All Episodes
Previous Next
May 6, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:20:34
"They" Hate Us for Our Freedom! FFWN With Cat McGuire
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to False Flag Weekly News, the one-stop shop for all of the hideous happenings that are afflicting your world.
I'm Kevin Barrett, reading all these stories so you don't have to, and so is Cat McGuire.
Welcome, Cat.
How are you?
Hey, I'm doing really good.
Yeah, we're doing better than the folks in Gaza, although I guess the Hamas guys in Gaza are doing fine.
It's the people that the Israelis have absolutely no cause whatsoever to be going after who are suffering the worst.
And our freedoms are suffering too, and that's the theme of our show.
They hate our freedom.
Which they.
So we'll be talking about that.
But first the obligatory PSAs.
First PSA.
Please continue to donate and support this show.
I really appreciate how well all of our supporters are generally doing.
Last time I checked we were up to only $70 though for this particular show.
So let's get that to the $200 level so we can push back against Bibi Netanyahu trying to delete words from the English language that he doesn't like.
We'll all be fined for antisemitism pretty soon for using river and sea.
And Rich Becker, who has been years ahead of many False Flag Weekly News viewers in making small, sometimes, but significant contributions.
If everybody kicked in even less than Rich does, we would have no problem.
I wouldn't have to yack like this.
He points out we're typically three years ahead of other independent journalists.
That's a pretty good estimate.
Thank you, Rich.
All right.
And thank you, Kat, for helping keep us ahead.
All right, let's get to They Hate Our Freedom.
Normally, Kat, this business of putting brackets around words to say they're Jewish, I'm not a fan of that, frankly.
It does, it looks kind of, you know, there's so much, there's so many people who are ethnically Jewish or perfectly good people or even out there protesting for good causes.
But in this case, the They Hate Our Freedom thing, I just couldn't resist doing that because of what's going on this week.
So what's going on this week?
Uh well this Mark Levin says we brackets own this country and so we're gonna round up and deport the people we don't like and shut everybody else up.
I mean the chutzpah!
Can you believe that?
Amazing.
Well, he's a typical conservative who was a former critic of cancel culture, yet when it comes to Israel, he doesn't about face and embraces the very censorship he was originally opposed to.
So, you know, when he says we own this country, you got to ask, who's this royal we he's talking about?
He's practically putting brackets around it himself.
Exactly.
It's sort of McCarthyism in the extreme, only instead of communists it's Nazis, because he talks about pro-Palestine protesters as Hitler youth, that their protests were just like Third Reich, the ICC should be added to our terrorist list, and he even threatens with the Samson option if the U.S.
doesn't give Israel weapons.
He's just a straight-up demagogue spouting straight-up hate speech, and he's supposedly this Who cares about life and liberty, but it seems all he really wants to do is get rid of our freedoms and nuke the planet in defense of Israel.
Yeah, I don't know what his real constitution is, the Talmud or something, but seriously, yeah.
My Jewish friend David Rovix, by the way, just wrote a song about this new McCarthyism, and I wrote back to David that actually that comparison is really unfair to the McCarthyites, who are a lot less wrong than these people are.
So, how about this Anti-Semitism Awareness Act?
This is our top story of the week.
They hate our freedoms, so no more criticism of a genocidal foreign country.
Does that make sense?
Oh my god, this really pushed all my buttons.
I would call May Day, because it happened on May Day, 2024 as a day of infamy.
I will go on to say that America has just had a soft coup d'etat, because that's what this is.
The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, as they call it, is the camel's nose under the tent.
And once it's signed into law, it has to go through the Senate.
It's only going to get worse.
This act has no rules of example as to what exactly is anti-Semitism.
It's all based on the IHRA's so-called working definition of antisemitism.
For people who don't know, IHRA is International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
So this non-American group is deciding what our free speech laws are.
And notice they have the word Holocaust in there, so already mendaciousness is embedded in the act.
This original IHRA definition of antisemitism In my opinion, it's been waiting patiently on the shelf longer than it took Homeland Security to trot out the Patriot Act in response to September 11th.
But people, please read the 11 points in that original IHRA working definition.
It's just extraordinarily dangerous.
The scope of unconstitutionality will take your breath away.
It basically gives Jews carte blanche to do or say anything because any pushback could be construed as anti-Semitic.
This act is equal parts fascism, totalitarian, and Talmudic.
Who knows to what degree they're going to leverage it now that they have officially decreed power?
This anti-free speech bill is just the tip of the iceberg.
And so once it's passed, who will they go after first?
There are thousands, if not millions, of people who would be guilty by the act's hate crime standards.
Who is going to be the first guinea pig they test drive their shiny new anti-Semitic hate crime law on?
And who knows what the penalties will be?
Probably fines in prison like BDS, but what else?
Re-education camp?
You're first born?
Pardon?
Oh, gas chambers.
Yeah, there you go.
The act exists to protect Jews who are seemingly hated for no reason at all.
This is just rampant, irrational anti-Semitism that they're calling it, as if Jewish behavior had nothing to do with it.
All opposition to Jews is because of their behavior, and this current cabal ruling the U.S.
is clearly terrified of the people they rule over.
A law against hating Jews is probably the beginning of the end for the Jews.
They can't seem to help themselves.
109 countries across the ages who have kicked them out of their country.
Can't be wrong.
Well, Kat, you know, when I saw that they were going to pass an Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, my first thought was, hey, that's great, because we need more awareness of anti-Semitism, or what gets called anti-Semitism.
The vast majority of stuff that gets called anti-Semitism is stuff people really should be aware of.
Like, you know, when you say that Israel did 9-11 and killed JFK, they immediately say that's anti-Semitic.
People need to be aware of those issues.
The, you know, questioning official World War II historiography, we need more awareness that people are doing that.
And the people who oppose genocide, we need to learn more about that.
So we really need to be more aware of all of these issues that are being labeled anti-Semitism.
But if we were genuinely aware of those issues, I'm not sure that they would like it.
But yeah, this is completely insane.
What can you say?
Thomas Massey at least got this right.
So, you know, there's one guy who remembers that we have a Bill of Rights.
I don't know that much about Thomas Massey.
Do you?
I don't know either.
He's from Kentucky, but he's been at the forefront of a lot of really good laws and voting against the mainstream of the Congress.
So he's been doing a pretty good job.
And we have to thank him for speaking out about this anti-Semitic Awareness Act.
Um, that enhances the possibility of anti semantic monitors on college campuses, because this monitors bill that he happens to be talking about here.
It's separate from that act.
It was sponsored by AIPAC-funded politicians, and basically they're just looking for spies for Israel at the universities.
The data collected by monitors could be used to sue the school for anti-Jewish discrimination or punish schools for civil rights violations.
Colleges could lose their federal funding if they don't comply.
So these are the type of issues the new Jew hate law will be finessing, and it's quite terrible.
It's not the kind of awareness that you spoke of that we need.
Yeah, there's kind of a full court press going, it seems, against freedom from the same parties.
Now, E. Michael Jones points out that this Anti-Semitism Awareness Act that just got passed in the House defines, among all these other things it mentions as being anti-Semitic, saying that Jews had anything to do with the death of Jesus.
Now I guess in Islam we question the whole crucifixion narrative and or its relevance.
It's not really that clear precisely what the doctrine is.
So this whole business of did the Jews kill Jesus or did they just think they did but they only crucified themselves, their illusion or what have you, I'm not going to get into the theological debate.
But what I will say is I mean, come on folks, are they trying to completely outlaw Christianity?
I mean, the Bible has how many of these passages?
21, this person counted, passages saying that the Jews wanted to kill Jesus, and indeed the Quran also says the Jews wanted to kill Jesus.
As for the Romans, who a lot of liberal Christians, like my good friends John Cobb and the late great David Ray Griffin, maybe John less than David, David always tried to insist that, no, it wasn't the Jews, it was really the Romans.
Well, that's not what traditional Christianity ever said.
So, E. Michael Jones, who we're going to go visit in Croatia real soon, says the reign of the Antichrist has begun.
Basically, this bill outlaws Christianity.
That's kind of stunning, isn't it?
Right.
Well, even more than that, it just outlaws saying anything about Jews as individuals or as a group, such as you can't say Jews are trying to control the world, that Jews own all the money, that Jews own Hollywood, nothing.
I mean, they're going to be going after everybody.
Somebody's going to be a big test case, and it's going to be interesting to see who they go after and for which one of those closets.
Me, me!
Come after me, please.
Mr. ADL.
You're out of the running now.
You're in Morocco.
Boy, you lost your standing here.
Yeah, I am.
Michael Jones.
I just got my residency card.
Here's my Moroccan residency card.
I got it this morning.
I'm officially—and the taxi driver said I was Moroccan.
I was riding in the taxi with a couple of Belgians who have been here for six years and don't speak a word of Darija, and I was kind of chatting in Darija and Arabic with the driver, and he said, given that and given the fact that I'm Muslim, I'm an honorary Moroccan, and so I can prove it now.
And I have no standing, so the ADL has completely forgotten about me, I'm sure.
I hope the JDL has, anyway.
But yeah, so the Antichrist is here.
You can't say the Jews had anything to do with this crucifixion of Jesus.
Hamas did it.
You have to say Hamas did it.
That's mandatory.
Or it could be, maybe it was Donald Trump who killed Jesus.
I like this one.
It's kind of a good image for your next little crash or whatever you put up on Christmas if you're a Trump fan, or Trump hater, I guess, TDS.
And then this is, I thought, also a fairly aware tweet.
So they passed a law to make it illegal to say Jews control the media, economy, government, or other societal institution.
Wait a minute.
And here's a rabbi telling us that it's amazing Jews control everything.
God must have wanted it that way.
And so yeah, your leaders have spoken.
You're under the red, white, and blue star of David.
And it's obligatory to say that no Jew was involved in killing Jesus 9-11 or the attack on the USS Liberty.
So we've got that all straight.
But we all know that Jews don't really have any power because if you say that they do, they'll take everything you own and destroy your life.
To show how powerless they are.
There's a lot of good commentary out there on social media about this.
Also pointing out that Mike Johnson got two-thirds of a million dollars from AIPAC, and who knows what else they're giving him.
Underage this, that, or the other.
And so, last word on this subject.
We're cooked!
It's over!
The previous record of over is shattered by how over it is.
And then we go back to the previous frames when it was even more over than we thought it was, and so on and so forth.
Yeah, yeah.
So, Kat, I agree with you.
This really was the story of the week, to say the least.
Good thing I'm in a country that has at least the sort of minimal standards of free speech, namely Morocco, which is vastly better than the United States now.
It's a quote-unquote medieval kingdom, and it's far more enlightened and in tune with the kind of, you know, Voltaire's let people think freely zeitgeist than the United States is.
So yeah, the Bible's illegal.
I just ask you, why would this not be considered a soft coup d'etat?
They've basically taken away all freedom of speech.
Senate's going to pass it.
This is going to become law.
This is a soft coup d'etat.
Yeah, yeah.
They're going to put those little, you know, stars of David on all the cops, like in our image this week.
There we go.
That's what you're going to see, folks.
You're going to walk out on the street, and they're going to be coming after you if you say anything that they don't like.
Kind of amazing, because it seems so counterproductive.
Ultimately, people are not going to stand for this.
Frank Zappa talked about this moment that we just experienced this week, where the illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion, at the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain.
They will just take down the scenery.
They will pull back the curtains.
They will move the tables and chairs out of the way, and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.
And so I just put some brackets around they to illuminate what just happened this week.
I mean, it's not that I dislike Jewish people, like half the demonstrators, the anti-genocide demonstrators are wildly disproportionately Jewish.
So it's not that, but it's that you've got this tribe.
You've got this tribe that's dominated by its tribal elite, which is billionaires and psycho rabbi extremists.
No, he'd probably be leftist and be woke.
which has just destroyed the United States.
If Frank Zappa were here, do you think he would have the guts to put the brackets around the they cap?
No, he'd probably be leftist and be woke.
That's the problem is that all of our allies who traditionally fought the establishment were left, but they got taken out.
But now here they're back in because of Palestine and we're glad to have them, but they bring problems with them in their wokeness.
So we'll get to that soon enough as well.
Okay, well, I guess we better start getting to that stuff, so let's head for it.
Getting away from woke Mr. Zapp, although I don't know if I would call him woke.
That's another topic for another conversation.
So not only are the Zionists pushing through this legislation to protect themselves from any form of criticism or critique and to protect their favorite country, but they're also pushing through this FISA law, which takes away the Fourth Amendment, right?
No longer do they need to get a warrant that they can perform as many unreasonable searches and seizures as they want now.
And why do we need that?
Well, it's to protect Israel, of course.
Which is, of course, why we had to have 9-11, too, was to protect Israel.
And we needed to take away our freedom.
It was all to protect Israel.
Because if you have freedom and they can't spy on every single thing we do, then the people who are opposed to Israel will have an easier time of finishing off the Zionist entities.
So let's burn American freedom so that we can protect Israel.
And that's basically what they're doing here.
Right.
The FISA bill has Two main components, this upgrade that they did, the biggest expansion of domestic surveillance since the Patriot Act, so they're getting that spying in.
But also, as we spoke about the last time I was on, they're going to make it so that businesses that provide Internet services will also be enrolled to act like NSA spies.
And so with this framework, they're going to be able to accuse pro-Palestine protesters as being proxies in the U.S.
for Hamas or Iran or whoever.
And if that's true, then they can be charged with providing material support to a designated foreign terrorist group, which would be jail, which would take away their rights to free speech, their First Amendment rights.
So this is all of a piece with the anti-Semitic hate bill that you said is a full court press.
Yeah, we're getting it from all different ways.
FISA is just the cousin of the IHRA hate bill, which is a cousin of the anti-Semitism monitors on campus.
So basically the ADL and the Israeli lobby want to take all of our rights and send the police or military after us for protesting their genocide and ethnic cleansing in Israel.
Well, at least we've finally found out that the guys who did 9-11 really did hate our freedoms.
It's a little different from how they portrayed it.
So yeah, here's the anti-Semitism monitor bill that you mentioned before that Thomas Massey was against.
So the education department will be defunding the universities that don't crack down on the pro-Palestine protests.
And this is, of course, how they got me chased out of the American universities, too, is through financial pressure.
I was told that the engineering school at the University of Wisconsin-Madison lost half a million dollars overnight when I was on Fox News pushing back against Hannity.
But the next day they had a half a million dollars missing from there, but that was just the engineering school.
So they, and then of course that was why I was unemployable after that in the American Academy, because any university that employed me would be hearing from these billionaire Zionist donors.
Uh, and now they've got the government too, the education department.
So they've got the control of the purse strings.
So whatever these college administrators might actually think themselves, it's irrelevant.
Because to keep their budgets going and keep their operations running, they have to bring in the Gestapo to crush the anti-genocide protesters.
It's disgusting.
And meanwhile, they're throwing in all of this money for mass murder in occupied Palestine and Ukraine.
And then they're also throwing in huge piles of money, as in $3.5 billion, to supercharge mass migration from the Middle East.
Sounds like they're going to deport all the Palestinians to the United States.
Now, as much as I like Palestinians, I don't think this is good either for Palestine or for the United States.
What do you think?
Why don't they just call this bill the Nakba 2.0 bill?
Because with this migration angle, the US is basically offering Palestinians the choice of genocide or industrial levels of ethnic cleansing.
But aside from that, what we are not hearing about is bold as you please in our face is that pier that they're building in Gaza that's supposedly going to deliver aid to starving refugees.
And that's such a lie like we're dumb.
It's really the makings of an Israeli port for oil, if not also prime beachfront property.
And then with the macabre undertones.
This pier is being built from the rubble of Gaza buildings, which were full of blood and bones of unrescued Palestinians.
But what is not being said, and I'm sure it's all packaged in this bill with aid to Israel, is that there are right now about a thousand U.S.
soldiers in Gaza building that offshore pier.
So when Congress brought Lloyd Austin, the defense secretary, before them to grill him, he lied That the U.S.
has no boots on the ground in Gaza.
He tried to imply that they're on this pier on water.
They're not on the ground, they're on the pier.
Yeah, but they're not boots on the ground.
You know, he's playing around with language, but he also had to admit.
Pardon?
Sneakers on the pier.
Something.
Well, the other thing that he had to admit is that the soldiers building the pier are all armed and they have permission to shoot back if fired on.
So what we have is a U.S.
military beachhead in Gaza tricked out as a humanitarian aid effort with a thousand sitting ducks all in place for a World War III false flag shootout.
Yeah, so I suppose the Zionists could take down the pier and or the U.S.
ships around it and try to blame Arabs.
But we all know Zionists would never try to harm an American ship and blame Arabs now, would they?
Wait a minute, the U.S.
has property.
Okay, maybe they would.
And then we got more Guess Who Controls America news here with Steven Spielberg is helping to direct Biden's campaign.
I like the wording there, direct Biden's campaign, and look at that little smirk on his face.
I mean, who puts together these headlines and these pictures?
And so the Biden campaign is a heartwarming film about a hair-sniffing genocidal geezer who somehow gets elected president.
That sounds like a Spielberg film.
Well, how do you want your propaganda?
In some ways, he's sort of a Lenny Reifenstahl.
Her film, Triumph of the Will, about Nazi Germany, is considered one of the most effective propaganda films of all time.
But instead of Reifenstahl's innovative, stirring display of pomp and circumstance, I can see us being sedated with Spielbergian serpiness and pablum, befitting of a presidential candidate who wears diapers.
Yeah, pretty much.
So, do you think they're going to, like, actually have Biden, you know, doing it in his own diapers, or are they going to hire a stuntman?
Okay, moving on.
That was a rhetorical question.
How about this great article by Eric Stryker, America's Foes Discover Its Weakness.
So, we've just been talking about this soft coup.
I mean, it's not very soft.
It's more kind of like a jackboot coming down on the American face for all eternity, a jackboot decked out in Stars of David.
And guess what?
That amounts to a big weakness for the American empire.
And Eric Stryker makes a good argument about that here.
So there's Russian roulette, and there's American roulette.
So, I mean, will this be the death of our empire, Kat?
Which weirdly wouldn't be such a bad thing, but there must be a better way to take down the American empire than let the Zionists kill it in this disgusting, degrading fashion.
Well, a big problem is that virtually the entire world knows what's going on, that America is zogged to high heaven.
But Americans, by and large, don't know it.
And that's because we're one of the most censored, propagandized countries in the world.
So after three or four generations of woke re-education camp at the universities, people are unable to even think that Jewish power is the problem.
And Jews themselves can't really grasp it because they're propagandized not just at school, but in their homes and communities.
So October 7th made a huge dent in waking people up, including Jews.
And although it's a terrible reality in terms of consciousness raising about Zionism, Gaza has been an invaluable tool.
But at some point, people are going to have to wake up to the fact that Zionism is just the low-hanging fruit.
It's kind of easy to point to Jews today as there Israeli Jews who are doing over the top genocidal evil.
That's easy to vilify.
These Zionists are almost like cartoon Nazis.
But the real problem is Jewish supremacism.
And because of the extreme censorship by Jews who own the media, that subject has long been verboten.
But now we've got this new hate crime bill that will make it Even more illegal to talk about.
So here's America, who barely knows about the U.S.
being a Zionist-occupied country.
Now we have this new IHRA hate bill law, as if out of the blue it arrived this unprecedented unconstitutional law.
They don't even know what's going on.
But the good news out of all this is that the Chinese and the Russians also seem now to be exposing, resisting, I hope everybody is waking up even more to what they already have that probably in their own countries because we know that diaspora is everywhere.
Yeah, I can't really disagree with too much of that.
So we'll move on to the anti-genocide uprising news.
This was really the good news of the week.
We just covered the bad news, the complete destruction of freedom in America by genocide perpetrators.
But here's the good news.
There are actual protests against the genocide.
And in fact, they're spreading like proverbial wildfire with over 120 this week after just a few dozen last week.
Here's the front page story from The Guardian two days ago, I think, and I noticed that the picture accompanying this front page story was taken at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, at almost the same spot where I used to do 9-11 truth teach-ins.
And I looked at the footage of it, and It's just crowded.
Huge throngs of these protesters are out there, and then they sent the police just marching into them and crushing them and throwing professors on the ground.
It looked just like this film, The War at Home, which is a documentary about the riots and protests and stuff on the UW campus during the Vietnam era.
It was like a total rerun And so for the first time in many months, Kat, I almost wished I were back in Wisconsin, so I could be cheering on these protesters and, you know, bringing them pizza and hanging out with them in their encampments, and then hopefully ducking out before the cop's baton came down on my head.
But yeah, this is incredible.
This generation is not as lost as I used to think it was.
Well, so many of them are on the left, which, yeah, the left, the woke side of the West, excuse me, the woke side of the left is really lost.
But wherever they are, they're 100 percent correct to be in alignment with Palestine.
So the problem is, is that their leftist behaviors fuels conservatives.
So, they're just looking, they're defining the pro-Palestine movement as just another woke cause, which it's not.
But that's how you get Donald Trump, who is pro-Israel, to say, here are these radical left lunatics are again out there and we have to stop them.
Or Zero Hedge weighed in saying, these protests have little to do with the poor Palestinians and more to do with the Marxist takeover of the U.S.
Well, yes, they do have to do with the poor Palestinians.
And yes, there is a Marxist takeover of the left.
So what can you do?
And then there's reports of Dark Soros money funding the leftists, if not the agents provocateurs, agents provocateur, who probably were Antifa squads who did that hostage takedown.
So whether the responses are coming from the left or right, the end goal Seemingly, is to make the Palestinian protests a vehicle so that the powers can pass repressive laws like the IHRA hate bill, because now we're hearing Trump and Biden both making noises about needing law and order.
Well, that's a far different law and order than Nixon gave us.
This one is going to be a Zod-delivered law and order to look out.
Yeah, well, I definitely agree.
It's a very nasty-looking law and order.
Well, there are protests here in Morocco, too.
This is a film that my wife took a couple of days ago in Morocco, in the eastern region, where there are vastly bigger protests out in western Morocco, where it's more of a thing.
But here, this is a pretty intense protest, and it's an anti-woke protest.
Here, so you can hear me better.
That's an anti-woke protest as well as a pro-Palestine protest, because here in the Islamic world, those two causes pretty much go together, like pro-Palestine and anti-woke.
Here, the big money Western donors are trying to push through Western-style legislation to quote-unquote liberalize traditional Islamic approaches to marriage and family.
And so there's a lot of pushback against that, and the same people are pushing back in general who are the strongest and most courageous voices for Palestine.
So the American conservatives need to wake up and notice this, that in fact the Muslims are your friends.
The Muslims agree with you on almost all of the family value issues.
And they are also correct about Palestine.
And finally, Paquette, I don't really agree that everything about the left is completely wrong, that Soros is 100% bad, and that the reason he's giving money to the cause he gives it to is all 100% bad.
I would say it's maybe 70 or 80, maybe 90% bad.
I would say it's maybe 70 or 80, maybe 90 percent bad.
But Soros, I think, is a real he's an honest as well.
Honest is not the right word for Soros, but he's a liberal and a fan of the open society concept.
And so he gives his money around partly for those idealistic reasons, as well as, of course, to pry open countries that he wants to be able to make money in.
His notion of liberalism includes the right of cash to come in and make money, which is obviously self-interested and evil.
However, I don't think Soros has ever been a Zionist or a Jewish supremacist in any way, shape, or form.
So the reason he's giving this money is the same reason he gave marijuana legalization money.
That's his political philosophy.
But anyway, did you want to respond to that or should we talk about the mob at UCLA?
Well, just really quickly, he and Israel do not get along, but we have to remember he funds Antifa, and he is the funder of all the color revolutions.
Right.
Yeah.
So again, whether it's 60, 70, 80, or 90% plus of the stuff he does is bad, we'll agree with that.
But I wouldn't throw out all of these demonstrations just because of that.
And indeed, a lot of conservatives, the smart conservatives, are all on board with these demonstrations.
And a lot of the younger, the male, especially the males in this Generation Z, tend to be much more socially conservative and a whole lot of them have noticed this problem of Zionist and Jewish power and so on and so forth.
So I think we have to give this generation some credit.
But over at UCLA, these Zionist thugs attacked the encampment screaming, Second Nakba, firing fireworks at them and beating them.
Uh, you know, spraying them with chemical weapons, uh, and the way it was reported in the mainstream media was clashes erupt.
You know, just like in Palestine, when the Zionists commit genocide, clashes erupt.
Uh, maybe they should just like have, wire their newspapers, just always print clashes erupt every time that there's any violence anywhere.
Um, well, these Zionist bugs, they were just the shock troops that paved the way for the police to come in and brutally clear the encampment out that so that makes them the exact corollary.
to the militant Israeli Jewish settlers in occupied Palestine.
These thugs here are given just as much permission as the militant Zionist settlers are, including being armed up.
There was one photo somewhere that the text said a pro-Palestinian protester clashes with a pro-Israeli supporter.
And that's just part of more mainstream media propaganda, because it really should have said when you looked at the picture of the Israeli guy actually trying to hit the pro-Palestinian guy, it really should have said a pro-Palestinian supporter defends himself from a pro-Israeli agitator who uses a makeshift it really should have said a pro-Palestinian supporter defends himself from a pro-Israeli agitator who uses a makeshift
So they arrested, like, 200, but if it weren't for the tip of the spear Zionists who went in there and started beating up like a little gang squad, would the police have really had that easy of a time to come in afterwards?
Yeah, I think the correct word here would have been terrorist.
The headline should have said Zionist terrorists attack demonstrators because that's exactly what they are.
Terrorism is defined as using violence against civilians in an attempt to spread fear.
And that's obviously what they were doing and what the Zionists have been doing ever since there was a Zionist movement.
I thought Andrew Anglin's headline here was pretty accurate.
A Jewish hate mob, that's another thing you could call them.
And they apparently were, yeah, they led off this attack by blasting the sound of babies crying at ear-splitting volume.
So they're proud of killing babies, right?
Just like the IDF soldiers all have this one-shot, two-kills t-shirt with a target on the belly of a pregnant Muslim woman as the image.
They tweet out how proud they are.
I killed 13 kids today and more tomorrow.
They're really, really into killing babies, and here they just kind of want it in an attempt to intimidate the people they're about to attack.
Wow, it used to be heavy metal, goth music that they blasted at prisoners and people, but babies crying, that speaks volumes about where there's psychopaths.
You know, they're proud that these babies are dying of hunger, dying under the rubble, and they're laughing about it, doing Jewish dances of joy about it.
I mean, that's who these people are.
Yeah, very psychopathic.
Yep.
What can you say?
So yeah, here's one of the many tweets.
To get the real story of this, you had to be on social media, although it's sort of leaking out into alternative media now.
How about like just knocking over the woman and stomping on her saying, you stand no choice, old lady.
So they like to pick on old ladies as well as babies, apparently.
Anybody who can't fight back.
They're terrified of Hamas.
They're getting their butts kicked by Hamas over in those tunnels.
But all the people that can't fight back are fair game, apparently.
And then you can look at the film of it.
This was just a totally one-sided attack.
It wasn't clashes erupting.
But what can you say?
So over in Columbia, this week of craziness, as you said, Kat, there were some some kinds of dubious things going on around the occupation of the building, which gave the police the pretext to clear out the encampments.
And now the students are being suspended.
So do you think the Antifa people were responsible for infiltrating the protest, convincing the protesters to take over a building by smashing a window, thereby providing the pretext for the crackdown?
Or is that too simplistic?
No, I think they had it in for them all along.
Back a couple months ago, they were already calling the university administrators in to say, stop the anti-Semitism.
So when it became physical encampments, oh boy, that was even worse than trying to halt speech.
What I find interesting is the myopic leftists who assume that Their peace camps and their protests are going to be treated the same way the George Floyd riots were considered mostly peaceful.
Now, granted, the rioting and violence is coming from the other side.
They are peace camps.
But I think they're getting, the left is getting a real education of what dissent looks like when you are not on the side of the powers that be.
And it was interesting, I saw something on MSNBC that was negatively comparing the pro-Palestinian supporters to J6ers.
Well, for different reasons, they probably were more right than they realize.
And maybe now some of these leftists will realize that now they too are J6ers.
Yeah, they're learning that lesson from the apocryphal Voltaire quote, to find out who rules you, just ask who you're not allowed to criticize.
And that's certainly become abundantly clear who we're not supposed to criticize, as Congress told us with this new anti-Semitism awareness bill that we let off the show with.
So this has really messed up the Columbia campus, and I think dozens if not over a hundred professors walked off in sympathy with the students.
So the whole, you know, these campus communities are getting pretty united against the Zionist Orwellian system that's coming down on them.
It's interesting.
It's creating a situation where all of the smart, aware people are kind of crowded into one One area where they're all together.
And I think that should include a lot of people on the political right as well, eventually.
I think, you know, it's going to be a little slower because the right wing looks at this and just from the, you know, if you're not paying attention, it does look sort of like just another crazy left-wing protest.
But once you learn the details, then it's totally different.
So, how about this one?
A Palestinian flag at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
These protests are happening all over the place, not just on campuses.
Yeah, well, this annual White House Correspondents' Dinner usually has a comedian of the day.
It's a vacuous jester's ball where the comedian can no longer even offer a hint of the shrewd truths that jesters of times past once delivered.
So rather than trying to skewer the superficial people who went to this Correspondents' Dinner, which is the media, What I'd like to do is focus on the Palestinian flag that's hanging so powerfully there and grabbing everyone's attention in such a big, strong, emotional way.
People might not know that the Palestinian flag was first introduced during the Arab Revolt in 1916.
The red symbolizes courage, sacrifice, and resilience.
The white stands for peace and unity.
The black signifies strength and steadfastness in times of adversity, and the green is associated with Islam, representing fertility, life, renewal, and prosperity.
So that Palestinian flag is truly a potent symbol, a semiotic visual shock almost.
And no wonder the Israelis go apeshit when it's displayed and do all that they can to outlaw it.
Well, if they can't find a jester to make fun of the people who deserve to be made fun of, I mean, I'll volunteer my services.
I've been writing satire for years.
Somehow, I don't think they're going to hire me, though.
I better keep my day job here at False Clag Weekly News.
So here's this Larry Summers character as yet another Zionist cartoon villain.
And here he is chatting with my old friend, that CNN guy.
What's that guy's name again?
Anderson Cooper.
Anderson Cooper, right.
He actually did an episode on me when I was under the gun at the University of Wisconsin-Madison for talking about 9-11 truth.
Yeah, so there's Anderson Cooper asking Summers about this and Summers basically is saying we need to totally purge the campuses of all these people who think incorrect thoughts about my beloved Zionist entity.
Well, that'd probably be at least 90% of the people on the campuses because, you know, you need like a basically a 120 plus IQ really to be doing much on those campuses.
And anybody with two brain cells to rub together who takes a look at what's going on in occupied Palestine is going to think politically incorrect thoughts from the Zionist perspective.
So I think Summers is, he's desperate.
All these Zionists are just getting increasingly desperate.
Well, he has to say they have the right to protest, the right to free speech.
but they can't be disruptive.
So who is disruptive?
They were peaceful encampments until the universities obeyed their donors' request to censor students and then sick the police on them.
In the past, we had anti-apartheid protest encampments that Anderson Cooper said he was even on, and they never caused such problems.
No student ever felt threatened.
You didn't see black students or even black students from Africa feeling like they were threatened.
So you really have to ask, what is this extreme fear Jews on campus have that they're afraid for their safety?
You know, this Jewish paranoia becomes more important than the genocide that they're committing.
Remember back in the anti-apartheid protests?
I don't remember white students saying that they feared for their safety because of the anti-apartheid protests.
You can't even imagine that, can you?
Right.
Yeah, actually, the better allegory is whites being fearful.
But who knows?
Blacks, too.
I mean, it's just There was no fear.
The infusion of Jewish fear in this forces us in our Zog Nation to follow every psychopathic path they take us down.
Pretty much.
Well, I'm not following them, but then I'm not in the nation anymore.
What's next here?
Have you no sense of decency, says Michael Hudson, comparing this situation, this crackdown on campuses, to what happened during the McCarthy period of the 1950s.
And again, as I told David Robix, I think that comparison is actually unfair to the McCarthyites.
I'd love that.
Well, what the students are demanding is that Columbia divest of its Israeli stocks and of stocks in U.S.
weapon manufacturers that supply Israel.
And Michael Hobson claims that this is just unrealistic because the universities are businesses, so that will never happen.
And he said that what the students should instead strive to get Columbia to recognize One, it is not anti-Semitic to condemn genocide.
Two, the university should support the UN and denounce the U.S.
veto.
Three, the university should not call the police over anything that has to do with free speech.
Four, the Columbia president should be fired for her one-sided support of Israel against her own students.
And five, that the university administrators should not bow to big money donors at the expense of their faculty and students.
To this list, I think the students should add the demand that APEC be registered as a foreign agent.
That all sounds good to me, but you know, I think that the Hudson is wrong in saying that they shouldn't be pushing for boycotts and divestments and sanctions.
They shouldn't be pushing universities to get out of the companies that support Israel.
That's what we did with South Africa and it worked.
It changed South Africa.
So if it worked for South Africa, why can't it work for the Zionist entity?
So I think that's that's pretty ridiculous, but The rest of it I would totally agree with.
So, how about this State Department?
Once again, Sam Husseini is holding the State Department accountable, pointing out that the official U.S.
policy is that nuclear proliferators have to have their funding cut off, and yet Israel is the world's worst nuclear proliferator, and there seems to be some kind of unwritten exception here, as there is in so many other places.
Right, just to confirm, the U.S.
law requires that no military funding can be given to a country if it is violating human rights or is involved with nuclear weapons.
So, the U.S.
is blatantly violating the law because the entire world knows Israel has nuclear weapons.
I suggest, why don't they just change the law or get rid of the law?
They do everything else with impunity.
Just abandon the fig leaf that we're complying the law, scrambling our brains to make us think, no, you're not, but they never say it.
The deceit is just an insult to everyone's intelligence.
And it's just hard for normal people to comprehend such deceitfulness, such blatant gaslighting, causes even more distrust in the government.
So no wonder at a recent protest, Both sides were shouting, fuck Joe Biden, both the right and the left, in unison, fuck Joe Biden.
I'm glad we can finally agree on something.
So, yeah, I think the fact that there's, you know, the rule-based order where there's one set of rules for us and one for everybody else, or rather, really, it's more like we make up the rules as we go along.
And flout them with impunity.
That's I think it's actually a way of the big bully sending the message that I don't have to obey the rules.
The rules are for you, not for me.
And that's the Zionist attitude.
And it's some extent the American imperial attitude as well.
So the war crimes section of our show, talk about Netanyahu getting charged with war crimes up to and including genocide, has been floating around all week.
And basically everybody, including the Israeli media and Yvi himself, all think that it's quite likely that he will indeed be charged with these war crimes.
The Jerusalem Post headline, Netanyahu's claim that if he is charged, that will be a terrible anti-Semitic hate crime, will pour jet fuel on the flames of anti-Semitism, which I thought was an interesting choice of words.
So, I wrote a satire about that, getting into the whole jet fuel, taking down the World Trade Center at free-fall speed.
So, maybe it'll take down the Jews at free-fall speed, too.
So, it's a good metaphor for me.
Anyway, you know, you can't really satirize these people anymore, Kat.
When Netanyahu would say, oh, I'd be so anti-Semitic if they prosecute me for genocide.
You know, talk about, you know, crying out as you strike them.
Come on.
Right.
He's the epitome of everything that people are concerned about when it comes to Jews.
Well, the head of the ICC has recently pushed back and demanded a halt to the threats of retaliation coming from the U.S.
and Israel.
Only gangsters and criminals threaten judges and courts.
I mean, what have we become?
And the best strategy for the ICC is not to go after the carpet bombing of Gaza, because Israel has convinced so many people that it's right to defend itself.
I don't know if convince is the right word, more like extort, bribe, strong arm, but in any event, The starvation campaign has legs, to use a bad pun.
But for years, Israel has controlled the calorie intake of the Gaza Strip population.
They've allowed just enough food to come through Gaza's heavily guarded borders to not cause any world alarm, but to ensure the right amount of mass malnutrition.
So now they've ramped up food as a weapon.
Oxfam has calculated that thousands of Gazans now are living on only 245 calories a day.
That's not even the equivalent of one McDonald's hamburger.
So, can war crimes make any difference for these people, for Netanyahu and his general?
Well, there's almost no consequences if they're found guilty, but they will not be able to travel.
And 124 countries are a member of ICC.
The U.S.
isn't, so we can be blessed with Netanyahu's presence.
But the biggest kind of consequence should be the shame.
To any other people, such widespread condemnation would be unbearable.
But the shamelessness of Israeli Jews clearly has no limits.
No, they're proud of it.
Well, I would think that if the Israeli leadership gets indicted for genocide, but there's impunity because nobody's extraditing, that would certainly give all sorts of forces in the region and the world a very good reason to invoke the R2P responsibility to protect doctrine and to take matters into their own hands and to go after these genocidal criminals who are enjoying impunity.
And it would be arguably perfectly legal for anyone on earth, certainly for governments and groups affiliated with governments, to directly target war criminals, genocidal war criminals, who've been indicted but who can't be prosecuted because of where they happen to be.
So that's my take on it.
I know a lot of countries probably are not brave enough to do that, but it could Mm hmm.
Right question.
Are you suggesting rendition?
Yeah, I mean, rendition?
Drone him?
You know, drone him, rendition?
No, haul him in, kidnap him, rendition.
Yeah, yeah, whatever.
Or send a kidnapping drone, right?
A drone that can fly down, swoop down, pick up Netanyahu, and carry him off to the Hague.
That's the drone that we need.
Iran's got some pretty advanced drones.
I don't know if they've got that one yet, but let's hope so.
Inshallah.
So how about Boris Johnson?
No, not Boris.
Is this Boris Johnson?
Yeah, it was, actually.
I don't know.
What can Biden do?
I mean, the U.S.
- Mike Johnson.
- Oh, that was Mike Johnson.
- Okay, Mike Johnson.
I get my idiot Johnson's mixed up sometimes.
So I don't know, what can Biden do?
I mean, the US isn't the party to the ICC, is it? - No, but what he wants Biden to do is use its influence to somehow block any plans for like the arrest warrants issuing of them.
But what Mike Johnson doesn't get is the U.S.
no longer has any global influence.
Well, Johnson is claiming that if ICC issues warrant arrests, then U.S. officials could be next.
And therefore, Israeli arrests are a threat to U.S. security, which is true, and it would be totally justified.
So since the U.S. and Israel are members of the ICC, the only major, neither of them are members of the ICC, the only real major threat is the inability to travel to the 124 countries that are members of the ICC.
So, I mean, there is, it's an empty threat.
What can you do? - Right, yeah.
Well, I know the American leadership has good reasons to fear being prosecuted for war crimes, right along with the Israelis.
Well, Turkey is now joining the genocide case against Israel, and that's pretty significant.
Turkey is a rising major player in the world.
Oh, yeah.
So far, they seem to have a lot of bark, but little bite.
But on Thursday, Turkey put their money where their mouth is, and they have halted all exports and imports to and from Israel.
So in addition to the diplomatic war, That Erdogan has been doing, going after Netanyahu personally.
I think you had something like they're going to send him to hell or something.
Turkey now is waging an economic war with Israel, and this is unprecedented for any NATO member.
Turkey has the second largest military of NATO members, so for Erdogan to side with South Africa really does carry some weight.
But will it matter?
Nicaragua boldly demanded the ICJ do an emergency halt of German arms sale to Israel, and Germany is the second biggest supplier to Israel after the US.
And the ICJ just disagreed, didn't even give valid reasons, and went ahead and let Germany sell weapons to Israel.
So, so much for the ICJ.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, they'll probably convict Israel of genocide 20 or 30 years from now.
And Sam Husseini points out that the lies can prove criminal intent.
That is, when you're trying to prove that somebody committed a crime willfully, the fact that they're Why in such a way as to try and disguise what they're doing is actually evidence against them.
And in this piece, he points out that it's not only the case for the Israeli genocide perps, but also for the COVID origins perps.
And Sam Husseini's been on that case for quite some time.
So, it was interesting that we just had this DASAC that dragged before the House Committee.
And it happened as all these demonstrations were breaking out, so it didn't get very much attention.
But he's under fire, and this issue of tracing COVID origins, but it's all the Republicans who hate China who are trying to blame China, which seems to me to be an obvious not only limited hangout, but that's what the COVID biotech perpetrators wanted to do.
That's why they did it to Wuhan, because that's why the first they set up a lab, the American money set up a lab in Wuhan in order to eventually allow the Americans to conduct an anti-economy bio-attack on China that could be plausibly blamed on the Wuhan lab.
And all of these Republicans in Congress are falling for that cover story.
Well, I think the genocide is obviously a Zionist project.
They're the ones who are doing it.
But I say COVID origins are likewise a Zionist project.
For example, as early as February 2020, the Israeli science and technology minister announced Israel could have a vaccine ready in three weeks.
Well, you can't have a vaccine without having the virus to go with it.
So I think that It was right of Sam to find commonality between the two evils of genocide and COVID origin.
But if he probed deeper, he would have discovered the common denominator in all likelihood is Israel.
Possible, although Israel wasn't the only party that seemed to be in a position to crank out a COVID vaccine a little bit too fast.
The whole West basically seemed to be, and that statement you referred to was merely a statement.
I don't think Israel actually did produce any vaccines any earlier than anyone else did, did they?
Well, they said they did.
Maybe you're saying they were just bluffing, but that was in February 2020.
Warp speed didn't happen until about 2021, so they were way ahead of the game.
I think if we had all the receipts, we'd see that, of course, everybody's involved.
Just as in 9-11, everyone's involved.
But the key question is, who's masterminding it?
Right, yeah, and of course I had this big fight with Lin Din about this, that I mean to me the Zionist or Jewish tribal project of continuing to occupy Palestine is obviously a Jewish tribal project.
But COVID, I don't really see it quite so much that way.
But maybe we'll find out in the future, maybe information will leak out clarifying all of that.
I think it was more, actually, of an American imperial war on the world.
And yeah, of course, Zionists dominate America, so they dominate the world.
Well, one other proof of concept is the fact that very early on, somehow, a high number of Iranian leadership got taken out.
Huh, how did that happen?
Why are you raining?
So maybe a joint American-Israeli project, sort of like maybe 9-11 and JFK?
Yes, but because we're Zogged, we're the junior partners, so again, who's the bottom line mastermind?
Could be.
Although, again, in terms of the overall effect, the deaths of a few senior Iranian leaders in Qom was really very minor, whereas the total shutdown of the Chinese economy or the huge economic blow to China for a couple of years of shutdowns was History changing.
So in terms of the effect of this biostrike, it actually had a long-term strategic effect on the competition between the U.S.
and China over the GDP growth rates.
And it significantly narrowed the difference between the U.S.
and China, which is the American empire's number one geostrategic problem, is that growth differential between the U.S.
and China.
So it was absolutely historic in that sense.
And the attack on Iran seemed almost like sort of an afterthought, just the sort of, you know, they're always slapping around with these things, but they didn't actually damage Iran that much more than anywhere else.
What it did was send a message that we got it and we got you too.
So, to me that was, they didn't need to take out all of Iran to the degree that China got taken down, but it sent a very clear message to me who else would be targeting on Iran.
That's true.
Yeah, throwing Iran in with the attack on China, it's kind of like when they picked a Palestinian Patsy to take the blame for shooting RFK.
It kind of tells you who was behind it.
So here's the war on Russia.
Biden is going to try to handcuff his successor into sticking with the war on Russia through Ukraine for another 10 years.
It's in the aid package.
Is this going to work, Kat?
No, the so-called security agreement is nothing less than a 10-year war on Russia.
Americans should be up in arms that the War Powers Act has been totally stripped of its purpose and meaning.
But even if Congress demanded a resolution on the Ukrainian security agreement, as it falls right within the War Powers Act, why bother?
Until we get unsolved, there's no solution.
We need a congressional committee to discover, figure out where the 110th country could be.
Yeah, I can't disagree.
And here's Larry Johnson on a Nord Stream Pipeline sabotage in the UN.
It's good to see a guy like Larry Johnson testifying in the UN.
Quite amazing, in fact.
He was very respectful, very decorous, but he did get around to the meat and potatoes issue here, which is the biggest act of economic sabotage in history, unless, of course, you're counting the COVID bio-attack on China and Iran, was this destruction of the Nord Stream Pipeline.
And we all know who did it.
Seymour Hersh, I think, gave probably the picture he painted, that is that the Biden administration ordered it, is almost certainly correct.
This is not the first time that the UN has been considering looking into it.
In March 2023, there was a resolution that was defeated by the Security Council to look into it way back then, but only three members voted in its favor.
The main reason That all 12 other nations abstained was supposedly because, well, there's three national investigations going on.
So we saw Germany had one, Denmark had one, Sweden had one, and they all were for naught.
And Russia was arguing that an international investigation would not interfere with those national investigations.
And it was a waste of time to wait for the national investigations.
And sure enough, Russia was right.
The investigations by Germany, Denmark and Sweden went nowhere.
Yeah, they were intended to go nowhere.
So now, long after the fact, the international investigation is finally happening, better late than never.
Yeah, and Larry Johnson is there talking about it on the world stage, so shout out to Larry.
Moving on to our family value section, Iraq bans homosexuality.
And this leads to my radio show tonight, involves an interview with Dr. Alan Sebrosky, who responded to our email around this by saying, you know, I think the white people need to all mass convert to Islam.
So we're going to see if he stands by that on the radio show.
So yeah, this family values still survive even though Iraq got clobbered by the hijacked American military.
Tucker Carlson is passionately defending parental rights.
What do you think of Tucker?
I mean, I think he's actually, I think he's a lot more sincere than I used to give him credit for.
What do you think, Kat?
I think he's great.
I think he's a great positive force and role model.
He never watches television.
This is what he claims.
He doesn't use email and he spends 20 minutes every day, quote, doing nothing in the sauna.
I think he's a model of defiance to the powers that be and he's like our Edwin R. Murrow for our generation.
I'm very impressed with how much he speaks out and how much kind of self sovereignty and self agency that he's created for himself.
I say Bravo, Tucker.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, I can relate to being in an institution where you also consciously kind of don't go too far in challenging certain things.
And then finally you can't take it anymore, so you get out of the institution and you just call it the way you see it.
That's what I did, and I think he's doing it too.
I think he's honest.
The people who say, oh, his dad was CIA, and he's got to be a bad guy because of this or that.
I don't think so.
I think he's actually one of those rare decent people in public life.
But we'll continue to keep an eye on him to see.
Well here he had a great conversation with Alexander Dugan.
I had a kind of a somewhat similar conversation with Dugan in Tehran several years ago.
So this was a flashback to watch Tucker have this conversation.
But it's a really good introduction to traditionalism.
Dugan approached me after I gave a talk in Tehran and said, yeah, I was really influenced by René Ganon too, a traditionalism founder.
And so here he is laying out precisely why the so-called liberal West is waging this all-out war on Russia, because they can't stand a powerful entity in the world still clinging to traditional civilizational values.
Right.
And thank goodness Tucker sought him out.
Tucker sought out some other exemplary people who are living in exile in Russia, including Tara Reade, who was the target of the Biden administration when she claimed that Biden had sexually assaulted her.
And then even Snowden, he talked with, and I hope that interview comes out soon enough.
But he's a force of bravery for going behind what we have now.
What would we call it?
There's not an iron curtain.
Maybe it's a digital curtain at this point.
There's some kind of this divide that we have right now.
He has just gone through it and come back.
No worry for less.
The paragon of a journalist who goes where we can't go and brings back news that we can't hear.
So, in this new age of the Iron Curtain, bravo, Tucker.
And it's really sad the way all of the mainstream propagandists feel so obliged to throw rotten fruit at Tucker Carlson and, you know, make these kinds of empty sorts of jibes when what Tucker Carlson's doing here is really nothing less than admirable.
Well, how about the immigration issue?
How about the waves of non-EU migrants in Slovenia?
I didn't know a whole lot about the situation in Slovenia, but I have followed the one in Ireland, the similar situation in Ireland, and I mean, I have part Irish ancestry, and I can kind of relate to people in Ireland who look at projections that native Irish people could be a minority in their own country by as early as 2030, and quite likely 2040, but possibly earlier, and they don't like that.
Well, I don't really blame them.
I like Muslims, I like people in Morocco, and I'm all on board with Alan Sebroski.
White people should convert to Islam, learn something from these immigrants.
Of course, at the same time, I understand why people want to maintain the particularity of the culture they live in.
So, on the whole, I don't really blame these demonstrators.
Well, by and large, they're ordinary working people, and they're not right-wing troublemakers as the media wants to make out to be.
They're homegrown patriots.
The foreigners are not patriots of Ireland.
They don't have any roots there.
Derry, a city with a history, As being a hotspot of anti-government activism.
Now, sadly, has a black mayor who believes anyone opposing mass immigration into Ireland is part of an organized terrorist group.
And unbelievably, she was nominated by Sinn Féin, the strong group that helped get the freedom for the Irish.
Sinn Féin is now straight up leftist.
What I would like to say, well, the threat of all citizens in the West comes not from Russia, China, Iran, but from their own government.
But I would like to talk a bit about Slovenia, because we don't know anything about it.
And it's kind of interesting what happened to Slovenia, if I may.
Slovenia's prime minister was a businessman from a leftist Green Party who had no prior political experience.
But now he's advocating opening Slovenia's doors to non-EU foreigners And making them legal.
The Prime Minister's name is Robert Golub, G-O-L-O-B, and that to me certainly sounds like a Jewish name, and I bet when he was elected, Mayorkas was thrilled to have another Jew watering down another homogenous white population.
Golub is a Jewish name?
Golem, I could say.
G-O-L-O-B?
I think so.
Okay.
Well, what I was going to say is Slovia has to realize that they've been zogged.
Golub is regularly meeting with Alex Soros, and the migration scheme is operated by NGO Flush Money that's coming in from abroad from the likes of people like Soros, because the Slovenian laws prevent foreign migration.
And the NGOs are a way to bypass it.
So, in a nutshell, Slovenia has been zogged, and they better get the golem out of office before he does any more damage.
Okay, well, that issue isn't going to go away anytime soon, the migration to Europe issue.
Of course, the real bottom line there is the low birth rates, and I'm going to be talking about that on the radio show also tonight.
So, people can go to truthjihad.com and click on the radio link to find out more about that.
So how about the British?
They're threatening to deport the quote-unquote asylum seekers to Rwanda.
That's kind of weird.
That's almost like Bibi Netanyahu threatening to deport the Palestinians to Congo because Congo and Rwanda both have these connotations of genocide.
You would think that these leaders would try to pick some other countries for their deportations.
Exactly.
Well, the Rwanda solution is a drop in the bucket.
England's recent numbers show that more than 200,000 migrants a year infiltrate into England, yet only 1,000 migrants a year will be sent to Rwanda.
That's like a half percent.
I suspect this is probably some do-gooder politician's project with vast built-in opportunities for bilking it for all of its worth.
In reality, there's no need to be sending illegal migrants to Rwanda or anywhere else.
The Brit's acclaimed Navy should just patrol their coast and keep outsiders out.
How hard is that?
Or has the British Navy become so dilapidated these days that they can't even go mano-a-mano against rubber dinghies?
I don't know.
I don't know how all those people are traveling, the migrants, you know, what percentage are on boats, what percentage are on planes, trains, whatever.
But moving on to these other kinds of demographic replacement type issues, there were some stories about a capital gains tax increase, basically a de facto capital gains increase on the top income earners.
And the question is, is that a white tax, as it's been claimed by some white advocates, or is it really a Jew tax?
Because actually, I believe Jews in the United States, economically, are considerably further ahead of non-Jewish whites than non-Jewish whites are ahead of non-whites, and even ahead of blacks, who are very much at the bottom of the non-white economic pecking order.
So, if you're going to argue that this is a white tax, as Paul Kersey does, because the white people are more prosperous than the black people, therefore taxing the rich people is really just taxing the white people, well, you could actually say it's really taxing the Jews.
It's a Jew tax, because the Jews are a lot richer than the whites than the whites are than the non-whites.
I see the logic there.
The proposal is to double the long-term capital gains tax.
Right now it's at about 20%, and they want it conceivably to go up to 44%, which is a form of highway robbery.
They say it's for high-income earners, anyone making over a million dollars, but in this age of multi-billionaires, a million dollars is not that much.
A million dollars a year is not that much, Kat?
Wow!
You've got to start donating to False Flag Weekly News.
No, because I'm talking about mid-sized to large mom and pops who are making that kind of money and upper middle class professionals who are making that kind of money with inflation.
It's not that much.
The bigger issue is that the super rich don't pay any taxes at all and they have all kinds of tax cuts to all kinds of loopholes to get them out of it.
So a million dollars It is not that much to start charging to people.
And actually... Really?
Because for me, based on my knowledge of American median and mean income earners and wealth holders, as I understand it, the median for American wealth holding, that is your total net assets, all of your net assets, not income, Yeah, the median for that is something like maybe, you know, two or three or four hundred thousand dollars.
Maybe somewhere in that area.
So, a one million dollar annual income is maybe three times the average net entire wealth of the average American.
So, that's what you earn in one year.
If you earn a million dollars in one year, and remember, this is where it starts and kicks in.
A million dollars one year, your working life is about 40 years.
So, you would make 40 million in your working life.
That's way, way, Way ahead of the average person, isn't it?
Well, I completely understand everything that you've said, because that's my starting point as well.
What do you mean, millionaires?
But what that whole base is, it's front loaded with a lot of working class people, middle class people, and it's upper middle class people that can help bring up, rise the tide.
The problem is, is that the real cutoff, if you look at the statistics, we've got middle, middle, middle upper and then you have super wealthy that's just completely off the charts that's who should be taxed not the ones who a million two million five million is chump change compared to the vast amount of multi-billionaire multi-trillionaire wealth that's there that could really rise uh be the tide that rises everybody and that's
who's not going to have to pay and they're going to go after people who really aren't even in that bracket.
They're going to be screwed just as much as us.
One million dollars is not that much.
And in terms of making it a racial wealth...
If anybody sends it to the "False Flag Weekly News," I will actually consider it that much.
So hey, listen you guys, if you want me to really think that you sent me a lot of money, just send me a million.
I'm joking.
I'm looking at it with a bigger lens.
Obviously, I don't have a million.
Most people I know don't.
But when you look at it with the bigger lens and the degree that the super wealth had, it is so extremely off the charts that going after people with a million is like a highway robbery.
And I also want to make- Well, I'm not saying Soros doesn't think it's Trump change.
You're right.
Yeah.
Well, in terms of the wealth tax to address racial wealth inequity, is this supposed to be reparations through taxes?
It sounds to me like a lame shakedown.
And we've had decades of welfare that hasn't fixed racial equality.
So I don't see how wealth transfers via taxes can solve these inequalities, racial or otherwise.
The bottom line, economic inequality is a class issue, not a race issue.
And then just throwing money at a supposed racial inequity problem as if poor people, Are not part of the problem and shouldn't be in the mix.
This what we need is a social overhauling to enable black and working all working families to live as strong, stable units the way they did in the 1950s.
Well, I agree with you.
It's an economic problem, not so much a racial problem.
On the other hand, black Americans are doing so badly for basically two reasons.
One is that the liberals passed welfare reform that blew up the black family back in the early 60s, leading to generations of people born out of wedlock growing up in not such great circumstances.
And then secondly, the loss of good, well-paid, working class jobs.
And the inequality in the United States has disproportionately hurt black people.
And so I think that while it's somewhat unfortunate and woke to be framing tax policy this way, I would like to see the tax rates go back to what they were in the 1950s under Eisenhower, which was up to 90% on the top income tax brackets.
And I also think capital gains should be taxed just as much as any other form of income, maybe more so, because they're basically, if not entirely parasitical, largely parasitical.
I mean, if you work to make money, you're working.
If you're just investing and putting, you're getting interest, which is Reba, which is Haram, which is going to send you to hellfire.
Maybe you should be taxed a little bit on that.
But instead, they'll tax you less for your interest that you're earning than you'd be taxed if you went out and made the same amount of money while working.
So my overall take is, yeah, I think we need way higher capital gains taxes on pretty much everybody, not just the people, the obscenely rich people making a million a year.
And I also think we need much higher income taxes as well.
We should go back to the 1950s level of taxation.
But, of course, we can't because people today are very, very selfish and greedy and materialistic, unlike back in the 1950s.
So, anyway, that's a lot of talk about taxes.
Oh, no, more taxes!
It's the same story, though, so we already talked about it long enough.
Let's move on to biological weapons of war.
Arizona declares mRNA vaccines biological weapons of war.
Does that mean that if you bring a vaccine across the state lines into Arizona, you're going to be arrested by a SWAT team in a hazmat suit?
I don't think so.
And it's not really by the state per se.
It's just a Republican Party actually that did it.
But it's still good news that they recognize the mRNA vaccine as a bioweapon.
Just the headlines alone are great.
And their unprecedented attack on the COVID vaccine should make everyone who took the vaccine question why the government forced it on them.
And hopefully Arizona's lead will also head off the MRNA as a wonder drug that they're trying to put in everything from food to cancer shots to animals, you name it.
So next time I'm crossing the Arizona border and they say, do you have any grapefruits?
Do you have any oranges?
Do you have any vaccines?
I'll make sure I've thrown out all my vaccines before I get to the border so I don't get caught.
Just kidding.
I wouldn't be caught dead taking a vaccine anywhere, much less across the board.
All right, here we are at the Who's Pandemic Treaty.
And we've been getting great updates from Merrill Mass about this.
Shout out to Merrill.
And we've got Utah and Florida now standing against this pandemic treaty, which basically creates an unaccountable bureaucracy above and beyond all lower levels of government.
And that's going to be controlled pretty much by the Biowar perps, the same types of people who gave us COVID and Lyme disease and so much else.
Somehow I don't trust those people to run the whole world in terms of its health and drugs and things like that.
Is this going to pass, though?
Where's this all going?
Well, it might pass.
The latest draft of the pandemic agreement no longer states that the treaty is binding on member states.
So that sounds promising, but the experts say the language is deceiving.
So who at what who was basically doing is trying to get pushed through an incomplete watered down solution so that real decisions can be made in the future when no one's looking.
And that sounds very much like what I've been hearing from Merrill Nass too.
Let's hope it doesn't go through.
Well, we're in a brave new world with such people in it.
Let's look at some of those people.
Okay, who are the people?
If you want to have any people in the world, you're now far right.
People who are in favor of human beings having babies are extremists.
At least that's what this story claims.
And I guess, yeah, I looked at that Politico story and it's true.
Stounding the alarm bells about this right-wing extremist movement of people who believe in having babies and think that people should have more babies.
That sounds really dangerous, doesn't it, Kat?
Babies.
It's just bizarre.
What next is far-right privilege?
Eating or breathing?
We know Zionists hate babies, right?
Zionists, they broadcast baby sounds to try and kill the people who come to save the babies.
They broadcast baby sounds when they attack the demonstrators.
They shoot babies.
They shoot pregnant women.
The Zionists really hate babies, but now I guess the liberals and the mainstream media do, too.
Well, maybe white people should demand a far-right awareness act.
There you go.
Anybody who likes babies, watch out, you're on the list.
And finally, the Girl Scout was fined $400 for selling cookies in her driveway.
Another great use of your tax dollars.
Well, at least she wasn't selling anti-Semitic cookies, we assume.
Because if she was, it would have been a lot more than $400.
It would have been Who knows what.
So cookies are illegal, and they hate our freedoms, and especially they hate our cookies.
But we're going to keep on speaking freely, and if we feel like it, eating cookies here at False Plague and Clean News.
Thank you, Kat McGuire.
It was good to have you on the show, telling the truth, as you so boldly do.
Keep up the great work, God bless, and see you in Croatia very soon.
Yeah, see you soon.
Bye.
▲
Export Selection