All Episodes
Previous Next
June 9, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:02:37
Sandy Hook, Challenger Hoax, Mex Prez, Palestine, Russia to blame, German Censorship
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to episode number 81 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents stories, video clips I don't know are coming from my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
Gary, what do you got for me today?
Well, there's one particular clip I'm really interested in what you had to say about it, since you're so involved with it.
All right, here we go.
Breaking news from CNN.
We have some breaking news for you tonight.
As the InfoWars host and known conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones has just moved to liquidate his personal assets to pay the families of the victims of the Sandy Hook massacre.
Alex Jones owes those families more than $1.5 billion in damages over his repeated lies and claims that the shooting was a hoax.
Joining us now is senior media reporter Oliver Darcy.
And Oliver, I mean, tell us what's happening here and what this means for Alex Jones.
Well, for one, the families are going to hopefully see some money.
They haven't seen a dime since these judgments came down, meaning that Alex Jones owes them $1.5 billion for telling this really heinous lie about the Sandy Hook shooting back in 2012.
It also means that he's no longer eventually going to own Infowars, which is this conspiracy empire that he's used for years and years to peddle all sorts of lies and conspiracy theories.
He's eventually going to lose control of that.
It is a little bit confusing because his company is in bankruptcy court, and he's personally in bankruptcy court, but because he owns the company, it's part of his personal assets, this does mean he will lose control of the company.
Well, and can we just play this?
We were all watching this moment of him on InfoWars the other day where he was seeming to cry about this situation that he was in.
I believe my parents.
I believe in humanity.
I just want to stop these people.
They gotta be stopped.
We gotta stop them.
So, at the end of the day, we're gonna beat these people.
Him talking about the future of this company.
I think he sees the writing on the wall there, Caitlin, and he was talking all weekend about how this was likely possible that he was going to get shut down and now he is agreeing tonight in court to liquidate his personal assets, which again will mean that he's not going to own this conspiracy empire he's owned since the 1990s and really used to poison the public discourse.
Yeah, I don't think he inspires much sympathy with those cheers.
Oliver Darcy, thank you for joining us.
Our media correspondent Hadass Gold is tracking the story for us.
Hadass, so does this finally mean that Alex Jones will have to pay for years of lying about what happened at Sandy Hook?
Well Fred, these families who have already suffered so much and suffered even more because of Alex Jones' terrible lies that he was spreading about this massacre that happened to these children, these families have actually not yet seen a single dime.
Now this ruling, or this decision to liquidate his assets, This does not mean that tomorrow these families are finally going to see some sort of monetary help in the form of this liquidation of the assets, but it is at least a step in the right direction.
Now, as you noted, Alex Jones has been ordered to pay 1.5 billion dollars to these families.
This is a combination of rulings That he had been found for defamation, for emotional distress.
Now, Alex Jones until now had been fighting against the liquidation of his assets.
He tried to do other things in bankruptcy courts to have them reorganize his assets, reorganize his company.
But this was a sort of surprise decision that came late yesterday, where he did ask the court to help him start liquidating his personal assets.
Now, the families had requested this.
Instead of to allow this reorganization, they had requested that the court liquidate his assets, especially as there had been reporting by both the Associated Press and the New York Times that he was continuing to spend lavishly and also that he was allegedly possibly trying to transfer some of his money to members of his families to keep it out of the hands of the creditors.
But it seems that the mounting pressure just got to the point that he recognized he needed to liquidate his assets.
We saw hints of this last week on his Infowars conspiracy show.
He started to break down in sort of bizarre tears last week, saying that the feds were going to come to shut down his show.
But now we know that what this likely was pointing to was the fact that he was going to need to liquidate his assets.
I should note, though, that even if all of his assets are liquidated, even if all of the company's assets are liquidated, it is unlikely to reach that $1.5 billion that these families are owed.
All right.
Hadass Gold, thanks so much.
Okay.
Woo!
Well, what the families are likely owed, actually, is prison terms for theft and fraud, theft by deception.
They didn't lose any kids, and for the most part, they don't even have their real names.
They're not even married to the parties they're supposed to be married to.
The whole thing was a fabrication.
They participated in a fraud that dated back to 2006.
When Eric Holder came to Newtown and offered the community $114 million to participate in an elaborate scam that was supposed to illustrate to the American people what could happen If we don't take guns away from the public, the whole thing was orchestrated.
They had auditions for roles.
They signed non-disclosure agreements.
They get all kinds of benefits.
They don't pay taxes.
They get free college tuition.
Alex did some responsible reporting in the beginning.
Actually, you can see samples of it in this new documentary called The Truth Versus Alex Jones, which is anything but.
I published quite an extensive and detailed exposé of what's actually the fraud versus Alex Jones, where he, of course, by virtue of being on both sides of the issue, Initially accurately asserting it was fake and then subsequently falsely withdrawing that claim and affirming falsely that it was real, he made himself vulnerable no matter which side you're on.
But the whole thing, elaborate charade, I have the understanding that it's his father who's going to buy up the company Not a lot is going to change.
The histrionics are a bit much, if you ask me.
I believe Alex has done a lot of good by bringing controversial issues to the attention of the public, but there are others that take up far more Sinister interpretation of his role and believe he's a limited hangout has been sponsored covertly by the intelligence agencies of the United States.
So this is the latest in an ongoing saga, Gary, where If I have any luck, I'm going to expose the whole thing as fraudulent.
And by the way, none of these lawsuits involving Sandy Hook ever were decided on the merits.
None of them ever went to juries for determination of the facts.
They've only gone to juries for deliberations about the amount of punishment, and in this case the situation is completely absurd.
A billion dollars for expressing an opinion?
And there's nothing illegal even about lying on television.
That's not illegal.
The Supreme Court actually has upheld that it's legal to lie on television.
But who knows the truth about it?
Most certainly television anchors reporting stories like this have no idea which end is up.
They've never investigated or understand the least about Sandy Hook.
They're just useful to convey in, you know, reports that have, in this case, very scant connection to reality.
Yeah, I mean, you have exposed, Dr. Fetzer, people that have eyes to see and ears to hear.
Johnson's fairy tale.
Enjoy your free speech.
Were you surprised at all by what happened?
Well, there was a sea of students who apparently have been involved in the protests here, and I'm not surprised that they didn't welcome our visit because we're calling out their activities.
The point we tried to make today is that this is not who we are as Americans.
This is not an expression of the First Amendment.
This is not an exchange of ideas.
This is threats and intimidation of violence against Jewish students for who they are, for their faith.
And that's a terrible trend that's going on in the country right now.
We have these similar types of activities and what are becoming violent protests on campuses around the country.
And members of Congress, I believe, have an obligation, a responsibility to speak about this and to demand that it come to an end because it's not good for us.
The main thing they were chanting was free Palestine.
How is that anti-Semitic?
Well, what's anti-Semitic is that Hamas endorsed this protest today.
Within the last two hours, they issued an endorsement statement and heralded the students here and said, this is the next generation of leadership in America.
If you're getting endorsed by Hamas, that's not a good look.
It's not a good sign.
Some of these students apparently are unaware of the atrocities of October 7th, or they're denying it.
They deny that women and children were Brutally raped and murdered that infants were placed into ovens and cooked alive The things that happen there are unspeakable and yet they're out there waving flags for the very people who committed those atrocities This is this is not who we are Speaker, in those early days, I was in the boots and you could smell the death and the bodies.
It was horrific.
And yet what's happened since has been horrific too.
And there's a student here, a PhD student at Columbia, I wanted to quote him.
He is Jewish.
He has written a testimonial about what's going on here right now, his experience on campus.
And he says, I'll read it to you, the most pressing threats to our safety as Jewish students do not come from tents on campus.
We should be focusing on the material reality of war, the munitions our government is sending to Israel, which kill Palestinians by the thousands and the Americans participating in the violence.
Do you think that protesting the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, protesting the tens of thousands of innocent people who have died there, is anti-Semitic in and of itself? - I think there's always a place for debate in the free exchange of ideas, but let's not equivocate on what's happening in Hamas, with Hamas and in Gaza.
This is a battle, as Netanyahu said, Prime Minister Netanyahu said, between good versus evil, light versus darkness, civilization versus barbarism.
This isn't a close call.
We have terrorists who preyed upon and attacked viciously and killed many innocent Israelis.
And the idea that they would be out here in support of that.
Hamas is using civilians as shields for themselves.
They put their operations under hospitals and schools.
They're using civilians in a theater of war.
And so it's difficult.
Why would someone blame Israel for trying to stamp out the very terrorist threats that are right there on the doorstep?
We should not be dictating to Israel their military strategy.
We should be supporting our ally, which is the only stable democracy in the Middle East.
Is there anything Israel Is there anything you could do that would be over the line for you?
Because when you talk about stamping it out, I mean, many innocent children have died and are dying at Israel's hands in the IDF.
They have.
There have been civilians murdered, but that is not the fault of Israel.
It's the fault of the terrorists, the Hamas operators and soldiers, the terrorists who have used these people and put them into harm's way.
Israel, I'm convinced, is doing its very best to prevent civilian casualties.
But this is a war, and they're fighting for their very existence, and they are not the aggressors.
It is the other side.
Some of the people here seem not to understand that, and I think that's a real problem.
We can debate the merits of all these things, but what they're doing here is intimidating Jewish students.
That's the thing that is so problematic.
All right, Dr. Fess, what a disgusting human being from Louisiana.
Oh, man.
I've never been more convinced that he's a lying, two-faced son of a bitch, phony, a fraud, despicable person as Mike Johnson, that he should be Speaker of the House, is a disgrace to America.
All the atrocities attributed to Haas are Fabrications.
They're illusions.
They're not real.
All the death and horror wreaked upon the Palestinians, including killing massive numbers of women and children.
Those are all too real.
Those are the grim reality on the ground.
There were no babies put in office by Hamas.
But we have an IDF guy who admitted to severing the heads of 13 Palestinian infants.
Thirteen!
Mike Johnson, you can shut up.
You're a disgrace.
I repudiate you and everything you stand for, and I would welcome, if there were any justice in the world, an indictment, a trial, and your execution for perpetrating fraud.
You made yourself an accessory.
You've been instrumental in facilitating munitions to the Israelis to continue the slaughter.
Let me praise the anchor who was questioning him.
She was doing her best to maintain a degree of decorum and intelligence.
And by the way, no one gives a damn about those Jewish students.
They don't need any protection.
No one cares about them.
There's a protest against genocide, as she put it.
Is there anything Israel could do that would lead to your condemnation?
And the answer is no, frankly, there's nothing.
They can continue the slaughter of innocents, of men, women, and children, each of whom is of greater moral worth, of stronger character, than are the Israelis oppressing them, or the pathetic psychophants Ass kissers like Mike Johnson who are apologizing for them.
Gary, this is a repulsive situation, frankly.
Even though I knew he was despicable, I had not quite realized the degree to which he should be held by us all in contempt.
Yeah, I'm from Louisiana.
I never heard of him before he became When it comes to censorship, I never really think about it in another country.
So this is Tina Foster talking about banned censorship in Germany.
Die Fahne hoch, also known as the Horst Wessel Lied, is a song that holds a significant place in the history of National Socialist Germany.
It served as the anthem of the party from 1930 to 1945.
The lyrics were penned by Horst Wessel, a member of the Sturmabteilung SA, and the music was composed by Herbert Norquist.
The song, beginning with the rallying cry of Die Fahne hoch, raise the flag, became ubiquitous at NS rallies and parades.
The horse-vessel lead is deeply intertwined with the fight against communism, reflecting both its historical context and thematic content.
Vessel's death at the hands of Albrecht Huller, a member of the Communist Party, further emphasized the song's anti-communist sentiment.
This tragic event became central to the narrative of the song, which glorified Vessel as a heroic martyr for the National Socialist cause and emphasized themes of sacrifice and loyalty.
Horst Wessel is credited with writing the lyrics to the song, which served as a tribute to him after his death.
As a prominent figure within the NS party and the Sturmabteilung, the song became emblematic of National Socialist ideology and aspirations.
Its use during rallies underscored its role as a tool against communism, with the rallying cry Die Fahnehoch Symbolizing the party's call to action against the threat of communism.
The Nazi party viewed communism as a threat to their vision for Germany, and the song played a crucial role in rallying support and galvanizing opposition against communist ideology.
Overall, the lyrics of the Horst Wessel Lied are deeply intertwined with the fight against communism.
After World War II, the Horst Wessel Liedt was banned in Germany with public performances or displays deemed illegal.
Today, it remains widely condemned and its use is strictly prohibited.
Banning Die Fahne hoch can be seen as an unjustifiable restriction on free speech for several compelling reasons.
Firstly, irrespective of any controversial associations, the song represents a significant cultural expression with deep historical relevance.
Banning it erases a part of German cultural heritage and impedes open discussion about the past.
Moreover, banning songs limits access to diverse viewpoints and hinders the ability to critically engage with its content.
Intellectual freedom involves exploring even unpopular or contentious ideas essential for fostering growth and understanding.
Furthermore, such bans establish a perilous precedent, potentially leading to further restrictions on free expression.
This could result in the censorship of other forms of art or cultural expression, ultimately stifling dissent and chilling open discourse.
People should have the right to hold and express their beliefs even if they diverge from mainstream ideologies.
Banning a song curtails this freedom, encroaching upon individuals' rights to express their political or ideological convictions.
Essentially, while some may find aspects of Dufano Hulk objectionable, banning it represents an unjustifiable curb on free speech, stifling cultural expression, artistic liberty, and intellectual inquiry.
Instead of prohibition, efforts should focus on contextualizing its historical significance and encouraging critical dialogue surrounding its themes.
The act of banning songs prompts discussions about the broader concept of freedom of speech, a cornerstone of democracy, ensuring that people can express themselves without fear of censorship.
While bans often arise due to the promotion of conflicting ideologies, they impede individuals' rights to express themselves.
Censorship stifles dialogue, inhibits historical understanding, and suppresses dissenting voices.
In some, the banning of songs raises pertinent questions about the limits of free speech in democratic societies and the justification for censorship.
Okay, Dr. Fenton.
Well, I'm not sure I absorbed all of that, but I will say I do believe that the Third Reich was a very significant political, social, economic development that is going to draw a lot of attention in the future.
I mean, more so than it has year before.
For Hitler's effort to really put Germany back on a level footing, turn it into an economic giant in the wake of the Treaty of Versailles, which was so profoundly unjust, I think it may take a future generation of historians to put Hitler and his accomplishments in an appropriate perspective.
Because of contemporary ideological conflict, but I compliment Tina Foster for making contributions on this order toward that end.
Very appropriate and deserving and worthy of applause.
Yes, indeed.
- Okay, there's been a lot about teenagers in the news today. - Tonight, Washington DC police searching for the teenagers who did this.
Unruly.
Teenagers.
Dozens of teenagers.
Four teenagers.
Teenagers.
Teenagers attacking two men.
A group of at least 20 teenagers.
Teenagers.
A group of teenagers attacked a man.
They were bombarded by a group of teens.
A large group of teens.
A group of teens.
The same group of teens.
The same group of teens.
Teens attack a 67-year-old woman.
He was rushed by more than 30 teens.
Yeah.
Hundreds of teens.
Nearly 1,000 teens.
Teens.
mostly young teens.
The search is on for teens behind a vicious attack caught on camera in Queens.
The group can be seen stealing a cane from a 67-year-old woman and then beating her with it.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer.
Well, it's all very disturbing, of course, but American society is falling apart.
There's no respect for law and order.
It's rotting from the top down and from the bottom up at the same time.
We have a massive influx of illegals, every one of whom is a criminal.
They're being given a red carpet by an administration that is so corrupt, where district attorneys across the country are not enforcing the laws, they're putting criminals back on the street.
They're basically legalizing shoplifting up to a thousand per, so you can bring up a whole caravan.
Assaults like this are going to grow in their occurrence.
They're going to become more and more frequent.
Our cities are going to continue to decay.
It's going to be true for everywhere.
And individuals who wander into the wrong area are going to find themselves beaten to a pulp, if not killed outright, Gary.
New York's going to be in the forefront, I have no doubt about it.
It's very disconcerting to see videos like this, but they're just a reminder that things are falling apart, and I think since the election was stolen by a Those with the resources and ability to do it.
And I go back to Barack Obama placing our electoral system under—classifying his critical infrastructure, putting it under Homeland Security so Homeland Security can monitor federal elections down to the precinct level and change the vote.
When you have no respect for the government, no respect for the Constitution, no respect for the law, Society is going to decay, and it's simply taking place faster than any of us could possibly have imagined.
And what we're witnessing here are some very low-level indications of how bad things are getting, but I guarantee you they're going to become much, much worse.
All right.
No one loves a montage like I do.
If you remember the Russian collusion, if you want to rile up the comments section, play a Trump clip.
The fake media tried to stop us from going to the White House.
But I'm president and they're not.
We are fighting the fake news.
It's fake, phony, fake.
Their agenda is not your agenda.
Very, very stupid.
They want you to think we're all crooked.
We're not.
It's Russia.
And the Russians.
And the Russians.
The presidency is effectively a Russian op.
A political hurricane is out there to seize Bahrain.
We'll call it Hurricane Vladimir.
U.S.
President possibly working for the Russians.
Donald Trump has been a Russian intelligence asset Since 1987.
What you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
There's outright treason.
I mean, there is no question.
He has no idea that he's going down.
There is a reason why Donald Trump fears Robert Mueller in front of the TV cameras with the nation's attention turned to him.
No, I said it the, uh... It's called a coup d'etat, which is a French for coup d'etat.
Part of the, uh... Just relax.
Take it easy.
Take your time.
Because, uh, some, uh... It really, uh... It's much more, uh... Come on, try getting it out.
That's beyond my purview.
I can't speak to that.
You can't speak to that?
FIRED!
You've been...
FUN THE STREET!
Rock in the alley, broke the gamut, we hit the top!
Back to Texas, yeah, Texas, and we had some fun!
We met some kids, some dancers who gave us your time!
Parked all the rooms, pint all the fools, yeah, yeah, they, they blew our brain!
I was shaking at the knees, could I kill me again please?
Yeah, the name is what you call me!
You've been...
FUN THE STREET!
We move that embassy to Jerusalem.
We could spark a full-on intifada and real people could die.
I believe they will.
The President of the United States is racist.
ACDC.
Thunderstruck.
All right.
Well, we confront a real quandary here, Gary, because, I mean, if you're going to pit Trump against Rachel Maddow or Robert Mueller, I mean, that's no contest.
The whole MSNBC lineup is nothing but propagandists who are, I'm afraid, corrupt to the core.
When you have Trump taking actions like moving the embassy to Jerusalem, declaring the Golan Heights to be a part of Israel, unfunding the UN agency, assisting refugees, supporting genocide in Gaza, we're in trouble.
When our best hope to save the nation is I can't begin to tell you how distressed I am.
the interests of Israel and most recently declared he wanted to reaffirm ABEX lobbying role over Congress.
I can't begin to tell you how distressed I am.
I have devoted so much time and effort and belief in this man, in the belief he really is going to turn the country around.
Make America great again, if you will.
And yet, over the last couple months, going on Hannity, deploring the Palestinian protesters as somehow unpatriotic, suggesting he'd send them all to Israel.
When they're objecting to genocide, then there's no greater crime.
I mean, these students are to be admired.
They have nothing to benefit.
They're running personal risk, their physical safety, their future careers.
School administrators, under the influence of Jewish donors, are acting reprehensibly.
They're punishing when they should be praising.
For Trump to talk about finishing the job, it's a horrible job, but it's got to be done, meaning slaughtering every man, woman, and child of Palestinian heritage.
That is, to me, morally repugnant.
I find no way to interpret what he's been saying in a fashion that exonerates him from complicity and genocide.
And yet, if I look at the alternatives, we have a hopelessly incompetent Biden who's even, it appears, shitting in his pants at Normandy, providing the bombs and bullets to kill the Palestinians.
The United States could have shut it off overnight.
And then you got an RFK Jr.
who's in a state of denial, says he sees no signs of genocide taking place or that the Israeli army goes out of its way to protect civilian life.
And I say, with choices like these, I think we're going to find out.
I have no doubt Trump is going to be overwhelmingly reelected.
Overwhelmingly reelected.
Though I gotta say, can they steal it again the way they did in 2020?
Arizona, Arizona, they've just discovered over a million fake names on their voter rolls in Arizona alone, over a million.
Gary, I don't know where we're going.
I do love the parallel phrase, however, from Joe from Florida on my show, The Raw Deal.
Make Israel Palestine again.
That I believe.
Let's make Israel Palestine again, Gary.
There you go.
Okay, last Trump clip, one minute long.
People, it doesn't matter.
How or what you feel about Donald Trump, but if you're a true student of the Constitution, if you're a student of law, even if you have a moral standard of justice, all of America ought to be afraid right now for that man to be convicted
Without the right to adequately defend himself from charges that weren't even stated.
We've lost our Republic.
Our Constitution is dead.
And everyone else in America, we ought to be afraid.
Afraid for ourselves.
It's not a good thing.
And for those that think it is, that's the enemy.
Hey, Dr. Tetson.
Well, that was a very commendable clip.
I agree with all of that.
These legal cases being brought up against Trump are all for election interference.
They're all trying to tarnish him.
They've had the opposite effect.
He had a fake judge with fake charges and a Unbelievably unconstitutional instructions to the jury.
As Jonathan Turley's observing, there are layers after layers of appealable issues here.
It looks like the whole thing may be tossed because someone, asserting themselves to be a cousin of one of the jurors the day before the verdict was announced, put up a Facebook post Saying the jury was convicting Trump, which is almost certainly going to lead to a mistrial.
So all that gloating that you've heard from the left, I think it's all going to collapse.
But then it was a house of cards to begin with.
And whatever reservation I may have about Trump in relation to Israel, there's no question he didn't deserve this.
And as she was accurately observing, the Constitution under circumstances like this is dead.
It's what George W. Bush said, just a goddamn piece of paper.
I believe Benjamin Franklin said it, it presumes men of goodwill to maintain a constitutional Republican What we're experiencing here in the United States today is a decided dearth of men of goodwill, especially in Washington, D.C., Gary.
So it's all backfiring.
Since the verdicts were announced, Trump has raised over $200 million.
The most staggering short-term benefit in American political history has gone up five or six points in the poll.
By my judgment, he's going to win a massive, overwhelming reelection.
But remember, he won in 2020 by my best estimate.
He had over 100 million votes to Biden's 37.
We'll see how it plays out.
But the country is reaching a point of no return where it may be that the people have to follow the spirit of the Declaration of Independence and Take up arms to end the tyranny of its own government, Gary.
This may be in the offing.
All right, we're going to do something that I've, uh, this is about to challenge it.
We're going to kick back for about eight minutes and I'll stop it then.
All I'm offering is the truth.
Nothing more.
Beardman Truth Chronicles.
Look at that epic Viking red beard.
Good morning commissioners.
Today I'm, I come here asking for your help but first a little backstory.
I think we all remember the Challenger explosion that took place in 1986 that tragically took the lives of all seven astronauts on board.
It launched not too far from where we're standing here today.
Well the interesting thing is a couple decades later this thing called the internet came about and someone allegedly found almost all of those astronauts alive and well.
Many using the same exact names.
As you can see here, we have Challenger astronaut Judith Resnick, and also a Judith Resnick Yale Law professor.
Michael J. Smith, the pilot of the Challenger astronaut, and also professor at University of Wisconsin, now retired, Michael J. Smith.
Commander Dick Scobie, who is now president of Cows and Trees.
Now, if you'll notice, they all have the exact same faces, 30 some odd years later, the same exact name, and they are the same age.
Now, we all have a doppelganger out there, right?
No big deal.
But to have the same face, the same age, and the same exact name is extremely rare.
So rare, I could only find one case in the last 120 years, and we're supposed to believe that three people from one spaceflight have exact lookalikes that have the same age and same exact names?
This, ladies and gentlemen, is beyond statistically impossible.
Ms.
Resnick was questioned I'm going to have to stop you.
I know what it is, sir.
I'm very familiar with the public comment.
And part of the public comment is that you're only allowed to address things that we have jurisdiction over.
I have a direct request at the end of this that is in your purview, sir.
both of these exchanges in a film called Level With Me and you can be the judge.
Mr. Scooby not only has- Sir, I'm going to have to stop you.
Sir, this is a public comment.
I know what it is, sir.
I'm very familiar with the public comment.
Okay.
And part of the public comment is that you're only allowed to address things that we have jurisdiction over.
We have no jurisdiction- I have a direct request at the end of this that is in your purpose, sir.
Sir?
Please.
Time.
I do.
Can we hold the time, please?
I have a direct request that... Listen to me.
Okay.
Very carefully.
Mr. Richardson, would you give an opinion in regards to this, please?
Yes, public comment is reserved for issues or topics that are under the jurisdiction or control of the County Commission or that are relevant to the business of the County Commission, so if your request at the end is going to explain why that falls into any of this, make that request now before you continue.
Absolutely.
So as I was saying, I'll just end it with what I was ending with.
But the ask is that Miss Pritchett, who knows very well about questioning science, whether it be COVID or fluoride, I'm just asking you all to question the science here.
Your, Goodson and Pritchett, your district covers the Kennedy Space Center.
This launched from the Kennedy Space Center.
You have the ability to help me in sounding the alarm and asking the federal government for help.
If this is contained in your area, I should be able to at least address something that happened here.
Don't you agree?
That's not within the jurisdiction or authority of the County Commission.
Thank you very much.
Will you let me finish for at least 10 seconds?
No sir, you're finished.
Thank you.
Thank you for taking away my freedom of speech today in here.
I did not take away your freedom of speech.
There's a... Yes you did.
I don't want to hear it from you people down here.
Just because this is an uncomfortable topic... Stop it!
Officers, please remove this man from the room.
You just violated the First Amendment.
I didn't violate the First Amendment.
He violated the rules.
No, he didn't.
This is a limited public forum and the meeting is for the purpose of the business of the County Commission.
It's not for this purpose.
Now, if you want to go, if you want to go too, take him out too.
Officer, take him out also.
Let's just, everyone just calm down.
They can leave willingly.
No, we're leaving willingly.
You don't have to remove us.
You just made a decision about NASA.
You're making your decisions based on your assumptions.
You violated the First Amendment.
Thank you very much for your opinion.
These astronauts are alive, by the way.
Look it up.
You can't have three doppelgangers.
You can't.
Same face, same name, same age.
It's impossible.
Look it up.
It's physically impossible.
Just because you think this is a mental problem, I should still be able to talk.
It's your opinion, sir.
Have a nice day.
You too.
Thank you.
Thanks again.
Yeah, y'all have a good one.
As I was saying, before I was rudely interrupted and my First Amendment was violated during a public comment period here in Brevard County, I was saying that Mr. Scobie is the most interesting because not only does he have the same age, same face, same name, same slanted eye in the cheek if you look very closely, Get this, he created a company called Cows and Trees, and the promo video has a cow blasting off strapped to a rocket, leaving a smoke trail eerily similar to that of the Challenger explosion.
You couldn't make this up if you tried.
That's why I, today, am calling on the Brevard County Commissioners to stand with me in demanding the Senate Subcommittee on Space Science open a new investigation into the Challenger explosion.
Because if this is all one big coincidence, no big deal.
But, if it's true, people watch what they believe were seven people blown up on live television, inflicting emotional and psychological trauma on millions of Americans.
And we deserve to know why on earth something like that would be done.
And like I was saying to Commissioner Pritchett and Commissioner Goodson, the only reason I'm back in here is because NASA ignored my last request and was completely unresponsive about the ISS discrepancies.
I was blocked by the Public Affairs Officer after one polite request.
Commissioner Pritchett and Commissioner Goodson cover the area that contains the Kennedy Space Center.
So I was just simply hoping that they would be able to help me in some way since it is their territory.
I still thank them for their time and I wish I was able to finish my speech, but we finished outside and that's good enough.
I hope we can get some transparency with NASA one way or another.
The Challenger story, the official narrative, is absolutely ridiculous.
I mean, let's just be bare naked honest here.
Our government wants us to believe that they found these people's remains on the ocean floor two months after they exploded in a fiery death spiral on their way into space.
The truth of the matter is this.
That's ****.
Especially about space.
Hold on, I'm sorry, hold on.
It was all a science.
What if nobody actually died and the astronauts from the Challenger are still alive and well?
What if NASA knew from the very beginning that they couldn't break through the firmament?
Gary, you lost the image.
I'm sorry?
You lost the image.
I can't see him.
Since he said bullshit, I haven't seen the image.
Okay.
Yeah, we can go from there.
That's good enough.
Yeah, you can comment or if you want me to play the rest of it.
Well, it's OK.
I'm prepared to comment.
I mean, he's right.
It's all bullshit now.
What's interesting about the Broward County Commission meeting, they were both right.
The challenger was a fraud.
He has identified three of the participants in the elaborate deception.
They're all alive.
I don't have any real doubt about it, unless one might have been Killed in an automobile accident or something such.
Unfortunately, the county commissioners were also correct because it fell beyond their jurisdiction.
That Stu Peter picked up on it I think is totally appropriate.
He's probably got quite a good segment there if we were to watch the whole thing.
What he needs to do is go political.
Go to the Whatever committee is on space that supervises NASA, because this is a fraud on the American people.
Go to Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Go to Matt Gaetz.
Go to Judge Napolitano.
That's where he should direct his effort.
He did.
Very appropriate investigation.
I mean, this guy is a citizen journalist, earns five stars, Gary.
He's right on.
I don't have any doubt whatsoever that he's correct in each and every instance.
He's simply in the wrong venue.
But for what it was worth, you know, it created a certain kind of a minor sensation there, but it's a big, big story that deserves a larger stage.
So I wish him well.
I have no doubt whatsoever he's 100% spot-on correct.
In the point, Stu, Peter is about finding their bodies on the ocean floor after exploding in space.
It is ludicrous!
Their bodies would have been blown into so many little pieces they would have been devoured by the fish.
There's nothing left, had it been real.
So they claim to have recovered the bodies and all that.
Utter nonsense.
So, Stu Peter's got it right, or Citizen Journalist's got it right, alas.
The Brown counter commissioners were within their right to cut him off.
He needs to go where his voice will be heard, because there's a point to it, and the public deserves to know.
All right.
Okay, we have a new president in Mexico, and she's Jewish.
Good morning, George, and historic victory this morning for Claudia Sheinbaum, who rose to national prominence here as mayor of Mexico City, and now will take office later this year as Mexico's first-ever female president.
No matter your politics, this is a monumental moment for this country, where politics have long been patriarchal, where women were not even granted the right to vote until the 1950s.
Shane Baum is also Jewish, another first in this extremely Catholic country.
Shane Baum is also Jewish, another first in this extremely Catholic country.
Her closest challenger conceding overnight.
Shane Baum currently leading by roughly 30 points.
The quote leading by roughly 30 points.
The question now, how does she govern amidst myriad challenges for US?
Does she follow in his footsteps or does she chart a different path That will be the key question, Robin, for everything from trade to migration to drug trafficking.
The question now, how does she govern amidst myriad challenges?
First.
Okay.
Okay.
Well, I think it's a legit question.
Was the election on the up and up?
I'd like to believe, but because she is Jewish, I'd be interested to know more about her politics.
How does she feel about genocide in Gaza, for example?
Is she committed to Israel come hell or high water?
Is there anything Israel could do that would lead her to no longer support Israel?
Troubling development that we have a Jewish president on our southern border, but then this whole migration thing appears to be a massive Jewish operation, the clergy plan, originally conceived in the 30s to flood the European nations with migrants from Africa to destroy their culture, which has been quite a considerable success, and now to do the same to America.
Gary, I'm troubled.
I'd be reassured if I knew more about her and found that she seemed to be a principled person who isn't going to give a blanket endorsement to Israel and that she is in fact not simply one more Jewish stooge for Israel.
I agree.
- Agreed.
All right, this should take us out, I think.
Six minute clip. - The warning by President Putin could not be starker.
In the event of the use of long-range weapons, the Russian Armed Forces will again have to make decisions about expanding the sanitary zone further.
Do they want global conflict?
It seems they want to negotiate with us, but we don't see much desire to do this, he said.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov then came up with the appropriate metaphor to designate NATO's ramped up military outbursts.
Not only NATO is raising the degree of escalation, but delving into a war like ecstasy.
Does not get more serious than that.
They, as Putin alluded to, do seem to want global conflict.
That's at the heart of NATO's new suicidal ecstasy strategy.
For all their circumlocutions, NATO Secretary Jens Stoltenberg, French President Emmanuel Macron, and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz have effectively green-lighted Kiev using Western weapons for attacks deep inside the Russian Federation.
The alleged debate, still ongoing, is just a smokescreen for the real objective, a pretext that could lead to World War III.
There's no reason to think Kiev will stick to limited strikes against relatively unimportant targets.
Instead, it is likely to target critical security infrastructure in hopes of provoking an unrelenting Russian response, which in turn would pave the way for NATO to invoke Article 5 and de facto engage in a hot war.
All that seems to point to a crucial decision, enveloped in several layers of fog, as the incoming, cosmic NATO humiliation on the black soil of Novorossiya becomes self-evident day after day.
The Western elites, who rarely run the show, are betting on provoking a full, hot war against Russia.
Richard H. Black, a former U.S.
Senator from Virginia, offers a sobering analysis.
This is a continuation of the pattern in which the NATO forces recognize they are losing the war in Ukraine, with the fragile lines of defense breaking and the NATO response is to escalate.
This is not accidental, but very deliberate.
It is not the first attack on the Russian nuclear triad.
The ideological folks are seeing their world crumbling after flying the rainbow flag over conservative countries and waging perpetual wars.
They are frantic and could escalate to nuclear war to get out of the bind.
They are taking a series of baby steps and respond that they don't do anything in response and so they keep taking these baby steps until one of them lands on the landmine and we are in World War 3.
Putin is very aware of the disconnect in the West who keeps saying he is just saber rattling but he is not.
He isn't forming the West of the dangerous reality.
In Russia, Senator Dmitry Rogozin, a former head of Roscosmos, directly warned Washington.
We are not just on the threshold, but already on the edge, beyond which, if the enemy is not stopped in such actions, an irreversible collapse of the strategic security of the nuclear powers will begin.
General Evgeny Bushinsky advanced an ominous scenario.
I'm sure that if the strikes of Taurus and Atacams are very harmful for Russia, then I presume we will at least strike the logistical hub of the territory of Poland, in Rzeszów, where the missiles are staged for delivery to Ukraine.
NATO war-like ecstasy is predictably cloaked in cowardice.
For all the rhetorical garbage 24-7 about we don't want a war with Russia, the facts point to NATO using Kiev to attack and try to destroy a wide range of Russian military assets.
There is also no denying the US deep state's role in enabling Kyiv's terror attacks against Russian civilians in the Donbass, Bolgharod and elsewhere.
Considering the serious debate finally on across several Russian platforms, all of that might constitute a reasonable pretext for a tactical nuclear drop on the legally illegitimate Kyiv gang.
At least, that would finish a war that is dragging on for too long.
Yet, that would be totally out of character when it comes to legalistic Putin, who deals with Armageddon-laden issues with the patience of a Taoist monk.
Yet, Russia has an entire arsenal of asymmetric tools, both conventional and nuclear, that can deliver a painful blow to NATO in places where the Alliance least expects.
We're not there yet, even as we get ominously closer day after day.
Dimitri Medvedev has issued the umpteenth red line, a U.S.
strike on Russian targets, or the U.S.
letting Kiev hit targets with Russia using American missiles and drones that could be the start of a world war.
And Foreign Minister Lavrov, once again displaying his trademark tireless patience, has to come up with another serious reminder.
Russia will regard the deployment of nuclear-capable F-16s in Ukraine, which de facto can only be operated by NATO pilots, as a deliberate signal from NATO in the nuclear field to Russia.
And still the gaggle of armchair Doctor Strange loves, lavishly rewarded by a rarefied Atlantis' plutocracy holding real power, funds, influence and mass media control, is not less.
Well, that was simply excellent, completely accurate, very sober assessment of where things stand.
Absent the most recent developments at the International Forum held in St.
Petersburg now.
Vladimir Putin spoke for three hours.
And from one who followed the entire event and explained it in detail, what occurred there, whose husband is Russian, who's in Russia now.
Putin even used maps to lay out where Russia would initially strike.
And it's not New York or Chicago or Los Angeles.
It's a city of London.
It's Raytheon.
It's Boeing.
It's General Dynamics.
It's NATO headquarters in Brussels.
And he's not even going to use nukes.
He has plenty of non-nuclear weapons that are capable of doing the damage, I believe.
He pulled the rug out from under the warmongers, Gary.
In that Vladimir Putin, whom I regard as the only true statesman astride the world stage, may have single-handedly thereby averted World War III.
So let's keep our fingers crossed.
But since hearing what Putin did so ably, I have been sleeping better.
And believing I might be around to celebrate my granddaughter's next birthday, my own wedding anniversary, and other events that we all care about in our own lives.
And thus do I say to every one of my listeners, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, people you love and care about, because we do not know how much time we have left.
And if we have what turns out to be a significant duration, give thanks to Vladimir Putin.
I agree.
All right, guys, just a little bit more sand, Dr. Fetzer.
So, what I'd like to do is clear up a little bit about last week.
Remember, we were talking about when the Belmont Stake is going to be running in just a few minutes.
We were talking about Secretariat and Sham.
So, how great was Sham?
Well, in the 150-something runnings of the Kentucky Derby, only three horses has ever run in less than two minutes.
I can't pronounce the other ones, but there are three horses.
Secretariat, Sham, and I think it's Morocco or something like that.
So, in the vein of the Belmont States, I'm going to play a very rare clip.
It's the Belmont States with the radio call, which has hardly ever been heard.
And we'll close out the show on that.
And don't forget, as soon as Cham's in the lead, he fractures his hook.
And that will be it.
He was off to the breeding shed after that. - Whether we have a Triple Crown winner, Sham in there now, they're all in line for the 105th Belmont and it's underway, they're off.
And moving out to get the early lead between horses, it's Mike Gallant, then twice a print.
Sham moving on the outside, but there goes Secretariat rushing up along the rail, right to the lead.
Private Smiles is last.
Into the first turn, Secretariat on the inside.
Sham on the outside, and they're racing stride for stride for the lead.
My Gallant is third, twice a Prince fourth, and Private Smiles is last.
They round the clubhouse turn.
Sham on the outside with a slight lead.
Secretariat along the rail.
It's Sham by a neck.
Secretariat, a gap of about 12 lengths.
My Gallant, twice a Prince, and seven or eight lengths last.
Private Smiles.
Surrounding the turn now, swinging in the backstretch, and it's Secretariat on the inside, Sham on the outside, and they're racing stride for stride as a team.
It's Secretariat with a very slight advantage.
Sham on the outside, Secretariat now by a half length.
It's Secretariat along the rail, by three quarters of a length.
Sham, a gap of 12 lengths, Mike Allen, then twice a print, and Private Smiles is last.
Down the backstretch.
Secretariat drawing clear.
Leading now by three.
Shams.
Then Mike Gallant.
Twice a Prince and Private Smiles.
Into the far turn.
It's Secretariat by four.
Shams.
Then a gap of 15 lengths.
Then twice a Prince, Mike Gallant, and Private Smiles.
Rounding the turn.
Secretariat leads now by seven or eight.
Sham second, then twice a prince, Mike Allen and Private Smile.
They round the turn, and Secretariat is so far out in front, he's absolutely making a joke of the 105th Belmont.
100th, Belmont, nearing the stretch.
It's Secretariat by some 20.
Then Sham, and Sham is dropping back as My Gallant goes by on the outside, and twice a prince on the inside.
Private Smiles is last.
They round the turn, and it's Secretariat way out on the lead.
It's Secretariat way out in front.
Secretariat at the eighth pole now, way out in front by some 20 lengths.
Then my government likes to press.
Secretary of threes and harm, and Secretary of science, and the Bears of the second-degree, wins the triple crown, the widest margin I've ever seen is 25 years as a race caller.
Then...
25 years a race caller, he's never seen a margin like that.
Very, very great.
Greatest racehorse in history, Gary.
Thank you for that.
All right, enjoyed it.
All right, this has been Interconvenient Truths, number 81.
Thanks again, Dr. Fetzer.
Another great show.
We'll see you next week.
▲
Export Selection