All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 13, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:22:06
Need to Know News (12 January 2024) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Ervin, Mission Viejo, California.
Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news!
Today is Friday, the 12th of January, 2024.
We'll take a look at our topics and stories and then go to opening statements.
All right, so we got the contextual question for today is, who's in control?
And then go to the war, COVID, Epstein, Biden-Trump optics, then the German farmers.
And then finally, taking a look at some of the architecture that I hope that we've demonstrated before, but will again demonstrate impossible architecture at these ancient world's fairs.
Brian, opening statement, brother.
Opening statement.
I guess prior to stepping on the show here today, I've been thinking about a lot this week.
I've been going through a whole lot of content, and obviously the news lately is moving at lightning pace.
It's almost like there's a new set of five to seven stories every single day, and I'm seeing a lot of threads that indicate that there's a very powerful class of people that Are being threatened.
And so for the first time in my life that I remember, I'm really beginning to see these people responding in a more random manner than I've seen before.
It's almost like their PR people have taken the day off or the month off.
They're just not there to cover for this anymore and too much truth seems to be slipping out.
As for other issues, you know, it's funny that there was a comment that one of our commenters made that bothered me about, oh, I don't remember, but he said something like, hey, what does current events have to do with the Bible?
You know, and the story of a nation that's four and six thousand years old.
And that one really did keep me perplexed, and it kept my mind sort of focused on it for quite a while, and I've been working on that issue, like how does all this tie together if I'm a Christian?
How do I tie together Israel with current events?
And I've been developing quite a set of information on that, and it's been coming together for me pretty well.
I'm not exactly sure I'm ready to report my thoughts on all of it, but I can tell you that The big puzzle pieces are beginning to come together and I'm beginning to understand.
I still have a couple of pieces that I need to put together, but I think America is more important than I may have given us credit for in terms of the future of the world.
I think we're a very special nation that had a very special founding.
Granted, there was a lot of pieces of that that were corrupt, but there was also a lot of pieces of a lot of things that were corrupt, especially when you go back and start taking a look at the characters of the Bible.
I mean, David had serious problems.
You can go through Israel right from the very beginning.
Abraham lied about who was his wife.
They all had flaws, flaws, flaws.
People with flaws everywhere.
Prophets had flaws.
Noah got drunk.
Naked.
His daughters found him.
I mean, everybody's got flaws, flaws, flaws, but the bigger question is, what was God trying to do with that special relationship with Israel?
And I think that in time, I think I'll be able to reveal some of these mysteries, but it's a little bit early for me to be speaking about it, just because I think there's probably about 10 more books I have to read before I'm even close to having a firm understanding of what's really taking place.
That's my thing, but I tell you what, the more I look around, the more I have hope that something different is happening.
I don't, I'm not necessarily saying that there's going to be a revival or anything like that, but I'm saying I'm beginning to see the puzzle pieces and understand Israel a lot more and understand America and how we've gotten to where we're at a lot more by looking at how Israel was also in the same mess of, you know, a downward spiral from a strong beginning to a A quick downward spiral.
And what were the causes?
What was the nature of it?
How did history tell the story?
And what was the replacement theory in terms of since they failed to do what they had to do, how did the covenant change?
That's sort of what I'm exploring right now.
Let's go ahead and jump in and context is kind of in the selection of the stories that I choose for me.
Oh, by the way, pay attention to the whole show because I think the biggest piece of the puzzle is in one of the last stories that we're going to show today about Germany.
So let's watch and see how it all comes together.
Yeah, we will see.
And I like this as the context because it asks the question, Okay, so who's in control?
And then to the idea of whoever started this thing.
Let's go this and talk a little bit and kind of blend an opening statement into that.
Whoever created this thing, I see has a, you could call it an extra dimensional advantage.
You could call it a programming advantage.
And pretty much whatever exists in the realm that we exist within, the creator can manipulate anything.
So, when you ask who's in control, the smaller context is, are the bad guys still in control?
Are they playing with their food?
Are they going to crush us again?
Ah, it's one level.
Or is it the White Hats?
Is this the show?
So that's one level.
But at the other level, there's a surrender to the Creator.
From what I can tell, from what I can imagine, what I can determine, is that time is not a barrier to the creator, and that we have three dimensions of space.
I'm sure the creator has three dimensions of time, and you can like go back in a video game and tweak things if the creator wants to do that.
So, you know, we talk about enjoy the show from Q, and although I resonate with that voice that was always like, How can you enjoy this depravity?
But as I've evolved, this is the only show in town.
It's the creator's creation.
So you can choose not to enjoy it.
Individually, I've had so many, all I can call them is miracles, gifts tossed into my lap, synchronicities.
And so I think, and I feel, and I conclude that this gift of faith, and some people don't have it, But people who do, who have experienced a connection to everything, and a connection to the Creator, as I look out at the beautiful sunset over the mountains of our view, is that everything is under the Creator's hand.
Now, does the Creator play with evil?
Apparently!
Adrenochrome?
Petivores?
That.
Serious.
evil and paradoxically as i'm seeing it too brother um it is so bad here in southern california we have a i don't know if you're going to be familiar with this are you familiar with the saying jump the shark i'm familiar with it yeah Alright, so it comes from when a script becomes so old and the people can't write any new ideas, they get more and more outlandish, and it seems to be the condition of our opponents.
Everything that they do just gets worse and worse and worse.
Nothing is broken yet, but I am optimistic.
We shall see, as my father.
Would say about most everything's in that general category.
Alright, so let's go to the war.
I got five of those.
Yeah, so do you remember when the UK carpet bombed Northern Ireland to get rid of the IRA?
That's it.
I like that.
That is it's not a perfect analogy.
Analogies are never going to be perfect, but it gives the flavor of it.
Unimaginable situation in Gaza has 600 patients and staff expelled from Al-Aqsa Hospital.
That was their last one.
This is the closing statement of the case of genocide in South Africa against Israel, and I'll play about a minute of it.
...delivered from a church in Bethlehem on Christmas Day, the same day Israel had killed 250 Palestinians, including at least 86 people, many from the same family, massacred in a single strike on Megazi refugee camp.
Palestinian pastor Munther Isak addressed his congregation and the world, and he said, and I quote, Gaza, as we know it, no longer exists.
This is an annihilation.
This is a genocide.
We will rise.
We will stand up again from the midst of destruction, as we have always done as Palestinians, though this is by far maybe the biggest blow we have received.
But he said, no apologies will be accepted after the genocide.
What has been done has been done.
I want you to look in the mirror and ask, where was I when Gaza was going through the genocide?
South Africa is here before this court.
Yeah, that was the main thing that I wanted to communicate from that message.
Going to the UK, David Cameron, former Prime Minister, and he's now the Foreign Secretary, which is similar to the US of the Secretary of State.
So this is the person who is in charge of Foreign Relations and War Law should be central to his understanding.
And he had to give a talk in front of Parliament that these guys do.
And this British writer is so Laura Kay.
This is so quintessentially British.
I just want to read it because it's so... just read it and you can appreciate the art.
Among many highlights, Lord Cameron accidentally admitted Israel committed a war crime after refusing to say if they are breaching international humanitarian law, said it's not his job to make a judgment on whether a genocide is taking place, even though it is his job to make that call.
Explain he is unable to say if it's Israeli policy to demolish Gaza, but he's supplying the weapons regardless.
Admitted he's concerned Israel may have broken international humanitarian law, but it's totally wrong for South Africa to take action at the International Court of Justice.
I don't know about you, but I think these are perfectly coherent positions that show the kind of leadership we need during an international crisis.
Now, this was part of the give and take of the question and answer, and I'm going to read three of them because they're just these are among the best examples of bullshit from leadership I have ever read.
All right.
So.
So this one MP, Member of Parliament, asks, hey, so has anybody given you, any of the attorneys, the barristers in the Foreign Office, given you an argument that this is a genocide?
And Cameron's answer, well, I'm going to give the exact same answer all over again, which is what my role is.
And it's a little back and forth, and the MP was insisting on an answer, rightly so.
So you've never had a piece of paper put in front of you from a foreign office lawyer that said that Israel in breach of international humanitarian law?
Um, look, I...
The reason I don't want to answer this question is I can't recall every single piece of paper that's been put in front of me.
And man, it's just so beautiful.
I want to give you one more.
Lord Cameron was asked what the UK's current legal position is on whether Gaza is occupied.
Our position is that Israel is fighting a campaign against Hamas.
We have to check regularly whether that is in compliance with international humanitarian law and assess that.
I don't think Israel regards itself as an occupying force, but whether that is correct, I would want to take legal advice because I think this comes to the issue of aid, where I think Israel needs to do more, a lot more to get aid to Gaza, which perhaps we can come on to.
And then she pierces through this bullshit and says, OK, so Lord Cameron just admitted he has a legal obligation to take advice, but he hasn't bothered to ask and take that.
Vice and he's going to supply weapons regardless when it goes on.
I recommend taking a look if you want more of that.
And here in the US, Lloyd Austin, the Secretary of Defense was gone for a week.
Let's go back.
Let's go back and cover those before we get into Lloyd Austin case.
Okay, because I think that's a good place.
All right, so the contents of the discussion are going to, okay, is Israel committing a war crime in Gaza?
South Africa says they are.
Now another country has come out and joined them.
I can't, off the top of my head, I can't remember which other one that is.
From all reporting that seems to be emanating, that is natural reporting from natural reporters and not just controlled propaganda, it appears very much so that South Africa or that Israel is committing war crimes in Gaza, it becomes obvious, and South Africa is pointing it out.
But what South Africa is doing is something that's never been done before in the sense of this, okay?
The International Criminal Court, which is also known as the Hague, was established in 2002.
And its purpose was, let me go ahead and read what types of cases would be referrals to the International Criminal Court And they would take a look at it.
Now, what's very interesting about these guys is that ever since they've been established, they've only done 51 trials.
And the trials are very similar to the British-style court.
But let's just take... I mean, they can... And the second thing is, the International Criminal Court is just about prosecuting individuals.
Who have done something.
So, the International Criminal Court of the 51 prosecutions that they've done, it appears to me that it's almost all African clan leaders, gang leaders, warlords, people that have become more powerful than they probably ought to have and engaged in all sorts of activities that would be considered a crime by the international courts.
So if you take a look at what they've done, I don't see a single Israeli on the list.
They can't go after a nation as a whole.
They don't have that in their purview, as we'll say.
And what they're basically doing is prosecuting crimes against humanity, of which there's only been 51, of which it's easy to pick on these African warlords.
They're after Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or forcible transfer of population, imprisonment, torture, rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, persecution against an identifiable group, racial, national, ethnic culture, enforced disappearance of persons, the crimes of apartheid, And other inhumane acts of similar character.
And the biggest sentence that they can issue in the International Criminal Court is 30 years plus financial sanctions.
So here's the problem.
South Africa is saying the International Criminal Court ought to take on what's happening in Gaza.
But the problem is you've got to be able to put your finger.
And by the way, I've looked at every document that they've published.
Ever since October 7th and beyond, there's not a single document, not a single news story, not a single anything that has to do with Palestinians and Gaza.
In other words, they're absolutely silent on the issue.
And of all the 51 people that they've gone off of, the only name that you would recognize in all the groups would be Muammar Gaddafi.
And they didn't really have much on him either.
So for those of you that think that South Africa's cries against genocide in Israel, here's the problem.
The International Criminal Court needs to be able to hold an actual person accountable.
Then they need to issue the warrant to the police agency that oversees that given person.
Then that person needs to be Extradited to the Hague, then they need to go on this big expensive huge trial that all these nations are paying for inside the Hague, and all they've been able to prosecute so far are a bunch of nickel and dime warlords by American standards.
So don't put your hopes in the International Criminal Court to take this.
If Israel goes down over what's happening in Gaza, it's gonna have to be The people of the world that call a spade a spade and go after these people as a group, and they're going to have to be exiled.
They're going to have to be persecuted from a population because there's no court in the world that's going to actually be able to drop something on Israel as a nation for what they've done in Gaza.
I just don't see it.
The legal question.
Oh, good.
The legal question is super clear.
And it's actually it's war crimes within an illegal war of aggression.
So we've had two world wars and treaties after both of those wars.
The first one was the Treaty of the Renunciation Against War.
And I encourage anybody who's interested to look it up.
Or actually, I'll go ahead and put into the show notes here at BitChute.
The one article that I have that goes through all of this and the renunciation against war.
It's a treaty after World War One is about a page long and it says that we renounce war.
It's not an option.
You can't do it.
That's not anybody's legal foreign policy.
Within World War Two, we had the UN Charter.
It's a charter because, instead of a treaty, but it's in the annual publication of the Secretary that the State Department publishes of treaties in force, and it's similar to Major League Baseball, where you have all of the members They elect their own government, so it's a charter and the UN Charter is the same way.
And the UN Charter says, OK, self-defense is OK.
If another nation's government is attacking you, you can respond and you can defend yourself up to and including lethal force.
It's very similar to if you or I were walking down the street.
Of course, you can apply self-defense even upon imminent threat of attack, but It is very clear you cannot cross your borders and attack another nation if you think that there is a security concern that dire.
I'll let my dog out here.
You want to go out?
There you go.
Then you take it to the Security Council of the UN.
So the UN has been Orwellian
to facilitate wars of aggression because that's all these wars are led by the US and the ICJ may again and now it has an opportunity to make a statement or it may just be setting itself up to for everyone to see ah so they're just like everyone else we shall see now my dog wants back in i'm gonna have to leave the door open a little bit anything else on that brother no that that dog has always got his mind someplace else doesn't he
I guess all I was saying is that I don't see how we're going to be able to select a particular Israeli leader and have them tried in the egg for war crimes.
South Africa might be putting up quite a bluster and making a lot of noise over there, but where, when, why, and how, and who exactly is going to be prosecuted, I don't see it, based on the little bit of research that I do.
I don't, you know, I don't understand international criminal courts as much as anybody, but I just looked at their history.
No way.
If you're an African warlord, they can come after you, but that's about it.
Yeah, we still need a breakthrough because it's just going to be talk and outrage as we've always had.
And I did write an article, I'll put it in the bitude notes as well, of a fictional conversation a hundred years ago, and people who were looking at the events then might have come to the same conclusions we are now.
It's like, how much lower can it get?
So we shall see.
Oh, there's one other thing, too.
The prosecutor's got to accept the referral.
In other words, he gets to decide whether or not the elements of the charges are there, and the prosecutor has to accept the case.
So, can you imagine how many documents have been turned in to the International Criminal Court saying that so-and-so committed one of these things, they can't get justice anywhere else, and then the prosecutor just simply says, I'm not going to accept the referral?
I think that's what the Lord Cameron article was about, which is These people don't care.
These people at the top, they're all part of the problem.
They're not a part of the solution.
They are.
The people who get elected and rise to the top, these are the best liars.
But I like that so strongly that Cameron couldn't talk his way out of it.
He just looked so foolish.
But the war does go on.
All right, so we got Lloyd Austin disappearing for a week, and I like the frame of this title, and it reveals that national security is a joke.
The Defense Department's Secretary of Defense is AWOL, and nobody knows, nobody checks in, and this is right at the height of World War III breaking.
So, wow, that is crazy.
Anything else that you want to say on the topic of the war?
Yeah, well, I'm Lloyd Austin.
I mean, I have a hard time getting all worked up about Lloyd Austin because they're all puppets anyway.
I mean, it's clear.
Why do we even need the puppets anymore?
Why don't the puppeteers just stand up and show themselves?
Oh, your dog's out of control, man.
A lot of energy.
Creative energy in the show.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Look, I'm tired of the puppets.
Why do we even...
Let's cut the shit.
I want to know who the puppeteers are.
I don't want to get under the hood.
I want to look behind the curtain and I'm getting tired of listening to puppets spin.
Look at Raggedy Ann sitting at the White House.
Look at Joe Biden, whichever version we're on, like 6.0 or whatever.
Look at Kamala Harris.
Could you think, I mean, she's got an IQ of like 90.
She can't even, I mean, she talks like you're in third grade.
Will the puppets please go away?
Or even better, will the Democrats please wake up and see that they're just being controlled by a bunch of puppeteers?
That these are all puppets and puppeteers?
I'm just a little bit frustrated with it, but I do think there is a lesson that's going to emerge from all of this in terms of these people are just a bunch of puppets because they keep replacing them.
Fetterman.
Now it's Oprah.
Oprah's got a new stand-in.
Hey, what's going on?
What's up?
Why are all these people getting replacements with masks?
And remember how everybody was running around with GPSs on their ankles?
You had Hillary Clinton.
When did Hillary Clinton die?
I mean, all these people running around with GPSs on their ankles.
And now it's just, oh, it's cool.
Don't worry about it.
And then we had Anne Heche.
Replaced.
We had Kobe Bryant, for some reason, replaced.
All these people, or I'm sorry, killed, quote unquote.
Something is seeming strange.
And I think, I think Carl, you might be onto it in terms of there's a much larger operation taking place here.
Lloyd Austin, though, being missing.
Who cares?
Just another puppet being controlled by the puppeteers.
I'm sure the puppeteers are still in charge because the U.S.
military sure isn't as strong as we had hoped it would be.
If a guy can, if the top guy can be missing for days on end.
Yeah, the optics, the optics are damning.
All righty, so let's go to COVID.
We got five of those.
The Reese Report, I want to play the first couple of minutes of this, but I do recommend the whole thing for more bombshells.
Dennis Rancourt has a PhD in physics.
He is a former tenured full professor and has published over 100 articles in leading science journals.
Rancourt and his team have used all-cause mortality data to prove there have been about 17 million deaths as a result of official COVID-19 measures, but not from COVID, which was a lie.
As far as I can tell from all-cause mortality data that we've been studying extensively for a long time, there's no such thing as a viral respiratory pandemic.
He explains all this in his essay entitled, There Was No Pandemic, which you can find on his sub stack.
There was no pandemic, in the sense that there was not a particularly virulent new pathogen that was spreading and causing death.
That is not what happened.
What happened was huge assaults against vulnerable people by many different methods.
And every time you did that, you caused excess mortality.
And all the countries where they were not doing that, there was absolutely no excess mortality, even if it was a jurisdiction that was right beside the one that was doing this.
Rancourt explains a science of psychological murder that has been officially studied and documented for well over a century.
It wasn't just the spike protein that killed us, it was the whole damn thing.
Psychological stress and social isolation are dominant determinants of an individual's health.
That causes a suppression of your immune system, And you're going to get some kind of infection, cancer, heart disease, and very often the lungs are very exposed to the environments and they're subjected to all the bacteria that you live with all the time, you get bacterial pneumonia.
And it's a huge killer when a society is stressed, meaning all of its individuals are stressed.
The kind of psychological stress that kills you Is when your entire world is turned upside down.
Your whole life you thought you had a place in the world and it's gone.
That will kill you within a very short time.
We always occupy a dominance hierarchy, a social dominance hierarchy.
That is how we organize our societies because we are social animals.
It is a fundamental truth of how we organize societies.
The stress That is intended to keep you in your place within that dominance hierarchy is an everyday chronic stress and the stressors have to keep changing how they're going to stress you because you get habituated to the stress.
So they have to randomly hit you with hard things every once in a while to really make sure you understand what your place is that stress.
is one of the biggest determinants of health.
But we have to admit that medicine itself is a massive killer.
It's a massive cause of premature death of individuals. - Modern Western medicine is officially recognized as the third highest cause of death.
It was designed to be a way of controlling the population.
The role of medicine as an... Right, and he goes on from there, and I'm just going to chat with you.
I'll put into the show notes as well the article that I wrote, and that he's absolutely right.
What we had was the number of people who died was from that overcycled PCR test, and then you had the hospital protocol that included Chris Weinart says killed his mom with the remdesivir and the ventilator treatment 88% mortality rate.
And then from the COVID, it was just 6% of the alleged deaths that died from COVID.
And the other ones died with COVID, with an average of 2.6 comorbidities.
And then they say that all these people they counted as COVID, 99% of the flu disappeared for only that year?
So it is just transparently bullshit, and what this PhD person is pointing to is the Emperor's New Clothes truth.
Alright, anything that you want to say at this point, brother?
No, I've said it before on the show and I'm just going to put the quote out there again because I think you ought to memorize it.
Doctors are people who prescribe medicines of which they know little, for diseases of which they know even less, to people of which they know nothing.
Okay, I've always believed that the health insurance game, that medical finance was a grift.
And I was in it for 11 years of my life.
I was trained by one of the top ERISA guys ever.
I mean, a guy that worked with Lloyd Benson at MassMutual way back in the day, back in the 60s.
One of the original architects of ERISA trained me.
And we all knew, and we would sit around and almost laugh at what a grift the entire industry was.
Now, it needs to be done.
But it's an absolute grift.
And the more I studied the big institutions, the big medical hospital institutions, the more I realized that they were nothing more than very expensive houses for doctors.
Doctors were the only ones authorized to practice the art or the science of medicine.
And the hospitals, massive, you know, eight staff members per bed and 650 beds, They had to manage to finance that house.
It's just a house for a doctor.
It's a massive rift, the entire thing.
The pharmaceutical industry is exactly the same way.
These days, the deeper I get into understanding it, the more I see it as nothing more than pharmakia.
It's old school black magic issuing a fog of effects.
That don't do anything to solve the underlying problem.
Now.
There's lots of things that have been figured out this way in that way and don't get me wrong.
I'd be dead without modern medicine.
I had a heart attack left anterior.
It was a little maker and had they not stuck me on that slab and put a catheter up there and opened it up and kicked a stent in there.
I'd be dead too.
So I understand that there are some things that they can do and emergency medicine is a little bit different.
But the more I No, about the big hospital systems, the more I see them as systems designed to evacuate your your estate prior to death.
And that's I mean, good people work there, just like the FBI.
Good people are doing their jobs all around.
But I mean, give me a break.
These costs today.
I mean, this trend has been on track for 15 to 17 years that it's been running between 7 and 12% of annual inflation.
And here we're at a place where just premium, this premium for like a $10,000 high deductible health plan on average is over $14,000 a year.
That's over $1,000 a month for premium for a federal employee.
That's employee only coverage.
Now, the government pays that premium.
So all you see is what comes out of your check.
Plus, whatever, you pay a deductible, co-pay, and coinsurance, but it's a grift.
It's a grift.
And even us that were part of the game, third-party administrator, processing and adjudicating claims and accumulating information towards giving individuals a deductible and cutting checks, even we recognized it as a grift from the inside.
We were always, this is a joke.
Well said, brother.
It is.
Every agency has been captured.
And we need help from friends in high places.
Breakthrough.
Alright, so I like this one.
Who are the real spreaders of deadly disinformation in relation to all things COVID?
And Fauci was number one, but I just want to play this little part here about Rochelle Walensky, the CDC director, to demonstrate.
When the head of the CDC, Ms.
Walensky, said that the vaccinated can't get the virus, did that undermine trust in government?
Data from the CDC today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick.
Importantly, no safety concerns were observed for people vaccinated in the third trimester or safety concerns for their babies.
We now have data that demonstrates that vaccines, in whatever time in pregnancy or lactating that they're given, are actually safe and effective and have no adverse events to mom or to baby.
So we absolutely have the data that demonstrates the overwhelming... She said no adverse events.
No.
Now, we can quantify that statement.
She's saying zero.
Wow.
And then you see the list played by it.
And then it goes on for the top 12.
And anytime you want to jump in, go ahead.
Otherwise, I'll just go through the story.
And then we got Rand Paul.
And it found a 1,200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities.
Really very little safety concerns at all.
And a 57-fold increase in miscarriages.
All right, and then it goes on for the top 12.
And anytime you want to jump in, go ahead.
Otherwise, I'll just go through the story.
And then we got Rand Paul.
And he's saying that Fauci is just trying to cover your ass by changing the definition of gain of function.
And he's absolutely right.
It looks like the double down is going to be, which is what our opponents always do, is that they're going to release Disease X if they have the power to do so.
So there's one article with one take on it, and here's another one.
Disease X, the World Economic Forum annual meeting to release follow-up PSYOP-19 pandemic.
And they will try.
And those are the COVID reports.
Your comments, brother.
I'm not worried about disease X.
There's nothing new under the sun.
I don't care what they've come up with.
It's fear porn.
Again, we need the government to keep us safe.
It's always the same thing.
Let me tell you something.
Humanity's been walking this earth for a long, long time, and we've fought off whatever has come out of whatever cave and whatever jungle, wherever, whenever, and we're still here, aren't we?
The skin is an amazing organ.
It does a great job keeping everything out.
The way we breathe, everything that happens with humanity is designed in such well and meticulous balance that I don't believe that they're going to be able, I don't believe they've been able to come up with disease X. Now, do they have some toxin that they can put out there that's going to be poisonous or effective?
Within a certain amount, yeah, but I think as soon as the wind blows, it's no good.
What I'm more concerned about is their Tesla-style death ray that they use to burn this burn stuff down.
You know, if they've really got this thing up there in the sky fastened to the firmament or whatever that can zoom in on whoever and kick down some 5G radiation to kill us all then, you know, then that's something I'm concerned about.
But I think what they did was they had to push the VAX to get the graphene oxide into people's veins so that they could turn on the 5G system and shut it shut it all down.
And I think the graphene oxide had its had its effects but sooner or later.
I think they're going to be able to turn on the machine and we're going to separate those who had a brain from separate from those who didn't and who took the VAX.
So, I like my odds as a normal, healthy, faith-based type guy.
Even at 50 years old, I'm not worried about whatever they're going to roll on out, because I keep my family well informed, and I know they don't have this toxic crap pumping through their veins.
Yeah, and it goes back to me for the main question of who's in charge.
And if the bad guys are in charge, then again, they're just playing with their food, and it'll be relentless.
That if they don't have the power and they've been undercut and the reports of Q are true that the enemy has already been decapitated.
And then they went immediately to the bottom and took out the assassins, and they're working from the top down and from the bottom up.
Then you would see, predictably for me, the type of squirming and, Brian, what you talked about is kind of the irrational actions, the sloppy scriptwriting, the exposure, the damning, course of events that just has these people look more and more criminal, psychopathic, and foolish.
So we shall see.
If they attempt to roll it out, then that would be a type of a breakthrough where somebody is going to make a move on the board.
And if they make the move on the board of, all right, mask up, you people are non-essentials, then it'll be a different contest and we shall see.
Well, let me address what I think I know about Q.
First of all, Q asked a lot of really good questions.
It was designed to get you to think and ask questions for yourself.
Second of all, Q's been off the grid for quite a while.
Now, I thought the questions that Q asked were very serious questions, and he seemed to be leading you down a path toward an idea, but the very fact that most of it was designed as question-based Intelligence indicated to me that they wanted those who were studying the phenomenon to use their brains and think critically.
And I think one particular post got out of hand, and that was the one that came along and said, trust the plan.
Trust the plan.
Like, oh, we're just supposed to sit back and trust the plan and let it all happen.
Well, I think that was a bit magnified and taken out of context.
I get the where we go one, where we go all.
That one seemed to make sense.
But I think what happened was that too many people trusted the plan and thought that the plan was somehow dedicated into Donald Trump.
Now, I don't know what role Trump is or is not playing.
I've seen lots of indications that he is indeed a part of the resistance.
But I've seen lots of indications that he's not.
I mean, he gets a lot of money from the Jews.
I mean, almost every single aspect of his campaign funding is Jewish.
You've got Adelson, Eiger, Roth, Kushner, Warsh, Cohen, Wynn, Schiller, Adelson, different Adelson.
They're all Jews.
Larry Fink, Daniel Yergin, they're all Jews.
I mean, he gets a ton of money from the Jews.
So, is he playing a divide and conquer strategy?
Is he playing along with the team?
Does he know about the resistance?
I think he does.
And I think he's playing a role in this.
I don't know what exactly that is, but I can tell you what.
The one thing about the plan that has worked very, very well is that millions of Americans have woken from a slumber and turned off their televisions and started doing some research on their own.
And that's a heck of a start.
Yeah.
And again, as I have tried to emphasize for the three plus years I've been on Need to Know News, is that in the fog of war, don't rely very much on what you think that you know.
We're being lied to by everybody, including Trump, as you say.
And the post for Q, yeah, there was a lot of questions.
And there was posting of among those of us who look for the most damning information to be able to explain, document, and prove the lies and crimes of our opponents.
Q provided just bombshells I did not find anywhere else, including some of our government's most authoritative data.
And then when I was serious, I'm now mostly retired from doing this type of research.
But when I was looking like to prove that the wars were started with lies known to be false, as they were told, the own government's most authoritative documents.
That those are those are authoritative.
That'll do it.
Yeah.
Oh, no, there's no doubt that whatever whatever Q was or whoever Q was or whatever group Q was.
Clearly, the questions came from some were fabricated out of some very serious, deep governmental file.
Clearly, they were and it had shown because of the way the questions were configured.
It had shown that somebody or some agency or some entity had put a tremendous amount of thought into grouping these questions up in their posts like they did.
It may have been the world's most sophisticated PSYOP.
I don't think it was quite an operation trust.
I mean, it wasn't a clunky Bolshevik revolution.
It was more of a cerebral awakening that was designed for a resistance.
Good people that cared about good things, that wanted to see their country return to power to the people.
That's really what was more designed to attract.
Now, maybe they were attracting the resistance so they could create a list.
Find people like us that are talking about it and then, you know, put their cosmic death ray on us, maybe, but I just, I'm just not, I'm not quite ready to jump off that suicide bench.
It's just not there for me.
The last Q post was concluded with, protect your DNA.
Ascension.
So the idea of the context of who's in control, then that points to the broadest context is that there is some sort of ascending event, some sort of a sorting of the wheat from the chaff event going on.
And we shall see.
We shall see.
We shall see.
It's funny that you say you use that.
You could also say separating the sheep from the goats, wheat from the chaff.
Yes.
Very interesting imagery.
Yep.
All right, so for Epstein, I got just two of these.
An ex-Mossad agent exposes who Epstein worked for and he said, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, we were both in Mossad together.
Now that's testimony.
Weakest form of evidence.
But no, it's not the weakest.
It's good.
It's it's evidence.
I mean, he's given eyewitness evidence.
It's not nothing.
Oh, no, it's not nothing it would it would demand follow up.
Okay.
So what you have is a guy who was a Mossad agent saying Epstein.
was a Mossad agent.
Maxwell, Robert, Ghislaine's father, was a Mossad agent.
And all the other parts of the explanation make sense is that you would have a taped session of underage sex with political and or financial business leaders and then leverage that blackmail to create puppets.
Makes sense to me.
Seems to follow what we're looking at.
Well, it's just because your traditional prostitution-based blackmail isn't going to be very effective.
So what?
So what?
But if they're underage, now you're stepping into a very serious game.
And I think there is a very large protection racket.
I think this operation still works out there.
Today, but I think these people have slunk under a stone so deep that most of the research that you could find even today that indicates that it's still running around would be a. A honey trap type scenario operated by some sort of agency because there's just too much heat on the issue.
Right now, but I can tell you that there are a lot of kids that go missing globally.
Year-round, all the time.
And it's, you know, it might not be your typical suburban kid, but look at all the kids crossing the borders that are getting separated.
I mean, what, oh, we just have this, this long list of 700 pages of names of people that are willing to take on these Hispanic children that are getting separated from their parents while the coyotes bring them across.
Where are they going?
What are they doing?
Nobody's read.
I mean, a few people have had some spotty reporting on what's taking place.
A few Congress people have had questions about it.
But the simple fact of the matter is these people are not being tracked properly.
And there's some something happening with oversight related to these kids.
I don't know where they're at.
I my fears are that they're in some sort of bunker.
But what do I know?
Yeah, yeah.
What do we know?
It doesn't look good.
And me with a mind for numbers, I can't even keep in mind very much.
I think it's something crazy like 800,000 children go missing a year.
I think it's 80,000 in the U.S.
or something like that.
I remember that number, working that number.
It was a shocking number.
I mean, I would have thought 8,000.
Would have been shocking.
I mean, we're a nation of 3.2 million people.
So, but whatever the number is, I think it's, it's probably even much higher than we even give it credit for right now.
And just think, anybody over the age 18 isn't nearly as valuable in an operation like this as people under the age of 18.
Of course, there's more expense into bringing them up, but you know, it is what it is.
Yeah.
Yeah, it is.
Crazy, and we can definitely conclude that the government agency is saying, oh yeah, we're trying to help the people.
No, now I want to go over this just to clarify kind of the brilliance of this position and what Aaron Rodgers actually did.
So quarterback.
And he had said that he had mocked.
So Kimmel had mocked Rodgers Initially for being skeptical of the COVID-19 vaccines and the dominant government narratives and it turns out that Kimmel was wrong about that and including Kimmel saying that medical care should be withheld from those who don't take it.
We thought that was funny to put it into a comedy routine and then Kimmel ...said that Rogers is an overly confused wacko for believing that an Epstein client list exists.
So Kimmel says it's crazy to believe that a list exists.
All right.
So now we have Rogers saying that Kimmel are really hoping that list doesn't come out because he would be proved wrong.
Now, what the bad guys did is they took it and said, oh, look, Rogers is is saying that Kimmel's a pedophile.
And Rogers said, no, that isn't what I said.
Look at what I said.
And I'm not stupid.
That's ridiculous.
And yet, Rogers got kicked off of his football show, and Rogers then went ahead and pointed out that that is the cancel culture that we're in.
They just come up with some bullshit, and if you step out of line and question the narrative, they're going to find a way to remove your voice.
And I thought, Rogers nailed it.
And that is pretty much what our opponents do.
If there is a threat, then they'll piece together the best bullshit that they have.
And, you know, as you were talking about earlier, they do have marketing groups and they will come up with things to say, and then they'll go ahead and put that out and protect their message through censorship.
Your thoughts, brother.
Well, if I'm conducting an investigation and I come upon a witness to some horrendous crime, I'm usually pretty disappointed that they didn't I'm usually pretty disappointed that they didn't tell anybody about it.
Now, maybe their life was in danger.
You know, maybe there were mitigating factors that prevented them from talking about it.
But to me, all these pedophiles, I mean, they say it's the It's the unspoken thing that they all know about is what's going on over there in Hollywood.
All these Hollywood actors and all these people that are aware of it that don't say anything.
Do you think your punishment's going to be any lesser than those who did something and didn't say something?
Those who are there?
You know, the Isaac Caffey thing is something I've been watching pretty carefully lately.
Lots of other guys.
These are guys that saw something and said something about a horrendous They weren't ratting out their brothers in the game.
Oh, yeah, Ashton Kutcher and all these other guys.
Oh, they're the cool guys.
We better protect them.
You know what?
I don't care how rich you are.
If somebody's a witness to something like this, they ought to be coming out and talking.
And I can tell you something.
Jimmy Kimmel's not.
And neither is anybody else.
So whether we have the evidence or not, I'm going to put you in the same group when it's time for judgment to get passed.
I'm going to put you in the same group because you were a witness who kept your mouth shut.
Yeah, and if we do get the truth, and if it is true that NSA has it all, And that makes logical sense to me, then these people are going to be toast.
And several years ago, one of the pieces of evidence, I think it was against Kimmel or one of those late night talk show hosts, is that in a skit, Kimmel walks up to a door to deliver pizza.
And on this front door, on a wall on the set, behind Kimmel, is that little swirly design, which is one of the FBI... The pedo symbol, yeah.
Yeah, pedo symbol.
I've seen it all over.
I saw Sheila Jackson Lee wearing a pedo necklace.
I mean, this is a black rights activist from Houston that works down in the wards.
She's got the pedo symbol on her necklace on her neck.
It's just like weird.
I see it all over the place.
True Detective season one covered it.
It looks like with the new trailer it's coming out with season four.
They're going to cover it a little bit more.
It's a slow awakening for a lot of people but that symbol is everywhere.
It's been around for a long time and a lot of people have known exactly what it meant.
Of course Pizzagate Look, you're not guilty of being a pedophile because you serve pizza at a function.
And I don't think anybody's saying it, but the preponderant.
Take a look at Ellen DeGeneres.
OK, yeah, she served pizza to her audience or whatever.
I don't.
That's nothing.
That's that's nothing.
Bill Clinton, hot dogs and pizza or sorry, Barack Obama, hot dogs and pizza.
OK.
Fifty six thousand dollars worth for a White House event.
Yeah, it smells funny.
It looks funny to fly in the hot dogs from Chicago.
Yeah, yeah.
But that's not where the evidence is at.
I believe that we've got the evidence, and I believe that we had plenty.
If you start pulling on the string, you'll unwind the sweater, you know?
And we had plenty with Anthony Weiner's laptop.
We had plenty with Julian Assange's WikiLeaks drop of the DNC emails.
We had plenty.
And it seems like these strings just don't, we just all of a sudden, every time they come out, somebody's just coming along, some magical force is just cutting the strings.
Stop pulling, stop pulling.
Now, there's too many journalists out there.
I think they've got a hold of this thing.
We'll see, I hope so.
But until that breakthrough, we're still gonna be chatting about it.
Alright, so now Biden-Trump optics.
I got six of those.
I like this.
Very artistic representation.
Puppets everywhere!
Puppets, puppets, puppets everywhere!
Yep, yep.
Biden's 2023.
And then this is good.
Caitlin Johnstone, who has a knack for being able to tell the truth and and to flip the script, actually.
And this is the projection of what our opponents do is that they accuse their the good people of what they themselves actually do.
We got mass reversal in the Trump case.
Fannie Willis gave Trump everything.
I'll just chat with you about this for a moment.
What we found out is that Fannie Willis, her lead prosecutor she hired and has paid about a million dollars to, is unqualified.
He is a private attorney, and I believe he was working on accidents, and now he is given, he's being paid double all of the other attorneys, and Fannie Willis had a choice of people who had more expertise to prosecute this case, although the cases were welly and To take that statute and twist it like that.
So basically.
She and her lover, Fannie Willis and her lover, are going to be disbarred over this.
And what I really like about it is everybody in the law profession sees this.
It's like, whoa.
So you hired your unqualified lover, and then on the tax, the money that you paid your lover, your lover sprung for vacations for the two.
Two cruises.
Two cruises and a bunch of hotel rooms and like $3,000 dinners and.
Yeah, I mean just ridiculous, just ridiculous expenses.
Yeah, it's it and it's like you said at the beginning, it's.
Their spin masters seem to be on our side.
It would be like my JV basketball coach Buzz Berner saying Herman, what team are you playing for?
You may as well put on the opponents jersey.
Thought you were that bad?
No, he just liked to come up with things to say about that.
You're playing for the other team, Herman.
All right, and then more optics.
The federal government program allows more than 200,000 illegal aliens to fly right over the border.
So there is more and more aspects to this.
Oops, going backwards here.
Oh, it just flipped me over.
First of all, that reminds me of something.
Look, I don't have a whole lot of confidence in the American Bar Association because I believe the American Bar Association is controlled by the same groups that control the International Bar Association and all the other bar associations.
And those are a bunch of liberals in that case.
So they're going to find a way to bury the Fannie Willis story.
And they don't care if they piss off every other lawyer out there that's been playing it straight.
They're going to bury it.
They're not going to disbar them.
They're not going to sanction them.
Fannie Willis and her friend, when this is all said and done, are just going to go away quietly.
But there's not going to be a big hubbub about this because the American Bar Association is too powerful and they're not going to want the black eye that they got involved with this.
They're not going to want that black eye.
I just don't think you're going to see anything serious come out of it.
If the Blackhats are still in charge, you are.
Right.
And whatever pops out like this will be quickly covered up and then forgotten about and explained.
But they're getting away with it all over the place.
They're fixing trials all over the place.
Ghislaine Maxwell's trial.
They fixed Dr. Fetzer's trial.
They fixed that ridiculous show of an Alex Jones trial.
They fixed trials all over the place.
They fixed these fake false flags.
We can prove they're false flag events.
They fixed the trials up for the shooters.
I don't even think they're happening in real courtrooms.
I think it's just some sort of set in some basement someplace where they're just shooting it using a bunch of actors.
I don't even think that these trials are for real.
I don't see the documents posted in the proper places.
I don't see them formatted in the proper ways.
It's almost like they're just jamming this stuff up there.
Um, and I'm not saying that's the case for all of them, because I think different operating entities, uh, clandestine groups that run different operations operate, some operate at a higher level than others.
Sometimes you get the C team, sometimes you get the B team, and sometimes you get the A team.
And when it's the A team, it's, it's a challenge.
You know, there were events like Uvalde that probably got like the B team or the C team.
But there were events, other ones, that have come up before me where I've had a real hard time with them, and they've gotten the A team.
And matter of fact, they've gotten the A team so well that it's like, I'm not going to put my reputation on this one.
So there are definitely higher quality groups that operate the false flags out there.
Yep.
And we have, oh, this is a good one.
This is FDUB, New York students booted from school to make room for immigrants.
So...
In New York, and the name of the school, James Madison High School.
So, they took over the school with illegal immigrants, illegal migrants, and kicked the students out to homeschooling.
And as a teacher, part of my argument for my teaching colleagues at Hayward High School to reconsider their obedience To the so-called health orders was that the year that we had distance learning so-called doubled the school failure rate.
Not just the school failure rate for the district, and not just our district.
That was common throughout the U.S.
for a doubled failure rate.
So they're being sent home for separate but equal education.
The headline says it all.
Let's not educate American citizens.
Instead, let's put our time and our energy into these immigrants who are going to vote Democrat because they're too stupid.
Let's give up on these American kids.
We don't need these American kids anymore.
I mean, we did all we could with the LGBT thing.
I'm hearing it's backfired.
I'm hearing that now there are groups of seriously righteous bullies in school That are really pushing around these LGBTQ gay kids all over the place.
I'm hearing that it's backfiring tremendously because there are still some kids out there that are raised by proper parents who see how much of a disaster this thing is and there's still kids that can see through the fog.
Thank God a lot of kids are beginning to wake up and see it and I'm glad to see that they're out there pushing their weight around a little bit.
We don't want these people to think they can I'm gay and I can show it.
No, we need them to hide that depravity in their little closet until they figure out what's under the hood.
It needs to go away.
Men are men.
Girls are girls.
Boys are boys.
Women are women.
Keep the lines drawn.
That's where they ought to be.
Once we get the truth about how much we've been poisoned and tortured, My dog is still trying to be confused about the door that I left partially open.
Then we'll have more data about what's going on.
Alright, I'm gonna move on here.
She figured it out and got back in.
Is out all day today.
I didn't give her her walk, so she's a little bit complaining.
Alright, so we're going to go to Germany.
Tucker Carlson outlines the farmers protest, the biggest protest in German history.
Corporate media is not going to cover this, of course, and it just got bigger.
Poland's truckers have joined, and this is after the Netherlands forced the resignation of their government.
And now we have An additional article about this, so it is a race to the bottom.
All over the world is not just Biden, but it is all these developed countries, heads of state, who are showing themselves to be ridiculous parodies of leaders.
And for me, that is unexplainable unless, just as you said Brian, something is wrong with the script writers.
This is Unless they want us just to explode into a civil war that they are then going to orchestrate.
That is one possibility.
But, you know, I may be wrong and I've been wrong so much.
I don't think the Deep State can survive.
I think that this will be an Emperor's New Clothes ending.
Now, I might be wrong, but we certainly are seeing that this is Everywhere on Earth, the heads of state are just looking like criminal psychopaths.
Brian, your thoughts?
This was the story that I was waiting for.
Because this is the example of what they're afraid of.
You gotta learn to think like these psychopaths.
You gotta learn to understand.
They think that they are part of a secret society.
Their Skull and Bones, or whatever it happens to be, their Mason Organization, or whatever their little secret handshake society is, their World Health Organization, or their Bilderberg Group, or whatever it happens to be.
They think that they were born and raised with royalty garbs on that said, hey, these people cannot consent.
These people cannot govern themselves.
These cattle, these goy cannot control it.
We were born and destined to lead the world and to run the world.
We were born to be the ones that will control everything.
We've been given the money, we've been given the sacred birthright, we've been taking the training, we've gone through our World Health Organization academic courses, and we're the ones that are appointed to lead mankind.
But they're a very small group of people.
And there are a lot of people right now that are just normal citizens that want normal freedom, that want a normal quality of life, that want what they've built and what they've earned and what they've paid to build return to their power and to their possession.
What's happening in Germany is wonderful.
What happened in Canada with the truckers is even better.
And I think that they're getting to understand That the American people are going to start holding hands and singing Kumbaya, left and right, Democrat and Republican.
And we're all going to start coming around and buy the world a Coke and teach it harmony.
And it's going to be against them.
They're going to have to go hide out in their bunkers.
Why?
I don't think they're buying their big bunkers because they're worried about global thermonuclear fallout.
They're worried about patriots with guns.
And it's not far off if they keep it up.
Very good.
And these guys are cocky.
And it may be because they've dominated our history forever.
And that leads to the last section here, where we have the impossible World's Fair's timelines of less than three years to architect, excavate, plumb wire, construct, and horse and buggy tech.
So these are some of the World's Fair pictures.
From 100 years ago, this is St.
Louis, I believe, in 1904, and the official story is, oh yeah, so we decided we'd hold this World's Fair, and we had contest winners for the architecture, and in less than three years, we were able to get the plans up.
All these materials we were able to do all of the excavation and the plumbing and the wiring and and build this with all the materials with horse and buggy tech and but we only built like one or two buildings real.
The rest of them were made from cheap materials and then we tore it all down.
But yet all these buildings were fully functional.
And just consider the beauty here.
I believe that one was destroyed in St.
Louis, the Central Fountain.
Now it's just an empty pond.
Here's Paris, of course.
And these World's Fairs are everywhere.
Now, take a look at the size of the people here.
Just barely visible here.
And of course the alternative explanation is that these buildings were here before.
They were getting etheric energy and that a civilization, this is Chicago, was completely destroyed by the parasites that took over.
Now this would be an advanced culture relative to our human beings today.
Of course, if you like, I'm just a person saying, oh, yeah, so three years you got this done.
That isn't always three years, but enough of them are of three years where it makes the story impossible.
And it's all around the world with similar architecture.
And that we can totally refute the official story.
I believe this is Grand or Pennsylvania Station or Grand Central Station in New York.
They had to destroy this, they said, because it was too costly to upkeep.
And yet they claim that they built it.
So, for those of you who are interested in pursuing this, I think that the facts demonstrate that the temporary buildings is bullshit, timeline is bullshit, and what it looks like is that we were a great reset.
Less than 200 years ago so thoroughly that they completely erased our history and it is similar to the most current Westworld series where you have the robots, that's us.
They wake up every day and they have a narrative and they go through the motions, but they're really just toys and tools to a paying class, a superior class who can break all the rules.
Or almost all the rules.
And then the robots just wake up in the next morning and it's like nothing happened and they go through the same torture over and over and over again.
Brother, your thoughts?
Well, I don't know what to think about it.
I remember I listened to Awar's big six-hour series, and I think it's A-E-W-A-R, who was one of the first I'd ever seen to pick up on this idea of Tartaria and really develop it.
He was a very serious flat earther, and he had done a lot of research on it.
And then he went on, I think it was Crow.
Yeah, he went on Crow 777.
And he basically said, you know, it was a theory and I was toying with it.
And I was, I was playing with it here and I was playing with it there.
But then after I came out with the videos, I was approached by all these other people that had all this history.
And I, I mean, I was listening to AWAR.
It was on Crow 777.
And he was saying, you know, I began to realize that I was wrong.
There really was a lot of documentation and these people did really build a lot of these structures.
Now, Just because I can't possibly imagine how it was done doesn't mean it wasn't.
And it also doesn't mean that it was.
I believe that there's something very mysterious about it.
I remember watching a documentary like 20 years ago where a guy He had these big fences and he only worked at night and he was moving around these 20,000 and 30,000 pound stones on his estate and he was building these unbelievable things but he didn't have any heavy equipment and he basically had said he had figured out how to use the ancient methods to move these big stones and was successfully doing it and that's what the documentary was about.
I was kind of indexed out at the back of my mind saying, it's possible, it's possible, it's possible.
I can tell you that a lot of the masons really believe that they are the enlightened ones, that they're the ones that are to hold special knowledge.
And as you get into these secret societies, I believe at the top of them, they do possess sort of magical Secrets and I don't really know how to say magical without saying it's things that we don't understand about how the ether really works.
It doesn't surprise me that these structures, that people are beginning to rethink these structures in 2023 and 2024.
It is a new awakening.
And think about where you were the first time you began to realize that the media was lying to you about these school shootings.
And think, think how you look back at that and said, if they're lying to me about this, what else are they lying to me about?
Well, I can tell you one thing from personal experience.
You can dig down a lot of rabbit holes and go a lot of places where you simply don't belong.
And sometimes at the bottom of it you find truth and sometimes at the bottom of it you find nothing more than a desperate attempt at a lie.
I don't know which one this is.
I'm very impressed with these structures.
I don't buy the whole fire burned it down and it doesn't exist when it was such a stone structure story.
I don't know what to put on the idea of the mud flood.
We just saw a picture of the Eiffel Tower and what's at the base of that?
Oh, arched columns.
Mud flood.
I don't know.
And I don't know if I'm ready to even make a determination as to how I feel about all of it, because I've got so much of what is real in this world that still needs to be analyzed and thought through.
But I can tell you, it is a mind-blowing study.
And if you go to YouTube, it's called Lunch Break is the channel.
This guy's done like 56 or 57 different 15-minute YouTube videos on it.
My Lunch Break.
My Lunch Break, yeah.
He's real good.
He's persuasive.
But, warning, Don't turn off your brain just because something sounds like it makes sense.
Seriously, don't do that.
Go back and ask the tough questions and put it to the test.
And if you've got a good working brain, you'll come out on the right side of the equation.
I just haven't simply done the exercise yet because I'm still too focused on what happened 2,000, 4,000, and 6,000 years ago to worry about what happened in the 1800s.
Although I do have a pretty good feel for the secret societies and the The Illuminati and sort of the foundation of what took place there, but you just got to have a big balanced view of history to figure it all out.
You do, and my general take on it as a professional historian is to first withdraw consent from any of the official stories because we've been lied to about so much.
And you can look back at my own personal history of how blind I was for decades.
And so now we have a prima facie case of my lunch break, that guy smacks of a construction professional.
And part of what I appreciate about him is taking a look at the timelines to demonstrate the physical impossibility of the alleged constructions in the given time.
My lunch break has some of the most impressive buildings that are completed in less than a year from conception to architecture to construction.
So, once you throw out the idea that you can trust history, And you start looking with your own two eyes and you wonder at the cockiness of the evil leaders today.
And you put that into the history of a great flood.
The Native Americans saying that this is the fourth, the fifth, the sixth reset.
What you can see in Hollywood putting out stories that apparently kind of mock us.
We're not knowing how long we've been, but you know, it's all in the fog of war and does raise interesting questions.
And if we are able to win and get the truth, then there are many areas of inquiry for our masters.
Anything else on that, brother?
Or should we go on to final thoughts?
Let's do final thoughts.
All right.
So every day is the same.
Every day is new.
I like what Brian said is that it seems to be increasing.
Yeah, seems to be.
Seems to be moving ever and ever closer to the end in this end game that we're in.
Seems to be.
And we're still talking about it.
And perhaps all that we have And our audience members today all that we have is what we think what we say and what we do and a choice and the choice is going to be either for the good.
Those people who in good faith effort are trying to discern the truth and have an empathy for other human beings and other beings and we want to have competitive.
Cooperative competition for the best ideas and certainly the fucking truth for policy and not to be run by warlords, psychopathic warlords.
That's the good.
Another category, there are three categories.
The good, the evil, And the evil, those are the ones who intentionally lie and obfuscate, like Lord Cameron in that earlier example.
And these are the psychopaths who are pushed into leadership, and the people who rise are the lie contest winners, and the ones who will prostitute the truth for monopoly money, that's another category.
And the third category are the sheeple.
And those are the people who, let's see, was it Leonardo da Vinci who said, am I taking this from him or it's close to him?
The quote is, there are three categories of people.
Those who see, those who see when they're shown, and those who do not see.
So it's a comparative quote.
So the sheeple are the people who do not see, even when shown, so far, but yet, I think that there is so much going on now where their herd instincts are being threatened.
Their survival is certainly threatened.
And they may have seen enough now where they can flip onto the side of being willing to embrace the fact that they were totally and completely lied to by psychopathic, puppetition, public serpents.
But we shall see.
We do need some sort of a breakthrough for this to happen.
Otherwise, it'll just be another chapter in the Empire.
And again, I'll put into the show notes here the essay that I wrote imagining a conversation 100 years ago, and the damning facts that could have been discussed then, and the same question of how long is this going to be going on?
Well, it's 100 years later now.
Brian, final thoughts, brother?
Well, the quote, I'm going to do the best I can with it.
Possibly Tommy Lasorda.
There are three types of people.
Those who make things happen, those who watch things happen, and those who wonder what happened.
Yeah.
I guess if I'm going to come down with a final thought on this, I want to remind every one of you that if you've still got your parents around or your grandparents around, interview them.
Ask them questions.
Go back to their childhood.
Get them to reach back in their memory.
The stories that their parents told them and stories that their parents' parents told them.
And remember that there was a time in this world when we didn't have televisions dominating our attention, when people hung around with family and told old stories about old things that they could remember.
And some of that stuff might have gone back generation after generation after generation.
These days we've replaced it all with whatever comes through the television, whatever comes through our local indoctrination camp, which is the schools.
We've replaced it all with whatever's coming through our phone or the screen in front of us.
But before all of this technology hit hard back in the 50s, it was nothing but books, Written by people.
Parents who told stories of their parents, who told stories of their parents, who told stories of their parents.
And those those stories would go back well beyond the Civil War if you start to trace it.
So what I'm going to say is get a good recorder and interview the elderly.
And it doesn't even have to be your own family.
Go down to the There are people that have good minds.
Go down to the local nursing home.
Spend a day.
So what?
A day out of your busy life?
Go talk to an 80-year-old or a 90-year-old or a 100-year-old and make them feel special.
Make them feel important.
But interview them.
Find out what their youth was like.
Find out what they remember about their parents and their grandparents and their grandparents.
That is very, very important.
And it's going to be, when you get older, You're going to be real glad that you've got that left to give to your kids.
Thank you, brother.
All right.
Thank you, Patriots.
▲
Export Selection