Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 2, 2024 - Jim Fetzer

01:45:20

The Raw Deal (1 April 2024) with Brian Davidson, P.I. and Keith Rodgers

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Okay, welcome everyone to a late start for the raw deal.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host.
	I'm going to be joined by Brian Davidson shortly, who had to restart his computer.
	I want to give a story of Ukraine.
	Zelensky is frantic.
	Sudden changes indicate the end is near.
	We know that in the past, Adolf Hitler, when he was facing imminent defeat at the hands of the Allied powers, those who watched a film about him, the film Downfall, about the end of World War II, know that Hitler was frantic during those final days of the war and acted erratically, issuing conflicting orders and more.
	What's reportedly going on in Zelensky's inner circle feels a lot like the events chronicled in Downfall.
	Beset by the Russians on all sides, Zelensky is frantic, firing his aides left and right.
	Not a behavior of someone who is winning a war.
	It is frantic behavior from someone increasingly cornered in, in a precarious position.
	A cornered animal will do anything to survive.
	Here's what is currently being reported.
	Facing increasing opposition to his refusal to negotiate with Russia, Zelensky is firing more and more of his inner circle.
	No one is safe.
	Anyone who speaks out is removed.
	Aides are calling for elections, but Zelensky is refusing.
	Here we have the Globe and Mail.
	Zelensky fires more aids in reshuffle as Russia launches drones and missiles across Ukraine.
	This is not playing out well.
	It's what we would have expected.
	And as we know, Putin has now post-election taken the gloves off.
	here's a story from the post and mail well you got the gist of it Meanwhile, here's the New York Post.
	So let's get out to two key staff aids.
	Okay, let's see here.
	Brian.
	Yeah, Brian, are you there?
	Keith, yeah.
	Okay, Keith, yeah.
	Let's have to try to get Brian.
	Here we go.
	I got him.
	Keith, did you want to add a comment here?
	Go ahead.
	I don't know if you saw the busload of those videos.
	It's the same thing.
	Look on those four cases showing that we're going Keith, listen, I got Brian here now.
	I'm going to bring you in or call back in when we do the calls, please, if you would be so kind.
	Brian, now that you're here, I want to begin with a story about how things are falling apart in Ukraine.
	And then turn to a couple of other cases where you have taken a position contrary to that of many others, which I find fascinating.
	Just to review the bidding, we're finding an hysterical situation in Ukraine, in Kiev, where Zelensky is acting frantically very much as Hitler did at the end of World War II.
	Here's part of the report we have, Brian.
	Ukraine facing increasing opposition to his refusal to negotiate with Russia.
	Zelensky is firing more and more of his inner circle.
	No one is safe.
	Anyone who speaks out is removed.
	Aides are calling for elections, but he's refusing.
	He has fired two of his key aides.
	His top aide, Shari Sherev, along with the nation's commissioner for soldiers' rights, Alyona Vybyshek, along with four other government workers.
	No reasons have been offered for their expulsion.
	The user pointed out today Zelensky's act as chief of staff and advisors, and it lists all four—presidential commission for servicemen and a commissioner for volunteer He's reaching the formula for a military dictatorship.
	He needs more people, so he'll continue to fire his aides.
	Moreover, the upcoming Ukrainian presidential election will raise the question of his legitimacy.
	Brian, I don't think there's going to be any Ukrainian election.
	I mean, I'm worried enough we're going to have an election right here in the USA.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, they're going to do everything they can to stop the election, obviously.
	It's a Western-controlled media puppet government, and I'm sure that the Ukrainian people, who remain after all the death and destruction, would like to change it out.
	Whether or not they're going to be given the opportunity to do that, or whether or not they're going to be willing to take the opportunity to do that, I really think comes down to Whether or not Russia gives them the confidence to do that.
	I think if they if they could break loose from Zelensky, they would in a heartbeat, but they can't because they just simply don't have a mechanism in place other than total control.
	And I I'm not sure that they're going to have the political will or the resources to do it unless Russia helps build another revolution.
	And I would invite Russia to do that over there, of course, but whether they will or whether they not, the question comes down to do you want Ukraine?
	And I don't know if Russia does.
	There's been a lot of chatter about whether they're involved.
	Sorry, there's been a lot of chatter about what portions of Ukraine they're willing to annex and what portions of the Ukraine they're not willing to annex.
	I can tell you at this point in time, it appears that even though billions and billions of dollars have gone in, they've been basically stolen by the Western media elite or the Western elite puppets that have been put into place.
	So would you want to inherit a disaster like that?
	It's similar to where we are with coming into 2024.
	It's a recipe for disaster with Donald Trump taking over.
	Donald, would you want to inherit the mess that Joe Biden left behind and Barack Obama, frankly, as the puppeteer has left behind?
	I wouldn't want to inherit it.
	It's going to be very easy to continue to start.
	Very easy to get the mob going.
	Very easy to make a mess of the entire situation.
	Well, no doubt.
	I mean, Russia intervened in the first place to save the people of the Donbass who were undergoing assault, and there was an imminent attack, all-out attack on the Donbass that forced the intervention, where they were going to slaughter the people of the Donbass, just as Israel is slaughtering the people of Palestine.
	I mean, it's grotesque.
	And of course, the threat of Ukraine joining NATO would remain.
	I don't think that Putin has any choice.
	I believe, in fact, he's going to have to take all of Ukraine.
	He's dramatically increased his attacks on Kiev, areas around the capital.
	And historically, of course, Kiev was the original capital of Russia.
	So he has sought to Preserve cultural artifacts, buildings, and so forth.
	In fact, he's been very kind and gentle as we're conducting the intervention, which he deliberately did not declare to be a war, so I could be very clear that his objectives were quite limited.
	But at this point in time, When you have the West unwilling to give up.
	I have a story here.
	Lloyd Austin is saying that the United States is not going to allow Ukraine to lose.
	Brian, what are we to make of this?
	We can continue to print money as long as we possibly can.
	We're just funneling it over through the military security industrial complex into Ukraine where it's being wasted.
	The only people that can fix this are going to be the Ukrainians themselves in terms of they're going to have to have some hangings in the streets.
	They're going to have to go after some of these oligarchs and people of control.
	But whether or not the word can even get out as to who's going to run, I'm not sure there's any puppets that will exist.
	If the article is indeed correct about Zelensky's beginning to act Strangely, it just indicates that he's losing control and they'll install another puppet.
	Somehow, Zelensky will be taken out.
	Maybe it's a front for a war, but I'm not really another war, a different type of war.
	I'm not really sure about it right now.
	I can tell you this, it's been a nothing but a money pit and he needs, he's desperately running around the world trying to gather more support to get more billions and billions of dollars to continue to run his war.
	We had a British general recently concede that they engaged with Russia, couldn't endure more than two months before sustaining a massive defeat.
	And yet we have Emmanuel Macron, the bizarre president of France, who appears to be married to a man, if Candace Owens has it right, and I think she does not have it wrong, talking about sending 200,000 French troops to Ukraine.
	Brian, this is so ludicrous!
	This is so beyond the pale.
	I mean, I think the failure of Western leadership has never been more manifest than we see it today.
	Well, who's going to fill the vacuum?
	I don't know.
	I mean, I don't know how it's going to get fixed.
	That situation is so out of control.
	The people are brokenhearted, devastated.
	They can barely stand on their own anymore.
	What, are you just going to bring in more troops to fight for somebody else's war?
	That's never worked in all of history.
	It's not going to continue to work.
	And who can afford another mercenary army to come in and replace all the Ukrainians that have been killed in this mess?
	The property is going to be there for the taking in terms of whoever has the political will to pick it up.
	It's great farming property.
	It's got a lot of great, great assets in terms of its mineral wealth and in terms of its agricultural wealth.
	But whether or not anybody has the political will to go in there and go up against the Westerners, I don't know.
	Maybe it's Israel.
	A lot of people have speculated that this is really an Israeli-controlled, Zionist-controlled war for somehow more land or more resources.
	I don't know that that's true.
	I'd rather see Russia continue to build its alliances in bricks and continue to build its alliances with China stronger, stronger, stronger.
	Maybe they can rent or lease more of the land and do something productive with it.
	at a distance, but I just don't really understand how it's going to happen or why it happened in the first place. - Yeah, it appears that's all Ukraine thing.
	I mean, there have been multiple declarations that Ukraine is indispensable to the new world order, that the new world order cannot proceed without it, which I think is part of the reason this struggle is turning out to be so titanic.
	And where Israel, of course, as you well know, it appears wanted to make Ukraine the new Israel.
	Zelensky himself even declared that Ukraine should be the new Israel.
	I think they have a sense that they're Unpopularity in the Middle East is waning, but with a failure of the war in Ukraine against Russia that they've had to do some housecleaning by this ethnic cleansing of killing or deporting every Palestinian from Palestine.
	I mean, this is just as grotesque a human rights violation as the world has ever seen.
	We have the United Nations Special Rapporteur declare that Israel is committing genocide.
	We had a Security Council demand 14 to Zebra with U.S.
	abstaining, declaring it must end.
	Israel must cease fire, must bring in humanitarian aid, must ensure that the people of Palestine are protected.
	And yet the United States represented falsely asserted it was non-binding.
	which in effect torpedoes the entire international structure built up since World War II through the United Nations as being virtually definitive of international law.
	Brian, the United States is like taking down the international order just as Samson took down the temple.
	I wonder if this isn't the legal equivalent.
	I don't know about that.
	Look, the question in the United States is, is the Israeli tail wagging the U.S. economic dog?
	And I would say it probably is.
	I don't see any independent United States thought in this or any Western thought.
	I don't see the UN being willing to break loose from the Zionist controlled machine that That obviously influences them and their judgment, and I say that word very specifically because obviously there's nobody in place making calls like an umpire would safe out, you know, you've broken the rules.
	There's nobody in there doing that.
	You can't get the International Court of Justice to really do anything.
	The United Nations doesn't have any political will to break loose and start coming up against the Zionists.
	You have a lot of chatter from pro-Palestinian support forces that are out there, but who's doing what?
	We can, there's, you know, Israel's continuing to run around asking for more money, more money, more money.
	They're continuing to expand their push for, you know, hey this is anti-Semitism, this is, we're big victims, the world is a bad place, and everybody's after us, we need more money, we need more money.
	I don't know that that's going to continue to play.
	The global climate is one thing in terms of the people.
	It's another thing in terms of the political elite that have been installed into their positions at the top of their institutions that are pushing policy down and allowing the puppet masters to tell them how the policies are going to take place.
	Those policies are then pushed through entire governments and entire institutional structures that are in place.
	I'm just not sure how it's all going to adjust, but I don't see any umpire in there that's able to make calls in terms of, hey, this is what we're going to do to sanction you.
	This is what we're going to do to shut you down.
	This is what we're going to do to slow you down.
	I think Israel will continue to use its leverage as a Zionist-controlled entity to get more money.
	Meanwhile, of course, we have the terror attack on the nature of the threat because a large network is preparing it.
	They are intercepting communications, financial transactions, the movement of people they have under watch, all of this because it would be a large network carrying out this terrorist attack.
	And they're claiming that it is ISIS.
	ISIS is an international terrorist organization.
	International terrorism requires a state sponsor.
	It's as simple as that.
	There are no international terrorist organizations that do not have state sponsors, and ISIS is no exception.
	I'm going to get into all of the evidence that not only does ISIS have state sponsors, but the United States is chief among them.
	In the real world, an international terrorist organization requires huge amounts of resources, financial resources, material resources, access to large amounts of weapons, the ability to move people discreetly from one country to the other.
	This is all something that It's almost impossible to do unless you have state sponsors at least assisting you, if not involved directly in these operations.
	We know the U.S.
	Central Intelligence Agency, the CIA, they have an established history of doing this all around the world.
	This is nothing new.
	This is why the U.S.
	should be the prime suspect anytime a terrorist attack like this takes place In a nation, the U.S.
	has designated an enemy, as they have designated Russia.
	Whether the organization is Al Qaeda, ISIS, whether they were Chechen separatists, whether they were a military unit operating under the command of the government in Kiev, Ukraine,
	All of these organizations, including the government in Ukraine, they all require state sponsorship to continue to exist, to conduct their operations, to carry out activities day-to-day.
	They require extensive state sponsorship.
	None of them are doing this independently.
	Well, Brian, of course, as I know, but our audience may not, you have been skeptical about the attack, suggesting a reason to believe it might have been staged.
	Just as I mentioned early on as you were coming in, we've done collaborative work on Buffalo, on Uvalde, on Nashville.
	And by the way, anytime if you'd like to put up a video or something, I can make you host and we can do some screen sharing, my friend, because I know you have reasons for suspecting that this terror attack might have been staged.
	It's something I've tended to rule out in the past because I believe it would be beneath the character of Vladimir Putin and the Russian people to perpetrate false flags that are so common here in the United States.
	But you have what you take to be good reasons, and I'm not prepared to dispute.
	Go right ahead, Brian.
	Give us a take on the concert attack.
	Well, you know, a lot of There's an organization out there called the Swiss Policy Research Organization that did a very well-written article on making the case that this was another synthetic terrorist group in ISIS doing another false flag.
	My initial instance was immediately when I heard about it because number one, it's another concert attack.
	Which we had October 7th, we had Las Vegas, we've had numerous other concert attacks.
	Number two, it's the usual suspects in terms of an organization that's immediately caught, immediately takes credit for it.
	You know, the bad guys, the boogeyman is still there.
	We have the painted gun concept and then we have the very terrible grainy video That is carefully edited and carefully selected in terms of what they want to release to make you believe that the event took place.
	You have some very questionable body bag type scenarios where they would set that up.
	You have the proper photography groups in place to take the proper photography.
	But with, you know, such cheap cameras, I don't understand.
	They can't even get an iPhone.
	Or even an Android to take, you know, the resolution, the graininess of these photos is taking place.
	We've seen a lot of these Hollywood style tricks in terms of blood bags and guns that put out ridiculous looking sparks.
	And then, of course, you've got the massacre count and what I believe is some pretty good evidence of Russian style crisis actors being put into place.
	A lot of the actual videos have been preserved over at 153news.net, but most importantly, the Swiss Policy Research Institute, swprs.org, put out A very good article, nice and long, that gives all the possible motivations for why it might take place, preliminary conclusions.
	And then they went ahead and indexed the key shots along with arrows in the photographs that indicate that something isn't quite right, that these are mannequins, that nothing else is quite real.
	So I'm going to go ahead and share that over to you right now.
	Let me do so.
	Let me make you host.
	Well, no, I'm just going to send it to you.
	Go ahead.
	We'll just take a look at it and see what they have to say about it.
	Oh, you can go ahead.
	You can show it right there on your screen, Brian.
	Okay.
	Well, then let me go ahead and share my screen.
	All right.
	Okay.
	Share my screen.
	There we go.
	All right.
	So this is the Swiss Policy Research article that came out.
	Moscow concert event may have been a staged event, and it's updated March 28th.
	From March 25th, and it basically just runs a little history of Putin and false flag terrorism.
	Remember, Putin was a former Soviet KGB officer and SFSB Russian intelligence officer.
	Russian authorities blamed the bombing on Chechen militants, but were later exposed to be an SFSB false flag operation.
	They deal with the synthetic terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda and ISIS, which have been repeatedly exposed by Western and Israeli intelligence as puppets of Western and Israeli intelligence services.
	And you've got U.S. Pentagon admitting that the supposed leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq is al-Dula al-Baghdadi, was just a phantom whose voice was played by an actor.
	Now they do an analysis of the video evidence and you're going to see things that were very similar in terms of lower blurry quality, events shot in 720p with things that are currently below cell phone standards.
	They talk, he talks about the Boston Marathon bombing and the Kenya shooting mall attacked.
	The appearance or posture of several dead bodies.
	The use of photorealistic simulation bodies or mannequins such as Los Angeles, Brussels, Kenya, Syria.
	The alleged beheading video.
	Does not show a beheading at all.
	It's just like what these people would do.
	Anyway, he goes through all of it, does an update, and then discusses some of the possible motivations.
	I've always said that the big motivations of False Flag were continue to drive fear within the population so that they could continue to expand the security industrial complex.
	He talks about the ownership of the concert hall and Why the date of the attack in terms of March 22nd was important in them.
	Comes up with some preliminary conclusions and then shows us some of the videos that he thinks are suspicious.
	This is something that's captured on that low quality 720p film that's, you know, shooting it out of a gun.
	You see the sparking effect.
	You can see here the painted gun.
	You know, that we've seen in other false flags such as Buffalo, such as Nashville, and other things.
	That was New Zealand as well.
	More of the supposed things.
	He makes an argument about the number 112 being important in this.
	Seeing some aftermath in terms of bodies.
	Those things are not real.
	Ryan, I agree.
	Well, who knows what's real, what's not?
	The problem is we have such low quality footage.
	How are we going to make a determination?
	And they're always careful to do that.
	So that nothing's quite right in terms of these images.
	You know, this does, this to me, it looks like a rubber hand.
	This doesn't look like a real body to me, but you know, is it possible that the arm is broken in such a way?
	Well, yeah, but where's the blood?
	You know, where's the blood on the rest of the body?
	We've got, you know, the, the cheap body bag with the cheap enclosure.
	Something's not quite right with it.
	You've got another guy sitting back here that seems to be calling the shots.
	That's what they were arguing with the notes on the photo.
	This is people don't just lay down with their knees up and something doesn't quite look right in terms of the height, but.
	You know, whatever, what is it that makes sense about these particular events?
	Here's another one where a guy's sort of relaxing with his knees up.
	And then we've seen this.
	This looks very reminiscent of many of the other types of false flags where the bodies are laid down.
	You've already got, of course, fire started.
	Here's the guy shooting, holding the weapon.
	It's got the paint on it.
	The yellow is probably going to symbolize something we've got.
	This is looks very reminiscent of Sandy Hook in terms of let's just scatter some blood over here and then put our bodies over here.
	I don't see blood here.
	Why is this guy down?
	I'm not sure.
	More of the strangeness.
	Involved in a lot of this.
	There's a knife.
	This guy's got a knife in his hand.
	And of course, we've got weird sparks coming off the floor when he's trying to cut this guy's throat.
	He had to take eight, seven or eight shots at it.
	And of course, more of the gore images that were normally given in a false flag type of scenario.
	You know, the man basically didn't move until the job was done.
	And then he rolls over to his left.
	But no defense mechanisms whatsoever.
	Then he rolls to the right, which wasn't visible.
	and you're seeing, you know, sort of this play out.
	He's got it.
	He did some pretty good research.
	I'm not saying it's completely conclusive.
	And I'm not saying that it's not conclusive.
	You're going to have to make your own, make your own determination.
	Doesn't this look similar to what we've seen before in terms of how it stays with all the lights, everybody being put in place, we get the photographs taking place, we have the burning building and the fire and the whole, you know, the whole scenario that's, you know, rolled on out.
	We've seen this before.
	Anyway, that's what we're seeing.
	So I'll go ahead and stop the share and take a look at it.
	But I think I did a pretty good job with the analysis.
	I'm not saying it's completely conclusive and I'm not saying That it's not.
	You have to make your own determination.
	But I've seen enough of these false flags to believe that it's suspicious.
	Why it's done, I don't know.
	Well, wouldn't the answer be, if Putin wants to have the anti-against Ukraine, that you get public outrage over an attack attributed to Ukraine that then is You know, going to enrage the public to take more severe action, which is what Putin intended to do all along, but wanted public support.
	I mean, he's just coming off of an election where he got 88% of the vote.
	Sensational.
	And I believe that was actually an honest count, unlike what we have here in the United States.
	Could that be the explanation, Brian?
	Well, I don't know what the explanation is.
	Like I said, I've always had to follow the money approach in terms of analyzing false flags.
	But, you know, we tend to think from a Western perspective that everybody's operating independently.
	And I think that we need to stop with that in terms of every country out there that is, you know, making their own decisions about what takes place inside their borders.
	I tend to believe that at this point in time, the global elite have taken control of so many institutions.
	That they really do have sort of a semi-global government in place in terms of most of the nations and most of the puppets that are installed at the top of these governments are puppets of the global government.
	So why would we see something break out in Moscow that looks so similar to false flags that we've seen here and in Europe and in Africa and in South America?
	I don't know, except the question arises in my mind, why don't we stop looking at them as independent nations making their own decisions and start taking a look at the global elite, banking cartel, money machine, sort of the top of the pyramid sort of eye of Horace sitting up there that's, you know, deciding where and when these things are going to take place.
	Let me remind you of something that's very important.
	When September 11th took place, our budget for all of the agencies that make up our Department of Homeland Security was approximately $23 billion.
	Today, here we are 20 years later, we have a budget of $840 billion for those same agencies.
	So just think about the massive inflation of the security industrial complex as a result of that one false flag that continued to drive American fear and concern about this boogeyman ISIS.
	And look at what it's done to our budgets.
	Where is all that money being spent?
	How spent?
	Where is it all going?
	Well, it's certainly not going to border protection.
	It's certainly not going to cyber structure and infrastructure security.
	Our TSA has completely grown out of control.
	All of our defense mechanisms from a federal perspective have just simply out of control bloated government budgets where there are certain people that are getting rich.
	And I suppose that those people are probably supporting the people that are making sure that those budgets continue to get authorized.
	I see false flags through the lens of this is a way to expand the security industrial complex and funnel money to the investors in those groups that are going to be getting those contracts.
	Those people then will support the politicians that they need to support and give a piece of the action back to the global elite security forces that are in place to pick up the pieces after a false flag takes place.
	Keith Rogers, are you there?
	I welcome your comments here about the concert attack and what's going on with Ukraine, where things do appear to be falling apart.
	Your thoughts, Keith?
	Oh, first of all, yeah, good morning there.
	I agree with everything Brian said there.
	I tried to comment earlier there, the fact that all those young boys that are heading to the front lines over there, you can see the look of despair on their face.
	They know they're going to their certain deaths.
	It was just like, as you were bringing out there, that the fall of Germany, where Hitler's out there congratulating the youth there who are being dissented, you know, fighting a two-front war.
	Well, Zelensky, as you mentioned, is losing, but it's worse than that there, because we see the despair with France right now with what they're losing in Africa, which is all the resource minerals and stuff.
	Nigeria cutting the LNG gas off.
	I mean, All wars are basically based on commerce.
	And as Brian was mentioning there earlier, hell, I remember when I was young, the national debt was only $850 billion.
	And then Reagan started his Contras Wars.
	By the time he left office, it was $1.4 trillion.
	And now look at us today, and as Brian was mentioning, what do we have to show for it?
	Well, we have a bunch of painted LGBT crosswalks.
	Yeah, stunning stuff.
	Glad to have you here, Keith.
	Let me... I had another thought there, Jim.
	I was laying here last night thinking about these immigrants and stuff, and again, I have no problem with immigrants as long as they're legal.
	However, when you're running a program of depopulating the planet there with the WEF, we have Oregon State now, Who is basically chomping down on the home gardens and small farms and all the stuff like that.
	The fact is, is here in the States, our growing season doesn't even start.
	It's planting for at least another 30 days.
	And when you have a million of immigrants coming up from the South, who's working all of that produce and stuff down there, which feeds the world with their growing climate, which down there is basically 12 hours a day.
	Uh, who's working those fields to produce the food and stuff to feed the planet?
	Brian, you care to comment?
	I don't know.
	You know.
	The question is, do they have the capacity to be able to make the types of investments that they need into the machinery and the equipment that they would need to replace the people?
	And I don't know that that's even possible in an environment where the cartels have that much control.
	Basically, the cartel, look, you either give them what they want or your life is or your life is gone.
	So the problem, the fundamental problem down there is that there's not enough law and order to Pause security, so you have to rely on cheap labor rather than heavy equipment and machinery to do the work.
	Where are they all going?
	They're obviously being forced up into the United States to dilute our culture, to dilute our population, and to basically continue to weaken the middle class.
	What's happening down there?
	Why do we have more agriculture workers than are needed when we've got such heavy equipment and machinery to work the fields?
	I'm not exactly sure, except they're doing a good job diluting the culture of the and you mentioned the LGBTQ stuff.
	That's the same thing.
	It's a divided culture that they're after and we divided we will fall.
	I think that they want to definitely weaken the middle class because we're the last bastion of hope in terms of our ability to continue to stand up and fight back against the global elite class.
	And I think that they're going to continue to to attack us in terms of bringing in more imports and cheap goods and diluting the dollar and diluting our fighting voting rights.
	So to me, it's it's more of a cultural takeover.
	Let's replace the older, more resistant cells that exist in America and let's replace them with either young, Government-sponsored minds that come out of the academic institutions that are easily controlled, easily shamed, and easily manipulated.
	Let's replace the older white classes with these younger, more slave-like populations so that that global military order can take place.
	As a piece I just published on my blog at jameshwetzer.org, Makes clear the globalists want to make all of our societies homogeneous.
	They want there to be no national borders, that they're flooding our nation because they want to change the demographic permanently.
	I think they believe we're going to have, you know, Kind of wind up all kind of a pale brown color.
	I mean, from a point of view of evolution, that could have been the inevitable result of evolution working over a very long period of time.
	But what they're doing is intervening from the outside to make it happen sooner.
	There may be good reasons that doubt it will be successful.
	One critic of whom is observed language is going to be a problem because these different groups are speaking different languages.
	We all know that there are areas of Miami, Little Havana, where you can be born and live your entire life and never speak a word of English.
	Brian, your thoughts?
	Well, When it comes to language, I see more of an Orwellian approach to academia right now, where they're replacing all the words that had a stigma attached to them with some new word that doesn't have a stigma attached to them.
	But fundamentally, what they're doing is they're trying to create a society that has no shame, that's willing to do whatever it can, that's so weakened that it won't stand up, that it will beg government to come in and solve all of its problems.
	With no sin, no shame, no words that have shameful meaning or connotations, anything goes.
	And an anything-goes culture ends up becoming a depraved culture, very similar to how the Romans kind of came apart from the inside out.
	It's a divide-and-conquer approach.
	The attack on our language is very, very important for them so that we have a populace that's unable to make a decision about what's right and what's wrong.
	And if we can't tell what's right and what's wrong, what reason do we have or what platform do we have to come after these controllers?
	They're not doing anything wrong.
	They're just simply making suggestions.
	And without right and wrong, there's a massive division between the conservatives that lean back towards our historical roots and the liberals that try to look forward to destroying all of the old iconography related to our morals, our directions, our moral compasses.
	They want to replace that, destroy all that, sort of act as an iconoclast to the right and wrong.
	And then they can continue to push their shameful behavior.
	I see it as a way to break down and destroy society.
	I would go back to the protocols of the learned elders of Zion to take a look at exactly what the roadmap is for how it would take place.
	Yes, yes.
	Many believe that's exactly right, Brian.
	Keith?
	Yeah, you know, I'm sure you've seen these videos of the Chinese and or Venezuelans.
	There's more than Venezuelans in there, but anyway.
	And I've sent you the information about how the U.S.
	cut a deal with the Venezuelan to bring those immigrants up here.
	But they're using instant voice video, not video, but instant voice translation, where they can talk to the border guards in their own language, whether it be, albeit Chinese or whatever like that.
	And it's simply translated so that the border guard knows exactly what the man said.
	And then the man talks, you know, the border guard talks back into the phone and it translates back to Chinese or whatever like that.
	They're getting a society that's so dependent on today's infrastructure of the internet or the internet of things.
	You can't even log on to your desktop without a stupid thing sending a text message to your cell phone.
	You are so connected to the web nowadays that there's no way to get away from it.
	And the web is so controlled.
	The web is so controlled by the globalist interests in terms of Wikipedia, Google, and other massive machines that use artificial intelligence to try to drive platforms.
	What it is, is a re-education campaign.
	The whole thing related to the internet is sort of a mainstream media re-education campaign designed to get everybody on the same page and to control the minds of people.
	For those that are capable of breaking loose, those that are still capable of critical thinking and independent thought, we can resist.
	But most people are just giving up.
	What they're doing is they're substituting information intake for critical thought, thinking that they're very intelligent.
	They become very defensive of their positions, unwilling to consider new positions.
	It's all psychological warfare.
	It's old school stuff.
	It's been around a long, long time, and I think they're being incredibly successful, especially with a youth that's so buried in their phones that they've forgotten what logical fallacies are and how they're supposed to work if they ever knew in the first place.
	Right?
	I worry about the capacity for social interaction or even reading or interacting with other members of the community.
	We've become little automata in our little tiny network all connected by our cell phones.
	Seems to me the cell phone thing historically is going to turn out to have been one of the Greatest, most consequential technological innovations of history on a par with the Gutenberg Crest, but I'm not at all sure the consequences are going to be positive as it was in the case of its predecessor, Bryant.
	Well, the consequences are going to be devastating.
	If our youth cannot read Solzhenitsyn or anybody else that are one of the important critical philosophical thinkers, then they're not going to be capable of stretching out their minds long enough to resist.
	They're going to have to sit back and allow the television to continue to pollute their brains with the images and the thoughts and ideas that are being driven forward, including transgenderism and other evils that are out there.
	Now I can tell you this, at the very top level of the global elite class, there is something that they want to happen.
	They want to see the incarnation of their They're a new global world leader.
	They believe it's truly going to be Satan reincarnated if they can get the levels of evil in society to break through a certain threshold, then they believe that that's going to usher in the incarnation of their new global world leader that's going to take over the whole, that's going to be able to unite the nations under a single flag.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Hey, Brian.
	Wasn't it just recently on a show that you said that you didn't have time to read the entire article, and so you ran it through a summary type thing?
	It's true.
	Gave you the points, you know?
	However, that might be true, but it's really just a prioritization because I've got three 2,000 page books right here on my desk that are all open to different chapters.
	So I put time in where I want to put time in, but I don't necessarily take the time to read every article out there on current events just because I have such a broad view of it.
	But thank you for the point.
	You're absolutely right.
	Artificial intelligence is being used to dumb us down.
	Remember in Milton Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent, one of the primary things he says is just like news articles.
	They'll start you out with a headline kicker, which is supposed to draw your attention.
	And then they give you all this garb all through like that.
	But it's usually right at the very end is what you actually see what's going on.
	But they they congest your mind and stuff with all the stupid facts and stuff like that, which they present as facts, you know.
	But when you want to get down to the nitty gritty, it's always using the last sentence that is usually what is actually being said.
	But the rest of the stuff is one is to gain your attention with the main headline.
	And then the other stuff is just fill your head up with garb.
	And then the last part is what's really going on.
	Yeah, but who gets to the end of the article?
	Yeah.
	Well, listen, when we had the powership, I want to discuss that before we turn to another really stunning issue related to right and wrong conditions.
	Container ship volley power failure.
	What happened?
	Updates from the NTSB.
	This is from the Daily Kos Brian.
	This article is suggesting nothing to see here, just move along.
	It was simply a power failure, nothing deliberate or contrived.
	Frankly, that is about as ridiculous as it gets coming from the Daily Cause.
	Well, I can tell you that what I foresee this summer breaking loose in Baltimore is going to be a hell like we haven't seen Yeah, they already have one of the highest murder rates per capita here in America.
	They're already a mess.
	This is basically their six mile, 610 loop, which would be Except it's a different freeway.
	So it's a big deal in terms of that bridge, that bridge's capacity to continue to handle the transportation infrastructure in Baltimore.
	Seeing it come down the way it came down was shocking to me.
	Hold that thought, Brian.
	We're hitting a break.
	We'll be right back with Brian Davidson and Keith Rogers.
	Stand by.
	Thank you.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a Drill, This is a Drill on Bull Hordes during the Marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tomb.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Come on.
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do!
	and we must fight back!
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us!
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio.
	It is no secret that the so-called mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda.
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
	And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
	Eastern, and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
	1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
	100% listener-supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, grabbing a cup of coffee and late.
	Oh my gosh, continue about the container ship.
	Brian, you're making some excellent points.
	Well, I don't look I I did make some points when I first, you know, emailed you about what I had seen the point that I was making at the time was that you know down here.
	I come in and out of the ship channel all the time on my boat.
	I see these massive machines that are always coming in and out.
	It's like an Interstate 10 freeway going through the Port of Houston.
	The boats basically come in south of Galveston, cut through Galveston Bay, and then go into the shipping channel underneath the Fred Hartman Bridge.
	Very tight area, but I have never, and I've been, I've had my boat down at the marina underneath that Fred Hartman Bridge now for Seven years and I have never seen or heard of any type of accident related to any of these vessels out there on that water.
	Now every now and then a small boat will have an accident or run into something but I've always seen these large ships be completely under control.
	That boat looked to me like it was going a lot faster than it ought to be going but I think we'll never really know what happened because the NTSB has come out and said okay There's some time on the black box that's missing.
	We don't know.
	There's two minutes that are missing that are critical.
	How did we lose three of these massive diesel engines that fast?
	I can tell you diesel engines.
	And I'm not sure if these are electric or diesel or what they are.
	I think that they're probably a combination of both.
	But for all three of them to go down in that instant and for that vessel to steer that direction into that dock is suspicious.
	But here's the problem.
	You'll never know.
	You've got Pete Buttigieg at the National Department of Transportation that's in place.
	He's a puppet.
	He's never going to be able to tell us anything about this one way or another.
	But what I was going back to my original point before the break was what you're going to see here in Baltimore this summer is going to be total chaos.
	There's going to be a transportation grid structural problem that's going to cut down your traffic, increase your problems.
	There's going to be that waterway is going to be cut off for a long, long time until the big cranes get in there and able to remove it.
	You're talking about a shortage of goods that are going to be able to come into the harbor.
	Plus now you've got another transportation problem and that the big trucks are going to come in and have a trouble getting in and out.
	It's already, that economy is already under a tremendous amount of stress and this is going to make the matters even worse.
	It wouldn't surprise me if the event was Darkly engineered to cause Baltimore to turn into a total chaotic mess this summer.
	Well, when you say we'll never know, what you mean is we'll never get an official acknowledgement from the government as to what actually happened.
	But I think we already can tell what did happen.
	It's called inference of the best explanation, which hypothesis, if it were true, would provide the highest probability in explaining the available evidence.
	The two hypotheses are it was contrived, made to happen, the alternative that it was merely an accidental power shortage.
	But when you look at the videos, especially when they're sped up, you see the ship had to go way out of its way, had to change its course completely in order to steer right into that major support column.
	In other words, There's no way in which this was simply happening by, say, drifting off because the power had gone out.
	Number two, you had almost immediately a tweet from Ukraine claiming that this is what's going to happen if you don't keep that money coming.
	Without the money, you're going to have more of these incidents.
	Number three, Yeah, the government, Biden, had been immediately saying, we're going to cover it all, so the insurance doesn't have to, because insurance would require an investigation to allocate proportionality, responsibility.
	So when you have these things happening too fast, you know something is terribly, terribly wrong.
	And then it feeds into the motivation, Brian, which you so clearly delineated.
	This was a Brilliant strategic move, as Laura Logan has observed, because of the catastrophic effects to their community, to transporting critical materials, hazardous materials, and the whole like.
	It's essentially shut down a major port on the east, as has had Long Beach when shut down on the west.
	Keith, your thoughts?
	Well, my thoughts were, as Laura had mentioned there, but I'm not Fully on with the the hacking thing there.
	But what I do see, though, is that we're as Brian mentioned there with the amount of commerce and stuff, and then they it's been highlighted that the I guess it's the military, the Navy, whatever, that has their quick response vehicles.
	But it's all those ships that are upstream of that that are tied in that can't move.
	And this one's down below that can't get into the harbor to unload.
	This to me is like Like Buttigieg, the first thing he should have done was reroute all those ships to different ports, aside from that, and go to rail trucking or whatever like that to disperse that stuff.
	But I think it's more of a nefarious thing to shut down commerce to drive more inflation prices for food and stuff like that, especially since Janet Yellen keeps talking about inflation's here to stay, it's going to go up.
	And it's going to go up on a lot of other things like that.
	But the one thing I did notice, though, is when they were talking about the ship and how it kind of veered off, it looks like it came back towards the bridge.
	They were talking about currents.
	And yet later, when you see the these up close scenes of the inspection of the bridge, I don't see any currents around that bridge.
	It's just like it's still water.
	So I don't understand.
	Well, see, that's further confirmation that it was, in fact, a contrived, deliberate event, because the explanations that are being offered have no merit.
	The alternative explanations, as you're suggesting here, fall apart upon inspection.
	Honestly, we can't know what happened.
	As with all scientific reasoning, it's never with certainty, and we're always open to revising our conclusion based on the acquisition of additional evidence or alternative hypotheses.
	But I frankly think it's beyond reasonable doubt that this was a deliberate hit on the United States.
	I strongly believe Ukraine was involved.
	This is a form of extortion.
	You know, we have it on the other end of the country with the Mexican president saying unless he gets hundreds of billions of dollars, he's going to keep the migrants flowing.
	And Keith, I never quite got your response to the observations I was making from the new blog at jameshfetzer.org.
	They're trying, you know, this is the globalist agenda, make all the populations homogeneous, destroy cultural identity, national sovereignty.
	That was beginning way back when they started taking down the statues in New Orleans.
	I saw it coming.
	This is an aspect of cultural Marxism.
	But in this case, really, the globalist attempt where even the UN and DHS appear to be all in on this.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, I think, Jim, you have to go back.
	I think it's called third state.
	Don't quote me on that.
	But Josh Hawley and a few others have brought this up.
	Senator John Kennedy, where they were talking about immigration.
	So say you're being oppressed, say, in Guyana.
	If you're being oppressed in Guyana and as you're asylum seeking, you're allowed to go to the next state.
	But this third state.
	Why are they coming up here?
	And that was the main question from the Senate panel about why are these immigrants all being allowed?
	And the reason that I thought of Mexico demanding more money is because Mexico is basically the holding center as more immigrants are catching release and stuff.
	They're pushed back into Mexico and they're just being held there that Mexico has to assume that debt of trying to pick up on their economy to probably feed or house or whatever like that.
	And so maybe this some General agreement, but I bet you tend to want if you and I are Brian had access to the World Bank and stuff like that.
	You see how the money is being transferred to see who's being propped up in all these NGOs and stuff like that to take care of these immigrants because that's it's not just something that just happens.
	All this has been planned out just like that Jewish organization down there in Texas that was sitting there at the border and you've seen the video.
	All these NGOs have got their own stake in it.
	So there's money going somewhere.
	And the point is, so if Mexico wants more money and stuff like that, is it for Mexico's infrastructure?
	No, it's probably to house all these.
	I mean, you see the rows and rows of these immigrants coming up.
	And again, like was brought out in a Senate meeting that the DHS has their own special app that allows these immigrants to log on Even select their flights from their own home country to bypass U.S.
	immigration borders and customs at the border and fly directly into New York or wherever like that, you know?
	Insanity!
	Complete insanity!
	Unless you want to destroy America, which of course is the agenda, in a perfect sense, and it's rational and appropriate.
	Yeah, and when you look at it, The US economy is failing.
	They're talking about now, I think it was Texas that Texas is starting to talk about giving a $500 like per capita type check, which I use that word because of the tribal up here.
	But anyway, they're coming out with more UBI stuff to make up for payments.
	And of course, we got Governor Newsom down there wants to put up 500 of these security cameras, which is the same premise of U.S.
	cameras over there in Britain, where everyone's going around sabotaging them.
	But it's just more of the surveillance state that Brian was talking about earlier.
	They're trying to get all this under and they're using a cloak of security and all this same thing as 9-11 with Patriot Act and stuff, you know?
	Yeah, let me get Brian back in here.
	He's in Texas.
	Your governor, Brian, has seemed to me to be among the only figures taking measures to try to stop the flow of immigrants, and on the other hand, you have him passing an anti-hate speech bill that is ridiculous beyond belief.
	Your thoughts?
	I don't trust Abbott.
	I have never trusted Abbott.
	When I saw, we had a false flag event take place here next to Houston in a place called Santa Fe at Santa Fe High School.
	That was a few years back.
	And then we had another false flag take place at Sutherland Springs at the church.
	And then we had the Dallas police fake shooting, you know, where the guy ran around like a military officer and then was supposedly killed by a bomb robot.
	Then we had Uvalde on top of it.
	Abbott is no dummy, and I can take a look at his body language and tell you nothing's right in terms of these events.
	How do you know?
	What do you see?
	You see the Uvalde-strong advertising campaign starting the day after the event.
	You see the Santa Fe-strong advertising campaign starting.
	And by the way, just so you know, in Baltimore, this ship crash happened at 128 a.m.
	The GoFundMes were already up the next morning at 8 a.m.
	and the Baltimore Strong was already going out across the radio waves that morning.
	Remember 9-11 appeared to be a real event.
	Uh, it was a it was an infrastructure takedown as well.
	In many ways, it was designed to take down a portion of the infrastructure that drove spending that continued to expand security infrastructure and apparatus spending.
	One of the reasons that a lot of these false flags take place at schools is because the very next thing that will happen as the events go through is that the legislation will be put in there to upgrade the security and rebuild all the schools.
	Now you've got Baltimore Bridge going down.
	Oh, our bridges are vulnerable.
	We need to rebuild our spending structure to take care of the bridges.
	Texas, to me, is just another show game.
	And I've seen independent reporting for people down there in the Valley that are saying that if they went down to Eagle Pass, And of course, it looked like there was some sort of big resistance taking place with Texas, and Texas was feeling real good about, hey, we're resisting the feds.
	But a mile away from each end of the fence where that was all taking place, the border walls were completely wide open, not even in check in any way.
	So I think Texas is simply trying to have a show for its citizens, where in reality, we're stuck in the global Game just as much as anybody else.
	And Greg Abbott's no different than any other governor anyplace.
	He's made a deal with the devil, in my opinion, that forces him to go along with whatever the globalists ask.
	And remember that every institution that we have requires money to continue to operate.
	And as it expands, it requires even more money.
	So you have to have a security state that's driving it.
	Now, right now, Texas and Greg Abbott, we rely on the feds Well, I saw two different things out of this whole thing.
	then flows through the systems down to even the county and the local school structures.
	Until we can break loose from that, don't expect any independent spirit or independent thought from Texas whatsoever.
	The feds are pulling the strings and they're calling the shots.
	And Greg Abbott's no different.
	I just don't trust him, even though the show looks like he's one of the holdouts. - Keith. - Well, I saw two different things on this whole thing.
	You know, when you mentioned the Ukraine, it cited it like that.
	We can go back to Victoria and Newland.
	Russia right now is taking out all the bridges along the Dnieper.
	However, when the Crimean bridge was struck twice, it seems like Russia got that bridge right open again.
	So, why they're talking about extending this out maybe five years to replace this Boston bridge there, but now we run Baltimore.
	Baltimore.
	Yeah, Baltimore.
	Yeah, sorry.
	The Baltimore Bridge like that.
	But a lot of this to me is just like the movie The Sum of All Fears, where you have these eccentric neo-Nazis from Ukraine using an Israeli nuke to get Russia and the United States into a war.
	And it comes out to what?
	Baltimore.
	Remember, that's where the nuke was to go off.
	That's right.
	There's so much of this stuff that goes along with this Simpsons, you know, predictive programming.
	Yeah.
	So, you know, is was that the so-called false flag like that?
	But I don't watch that much TV.
	I actually don't watch any TV.
	I just see clips, you know, that's on the Internet like I don't have a TV here.
	But but when you start looking at all the videos and stuff and And trying to keep the so-called back channel open with Russia that does seems like you do have some sane people out there whether they'll be at Larry Johnson or Scott Ritter or something like that there that are in some way trying to keep some dialogue going with Russia and stuff.
	And then we actually have Russia out there now with a verbal basic threat that if you put your Troops and or F-16s in the area, they will be taken out, and now they're debating whether this is going to include Article 5 of NATO's treaty there.
	They've all been warned, and Putin's not kidding.
	Well, NATO being the aggressor was not the original conception, you know, but that's what happened.
	NATO has become the aggressor, so Russia has a right to defend itself, and NATO does not have the right to assault Russia.
	Well, that brought up another question here, because everyone keeps talking about Turkey going in there to help out Gaza.
	The latest I saw, Keith, Turkey was joining with Israel.
	I mean, that's very bizarre.
	What the hell?
	Yeah, so again, though, here's an 805 again like that, or Article 5.
	If Turkey was now being attacked, would the U.S.
	come in on behalf of that member?
	Uh, it, I mean, everything just, it's so conglomerated, like they're, they're squeezing everyone together like that to, to actually cause something to happen.
	Yeah.
	And now we have the, all the U S sorry, the Russian ships that are off the, are in the red sea now.
	Uh, it just seems like they're getting ready for a spark and they're just waiting for something to ignite it, you know, Brian.
	Well, it's always been speculated that Russia was the last remaining chess piece on the global world domination board that needed to go down and the whole Minsk agreement
	scenario that you know where they were stabbed in the back supposedly by you know Newland and the rest of the Minsk agreement team to buy time so that they could set up the war down in Ukraine which was would further weaken Russia was designed to basically remove that final global chess piece the problem began to arise in Ukraine when China
	India and others began to sympathize with Putin and with Russian resistance to U.S.
	hegemony.
	So I think it's very important to remember that the global power play is very much taking place in front of us.
	And look, if I want to control somebody, the only guy that I can't control is a guy that has A righteous indignation or a righteous character or a righteous spirit.
	Tell me how many of those continue to exist where righteousness is more important than money.
	When you can print from the global supply of money like the international banking cartel can do, you can buy anybody out there who's controlled by carrots.
	Now, the sticks are very simple.
	That old operation isn't a Mossad operation.
	It's been around for a long, long time.
	Um, the Epstein-style operation of let's make sure that these people are brought through our system of leadership, which takes them to very exclusive parties so that we can get very exclusive video, and then they'll go along with whatever we tell.
	We'll install them into position.
	They'll continue to do their thing until the day we come in and call in our favor.
	You could say the same thing about Erdogan in Turkey.
	I mean, Erdogan was, he appeared to be just as much a tyrant as anybody else for a long period of time in terms of some of the people that he was going after in his own area.
	But now, all of a sudden, Erdogan's changing.
	He originally was hugely sympathetic with the Palestinians, usually Very nice.
	hugely sympathetic with the local militia forces that were beginning to fight along with Israel.
	And now all of a sudden we have a 360 or 180 degree turn.
	So the question is, what deal was struck, where, why, when and how, and how much money was at stake?
	I don't know if we'll ever know the answer to that.
	But at this point in time, I see the whole world is nothing more than chess pieces that are all that can all be bought with the unlimited accounts of the global elite banking card.
	Very nice.
	They can print as much money as they want.
	Yeah, very nice.
	Well, there's a really big issue I want us to address in terms of this declaring Easter Day to be a transgender day of visibility.
	I mean, this is just outrageous.
	We have a relatively prominent website saying, on Transgender Visibility Day, a special message from Joan Rivers.
	I'm delighted to see this.
	The Biden regime wants to call Easter Sunday Transgender Visibility Day.
	I figured I'd play along for just a moment.
	I thought we're going to draw visibility to trannies.
	There's no better, one better to deliver the message than Joan Rivers.
	They want this absolutely wiped off the internet.
	Well, I save it.
	And it's now safe on Rumble, where it can't be taken down.
	Do you remember what Joan Rivers said right before she suddenly dropped dead?
	What she said about Obama?
	I should do very well, because I don't show it.
	And do you think that the United States will see the first gay president or the first woman president?
	Well, we already have it with Obama, so let's just calm down.
	Got it.
	No, Michelle!
	Apologies, I hit the wrong button.
	Let's go again.
	Here I go.
	I'm sorry, she's a what?
	A transgender.
	We all know.
	Oh my gosh.
	It's okay.
	She has the...
	Welcome back.
	Let me play that again for those who missed.
	I should do very well because I don't show it.
	And do you think that the country will see the first, the United States will see the first gay president or the first woman president?
	Well, we already have it with Obama, so let's just calm down.
	Got it.
	You know Michelle is a trans... I'm sorry, she's a what?
	A transgender.
	We all know.
	Oh my gosh.
	Oh God.
	It's okay.
	She has the...
	Welcome back.
	And it continues.
	I mean, this article is actually pretty good.
	Then she dropped in days later when she was perfectly healthy.
	You know, this makes Joan Rivers' death even more suspicious.
	She called her Michelle Atrani.
	How long after that did she die?
	It was totally unexpected and quite suspicious.
	Look, folks, this isn't... She isn't the only one who thought this.
	It's pretty common knowledge.
	Take a look.
	And here's Renee on Twitter.
	You know, this makes John Rivers' death even more suspicious, talking about it.
	And there are numerous others who are tweeting.
	Here you have another one.
	His real name is Michael LaVaughn Robinson.
	Some jokes write themselves.
	And here you have Michelle sitting like a man with his legs spread and you have Justin Trudeau with his legs crossed like a woman.
	Some jokes they say write themselves.
	I like it.
	And there's a whole lot more they got here.
	Stormy, true stormy Joe, right?
	Build Back Better, Michelle Obama, Joe Biden showing a comparison of the back of a woman and the back of a man.
	And it's obvious which back has Michelle Obama.
	Brian, go ahead, give us some preliminary thoughts of yours.
	There's a lot more here.
	Well, I knew very early that Well, I was told very early on after Barack Obama was elected that Michelle was a tranny.
	I have a friend who is another sort of highly recognized private investigator.
	And he told me that one of his good friends that was in the Secret Service saw her being standing up and knew that she was a tranny.
	And he reported it to me.
	That was the very first time I ever heard of it.
	That was probably around 2010.
	And of course, I've been looking into it ever since, and I've seen more and more evidence that indicates that that's the case.
	The question is, why?
	What is it about the transgenders that makes them easier to control or easier to install?
	We'll be right back after this break with Bryan Davidson and Keith Rogers.
	Stand by.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio.
	FreedomSubs.com.
	The number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	revolution
	oh oh
	oh oh oh oh Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8 p.m.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSex.com, the people's station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Newt on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	And of course, we have many photographs that show that Michelle has a package that most women do not have.
	Maybe he forgot his tuck-friendly undies that day.
	We got any time that the author covers Barack Obama, his brother Malik, he comments about Big Mike.
	And it's most definitely newsworthy when Hussein, that's Barack Hussein Obama, old brother, keeps making these posts.
	Today he posted this picture with no com hat.
	Join Michelle coming in in a strapless gown and the breadth of the shoulders and the musculature.
	You can garner whatever conclusion you want from that image, but it does appear as though Michelle is towering over Hussein and that she has better delts than I could ever hope to have.
	People took to Twitter to post their own replies.
	Here are some of them.
	Well, they're pretty fascinating good stuff.
	We all remember what happened at Joan Rivers, needless to say.
	More, more, more, more.
	Keith, let me get your thoughts about this.
	Well, I have to laugh at a lot of this, because sex is a political tool.
	And it's no different than Macron and his estranged teacher, which is supposed to be female, raised three children, but is now a man.
	They've done this for eons now to be able to control everyone.
	Same thing with Pete Buttigieg, all this stuff, you know.
	Now we have the P. Diddy thing down there in California coming out and it's supposed to be linked to the Epstein.
	It's just, you know, but what gets me is, is how people are attacked over this because Growing up, I knew one or two people that you, in our day, we called it might be a little bit queer, you know?
	And of course, back then it was, hey, whatever floats your boat like that, you know, but today it's quite a bit different.
	And then now with years of these GMOs and stuff like that, and suddenly this transgender movement, you start wondering like, are these guys being genetically altered or something like that?
	Because I mean, you're seeing like on these pride events and stuff like that, thousands of people out there on the street.
	It's like, you know, I can't believe that these were all closet people growing up and stuff like that, you know, but, uh, Russia has just designated the LGBT movement as a terrorist organization.
	And I'd like to remind you that, uh, our kosher Congressman Jamie Raskin has said that Russia is an Orthodox Christian country with the traditional social values.
	And for that reason, it must be destroyed no matter what the cost to us.
	And then what's odd is he says, this is Jihad.
	I've never heard a Jew talk about the word jihad before in that reference like that.
	And just like you go onto Google like that, look up Tel Aviv.
	It's the gay capital of the world.
	And I don't care about what people do in their own private bedrooms and stuff like that, but when you get 250,000 Jews out there celebrating pride stuff in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv, and then tell me that that's God's country or that God's holy land, I have to have a little speculation of doubt.
	Keith, all that is good stuff, but you're not appalled that we could have a First Lady who's actually a man posing as a woman as a form of fraud and deception on the American people, don't you believe?
	I despise liars, phonies, and frauds, and I've gone after this issue hammer and tongue because I believe it's so outrageous.
	You don't share— Yeah.
	Yeah.
	No, Jim, I do.
	But the other what I'm trying to say, though, is with the amount of this so-called LGBT stuff like that, the White House is at least to worry about, because think of what the medical industry is going to be doing.
	You're talking about promoting a lifestyle that brings disease and stuff like that with it.
	The tax on the social programs of medical treatment, stuff like that, as they keep pushing this.
	The White House is going to be, or France or anyone else, is going to be the least of our problems like that because they're already talking about cutting social programs for Social Security and stuff like that to pay other bills.
	What's going to happen when they start having this mass outbreaks of, say, HIV and stuff like that?
	Because they're pushing a lifestyle.
	And this goes right up to the White House.
	You've seen those photos of Biden there on Friday.
	Well, I want to return to Brian, because it seems to me, on Easter Sunday, the most sacred day in Christianity, you come out declaring it to be Pride Visibility Day, and he added that they wouldn't allow any Easter eggs that had overly religious symbolism, coloring, decoration.
	Brian, I find this extraordinarily offensive.
	Well, the Christian church are the ones that actually care about offending God.
	There's a big separation between church and state here in America on purpose, and it was built that way.
	Easter is a corrupt event.
	Bunnies, fertility, running around, eggs, spring colors.
	That has nothing to do with Christ rising from the dead on Sunday morning after Good Friday.
	There's been a lot of corruption.
	Santa Claus has nothing to do with Christmas, the birth of Christ.
	The dates don't correspond.
	They more correspond to ancient festivals anyway.
	And so you're really talking about a small group of people that actually care that God is offended versus the very large portion of the population that just simply goes to church because it's Easter and it's the right thing to do.
	As the late great Keith Green said, going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than Going to McDonald's makes you a hamburger, and he's exactly right.
	Now, as for why this day, well... They're taunting...
	God.
	They're taunting righteousness, and I do believe that with their old bafflement—by the way, none of this is new, this has been around for a long, long time—in order to corrupt, destroy religion, destroy faith, destroy people who recognize God's role in this world and righteousness, and offend, continue to offend God.
	Again, they think if they can get the evil levels up in society high enough that they can usher in They're trying to brainwash the next generation into being so confused and mindless that they'll simply do whatever they're told or go whichever direction the wind blows.
	But this is the product and the result of liberalism.
	Remember, conservatives look back on their parents, look back on the founding of the nation.
	For 150 years, the pilgrims were here in this nation.
	Most people heard over 7,000 sermons in their lifetime.
	The churches were the ones that drove the Declaration of Independence and established America.
	All 209 founding fathers were Christians.
	From that level, we have fallen in less than 200 years.
	And just like the Romans came apart from the inside as a result of homosexuality and depravity, expect that America will come apart the same way.
	These lessons are old.
	This history is old.
	It doesn't surprise me, but I think that a guy by the name of Jonathan Cahn, a Hebrew that wrote a lot of, he's a Messianic Hebrew, but he wrote a book called Return of the Gods, probably hits the nail on the head in terms of why the transgender, because they're trying to bring in a particular god.
	Well, you mentioned the goat god.
	You mentioned the goat god, Brian, who, of course, has the breasts of a woman, but male equipment and female equipment alike.
	And I think that Michelle is kind of an exemplification, and this effort for transgenderism is at least part driven by the Obamas, who are very weird.
	wanting to feel more normal by normalizing transgenderism.
	And it's absurd.
	I mean, the idea of transgender visibility today, that transgenders have more visibility in our culture than any other group you could name.
	So this is just absurd in my judgment.
	Brian, then Keith.
	Well, if you think of the heavenly battle, it makes a lot of sense.
	Transgender visibility on the day that Christ rises?
	They're pissed.
	They're upset.
	They're trying to offend God.
	They want God to see what they've done to society, what they've managed to achieve with the power that he's given them.
	They're trying to offend God.
	God and they've done a good job.
	It's one of God's most offensive areas of concern has always been the homosexual area the degrading of sexuality in terms of men and women.
	If you look through your Bible, you'll see that these are the ways to the evil ways to offend God to the highest level.
	And so to take man make a mix between man and woman instead of keeping them separate is an area of great offense.
	And this is basically the old Giving the bird to God.
	And I think it's, again, they're trying to usher in their God.
	Keith, go ahead, Keith.
	Yeah, you know, as I said before, uh, growing up, we knew a few people that might be a little bit queer or something like that, but as you know, it's whatever you did was in your home and stuff.
	And, uh, and I, and I don't like to apologize for anyone, but Obama's my fifth cousin.
	Uh, and.
	He hasn't flaunted his lifestyle out there in the public and stuff.
	And so whatever is done behind doors, I wouldn't give a damn.
	However, the, uh, the main thing is like Brian mentioned here, when you start destroying a culture, and there has been so many videos here lately about the fall of Rome and, uh, we've lost our cuisine, we've lost our art, uh, Antifa BLM's destroying the statues, you know, We're looking at a massive decline in America here.
	And it's, and I hate to say this, it's not just America because all over the world, your stop oil groups are throwing paint and stuff on paintings, oil paintings, get it?
	Oil paintings, you know?
	They're gluing themselves to highways and stuff.
	And of course they're taking out iconic bridges.
	You know what I'm getting at?
	It's all an attack on the actual culture or what used to be of America.
	There's that one 1974 video which depicts America when, and I remember the era, it was so industrialized.
	We had strong union jobs.
	We had 40 hour work weeks, paid healthcare, overtime, sick leave, vacation leave, pregnancy leave.
	That's all gone.
	But it was your US corporations that did that.
	They're the ones that fired Americans, sent our labor over to China, Malaysia to make our shirts and stuff, Mexico to make air conditioners and stuff.
	All this stuff has been done by these global elite that own these massive corporations and stuff.
	China just happened to get in on the ground floor with under Reagan there and then Clinton sealed the deal.
	Remember, Lou Dobbs used to talk about NAFTA all the time.
	These were all warnings about what was coming, the super highway and stuff, you know.
	The same thing with Trump saying that Nicaragua was an existential threat.
	Joe Biden said the same thing.
	Well, then you start looking at what Nicaragua was offering.
	And this goes clear back to the days of Contra.
	And it's because China was executing this, or was trying to execute this massive new canal there, because why?
	Well, the Panama Canal is drying up, and so those export vehicles can't get through there, you know?
	Well, this is...
	This Baltimore thing is going to have an effect on shipping worldwide, I have no doubt, Brian.
	Would you care to comment on that and any other aspect of what we have here?
	We already have a shipping problem.
	The ships have been backed up outside the ports, waiting in the ocean to get into each of the ports, the major ports, for quite a while.
	There's a large backup, they sit out there, they're spending money every day waiting To get their ships into port, to get everything off, shutting down Baltimore.
	That's a massive harbor.
	I'm not sure that it's the size of the Port of Houston, but it's a massive one.
	It's just going to continue to cause a deeper and deeper congestion, which is going to force everybody to work harder and work faster.
	There are people out there that will get rich off this event, and that's not just to do with the shipping.
	Think about all the contractors that are going to get rich re-evaluating or rebuilding or restructuring all of the bridges.
	So, to me, I always see this.
	Every time I see the Go Baltimore Strong, Uvalde Strong, you know, whatever strong, then I start to add up how much money is going to have to get spent by the government and non-governmental organizations to restructure all of these security structures.
	So, there's nothing new here.
	Janet Yellen said that by 2035 the national debt would be 50 trillion dollars.
	Where's this money going?
	We're putting on a trillion of debt every hundred days right now.
	We don't need 2050.
	Think about the time value of money and the compounding factor.
	We need more like 2030.
	The amount of austerity that's coming is going to just shock people.
	Isn't national debt largely a function of interest on printing money to the Fed?
	So that, you know, it seemed to me we could declare a jubilee, a holiday, and just vacate the national debt.
	Period.
	Boom.
	It's gone.
	I don't expect that.
	Yeah, it's all imaginary.
	It's just a phony baloney scheme to manipulate the public.
	Well, I'm not sure that the boys over at the Macy's Institute would say that we can just erase it.
	Think about all the outstanding bonds that people own and investors own that have put their money into.
	What is debt?
	It's bonds that have been issued to people, a guarantee of repayment.
	At a low interest rate and these bonds are all over the place.
	I believe China owns something like or last I heard they own something like 25% of all U.S.
	Treasury bonds.
	So if they were to go nuclear and cash them in, we'd have to come up with 20% of the value of that or 25% of the value of that trillions of dollars overnight.
	So all that theory is one thing, but it's all sort of the Janet Yellen and all of the rest of the people that are in, you know, What Race Is She?, that are controlling how all this debt is juggled and financed.
	You know, there's a lot to talk about in terms of how to restructure a society after a crash, but What's going to have to ultimately happen is that there's going to be a day where there's a crash.
	It's going to be a blackout.
	They're going to come back out with a restructuring and a central bank digital currency that's going to be issued to each person that agrees to comply with the new standards of society.
	Those are the ones that are going to be able to buy and sell and trade and the rest of them are going to be stuck in the outer limits trying to have plant seeds and water their gardens without electricity.
	Well, we haven't been talking about it, but all the lawsuits against Trump are just falling apart.
	Such an obvious attempt to interfere with the election and campaign, but it's failing completely and utterly.
	He's ahead nationally by a four or five point margin over Biden.
	He's ahead in all six of the swing states by four to two points.
	So what are they going to do?
	I want to get your anticipation, Keith, first you and then Brian, as to where we stand now in terms of domestic politics and where we're going.
	Will we even have an election in November?
	Well, I have an idea on that, and members, Jim, I don't vote.
	But anyway, Trump, Remember, he restored the Albert Pike statue.
	Albert Pike is notorious for saying that when they need a hero, we'll supply them with one.
	I'm of the mind here where it doesn't matter what charges they level against, or levy, I should say, against Trump, because it's just like the Jews saying, give us Barbaros.
	Trump stands for nationalism, and this is what they have been trying to destroy all over.
	They want to destroy Russian nationalism.
	They've destroyed it all throughout Latin America, through the CIA and their ventures of their covert wars.
	They want to get rid of anything that ties people to their homeland, their own culture, as Brian has brought out.
	And they want to build us into this new world order.
	Again, as Brian mentioned there with the Bible and all that, we have Harari out there that talks about AI.
	And about rewriting the Bible to make it more tolerant of other people and stuff.
	And that's not what scripture says.
	Hate is justified scripturally by the Bible.
	You're supposed to hate what is wicked.
	You know, if you started loving what was wicked, well, and I know you're agnostic there, Jim.
	But the point is, I hear you so many times quote the scriptures.
	It's like, well, you know, it's got to be a little hint of belief.
	And I'll tell you a story here.
	Don't make it fast.
	I was in our ministry once and I talked to a guy there and I says, can I share a scripture with you?
	And he said, sure.
	He says, I was a bishop for 30 years.
	And I says, oh really?
	And I said, well, on top of that, I says, can I ask you a personal question?
	And he says, yeah.
	I says, can you name me one man of God in the Bible that ever retired from serving God?
	He told me to get the F off his property.
	It had become a vocation for him.
	It was just a job.
	And that's where some people today are with their religions and stuff, you know.
	There's a lot of fallacy in today's religions.
	They can't even keep their congregation members together.
	And I was going to make a mention of this earlier when I look across video platforms, whether it be Bitchute or whatever like that, you know, all these religious videos coming out there about, oh, the end is near and stuff.
	You know, where were these guys 30 years ago that would have kept this country together?
	Through their high morals, their high standards of living and stuff, but now it's only sudden when they're at the crosshairs of seeing their whole economy, their world being shattered, that suddenly they're turning to God.
	It's kind of hypothetical, you know, of what Christianity has become today.
	Brian.
	Well, I couldn't agree more in terms of what Christianity today is.
	Make no mistake about it.
	Christianity is not an institution.
	And this is something I've been taking a lot of hits for in the comments on what I've been saying.
	Christianity is not an institution.
	How do I corrupt an institution?
	By the way, if I'm looking to corrupt the rest of this world or this whole world, I'm going to start with the institution, because it's easier to put my guy in at the top so that my policies can float downhill to all of the sub-organizations within the institution.
	Government is nothing more than an institution, and a lot of churches Are nothing more than institutions.
	I can tell you this, 325 AD at the Council of Nicaea, one of their canons that everybody agreed on, number six, was that there would be no Pope.
	Yet we have a Pope at the top of that Roman-style institution of Catholicism.
	Why is it an institution?
	Because it's easier to control from the top down.
	And I do believe that institutions can be corrupted.
	Now, on the other hand, What is?
	Who are Christians?
	Christians are people that recognize God is who he said he is.
	That Jesus, when he said before Abraham was, I am, he's representing himself as God.
	We believe in him.
	We've subscribed to certain basics about his identity.
	Now that is a cellular structure.
	And this is what they're after.
	They've got all the institutions.
	What they don't have are the cellular, patriotic Americans, very similar to the 209 founding fathers, who were thinking independently, operating independently, working independently.
	And it was the churches and what was taking place in the churches that was driving the new chatter for how we should break loose and form our own new government and break loose.
	So I believe in the church, not as an institution, but in the church as the cellular men and women on their knees in a proper position.
	And the Bible says if those people have faith the size of a mustard seed, they can move mountains.
	There is a remnant left in America.
	That remnant is going to be powerful, but we're not looking forward to the salvation of America.
	We would love to see that because that's our nation in terms of where we put our bodies.
	But our souls are upstairs and we're a different breed of cat.
	You can't corrupt us.
	Let me ask a final question here, Keith.
	that they're going to be Are we going to have an election in 2024?
	Is Biden going to be the nominee of the Democratic Party?
	Who will prevail if an election takes place, Keith?
	Well, if it's anything like Zelensky, like now, he just canceled their election.
	So that's a dictatorship over there.
	So I don't think there's going to be one here.
	But I wanted to capitalize on one thing that Brian said.
	The kingdom is within you.
	Everything is written in your hearts.
	Jesus himself said that no one can come to me unless the Father himself called him.
	This is the remnant, as Brian mentioned, is those that will that function unabashed from what the Catholic Church is doing today.
	You know, they're basically siding with the globalists and stuff like that.
	But real Catholics and stuff that believe in the Bible, the scriptures, they don't go along with that stuff.
	And this is where it gets down to individuality there.
	And that's, again, why they're going after the individuals.
	They have to break the individual down.
	To get them to go along.
	It's no different than torture or anything else like that.
	But again, Jim, as far as that, I don't think there's going to be an election.
	Brian?
	I do think they're going to continue to play it.
	They're going to run it just like they ran 2020.
	They're going to fix it.
	It's going to be rigged.
	They're going to install whoever they install.
	The question is whether or not I think Joe Biden's going to be running, and I've been sort of paying attention to it.
	Look, they've How many Joe Bidens have they cycled in and out?
	They can do it again.
	The mainstream media will go with it.
	Nobody's going to notice.
	Nobody's going to care.
	People are too stupid.
	They take their information from the television and they're just willing to go along with whatever.
	It's only the outlying people.
	The question is whether or not we will be silenced in whatever play they choose to run.
	And another question is, do we believe?
	Look, I believe Trump is there and he's dividing The top level of the pyramid.
	I think he's making progress in terms of breaking up something that's taking place at the top of the Jews.
	Otherwise, he wouldn't have that resistance.
	But he's working with them.
	He's working.
	He talked about the other day about protecting the Trani community.
	There's a lot of things I'm deeply concerned about taking place, but I believe that he's taking an approach where he's trying to divide the power brokers into camps that he can control.
	Whether or not he'll be successful, I do not know.
	Whether or not those camps of power brokers will allow him into place, I do not know.
	Those are very shrewd observations, Ron.
	Just to offer a third point of view, I do believe the massive opposition that Trump tells us he actually cares about America, he can do us some good, that he is a nationalist, that he's opposed to globalism, and he actually believes in human beings and life.
	I think those are true of Trump.
	Notwithstanding his making many concessions to Israel over the years, which have troubled me profoundly, I do believe in his heart of hearts.
	He really does want to make America great again.
	I do believe he has an agenda, including Schedule F, that allows him to gut the senior executive service where we have A vast number of bureaucratic employees are playing policy-shaping and decision-making roles they're not entitled to make, and he has a way to get rid of them.
	Surprise, surprise, I believe he's actually going to prevail.
	They're not going to be able to pull off the same kind of theft of the election they have in the past.
	Brian Davidson, Keith Rogers, I thank you both.
	You're terrific.
	Everyone out there, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you love and care about, because we do not know how much time we have left.
	And support Revolution Radio.
	Thanks for being here.

▲