All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 29, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:20:31
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (28 January 2024) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, folks!
Welcome back!
This is Truth Vs. News, and this is January the 28th of 2024.
One month has gone by, and what a hot month it is.
And I was summarizing it here with the hot stuff out of Texas that is really very critical to our country, and Civil War and other things could be happening.
So Jim, uh, Jim Henson, Brian Davidson, and Scott Bennett, whoop, where'd he go?
Anyway.
Meanwhile, here's a border update.
Twenty-five Republican governors have issued a joint statement of support of Texas in a border dispute.
We stand in solidarity with our fellow governor, Greg Abbott, and the state of Texas in utilizing every tool and strategy, including razor wire fences, to secure the border.
We do it in part because the Biden admin is refusing to enforce immigration laws already on the books and is allowing illegally mass parole across America of migrants who entered our country illegally.
There's no question about the Constitution giving the state the right to protect itself from invasion when the federal government refuses to do so.
Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3.
No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops or ships, or warrant time to peace, enter into any agreement or contact with another state or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit a delay, noting Two to three million illegals per year are being transported from the open southern border across America.
Most are unvetted fighting age men, and by the way, about half of them have rap sheets.
Mexican drug cartels are now de facto in charge of our southern border.
They're establishing cartel criminal gang control over our southwest states, and they are flooding America with fentanyl, killing more than 100,000 a year.
In addition, Article 4, Section 4, the Guarantee Clause, the United States, that's a federal government, Shall guarantee to every state in this union a Republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.
The Biden admin is already fighting a proxy war with Russia, Gaza, Iran, and Yemen.
Let's see them invade Texas next to throw open the border and further facilitate an illegal alien invasion.
So what happens if Biden tries to take over the Texas National Guard in a 5-4 ruling?
The Supreme Court sided with a Biden admin, saying that wire erected in Eagle Pass was put up illegally and prevent Border Patrol from trying to detain people who were attempting to cross the border.
Despite this ruling, Governor Abbott argued Biden's failing his duty as president By not controlling the record levels of illegal crossings at the border during his time in office.
He's also declared Texas is under invasion, invoking the state constitutional right to defend and protect itself.
That authority is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any federal statute to the contrary.
The Texas National Guard, the Texas Department of Public Safety, and other Texas personnel are acting on that authority, as well as state law, to secure the Texas border.
As a result, Abbott is allowing the Texas National Guard to continue to install razor wire, refusing to allow Border Patrol access to Shelby Park, In order to remove the wires.
Can Biden take over the Texas National Guard?
Biden is within his power to federalize the Texas National Guard in accordance with Title 10 of the U.S.
Code, which would mean the state group would be under direct orders of the president.
In 57, Eisenhower placed the Arkansas National Guard under federal authority and ordered them to protect nine black students who enrolled at Central High and Little Rock.
The move arrived after the state governor, Orval Faubus, previously called to prevent the black students' entry into the all-white school, despite a Supreme Court ruling That declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional.
Currently, Texas National Guards operate under Title 32, which means they fall under the command of the Texas Governor.
Abbott is using the Texas Guard to defy a Supreme Court ruling when Governor Faubus did this in 1957.
Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas Guard to ensure compliance with a law.
O'Rourke posted on Twitter, Biden must follow this example of bold, decisive leadership to end the crisis before it gets worse.
However, Questions have been raised as to whether Biden can federalize the Texas National Guard in these current circumstances, some suggesting the president does not have the legal justification to do so.
Title 10 can only supersede Title 32 in a national emergency.
In this case, Biden would have to activate the Texas National Guard to guard the border.
Otherwise, it is an unlawful order.
Retired Air Force General Robert Springbalding posted on Twitter, What happens if he does it?
Presumably, a move to federalize the Guard would mean the Border Patrol would move in and remove the razor wire.
Others suggest such a move would have broader implications for Biden.
If the Texas National Guard were federalized under Title 10 for the sole purpose of pulling them off the border and out of the chain of command of the Commander-in-Chief of the Texas military after Abbott invoked his constitutional authority to defend the Texas border,
The founders would have envisioned this as a crime and misdemeanor and impeachable offense, said Jonathan Hooley, a constitutional law and national security expert.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxson also suggested Democrats calling for Biden to federalize the Guard don't understand the law, and the president must first declare a national emergency.
That goes to the whole question.
Why is he declaring an emergency?
Obviously you have one, right?
And now he's admitting it?
I think that becomes a political issue for him.
It becomes a real problem for him politically.
What can Abbott do in response?
Beyond continuing to defy the Biden admin and ordering law enforcement to continue erecting the wire, he's indicated willing to appeal any decision from the president to the Supreme Court.
Professor Peter Shane, a law lecturer at NYU and constitutional expert, dismissed Abbott's suggestion he could have supreme authority in Texas after declaring the state is under invasion from people crossing the border illegally.
This is nonsense.
Governors have no power to declare anything under the Constitution.
Nor does the Constitution give states any power to countermand the exercise of federal authority.
Meanwhile, Dan Mangino.
Biden is totally up.
And he did it to himself because he's a moron.
Now he can either.
Use force, or the threat of force, to force Texas law enforcement to assist in the invasion of their state in front of television cameras for the world to watch.
Or he can fold and slither away on the issue, knowing he's being destroyed at the most for supporting this invasion at the southern border.
Either way, he loses because he's a moron.
I stand with Texas.
Meanwhile, here's a late report.
National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd with me now.
60 Republicans head to the border.
They want to stop the migrant flow.
Are they going to get it, Brandon?
Absolutely not.
This is an administration issue, and we're seeing exactly what this administration wants.
We have open borders, and all we have to do to understand why is look at the White House.
Look at the activists that are the political appointees that are in the White House.
They want open borders, and they're getting exactly what they want.
And so a delegation of Republicans is not going to change a Democrat's mind.
It never has.
But what it does do is it shines a spotlight on the issue.
It forces the mainstream media to look at this issue.
And all we want is that honest conversation.
And if we get that honest conversation, the vast majority of Americans are going to agree we need secure borders.
I'm sorry to say, elections do have consequences, and we've been in a perilous state ever since the last election, which was fraudulent.
ballot box, and they're going to vote that way.
And that's what we want to see.
Elections have consequences.
And with the proper people in, we can get the proper border security policies.
I'm sorry to say, election do have consequences.
And we've been in a perilous state ever since the last election, which was fraudulent.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it's interesting, the reading of the Constitution in the first slide, where it says no state may enter into an agreement unless there is an invasion and situation.
So that means...
Uh, the state of Texas can enter into an agreement with Mexico, with South American countries, to say, hold your people, or the moment we catch them, we're shipping them back to you.
Where's the port?
Where's the place to land the planes?
Where's the place to send the buses or trucks or whatever?
But they are not Violating the American integrity of our borders.
They are not refugees.
They are not seeking political asylum because they're being killed or tortured or afflicted.
That's the big issue.
They are migrants.
Well, they do not have a right to come to the United States.
The United States is owned and controlled by the people, the citizenry, the shareholders, the owners of this country.
Not by the government, by the people.
And it comes back to a fundamental understanding of the anti-federalist sympathies and understanding.
And that is, and I studied all of this when I was in Washington.
I did my dissertation in political theory.
I know what I'm talking about.
The anti-federalists were all about individual liberty.
And individual liberty is secured by the states, and the states are sovereignties.
Sovereign.
They are independent countries and republics.
They are bound together by the Constitution, but they are independent, individual republics.
And the Federal Constitution was a loosely written, genuine, general rope that held them all together.
But the bottom line is the people of the states, state of Texas, state of California, state of Idaho, wherever it is, the people have a right to be secure in their persons, papers, and effects.
And I would say by nature of being secure in that dimension, it's being secure in your home, being secure in your town, your village, your state, your county.
That means you have a right to not have invaders from China, from Middle East, from South America, wherever, illegally coming parachuting or swimming across your border and setting up a tent in your backyard, which is what this is.
Uh and and then from that tent engaging in all sorts of criminal mischief.
That's why the government was created to secure people's rights not to be molested, invaded, bothered, harassed, inconvenienced by illegal invaders.
These are not people traveling On a tour, on a plane, on a vacation, that is entering into an agreement with the United States for a temporary visa or temporary stay.
This is a climbing the walls, illegal invasion, and it needs to be treated like an act of war.
These people are either shot or incarcerated or loaded onto a bus or a plane and sent back.
They are not to be allowed into the United States because they are a threat to the American states as a whole.
So this whole issue needs to be translated into a wartime invasion.
Biden cannot take over the National Guard in this time.
It's already been declared as an invasion.
But what this could lead up to is a very real climactic clash.
If Abbott has any balls, he will say, Texans, you are part of the Texan National Guard.
We are being invaded.
I hold you to your oath to the Constitution.
To stand your ground and do not serve or join this traitor Joe Biden.
And he needs to say that.
I'm sick and tired of hearing my friends on the other side or the President Biden.
He is a traitor.
He is an enemy to the United States.
And until those words are said, People don't realize just how evil and corrupt and vile these people and these Democrats are.
Everything they've done for Martizio Cortez and all the rest of them have been trying to bring in these third world people out of a racist bigotry against white people, the white establishment, the founding fathers.
You know, there's a hatred For the indigenous people that have established America from 1776 to present.
The white Anglo-Saxons have been the majority in this country.
And these Democrats, these lunatic vicious women especially, have this hysteria and this madness to tear all that down.
So this is a civil war.
This is a revolution.
This has to be something that's treated with the violence that it's fomenting.
Because what I see happening is either Abbott's going to buckle, Or he's going to stand his ground with the other states coming around him and the real question is does he does he deputize?
Does he give power or recognize or affirm or encourage the sheriffs to deputize their citizens and stand on the ground of the border?
That's when you have citizens of Texas and Idaho and Montana and and Boston and everywhere else converging down to the border Not with, you know, hillbilly craziness or volatility or shooting guns in the air, but to show the national concern about this, then you will have the Texas Guard recognize if they are against the people, they're on the side of a dictator and it's not going to end well.
So this may end up as a, you know, the spark that triggers a very real civil war.
And everyone's saying that, Jim.
Yeah, I think it's actually a revolution as opposed to a civil war, but it would depend where the other states aligned.
I do believe his statement was very clear and definitive, and I believe the Constitution is on the side of the state of Texas, and for a certainty, I stand with Texas, too.
Brian?
I saw a headline this week.
I don't know if I was able to read the entire article, but it was a Texas sheriff that deputized 350 of its citizens.
Now, one may ask the question, why do we adhere to the law?
And let me point out something that the Founding Fathers were very careful.
They studied for a long, long time governments of history, governments of the Bible.
They studied for a long, long time before they decided to draft up the Constitution that runs us.
And one thing that I can tell you for certain, the way that they thought, was that the law was there to tell people and show people that they're immoral.
The law wasn't there for righteous men that acted morally.
The law was there.
And it was a separation of powers, a balancing act that was supposedly going to limit the powers and the authorities of the law, which is why they created the three branches of government to have the balancing act in place.
Now, we need, as a people, If the American experiment is to succeed, and I'm not going to say that it's failed yet, it appears that it has because we've lost the ability to control our elections.
We've given up our voice.
We've lost the ability to control our borders.
We've lost the ability to control our federal government, which has grown vastly out of control with evil, corrupt men who do evil.
And are corrupted all over the place, and Carrie Lake this week was a perfect example.
I thought that isolated everything so well as to how the corruption spreads.
Now, the new Declaration of Independence ought to be drafted by someone smarter than me, someone wiser than me, although I would love to take a stab at it.
The people of America are a people that have chosen to govern themselves.
And when the founding fathers, all 209 of them, decided to draft up how we would govern ourselves, when they did what they did, they recognized one thing: that without people choosing to be moral and righteous, Government would fail, just like all the governments of the past have failed.
In terms of, we started out, the Israelites started out with a theocracy, then they moved to a monarchy.
Talk about the Romans imploding, talk about the Greeks, talk about how they put it all together.
They looked at all of these things and they thought, well, this is the best effort that we can possibly make.
They knew that it was going to fail in a sense when morality was lost by society.
If people chose to abandon what they called inalienable rights, or God-given, Almighty God has bestowed upon mankind the ability to recognize right from wrong.
And when that is gone, Then the government no longer should serve its functions.
And they built into our Declaration of Independence a responsibility among the citizens to create and maintain a militia to destroy the government when the government fails to properly align morality with law.
This is where we're at.
We're having a failure and we're going to need some leadership.
And I just don't know where it's at.
That was an excellent statement, Brian.
100%, I agree.
Very, very well crafted.
Scott, go ahead.
One thing, Brian brought up a very good thing.
The evolution of our political choices and leadership is something that's always flowing.
We always have to be open to that.
You have to be outside your imagination.
What we seem to be morphing into or transforming into, which in a sense we've always had, but it's been sort of watered down, is tribalism.
What is the tribal leader?
If you go to the Indian tribes, for example, how did you choose your chief?
Who became a chief?
Who became the leader?
Who became the warrior king?
Well, in a sense, it's all biological.
It's all primordial.
It's who is the strongest, who is the smartest, who is anointed with almost a mystical clairvoyance from God, who has the best of luck, who is favored by the invisible powers that be.
And that is how people Followed and chose their leaders was on this look at David David King David You killed a bear.
You killed a lion.
You killed a giant.
You were anointed by God and God's prophet.
And, you know, these are not just political discussions.
These were very real, physical events.
And I think we're moving in this direction.
And it's a good thing, in a sense, because, as Plato said, too, You know, the best leaders and the best of men are those who don't want to be leaders, that don't want to be politicians, that don't want to be, you know, doing all of this stuff.
But yet, they're the best ones.
The worst people, the worst Democrats, if you will, are those who want power, that want political power and the lust of power and the thrill of manipulating others.
Look at Gavin Newsom and Megan Whitmer and Murphy and all of these scumbags!
That are, that consumed, and the mayor of New York, that ugly troll that looked like she popped out of a goblin house, whatever the hell her, Lori Lightfoot, all of these were scumbag people.
How they could possibly be in echelons of political leadership and control over people is totally unnatural.
So we have to move in the direction of natural born leaders.
They're not made.
They're born.
They're strong.
They're smart.
They're charismatic.
They're anointed.
They don't back down.
There's no fear.
There's a warrior impulse.
There's also a tenderness.
You take care of the children.
You take care of the elderly.
You divide resources.
But you are steel-fisted.
This is the direction we have to go as the crumbling house of cards of the American democracy begins to shake and crumble in a lot of ways, is tribalism on a small community level, but where the strongest men The strongest, most charismatic and good-willed men naturally rise to the top.
These bureaucrat deep state processes have led us to this implosion.
Jim? Jim? Jim? Jim? Jim? Jim? Jim? Jim? Jim?
This is the most dangerous moment in America's history.
We are all Texans now.
Now that President Trump, for all intents and purposes, has wrapped up the GOP nomination for the third time, Democrats are dead and they know it.
If this next election is about a fair, honest, popular vote, Democrats booze by a landslide.
That's what Democrats see in the latest polls.
They feel that as young people, blacks and Latinos all move toward Trump.
Black community leaders in Chicago are even announcing, because of the open border disaster, they will vote Republican.
There's no one left.
Democrats are facing a massive defeat in November.
But that's why this is the most dangerous moment in America's history.
We have an evil enemy from within inside the White House with Biden and his boss Obama.
And they can see the reign of terror is ending.
Their desk won't hold on to power, but they see it slipping away.
They have two choices.
Either try to win the election by rigging and cheating at unimaginable levels, even worse than in 2020.
Or burn the country down on the way out the door.
So Trump inherits a disaster, a country on fire, divided like never before, on the verge of collapse, on the verge of civil war, on the verge of World War III, and in the throes of a massive foreign invasion, overwhelming our economy, schools, and healthcare system.
I had an uncanny crystal ball eight years ago, so heed my warning now.
On October 30, 2016, I was the opening speaker for presidential candidate Donald J. Trump in Las Vegas one week before the 2016 election.
Seems like a lifetime ago.
I told the crowd, this is a life-or-death moment for America.
Either we elected Trump or we'd face the end of America.
I predicted exactly how Democrats would intentionally destroy America.
They have 12 months to accelerate this intentional plan through this mass foreign invasion, so heed my warning.
You ain't seen nothing yet.
10 million illegals have already come in.
They are just the ones who were caught.
Another 10 million were gotaways.
That's 20 million in three years.
That's a foreign army inside our country.
But now Biden and his boss Obama have 12 months to make it rain like never before.
They will accelerate the plan.
This is their window.
20 million illegals in three years will look small compared to what Democrats will do in the next 12 months.
They will wave in 20 million illegals or 30 million in only a 12-month period.
What you're about to see is unimaginable chaos, crisis, and catastrophe.
That's how they'll steal the upcoming election or if they lose to Trump.
This is their parting gift.
Their middle finger to Trump in America.
They want to fill America with so many illegal alien criminals, some austere M13 gangbangers, welfare addicts, and minority-age males from China that even Trump can't turn it around.
He inherits a failing country on the verge of collapse and civil war.
The next 12 months is their window.
That's why Texas is so important at this moment in time.
Texas holds the future of America in its hands.
Biden and his boss Obama will do anything to stop Texas.
Can Texas stand up to the president, the federal government, and the Supreme Court?
Can they show red Republican states how to block the foreign invasion?
Can they keep America safe until the cavalry Trump rides in?
Our future rides on Texas.
Will they stand strong or will they fall?
We're all Texans now.
Meanwhile, House GOP unveils Majorca's impeachment articles.
House Republicans have unveiled two articles of vetoing against the Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, signing him for refusing to enforce multiple immigration laws, creating new programs that defy congressional intent, and lying to Congress about multiple aspects of the crisis on the border.
The articles are due for markup on Tuesday.
We're for the House Homeland Security Committee, led by Representative Mark Greene of Tennessee.
The first charges Mayorkas with willful and systematic refusal to comply with the law.
The second accuses him of breach of public trust.
Throughout his tenure as Secretary of Homeland Security, he has repeatedly violated laws enacted by Congress regarding immigration and border security, in large part because of his unlawful conduct.
Millions of aliens have illegally entered the United States on an annual basis, with many unlawfully remaining.
His refusal to obey the law is not only an offense against the separation of powers, but also threatens our national security and has had a dire impact on communities across the country.
In the second article, Mycroft is accused of willfully violating his public trust by having knowingly made false statements and knowingly obstructed lawful oversight of the Department of Homeland Security, principally to obfuscate the results of his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law.
Meanwhile, timeline of destruction The proposed immigration deal by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and James Langford is a clear betrayal of American sovereignty and the rule of law.
This deal, which would allow 35,000 illegals to flood our country every week, Before any form of border control is enforced is nothing short of a disaster.
It's a slap in the face to every law-abiding American citizen and legal immigrant who expects and follows our immigration laws.
The idea of permitting 5,000 illegal per day over a seven-day period amounting to $150,000 a month before the Department of Homeland Security is obligated to act is ludicrous.
It's a complete surrender of our border security and a green light for illegal immigration.
The fact that this deal would also maintain Biden's expansive catch-and-release network only adds insult to injury.
Essentially, it would legalize Biden's disastrous open border policies that have already led to an unprecedented crisis at our southern border.
This deal also undermined the public health authority used effectively by President Trump under Title 42, which was crucial in stemming illegal immigration instead of upholding and strengthening this possible policy.
Schumer and Lenk would deal with diluted Rendering it ineffective.
House Speaker Johnson's opposition, along with several Senate Republicans, is commendable and necessary.
It's shocking and deeply disappointing that Minority Leader McConnell It's reportedly lobbying Republicans to support this atrocious deal.
Republicans like Marsha Blackburn, J.D.
Vant, Ted Cruz, and Josh Hawley are rightly opposing a deal that essentially aims to make illegal immigration legal.
We Americans cannot stand by and watch as our elected leader dismantle our nation's sovereignty and security.
This deal is a clear indication.
Some in Washington are more interested in political gamesmanship and catering to special interests than in protecting America's citizens and upholding our laws.
Trump blasts Biden-backed border bill.
Rather have no bill than a bad bill.
He's got it right.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, you know, on the steps to stop all of this, this is—and Brian said it too—this is already three years too late.
You have millions upon millions of these people in this country.
And what do you do with them?
Where are they?
You know, you really, in one sense, you have to not concern yourself with their welfare, but the welfare of yourself, your families, your community, your village, your town, whatever.
You have to draw up the castle drawbridge and say, okay, no one rents or owns in our community, in our county, who's an illegal alien.
An illegal alien, your persona non grata.
You are not welcome in our county.
You do not get hired.
There's no jobs.
And if there is, you and the employer go to jail.
There has to be a zero tolerance to allow them to be pushed out.
You can't create any conditions in your community for them to parasitically exist off of.
Otherwise, they will get worse.
You will have one-bedroom apartments occupied by 10-20 people.
That degrades the whole society around you.
What are they doing?
There's only so many construction jobs.
There's only so many any kind of jobs.
Uh, that there are anywhere, and they certainly shouldn't be given any government money of any kind, food stamps, nothing should be given to an illegal alien of any kind.
That's another unconstitutional action is taking American taxpayers money and giving it to illegal invaders, illegal aliens, illegal, uh, those with whom we're at war with, as Augustine would say.
So, you have to really kind of create the conditions where they have nothing and no hope in your community, and they have to move on, hopefully somewhere else, somewhere back to their own country.
But that's the problem.
They are here.
Now, where can you herd them to?
You know, there's a lot of talk of alternative economic development on the southern border, manufacturing returning, things like that.
This is a massive problem that is only going to get worse too, Jim, because they're uneducated, they don't speak English, they're mentally retarded in a certain degree, they're not very smart people at all.
That have come across.
I mean, they're the lowest of the low.
What possibly thing can they do?
Now, they also have a propensity to allow, tolerate, facilitate, or enjoin and practice criminal behavior.
Drug selling.
Child sex trafficking.
That's always been on my mind because I've seen it up close and personal.
Little girls and boys snatched out of parking lots by Mexican women serving as distraction operations.
Lures.
Baits.
uh grabbing little girls and then they're gone and the fate worse than death that will only increase as illegal aliens increase because they don't have anything else to feed themselves with so there's going to have to come a point Where you have to go military.
You have to go kill or be killed.
You have to go zero tolerance.
It's like rats in your house.
Do you tolerate the rats or do you drive them out by knife, gun, poison, or anything else?
Sometimes you have to get a cat or a dog, a rat, terrier, dog.
Well, that's the mafia.
That's what San Francisco needs.
That's what America needs are, in a sense, committed, blood-ruthless, hunter-killers.
To drive them out, and I know that may shock some of the sensibilities of people who live in this modern time of soft, fluffy football games, but it's only going to get uglier and more violent and more devastating and destructive to America and the American people unless warriors rise up and drive these invaders and parasites out of your land, of your town, of your county,
There is no tolerance and the moment you tolerate it is the moment you're tolerating leprosy and disease and gangrene in your society.
And there is no other description for it.
And these fools in these religious organizations or others that are welcoming them, they ought to be shot for treason too!
They all should be shot and executed for treason.
They're aiding and abetting an invasion of the United States.
And if we don't have warriors rise up and people voting and putting in warriors to defend these communities, Uh, you know, then these communities are just going to naturally die.
It's going to be interesting because I see the warriors of this country relocating, recoagulating, mobilizing in communities similar to Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged.
Where the most successful industrial, you know, profit, you know, people relocated out as society collapsed and fell apart.
I think Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged is exactly the narrative that we're living now.
And the only question is, are the warriors going to rise up before the Democrats destroy this country?
And take it back by force like we saw on January 6th.
Let's never forget the American people descended onto January 6th prepared for a full bloodthirsty revolution if President Trump gave the word.
If he said, ladies and gentlemen of America, we've been overthrown and I'm calling upon you to stand with me by all means necessary with your guns, your swords, your spears, or whatever you have.
Take secure of Washington and secure your towns.
Four-fifths of the American public would have stood with him and done that.
But instead, we were stabbed in our own back by our own Republican rhinos and pence and the rest of it, and we've allowed this traitor, this train wreck, to destroy the country from within.
And there has been barely any real manly leadership response, any real outrage, any real rhetorical violence, and that is what needs to come.
I'm sick and tired of hearing Rand Paul and his godless, you know, quasi-erudite, you know, well, you know, this is what the Constitution of the Founding Fathers and all that, all of that is mumbo-jumbo.
Because the Democrats are consumed with political violence.
This is not a difference of opinion.
This is an act of violence, of treason, upon the American public.
And it's, again, this impeachment of Mayorkas should have happened three years ago.
And the fact that it's happening now, sure, everything is welcome that does something good, but I think we have to go far more draconian and bloodthirsty and ruthless if we are going to beat back and purge our body politic of this infection.
Otherwise, this infection is going to destroy the body politic and we are going to be a dystopia of road warrior Uh, uh, you know, uh, little, um, little fortresses around America like I Am Legend.
Jim?
Brian?
Oh.
We've been here before, and prior to the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776, we had to go through the 1760s and the 1770s.
Out of those times emerged a group called the Sons of Liberty, who were an American Patriot Front that were very upset about the taxation without representation.
We just talked in the articles about Alexander Mayorkas not doing the job that he's been appointed to do, and you could go down an endless list of politicians that have been installed like puppets that are not doing the will of the American people.
But let me remind you as to what the Sons of Liberty did when The tax collectors for the King of England was out there trying to take their money without giving them any representation or any effective governments whatsoever.
There was a process that they put these people through that was public shame and humiliation.
Ever heard the term tar and feather?
Tar and feather?
What they did, the Sons of Liberty, is they took these tax collectors and they took them under the tree and they stripped them of all their clothes.
They took boiling hot pine tar, which was used to coat ships, and they coated these people with boiling hot pine tar, which would cause terrible blisters and all sorts of terrible things.
And then they would cover them with feathers to make them appear as if they were a large bird.
And sometimes they would even light those feathers on fire.
Now, the practice was not meant to be deadly.
It was meant to make an example of those people who would actually take advantage of what they considered to be the inalienable rights to govern yourselves.
Now these people were considered patriots, and they did this for a purpose.
To show everybody that if you do not effectively govern and do the job that you've been appointed by God to do, and that's the way they looked at it, you're appointed by God.
And if you do not do the job, then you have become a tyrant.
Now, I'm going to remind you about the American Revolution breaking forth as a result of the preachers.
And the preachers were out there, and they started talking about this, and they brought it up, and they went through it, and they said, when a father ...ceases to perform his duties to his children, his proper God-given duties to his children, and becomes a tyrant, the children should rise and destroy the father.
This was the illustration that they used to set forth the American Revolution.
And so, therefore, as a result of these events in the 1760s, 1770s, up to 1776, we said, we're breaking loose from this tyranny, we're publicly punishing these people, and we're going to show that proper governance instituted by God must be adhered to in a civil and just society.
Very good.
Meanwhile.
Trump.
Since the knockout blow in New Hampshire, it began, it happened.
I offer this because it's a poll before the election in New Hampshire showing Trump with a 27-point lead, 62 to 35.
You can use that as a measure.
If there's a departure from that, it means there are other intervening factors taking place.
I believe in this case, There was a factor, namely the report about Haley having had sexual relations with two different men while she was married, one of whom was himself married, but that would have adversely affected Haley.
So we got Trump winning and saying a new record in New Hampshire when only 20% were reporting.
He had 52 to 46.
were reporting, he had 52 to 46.
That's only 6%.
So what happened to that 20%?
What happened to the other 21%?
Nevertheless, you have to go back to 1980, when the last time a Republican won both Iowa and New Hampshire, which was Ronald Reagan, which established him as the leading candidate, which he went on to secure.
Not only that, but now Trump has officially become the only person to win the New Hampshire primary three times.
Meanwhile, all despite records of Democrats showing up to vote for Nikki Haley, in some districts the numbers were inflated by as much as 50% of registered Republicans due to an audit in New Hampshire.
Allowing Democrats to vote in Republican primaries.
Get this, CNN exit poll, 70% of the Nikki Haley voters were not registered Republicans.
She relied heavily on the support of Independents and Democrats, yet still lost by a wide margin.
In Iowa, where Trump won by a historic 30%, it took the Associated Press 31 minutes to call the race.
In this case, the AP called New Hampshire within three.
Here's 95% reporting, 54% for Trump, 43% for Haley, and 11 point margin.
But remember, 70% of the Trump 70% of her 134,214 would be 93,946.
Subtract that from her total, and you get 40,268 legitimate votes for Haley by Republicans.
34,214 would be 93,946.
Subtract that number total, and you get 40,268 legitimate votes for Haley by Republicans.
Add that to Trump's 168,713.
You get a total vote, 208,981 of which Trump's percentage was 80%, Haley's approximately 20% for a humongous 60-point margin. - Okay.
I absolutely hate Trump.
Big swath of independents are rejecting him.
This is propaganda, I guarantee.
In 2020, a long list of well-known conservatives endorsed Democrat Joe Biden, including former Senator Jeff Flake, GLP activist Sidney McCain, attorney George Conway, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiona four years later.
He seemed seemingly on track to win the 2024 GOP nomination.
Biden's campaign is hoping anti-Trump conservatives will again be part of Biden's coalition.
Political reporters Sam Stein and Natalie Allison took a look at Republicans and Independents who are refusing to vote for Trump.
Donald Trump has a problem.
No matter what happens in New Hampshire, there's a whole swath of Republican-electric good chunk of independents who appear firmly committed to not voting for him.
According to them, this issue became starkly a barrier polling ahead of the Iowa caucuses.
A state that found 43% of haley voters said they would back Biden over Trump.
But remember, that would be 70% in New Hampshire, because they weren't even Republicans.
Stunning stuff.
Scott, your thoughts?
I mean, the measures they're taking here are ridiculous.
Well, I could see Nikki Haley betraying the Republican Party and becoming Democrat, independent, and running with Gavin Newsom.
I've said for a long time, and I continue to say, they are going to assassinate Joe Biden.
They're going to blame it on a Trump supporter or a group of others.
Uh, and, uh, replace him as a martyr.
I don't think they can let him.
I don't think he'll run again.
He can't run again.
But I do think they're going to kill him.
They can't let him retire or do the 25th Amendment, uh, because it would look bad.
And, of course, we know this isn't the real Biden.
There's so many people have talked about it.
So they're preparing for a theatrical, dramatic event.
And I could see Nikki Haley switching over.
I don't think Michelle Obama would survive because of all of the information that would come out like a swift boat ad against John Kerry.
Michelle Obama is really Michael LaVaughn Robinson.
It's a man.
It's homosexual.
It's a transvestite.
You could see that at every polling place in every county around the country.
This is not a real man.
This is a homosexual transvestite, and they've lied to you, and they lied to you when Obama came in.
He's a liar, too.
We know he was an American citizen, so every order he's ever done is null and void.
The real question is Trump, and I hope and pray Trump has the intelligence to be humble and to portray himself in a unifying sort of way, as he said the first time.
We all need to come together.
The hope is this, Jim, and I would win the million dollar lottery ticket if I had the number to put it in there, and this is the winning lottery ticket number.
Trump and Tucker Carlson.
I think I said it before.
Tucker Carlson represents the Huckleberry Finn nostalgic return to America of the 1980s and 90s, particularly the 80s, where everybody wants to go back to that.
People have a subconscious and conscious aversion to the modern deformities that have taken over in the world, and particularly America.
Over the last 20 years, from 9-11, to endless wars, to social media perversions, to the transvestite confusion, to the totally destroyed nuclear family, to the totally destroyed complementariness between men and women in marriage.
Every form of sickness, perversion, and deformity has sprung up since 1990 onward.
So, people want to go back, in a sense, before the 1990s.
I've had discussions about this with people.
And I think Tucker Carlson represents a symbolic bridge to that.
Plus he represents a buoyant optimism and laughter and intelligence that people would be attracted to.
And I think it would be politically accepted.
And I think, again, because we're in such a unique time.
Never before in the history of the United States have we existed in such dire straits.
And the only thing that can jerk us out of this is a radical, hard grabbing of the oar, the rudder, and violently pulling it back to turn us before we go off the edge of the waterfall.
And I think that's Trump and Tucker Carlson.
A Trump-Tucker ticket, I think, would defeat everything and it would win Two-thirds of the American public to vote because they would see Trump is educated and helped by Tucker's erudite experience, his journalistic understanding, he is a smart guy, he's very articulate, and Trump would be well balanced.
And then at the same time, Tucker would be like an American founding father that kind of steps in, that you don't have to be a lawyer, But as a founding father type, well acclimated in history and the Constitution and what America should be, and Tucker was married to one woman and has four daughters.
That's the last great American marriage we have, besides others like Brian and I'm sure.
But Tucker represents a very deep Nostalgic representation of America.
And I don't care what the sick, blue-haired, lesbian, transgender, faggot club think.
Or any Democrat, for that matter.
I care about what the majority of the American people would shift towards.
And there's nothing really you can say bad about Tucker.
So, if they did that, you'd have 12 years Of a conservative Republican cathartic healing experience for America.
And I think that would, if that would happen, if God wills it, we would have a return to the Ronald Reagan, George Washington America, where the federal government is slowly withered to one-third of its size.
And I think it would be the renaissance of America if it happened, Jim.
Well, I think you're going to get your ticket.
Brian.
Hard times make strong men. - Yeah.
And we don't have very many strong men left.
If we've learned anything from the previous 10 years of history, we've learned that these people are willing to rig our elections.
They're willing to censor our voice.
They're willing to persecute the patriots.
They're willing to commit all sorts of depravity against our children.
They're willing to corrupt our academic institutions, and if you think that they're not willing to burn it down prior to losing power, you're wrong.
They are psychopaths that are in control of our puppeteering politicians.
And until these people have a Carrie Lake-style event where they say, no, I'm an American first, and repent from being controlled by this machine, we have no hope.
We are headed into hard times.
That is what is coming.
The Great Depression was a tiny glitch in our history compared to what's coming because we've experienced such prosperity for so long, such hegemony for so long.
We've seen ourselves as so tall and righteous and good and yet we've abandoned all levels of morality.
Folks, there are punishments We've got coming because we've allowed this depravity to take place in our society.
I predict very hard times.
I predict another 2020 style rigged election.
I predict more corrupt judges.
I predict more corruption from the feds.
I predict a darker time in American history than we ever dreamed possible.
If that is if they don't just simply turn out the lights and shut it down.
Nice.
A couple more stories.
Obama's secret confession threatened to derail Biden's train.
A secret source close to Obama recently spilled the beans revealed he's actually worried Biden might lose the election.
Big news, folks.
If Obama is concerned, there must be a serious problem with Biden's campaign.
It gets worse.
David Axelrod, major strategist for Obama, straight up told Biden he should either step up his game or drop out of the race altogether.
But hold on to your hats.
There's more.
A Wall Street insider who frequents Mira Lago has predicted that Biden could be kicked out of the race as early as August 19th.
Can you believe it?
This insider, Les Navaliers, is known for being right about things like the 2008 financial crisis.
So we better pay attention to what he's saying.
According to him, a shadow candidate will come out of nowhere and push for all sorts of crazy liberal policy.
Brace yourself, folks.
It's about to get real.
Biden is going to be sliding, slidding out of the reasoning, running before the Dem Convention.
Mark my words, Obama's leaked convention could spell the end for Biden.
Meanwhile, The Navy is again lowering its requirements as it struggles to meet recruitment goals.
How bad is this?
The U.S.
Navy is starting to enlist individuals who didn't even graduate from high school or get a GED.
The second time in a year, the service has opened the door to lower-performing recruits struggling to meet enlistment goals.
The decision follows a move in December of 2022 To bring in a larger number who score very low on the Armed Services Qualification Test.
Both are fairly rare steps.
The other military services largely avoid or limit Even though they're all finding it increasingly difficult to attract the dwindling number of young people who can meet the military physical, mental, and moral standards under the new plan, Navy recruits with an education credential will be able to join as long as they score 50 or above on the qualification test out of 99.
The last time the servant took an individual without credentials was in 2000, in the wake of the pandemic.
The services have faced significant enlistment challenges, COVID, Forced the military to shut down recruiting stations.
They were closed out of high schools and public fair events, where they historically had found success reaching prospective candidates.
But even as things open up, the military has struggled to compete with the higher-paying businesses, particularly as companies have begun to offer types of benefits, like college funding, that had made the military a popular choice in the past.
Those economic problems were only exacerbated by the sharp political divide and young people's fears of being killed or injured going to war.
Last fiscal year, the Navy, Army, and Air Force all failed to meet their recruitment goals, while the Marine Corps and the Chinese Space Force met theirs.
Meanwhile, surprise, surprise, Average IQ score of college students has dropped 17 points since 1939.
It's commonly cited that undergrads are significantly smarter than the average, IQs ranging from 115 to 130.
But as a team of Canadian researchers have shown, that fact is woefully out of date.
Conducted by first author Bob Woody, a psychologist and faculty at Mount Royal University, and his co-authors, the meta-analysis aggregated numerous studies of college student IQs between 1939 and 2022.
The results show undergraduate IQs have steadily fallen from roughly 119 to a mean of 102 today, just slightly above the average of 100.
In short, undergrads are now no more intelligent on average than members of the general population.
This finding is interesting for several reasons.
First, The decrease in undergrad IQs sharply contrasts with the long-observed Flynn effect, which describes how IQ scores among the general public have been steadily rising over time.
In 1984, James Flynn published showing American IQs had risen by about three points per decade over the prior 46 years, an increase he found not attributable to recalibration of tests,
Which are performed roughly every 15 years, which has since been replicated by other researchers where the climate IQs appears to have mostly continued, though there are signs it may have reversed the first two decades of the 21st century.
What do we make of that?
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, the military has slowly been degraded.
You could say that easily for the last 30, 40, 50 years.
The military, and I know this from my father was a Marine Corps fighter pilot.
My uncles and great-uncles and grandfathers were all in the military, too.
The military has changed from being a very masculine, men-only fighting force that kills and, you know, is meant to defend the borders of the United States to something else, to this empire Mercenary, social climbing organization.
Now we see the absolute degradation of the military by pathetic, degraded, morally compromised officers that have been infecting the military with wokeism and homosexuality and transgenderism.
And you've got men dressing up in women's uniforms now and sodomy being acceptable and lesbianism being acceptable.
There is no more moral character in the military anymore.
And when you do that, you have completely degraded yourself.
And to think for one second that you are going to have that kind of a military go against Chinese or North Korea or Russian or Iranian military that represent a fighting force similar to what we had in the 50s and in the 60s, which we don't have anymore, would be a massacre.
The United States military would be massacred on a moral level and on a technological level, as McGregor and Ritter have said too.
Ritter or McGregor has said it very well.
The American military technology that we had in the 1990s has not changed.
It may have been given a paint job, it may have had new spark plugs put in, but the tanks and all the technology has remained fundamentally unchanged.
While Russia and other countries have developed hypersonic missiles, we have not.
Torpedoes that can sail around half the way around the world, we have not.
All sorts of other things.
We've focused on cloak, on stealth, Because we have been invading stealthily other countries and bombing them without their notice from Yugoslavia to Iraq.
But those are flip-flop, man-dressed countries, not the hardened countries of Russia, Iran, China, North Korea, and such.
And it is especially when all those countries are standing side by side, shoulder to shoulder, against The tyranny and the cannibalistic policy that the United States has been trying to force upon other countries, Africa and others.
So we are, I think we're witnessing the fall of Rome, where again, it would be a good thing if the United States was forced to retract and pull out all of its forces from all over the world, from every base around the world, back to the continental United States.
That's where we were when we were born in 1776.
That's what Washington said we should remain as, and that's, I think, where we need to go now if we're going to survive.
Otherwise, we're going to have every base and every soldier around the world begin to get picked off by snipers and rogue attacks.
Jim?
Right.
I think that the January 6th false flag was, in a sense, a prophecy of their greatest fears, the power structure's greatest fears, is that American men, American families, would rise against that level of corruption.
It's their greatest fear, which is why they played it to such a level.
Now, obviously they wanted to use the insurrection clause to try to keep our leadership down, but we have a problem here in America that is not being addressed by any faction or arm of the military that I see whatsoever.
I don't see any leadership anywhere.
I see corruption everywhere I look when it comes to society.
I have a lot of respect for my local sheriff.
I have a lot of respect for the local governments that are trying to operate.
But they all depend on this money.
I don't see anything changing as long as our politicians think that money is more important than our freedom.
And I'm deeply concerned that nothing will rise from a military that has become neutered and it's going to take nothing but men In America, to rise and I don't know if we've got the guts I see these convoys developing.
I see these farmers and other countries developing.
I see a lot developing but until I see a representation of a federal level politician being tarred and feathered in the center of one of our major cities.
Then I don't think, I think it's going to continue to be a downward spiral into a depth of darkness and pain that we've never dreamed of.
Well, our final story reinforces the corruption of our judicial system.
The verdict reached in the Jean Carroll defamation case, which Trump vows to appeal.
She initially only sought $10 million in damages and raised it to $24 million at the end of the trial.
And then was awarded $83 absolutely insane.
A Manhattan jury just ordered Donald Trump to pay writer E. Jean Carroll $83 million for defamation and sexual abuse.
Donald Trump, absolutely ridiculous.
I fully disagree with both verdicts and will be appealing this whole Biden directive, which focused on me and the Republican Party.
Our legal system is out of control and being used as a political weapon.
They have taken away all First Amendment rights.
This is not America.
Former President Trump must pay writer E.G.
Carroll over $83 million in damages for repeatedly defaming her, a jury found Friday.
The nine-person jury began deliberation in court at 1.40 p.m.
Eastern, reached a verdict in under three hours, $11 million for damages to her reputation, $7.3 for emotional harm, and $65 in punitive.
Well, get this.
Trump lawyers have now uncovered a conflict of interest.
Simply insane!
Trump lawyers have just revealed their plan to challenge a ridiculous verdict.
Trump and his legal team vowed to appeal.
Now they have a previously undeclosed detail.
It turns out it was a hidden link between E.G.
and Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, and the presiding judge, Louis Kaplan.
Despite their names being the same, they are not related familially.
However, They worked together in the early 1990s with Lewis Campbell and serving as Roberta's mentor.
Trump lawyer Alina Hama said this detail was overlooked during the case.
She only became aware after the end of the trial.
It was never disclosed.
It's insane and so incestuous.
Look at this!
It's hard to fight organized crime when they run the courts.
Do they think they could hide it forever in time?
The truth always comes out.
Trump lawyers use conflict of interest between judge, Carroll's attorney, and a bill of $83 million jury verdict.
Insane.
Crazy E. Jean Carroll accused several men of sexual abuse, including CBS CELS Moonvarez, who also emphatically denies her accusation.
Look at that cover of New York Magazine.
This is what I was wearing.
Twenty-three years ago, when Donald Trump attacked me in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room, she can't remember the year it happened.
She can't remember the month.
She can't remember the week, the day, or the minute, but she can remember what she was wearing?
For some strange reason.
This news didn't make headlines in the mainstream punk-hating media.
E. Jean Carroll has accused several men of sexual assault, including a babysitter's boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, a college boy, a boss, and Les Moon, who is from CBS, and of course, Donald Trump.
Forgiven, if you never heard this before.
The National Pulse reported, Carol's claimed to have been assaulted by numerous men other than Donald Trump, including a babysitter boyfriend at Dennis, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Moonbridge.
Her lawsuit against Trump was funded by Democrat billionaire Reed Hoffman.
Moonray emphatically denies Carroll's account.
Here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, previously imparted at The Gateway Pundit.
Most of this was deemed inadmissible by the judge.
She couldn't recall the date, the month, the season, or year the incident happened.
She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality.
The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time.
Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible.
Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein, pal-democrat, and Nikki Haley mega-donor Reid Hoffman.
Democrats created a law—the Adult Survivors Act in 2022—to enable her lawsuit to proceed.
Her lawsuit specifically.
Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode on Law & Order, one of her favorite shows.
Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorites.
She has a history of falsely accusing men of rape, including Les Moonbrake.
She told Anderson Cooper.
Most people think of rape as being sexy.
Think of the fantasies.
She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina.
Meanwhile, I've talked about a demolition of justice in the United States, of which this is a sterling instance on my blog.
Check it out.
You'll understand how bad the situation is, including of our own United States Supreme Court.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it's interesting.
Reid Hoffman, another Jew, Jewish Zionist, certainly seems that way, Ashkenazi.
Reid Hoffman, he's the one who should be tarred and feathered.
This crazy woman, you know, I don't know the details of the trial, but they can always impeach her character by bringing up these other allegations.
That she said all these other men approached her.
You know, it has to go through appeal.
It is the complete abuse and abuse of justice.
But Jim, it is the eclipse moment.
It's the tipping scale.
Because if they are allowed to, as Brian said, well, I think this is the symbolic tarring and feather of Donald Trump.
They are tarring and feathering Donald Trump with these fake lawsuits and prosecutions, the Carroll sexual event, the claims of Trump having classified documents in Mar-a-Lago, all the other ones that they're going to throw.
These are actions of tarring and feathering.
And the next thing I've said before, we have to be prepared for their assassination of Donald Trump.
We have to be prepared for one of these judges to say, you violated a gag order, I'm throwing you in jail.
And a judge can do that.
A judge can say, Deputy, take Mr. Trump and put him in jail.
And the attorneys can argue up to the appeal court to have him released.
But that judge can throw him in jail and then they could kill him.
So I'm prepared for that inevitability.
I'm prepared for them to try and kill Trump, because I know just how homicidal, suicidal, and psychotic these woke Democrat COVID-19 infected lunatic zombies are.
And if we don't rise up and in a sense defend, not because Donald Trump is anything special, but because he represents the speciality of the American people, he represents seemingly all of the virtues of the Republican form of government, limited government, fully defended rights, hopefully getting us out of all of these foreign entanglement wars,
Uh, this is what the American people want.
And if I could see them again pulling this assassination of Biden, blame it on a Trump supporter.
They've already laid the groundwork several months ago when they killed the guy claiming he was going to assassinate Biden.
I see them pulling Gavin Newsom in in the midnight hour.
Uh, and, and, uh, trying to shock and guilt trip people into, uh, you know, accepting this.
I, I think they're going to put Gavin Newsom in as the vice presidency before they kill Joe Biden, and then Gavin Newsom can automatically claim to be the president and suspend elections just like Zelensky did.
until he feels the time is right make no mistake the american republic is dead and we are entering dictatorship the question is are we going to rise up and overthrow this dictatorship as the declaration of independence demands jim brian there's an old latin phrase i believe it's attributed to cicero i It goes, sumum ius suma inuria.
And basically what it means is, and it was a phrase that was used by the Founding Fathers and Blackstone both, to help form how we do our justice.
And it basically means, supreme justice is supreme injustice.
Now, Let me see if I can bring this around for the crew here.
To the extent that we try to over-apply justice, we are exposing ourselves as being injust.
It was meant to keep the balance in the courts in terms of what is justice.
Now you take a look at the E. Gene Carroll verdict of $83 million.
Does that seem like an over supreme application of The rights of the law or the jury, of course, and what it does is it illustrates that this is indeed a kangaroo court that has gone off the rails.
It reminds me of the ridiculousness of the Alex Jones verdict, whatever the hell really happened there, where it's $1 billion for having covered the Sandy Hook issue.
I mean, something like that.
It happened to Dr. Fetzer when he experienced extreme injustice related to his book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, and Lenny Posner.
It's happening to all truthers.
And in a sense, I'm glad it's happening to people.
Although there are real consequences and real issues, what it's doing is it's highlighting or beginning to boil to the top the deep level of rot inside of our system.
And it's the responsibility of the Bar Association to regulate this.
Where is the Bar Association?
Is the American Bar Association so corrupt That it cannot regulate itself anymore?
Have they succumbed to the will of the International Bar Association on that level?
Where are our lawyers?
Where are our courts?
Where are our judges?
Where are the righteous men to stand up against this extreme level of injustice related to January 6th and the Patriots?
I don't care how you cut it, but Until people rise, until people see the extent of corruption and rise against it, we have no hope.
Gentlemen, thanks for just a wonderful discussion today, and we got intense about it because these issues are so serious.
I compliment you.
Don, take us out.
Holy smokes, what a way to end the show here.
This is really Getting rough here.
Looks like this is a crisis time here.
End of January 2024.
By golly, hopefully we can all come around by Valentine's Day or something and all get back together.
But right now it looks like we're going poles apart.
All kinds of things are happening that shouldn't be happening in America.
So thank you for watching here.
And remember, it's up to you.
And by the way, thank you very much for your compliments and your sharing of the show here.
It's up to you to spread this kind of word because nobody else is getting it.
And we love you and want you to do the best.
I hope to see you next week for hopefully a better, more peaceful show.
But right now, it looks like it's Really, you're getting rough out here.
So thank you so much.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection