All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 15, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:19:41
Need to Know News (14 August 2023) with Carl Herman & Chirs Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in Mission Viejo, California, and Chris Weinhardt en route to Fort Myers, Florida, where we're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with a BRICS report about the death of the dollar and America's fall from supremacy, the enemies locked and loaded.
This is from Breitbart Business Digest.
The United States has long been the reigning superpower of the global economy, with the currency, the U.S.
dollar, as the world's primary reserve.
However, in recent years, emerging nations, Brazil, Russia, India, and China, and South Africa, collectively known as BRICS, have begun to challenge that supremacy.
At a 2019 summit meeting in Brazil, BRICS announced they're planning to hatch a gold-backed digital currency designed to dethrone and replace the dollar.
The goal of the new currency is to provide an alternative to the current system that's not subject to being manipulated by economic sanctions or other geopolitical conflicts, as has been illustrated so clearly with the sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine war, which had devastating ripple effects.
Foreign governments trying to liberate themselves from reliance on the dollar can now throw it overboard.
As many as 19 other countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, want to join the ranks of BRICS and catalyze a shift in the world economic order.
A new BRICS currency would not only deteriorate the value of the dollar, but also undercut the influence of the U.S.
on the global stage.
Countries are also dropping the dollar because Biden's inflation is wreaking havoc on their economies.
Inflation, of course, erodes the value of fiat currencies, and countries that heavily depend on U.S.
dollar reserves are feeling the heat.
Diversification in gold is thus critical for retirees.
As BRICS gains influence, the purchasing power of the U.S.
citizen plummets, meaning a fixed amount of savings will have less purchasing power down the road.
China has already developed its digital currency, known as the digital yuan.
This project could set a precedent for other BRIC member countries to follow, a move that would only further destabilize the U.S.
dollar's hegemony over global finance.
Why is this bad for the U.S.?
BRICS is back by gold.
The dollar and soon-coming digital dollar is back by debt.
We now own up from $28 trillion to $32 trillion in debt.
Janet Yellen told the Senate Bank and Finance Committee she and Biden plan to take the national debt to $50 trillion in the next 10 years.
We're now up to $32 trillion.
What do you think inflation will be like in 10 years?
A silver lining for investors?
If countries switch away from the U.S.
dollar to a gold-backed currency, it could drive up the price of gold already at record highs even further, increase demand for physical gold, higher prices, potential shortage.
In short, BRICS adoption of a digital gold-backed currency will spell trouble for the U.S.
economy.
I think they want to promote the sale of gold, but their depiction of what's taking place here seemed to me to be spot on.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, yeah.
So the BRICS and a gold-backed currency is going to destroy both the value of the dollar or increase it or add to it, given the inflationary trend, and it's going to destroy the demand for the U.S.
debt securities, and this is a big deal.
The inflation rate is, so shadowstats.com economist John Williams does an expert job to be able to document the changes in definition of inflation over time.
And if you take the 1990 definition of inflation, then that rate would be about double the official rate.
You go back to the 1980 definition of inflation, then triple the rate.
So it, An investor is not going to want to buy U.S.
debt securities, and the U.S., the whole situation for the U.S.
needs that great reset, because in order to compensate for the inflation, once this emperor's new closed realization hits the marketplace and the general feeling of investors, Is that that interest rate for the US debt securities is going to have to go way up to match that expectation of inflation.
Now, when the reality does hit, then demand for precious metals is going to spike and the Traditionally, silver has been at a ratio of roughly 15 to 1 over gold.
That ratio is currently, I believe, 80 to 90 to 1.
So, my personal is that silver has a much more expansionary possibility than gold, but certainly hard assets are going to be comparable over the U.S. dollar once this BRICS thing becomes real and gains some but certainly hard assets are going to be comparable over the I think you're absolutely right, Chris.
Yeah, I think the BRICS is going to probably dissociate much of the speculation and much of the manipulation that's going on with commodity values.
And even with currency exchange rates, interbank offering rates, things like that, the credit industry is going to be tied to something real intangible for once in well since 1913.
And yeah, I think it's going to be an interesting situation for a lot of these Keynesians that have really taken over the world's resources with this fiat system and the fractional reserve system.
I think that the game's up for them as far as just declaring what value is and what valuation is, and I think it may even impact the valuation of labor too.
Maybe a little too late after automation and AI and all this stuff, but I guess it's The return to reality in terms of economics and certainly in terms of credit and lending and international trade as well.
So, yeah, these guys have fought many, many wars to try to dissociate the currency from a gold and silver standard.
And I think that it's going to come back to roost.
And man, I hope that people are ready for this and maybe can use some of this manipulation to their advantage.
I don't know, I think right now we're in a liquidity crutch and everybody's really having trouble with saving and accumulating wealth and things like that, so I think maybe a return to reality is long overdue, but I think a lot of people are going to be unprepared for this when it actually does take hold.
And it's supposed to be August 22nd through the 24th, they have this BRICS meeting, and we'll see what happens there.
Yes, Carl?
And context for all this happening is that The top 1% now own more assets than the bottom 99% combined.
And here on BitChute, I'll give my best article to give the most damning economic data to show that this is just a parasitic Ponzi scheme of known mechanics to create this exponential debt curve.
And they're trying to use the Great Reset to hide it and to try another game.
Yeah, no doubt.
They use this to create the wealth inequality that they celebrate and enjoy at this point, no doubt.
Nice, nice additions.
Meanwhile, we have something happening in Ecuador that's pretty damn disturbing—the assassination of a presidential candidate.
Check this out.
Ecuador's president has declared a state of emergency and three days of national mourning after the brutal assassination of a presidential candidate.
Six people have been arrested over the killing, which appears to be caught on video.
We're about to show you that footage, but of course we need to warn you that it is disturbing.
At least 12 gunshots could be heard on that video, which appears to show the killing of presidential candidate Fernando Villavicencio.
Officials say that he was gunned down at a campaign event in the capital on Wednesday.
The country's attorney general says security forces later exchanged fire with the suspect and he died in custody.
Government officials say the presidential election will still be held on August 20th as scheduled.
Yeah, no doubt about it.
It's shocked the entire country, Cristina.
Fernando Villavicencio had just finished, just finished, Cristina, a speech after a rally held at a school in Quito, the Ecuadorian capital.
As he was leaving the school and being ushered into a car, gunfire rang out.
It was at least Like you said, 12 shots and all the people who moments before were cheering him on dove for cover.
Officials say this was a targeted attack against the man who once described his own country as a narco state won by a political mafia.
Authorities say nine people were injured.
Villavicencio, a 59-year-old activist, journalist, and politician who was running in Ecuador's presidential elections to be held in less than two weeks on August 20th.
He would frequently speak openly against corruption in his country and had recently said that the mafia had subjugated his homeland.
And just to give you an idea, Cristina, of how bad the security situation is in Ecuador, seven of the eight candidates in the election were under police protection.
The attack happened less than two weeks before the August 20th election, but officials say it will still go on as planned in a video shot at a rally just a few days ago.
Villavicencio said he was refusing to wear a bulletproof vest because the people, his supporters, he said, were his bulletproof vest.
He also said he had received death threats from a known drug trafficking gang in Ecuador, and current Ecuadorian President Guillermo Lazo vowed the killing will be will not go unpunished and announced a 60-day state of emergency.
Cristina, back to you.
Well, I think that, uh, uh, A bulletproof vest.
The popular support is not a substitute for a bulletproof vest, and I just worry that this guy was the Trump of Ecuador and that we may have predicted programming here.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, Villavicencio is just the latest.
Anybody who's going to say we have a narco state run by a political mafia, that's going to put a target on them.
But it's true.
And here at BitChute, I'll put a two minute video of John Perkins, who worked in Central and South America to make sure that the political heads of state were consistent with U.S.
corporate profits to be able to show that.
I said that a few shows ago, but I don't think I actually put it in, but I'll put it in now.
So this is connected to Biden refusing any Secret Service protection for RFK2 even though his dad and uncle were gunned down, and that is just the state of the world, is that corporate media is just going to bullshit, and they're going to… Ted tears of regret.
And even if you do have the bulletproof vest, then they're going to work around it anyway.
Like, who knows that there didn't have guys on the inside for the protection of that candidate and just kill him in the car if it didn't work out.
So this is business as usual, unfortunately.
And until we have some sort of a breakthrough, it's not possible for Any honest candidate to get into any position to cause any real harm, apparently.
And we had a mobster saying that the Biden family is a crime family, and he was from a crime family, and he was drawing the barrelhouse, and this is what they would do.
They got an opponent, they can circumvent him having protection, don't give him protection.
You got another opponent, hit him with all kinds of lawsuits, make it a real mess for him.
I mean, the case against Biden is simply overwhelming.
Chris, your thoughts?
Wow, you know, think about how many times the Democratic leadership has actually called for the assassination of Donald Trump, whether he was running or while he was president, and even after he had lost in 2020, in theory, if you buy into that bullshit.
So yeah, I think that really we're seeing a strange dichotomy happen, and anybody that's not a World Economic Forum-controlled opposition operative is pretty much in danger from this deep state, as it were.
Any idealist that really tries to rebel is going to be murdered in cold blood in front of all his supporters.
This is how these guys roll.
This is what they do.
It's what they've always done is murder their way into and out of trouble and into great power and wealth.
So yeah, I think really we've got
A pretty big problem to deal with, and I think that, you know, we were talking about in the previous segment with the BRICS, it's kind of taken one of the cards out of the deck for these guys that have used the monetary and central banking system to create and train not only assassins, but even political leaders who are probably even more dangerous, and really to lend people the optic and the illusion of hope, but to truly steer them into certain doom as a controlled opposition operative.
Yeah, I think you're going to see some interesting stuff going on in South America, not only with the guy that was running against Correa for a minute before he got killed, but also in Argentina.
You're seeing a lot of the 15- and 20-year debt notes coming due, mostly the 10-year debt stuff coming due in Argentina, the 20-year stuff.
And a lot of the vulture capitalists, the Judeo-Masonic vulture capitalists, have bought much of this debt for pennies on the dollar or the peso, I should say, in the case of Argentina and some of these other South American countries, and are going to get some very lucrative returns guaranteed to them by the IMF World Bank through national loans to these countries.
So you don't hear a damn word about this in the American media, but guys like Singer and Thinking of the other guy's name, I'm blanking on it right now.
Elliott and Singer are the two of them.
They were running a lot of money in their Elliott Capital and Singer.
But they were at Paulson, was the other guy's name, were running a lot of these debt purchases where they bought, you know, $20, $30 million of Argentinian debt.
And are guaranteed in 20 years from IMF retribution from an actual national loan that would go to the citizens of Argentina and that their money would be taken off the top to the tune of four or five billion.
It's like World Trade Center, you know, disaster derivative type of indemnity that they're getting in terms of return on investment.
And it's absolutely predatory.
And these people are just rendered into abject poverty further from many of these deals.
And the American media and the international media And to back that up, we have Simon Johnson is a current economist at MIT.
He's the former chief economist of the IMF, and he wrote a book.
He's written a couple of books.
He basically quit his job as the chief economist of the IMF, basically saying, okay, so the purpose of the IMF is to make countries in debt, is to control them.
It's not to alleviate poverty, it's not to help them, it's to control them.
And I think that the story, backstory with him is that he was told to shut up and he resigned his debt and wrote a book and then he wrote another book of the 13 banks or the bankers that became a bestseller talking about the US Financial system as a banana republic in his word.
And in addition, the World Bank, former chief economist Joseph Stiglitz, who has a Nobel Prize in economics, he had the same experience and he quit.
And he said, you know, they're doing the opposite.
They say that they're going to help people, but they actually hurt people.
And all that economic data, I have sufficient documentation of what I'll provide here in the show notes in bit Jude for withdrawing consent and demanding arrest, like always.
Yeah, nice.
Very nice.
Yeah, I'd like to urge people to check out some of Stiglitz's lectures.
He talks about this in detail.
Even John Perkins, too.
He comes from a long lineage of the British East India Trading Company, so the Perkins family goes back generations in terms of this whole Kohong debt slavery system and using Second and Third World nations as slave labor.
Excellent.
Excellent.
So striking, so stunning, so corrupt that even CNN is raising questions about the appointment of David Wise as a special counsel.
Even CNN!
CNN anchor Jake Tapper exclaimed Friday the timing of Attorney David Weiss' special counsel appointment is very suspicious.
After Attorney General Merrick Garland shocked Washington with the appointment, Tapper and a CNN panel broke down the significance of the development.
And now it raises more questions than it answers.
Tapper, for example, Ask why the Hunter Biden case now merits a special counsel when, less than two months ago, Weiss was trying to push it across the finish line with a sweetheart plea deal.
Does he know of stuff that should be in a special counsel investigation that wasn't in that plea deal?
I mean, maybe he does, but then why do the plea deal?
It's all very suspicious.
Among other issues to have erased, first, why choose Weiss when special counsels are normally non-U.S.
government employees?
Second, why stick with Weiss when his plea deal was recently decimated by a federal judge?
Third, Doesn't the appointment of Weiss as a special counsel confirm what the IRS whistleblowers have alleged?
This move makes it seem as though, well, maybe the whistleblowers were right.
Maybe what they were alleging is true, and he just didn't have the ability to charge whatever he wanted to charge, but now he does.
So I have a lot of questions about that, and I do think some of the political questions being raised by Republicans have merit.
I would notice in particular this appointment appears to be improper on its face because Weiss is working for Merrick Garland, who works for the president, who is the father of the individual being investigated.
This had to be an independent party investigation.
In a later segment, CNN legal analyst Laura Coates and reporter Paula Reed raised more questions.
Coates, knowing Garland, claimed Weiss asked for special counsel power just last week, herself asked, why now?
Read, moreover, a question whether the motive were to insulate the DOJ if the case goes to trial and from House Republicans, or investigating allegations of corruption involving Hunter and President Joe.
Finally, Tapper asks why Weiss is suddenly interested in prosecuting Hunter for more potential crimes than those he'd agreed to just weeks ago.
Here's another one for you, okay?
So I'm David Wise.
Once again, play this game with me.
I am special counsel.
Just a few weeks ago, I was ready to say, hey, a diversion, a slap on the wrist, a misdemeanor.
Really?
It was not a big punishment.
And now I want special counsel authority to investigate something that just weeks ago I was basically saying this is the most I can prove in a court of law?
That doesn't make sense to me either, Taber said.
By the way, I'm fully willing to believe there's a lot more to investigate and a lot more to charge him with, but that wasn't his position a few weeks ago.
Coates agreed the development lends credence to the IRS whistleblowers before asking a final question.
Why did Weiss say two times that he had full authority to carry out the investigation in any direction that it led, yet now he feels he needs special counsel authority?
The whole thing is a disaster for everyone, Reid said to conclude the segment.
Why now?
Why now appoint a special counsel?
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, this is another story that I like a lot.
So they appoint the same dude who constructed the plea deal, who is an employee of the Biden DOJ, huh?
Well, yeah, this person is supposed to be an outsider.
But having Weiss step up, and that article lays out the key facts appropriately, these optics, again, are so damning and destructive that I have to wonder, who's really orchestrating and calling the shots and pulling the strings here?
Because it would have been so easy to appoint some no-name, and then to pretend that this is some independent investigation.
But what we have, in effect, is to the benefit of what we've seen for months now, is that every action that we see being played out in this script damns the oligarchs, the black hats, the parasites, Even further, and I think that these optics are going to raise questions and people like us are going to point to, well, you know, there's a there's a history of this.
The Warren Commission was not about investigating the assassination of JFK.
It was to cover it up.
And the 9-11 Commission, it wasn't to investigate what happened.
It was to cover up the crime and that that would be typical and usual business.
Of course, you would have to Uh, virtue signal and pretend that you're getting some objective type of a group together of experts.
And then they're just going to bullshit and put it on paper.
Then corporate media is going to virtue signal that, uh, it was fully investigated.
It was the most secure investigation in history.
And then they're just going to go ahead and say that, uh, you know, business as usual, wasn't that bad mistakes were made.
And then it'll go into our children's textbooks.
I think they're just getting so blatant and obvious about this that everyone understands—anyone paying the least attention—Chris.
Yeah, you know, seeing current events and the narrative that the official media is putting out there makes me relive old events and wonder what the historic narrative that resides in our history books truly actually leads to.
And it's actually something that I've known and seen for a while and really tried to get to the bottom of most of my life.
And I have to say in terms of this, I think the answer is very obvious.
I think that there's obvious shenanigans going on here.
There's always been, it's a revolving door of ghouls.
Really, these people are complete and total scummers and they just go from one place to the next in these administrations, falling their way upwards as they commit cover-ups and crimes and nobody ever goes to jail Nobody ever really pays the price except for the victims and the American taxpayer.
So yeah, it's kind of unfortunate to see our government getting to this level of deliverance and our expectations allowing this is even more puzzling to me.
But I guess maybe time will sort this out and we'll be the ultimate avenger in much of what we're seeing here.
It's just so blatant.
It's just so obvious.
Meanwhile, Trump reveals a dirty January 6th committee illegally destroyed their records and documents now that he has full subpoena power.
President Trump dropped a bombshell that the sham committee overseeing the January 6th investigation has destroyed their documents and records illegally.
Trump wrote, So now that I have full subpoena power because of the Freedom of Speech sham indictment by crooked Joe Biden, deranged Jack Smith, and the DOJ, it has just been reported that the unselect January 6th Committee on Political Hacks and Thugs has illegally destroyed their records and documents.
This is unthinkable, and the fake political indictment against me must be immediately withdrawn.
The system is rigged and corrupt, very much like the presidential election of 2020.
We are a nation in decline.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported Dr. Jan Halper Hayes said Special Counsel Jack Smith made a huge mistake in indicting Trump because it gives him the power to subpoena.
They made a huge mistake because even though we thought what was going to happen was they were going to go after him for treason or sedition, they did criminally charge him, but they didn't go to that extreme.
As a result, he has due process.
He can subpoena people and bring things in.
Trump was hit with four counts in Smith's January 6 case—conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.
Smith's latest entitlement is a retread January 6th Committee garbage free speech violation by Biden-DOJ, who should know better, and ESP-like assumptions and mind-reading nonsense.
It can be recalled how Speaker McCarthy sent a letter to Chairman Bernie Thompson on November 2022 demanding preservation of committee records for the incoming Republican-controlled Congress.
McCarthy also said Republicans would hold hearings on why the Capitol was not secure on January 6th.
Here's the letter, dear Chairman Thompson.
American people chose Republicans to lead the 118th Congress.
On January 3rd, 2023, your work as Chairman of the Select Committee to Investigate will come to an end.
For those reasons, I remind you and your staff to preserve all records collected and transcripts of testimony taken during your investigation in accordance with House Rule 7.
As a Chair, regardless of who may be directing the work of the Committee, you are responsible for the work done by its members and staff.
It's clear based on recent news reports that even your own members and staff have no visibility into the totality of the investigation.
Some reports suggest entire swaths of findings will be left out of the committee's final report.
You have spent a year and a half and millions of taxpayer dollars conducting this investigation.
It's imperative all information collected be preserved, not just for institutional prerogatives, but for transparency to the American people.
The official congressional records do not belong to you or to any member but to the American people, and they are owed all the information you gathered, not merely the information that comports with your political agenda.
Although your committee public hearing did not focus on why the complex was not secure on January 6th, the Republican majority will be holding hearings on that point.
The people have a right to know the allegation you made are supported by facts and be able to view the transcript with an eye toward encouraged enforcement of 18 U.S.
Code 1001.
Excerpts from the code, except as otherwise provided, the government Anyone who knowingly and willingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up by trick, scream, or device a material fact, makes any materially false fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry,
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism, imprisoned for not more than eight, or both.
According to Fox, Democrat Bernie Thompson told House Republicans in a letter, consistent with guides from the Office of the Clerk and other authorities, the Select Committee did not archive temporary committee records that were not elevated by the committee's actions, such as use in hearings or official publications or those that did not further its investigative activities.
The letter continues.
Accordingly, and contrary to your letter's implication, the Select Committee was not obligated to archive all video recordings of transcribed interviews or depositions.
Based on guidance from House authorities, the Select Committee determined that the written transcript provided by nonpartisan professional official reporters, which the witnesses and Select Committee staff had the opportunity to review for errata, With the official permanent records of transcribed interviews and depositions for the purpose of Rule 7.
This looks to me like a criminal enterprise of destroying all the records that implicate you.
Just exactly what we'd expect from an extension of a crime family, Carl.
This is consistent and the pattern is unmistakable.
It is, it is, and it's so clear.
Again, I feel good about it.
So the DOJ is where now?
Do you enforce the law and uphold the law that they And they swear that they're there to do.
So, again, this is tick, tick, tick, trip, trip, trip.
And we're on the side of the breakthrough and something will break.
So our audience members, you, you, patriots, brothers and sisters, all, you're going to be in position when this thing does break, you're going to be able to point to the data and to guide people through your family, your friends and your colleagues to be able to recognize the true political and economic playing your friends and your colleagues to be able to recognize the true political and economic playing field that we've all been Now, the Dem response, I really like what they said, the lie that they said.
So in order for them to destroy the records of the proceedings, they have to first destroy the definition of the word record.
So what they're supposed to do is they're supposed to, whatever they work on, they archive.
And as a retired historian, that's what you do.
Whatever it is that you did, you archive it.
Now, what they're doing is they're destroying the definition of records to say, okay, so a record—me, to my dog, is also very upset about this, as we all are—a record is only going to be that which gets publication.
May, you can go outside and bark.
So they have to not have everything they worked on, but only selectively take what they work on and what they choose to put in their report, and they're going to censor, through destruction, all other evidence.
Now, another question that would be helpful to ask that the report didn't generate would be, Has this happened before?
Is this actually ethical?
Because on its face it is fishy, and it is fishy because that's not what a record means.
And it just reminds me that, again, part of the optics that is getting destroyed is the idea of these official commissions.
And for example, just the one example historically that pops to mind, is in the Warren Commission investigating the JFK assassination.
You had around 20 doctors and nurses at the emergency room describing the wounds to JFK being shot at the front, blowout to the back, a small little wound, entry wound to the throat.
And all of that testimony was not deemed to be appropriate and fitting for the final commission report.
report.
I don't know if they destroyed those records, but they certainly didn't publish them.
So we need to take a look and have an opportunity to be able to dive into all such official reports as similar bullshit.
Yeah, and those two shots were widely reported the day of the assassination.
Go back and watch, see it now on NBC, and they talk first about the shot to the throat as a wound of entry attributed to Malcolm Perry, MD, who performed a tracheostomy incision through the wound and the shot to the right temple that blew out the brains out the back who performed a tracheostomy incision through the wound and the shot to the right temple that blew out the brains out
It was all over radio and television that very afternoon, and yet somehow, Carl, as you observed, it was not in the final report.
Chris?
Yeah, it's amazing.
It's Think about the word reality, and it comes from like the word of the king, and that's basically what people took as reality.
And I'll tell you, these royals were really not too concerned, nor have they been, nor will they be, about your reality or your experience in life.
They're referring to their own in the way they will remember it or want it remembered in terms of their kingship.
At some point in time, I think the crown maybe Uh it was dethroned maybe by a cabal of people literally uh in the 1600s and basically put in secret societies and in certain ways that uh it represents most of european
Proxier, as I say, this political theatrics and this lawfare as well is very much theatrical and through these theatrics they can kind of create a new reality, let's just say, with the expectation of the onlooking people that aren't experienced in law and the citizens' perceptions of their rights or lack thereof.
And certainly set a precedent in terms of social engineering and behavioral type of expectations.
I know it's a little bit long-winded, but I think it kind of ties together in terms of social engineering and in power and real power concepts.
Things that most people don't think about, but it's taught at the highest levels of the Ivy League and the royalty schools at the highest levels and internal organizations as well.
So I think that there's something going on here with that, the banking system, and I think there's a genuine uprising against it.
And I think that word on the street's going to get louder than the rumor and echo that these guys can rock into the history books, and I think they're going to have a hard time putting this genie back in the bottle.
Very nice, very nice.
Meanwhile, Reporter Saman Atiba sues White House in fight for press freedom after 440 journalists are stripped of hard pass credentials.
Can you believe?
White House correspondent for Today News Africa, Saman Atiba, filed a lawsuit against a Biden admin in a fight for press freedom after hundreds of reporters were stripped of their hard pass press credentials.
A lawsuit filed by the Center for American Liberty accused the White House of effectively banning Atiba and more than 440 other reporters.
In May, the White House Press Office announced it would implement stricter press badge restrictions, forcing journalists to reapply for hard pass access by the end of July.
Previously, press badges had been automatically renewed.
...nor to qualify for a hard pass under the new restrictions.
Reporters were required to prove their full-time employment with an organization whose principal business is news dissemination.
Freelance journalists had to submit letters from news outlets describing their affiliation.
Other requirements included providing a professional or personal Washington, D.C.
address.
The updated restrictions also noted reporters who fail to act in a professional manner may be stripped of their best credentials.
That, no doubt, would include not asking Jean Pierre a question she doesn't want to answer.
The new rules were announced following several occasions when Press Secretary Corine Jean-Pierre sparred with Atiba during daily press briefings.
Atiba had previously accused her of making a mockery of the First Amendment, as she does on a daily basis, and discriminating against reporters at smaller news outlets.
According to Atiba, the Press Secretary had not taken questions from him in months.
After months of not receiving answers to his inquiries from the White House Press Office, Mr. Adiba chose to utilize the only option available to him, speaking up during press briefings on several occasions since December 2021.
Mr. Adiba asserted himself in the briefing room, speaking over other reporters and the White House Press Secretary in an attempt to make his concerns known.
Adiba lost his hard press credentials following the White House Press Office newly implemented rules.
The CEO at the Center for American Literature, Amit Dhillon, stated, The White House's new press credential requirements are unconstitutional and directly target Simone.
By outsourcing the credentialing process, the White House has given a group of elite-minded journalists unbridled discretion to pick and choose which reporters and outlets are worthy of holding the White House accountable.
We urge the court to uphold the First Amendment and declare these new requirements unconstitutional so Simon can continue to do his job.
Adiba noted the lawsuit isn't just about me, but about maintaining a free press and holding those in power accountable.
Today, President Joe Biden is in power.
Tomorrow, it might be someone else, regardless of who holds the office.
No president should have the authority to decide who covers them.
Today, the arbitrary new rules target me.
Tomorrow, they might target you.
This isn't just about one individual, but a free press, a cornerstone of democracy.
In a democracy, people have a right to know, and journalists have a duty to tell.
Center for American Liberty tweets, we won't stand for the White House targeting journalists for asking tough questions.
Simone says, join us in fighting for freedom of the press.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, the White House press pass procedure used to involve journalist professionals being able to approve of any type of a list to go in there.
And the current, you know, obviously it's just propaganda that is coming out from these leaders, but the optics are looking better and better for us.
But the idea of, this is supposed to be a very tough And the most egregious and comical violation of it was with Jeff Gannon around the year 2004.
Mr. Gannon in the baby Bush White House was a favorite reporter of W, tossing the most ridiculous softball questions such as, those who aren't standing with you, Mr. President, do you see them as enemies of America?
And Gannon was built, and W liked to give him hugs and grab his bald head and kiss it, and all that looked good, until one day somebody said, huh, that Jeff Gannon guy, he's a gay male prostitute, and I know that because he has a gay male prostitute website advertising the length of his tool and pictures and everything.
And it turned out that Mr. Gannon had no academic training in journalism nor professional experience.
He had a website where he would reprint stories favorable to the Republican leadership and their narrative.
And a funny thing, though, is that there weren't the votes in Congress to investigate any further.
So the idea of a gay male prostitute whose records of coming and going into the White House included hundreds of times, hundreds of times where he would show up Four hours or more before a press conference, four hours or so later after it ended and everyone else left with the official entry logs.
Sometimes he didn't even leave, which probably meant that he spent the night, but that wasn't investigated to find out who he was doing in the White House.
I mean, what he was still doing after those press conferences and before.
Oh, Carl, that's such an egregious case.
Wonderful you raised it here.
Chris, your thoughts?
Once again, I'm astounded by the reality of the things that are going on and what they're saying is going on.
It's a theatrics.
It's like a softball game.
I don't even think maybe a t-ball game.
I'd say in terms of these insiders in the media.
Nobody in that room will dare ask a hardball question to any of these people in any way shape or form.
Nothing that's not known or meant to be known.
Let's just say if there is in fact any quote-unquote journalism at all going on in that circuit.
I will say that it reminds me of the Gentleman's Club or the Rules of Queensberry in terms of Oscar Wilde debating publicly a lot of personal matters with the Marquess of Queensberry in English history.
I think people really need to look into that a little bit and understand maybe what's going on in the press pass and the UPI and the AP and all this stuff.
They basically put out cookie cutter propaganda.
Yeah.
Did we lose it?
Yeah, we lost it.
it by political preference but for the most part they're talking about the same thing and scripting us down this political kabuki theater that I mention all the time you hit the end huh there we go yeah did we lose it yeah we lost it I fucked up oh shit
there are a couple of nice memes that hit home Check out the first.
Face masks are banned from the studio.
If you're sick, please do not enter.
Save the children.
Meanwhile, the real pandemic is pedophilia.
We do not believe in the election infection.
Save the children.
Another at Da Vinci's Italian restaurant.
Customers who pay their full bill with cash will receive 10% off their total.
Who wouldn't want that?
Fight against the cashless society.
Well said.
Meanwhile, Trump braided A striking new revelation from court documents show the Biden-DOJ raided former President Trump's Twitter account through a search warrant in January.
Trump's real Donald Trump was the most popular account on Twitter, until he was censored by the social media platform previous far-left management after the January 6 events at the U.S.
Capitol.
After Trump was banned from Twitter, he launched his own social media, Truth Social.
He's been posting there almost exclusively, even though Twitter's new owner, Elon Musk, lifted the ban months ago.
According to newly released court documents in January 2023, DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith, who has already slapped Trump with two highly federal indictments, Obtained a search warrant with a former president's Twitter account.
Smith's motivation remains unclear, but the papers show Twitter didn't comply immediately and produced the requested information three days after the court's deadline.
This led a federal judge to hold the company in contempt and slap it with a $350,000 fine.
Most companies appealed, but in July, the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the lower court's sanction.
Importantly, Twitter remained free to raise general concerns about warrants or nondisclosure orders, and it is weak publicly about the January 6th investigation, the appellate judge wrote.
The whole point of the nondisclosure order was to avoid tipping off the former president about the warrants' existence, she argued.
Meanwhile, the Biden admin has placed blame on Trump for the loss of credit.
Thursday, Fitch made public its decision to lower the United States' long-term foreign currency issuer default rating from AAA to AA+, citing the country's massive debt load and anticipated fiscal deterioration as reasons for the move.
President Biden blames former President Trump and the January 6th riots for the U.S.
credit rating drop.
How absurd is that?
On Wednesday, Fox Business Report and Administration Insider said the underlying model had a AAA rating before Trump took office.
U.S.
long-term foreign currency issuer default rating was lowered by Fitch from AAA to AA plus on Tuesday.
That's long after Trump left office over two and a half years later.
The nation's enormous debt load and resulting decline in fiscal health are reflected by the downgrade.
The agency decided, citing deteriorating American governance, interesting, increasing deficits and Federal Reserve tightening as reasons.
It also believes a modest reception will hit the U.S.
in the fourth quarter.
Treasury Secretary Yellen criticized Fitch's decision, saying the ratings agency used out-of-date information and that the situation has improved during the Biden administration.
Yellen's comments were a vehement rejection of Fitch Rating's verdict.
Fitch Rating's recent adjustment was made for no good reason and is based on old information, she claims.
From 2018 to 2020, Fitch's quantitative ratings approach drastically weakened.
Nevertheless, Fitch is making the announcement now, even though many of the factors upon which Fitch's conclusion was based have improved.
Many have improved under the current admin, particularly relating to governance.
Right, right, right.
Thanks to the passing of bipartisan legislation to raise the debt ceiling, fund infrastructure projects, and boost the U.S.
competitiveness, credit ratings are used in the debt capital market to assess the relative safety of debt obligations issued by corporations and government.
The cost of borrowing money is usually greater for borrowers with poor credit scores, of course.
Meanwhile, give me a sec.
Like...
Here we go, Carl, your thoughts.
Wow, first with those memes.
Here in Orange County, I found that a lot of the people that I've worked with with contractors, they have a similar deal for if you want to pay with credit card, is that they're going to charge you a 2% transaction fee with it to encourage cash and checks.
And I think that getting around the banksters is a good thing.
And for censorship, Yeah, for Trump and Twitter, our opponents have to dominate the conversation.
So they're going to have to censor the voices of opponents or censor the speaker, remove the speaker, assassinate the speaker.
And of course, they're going to look and they're going to fish everywhere they can for anything that they can use to spin.
And as we have seen, and as we can document through history, whatever it is that they say that they can try to spin, they will spin.
And the January 6th for Blaming the decrease in the credit rating on Trump, and that would be consistent with their spin that January 6th was the worst attack on America since Pearl Harbor and 9-11, because it destroyed faith in our democracy.
And all these talking points, they're given to focus groups, and they pick the ones that rate the best, and that's all that they ever do, is that they choose narratives and They choose political policy outcomes, and then they pick the language that is going to best support it.
And just on its surface, to say something that is a triple A or double A plus, that immediately smacks of bullshit and some cartoonish understanding.
What was the more bullshit?
You just add more A's at the rating, and then it's fundamental fraud to begin with.
And again, this is in the documentation that I'll provide here at the BitFued.
Notes is that this is a monetary system, which is actually a debt system.
That's why the debt grows at an exponential rate.
So for one to say fundamentally that this is a triple A investment, you have to destroy the definition of investment, because what you're investing in is an exponential Ponzi debt scheme that must collapse when the interest, when the total interest bearing cost becomes tragic comic.
But everybody in all corporate media can just pretend that this is going to go on forever with Janet Yellen saying, oh, yeah, we'll just raise, we'll just go up to like $50 trillion in debt in the next 10 years.
It is tragic comic.
It is, Chris.
Yeah, you know, I was thinking about this.
I was listening to a video earlier.
I think it was on Arcadia Economics with Vince Lancey.
He was talking about the Wizard of Oz and the gold standard, and it really got me going on a lot of thoughts and parallels.
And I think it's really interesting to see what these economic sorcerers are doing right now, not only with the Federal Reserve note and with that whole premise, but transitioning into the crypto phase and the CBDC thing.
They are really trying to take total control, so I would advocate if anybody is listening to possibly get out of that system in some way, shape, or form, at least take 10% of your wealth and get it out, you know, so you can live on something tangible, not something that they can shut down, take off, track, trace, rescind, or even have any right over you, your ownership to your own items, you know?
I mean, this is something people don't understand about the Dodd-Frank law, that you're a secondary creditor to your own funds in these financial institutions.
And really, this is a whole Ponzi scheme, as Carl said.
It is worse than that, I'd say.
If you gave any single HAPLO group 10 years of the control of the Federal Reserve and that ability, man, I think they would pull away from the rest of the world in any way, shape, or form, too.
So I'll say this also, that the Federal Reserve has printed 40% of its total currency in the last two and a half years during the Biden administration.
So, wow, you talk about there's no inflation, there's no economic mischief going on there.
This is very carefully designed and coordinated.
about asset control and resource control.
And certainly, in my opinion, this would be one of the most egregious depopulation events that we've ever seen in terms of warp speed and the VACs mandate.
So, yeah, time is going to tell this and will vindicate my words.
But for now, I guess, until it happens, until more people believe what's really going on, I think we're just here kind of waiting in the wings, aren't we?
Yes, very nice.
Meanwhile, we have Trump's criminal cases There are a lot of them going on.
It's worth reviewing just so we can keep track of what's going on and observe that, in my opinion, none of them are well-founded in either the facts or the law.
Criminal cases, these are the key ones.
People in New York versus Trump.
This has to do with payoff money to Stormy Daniels.
That was actually made by his attorney, Michael Cohen.
Stormy Daniels has asserted and even signed an affidavit she did not have sex with Trump.
So what was there to cover up?
Then we have U.S.
v. Trump now in Florida.
They're handling classified docs.
When Jack Smith wrote his indictment, he ignored the Presidential Records Act, which is the prevalent statute governing these matters, which means it has no foundation in the law.
And since Trump had all his documents in a secure facility that had already been proved by both the FBI and the National Archives, it appears they have no foundation in fact.
And we have the investigation of January 6, which many regard as being the most serious.
It looks to be a totally fabricated event, where even in his own writing of the indictment, he excluded the words where Trump encouraged everyone to be peaceful in their protest.
And here, of course, we find that the House Committee is getting rid of the evidence that would contradict its findings and thereby undermine Trump's own ability To refute the claims based on the evidence they had in their possession.
This is the kind of action you would expect from a crime family.
And I say the DOJ, Merrick Garland is acting as a conciliary to Don Biden, just as Tom Hagen was a conciliary to Don Corleone, except the Corleone family was far more competent than the Biden.
Here we have the investigation in Georgia, which is supposed to be issuing multiple indictments.
Just before the show, a dear friend called me to say they'd posted all the indictments in Georgia, but then they had to take them down because the grand jury had yet to vote on them.
This is another indication of the degree of corruption we're up against.
A civil suit seemed to me to be frivolous as well.
Just notice one is for E. Jean Carroll.
That's a woman who claimed to be raped but couldn't remember the year she was raped.
It was 2005 or 2006, I guarantee.
Any woman who is raped not only remembers the year, but the month, the week, the day, the time, the place.
Isn't it just outrageous?
She claimed it was at Bergdorf Goodman, which is a very swanky department store in Manhattan.
But if we don't know the date or the time, how can Trump defend himself with an alibi showing he was somewhere else, not even in the vicinity, which I expect was indeed the case?
So here we have the cases all together.
As I mentioned, you got the very first $130,000 payment made by Trump's then personal attorney Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels in late October 2016.
The second indictment annotated Trump faces his first indictment for retention of classified docs in conspiracy with a top aide and employee at Mar-a-Lago.
The case fits a federal government against a man who could very well win the next election and become president again.
The detailed in-type was filed in Florida in June, updated in July.
In an annotated version of what's known as a superseding in-type, along with shocking photos of boxes of classified materials openly stored in a ballroom and a bathroom, I think that was just a display that was laid out by the Department of Justice.
It was not how Trump cabbed them.
They're in a real problem here, however, because a judge in Florida is asking how this indictment being brought in Florida could be based upon a jury that was convened—a grand jury that was convened in New York City.
And I think they're in deep, deep trouble here, as well as on multiple other grounds.
The third indictment, of course, has to do with January 6th, his efforts to remain in the White House.
But Trump, I think, is going to be completely exonerated.
We have mountains and mountains of evidence to show that the election was stolen.
So the absurd claims that this is based upon to wit that Trump knowingly lied about having lost the election, as Jonathan Turley has observed, the whole case collapses if Trump sincerely believed it.
And since we got more and more evidence to substantiate the belief we already got from Mike Lindell, from Ron Johnson, from Denise D'Souza, now we have the Michigan scandal.
There's another in Colorado.
This case is really quite absurd, and as I say, we'll learn more about Georgia, but they've already tipped their hand.
Carl.
Yeah, again, this is great optics for patriots.
This is lawfare, and anybody who's paying attention, and especially people who are just a little bit trained, is that it is tragic, comic, ridiculous.
And Jonathan Turley, he's one of my favorite attorneys, his blog was voted at least once as the best in the U.S., and he lays out For me, too, the most ridiculous aspect of the case is that they're claiming fraud.
All right, so you're going to have to prove that this was a known lie to benefit Trump.
And a known lie, just taking a look at the primary evidence of what happened on that fateful day and evening and into the next morning in November of 2020, is that you had the impossible vote counts after all those But what our opponents are doing is that this is all that they have.
impossible to have an honest election.
And therefore, that's the end of the story.
There is no fraud there.
But what our opponents are doing is that this is all that they have.
All that they have is bullshit and spin.
And they're hoping to win somehow and then just sweep the story under the rug again and just rely on corporate media to gloss over like saying, oh, yeah, well, 2020, that all those cases, they were all thrown out.
Without mentioning the crooked judicial system that would not allow for the court to have to be able to receive the evidence and for juries to be able to consider the evidence.
So this is is all more bullshit.
And our opponents, they have to somehow assassinate Trump or do something to take control of the narrative again, and then just push the story into corporate media and textbooks.
But man, if we can get this breakthrough for the truth, then all of it, all of it, all of it falls apart.
This shameless politicalization of law enforcement and the judicial system is proof positive the United States truly has become a banana republic.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I will say you're absolutely correct, and I think this is more of a lawfare thing.
As Carl said, it also was an inquisition tactic that has been used by authority in many instances, and has been great around the time of the fall of that empire, consequently, too.
So that's really something people should think about in terms of this overreach.
I think the tighter they squeeze, the more that's going to slip through their fingers, and they really can't go velvet glove or iron fist anymore.
This is going to get interesting, I think, for a lot of these people that are holding on to power and trying to hold on to centuries of ill-gotten gains in the ways that they are, and trying to turn out humanity in the way that they are too, and think about how much damage has been done.
By this orchestration in terms of depopulation by fear and voluntary means, as they're saying.
These people are in their own mind, in their own souls, absolved of the mischief that they've caused and this experiment that they've unleashed on humanity.
I think that this is going to be monumental in terms of human history, if there's enough survivors allowed to tell the truth there.
Nice.
Very good points.
Meanwhile.
Trump to Newsmax.
Georgia won't stand for a fourth indictment.
Hesitantly joking about being indicted for a fourth time, former President Trump said the next might be a tipping point.
Look, I don't think the people of Georgia, where I did very well and won it the first time, I think by much more a second, I can say that about the whole election, too.
I don't think they'd stand for it.
As Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney Fannie Willis convenes the latest Trump grand jury, seeking an indictment related to his 2020 presidential election.
Bullying asks if she could give Trump a fair trial.
hesitantly joking about potentially being indicted for a fourth time.
Oh, no, of course not, Trump said.
This woman is not a capable woman.
Trump S.Y.
an indictment on seeking a 2020 election challenge would come years later, potentially days before the 2024 GOP presidential primary kicks off.
There's a question that answers itself.
Maybe she'll change her mind.
I don't know what she's doing.
I really don't know.
All I know is she could have done it two and a half years ago if she were going to do something.
And this is about a perfect phone call, a call where I'm questioning the election.
I'm telling them that, in my opinion, the election was rigged.
And they're saying that I did something incorrect.
I didn't do anything wrong.
I believe I won that election by many, many votes, many, many hundreds of thousands of votes.
That's what I think.
And I express that on the phone call.
As has been reported, Trump asked Georgia to investigate election fraud in the tight race.
I said, what I need is 11,000 votes.
I want this thing by hundreds of thousands.
That's my opinion.
It's a strong opinion, and I think it's borne out by the facts, and we'll see that.
Trump references the House Democrats' first failed impeachment, where he was impeached, but we're asking Ukraine to investigate what are now serious allegations of a bribery scheme potentially leading all the way to Joe Biden.
But she wants to do something on a perfect phone call.
This call, I say, was more perfect than my call with Ukraine, which turned out to be a hell of a lot better than people even thought.
Because I was right about Ukraine when I said you should take a look at Biden.
I called to congratulate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the time.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, Trump's choice of how to respond is just pretty much off the cuff, and this would be an opportunity to lay into some of the data of what happened into Georgia They'll be able to take advantage of those of those talking points, but he didn't do it.
And this is going to have to have a different venue for those facts to come out.
But I'll put into the show notes here at bit shoot, and I can say for absolute confidence in the Pennsylvania legislative hearing after the 2020 election.
The votes counted after their 3 a.m.
stoppage had a batch of votes allegedly for Biden for 600,000 and 3,000 for Trump a 201 ratio.
And that's it.
Story over.
That's election fraud.
It's mathematically impossible for it to be anything else.
And I'm sure that Georgia has similar data.
And again, the documentaries 2,000 Mules and Selection Code, if you haven't seen those, those will prove election fraud.
Well, let me reiterate the point I made earlier on.
I had a phone call just before we went on the show that they had posted the indictments against Trump in Georgia, but they had to take them down because the grand jury hadn't even voted them yet.
This is just an indication of the fraudulent character of this entire undertaking, purely political, no foundation in fact or law.
Chris.
Yeah, you would think most of these cases would be dismissed just from the nature and the predatory history of people that have made accusations that have been proven to be false multiple times and the same people get to keep making these accusations and then he's got to go through all this walking on eggshells.
This is an acquisition tactic.
Like I say, it's a bargaining trick where they put you on the defensive for things you didn't do and even sometimes accuse you of your own their own misdeeds so that you're on the defensive and you're defending against things that you know, You shouldn't be and you waste a lot of your political energy on the defensive instead of worrying about doing maybe things that would separate you from them in terms of policy.
And I think that maybe that's what they're trying to do here a little bit too.
But I think, you know, the ball is in Trump's court.
He's kind of seems to be, you know, on the ropes where he likes to be.
This, to me, I think he's just toying with them.
This is part of the theater, like I say.
I see another Judeo-Masonic-led civil war coming on soon.
I'll just say that.
Well, very good, Chris.
You make lots of points.
Meanwhile, get this.
Charging an electric car in public is now more expensive than filling up with petrol.
This is a report from the UK.
Some electric car owners will now be paying more to charge than owners of petrol.
She added that access to free charging is a brilliant incentive to get people to switch, but it's not a sustainable solution for the future.
Many have called on the government to slash the rate of VAT that's a tax on public chargers for $0.20 to $0.05 to match the rate of VAT on home charging.
Some major supermarkets have free electric car charging available to customers, including Tesco, Sainsbury's, Aldi, and Lidl, but drivers are urged to check before they go to charge.
Many hotels across the UK also offer customers a chance to charge during their stay, with local attractions like zoos and museums doing the same.
Data has found that electric car drivers without off-street parking are paying up to 1,213 pounds a year to charge, which is 1,037 more than those with a driveway.
With petrol prices around 1.47 pound per liter, it costs an average of 1,023 pounds to fill up a Volkswagen Golf based on annual mileage.
Meanwhile, the CEO behind Hallmark's woke journey announces plans to step down.
Hallmark Media CEO Wanya Lucas oversaw the company's transition to embracing more LGBTQ-friendly storylines, Will stepped down, according to a report published by The Hollywood Reporter.
Lucas will stay till year's end and will remain on Hallmark Media Board of Directors.
And Hallmark Company CEO Mike Perry will manage the transition as she exits.
I am honored to have led this company and am tremendously proud of the progress we've made by creating an evolved entertainment experience that inspires meaningful emotionally connected moments for audiences, Lucas said.
My passion for the Hallmark brand has grown in deeply rewarding ways and will remain paramount as I continue to help guard Hallmark Media's future in a more strategically focused capacity.
Lucas came to Hallmark from TV One in 2020, taking the reins from former CEO and President Bill Abbott after backlash over Hallmark Channel's removal of a commercial featuring a same-sex couple, and one of her priorities was to increase representation.
LucasArrival followed a promise from Perry for Hallmark Channel to work with GLAAD, the gay and lesbian alliance against defamation, to create a more inclusive environment and promote more diverse storylines.
During her tenure, the channel not only introduced several LGBTQ+, supporting characters, but also premiered its first feature film centered on a same-sex relationship.
While Lucas, the niece of late baseball legend Hank Aaron, oversaw a move to more diverse, inclusive programming, she also oversaw the abrupt exit of a number of the network's biggest stars.
Candace Cameron-Brew, who headlined a number of holiday films for the network and starred in the Aurora Teagarden mystery series, announced in 2022 she was joining ex-CEO Bill Abbott's new venture, Great American Family, which would keep the focus on traditional marriage and faith-based storylines.
Among other actors that made the jump from Hallmark to Great American Family are Trevor Donovan, Jenny Garth, Daniel Lessing, Lori Loughton, and Jenny Liley.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first with electric cars, incentives do matter.
They matter at all levels, at an individual level, family member level, and a society level member.
So, with The electric cars, if the electricity is cheaper than the gas, that's going to be an incentive.
You give a tax break, that's going to be an incentive.
If you have a quieter ride, that's an incentive.
But the best incentive here in California that I responded to, especially with cars for our family, at least one of them, the electric, is the Diamond Lane sticker.
So on the freeways in California, you get that little sticker with an electric car, you get to go in the Diamond Lane or the freeway, and that is a huge advantage.
So Hallmark, CEO, stepped down after woke programming.
That would be interesting to take a look at the Bud Light-like numbers that might be transparent with that decision as well.
Yes.
Chris?
Yeah, I wonder how many social credit points that would be worth in terms of social credit score.
You know, having one of those electronic cars or whatever versus a gas-powered one.
Yeah, I often wonder what kind of shakedown taxes they're going to have for us in years to come.
And it seems to become pretty obvious, I guess, from what we're seeing from these guys.
And there doesn't really seem to be too much human resistance to it.
And I think that's unfortunate because I don't know.
I don't know what's going on fast, but you have to have to have seen the change in generational reactions in the past few years and and probably in proportion to what we're looking at.
I really can't believe that the response has been like so mellow.
You know what I mean?
It's like we're going to depopulate you all and you're going to not even be able to complain about it.
You know, it's something else.
Yeah, you're absolutely right.
I think these two combined just show the Democrats' agenda is falling apart worldwide.
Worldwide.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
The fun just keeps coming from my blog.
Watch.
Forensic accounting expert exposes Biden family's web of LLCs.
Dubinsky, forensic accounting expert, indicated that individuals sometimes establish shell companies to allow for the transfer of funds in a way that obfuscates a source and purpose.
If you start with those and then follow it all the way down, that's where you'll start to get more information, he explained.
And, of course, we know that's what the mobster said, that he was used to dealing with shell companies, and that's exactly what the Bidens are doing, one of the ways he was able to nail them as being a crime family, which the evidence continues to mount on a daily basis.
Carl?
So, yeah.
You have to hide the money.
Yep.
Yep.
You have to hide the money.
Of course you do.
And then you get that quip of the actor Biden, maybe about two months ago, where he faced these accusations and the actor just said, well, where's the money?
I'm kidding.
Okay.
Well, we're showing you where the money is.
Now we have the FBI's own documents of the IRS whistleblower documenting the $20 million in bribes.
And that's corroborated by The CEO of Burisma saying, yeah, yep, we did that.
Yep, yep, yep.
So it's just a matter of time if, if we can avoid any catastrophes or World War III or anything else that would steer the narrative away, or perhaps this is what our opponents actually want is the construction of a civil war.
But again, I'm at 95% certainty with the optics being so bad is that this is the destruction The final destruction of our opponents and all of this is being brought into the light, and I hope that we're going to see, is a brilliant orchestration of all these narratives, Ukraine, the Great Reset, the election fraud of COVID, all coming together and all of them becoming clear to the American public all at once.
What we shall see, anything that can be orchestrated for the good can also be co-opted for the bad, because that's the entire history.
Well, I think some of the stuff that I was talking about earlier is relevant.
Maybe some of it didn't make it out of the first session that we were recording, but I really think that humanity's got to think about what has been done and what needs to be done, and maybe we can outsource the 1% and make it right for the rest of the world.
I think it's going to start with us stepping away from their power mechanisms and I guess appeasing their authority.
And I'm sure they're going to crank down and call it treason or whatever they're going to call it or terrorism or whatever good word they have every decade for it.
But there has to be some sort of resistance left in the human spirit or it will be gone.
So I think that's important that people realize what we're facing here.
Well, thank you both for excellent commentary.
It seems to me these lawsuits are just falling apart.
That they were fabricated to try to smear Trump or even defeat him from running again is more than obvious, even to the most Dull-witted American, if they're paying any attention at all.
This latest case of posting prematurely indictments that have not even been voted upon by the grand jury is a case in point.
But Jack Smith has no case whether it's related to Stormy Daniels, who, as I said, has asserted in an affidavit she did not have an affair with Donald Trump, so there was nothing to cover up.
Or with regard to the documents case in Florida where he's having a grand jury in New York because he knows they'll do anything he wants them to do.
Not so in Florida.
And where he's even prosecuting Trump under the wrong statute.
Then we go to the January 6th, which really had no foundation to begin with because Trump had only encouraged his followers to be peaceful and patriotic.
But the Democrats think they can just excise all the exculpating evidence and go ahead and prosecute Trump.
This is what happens in very low quality nations.
This is indeed even, I think, beneath contempt of a banana republic.
This is just a disgrace.
The Democrats are terrified of Trump.
If the numbers I've heard are right, he actually won by a massive margin on the order of 101 million to 37 votes for Biden.
The Democrats are shitting in their pants.
They're soiling their diapers.
They haven't got a chance and they know it.
So resorting to every trick in the book—underhanded, foul, immoral, illegal—they could care less if it'll do the job.
And I think, similarly, they don't want R.F.K.
Jr.
to upset their apple cart.
So, even though there could never have been a more clear-cut case for deserving of Secret Service protection, they, like a mafia don, were in the position to do it, are denying it to him.
This is completely outrageous and contemptible.
Anyone who thinks the Democratic Party deserves a place of respect in this nation didn't get the memo.
It's becoming writ large.
Do we need to have skywriting in the atmosphere for you to appreciate?
The situation is very, very bad.
And for the Democrats to even claim that defaulting or reducing the United States credit is false Is Trump's fault when he's out of office two and a half years just can see how they are playing games here?
This isn't a serious administration, sad to say, and the damage they're wreaking upon America is monstrous.
Spend as much time as you can with family, friends, and people you love and care about.
We still do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection