaintiff and against Dr. Fancher, including, most recently, repeated violations of basic due process rights under Wisconsin rules of civil procedure.
Plaintiff argues that Dr. Petzer cannot meet his burden for recusal, alleging that there is not even the appearance of partiality and that there is no basis for objecting on due process grounds.
Both are in blatant contradiction with Judge Remington's conduct, in this case, from the beginning, which Dr. Petzer had previously documented and will, at least in part, summarize here.
All previous submissions in Case No.
18-CV-3122 are incorporated and adopted for the purpose of this reply.
Background.
Wisconsin Statute Chapter 757, General Provision Concerning Courts of Record, Judges, Attorneys, and Clerks under Section 757-19, Disqualification of Judge, specifically 757-19-2, asserts Any judge shall disqualify himself or herself from any civil or criminal action when one of the following situations occurs.
Gee, when a judge determines that for any reason he or she cannot, or it appears he or she cannot, act in an impartial manner.
Emphasis added.
In relation to the 26 exhibits A through Z supporting Dr. Fetzer's motion to open judgment pursuant to extrinsic fraud and fraud upon the court, filed on June 20, 2024, cited below as MOJ, Dr. Fetzer submits the following proofs Of clear bias and partiality by Judge Remington, who is acting in collusion with the Posner attorneys.
Argument one.
Judge Remington suppressed the affidavit of Kelly Watt.
Judge Remington's approach was to manufacture a predetermined outcome by finding that Dr. Fetzer had libeled Leonard Posner by declaring a death certificate that Posner himself had provided to Dr. Fetzer's research colleague Kelly Watt to be fake.
It was done by substituting a different and complete death certificate in the complaint.
The published death certificate, unlike the substitution, had no file number nor state or town certification.
Under Connecticut law, not even parents are allowed to possess incomplete death certificates.
Kelly Watt's affidavit exposes the fraud and vitiates the case against Dr. Vancer.
But was suppressed by Judge Remington in collusion with the Posner attorneys.
MOJ exhibits J, K, and V.
2.
Judge Remington dismissed proof that nobody died at Sandy Hook.
Judge Remington excluded Dr. Fetzer's proof that nobody died at Sandy Hook on both legally and logically absurd grounds when he declared that whether or not Sandy Hook ever happened or not is not relevant to the truthfulness or the accuracy of the death certificate.
But the death certificate states the decedent died at Sandy Hook on December 14, 2012 of multiple gunshot wounds.
MOJ Exhibit M. Once again, a proof amassed by Dr. Vetser's co-edited book.
Nobody died at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill to promote gun control.
2015, 2nd edition, 2016, was inconsistent with Posner's position, thereby producing disputed facts that, had they been admitted, required a jury.
Three.
Judge Remington set aside reports of two forensic document experts.
Having restricted the issue to the authenticity or truthfulness of the death certificate, and having disallowed extensive and detailed proof Dr. Fetzer had submitted in defense, Dr. Fetzer provided reports of two forensic document experts, Larry Wickstrom and A.P.
Robertson, who found not only that the incomplete death certificate published by Dr. Fetzer was fake, But that the complete death certificate attached to the complaint was also fake, along with two others obtained from the town of Newtown and from the state.
Judge Remington simply dismissed them as someone else's opinion and said, I just don't think they were helpful.
MOJ Exhibit R, pages 163 and 165.
Their uncontested reports again vitiated the case against Dr. Fetzer by proving his statements were true.
Four, Judge Remington denied Dr. Fetzer discovery on his counterclaims to ensure that Dr. Fetzer not discover more proof of the non-occurrence of mass murder or that Luciden had not died at Sandy Hook.
Judge Remington took the further step of bifurcating the case to deny Dr. Fetzer discovery on his counterclaims of abuse of process, fraud by deception, and fraud upon the court.
A deft maneuver to cut off Dr. Fetzer's access to new evidence that might strengthen his case.
MOJ Exhibit N.
This denial of Dr. Fetzer's right to discovery has now been used to claim that Dr. Fetzer had not made allegations of fraud upon the court in a timely manner brought about by Judge Remington's denial of Dr. Fetzer's discovery rights.
Five.
Judge Remington refused to admit proof that Noah Posner is a fiction.
Dr. Fetzer repeatedly advanced proof that the alleged saint Noah Posner was not a real person, but a legal fiction created out of photographs of her purported older half-brother, Michael Vabner.
Dr. Fetzer raised the issue by moving to expand DNA testing to include not just Noah Posner and Leonard Posner,
But Michael Vabner and Ruben Vabner, whom Dr. Vetser had concluded to be the basis for NOAA and for Lanard, MOJ Exhibit O. This fact has now been substantiated by the affidavit of Brian Davidson, PI, who has also established that a party who testified as Leonard Posner and Madison is not the same person as the Leonard Posner of Sandy Hook,
...whose image has appeared millions of times around the world.
M.O.J.
exhibits W, X, and Y. This has enormous importance, not least of all because it implicates Posner's attorneys in the subordination of perjury.
Six.
Dr. Wetzler refused to acknowledge Dr. Wetzler.
Judge Remington refused to acknowledge Dr. Wetzler as a media person.
To lower the bar for finding Dr. Fetzer liable.
Judge Remington declined to rule that Dr. Fetzer had media standing as an investigative journalist.
Even though Dr. Fetzer had submitted a brief, Lane has experience as an investigative journalist reporter for decades, including paid assignments.
MOJ Exhibit U.
Even more blatantly, Dr. Fetzer was being sued over three sentences in a book he had co-edited and another in a separate publication to which he had contributed.
How could Judge Remington, who insisted that he read every document submitted to the court, have missed this?
Seven.
When Dr. Fetzer tried to expose the imposter, he was sanctioned.
Among the most important tales that Judge Remington was acting in concert with the Posner attorneys is that when Dr. Fetzer attempted to expose the party who had testified under the name of Leonard Posner as an imposter because he was too young and too small to be the Sandy Hook Posner, Dr. Fetzer sent a video deposition to Wolfgang Hellbig for confirmation.
Judge Remington took offense and held Dr. Fetzer in contempt of court, adding attorney fees in the amount of $650,000 to the $450,000 that would be awarded by the jury for his purported defamation of Leonard Posner, thereby protecting himself and the Posner attorneys when Dr. Fetzer had told the truth.
MOJ pages 11 through 15.
Judge Remington has been so eager to avoid his exposure that he has now violated Dr. Fetzer's due process rights by abandoning the Wisconsin Rules of Civil Procedure, Chapter 802, not once or twice, but three times.
First, by rejecting Dr. Fetzer's motion to open judgment pursuant to extrinsic fraud at run-up on the court, Second, by rejecting Dr. Vetser's request for relief from judgment or order filed on June 20th should be 24th, 2024.
And third, by granting plaintiffs motion to seal a redacted court record filed on June 24th, 2024.
The Posner response thus fails.
It was not making decisions per se that deprived Dr. Fetzer of his legal rights, but the decisions that Judge Remington made.
The pattern of ruling to deny Dr. Fetzer's motions and facts to produce no disputed facts, when the case was factually contradictory from the beginning, reveals that Judge Remington was acting with partiality and bias.
Of a rather extreme variety, given he manufactured the absence of disputed facts to apply summary judgment in a case that had to be sent to a jury for fact resolution.
That goes far beyond the appearance of partiality and bias.
Judge Remington, together with the Posner attorneys in opposition, including Jake Zimmerman, Prohok Veche, Genevieve Zimmerman, Wisconsin number 110693, and Emily M. Feinstein, Wisconsin SBN, 103-7924, acted in concert to deprive Dr. Fetzer his right to present a valid defense.
By violating the Wisconsin rules of civil procedure and denying Dr. Fetzer his right to a trial by jury.
They, separately and jointly, sabotage these proceedings by going so far as to suborn perjury by an imposter witness.
And when Dr. Fetzer attempted to expose the fraud, he was, in no uncertain terms, smacked down by Judge Remington, lest the deception become known.
They don't want to be held to account.
For multiple violations of Supreme Court rules and rules of civil procedure whereby they committed fraud upon the court.
Decker, 214 Wisconsin, 2nd at 21.
By eliminating disputed facts and fabricating a case against him.
Relief sought.
By suppressing the affidavit of Kelly Watt, dismissing proof that nobody died at Sandy Hook and that Noah Posner was a legal fiction, setting aside the reports of two forensic document experts, denying Dr. Fetzer discovery on his counterclaims, failing to acknowledge Dr. Fetzer as a media person, and holding him in contempt when he sought to expose the imposter witness.
Together with his more recent procedural violation to suppress the proof of his egregious misconduct as quickly as possible.
Judge Remington has egregiously violated Wisconsin Statute 757, General Provisions Concerning Courts of Record, Judges, Attorneys, and Clerks under Section 757-19-2G, Disqualification of Judge.
Dr. Fetzer therefore again moves that Judge Remington recuse himself from this case and any further associated proceedings.
Respectfully submitted, James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
Scott, your thoughts?
Oh, Jim, the other thing that needs to happen is submitting him to be removed, de-cloaked, de-robed, whatever the administrative corrective procedures are for removing a corrupt judge.
He conspired to deprive you of your rights under color of law, violation of 18 U.S.
Code 241-242.
He needs to be sued for that conspiracy to deprive you of your rights.
He does not have immunity when he consciously conspires to deprive you of your rights because he's been bribed or controlled or threatened by the CIA or whoever else may be behind this.
So a simultaneous complaint to remove him as a judge needs to be filed, and a civil suit against him for violating your rights and conspiring to do this, abusing his power of a judge, needs to be filed.
And you're exactly right.
Your allegations of fraud upon the court that this Noah Posner, or whoever the guy was filing against you, he didn't even have status.
He didn't have status because he wasn't a real person.
He was a fiction.
So that's the other thing.
So your presentation of material evidence that fraud upon the court has been submitted absolutely requires investigation sua sponte by the court.
And failure to do that is a conspiracy to allow fraud upon the court to go forth.
So, you know, you went on a lot of different levels, and as you succeed in this, Alex Jones also is vindicated in this.
So, you have to just keep hammering away.
A friend of mine who was a lawyer that had been thrown in jail fought and fought and fought, and he said, the system cannot withstand a dedicated zealot.
A dedicated zealot who has the truth on their side and doggedly pursues in the most ragged, rustic way, without apology and without politeness, and demands that justice be achieved, will win out.
And you are going to win out, I have no doubt, Jim.
Oh, I'm very pleased to hear those words I just mentioned.
That's six pages.
Summarize the case that endured over six years and over 600 documents reduced to six pages.
Brian.
Well, Dr. Pfetzer, you sound like a conspiracy theorist and you write like one because obviously you are involved in an actual conspiracy.
I think that there's a lot of hope for this and I think there's a lot of hope for us.
Something that happened on a couple days ago, August 2nd, I think that was Thursday or Friday, Sidney Powell was basically exonerated for
Exonerated from the Texas disciplinary action that had gone into her because she actually did provide conclusive evidence that the 2020 election was stolen, but she couldn't get it there because the corrupt Texas Bar Association tried to discipline her for bringing forth this evidence that they didn't want to see revealed.
And if you go to the language in it, basically to summarize The article that came out, I believe it was even an MSNBC article, MSN article, in plain language authorities filed two sloppy complaints and were then unable to defend their work when the time came to do so.
Sound familiar?
The bar employed a scattershot approach to the case which left the court and the trial court with the task of sorting through the argument to determine what issue had actually been raised, Justice Denise Garcia wrote for the unanimous panel.
Having done so, the absence of a competent summary judgment compels our conclusion that the bar failed to meet its summary judgment burden.
In other words, she was railroaded.
So were you.
So that's why I have a lot of hope on this particular issue.
I hope it goes well.
Well, I thank you both, and Brian, you've made wonderful contributions to my efforts, including with the Supreme Court.
When I petitioned for a re-hearing, and now with your new affidavit, which is easily the most outstanding of the 26 exhibits, Exhibit Y. Affidavit of Brian Davidson, P.I.
Sensational.
And Scott— You're peeing on my leg, Jim.
I don't like to have my leg peed on.
Nobody pees on my leg.
Hey man, you deserve accolades.
That's just sensational.
And Scott, I love the idea that a determined You know, Applegate, like myself, could prevail because I'm not done.
If they mess with me, I have other options and I'm going to pursue them.
So, I'm greatly heartened by both of your comments.
And always remember, you can succeed more, Jim, even if you appear in court by yourself and you speak without an attorney.
You're not bound by any of the attorney of politeness.
You can get up there like the old Marine you are and say, Judge, here's the facts, here's the truth, here's the law, here's what I want done.
And I'd take a flamethrower to this court.
Right.
That's exactly right.
Let's see what you'll do here, you skinny-eyed black-robed bastard.
What a marvelous way to conclude today's show.
Don, take us out.
Well, yeah, we're concluding on corruption and other things that are going on in this in this crazy world, in this crazy country.
And I mean, we are targets because we're standing for the truth, I think.
And as you say, James Pescer sure has been targeted in his court case and and other things.
And he's standing tall.
And I guess you I'm drawing a lot of fire, but I think we have the repellents and other ways to get the best in the end.
And if the end is coming and it's going to be strong and it's going to be for us, and we're going to stand tall and everything else.
So thank you so much, folks, for watching the show.
I think it's been an outstanding truth versus news show that you ain't going to hear this kind of stuff nowhere else.
And it's more worthy of hearing in all the media combined.
So we're doing good, and I thank you so much for watching, and please share.
Thank you for your comments, and I will say that we hope to be back next week, and things are getting really rough out there.
The market's down, all kinds of things.
This country is on a tipping edge, and you need to have the information you can only get right here on Truth vs. News Incorporated.
Thank you.
▲
Export Selection