Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 3, 2024 - Jim Fetzer

01:38:09

Need to Know News (2 August 2024) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas, Need to Know News, 2nd of August, 2024.
	Let's take a look at those topics.
	Opening statements.
	All right, we're going to the war.
	We have three important updates.
	All these updates, I mean, it's the same topics, but it's more and more important.
	War does include financial domination, destruction of the petro debt dollar.
	We're going to talk about that.
	That's a big deal.
	The most valuable topic that you can invest your time to learn about.
	Trump assassination attempt, huge breakthrough with that.
	Olympics optics, 2024 election facts and optics.
	Professor Jim Fetzer, official show trial update.
	This will be a future law school case study.
	I promise you that.
	And after five months, Brian and I are going to give an update on what we conclude and what we've been taking a look at.
	Well, it's been a slow week.
	that broad topic of the possible ancient advanced earth civilization.
	Brian, opening statement, brother.
	Well, it's been a slow week.
	I had to, had to work the streets for a few days, went and visited some old friends.
	Files are slowing down right now.
	I don't know.
	It seems like last summer I was slow this time of year.
	I'm relatively slow right now.
	I've been working on upgrading my tech and keeping my Linux environment up to date as well as my Android emulation machines that allow me to be a Android phone wherever I place the GPS coordinates.
	That allows me to use sock puppet accounts to pretend to be somebody else and set up honey pots for People that are cheating or doing something that they shouldn't be doing.
	I've had quite a bit of surveillance hours lately, but it's been rather boring, like five hours of waiting for five minutes and following.
	So, you know, it's the nature of the beast.
	You get to listen to a lot of YouTube rumble and bit shoot videos.
	Hear a lot of different opinions.
	Keep yourself open on everything that's out there.
	At this point in time, I'm going to go ahead and preface the show with I am 100% convinced that the entire Trump assassination was just another false flag.
	I have no doubt in my mind anymore.
	You know, and I'll be honest with you, in the past, you know, there's been times where it's taken my mind a while to get around.
	The idea of a false flag, especially when I first began to recognize false flags.
	I didn't understand exactly what was happening, but as I got more familiar with the fundamental strategies that they use to run the deception, it became very, very easy to identify them very early.
	And I'm not saying that I'm early at the game or late at the game at this point in time, but I'm I'm 100% convinced that this was using all the same old techniques as before.
	The question is, why?
	What's the long play?
	There's a lot of different theories out there, and of course we can explore that during the course of the show, but I don't think there was projectiles used at all.
	I don't think so either, but we'll take a look at the current updates and play around with what we're shown and what type of an explanation of the facts might fit what happened.
	So we shall see.
	Alright, let's go to where we got three of those.
	Caitlin Johnstone promoting peace and stability in the Middle East by unconditionally backing its worst aggressor.
	Now we talked about this photo of Biden apparently growing six inches.
	I mean before that health episode and and.
	Declaring on a non stationary with a different signature writing Biden's with an S as if a bunch of actors have been playing him.
	You see that he's taller than Netanyahu or, you know, take a close look.
	We have demonstrated that this gentleman is not Joe Biden.
	And I want to point out and suggest the possibility that you're looking at a masked actor in Netanyahu as well.
	And so this this title that Caitlin is referencing is that the United States said that no matter what Israel does, they're going to back them up.
	So if Iran or Lebanon decide to take military action against Israel, the actor playing Biden seemed to suggest That we would have Israel's back.
	Now, whether we follow through with that or not, I don't know.
	Iran officially informs United Nations will conduct retaliatory attack upon Israel according to UN Treaty Article 51, and that is for self-defense.
	And if you haven't read the UN Charter, I recommend that you do.
	I'll put it into the show notes here on BitTube, the article I have that explains the Treaties the two treaties after both world wars and they're relatively easy to read But Iran is making the argument.
	Hey, I don't care who those bitches went after in our country, but they went into our country So we will retaliate on this attack and They need to keep it proportional Iran accused of supplying Hezbollah with MP weapons that can disable Israeli military tech almost instantly That would be interesting.
	We know that those weapons exist to the extent that Iran has them or not and what they're going to do and what we're going to be shown and how much of this is real is another question, but the tech is there and that is a very interesting play forward.
	Brian, your thoughts, brother?
	I have no doubt that the tech is there to do these things.
	The question is, whose interest is it in?
	Are they risking their opportunities to join the new world order when they Take retaliatory actions.
	Are they worried about the financial banking consequences of such an attack?
	What's slowing them down and what's stopping them in the past?
	Obviously, it was that there was Western hegemony that was lined up with Israel's interests that provided pressure from a banking perspective as well as from a political perspective and military perspective, but These days, I'm beginning to see that these nations can't really operate completely independently.
	I think the CIA has done a great job infiltrating high levels of power and making sure that people that could be controlled are in place.
	How else can you explain the amount of turmoil that we've heard about in this administration of Biden, yet we don't have some huge full-scale nuclear weapon or massive, you know, bomb going off?
	We've got all these little targeted attacks that we're told about.
	But nothing really devastating taking place.
	I tell you what, if I was really attacked in a situation like this, I would retaliate with everything I've got, and you'd be seeing a full-scale war, you know, similar to what the Six-Day War looked like with Israel back in the day.
	Iran has capabilities that we don't even understand, that we haven't even begun to understand.
	Remember, these are Israel's neighbors.
	So how often is it that Israel is unprotected in terms of their ability to continue to influence the incumbent oligarchy at these nations?
	I doubt it's as much as we would think it is.
	But they have good intelligence apparatus, obviously a lot of respect from Assad in terms of their ability to do what they do.
	But this this supporting Israel thing is getting very, very old.
	And it's it's driving Americans crazy to see Israel being put first all the time, you know, and this is the one area where I do want to applaud.
	Donald Trump, and I hate to say it that way, but yeah, I mean, it should be America first in terms of our policy and our foreign policy, and nobody is doing America first right now.
	It's Israel first across the board.
	It's getting very old.
	Yeah, except I would argue that Israel is maybe second to the transgenders.
	I think they've been put first above and beyond.
	Well, that's part of the satanic agenda that's obviously being put through.
	We'll talk about that more.
	It's a question.
	Are Israel and Satan simultaneous?
	Are they the same?
	Was it the same issue?
	I mean, we've seen some pretty depraved behavior from Israel influences over the years, but we've seen depraved behavior from the whole rest of the world too.
	Yeah, with Iran, with the last time that they showed off their arsenal, they sent a bunch of older drones, slower drones.
	Then most of those got shot down, maybe even all of them.
	But then they sent in a couple of the faster ones.
	And the hypersonic?
	Drones?
	Ooh, those aren't going to be stopped, baby.
	Those are going in, and they're targeted.
	And the last time, Iran was showing off what they were capable of doing, hit exactly what they were aiming for, and they're not going to be able to do anything about it except the Samson option.
	And then answer briefly with, one of the same for the Jews, yeah.
	As I keep saying, it's those long-headed guys, the Elohim, those are going to be the people in the Old Testament pretending to be gods as the psychopaths that they are, murdering whole societies, demanding praise to them.
	And I think that they designed and created Jews, the Jewish race, in order to be handlers of the sheeple, the workers in their gardens and I think that's what we're looking at.
	Something went wrong in the garden though, and there's a lot to say about that going back to the mythology of Enki and Enlil and a split between brothers about whether they would tolerate the destruction of these free-willed human beings.
	And I think that that one way or another, no matter what happened, has led us to the present.
	You know, it's very interesting that you say that, because I've been actually going through Michael Heisner's book, Michael Heiser's book, he's called The Unseen Realm by Michael Heiser.
	And he really does, you know, I have a theology degree and I never understood the unseen realm Like this particular theologian lays it out.
	I've got a lot of respect for this guy, Michael Heiser.
	He has a tremendous command of the ancient languages and he was the first guy I've ever come across that defined Elohim In a way that's very consistent with what you're determining.
	I always saw it as a very simple process.
	Here you've got this all-powerful God that's simultaneously present, who basically speaks the Word into existence.
	But if you actually study the text in a lot more detail, you'll see that He had a council of Beings that he had created to assist him in the process, also known as the Elohim, and many of them had names and many of them had identities and characters of their own.
	I'm only about halfway through the book and I've just been sort of piecemealing it, but I find it to be very interesting that he defines Elohim similarly to the way you do it, which is not a way I was ever taught when I got my theology degree.
	Well, for me, just as a guy who likes to read, in reading the text from cover to cover, I think I was 16 or 17, my impression was is that it is a committee.
	We're going to make man in our image.
	And then Satan is in that group, huh?
	Yeah, Christians argue it's Trinitarian.
	Jews argue that it's the angels.
	Heizer's arguing that it's demigods, basically, the old gods.
	Interesting way to look at it.
	But again, each position can be theologically supported depending on how you define or redefine a particular phrase or a particular term.
	Theology is like that, and those old languages are like that.
	They have a lot of versatility, and there are ways to To really make a lot of mistakes in the parsing of of the different words that are out there, so I don't think anybody's out there saying that there's some.
	The magical religion that has all the answers.
	Even Christians don't claim to have it.
	And we don't look to any particular individual for, you know, commentary in terms of, oh, this guy's right.
	This guy knows everything.
	R.C.
	Sproul didn't have it.
	There was big debates among big theologians for a long, long time.
	And that's why you look through the history of the church and you see the different councils.
	Each council was a big Gathering of the latest ideas, episodes, technologies, and manuscripts, and comparison, and argument.
	And it's been that way since the beginning of time.
	When you go and define a Christian or a theology, you're generally defining a set of doctrinal principles that can be extracted from the text and said, this is a fact.
	But there's nobody out there that's got a handle on how deep and how far it goes, because I'll tell you, The structures of those languages just don't allow for that.
	And in the paradox of our limited understanding and our limited ability to facts, I do agree with you that there are a lot of interpretations that to our human mind says, yeah, that could be, and that could be, and that could be.
	And I want to finish by impression.
	Of reading the book and comparing it to the world that we saw of constant wars, and I keep telling the story of my two grandfathers lied into World War One, my father, my uncle, my wife's father in World War Two, and working on the issue of ending poverty, and I concluded that whoever, so these Old Testament gods, and I read their stories, and I couldn't find anything that I would consider virtuous, nothing to respect,
	And as a matter of fact, I would say that I would be anti-Old Testament gods, that I would be a heretic.
	And then, you know, as a history student, taking a look at the history that we're told with the wars, the revolutions, the slaughters, and the Pope in the Serpent Hall with the demon statues, is that I think that there is a strong
	Reference of factual background to make the conclusion that It really is you call it Satan or the devil or evil something has inverted everything and They seem to want to run an empire They seem to have no empathy and their characteristics their personality characteristics is also consistent What I say and what may have happened is it seems to be some sort of a predator like evolution
	Like a lizard or a reptilian.
	And I have no problem with that.
	You got to keep your distance.
	They're hungry like everybody else.
	And they will snap and they'll eat anything.
	And if you give them higher intelligence, that's going to be a foe.
	And they'll have no compunction manipulating their food source and just farming us.
	And I think that's where we're at.
	But I think that they violated some sort of a prime directive to allow the beings here to have some freedom of expression.
	I think that the creator and or the creators.
	plan, got involved here, and have elegantly provided choice for the humans while at their level, I think that they have done what they ethically need to do with that reptilian or AI force that is in the background.
	It has a lot of speculation.
	And I mean, once you see the world, as far as a human being's two eyes and brain can determine, you got to ask those questions and come up with working answers to maneuver your way around this thing.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Yep.
	Lost your sound, buddy. . buddy. .
	This microphone keeps cutting in and out.
	I don't like to use the default microphone.
	I do have an updated computer, but I haven't done all the work to get it set up.
	Let me try the microphone one more time.
	All right, can you hear me now?
	Yep, that's good.
	All right.
	Lost you again.
	Microphone's out.
	Senator Marco Rubio furious and demands action after China, Russia, and Iran avoid sanctions by abandoning the dollar.
	Here's Senator Rubio.
	China, Russia and Iran are evading U.S.
	sanctions by using alternative financial systems.
	Yeah, that's right, bitch.
	And this doesn't make sense, Marco.
	You literally say foreign countries should be held accountable for not following U.S.
	laws.
	Oh, wait, that's what you actually believe.
	Now, this is what I think that this serpent is saying.
	Introduced a bill that would ensure these regimes Are held accountable.
	So what I think that he's threatening to do is that he's threatening to seize accounts and they've done this before.
	They have taken Russian assets and as the Empire is running out of money.
	I think they're going to I think that's what the threat is and at the same time Zelensky suspends Ukraine's foreign debt payments starting August 1st.
	Yeah, you bet.
	I mean as if this was ever going to be repaid.
	And so this is the background article that have solutions here.
	And I want to point out what I think we're going to be seeing and what a lot of the colleagues that I pay attention to are spelling out is going to happen.
	Now, as I've been saying, the demand for U.S.
	debt securities will evaporate.
	And there's going to be two reasons for that.
	One, people are going to take a look at the inflation rate hidden And they're going to conclude to themselves, I don't think that this is a wise investment.
	I don't think that the Fed and the Treasury Department are trustable enough for me to invest my money.
	And the other thing is they're going to be looking at funding genocide, and they're not going to be willing to do that.
	And the wokeism, they're not going to be willing to do that.
	They're just not.
	And where is that money going to look for investment?
	It's going to go to hard assets.
	And right now, silver is priced at a ratio where gold is at 85 to 1.
	That is, that will flip.
	It's being pulled out of the ground.
	Silver is pulled out of the ground compared to gold at 7 to 1.
	And historically, that price ratio, people are going to fly to hold physical assets.
	The two big to fail banks have a quadrillion dollars, as best we can estimate, of these derivatives contracts.
	That's a thousand trillion, 90% of which are held by the two big to fail banks.
	If there's a hard run for the assets, then these over-leveraged big banks, 20 to 1, over-leveraged, they're going to have to admit, ah, hey, we can't pay.
	We can't deliver.
	And the system will be done in an instant.
	And then the sheeple will know.
	And I think that that will be the big breakthrough.
	That's just one of them.
	It could also be with the election fraud, who Biden is, the pedophilia, the World War III scare.
	I think they're going to continue to pump that fear up.
	So it is on the edge.
	Brother, your thoughts?
	I think they'll be able to support the currency through the election.
	And then I think Trump has the capability of getting it stabilized again.
	I'm more worried about the New World Order agenda, and I see that being pressed harder and harder and harder, because I know that that comes with the central bank digital currency.
	I think that their plan includes propping up your big banks and your big banking partners, because frankly, if it's a central bank, why do you need the banks anyway?
	So, I see the banks playing more of a role of your local police structure than continuing to be a centralized point.
	I see a big master bank being in control of issuing the currencies, but BRICS could really put a delay on the whole situation and a lot of countries can begin to pull out.
	The question really comes down to whether or not nations are acting We're going to be capable of acting autonomously, separate from whatever this new central digital currency is.
	For instance, Russia rolled out its test on its central bank digital currency, and it was theoretically successful, according to RT.
	I've heard that there's been a lot of test runs here in the States on different types of currencies, but it's basically the same thing.
	Right now, we sling plastic around.
	Very few people carry large sums of cash.
	Yeah, people hoard their gold and their silver for a rainy day, and that's fine, but that's nothing compared to what people have deposited inside banks.
	And I think when they do roll out the centralized bank digital currency, there'll be a sort of A square trade idea, like for every thousand dollars you get one new credit, something like that.
	And so there will be assets that will continue to flow where they're at, just because there'd be a huge uproar otherwise.
	So whatever you have, you'll probably just have it converted into something different.
	The question really comes down to what sort of strings get put on how you can spend your money.
	and what freedoms you're going to have to contribute to dissenting causes, such as giving money to a truther, or such as buying an AR-15 or whatever it happens to be.
	What are the strings that are going to be on this new centralized bank digital currency?
	And these things we don't really know yet at this point in time.
	Glad you mentioned that second part because yes, everything that would be lost can be made whole.
	And it all depends, again, it's who's in charge.
	White hats are in charge.
	They're going to use this as an opportunity to get the sheep along their side by scaring them.
	By showing them, bitches, you were this fucking close.
	This close, okay?
	And to have them pay attention.
	And then, exactly as you said, just make some sort of a conversion.
	And then we're all good.
	The current system, we're so looted.
	The 0.1% own more assets than the 90% and all that data and more is in that article that I offered for public consideration.
	So the destruction of the parasites would be a good thing.
	And then, The ability to make people whole again.
	Oh yeah, we can do that.
	We've had those technical tools for well over 300 years documented by Benjamin Franklin, so excited he wrote a pamphlet saying, hey, if the government is a bank and does it ethically, you don't need to tax the people.
	Not at all.
	Nothing.
	Well, just for fun, just for fantasy purposes, you know, Carl, why don't you update the audience in terms of what is Nassara Gassara?
	See what you can pull out of the archives on that.
	Okay, well, if you wanted to do an accounting of how much we've been looted, and Catherine Austin Fitts, the former secretary of the, assistant secretary of HUD, and a Wall Street financial analyst before and after that part, who just tried to do an accounting, and said when he was under Bush Sr., Papa Bush, excuse me, we're being looted somehow.
	Tens of trillions we're getting are off the books.
	We don't know where they are.
	And she was prosecuted for pointing that out.
	Answer the question, how much have we been looted?
	And Catherine Austin Fitts and Robert David Steele said, Oh, yeah, hundred trillion easy.
	And for the historic compilation, all I did was do a rough calculation that the average American family would be able to gain about a million dollars.
	In just easily demonstrable benefits, so the Sara Jasara would be saying, okay, you're now free of this parasite.
	Here's the documentation of what they took from you.
	Here's something going forward.
	Now, this has to be done in such a way that.
	We relieve the immediate emergency of these poor people so stressed into poverty and having to struggle and not having the opportunity of much creative enterprise outside of the pressure of trying to survive in the system.
	And we all know that.
	There are some people who don't, who get crushed psychologically and or financially and lose those resources.
	You see the record homelessness.
	The pressures are real.
	So you want to relieve that torture and then make people whole.
	And we still have to produce a society.
	So that's a big ticket.
	And in terms of how they're going to do that, you know, I don't I don't know.
	A lot of the details.
	I can tell if I was in line with them to construct goals.
	And yeah, those are the basic goals that you're going to set up.
	But realistically, as we all know, you'd ask the question, have you ever saved a planet's financial system before?
	No.
	That is probably going to take at least twice as long as you thought.
	And you're going to have ridiculous problems along the way that you're going to have to scramble.
	So I think that even if we had that conversation up front, and you release the technology, I think if you gave people free energy, I think that would go in med beds.
	That would go a long way to getting people's cooperation and understanding, and we'd be able to work it out.
	It's interesting that you say that.
	Do you know who was the one who went in and captured all of Tesla's papers after he died?
	Yes, yes, yes, that was Trump's uncle, is what I've read.
	Now, I don't think that that's a coincidence either.
	All right, let's go on.
	Okay.
	Trump assassination attempt.
	All right, these are some good ones.
	The idea that Google is manipulating search results.
	We need to, we've covered this guy before on Need to Know News.
	I don't know when in the last four years, but we have.
	Zach Vorhies was a senior software engineer at Google.
	He could no longer live with his conscience.
	Revealed 950 pages that expose the agenda of Google.
	He says, quote, Google manipulates mankind by hiding certain information and imposing other information.
	They blacklist thousands of websites.
	Their mission is to program humanity.
	Hmm.
	That's called expert testimony.
	Now, this guy.
	Now, I don't know who this guy is, Daniel Davis, but I can read in the background that he's an author of this book on the shelf, The Eleventh Hour, and it says, Lieutenant Colonel.
	So, this would be expert testimony from a military man, and he's going to point out a couple of important facts.
	He's going to show the video.
	Oh, he gives the explanation, first of all, of this acting director.
	point out the highlights of this and I do recommend the whole thing so he says that this guy the acting director of secret service claims that oh you know this was their reenactment he snuck up from behind and and even when he came up to to shoot this was all we could see that's their official story okay
	Yeah, I listened to all 25 minutes of the video and the guy basically takes the perspective of, okay, let's say I'm outside the agency and I'm evaluating this particular event and I'm going to start asking some serious questions.
	Well, the one fundamental problem that we have at this point in time is we have no serious answers to any serious questions related to this event.
	How did he get the gun there?
	How did he, you know, how did he get through the crowds?
	How did he, you know, just we're not even answering the big questions because we don't have a report yet to give us anything.
	So, I listened to 25 minutes of this guy talk about it like he was, you know, a real professional on the inside evaluating the different things that have been put out.
	The fundamental problem is everything that gets put out is part of a disinformation operation in a false flag event.
	So why would you take a variable that comes after the fact and then begin to include it into the program?
	He agrees that the audio has been manipulated, that the cell phone coverage Has only been released on a on a limited basis that there's only certain perspectives available that what you should see you're not seeing what that what you're not seeing.
	So he agrees that there's all these questions, but he acts as if there's there ought to be a serious answer to these questions.
	Do you remember Las Vegas?
	Las Vegas is the perfect.
	It's the perfect scenario because it gives you such a concise view of what a false flag event really looks like.
	No answers.
	To the real questions.
	Was it a sound effect?
	How did he get all those guns in the room?
	Gaslight, gaslight, gaslight.
	I mean, Las Vegas was just an absolute mess in terms of false flag answers.
	And yet, Joe Lombardo or whatever, Sheriff Joe is now the governor of Nevada.
	That's the fundamental problem that you've got when you try to take a serious approach to an evaluation of an event that's as screwy fake as this particular event.
	I'm convinced that anybody who takes a look at or even drops the name Matthew Crooks as if he was a real person sitting on a real that really got his head blown off under these particulars.
	And that was a real photo of his.
	You know, give me a break.
	It's just it's not it's all magic.
	It's all magic.
	Nothing is real.
	They tell you to rely on what you see or what video you're getting.
	But I'm telling you, everything seems to have been so well controlled in this.
	It wouldn't surprise me if 40% of that audience were crisis actors that you could find in other events just as well.
	And that's the spirit of what I'm talking about.
	Because when people say, when they say, oh, yeah, I know the government lies.
	I know that.
	Then OK.
	Then that means nothing should be believed.
	Nothing.
	And when you embrace the history of the false flags, then you should look from the perspective of first, like, okay, so what do they do in this false flag this time?
	And simultaneously, part of you has to be outraged, and we have sufficient evidence already To demand leadership arrests, and that, you know, I appreciate the members of Congress, like this gentleman here, Daniel Davis, the Lieutenant Colonel, asking serious questions.
	But after you get your toes wet in the pool, then you realize that, oh, of course, you're going to find the fuckery.
	And this is based upon, and I'll put in the show notes here at Bitchute, the article that I have that Demonstrates that like you're talking about with with Las Vegas as a false flag.
	Well, they did JFK, RFK and MLK.
	And anybody who takes a look at those at that evidence to has to come to the same conclusion.
	So, let's take a look at what the sheeple are seeing with this this video.
	And what the news is going to tell them, maybe.
	So he is saying, exactly as you said, that by all appearances, the sound has been manipulated.
	And then we have this video of, let's see, he's up here, where the dude is running across the roof, or some guy is running across the roof, and I'll let him see him.
	Plain as day, from a position below Trump's head, as opposed to the guy who's about 10 feet above his head, supposed to be looking in this direction, he didn't see him.
	And it's so clear, watch this tape.
	So again, the official story was, is that this character, and Brian is correct to say, yeah, yeah, Crooks, huh?
	Then he's going to pop his head up like almost up to the middle of his chest.
	So again, the official story was, is that this character, and Brian is correct to say, yeah, yeah, crooks, huh?
	So the official story is he snuck up from behind and wasn't visible.
	You know, and then from this camera angle, you certainly can refute that instantly.
	Now, but wait, there's more.
	He is talking about, of course, and professional snipers are saying that if they were going to take a shot, they'd be up here at the water tower, that would be one.
	But this guy is inside the zone, and he also talks about with...
	The Secret Service countersniper shot and killed him.
	That's the official story.
	Okay, so this lieutenant colonel says that if he was taken out by a countersniper, that caliber of bullet and the speed of that round would have literally turned his head into mist and fragments.
	There wouldn't be anything left.
	And that is his expert testimony.
	Now, at the end, he does go into a range of important questions.
	Now, let him ask these, because this is exactly what Brian was talking about.
	Anybody serious would be asking these questions.
	And if we don't get an answer, then it's, I'm sorry.
	Sir or Madam, you're under arrest in apparent criminal complicity for the assassination attempt on President Trump.
	Guys, it's impossible to be any other way.
	There is no way that wound was caused by that weapon.
	It was caused by something else.
	So, those are some of the critical questions that need to be answered because folks, we are not being told the truth and it is clear somebody is trying to cover something up.
	It is blatantly obvious.
	I don't know yet what's going on.
	I don't know who's doing what.
	I don't know who may be behind anything.
	I just don't have enough information to even make a guess.
	Yeah, I love that guy, but you can tell he's pretty much a rookie.
	He hasn't seen this before.
	Oh yeah, he's joining the crew.
	That's what he's doing.
	He's joining the crew.
	He's sitting down doing the analysis, going over all the stuff, and trying to convince himself that his brain is not going crazy.
	Which is cognitive dissonance, which is what everybody has to go through when they get to this.
	You can take any thread in this event and chase the theory until the sweater completely unravels.
	And you can find yourself going crazy with all these different variables.
	And I'll tell you, the guy with the best instincts on this stuff is PK.
	I mean, Fetzer's good at it.
	He does a lot of analysis, but just PK is just funny.
	And he just lays it out like, guys, how do you buy this?
	That was what it took for me at the beginning was just somebody who's just like, you don't see it?
	You don't see it?
	Why do you have to go through all these different variations and all these different, you know, critical questions to get to it?
	It was a show.
	I have now studied I probably have 40 or 50 false flag folders on my computer.
	Plus, I've got access to Olay's entire digital vault, which probably includes another 300 to 500 events inside of it.
	Now, I don't have time to sit down and go through every single event and find all the anomalies that sit out there and analyze and parse until the point I can write, nobody died at Sandy Hook.
	I don't really much care to do it because once you see the big picture, now you know And that's, that's the trick is getting yourself broken through that one spot where you're thinking, okay, I'm going to, I'm going to start to ask questions about the narrative.
	Wait a second.
	Was the whole damn thing staged?
	Is it, could I be crazy?
	Is the whole world talking about Scrooge and a second shooter and you know, what direction did it come from?
	And they can't see it.
	It's fake.
	Oh shit!
	Was I deceived on that level?
	Is the whole world that deceived?
	That's what, that's what truthers have to go through.
	That's what we go through.
	We go through that.
	Then once you've been through it, you're like, Oh, I'll never see the world the same again.
	Yeah.
	That's how you come out.
	Yeah, and hence, you know, we talk about it with crime du jours, and we wrote a thousand articles, and I'm with you.
	I mean, I could study it again.
	I don't want to.
	Don't care to.
	I don't think, I don't think it would be helpful at this point for me to invest my intellect in that direction.
	We can make more, wake more people up with You know, detailed analysis and, hey, let me show you, let me show you, let me show you.
	I mean, we can do that.
	That's that's part of the goal of what we do.
	But how much of your life do you put in?
	When I break out something like Buffalo, I literally spent four days, three or four days prepping to break out and show you that these are not real bullets.
	I did that work load for the audience.
	Nashville.
	It was like 15, 16 hours.
	I did that workload for the audience.
	But if I did that for every single event, I would be a full timer.
	And I've never asked, I can't, I don't want to ask people for money to do this.
	I make my own money.
	I don't want to have to go raise money to, to do this besides, okay.
	You go build a YouTube channel with a million viewers.
	Oh, gone.
	You know, Yeah, if you want to, in the comments and bit shoots, I'm sure that many people would like to see that work that you did on previous false flags so that they could go ahead and shop around.
	Because me, as somebody who has paid attention to this, my impression of your work, Brian, is that it is professional, it is brilliant, there is a A tone that you take on as a private investigator, that is just, just smacks of expert witness.
	It's just for me, it's like, all right, sit back, bring it brother.
	And you bring the goods, you destroy the story and bring people to the place where they need to go, which is to withdraw consent from the official story and to know that they've been fooled and demand arrest.
	Now with the, the, uh, I'll jump in and show you that.
	But what I can tell you with a lot of confidence is what you are being told is not true.
	And then we'll talk about the possibility that, yeah, the whole thing was staged.
	Nothing happened.
	Nobody got shot.
	But let me let this guy finish his questions because they're good.
	But what I can tell you with a lot of confidence is what you are being told is not true.
	And we need people to start asking some of the hard questions like we're talking about here.
	How is it that your team can't see him allegedly only when he's on the crest, but yet you allegedly killed him off the crest?
	How is it that you didn't see the?
	Yeah, let me let me point out the importance of that question, because the photos that we have of him as a body is he's about on the middle of that roof.
	And that's interesting.
	He wasn't on the top of the crest when he got his head blown off.
	So that data point alone of physical evidence, photographic evidence, refutes the official story.
	That's a big deal.
	That would demand that we arrest that guy in charge of Secret Service now and his predecessor as apparent criminal accomplices for the murder attempt.
	The gunman running across the building.
	How is it that we're told that the gunman came in from the back side when now we see video evidence that he came in from the left side, from the vantage point of the Trump's platform?
	How is it that some of the video evidence has been altered with the audio so that they no longer line up?
	So all of these questions need to be answered here.
	Who literally took the who are you going to tell us confidently took the fatal shot?
	That's all these things we need to understand, because what we are being told, folks, it ain't right.
	It's not lining up and we need to find some answers here.
	Thanks for watching today.
	Listen.
	Yeah, I like that guy.
	All right.
	He's coming around.
	He won't be on YouTube for long if he keeps it up.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I want to point out Mike King of the anti-New York Times.
	Now, he and I share the same conclusion that white hats are in charge, and what he does is he's a New Yorker, and he goes ahead and just pillars the New York Times.
	And the New York Times ran this article, Some Republicans Embrace Conspiracy Theories on Trump Assassination Attempt.
	Now, it's a smear job.
	But what Mike is pointing out is that this Annie Carney, another recent addition or plant to the Slimes, smears the people challenging the official story, these members, eight members of Congress.
	And if you want to, you know, check out the smears.
	But these eight individuals are all former military.
	Ooh.
	Now that's just interesting to me.
	I don't know what it means, but that is interesting.
	And I'm with you that because, so first, if Trump is an important figure and is being protected, and if he knows any damn thing, then he knows he's going to be targeted for assassination every day.
	Now, I don't even know if that gentleman on the stage was Trump or not.
	Doesn't really matter.
	But they would have known that he would be a target, and they would have anticipated.
	Now, as Brian and I talked about the day after, a couple weeks ago, when we talked about it, the most stunning physical evidence for me was, so you have these alleged shots.
	You have Trump go down, and he comes up, and he's got an ear booboo.
	Okay.
	That's convenient.
	And then you have the photo of him raising his hand.
	A little bit of blood there.
	Or a little bit of stage blood.
	And the fight, fight, fight.
	That's the optic.
	Fight, fight, fight.
	Saying it three times is important.
	It's kind of like a spell.
	Trying to slap the Americans into being able to recognize that this is a war, but it's just so perfectly staged.
	And then Trump goes ahead and plays his role at the Republican National Convention and say, oh, there was so much blood, so much.
	No, he had an ear boo-boo, which is inconsistent with any wound on the ear.
	I've never wounded my ear or harmed my ear, but my understanding is that you get a lot of blood.
	No blood on his hand, nothing, no blood, just a little stage boo-boo.
	So I'm with you that the whole thing was somehow contrived.
	with the effect of opening up another area of the deep state.
	And I don't know anything, but I do know that the whole world is watching.
	What we've seen in this assassination attempt, in my estimation, is not enough for victory.
	But with a breakthrough event, then people will look to this area and like that former lieutenant colonel, they will have had enough.
	Your thoughts, brother?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	So even if I sit down and do a frame by frame analysis of an event, that doesn't mean that I'm not still mystified as to how they achieve this particular effect under these particular circumstances.
	There's been a few times where I simply couldn't explain or didn't have an answer for why we think this image and this frame is authentic.
	It happens.
	You have to look at the preponderance of the evidence.
	You have to look at the overall.
	For instance, let's say you're going to evaluate Sandy Hook.
	You might go into the Connecticut State Police report on the event and you might find a whole bunch of anomalies that are in there.
	And in the process, you'll run across 911 calls and all sorts of fabricated evidence that's thrown in there.
	But when you really understand the big picture and really begin to isolate the important stuff, which is where were the bodies lying?
	Where is the blood?
	Where is the blood spatter?
	How is that supposed to be laid out?
	Then everything else fades away.
	So, when I do an event, I always look at the earliest and most reliable evidence.
	In this case, it was, yeah, I wanted to see all these social media posts and all this cell phone footage, which I assumed people from all around the world would be uploading on a daily basis, so I can create this nice archive with 75 different angles.
	For some reason, Think of how few videos we've had actually originate from the event.
	I mean, we've got seven or eight angles.
	I mean, everybody's got a cell phone in there.
	You're being controlled.
	You're being controlled.
	Otherwise, Facebook and Twitter and whatever, every single video would be out there and people would have found it by now.
	We're being fed seven or eight different angles and highly modified video.
	And that's what we're being told to analyze.
	Fuck you, I'm not playing your game.
	That's the ticket!
	And the day after this thing, when you and I talked about it, I don't remember how we framed it, but our conclusion was, huh, so they didn't cover that roof.
	They didn't think that was important to cover.
	150 yards away.
	Huh?
	I could almost Make it more dangerous.
	I could be dangerous with a golf club and a golf ball from that distance.
	And then the water tower right there.
	You excluded that, too.
	So that alone is enough of, I'm sorry, sir, you're under arrest for the criminal complicity in the assassination attempt on President Trump and not to play their game anymore.
	I mean, thank them for their testimony.
	Oh, you excluded the roof because it was too slopey.
	Thank you for that.
	That's very helpful.
	That will be very helpful in the understanding of what your role was in this event.
	Alright.
	So another good conversation here, partner.
	All right, and let's see, we have, oh yeah, so with the New York Times.
	So in terms of the New York Times, I wanted to connect this to the ongoing gaslighting and the necessity to have corporate media lie to the people to cover these official crimes, and then you got to put it into the corporate media text.
	And the New York Times, this is a, Reminder, waterboarding used 266 times on two suspects.
	This was from Al-Qaeda now.
	I'm not going to give the Times any of my information in order to unlock this article.
	But that would be prima facie war crimes and would discount the United States from anything other than receiving an arrest warrant.
	For the New York Times, and anybody who is homeschooling their kids, this is my best shot of teaching critical thinking to high school students.
	It can be used in a six-part series.
	But part of what I presented to students, and this was in high school U.S.
	government classes, And this is based upon my 18 years of expert testimony as a volunteer lobbyist for ending poverty that led to UN summits for heads of state.
	And it's getting to what did the New York Times have to report on the 1990 World Summit for Children.
	I'll lay out the data here.
	For global and domestic policy, And I just want to read this part here, because this is kind of the summary of what I found, and then we're going to tie it into what you can expect from corporate media.
	At results, after 18 years of leadership from both parties were nagging on each and every public and private promise to end poverty, we concluded that leadership had what we euphemistically call other interests than ending poverty.
	And we framed that so we could talk to people and not polarize them.
	But really, it was an empire that we concluded that we were looking at.
	Former chief economist John Perkins has written two bestselling books consistent with our findings, as Perkins explains in this two minute video.
	That's the economic hitman.
	He explains that U.S. foreign policy is neocolonialism for the purpose to control foreign governments and their resources and make profits for insider cooperating U.S. corporations.
	His testimony is supported by bestselling books from the chief economist to the World Bank and IMF.
	Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and MIT Simon Johnson.
	For a specific example, the New Republic article, RIGGED, clearly explains U.S.
	support of perpetual, vicious, dictators friendly to U.S.
	oil interests in Africa's second, third, and fourth biggest oil-producing countries, Angola, Gabon, and Equatorial Guinea.
	Most people have no idea about that.
	Of course, these acts are only possible with cooperation of U.S.
	corporate media.
	Let's consider media coverage of the 1990 World Summit for Children, the largest meeting of heads of state in world history.
	And the purpose of the summit was nations' agreement to end poverty once and for all, forever.
	And we had pre-agreements from all of the players.
	The developed nations would fund the work to accomplish the summit's goals with just 0.7% of their incomes.
	This would save a million children's lives every month.
	With history strongly projected, the proven strategies would end poverty everywhere on earth within 10 years.
	And in every historical instance of ending poverty, population growth rates decrease.
	And the problem of overpopulation I didn't say it here, but I said it otherwhere in the article that the CIA director also contributed saying, hey, if you want to end terrorism, end poverty.
	It's the most correlative statistic we've found.
	So we have the largest meeting of heads of state in world history to save a million children's lives every month.
	That's the investment?
	Reduces population growth rate in every historical case?
	You think that would be front page news?
	Nope.
	Couldn't get coverage.
	And the New York Times, this was at the UN Summit in New York.
	The New York Times refused to cover the story until the last day of the summit.
	And this is the headline they chose.
	World Summit for Children.
	World's leaders gather at UN for summit meeting on children.
	What?
	And they put it in the education section.
	Okay.
	Now for 1990, I don't know where education was, but when I wrote this article, I could see where they placed education and they placed this story.
	They put it behind business and New York and technology and health, opinion, the arts, books, movies, music, television, theater.
	They put it behind style, dining and wine.
	Fashion and style was more important, as was home and garden and weddings and celebrations and travel and And then I go through and parse the details of that article in order to demonstrate that this was intentional.
	And I think that this is the last part here.
	No, it's not the last part here.
	And then this background article about the war that we're in.
	I'll tell you in a moment.
	So corporate media is going to cover for the empire.
	And that enough of us have documented that to make it clear, and that was my wake up call in 1990, that we're not going to get anything of truth from corporate media.
	Now, when I presented this information professionally to students, the result of students was that their average grade for me as a teacher in anonymous semester ending surveys was A, And the response of the school districts, remember all the agencies are captured, is that they had to contrive and find a way to fire me.
	And they did!
	Four times.
	Last District tried five times to fire me and eventually put me on paid administrative leave in order to investigate how and why I was asking questions regarding their health orders.
	And that last article, I engage the fictional character of Socrates in the conversation and I tell a lot of those stories.
	It is ridiculous.
	It is gaslighting.
	And in terms of who's in charge, as Brian and I were talking about, you want to call it Satan or evil or whatever, it's big, and it seems to have gotten to everything, at least in what I can see.
	All right, Brian, your thoughts, brother?
	I think I've told this story before, but after COVID hit, within 48 hours, I had seen this Image from this website of all these different spider web pipe scenarios that have been laid out by the World Economic Forum in relation to this pandemic event.
	And obviously what you were looking at was years and years of planning and practice.
	And I was like, she didn't pop up overnight because COVID was discovered.
	This is, this is years and years and years in the planning.
	And I'm telling you that the way that they bring up these globalists, Is that they groom them for roles at these Ivy League schools and other types of institutions.
	They bring them through and educate them in the steps.
	Some are taken out of that special program and used for.
	Bureaucratic purposes implementation and exercise the other ones are taken out for leadership roles where they're supposed to be placed into positions of authority.
	Others are taken out and used into.
	You'll be the next person in line to manage this particular line of the vertical supply chain and.
	People are brought through that system.
	They're groomed.
	They're looked at and I'll tell you one thing.
	They're not going to pick the kids that are the best and the brightest that are thinking independently.
	Okay, their goal is to pick the kids that obey.
	that do what they're told and they reward them carrots and sticks both ways but that's how they bring them through the system when you have that young radical mind that's hungry that needs to learn to feed himself and he's given just the right balance of hey y'all i'll give you a fish today but i'm going to teach you to fish because if you don't learn to fish you're going to be put into a position
	Now, on the other hand, you got the kids that are just the government, you know, they're the typical DNA melting pot of government assistance.
	Mom and dad are busy watching television and on the phone.
	There's no books in the house.
	You have cartoons.
	You're given a phone.
	A phone is slapped in your hand when you're 10 years old.
	And now you've got TikTok to educate you and you're just going to go through the system.
	And you begin to learn, oh, I can just be dependent on the government just like mom and dad are.
	I don't have to be successful.
	You want success, but you don't know how to do it because you haven't had to you haven't had to break through the hard glass ceiling that that is trials and tribulation in order to become successful.
	We make a big mistake today in that we allow our government institutions to have way too much power and control in terms of how they're going to bring up young people.
	Hillary Clinton, the DNC, just remember what they said about education.
	It takes a village.
	Folks, I'll tell you, bullshit.
	Bullshit.
	All a village is going to do is confuse you.
	Takes a mother and a father.
	Yes, yes.
	And the work, I mean, everything is inverted.
	And what I would tell students is that, okay, so it's children wanting to learn what's most important to enjoy and be successful in your life.
	We're sitting here at desks having you do paperwork that you're never going to use.
	And in people's real experiences, I mean, maybe 10% is chalk talk, where you get the theory, and then 90% is you gotta try it, and you're gonna learn from your mistakes.
	And that's going to be the process of education.
	And for in terms of finding the system, finding the people who are going to be compliant to do the bidding of the evil, John Perkins, the economic hitman, his answer was simple.
	It says, Oh, yeah, yeah, they groomed me in college.
	And I was all excited about working for the CIA and being a spy and being an economist at a private corporation.
	But really, I'd be working for the CIA.
	And how the CIA got me?
	Money.
	Sex.
	Drugs.
	I was all in, baby.
	And it was only until he became a granddad and 9-11 happened that Perkins said, OK, I better tell what I know.
	They're probably going to kill me, but I love my family and my grandchildren more because I see where they're heading with this.
	And I'm going to tell my story.
	All right.
	What else do we have?
	All right.
	The Olympics!
	Yes!
	All right, the stands are half empty and the ratings are in the toilet.
	The IOC says the games will lose more than $300 million over the blast from this opening.
	They allowed to happen, go woke, go broke.
	Now, I haven't looked at some of the figures, but I just want to point that out, that this is the great awakening and the great choosing This is unjust.
	Biological male boxer viciously beats female opponent and forces her to quit in tears within seconds.
	At Woke Olympic, there's a picture and take as long as you need to study that in terms of evaluating the musculature of this biological male.
	And they allowed these two guys to get into the ring, even though they are biological males and that their biological tests demonstrate that.
	Here's another great picture to show this male beating up another scandal at the Paris Olympics involving the most dangerous sport, Sparks Outrage.
	Another meme was, yeah, I haven't been watching the Olympics, but apparently now they have men beating women as a sport.
	And then Kathy Barnett, this is the new women's rights movement with this image.
	And then J.K.
	Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series.
	Could any picture sum up our new men's rights movement better?
	The smirk of a male who knows he's protected by a misogynist sporting establishment enjoying the distress of a woman he's just punched in the head and whose life's ambition he just shattered.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I like this.
	Secretary of State of Missouri candidate Valentina Gomez.
	I'll let her speak for herself.
	These faggots should get their own faggot category.
	Because before, if a man hit a woman, it used to land him in jail.
	Now, it gets you a gold medal at the Olympics.
	These are the worst Olympics in history.
	They have made a mockery out of Christianity and women.
	And let me remind you, there's no such thing as a chick with a dick.
	keep women sports females There's no start staying as a chick with a dick keep women sports females And that's powerful!
	And that's why everything that we're seeing seems to be pushing us in the right direction.
	Brian, your thoughts, brother?
	She's pretty much saying that, like she said it.
	I don't know if that's attractive or not.
	I think it's terrifyingly attractive.
	Not very feminine, but it's funny she's got the Olympic shirt on and it's obviously a PR stunt.
	That's fine.
	You know, let's just isolate the entire issue.
	Woke has gone crazy.
	Woke goes broke.
	Woke is what's being pushed by this DEI agenda.
	The reason for the wokeness is to create a weaker citizenry.
	And that's what it's leading to.
	Reduces global population, it increases suicide, and it's a disaster in terms of confusing children about, you know, what role do they play in society.
	It's going to lead to more shame, embarrassment, and destruction than anything else that's out there.
	You couldn't set off a bomb in a city and get better results than woke in the academic institutions.
	We must destroy this beast by continuing to have people speak like that about what it is.
	I'll tell you, I have very little tolerance for these faggots.
	I've seen them.
	I know they're on the cheer teams.
	My daughter's a cheerleader.
	I'm having a hard time allowing this to continue to take place.
	Now, there's been male cheerleaders, but they're guys.
	That's totally different than a little boy pretending to be a little girl.
	That's a difficult situation, I feel, for the parents.
	You should never let them play with dolls.
	Never.
	You know, for me, as a public school teacher, seeing the kids as teenagers deal with this, I tried to look at the data, and apparently, through history, with the self-reporting of people who are more attracted to the same sex than the opposite sex, it's somewhere 2-4%.
	Historically now, I think that our kids are being tortured through the injections that make that push that biological confusion to better confuse people and as a public school teacher.
	Just standing in defense of human beings in general, not once, but twice.
	Students group of students came up to me.
	It was a lunchtime both times.
	And these were were individuals who seem to be more of an expression.
	And then I would tell people, okay, so the science.
	In terms that was presented in United States court cases for the ability of people to marriage, do you have marriage on the same sex?
	The arguments that had been winning was the biological arguments that seemed to indicate that you can have an exterior genitalia be distinct from a psychology that seems to be more attracted to the opposite of that genitalia.
	And I would tell students, you know, I don't know anything.
	This was the evidence that was presented in court by these expert witnesses.
	It got the votes.
	And hence, we have the marriages.
	And students approached me twice, groups of students, saying, Mr. Herman, we're interested in forming a gay-straight alliance club, and would you be our sponsor?
	I said, why would you want me?
	They said, you will defend us.
	And I said, yes, yes, I defend everyone.
	So I did.
	And my observation of these students, you know, I tell them, I wish you well.
	I have nothing to say legally.
	An adult, I can't say anything.
	But I do encourage you to talk with your families and work it out.
	You know, personally, I know people who go into that lifestyle.
	Some of them seem to and some of them say that it matches their self-expression again.
	I don't know.
	Life is challenging enough.
	So go ahead and go for what's most important for you and and God bless you and good luck.
	So.
	I think that the expression that we're seeing in the Olympics, to tie it back to that topic, has evoked the outrage, and I think that that candidate for Missouri expresses what the vast majority of people are feeling, and Trump jumped on that bandwagon just a couple of days ago, saying that, as president, men will not compete in women's sports.
	It is the destruction of women.
	Anything else on this topic, brother, or move on?
	Tall fences make good neighbors.
	We've got to teach kids boundaries.
	You've got to teach kids boundaries.
	You've got to teach them discipline.
	They can't have everything they want.
	They're curious about the human body.
	I get it.
	They have these feelings arising.
	I was a kid once too.
	I remember.
	Boundaries!
	If you're not there doing it, then the internet's going to do it for you and it's going to end up being Porn tube or red cider, whatever is out there.
	And there's no boundaries on that.
	It's a dangerous thing.
	Yeah, they simultaneously shame people from talking about and bringing up certain topics while they program people in the media to go ahead and act upon those, and then this state of confusion, which is what they do too, they're going to go ahead and torture these people into the gender mutilations, and then pretend that they're there for them, for our trans kids, and then they're going to groom them, and continue to groom them, use them, manipulate them.
	The amount of shame that it produces is enough to... I can see that these days it would be enough to make a kid want to check out.
	Oh, yeah.
	I think it's that powerful.
	Yeah.
	I mean, I only checked one of the video documentaries of medical professionals saying, you know, you should see the images of what they're doing to the kids.
	You should, and that's enough.
	And that shame, that would traumatize a kid forever.
	Yep.
	All right.
	Here we are.
	All right.
	That's the Olympics and 2024 election facts and optics.
	Who funds the U.S.
	presidential campaigns?
	All right.
	So you have all this obfuscation.
	And in terms of understanding how the sausage is made, I don't know much.
	But I do know the money gets funneled in.
	And we do know that you get these smurfs of enough lies so that you would withdraw consent.
	And this, again, is a topic that anybody from the outside who is looking at this can see that the funny money is just buying and manipulating people's opinions.
	In terms of the election optics, Elizabeth Warren says the quiet part out loud Kamala is going to legalize tens of millions of illegals.
	I'll let her say this about 10 seconds or so.
	the border to have more resources in the states and cities that are supporting migrants.
	And I believe we need to create a pathway to citizenship.
	All of that is a part of what we need to do for comprehensive immigration reform.
	Kamala Harris will work with Congress and get that done.
	Yeah, they want to create them as citizens and alleged voters or at least cover to say why they keep getting elected.
	My God, I don't pay attention to this stuff, but I do read.
	I do read.
	Like, I don't pay attention to this stuff, but I do read.
	I do read.
	And these topics are, in addition to changing her position on fracking, campaign officials said she now backed the Biden administration's budget request for increased funding for border enforcement.
	That's just optics after four years.
	No longer supported a single-payer health insurance program.
	Yeah, the Dems.
	Most people who are progressive want that.
	But the leadership says, no, it's off the table.
	Obama campaigned on that.
	And I was excited back in 2008.
	And then he said, no, that's off the table.
	Without explanation.
	And echoed Mr. Biden's call for banning assault weapons, but not a requirement to sell them to the federal government, so they just take what David Icke says, a tiptoe totalitarian shuffle.
	Kamala's Indian-Caucasian-Jamaican birth certificate resurfaces as Trump triggers race debate.
	Trump said, I didn't know she was black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn black.
	And then the evidence of this, they do, she does go on and on bragging that she's the first Indian senator in American history, identifying as Indian in the kitchen.
	And so when Kamala hits Indian TV, she's Indian.
	When she rolls up in Atlanta, she's black.
	They called this code switching and it's damn offensive.
	I think that is what people are going to come to the conclusion.
	And here in Alameda County, where I was living for a while, birth certificate, Caucasian, India, Jamaican.
	Grooming the next puppet!
	Brian was talking about this.
	Over 1,100 pro-LGTBS plus political leaders endorsed Kamala Harris for president.
	And they're just going to go ahead and see who the best lie contest winner is in order to move up in what Brian was talking about in one avenue of expression.
	You take the glib people, maybe the ones who can laugh, hopefully not like Kamala's cackles and he put them in positions of authority and it really is a lie contest winning strategy.
	And finally illegal aliens living in Georgia apartment complex say they are registered to vote in the elections.
	In any fair system this would be.
	I mean the election fraud is obvious and in a fair system we wouldn't even have it and it would be covered but Hence, you got to go to Need to Know News in order to find these things out, and we're just looking ourselves, and probably we're just covering, you know, 10% of what's most important to say, but it's all that we can get in the environment we're in.
	Brian, your thoughts?
	Border doesn't surprise me that whatever her name is, Pocahontas there, Wants to see them all legalized.
	We knew this from the beginning that that was their plan.
	If they couldn't crash the economy with them now, at least it's about votes.
	Okay, so there's at least one of the, uh, one of the ulterior motives.
	Kamala Harris being Indian, then Black, then Indian again, then back to Black.
	People are going to start seeing through this fraud real fast.
	It's, it doesn't, but it doesn't matter.
	Because look, LGBTQ just got together and decided that they're all going to live under one big happy family label.
	There's no more diversity among them at all.
	No dissenting thoughts are allowed.
	Look, you're creating a perfect, a perfect community that will only last one generation.
	Congratulations.
	Congratulations.
	Yeah.
	And to the Olympics, I want to, they didn't mention this and I wanted to bring it up.
	So the official rules for the Olympics is that you can't make any religious statements.
	You just can't.
	And yet, they violate an Orwellian degree through the opening story, mocking The Last Supper, having that white horseman.
	And so they can do it, and then they bullshit and say, oh no, we wouldn't let you do this because it's too close to an interpretation of a religious statement, but we did it, it wasn't at all religious.
	And if you took that interpretation, you know, I'm sorry that You can't see inclusivity.
	You should re-examine that and have some sort of a re-education to help yourself out there.
	That's their official statement.
	Yeah, so Jesus has been replaced with an obese woman who likes to eat hamburgers.
	Okay, what a statement, you know.
	Oh, we've got 12 disciples now.
	Everybody's going to follow around the big, fat, obese person.
	The whole thing is absolutely ridiculous and it's such a blatant show of blasphemy and heresy.
	Look, I don't tend to think too high of any symbols or any artwork or anything like that.
	I never give that stuff any more power or credit than it should be.
	It should be who were the real people behind the show, who were the real influences, and they weren't just a label.
	When I study the Bible, it's the same thing.
	Everything's not black and white all the time.
	People have flaws all over the place, but they still have a solid contribution to the game.
	These artists that made this stuff that they're mocking, solid contribution, an important part of that community.
	But just remember from the very beginning, the devil has done a job to try to deceive people into thinking that it's a crucifix or it's a cross or it's a You know, it's some symbol out there that we ought to be worshiping.
	Nothing could be farther from the truth.
	And so it doesn't offend me to see some desecration of some symbol.
	It would never bother me to see anything like that.
	But the fact that the Olympics has decided to do it for the weak-minded brother, you know, that's concerning at the same time.
	But if everybody could see things as clearly as I could, then you'd know no symbol has any power over anything.
	Go tell the Masons that.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And growing up in Southern California, the phrase, jump the shark, is that when you make the plot too ridiculous, the audience may not be able to articulate the reasons why they're no longer attracted.
	They're repulsed.
	But you've jumped the shark.
	You've gone too far.
	And, you know, at the last supper there, part of the food items offered is that guy's nut sack on that plate.
	Jump in the shark, and for that the tragic comedy, like, I, I see white hats right in this script.
	And that was the artist of the day.
	That's all it was.
	That was the artist of the day got the contract to do some sort of thing and the artist of the day was.
	An idiot, as they all are.
	Trying to make some sort of bold statement to get famous and make a half a million dollars.
	So he just decided to desecrate a classic piece of art.
	I don't know if these people think this far through.
	I don't.
	I think it was... I mean look at the colossal...
	The Colossal Outpouring.
	Whoever designed it is the artist of the day.
	It might have been Marina Abramovic for all we know.
	It doesn't really matter, but I'm telling you, I think it was just like this Dylan Mulvaney thing.
	Artist of the day, trying to press an agenda, backfires, goes ugly, you know?
	You want to show me some art?
	Okay, yeah, go out there and paint up a Michelangelo.
	Go out there and paint up, you know, the guy that paints the light all the time.
	You know, show me something high and noble and detailed and brilliant that creates a harmony of colors, images, and thoughts.
	Show me a piece of architecture that rises to the sky, that gets people to lift up.
	Don't show me some Face depravity?
	I think all it is is just an indicator of the depravity of our society that art has descended to such a level that now we'll stick an obese woman with a crown into the last supper.
	It's just stupid.
	Yeah, yeah.
	All right, let's go to Fetz's visual soul trial update.
	So Jim Fetzerside, And Jim was sued for damages because the alleged father, Noah Ponzer, of an alleged Sandy Hook victim claimed that Jim, as the editor of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, had claimed that a death certificate was fake.
	Okay?
	So, they go to court.
	This is the judge, Frank Remington.
	And Fetzer says, alright, so we have a total of five.
	Death certificates, none of which meet the legal definition of a death certificate.
	And the judge says, okay, fine, I'm not going to allow that evidence.
	I'm not going to allow a jury.
	I'm just going to declare you guilty.
	And the only question is, is how much you're going to pay.
	Now, in response to that, to this show trial, Jim has filed a couple of motions.
	This current one is the most recent, and I'll talk about that second, but this was the other one, is that open for extrinsic fraud and fraud upon the court.
	So the judge said, we're not going to consider the question of whether Sandy Hook was real or not.
	And Jim responded like, OK, bitch, then I'm going to state that you have suffered from fraud upon the court because it was a false flag.
	And you have been defrauded.
	So we'll see where that one goes.
	And this other one here, just so the audience knows that photograph that you just showed on the bottom of the page.
	Yep.
	That was the 60-minute special.
	That photograph was taken prior to creating the 60-minute special with the crybaby Lenny Paz and talking about how he's been persecuted by all the Sandy Hook deniers.
	So that guy on the left is an Oscar-winning, world-famous mask maker for the movies that has won all sorts of awards.
	His name is Hattori something.
	And right there, what they're doing is they're taking an actor and turning him into Lenny Potter for the 60-minute special.
	There you go.
	Yeah.
	Any fraud there?
	Nope.
	Nope.
	But those pictures were leaked and we got a hold of them and they're actually included in my affidavit when I did the analysis of them.
	Excellent.
	Thank you for that, brother.
	And the most recent court motion that Jim is trying is saying, okay, so what we need to do is file a motion to recuse the judge for not following any of the protocol to hold a trial because he refused the evidence, he refused a jury, he declared guilt, and then This is Jim's statement.
	So he filed that motion, and then the plaintiff had a response, which basically said, oh, no, it's all good.
	Judge Frank Remington is professional, and he followed, did everything that he needed to do, and then Jim had an opportunity to respond.
	And this was just a few days ago.
	He'll end up in the appeal court.
	Yeah, he'll end up in the appeal court.
	And he says enough about what went on there to fully appreciate the travesty of it.
	And in 2019, this was the article that I wrote as a college-level government teacher to be able to demonstrate that this is a show trial and everybody, as I keep saying, everybody in law sees this to be true.
	All right, any comments on Jim's show trial and that standing, brother?
	I wish him luck, but I told him a long time ago, I didn't think he'd ever see actual justice.
	I don't think they'll ever admit to it on that level.
	But the good news is, they're not attacking him as much anymore.
	Every now and then they do some hit piece, like they did in the New York Times.
	But the good news is, I think they're beginning to leave us alone and let us do our thing.
	They're not as hard-assed about coming after us as they can.
	But I tell you one thing.
	Sandy Hook is their fortress.
	They've got to protect that fortress, because if not, the rug of authority from underneath them is going to get pulled out.
	Now I could use, we could do Sandy Hook level Evaluations on just about any false flag.
	Sandy Hook is the one where they decided to dig in and create the biggest stink because that's the first big one I think that they ever did where they really used, you know, a bunch of innocent kids and such a, you know, such a ridiculous story.
	You know, there's 26 dead second graders because Adam Lanza came rolling on in with his, you know, assault rifles and shot up all the kitties while they were piled up in the bathrooms.
	You know, it's just stupid.
	They overplayed their hand and they got caught.
	And then they decided to make an example of the people that caught them.
	And the squeaky wheels get the grease.
	And that's why Jim got that grease.
	Because Jim did get the grease.
	Wolfgang Halbig, I'm going to give a little bit of historical perspective to our audience members.
	Wolfgang, former state trooper in Florida, former school administrator and principal, who became the number one authority to train school districts to protect their student population.
	And after Sandy Hook, Wolfgang, Reached out to the school district and wanted to know, you know, you probably know who I am, but here's who I am.
	I want to find out what went wrong with implementing your school plan.
	And the response that he get, he got pretty much lit him up like that Lieutenant Colonel and Wolfgang.
	You know, I reached out to him many times and my videos frozen yet again.
	And he worked closely with Jim and Wolfgang got bitch slapped, too.
	And, you know, I shared with him to be able to see the bigger picture, and that everything that he's doing is reverberating and will reverberate down the ages.
	But brother, hmm.
	You have tackled the opponent, and the opponent will have something to respond to you with.
	And just God bless you.
	They hurt him.
	They hurt the man.
	They hurt the man big time.
	Just like they hurt Jim.
	I mean, they hit Jim for a lot of money.
	A lot of money.
	They hit Wolfgang, a lot of money.
	When these people decide you gotta go in the crosshairs, it's gonna get ugly for you financially.
	And there's nothing that's gonna be able to bail you out when you do that, which To be honest, I mean, these guys have wanted me to come in and fight that same sort of fight, write books and, you know, lay all this stuff out.
	I don't mind going on a show and giving my perspective, but I'm licensed by DPS.
	That's the same agency that operated the Uvalde false flat.
	Same it.
	I mean, like literally the guy that ran the show signed my license.
	Well, puts me in a tough spot.
	When I know that all these Rangers are corrupt, when I know what happened, when I know why they did it, when I know, and I'm the guy out there exposing how the money all flowed and what happened.
	It's a tough spot.
	Do I want to be the squeaky wheel in Texas?
	Man, I support my family with my license.
	It's a tough, it's a tough call.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	In each of the four times that I was fired into the fifth time, I did my best not to cross the line.
	I tried to be reasonable, responsible, uphold every professional level, just ask questions.
	And against it, I don't know, but these are questions that an objective observer with care for the children would have to ask because And then the circumstances over those four times, and each time the response went up the line, and the response was, all right, get rid of this guy.
	Mr. Herman, you're not a good match for our student population and for our district.
	And they would be able to find a legal way to do it.
	Bravo, bravo.
	I've had people tell, I had a guy write a review on my company.
	Negative review because he saw one of my analysis of an event and he just couldn't believe it.
	Hmm.
	Look, I can't, you know, I rely on my reviews.
	I need good reviews.
	I've helped 1500 people.
	I've only got like 88 reviews right now.
	I, and I, I need, I need good reviews.
	I don't need somebody coming along, making a bad review and deciding to bury my company because he doesn't like what I said about Buffalo.
	Yeah.
	Or evolving.
	All right.
	Finally, five months ago, Brian and I did take a look at Tartaria, the Old World.
	And in those five months, I just want to point out that everything that I have studied on the issue just has me be more firm in the conclusion that there was an advanced civilization that was erased from time.
	Now, this particular picture He states, in 1880, Nikola Tesla lived in Prague at 13 Smekák Street.
	He spent most of his time at the Clementinima Library and People's Café.
	And that this environment, as Brian was talking about, you want something to uplift you.
	Something like that.
	Look at this.
	This is from the 1893 Chicago Columbian Exhibition of the World's Fair.
	And as Brian and I went over in detail, taking a look at the St.
	Louis World's Fair, which was, you know, about three miles away from where my parents grew up.
	And if I could ask my grandparents, I could get some really good Answers for information about what they knew of those fairgrounds and how long those buildings have been here, but the details here of these buildings, the official story is that these were temporary buildings.
	That even though they were fully functional as balconies up here.
	And can support people that it was just temporary and then all destroyed, leaving just a couple of buildings there.
	And in terms of the deep dive that we did, I was on a Sky Dragon slaying interview the day after Brian and I talked about it.
	But here is the photographic evidence that Brian and I talked about for about an hour.
	And so my conclusion is that.
	There was at least one advanced ancient human civilization, and that the Tartarian buildings were constructed with, as we talked about in that show, with possible timelines, saying that the whole St.
	Louis World's Fair, like 1,500 buildings, many of which that magnitude, were all planned, architectured, And then you had all the materials brought in, you know, horse and buggy days, really.
	And all of that plumbing, excavation, construction was complete in two years, which is not physically possible.
	All you need to do is, if you don't see it yourself, you can get expert testimony because a lot of the people who are diving into this Well, they weren't human.
	They weren't your typical traditional humans.
	jumps up at them.
	So Brian, in the last five months, what do you want to say about what you've been seeing regarding the general topic described as Tartaria?
	Well, they weren't human.
	They weren't your typical traditional humans.
	They might have been giants or, you know, but they aren't what we think of human today.
	These are not gunslingers headed west on the gold rush that decide to stop by St.
	Louis and create this structure.
	This is something that's very old and something very powerful and something with an understanding and a technology that is far beyond what we can even imagine in terms of foundations, in terms of Vertical structure in terms of lifting weight in terms of cutting those stones.
	I have no doubt that it's they've been assisted by something I would consider to be extraterrestrial.
	In other words, some force.
	Who are they?
	Some people have said they're angels.
	Some people have said that they had a I don't know the answer to that question.
	I can tell you that there's all sorts of lore and all sorts of But whatever you're going to get in school, in terms of the history books, is never going to be able to explain it.
	You're going to have to dig deep.
	I'm glad to see people out there that are focused on it.
	I'm glad that they're fascinated with it.
	Hopefully, they'll come up with something.
	All right.
	Very good.
	Final thoughts, audience members and Brian.
	I do appreciate the intellectual integrity and moral courage to dig into these important questions.
	You know, at the very least, I recommend, as Brian talked about it, and stated it perfectly in tone, is that enough of this bullshit, and to simply reject it.
	I don't know what to do with the demand for arrest of leadership, but when something does break, again, there will be opportunities to express yourself.
	The game field, the battlefield, will change, and keep looking for openings.
	Keep yourself strong, and all the facts seem to be on our side.
	Brother, final thoughts?
	Don't be afraid to talk about what you see when you know about a false flag.
	Look, I didn't know anything about Sandy Hook until my sister said, hey, why don't you look into this?
	That's how it all began for me.
	And then three, two months later, two months later, Orlando Pulse Nightclub happened right in front of my eyes.
	And I, Took me about three months to wake up, to break through and settle my mind as to, you know, the damage that had been done by just studying Orlando.
	It wasn't an easy thing to be able to confront the fact that these people had been lying to me through the television for a very, very long time with a lot of very big lies.
	Again, prior to that point, I thought of myself as pretty darn smart.
	I had to deal with that and say, hold on, I was deceived.
	Everything needs to be rethought.
	And when I say everything, everything, I had to go back and rethink through the Bible.
	And I have a theology degree.
	No problem.
	I did it.
	I had the energy to do it.
	I had the will to do it.
	I put it in the time and I worked my way through it.
	I'll tell you, there's one more too.
	You get hit with it.
	You're going to think it's preposterous.
	You're going to say, you're going to say, never.
	You're crazy.
	You're out of your mind.
	Flat Earth?
	Talk about blow your mind.
	Talk about it, man.
	It hit me like a... But it put a lot of the pieces together for me.
	It put a lot of the pieces together for me.
	Now, all these other things were distractions.
	There were thousands of distractions all over the place.
	But once I began to understand what they were saying and why they were saying it, and it began to jive with my own experience running my 40-foot Viking yacht all over Galveston Bay and others.
	I began to understand, hey, wait a second, wait a second, wait a second.
	Water is level.
	Now, what's under the hood?
	Where does it come from?
	Why was it there?
	How could it be?
	How deep does it go?
	That rabbit hole is one you have to answer for yourself.
	And it took me a long time to get through that one, but once I got through it, I began to say, the Bible was right all along.
	That's where I came out of it.
	Yeah, you've got a couple things to say to that.
	One, where's your sis now regarding Sandy Hook?
	You reported to her and where's she at?
	She calls me when she sees an event she wants to know.
	She calls me.
	Hey, is this one fake?
	She doesn't bother with it anymore.
	She's not caught up in the problem.
	She's got kids to raise.
	For the Flat Earth, you know, I reached out to Flat Earth Dave.
	I forget the guy's last name, but he's one of the most influential people.
	And he had me on his show, and I said, okay, I'm a professional mathematician and scholar.
	And here's what I can say, is that the mathematical formula that we're given for the size of the official sphere, is that whatever it is, eight inches per mile squared. Per mile squared.
	25,800 miles in circumference, eight inches per mile squared is the drop.
	Yeah.
	It doesn't work.
	It's impossible.
	It is impossible.
	It refutes the official story about the size of Earth.
	And anybody who wants to throw stuff up, I'm going to ask questions in the comment, and I'll find some video of, there are hundreds of them out there, where you can see, and mostly it's over the water, you can see objects fully visible from miles away, That are completely unobscured by the alleged curvature of the sphere.
	And therefore, as you said before, fuck this shit.
	It's done.
	The official story is refuted.
	We're not living on the sphere of the state of size.
	End of story.
	And if anybody wants to argue that, all right.
	Burden of proof is now on you.
	You go ahead and take a look and find three of those things of objects visible over the horizon and come up with an explanation.
	I can't do it other than to say the official story is a lie.
	That it is.
	The official story is third rock from the sun, purposeless existence, you know, evolution, millions of years, primordial ooze.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Then what's the other song?
	The Big Bang Theory.
	Yeah.
	Big Bang Theory, heliocentrism.
	You know, hey, that's the official story.
	Yeah, those sitcoms don't come to us by accident.
	No, no, that's old.
	That's that's old magic there.
	You're talking old magic there.
	All right, Patriots and Brian, thank you very much.
	And we will be back on Monday with more of the news that you need to know.

▲