Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 31, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:55:53

The Raw Deal (31 July 2023) with Mike Cunningham

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	No, I need to.
	No, I need I need to.
	No.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal.
	I have a very interesting guest.
	Mike Cunningham is going to talk about the death of education in America.
	He calls it edgeicide.
	I think he's got a lot of points you're going to appreciate.
	Before we get there, at the bottom of the hour, however, I have some stories to share with you.
	Russia's Medved, for example, has asserted we'd have to use nuclear weapons if the Ukrainian offensive were a success.
	In my opinion, this is the first major blunder I've seen coming from Russian authorities.
	I'll explain why.
	Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who sometimes raises a specter of nuclear conflict over Ukraine, said Sunday Moscow would have to use nukes if he has ongoing counter-effects that were a success.
	It's not a success.
	I don't anticipate Russia having to resort to nukes.
	But in my opinion, this is a very, very bad thing to say.
	Imagine if the offensive backed by NATO were a success, and they tore up part of our land, we'd be forced to use nuclear weapons, according to the rules of a decree from the President of Russia.
	There would simply be no other option.
	So our enemies should pray for our warrior success.
	They are making sure that a global nuclear fire is not ignited.
	Mendevin, who has cast himself as one of Moscow's most hawkish voices, appeared to be referring to part of Russia's nuclear doctrine, asserting nukes can be used in response to aggression against Russia, carried out using conventional weapons, when it threatens the existence of the Russian state.
	Ukraine, of course, is trying to retake territory Russia has unilaterally annexed and declared part of its own, which included Crimea and the Donbass.
	But that was done in accordance with international law, in Crimea in particular, and there's no prospect whatsoever Russia would ever relinquish Crimea.
	Putin said Saturday there were no serious battlefield changes to report in recent days and that Ukraine had lost large amounts of military equipment since June 4th.
	In fact, I have reports now showing Ukrainians are surrendering, they're putting up the white flag, they're bringing in their tanks, in large measure.
	Kremlin critics have in the past accused Mendovet of making extreme statements in an effort to dissuade Western countries from continuing to supply Ukraine with arms.
	But think about it.
	Think about it.
	If Mendevedt is saying that Russia could use nukes if Ukraine were about to prevail, why could the NATO nations, the West, not declare that if Russia is about to prevail, if Ukraine is about to lose, then they're entitled to use nukes?
	This was a very dumb thing for Mendevedt to have said.
	I respect him in so many ways, but this was a major mistake.
	We've heard a lot about the Biden crime family.
	The evidence is simply overwhelming.
	Well, if the Bidens are a crime family, then what's the role of Merrick Garland?
	Well, think of the Godfather, the conciliatory to the Don.
	I dare say Merrick Garland is a conciliatory to Don Biden.
	Get this.
	Absolutely extraordinary.
	On the eve of a high-profile House Committee testimony by Hunter Biden's business associate, Devin Archer, the DOJ from the Southern District of New York has mysteriously asked Judge Ronnie Abrams to schedule a date for Archer to report to prison in an unrelated case.
	If the SUNY New York was attempting to threaten or intimidate Archer in advance of his testimony, this is the path they would take.
	At Politico notes, the court isn't expected to make a decision before Archer will meet behind closed doors with the House Oversight Committee, meaning that even if the court ultimately were to side with a request, Archer wouldn't have to report to prison before the meeting, and his Archer wouldn't have to report to prison before the meeting, and his attorney said he will move forward with his planned appearance The timing of the letter, however, looks transparently motivated.
	Absolutely unbelievable.
	Here we have a reported interview with the head of the country.
	Sunday morning with what some are calling the biggest political scandal in recent memory, the Biden family's alleged business of influence peddling.
	Oversight committee member Nancy Mays telling me Joe Biden and family may have taken in upwards of $50 million from foreign nationals while he was a sitting vice president and beyond.
	Tomorrow, a key player in the Biden business partnership is set to testify before Congress behind closed doors.
	Former Hunter Biden business associate Devin Archer set to sit for an on-the-record interview with House Oversight Committee members behind closed doors Monday morning.
	On just how involved Joe Biden was in Hunter's foreign deal-making.
	The New York Post's Miranda Devine is reporting that Archer is expected to reveal Hunter put his then-Vice President father on the phone with business associates at least two dozen times.
	This, of course, would appear to contradict President Biden's claim that he never spoke with Hunter Biden about any business deals.
	Miranda Devine will join us coming up in this broadcast.
	Stay with us for that.
	Meanwhile, Hunter's plea deal with his father's DOJ unraveled on Wednesday after a federal judge balked at Hunter's lawyer's demands that his plea would exonerate him from any future criminality, even as prosecutors had to admit he is in fact under active investigation right now.
	This after Hunter's lawyers misrepresented themselves to the court in trying to get whistleblower testimony removed from the evidence.
	One day after the deal fell apart and Hunter pleaded not guilty, the DOJ went after President Trump again, with special counsel Jack Smith adding three new charges against the former president over his handling of classified documents.
	Joining me right now in this Sunday Morning Futures exclusive is the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Congressman James Comer.
	Mr. Chairman, good to see you.
	Thanks very much for being here this morning.
	Good morning.
	I want to ask you about your investigation, but first let me get to this breaking news.
	I have in my hand a letter from the Department of Justice that was sent to the Southern District of New York on Saturday.
	By the way, Devin Archer is testifying on Monday.
	Do you ever see, do you usually see the DOJ send letters like this out on a Saturday?
	Never.
	Never.
	This is the first time I've ever heard of the Department of Justice doing anything on a Saturday.
	So what is this letter?
	Can you walk us through it?
	The government is apprising the court of the status of Devin Archer's appeal of his judgment of conviction and they request that the court set a surrender date for the defendant to report to a facility.
	Please walk us through what this letter says.
	Yeah, the letter from the Department of Justice is trying to nudge the judge to go ahead and sentence Devin Archer for something unrelated to what we're going to be talking to him about tomorrow.
	It's odd that it was issued on a Saturday and it's odd that it's right before he's scheduled to come in to have an opportunity to speak in front of the House Oversight Committee and tell the American people the truth about what really went on.
	With Barisma.
	So, you know, I don't know if this is a coincidence, Maria, or if this is another example of the weaponization of the Department of Justice, but I can tell you this, the lengths to which the Biden legal team has gone to try to intimidate our witnesses, to coordinate with the Department of Justice and to certainly coordinate with the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee to encourage people not to cooperate.
	With our investigation to encourage banks not to turn over bank records, to encourage Treasury not to let us have access to those suspicious activity reports.
	It's very troubling and I believe that this is another violation of the law.
	This is obstruction of justice, but nevertheless we're going to continue to move forward and try to present the American people with the facts and the truth about this president and his family.
	Let me say that while Don Biden is no Don Corleone.
	And it seemed to me that his conciliatory was far more talented than Merrick Garland.
	There can be no doubt whatsoever that trying to free up his witness from testifying before this House committee is just what a crime boss would do.
	And Merrick Garland, I mean, God forbid, he was actually being considered to be a candidate for the Supreme Court.
	How outrageous is that?
	There's more about it.
	Much, in fact.
	The Gateway Pundit has a significant article here.
	DOJ requests court to order Devin Archer's surrender for imprisonment prior to testimony on Biden and crime family.
	In an unprecedented move, a DOJ has issued a letter to a federal judge in the Southern District of New York suggesting Devin Archer, a business associate of Hunter Biden, be ordered to surrender and begin his term of imprisonment.
	The development comes amidst Archer's ongoing appeal, just before a scheduled testimony about the criminal activities involving the Biden crime family.
	The letter requests the court send a date and time for Archer to report to a facility chosen by the Bureau of Prisons.
	In light of the foregoing, the government respectfully requests an amendment be ordered to surrender, at a date and time determined by the court, to a facility designated by the Bureau of Prisons to commence the term of imprisonment.
	Archer's counsel replied, Mr. Archer believed it premature to set a report date in light of his anticipated continuing appeal, as well as a newly discovered sentencing error that the government has now conceded.
	Counsel for Mr. Archer will put in a response to government's request by Wednesday.
	Despite the opposition, the DOJ continues to push for Archer's surrender date to be set.
	This is just disgusting!
	This is just so blatant!
	Comber suggested the move is an attempt to obstruct Archer's upcoming testimony before the House Oversight Committee, which he chairs, regarding Biden family crimes.
	I have in my hand a letter from the DOJ sent to the Southern District of New York on Saturday, by the way.
	Devin Archer testifying on Monday.
	Do you ever see—usually see the DOJ send a letter like this out on a Saturday?
	Rehabilitation romance?
	Never, never.
	The first time I've ever heard of the DOJ doing anything on a Saturday.
	I mean, this is just so blatant and disgusting.
	It was last month, and even earlier this week, announced he would be testifying in front of the House Oversight Committee.
	Many have been predicting he'd testify about 24 instances of Joe Biden's engagement with Ernest Warren's business partners over the phone.
	Maria said it would appear to contradict.
	Obviously it would contradict, because Don Biden has denied that he had anything to do with his business dealings, which is obviously as big a line of bullshit as we get from this White House, and we get a lot of them.
	It's also reported Archer's in hiding after receiving threats.
	His Yale buddy and John Kerry's former campaign manager, Archer, has been forced to flee both his Long Island and Brooklyn homes, he told friends, but still plans to testify to the House Oversight Committee on Monday.
	They better have this guy in witness protection or he's going to wind up like some of those who are going to testify against the Corleone family, including Michael.
	The reports he was cancelling his appearance, that's not true.
	But he has gotten threats, and he's concerned about them.
	A different source denied Archer was in hiding, but confirmed he received threats.
	Archer's wife Krista told the Daily Mail he's not here, he's not at our other home, he's not in D.C., but would not reveal his location.
	Meanwhile, George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley has discussed developments in the Hunter Biden plea deal, which raised serious concerns for the White House.
	According to a report by Axios, the hearing before the court got so intense, There were not one but two recesses.
	During one of those breaks, Noriega dropped a bombshell questioning whether the deal could shield Hunter from potential prosecution under the Foreign Agent Registration Act, among other laws.
	That's the one that the White House most fears Turley has observed.
	Today, the DOJ revealed Hunter Biden is under investigation for being a foreign agent.
	It gets even juicier.
	Justice Department prosecutor Leo Wise mentioned during the hearing there's an ongoing Investigation related to Hunter Biden.
	However, when pressed for more information, he couldn't talk about it.
	Professor Turley added more spice to the mix, saying this whole situation is like a poorly planned wedding, where both the bride and the groom are having second thoughts.
	He pointed out that DOJ wanted to close the case and cap the investigation, but did not want to admit it was over.
	The action, by the way—and this was covert, it was in a previous document, not in the formal deal, but in an earlier document where they hoped the judge would not notice—it was so corrupt to exempt him, give him immunity for future discoveries of crimes he may have committed, they could not admit it in open court.
	They hoped, of course, the other scene would just play along, but they were outraged because that was the whole point of the deal.
	Hunter's legal team had been under the impression his plea agreement would close out the case and nothing else would be investigated.
	Looks like someone didn't get the memo.
	Now, we've had this fascinating development at Martha's Vineyard with the death of his chef.
	I want to comment on that because I have further thoughts about it.
	It turns out we know from as far back as November 3, 2011, Barack Obama was accused by two men of inappropriate behavior.
	Barack was accused of sexually harassing individuals when he was president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s.
	At least two male students compared to editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the Journal because of it.
	The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama, That made them angry and uncomfortable.
	They signed agreements with the university and gave them financial payouts to leave the journal.
	Agreements including language that bars them from talking about their departure.
	In a series of comments over the past ten days, and remember, as I observe, this was published in 2011.
	Obama and his administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegation of sexual harassment of men.
	They have declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming there were financial settlements in two cases.
	The Kansas Citian has confirmed the identities of the two male journal editors who complain about Obama, but for privacy reasons is not publishing their names.
	Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review from late 1988 to mid-1989.
	The Catasidian learned the allegation against him over the course of several weeks and put together accounts of what happened by talking to a lengthy roster of former university officials, current and past students, and others familiar with the workings of the journal.
	This is very serious stuff!
	Now get what's going on here and just how it fits together.
	This chap was a handsome guy.
	I would bet he appealed to Obama.
	But he's married with children.
	My suspicion is he's not bisexual and didn't want to play the games Obama wanted.
	In the section where the cops are supposed to write the reason for the call?
	It was left blank.
	But every other call that night was properly filled out.
	But the logs also state that the call came from an address two miles away from the Obama home.
	But when this story first broke, we were told it came from the Obama's property.
	We're also finding out the 911 call was made by a woman.
	What's up, guys?
	It's your boy, Benny.
	It is our obligation to go to you with all of the new evidence and information that we get on a story that we have covered, and we have been covering this death at Obama's mansion.
	Every single TikTok of this event seems incredibly, incredibly strange to us, and we will tell you straight up that skepticism can never be wrong.
	We were skeptic about this entire story the moment it broke, and hot damn it, we've been proving right now.
	Check this out.
	The police are covering up For the Obamas, check it out.
	Tafari Campbell is the name of the private chef for Barack Obama.
	Paddleboarding death riddle.
	Cops left call log reporting blank and said it came from two miles away as they refused to reveal who was with him in the water.
	What the hell is this about?
	Ladies and gentlemen, the police officers did not write down what was inside.
	Okay, let's read the article.
	Exclusive.
	Tafari Campbell, this is the chef, paddleboarding death.
	The cops left the report blank.
	The call came from the Edgartown Police Department at 746, but the logs show the reason is blank.
	Tafari drowned while paddleboarding with another person.
	Who was that person?
	You can see here, in the article.
	Everything here is the publicly available Police Department logs.
	This is from the Edgartown Police.
	This is a check of the property.
	This is a minor motor vehicle movement.
	Vehicle accident.
	Medical emergency.
	Blank.
	At Obama's address.
	Blank.
	Huh?
	And why can't we get the 9-1-1 number?
	We can't get it.
	They won't release it.
	Why won't they release who called 9-1-1?
	The story continues to change, which makes you think that these people are lying to us.
	We're not saying there was foul play.
	We're simply saying that if you don't tell us the truth, if you don't give us the information, then there has to be an assumption of foul play.
	Remember Paul Pelosi with the hammer.
	So, this man, Barack Obama's private chef, He died, even though he was a proficient swimmer.
	We've covered that.
	He was able to hold his own in water.
	You can see the videos of him swimming back and forth in the swimming pool.
	So, this man died in eight feet of water for some reason.
	Couldn't grab onto his paddleboard for some reason.
	Like, if you fell off, at least just hold onto your board.
	It'll absolutely keep you afloat.
	And there was a second person with him?
	None of it makes any sense.
	None of it makes any sense.
	The Edgartown Police Chief, Bruce Nemi, told the Daily Mail that the call log is generated by the Dukes County Sheriff's Office.
	He could only speculate as to the reason why it's left blank, saying there may be because the caller from Obama's property didn't dial 911, which automatically generates location data, and instead maybe made a direct call to a business line.
	Okay, I mean, you'd have to assume that the President would have that.
	That's not outside of the realm of possibility.
	He also said the address was listed as Wilson's Landing because that was the public launch used as the command post.
	At the time the call came in, authorities didn't know where the drowning occurred, so they used a staging site for incident's location.
	It took them 12 hours to find the body.
	They went door-to-door asking neighbors about it.
	Why would you go door-to-door looking for a drowned person?
	Another strange thing.
	The property boasts a private beach from which the paddleboarders can easily launch.
	At the time of the drowning, Brock and Michelle were out of the house.
	Were they?
	Because that story's changed.
	They first said, these people are off the island.
	They're nowhere near the island.
	Don't worry about it.
	Brock and Michelle weren't around.
	It's just their private chef who travels with them everywhere he was around.
	Then that story changed.
	They were off the island, along with their two girls, who left the island immediately afterwards.
	Malia and Sasha Obama are pictured leaving Martha's Vineyard after death of Chef.
	So, they sent their... they're starting to send... they sent their family away.
	See ya!
	Just think about what would happen if you want to cover up a crime.
	Notice some of the key features.
	We have this call-in where they won't identify the caller, but it was supposed to be a woman.
	And there's something odd about the way the call was made.
	It doesn't have the proper location, but rather Wilson's Landing, which is where they set up the command post.
	That's improper.
	They don't have the source, the identity, what's going on.
	That's improper.
	We know the guy was a good swimmer.
	We actually have video of him swimming.
	He could swim.
	Now, guess what?
	The fancy boots?
	Obama spotted golfing with bandaged fingers and possible wounded eye days after Shaft's death.
	He has what clearly looks to be a black eye.
	He's got bandages on his fingers.
	Images have appeared online of Barack Obama golfing.
	They have people raising questions.
	He wears bandages on his left dominant hand.
	May or may not have a small wound under the left eye, depending on whom you ask.
	Here's a post from Twitter.
	The images, which came from an article on Daily Mail, clearly show the bandages and have people speculate about the dark spot that appears to be on his face.
	The latter is questionable.
	Certainly either wouldn't come out in public or would wear makeup if they were trying to hide something suspicious, but who knows?
	All this comes days after his sue's shift.
	Terrified Tafari Campbell was found dead, according to the Gateway Pundit.
	Dressed in a green polo shirt and white shorts, Barack Obama was seen engaging in a round of golf at the exclusive In Your Golf Club.
	The former president noticeably buried bandaged fingers, which caused speculation online.
	Citizen journalist Travis Aplin wrote, just days after his personal friend and chef died in a very mysterious paddleboarding accident, Barack Obama appears to have injured fingers and a black eye.
	We don't know still who the other person was, and Obama loves paddleboarding.
	I think we can all guess what happened at this point.
	I think sending off the girls is another tell.
	They won't identify it was on a paddle boat.
	I now suspect the situation was the following.
	That Barack actually approached Taref in the kitchen of their own home.
	Taref put up a fight.
	He actually cut a couple of fingers of Obama.
	So to conceal the location and circumstances, they sent it out in a paddle boat, had Michelle call in.
	To say it happened on a paddle boat and they're covering it up.
	The differences between death from drowning and other deaths is easy to discern.
	We'll be right back with Mike Cunningham.
	Thank you.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support.
	This has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution.
	Rainbow, rainbow, rainbow, rainbow.
	Hey everyone!
	It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8 p.m.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSedge.com, the people station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website By the host, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Just a few additional thoughts as I'm joined by Mike Cunningham today, and I'm very pleased to have him here.
	The Edgartown Police Department is not going to be equal to the task of investigating a potential murder by Barack Obama.
	They are just not going to be up to it.
	You can see they're already concealing vital information.
	They're not identifying who called in with a 911 report.
	And by the way, that caller said he was dressed all in black on his paddleboard.
	He'd fallen off and hadn't resurfaced.
	In other words, they want to implant an image of the circumstances under which he died.
	Number two, the fact they won't identify who was paddleboarding with him.
	My suspicion has to be at this point that it was Brock himself taking the body out so he could dump it in the The pond.
	The Edgartown Great Pond.
	But they're concealing that information, too.
	The fact they've sent the girls off.
	They would have been in the house.
	They might even have known that Barack and Tariq had an argument in the kitchen.
	They might have vital information.
	So I get them out of town.
	Now, the Obamas Or amateurs at murder, unlike the Clintons who have vast experience.
	The Clintons don't do it themselves, they invoke intermediaries.
	But given the injuries to Barack under these circumstances, I can only say, this requires a formal investigation by authorities higher than the Edgartown Police Department.
	And let me add, The symptoms, the signs of having died from drowning, are very distinctive.
	And I'm going to predict right now, if a proper autopsy is conducted, those signs will not be present.
	I also had an independent report that there were bruises on the body, suggesting they had a Knocked down, dragged out, fight in the kitchen, and that he managed to cut Barack's hand, and now he's out on the golf course trying to gut it out, fake it through, but these are amateurs at murder.
	I'm just saying, between the Biden crime family collapsing, with Arthur Daniels testifying today, assuming he made it to Congress, The whole Biden situation is falling apart.
	The Democratic Party is in upheaval.
	This event with Barack and Michelle has legs.
	This is not going to go away.
	I'm extremely pleased to have as my featured guest today Mike Huntingham, who's an educator from Houston, Texas, in the Dallas-Fort Worth region.
	He's been involved in international education.
	He's featured me on his shows with international students in the past.
	I hold him in high esteem.
	Mike thinks that the state of education in America today is calamitous, and actually talks about edgicide as a term, a global term, to describe what's going on here.
	Mike, welcome to The Raw Deal.
	Oh, thank you very much, Dr. Pritzker, and it's a pleasure being with you today.
	I'd like to begin by saying that this week I'll begin my 39th year in education, so I love that, Michael.
	I had a career of 35 years in higher education.
	I'd welcome, by the way, any comments you might have on the stories during the first segment, should you be so disposed.
	Well, it kind of fits into what I wanted to talk about in Edgeicide, because basically, if you control the narrative, you control the story, and because we don't really teach intensive questioning anymore, and much of what we get knowledge is through social media, and if you control the social media like we've seen in the past, this could blow over very easily.
	So it all fits in together.
	And I got interested in this many years ago.
	I got interested in conspiracies many years ago when I wrote a screenplay for a television series.
	And I got an agent and started doing some stuff.
	This is back in 2000.
	And then, lo and behold, I talked to a production person, and over a course of a year, he pretty much picked my brain, and he decided to do it without actually cluing me in on anything.
	So I found out the hard way, conspiracies actually do happen, and they can happen to you as the individual person.
	Fast forward to last year, I have been actively involved in obtaining a second master's degree, and I've been doing it through Armenian Virtual College.
	My master's thesis for my second master's was about the Armenian Genocide and American-U.S.
	foreign policy under Woodrow Wilson.
	I did a deep dive and research into Woodrow Wilson.
	Woodrow Wilson has a fantastic The PR department.
	Remember, some of the greatest propagandists that started the propaganda movement were being benefited by Woodrow Wilson.
	Woodrow Wilson was probably not one of our best presidents.
	He had probably one of the best press relations.
	And you could say that he got credit for quite a few different things.
	So in the course of what I thought was a free and understanding and I thought I'd try to explain how we need to look at education.
	When you control the narrative, it just doesn't happen.
	And this is where I come up and coined this word, Educide.
	Educide originally came out in around 2006 or 2007.
	2006 or 2007.
	Then in 2022, a professor from Cambridge used it as a term to try to Americans killing Iraqi educators to try to take a narrative there and she gave a paper.
	Then I changed it in my master's thesis to the idea of changing narratives, the government doing this stuff.
	And you could go through almost any kind of conspiracy, or any kind of government action, or false flag action, or something like this, and you will see how Edgestide plays an important role.
	Excellent, excellent.
	Keep going, Mike.
	Lay it off.
	Okay, well now, I'd like to bring this down to some stuff that's happening currently.
	I know you're interested in current events, so let me try to talk to you a little bit about a current event here.
	My wife is at the store right now.
	And when you go by shopping, you see prices.
	And during the summer while we're off, I've been shopping a little bit more than I do during the school year.
	And we find you see prices and prices are going up and up and up and up.
	But if you just listen to the television, they say we have a 3% inflation rate.
	Now you're going to say, how does that have to do with education?
	And I'm going to tell you it has to do with education and calculators.
	Okay, now, you're going to say, how in the world is education?
	Back when I was in school, and probably when Jim was in school, and many of us were in school, we didn't really have calculators, and you had to learn most of your math in your mind, mental math.
	But you could do percentages, you could do, oh gosh, You can do percentages.
	You can do decimals.
	You can do anything.
	You can figure out stuff.
	You can figure out mortgage payments.
	It was not terribly difficult to do.
	But now, to give a student any kind of math problems, you have to give them a calculator to do it on the calculator, because they won't even do 2 plus 2 or 2 times 5 or whatever that.
	You know, times tables are obsolete.
	The computer doesn't work.
	It doesn't happen.
	I want to bring this up.
	I had to do a fundraiser.
	And for several years we could sell goods at our school after school.
	So we would sell goods and then we'd mark them up and sell them right after school and you know it was like that.
	So I gave a hundred dollars to the cash register, a cashier, and she said then all of a sudden all electricity in the Walmart went out.
	So they couldn't give you change or anything else and I was about to leave and I said, well, I'm just going to go ahead and leave.
	I'll feel real comfortable staying in the store with the storm warnings and stuff.
	We didn't have electricity.
	I want to take my chances outside.
	And she turned to me and said, you cannot leave.
	And I said, why?
	I gave you $100, but it was $99.99.
	You do not know how much change you're going to get till the machine comes back on.
	You're kidding me!
	No, no, no, no.
	And I'm sitting there thinking, oh my gosh, it's one penny!
	Now, think about this.
	When you go back to any kind of businesses today, if you use cash money, which probably very few people do, Do you use cash money?
	People do not know how to count change back to you.
	They don't really know.
	They have to figure it out like this.
	So this has been a concerted effort, I believe, for a long period of time.
	Now, you're going to ask me why?
	Okay, now combine the 3% that they had mentioned yesterday.
	I looked up Oreo Cookies.
	Oreo Cookies is the largest name-brand cookie in the United States.
	It's been that way for many years.
	B.Y.
	Hydrox Cookies, if you're familiar with Hydrox Cookies from a long time ago, but Oreos are from Nabisco, and it's a large, double stuffed, no-ing content, just regular cookies.
	Well, back in 2017, they were about $2.50 a package.
	Now the package has been reduced, I believe, by a couple ounces and today it's at $4.98 at our local grocery store.
	So that has almost doubled in price inside of about four or five years.
	And there's a lot of, if you look for information, there's a lot of articles that came out and they said, well, we have to raise because of this cost.
	We had to raise because of this cost.
	We had to raise because of this cost.
	All of which, still, the Washington D.C.
	is telling you it's only 3%.
	Well, when you start looking at it, that's even more than 3% each month for the last 60 months.
	So to double in price, that'd be a 500% rise in price.
	It's a double.
	But they say, well, they're going to do it backwards.
	They're taking from the 500 down to the $2.50.
	And then they'll try to look at that way.
	So people don't even question anything.
	And they just think they go along their merry way.
	And that's what's going to happen.
	And it's not that way at all.
	That's just a staggering illustration.
	You owed $99.99, you gave her a $100 bill, and she didn't know how much change you were gonna get?
	I mean, Mike, give me a break!
	Yeah, it happens quite frequently.
	Or then you have these things, it's really interesting, if you go to Starbucks or something, and then, you know, they'll say, you give them your card, you don't have cash involved, and they want to have a tip.
	Okay, I don't know what they really did, except just hand you a copy, but you still want to have a tip too.
	So you have a lot of people that are out for different money, but the idea or the central focus of this is why this is so important.
	It's why we need to teach critical thinking skills.
	And you do not get critical thinking skills by devoting time to using machines and machines doing the thinking for you.
	That takes away critical thinking skills, And that has been a modus operandi of the education system for many years now.
	We went to calculators, you know, since the time I was in school.
	You know, Scantron sheets.
	We're going to ABC.
	We have had a tremendous amount.
	No child left behind.
	No child left behind.
	I guess the idea was that they weren't going to leave anybody behind, but the trouble is they left everybody behind, because now you are taking the test not to see how smart you are, but effectively how well you read, and you're judging against people who did it the year before, but it aren't necessarily you.
	That's not a good way to find out how education is all about, because education should be individualized, not collectivized.
	The collectivization of education is one of the reasons why they're able to produce this exercise right now, because we no longer take personal type of responsibility.
	Yes, yes, Mike.
	I love it.
	I love it all.
	Very disturbing.
	Yeah, and you know... Go ahead.
	Well, I was thinking, because I recently came up with some very learned people that are questioning, and they said, well, I don't believe in edgecide at all.
	I don't think edgecide is important.
	And I told them, in no uncertain terms, edgecide is the foundation of why we can have wars, why we can't genocide, why we can't do anything like that completely.
	Because what we have done is we have made Uh, boogeyman and stuff out of people.
	Uh, people don't question it and then all of a sudden we go to war for, uh, reasons that are just totally unbelievable.
	A good example would be this.
	Back in 2000 and, um, I guess it's 8, 9, 10.
	We were doing a bunch of, uh, you mentioned earlier, I do a bunch of international education and we were doing Some international video conferencing and mock trials with A school in Iran.
	And we could hear clicks and clicks and clicks because it was Iran's secret police were listening to what we're talking about.
	And what we were doing, we were trying Harry Truman for dropping nuclear bombs and they were hearing the nuclear bombs and dropping and we were defending Truman for doing it.
	And they were saying that you shouldn't use nuclear bombs.
	It was a very interesting discussion.
	Then we talked for about five, six years, as long as that teacher was there.
	And I found out such an interesting part, because the people in Tehran would actually know what Barack Obama was doing, what his speech was.
	They could quote stuff right there, where the people from the United States couldn't do it at all.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	And you can't say that this happens by happenstance because it's happening all over the United States.
	It's not any one individual school.
	And one of the things you can kind of look at, which ends up happening kind of weird, is that education, you get individual grades.
	But we're teaching everybody to collectively think and we're teaching people not to question.
	So, like, when you take a look at certain things, like, I know how your feelings are, so I want to just throw it out there, but you take any subject and you'll find out if it's against what the people say the norm should be, then they start attacking that person.
	You know, on an individual basis and logical fallacy by ad hominem attacks, they'll attack the person.
	Whether it could be like a Robert Candy Jr.
	who's at this point, you know, coming out really strong on anti, not anti-vaccine, but at least questioning COVID and questioning some of these other things.
	And by their suspense, you can't question anything.
	So, you know, this reinforces the whole idea of edgesight again.
	Why should we be able to question?
	Isn't that the government's responsibility to question?
	Needless to say, if you don't have the right to challenge your government, you know, to criticize your government, what does it mean to be an American, Mike?
	That's always been the core of it.
	And the massive censorship being imposed, especially by this administration, which has so much to hide and conceal from the public.
	Has gone far beyond the bounds of even reason.
	There's no construction or constraint under which their imposition, their violation to the First Amendment is remotely justifiable.
	And they've made a practice of using intermediaries like Amazon, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, and the like as agents of the state while denying they were doing just that.
	Making them also the world's biggest liars, as well as the greatest censors.
	Yeah, you know, you talk about communism during the day.
	Communism didn't have as much control over some of the media as we do today with our own media.
	So, you know, you can take a look at censorship.
	You know, they talk about McCarthyism during the 50s.
	I believe that this censorship is much greater even than McCarthyism.
	What do you think?
	Yeah, I agree completely.
	I agree completely.
	And it's got a lot to do with technology.
	Well, computers can be used for good or for evil, and when they're used to massively search and, you know, suppress or shadow ban or whatever on specific topics.
	I've been targeted for that for my research on Sandy Hook.
	So have many, many others.
	They've taken down probably 10,000 videos of different exposés of what happened in Newtown that day.
	Yeah, you know, it goes back to something that we worked on a long time ago with Lance and them.
	I remember when we talked to Turkey and we talked about the landing on the moon.
	And we had an argument and you came in as an expert and talked about landing on the moon.
	How does it presuppose this idea that if our computers today, not computers, but the handheld cell phone is 1,800 times more powerful than the three-story computer that had this unique ability to magically Do anything.
	So then in 2017 and 18, I went to the Space Museum in Washington, D.C., the Smithsonian, and you could actually see the control panels, and you could see the pictures of the lunar modules, and it really looked like a fourth or fifth grade science project.
	It had aluminum foil on it, It had toggle switches on the command post.
	And the toggle switches would just go up and down.
	There is no way that you could store any kind of receiver in there for a computer in that size of the whole thing.
	So, in other words, a computer was doing these marvelous things without even going anywhere to anything.
	And people never question it.
	And even today, if you start questioning it, they look at you like, you know, they try to ostracize you.
	What do you think?
	Yeah, of course, of course, of course.
	Absolutely right.
	I mean, the moon landing is one of those mega hoaxes, you know, perpetrated on the American people.
	They do not want the truth to be revealed.
	But it's all absurd.
	We didn't have the propulsion power.
	We didn't have the computing power.
	We didn't have the communication capacity.
	We could not have overcome the Van Allen radiation belt.
	NASA even admitted they didn't even have a way to dispose of space poop.
	They had like a 14-hour kind of diaper, but these trips were taking seven and eight days.
	They put out a pitch to the American public to help to solve the space poop problem with a $30,000 award, but it shows the whole claim to have gone to the moon was nothing but a humongous pile of space poop.
	Yeah, I think that fits into the topic we're talking a little bit about today, because we weren't really taught to question that.
	If you were alive in 1969, you were in school, you didn't question that at all, you know?
	And this idea of not questioning has gotten to this generation, to where they're not even really even interested.
	And that becomes a whole other problem, because lack of motivation and Let's take COVID, for example.
	COVID has changed the face of education, and if you start looking at the news now, they're talking about another strain of COVID allegedly coming in the fall.
	Do you think that it's a forecoming of the same thing that we got in the past?
	Bill Gates has said, you know, the next pandemic could be far more serious.
	I mean, when you have wealthy, powerful men who are out to murder most of the world's population, there's no end to the damage they can wreak.
	I mean, civilized society is built on respect for other persons and appreciation for the quality of life.
	These are barbarians.
	These are Mongolian hordes who just have enough power and influence to bring about their desired end, who want to recreate a feudal society where the rich are ensconced in their castles, call them gated communities, and the rest of us are toiling as serfs and slaves in the field, but they got to reduce our number to make us manageable.
	They want only a half a billion, 500 million.
	That means they want to go from 8 billion to 500 million.
	That's a reduction of 7.5 billion souls.
	They're out to exterminate him.
	Bill Gates is, in my opinion, right up there at the very top in promoting this mass genocide.
	He may be Along with Anthony, Tony the Rat, Foushee, the two most despicable figures on the face of Earth, notwithstanding the role of George Soros, the Rothschild banking empire, and the rest.
	But they are right up there as prime candidates, in my opinion, for the gallows.
	Okay, now, what is your opinion, when you first started teaching at college, How are the students prepared to go to college?
	And as your last year, if you can remember back to your last year, how has it, how would it change during those 35 years?
	Well, the biggest change I witnessed my last 19 were on the Duluth campus at University of Minnesota.
	And we got a lot of kids who weren't super bright.
	I mean, we had some who were really very talented, but it was a pretty good cross section of the community.
	They were, Prepared for college courses.
	The biggest change I saw, Michael, over those years was the growth, the introduction of political correctness, where we were supposed to censor ourselves in how we spoke and talked about various issues, which in my opinion is the most severe form of censorship, because you're censoring yourself before you can even express yourself.
	Am I entitled to say that?
	It was outrageous and to me profoundly disturbing where I retired in 2006 after having arrived there in 1987.
	I was thinking, not necessarily academically prepared, but I was thinking in 1988, did they question you a lot?
	If you put out an opinion, did they try to push back a little bit?
	Or are they more accepting now today?
	That's what I was trying to say.
	Well, Michael, I was teaching courses mostly in logic and critical thinking.
	In critical thinking, you can discuss anything, and I took full advantage to draw on issues that were controversial—JFK, 9-11, Wellstone.
	Even I think I may have talked a bit about Sandy Hook, though it did not become as important as it would subsequently.
	But, you know, the students were pretty good.
	I mean, they were fairly good at exercising their independent thoughts.
	Some would tell me years later what a difference the course had made in their lives when they would enter the class.
	The very first class, I'd say, if you'd come to this university to take only one course, this is the course you should be taking, because it would develop their ability to reason and think things through for the rest of their lives no matter what.
	And I had students intermittently who had confirmed that that indeed had been the case for them.
	See, I'm thinking that's really good, but I'm not so sure if that's the way it's at every college anymore, because like you were saying earlier, I think they're more interested about putting out a certain ideology, and you don't really question it, and we even see this creeping down into secondary education.
	Michael, you're absolutely right.
	Today it's got more to do with indoctrination and ideology.
	Sad to say.
	We'll be right back with Mike Cunningham on the topic of edicide.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomsless.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a Drill, This is a Drill on Bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Go!
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do and we must fight back.
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us!
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio.
	Revolution Radio.
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
	And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. OTT every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
	Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the individual source who express them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	I'm here with my featured guest, Mike Cunningham, and we're talking about what he refers to as educide, really the death of education and we're talking about what he refers to as educide, really the And I think he's got it right.
	Mike, more of your thoughts, please.
	Yeah, I just want to go back and give you listeners a little history lesson here, I guess.
	Back in 1912, When we had the three-way race between Taft and Roosevelt and Wilson, Wilson was around 40%, I guess.
	And the only way he could win is if they divided the other 60% into two halves or two parts, and then Wilson wasn't kind of equal.
	Of course, you're talking about Theodore Roosevelt.
	Yeah, Theodore Roosevelt.
	Yes, I'm sorry.
	And what is kind of fascinating is if you take a look at Wilson and his inactive ideas and his inability to act on almost anything, it's a pretty persuasive part of this progressive type of movement that has gone to where it is.
	You don't have to necessarily have the truth if you control the narrative.
	And he controlled the narrative.
	We take a look at the happenings in the Ottoman Empire with the Armenians.
	And on April 24th of 1915, Armenians' intelligentsia was taken out by quite a few of the Ottomans.
	And it developed into whatever you want to call that at that particular point.
	But in 2012, I think Hillary Clinton said that this was not a matter, this was a matter for historians to debate.
	It wasn't a matter of that.
	And in 2008, she said earlier that this was a genocide.
	Barack Obama used the word genocide, then when he was in office, he quit using the word genocide and did that.
	It was just Joe Biden that actually came up with the word genocide, but we also know how Joe Biden's mind is not necessarily always clear, so somebody else is leading him on in that particular place.
	But when you control that narrative and no one questions, George Orwell said it best, whoever controls the media will control history.
	And this is what's happened.
	History has been totally rewritten.
	I know you could talk in length about the Gulf of Tonkin.
	You know, I don't think that Vietnam was run right immediately.
	But we may even gone into Vietnam for some weird reasons.
	1939, the Nazis had Polish Army attacking that, a false flag type of a situation.
	We've had false flag situations much earlier.
	In our recent history as well.
	And even the news, as we continue, you can see two different sides and both cannot be true.
	You listen to our major media and they are telling you that the Ukraine is winning the war.
	You listen to foreign media, especially from Eastern Europe or whatever, and you say Russia is winning the war.
	They both cannot be true.
	They both cannot exist in surface, but people don't really even question to find out what the truth is.
	People just will accept it.
	This non-questioning of this is so, so hard.
	Last year, I gave a sermon out And I asked some people to write their opinions, and a couple people raised their hand and said, well, what is my opinion?
	When people are asking the teacher what their opinion is, this is the epitome of exactly what has happened in our society when it comes to education.
	You used to would have people who had an opinion, it was based on whatever, and you can have whatever your opinion is.
	But if you have no opinion at all, it pretty much loses for everyone.
	So this happens, and consider these people can be voters and these people can be just as active as anybody else.
	Do we really want to have those people making decisions?
	What do you think?
	Yeah, of course, of course, of course.
	I remember as an undergraduate, the most telling moment in my entire undergraduate career was when A professor in a tutorial turned to me and asked, what did I think?
	And Mike, that just was a turn on for me, man, because I had a lot of thoughts, but no one had ever asked for my opinion.
	I think exchange of opinion, if you can promote open debate in exchange of ideas and develop the capacity to argue for your position by citing evidence, Hopefully good reasons for holding your opinion.
	Then we can appreciate that while everyone's entitled to have an opinion, not all opinions are of equal value and worth, which is something that everyone needs to appreciate and understand, which is why you are deserving to benefit yourself of an education and your ability to think things through.
	To which I devoted my entire life, teaching students how to think things through.
	Well, I would say that that was probably more of a core course than some of the things we say are core courses.
	Like, you take math.
	Okay, and let me ask you this question from a logical point of view.
	If you take 12 years of math in your high school career, and then you take one year of math in college, and then in 10 years you have forgotten all the math that you have ever really learned, and you cannot help your You cannot help your children doing simple math.
	Is that really a core course?
	You mean there's instruction in math in general, a core course, I mean?
	Yeah.
	It's a tool, Mike.
	I mean, that's the reason why, you know, most people don't understand.
	Philosophy is a tool.
	It's teaching you how to think.
	Math, how to reason using numbers.
	English, how to express yourself and appreciate work, great works of literature, of which there's very little today in this world.
	I mean, we've gone all video.
	We're preoccupied with games.
	Everyone's on their computer.
	There's a loss of social interaction.
	We're becoming atomized as a society.
	I think the effects of the cell phone go down historically as among the most profound in affecting social interaction.
	Because you can, with your cell phone, no matter where you are, be interacting with your tight little group of friends, not even with people you're sitting on a subway or a bus or train or whatever, whatever.
	I mean, you just can be selective, and I think it's going to have profound negative effects in terms of capacity to interact with other people, because we are losing the ability to do precisely that.
	Oh yeah, I've had several conversations in the last week or so.
	I'm teaching a course online and we're supposed to have a video of a conversation, like we're having a conversation here.
	You're in Wisconsin, I'm in Texas, but we're having a conversation.
	But they think that texting is a conversation.
	Well, the problem is there's so much miscommunication in texting.
	I'm not so sure that texting is a real proper one.
	Well, you can see it so much in our school today, is that you'll see a boy and a girl walking down the hallway texting each other.
	Asking each other questions instead of talking.
	What has happened to our communication skills if we don't even talk to each other anymore?
	What's happening to our friends?
	If we think somebody's a friend, it's just acquaintance that we just know over the computer.
	That's not necessarily the same as a friend relationship that you actually know the person.
	Yes.
	Okay, now I had something I wanted to say.
	When you think about a general way to educate people, and if you were in charge of school, a superintendent, what would you do or what would you change that would be the most effective way to help high school students to prepare for college?
	What would you do?
	Well, I'd emphasize the basics.
	I'd introduce courses in critical thinking that are generally not viewed as appropriate at the high school level because they don't want students raising questions teachers can't answer.
	But I mean, I'd have a pretty core curriculum, you know, history, civics, constitution, English, creative writing, Critical thinking, but I'd also have some stuff in art history.
	Actually, it turns out art history is a fascinating discipline because you can trace the history of societies through their art.
	I gained an appreciation of that by having an art historian just a door or two down from my office in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota.
	And I sat in on some of her classes and they were fascinating!
	I mean, my enthusiasm for art history just grew exponentially.
	Love it!
	Go ahead.
	No, I think culture would be really good.
	You could teach through religion, you could teach through food, you could teach through a lot of things to get a lot better.
	Because the way we teach history, we just teach history like through multiple choice.
	You don't get to a very in-depth understanding, and we don't really know why the people do what they do.
	If we understood this other, we'd actually know why people did what they did.
	And that brings out history to a lot better.
	Because history for most people is not a fun experience.
	They may have or may not have a really good teacher.
	And all they have to do is basically a reading test when they have to do one of the major tests.
	So you don't have to necessarily know history for that much of a level anyways.
	So it ends up reinforcing the whole idea of not getting a good education.
	Yeah.
	Agreed.
	One thing that's probably a little controversial, I guess you could say, is that when you start looking at this, most genocides have been committed during a war.
	Most times we go to war, we try to really make people be like subhuman.
	You know, like you take a look at the propaganda posters in the United States talking about the Huns in World War I. We show Huns as guerrillas and stuff like that.
	So, you know, this is something we do, other people do too.
	It's a dehumanization when people can get to that level, but they can't get to that level unless they control the situation, because if people thought and literally looked at that and say a human being is a human being no matter where they are born or wherever they exist, don't you agree that that would be a better way to circumvent some of these problems that we had of discrimination and stuff?
	Oh yes, I mean you have lots of great ideas, Mike.
	Tell us more.
	Well, okay, if that's the case, take a look at our civil rights movement.
	Basically, we, in the civil rights era back in the 1860s, we did not invest enough money to help educate people to get out of the situations and stuff that were.
	We gave people rights and then they were able to be able to be taken away simply because they didn't get to realize that.
	And we have the civil rights movement a hundred years later.
	So you could actually say the failure of the first civil rights had to do with the failure of education, wouldn't you agree?
	Yes.
	Okay.
	So today, we can make a counter thing and look at it is if we fail to, in the 2024 election, if we fail to educate people properly, and if we look at the government is supposed to be not of the people or by the people, but it's allegedly supposed to be giving away money to people, I guess you'd say, don't know.
	We don't understand economics, we don't understand math, we don't understand this.
	What's the future of our rights are going to be after a complete takeover?
	Or institutionalized takeover?
	You know, if we say now, there's a lot of us that can still remember that four years ago, remember the quote, I guess, Ronald Reagan said, Jimmy Carter, were you better off four years ago?
	I mean, all somebody has to do is, I don't see anybody's better off now than they were four years ago.
	Do you?
	Absolutely not.
	No, it's catastrophic.
	The damage this administration has done in two and a half years has been catastrophic.
	Could we make it a parallel to England right after when they—remember in May of 45 they voted Churchill out, and then all of a sudden, you know, they get all the socialist reforms?
	There is a time where you can't really go back anymore, is there?
	Don't you think?
	If they lose again in 24, what's going to happen?
	Well, that's a forthcoming election.
	Trump isn't re-elected.
	You see, the Democrats are in chaos right now.
	I mean, Obama may have murdered his chef.
	Biden's running a crime family.
	The DOJ working as its conciliary.
	I mean, this is so blatant, so obvious.
	There's no possible way a Democrat could be re-elected.
	But they have stolen the election in 2020 and in 2022, and it looks as though they're planning to do it again.
	So I am at a bit of a loss as to how we regain control of our own government.
	I mean, the first move has to be to get rid of electronic voting machines, go back to hand counts and paper ballots, require a photo ID for voting, You have to have an I.D.
	to drive.
	You have to have an I.D.
	to buy alcohol, even beer, for crying out loud.
	Voting is our most important civic responsibility.
	Then we need to get rid of gerrymandered, you know, voting districts.
	Use the Iowa model, where they have a panel of retired judges who determine the voting districts.
	Ultimately, I think we have to restore the draft.
	We got a bunch of young people who've never had any responsibility, have no training, have no discipline.
	It's a major form of corruption.
	Nixon wanted to take the wind out of the sails of the anti- Vietnam War movement, but he did something far more consequential by abolishing the draft.
	He disconnected families from decisions of war and peace because the parents now knew that whatever decision were made, their sons and daughters wouldn't be at risk, so they became careless, nonchalant, let the government get the U.S.
	involved in military actions all over the world on the basis of having a volunteer force.
	Now, Because the military has gone woke, because they're having trannies, showering with trannies, because they had the vaccine mandate.
	All this, in my opinion, was a deliberate effort to destroy the American military, and it has succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
	They're having to drop physical standards, moral standards, Mental standards.
	Again, a bunch of incompetent people who are misfits and are committing crimes on other members of the armed forces.
	I mean, we've created a descending spiral of incompetence and corruption, Mike, and it's all been done deliberately by this administration.
	Okay, without computers aside, do you think that you got a better education as an elementary student back when you were a kid than they're giving today?
	Of course!
	This isn't even arguable, Mike!
	Yeah, and the bad part about it is if you talk to a younger parent or you talk about that, I don't think people really understand how much even parents would like, they send their kids to school hoping to get a good education, but they don't really realize that children might, but the parents do not realize how much people are getting ripped off because it wasn't even the same as it was in their generation, which is crazy.
	Yeah, of course.
	I mean, I agree completely.
	Okay, now I had another question.
	Who do you think would be the best running mate for Donald Trump if he was able to get the nomination?
	Who do you think would be the best running mate for him?
	My nominee is Tulsi Gabbard.
	I think she's wonderful, intelligent background, military experience, independent, separating herself from the Democrat Party.
	I think Tulsi may need to appreciate more the importance of the Second Amendment, but I think she'd be a superb candidate.
	I've been predicting Trump would run with Tulsi for years now, Mike.
	Oh, wow.
	Yeah, that'd be good.
	And could Robert Kennedy head the CDC or something?
	There's no telling what would happen, huh?
	Bobby Jr.
	is causing chaos in the Democrat Party.
	They're trying to trash him.
	They're trying to destroy him.
	I mean, here you have the greatest family, with the possible exception of the Roosevelts, in American political history among the Democrats, and the Democrat Party is trying to destroy their own best candidate.
	It's outrageous to witness.
	But it's not going to work.
	An awful lot of Democrats admire R.F.K.
	Jr., and guess what?
	The admin has just declared they're not providing him, even though he's a presidential candidate who's drawing a lot of support with secret service protection.
	What does that tell you, Mike?
	Talk about a crime family.
	You want to eliminate your competitors.
	That's why they brought all these charges against Trump.
	They're trying to make it impossible for him to run.
	And they're using the Department of Defense as a private legal operation on behalf of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden and Jim Biden and Jill Biden, who turns out to be just as corrupt as the rest.
	Yeah, it's almost like waving off the Secret Service there at Love Field.
	If you don't have protection, it's easier to negotiate the narrative, I would say.
	Wouldn't you?
	Oh, absolutely, of course.
	Yeah, which makes it really scary.
	The vast majority of assassination in modern times is a reduction in security.
	Isaac Murabit was assassinated by a guy walking right into the security group and shooting him in the back of the head.
	What could have been more blatant?
	Yeah.
	It's a very scary proposition.
	Getting back to the edgeside thing, I didn't really realize, because I could see all these connections, and I really think that it is proper to be able to act when you are able to act from a superior type of looking at it.
	So I'm thinking some of these things are played out.
	Well, I have been, I listened to several people talk about abiotic fuel and listened to John D Rockefeller and talking about, you know, when he went and voted on the deal there.
	And this idea about climate change and this idea about, you know, the whole construct that we have that putting people on electric cars would be better.
	Well, the problem is going to be is that how are we going to generate all the electricity for electric cars where, like in Texas, we use a lot of the electricity is made still from oil.
	So even if you thought about it, you're not saving anything because you're using the oil to make electricity and electricity to the car.
	Why do you think people do not put all these connections together to come up with something?
	Because they're not capable of thinking things through because they tend to believe if multiple media are giving the same report, it must be true.
	So if they hear it on CBS and CNN, Or maybe on their local radio, they think it has to be true, they don't understand the extent to which the media has been co-opted and is really just talking heads, giving reports from the scripts they've been handed.
	Yeah, so then that underlies the idea that we had to have a poor education system to start before that.
	So what I was thinking was that the whole idea was you couldn't start with a good education system and do this.
	We couldn't have done this in the 1950s.
	We didn't have technology, but we couldn't have done it even if we had technology because I think we had a better education system.
	Don't you agree?
	Yeah, sure.
	Of course I agree.
	Okay, so as we speak now, if we don't turn our education system around, what's going to happen to our country no matter what we do?
	That last part, Mike, no matter what we do.
	Yeah, no matter what we do.
	Let's say we try to save the 24th election.
	But if we don't save our education, we need to have a dynamic person go into education and try to say, let's put education back to the states.
	You need an administration that cares about the American people, that believes in the Constitution, you know, key players.
	I understand Mayorkas and Merrick Garland and Lloyd Austin have not even signed their oath of office of loyalty to the Constitution of the United States.
	They have not even done that.
	So you've got a bunch of traitors running the government.
	We have to get a government that cares about America.
	And as I see it, it's Donald Trump, for all his flaws, and I really admit he's not perfect, But we cannot let perfection be the enemy of the good.
	He can do America a whole lot of good, and he's had enough experience at this point to know how to drain the swamp.
	So I think getting Trump back in office is the key to the future of America, and if it doesn't happen, we are done.
	Yeah, you're probably exactly right.
	You're very passionate.
	What would you want your audience to ascertain from your discussion today?
	Why is it so important for them to go out and vote?
	Why is it so important for them to be active, contributing to other things too?
	Well, look, electronic voting machines have been used to steal one election after another.
	I mean, I remember when Chuck Hagel introduced them back in Nebraska.
	He actually was an owner of the machine that then made him the senator.
	I mean, it was outrageous.
	And they've just gone full bore.
	Dominion voting machines were designed to steal elections.
	If we don't get rid of them, we haven't got a prayer.
	Fortunately, there are other aspects that Democrats use to seal these elections, including Eric, which is a voter registration compendium that had just padded it with massive numbers of dead, moved, ineligible voters so the Democrats could send out mail-in ballots, and when they were returned, they could go ahead and process them as though they were legitimate.
	17 or 20 states have already dropped out of Eric.
	It will be harder to steal the election, but just if they don't succeed, it won't be for lack of trying.
	We'll be right back and we'll take your calls after this break.
	Thank you.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so that free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in the dark world.
	Revolution Radio.
	FreedomSubs.com.
	The number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution.
	Radio.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	But did you know that it was an inside job that Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives that landed in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	A U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Newt on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
	100% listener, supporter of radio.
	And now we return to you to be your host.
	Two brief announcements.
	First, of course, we're opening the lines for your calls.
	540-352-4452.
	540-352-4452. 540-352-4452.
	Love your opinion about whether you think Barack killed Tariff Campbell or not.
	I believe he did.
	It's absolutely unbelievable what's going on here.
	Also, your thoughts about the Biden crime family.
	You know, this may be no Don Corleone, but where Merrick Garland is most certainly playing the role of Tom Reagan as a conciliatory to Don Corleone.
	I mean, I think the parallels are just stunning, except that Biden people are, in my opinion, more corrupt and less competent.
	That's a hell of a combination.
	More corrupt and less competent.
	Let me also add now a special announcement.
	Wednesday, by popular demand, We're doing a whole show on Flat Earth.
	David Weiss, a principal proponent and a colleague of his, are going to participate in a question-answer format where I'm going to be asking questions, I'm going to be introducing some arguments, issues, short videos from public domain, and seeking to, you know, eliciting his response.
	It's not going to be, you know, at each other's throat.
	I'm really interested in eliciting their opinion.
	It's a standard argument that, in my opinion, are decisive to establish that Earth is a globe.
	So I'm a globe guy.
	Everybody knows.
	But there are a lot of flat earthers out there, including any number of people whom I actually highly respect.
	So, I mean, it never ceases to amaze me how widespread is the view.
	Which dates from primitive times that Earth is flat.
	Meanwhile, we do have our first scholar, Brian.
	Join the conversation.
	Your thoughts.
	You know, when it comes to flat Earth and round Earth, you guys are both right.
	Can I explain?
	We live in illusion, okay?
	Nothing is real here.
	Time isn't real.
	If you study quantum mechanics, they'll tell you time is illusion.
	You've heard of Max Planck, who had the Heisenberg exclusionary principle.
	He was studying matter, and he was a quantum mechanical physicist.
	And at the end of his study, they said, well, what did you conclude?
	And he said, matter isn't real.
	Okay, we have We have fake religion.
	We have fake breastfeeding with bottles.
	We have fake everything.
	Our food is fake.
	Our air is fake.
	Our water is fake.
	Time is fake.
	You can go down the list of everything, and it's fake, okay?
	Our president's fake.
	And because time isn't real, And matter isn't real.
	It gives the illusion of flat Earth.
	But in reality, beyond that illusion, the Earth is a globe.
	And the real time is in hundred-year, roughly hundred-year increments.
	That's why, as I've said before, Abraham Lincoln, later on with John F. Kennedy, and it's like a hundred years later, they assassinated Joseph Smith, And Adolf Hitler the same and almost to the month.
	Justice Smith was killed in June of 1840.
	They had a big attempt on Hitler in July of 1944.
	Smith came to power 1833.
	on Hitler in July of 1944, Smith came to power 1833, Hitler in 1933.
	Everything is incremental.
	You can look at the pandemic in 1918 and then COVID in 2020.
	That's the reality, okay?
	And in the reality, and what kind of shows it is a rainbow.
	Okay, a rainbow is actually Gaia's chakras, and that's in reality, and that's why we see it as a semicircle, okay?
	All those Greek gods and goddesses, they're just things that were really here, but it's removed, like Teteria, that, you know, they take everything away from us.
	To dumb us down and make it stupid.
	So that's my argument on all that.
	The other thing I wanted to tell you about that you would find interesting on that prepareforchange.net website, they have a book by that guy that got punched by the astronaut because he said you guys didn't really land on the moon.
	No, I asked him to swear on a Bible and he wouldn't do it.
	Yeah, well, whatever it was.
	But anyway, the book is Moon Man, and he uncovers some interesting things that I didn't know before, that like all those people at Johnson Space Center, you know, all those people behind the scenes at NASA were cremations.
	And he started out way back when thinking the moon landing was real and then you know he was asking for telemetry and all this stuff and it finally dawned on him that it didn't really happen but he he was asking for for movie film from the moon all this stuff and they ended they accidentally sent him a uh a movie and it said do not show to the public
	And so he viewed it and it was on one of the Apollo missions where they were filming Earth
	And the camera should have been up against the window but the camera was in the back of the spacecraft and it was orbiting Earth and then they were they were taking pictures of the fake Earth and then there were there were voices on it that were saying they were supposed to be halfway between Earth and Moon and there were voices on the tape saying to the astronauts counting off the seconds to make sure that they had the time lapse
	For the voice reaching Earth from this alleged spacecraft halfway to the moon, and then the voice would say, okay, now speak, and then the astronaut would say something.
	And it was just really good, this hour-long interview with this guy, and then he was pushing his book.
	So anyways, that's what I wanted to say on these things.
	Well, you have no end of interesting ideas, Brian.
	I like the latter a bit more than the former, because time, alas, is all too real.
	It's—by the causal theory of time, it's a matter of causal—listen to me, Brian.
	You spoke.
	I did not interrupt.
	By the causal theory of time, we're looking for periodic processes that are repeating.
	Thus, we have day and night by the rotation of Earth on its axis.
	We have months defined roughly by the Moon orbiting around Earth.
	We have the year defined by Earth orbiting around the Sun.
	We get the seasons thereby taking place.
	The most reliable turns out to be a caesium clock That is used as the national standard for measuring time.
	Just think how it depends and how the rate of events would vary if you assume, for example, instead of a regular periodic process like a cesium clock, say the heartbeat of the Dalai Lama, And you assume that every heartbeat is an equal interval of every other heartbeat.
	Then if the Dalai Lama gets excited and his heart beats faster, events slow down because they're taking more heartbeats, which are defined as equal units.
	And when he rests, then events speed up because now you're having more things take place in the same, by definition, equal increment of time.
	When you talk about time being an illusion, therefore, that's really not quite right.
	It's a metaphor.
	And if there is a prospect of time travel, I'm personally not convinced.
	But I mean, it would be fascinating if it were so.
	Of course, it could not be one where you could go back and change events.
	However, we might want to correct mistakes we've made in our lives by going back and traveling through time.
	That wouldn't be possible, even if time travel were possible.
	What it means roughly is you could recapture events that occurred in the past because they're still accessible somehow through a time travel mechanism.
	But other things you said I found extremely interesting, of course, and I don't necessarily disagree with those, but I wanted to clarify about this.
	Mike, would you like to respond to Brian's avalanche of ideas here?
	Yeah, very interesting.
	I've always been fascinated with the idea of time.
	I'm not so sure I have an interesting discussion about Joseph Smith because I really don't think he was killed by the crowd or the mob of people.
	He might have been killed by his own people inside that room.
	So that's kind of another interesting story.
	It could be an inside type of job.
	But the timing itself, maybe certain events do seem to repeat or cyclic or whatever you are in nature, that would be very good.
	The idea that that it could be too simplistic.
	I think we think everybody could be.
	Uh, Freemason or whatever like that.
	Uh, I think sometimes that might could be a case.
	I just don't know if that could be the overwhelming case, but he brought up some very good points, all of which should be discussed.
	Uh, I don't think that we should go back and 1 thing I think kind of proves what we're talking about earlier.
	If you take a history book, he probably could be summarized in maybe less than a paragraph, but it should take a.
	A couple of lectures to be able to discuss that out for the students, and the students are getting shortchanged by not being able to do that.
	We have a second caller on the line, Paul, who has been a prime mover for more discussion of Flat Earth.
	He may or may not care to address that subject.
	So much else going on here.
	Paul, join the conversation.
	No, no, of course, I care not until Wednesday, until the show.
	But yeah, with
	I really wanted to call in and talk a little bit of the political aspects you guys were discussing, the state of the nation as you say, but yeah, Brian cooked up that huge stew, that's what I'm going to call it, a crockpot of fakeness, and then threw in all the ingredients, and then now by association, because of these things he threw in the pot, they're fake, and now of course you two just addressed time, and of course that's what I wanted to address as well, because I've been hearing and
	Listening to this sort of thing for a very long time.
	And there again, using the word time, right?
	And every, every time I've heard somebody say such things as, well, you know, there's really no such thing as time, blah, blah, blah.
	I swear to God, it's like one of these people that they took too much acid or something like that.
	I mean, you know, I'm serious.
	One guy exactly, he told me, he goes, well, no, if you take mushrooms enough, you'll realize there's no such thing as time.
	And I just remember looking at him going, okay, so you can't tell yesterday from today?
	Right?
	I mean, you know, there's no difference between when you were 10 years old and when you were like 30?
	You know, it's just, I mean, I remember a long time ago asking my brother, who's a brilliant guy.
	He used to think about these sort of things.
	He got a degree in math.
	I said, well, okay, if you had to define time, how is it they define it?
	He goes, well, it's the perceived distance between events.
	You know, and that's one definition.
	And of course, the perception you just laid out, Jim, with, you know, we're using celestial markers, you know, among other things.
	So, yeah, okay, time is something, it's a word, okay, that we created to define something which we perceive, and it's real.
	It's as real as anything else.
	And, you know, the other thing I like to laugh at is this whole idea of quantum physics or quantum mechanics.
	I think people love saying those words, and not only does the average person not know what they mean, I don't think the average physicist knows really what quantum mechanics is or quantum physics, okay?
	Including, I mean, I know a physicist who, you know, has informed me that, you know, a lot of stuff that is thought of as known is in reality just I mean, I've heard it said by more than one person, including this individual I just mentioned, that they still really don't understand exactly what electricity is.
	You know, they can describe it, and they can harness it, and they can come up with various equations and so forth, but what the heck is it?
	Because it surely isn't just electrons moving down a copper wire, because that has We can appreciate Brian without agreeing with everything he has to say.
	it's been, shall we say, rethought.
	Anyway, those are my thoughts.
	Brian, I got to tell you, I do enjoy a lot of your calls, and sometimes you make sense, but when I was listening to today, I was going, what the heck are you talking about?
	We can appreciate Brian without agreeing with everything he has to say.
	Mike, did you want to respond to Paul's comments?
	Yeah, I was going to say they sure can charge you for that electricity, though, too.
	They may not know what it is, but they figured out a way to charge him.
	And I think that kind of is similar to maybe the vaccines and everything else.
	If they can make money out of it, they'll have a war, they'll have electricity, they'll have all these things.
	Time is kind of very fascinating in a couple of ways.
	You can take a look at the average high school student.
	Ninth grade seems to last forever.
	Tenth grade is quicker.
	Junior year is even quicker than that.
	Senior year goes by just like that.
	As we have become adults, can you remember back as a child, you know, waiting from Christmas to Christmas or birthday to birthday or whatever you want to look at, seemed to take forever.
	As we get older and older, time has a tendency to go faster and faster and faster.
	So, I think you have something right about perception, even though we've had the same amount of hours or the same amount of hours in the day.
	The old adage is, if you want something done, give it to a busy person because they can pick it in.
	Some people can have 48 hours a day and still not do anything.
	So time is a... Well, there is, of course, subjective perception of time.
	As you grow older, you may realize You have less time left, and you may appreciate more what time you have remaining, though literally, time isn't speeding up or slowing down, you know?
	We talked about the longest day of our life, for example, really meaning so much was happening, it was so consequential, that made it a heavy day, but it doesn't literally mean there's any change in the number of minutes in an hour, the number of hours in a day, and the like.
	Paul, I wanted to ask, given you are astute about so many matters, how did you respond to my reports about the Biden crime family, the DOJ trying to keep Devin Archer from testifying?
	I mean, really, I think the comparison to the Godfather is rather fitting.
	And then we have Obama, who may have committed a murder himself personally.
	I find this rather dumbfounding, and I believe it's going to create chaos in the Democratic Party.
	Well, I mean, the first I hear about a lot of things is from, you know, your show and or from the internet.
	So, I mean, for me, I just look at everything as, you know, this gigantic soap opera, which does not impact me, and it does not impact the vast majority of people.
	It's kind of like watching a TV show, as I made this point before, that when you, if you just look at your life for the most part, I mean, you're on radio all the time, and that's an exceptional thing.
	You know, most people, they just pass the day in a similar way.
	I mean, if you're working, you know, you go to work, you come home, you have dinner, you know, maybe click on the TV, see what's on, you know, interact with your family if you have one.
	You know, when you're retired, you know, same thing.
	It's like, Uh, you know, to me, uh, I don't pay a lot of attention to these things the way that I used to, although it is of some interest to talk about.
	So, again, uh, did Obama murder his chef?
	Well, that's interesting.
	Why?
	What would have been the motivation for this?
	Well, it came on to The Chef.
	I reported about sexual harassment.
	Then it came on to The Chef, and The Chef didn't want to miss.
	The Chef appears to be straight.
	He's got a wife and two kids.
	And if Obama wanted to fool around, and he didn't—I mean, Obama's a narcissist.
	He thinks everyone should literally bend over for him.
	And I think that Tareff didn't want to do it, and they got into an altercation, and in defending himself, he cut Obama on his hand.
	He's now on a golf course.
	He's got a black eye.
	He's got bandages on his hand.
	We have the fake call about saying that this guy was paddleboarding and disappeared into the water, which appears to me to change the location from which the murder occurred, but we're not told who called.
	We got the report there was a second person on a paddleboard with him.
	I believe it was Obama getting the body into the water.
	That's my current take on this, and I'm open to being proven wrong.
	I do not think the Edgar Town Police Department is equal to the task.
	They're already suppressing information.
	It is the case, however, that the causes, you know, if you die from drowning, The symptoms are very distinct from death from other causes, including suffocation or strangulation, which might have been the case here.
	Your further thoughts, Paul?
	That's fascinating.
	So you're talking about his, like, current chef at his residence, right?
	Yes.
	Like a live-in chef?
	Yes.
	He lived there?
	Well, you know, well, Well, whether he lived in there, they got the girls out of town, by the way, and I think if this did happen at the house, as I surmise at this point in time, then they could be witnesses, they could be aware of what happened, and then to protect, you know, keep them out of the witness list, they've been sent abroad to who the hell knows where.
	Everything that has happened here is totally suspicious, not standard whatsoever, and implicates Edgartown Police Department in covering up for the Obamas.
	Yeah, Paul.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	They got a twelve and a half million dollar estate on Martha's Vineyard.
	Among the most exclusive enclaves in the world, by the way.
	So, here's what it reminds me of.
	I just thought of this.
	The movie that I saw way back when called The Talented Mr. Ripley.
	Alright, which I thought was a very good movie.
	In fact, I really enjoyed it in the theater and I watched it twice.
	I actually went one time by myself and another time I took a date.
	I just thought the movie was actually that enjoyable, that good.
	And at the time that it was, I think it was, I don't know, the 90s sometime, right?
	You may or may not remember the movie, Jim, but I thought it was good.
	I remember the title, Paul.
	Yeah.
	Okay, well, basically, in it, Matt Damon plays this character, okay, the talented Mr. Ripley, and of course, he's gay, and, you know, it's very, it's kind of a convoluted movie, but at the same time, it's well-acted.
	I recommend, Jim, to plug it in and watch it.
	You'll probably enjoy it overall as entertainment, but he kills a couple of guys who basically, they, you know, sort of reject him.
	And, you know, at the time, my awareness of, quote, gays, homosexuals in general, or what has been known as the pathology of this, you know, part of the human race, my awareness was, like, near zero, okay?
	Subsequently to that, I would learn from multiple different sources that, of course, gay relationships, especially men and men, and also women and women as well, in other words, lesbians, have much higher rates of domestic violence.
	And actually, these gay people are much more likely to commit even acts of murder, as a rule, because of their emotional and mental instability.
	And I thought that was very interesting.
	And you know, if you look into these stats, and you may already be aware of them, they turn out to be absolutely true.
	Just like, for example, mixed race marriages tend to have much higher rates of domestic violence, especially when one of the partners is black.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, it's just astounding, Paul!
	It's astounding!
	This is going to rip up the Democrat Party!
	I want to squeeze Brian in, but only—Brian, you've got to be real concise.
	- Obama made himself have personally whacked his chef and didn't want to get with him. - Yeah, it's just astounding, Paul, it's astounding.
	This is gonna rip up the Democrat party.
	I want to squeeze Brian in, but only, Brian, you gotta be real concise.
	And by the way, Michael reminded me that the Edgartown PD were the same that investigated Teddy Kennedy's Chad Laquittic Bridge incident, which I believe, by the way, was a setup.
	Brian, for a real mini-brief response.
	I just wanted to say I'm sure those two girls were sent to Hunter Biden.
	He'll help them with their trauma.
	There is video on Hunter's laptop of them converting in bed with Hunter, and there's this little dog.
	I know, I mean, it's just outrageous!
	Yeah, good.
	Very good, Brian.
	I'd like Michael to have a chance to say a few final words here.
	I've been very pleased to have him on the show, and I appreciate, Brian, both your and Paul's calls.
	Very good.
	Michael.
	Yeah, yeah, really.
	Thank you for that opportunity.
	I really enjoyed it.
	I did remember back when I was much younger about Egretown police.
	And no matter what the situation was, I think the police investigation left a lot to be desired.
	And I wouldn't be surprised if you were going to do something that would be a good place to do it in other than DC or any other place because you may know what you're dealing with.
	Just like Dallas was picked out for assassination because they were able to control the scene a little bit better.
	See, in relation to killing off those who know too much or whatever, the Clintons are very accomplished, and they tend to use intermediaries.
	The Obamas are amateurs.
	I think this is very slovenly done.
	I believe it was Michelle who made the phone call.
	That's why it wasn't recorded properly.
	They're covering it up.
	I believe Barack was the other paddleboater.
	That's why they're not identifying who it was.
	All of this reflects that.
	This appears to be a Much, much larger story than is being portrayed, and I think that it's going to be a calamity for the Obamas and their image, especially when they want Michelle to run, I think, as a VP with Gavin Newsom on the Democrat ticket in 2024.
	I think calamity is going to engulf them over this.
	I don't think they're going to get away with it, but the Edgartown police, I don't doubt, will do their best to cover up.
	I simply think it's not going to work.
	Michael, I can't thank you enough for being here.
	Real pleasure, and I want you to keep up your great work with education, international students, and all that.
	I don't know if Paul were still here, he could add a final thought, Paul.
	Well, Jim, for the next month or so, the futures bets are still open.
	So what do you say, Wisconsin under or over eight and a half wins for the season?
	Oh, Wisconsin is going to have a phenomenal season.
	We have the potential not only to be Big Ten champs, but to go all the way, Paul.
	You're going to be blown away by this year's Wisconsin football team under Finkel.
	It's going to be fantastic.
	Thank you all for being here.

▲