All Episodes
Previous Next
June 25, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:56
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (24 June 2024) with Don Grahn and Bill Bonitati
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Three, two, one.
And welcome, folks!
This is Truth Vs. News, Incorporated, and what a life it is here on June the 24th.
We just had the summer solstice and heading for winter and the year's half over, and we survived this half of the year, but the way the news is looking, it's looking pretty awful.
Nobody survived the next half, but we're going to find out today on Truth Vs. News, and we have a special Well, of course, it's always special to have Jim Fetzer on the line here.
He's got all these books, including America Nuked on 9-11 and JFK and other things.
And these books are mandatory for your library if you want to know what's really going on.
And then, Jim, you want to introduce your special guest.
Well, my dear friend Bill Bonitotti is joining me on Wednesdays on the special editions of The Raw Deal, we call a few good men, where we're interviewing luminaries like Alan Sebrosky, Ross Winder, and others.
Very, very exciting stuff.
And Bill's been very actively engaged in the past in litigation and been astonishingly successful as a pro se.
Litigant, which is inspiring to me because, of course, I'm still getting my feet wet in this arena over the case where I have been sued by Sandy Hook, which I'm seeking to have reopened.
Yeah.
Okay, so we're going to go to some information from Scott Bennett here, I understand, and he's written a couple of good books here.
Thanks, Don.
Yeah, I had an interview with Scott.
He's in Moscow now.
He's been in the Donbass.
He's been in Belgorod.
Here's what our dear colleague had to say about what's going on in Russia today.
Yeah, a lot's going on.
It's my great pleasure to have the opportunity to speak with Scott Bennett, who's on a special assignment.
Scott, give us an update for Truth vs. News to be broadcast this evening, my friend.
Well, Jim, I just returned to Moscow.
I took a 15-hour train ride, which is quite an adventure.
But I just left Belgorod, and Belgorod is the Russian city that has been enduring the French hammer missiles and the U.S.
HIMARS, ATACOMS, cluster bombs, and other weapons being fired at it.
This is a civilian Russian city.
So this is like, you know, San Francisco or New York or Miami.
This is a city of Russia, in Russia, a region of Russia, not the Donbass, not Ukraine, not disputed areas.
These are Russian people, Russian cities being blown up, their apartment complexes being blown up, their women and children, you know, having to run into bomb shelters.
So this is really a declaration of war.
When the United States uses Ukrainian proxies to attack Russian cities.
And they've just done this again, of course, in Crimea.
They fired cluster bombs at Sevastopol, which is like really it's it's like the Miami Beach of Russia.
It's like Athens, Russia or Athens, Greece.
It's a beautiful turquoise water beach resort community where the Russian people go In the summertime, and this was just struck with cluster bombs killing a three-year-old and a nine-year-old child and causing a hundred people to be wounded, killing two adults.
There'll be more people dying in the next few days with missing legs and arms and traumatic injuries.
So the United States flying its drones and using Ukraine as a proxy really is declaring war upon Russia.
The Russians know this, but they also know that the Biden administration is desperate to try and trigger a provocation and a conflict in order to justify its own police state, you know, national emergency.
They want to use a national emergency to do another COVID-19 lockdown, draft, you know, a whole Military mobilization.
They want a national emergency to justify their national power grab.
And Russia knows that, so they're not going to be provoked.
They're not going to enter in a tit-for-tat.
They're not going to strike America.
They're not going to strike civilian targets.
Russians never do that.
It is only the United States that does that.
I've witnessed this firsthand.
I've taken video evidence and photographic evidence.
I might add, Jim, in Russia, in Belgorod, there wasn't a single chemtrail anywhere in the sky since I've been here.
It wasn't in St.
Petersburg, not in Belgorod, not in Moscow.
There are no chemtrails in Russia.
So, you know, I walk away just amazed at how bad, really, the United States has become.
And I'd also say there was never a piece of garbage on the ground anywhere in St.
Petersburg or Belgorod.
Not a straw, not a napkin, not a cup, not a piece of gum.
The city was immaculate.
And it's shameful because it shows you how much of a garbage heap America has allowed itself to become.
Yeah, Scott, I think those are impeccable points.
In fact, I believe Russian society, Russian culture, the Russian people are the very embodiment of what used to be American values, Scott.
I think that the American people of the past have more in common with the Russian people of the present than the other two great populations of recent history.
Would you be inclined to agree?
Oh, I would without hesitation, Jim.
And they know that, too.
The Russian people have always been saying, Trump!
Trump!
Right?
They like Trump.
They like America.
They like the American people.
They know it is the American government under the Democrats.
that are causing this national, you know, emergency.
They know it is the globalists, the Klaus Schwab, the Risi-Schunek, Macron, Ursula von Leiden types.
The Russians know these are the enemies of humanity, not the American people.
And the Russian people and the American people have nothing but, you know, natural kinships.
So I've never encountered so much as a hostile word or a frown or an angry expression on any Russian person's face since I've come here, and that tells me a lot.
So they know we have, you know, a lot of cultural history in common.
The Russian The Russian sense of Christian character is incredible, just how much they show love and compassion.
And it really is, I mean, breathtaking, the degree of fortitude they have.
Americans couldn't survive one day what Russia has endured for 10 years.
And I'll tell you this, when I see women pushing their baby carriages into bomb shelters, like I was at Belgorod, and we were under attack Every hour with with missiles being fired into the city, I went there to document it, but missiles were flying in the city, the air raid sirens are going off every couple hours, you know.
It's like the Blitz, World War II, but women pushing their babies into the bomb shelters and being calm.
Americans couldn't do that, Jim.
Americans would fall apart.
They'd go hysterical.
They'd fold into a fetus position.
They'd kill themselves.
They'd jump out of the windows.
They'd commit suicide.
The American people, sadly, have been so conditioned, so brainwashed, so polluted.
Present company excluded, and I know the Truth Vs. News community and our audience is the smarter and stronger of the American society.
But on the macro level, we all know the American people are sorely ignorant, stupid, and completely oblivious to this stuff.
But they could not endure one day what the Russians have endured.
And that tells me that, you know, when it comes to a fight in a war, we have no chance.
Yes, we've even seen maps where NATO is proposing to attack Russia with some 500,000 what seem to be to be non-existent troops on five different axes.
Putin has even spoken directly to Greece, since one of those would originate there.
Given Greece is the cradle of Western civilization, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Birthplace of philosophy.
It seems to me that he was acting out of kindness and a spirit of generosity and compassion to suggest that if Reese were to become further involved in these efforts against Russia over Ukraine, that the outcome could be tragic.
Well, Putin has done what I described as a masterful maestro conduction of the geopolitical orchestra by going to North Korea, winning the hearts and minds.
And I'll tell you this, Jim, I saw this on Russian TV.
You probably didn't get a glimpse of the fanfare and pageantry and parades that the North Koreans threw, but it was like 10 Olympics combined.
I've never seen such an incredible display of pageantry and celebration and honoring of Putin as the North Koreans did when he visited.
They had, you know, a few, maybe a week or so to prepare for this.
The entire streets were lined with big flags with Putin's face on it.
They had tens of thousands of people out there.
The whole city was immaculate, too.
But the support, adoration, and honor they showed President Putin was breathtaking.
I mean, it was overwhelming.
So he won North Korea.
He's entered into a military pact with North Korea.
And like my father said, in Vietnam, the Koreans are the toughest soldiers.
He fought with the Republic of Korean Marines in Vietnam.
The Koreans are extraordinarily tough soldiers, and for Putin and Russia and North Korea to enter into a pact, that's a powerful statement.
Then he goes to Vietnam, and he wins the Vietnamese.
So he has, in a checkerboard move, captured North Korea, Vietnam, China.
The next countries that will fall will be Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand.
And then Japan and the Philippines will naturally be inclined to neutrality.
That will take them out of the militarism orbit, which the United States has tried to keep them in.
The United States has tried to keep Japan and the Philippines as militant counterweights to China and North Korea, but now with Putin going in there, He's almost created a mini BRICS.
He's created a rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
He's done the same thing now, I think, with Russia being the centerpiece for North Korea and its neighbors and others.
I mean, it's just a masterful stroke.
And the United States is nothing but clowns in our State Department and CIA that can't engage in any diplomacy.
Other than firing cluster bombs at little children, making sandcastles on the beach.
How much is this going to blow up in our face in the European elections?
That's the other thing.
The European elections?
We've said this before.
Macron's a dead man walking.
And now we see why.
He's about to be thrown out.
Recy Schoenack, he's a dead man walking.
Nigel Farage or George Galloway will be the Prime Minister.
Ursula von Leyden?
She's dead and gone.
The Prime Minister of Hungary has called for her ouster.
Schultz, Olaf Schultz, the German Prime Minister?
He's going to be gone.
The entire European EU is about to collapse, and NATO's about to collapse, and Russia is just methodically, legally, and in a very slow motion way, gradually pushing the Ukrainian lunatics farther and farther To the periphery.
And they're going to continue.
Russia is not going to attack Miami or New York or Kansas or anything like that.
But they are going to, I think, be more and more devastating towards the Ukrainians as they need to be.
Because they can't allow their women and children on beaches to be blown up.
They can't allow that.
And they will blow up U.S.
drones, and they will give weapons to the Yemenis and others.
So the U.S.
is going to lose some naval ships, I would say, in the next few weeks.
And Scott, those attacks on the beaches were with cluster bombs, which are illegal under international law.
I mean, it's rather shocking the extent to which they're going, whereas the Russians have retaliated or actually independently acted to take out a major arms base in Chad of the French, so they can't send the weapons to Ukraine, and dropped a 3,000-pound bomb On a Ukrainian post which killed over 2,000 Ukrainians, Scott, it seemed to me Putin is taking the gloves off.
Well, the Ukrainians are killing their own people who tried to surrender, too.
There are videos I see on Russian TV of, you know, Ukrainians trying to surrender, and these Ukrainians will fly their own drones after their own people and kill their own people who are trying to surrender.
I would add this too.
What's interesting, Jim, on Russian TV here, and I'm in Moscow, so when I put the TV on, some of the things I've seen, you'll laugh about this.
Candace Owens is on Russian TV, and she is shown exposing Emmanuel Macron's transvestite husband.
So Russian national TV is showing Macron's transvestite husband, and they know the game is up.
They know about Michelle Obama, Michael Lavon Robinson.
I've been talking about it with every Russian that I come across, and I talk about, you know, great James Fetzer and his books, so don't be surprised if you get some Russians going, yeah, no, Dr. Fetzer, I want to read your books.
Love it.
Scott, they've actually been here to interview me about JFK for a special that I think will be broadcast in November in relation to the 22nd.
All of these things, all of these things are culminating and maturing.
And, you know, the Russians love the American people.
They love Trump.
He did some stupid things and he had some stupid people.
But they like Trump and they despise Biden.
So they are a natural friend and ally to the American people.
I've never received a hostile look or an anger tone.
The Russian people are extraordinarily gracious.
So, you know, I'm amazed.
And, you know, they're going to win this, but the danger is Our own government is going to set up a false flag.
The media are going to play upon it, and they're going to try and use this as a national emergency to justify a draft, justify a World War II.
We all have to go to war against Russia.
You know, it's 1945 or 41 all over again.
Bull.
People need to be prepared because Russia is not going to attack America.
Our own politicians like Lindsey Graham, Mike Johnson, Mitch McConnell, and all these other traitors are going to be setting off attacks within America.
So we are, and I've said it before in Russia, I said our country is on the verge of a massive civil war, revolution, perestroika, whatever you want to call it.
But the Biden administration are not going to allow elections to happen in November.
And I've said on Russian TV, they're going to try, probably in my mind, kill Kamala Harris, move in Gavin Newsom to the vice presidency, then he is automatically the president when Biden dies or they kill him too.
Then you have the groundwork for a dictatorship under Gavin Newsom, suspension of the elections, he's Zelensky 2.0, so we need to be prepared for every contingency.
Yeah, I think those are good points.
Roger Stone actually has now suggested that they're going to swap out Biden for Michelle herself.
And, you know, I just wonder how the American people would feel about voting for a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill.
You know, the Russians are always saying to me, Mr. Bennett, we are so worried about America, the transgender, this.
I mean, they feel pity towards America.
They're worried about America.
They look at this transgender, homosexual insanity, chopping off the penises of your little boys and the breasts of your little girls.
And they are horrified like we have become a monster movie, a horror show.
And we have.
And, you know, it's something to behold.
I never expected America to so quickly, you know, begin to fall apart.
But, you know, it shouldn't surprise us, Jim, because for 50 years we've allowed the termites of sin to eat away at our identity with broken marriages, divorce, homosexuality, abortion, all kinds of perversions, never mind the endless war.
Never mind the bloodshed we've caused from Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya.
But all of this is coming back to haunt us, whether you believe in God's vengeance, His mind, sayeth the Lord, wrath, or karma.
Whatever you believe in, America is reaping what it sows.
And unless we we get tough and throw these people out of office and and not even recognize Washington D.C.
but return perhaps to a confederation of states or some sort of new republic, we can't survive With this current regime of political decision makers in Washington, they have no power to make decisions.
Because every decision that they're making is violence and war and bloodshed and insanity.
And Lindsey Graham is a prime example.
Scott, just absolutely terrific.
Would you like to give a summing up?
It seems to me Russia has won the war with the Rothschild Empire and the New World Order, which has declared it cannot move forward without Ukraine, or the world is to be ruled from Jerusalem Is not going to quit.
So are we into an immovable object in an irresistible force, which to me spells nuclear war?
I think the Russians can win even without resorting to nukes.
But the West doesn't have the capacity to cope with Russia, and therefore I believe will inevitably resort to nuclear weapons, some of which appear to have already been used in Gaza and in Lebanon of late.
Your thoughts?
Well, Jim, we just have to have diplomatic maturity and understand how the winds of change have come upon our civilization.
America is not recognized by the world as deserving to be The high priest, the world's policeman, or the judge of nations.
America is not that position anymore.
We may have assumed that position in 1990, but McGregor has also confirmed this.
We've fallen from that graceful position a long time ago.
We've fallen with our own false flag 9-11 attacks.
and uh the juggernaut of military death and conquest that we the jewish zionist israelis uh launched us in uh in 2001 so all of that is now coming back in america is not a second world country but we are going to be lowered to a different status than what we currently occupy because the world is turning away from us and the world is turning away from the dollar.
That's inevitable and you're not going to conquer every nation of the world and hold them captive to the dollar.
That's the delusion that Lindsey Graham and Mike Johnson and even Trump and all the rest of these people suffer from.
They seem to think that we can bully and threaten the world into submission and the The world has moved on.
So we really have to be prepared to kind of become what the British became after World War II.
They weren't the great empire that they were before World War II, and we're not the great empire that we were in the 80s and the 90s.
We've fallen.
I mean, we're on the verge of becoming a leper colony.
Because of our hostility and our madness.
So I think we have to all be prepared to humbly and realistically and pragmatically carve out where do we go as a nation from here.
And the only way that we survive I mean economically and socially is if we get along with the other nations and specifically starting with Russia.
I see more people leaving America and coming to Russia than I've ever seen before.
Why?
Because mothers and families and children are encouraged.
Billboards in Belgarod Tell people to get married.
People can buy houses for $70,000.
A two-story house in Belgorod.
$70,000.
And the government pays for the land.
You know, there's no dirt.
There's no drugs.
There's no crime.
This is right out of Pleasantville.
I mean, I wouldn't have believed it had I not seen St.
Petersburg, Moscow, Belgorod.
I've seen a lot of Russia in the last year, and I'll tell you, Jim, it's a better society than what America has.
We've got good pockets, we've got good people, we've got our good audience, we've got the patriots.
But we have a lot of cancer and madness and violence that we really have to expel and ostracize and cut out of our body politic like cancer if we're going to survive it.
And we're going to go through some major trauma.
So I think we just have to look realistically of how we adapt out of this.
And it starts by having diplomats.
And if Trump gets elected, he better not be dumb enough to have the same people he had the first time.
He has to have diplomats and he has to be humble and not arrogant.
America is not Rome anymore.
Rome is falling as we speak.
Nero is playing his fiddle and America is burning.
And we'll see what resurrects itself, but we have to understand that yeah, there's pockets of Americana that are that are going to survive where the Patriots like in Texas and Florida and other places are going to, you know, rally.
But we're not going to be the nation that we once were because we've got too much sepsis in our media, our academics, and our culture overall.
We have to do some major surgery, major political surgery, if we're going to keep our country alive.
Well, Scott, I so admire your efforts, your visit to Russia, to the Donbass, to Donetsk, to Belgarod.
You are a personal hero of mine, my friend.
And although I'm agnostic, I wish you Godspeed, be well, and look forward to sharing this conversation on Truth vs. News today.
Thank you, Jim.
And God bless you and Don and Brian and the rest.
And I'll add this, too.
Bill, how did you like what Scott had to say there?
Your thoughts?
Well, I'm glad to hear that he's there and he's got some first-hand reports.
We'll see what's going on.
I think he's a little off in thinking Trump has or any intention of bringing what his campaign rhetoric is because of who backs him.
We talked about that last week, the Zionist money behind them, and this is all in collaboration with the multipolar world order.
This is, as we mentioned earlier on the last show, we've talked about it along with Brian Davis, and of course, Hakeem Yaakovian's piece.
The ruling families have this all gamed out.
I know you're asking to stay on point.
It is relevant.
And without diving into it right now... Well, we're going to retry the labor bill, so you have no doubt.
Don, I know how much Scott means to you.
Would you like to add some words of appreciation?
Well, admiration, appreciation, all the positive adverbs and things I can for this man, Scott, that I've known 15 years.
And it's just been a blessing to me to have such an outstanding representative, an outstanding American be my best friend and a leader.
I think he's qualified for any post in this country and I think he should be running for some high office because he sure would be the best leader I think I would pack for anybody out there.
That's good, Don.
a high SSC for this man.
And he's just-- - That's good, Don.
Meanwhile, Russia's new offensive brings losses to Ukraine.
Amid the ongoing heavy battle, the front lines have begun moving in a new direction in Ukraine.
The Russian army launched a new offensive operation, forcing the armed forces of Ukraine to deploy their depleted reserves on extended fronts.
At the same time, precision strikes by Russian drones and missiles are hounding the Ukrainian rear.
On the night of June 20, the Russian military launched a series of strikes in Ukrainian rear regions.
Explosions centered in the city of Dnipro, where a large fire broke out.
Russian strikes hit targets in the city of Khariv Reg.
According to an unconfirmed report, the target was a military airfield of the Ukrainian Air Force.
The Vinnytsia region also came under Russian attack.
Local authorities confirmed damage to some strategic infrastructure facilities.
A series of explosions thundered around Kiev.
Strikes were reported in the town of Brauvery, according to a local report.
Russian kamikaze UAVs inflicted damage to Ukrainian air defenses near the capital.
The border regions in eastern Ukraine are pounded on a daily basis.
The Russian Aerospace and Missile Forces are destroying Ukrainian manpower and military equipment accumulated near the front lines in particular.
Massive strikes were launched in the Kharkov region and continue to be launched every night and every day.
At least three explosions were reported in Kharkov on June 19.
The territory of a children's camp used for the accommodation of Ukrainian servicemen and foreign missionaries in the Shevchenko district came under another attack on the same day.
Another wave of Russian strikes hit the southern Odessa region, Explosions thundered in the port town of Chermorovsk and the village of Karolino Bugaz, located south of Odessa.
Another recreation facility used by the Ukrainian military was destroyed.
In turn, The Armed Forces of Ukraine attempted to reach Russian rear facilities with Kamikaze drones, according to the Russian Defense Ministry.
Fifteen Ukrainian UAVs were destroyed in six Russian regions as a result of the massive drone attack.
A fire broke out at an oil depot and added to another target was the F-15 oil refinery, but the drone did not reach it.
A civilian woman was killed after a UAV fell on her house.
Meanwhile, bad news for Ukraine.
Russian dropped FAB 3000 M54 beast bomb for the first time.
Kiev casualties in 24 hours at 2,165 from a single bomb.
The Russian Air Force used for the first time the Fab 3000 against the Ukrainian base in Kargov, causing an electric shock in the Ukrainian military command.
Russia's monstrous three-ton FAB 3000 bombs were proved to be a game-changer Three tons in the conflict in Ukraine as they can destroy entire Ukrainian fortifications, hit underground targets, concrete reinforced command posts, and the like.
For the very reason these bombs went back into mass production and improved with indig kits.
The Russian Ministry of Defense recently announced the start of mass production.
of the FAB 3000, but they had not been used until now.
Today in the village of Lipsky, a corporation of the Russian Air Force has fired a FAB 3000.
A four-story building used by the Ukrainian Armed Forces as a temporary deployment boat was chosen as the first target.
Here it is, DD Geopolitics tweeting, First use of FAB 3000 with a guide module on Ukrainian positions in Lipsky, Kharkov region.
The bomb didn't hit directly the building where Ukrainian troops were deployed, but it was the first time this kind of weapon has been used.
The blast radius is 230 meters, and it fragments between lethal forces at distances up to 1240 meters.
So still a pretty devastating result.
Long story short, Fab 3000 guide bombs are here.
Bill, your thoughts?
I mean, Bill, I'm not sure.
There we go.
Hey, guys.
Well, doesn't look good.
I mean, if they're dropping those bombs, they're going to wipe out Obviously whole platoons and the young men.
I mean, this is really sad that we can't prevent the loss of these lives.
These are innocent guys who are pulled off the street apparently and forced into war.
They're fighting their own people.
I don't know, guys.
It's tragic.
And obviously we see the devastation.
I don't have much more to add other than it seems that those in charge— I welcome your compassion.
Meanwhile, Washington faces a red seed Donny Brock.
The Houthis have agreed to end their attacks on commercial traffic in the Red Sea if Israel allows the delivery of humanitarian aid to the Palestinians.
This is not just a reasonable proposal.
It's a policy supported by the vast majority of people around the world.
End June.
A defense intelligence agency released a report highlighting the impact of Houthi attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea.
The report is a devastating account of Washington's failure to protect critical all-transit corridors in one of the world's most important waterways.
The Biden admin's makeshift naval coalition, dubbed Operation Prosperity Guardian, has not only been unable to ensure safe passage of commercial carriers in the Red Sea, it's actually made matters worse.
The Houthis have fine-tuned their military operation while adding more lethal weapons to their arsenal.
In short, the Houthis have shown that a disparate group of militants can impose costly penalties on their enemies by implementing asymmetrical strategies that undermine the rule-based order.
Meanwhile, Ron Paul, who spent a billion dollars fighting the Houthis, and lost.
Why does it seem the Pentagon is far better at spending money than actually putting together a successful operation?
The failed Operation Prosperity Guardian and the disastrous floating gauze up here, pictured above, are but two recent examples of enormously expensive initiatives that, though they no doubt enriched military contractors, were incapable of meeting their stated goals.
To great fanfare!
Last December, the Pentagon announced the launch of Operation Prosperity Guardian, a joint U.S.-UK military operation to halt the Yemeni-Houthi disruption of Israeli-linked commercial shipping through the Red Sea.
The Houthis announced a policy in response to civilian deaths in Israel's war in Gaza.
But when the U.S.
and U.K.
military became involved, they announced they would target U.S.
and U.K.
shipping as well.
The operation was supposed to be quick and easy, after all.
The ragtag Houthi militia was no match for the mighty U.S.
and U.K.
navies.
But it didn't work out that way at all.
Over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal published a devastating article revealing that after spending more than a billion dollars on munitions alone, The operation had failed to deter the Houthis and failed to reopen commercial shipping in the Red Sea.
The Journal reported that Abel Haynes, Director of National Intelligence, recently told Congress the U.S.-led effort had been insufficient to deter the militant group targeting of ships, and that the threat will remain active for some time.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
continued effort to fight the Houthis over Red Sea shipping was not sustainable.
Perhaps most revealing came from a military Washington expert, Emily Harding of CSIS.
Their supply of weapons from Iran is cheap and highly sustainable.
Ours is expensive, our supply chains are crunched, and our logistics trails are long.
It's reminiscent of a recollection by Colonel Harry G. Summers of a discussion he had with North Vietnamese Colonel Tu.
You know, you never defeated us on the battlefield, said Summers.
Tu paused for a moment and then replied, that may be so, but it is also irrelevant.
Similarly, the U.S.
military spent a quarter of a billion building a temporary floating pier to deliver aid to the starving Palestinians, even though a land route already existed and would have been far cheaper to use.
The project was doomed from the beginning, as days after opening, stormy weather broke up the pier and washed part of it up on Israel's shore.
The U.S.
military managed to gather the pizza together again, but in total only a few aid trucks managed to use it before over the weekend.
The beer was again disassembled for fear of another weather-related breakup.
Bill, your thoughts?
Well, regarding the situation in Gaza and food security, New York Post just came out June 19th.
There's no evidence of famine.
The UN Food Insecurity Agency announced this month that it finds the analysis suggesting a famine was on the way, wasn't plausible, and lacked supportive evidence.
Turns out... Anyway, I can go on, but from what I understand, they opened two portholes through the Gaza border, in addition to their crossing in North Gaza and in Egypt.
To bring food.
And so that falls in line with what Jim and I and Deidre, one of my other set of eyes, have been observing versus the reports.
Also, water's being delivered.
Deidre sent me a clip on big water tanks for people going to get potable water.
And that is consistent with the... For months, it's been 37,000 deaths.
We haven't seen a huge increase of deaths.
And Jim, you know, of course, The reports early on were lack of water, food, and sanitation.
And so, as Jim often cites, three hours, I'm sorry, three minutes without oxygen, three weeks without... Three days without water, three weeks without food are typical limits for human life.
Right.
And we're into eight and a half months here.
So all along, there has been supply.
It's fascinating.
It's fascinating.
Bill, you've really done great work in tracking this down.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu complains the U.S.
is ignoring Israeli requests for more munitions.
Four months ago, there was a dramatic decrease in munition coming to Israel from the U.S.
For long weeks, we turned to our American friends and requested shipments.
We expedited, received all sorts of explanation.
One thing we did not receive, basic situation did not change, Netanyahu said at a cabinet meeting.
Israeli Prime Minister Aded, certain items arrived sporadically, but the munitions at large remained behind.
After months in which there was no change in the situation, I decided to give this public expression.
We did so out of years of experience and the knowledge that this step was vital to opening the bottleneck.
He also said he was willing to absorb personal attacks on behalf of the State of Israel, and he believes could follow after his remarks.
In May, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin confirmed a pause in armed delivery, adding, this concerned only one batch.
President Biden later told CNN he would stop activation bomb and artillery munition deliveries if the operation and the Gaza trip were extended to the southernmost city of Rafah.
But the U.S.
would continue to provide defensive weapons to Israel, including air defense systems.
Tuesday, Secretary of State Blinken said the U.S.
continues shipping weapons to Israel, but for the only batch of aviation bombs that remain under consideration.
Meanwhile, Biden is in full denial as he escalates his wars.
Phil Giraldi in the UN's review.
Over the past week, it was revealed Congress is considering legislational strength and current conscription registration requirements could even include women.
It seems the U.S.
Armed Forces can no longer obtain enough volunteers to meet the needs and are getting desperate, given the war is both ongoing and planned by the national security state.
Pentagon planners note how the wars we caused in Ukraine are also escalating alarmingly, and China and Russia are being targeted over the horizon.
But when Joe Biden is able to compose himself and have to express something that he considers to be an elemental truth, he generally limits himself to a few words that he has memorized.
One of my favorites is the empty of meaning expression, no boots on the ground, meaning that the U.S.
will not rush willy-nilly in any of the wars it has started recently by engaging actual American armed forces in hand-to-hand combat.
Of course, the narrative would work better if Joe were not lying about what he's up to secretly in both Israel, Gaza, and Ukraine.
One recalls Joe made a morale-boosting trip to support Israel back in October 2023, where he was photographed together with a number of U.S.
Delta Force Special Ops soldiers in full combat gear.
The White House actually posted a picture of its website before deleting it together with a description of a photo reading, and it is real.
President Biden met with first responders to thank them for their bravery and the work they're doing in response to the Hamas terrorist attacks.
It was explained to the media at the time that the men were there to provide assistance to Israel in defending itself against Hamas, but they were apparently first responders.
Whatever that was supposed to mean, not combat soldiers.
What it meant was Israel sent them into Gaza City first, where a thousand of them were killed by Hamas snipers.
No matter, they were just Americans, not Jews.
A problem quickly developed was also observed by some military veterans.
The photos were of such a quality to enable identification of the soldiers, a definite no-no for a covert unit involved in sensitive undercover ops.
Fox News contributor Sarah Carter questioned, is the White House really this stupid?
Are they just trying to get people targeted?
This is totally unacceptable.
These operators are required to maintain a level of discretion this administration has completely disregarded.
I would know.
My husband is a retired operator.
They're elite trained fighters, and something as simple as facial ID recognition is putting them in direct threat by adversaries.
How did this happen, White House?
The photo faux pas also demonstrated Biden was a liar when he denied having made the risky decision to put boots on the ground.
Beyond that blunder, it's already been observed by numerous sources that the White House has been secretly sending weapons and money to both Israel and Ukraine.
And it's also generally known that the equipment is frequently accompanied by soldiers and civilian contractors who are long for the ride to set the stuff up and provide minimal training in its use.
That's referred to in military slang as SOB, or Standard Operating Procedure, and it's to be assumed that the personnel are wearing their boots or whatever attire they choose to put on their feet.
And then there's the now-influenced pontoon pier construction at great cost, $320 million.
By the U.S.
military, which broke after brief use and may have been used to insert Israeli commandos who slaughtered 274 Palestinians in the controversial June 8th Hoski Rescue at Nusar Refugee Camp.
Claims that Israel used the U.S.
pontoon pier are supported by a photo that shows an Israeli helicopter landing near the structure, but the evidence has been disputed by Washington, which claims the pier is only used for humanitarian relief.
That, of course, is debatable, and Prime Minister Netanyahu has suggested it could also be used to depart Palestinians, get them the hell out of Israel.
Craig Mochler, American former U.N.
human rights officer and specialist in international human rights law, has asked a critical question on X. Was the U.S.
humanitarian period used as a launching point for the al-Nusra massacre, which could not happen without U.S.
corroboration?
And what role did U.S.
forces play on the ground, besides arming and providing diplomatic cover for the IOM?
Adding to the confusion is an interview in which a perpetually dim secretary of defense, Lloyd Austin, seems confused over whether the soldier building the structure would be authorized to shoot back if it came under fire when at work or while running the completed operation.
Would they constitute boots on the ground?
Bill, your thoughts?
A lot to cover there, Jim.
Well, it appears that there's been other means of supplying humanitarian aid all along, as we described, so the suspect of what that pier was really built for does give rise to question.
A couple quick notes, if anyone's interested, I have an ex-account at W. Bonatatti Italiano Clydesdale.
Here's the post I put up.
Gaza deaths and injured disease and dying report anomalies.
Question, the reports are the total tonnage of bombs dropped on Gaza surpasses that of World War II dropped on London, Hamburg, and Dresden.
Then, wouldn't the death rates we'd be seeing be some type of equivalency to that and injuries?
Perhaps even higher as Gaza is an area of only 360 square miles, square kilometers, I'm sorry, Populations, I've heard various reports from 800,000 to 2 million.
It varies widely, the reports on population prior to the October 7th.
It's hard to determine.
But nonetheless, we also have the issue of what they're saying.
There's no water for sanitation.
If you have all those people, Jim, anyone who's had livestock knows you have to do flight control measures.
If we had that many people without sanitation, It would be infested that area plus the bodies claim to be under rubble.
We had Brian on last week who was in the military said the rat infestation that even when they're in the trenches was was troubling when he was in the military recall.
And so what would it be like in Gaza now between rats and fly infestation if the number of the tonnage was dropped and we had the equivalent deaths?
Something's not comporting here.
That's all I'm trying to say.
I don't have answers.
I have a lot of questions.
And so... Yeah, go ahead, Jim.
I was just going to say, that's great.
Well, go ahead.
Finish if you have more.
One option... There are possibilities.
Just like the Hebara Agreement, 1933.
Maybe there's been some transfer agreements.
We're not aware of them.
Maybe some of the Palestinians, a significant number of them, are not there.
I don't know.
The other option is they have an extensive tunnel system.
Said to be 311 miles long or 500 kilometers.
That's an option.
I was told by people I knew from across the pond that that's how the British escaped a lot of devastation when, you know, London was bombed because they went underground.
Obviously, migration from the bombing areas.
So, We can only speculate what the numbers would be if everything we're told was happening was actually happening, so it's just not jibing.
I'm just making that observation, and I think we need to consider that.
I think it's great, Bill.
I think it's great.
I think these are very astute observations.
Here is an article that's going to bother everyone greatly.
European Mutiny at the Illiberal Order, Alistair Cook.
A mutiny has arisen because many in the West see only too clearly that the Western ruling structure is an illiberal mechanical control system.
I've been writing for some time that Europe and the U.S.
are in a period of alternate revolution and civil war.
History warns us that such conflicts tend to be extended, with peak episodes that are revolutionary as a prevailing paradigm for its cracks, yet which in reality are but alternate modes of the same, a toggling between revolutionary peaks and the slow slog of intense cultural war.
We are, I believe, in such an era.
I've also suggested that a nascent counter-revolution was slowly gathering, one defiantly unwilling to recant traditionalist moral values, nor prepared to submit to an oppressive, illiberal international order posing as liberal.
What I had not expected was that a parachuted drop would occur in Europe, That would be France.
That would be the first to break the illiberal mold.
I had thought that it would break first in the U.S.
The European MEP election outcome may come to be viewed as a first swallow, signaling a substantive change in the weather.
There are to be snap elections in Britain and France and Germany, as well as much of Europe is in a state of political disarray.
Have no illusions, though.
The cold reality is that Western power structures own the wealth, the key institutions in society, and the levers of enforcement, to be blamed.
They hold The commanding heights.
How will they manage a West edging toward moral, political, and possibly financial collapse?
Most likely by doubling down with no compromise.
And that predictable doubling down will not necessarily be confined to fights within the Colosseum area.
It will certainly impinge into high-risk geopolitics.
Undoubtedly, U.S.
structures will have been deeply disconcerted by the European election portent.
What does the European anti-establishment mutiny imply for those ruling structures in Washington, especially at a time when all the world sees Joe Biden visibly wobbling?
How will they distract us from this first crack to their international structure ahead of us?
Already.
There is U.S.-led military escalation, ostensibly connected to Ukraine, but whose objective clearly is to provoke Russia into retaliation.
By incrementally escalating NATO violations of Russia's strategic red lines, it seems that the U.S.
hawks hope to gain the escalatory advantage over Moscow, leaving to Moscow the dilemma of how far to retaliate.
The Western elites do not fully believe the warnings from Moscow.
This provocation point might conceivably offer either a crafted image of the U.S.
winning, staring down Putin, or alternatively come to provide a pretext to postpone U.S.
presidential elections as global tensions spike, thereby giving a permanent state time to get its ducks lined up to manage an early Biden succession.
This calculus, however, is contingent on how soon Ukraine implodes, either militarily or politically.
An earlier than expected Ukraine implosion might become the staging for a U.S.
pivot to the Taiwan front, a contingency that already is being prepared.
Why is Europe in mutiny?
The mutiny has arisen because many in the West now see only too clearly that the Western ruling structure is no liberal project per se, but rather an avowedly illiberal mechanical control system, managerial technocracy that fraudulently poses as liberalism.
Clearly, many in Europe are alienated from the establishment because it may be multiple.
Ukraine, immigration, following living standards.
Yet all Europeans are versed in the narrative that history has met the long arc of liberalism in the post-Cold War period.
Yet that has proved illusory.
Reality has been controlled, surveillance, censorship, bureaucracy, lockdown, the climate emergency, illiberalism, even quasi-totalitarianism in short.
Van der Leyen took things even further, arguing that if you think of information manipulation as a virus, instead of treating an infection once it has taken hold, it is much better to vaccinate so a body is inoculated.
When, then, did traditional liberalism in the loosest definition turn illiberal?
Listen to this.
The about-face came in the 1970s.
In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was to become National Security Advisor to President Carter, published a book entitled Between Two Ages, America's Role in the Technotronic Era.
In it, Brzezinski argued, The technotronic era involves a gradual appearance of a more controlled society.
Such a society, dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values, and practicing continuous surveillance over every citizen, together with the manipulation of the behavior and intellectual functioning of all people, would become the new norm.
Elsewhere, he argued, the nation-state, as a fundamental unit of man's organized life, has ceased to be the principal creative force.
International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concept of the nation-state, business cosmopolitanism, as the future.
David Rockefeller and the power brokers around him, together with his Bilderberg grouping, seized on Bernanski's insight to represent the third leg to ensure that the 21st century would indeed be the American century.
The other two legs were control of oil resources and dollar hegemony.
Then followed a key report, Limits to Growth, 1971 Club of Rome, again a Rockefeller creation, which provided the deeply flawed scientific underpinning to Brzezinski.
It predicted an end to civilization, owing to population growth, combined with depleting resources, including especially depleting energy resources.
This dire prediction was imputed to say that only economic expert, tech expert, leaders of multinational corporations and banks have the foresight and technological understanding to manage society subject to the complexity of limits to growth.
Limits to growth, however, was a mistake.
It was flawed, yet that did not matter.
President Clinton's advisor to the UNRIO conference, Tim Wirth, admitted the area.
It shortly added, We have got to ride the global warning issue.
Even if the theory is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy.
The proposition was wrong, but the policy was right.
Economic policy was upended based on faulty analysis.
The godfather to the further pivot of totalitarianism, apart from David Rockefeller, was his protege and later, Klaus Schwab's indispensable advisor, Maurice Strong.
William Ingdahl has written how circles directly tied to David Rockefeller and Strong in the 1970s birthed a dazzling array of elite private invitation institutions and think tanks.
It included the Neo-Malthusian Club of Rome, the MIT-authored study Limits to Growth, and the Trilateral Commission.
The Trilateral Commission, however, was the secret of Hart to the Matrix.
When Carter took office in January 1976, his cabinet was drawn almost entirely from the ranks of Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission to such an astonishing degree, some Washington insider called it the Rockefeller Presidency.
Dingo rides.
Craig Carpell in 1977 also wrote, the presidency of the U.S.
and the key cabinet departments of the federal government have been taken over by a private organization dedicated to the subordination of the domestic interests of the United States to the international interests of the multinational banks and corporations.
It would be unfair to say the trilateral Commission dominates the Carter administration.
The Trilateral Commission is the Carter administration.
Every key U.S.
government, foreign, and economic policy post since Carter has been held by a trilateral inked on rights, and so it continues.
A matrix of overlapping membership adds a little visible to the public, and what very loosely may be said to have constituted the permanent state.
Did it exist in Europe?
Yes.
Branches across Europe.
Here lies the root of last weekend's European mutiny.
Many Europeans refuse the concept of a controlled universe.
Many are definitely unwilling to recount their traditional ways of life and their national allegiances.
The Rockefeller-Faustian bargain of the 1970s had one narrow segment of the American ruling cadre seceding from the American nation to occupy a separate reality in which they disassembled an organic economy to the benefit of the oligarchy, with compensation coming only from their embrace of identity politics and the just rotation of some diversity into corporate executive suites.
Don, take us out.
You're on mute.
Yeah.
Oh yeah.
This has been one heck of an hour here with Scott Bennett's interview and other things going on.
There's a lot of serious finagling and aggressions and things that we need to be aware of, so you're getting to be aware of what More than what the average bear is running here in America.
We are the leaders in getting the truth out and you can join us and do that by sharing this important video.
And so we'll be coming back to run June the 24th for the second hour.
So be sure to tune back in and we thank you for watching folks.
▲
Export Selection